Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number
0-3134
Park-Ohio Holdings
Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-1867219
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
23000 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland,
Ohio
|
|
44117
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
216/692-7200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Park-Ohio
Holdings Corp. is a successor issuer to Park-Ohio Industries,
Inc.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports) and |
|
(2) |
|
Has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. |
|
|
|
Yes þ No o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated
Filer o Accelerated
Filer þ Non-Accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Number of shares outstanding of registrants Common Stock,
par value $1.00 per share, as of July 31, 2007: 11,393,957.
The Exhibit Index is located on page 26.
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
PART I.
Financial Information
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
20,500
|
|
|
$
|
21,637
|
|
Accounts receivable, less
allowances for doubtful accounts of $3,914 at
June 30, 2007 and $4,305 at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
189,274
|
|
|
|
181,893
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
211,812
|
|
|
|
223,936
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
34,142
|
|
|
|
34,142
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
34,199
|
|
|
|
24,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
489,927
|
|
|
|
485,826
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
255,765
|
|
|
|
248,065
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
155,022
|
|
|
|
146,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,743
|
|
|
|
101,085
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
98,676
|
|
|
|
98,180
|
|
Net assets held for sale
|
|
|
4,458
|
|
|
|
6,959
|
|
Other
|
|
|
93,986
|
|
|
|
92,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
787,790
|
|
|
$
|
784,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
116,468
|
|
|
$
|
132,864
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
66,163
|
|
|
|
78,655
|
|
Current portion of long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
7,915
|
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
190,546
|
|
|
|
217,392
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities, less
current portion
8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
Revolving credit
|
|
|
169,100
|
|
|
|
156,700
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
|
|
4,790
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
32,089
|
|
|
|
32,089
|
|
Other postretirement benefits and
other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
28,447
|
|
|
|
24,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,621
|
|
|
|
428,013
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock, par value $1 a
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial Preferred Stock
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
12,132
|
|
|
|
12,110
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
60,764
|
|
|
|
59,676
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
80,638
|
|
|
|
70,193
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(9,100
|
)
|
|
|
(9,066
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
9,189
|
|
|
|
5,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,623
|
|
|
|
138,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
787,790
|
|
|
$
|
784,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
The balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not
include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements.
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
286,636
|
|
|
$
|
268,453
|
|
|
$
|
554,522
|
|
|
$
|
528,674
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
244,256
|
|
|
|
230,738
|
|
|
|
473,533
|
|
|
|
454,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
42,380
|
|
|
|
37,715
|
|
|
|
80,989
|
|
|
|
74,602
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
24,859
|
|
|
|
22,209
|
|
|
|
50,349
|
|
|
|
43,928
|
|
Gain on sale of assets held for
sale
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(2,299
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,521
|
|
|
|
15,506
|
|
|
|
32,939
|
|
|
|
30,674
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,286
|
|
|
|
7,735
|
|
|
|
16,293
|
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
7,771
|
|
|
|
16,646
|
|
|
|
15,569
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
5,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,849
|
|
|
$
|
4,901
|
|
|
$
|
11,053
|
|
|
$
|
9,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.53
|
|
|
$
|
.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
.88
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.50
|
|
|
$
|
.43
|
|
|
$
|
.95
|
|
|
$
|
.84
|
|
Common shares used in the
computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
11,061
|
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
|
|
11,055
|
|
|
|
10,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
11,631
|
|
|
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
11,598
|
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
12,110
|
|
|
$
|
59,676
|
|
|
$
|
70,193
|
|
|
$
|
(9,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,824
|
|
|
$
|
138,737
|
|
Adjustment relating to adoption of
FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,053
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit
adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,418
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
(21,917 shares)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
12,132
|
|
|
$
|
60,764
|
|
|
$
|
80,638
|
|
|
$
|
(9,100
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,189
|
|
|
$
|
153,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
11,053
|
|
|
$
|
9,658
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash used by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,686
|
|
|
|
9,869
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Gain on sale of assets held for
sale
|
|
|
(2,299
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(7,381
|
)
|
|
|
(33,655
|
)
|
Inventories and other current
assets
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
(26,159
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(28,888
|
)
|
|
|
20,774
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
|
(1,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Operating
Activities
|
|
|
(10,271
|
)
|
|
|
(20,817
|
)
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and
equipment, net
|
|
|
(8,964
|
)
|
|
|
(7,523
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(3,219
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets held
for sale
|
|
|
4,365
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing
Activities
|
|
|
(4,599
|
)
|
|
|
(10,742
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt, net
|
|
|
13,637
|
|
|
|
29,907
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing
Activities
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
|
|
29,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
|
|
(1,137
|
)
|
|
|
(1,590
|
)
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Period
|
|
|
21,637
|
|
|
|
18,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End
of Period
|
|
$
|
20,500
|
|
|
$
|
17,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes paid
|
|
$
|
2,660
|
|
|
$
|
3,022
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
15,170
|
|
|
|
13,897
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
June 30, 2007
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE A
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries (the
Company). All significant intercompany transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted for interim financial information and with
the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to
the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Certain amounts in
the prior years financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
NOTE B
Segments
The Company operates through three segments: Integrated
Logistics Solutions (ILS), Aluminum Products and
Manufactured Products. ILS is a supply chain logistics provider
of production components to large, multinational manufacturing
companies, other manufacturers and distributors. In connection
with the supply of such production components, ILS provides a
variety of value-added, cost-effective supply chain management
services. Aluminum Products manufactures cast aluminum
components for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction
equipment, heavy-duty truck and marine equipment industries.
Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as
design and engineering, machining and assembly. Manufactured
Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing
businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high
quality products engineered for specific customer applications.
Results by business segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILS
|
|
$
|
131,133
|
|
|
$
|
150,338
|
|
|
$
|
269,890
|
|
|
$
|
300,497
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
48,563
|
|
|
|
44,913
|
|
|
|
90,650
|
|
|
|
87,615
|
|
Manufactured products
|
|
|
106,940
|
|
|
|
73,202
|
|
|
|
193,982
|
|
|
|
140,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
286,636
|
|
|
$
|
268,453
|
|
|
$
|
554,522
|
|
|
$
|
528,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILS
|
|
$
|
5,548
|
|
|
$
|
10,231
|
|
|
$
|
12,132
|
|
|
$
|
20,653
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
Manufactured products
|
|
|
14,164
|
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
23,673
|
|
|
|
11,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,116
|
|
|
|
18,759
|
|
|
|
37,959
|
|
|
|
36,883
|
|
Corporate costs
|
|
|
(3,595
|
)
|
|
|
(3,253
|
)
|
|
|
(5,020
|
)
|
|
|
(6,209
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,286
|
)
|
|
|
(7,735
|
)
|
|
|
(16,293
|
)
|
|
|
(15,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,235
|
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
$
|
16,646
|
|
|
$
|
15,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Identifiable assets were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILS
|
|
$
|
391,845
|
|
|
$
|
382,101
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
110,606
|
|
|
|
98,041
|
|
Manufactured products
|
|
|
223,844
|
|
|
|
206,089
|
|
General corporate
|
|
|
61,495
|
|
|
|
97,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
787,790
|
|
|
$
|
784,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE C
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entitys
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial
statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be
taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an
uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be
recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to
be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An
uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has a
50% or less likelihood of being sustained. Additionally,
FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. The total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits as of the date of adoption was $4,691, all of which, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. As a result of
the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $608
increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a
corresponding reduction to retained earnings.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Upon adoption
of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, the Company increased
its accrual for interest and penalties to $479.
The Company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its
unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within
twelve months of the date of adoption of FIN 48.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various
states and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys tax years
from 2003 to 2006 are subject to examination by the tax
authorities. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state, local or foreign
examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) AUG
AIR-1, Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance
Activities (FSP AUG AIR-1). FSP AUG AIR-1
prohibits the use of the
accrue-in-advance
method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities in
annual and interim financial reporting periods and is effective
for the Company in 2007. The adoption of FSP AUG AIR-1 on
January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial position and results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value in
GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements and is effective for
the Company in 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of adopting this statement.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159).
SFAS No. 159 permits an entity to elect fair value as
the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many
financial assets and liabilities. Entities electing the fair
value option would be required to recognize changes in fair
value in earnings. Entities
8
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
electing the fair value option would also be required to
distinguish, on the face of the statement of financial position,
the fair value of assets and liabilities for which the fair
value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities
measured using another measurement attribute.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company in 2008. The
adjustment to reflect the difference between the fair value and
the carrying amount would be accounted for as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date
of initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of adoption of SFAS No. 159 on the
Companys financial position and results of operations.
NOTE D
Acquisitions
In October 2006, the Company acquired all of the capital stock
of NABS, Inc. (NABS) for $21,201 in cash. NABS is a
premier international supply chain manager of production
components, providing services to high technology companies in
the computer, electronics, and consumer products industries.
NABS has 19 operations across Europe, Asia, Mexico and the
United States. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under
the Companys revolving credit facility.
The purchase price and results of operations of NABS prior to
its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined
in
Regulation S-X.
The results of operations for NABS have been included since
October 18, 2006. The allocation of the purchase price has
been performed based on the assignments of fair values to assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. The allocation of the purchase
price is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquisition price, less cash
acquired
|
|
$
|
20,053
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(11,460
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(4,326
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Equipment
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
Intangible assets subject to
amortization
|
|
|
(8,020
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
8,989
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
3,904
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
3,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
10,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a plan for NABS integration activities. In
accordance with FASB EITF Issue
No. 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination, the Company recorded accruals for
severance, exit and relocation costs in the purchase price
allocation. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending accrual
balances is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
Exit and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at October 18, 2006
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
Add: Accruals
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Less: Payments
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Add: Accruals
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Less: Payments
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
In January 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of all of
the shares of Foundry Service GmbH (Foundry Service)
for approximately $3,219, which resulted in additional goodwill
of $2,313. The acquisition was funded with borrowings from
foreign subsidiaries of the Company. The acquisition was not
deemed significant as defined in
Regulation S-X.
In connection with the acquisition of the assets of Purchased
Parts Group, Inc. (PPG) in July 2005, the Company,
in accordance with FASB EITF Issue
No. 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination, recorded accruals for severance,
exit and relocation costs in the purchase price allocation. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending accrual balance is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
Exit and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
Add: Accruals
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Less: Payments
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(1,145
|
)
|
Transfers
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
Less: Payments and adjustments
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
Transfers
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Less: Payments
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE E
Inventories
The components of inventory consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
136,871
|
|
|
$
|
143,071
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
19,022
|
|
|
|
42,405
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
55,919
|
|
|
|
38,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
211,812
|
|
|
$
|
223,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE F
Shareholders Equity
At June 30, 2007, capital stock consists of (i) Serial
Preferred Stock, of which 632,470 shares were authorized
and none were issued, and (ii) Common Stock, of which
40,000,000 shares were authorized and
12,132,192 shares were issued, of which 11,393,957 were
outstanding and 738,235 were treasury shares.
10
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
NOTE G
Net Income Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
NUMERATOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,849
|
|
|
$
|
4,901
|
|
|
$
|
11,053
|
|
|
$
|
9,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DENOMINATOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per
share weighted average shares
|
|
|
11,061
|
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
|
|
11,055
|
|
|
|
10,976
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings
per share weighted average shares and assumed
conversions
|
|
|
11,631
|
|
|
|
11,446
|
|
|
|
11,598
|
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.53
|
|
|
$
|
.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
.88
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.50
|
|
|
$
|
.43
|
|
|
$
|
.95
|
|
|
$
|
.84
|
|
Stock options on 26,000 and 104,000 shares were excluded in
the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and 13,000 and 104,000 were excluded in the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, because
they were anti-dilutive.
NOTE H
Stock-Based Compensation
Total stock compensation expense recorded in the first six
months of 2007 and 2006 was $980 and $370, respectively. Total
stock compensation expense recorded in the second quarter of
2007 and 2006 was $496 and $181, respectively. There were stock
options for 30,000 shares awarded with an exercise price of
$20.00 per share during the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2007. There were no restricted stock awards during
the first six months of 2007. As of June 30, 2007, there
was $4,218 of unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock-based compensation, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.
NOTE I
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The components of net periodic benefit cost recognized during
interim periods was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Service costs
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Interest costs
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(2,213
|
)
|
|
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
|
(4,425
|
)
|
|
|
(4,156
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit (income) costs
|
|
$
|
(1,388
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,776
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,314
|
)
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
|
$
|
902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
NOTE J
Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,849
|
|
|
$
|
4,901
|
|
|
$
|
11,053
|
|
|
$
|
9,658
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
2,583
|
|
Pension and postretirement
benefits, net of tax
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
8,518
|
|
|
$
|
7,006
|
|
|
$
|
14,418
|
|
|
$
|
12,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated comprehensive loss at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
$
|
8,630
|
|
|
$
|
5,384
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit
adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,189
|
|
|
$
|
5,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pension and postretirement benefit liability amounts are net
of deferred taxes of $326 and $404 at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. No income taxes are
provided on foreign currency translation adjustments as foreign
earnings are considered permanently invested.
NOTE K
Restructuring Activities
The Company responded to an earlier economic downturn by
reducing costs in a variety of ways, including restructuring
businesses and selling non-core manufacturing assets. These
activities generated restructuring and asset impairment charges
in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2005, as the Companys
restructuring efforts continued and evolved. For further details
on the restructuring activities, see Note O to the audited
financial statements contained in the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The accrued liability balance for severance and exit costs and
related cash payments during the six months ended June 30,
2007 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE L
Accrued Warranty Costs
The Company estimates the amount of warranty claims on sold
products that may be incurred based on current and historical
data. The actual warranty expense could differ from the
estimates made by the Company based on product performance. The
following table presents the changes in the Companys
product warranty liability:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
3,557
|
|
Claims paid during the year
|
|
|
(647
|
)
|
Additional warranties issued
during the year
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
PARK-OHIO
HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
NOTE M
Income Taxes
Previously, a valuation allowance was recorded against deferred
tax assets as a result of operating losses. The valuation
allowance was adjusted in subsequent periods through 2006 and
charged or credited to income or other comprehensive income as
appropriate. In the fourth quarter of 2006, it was determined
that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets
would be realized and the remaining amount of valuation
allowance was reversed to income in that period. Therefore,
beginning with the first quarter of 2007, a tax expense has been
recorded based on an estimated effective tax rate for all
jurisdictions.
The income tax provision for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2007 was calculated based on
managements estimate of the annual effective tax rate of
36% compared with the effective tax rate of 39% for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2006.
On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an entitys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under
FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on
the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount
that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the
relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will
not be recognized if it has a 50% or less likelihood of being
sustained. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. The total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits as of the date of adoption was $4,691, all of which, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. As a result of
the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $608
increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a
corresponding reduction to retained earnings.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Upon adoption
of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, the Company increased
its accrual for interest and penalties to $479.
The Company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its
unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within
twelve months of the date of adoption.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various
states and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys tax years
from 2003 to 2006 are subject to examination by the tax
authorities. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state, local or foreign
examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002.
NOTE N
Financing Arrangements
On June 20, 2007, Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other
loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto and JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, N.A.), as
agent, entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement (the Agreement). The Agreement, among
other things, increases the availability under the credit
facility from $230 million to $270 million, adds an
uncommitted accordion feature which could increase future
availability to $290 million, and amends the borrowing base
and pricing terms.
13
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 30,
2007 and the related consolidated statements of income for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, the consolidated statement of shareholders equity
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 and the
consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based upon our review, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial
statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note M to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective
January 1, 2007.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein;
and in our report dated March 12, 2007, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
Cleveland, Ohio
August 6, 2007
14
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Financial information for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2007 is not directly comparable to the
financial information for the same periods in 2006 primarily due
to acquisitions.
Executive
Overview
We are an industrial supply chain logistics and diversified
manufacturing business, operating in three segments: ILS,
Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS provides
customers with integrated supply chain management services for a
broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. ILS
customers receive various value-added services, such as
engineering and design services, part usage and cost analysis,
supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product
packaging and tracking,
just-in-time
and point-of use delivery, electronic billing and ongoing
technical support. The principal customers of ILS are in the
heavy-duty truck, automotive and vehicle parts, electrical
distribution and controls, power sports/fitness equipment, HVAC,
aerospace and defense, electrical components, appliance and
semiconductor equipment industries. Aluminum Products casts and
machines aluminum engine, transmission, brake, suspension and
other components such as pump housings, clutch
retainers/pistons, control arms, knuckles, master cylinders,
pinion housings, brake calipers, oil pans and flywheel spacers
for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction equipment,
heavy-duty truck and marine equipment OEMs, primarily on a
sole-source basis. Aluminum Products also provides value-added
services such as design and engineering and assembly.
Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche
manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad
range of highly-engineered products including induction heating
and melting systems, pipe threading systems, industrial oven
systems, injection molded rubber components, and forged and
machined products. Manufactured Products also produces and
provides services and spare parts for the equipment it
manufactures. The principal customers of Manufactured Products
are OEMs, sub-assemblers and end users in the steel, coatings,
forging, foundry, heavy-duty truck, construction equipment,
bottling, automotive, oil and gas, rail and locomotive
manufacturing and aerospace and defense industries. Sales,
earnings and other relevant financial data for these three
segments are provided in Note B to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
Sales grew in the first two quarters of 2007 compared to the
same quarters a year earlier, as growth in the Manufactured
Products segment and new customers in the ILS and Aluminum
Products segments exceeded declines in ILS sales to the
heavy-duty truck market caused by the introduction of new
environmental standards at the beginning of 2007. New customers
in the ILS segment came both from the October 2006 acquisition
of NABS and from organic sales, while new sales in the Aluminum
Products segment primarily reflect two new contracts starting
production. Operating income increased in the first quarter of
2007 because a gain from the sale of an asset held for sale
exceeded the earnings decrease created by reduced ILS sales and
the costs associated with starting up the new Aluminum
Products contracts. Consolidated net sales are expected to
increase over the coming quarters as heavy-duty truck sales
begin to recover from their temporary dip and as the new
contracts in Aluminum Products continue to ramp up.
Sales and operating income grew in 2006, continuing the trend of
the prior year, as the domestic and international manufacturing
economies continued to grow. Net sales increased 13% in 2006
compared to 2005, while operating income increased 10%. Net
income declined in 2006 because the reversal of the
Companys tax valuation allowance was larger in 2005 than
in 2006, $7.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively,
and also due to higher interest expense. The tax valuation
allowance was substantially eliminated by December 31,
2006, so no further reversals are expected to affect income in
subsequent years. During 2005, net sales increased 15% and
operating income increased 9% as compared to 2004. 2005
operating income was reduced by $1.8 million of
restructuring charges ($.8 million reflected in Cost of
products sold and $1.0 million in Restructuring and
impairment charges).
During 2004, we reinforced our long-term availability and
attractive pricing of funds by refinancing both of our major
sources of borrowed funds: senior subordinated notes and our
revolving credit facility. In November 2004, we sold
$210.0 million of 8.375% senior subordinated notes due
2014. We have amended our bank revolving
15
credit facility, most recently in June 2007, to extend its
maturity to December 2010, increase the credit limit up to
$270.0 million subject to an asset-based formula, and
provide lower interest rate levels.
In October 2006, we acquired all of the capital stock of NABS,
Inc. for $21.2 million in cash funded with borrowings under
our revolving credit facility. NABS is a premier international
supply chain manager of production components, providing
services to high technology companies in the computer,
electronics, and consumer products industries. NABS had 14
international operations in China, India, Taiwan, Singapore,
Ireland, Hungary, Scotland, and Mexico plus five locations in
the United States.
In January 2006, we completed the acquisition of all of the
capital stock of Foundry Service GmbH for approximately
$3.2 million in cash, which resulted in additional goodwill
of $2.3 million. The acquisition was funded with borrowings
from foreign subsidiaries of the Company.
In December 2005, we acquired substantially all of the assets of
Lectrotherm, which is primarily a provider of field service and
spare parts for induction heating and melting systems, located
in Canton, Ohio, for $5.1 million cash funded with
borrowings under our revolving credit facility. This acquisition
augments our existing, high-margin aftermarket induction
business.
In July 2005, we acquired substantially all the assets of PPG, a
provider of supply chain management services for a broad range
of production components for $7.0 million cash funded with
borrowings from our revolving credit facility, $.5 million
in a short-term note payable and the assumption of approximately
$13.3 million of trade liabilities. This acquisition added
significantly to the customer and supplier bases, and expanded
our geographic presence of our ILS segment.
Accounting
Changes
SFAS No. 158 On December 31,
2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an Amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)
(SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158
requires an employer that is a business entity and sponsors one
or more single employer benefit plans to (1) recognize the
funded status of the benefit in its statement of financial
position, (2) recognize as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior
service costs or credits that arise during the period but are
not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost,
(3) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as
of the date of the employers fiscal year end statement of
financial position and (4) disclose additional information
in the notes to financial statements about certain effects on
net periodic benefit costs for the next fiscal year that arise
from delayed recognition of gains or losses, prior service costs
or credits, and transition assets or obligations. See
Note K of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 158 on the Companys
financial statements.
FIN 48 On July 13, 2006, the FASB
issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in an entitys financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under
FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on
the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount
that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the
relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will
not be recognized if it has a 50% or less likelihood of being
sustained. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. The total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits as of the date of adoption was $4,691, all of which, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. As a result of
the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $608
increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a
corresponding reduction to retained earnings.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Upon adoption
of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, the Company increased
its accrual for interest and penalties to $479.
16
The Company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its
unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within
twelve months of the date of adoption of FIN 48.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various
states and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys tax years
from 2003 to 2006 are subject to examination by the tax
authorities. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state, local or foreign
examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002.
Results
of Operations
Six
Months 2007 versus Six Months 2006
Net
Sales by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired/
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
(Divested)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
ILS
|
|
$
|
269.9
|
|
|
$
|
300.5
|
|
|
$
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
$
|
18.8
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
90.6
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured products
|
|
|
194.0
|
|
|
|
140.6
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Sales
|
|
$
|
554.5
|
|
|
$
|
528.7
|
|
|
$
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased 5% in the first half of 2007 compared to the
same period in 2006 as growth in the Manufactured Products
segment and new customers in the ILS and Aluminum Products
segments exceeded declines in ILS sales to the heavy-duty truck
market caused by the introduction of new environmental standards
at the beginning of 2007. ILS sales decreased 10% primarily due
to volume reductions in the heavy-duty truck industry, partially
offset by $18.8 million of additional sales from the
October 2006 acquisition of NABS, the addition of new customers
and increases in product range to existing customers. Aluminum
Products sales increased 3% as the sales volume from new
contracts starting production
ramp-up
exceeded the end of production of other parts and the general
decline in auto industry sales volumes. Manufactured Products
sales increased 38% primarily in the induction, pipe threading
equipment and forging businesses, due largely to worldwide
strength in the steel, oil & gas, aerospace and rail
industries.
Cost
of Products Sold & Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Consolidated cost of products sold
|
|
$
|
473.5
|
|
|
$
|
454.1
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
81.0
|
|
|
$
|
74.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold increased 4% in the first half of 2007
compared to the same period in 2006, while gross margin
increased to 14.6% in the first half of 2007 from 14.1% in the
same period of 2006.
ILS gross margin decreased because reduced heavy-duty truck
sales volume outweighed the margin benefit from sales from the
NABS acquisition and new customers. Aluminum Products gross
margin decreased primarily due to the costs associated with
starting up new contracts and delays in new contract volume
ramp-ups.
Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased
primarily due to increased sales volume.
17
Selling,
General & Administrative (SG&A)
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
50.3
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
SG&A percent
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated SG&A expenses increased 15% in the first half
of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, representing an
increase in SG&A expenses as a percent of sales of .8%,
from 8.3% to 9.1%. SG&A expenses increased approximately
$3.6 million due to the acquisition of NABS. SG&A
increased further in the first half of 2007 compared to the same
period in 2006 primarily due to increased expenses related to
stock options and restricted stock, legal and professional fees
and franchise taxes, partially offset by a $.5 million
increase in net pension credits, reflecting higher returns on
pension plan assets.
Interest
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Average outstanding borrowings
|
|
$
|
389.5
|
|
|
$
|
368.6
|
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Average borrowing rate
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
basis points
|
|
Interest expense increased $1.2 million in the first half
of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006, primarily due to
higher average outstanding borrowings and a higher average
borrowing rate during the first half of 2007. The increase in
average borrowings in the first half of 2007 resulted primarily
from higher working capital requirements and the purchase of
NABS in October 2006. The higher average borrowing rate in the
first half of 2007 was due primarily to increased interest rates
under our revolving credit facility compared to the same period
in 2006, which rates increased primarily as a result of actions
by the Federal Reserve.
Income
Tax:
The provision for income taxes was $5.6 million in the
first half of 2007, a 34% effective income tax rate, compared to
income taxes of $5.9 million provided in the corresponding
period of 2006, an effective 38% income tax rate. First half
2007 income taxes were reduced by accrual adjustments. We
estimate that the effective tax rate for full-year 2007 will be
approximately 36%.
Previously, a valuation allowance was recorded against deferred
tax assets as a result of operating losses. The valuation
allowance was adjusted in subsequent periods through 2006 and
charged or credited to income or other comprehensive income as
appropriate. In the fourth quarter of 2006, it was determined
that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets
would be realized and the remaining amount of valuation
allowance was reversed to income in that period. Therefore,
beginning with the first quarter of 2007, a tax expense has been
recorded based on an estimated effective tax rate for all
jurisdictions.
18
Results
of Operations
Second
Quarter 2007 versus Second Quarter 2006
Net
Sales by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired/
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
(Divested)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
ILS
|
|
$
|
131.1
|
|
|
$
|
150.3
|
|
|
$
|
(19.2
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Manufactured products
|
|
|
106.9
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Sales
|
|
$
|
286.6
|
|
|
$
|
268.4
|
|
|
$
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased 7% in the second quarter of 2007 compared to
the same quarter in 2006 as growth in the Manufactured Products
segment and new customers in the ILS and Aluminum Products
segments exceeded declines in ILS sales to the heavy-duty truck
market caused by the introduction of new environmental standards
at the beginning of 2007. ILS sales decreased 13% primarily due
to volume reductions in the heavy-duty truck industry, partially
offset by $9.5 million of additional sales from the October
2006 acquisition of NABS, the addition of new customers and
increases in product range to existing customers. Aluminum
Products sales increased 8% as the sales volume from new
contracts starting production
ramp-up
exceeded the end of production of other parts and the general
decline in auto industry sales volumes. Manufactured Products
sales increased 46% primarily in the induction, pipe threading
equipment and forging businesses, due largely to worldwide
strength in the steel, oil & gas, aerospace and rail
industries.
Cost
of Products Sold & Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Consolidated cost of products sold
|
|
$
|
244.3
|
|
|
$
|
230.7
|
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
42.4
|
|
|
$
|
37.7
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold increased 6% in the second quarter of 2007
compared to the same quarter in 2006, while gross margin
increased to 14.8% in the second quarter of 2007 from 14.0% in
the same quarter of 2006.
ILS gross margin decreased because reduced heavy-duty truck
sales volume outweighed the margin benefit from sales from the
NABS acquisition and new customers. Aluminum Products gross
margin decreased primarily due to the costs associated with
starting up new contracts and delays in new contract volume
ramp-ups.
Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased
primarily due to increased sales volume.
SG&A
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
22.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
SG&A percent
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated SG&A expenses increased 12% in the second
quarter of 2007 compared to the same quarter in 2006,
representing an increase in SG&A expenses as a percent of
sales of .4%, from 8.3% to 8.7%. SG&A expenses increased
approximately $1.7 million due to the acquisition of NABS.
SG&A increased further in the second quarter of 2007
compared to the same quarter in 2006 primarily due to increased
expenses related to stock options
19
and restricted stock, legal and professional fees and franchise
taxes, partially offset by a $.2 million increase in net
pension credits, reflecting higher returns on pension plan
assets.
Interest
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Average outstanding borrowings
|
|
$
|
392.3
|
|
|
$
|
379.3
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Average borrowing rate
|
|
|
8.46
|
%
|
|
|
8.12
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
basis points
|
|
Interest expense increased $0.6 million in the second
quarter of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006, primarily
due to higher average outstanding borrowings and a higher
average borrowing rate during the second quarter of 2007. The
increase in average borrowings in the first quarter of 2007
resulted primarily from higher working capital requirements and
the purchase of NABS in October 2006. The higher average
borrowing rate in the second quarter of 2007 was due primarily
to increased interest rates under our revolving credit facility
compared to the same period in 2006, which rates increased
primarily as a result of actions by the Federal Reserve.
Income
Tax:
The provision for income taxes was $3.4 million in the
second quarter of 2007, a 37% effective income tax rate,
compared to income taxes of $2.9 million provided in the
corresponding quarter of 2006, an effective 37% income tax rate.
Previously, a valuation allowance was recorded against deferred
tax assets as a result of operating losses. The valuation
allowance was adjusted in subsequent periods through 2006 and
charged or credited to income or other comprehensive income as
appropriate. In the fourth quarter of 2006, it was determined
that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets
would be realized and the remaining amount of valuation
allowance was reversed to income in that period. Therefore,
beginning with the first quarter of 2007, a tax expense has been
recorded based on an estimated effective tax rate for all
jurisdictions.
Liquidity
and Sources of Capital
Our liquidity needs are primarily for working capital and
capital expenditures. Our primary sources of liquidity have been
funds provided by operations and funds available from existing
bank credit arrangements and the sale of our senior subordinated
notes. In 2003, we entered into a revolving credit facility with
a group of banks, that, as subsequently amended, provides for
availability of up to $270.0 million, of which up to
$245.0 million is subject to an asset-based formula. The
most recent amendment in May 2007 also added an uncommitted
accordian feature which could increase future availability to
$290.0 million. The revolving credit facility matures on
December 31, 2010 and is secured by substantially all our
assets in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom.
Borrowings from this revolving credit facility will be used for
general corporate purposes.
Amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility may be
borrowed at the Companys election at either (i) LIBOR
plus .75% to 1.75% or (ii) the banks prime lending
rate. The LIBOR-based interest rate is dependent on the
Companys debt service coverage ratio, as defined in the
revolving credit facility. Under the revolving credit facility,
a detailed borrowing base formula provides borrowing
availability to the Company based on percentages of eligible
accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets. As of
June 30, 2007, the Company had $169.1 million
outstanding under the revolving credit facility and
approximately $75.6 million of unused borrowing
availability.
Current financial resources (working capital and available bank
borrowing arrangements) and anticipated funds from operations
are expected to be adequate to meet current cash requirements.
The future availability of bank borrowings under the revolving
credit facility is based on the Companys ability to meet a
debt service coverage ratio covenant, which could be materially
impacted by negative economic trends. Failure to meet the debt
service coverage ratio could materially impact the availability
and interest rate of future borrowings.
20
At June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the
debt service coverage ratio covenant and other covenants
contained in the revolving credit facility.
The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.57 at
June 30, 2007 versus 2.23 at December 31, 2006.
Working capital increased by $31.0 million to
$299.4 million at June 30, 2007 from
$268.4 million at December 31, 2006.
During the first six months of 2007, the Company used
$10.3 million from operating activities compared to using
$20.8 million in the same period of 2006. The decrease in
operating cash usage of $10.5 million was primarily the
result of a much smaller increase in accounts receivable,
inventories and other current assets in the first six months of
2007 compared to the same period of 2006 ($5.2 million
compared to $59.8 million, respectively), primarily as a
result of a smaller increase in revenue. The lesser increases in
current assets, plus an increase in net income of
$1.4 million, more than offset the increased operating cash
used by an reduction of $28.9 million in accounts payable
and accrued expenses in the first six months of 2007 compared to
an increase of $20.8 million in the first six months of
2006. In the first six months of 2007, the Company also used
cash of $9.0 million for capital expenditures. These
activities, plus cash interest and taxes payments of
$17.8 million, $4.4 million of cash received for the
sale of an asset held for sale and a net increase in borrowing
of $13.6 million, resulted in a decrease in cash of
$1.1 million in the first six months of 2007.
We do not have off-balance-sheet arrangements, financing or
other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other
persons. There are occasions whereupon we enter into forward
contracts on foreign currencies, primarily the euro, purely for
the purpose of hedging exposure to changes in the value of
accounts receivable in those currencies against the
U.S. dollar. At June 30, 2007, no such currency hedge
contracts were outstanding. We currently have no other
derivative instruments.
Seasonality;
Variability of Operating Results
Our results of operations are typically stronger in the first
six months than the last six months of each calendar year due to
scheduled plant maintenance in the third quarter to coincide
with customer plant shutdowns and due to holidays in the fourth
quarter.
The timing of orders placed by our customers has varied with,
among other factors, orders for customers finished goods,
customer production schedules, competitive conditions and
general economic conditions. The variability of the level and
timing of orders has, from time to time, resulted in significant
periodic and quarterly fluctuations in the operations of our
business units. Such variability is particularly evident at the
capital equipment businesses, included in the Manufactured
Products segment, which typically ship a few large systems per
year.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Form 10-Q
contains certain statements that are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The
words believes, anticipates,
plans, expects, intends,
estimates and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause our actual results, performance and
achievements, or industry results, to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
uncertainties and other factors include such things as: general
business conditions and competitive factors, including pricing
pressures and product innovation; demand for our products and
services; raw material availability and pricing; changes in our
relationships with customers and suppliers; the financial
condition of our customers, including the impact of any
bankruptcies; our ability to successfully integrate recent and
future acquisitions into existing operations; changes in general
domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest
rates, tax rates and adverse impacts to us, our suppliers and
customers from acts of terrorism or hostilities; our ability to
meet various covenants, including financial covenants, contained
in our revolving credit agreement and the indenture governing
our senior subordinated notes; increasingly stringent domestic
and foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting
the environment; inherent uncertainties involved in assessing
our potential liability for environmental remediation-related
activities; the outcome of pending and future litigation and
other claims; dependence on the automotive and heavy-duty truck
industries, which are highly cyclical; dependence on key
21
management; and dependence on information systems. Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which
such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by
law. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of
a forward-looking statement herein should not be regarded as a
representation by us that our plans and objectives will be
achieved.
Review By
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2007, and
for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, have been reviewed, prior to filing, by
Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm, and their report is included herein.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk including changes in interest
rates. We are subject to interest rate risk on borrowings under
our floating rate revolving credit agreement, which consisted of
borrowings of $169.1 million at June 30, 2007. A
100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have
resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately
$.8 million during the six-month period ended June 30,
2007.
Our foreign subsidiaries generally conduct business in local
currencies. During the first six months of 2007, we recorded a
favorable foreign currency translation adjustment of
$3.2 million related to net assets located outside the
United States. This foreign currency translation adjustment
resulted primarily from the weakening of the U.S. dollar in
relation to the euro and Canadian dollar. Our foreign operations
are also subject to other customary risks of operating in a
global environment, such as unstable political situations, the
effect of local laws and taxes, tariff increases and regulations
and requirements for export licenses, the potential imposition
of trade or foreign exchange restrictions and transportation
delays.
The Company periodically enters into forward contracts on
foreign currencies, primarily the euro and the British Pound
Sterling, purely for the purpose of hedging exposure to changes
in the value of accounts receivable in those currencies against
the U.S. dollar. The Company currently uses no other
derivative instruments. At June 30, 2007, there were no
such currency hedge contracts outstanding.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Under the supervision of and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report.
Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of
2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in
which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary
course of business. While any litigation involves an element of
uncertainty, in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any,
arising from currently pending or threatened litigation is not
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, liquidity or results of operations.
At June 30, 2007, we were a co-defendant in approximately
365 cases asserting claims on behalf of approximately 8,500
plaintiffs alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to
asbestos. These asbestos cases generally relate to production
and sale of asbestos-containing products and allege various
theories of liability, including negligence, gross negligence
and strict liability and seek compensatory and, in some cases,
punitive damages.
In every asbestos case in which we are named as a party, the
complaints are filed against multiple named defendants. In
substantially all of the asbestos cases, the plaintiffs either
claim damages in excess of a specified amount, typically a
minimum amount sufficient to establish jurisdiction of the court
in which the case was filed (jurisdictional minimums generally
range from $25,000 to $75,000), or do not specify the monetary
damages sought. To the extent that any specific amount of
damages is sought, the amount applies to claims against all
named defendants.
There are only four asbestos cases, involving 21 plaintiffs,
that plead specified damages. In each of the four cases, the
plaintiff is seeking compensatory and punitive damages based on
a variety of potentially alternative causes of action. In three
cases, the plaintiff has alleged compensatory damages in the
amount of $3.0 million for four separate causes of action
and $1.0 million for another cause of action and punitive
damages in the amount of $10.0 million. In the other case,
the plaintiff has alleged compensatory damages in the amount of
$20.0 million for three separate causes of action and
$5.0 million for another cause of action and punitive
damages in the amount of $20.0 million.
Historically, we have been dismissed from asbestos cases on the
basis that the plaintiff incorrectly sued one of our
subsidiaries or because the plaintiff failed to identify any
asbestos-containing product manufactured or sold by us or our
subsidiaries. We intend to vigorously defend these asbestos
cases, and believe we will continue to be successful in being
dismissed from such cases. However, it is not possible to
predict the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related lawsuits,
claims and proceedings due to the unpredictable nature of
personal injury litigation. Despite this uncertainty, and
although our results of operations and cash flows for a
particular period could be adversely affected by
asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings, management
believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
liquidity or results of operations. Among the factors management
considered in reaching this conclusion were: (a) our
historical success in being dismissed from these types of
lawsuits on the bases mentioned above; (b) many cases have
been improperly filed against one of our subsidiaries;
(c) in many cases , the plaintiffs have been unable to
establish any causal relationship to us or our products or
premises; (d) in many cases, the plaintiffs have been
unable to demonstrate that they have suffered any identifiable
injury or compensable loss at all, that any injuries that they
have incurred did in fact result from alleged exposure to
asbestos; and (e) the complaints assert claims against
multiple defendants and, in most cases, the damages alleged are
not attributed to individual defendants. Additionally, we do not
believe that the amounts claimed in any of the asbestos cases
are meaningful indicators of our potential exposure because the
amounts claimed typically bear no relation to the extent of the
plaintiffs injury, if any.
Our cost of defending these lawsuits has not been material to
date and, based upon available information, our management does
not expect its future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
liquidity or financial position.
23
There have been no material changes in the risk factors
previously disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(or Approximate
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(or Units)
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Paid per
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
that May yet be
|
|
|
|
(or Units)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(or Unit)
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
Plans or Programs(1)
|
|
|
April 1, 2007 through
April 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,717
|
(2)
|
|
|
18.76
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
May 1, 2007 through
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
June 1, 2007 through
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
$
|
18.76
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company has a share repurchase program whereby the Company
may repurchase up to 1.0 million shares of its common
stock. No shares were purchased under this program during the
quarter ended June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock the Company acquired from
recipients of restricted stock awards at the time of vesting of
such awards in order to settle recipient withholding tax
liabilities. |
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
The Company held its annual meeting of shareholders on
May 24, 2007. The shareholders approved the elections of
three directors to serve until the annual meeting of
stockholders in the year 2010. The votes cast for each nominee
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
Patrick V. Auletta
|
|
|
10,592,205
|
|
|
|
781,552
|
|
Dan T. Moore
|
|
|
10,603,518
|
|
|
|
770,239
|
|
James W. Wert
|
|
|
10,514,912
|
|
|
|
858,845
|
|
The following exhibits are included herein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated June 20, 2007, among Park-Ohio Industries,
Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders thereto and JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA),
as agent (filed as exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. on June 26, 2007, SEC File
No. 000-03134, and incorporated by reference and made a
part hereof).
|
|
15
|
|
|
Letter re: unaudited interim
financial information
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Principal Executive Officers
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Principal Financial Officers
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification requirement under
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
24
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 9, 2007
PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Richard
P. Elliott
|
Name: Richard P. Elliott
Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
25
EXHIBIT INDEX
QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated June 20, 2007, among Park-Ohio Industries,
Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders thereto and JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA),
as agent (filed as exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. on June 26, 2007, SEC File
No. 000-03134, and incorporated by reference and made a
part hereof).
|
|
15
|
|
|
Letter re: unaudited interim
financial information
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Principal Executive Officers
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Principal Financial Officers
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification requirement under
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
26