Prospect Energy Corporation - Form N-2/A
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 1, 2006
Registration
No. 333-132575
U.S. SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form N-2
þ REGISTRATION
STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
þ PRE-EFFECTIVE
AMENDMENT NO. 2
o POST-EFFECTIVE
AMENDMENT NO.
PROSPECT ENERGY
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Charter)
10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor
New York, NY 10016
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
Registrants Telephone
Number, including Area Code:
(212) 448-0702
John F. Barry III
M. Grier Eliasek
c/o Prospect Capital
Management, LLC
10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor
New York, NY 10016
(212) 448-0702
(Name and Address of Agent for
Service)
Copies of information
to:
Leonard B.
Mackey, Jr., Esq.
Clifford Chance US LLP
31 West
52nd Street
New York, NY
10019-6131
(212) 878-8000
Approximate Date of Proposed Public
Offering: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any securities being registered on this form will be offered
on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415
under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered
in connection with a distribution reinvestment plan, check the
following box. þ
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check
appropriate box):
o when declared
effective pursuant to section 8(c).
If appropriate, check the following box:
o This [post-effective]
amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed
[post-effective amendment] [registration statement].
o This form is filed to
register additional securities for an offering pursuant to
Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act and the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering
is .
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
Amount Being
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Registration
|
Title of Securities Being Registered
|
|
|
Registered(1)(2)
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Fee
|
Common Stock, $.001 par value
per share(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000,000
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$300,000,000(5)
|
|
|
$32,100.00(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated pursuant to Rule 457
solely for the purpose of determining the registration fee. All
of such amount was previously paid. The proposed maximum
offering price per Security will be determined, from time to
time, by the Registrant in connection with the sale by the
Registrant of the securities registered under this registration
statement.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Subject to Note 5 below, there
is being registered hereunder an indeterminate principal amount
of common stock or preferred stock as may be sold, from time to
time.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Subject to Note 5 below, there
is being registered hereunder an indeterminate principal amount
of warrants as may be sold, from time to time, representing
rights to purchase common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Subject to Note 5 below, there
is being registered hereunder an indeterminate principal amount
of debt securities as may be sold, from time to time. If any
debt securities are issued at an original issue discount, then
the offering price shall be in such greater principal amount as
shall result in an aggregate price to investors not to exceed
$300,000,000.
|
|
(5)
|
|
In no event will the aggregate
offering price of all securities issued from time to time
pursuant to this registration statement exceed $300,000,000.
|
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON
SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE
DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH
SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL
THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a)
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THIS
REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS
THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SECTION 8(a), MAY
DETERMINE.
The information in
this prospectus supplement is not complete and may be changed.
We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus supplement is not an offer to sell
these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer and sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED
AUGUST 1, 2006
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated August , 2006)
4,000,000 Shares
Common
Stock
We are selling 4,000,000 shares of our common stock to
repay debt and fund additional investments from our investment
pipeline. Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market
under the symbol PSEC. On July 31, 2006, the
last sale price reported for our common stock on the NASDAQ
Global Market was $16.21 per share.
Prospect Energy Corporation is a financial services company that
lends to and invests in middle market, privately held or thinly
traded public companies in the energy industry. We are organized
as a non-diversified closed-end management investment company
that has elected to be treated as a business development company
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Prospect Capital
Management, LLC manages our investments, and Prospect
Administration, LLC provides the administrative services
necessary for us to operate.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on
page S-12
of this prospectus supplement and on page 10 of the
accompanying prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount (sales load)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to us before
expenses(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Before deducting estimated expenses
payable by us of $563,000.
|
The underwriters have the option to purchase up to an additional
600,000 shares of common stock at the public offering
price, less the underwriting discount, within 30 days from
the date of this prospectus supplement solely to cover
over-allotments. If the over-allotment option is exercised in
full, the total public offering price will be
$ , and the total underwriting
discount (sales load) will be $ .
The proceeds to us would be $ ,
before deducting estimated expenses payable by us of $563,000.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares on or
about , 2006.
Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc.
Sole Book
Running Manager
Ferris,
Baker Watts
Incorporated
|
|
|
Sterne,
Agee & Leach, Inc.
|
The date of this prospectus supplement
is , 2006.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-3
|
|
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
|
|
|
S-12
|
|
|
|
|
S-27
|
|
|
|
|
S-28
|
|
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
|
|
|
S-31
|
|
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
|
|
S-33
|
|
|
|
|
S-38
|
|
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
PROSPECTUS
|
|
|
|
|
Prospectus Summary
|
|
|
1
|
|
Selected Condensed Financial Data
|
|
|
8
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
10
|
|
Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
25
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
31
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
31
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
32
|
|
Price Range of Common Stock
|
|
|
33
|
|
Business
|
|
|
34
|
|
Management
|
|
|
37
|
|
Certain Relationships and
Transactions
|
|
|
53
|
|
Control Persons and Principal
Stockholders
|
|
|
54
|
|
Portfolio Companies
|
|
|
55
|
|
Determination of Net Asset Value
|
|
|
56
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
|
|
|
56
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Considerations
|
|
|
58
|
|
Description of our Capital Stock
|
|
|
64
|
|
Description of Our Preferred Stock
|
|
|
70
|
|
Description of Our Warrants
|
|
|
75
|
|
Description of Our Debt Securities
|
|
|
77
|
|
Regulation
|
|
|
78
|
|
Custodian, Transfer and Dividend
Paying Agent and Registrar
|
|
|
83
|
|
Brokerage Allocation and Other
Practices
|
|
|
83
|
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
|
84
|
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
85
|
|
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
|
85
|
|
Available Information
|
|
|
85
|
|
Index to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-19
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
Exhibit (k)(4) Credit Agreement between Registrant, its domestic subsidiaries and HSH Nordbank AG |
Exhibit (l)(1) Opinion and Consent of Clifford Chance US LLP |
Exhibit (l)(2) Opinion and Consent of Venable LLP |
S-2
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights some information from this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus, and it may not
contain all of the information that is important to you. To
understand the terms of the common stock offered hereby, you
should read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus carefully. Together, these documents describe the
specific terms of the shares we are offering. You should
carefully read the sections titled Risk Factors in
this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus
and the documents identified in the section Additional
Information. Except as otherwise noted, all information in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option.
The terms we, us, our,
Company and Prospect Energy refer to
Prospect Energy Corporation; Prospect Capital
Management or the Investment Adviser refers to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC; Prospect
Administration or the Administrator refers to
Prospect Administration, LLC.
The
Company
We are a financial services company that lends to and invests in
companies in the energy industry. We are organized as a
non-diversified closed-end management investment company that
has elected to be treated as a business development company
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940
Act.
We concentrate on making investments in energy companies having
annual revenues of less than $250 million. Our typical
investment involves a secured loan of less than $30 million
with some form of equity participation. In most cases, companies
in which we invest are privately held or have thinly traded
public securities at the time we invest in them. We refer to
these companies as middle market companies and these
investments as middle market investments.
We seek to maximize returns to our investors by applying
rigorous credit analysis and asset-based lending techniques to
make and monitor our investments in asset intensive energy
companies. We do not intend to invest directly in any energy
company engaged exclusively in (1) oil and gas exploration,
(2) speculative risks or (3) speculative trading in
oil, gas
and/or other
commodities, although some of the energy companies in which we
invest may be involved in some exploration or development
activity.
As of March 31, 2006, we held investments having an
aggregate value of $104.2 million in ten portfolio
companies. For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the
weighted average yield on all of our outstanding investments in
long-term debt securities issued by our portfolio companies was
14.5% (18% including dividend paying equity securities). As of
July 28, 2006, we have executed non-binding letters of
intent with four companies to make investments aggregating
approximately $45 million. The proposed investments are
subject to due diligence, approval of our investment committee
and negotiation and execution of definitive investment
agreements. We may consummate less than all or none of the
investments that are subject to these non-binding letters of
intent.
The
Energy Industry
We invest primarily in the North American energy industry. We
believe the energy industry is one of the largest, most dynamic
and important industries in North America. The energy industry
consists of companies in the direct energy value chain as well
as companies that sell products and services to, or acquire
products and services from, the direct energy value chain. In
this prospectus, we refer to all of these companies as
energy companies and assets in these companies as
energy assets. The categories of energy companies in
this value chain are described below. The direct energy value
chain includes upstream businesses, midstream businesses and
downstream businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream businesses find, develop and extract energy resources,
including natural gas, crude oil and coal, which are typically
found underground or offshore in geological reservoirs.
|
S-3
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream businesses gather, process, refine, store and transmit
energy resources and their byproducts in a form that is usable
by wholesale power generation, utility, petrochemical,
industrial and gasoline customers.
|
|
|
|
Downstream businesses include the power and electricity segment
as well as businesses that process, refine, market or distribute
hydrocarbons or other energy resources, such as customer-ready
natural gas, propane and gasoline, to end-user customers.
|
Our
Competitive Advantages
We believe we have the following competitive advantages over
others investing in middle market energy companies:
|
|
|
|
|
our team of investment professionals has more than
125 years of combined experience in the energy industry;
|
|
|
|
our focus on the energy industry distinguishes us from
generalist private equity and mezzanine capital providers;
|
|
|
|
we avoid widely marketed auctions to achieve better pricing and
terms;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we focus on transactions where we can obtain meaningful equity
participation as additional consideration for our loans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we believe we lower our risk by taking first or second lien
security interests on strategic assets within the energy
industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a public company, our cost of capital is likely to be lower
than the cost of capital of a private equity or private
mezzanine fund;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our status as a business development company provides us with
greater flexibility in customizing one-stop and other financing
solutions for energy companies; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our willingness to invest across all sub-sectors of the energy
industry enhances portfolio diversification, decreasing risk and
providing us a wider spectrum of investment opportunities.
|
Our
Investment Objective and Policies
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and
long-term capital appreciation through debt and equity
investments. We focus on making investments in energy companies
and will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of our
assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment
purposes) in these companies. Prospect Energy is a
non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act,
which means that from time to time a greater portion of our
assets may consist of portfolio companies in which we have
invested more than 5% of our net asset value
and/or hold
more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities than would be
the case if we were a diversified company.
We seek to maximize returns to our investors by applying
rigorous credit analysis and asset-based lending techniques,
such as taking first or second priority security interests in
energy assets. We do not invest directly in any energy company
exclusively involved in (1) speculative oil and gas
exploration, (2) speculative risks or (3) speculative
trading in oil, gas
and/or other
commodities. Some of the energy companies in which we invest are
involved in some exploration or development activity. While the
structure of our investments varies, we invest primarily in
secured senior and subordinated loans, generally referred to as
mezzanine loans, which often include equity interests such as
warrants or options received in connection with these loans, and
dividend-paying equity securities, such as common and preferred
stock and convertible securities, of middle market energy
companies. Our investments typically range between
$5 million and $30 million each, although this
investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our
capital base changes.
While we primarily seek current income through investment in the
debt and/or
dividend-paying equity securities of privately held or thinly
traded public energy companies and long-term capital
appreciation by
S-4
acquiring accompanying warrants, options or other equity
securities of such companies, we may invest up to 30% of our
assets in opportunistic investments in order to seek enhanced
returns for stockholders. Such investments may include debt and
equity instruments of public companies that are not thinly
traded. We expect that these public companies generally will
have debt securities that are non-investment grade. Within this
30% basket, we may also invest in debt and equity securities of
middle-market companies located outside of the United States.
Our investments typically include equity components that provide
us with opportunities to share in the growth in value of
portfolio companies. Equity components may include warrants or
options to acquire common shares in a portfolio company, payment
of a portion of the contractual interest on debt securities in
common shares of the portfolio company, or contractual payment
rights or rights to receive a proportional interest in the
revenue, operating cash flow or net income of such company. When
determined by the Investment Adviser to be in our best interest,
we may acquire a controlling interest in a portfolio company.
Any warrants or options we receive may require only a nominal
cost to exercise, and thus, as a portfolio company appreciates
in value, we may achieve additional investment return from this
equity interest. In many cases, we have structured, and may seek
to include, in all warrants provisions protecting our rights as
a minority-interest or, if applicable, controlling-interest
holder, as well as puts. We may also seek to include in all
warrants rights to sell such securities back to the company,
upon the occurrence of specified events. In many cases, we
obtain registration rights in connection with these equity
interests, which may include demand and piggyback
registration rights.
We plan to hold most of our investments to maturity or
repayment, but may sell our investments earlier if a liquidity
event takes place, such as the sale or recapitalization of a
portfolio company, or if the Investment Adviser deems such sale
to be in our best interest.
We have qualified and elected to be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or a RIC, under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code). As a RIC, we generally do not pay
corporate-level federal income taxes on any ordinary income or
capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as
dividends. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other
things, meet certain
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In
addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to
our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our
investment company taxable income, which is
generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized
net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term
capital losses.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect Capital Management manages our investment activities.
John F. Barry III, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is
majority owner of Prospect Capital Management. Prospect Capital
Management is an investment adviser registered under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Advisers
Act. Under an investment advisory agreement between the
Company and Prospect Capital Management (the Investment
Advisory Agreement), we have agreed to pay Prospect
Capital Management investment advisory fees, which will consist
of an annual base management fee based on our gross assets
including assets purchased with borrowed funds, as well as a
two-part incentive fee based on our performance. On May 15,
2006, the Board of Directors of the Company voted unanimously to
renew the Investment Advisory Agreement for the one year period
beginning June 24, 2006. Our headquarters are located at 10
East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and
our telephone number is
(212) 448-0702.
Our web site is www.prospectenergy.com. The information on our
web site is not part of this prospectus supplement.
Recent
Developments
On July 31, 2006 our Board of Directors declared a quarterly
dividend of $0.38 for the first fiscal quarter 2007, payable
September 29, 2006 to stockholders of record on
September 22, 2006. This represents a $0.04 or 12% increase
in the dividend paid for the last fiscal quarter in 2006.
On July 20, 2006, we entered into a $50 million senior
revolving credit facility with HSH-Nordbank AG. The facility is
for an initial term of one year, but our lender has the option
to extend the facility for an
S-5
additional two years. Interest on borrowings under the facility
is charged at either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable spread
at such time, ranging from 200 to 250 basis points, or
(ii) the greater of the lender prime rate or the federal
funds effective rate plus the applicable spread at such time,
ranging from 50 to 100 basis points. Loans under our credit
facility are collateralized by a security interest in all of our
assets, including investments. Our credit facility will be used
to supplement Prospect Energys equity capital to make
additional portfolio investments. Our credit facility, together
with other borrowings (which may include reverse repurchase
agreements and similar transactions), may be used in the future
to leverage our capital. Our primary use of funds will be
investments in portfolio companies and cash distributions to
holders of our common stock.
On July 17, 2006, our Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee nominated Mr. William J. Gremp, Jr., and our
Board of Directors accepted the nomination and elected
Mr. Gremp as a director of the Company with a term expiring
in 2007. Please see Management Board Of
Directors And Executive Officers for more information.
On June 14, 2006, we declared a fourth fiscal quarter (for
the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006) dividend of
$0.34 per share, payable on June 30, 2006, to
shareholders of record as of June 23, 2006. This dividend
marks an increase of $0.04 or 13.3% from the prior
quarters dividend of $0.30 per share, an increase of
$0.19 or 126.7% from the
year-over-year
prior quarters dividend of $0.15 per share, and the
seventh consecutive quarterly increase.
Since March 31, 2006, we have made investments totaling
$39.8 million, including investments in Charlevoix Energy
Trading, LLC; Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.; Central Illinois
Energy, LLC; Conquest Cherokee LLC; and Advantage Oilfield
Group, Ltd. We also received full payment on our loan to Natural
Gas Systems, Inc. of $5.0 million. We have also received a
prepayment premium of $375,000 and have realized $2.2 million in
our equity position in Natural Gas Systems, Inc. Our realized
annualized cash return on this investment is in excess of 60%,
which does not include the value of shares we still hold.
S-6
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
4,000,000 shares. |
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding prior to this offering |
|
7,069,873 shares. |
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding after this offering |
|
11,069,873 shares. |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect to use approximately $29.3 million of the net
proceeds of this offering to repay amounts outstanding under our
revolving credit facility. After such repayment, our revolving
credit facility will be fully available to fund additional
investments. We expect to use the remainder of the net proceeds
to fund investments from our investment pipeline. See Use
of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
PSEC |
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors in this prospectus supplement and
other information in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus for a discussion of factors you should
carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our
common stock. |
|
|
|
Current distribution rate |
|
On July 31, 2006 our Board of Directors declared a quarterly
dividend of $0.38 for the first fiscal quarter 2007, payable
September 29, 2006 to stockholders of record on
September 22, 2006. Our dividend is subject to change or
discontinuance at any time in the discretion of our Board of
Directors. Our future earnings and operating cash flow may not
be sufficient to support a dividend. |
S-7
Fees and
Expenses
The following tables are intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will
bear directly or indirectly. In these tables, we assume
borrowings of $30 million, the approximate amount currently
outstanding under our credit facility. Except where the context
suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus supplement contains
a reference to fees or expenses paid by you,
us or Prospect Energy, or that
we will pay fees or expenses, Prospect Energy will
pay such fees and expenses out of our net assets and,
consequently, you will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as
an investor in Prospect Energy. However, you will not be
required to deliver any money or otherwise bear personal
liability or responsibility for such fees or expenses.
Stockholder
Transaction Expenses:
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of
offering
price)(1)
|
|
5.50%
|
Offering expenses borne by us (as
a percentage of offering
price)(2)
|
|
0.87%
|
Dividend reinvestment plan
expenses(3)
|
|
|
Total stockholder transaction
expenses (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
6.37%
|
Annual
Expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common
stock):(4)
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
2.38%(5)
|
Incentive fees payable under
Investment Advisory Agreement (20% of realized capital gains and
20% of pre-incentive fee net investment income)
|
|
1.29%(6)
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
1.45%(7)
|
Other expenses
|
|
1.24%(8)
|
Total annual expenses (estimated)
|
|
6.36%(6)(8)(9)
|
Example:
The following table demonstrates the projected dollar amount of
cumulative expenses we would pay out of net assets and that you
would indirectly bear over various periods with respect to a
hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the
following expense amounts, we have assumed that our annual
operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the
table above and that we pay the stockholder transaction costs
shown in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
10 Years
|
|
|
You would pay the following
expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
While the table assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return
greater or less than 5%. The income incentive fee under the
Investment Advisory Agreement would be zero at the 5% annual
return assumption required by the SEC for this table, since no
incentive fee is paid until the annual return exceeds 7%.
However, we have reflected in the example the income incentive
fee currently earned as if the annual return were at the level
recently achieved, which is higher than 5%. Accordingly, the
resulting calculations overstate expenses at the 5% annual
return as these calculations do not reflect the provisions of
the Investment Advisory Agreement as it would actually be
applied in the case of a 5% annual return. This table assumes
that we will not realize any capital gains computed net of all
realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation in
any of the indicated time periods. If we achieve sufficient
returns on our investments, including through the realization of
capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount,
our expenses, and returns to our investors after such expenses,
would be higher. In addition, while the example assumes
reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset
value, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will
receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined by
dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to a
participant by the market price per share of our common stock at
the close of trading on the valuation date for the dividend. See
Dividend Reinvestment Plan for additional
information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
This example and the expenses in the table above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses. Actual
expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other
expenses) may be greater or less than those shown.
S-8
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The underwriting discount with respect to our common stock sold
in this offering, which is a one-time fee, is the only sales
load paid in connection with this offering. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The offering expenses of this offering are estimated to be
approximately $563,000. If the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option in full, the offering expenses borne by us
(as a percentage of the offering price) will be 0.76%. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in
other expenses. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Net assets attributable to our common stock equal net assets
(i.e., total assets less liabilities other than liabilities for
money borrowed for investment purposes) at March 31, 2006
as adjusted for the net proceeds of this offering. See
Capitalization. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Our base management fee is 2.00% of our gross assets (which
include any amount borrowed, i.e., total assets without
deduction for any liabilities). Assuming that we have borrowed
$30 million, the 2.00% management fee of gross assets
equals 2.38% of net assets. See Management
Investment Advisory Agreement in the accompanying
prospectus and footnote 7 below. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
We expect to invest all of the net proceeds from this offering
within 90 days of the date of the completion of the
offering and may have capital gains and interest income that
could result in the payment of an incentive fee to our
Investment Adviser in the first year after completion of this
offering. For a more detailed discussion of the calculation of
the two-part incentive fee, see Management
Investment Advisory Agreement in the accompanying
prospectus. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
We may borrow additional money before and after the proceeds of
this offering are substantially invested, but, in general, will
utilize debt to the maximum extent reasonably possible before
issuing equity. We currently have approximately $30 million
outstanding under our credit facility, which has a one year term
expiring July 19, 2007, subject to our lenders option
to extend the credit facility for an additional two years. For
more information, see Risk Factors Changes in
interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment
income below and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Condition, Liquidity and
Capital Resources, Capital Raising Activities in the
accompanying prospectus. The table above assumes that we have
borrowed $30 million under our credit facility, which is
the approximate amount currently outstanding. The table below
shows our estimated annual expenses as a percentage of net
assets attributable to common stock, assuming that we did not
borrow any money. |
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
2.02%
|
Incentive fees payable under
Investment Advisory Agreement (20% of realized capital gains and
20% of pre-incentive fee net investment income)
|
|
1.29%
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
1.24%
|
Total annual expense (estimated)
|
|
4.55%
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Other expense is based on an estimate of expenses
during the current fiscal year representing all of our estimated
recurring operating expenses (except fees and expenses reported
in other items of this table) that are deducted from our
operating income and reflected as expenses in our Statement of
Operations. The estimate of our overhead expenses, including
payments under the administration agreement, is based on our
projected allocable portion of overhead and other expenses
incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement. Other
expense does not include non-recurring expenses. See
Management Administration Agreement in
the accompanying prospectus. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Total annual expense as a percentage of net assets attributable
to our common stock are higher than the total annual expense
percentage would be for a company that is not leveraged. We
borrow money in order to leverage our net assets and increase
our total assets with a view to increasing shareholder returns.
The total annual expense percentage is required by the SEC to be
calculated as a percentage of net assets, rather than the total
assets, which includes assets that have been acquired with
borrowed funds. If the total annual expense percentage were
calculated as a percentage of total assets, our total annual
expense ratio would be 5.34% of total assets. |
S-9
SELECTED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
You should read the condensed financial and other data below
with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations included in the accompanying
prospectus. Financial information for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial
statements for that period. Quarterly financial information is
derived from unaudited financial data, which in the opinion of
management reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) that are necessary to present fairly the
results of such interim periods. Interim results for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending June 30, 2006. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations on page 25 of the accompanying prospectus
for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of operations
data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
4,569
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
Interest income, controlled entities
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Dividend income, controlled entities
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
Income incentive fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment advisory fees
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
Interest expense and credit
facility costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Administration costs
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
5,582
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation)
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
|
$
|
6,956
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted and basic
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data and other
information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,848
|
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
$
|
12,848
|
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
Total investments, net of unearned
income
|
|
|
93,866
|
|
|
|
85,361
|
|
|
|
104,241
|
|
|
|
85,361
|
|
|
|
104,241
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
96,927
|
|
|
|
104,602
|
|
|
|
96,927
|
|
|
|
104,602
|
|
NAV per share
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
Number of Portfolio Companies
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
S-10
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the
periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Per share
data(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of
period
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
Proceeds from initial public
offering
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to the initial public
offering
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share issuance related to dividend
reinvestment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of
period
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
Total return based on market
value(2)
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.46
|
)%
|
|
|
37.35
|
%
|
|
|
8.54
|
%
|
|
|
11.08
|
%
|
Total return based on net asset
value(2)
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
|
|
(6.88
|
)%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7,061,941
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7,061,941
|
|
Other data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in
thousands)
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
$
|
96,925
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
96,927
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating
expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of operating
income to average net assets
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
7.12
|
%
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
8.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights as of March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2005 are based on 7,061,941 shares and
7,055,100 shares outstanding, respectively. We issued
6,841 shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan on
March 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value calculates the total return
as a percentage for the period shown using the change in market
price per share from the opening to the ending market price per
share in each period assuming that dividends are reinvested in
accordance with Prospect Energys dividend reinvestment
plan. Total return based on net asset value calculates the total
return as a percentage for the period shown using the change in
net asset value per share from the opening to the ending net
asset value per share in each period assuming that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Energys dividend
reinvestment plan. The total return is not annualized. |
S-11
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus, before
you decide whether to make an investment in our common stock.
The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face. If any
of the adverse events or conditions described below occur, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected, our net asset value and the
trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could
lose all or part of your investment.
Our portfolio investments have not been valued by our
Board of Directors or independent valuation firm at
June 30, 2006, and our net asset value may have changed
significantly since our last independent valuation at
March 31, 2006.
Our Board of Directors determines the fair value of our
portfolio investments on a quarterly basis based on input from
our Investment Adviser, the audit committee of our Board of
Directors and a third party independent valuation firm. The last
such determination of fair value was as of March 31, 2006,
and, while the Board of Directors will review our net asset
value per share in connection with this offering, it will not
have the benefit of input from the independent valuation firm
when it does so. Moreover, our financial statements have not
been audited by our independent registered public accounting
firm since the period ended June 30, 2005. In the period
since the independent valuation firm last conducted an
evaluation of our investment portfolio, the fair value of
individual investments in our portfolio and the aggregate fair
value of our investments may have changed significantly.
Subsequent to completion of this offering, our audit committee
and Board of Directors expect to receive from the independent
valuation firm an analysis of the valuation of our investment
portfolio at June 30, 2006. Based in part on that analysis,
as well as the analysis performed by the Investment Adviser and
the Audit Committee, our Board of Directors will determine the
fair value of our investments at June 30, 2006. All of
these steps will occur after completion of this offering. If our
Board of Directors determines that the fair value of our
investment portfolio at June 30, 2006 was less than such
fair value at March 31, 2006, then we will record
unrealized loss on our investment portfolio and report a lower
net asset value per share than is reflected in the Selected
Condensed Financial Data and the financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus. If our board of directors determines that the fair
value of our investment portfolio at June 30, 2006 was
greater than such fair value at March 31, 2006, we will
record unrealized gain on our investment portfolio and report a
greater net asset value per share than so reflected elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Upon
publication of this information in connection with our
announcement of operating results for our fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006, the market price of our common stock may
fluctuate materially, and may be substantially less than the
price per share you pay for our common stock in this offering.
Potential writedowns or losses with respect to three
portfolio investments that are on our credit watch
list, or on other portfolio investments, existing and to
be made in the future could adversely affect our results of
operations, cash flows, dividend level, net asset value and
stock price.
As of the date of this prospectus supplement, loans we have made
to Unity Virginia Holdings LLC (Unity), Whymore Coal
Company (Whymore) and Worcester Energy Partners,
Inc. (Worcester) are on our credit watch
list due to existing or potential payment and existing or
potential covenant defaults under the contracts governing such
investments. Unity has filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition
under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code and is currently
in default under the contract governing the investment. Unity is
in the process of liquidating its assets. Our security interest
in Unitys assets is a second priority lien, and the net
proceeds from the sale or liquidation of Unitys assets may
not satisfy in full the debt owed to the holder of the first
priority lien on Unitys assets. Our lack of control over
the liquidation of Unitys assets, our second lien security
position in such assets and the prospect that Unitys
assets have substantially decreased in value could result in our
losing our entire investment in Unity. In addition, if the
bankruptcy court were to set aside as preferential payments or
we were otherwise deemed not to have recognized any amounts
previously paid to us by Unity, our net investment income could
be materially adversely affected. As of March 31, 2006,
Unity was valued at $3.5 million, which represented 3.4% of the
net asset value of the fund. Whymore and
S-12
Worcester have experienced liquidity problems, and the
Investment Adviser believes both portfolio companies could
continue to experience covenant
and/or
payment defaults under the contracts governing our investments
in those companies. We have provided, and may in the future
provide, additional capital to Whymore and Worcester to provide
liquidity to those portfolio companies, to enable them to pay
operating expenses, including debt service, and for capital
expenditures. While we have a first priority security interest
in the assets of both Whymore and Worcester, the net realizable
value of such collateral may be substantially less than the
balances outstanding on the loans to those entities. Moreover,
either of those portfolio companies may fail to pay principal
and/or interest on their outstanding debts to us. Upon further
analysis of the values of these investments, we could determine
that the fair value of these investments should be reduced
substantially, possibly to zero. If any of these events were to
occur, our results of operations and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected, our net asset value could be
substantially reduced, our dividend could be reduced or limited
and the market price for our stock could be substantially
adversely affected.
Risks
Relating To Our Business And Structure
We are
dependent upon Prospect Capital Managements key management
personnel for our future success.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business
contacts of the senior management of Prospect Capital
Management. We also depend, to a significant extent, on our
Investment Advisers access to the investment professionals
and the information and deal flow generated by these investment
professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio
management activities. For a description of the senior
management team, see Management. The senior
management team evaluates, negotiates, structures, closes,
monitors and services our investments. Our success depends to a
significant extent on the continued service of the senior
management team, particularly John F. Barry III and M. Grier
Eliasek. The departure of any of the senior managers of Prospect
Capital Management could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to achieve our investment objective. In addition, we can
offer no assurance that Prospect Capital Management will remain
our Investment Adviser or that we will continue to have access
to its investment professionals or its information and deal flow.
Our
Investment Adviser and its senior management have limited
experience managing a business development company under the
1940 Act.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of
business development companies. For example, business
development companies are required to invest at least 70% of
their total assets primarily in securities of privately held or
thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high
quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Our
Investment Advisers and its senior managements
limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such
constraints may hinder their ability to take advantage of
attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve
our investment objective. In addition, our investment strategies
differ in some ways from those of other investment funds that
have been managed in the past by our Investment Advisers
investment professionals.
We are
a relatively new company with limited operating
history.
We were incorporated in April 2004 and have conducted investment
operations since July 2004. We are subject to all of the
business risks and uncertainties associated with any new
business enterprise, including the risk that we may not achieve
our investment objective and that the value of your investment
in us could decline substantially or fall to zero. We completed
our initial public offering on July 27, 2004. As of
March 31, 2006, we continue to pursue our investment
strategy and 89.5% of our net assets were then invested in
energy companies, with the remainder invested in
U.S. government and money market securities. If we do not
realize yields in excess of our expenses, we may incur operating
losses and the market price of our shares may decline.
S-13
If our
primary investments are deemed not to be qualifying assets, we
could lose our status as a business development company or be
precluded from investing according to our current business
plan.
In order to maintain our status as a business development
company, we must not acquire any assets other than
qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after
giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total
assets are qualifying assets. If we acquire mezzanine loans or
dividend-paying equity securities from an issuer that has
outstanding marginable securities at the time we make an
investment, these acquired assets cannot be treated as
qualifying assets. See Regulation Qualifying
Assets in the accompanying prospectus. This result follows
the definition of eligible portfolio company under
the 1940 Act, which in part looks to whether a company has
outstanding marginable securities.
Amendments promulgated in 1998 by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System to Regulation T under the Exchange
Act expanded the definition of marginable security to include
any non-equity security. These amendments have raised questions
as to whether a private company that has outstanding debt
securities would qualify as an eligible portfolio company.
We believe that the mezzanine loans and equity instruments that
we have acquired and expect to continue to acquire should
constitute qualifying assets because the privately held
companies to which we lend do not, at the time of our
investment, have outstanding marginable securities. Until the
questions raised by the amendments to Regulation T have
been clarified through SEC rulemaking or addressed by
legislative, administrative or judicial action, we intend to
treat as qualifying assets only those mezzanine loans that are
not investment grade, do not have a public secondary market, and
are issued by a private issuer that does not have outstanding a
class of margin eligible securities at the time of our
investment. Likewise, we treat equity securities issued by a
portfolio company as qualifying assets only if such securities
are issued by a private company that has no marginable
securities outstanding at the time we purchase such securities.
To date, we do not believe that either the SEC or its staff has
taken any position with respect to our analysis of the issues
discussed above and neither the SEC or its staff has indicated
that they concur with our analysis. We intend to adjust our
investment focus as needed to comply with
and/or take
advantage of any future administrative position, judicial
decision or legislative action.
If there were a court ruling or regulatory decision that
conflicts with our interpretations, we could lose our status as
a business development company or be precluded from investing in
the manner described in this prospectus, either of which would
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. See
Regulations governing our operation as a
business development company affect our ability to raise, and
the way in which we raise, additional capital in the
accompanying prospectus. Such a ruling or decision also may
require that we dispose of investments that we made based on our
interpretation of Regulation T. Such dispositions could
have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders. We
may need to dispose of such investments quickly, which would
make it difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable
terms. In addition, because these types of investments will
generally be illiquid, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer
and, even if we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the
investments at a substantial loss. See The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business in the accompanying prospectus.
Our
financial condition and results of operations will depend on our
ability to manage our future growth effectively.
Prospect Capital Management has been registered as an investment
adviser since March 31, 2004, and Prospect Energy has been
organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004. As such, each entity is subject to the
business risks and uncertainties associated with any young
business enterprise, including the limited experience in
managing or operating a business development company under the
1940 Act. Our ability to achieve our investment objective
depends on our ability to grow, which depends, in turn, on our
Investment Advisers ability to continue to identify,
analyze, invest in and monitor companies that meet our
investment criteria. Accomplishing this result on a
cost-effective basis is largely a function of our Investment
Advisers structuring of investments, its ability to
provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and
our access to financing on acceptable terms. As we grow, we and
Prospect Capital
S-14
Management need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage
new employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities.
A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of
investments that we make in middle market energy companies. We
compete with other business development companies, public and
private funds, commercial and investment banks and commercial
financing companies. Additionally, because competition for
investment opportunities generally has increased among
alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those
entities have begun to invest in areas in which they have not
traditionally invested, including investments in middle-market
companies. As a result of these new entrants, competition for
investment opportunities in middle-market companies has
intensified, and we expect that trend to continue. Many of our
existing and potential competitors are substantially larger and
have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a
lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not
available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have
higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which
could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and
establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our
competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that
the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We
cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will
not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of
existing and increasing competition, we may not be able to take
advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to
time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to
identify and make investments that are consistent with our
investment objective.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates
that we offer. We believe that some of our competitors make
loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than
the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we
do not match our competitors pricing, terms and structure.
If we match our competitors pricing, terms and structure,
we may experience decreased net interest income and increased
risk of credit loss.
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company affect
our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional
capital.
We may issue debt securities or preferred stock
and/or
borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which
we refer to collectively as senior securities, up to
the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the
provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business
development company, to issue senior securities only in amounts
such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals
at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the
value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this
test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of
our investments or sell additional shares of common stock and,
depending on the nature of our leverage, to repay a portion of
our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be
disadvantageous. In addition, issuance of additional securities
could dilute the percentage ownership of our current
stockholders in us.
As a business development company regulated under provisions of
the 1940 Act, we are not generally able to issue and sell our
common stock at a price below the current net asset value per
share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants,
options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below
the current net asset value of our common stock in a rights
offering to our stockholders or; if (1) our Board of
Directors determines that such sale is in the Companys
best interests and our stockholders, (2) our stockholders
approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less
than the current net asset value, and (3) the price at
which our common stock is to be issued and sold may not be less
than a price which, in the determination of our Board of
Directors, closely approximates the market value of such
securities (less any sales load).
In addition, we may in the future seek to securitize our loans
to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize
loans, we may create a wholly owned subsidiary and contribute a
pool of loans to
S-15
such subsidiary. This could include the sale of interests in the
subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers who we would
expect to be willing to accept a lower interest rate to invest
in investment grade loan pools. We would retain a portion of the
equity in the securitized pool of loans. An inability to
successfully securitize our loan portfolio could limit our
ability to grow our business and fully execute our business
strategy, and could decrease our earnings, if any. Moreover, the
successful securitization of our loan portfolio might expose us
to losses because the residual loans in which we do not sell
interests may tend to be those that are riskier and more likely
to generate losses.
If we
fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level
taxes on our income and our income available for distribution
would be reduced.
To maintain our qualification as a RIC under the Code, and
obtain RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain source of income,
asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. The
annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we
distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net
short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis.
Because we expect to use debt financing in the future, we are
subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the
1940 Act and financial covenants that could, under certain
circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary
to qualify for RIC tax treatment. If we are unable to obtain
cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax
treatment and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income
tax. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must also meet
certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each
calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our
having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to
prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments
are in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at
disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If
we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason or become subject to
corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could
substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income
available for distribution, and the actual amount of our
distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse
effect on us and our shares. For additional information
regarding asset coverage ratio and RIC requirements, see
Regulation Senior securities and
Material U.S. federal income tax considerations.
We may
have difficulty paying our required distributions if we
recognize income before or without receiving cash representing
such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain
amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original
issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in
connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other
circumstances, or
payment-in-kind
interest, which represents contractual interest added to the
loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original
issue discount, which could be significant relative to our
overall investment activities, or increases in loan balances as
a result of
payment-in-kind
arrangements, are included in our income before we receive any
corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include
in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash.
While we focus primarily on investments that will generate a
current cash return, our investment portfolio may also include
securities that do not pay some or all of their return in
periodic current cash distributions.
The income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on
income that may include interest that has been accrued but not
yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan
that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible
that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the
income incentive fee will become uncollectible.
Since in some cases we may recognize taxable income before or
without receiving cash representing such income, we may have
difficulty meeting the requirement to distribute at least 90% of
our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in
excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to
maintain RIC tax treatment. Accordingly, we may have to sell
some of our investments at times we would not consider
advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce
new investment originations to meet these distribution
requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other
sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC treatment and thus
become subject to corporate-level income tax. See Material
U.S. federal income tax considerations Taxation
as a RIC in the accompanying prospectus.
S-16
If we
issue senior securities, including debt, you will be exposed to
additional risks, including the typical risks associated with
leverage.
|
|
|
|
|
You will be exposed to increased risk of loss if we incur debt
to make investments. If we do incur debt, a decrease in the
value of our investments or in our revenues would have a greater
negative impact on the value of our common stock than if we did
not use debt.
|
|
|
|
Our ability to pay dividends would be restricted if our asset
coverage ratio were not at least 200% and any amounts that we
use to service our indebtedness would not be available for
dividends to our common stockholders.
|
|
|
|
It is likely that any debt we incur will be governed by an
indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting
our operating flexibility.
|
|
|
|
We and you will bear the cost of issuing and servicing our
senior securities.
|
|
|
|
Any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the
future may have rights, preferences and privileges more
favorable than those of our common stock.
|
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
We expect that a significant portion of our debt investments
will bear interest at fixed rates and the value of these
investments could be negatively affected by increases in market
interest rates. In addition, an increase in interest rates would
make it more expensive to use debt to finance our investments.
As a result, a significant increase in market interest rates
could both reduce the value of our portfolio investments and
increase our cost of capital, which would reduce our net
investment income.
We
need to raise additional capital to grow because we must
distribute most of our income.
We need additional capital to repay borrowings under our
revolving credit facility and to fund new investments. A
reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our
ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary
income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of
realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our
shareholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, such
earnings are not available to fund investment originations. We
have sought additional capital by borrowing from financial
institutions and may issue debt securities or additional equity
securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from
other sources to fund our investments, it could limit our
ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value
of our common stock. In addition, as a business development
company, we are generally required to maintain a ratio of at
least 200% of total assets to total borrowings, which may
restrict our ability to borrow in certain circumstances.
Most
of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a
result, there is uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
A large percentage of our portfolio investments consist of
securities of privately held or thinly traded public companies.
The fair value of these securities is often not readily
determinable. The determination of fair value, and thus the
amount of unrealized gains or losses we may incur in any year,
is to a degree subjective, and the Investment Advisor has a
conflict of interest in making the determination. We value these
securities quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith
by our Board of Directors based on input from our Investment
Adviser, a third party independent valuation firm and our audit
committee. Our Board of Directors utilizes the services of an
independent valuation firm to assist in determining the fair
value of any securities. Certain factors that may be considered
in determining the fair value of our investments include the
nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio
companys earnings, cash flows and ability to make
payments, the markets in which the portfolio company does
business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted
cash flow and other relevant factors. Because such valuations,
and particularly valuations of private securities and private
companies, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may
fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on
estimates the assumptions underlying which are erroneous. The
determinations of fair value by our Board of Directors may
differ materially from the values that would
S-17
have been used if a ready market for these securities existed.
Our net asset value could be adversely affected if the
determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were
materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize
upon the disposal of such securities.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We generally make investments in private companies.
Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and
other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than
publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments
may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the
need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or
a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly
less than the value at which we have previously recorded our
investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our
ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the
extent that we or our Investment Adviser has material non-public
information regarding such portfolio company.
We may
experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to a number of factors, including the interest or
dividend rates payable on the debt or equity securities we
acquire, the default rate on debt securities, the level of our
expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of
realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we
encounter competition in our markets, the seasonality of the
energy industry, weather patterns, world events, changes in
energy prices and general economic conditions. Several of these
factors are outside our control. As a result of these factors,
results for any period should not be relied upon as being
indicative of performance in future periods.
Potential
conflicts of interest could impact our investment
returns.
Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers
of our Investment Adviser may serve as officers, directors or
principals of entities that operate in the same or related lines
of business as we do or of investment funds managed by our
affiliates. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors
in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the
best interests of us or our stockholders. It is possible that
new investment opportunities that meet our investment objective
may come to the attention of one these entities in connection
with another investment advisory client or program, and, if so,
such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made
available, to us. However, as an investment adviser, Prospect
Capital Management has a fiduciary obligation to act in the best
interests of its clients, including us. To that end, if Prospect
Capital Management or its affiliates manage any additional
investment vehicles or client accounts in the future, Prospect
Capital Management will endeavor to allocate investment
opportunities in a fair and equitable manner over time so as not
to discriminate unfairly against any client. If Prospect Capital
Management chooses to establish another investment fund in the
future, when the investment professionals of Prospect Capital
Management identify an investment, they will have to choose
which investment fund should make the investment.
In the course of our investing activities, under the Investment
Advisory Agreement we pay base management and incentive fees to
Prospect Capital Management, and reimburse Prospect Capital
Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a result of the
Investment Advisory Agreement, there may be times when the
management team of Prospect Capital Management has interests
that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a
conflict.
Prospect Capital Management receives a quarterly income
incentive fee based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net
investment income, if any, for the immediately preceding
calendar quarter. This income incentive fee is subject to a
quarterly hurdle rate before providing an income incentive fee
return to the Investment Adviser. To the extent we or Prospect
Capital Management are able to exert influence over our
portfolio companies, the income incentive fee may provide
Prospect Capital Management with an incentive to induce our
portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other
obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another. If
our Investment Adviser terminates its voluntary agreement to
have the income incentive fee be subject to a fluctuating hurdle
rate, the hurdle rate would be fixed. Thus, if interest rates
rise,
S-18
it would become easier for our investment income to exceed the
hurdle rate and, as a result, more likely that our Investment
Adviser will receive an income incentive fee than if interest
rates on our investments remained constant or decreased. Subject
to the receipt of any requisite shareholder approval under the
1940 Act, our Board of Directors may readjust the hurdle rate by
amending the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The income incentive fee payable by Prospect Energy is computed
and paid on income that may include interest that has been
accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company
defaults on a loan that has a deferred interest feature, it is
possible that interest accrued under such loan that has
previously been included in the calculation of the income
incentive fee will become uncollectible. If this happens, our
Investment Adviser is not required to reimburse us for any such
income incentive fee payments. If we do not have sufficient
liquid assets to pay this incentive fee or distributions to
stockholders on such accrued income, we may be required to
liquidate assets in order to do so. This fee structure could
give rise to a conflict of interest for our Investment Adviser
to the extent that it may encourage the Investment Adviser to
favor debt financings that provide for deferred interest, rather
than current cash payments of interest. In addition, the amount
of the Investment Advisers compensation under the
incentive fee, is due, in part to the amount of unrealized
depreciation accrued by the Company.
We have entered into a royalty-free license agreement with
Prospect Capital Management. Under this agreement, Prospect
Capital Management agrees to grant us a non-exclusive license to
use the name Prospect Energy. Under the license
agreement, we have the right to use the Prospect
Energy name for so long as Prospect Capital Management or
one of its affiliates remains our Investment Adviser. In
addition, we rent office space from Prospect Administration, an
affiliate of Prospect Capital Management, and pay Prospect
Administration our allocable portion of overhead and other
expenses incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations as Administrator under the administration agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our
chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their
respective staffs. This may create conflicts of interest that
our Board of Directors monitors.
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely
affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws
at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and
regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed
from time to time. Accordingly, changes in these laws or
regulations could have a material adverse effect on our
business. For additional information regarding the regulations
we are subject to, see Regulation in the
accompanying prospectus.
We may
not be able to find an appropriate replacement chief compliance
officer in the timeframe allotted by William E.
Vastardis.
William E. Vastardis has resigned as chief compliance officer of
Prospect Energy with a target effective date of July 31,
2006. Although Mr. Vastardis has stated he will continue
for some time after July 31, 2006, there is a risk that the
chief compliance officer position will remain vacant for a
period of time if we do not find an appropriate chief compliance
officer who will replace Mr. Vastardis. Mr. Vastardis will
remain our chief financial officer.
Risks
Related To Our Investments
We may
not realize gains or income from our investments.
We seek to generate both current income and capital
appreciation. However, the securities we invest in may not
appreciate and, in fact, may decline in value, and the issuers
of debt securities we invest in may default on interest
and/or
principal payments. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize
gains from our investments, and any gains that we do realize may
not be sufficient to offset any losses we experience.
S-19
Our
portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of portfolio
companies in the energy industry, which subjects us to a risk of
significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its
obligations under any of the securities that we hold or if the
energy industry experiences a downturn.
As of July 28, 2006, we held investments in 15 portfolio
companies. A consequence of this lack of diversification is that
the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely
affected if a small number of such investments perform poorly or
if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond
our income tax diversification requirements, we do not have
fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments are
concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. We estimate
that, once we have invested substantially all of the net
proceeds of this offering and fully utilized our credit
facility, we will have invested in approximately 25 to 35
portfolio companies, depending on the availability of
appropriate investment opportunities consistent with our
investment objective and market conditions. In addition, we
concentrate on making investments in the energy industry and
will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the
value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings
for investment purposes) in energy companies. As a result, a
downturn in the energy industry could materially adversely
affect us.
The
energy industry is subject to many risks.
We concentrate our investments in the energy industry. Our
definition of energy, as used in the context of the energy
industry, is broad, and different sectors of the energy industry
may be subject to various risks and economic pressures. As a
result, it is difficult to anticipate the impact of changing
economic and political conditions on our portfolio companies
and, as a result, our financial results. The revenues, income
(or losses) and valuations of energy companies can fluctuate
suddenly and dramatically due to any one or more of the
following factors, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Risk. While we generally do
not invest in companies that accept completely unhedged
commodity risk, energy companies in general are directly
affected by energy commodity prices, such as the market prices
of crude oil, natural gas and wholesale electricity, especially
for those who own the underlying energy commodity. In addition,
the volatility of commodity prices can affect other energy
companies due to the impact of prices on the volume of
commodities transported, processed, stored or distributed and on
the cost of fuel for power generation companies. The volatility
of commodity prices can also affect energy companies
ability to access the capital markets in light of market
perception that their performance may be directly tied to
commodity prices. Historically, energy commodity prices have
been cyclical and exhibited significant volatility. Currently,
crude oil prices are near record high levels. Although we
require adherence to strict risk controls, including appropriate
commodity and other hedges, by each of our portfolio companies,
some of our portfolio companies may not engage in hedging
transactions to minimize their exposure to commodity price risk.
For those companies that engage in such hedging transactions,
they remain subject to market risks, including market liquidity
and counterparty creditworthiness.
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Risk. The profitability of energy
companies could be adversely affected by changes in the
regulatory environment. The businesses of energy companies are
heavily regulated by federal, state and local governments in
diverse manners, such as the way in which energy assets are
constructed, maintained and operated and the prices energy
companies may charge for their products and services. Such
regulation can change over time in scope and intensity. For
example, a particular by-product of an energy process may be
declared hazardous by a regulatory agency, which can
unexpectedly increase production costs. Moreover, many state and
federal environmental laws provide for civil and criminal
penalties as well as regulatory remediation, thus adding to the
potential liability an energy company and its officers may face.
In addition, the deregulation of energy markets and the
unresolved regulatory issues related to some power markets such
as California create uncertainty in the regulatory environment
as rules and regulations may be adopted on a transitional basis.
We cannot assure you that the deregulation of energy markets
will continue and if it continues, whether its impact on energy
companies profitability will be positive.
|
S-20
|
|
|
|
|
Production Risk. The profitability of energy
companies may be materially impacted by the volume of crude oil,
natural gas or other energy commodities available for
transporting, processing, storing, distributing or power
generation. A significant decrease in the production of natural
gas, crude oil, coal or other energy commodities, due to the
decline of production from existing facilities, import supply
disruption, depressed commodity prices, political events, OPEC
actions or otherwise, could reduce revenue and operating income
or increase operating costs of energy companies and, therefore,
their ability to pay debt or dividends. In recent months, OPEC
has announced changes in production quotas in response to
changing market conditions, including near record high oil
prices in the United States.
|
|
|
|
Demand Risk. A sustained decline in demand for
crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products and
electricity could materially affect revenues and cash flows of
energy companies. Factors that could lead to a decrease in
market demand include a recession or other adverse economic
conditions, an increase in the market price of the underlying
commodity, higher taxes or other regulatory actions that
increase costs, or a shift in consumer demand for such products.
|
|
|
|
Depletion and Exploration Risk. A portion of
any one energy companys assets may be dedicated to natural
gas, crude oil
and/or coal
reserves and other commodities that naturally deplete over time.
Depletion could have a material adverse impact on such
companys ability to maintain its revenue. Further,
estimates of energy reserves may not be accurate and, even if
accurate, reserves may not be fully utilized at reasonable
costs. Exploration of energy resources, especially of oil and
gas, is inherently risky and requires large amounts of capital.
|
|
|
|
Weather Risk. Unseasonable extreme weather
patterns could result in significant volatility in demand for
energy and power. This volatility may create fluctuations in
earnings of energy companies.
|
|
|
|
Operational Risk. Energy companies are subject
to various operational risks, such as failed drilling or well
development, unscheduled outages, underestimated cost
projections, unanticipated operation and maintenance expenses,
failure to obtain the necessary permits to operate and failure
of third-party contractors (for example, energy producers and
shippers) to perform their contractual obligations. In addition,
energy companies employ a variety of means of increasing cash
flow, including increasing utilization of existing facilities,
expanding operations through new construction, expanding
operations through acquisitions, or securing additional
long-term contracts. Thus, some energy companies may be subject
to construction risk, acquisition risk or other risk factors
arising from their specific business strategies.
|
|
|
|
Competition Risk. The progress in deregulating
energy markets has created more competition in the energy
industry. This competition is reflected in risks associated with
marketing and selling energy in the evolving energy market and a
competitors development of a lower-cost energy or power
source, or of a lower cost means of operations, and other risks
arising from competition.
|
|
|
|
Valuation Risk. Since mid-2001, excess power
generation capacity in certain regions of the United States has
caused substantial decreases in the market capitalization of
many energy companies. While such prices have recovered to some
extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market
capitalization will not recur, or that any future decreases in
energy company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in
nature.
|
|
|
|
Terrorism Risk. Since the
September 11th attacks, the United States government
has issued public warnings indicating that energy assets,
specifically those related to pipeline infrastructure,
production facilities and transmission and distribution
facilities, might be specific targets of terrorist activity. The
continued threat of terrorism and related military activity will
likely increase volatility for prices of natural gas and oil and
could affect the market for products and services of energy
companies. In addition, any future terrorist attack or armed
conflict in the United States or elsewhere may undermine
economic conditions in the United States in general.
|
|
|
|
Financing Risk. Some of our portfolio
companies rely on the capital markets to raise money to pay
their existing obligations. Their ability to access the capital
markets on attractive terms or at all may be affected by any of
the risks associated with energy companies described above, by
general economic
|
S-21
|
|
|
|
|
and market conditions or by other factors. This may in turn
affect their ability to satisfy their obligations with us.
|
Our
investments in prospective portfolio companies may be risky, and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
We invest in companies in the energy industry, most of which
have relatively short or no operating histories. These companies
are and will continue to be subject to all of the risks and
uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise,
including the risk that these companies may not reach their
investment objective and the value of our investment in them may
decline substantially or fall to zero.
In addition, investment in the middle market energy companies
that we are targeting involves a number of other significant
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
these companies may have limited financial resources and may be
unable to meet their obligations under their securities that we
hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value
of their equity securities or of any collateral with respect to
debt securities and a reduction in the likelihood of our
realizing on any guarantees we may have obtained in connection
with our investment;
|
|
|
|
they may have shorter operating histories, narrower product
lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which
tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions
and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;
|
|
|
|
because many of these companies are privately held companies,
public information is generally not available about these
companies. As a result, we will depend on the ability of our
Investment Adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate
these companies in making investment decisions. If our
Investment Adviser is unable to uncover all material information
about these companies, it may not make a fully informed
investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments;
|
|
|
|
they are more likely to depend on the management talents and
efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death,
disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these
persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio
company and, in turn, on us; and
|
|
|
|
they may have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in changing
businesses with products subject to a risk of obsolescence and
may require substantial additional capital to support their
operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive
position. In addition, our executive officers, directors and our
Investment Adviser could, in the ordinary course of business, be
named as defendants in litigation arising from proposed
investments or from our investments in the portfolio companies.
|
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and
harm our operating results.
Our portfolio companies will generally be affected by the
conditions and overall strength of the national, regional and
local economies, including interest rate fluctuations, changes
in the capital markets and changes in the prices of their
primary commodities and products. These factors also impact the
amount of residential, industrial and commercial growth in the
energy industry. Additionally, these factors could adversely
impact the customer base and customer collections of our
portfolio companies.
As a result, many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible
to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay
our loans or meet other obligations during these periods.
Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase, and
the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease, during these
periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value
of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our
equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead
to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues,
net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also
could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the
capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend
credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing
investments and harm our operating results.
S-22
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or
operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to
defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio
companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or
equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the
extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate
new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial
covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if
one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though
we may have structured our interest as senior debt or preferred
equity, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the
extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to
that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize
our debt or equity holding and subordinate all or a portion of
our claim to those of other creditors.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities
that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such
companies.
We invest primarily in mezzanine debt and dividend-paying equity
securities issued by our portfolio companies. Our portfolio
companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other
debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with,
or senior to, the securities in which we invest. By their terms,
such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to
receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before
the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in
respect of the securities in which we invest. Also, in the event
of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking
senior to our investment in that portfolio company would
typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we
receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After
repaying the senior security holders, the portfolio company may
not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation
to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with securities
in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any
distributions with other security holders in the event of an
insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we
may not be in a position to control any portfolio company in
which we invest. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a
portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions
with which we disagree and the management of such company, as
representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take
risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests
as debt or preferred equity investors.
We may
not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral
securing our debt investments.
Although a substantial amount of our debt investments are
protected by holding security interests in the assets of the
portfolio companies, we may not be able to fully realize the
value of the collateral securing our investments due to one or
more of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
since our debt investments are primarily made in the form of
mezzanine loans, our liens on the collateral, if any, are
subordinated to those of the senior secured debt of the
portfolio companies, if any. As a result, we may not be able to
control remedies with respect to the collateral;
|
|
|
|
the collateral may not be valuable enough to satisfy all of the
obligations under our secured loan, particularly after giving
effect to the repayment of secured debt of the portfolio company
that ranks senior to our loan;
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy laws may limit our ability to realize value from the
collateral and may delay the realization process;
|
|
|
|
our rights in the collateral may be adversely affected by the
failure to perfect security interests in the collateral;
|
|
|
|
how effectively the collateral would be liquidated and the value
received could be impaired or impeded by the need to obtain
regulatory and contractual consents; and
|
|
|
|
by its nature, some or all of the collateral may be illiquid and
may have no readily ascertainable market value. The liquidity
and value of the collateral could be impaired as a result of
changing economic conditions, competition, and other factors,
including the availability of suitable buyers.
|
S-23
Our
incentive fee could induce Prospect Capital Management to make
speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
may create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to make
investments on our behalf that are more speculative or involve
more risk than would be the case in the absence of such
compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee
payable is determined (calculated as a percentage of the return
on invested capital) may encourage the Investment Adviser to use
leverage to increase the return on our investments. The use of
leverage would increase the likelihood of default, which would
disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because the
Investment Adviser will receive an incentive fee based, in part,
upon net capital gains realized on our investments, the
Investment Adviser may invest more than would otherwise be
appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield
capital gains, as compared to income producing securities. Such
a practice could result in our investing in more speculative
securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result
in higher investment losses, particularly during economic
downturns.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
also could create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to
invest on our behalf in instruments, such as zero coupon bonds,
that have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments,
we would accrue interest income over the life of the investment
but would not receive payments in cash on the investment until
the end of the term. Our net investment income used to calculate
the income incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest.
For example, accrued interest, if any, on our investments in
zero coupon bonds will be included in the calculation of our
incentive fee, even though we will not receive any cash interest
payments in respect of payment on the bond until its maturity
date. Thus, a portion of this incentive fee would be based on
income that we may not have yet received in cash.
We
have not yet identified all of the potential investments for our
portfolio.
We have not yet identified all of the potential investments for
our portfolio, and, thus, you will not be able to evaluate all
of our potential investments prior to purchasing our common
stock. This factor will increase the uncertainty, and thus the
risk, of investing in our common stock.
Our
investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks
in addition to the risks inherent in
U.S. investments.
Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in
securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies
may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with
investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in
exchange control regulations, political and social instability,
expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets
and less available information than is generally the case in the
United States, higher transaction costs, less government
supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed
bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual
obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards
and greater price volatility.
Although currently all of our investments are, and we expect
that most of our investments will be,
U.S. dollar-denominated, our investments that are
denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk
that the value of a particular currency will change in relation
to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may
affect currency values are trade balances, the level of
short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of
similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities
for investment and capital appreciation, and political
developments.
We may
employ hedging techniques to mitigate certain risks, but it may
not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against such
risks.
We may employ hedging techniques to minimize currency or
interest rate risks, but we can offer no assurance that such
strategies will be effective. If we engage in hedging
transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with
such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward
contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps,
collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the
relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in
currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Hedging
S-24
against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does
not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of
such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions
decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions
designed to gain from those same developments, thereby
offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions.
Such hedging transaction may also limit the opportunity for gain
if the values of the portfolio positions should increase.
Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange
rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally
anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging
transaction at an acceptable price.
The success of our hedging transactions depends on our ability
to correctly predict movements, currencies and interest rates.
Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to
reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks,
unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest
rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than
if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. The
degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments
used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio
positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of
reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation
between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings
being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from
achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In
addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly
against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities
denominated in
non-U.S. currencies.
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
Because we borrow money to make investments, our net investment
income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at
which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these
funds. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant
change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse
effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising
interest rates, our cost of borrowed funds would increase, which
would reduce our net investment income. We use a combination of
short-term borrowings and equity capital to finance our
investing activities. We utilize our revolving line of credit as
a means to bridge to long-term financing. These risks are in
addition to risks associated with fluctuating interest rates,
which can adversely affect the interest income we are owed and
that we must pay, in addition to the ability of portfolio
companies to pay us, and our ability to pay our debt service and
dividends, which could adversely affect us and our stock price.
We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort
to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such
techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities
to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act.
Risks
Relating To Our Common Stock
There
is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our
dividends may not grow over time.
We have made and intend to continue to make distributions on a
quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will
achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will
allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or
year-to-year
increases in cash distributions. In addition, due to the asset
coverage test applicable to us as a business development
company, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions.
See Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions in
this prospectus supplement and Distributions in the
accompanying prospectus.
Provisions
of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and
bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact
on the price of our common stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws
contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging,
delaying or making more difficult a change in control and
preventing the removal of incumbent directors. We are covered by
the Maryland Business Combination Act (the Business
Combination Act) to the extent such statute is not
superseded by applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. However,
our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution exempting any
business combination between us and any other person from the
Business Combination Act, subject to prior approval of such
business combination by our Board of Directors, including a
majority of our directors who are not interested persons as
defined in the 1940
S-25
Act. In addition, the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act
(the Control Share Act) provides that control shares
of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the
Control Share Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our
shares of stock. If the applicable board resolution is repealed
or our Board of Directors does not otherwise approve a business
combination, the Business Combination Act and the Control Share
Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to that Act) may
discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and
increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Additionally, under our charter, our Board of Directors is
divided into three classes serving staggered terms and no
director may be removed except for cause and upon vote of
stockholders holding
662/3%
of the shares of common stock entitled to vote on the election
of directors. The inability to remove directors and the
maintenance of a staggered board could discourage others from
pursuing a merger or other
change-of-control
transaction. Our Board of Directors may, without stockholder
action, authorize the issuance of shares of stock in one or more
classes or series, including preferred stock; and our Board of
Directors may, without stockholder action, amend our charter to
increase the number of shares of stock of any class or series
that we have authority to issue. The existence of these
provisions, among others, may have a negative impact on the
price of our common stock and may discourage third party bids
for ownership of our Company. These provisions may prevent any
premiums being offered to you for shares of our common stock.
Investing
in our common stocks may involve a high degree of
risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment
objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative
investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our
investments in portfolio companies may be speculative and
aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not
be suitable for someone with low risk tolerance.
The
market price of our common stock may fluctuate
significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for our common
stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of
which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to
our operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of business development companies or other companies
in the energy industry, which are not necessarily related to the
operating performance of these companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly
with respect to RICs or business development companies;
|
|
|
|
loss of RIC status;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Prospect
Capital Management, or departure of one or more of Prospect
Capital Managements key personnel;
|
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
changes in prevailing interest rates;
|
|
|
|
litigation matters;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors; and
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source.
|
S-26
We may
allocate the net proceeds from any offering in ways with which
you may not agree.
We will have significant flexibility in investing the net
proceeds of any offering of our common stock. We may use the net
proceeds from the offering in ways with which you may not agree
or for investments other than those contemplated at the time of
the offering, unless such change in the use of proceeds is
subject to stockholders approval or prohibited by law.
Sales
of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market
may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common
stock.
As of July 19, 2006, we have 7,069,873 shares of
common stock outstanding and will have over 11 million shares
outstanding after this offering. Sales of substantial amounts of
our common stock or the availability of such common stock for
sale could adversely affect the prevailing market price for our
common stock. If this occurs and continues, it could impair our
ability to raise additional capital through the sale of common
stock should we desire to do so.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus supplement contains forward-looking statements
that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These
forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather
are based on current expectations, estimates and projections
about our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such
as anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, and estimates and variations of
these words and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties,
and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and
difficult to predict and which could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements, including the risks, uncertainties
and other factors we identify in Risk Factors in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and
in our filings with the SEC.
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these
forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of
those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result,
the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also
could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability
to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and
levels of profitability and the availability of additional
capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the
inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this
prospectus supplement should not be regarded as a representation
by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those
described or identified in Risk Factors in this
prospectus supplement and Risk Factors in the
accompanying prospectus. You should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the
date of this prospectus supplement.
S-27
PORTFOLIO
COMPANIES
The following is a listing of our portfolio companies at
June 30, 2006. Equity values are as of March 31, 2006.
For any investments made after March 31, 2006, we have
reflected investments at original cost.
The portfolio companies are presented in three categories.
Companies more than 25% owned are portfolio
companies in which we directly or indirectly own more than 25%
of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company
and, therefore, are presumed to be controlled by us under the
1940 Act. Companies owned 5% to 25% are portfolio
companies where we directly or indirectly own 5% to 25% of the
outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company
and/or hold
one or more seats on the portfolio companys Board of
Directors and, therefore, are deemed to be an affiliated person
under the 1940 Act. Companies less than 5% owned are
portfolio companies where we directly or indirectly own less
than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio
company and where we have no other affiliations with such
portfolio company. As of June 30, 2006, we owned 100% of
the fully diluted common equity of Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.,
and 51% of the fully diluted common equity of Worcester Energy
Partners, Inc. and certain of its affiliates and therefore have
a controlling interest in each case. Excluding intermediary
wholly owned holding companies, we have no other controlled or
affiliated investments (although we are in discussions with
Whymore Coal Company about assuming a controlling interest in
that company). We make available significant managerial
assistance to our portfolio companies. We generally request and
may receive rights to observe the meetings of our portfolio
companies Boards of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Principal
|
Name of Portfolio
|
|
Principal
|
|
of Securities
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Investment
|
|
Securities
|
|
Balance of
|
Company
|
|
Business (Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Held
|
|
Structure
|
|
Held
|
|
all Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25%
owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Gas gathering and processing (Texas)
|
|
Subordinated secured debt and
common equity
|
|
Second priority lien on
substantially all assets, subject to first priority lien of
senior lender, Citibank Texas, N.A.
|
|
Common shares;
Subordinated secured note, 18.00% due 12/22/2011
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
$
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Partners,
Inc.
|
|
Wood processing and biomass power
generation (Maine)
|
|
Senior secured debt convertible
preferred stock and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares;
Preferred stock, convertible, Series A;
Senior secured note, 12.50% due 12/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies 5% to 25%
owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Coiled tubing and pressure pumping
services (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt financing with
warrants for common and preferred
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring
7/19/2012;
Warrants, preferred shares, expiring 7/19/2012;
Senior secured note. 13.00% due 6/15/2009
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC
|
|
Energy construction services (West
Virginia)
|
|
Senior secured debt, preferred
equity with penny warrants
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Preferred shares;
Warrants, preferred shares, expiring 2/14/2016;
Warrants, common shares, expiring 2/14/2016;
Senior secured note, 14.00% due 2/14/2011
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Coiled tubing services (Alberta,
Canada)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common stock
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares;
Senior secured note, 15.00% due 4/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group, Ltd.
|
|
Pipeline and facility construction
(Alberta, Canada)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common stock
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares;
Senior secured note, 15.00% due 5/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies less than 5%
owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Oil and gas production (Tennessee)
|
|
Senior secured debt and warrants
|
|
N/A loan repaid
|
|
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010;
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal Company
|
|
Coal production (Kentucky)
|
|
Senior secured debt and preferred
equity
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Preferred shares, convertible,
Series A;
Senior secured note, 16.31% due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
S-28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Principal
|
Name of Portfolio
|
|
Principal
|
|
of Securities
|
|
Collateral
|
|
Investment
|
|
Securities
|
|
Balance of
|
Company
|
|
Business (Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Held
|
|
Structure
|
|
Held
|
|
all Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Ohio)
|
|
Common shares, preferred shares and
senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares, Class A;
Preferred shares, Class B;
Senior secured note, 14.12% due 4/8/2010
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.
|
|
Oil and gas production (Texas)
|
|
Registered and unregistered common
stock
|
|
N/A loan repaid
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings LLC
|
|
Coal mining (Virginia)
|
|
Secured subordinated debt
|
|
Second priority lien on
substantially all assets, subject to first priority lien of
senior lender, PlainsCapital Bank
|
|
Subordinated secured note, due
1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis Coal Company, LLC
|
|
Coal production (Kentucky)
|
|
Senior secured debt and preferred
equity
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets including equipment, although
Prospects lien on certain equipment is second to $600K
loan by First Tennessee Bank
|
|
Warrants, preferred shares,
expiring 1/31/2016;
Senior secured note, 15.86% due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC
|
|
Natural gas marketing (Michigan)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Net profits royalty interest,
10%;
Senior secured note, 12.5% due 3/31/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC
|
|
Ethanol (Illinois)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, LIBOR + 10%
due 3/31/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Tennessee)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Overriding royalty interest,
5-10%;
Senior secured note, 13.00% due 5/5/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have loaned Worcester Energy Partners, Inc. an additional
$3.7 million since March 31, 2006. The outstanding principal
balance of all loans to Worcester Energy Partners, Inc. was
$13.3 million at March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Since March 31, 2006 Natural Gas Systems, Inc. has repaid all
loan balances. The outstanding principal balance of loans to
Natural Gas Systems, Inc. was $4.7 million at March 31, 2006. |
S-29
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
We have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly
dividends to our stockholders out of assets legally available
for distribution. Our dividends, if any, will be determined by
our Board of Directors.
In order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on
RICs, we currently intend to distribute during each calendar
year an amount at least equal to the sum of
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
|
98% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the
one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar
year, and
|
|
|
|
any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years
that were not distributed during such years.
|
In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized
net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital gains in excess
of short-term capital losses), if any, at least annually, out of
the assets legally available for such distributions, we may
decide in the future to retain such capital gains for
investment. In such event, the consequences of our retention of
net capital gains are as described under Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations. We can offer
no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the
payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior
securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if
doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios
stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by
the terms of any of our borrowings.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend, cash dividends payable to stockholders will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they (or the brokers holding their shares)
specifically opt out of the dividend reinvestment
plan so as to receive cash dividends. To the extent prudent and
practicable, we intend to declare and pay dividends on a
quarterly basis.
Income from origination, structuring, closing, commitment and
other upfront fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies has been treated as taxable income and, accordingly,
distributed to shareholders. From our initial public offering
through March 31, 2006, we have distributed approximately
103% of our taxable income to our stockholders. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2006, we declared total dividends of
$7.8 million.
Tax characteristics of all dividends will be reported to
stockholders, as appropriate, on
Form 1099-DIV
after the end of the calendar year. Our ability to pay dividends
could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
S-30
Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol PSEC. The following table sets forth, for the
periods indicated, our net asset value per share of common stock
and the high and low closing prices per share of our common
stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market. Our common stock
historically trades at prices both above and below its net asset
value. There can be no assurance, however, that such premium or
discount, as applicable, to net asset value will be maintained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
|
(Discount) of
|
|
|
(Discount) of Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
NAV(1)
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High to NAV
|
|
|
to NAV
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
|
15.45
|
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
15.15
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
13.72
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
15.46
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter (through
July 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
16.50
|
|
|
$
|
15.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high or low sales price. The
net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at the
end of each period. |
|
(2) |
|
Net asset value has not yet been determined as of June 30,
2006 or for any day thereafter. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On July 31, 2006 our Board of Directors declared a
quarterly dividend of $0.38 for the first fiscal quarter 2007,
payable September 29, 2006 to stockholders of record on
September 22, 2006. |
On July 31, 2006, the last reported sales price of our
common stock was $16.21 per share. As of March 13,
2006, we had approximately 7,100 stockholders of record.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The net proceeds from the sale of 4.0 million shares of our
common stock in this offering are $60.7 million ($69.9 million
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full) after deducting underwriting discounts of $3.6 million (or
$4.1 million if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment
option in full) and estimated offering expenses of approximately
$563,000 payable by us.
We expect to use approximately $29.3 million of the net
proceeds of this offering to repay borrowings under our credit
facility. Such borrowings bear interest at (i) LIBOR plus
the applicable spread at such time, or (ii) the greater of
the lender prime rate or the federal funds effective rate plus
the applicable spread at such time. Our credit facility matures
on July 19, 2007, subject to our lenders option to
extend the facility for an additional two years at the end of
the initial term. We expect such repayment will occur within two
business days after the closing of this offering. Once repaid,
we expect the entire amount of our credit facility to be
available to fund additional investments. We expect to use the
remainder of the net proceeds to fund investments from our
investment pipeline.
S-31
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth (1) our actual
capitalization at March 31, 2006 and (2) our
capitalization as adjusted to reflect the effects of the sale of
our common stock in this offering, after deducting the
underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses
payable by us. You should read this table together with
Use of Proceeds and our balance sheet included in
the accompanying prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
$
|
61,771
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current
maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under senior credit
facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(2)
|
Amount owed to affiliate
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value
$.001 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
7,061,941 shares outstanding, actual;
11,061,941 shares outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
97,136
|
|
|
|
157,843
|
|
Distributions in excess of net
investment income
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
7,734
|
|
|
|
7,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
165,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
105,210
|
|
|
$
|
165,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include shares issuable upon exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The above table reflects no debt outstanding as of
March 31, 2006. However, as of July 26, 2006, we had
$29.3 million outstanding under the HSH credit facility. A
portion of the proceeds from the sale of our common stock in
this offering will be used to repay all amounts outstanding
under the HSH credit facility. |
S-32
MANAGEMENT
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently consists of
six directors, four of whom are not interested
persons of Prospect Energy as defined in
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We refer to these
individuals as our independent directors. Our Board of Directors
elects our officers to serve for a one-year term and until their
successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their
earlier removal or resignation.
Board Of
Directors And Executive Officers
Under our charter, our directors are divided into three classes.
Directors are elected for a staggered term of three years each,
with a term of office of one of the three classes of directors
expiring each year. At each annual meeting of our stockholders,
the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at
such meeting are elected to hold office for a term expiring at
the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year
following the year of their election. Each director holds office
for the term to which he or she is elected and until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualified.
Directors
and Executive Officers
Our directors and executive officers and their positions are set
forth below. The address for each director and executive officer
is c/o Prospect Energy Corporation, 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Portfolios in
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Held
|
|
Office(1)
and
|
|
|
|
Fund Complex
|
|
Directorships
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Length of
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Held by
|
Name and Age
|
|
Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Director
|
|
Director(2)
|
|
Michael E. Basham, 56
|
|
Director
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
Executive Vice President of
Finance and Planning of Howard Energy Co., Inc.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
Robert A. Davidson, 48
|
|
Director
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Investment Officer and President of Longwood Investment
Advisers, a small-cap and mid-cap money manager, which he
co-founded in 1991.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
William J. Gremp, Jr.,
64(3)
|
|
Director
|
|
July 2006
to present
|
|
Vice President of Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated since 1999.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
Walter V. E. Parker, 59
|
|
Director
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
Executive Director of the
Greenwich Land Trust, Inc., a not-for-profit organization
focused on the preservation of open space since January 2005.
From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Parker served as the founding
principal of the Sippican Group LLC, a financial advisory firm.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
(footnotes on next page)
S-33
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Portfolios in
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Position(s) Held
|
|
Office(1)
and
|
|
|
|
Fund Complex
|
|
Directorships
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Length of
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Held by
|
Name and Age
|
|
Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Director
|
|
Director(2)
|
|
John F.
Barry III(4)
54
|
|
Director,
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
April 2004
to present
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Prospect Energy, Managing Director of Prospect since
1990; Chairman of the Investment Committee of Prospect Capital
Management.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
M. Grier
Eliasek(4)
33
|
|
Director, President and Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer of Prospect Energy, Managing Director of Prospect since
1999; Senior Professional of Prospect Capital Management.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. Mr. Parker
and Mr. Davidson are Class I directors with terms that
will expire in 2008, Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Basham are
Class II directors with terms that will expire in 2006 and
Mr. Barry and Mr. Gremp are Class III directors
with terms that will expire in 2007. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
No director otherwise serves as a director of an investment
company subject to the 1940 Act. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On July 17, 2006, our Board of Directors elected
Mr. Gremp to our Board. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Messrs. Barry and Eliasek are each considered an
interested person under the 1940 Act by virtue of
serving as one of our officers and having a relationship with
the Investment Adviser. |
S-34
Information
about Executive Officers who are not Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) Held
|
|
Term of Office
|
|
|
|
|
with the
|
|
and Length of
|
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
|
|
William E. Vastardis, 50
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
January 2005 to present as Chief
Compliance Officer and April 2005 to present as Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
Mr. Vastardis is a founder and
President of Vastardis Fund Services (formerly, EOS Fund
Services LLC) (Vastardis) and of Vastardis
Compliance Services LLC (formerly, EOS Compliance Services LLC)
(Vastardis Compliance). Mr. Vastardis founded
Vastardis in 2003 and Vastardis Compliance in June 2004.
Vastardis Compliance performs chief compliance officer services
for various registered investment companies and registered
investment advisers. Prior to founding Vastardis, he managed a
third-party fund administration firm, AMT Capital Services Inc.,
which was acquired by Investors Bank & Trust Company in
1998. Mr. Vastardis continued in the role of Managing
Director at the renamed Investors Capital Services until he
departed in 2003 to found Vastardis.
|
Independent
Directors
Michael E. Basham. Mr. Basham has
34 years of experience in the energy and finance
industries. Mr. Basham currently serves as executive vice
president for finance and planning for Howard Energy &
Co., Inc., a privately held energy company that has made both
domestic and international energy investments in the oil and gas
exploration, natural gas marketing and storage, energy services,
hydroelectric power generation, and drilling services
industries. Prior to joining Howard Energy in 1999,
Mr. Basham served as a principal in the consulting practice
of Ernst & Young from 1996 to 1999. From 1994 to 1996,
Mr. Basham, served as an executive vice president with
First Fidelity Bank. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Basham was a
managing director at Shearson Smith Barney, now owned by
Citigroup, where he headed up the Privatization investment
banking group and the International division. From 1989 to 1991,
Mr. Basham served as Deputy Assistant Secretary and Acting
Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury. From 1987 to
1989, Mr. Basham worked as a senior professional at
Wertheim Schroder, an investment bank. From 1982 to 1986,
Mr. Basham founded and served as chief executive officer of
Norden Capital, an investment management firm. From 1972 to
1982, Mr. Basham served in various roles, including vice
president of the investment division and manager of fixed
income, trading, and sales, for South Carolina National Bank.
Mr. Basham received a Bachelor of Science degree from the
University of Southern Mississippi, and received an MBA from the
University of South Carolina.
Robert A. Davidson. Mr. Davidson has
25 years of experience in the investment management
industry. Mr. Davidson currently serves as chief executive
officer, chief investment officer and president of Longwood
Investment Advisers, a small-cap and mid-cap money manager, with
approximately $1 billion of assets under management, which
he co-founded in 1991. From 1984 to 1991, Mr. Davidson
served as vice president, portfolio manager, and analyst at
Essex Investment Management Company, where his responsibilities
included research, valuation, investments, and disposals of a
broad range of securities for various Essex funds. While at
Essex, Mr. Davidson managed approximately $200 million
and was a member of the investment committee managing the Essex
Hedge Fund. From 1981 to 1984, Mr. Davidson served as an
options portfolio manager and analyst with Keystone Custodian
Funds, with a specialty in energy, environmental control
systems, and communications. Mr. Davidson is a Chartered
Financial Analyst (CFA), and he received a Bachelor of Arts in
Economics and Business from Colby College.
S-35
William J. Gremp. Mr. Gremps career
as an investment banker, with over 30 years of corporate
finance experience in originating and executing transactions and
advisory assignments for energy and utility related clients, has
spanned years of significant change in the energy industry.
Since 1999, Mr. Gremp has been responsible for traditional
banking services, credit and lending, private equity and
corporate cash management with Merrill Lynch & Co. From
1996 to 1999, he served at Wachovia as senior vice president,
managing director and co-founder of the utilities and energy
investment banking group, responsible for origination,
structuring, negotiation and successful completion of
transactions utilizing investment banking, capital markets and
traditional commercial banking products. From 1989 to 1996,
Mr. Gremp was the managing director of global power and
project finance at JPMorgan Chase & Co., where he was
responsible for the origination, delivery and successful
implementation of all corporate finance and investment banking
products and services to the utility and energy industries. He
advised clients on corporate strategy, project financing,
mergers and acquisitions and equity and lease finance. From 1970
to 1989, Mr. Gremp was with Merrill Lynch & Co.,
starting out as an associate in the mergers and acquisitions
department, then in 1986 becoming the senior vice president,
managing director and head of the regulated industries group.
From 1965 to 1970, Mr. Gremp served in roles at the United
States Army, the Mobil Oil Corporation and a New York management
consulting firm. Mr. Gremp received his MBA from New York
University and his Bachelor of Science degree from the
University of Minnesota.
Walter V. E. Parker. Mr. Parker has
35 years of experience in the energy and finance
industries. Mr. Parker currently serves as executive
director of the Greenwich Land Trust, Inc., a not for profit
organization focused on the preservation of open space since
January 2005. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Parker served as a
founding principal in the Sippican Group, LLC, a financial
advisory firm. While at Sippican, he advised clients on business
development, and financial matters. From 2000 to 2001,
Mr. Parker served as interim chief operating officer of
Avienda Technologies, Inc. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Parker
served as managing director of Claymore Partners, Inc., a
long-standing financial advisory firm addressing the needs of
troubled businesses. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Parker served
as a subsidiary board member and the credit officer at Parrish
Leasing and Finance Corporation, a joint venture with the
Travelers Group focused on large-scale project-based and
asset-based transactions. From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Parker
served as vice president and senior credit officer of the
Corporate Finance Division for Xerox Credit, Inc., which
provided project finance, equipment leasing, high-yield
corporate debt, secured loans, and real estate financing to a
diverse group of US and international companies, including
energy companies. Mr. Parker received Xeroxs
Presidents Award for timely achievement of liquidity and
value enhancement goals. From 1989 to 1991, Mr. Parker was
a vice president for the Project and Lease Finance Group of
Kidder Peabody & Co., where he focused on energy
transactions. From 1971 to 1989, Mr. Parker served in
several roles, including as a senior credit officer, at
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and the United States Trust
Company of New York. Mr. Parker is a graduate of the Xerox
Advanced Management School and the American Management
Associations Time Based Accounting series. Mr. Parker
received his MBA from Columbia University, where he received
honors ratings for course work in banking and finance, and his
Bachelor of Arts degree from Colgate University.
Interested
Directors
John F. Barry III. Mr. Barry is
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Prospect Energy and is
majority owner of Prospect Capital Management and Managing
Director of Prospect Administration. Mr. Barry is chairman
of Prospects investment committee and has been an officer
of Prospect since 1990. In addition to overseeing Prospect,
Mr. Barry has served on the boards of directors of twelve
private and public Prospect portfolio companies. Mr. Barry
has served on the board of advisors of USEC Inc., a publicly
traded energy company. Mr. Barry has served as chairman and
chief executive officer of Bondnet Trading Systems. From 1988 to
1989, Mr. Barry managed the investment bank of L.F.
Rothschild & Company, focusing on private equity and
debt financings for energy and other companies. From 1983 to
1988, Mr. Barry was a senior investment and merchant banker
at Merrill Lynch & Co., where he was a founding member
of the project finance group, executing more than
$4 billion in energy and other financings. From 1979 to
1983, Mr. Barry was a corporate securities attorney at
Davis Polk & Wardwell, where he advised energy
companies and their commercial and investment bankers. From 1978
to 1979, Mr. Barry served as law clerk to Circuit Judge,
formerly Chief Judge, J.
S-36
Edward Lumbard of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit in New York City. Mr. Barry is Chairman of the
Board of Directors of the Mathematics Foundation of America, a
non-profit foundation which enhances opportunities in
mathematics education for students from diverse backgrounds.
Mr. Barry received his JD cum laude from Harvard Law
School, where he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review, and
his Bachelor of Arts magna cum laude from Princeton University,
where he was a University Scholar.
M. Grier Eliasek. Mr. Eliasek is
president and chief operating officer of Prospect Energy and a
managing director of Prospect Capital Management and Prospect
Administration. At Prospect Energy, Mr. Eliasek is
responsible for various administrative and investment management
functions and leads and supervises other Prospect professionals
in origination and assessment of investments. Mr. Eliasek
has served as a senior investment professional at Prospect since
1999. Prior to joining Prospect, Mr. Eliasek assisted the
chief financial officer of Amazon.com in 1999 in corporate
strategy, customer acquisition, and new product launches. From
1995 to 1998, Mr. Eliasek served as a consultant with
Bain & Company, a global strategy consulting firm,
where he managed engagements for companies in several different
industries. At Bain, Mr. Eliasek analyzed new lines of
businesses, developed market strategies, revamped sales
organizations and improved operational performance.
Mr. Eliasek received his MBA from Harvard Business School.
Mr. Eliasek received his Bachelor of Science in Chemical
Engineering with Highest Distinction from the University of
Virginia, where he was a Jefferson Scholar and a Rodman Scholar.
Executive
Officer
William E. Vastardis. Mr. Vastardis is
chief compliance officer, chief financial officer, treasurer and
secretary of Prospect Energy. Mr. Vastardis has resigned as
chief compliance officer effective July 31, 2006.
Mr. Vastardis is a founder and president of Vastardis and
of Vastardis Compliance. Vastardis serves as the Companys
sub-administrator. Mr. Vastardis founded Vastardis in
August 2003 and Vastardis Compliance in June 2004. Vastardis
Compliance performs chief compliance officer services for
various registered investment companies and registered
Investment Advisers. Prior to founding Vastardis, he managed a
third-party fund administration firm, AMT Capital Services Inc.,
which was acquired by Investors Bank & Trust Company in
1998. Mr. Vastardis continued in the role of managing
director at the renamed Investors Capital Services until he
departed in 2003 to found Vastardis.
S-37
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions of an underwriting agreement
dated
August ,
2006, the underwriters named below, acting through Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc. as lead manager, and Ferris,
Baker Watts, Incorporated, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., D.A.
Davidson & Co. and Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.
as their representatives, have severally agreed to purchase from
us the number of shares of common stock indicated in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Morgan Keegan & Company,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Oppenheimer & Co.
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
D.A. Davidson & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
Sterne, Agee & Leach,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriters are subject to approval of certain legal matters by
counsel, delivery of customary closing certificates and to
certain other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to
purchase all of the shares of common stock listed in the table
above if any of these shares are purchased.
The underwriters propose to offer shares of our common stock
directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus supplement. Any shares sold by
the underwriters to securities dealers will be sold at the
public offering price less a selling concession not to exceed
$ per share. The underwriters may
allow, and these selected dealers may re-allow, a concession of
not more than $ per share to other
brokers and dealers.
This offering will conform with the requirements set forth in
Rule 2810 of the Conduct Rules of the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc., or NASD.
Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us
or by the underwriters that would permit a public offering of
the shares of common stock included in this offering in any
jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The
shares of common stock included in this offering may not be
offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus
supplement or any other offering material or advertisements in
connection with the offer and sales of any shares of common
stock be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except
under circumstances that will result in compliance with the
applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons
who receive this prospectus supplement are advised to inform
themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to
this offering of shares of our common stock and the distribution
of this prospectus supplement. This prospectus supplement is not
an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any
shares of our common stock included in this offering in any
jurisdiction where that would not be permitted or legal.
The representatives of the underwriters have advised us that the
underwriters do not intend to confirm sales to any account over
which they exercise discretionary authority.
Underwriting
Discount and Expenses
The following table summarizes the underwriting discount to be
paid to the underwriters by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total without
|
|
|
Total with
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Over-allotment
|
|
|
Over-allotment
|
|
|
Underwriting discount to be paid
to the underwriters by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
In no event will the maximum discount to be received by any NASD
member in connection with this offering exceed 10%. The maximum
reimbursement to any NASD member for bona fide due diligence
expenses incurred in connection with this offering will not
exceed 5%. We will pay all expenses of the
S-38
offering that we incur. We estimate that our total expenses for
this offering, excluding the underwriting discount, will be
approximately $563,000.
Over-allotment
Option
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable not
later than 30 days after the date of this prospectus
supplement, to purchase up to 600,000 additional shares of our
common stock at the public offering price, less the underwriting
discount, set forth on the cover page of this prospectus
supplement. The underwriters may exercise the option solely to
cover over-allotments, if any, made in connection with this
offering. To the extent that the underwriters exercise the
option, each underwriter will become obligated, as long as the
conditions of the underwriting agreement are satisfied, to
purchase a number of additional shares of common stock
approximately proportionate to that underwriters initial
commitment as indicated in the table above. We will be
obligated, pursuant to the option, to sell these additional
shares of common stock to the underwriters to the extent the
option is exercised. If any additional shares of common stock
are purchased pursuant to the option, the underwriters will
offer the additional shares on the same terms as those on which
the other shares are being offered hereby.
Passive
Market Making Pursuant to Regulation M
In connection with this transaction, certain of the underwriters
(and selling group members) may engage in passive market making
transactions in the common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market,
prior to the pricing and completion of this offering. Passive
market making is permitted by SEC Regulation M and consists
of displaying bids on the NASDAQ Global Market no higher than
the bid prices of independent market makers and making purchases
at prices no higher than these independent bids and effected in
response to order flow. Net purchases by a passive market maker
on each day are limited to a specified percentage of the passive
market makers average daily trading volume in the common
stock during a specified period and must be discontinued when
such limit is reached. Passive market making may cause the price
of the common stock to be higher than the price that otherwise
would exist in the open market in the absence of such
transactions.
Indemnification
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be
required to make in respect of any of these liabilities.
Stabilization,
Short Positions and Penalty Bids
The underwriters may engage in over-allotment, syndicate
covering transactions, stabilizing transactions and penalty bids
or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining
the price of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of shares
over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number
of shares that they may purchase pursuant to the over-allotment
option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved
is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment
option. The underwriters may close out any short position by
either exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in
part, or purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of our common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by
|
S-39
|
|
|
|
|
the over-allotment option, resulting in a naked short position,
the position can only be closed out by buying shares in the open
market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if
the underwriters are concerned that there could be downward
pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after
pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in
the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions consist of various bids for or
purchases of common stock in the open market prior to completion
of the offering.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
|
|
|
These syndicate covering transactions, stabilizing transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result,
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the NASDAQ Global Market or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
|
Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation
or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effort
that the transactions described above may have on the price of
our common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the
underwriters make any representation that the underwriters will
engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any
transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without
notice.
Lock-Up
Provisions
Except for the shares of our common stock offered hereby and
shares of common stock issuable under our dividend reinvestment
plan, we and our directors and executive officers, individually,
have agreed that, for a period of 90 days from the date of
this prospectus supplement, we will not, without the prior
written consent of Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
(i) directly or indirectly, offer, pledge, sell, contract
to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any
option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant
to purchase or otherwise transfer or dispose of our common stock
or any securities convertible into or exerciseable or
exchangeable for our common stock or file any registration
statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to any
of the above or (ii) enter into any swap or other agreement
or any transaction that transfers, in whole or in part, directly
or indirectly, the risk of owning our common stock, whether any
such swap or transaction described in clause (i) or
(ii) above is to be settled by delivery of our common stock
or such other securities, in cash or otherwise.
Other
Relationships
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have provided
in the past to us, and may from time to time in the future
provide, certain commercial banking, financial advisory,
investment banking and other services, for which they will be
entitled to receive separate fees. The underwriters and their
affiliates may from time to time in the future engage in
transactions with us and perform services for us or our
portfolio companies in the ordinary course of business.
The addresses of the representatives
are: Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.,
50 N. Front Street, 19th Floor, Memphis,
Tennessee, 38103; Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated, 100 Light
Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202; Oppenheimer & Co.
Inc., 125 Broad Street, New York, New York 10004; D.A.
Davidson & Co., Z Centerpointe, Suite 400, Lake
Oswego, Oregon 97035; and Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.,
800 Shades Creek Parkway, Suite 700, Birmingham, Alabama
35209.
S-40
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain legal matters regarding the common stock offered hereby
will be passed upon for Prospect Energy by Clifford Chance US
LLP, New York, New York, and Venable LLP as special Maryland
counsel. Clifford Chance US LLP also represents Prospect Capital
Management. The validity of the shares of common stock offered
hereby will be passed upon for the underwriters by Bass,
Berry & Sims PLC, Memphis, Tennessee.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO Seidman LLP is the independent registered public accounting
firm for Prospect Energy.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to our common stock offered by this
prospectus supplement. The registration statement contains
additional information about us and the common stock being
registered by this prospectus supplement. We file with or submit
to the SEC annual, quarterly and current periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information meeting the informational
requirements of the Exchange Act. This information and the
information specifically regarding how we voted proxies relating
to portfolio securities for the period ended June 30, 2005,
are available free of charge by contacting us at 10 East
40th Street, 44th floor, New York, NY 10016 or by
telephone at toll-free
(888) 748-0702.
You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and
other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
(202) 551-8090.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of these
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic
request at the following
E-mail
address: public info@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs
Public Reference Section, Washington, D.C.
20549-0102.
No dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized
to give any information or to make any representation other than
those contained in this prospectus supplement and, if given or
made, such information or representations must not be relied
upon as having been authorized by us or the underwriters. This
prospectus supplement does not constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any
jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation is not
authorized or in which the person making such offer or
solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any person to whom
it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Neither the
delivery of this prospectus supplement nor any sale made
hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication
that there has been no change in our affairs or that information
contained herein is correct as of any time subsequent to the
date hereof.
S-41
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer and sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION
Preliminary Prospectus dated
August 1, 2006
Prospectus
dated [ ], 2006
$300,000,000
Prospect
Energy Corporation
Common
Stock
Preferred Stock
Warrants
Debt Securities
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or
series, together or separately, up to $300,000,000 of our common
stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants representing
rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock
or debt securities, (collectively, the Securities)
to provide us with funds to repay outstanding debt and to
acquire investments that we reasonably believe are in our
acquisition pipeline. Securities may be offered at prices and on
terms to be disclosed in one or more supplements to this
prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the applicable
prospectus supplement carefully before you invest in our
Securities.
Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers, including existing stockholders in a rights
offering, or through agents designated from time to time by us,
or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus
supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities, and will
disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or
discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters
or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount
may be calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may
not sell any of our Securities through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of such Securities. Our
common stock is traded on The NASDAQ National Market under the
symbol PSEC. As of July 31, 2006, the last
reported sales price for our common stock was $16.21.
Prospect Energy Corporation (Prospect Energy or the
Company) is a financial services company that lends
to and invests in middle market privately held or thinly traded
public companies in the energy industry.
The Company, a Maryland corporation, has been organized as a
closed-end investment company since April 13, 2004 and has
filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
(the 1940 Act), and is a non-diversified investment
company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
Prospect Capital Management, LLC manages our investments and
Prospect Administration, LLC provides the administrative
services necessary for us to operate.
Investing in our Securities involves a heightened risk of
total loss of investment and is subject to risks. Before buying
any Securities, you should read the discussion of the material
risks of investing in our Securities in Risk Factors
on page 10 of this prospectus. Please read this prospectus
before you invest and keep it for future reference. The
prospectus sets forth concisely the information about Prospect
Energy that a prospective investor ought to know before
investing and should be retained for future reference. The
registration statement contains additional information about us
and the Securities being registered by this prospectus. We file
with or submit to the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC, annual, quarterly and
current periodic reports, proxy statements and other information
meeting the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. This
information and the information specifically regarding how we
voted proxies, if any, relating to portfolio securities for the
period ended June 30, 2005, are available free of charge by
contacting us at 10 East 40th Street, 44th floor, New
York, NY 10016 or by telephone at toll-free
(888) 748-0702.
You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and
other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
(202) 551-8090.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of these
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic
request at the following
E-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section, Washington, D.C.
20549-0102.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if
this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of
securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have
filed with the SEC, using the shelf registration
process. Under the shelf registration process, we may offer,
from time to time, up to $300,000,000 of our common stock,
preferred stock, debt securities or warrants representing rights
to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt
securities on the terms to be determined at the time of the
offering. The Securities may be offered at prices and on terms
described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. This
prospectus provides you with a general description of the
Securities that we may offer. Each time we use this prospectus
to offer Securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement
that will contain specific information about the terms of that
offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or
change information contained in this prospectus. Please
carefully read this prospectus and any prospectus supplement
together with any exhibits and the additional information
described under the heading Available Information
and the section under the heading Risk Factors
before you make an investment decision.
No dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized
to give any information or to make any representation other than
those contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such
information or representations must not be relied upon as having
been authorized by us or the underwriters. This prospectus does
not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to
buy any securities in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or
solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making
such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any
person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or
solicitation. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any
sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any
implication that there has been no change in our affairs or that
information contained herein is correct as of any time
subsequent to the date hereof.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
The following summary contains basic information about this
offering. It does not contain all the information that may be
important to an investor. For a more complete understanding of
this offering, we encourage you to read this entire document and
the documents to which we have referred.
Information contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus may contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, which are statements about the future that may be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
may, will, expect,
intend, plans, anticipate,
estimate or continue or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
The matters described in Risk Factors and certain
other factors noted throughout this prospectus and in any
exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part, constitute cautionary statements identifying
important factors with respect to any such forward-looking
statements, including certain risks and uncertainties, that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
such forward-looking statements. The Company reminds all
investors that no forward-looking statement can be relied upon
as an accurate or even mostly accurate forecast because humans
cannot forecast the future.
The terms we, us, our,
Company and Prospect Energy refer to
Prospect Energy Corporation; Prospect Capital
Management or the Investment Adviser refers to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC; Prospect
Administration or the Administrator refers to
Prospect Administration, LLC; and Prospect refers to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC, its affiliates and its
predecessor companies.
The
Company
Prospect Energy is a financial services company that lends to
and invests in middle market privately held or thinly traded
public companies in the energy industry.
We have been organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004 and have filed an election to be treated as
a business development company under the 1940 Act, and we are a
non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect Capital Management, an affiliate of Prospect Energy,
manages our investment activities. Prospect Capital Management
is an investment adviser that has been registered under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Advisers
Act, since March 31, 2004. Under an investment
advisory agreement between the Company and Prospect Capital
Management (the Investment Advisory Agreement), we
have agreed to pay Prospect Capital Management investment
advisory fees, which will consist of an annual base management
fee based on our gross assets (which include any amount
borrowed, i.e., total assets without deduction for any
liabilities) as well as a two-part incentive fee based on our
performance. Our headquarters are located at 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and our
telephone number is
(212) 448-0702.
The
Offering
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or
series, together or separately, up to $300,000,000 of our
Securities to provide us with funds to repay outstanding debt
and to acquire investments that we reasonably believe are in our
acquisition pipeline. Our Securities may be offered at prices
and on terms to be disclosed in one or more prospectus
supplements.
Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers, including existing stockholders in a rights
offering, to new stockholders, via an optional cash purchase or
designated offeree program, or through agents designated from
time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers.
The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will disclose
the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any
agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities by
us, the purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount
arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among
our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be
calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not
sell any of our
1
Securities through agents, underwriters or dealers without
delivery of a prospectus supplement describing the method and
terms of the offering of our Securities.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering
of our Securities:
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend
to use the net proceeds from the sale of our Securities for
general corporate purposes, which may include investments in
securities, repayment of indebtedness, acquisitions and other
general corporate purposes. Pending these uses, we will invest
the net proceeds primarily in cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less from the date of
investment. See Use of Proceeds. |
|
Distributions |
|
We have paid quarterly dividends to the holders of our common
stock and generally intend to continue to do so. The amount of
the quarterly dividends is determined by our Board of Directors
and is based on our estimate of our investment company taxable
income and net short-term capital gains. See Price Range
of Common Stock and Distributions. Certain
additional amounts may be deemed as distributed to stockholders
for income tax purposes. Other types of Securities will likely
pay distributions in accordance with their terms. |
|
Taxation |
|
We have qualified and elected to be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or
RIC. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay
corporate-level federal income taxes on any ordinary income or
capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as
dividends. To maintain our qualification as a RIC and obtain RIC
tax treatment, we must maintain specified
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually
at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of assets legally available for
distribution. See Distributions and Material
U.S. federal income tax considerations. |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
We have a dividend reinvestment plan for our stockholders. This
is an opt out dividend reinvestment plan. As a
result, when we declare a dividend, the dividends to
stockholders are automatically reinvested in additional shares
of our common stock, unless stockholders specifically opt
out of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive
cash dividends. Stockholders who receive distributions in the
form of stock are subject to the same federal, state and local
tax consequences as stockholders who elect to receive their
distributions in cash. See Dividend reinvestment
plan. |
|
The NASDAQ National Market Symbol |
|
PSEC |
|
Anti-takeover provisions |
|
Our charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and
regulatory requirements, contain provisions that may have the
effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition
proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a
change in control in circumstances that could give the holders
of our common stock |
2
|
|
|
|
|
the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price of
our common stock. See Description of our capital
stock. |
|
Management arrangements |
|
Prospect Capital Management serves as our investment adviser.
Prospect Administration serves as our administrator and has
engaged Vastardis Fund Services, LLC (formerly, EOS
Fund Services LLC, Vastardis), as
sub-administrator. For a description of Prospect Capital
Management, Prospect Administration, Vastardis and our
contractual arrangements with these companies, see
Management Investment Advisory
Agreement, and Administration
Agreement. |
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
Investment in our Securities involves certain risks relating to
our structure and investment objectives that should be
considered by the prospective purchasers of the Securities. In
addition, investment in our Securities involves certain risks
relating to investing in the energy sector, including but not
limited to risks associated with commodity pricing, regulation,
production, demand, depletion and expiration, weather, and
valuation. We have a limited operating history upon which you
can evaluate our business. In addition, as a business
development company, our portfolio includes securities primarily
issued by privately held companies. These investments may
involve a high degree of business and financial risk, and are
generally less liquid than public securities. Also, our
determinations of fair value of privately-held securities may
differ materially from the values that would exist if there was
a ready market for these investments. A large number of entities
compete for the same kind of investment opportunities as we do.
Moreover, our business requires a substantial amount of cash to
operate and to grow, and we are dependent on external financing.
In addition, the failure to qualify as a RIC eligible for
pass-through tax treatment under Subchapter M of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code, on income
distributed to stockholders could have a materially adverse
effect on the total return, if any, obtainable from an
investment in our Securities. See Risk Factors
beginning on page 10 and the other information included in
this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully
consider before deciding to invest in our Securities. |
3
|
|
|
Plan of distribution |
|
We may offer, from time to time, up to $300,000,000 of our
common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants
representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock,
preferred stock or debt securities, on terms to be determined at
the time of the offering, which may include a rights offering or
via an optional cash purchase or designated offeree program.
Securities may be offered at prices and on terms described in
one or more supplements to this prospectus directly to one or
more purchasers, or through agents designated from time to time
by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The supplement
to this prospectus relating to the offering will identify any
agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities,
and will set forth any applicable purchase price, fee and
commission or discount arrangement or the basis upon which such
amount may be calculated. We may not sell Securities pursuant to
this prospectus without delivering a prospectus supplement
describing the method and terms of the offering of such
Securities. For more information, see Plan of
Distribution. |
Fees and
Expenses
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will
bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the
percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may
vary. The table is based on our net assets at March 31,
2006 and assumes that we have borrowed all $30 million
available under our line of credit on that date and used the
contractual fee due to the Investment Adviser. Except where the
context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus contains a
reference to fees or expenses paid by you,
us or Prospect Energy, or that
we will pay fees or expenses, stockholders will
indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in Prospect
Energy.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder transaction
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of
offering price)(1)
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Offering expenses borne by us (as
a percentage of offering price)(2)
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
Dividend reinvestment plan
expenses(3)
|
|
|
None
|
|
Total stockholder transaction
expenses (as a percentage of offering price)(4)
|
|
|
6.82
|
%
|
Annual expenses (as a
percentage of net assets attributable to common
stock)*:
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
2.60
|
%(5)
|
Incentive fees payable under
Investment Advisory Agreement (20% of realized capital gains and
20% of pre-incentive fee net investment income)
|
|
|
2.04
|
%(6)
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
2.58
|
%(7)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1.96
|
%(8)
|
Total annual expenses (estimated)
|
|
|
9.18
|
%(6)(8)(9)
|
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount
of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various
periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common
stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have
assumed we would have no leverage and that our annual operating
expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
3 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
10 years
|
|
You would pay the following
expenses on a $1,000 investment, assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
|
$
|
843
|
|
4
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return
greater or less than 5%. The income incentive fee under the
Investment Advisory Agreement would be zero at the 5% annual
return assumption, as required by the SEC for this table, since
no incentive fee is paid until the annual return exceeds 7%;
however, the income incentive fee currently being earned is
nevertheless used to aggregate total expenses in the example as
if the annual return were at the level recently achieved, which
is higher than 5%, in accordance with SEC requirements.
Accordingly, the resulting calculations overstate expenses at
the 5% annual return as these calculations do not reflect the
provisions of the Investment Advisory Agreement as it would
actually be applied in the case of a 5% annual return. This
illustration assumes that we will not realize any capital gains
computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized
capital depreciation in any of the indicated time periods. If we
achieve sufficient returns on our investments, including through
the realization of capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of
a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors
after such expenses, would be higher. In addition, while the
example assumes reinvestment of all dividends and distributions
at net asset value, participants in our dividend reinvestment
plan will receive a number of shares of our common stock,
determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend
payable to a participant by the market price per share of our
common stock at the close of trading on the valuation date for
the dividend. See Dividend reinvestment plan for
additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
This example and the expenses in the table above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses. Actual
expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other
expenses) may be greater or less than those shown.
|
|
|
* |
|
Net assets attributable to our common stock equal net assets
(i.e., total assets less liabilities other than liabilities for
money borrowed for investment purposes) at March 31, 2006. |
|
(1) |
|
In the event that the Securities to which this prospectus
relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding
prospectus supplement will disclose the applicable sales load. |
|
(2) |
|
The related prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated
amount of offering expenses, the offering price and the offering
expenses borne by us as a percentage of the offering price. |
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in
other expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
The related prospectus supplement will disclose the offering
price and the total stockholder transaction expenses as a
percentage of the offering price. |
|
(5) |
|
Our base management fee is 2.00% of our gross assets (which
include any amount borrowed, i.e., total assets without
deduction for any liabilities). Assuming that we have borrowed
$30 million, the 2.00% management fee of gross assets
equals 2.60% of net assets. See Management
Investment Advisory Agreement and footnote 6 below. |
|
(6) |
|
We expect to invest all of the net proceeds from securities
registered under the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part within three years or less of the date of
the initial registration and may have capital gains and interest
income that could result in the payment of an incentive fee to
our Investment Adviser in the first year after completion of
this offering. However, the incentive fee payable to our
investment adviser is based on our performance and will not be
paid unless we achieve certain goals. In the chart above, we
have assumed our pre-incentive fee net investment income is an
amount equal to 10.20% of our net assets. The incentive fee
consists of two parts. The first part, the income incentive fee,
which is payable quarterly in arrears, will equal 20% of the
excess, if any, of our pre-incentive fee net investment income
that exceeds a 1.75% quarterly (7% annualized) hurdle rate,
subject to a catch up provision measured as of the
end of each calendar quarter. In April 2006, we paid an
incentive fee of $531,489 (see calculation below). We expect the
incentive fees we pay to increase to the extent we earn greater
interest and dividend income through our investments in
portfolio companies and, to a lesser extent, realize capital
gains upon the sale of warrants or other equity investments in
our portfolio companies. Our Investment Adviser has voluntarily
agreed that, for each fiscal quarter after January 1, 2005,
the quarterly hurdle rate will be equal to the greater of
(a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal to (i) the
sum of the daily average of the quoted treasury rate
for each month in the immediately preceding two quarters plus
(ii) 0.50%. Our Investment Adviser may terminate this
voluntary agreement at |
5
|
|
|
|
|
any time upon 90 days prior notice. The
catch-up provision requires us to pay 100% of our
pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that
portion of such income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but
is less than 125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar
quarter (8.75% annualized assuming an annualized hurdle rate of
7%). The
catch-up
provision is meant to provide our Investment Adviser with 20% of
our pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle rate
did not apply when our pre-incentive fee net investment income
exceeds 125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar
quarter (8.75% annualized assuming an annualized hurdle rate of
7%). The income incentive fee will be computed and paid on
income that may include interest that is accrued but not yet
received in cash. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income
used to calculate the income incentive fee is also included in
the amount of our gross assets used to calculate the 2% base
management fee (see footnote 5 above). The second part of
the incentive fee, the capital gains incentive fee, will equal
20% of our realized capital gains, if any, computed net of all
realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation. |
Examples of how the incentive fee is calculated are as follows:
Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 0.55%, there
would be no income incentive fee because such income would not
exceed the hurdle rate of 1.75%.
Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 2.00%, the
income incentive fee would be as follows:
= 100% × (2.00% − 1.75%)
= 0.25%
Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 2.30%, the
income incentive fee would be as follows:
= (100% × (catch-up: 2.1875% −
1.75%)) + (20% × (2.30% − 2.1875%))
= (100% × 0.4375%) + (20% × 0.1125%)
= 0.4375% + 0.0225%
= 0.46%
Assuming net realized capital gains of 6% and realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation of 1%, the capital
gains incentive fee would be as follows:
= 20% × (6% − 1%)
= 20% × 5%
= 1%
The following is a calculation of the most recently paid
Incentive fee of $531,489 in April 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Quarter Net Asset Value
|
|
$
|
105,363,891
|
|
Quarterly Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
1.7500
|
%**
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
1,843,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125% of the Quarterly Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
2.1875
|
%
|
125% of the Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
2,304,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Quarter Pre Incentive Fee
Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
2,657,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Fee
Catch-Up
|
|
$
|
460,967
|
|
Incentive Fee 20% in
excess of 125% of the Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
70,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Quarter Incentive Fee
|
|
$
|
531,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Please note that the quoted treasury rate plus 0.50% was
1.5575%, therefore the quarterly hurdle rate of 1.75% was used. |
|
|
|
For a more detailed discussion of the calculation of the
two-part incentive fee, see Management
Investment Advisory Agreement. |
6
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Although we may incur indebtedness before the proceeds of an
offering are substantially invested, we have not yet decided to
what extent we will finance investments using debt. We currently
have $30 million available to us under a credit facility.
For more information, see Risk Factors Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income and Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Condition, Liquidity and
Capital Resources, Capital Raising Activities. The table
above assumes that we have borrowed all $30 million
available under our line of credit. The table below shows our
estimated annual expenses as a percentage of net assets
attributable to common stock, assuming that we did not incur any
indebtedness. |
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
Incentive fees payable under
Investment Advisory Agreement (20% of realized capital gains and
20% of pre-incentive fee net investment income)
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
None
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1.96
|
%
|
Total annual expenses (estimated)
|
|
|
6.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Other expenses is based on an estimate of expenses
during the current fiscal year representing all of our estimated
recurring operating expenses (except fees and expenses reported
in other items of this table) that are deducted from our
operating income and reflected as expenses in our Statement of
Operations. The estimate of our overhead expenses, including
payments under the administration agreement based on our
projected allocable portion of overhead and other expenses
incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement. Other
expenses does not include non-recurring expenses. See
Management Administration Agreement. |
|
(9) |
|
Total annual expenses as a percentage of net assets attributable
to our common stock are higher than the total annual expenses
percentage would be for a company that is not leveraged. We
borrow money to leverage our net assets and increase our total
assets. The total annual expenses percentage is required by the
SEC to be calculated as a percentage of net assets, rather than
the total assets including assets that have been funded with
borrowed monies. If the total annual expense percentage were
calculated as a percentage of total assets, our total annual
expenses would be 7.06% of total assets. |
7
SELECTED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands)
You should read the condensed financial information below with
the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this
prospectus. Financial information for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial
statements for that period. Quarterly financial information is
derived from unaudited financial data, but in the opinion of
management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) that are necessary to present fairly the
results of such interim periods. Interim results for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending June 30, 2006. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations on page 25 for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
April 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
(Inception)
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
4,569
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest income, controlled entities
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income, controlled entities
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
income
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income incentive fee
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and credit
facility costs
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration costs
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
5,582
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation)
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in
stockholders equity resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
2,955
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
6,956
|
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net increase
(decrease) in stockholders equity per common share resulting
from operations
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the
periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Per share data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of
period
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Proceeds from initial public
offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
Costs related to the initial public
offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Share issuance related to dividend
reinvestment
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of
period
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
Total return based on market
value(2)
|
|
|
11.08
|
%
|
|
|
8.54
|
%
|
|
|
37.35
|
%
|
|
|
(12.46
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
Total return based on net asset
value(2)
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
(6.88
|
)%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Ratio/supplemental data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in
thousands)
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
96.927
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
96,925
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating
expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of operating
income to average net assets
|
|
|
8.13
|
%
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
7.12
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights as of March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2005 are based on 7,061,940 shares and
7,055,100 shares outstanding, respectively. Share issuance
of 6,840 shares occurred on March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Energys dividend
reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is
based upon the change in net asset value per share between the
opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and
assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with
Prospect Energys dividend reinvestment plan. The total
return is not annualized. |
9
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our Securities involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in
our Securities. The risks set forth below are not the only risks
we face. If any of the adverse events or conditions described
below occur, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected, our net asset
value and the trading price of our common stock could decline,
or the value of our preferred stock, debt securities or warrants
may decline, and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Business and Structure
We are
dependent upon Prospect Capital Managements key management
personnel for our future success.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business
contacts of the senior management of Prospect Capital
Management. We also depend, to a significant extent, on our
Investment Advisers access to the investment professionals
and the information and deal flow generated by these investment
professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio
management activities. For a description of the senior
management team, see Management. The senior
management team evaluates, negotiates, structures, closes,
monitors and services our investments. Our success depends to a
significant extent on the continued service of the senior
management team, particularly John F. Barry III and M. Grier
Eliasek. The departure of any of the senior managers of Prospect
Capital Management could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to achieve our investment objective. In addition, we can
offer no assurance that Prospect Capital Management will remain
our Investment Adviser or that we will continue to have access
to its investment professionals or its information and deal flow.
Our
Investment Adviser and its senior management have limited
experience managing a business development company under the
1940 Act.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of
business development companies. For example, business
development companies are required to invest at least 70% of
their total assets primarily in securities of privately held or
thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high
quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Our
Investment Advisers and its senior managements
limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such
constraints may hinder their ability to take advantage of
attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve
our investment objective. In addition, our investment strategies
differ in some ways from those of other investment funds that
have been managed in the past by the investment professionals.
We are
a relatively new company with limited operating
history.
We were incorporated in April 2004 and have conducted investment
operations since July 2004. We are subject to all of the
business risks and uncertainties associated with any new
business enterprise, including the risk that we may not achieve
our investment objective and that the value of your investment
in us could decline substantially or fall to zero. We completed
our initial public offering on July 27, 2004. As of
March 31, 2006, we continue to pursue our investment
strategy and 89.5% of our net assets are invested in energy
companies, with the remainder invested in U.S. government
and money market securities. Dividends that we pay prior to
being fully invested may be substantially lower than the
dividends that we expect to pay when our portfolio is fully
invested. If we do not realize yields in excess of our expenses,
we may incur operating losses and the market price of our shares
may decline.
If our
primary investments are deemed not to be qualifying assets, we
could lose our status as a business development company or be
precluded from investing according to our current business
plan.
In order to maintain our status as a business development
company, we must not acquire any assets other than
qualifying assets unless, at the time of and after
giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our
10
total assets are qualifying assets. If we acquire mezzanine
loans or dividend-paying equity securities from an issuer that
has outstanding marginable securities at the time we make an
investment, these acquired assets cannot be treated as
qualifying assets. See Regulation Qualifying
Assets. This results from the definition of eligible
portfolio company under the 1940 Act, which in part looks
to whether a company has outstanding marginable securities.
Amendments promulgated in 1998 by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System to Regulation T under the Exchange
Act expanded the definition of marginable security to include
any non-equity security. These amendments have raised questions
as to whether a private company that has outstanding debt
securities would qualify as an eligible portfolio company.
We believe that the mezzanine loans and equity instruments that
we have acquired and expect to continue to acquire should
constitute qualifying assets because the privately held
companies to which we lend do not, at the time of our
investment, have outstanding marginable securities. Until the
questions raised by the amendments to Regulation T have
been clarified through SEC rulemaking or addressed by
legislative, administrative or judicial action, we intend to
treat as qualifying assets only those mezzanine loans that are
not investment grade, do not have a public secondary market, and
are issued by a private issuer that does not have outstanding a
class of margin eligible securities at the time of our
investment. Likewise, we treat equity securities issued by a
portfolio company as qualifying assets only if such securities
are issued by a private company that has no marginable
securities outstanding at the time we purchase such securities.
To date, we do not believe that either the SEC or its staff has
taken any position with respect to our analysis of the issues
discussed above and neither the SEC or its staff indicated that
they concur with our analysis. We intend to adjust our
investment focus as needed to comply with
and/or take
advantage of any future administrative position, judicial
decision or legislative action.
If there were a court ruling or regulatory decision that
conflicts with our interpretations, we could lose our status as
a business development company or be precluded from investing in
the manner described in this prospectus, either of which would
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. See
Regulations governing our operation as a
business development company affect our ability to raise, and
the way in which we raise, additional capital. Such a
ruling or decision also may require that we dispose of
investments that we made based on our interpretation of
Regulation T. Such dispositions could have a material
adverse effect on us and our stockholders. We may need to
dispose of such investments quickly, which would make it
difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms. In
addition, because these types of investments will generally be
illiquid, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer and, even if
we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the investments at a
substantial loss. See The lack of liquidity in
our investments may adversely affect our business.
Our
financial condition and results of operations will depend on our
ability to manage our future growth effectively.
Prospect Capital Management has been registered as an investment
adviser since March 31, 2004, and Prospect Energy has been
organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004. As such, each entity is subject to the
business risks and uncertainties associated with any young
business enterprise, including the limited experience in
managing or operating a business development company under the
1940 Act. Our ability to achieve our investment objective
depends on our ability to grow, which depends, in turn, on our
Investment Advisers ability to continue to identify,
analyze, invest in and monitor companies that meet our
investment criteria. Accomplishing this result on a
cost-effective basis is largely a function of our Investment
Advisers structuring of investments, its ability to
provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and
our access to financing on acceptable terms. As we grow, we and
Prospect Capital Management need to continue to hire, train,
supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future
growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
11
We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities.
A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of
investments that we make in target energy companies. We compete
with other business development companies, public and private
funds, commercial and investment banks and commercial financing
companies. Additionally, because competition for investment
opportunities generally has increased among alternative
investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those entities have
begun to invest in areas they have not traditionally invested
in, including investments in middle-market companies. As a
result of these new entrants, competition for investment
opportunities at middle-market companies has intensified and we
expect that trend to continue. Many of our existing and
potential competitors are substantially larger and have
considerably greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a
lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not
available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have
higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which
could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and
establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our
competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that
the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We
cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will
not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of
existing and increasing competition, we may not be able to take
advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to
time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to
identify and make investments that are consistent with our
investment objective.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates
that we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors make
loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than
the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we
do not match our competitors pricing, terms and structure.
If we match our competitors pricing, terms and structure,
we may experience decreased net interest income and increased
risk of credit loss.
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company affect
our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional
capital.
We may issue debt securities or preferred stock
and/or
borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which
we refer to collectively as senior securities, up to
the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the
provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business
development company, to issue senior securities only in amounts
such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals
at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the
value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this
test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of
our investments or sell additional shares of common stock and,
depending on the nature of our leverage, to repay a portion of
our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be
disadvantageous. In addition, issuance of additional securities
could dilute the percentage ownership of our current
stockholders in us.
As a business development company regulated under provisions of
the 1940 Act, we are not generally able to issue and sell our
common stock at a price below the current net asset value per
share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants,
options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below
the current net asset value of our common stock in a rights
offering to our stockholders or if (1) our Board of
Directors determines that such sale is in the Companys
best interests and our stockholders, (2) our stockholders
approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less
than the current net asset value, and (3) the price at
which our common stock is to be issued and sold may not be less
than a price which, in the determination of our Board of
Directors, closely approximates the market value of such
securities (less any sales load).
In addition, we may in the future seek to securitize our loans
to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize
loans, we may create a wholly owned subsidiary and contribute a
pool of loans to such subsidiary. This could include the sale of
interests in the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to
purchasers who we would expect to be willing to accept a lower
interest rate to invest in investment grade loan pools. We would
retain a portion of the equity in the securitized pool of loans.
An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could
limit our ability to grow our business and fully execute our
business strategy, and could
12
decrease our earnings, if any. Moreover, the successful
securitization of our loan portfolio might expose us to losses
because the residual loans in which we do not sell interests may
tend to be those that are riskier and more likely to generate
losses.
If we
fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level
taxes on our income and our income available for distribution
would be reduced.
To maintain our qualification as a RIC under the Code, and
obtain RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain source of income,
asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. The
annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we
distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net
short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis.
Because we expect to use debt financing in the future, we are
subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the
1940 Act and financial covenants that could, under certain
circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary
to qualify for RIC tax treatment. If we are unable to obtain
cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax
treatment and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income
tax. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must also meet
certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each
calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our
having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to
prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments
are in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at
disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If
we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason or become subject to
corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could
substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income
available for distribution, and the actual amount of our
distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse
effect on us and our shares. For additional information
regarding asset coverage ratio and RIC requirements, see
Regulation Senior securities and
Material U.S. federal income tax considerations.
We may
have difficulty paying our required distributions if we
recognize income before or without receiving cash representing
such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain
amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original
issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in
connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other
circumstances, or
payment-in-kind
interest, which represents contractual interest added to the
loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original
issue discount, which could be significant relative to our
overall investment activities, or increases in loan balances as
a result of
payment-in-kind
arrangements, are included in our income before we receive any
corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include
in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash.
While we focus primarily on investments that will generate a
current cash return, our investment portfolio may also include
securities that do not pay some or all of their return in
periodic current cash distributions.
The income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on
income that may include interest that has been accrued but not
yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan
that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible
that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the
income incentive fee will become uncollectible.
Since in some cases we may recognize taxable income before or
without receiving cash representing such income, we may have
difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least
90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if
any, to maintain RIC tax treatment. Accordingly, we may have to
sell some of our investments at times we would not consider
advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce
new investment originations to meet these distribution
requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other
sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC treatment and thus
become subject to corporate-level income tax. See Material
U.S. federal income tax considerations Taxation
as a RIC.
13
If we
issue senior securities, including debt, you will be exposed to
additional risks, including the typical risks associated with
leverage.
|
|
|
|
|
You will be exposed to increased risk of loss if we incur debt
to make investments. If we do incur debt, a decrease in the
value of our investments or in our revenues would have a greater
negative impact on the value of our common stock than if we did
not use debt.
|
|
|
|
Our ability to pay dividends would be restricted if our asset
coverage ratio were not at least 200% and any amounts that we
use to service our indebtedness would not be available for
dividends to our common stockholders.
|
|
|
|
It is likely that any debt we incur will be governed by an
indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting
our operating flexibility.
|
|
|
|
We and you will bear the cost of issuing and servicing our
senior securities.
|
|
|
|
Any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the
future may have rights, preferences and privileges more
favorable than those of our common stock.
|
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
We expect that a significant portion of our debt investments
will bear interest at fixed rates and the value of these
investments could be negatively affected by increases in market
interest rates. In addition, an increase in interest rates would
make it more expensive to use debt to finance our investments.
As a result, a significant increase in market interest rates
could both reduce the value of our portfolio investments and
increase our cost of capital, which would reduce our net
investment income.
We
need to raise additional capital to grow because we must
distribute most of our income.
We need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. A
reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our
ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary
income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of
realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our
shareholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, such
earnings are not available to fund investment originations. We
have sought additional capital by borrowing from financial
institutions and may issue debt securities or additional equity
securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from
other sources to fund our investments, it could limit our
ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value
of our Securities. In addition, as a business development
company, we are generally required to maintain a ratio of at
least 200% of total assets to total borrowings, which may
restrict our ability to borrow in certain circumstances.
Most
of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a
result, there is uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
A large percentage of our portfolio investments consist of
securities of privately held or thinly traded public companies.
The fair value of these securities is often not readily
determinable. The determination of fair value, and thus the
amount of unrealized losses we may incur in any year, is to a
degree subjective, and the Investment Advisor has a conflict of
interest in making the determination. We value these securities
quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board
of Directors based on input from our Investment Adviser, a third
party independent valuation firm and our audit committee. Our
Board of Directors utilizes the services of an independent
valuation firm to aid it in determining the fair value of any
securities. The types of factors that may be considered in fair
value pricing of our investments include the nature and
realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which
the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly
traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant
factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of
private securities and private companies, are inherently
uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate over short periods of
time and may be based on estimates. The determinations of fair
value by our Board of Directors may differ materially from the
values that would have been used if a ready market for these
securities existed. Our net asset value
14
could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the
fair value of our investments were materially higher than the
values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such
securities.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We generally make investments in private companies.
Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and
other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than
publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments
may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the
need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or
a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly
less than the value at which we have previously recorded our
investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our
ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the
extent that we or our Investment Adviser has material non-public
information regarding such portfolio company.
We may
experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to a number of factors, including the interest or
dividend rates payable on the debt or equity securities we
acquire, the default rate on debt securities, the level of our
expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of
realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we
encounter competition in our markets, the seasonality of the
energy industry, weather patterns, changes in energy prices and
general economic conditions. As a result of these factors,
results for any period should not be relied upon as being
indicative of performance in future periods.
Potential
conflicts of interest could impact our investment
returns.
Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers
of our Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital Management, may
serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that
operate in the same or related lines of business as we do or of
investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they
may have obligations to investors in those entities, the
fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or
our stockholders. For example, it is possible that new
investment opportunities that meet our investment objective may
come to the attention of one these entities in connection with
another investment advisory client or program, and, if so, such
opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made available,
to us. If that were to occur, we would not have the opportunity
to benefit from such investment, as a result of which our
investment returns may be lower than they would have been had we
made such investment. However, as an investment adviser,
Prospect Capital Management has a fiduciary obligation to act in
the best interests of its clients, including us. To that end, if
Prospect Capital Management or its affiliates manage any
additional investment vehicles or client accounts in the future,
Prospect Capital Management will endeavor to allocate investment
opportunities in a fair and equitable manner over time so as not
to discriminate unfairly against any client, including us. Our
Board of Directors will periodically review the policies and
procedures of Prospect Capital Management for allocation of
investment opportunities. If Prospect Capital Management chooses
to establish another investment fund in the future, when the
investment professionals of Prospect Capital Management identify
an investment, they will have to choose which investment fund
should make the investment.
In the course of our investing activities, under the Investment
Advisory Agreement we pay base management and incentive fees to
Prospect Capital Management, and reimburse Prospect Capital
Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a result of the
Investment Advisory Agreement, there may be times when the
management team of Prospect Capital Management has interests
that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a
conflict.
Prospect Capital Management receives a quarterly income
incentive fee based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net
investment income, if any, for the immediately preceding
calendar quarter. This income incentive fee is subject to a
quarterly hurdle rate before providing an income incentive fee
return to the Investment Adviser. To the extent we or Prospect
Capital Management are able to exert influence over our
portfolio companies, the income incentive fee may provide
Prospect Capital Management with an incentive to induce our
portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other
obligations owed to us from one
15
calendar quarter to another. If our Investment Adviser
terminates its voluntary agreement to have the income incentive
fee be subject to a fluctuating hurdle rate, the hurdle rate
would be fixed. This fixed hurdle rate has been based in
relation to current interest rates, which are currently
relatively low on a historical basis. Thus, if interest rates
rise, it would become easier for our investment income to exceed
the hurdle rate and, as a result, more likely that our
Investment Adviser will receive an income incentive fee than if
interest rates on our investments remained constant or
decreased. Subject to the receipt of any requisite shareholder
approval under the 1940 Act, our Board of Directors may readjust
the hurdle rate by amending the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The income incentive fee payable by Prospect Energy is computed
and paid on income that may include interest that has been
accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company
defaults on a loan that has a deferred interest feature, it is
possible that interest accrued under such loan that has
previously been included in the calculation of the income
incentive fee will become uncollectible. If this happens, our
Investment Adviser is not required to reimburse us for any such
income incentive fee payments. If we do not have sufficient
liquid assets to pay this incentive fee or distributions to
stockholders on such accrued income, we may be required to
liquidate assets in order to do so. This fee structure could
give rise to a conflict of interest for our Investment Adviser
to the extent that it may encourage the Investment Adviser to
favor debt financings that provide for deferred interest, rather
than current cash payments of interest. In addition, the amount
of the Investment Advisers compensation under the
incentive fee, is due, in part to the amount of unrealized
depreciation accrued by the Company.
We have entered into a royalty-free license agreement with
Prospect Capital Management. Under this agreement, Prospect
Capital Management agrees to grant us a non-exclusive license to
use the name Prospect Energy. Under the license
agreement, we have the right to use the Prospect
Energy name for so long as Prospect Capital Management or
one of its affiliates remains our Investment Adviser. In
addition, we rent office space from Prospect Administration, an
affiliate of Prospect Capital Management, and pay Prospect
Administration our allocable portion of overhead and other
expenses incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations as Administrator under the administration agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our
chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their
respective staffs. This may create conflicts of interest that
our Board of Directors monitors.
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely
affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws
at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and
regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed
from time to time. Accordingly, changes in these laws or
regulations could have a material adverse effect on our
business. For additional information regarding the regulations
we are subject to, see Regulation.
We may
not be able to find an appropriate replacement chief compliance
officer in the timeframe allotted by William E.
Vastardis.
William E. Vastardis has resigned as chief compliance officer of
Prospect Energy with a target effective date of July 31,
2006. Although Mr. Vastardis has stated he will continue
for some time after July 31, 2006, there is a risk that the
chief compliance officer position will remain vacant for a
period of time if we do not find an appropriate chief compliance
officer who will replace Mr. Vastardis. Mr. Vastardis will
remain our chief financial officer.
Risks
Related To Our Investments
We may
not realize gains or income from our investments.
We seek to generate both current income and capital
appreciation. However, the securities we invest in may not
appreciate and, in fact, may decline in value, and the issuers
of debt securities we invest in may default on interest
and/or
principal payments. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize
gains from our investments, and any gains that we do realize may
not be sufficient to offset any losses we experience.
16
Our
portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of portfolio
companies in the energy industry, which subject us to a risk of
significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its
obligations under any of the securities that we hold or if the
energy industry experiences a downturn.
As of June 26, 2006, we had invested in fifteen companies.
A consequence of this lack of diversification is that the
aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely
affected if a small number of such investments perform poorly or
if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond
our income tax diversification requirements, we do not have
fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments are
concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. We estimate
that, once we have invested substantially all of the net
proceeds of this offering, we will have invested in
approximately 15 to 25 portfolio companies, depending on the
availability of appropriate investment opportunities consistent
with our investment objective and market conditions. In
addition, we concentrate on making investments in the energy
industry and will invest, under normal circumstances, at least
80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any
borrowings for investment purposes) in energy companies. As a
result, a downturn in the energy industry could materially
adversely affect us.
The
energy industry is subject to many risks.
We concentrate our investments in the energy industry. Our
definition of energy, as used in the context of the energy
industry, is broad, and different sectors in the energy industry
may be subject to variable risks and economic pressures. As a
result, it is difficult to anticipate the impact of changing
economic and political conditions on our portfolio companies
and, as a result, our financial results. The revenues, income
(or losses) and valuations of energy companies can fluctuate
suddenly and dramatically due to any one or more of the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Risk. While we generally do
not invest in companies that accept completely unhedged
commodity risk, energy companies in general are directly
affected by energy commodity prices, such as the market prices
of crude oil, natural gas and wholesale electricity, especially
for those who own the underlying energy commodity. In addition,
the volatility of commodity prices can affect other energy
companies due to the impact of prices on the volume of
commodities transported, processed, stored or distributed and on
the cost of fuel for power generation companies. The volatility
of commodity prices can also affect energy companies
ability to access the capital markets in light of market
perception that their performance may be directly tied to
commodity prices. Historically, energy commodity prices have
been cyclical and exhibited significant volatility. Although we
require adherence to strict risk controls, including appropriate
commodity and other hedges, by each of our portfolio companies,
some of our portfolio companies may not engage in hedging
transactions to minimize their exposure to commodity price risk.
For those companies that engage in such hedging transactions,
they remain subject to market risks, including market liquidity
and counterparty creditworthiness.
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Risk. The profitability of energy
companies could be adversely affected by changes in the
regulatory environment. The businesses of energy companies are
heavily regulated by federal, state and local governments in
diverse manners, such as the way in which energy assets are
constructed, maintained and operated and the prices energy
companies may charge for their products and services. Such
regulation can change over time in scope and intensity. For
example, a particular by-product of an energy process may be
declared hazardous by a regulatory agency, which can
unexpectedly increase production costs. Moreover, many state and
federal environmental laws provide for civil penalties as well
as regulatory remediation, thus adding to the potential
liability an energy company may face. In addition, the
deregulation of energy markets and the unresolved regulatory
issues related to some power markets such as California create
uncertainty in the regulatory environment as rules and
regulations may be adopted on a transitional basis. We cannot
assure you that the deregulation of energy markets will continue
and if it continues, whether its impact on energy
companies profitability will be positive.
|
|
|
|
Production Risk. The profitability of energy
companies may be materially impacted by the volume of crude oil,
natural gas or other energy commodities available for
transporting, processing, storing,
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
distributing or power generation. A significant decrease in the
production of natural gas, crude oil, coal or other energy
commodities, due to the decline of production from existing
facilities, import supply disruption, depressed commodity
prices, political events, OPEC actions or otherwise, could
reduce revenue and operating income or increase operating costs
of energy companies and, therefore, their ability to pay debt or
dividends. In recent months, OPEC has announced changes in
production quotas in response to changing market conditions,
including near record high oil prices in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand Risk. A sustained decline in demand for
crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products and
electricity could materially affect revenues and cash flows of
energy companies. Factors that could lead to a decrease in
market demand include a recession or other adverse economic
conditions, an increase in the market price of the underlying
commodity, higher taxes or other regulatory actions that
increase costs, or a shift in consumer demand for such products.
|
|
|
|
Depletion and Exploration Risk. A portion of
any one energy companys assets may be dedicated to natural
gas, crude oil
and/or coal
reserves and other commodities that naturally deplete over time.
Depletion could have a material adverse impact on such
companys ability to maintain its revenue. Further,
estimates of energy reserves may not be accurate and, even if
accurate, reserves may not be fully utilized at reasonable
costs. Exploration of energy resources, especially of oil and
gas, is inherently risky and requires large amounts of capital.
|
|
|
|
Weather Risk. Unseasonable extreme weather
patterns could result in significant volatility in demand for
energy and power. This volatility may create fluctuations in
earnings of energy companies.
|
|
|
|
Operational Risk. Energy companies are subject
to various operational risks, such as failed drilling or well
development, unscheduled outages, underestimated cost
projections, unanticipated operation and maintenance expenses,
failure to obtain the necessary permits to operate and failure
of third-party contractors (for example, energy producers and
shippers) to perform their contractual obligations. In addition,
energy companies employ a variety of means of increasing cash
flow, including increasing utilization of existing facilities,
expanding operations through new construction, expanding
operations through acquisitions, or securing additional
long-term contracts. Thus, some energy companies may be subject
to construction risk, acquisition risk or other risk factors
arising from their specific business strategies.
|
|
|
|
Competition Risk. The progress in deregulating
energy markets has created more competition in the energy
industry. This competition is reflected in risks associated with
marketing and selling energy in the evolving energy market and a
competitors development of a lower-cost energy or power
source, or of a lower cost means of operations, and other risks
arising from competition.
|
|
|
|
Valuation Risk. Since mid-2001, excess power
generation capacity in certain regions of the United States has
caused substantial decreases in the market capitalization of
many energy companies. While such prices have recovered to some
extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market
capitalization will not recur, or that any future decreases in
energy company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in
nature.
|
|
|
|
Terrorism Risk. Since the
September 11th attacks, the United States government
has issued public warnings indicating that energy assets,
specifically those related to pipeline infrastructure,
production facilities and transmission and distribution
facilities, might be specific targets of terrorist activity. The
continued threat of terrorism and related military activity will
likely increase volatility for prices of natural gas and oil and
could affect the market for products and services of energy
companies. In addition, any future terrorist attack or armed
conflict in the United States or elsewhere may undermine
economic conditions in the United States in general.
|
|
|
|
Financing Risk. Some of our portfolio
companies rely on the capital markets to raise money to pay
their existing obligations. Their ability to access the capital
markets on attractive terms or at all may be affected by any of
the risks associated with energy companies described above, by
general economic and market conditions or by other factors. This
may in turn affect their ability to satisfy their obligations
with us.
|
18
Our
investments in prospective portfolio companies may be risky and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
We invest in companies in the energy industry, most of which
have relatively short or no operating histories. These companies
are and will be subject to all of the business risk and
uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise,
including the risk that these companies may not reach their
investment objective and the value of our investment in them may
decline substantially or fall to zero.
In addition, investment in the middle market energy companies
that we are targeting involves a number of other significant
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
these companies may have limited financial resources and may be
unable to meet their obligations under their securities that we
hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value
of their equity securities or of any collateral with respect to
debt securities and a reduction in the likelihood of our
realizing on any guarantees we may have obtained in connection
with our investment;
|
|
|
|
they may have shorter operating histories, narrower product
lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which
tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions
and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;
|
|
|
|
because many of these companies are privately held companies,
public information is generally not available about these
companies. As a result, we will depend on the ability of our
Investment Adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate
these companies in making investment decisions. If our
Investment Adviser is unable to uncover all material information
about these companies, it may not make a fully informed
investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments;
|
|
|
|
they are more likely to depend on the management talents and
efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death,
disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these
persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio
company and, in turn, on us;
|
|
|
|
they may have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in changing
businesses with products subject to a risk of obsolescence and
may require substantial additional capital to support their
operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive
position. In addition, our executive officers, directors and our
Investment Adviser could, in the ordinary course of business, be
named as defendants in litigation arising from proposed
investments or from our investments in the portfolio companies.
|
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and
harm our operating results.
Our portfolio companies will generally be affected by the
conditions and overall strength of the national, regional and
local economies, including interest rate fluctuations, changes
in the capital markets and changes in the prices of their
primary commodities and products. These factors also impact the
amount of residential, industrial and commercial growth in the
energy industry. Additionally, these factors could adversely
impact the customer base and customer collections of our
portfolio companies.
As a result, many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible
to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay
our loans or meet other obligations during these periods.
Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase, and
the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease, during these
periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value
of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our
equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead
to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues,
net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also
could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the
capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend
credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing
investments and harm our operating results.
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or
operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to
defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio
companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or
equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the
extent necessary to
19
seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may
include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a
defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if one of our
portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though we may have
structured our interest as senior debt or preferred equity,
depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent
to which we actually provided managerial assistance to that
portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our
debt or equity holding and subordinate all or a portion of our
claim to those of other creditors.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities
that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such
companies.
We invest primarily in mezzanine debt and dividend-paying equity
securities issued by our portfolio companies. Our portfolio
companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other
debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with,
or senior to, the securities in which we invest. By their terms,
such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to
receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before
the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in
respect of the securities in which we invest. Also, in the event
of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking
senior to our investment in that portfolio company would
typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we
receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After
repaying the senior security holders, the portfolio company may
not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation
to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with securities
in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any
distributions with other security holders in the event of an
insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we
may not be in a position to control any portfolio company in
which we invest. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a
portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions
with which we disagree and the management of such company, as
representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take
risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests
as debt or preferred equity investors.
We may
not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral
securing our debt investments.
Although a substantial amount of our debt investments are
protected by holding security interests in the assets of the
portfolio companies, we may not be able to fully realize the
value of the collateral securing our investments due to one or
more of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
since our debt investments are primarily made in the form of
mezzanine loans, our liens on the collateral, if any, are
subordinated to those of the senior secured debt of the
portfolio companies, if any. As a result, we may not be able to
control remedies with respect to the collateral;
|
|
|
|
the collateral may not be valuable enough to satisfy all of the
obligations under our secured loan, particularly after giving
effect to the repayment of secured debt of the portfolio company
that ranks senior to our loan;
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy laws may limit our ability to realize value from the
collateral and may delay the realization process;
|
|
|
|
our rights in the collateral may be adversely affected by the
failure to perfect security interests in the collateral;
|
|
|
|
how effectively the collateral would be liquidated and the value
received could be impaired or impeded by the need to obtain
regulatory and contractual consents; and
|
|
|
|
by its nature, some or all of the collateral may be illiquid and
may have no readily ascertainable market value. The liquidity
and value of the collateral could be impaired as a result of
changing economic conditions, competition, and other factors,
including the availability of suitable buyers.
|
20
Our
incentive fee could induce Prospect Capital Management to make
speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
may create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to make
investments on our behalf that are more speculative or involve
more risk than would be the case in the absence of such
compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee
payable is determined (calculated as a percentage of the return
on invested capital) may encourage the Investment Adviser to use
leverage to increase the return on our investments. The use of
leverage would increase the likelihood of default, which would
disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because the
Investment Adviser will receive an incentive fee based, in part,
upon net capital gains realized on our investments, the
Investment Adviser may invest more than would otherwise be
appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield
capital gains, as compared to income producing securities. Such
a practice could result in our investing in more speculative
securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result
in higher investment losses, particularly during economic
downturns.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
also could create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to
invest on our behalf in instruments, such as zero coupon bonds,
that have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments,
we would accrue interest income over the life of the investment
but would not receive payments in cash on the investment until
the end of the term. Our net investment income used to calculate
the income incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest.
For example, accrued interest, if any, on our investments in
zero coupon bonds will be included in the calculation of our
incentive fee, even though we will not receive any cash interest
payments in respect of payment on the bond until its maturity
date. Thus, a portion of this incentive fee would be based on
income that we may not have yet received in cash.
We
have not yet identified all of the potential investments for our
portfolio.
We have not yet identified all of the potential investments for
our portfolio, and, thus, you will not be able to evaluate all
of our potential investments prior to purchasing our Securities.
This factor will increase the uncertainty, and thus the risk, of
investing in our Securities.
Our
investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks
in addition to the risks inherent in
U.S. investments.
Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in
securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies
may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with
investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in
exchange control regulations, political and social instability,
expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets
and less available information than is generally the case in the
United States, higher transaction costs, less government
supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed
bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual
obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards
and greater price volatility.
Although currently all of our investments are, and we expect
that most of our investments will be,
U.S. dollar-denominated, our investments that are
denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk
that the value of a particular currency will change in relation
to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may
affect currency values are trade balances, the level of
short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of
similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities
for investment and capital appreciation, and political
developments.
We may
employ hedging techniques to mitigate certain risks, but it may
not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against such
risks.
We may employ hedging techniques to minimize currency or
interest rate risks, but we can offer no assurance that such
strategies will be effective. If we engage in hedging
transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with
such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward
contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps,
collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the
relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in
currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Hedging
21
against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does
not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of
such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions
decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions
designed to gain from those same developments, thereby
offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions.
Such hedging transaction may also limit the opportunity for gain
if the values of the portfolio positions should increase.
Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange
rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally
anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging
transaction at an acceptable price.
The success of our hedging transactions depends on our ability
to correctly predict movements, currencies and interest rates.
Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to
reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks,
unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest
rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than
if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. The
degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments
used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio
positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of
reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation
between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings
being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from
achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In
addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly
against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities
denominated in
non-U.S. currencies.
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
Because we borrow money to make investments, our net investment
income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at
which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these
funds. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant
change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse
effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising
interest rates, our cost of borrowed funds would increase, which
would reduce our net investment income. We use a combination of
short-term borrowings and equity capital to finance our
investing activities. We utilize our revolving line of credit as
a means to bridge to long-term financing. These risks are in
addition to risks associated with fluctuating interest rates,
which can adversely affect the interest income we are owed and
that we must pay, in addition to the ability of portfolio
companies to pay us, and our ability to pay our debt service and
dividends, which could adversely affect us and our stock price.
We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort
to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such
techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities
to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act.
Risks
Relating To Our Securities
There
is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our
dividends may not grow over time.
We have made and intend to continue to make distributions on a
quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will
achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will
allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or
year-to-year
increases in cash distributions. In addition, due to the asset
coverage test applicable to us as a business development
company, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions.
See Distributions.
Provisions
of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and
bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact
on the price of our common stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws
contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging,
delaying or making more difficult a change in control and
preventing the removal of incumbent directors. We are covered by
the Maryland Business Combination Act (the Business
Combination Act) to the extent such statute is not
superseded by applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. However,
our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution exempting any
business combination between us and any other person from the
Business Combination Act, subject to prior approval of such
business combination by our Board, including a majority of our
directors who are not interested persons as defined in the 1940
Act. In addition, the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act
(the Control Share Act) provides that control shares
22
of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the
Control Share Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our
shares of stock. If the applicable board resolution is repealed
or our Board does not otherwise approve a business combination,
the Business Combination Act and the Control Share Act (if we
amend our bylaws to be subject to that Act) may discourage
others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the
difficulty of consummating any offer.
Additionally, under our charter, our Board of Directors is
divided into three classes serving staggered terms and no
director may be removed except for cause and upon vote of
stockholders holding
662/3%
of the shares of common stock entitled to vote on the election
of directors. The inability to remove directors and the
maintenance of a staggered board could discourage others from
pursuing a merger or other
change-of-control
transaction. Our Board of Directors may, without stockholder
action, authorize the issuance of shares of stock in one or more
classes or series, including preferred stock; and our Board of
Directors may, without stockholder action, amend our charter to
increase the number of shares of stock of any class or series
that we have authority to issue. The existence of these
provisions, among others, may have a negative impact on the
price of our common stock and may discourage third party bids
for ownership of our Company. These provisions may prevent any
premiums being offered to you for shares of our common stock.
Investing
in our Securities may involve a high degree of
risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment
objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative
investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our
investments in portfolio companies may be speculative and
aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not
be suitable for someone with low risk tolerance.
The
market price of our Securities may fluctuate
significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for our Securities
may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which
are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our
operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of business development companies or other companies
in the energy industry, which are not necessarily related to the
operating performance of these companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly
with respect to RICs or business development companies;
|
|
|
|
loss of RIC status;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
departure of one or more of Prospect Capital Managements
key personnel;
|
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
changes in prevailing interest rates;
|
|
|
|
litigation matters;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors; and
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source.
|
23
We may
allocate the net proceeds from any offering in ways with which
you may not agree.
We will have significant flexibility in investing the net
proceeds of any offering of our Securities. We may use the net
proceeds from the offering in ways with which you may not agree
or for investments other than those contemplated at the time of
the offering, unless such change in the use of proceeds is
subject to stockholders approval or prohibited by law.
Sales
of substantial amounts of our Securities in the public market
may have an adverse effect on the market price of our
Securities.
As of July 19, 2006, we have 7,069,873 shares of
common stock outstanding. Sales of substantial amounts of our
Securities or the availability of such Securities for sale could
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our Securities.
If this occurs and continues, it could impair our ability to
raise additional capital through the sale of Securities should
we desire to do so.
24
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Prospect Energy was incorporated under the Maryland General
Corporation Law in April 2004. We have elected to be treated as
a business development company under the 1940 Act. Accordingly,
we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements.
For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our
total assets in qualifying assets, including
securities of private or thinly traded public
U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities and high-quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less. We will typically
invest under normal circumstances at least 80.0% of net assets
in energy companies.
We completed our initial public offering on July 27, 2004.
As of March 31, 2006, we continue to pursue our investment
strategy and 89.5% of our net assets are invested in energy
companies, with the remainder invested in U.S. government
and money market securities.
We invest in companies in the energy industry, most of which
have relatively short or no operating histories. These companies
are and will be subject to all of the business risk and
uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise,
including the risk that these companies may not reach their
investment objective and the value of our investment in them may
decline substantially or fall to zero.
Our portfolio generated an annualized current yield of 18.0% and
21.8% as of March 31, 2006 and as of June 30, 2005,
respectively, across all our long-term debt and equity
investments. This yield includes interest from all of our
long-term investments as well as dividends from GSHI and Unity
Virginia Holdings. We expect this number to decline over time as
we become fully invested. Monetization of, or dividends from,
other equity positions that we hold is not included in this
yield estimate.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Investment
Activity
As of March 31, 2006, we completed our sixth full quarter
since completion of our initial public offering on July 27,
2004, with approximately 1.9% of our net assets invested in an
obligation of the Federal Home Loan Bank; 89.5%, or about
$93.6 million, in ten long-term portfolio investments and
8.3% in two money market funds. The remaining 0.3% represents
other assets in excess of liabilities.
Long-term
Portfolio Investments
On February 1, 2006, we converted the $0.5 million of
redeemable preferred equity in Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC
(Unity) to additional subordinated secured debt. On
May 10, 2006, Unity sought relief from creditors under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code.
On February 9, 2006, we provided $6.9 million of
senior secured debt financing to Genesis Coal Corporation
(Genesis), a coal production company based in
Prestonsburg, Kentucky. Genesis is led by Jerry Tackett and
David Stetson, who have significant experience in the
Appalachian coal business. Genesis holds leases on approximately
4,700 mineral acres with approximately 10 million
recoverable tons of low to medium sulfur coal reserves in Floyd
County, Kentucky. The majority of this coal is located
underground. Genesis has separate fixed-price multi-year
contracts for a majority of its production with a major electric
utility and a major coal producer and marketer. Our funding is
being utilized to acquire non-management shareholder interests,
to acquire additional mining equipment, and to increase
production rates.
On February 15, 2006, we provided $3.0 million of
senior secured debt and a $0.2 million preferred equity
investment in Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC.
(AEH), an energy services company based in
Charleston, West Virginia. AEH is led by R. William West, who
has more than 30 years of experience in natural resource
related construction, equipment fleet management, and services.
AEH is an energy services business focused on acquiring and
expanding small and medium-sized energy services companies in
the fragmented Appalachian region. AEH provides services to
customers in the coal, natural gas, and oil
25
industries. Existing lines of business include tree clearance,
road construction, excavation, drill site preparation, pipeline
construction, and reclamation. Prospects capital, along
with external equity, is being used by AEH to acquire East
Cumberland, LLC, and C&S Oilfield and Pipeline Construction,
LLC.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we provided
an additional $2.8 million of senior secured debt to
Worcester Energy Company, Inc. (WECO). WECO is using
this as operational funding for ongoing activities. We have
retained a controlling interest in WECO as part of this
additional funding.
GSHI owns and operates a major gas gathering and processing
system in the East Texas Field in Gregg, Upshur, Rusk and Smith
counties, Texas. This system consists of two processing
facilities (the Longview Plant and the Chapel Hill Plant) and
approximately 1,000 miles of associated gathering and
transportation pipelines. GSHI controls the only independent
gathering system in the East Texas Field serving all of the
approximately 4,000 currently operating wells in the region.
GSHI completed construction and started operation of the
22.5 mile Exxon Hawkins NGL Pipeline connecting the Exxon
Hawkins gas plant to GSHI on June 6, 2005. Deliveries for
2005 averaged 650 barrels per day and are expected to
exceed 1,000 barrels per day in 2006. The Agreement with
Exxon Gas & Power Marketing Company (Exxon)
is effective as of June 30, 2004 and has a term of seven
years with an annual renewal provision thereafter. Under the
agreement, Exxon is to deliver a specified minimum number of
barrels of natural gas liquids in the first five years and to
pay a transportation, treating and fractionation fee, which
includes a capital recovery component. After five years or
delivery of the specified minimum number of barrels, whichever
comes first, the fee decreases to a base transportation,
treating and fractionation rate for the remainder of the
contract term. Total capital expenditures for 2005 were
approximately $3.5 million of which $3.25 million was
related to the construction of the Exxon Hawkins NGL Pipeline.
GSHI continued to perform according to expectation and benefited
from a strong commodity price environment, generating operating
earnings of approximately $13.1 million in 2005.
Prospect Energys investment in GSHI is comprised of
$18.4 million in subordinated secured debt
(Subordinated Debt) and 100% common equity shares
($12.3 million). The Subordinated Debt matures on
December 22, 2011. The loan is paid in equal quarterly
installments of $876,190 beginning December 31, 2006 and
bears interest at 18%. Interest paid in 2005 was
$3.312 million or $828,000 quarterly. Amounts outstanding
on the Subordinated Debt at December 31, 2005 were
$18.4 million. Additionally, on December 22, 2004,
GSHI entered into a $12.5 million senior secured term loan
(Senior Debt) with Citibank Texas, N.A. (formerly
known as First American Bank, SSB). The Senior Debt matures on
December 22, 2010. The loan is paid in equal quarterly
installments of $543,479 beginning on June 30, 2005 and
bears interest at LIBOR plus 225 basis points. Interest paid on
the Senior Debt in 2005 was $682,875 and amounts outstanding at
December 31, 2005 were $10.869 million.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, we had one
repayment of debt in entirety. On December 29, 2005, Miller
Petroleum, Inc. repaid $3.2 million that was originally due
August 21, 2006. We have retained our equity interest in
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
Investment
Income
We generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt
securities that we own, dividend income on any common or
preferred stock that we own, and capital gains or losses on any
debt or equity securities that we acquire in portfolio companies
and subsequently sell. Our investments, if in the form of debt
securities, will typically have a term of one to ten years and
bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. To the extent
achievable, we will seek to collateralize our investments by
obtaining security interests in our portfolio companies
assets. We also may acquire minority or majority equity
interests in our portfolio companies, which may pay cash or
in-kind dividends on a recurring or otherwise negotiated basis.
In addition, we may generate revenue in other forms including
commitment, origination, structuring or due diligence fees; fees
for providing managerial assistance; and possibly consultation
fees. Any such fees generated in connection with our investments
are recognized as earned.
Investment income, which consists of interest income, dividend
income, and origination fee accretion totaled $4.0 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$3.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 and
$1.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. As
well, investment income
26
totaled $11.1 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to $5.0 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2005. The remaining investment
income during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was
generated primarily from investments in short-term Federal Home
Loan Bank Discount Notes and cash equivalents.
Operating
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of investment advisory
fees, legal and professional fees and other operating and
overhead-related expenses. These expenses include our allocable
portion of overhead under the administration agreement with
Prospect Administration under which Prospect Administration
provides administrative services and facilities for Prospect
Energy. Our investment advisory fees compensate our Investment
Adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating,
closing and monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs
and expenses of our operations and transactions in accordance
with our administration agreement with Prospect Administration.
Operating expenses totaled $1.9 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006 as compared to $1.9 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 2005 and $1.3 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. Operating expenses
totaled $5.5 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to $3.8 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2005. The base management fee
totaled $0.5 million for the quarter ended March 31,
2006 compared to $0.5 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2005 and $0.5 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005. The base management fee totaled
$1.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006
compared to $1.3 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2005. The current quarter is the second quarter
where an income incentive fee has been earned by the Investment
Adviser. The fee totaled $0.5 million as compared to
$0.5 million in the prior quarter. Legal and professional
fees began to stabilize during the three months ended
March 31, 2006, as litigation related costs began to
decrease.
Net
Investment Income, Net Unrealized Appreciation and Net Increase
in Stockholders Equity Resulting from
Operations
Prospect Energys net investment income totaled
$2.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
compared to $2.0 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2005 and $0.4 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005. Net investment income totaled
$5.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006
compared to $1.2 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2005. Net investment income represents the
difference between investment income and operating expenses and
is directly impacted by the items described above. Net
unrealized appreciation totaled $0.8 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 compared to $0.5 million
for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 and
$0.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,
primarily as a result of the increase in fair value of our
investment in GSHI. Net unrealized appreciation totaled
$1.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2006
compared to $0.4 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2005. Net increase in stockholders equity
resulting from operations represents the sum of the returns
generated from net investment income, realized gains (losses)
and from unrealized appreciation (depreciation).
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys liquidity and capital resources were
generated primarily from the remaining net proceeds of its
initial public offering as well as from cash flows from
operations. We generated $97.0 million in cash from the net
proceeds of our initial offering. We used cash flows in
operating activities totaling ($3.2) million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
($82.6) million for the nine months ended March 31,
2005. We declared and paid dividends totaling $5.5 million
for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$1.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2005.
In the future, we may also fund a portion of our investments
through borrowings from banks, issuances of senior securities or
secondary offerings. We may also securitize a portion of our
investments in mezzanine or senior secured loans or other
assets. Our objective is to put in place such borrowings in
order to expand our portfolio. Our primary use of funds will be
investments in portfolio companies and cash distributions to
holders of our common stock.
27
At March 31, 2006, we held no cash in the segregated
account maintained in conjunction with a limited indemnity
issued to Citibank Texas, N.A. (formerly First American Bank,
SSB). The limited indemnity with Citibank required us to
indemnify Citibank for up to $12.0 million for any losses
it realizes on its term loan to GSHI resulting only from
potential legal claims that might or could be asserted by
certain third parties. This limited indemnity was backed by the
funds in the segregated account. During the quarters ended
December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005, $9.6 million
and $3.3 million of previously segregated funds were
released to the Company, respectively. These reductions
reflected a waiver of the segregated funds requirement due to
the developments related to legal claims and prior payments by
GSHI to Citibank Texas, N.A., respectively.
Capital
Raising Activities
On February 17, 2006, we entered into a $20,000,000 senior
revolving credit facility (Facility) with a
syndicate of lenders administered by the Bank of Montreal.
Interest on borrowing under the Facility is charged at either
(i) a LIBOR rate loan plus the applicable percentage at
such time, generally 250 basis points, or (ii) the
greater of the lender prime rate or the federal funds effective
rate plus 50 basis points. Loans under the Facility are
collateralized by a perfected first priority security interest
in all of the assets of the Company, including all investments
in its portfolio companies. The Facility will be used to
supplement Prospect Energys equity capital to make
additional portfolio investments. This Facility, which, together
with other borrowings (which may include reverse repos and
similar transactions), may be used in the future to leverage our
capital. Our objective is to put in place such borrowings in
order to expand our portfolio. Our primary use of funds will be
investments in portfolio companies and cash distributions to
holders of our common stock. Subsequently the credit facility
has been increased to $30.0 million.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in
interest rates, equity price risk and some of the loans in our
portfolio may have floating rates. To date, a significant, but
declining, percentage of our assets have been and are invested
in short-term U.S. treasury bills. We may hedge against
interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments
such as futures, options and forward contracts subject to the
requirements of the 1940 Act. While hedging activities may
insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may
also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of higher
interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments.
During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 and
the twelve months ended June 30, 2005, we did not engage
directly in hedging activities.
Controls
and Procedures.
As of March 31, 2006, Prospect Energy carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
Prospect Energys management, including Prospect
Energys chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
Prospect Energys disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15
of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, as of
April 27, 2006, the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer have concluded that Prospect Energys
current disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
timely alerting them of material information relating to
Prospect Energy that is required to be disclosed by Prospect
Energy in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such responsibility is
defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act, and for performing an assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Prospect Energys internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
28
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide
absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives
because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over
financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence
and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and
breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over
financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or
improper management override. Because of such limitations, there
is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial
reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known
features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is
possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce,
thought not eliminate, this risk.
There have been no changes in Prospect Energys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the three
months ended March 31, 2006 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
RIC
Status
We elected an August 31st fiscal year end for income tax
reporting purposes, commencing with the initial taxable year
ended August 31, 2004. Our fiscal year-end for financial
reporting purposes will remain June 30th. The Company has
qualified and elected to be subject to taxation as a RIC under
Subchapter M of the Code commencing with its taxable year ended
August 31, 2004. As long as the Company continues to
qualify as a RIC, the Company will not be subject to tax on its
investment company taxable income or its net capital gains, to
the extent that such taxable income or gains are distributed, or
deemed to be distributed, as dividends to our stockholders on a
timely basis. Certain investments in the partnerships, limited
liability companies, joint ventures and other pass
through entities common in the energy industry can create
enhanced risks of failing to comply with the requirements
applicable to regulated investment companies under the Code.
Dividends and distributions declared and paid to stockholders
may differ from net income for financial reporting and taxable
fiscal years due to the timing of recognition of income and
expenses, realization of gains and losses, occurrence of a
return of capital,
and/or net
realized appreciation or depreciation in investments, which may
not be included in taxable income.
To remain in compliance with Subchapter M of the Code with
respect to the Companys taxable year, the Company is
generally required to maintain its status as a business
development company in accordance with the 1940 Act, derive at
least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, gains
from the sales of securities and other specified types of income
required under Subchapter M of the Code, satisfy certain asset
diversification requirements as defined in Subchapter M of the
Code, and distribute to stockholders at least 90% of the
Companys investment company taxable income as defined in
Subchapter M of the Code. However, we offer no assurance that we
will continue to qualify for such treatment in future taxable
years. If we fail to qualify as a RIC, we would be subject to
corporate-level taxes on our taxable income, whether or not such
taxable income is distributed to our stockholders. The
imposition of corporate-level taxes on us would substantially
reduce the amount of income available for distribution to our
stockholders. Even if we qualify as a RIC for any taxable year
in question, we would be subject to corporate-level income tax
on any income not distributed to our stockholders. Moreover, we
would be subject to a 4%, entity-level excise tax, for any
calendar year in which we do not distribute an amount equal to
or exceeding the sum of 98% of our calendar year ordinary income
and 98% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period
ended October 31st, computed in accordance with
Section 4982 of the Code.
29
Critical
Accounting Policies
In determining the fair value of our investments at
March 31, 2006, the Audit Committee considered valuations
from an independent valuation firm and from management having an
aggregate range of $93.6 million to $96.7 million.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the
economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters
used in determining these estimates could cause actual results
to differ.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by Prospect Energy:
We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments
involved in the accounting policies described below have the
greatest potential impact on our financial statements. We
consider these to be our critical accounting policies and they
are consistently applied by us:
Investments:
(a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date
basis.
(b) Valuation:
(1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
(2) Short-term investments, which mature in 60 days or
less, such as U.S. treasury bills, are valued at amortized
cost, which approximates market value. The amortized cost method
involves valuing a security at its cost on the date of purchase
and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of
the difference between the principal amount due at maturity and
cost. Short-term securities, which mature in more than
60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
(3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a documented
valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process,
which is under the direction of our Board of Directors.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations
in interest rates, the financial environment in which the
portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar
publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the
inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of
investments that do not have a readily available market value,
the fair value of these investments may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market
existed for such investments, and any such differences could be
material.
As part of the fair valuation process, the Audit Committee
reviews the preliminary evaluations prepared by the independent
valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors. Management and
the independent valuation firm respond to the preliminary
evaluation to reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews the final valuation report and makes
a recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis
of the methodologies employed and the various weights that
should be accorded to each portion of the valuation as well as
factors that the independent valuation firm and management may
not have included in their evaluation process. The Board of
Directors then
30
evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and undertakes a
similar analysis to determine the fair value of each investment
in the portfolio in good faith.
(c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
(d) Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium
and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
(e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
(f) Loan origination, facility, commitment, consent and
other advance fees received by us on loan agreements or other
investments are accreted into income over the term of the loan.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Prospect Energy currently engages in no off-balance sheet
arrangements including any risk management of commodity pricing
or other hedging practices.
Contractual
Obligations
The Company has future obligations for investment advisory and
administrative services. Such descriptions may be found under
Management Services Investment Advisory Agreement
(Page 44) and Management Services
Administration Agreement (Page 50), respectively.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We intend to use the net proceeds from selling Securities
pursuant to this prospectus for general corporate purposes,
which includes investing in portfolio companies in accordance
with our investment objective and strategies and, pending such
investments, investing in cash equivalents, U.S. government
securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature
in one year or less from the date of investment and other
general corporate purposes. The supplement to this prospectus
relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of the
proceeds from such offering.
We anticipate that substantially all of the net proceeds of an
offering of Securities pursuant to this prospectus will be used
for the above purposes within six months, depending on the
availability of appropriate investment opportunities consistent
with our investment objective and market conditions. In
addition, we expect that there will be several offerings
pursuant to this prospectus; therefore we expect that
substantially all of the proceeds from all offerings will be
used within three years. Pending our new investments, we plan to
invest a portion of net proceeds in cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less from the date of
investment and other general corporate purposes. The management
fee payable by us will not be reduced while our assets are
invested in such securities. See Regulation
Temporary investments for additional information about
temporary investments we may make while waiting to make
longer-term investments in pursuit of our investment objective.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking
statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on
current expectations, estimates and projections about our
industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as
anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, and estimates and variations of
these words and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties,
and other factors, some of which are beyond our control
31
and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
an economic downturn could impair our customers ability to
repay our loans and increase our non-performing assets,
|
|
|
|
an economic downturn could disproportionately impact the energy
industry in which we concentrate causing us to suffer losses in
our portfolio and experience diminished demand for capital in
this industry sector,
|
|
|
|
a contraction of available credit
and/or an
inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending
and investment activities,
|
|
|
|
interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results and
|
|
|
|
the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus and in
our filings with the SEC.
|
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these
forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of
those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result,
the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also
could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability
to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and
levels of profitability and the availability of additional
capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the
inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this
prospectus should not be regarded as a representation by us that
our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and
uncertainties include those described or identified in
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. You
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus.
DISTRIBUTIONS
We have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly
dividends to our stockholders out of assets legally available
for distribution. Our dividends, if any, will be determined by
our Board of Directors.
In order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on
RICs, we currently intend to distribute during each calendar
year an amount at least equal to the sum of
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
|
98% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the
one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar
year, and
|
|
|
|
any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years
that were not distributed during such years.
|
In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized
net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital gains in excess
of short-term capital losses), if any, at least annually, out of
the assets legally available for such distributions, we may
decide in the future to retain such capital gains for
investment. In such event, the consequences of our retention of
net capital gains are as described under Material
U.S. federal income tax considerations. We can offer
no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the
payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior
securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if
doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios
stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by
the terms of any of our borrowings.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash
32
dividends. See Dividend reinvestment plan. To the
extent prudent and practicable, we intend to declare and pay
dividends on a quarterly basis.
With respect to the dividends paid to shareholders, income from
origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront
fees associated with investments in portfolio companies were
treated as taxable income and accordingly, distributed to
shareholders. Since our initial public offering through which we
have distributed more than 97.15% of our taxable income to our
stockholders. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, we
declared total dividends of $2.7 million.
Tax characteristics of all dividends will be reported to
stockholders, as appropriate, on
Form 1099-DIV
after the end of the year. Our ability to pay dividends could be
affected by future business performance, liquidity, capital
needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan covenants.
The following table lists the quarterly dividends per share
since shares of our common stock began being regularly quoted on
The NASDAQ National Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Record Date
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
11/11/2004
|
|
|
12/10/2004
|
|
|
|
12/30/2004
|
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
$
|
705,510
|
|
2/9/2005
|
|
|
3/11/2005
|
|
|
|
3/30/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.125
|
|
|
$
|
881,888
|
|
4/21/2005
|
|
|
6/10/2005
|
|
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.150
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,265
|
|
9/15/2005
|
|
|
9/22/2005
|
|
|
|
9/29/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
$
|
1,411,020
|
|
12/12/2005
|
|
|
12/22/2005
|
|
|
|
12/29/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.280
|
|
|
$
|
1,975,428
|
|
3/15/2006
|
|
|
3/23/2006
|
|
|
|
3/30/2006
|
|
|
$
|
0.300
|
|
|
$
|
2,116,530
|
|
Total Declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,148,641
|
|
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ National Market under
the symbol PSEC. The following table sets forth, for
the periods indicated, our net asset value per share of common
stock and the high and low sales prices per share of our common
stock as reported on The NASDAQ National Market. Our common
stock historically trades at prices both above and below its net
asset value. There can be no assurance, however, that such
premium or discount, as applicable, to net asset value will be
maintained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium (Discount)
|
|
|
Premium (Discount)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Net Asset Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of High Sales Price
|
|
|
of Low Sales Price
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
per Share(1)
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
to Net Asset Value
|
|
|
to Net Asset Value
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.85
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.25
|
)%
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
|
$
|
15.46
|
|
|
$
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
|
|
(12.59
|
)%
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
16.64
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
12.35
|
%
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
$
|
15.45
|
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
|
13.02
|
%
|
|
|
5.49
|
%
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
15.15
|
|
|
$
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
%
|
|
|
(15.36
|
)%
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
13.72
|
|
|
$
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.78
|
)%
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
13.47
|
|
|
$
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
(7.68
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.90
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high or low sales price. The
net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at the
end of each period. |
On June 23, 2006, the last reported sales price of our
common stock was $16.42 per share. As of March 13,
2006, we had 7,100 stockholders of record.
33
BUSINESS
General
Prospect Energy is a financial services company that lends and
invests in middle market privately-held or thinly traded public
companies in the energy industry. Prospect Energy, a Maryland
corporation, was organized on April 13, 2004 and is a
closed-end investment company that has filed an election to be
treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act.
Our headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and our telephone number is
(212) 448-0702.
Industry
Sector
We invest primarily in the energy industry. The energy industry
consists of companies in the direct energy value chain as well
as companies that sell products and services to, or acquire
products and services from, the direct energy value chain. In
this prospectus, we refer to all of these companies as
energy companies and assets in these companies as
energy assets. The categories of energy companies in
this chain are described below. The direct energy value chain
broadly includes upstream businesses, midstream businesses and
downstream businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream businesses find, develop and extract energy resources,
including natural gas, crude oil, coal and agricultural
products, which are typically from geological reservoirs found
underground or offshore.
|
|
|
|
Midstream businesses gather, process, refine, store and transmit
energy resources and their byproducts in a form that is usable
by wholesale power generation, utility, petrochemical,
industrial and gasoline customers.
|
|
|
|
Downstream businesses include the power and electricity segment
as well as businesses that process, refine, market or distribute
hydrocarbons or other energy resources, such as customer-ready
natural gas, propane and gasoline, to end-user customers.
|
Our
Investment Objective and Policies
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and
long-term capital appreciation through debt and equity
investments. We focus on making investments in energy companies
and will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of our
net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for
investment purposes) in these companies. Prospect Energy is a
non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
We concentrate on making investments in energy companies having
annual revenues of less than $250 million and in
transaction sizes of less than $100 million, which we refer
to as target or middle market companies.
In most cases, these middle market companies are privately held
or have thinly traded public securities at the time we invest in
them.
We seek to maximize returns to our investors by applying
rigorous credit analysis and asset-based lending techniques to
make and monitor our investments in asset intensive energy
companies. We do not invest directly in any energy company
exclusively involved in (1) speculative oil and gas
exploration, (2) speculative risks or (3) speculative
trading in oil, gas
and/or other
commodities. Some of the energy companies that we do invest in
are involved in some exploration or development activity. While
the structure of our investments vary, we invest primarily in
secured and unsecured senior and subordinated loans, generally
referred to as mezzanine loans, which often include equity
interests such as warrants or options received in connection
with these loans, and dividend-paying equity securities, such as
common and preferred stock and convertible securities, of target
energy companies. Our investments range between approximately
$5 million and $50 million each, although this
investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our
capital base changes.
While our primary focus is on seeking current income through
investment in the debt
and/or
dividend-paying equity securities of privately held or thinly
traded public energy companies and long-term capital
34
appreciation by acquiring accompanying warrants, options or
other equity securities of such companies, we may invest up to
30% of the portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to
seek enhanced returns for stockholders. Such investments may
include investments in the debt and equity instruments of public
companies that are not thinly traded. We expect that these
public companies generally will have debt securities that are
non-investment grade. Within this 30% basket, we may also invest
in debt and equity securities of middle-market companies located
outside of the United States.
Our investments include other equity investments, such as
warrants, options to buy a minority interest in a portfolio
company, or contractual payment rights or rights to receive a
proportional interest in the operating cash flow or net income
of such company. When determined by the Investment Adviser to be
in our best interest, we acquire a controlling interest, in the
portfolio company. Any warrants we receive with our debt
securities may require only a nominal cost to exercise, and
thus, as a portfolio company appreciates in value, we may
achieve additional investment return from this equity interest.
We have structured, and will continue to structure, the warrants
to provide provisions protecting our rights as a
minority-interest or, if applicable, controlling-interest
holder, as well as puts, or rights to sell such securities back
to the company, upon the occurrence of specified events. In many
cases, we obtain registration rights in connection with these
equity interests, which may include demand and
piggyback registration rights.
We plan to hold most of our investments to maturity or
repayment, but will sell our investments earlier if a liquidity
event takes place, such as the sale or recapitalization of a
portfolio company.
We have qualified and elected to be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC,
we generally do not have to pay corporate-level federal income
taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute
to our stockholders as dividends. To continue to qualify as a
RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In
addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to
our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our
investment company taxable income, which is
generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized
net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term
capital losses.
For a discussion of the risks inherent in our portfolio
investments, see Risk Factors.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect Capital Management manages our investments as our
Investment Adviser. Prospect Capital Management is a Delaware
limited liability corporation that is registered as an
investment adviser under the Advisers Act since March 31,
2004. Under our Investment Advisory Agreement, we pay Prospect
Capital Management investment advisory fees, which consist of an
annual base management fee based on our gross assets as well as
a two-part incentive fee based on our performance.
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We may receive fees for
these services. Such fees would not qualify as good
income for purposes of the 90% income test that we must
meet each year to qualify as a RIC. Prospect Administration
provides such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio
companies when we are required to provide this assistance.
Staffing
Mr. John F. Barry III, our chairman and chief
executive officer, Mr. Grier Eliasek, our chief operating
officer and president, and Mr. William E. Vastardis, our
chief financial officer, treasurer, secretary and chief
compliance officer, comprise our senior management. Over time,
we expect to add additional officers and employees.
Messrs. Barry and Eliasek each also serves as an officer of
Prospect Administration and performs his respective functions
under the terms of the administration agreement.
Mr. Vastardis is the president of Vastardis Capital
Services, sub-administrator to the Company. Our
day-to-day
investment operations are
35
managed by our Investment Adviser. In addition, we reimburse
Prospect Administration for our allocable portion of expenses
incurred by it in performing its obligations under the
administration agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief executive officer, chief
financial officer (and treasurer), chief operating officer (and
president) and chief compliance officer and their respective
staffs. See Management Administration
Agreement.
Properties
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties
materially important to our operation. Our corporate
headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, where we occupy an office
space pursuant to an administration agreement with Prospect
Administration.
Legal
Proceedings
The Company is a defendant in two legal actions arising out of
its activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is
inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of
possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be
reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its
understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that
it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We intend to
defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that
resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse
effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Energy with a
complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District
for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP
alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached
its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with
DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a
subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with
Prospect Energys alleged agreement in September 2004 to
loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas
Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The
complaint seeks relief not limited to $100 million. We
believe that the DGP complaint is frivolous and without merit,
and intend to defend the matter vigorously. On November 30,
2005, U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
Prospect Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing
all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006 the
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division
issued an order granting Prospect Energys Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by Dallas Gas Partners,
L.P. against Prospect Energy Corporation. DGP has appealed this
decision.
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a
complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging
discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress
and other claims. This former officer seeks economic
reinstatement and other relief. On September 15, 2005, OSHA
issued findings, including an order dismissing this complaint.
The complainant has filed written objections to the order and
had a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge on
March 16, 2006. On May 5, 2006, the Administrative Law
Judge issued a Decision and Order granting Summary Decision and
dismissing the Complaint. The Company does not believe that
these claims, even if ultimately resolved against the Company,
would be material. The Company believes the complaint is
frivolous and without merit and intends to defend itself
vigorously.
We are not aware of any other material pending legal proceeding,
and no such material proceedings are contemplated to which we
are a party or of which any of our property is subject.
36
MANAGEMENT
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently consists of
six directors, four of whom are not interested
persons of Prospect Energy as defined in
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We refer to these
individuals as our independent directors. Our Board of Directors
elects our officers to serve for a one-year term and until their
successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their
earlier removal or resignation.
Board of
Directors and Executive Officers
Under our charter, our directors are divided into three classes.
Directors are elected for a staggered term of three years each,
with a term of office of one of the three classes of directors
expiring each year. At each annual meeting of our stockholders,
the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at
such meeting are elected to hold office for a term expiring at
the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year
following the year of their election. Each director holds office
for the term to which he or she is elected and until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualifies.
Directors
and Executive Officers
Our directors and executive officers and their positions are set
forth below. The address for each director and executive officer
is c/o Prospect Energy Corporation, 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office(1) and
|
|
Principal
|
|
Portfolios in Fund
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Position(s) Held
|
|
Length of
|
|
Occupation(s)
|
|
Complex Overseen
|
|
Directorships
|
Name and Age
|
|
with the Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
by Director
|
|
Held by Director(2)
|
|
Michael E. Basham, 56
|
|
Director
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
Executive Vice President of Finance
and Planning of Howard Energy Co., Inc.
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Robert A. Davidson, 48
|
|
Director
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Investment Officer and President of Longwood Investment
Advisers, a small-cap and mid-cap money manager, which he
co-founded in 1991.
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Walter V. E. Parker, 59
|
|
Director
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
Executive Director of the Greenwich
Land Trust, Inc., a not-for-profit organization focused on the
preservation of open space since January 2005. From 1999 to
2004, Mr. Parker served as the founding principal of the
Sippican Group LLC, a financial advisory firm.
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
William J. Gremp, Jr., 64(3)
|
|
Director
|
|
July 2006
to present
|
|
Vice President of Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated since 1999.
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. Mr. Parker
and Mr. Davidson are Class I directors with terms that
will expire in 2008, Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Basham are
Class II directors with terms that will expire in 2006 and
Mr. Barry and Mr. Gremp are Class III directors
with terms that will expire in 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
No director otherwise serves as a director of an investment
company subject to the 1940 Act. |
|
(3) |
|
On July 17, 2006, our Board of Directors elected
Mr. Gremp to our Board. |
37
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of Office(1)
|
|
Principal
|
|
Portfolios in Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) Held
|
|
and Length of Time
|
|
Occupation(s)
|
|
Complex Overseen
|
|
Other Directorships
|
Name and Age
|
|
with the Company
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
by Director
|
|
Held by Director(2)
|
|
John F. Barry III(4) 54
|
|
Director, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
April 2004
to present
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Prospect Energy, Managing Director of Prospect since
1990; Chairman of the Investment Committee of Prospect Capital
Management.
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek(4) 33
|
|
Director, President and Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
June 2004
to present
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer of Prospect Energy, Managing Director of Prospect since
1999; Senior Professional of Prospect Capital Management.
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Messrs. Barry and Eliasek are each considered an
interested person under the 1940 Act by virtue of
serving as one of our officers and having a relationship with
the Investment Adviser. |
Information
about Executive Officers who are not Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of Office and
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) Held
|
|
Length of Time
|
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
with the Company
|
|
Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past five Years
|
|
William E. Vastardis, 50
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
January 2005 to present* as Chief
Compliance Officer and April 2005 to present as Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
Mr. Vastardis is a founder and
President of Vastardis Fund Services (formerly, EOS Fund
Services LLC) (Vastardis) and of Vastardis
Compliance Services LLC (formerly, EOS Compliance Services LLC)
(Vastardis Compliance). Mr. Vastardis founded
Vastardis in 2003 and Vastardis Compliance in June 2004.
Vastardis Compliance performs chief compliance officer services
for various registered investment companies and registered
investment advisers. Prior to founding Vastardis, he managed a
third-party fund administration firm, AMT Capital Services Inc.,
which was acquired by Investors Bank & Trust Company in
1998. Mr. Vastardis continued in the role of Managing
Director at the renamed Investors Capital Services until he
departed in 2003 to found Vastardis.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Mr. Vastardis has resigned as Chief Compliance Officer
effective July 31, 2006. |
Independent
Directors
Michael E. Basham. Mr. Basham has
34 years of experience in the energy and finance
industries. Mr. Basham currently serves as executive vice
president for finance and planning for Howard Energy &
Co., Inc., a privately held energy company that has made both
domestic and international energy investments in the oil and gas
exploration, natural gas marketing and storage, energy services,
hydroelectric power generation, and drilling services
industries. Prior to joining Howard Energy in 1999,
Mr. Basham served as a principal in the consulting practice
of Ernst & Young from 1996 to 1999. From 1994 to 1996,
Mr. Basham, served as an executive vice president with
First Fidelity Bank. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Basham was a
managing director at Shearson Smith Barney, now owned by
Citigroup, where he headed up the Privatization investment
banking group and the International division. From 1989 to 1991,
Mr. Basham served as Deputy Assistant Secretary and Acting
Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury. From 1987 to
1989, Mr. Basham worked as a senior professional at
Wertheim Schroder, an investment bank. From 1982 to 1986,
Mr. Basham founded and served as chief executive officer of
Norden Capital, an investment management firm. From 1972 to
1982, Mr. Basham served in various roles, including vice
president of the investment division and manager of fixed
income, trading, and sales, for South Carolina National Bank.
Mr. Basham received a Bachelor of Science
38
degree from the University of Southern Mississippi, and received
an MBA from the University of South Carolina.
Robert A. Davidson. Mr. Davidson has
25 years of experience in the investment management
industry. Mr. Davidson currently serves as chief executive
officer, chief investment officer and president of Longwood
Investment Advisers, a small-cap and mid-cap money manager, with
approximately $1 billion of assets under management, which
he co-founded in 1991. From 1984 to 1991, Mr. Davidson
served as vice president, portfolio manager, and analyst at
Essex Investment Management Company, where his responsibilities
included research, valuation, investments, and disposals of a
broad range of securities for various Essex funds. While at
Essex, Mr. Davidson managed approximately $200 million
and was a member of the investment committee managing the Essex
Hedge Fund. From 1981 to 1984, Mr. Davidson served as an
options portfolio manager and analyst with Keystone Custodian
Funds, with a specialty in energy, environmental control
systems, and communications. Mr. Davidson is a Chartered
Financial Analyst (CFA), and he received a Bachelor of Arts in
Economics and Business from Colby College.
Walter V. E. Parker. Mr. Parker has
35 years of experience in the energy and finance
industries. Mr. Parker currently serves as executive
director of the Greenwich Land Trust, Inc., a not for profit
organization focused on the preservation of open space since
January 2005. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Parker served as a
founding principal in the Sippican Group, LLC, a financial
advisory firm. While at Sippican, he advised clients on business
development, and financial matters. From 2000 to 2001,
Mr. Parker served as interim chief operating officer of
Avienda Technologies, Inc. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Parker
served as managing director of Claymore Partners, Inc., a
long-standing financial advisory firm addressing the needs of
troubled businesses. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Parker served
as a subsidiary board member and the credit officer at Parrish
Leasing and Finance Corporation, a joint venture with the
Travelers Group focused on large-scale project-based and
asset-based transactions. From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Parker
served as vice president and senior credit officer of the
Corporate Finance Division for Xerox Credit, Inc., which
provided project finance, equipment leasing, high-yield
corporate debt, secured loans, and real estate financing to a
diverse group of US and international companies, including
energy companies. Mr. Parker received Xeroxs
Presidents Award for timely achievement of liquidity and
value enhancement goals. From 1989 to 1991, Mr. Parker was
a vice president for the Project and Lease Finance Group of
Kidder Peabody & Co., where he focused on energy
transactions. From 1971 to 1989, Mr. Parker served in
several roles, including as a senior credit officer, at
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and the United States Trust
Company of New York. Mr. Parker is a graduate of the Xerox
Advanced Management School and the American Management
Associations Time Based Accounting series. Mr. Parker
received his MBA from Columbia University, where he received
honors ratings for course work in banking and finance, and his
Bachelor of Arts degree from Colgate University.
William J. Gremp. Mr. Gremps career
as an investment banker, with over 30 years of corporate
finance experience in originating and executing transactions and
advisory assignments for energy and utility related clients, has
spanned years of significant change in the energy industry.
Since 1999, Mr. Gremp has been responsible for traditional
banking services, credit and lending, private equity and
corporate cash management with Merrill Lynch & Co. From
1996 to 1999, he served at Wachovia as senior vice president,
managing director and co-founder of the utilities and energy
investment banking group, responsible for origination,
structuring, negotiation and successful completion of
transactions utilizing investment banking, capital markets and
traditional commercial banking products. From 1989 to 1996,
Mr. Gremp was the managing director of global power and
project finance at JPMorgan Chase & Co., where he was
responsible for the origination, delivery and successful
implementation of all corporate finance and investment banking
products and services to the utility and energy industries. He
advised clients on corporate strategy, project financing,
mergers and acquisitions and equity and lease finance. From 1970
to 1989, Mr. Gremp was with Merrill Lynch & Co.,
starting out as an associate in the mergers and acquisitions
department, then in 1986 becoming the senior vice president,
managing director and head of the regulated industries group.
From 1965 to 1970, Mr. Gremp served in roles at the United
States Army, the Mobil Oil Corporation and a New York management
consulting firm. Mr. Gremp received his MBA from New York
University and his Bachelor of Science degree from the
University of Minnesota.
39
Interested
Directors
John F. Barry III. Mr. Barry is
chairman and chief executive officer of Prospect Energy and is a
control person of Prospect Capital Management and managing
director of Prospect Administration. Mr. Barry is chairman
of Prospects investment committee and has been an officer
of Prospect since 1990. In addition to overseeing Prospect,
Mr. Barry has served on the boards of directors of twelve
private and public Prospect portfolio companies. Mr. Barry
has served on the board of advisors of USEC Inc., a publicly
traded energy company. Mr. Barry has served as chairman and
chief executive officer of Bondnet Trading Systems. From 1988 to
1989, Mr. Barry managed the investment bank of L.F.
Rothschild & Company, focusing on private equity and
debt financings for energy and other companies. From 1983 to
1988, Mr. Barry was a senior investment and merchant banker
at Merrill Lynch & Co., where he was a founding member
of the project finance group, executing more than
$4 billion in energy and other financings. From 1979 to
1983, Mr. Barry was a corporate securities attorney at
Davis Polk & Wardwell, where he advised energy
companies and their commercial and investment bankers. From 1978
to 1979, Mr. Barry served as law clerk to Circuit Judge,
formerly Chief Judge, J. Edward Lumbard of the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City.
Mr. Barry is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Mathematics Foundation of America, a non-profit foundation which
enhances opportunities in mathematics education for students
from diverse backgrounds. Mr. Barry received his JD cum
laude from Harvard Law School, where he was an editor of the
Harvard Law Review, and his Bachelor of Arts magna cum laude
from Princeton University, where he was a University Scholar.
M. Grier Eliasek. Mr. Eliasek is
president and chief operating officer of Prospect Energy and a
managing director of Prospect Capital Management and Prospect
Administration. At Prospect Energy, Mr. Eliasek is
responsible for various administrative and investment management
functions and leads and supervises other Prospect professionals
in origination and assessment of investments. Mr. Eliasek
has served as a senior investment professional at Prospect since
1999. Prior to joining Prospect, Mr. Eliasek assisted the
chief financial officer of Amazon.com in 1999 in corporate
strategy, customer acquisition, and new product launches. From
1995 to 1998, Mr. Eliasek served as a consultant with
Bain & Company, a global strategy consulting firm,
where he managed engagements for companies in several different
industries. At Bain, Mr. Eliasek analyzed new lines of
businesses, developed market strategies, revamped sales
organizations and improved operational performance.
Mr. Eliasek received his MBA from Harvard Business School.
Mr. Eliasek received his Bachelor of Science in Chemical
Engineering with Highest Distinction from the University of
Virginia, where he was a Jefferson Scholar and a Rodman Scholar.
Executive
Officer
William E. Vastardis. Mr. Vastardis is
chief compliance officer, chief financial officer, treasurer and
secretary of Prospect Energy. Mr. Vastardis has resigned as
chief compliance officer effective July 31, 2006.
Mr. Vastardis is a founder and president of Vastardis and
of Vastardis Compliance. Vastardis serves as the Companys
sub-administrator. Mr. Vastardis founded Vastardis in
August 2003 and Vastardis Compliance in June 2004.
Vastardis Compliance performs chief compliance officer services
for various registered investment companies and registered
Investment Advisers. Prior to founding Vastardis, he managed a
third-party fund administration firm, AMT Capital Services Inc.,
which was acquired by Investors Bank & Trust Company in
1998. Mr. Vastardis continued in the role of managing
director at the renamed Investors Capital Services until he
departed in 2003 to found Vastardis.
For information on the investment professionals of Prospect
Capital Management, see Investment Advisory
Agreement Investment personnel.
Committees
of the Board Of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee and a
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2005, the Board of Directors of the
Company held sixteen Board meetings, nine Audit Committee
meetings, and three Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the
aggregate number of meetings of the Board and of the
40
respective committees on which they served. The Company requires
each director to make a diligent effort to attend all board and
committee meetings, as well as each annual meeting of
stockholders.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates
pursuant to a charter approved by the Board of Directors. The
charter sets forth the responsibilities of the Audit Committee,
which include selecting or retaining each year an independent
registered public accounting firm (the independent
accountants) to audit the accounts and records of the
Company; reviewing and discussing with management and the
independent accountants the annual audited financial statements
of the Company, including disclosures made in managements
discussion and analysis, and recommending to the Board of
Directors whether the audited financial statements should be
included in the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K;
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
accountants the Companys quarterly financial statements
prior to the filings of its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q;
pre-approving the independent accountants engagement to
render audit
and/or
permissible non-audit services; and evaluating the
qualifications, performance and independence of the independent
accountants. The Audit Committee is presently composed of three
persons: Messrs. Basham, Davidson, and Parker, all of whom
are not interested persons as defined in the 1940
Act and are considered independent under the National
Association of Securities Dealers Marketplace Rules (the
NASD Marketplace Rules). The Companys Board of
Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Basham and
Parker is an audit committee financial expert as
that term is defined under Item 401 of
Regulation S-K.
The Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval
responsibilities to one or more of its members. The members to
whom such responsibility is delegated must report, for
informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the
Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The function of the Audit Committee is oversight. Management of
the Company is primarily responsible for maintaining appropriate
systems for accounting and financial reporting principles and
policies and internal controls and procedures that provide for
compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and
regulations. The independent accountants are primarily
responsible for planning and carrying out a proper audit of the
Companys annual financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting standards. The independent
accountants are accountable to the Board of Directors and the
Audit Committee, as representatives of the Companys
shareholders. The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee
have the ultimate authority and responsibility to select,
evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the Companys
independent accountants (subject, if applicable, to shareholder
ratification).
In fulfilling their responsibilities, it is recognized that
members of the Audit Committee are not full-time employees of
the Company or management and are not, and do not represent
themselves to be, accountants or auditors by profession. As
such, it is not the duty or the responsibility of the Audit
Committee or its members to conduct field work or
other types of auditing or accounting reviews or procedures, to
determine that the financial statements are complete and
accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, or to set auditor independence standards.
Each member of the Audit Committee is entitled to rely on
(a) the integrity of those persons within and outside the
Company and management from which it receives information;
(b) the accuracy of the financial and other information
provided to the Audit Committee absent actual knowledge to the
contrary (which is required to be promptly reported to the Board
of Directors); and (c) statements made by the officers and
employees of the Company, its Investment Adviser or other third
parties as to any information technology, internal audit and
other non-audit services provided by the independent accountants
to the Company.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee (the Nominating and Governance
Committee) is responsible for selecting qualified nominees
to be elected to the Board of Directors by stockholders;
selecting qualified nominees to fill any vacancies on the Board
of Directors or a committee thereof; developing and recommending
to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance
principles applicable to the Company; overseeing the evaluation
of the Board of Directors and management; and undertaking such
other duties and responsibilities as may from time to time be
delegated by the Board of Directors to the Nominating and
Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is
presently composed of four persons: Messrs. Basham,
Davidson, Gremp and Parker, all of whom are not interested
persons as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940
Act. The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a
written Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.
41
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider
stockholder recommendations for possible nominees for election
as directors when such recommendations are submitted in
accordance with the Companys bylaws and any applicable
law, rule or regulation regarding director nominations.
Nominations should be sent to William E. Vastardis, Secretary,
Prospect Energy Corporation, 10 East 40th Street,
Suite 4400, New York, NY 10016. When submitting a
nomination to the Company for consideration, a stockholder must
provide all information that would be required under applicable
SEC rules to be disclosed in connection with election of a
director, including the following minimum information for each
director nominee: full name, age and address; principal
occupation during the past five years; current directorships on
publicly held companies and investment companies; number of
shares of Company common stock owned, if any; and, a written
consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by
the Board of Directors and to serve if elected by the
stockholders. Criteria considered by the Nominating and
Governance Committee in evaluating the qualifications of
individuals for election as members of the Board of Directors
include compliance with the independence and other applicable
requirements of the NASD Marketplace Rules and the 1940 Act and
all other applicable laws, rules, regulations and listing
standards, the criteria, policies and principles set forth in
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and
the ability to contribute to the effective management of the
Company, taking into account the needs of the Company and such
factors as the individuals experience, perspective, skills
and knowledge of the industry in which the Company operates. The
Nominating and Governance Committee also may consider such other
factors as it may deem are in the best interests of the Company
and its stockholders. The Board of Directors also believes it is
appropriate for certain key members of the Companys
management to participate as members of the Board of Directors.
Corporate
Governance
Corporate Governance Guidelines. Upon the
recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the
Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines
on behalf of the Company. These Corporate Governance Guidelines
address, among other things, the following key corporate
governance topics: director responsibilities; the size,
composition, and membership criteria of the Board of Directors;
composition and responsibilities of directors serving on
committees of the Board of Directors; director access to
officers, employees, and independent advisors; director
orientation and continuing education; director compensation; and
an annual performance evaluation of the Board of Directors.
Code of Conduct. The Company has adopted a
code of conduct which applies to, among others, its senior
officers, including its chief executive officer and its chief
financial officer, as well as every employee of the Company. The
Companys code of conduct is attached as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC, and can be accessed via the Internet site of
the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company intends to disclose
amendments to or waivers from a required provision of the code
of conduct on
Form 8-K.
Code of Ethics. The Company and PCM have each
adopted a code of ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal
investments and restricts certain personal securities
transactions. Personnel subject to each code may invest in
securities for their personal investment accounts, including
securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such
investments are made in accordance with the codes
requirements.
Internal Reporting and Whistle Blower Protection
Policy. The Companys Audit Committee has
established guidelines and procedures regarding the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters (collectively,
Accounting Matters), and the confidential, anonymous
submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters. Persons with
complaints or concerns regarding Accounting Matters may submit
their complaints to the Companys chief compliance officer
(CCO). Persons who are uncomfortable submitting
complaints to the CCO, including complaints involving the CCO,
may submit complaints directly to the Companys Audit
Committee Chairman (together with the CCO, Complaint
Officers). Complaints may be submitted on an anonymous
basis.
42
The CCO may be contacted at Prospect Energy Corporation, Chief
Compliance Officer, 10 East 40th Street, Suite 4400,
New York, NY 10016.
The Audit Committee Chairman may be contacted at Walter V.E.
Parker, Prospect Energy Corporation, Audit Committee Chairman,
10 East 40th Street, Suite 4400, New York, NY 10016.
Proxy
Voting Policies And Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to the
Investment Adviser. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by
Prospect Capital Management and our non-interested directors,
and, accordingly, are subject to change. See
Regulation Proxy Voting Policies and
Procedures.
Compensation
of Directors and Officers
The following table shows information regarding the compensation
received by the independent directors and officers for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. No compensation is paid to
directors who are interested persons, as that term
is defined in the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension or
|
|
|
Total Compensation
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
from Company and
|
|
|
|
Compensation from
|
|
|
Accrued as Part of
|
|
|
Fund Complex Paid
|
|
Name
|
|
the Company
|
|
|
Company Expenses(1)
|
|
|
to Director
|
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael E. Basham
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Robert A. Davidson
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
Walter V. Parker
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Barry III
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Vastardis(2)
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Karen Gattegno(4)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Eugene S. Stark(5)
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Mark N. Witt(6)
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We do not have a bonus, profit sharing or retirement plan, and
directors do not receive any pension or retirement benefits. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Vastardis has served as chief compliance officer since
January 4, 2005, and as chief financial officer, treasurer
and secretary since April 30, 2005. |
|
(3) |
|
The compensation of William E. Vastardis for his service as
chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary of the Company
is paid by Vastardis, sub-administrator to the Company.
Vastardis is in turn paid by the Company at a monthly rate of
$18,750. The compensation of William E. Vastardis for his
service as chief compliance officer of the Company is paid by
Vastardis Compliance. Vastardis Compliance is in turn paid by
the Company at a monthly rate of $6,250. In addition, the
Company pays Vastardis Compliance for certain other services at
the rate of $270 per hour. Both Vastardis and Vastardis
Compliance determines the compensation to be paid to
Mr. Vastardis with respect to the Company based on a
case-by-case
evaluation of the time and resources that is required to fulfill
his duties to the Company. For the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005, the Company paid Vastardis Compliance
approximately $44,045 for services rendered by
Mr. Vastardis as chief compliance officer from
January 4, 2005 through June 30, 2005. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2005, the Company paid Vastardis
approximately $37,500 for services rendered by
Mr. Vastardis as chief financial officer, treasurer and
secretary from April 30, 2005 through June 30, 2005. |
43
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Karen Gattegno served as chief compliance officer from
June 9, 2004 until December 23, 2004, and as chief
financial officer, treasurer and secretary from
September 9, 2004 until December 23, 2004. |
|
(5) |
|
Eugene S. Stark served as chief financial officer from
January 3, 2005 through April 29, 2005. |
|
(6) |
|
Mark N. Witt served as chief financial officer from June 9,
2004 through September 9, 2004. |
The independent directors receive an annual fee of $70,000 plus
reimbursement of any reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred. The chairman of each committee also receives
an additional annual fee of $5,000. In addition, we purchase
directors and officers liability insurance on behalf
of our directors and officers.
Management
services
Investment
Advisory Agreement
Prospect Energy has entered into an Investment Advisory
Agreement with Prospect Capital Management under which Prospect
Capital Management, as investment adviser, subject to the
overall supervision of Prospect Energys Board of
Directors, will manage the
day-to-day
operations of, and provide investment advisory services to,
Prospect Energy. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser will receive a fee from Prospect Energy, consisting of
two components a base management fee and an
incentive fee. The base management fee will be calculated at an
annual rate of 2.00% on Prospect Energys gross assets
(including amounts borrowed). For services rendered under the
Investment Advisory Agreement during the period commencing from
the closing of Prospect Energys initial public offering
through and including the first six months of operations, the
base management fee was payable monthly in arrears. Thereafter,
for services rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement,
the base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The
quarterly base management fee is calculated based on the average
value of Prospect Energys gross assets at the end of the
two most recently completed calendar quarters (the closing of
Prospect Energys initial public offering was treated as a
quarter end for these purposes) and appropriately adjusted for
any share issuances or repurchases during the current calendar
quarter. Base management fees for any partial month or quarter
are appropriately pro rated. If in the future the average amount
of our gross assets for each of the two most recently completed
calendar quarters, appropriately adjusted for any share
issuances, repurchases or other transactions during such
quarters, exceeds $750,000,000, our investment adviser has
voluntarily agreed to waive 0.5% of the base management fee for
that portion of the average amount of our gross assets that
exceeds $750,000,000. This waiver may be terminated by the
investment adviser at any time upon 90 days prior
notice.
Our investment advisory fees were $0.521 million,
$0.485 million, $1.554 million, $1.317 million
and $1.808 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, for the three months ended March 31,
2005, for the nine months ended March 31, 2006, for the
nine months ended March 31, 2005 and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The Income Incentive
fees were $0.533 million, none, $1.041 million, none
and none for the three months ended March 31, 2006, for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, for the nine months
ended March 31, 2006, for the nine months ended
March 31, 2005 and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively. At March 31, 2006 the
Company owed the Investment Adviser $0.533 million in
income incentive fees. Also, the Company was owed
$0.005 million for legal costs and miscellaneous expenses
that it paid on behalf of the Investment Advisor.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment
income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this
purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest
income, dividend income and any other income (including any
other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees and other fees that Prospect
Energy receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the
calendar quarter, minus Prospect Energys operating
expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee,
expenses payable under the administration agreement described
below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the
case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as
original issue discount, debt instruments
44
with payment in kind interest and zero coupon securities),
accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Thus, if
we do not have sufficient liquid assets to pay this incentive
fee or distributions to stockholders on such accrued income, we
may be required to liquidate assets in order to do so.
Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any
realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized
capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net
investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of
Prospect Energys net assets at the end of the immediately
preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a hurdle
rate of 1.75% per quarter (7% annualized). However, our
Investment Adviser has voluntarily agreed that for each fiscal
quarter after January 1, 2005, the quarterly hurdle rate
will be equal to the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a
percentage equal to the sum of the daily average of the
quoted treasury rate for each month in the
immediately preceding two quarters plus 0.50%. Quoted
treasury rate means 25% of the yield to maturity
(calculated on a semi-annual bond equivalent basis) at the time
of computation for Five Year U.S. Treasury notes with a
constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent
Federal Reserve Statistical Release H). These calculations
will be appropriately pro rated for any period of less than
three months and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases
during the current quarter. The voluntary agreement by the
Investment Adviser that the hurdle rate be fluctuating for each
fiscal quarter after January 1, 2005 (as discussed above)
may be terminated by the Investment Adviser at any time upon
90 days prior notice. The net investment income used
to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in
the amount of the gross assets used to calculate the 2% base
management fee. Prospect Energy pays the Investment Adviser an
income incentive fee with respect to Prospect Energys
pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter
as follows: (1) no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in
which Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment
income does not exceed the hurdle rate; (2) 100% of
Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income
with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net
investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is
less than 125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar
quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7% annualized hurdle rate);
and (3) 20% of the amount of Prospect Energys
pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds
125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming a 7% annualized hurdle rate). These
calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of less
than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20%
of Prospect Energys realized capital gains for the
calendar year, if any, computed net of all realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of such
year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to
the Investment Adviser, Prospect Energy calculates the aggregate
realized capital gains, aggregate realized capital losses and
aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as applicable, with
respect to each of the investments in its portfolio. For this
purpose, aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the
sum of the differences between the net sales price of each
investment, when sold, and the original cost of such investment
since inception. Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum
of the amounts by which the net sales price of each investment,
when sold, is less than the original cost of such investment
since inception. Aggregate unrealized capital depreciation
equals the sum of the difference, if negative, between the
valuation of each investment as of the applicable date and the
original cost of such investment. At the end of the applicable
period, the amount of capital gains that serves as the basis for
Prospect Energys calculation of the capital gains
incentive fee equals the aggregate realized capital gains less
aggregate realized capital losses and less aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation with respect to its portfolio of
investments. If this number is positive at the end of such
period, then the capital gains incentive fee for such period is
equal to 20% of such amount, less the aggregate amount of any
capital gains incentive fees paid in respect of its portfolio in
all prior periods.
Because of the structure of the incentive fee, it is possible
that we may have to pay an incentive fee in a quarter where we
incur a loss. For example, if we receive pre-incentive fee net
investment income in excess of the hurdle rate for a quarter, we
will pay the applicable income incentive fee even if we have
incurred a loss in that quarter due to realized or unrealized
losses on our investments. The Investment Adviser has
voluntarily agreed that, in the event it is paid an incentive
fee at a time when our common stock is trading at a price below
$15 per share for the immediately preceding 30 days
(as adjusted for stock splits, recapitalizations and
45
other transactions), it will cause the amount of such incentive
fee payment to be held in an escrow account by an independent
third party, subject to applicable regulations. This amount may
not be drawn upon by the Investment Adviser or any affiliate or
any other third party until such time as the price of our common
stock achieves an average 30 day closing price of at
least $15 per share. The Investment Adviser also has
voluntarily agreed to cause 30% of any incentive fee that it is
paid to be invested in shares of our common stock through an
independent trustee. Any sales of such stock will comply with
any applicable six month holding period under Section 16(b)
of the Securities Act and all other restrictions contained in
any law or regulation, to the fullest extent applicable to any
such sale. Any change in these voluntary agreements will not be
implemented without at least 90 days prior notice to
stockholders and compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations.
Examples
of Quarterly Incentive Fee Calculation
Example
1: Income Incentive Fee (*):
Alternative
1
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
1.25%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income
(investment income-(base management fee + other expenses)) =
0.55%
Pre-incentive net investment income does not exceed hurdle rate,
therefore there is no income incentive fee.
Alternative
2
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
2.70%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income
(investment income-(base management fee + other expenses)) =
2.00%
Pre-incentive net investment income exceeds hurdle rate,
therefore there is an income incentive fee payable by us to our
Investment Adviser.
Income incentive Fee = 100% × Catch Up + the
greater of 0% AND (20% × (pre-incentive fee net investment
income 2.1875%)
= (100% × (2.00% 1.75%)) + 0%
= 100% × 0.25% + 0%
= 0.25%
46
Alternative
3
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
3.00%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment income-(base
management fee + other expenses)) = 2.30%
Pre-incentive net investment income exceeds hurdle rate,
therefore there is an income incentive fee payable by us to our
Investment Adviser.
Income incentive Fee = 100% × Catch Up + the
greater of 0% AND (20% × (pre-incentive fee net investment
income 2.1875%)
= (100% × (2.1875% − 1.75%)) + the greater of 0%
AND (20% × (2.30%
− 2.1875%))
= (100% × 0.4375%) + (20% ×0.1125%)
= 0.4375% + 0.0225%
= 0.46%
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 7% annualized hurdle rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 2% annualized base management fee. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes organizational and offering expenses. |
|
(*) |
|
The hypothetical amount of pre-incentive fee net investment
income shown is based on a percentage of total net assets. |
Example
2: Capital Gains Incentive Fee:
Alternative
1
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Fair market value (FMV) of
investment determined to be $22 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of investment determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Investment sold for $21 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Reduce base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $3 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Increase base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by the realized gain of
$1 million based on the sale at $21 million plus that
portion, if any, of the $3 million unrealized loss in year
3 that was used to reduce the incentive fee paid in year 3.
|
47
Alternative
2
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of investment determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of investment determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: FMV of investment determined to be
$21 million
|
|
|
|
Year 5: FMV of investment determined to be
$18 million
|
|
|
|
Year 6: Investment sold for $15 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Reduce base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $3 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 4: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 5: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 6: Reduce base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $2 million plus the
amount, if any, of the unrealized capital depreciation from Year
2 that did not actually reduce the incentive fee that would
otherwise have been payable to the Investment Adviser in prior
years
|
Alternative
3
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made in company A
(Investment A), and $20 million investment made
in company B (Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$21 million, and Investment B is sold for $18 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Investment A is sold for $23 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Reduce base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $2 million (realized
capital loss on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Increase base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (realized
capital gain on Investment A)
|
48
Alternative
4
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made in company A
(Investment A), and $20 million investment made
in company B (Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$21 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$18 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$18 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$19 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$21 million
|
|
|
|
Year 5: Investment A is sold for $17 million,
and Investment B is sold for $23 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Reduce base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $3 million
(unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Reduce base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $2 million
(unrealized capital depreciation on Investment A)
|
|
|
|
Year 4: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 5: Increase base amount on which the second part
of the incentive fee is calculated by $5 million
($6 million of realized capital gain on Investment B
partially offset by $1 million of realized capital loss on
Investment A) less the amount, if any, of the unrealized
capital depreciation on Investment A from Year 3 and the
unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B from Year 2 that
did not actually reduce the incentive fees that would otherwise
have been payable to the Investment Adviser in prior years.
|
Payment
of our expenses
All investment professionals of the Investment Adviser and their
respective staffs, when and to the extent engaged in providing
investment advisory and management services, and the
compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel
allocable to such services, will be provided and paid for by
Prospect Capital Management. We bear all other costs and
expenses of our operations and transactions, including those
relating to: organization and offering; calculation of our net
asset value (including the cost and expenses of any independent
valuation firm); expenses incurred by Prospect Capital
Management payable to third parties, including agents,
consultants or other advisors (such as independent valuation
firms, accountants and legal counsel), in monitoring our
financial and legal affairs and in monitoring our investments
and performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio
companies; interest payable on debt, if any, and dividends
payable on preferred stock, if any, incurred to finance our
investments; offerings of our debt, our preferred shares, our
common stock and other securities; investment advisory fees;
fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or
other advisors, relating to, or associated with, evaluating and
making investments; transfer agent and custodial fees;
registration fees; listing fees; taxes; independent
directors fees and expenses; costs of preparing and filing
reports or other documents with the SEC; the costs of any
reports, proxy statements or other notices to stockholders,
including printing costs; our allocable portion of the fidelity
bond, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability
insurance, and any other insurance premiums; direct costs and
expenses of administration, including auditor and legal costs;
and all other expenses incurred by us, by our Investment Adviser
or by Prospect Administration in connection with administering
our business, such as our allocable portion of overhead under
the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs
49
of our chief compliance officer and chief financial officer and
their respective staffs under the sub-administration agreement,
as further described below.
Duration
and termination
The Investment Advisory Agreement was approved by our Board of
Directors on June 23, 2004. Unless terminated earlier as
described below, it will continue in effect for a period of two
years from its effective date. It will remain in effect from
year to year thereafter if approved annually by our Board of
Directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in
either case, approval by a majority of our directors who are not
interested persons. The Investment Advisory Agreement will
automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The
Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated by either party
without penalty upon not more than 60 days written
notice to the other. See Risk Factors Risks
relating to our business and structure We are
dependent upon Prospect Capital Managements key management
personnel for our future success.
Administration
Agreement
Prospect Energy has also entered into an administration
agreement with Prospect Administration under which Prospect
Administration, among other things, provides administrative
services and facilities for Prospect Energy. Prospect
Administration has engaged Vastardis to serve as
sub-administrator of Prospect Energy. For providing these
services, Prospect Energy reimburses Prospect Administration for
Prospect Energys allocable portion of overhead incurred by
Prospect Administration in performing its obligations under the
administration agreement, including rent, the fees of the
sub-administrator for services provided with respect to Prospect
Energy and Prospect Energys allocable portion of the
compensation of its chief compliance officer and chief financial
officer and their respective staffs. Prospect Administration
also provides on Prospect Energys behalf managerial
assistance to those portfolio companies to which Prospect Energy
is required to provide such assistance. Under this agreement,
Prospect Administration furnishes us with office facilities,
equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services
at such facilities. Prospect Administration also performs, or
oversees the performance of, our required administrative
services, which include, among other things, being responsible
for the financial records which we are required to maintain and
preparing reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the
SEC. In addition, Prospect Administration assists us in
determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the
preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and
dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally
oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of
administrative and professional services rendered to us by
others. Prospect Administration also provides on our behalf
managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to which we
are required to provide such assistance. The administration
agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon
60 days written notice to the other party. Prospect
Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Investment
Adviser.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our Board
of Directors, has engaged Vastardis to serve as the
sub-administrator of Prospect Energy to perform certain services
required of Prospect Administration. This engagement began in
May 2005 and runs on a month to month basis at the rate of
$250,000 annually, payable monthly. Under the sub-administration
agreement, Vastardis provides Prospect Energy with office
facilities, equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping
services at such facilities. Vastardis also conducts relations
with custodians, depositories, transfer agents, dividend
disbursing agents, other stockholder servicing agents,
accountants, attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers,
corporate fiduciaries, insurers, banks and such other persons in
any such other capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable.
Vastardis provides reports to the Administrator and the
Directors of its performance of obligations and furnishes advice
and recommendations with respect to such other aspects of the
business and affairs of Prospect Energy as it shall determine to
be desirable. Vastardis does not provide any advice or
recommendation relating to the securities and other assets that
Prospect Energy should purchase, retain or sell or any other
investment advisory services to Prospect Energy. Vastardis is
responsible for the financial and other records that either
Prospect Energy (or the Administrator on behalf of Prospect
Energy) is required to maintain and prepares reports to
stockholders, and reports and other materials filed with the SEC
and provides
50
on Prospect Energys behalf significant managerial
assistance to those portfolio companies to which Prospect Energy
is required to provide such assistance under the 1940 Act or
other applicable law. In addition, Vastardis assists Prospect
Energy in determining and publishing Prospect Energys net
asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of Prospect
Energys tax returns, and the printing and dissemination of
reports to stockholders of Prospect Energy, and generally
overseeing the payment of Prospect Energys expenses and
the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to Prospect Energy by others.
The Company reimbursed Prospect Administration
$0.082 million, $0.126 million, $0.225 million,
$0.295 million and $0.266 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, for the nine months ended March 31,
2006, for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, for
services it provided to Prospect Energy at cost. The Company
also reimbursed Prospect Administration for certain expenses
which Prospect Administration initially funded on behalf of the
Company. At March 31, 2006, the Company was owed
$0.028 million for tax compliance fees and miscellaneous
expenses that it paid on behalf of Prospect Administration.
Indemnification
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties
and obligations, Prospect Capital Management and its officers,
managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from Prospect Energy for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Capital Managements
services under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as
the Investment Adviser of Prospect Energy.
The administration agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from Prospect Energy for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administrations
services under the administration agreement or otherwise as
administrator for Prospect Energy.
Under the sub-administration agreement, Vastardis and its
officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons,
members and any other person or entity affiliated with
Vastardis, is not liable to the Administrator or Prospect for
any action taken or omitted to be taken by Vastardis in
connection with the performance of any of its duties or
obligations or otherwise as sub-administrator for the
Administrator on behalf of Prospect Energy. The agreement also
provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
negligence in the performance of Vastardis duties or by
reason of the reckless disregard of Vastardis duties and
obligations, Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or
entity affiliated with Vastardis is entitled to indemnification
from the Administrator and Prospect Energy. All damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
incurred in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed
action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an
action or suit by or in the right of the Administrator or
Prospect Energy or the security holders of Prospect Energy)
arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of
Vastardis duties or obligations under the agreement or
otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf
of Prospect Energy.
Board
approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement
On May 15, 2006, the Audit Committee and Board of Directors
of the Company each voted unanimously to renew the Investment
Advisory Agreement for the one year period beginning
June 24, 2006. In its consideration of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, the Board of Directors focused on
information it had received relating to, among other things:
(a) the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and
other services to be provided to us by the Investment Adviser;
(b) comparative data with respect to advisory fees or
expense
51
ratios paid by other business development companies with similar
investment objectives; (c) our projected operating
expenses; (d) the projected profitability of the Investment
Adviser and any existing and potential sources of indirect
income to the Investment Adviser or Prospect Administration from
their relationships with us and the profitability of those
relationships; (e) information about the services to be
performed and the personnel performing such services under the
Investment Advisory Agreement; (f) the organizational
capability and financial condition of the Investment Adviser and
its affiliates and (g) the possibility of obtaining similar
services from other third party service providers or through an
internally managed structure.
Based on the information reviewed and the discussions, the Board
of Directors, including a majority of the non-interested
directors, concluded that the investment advisory fee rates were
reasonable in relation to the services to be provided.
Portfolio
Managers
The following individuals function as portfolio managers
primarily responsible for the
day-to-day
management of the Companys portfolio. The Companys
portfolio managers are not responsible for
day-to-day
management of any other accounts. For a description of their
principal occupations for the past five years, see above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Length of Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with Company
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
|
(years)
|
|
|
John F. Barry
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Mr. Eliasek receives no compensation from Prospect Energy.
Mr. Eliasek receives a salary and bonus from Prospect that
takes into account his role as a senior officer of Prospect and
of Prospect Energy, his performance and the performance of each
of Prospect and Prospect Energy. Mr. Barry receives no
compensation from Prospect Energy. Mr. Barry, as the sole
member of Prospect Capital Management, receives no salary or
bonus from Prospect Capital Management but is entitled to equity
distributions after all other obligations are met.
The following table sets forth the dollar range of common stock
of the Company beneficially owned by each of the portfolio
managers described above as of May 27, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Common Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
Beneficially Owned by Manager
|
|
|
John F. Barry
|
|
Over $
|
100,000
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
$
|
10,001-$50,000
|
|
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. The company received
$0.071 million, $0.148 and $0.077 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, the nine months ended
March 31, 2006, and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively, of these assistance fees from
GSHI. These fees are paid to the Investment Adviser.
License
Agreement
We entered into a license agreement with Prospect Capital
Management, pursuant to which Prospect Capital Management agreed
to grant us a nonexclusive, royalty free license to use the name
Prospect Energy. Under this agreement, we have a
right to use the Prospect Energy name, for so long as Prospect
Capital Management or one of its affiliates remains our
Investment Adviser. Other than with respect to this
52
limited license, we have no legal right to the Prospect Energy
name. This license agreement will remain in effect for so long
as the Investment Advisory Agreement with our Investment Adviser
is in effect.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with
Prospect Capital Management. Our chairman of the board is the
sole member of and controls Prospect Capital Management. Our
senior management may in the future also serve as principals of
other investment managers affiliated with Prospect Capital
Management that may in the future manage investment funds with
investment objectives similar to ours. In addition, our
directors and executive officers and the principals of our
Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital Management, may serve as
officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in
the same or related lines of business as we do or of investment
funds managed by affiliates. Accordingly, we may not be given
the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by
investment funds managed by advisers affiliated with Prospect
Capital Management. However, our Investment Adviser and other
members of Prospect intend to allocate investment opportunities
in a fair and equitable manner consistent with our investment
objectives and strategies so that we are not disadvantaged in
relation to any other client. See Risk Factors
Risks relating to our business and structure There
are significant potential conflicts of interest which could
impact our investment returns.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the administration
agreement, Prospect Administration provides, or arranges to
provide, us with the office facilities and administrative
services necessary to conduct our
day-to-day
operations. Prospect Capital Management, our investment adviser,
is the sole member of and controls Prospect Administration.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our Board
of Directors, has engaged Vastardis to serve as the
sub-administrator of the Company. Our chief financial officer,
treasurer, secretary and chief compliance officer is the founder
and president of Vastardis.
We have no intention of investing in any portfolio company in
which Prospect or any affiliate currently has an investment.
53
CONTROL
PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
As of May 27, 2006, there were no persons that owned 25% or
more of our outstanding voting securities, and no person would
be deemed to control us, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act.
The following table sets forth, as of May 27, 2006, certain
ownership information with respect to our common stock for those
persons who directly or indirectly own, control or hold with the
power to vote, 5% or more of our outstanding common stock and
all officers and directors, as a group. Unless otherwise
indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners set forth in
the tables below have sole voting and investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Type of Ownership
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding(1)
|
|
|
Prospect Capital Management, LLC(2)
|
|
|
Record and beneficial
|
|
|
|
9,631.457
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All officers and directors as a
group (7 persons)(3)
|
|
|
Record and beneficial
|
|
|
|
149,059.7628
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Does not reflect shares of common stock reserved for issuance
upon any exercise of any underwriters overallotment option. |
|
(2) |
|
John F. Barry is a control person of Prospect Capital
Management, LLC. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents shares of common stock held by Prospect Capital
Management, LLC. Because John F. Barry controls Prospect Capital
Management, LLC, he may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of
shares of our common stock held by Prospect Capital Management,
LLC. The address for all officers and directors is
c/o Prospect Energy Corporation, 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016. |
The following table sets forth the dollar range of our equity
securities beneficially owned by each of our directors as of
December 31, 2005. We are not part of a family of
investment companies as that term is defined in the 1940
Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities
|
Name of Director
|
|
in the Company(2)
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
Michael E. Basham
|
|
$10,000 $50,000
|
Robert A. Davidson
|
|
$10,000 $50,000
|
Walter V. Parker
|
|
None
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
John F. Barry III(1)
|
|
Over $100,000
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
$10,000 $50,000
|
Executive Director(s)
|
|
|
William E. Vastardis
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents an indirect beneficial ownership in shares of our
common stock, that are beneficially owned directly by Prospect
Capital Management, by reason of Mr. Barrys position
as a control person of Prospect Capital Management. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar ranges are as follows: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000 or over $100,000. |
54
PORTFOLIO
COMPANIES
The following is a listing of each portfolio company or its
affiliate, together referred to as portfolio companies, in which
we currently have a debt or equity investment at March 13,
2006. Percentages shown for class of investment securities held
by us represent percentage of the class owned and do not
necessarily represent voting ownership.
The portfolio companies are presented in three categories:
companies more than 25% owned which represent
portfolio companies where we directly or indirectly own more
than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio
company and, therefore, are presumed to be controlled by us
under the 1940 Act; companies owned 5% to 25% which
represent portfolio companies where we directly or indirectly
own 5% to 25% of the outstanding voting securities of such
portfolio company or where we hold one or more seats on the
portfolio companys Board of Directors and, therefore, are
deemed to be an affiliated person under the 1940 Act; and
companies less than 5% owned which represent
portfolio companies where we directly or indirectly own less
than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio
company and where we have no other affiliations with such
portfolio company. As of March 31, 2006, the Company owns
100% of the outstanding common equity shares of GSHI, and 51% of
Worcester Energy Partners, Inc. and certain of its affiliates
and therefore has a controlling interest in each case. Excluding
intermediary wholly owned holding companies, the Company has no
other controlled or affiliated investments. We make available
significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. We
generally request and may receive rights to observe the meetings
of our portfolio companies Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class of
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
Amount of
|
Portfolio Company
|
|
Principal Business
|
|
Securities Held
|
|
Company Held
|
|
All Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Companies more than
25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holding, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Gas gathering and processing
|
|
Bank notes/senior secured debt and
common equity
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Worcester Energy Partners,
Inc.
|
|
Maine/Wood processing and biomass
power generation
|
|
Senior secured debt convertible
preferred stock and common equity
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
Companies 5% to
25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Texas/Oil field services
|
|
Senior secured debt financing and
warrants for common and preferred
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holding, LLC
|
|
W. Virginia/Energy Services
|
|
Senior secured debt, preferred
equity and penny warrants
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Companies less than
5% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil and gas production
|
|
Senior secured debt financing and
warrants
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Whymore Coal Company
|
|
Kentucky/Coal production
|
|
Senior secured debt and preferred
equity
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC
|
|
Ohio/Oil and gas production
|
|
Common shares, preferred shares and
senior secured debt
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Oil and gas production
|
|
Senior secured debt financing,
revocable and non-revocable warrants
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings LLC
|
|
Virginia/Coal Mining
|
|
Secured subordinated debt and
redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Genesis Coal Company, LLC
|
|
Kentucky/Coal Production
|
|
Senior secured debt and preferred
equity
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
55
DETERMINATION
OF NET ASSET VALUE
The net asset value per share of our outstanding shares of
common stock will be determined quarterly by dividing the value
of total assets minus liabilities by the total number of shares
outstanding.
In calculating the value of our total assets, we will value
investments for which market quotations are readily available at
such market quotations. Short-term investments which mature in
60 days or less, such as U.S. Treasury bills, are
valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The
amortized cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on
the date of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant
amortization to maturity of the difference between the principal
amount due at maturity and cost. Short-term securities which
mature in more than 60 days are valued at current market
quotations by an independent pricing service or at the mean
between the bid and ask prices obtained from at least two
brokers or dealers (if available, or otherwise by a principal
market maker or a primary market dealer). Investments in money
market mutual funds are valued at their net asset value as of
the close of business on the day of valuation.
It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market price is not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a valuation policy
and a consistently applied valuation process which is under the
direction of our Board of Directors. Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do
not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our
investments may differ significantly from the values that would
have been used had a ready market existed for such investments,
and the differences could be material. For a discussion of the
risks inherent in determining the value of securities for which
readily available market values do not exist, see Risk
Factors Most of our portfolio investments are
recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board
of Directors and, as a result, there is uncertainty as to the
value of our portfolio investments.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the financial environment in which the portfolio
company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly
traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do
not have a readily available market value, the fair value of
these investments may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for such
investments, and any such differences could be material.
As part of the fair valuation process, the Audit Committee
reviews the preliminary evaluations prepared by the independent
valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors, as well as
managements valuation recommendations. Management and the
independent valuation firm respond to the preliminary evaluation
to reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee reviews the final valuation report and
managements valuation recommendations and makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis
of the methodologies employed and the various weights that
should be accorded to each portion of the valuation as well as
factors that the independent valuation firm and management may
not have included in their evaluation processes. The Board of
Directors then evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and
undertakes a similar analysis to determine the fair value of
each investment in the portfolio in good faith.
Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and
estimates not susceptible to substantiation by auditing
procedures. Accordingly, under current auditing standards, the
notes to our financial statements will refer to the uncertainty
with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any
change in such valuations, on our financial statements.
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT PLAN
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for
reinvestment of our distributions on behalf of our stockholders,
unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below.
As a result, when our Board of Directors authorizes, and we
declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not
opted out of our dividend reinvestment plan will
have their cash dividends automatically reinvested in additional
shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash
dividends.
56
No action is required on the part of a registered stockholder to
have their cash dividend reinvested in shares of our common
stock. A registered stockholder may elect to receive an entire
dividend in cash by notifying the plan administrator and our
transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is
received by the plan administrator no later than the record date
for dividends to stockholders. The plan administrator sets up an
account for shares acquired through the plan for each
stockholder who has not elected to receive dividends in cash and
hold such shares in noncertificated form. Upon request by a
stockholder participating in the plan, the plan administrator
will, instead of crediting shares to the participants
account, issue a certificate registered in the
participants name for the number of whole shares of our
common stock and a check for any fractional share. Such request
by a stockholder must be received three days prior to the
dividend payable date in order for that dividend to be paid in
cash. If such request is received less than three days prior to
the dividend payable date, then the dividends are reinvested and
shares are repurchased for the stockholders account;
however, future dividends are paid out in cash on all balances.
Those stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other
financial intermediary may receive dividends in cash by
notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their
election.
We may use primarily newly issued shares to implement the plan,
whether our shares are trading at a premium or at a discount to
net asset value. However, we reserve the right to purchase
shares in the open market in connection with our implementation
of the plan. The number of shares to be issued to a stockholder
is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the
dividend payable to such stockholder by the market price per
share of our common stock at the close of regular trading on The
NASDAQ National Market on the valuation date for such dividend.
If we use newly-issued shares to implement the plan, the
valuation date will not be earlier than the last day that
stockholders have the right to elect to receive cash in lieu of
shares. Market price per share on that date will be the closing
price for such shares on The NASDAQ National Market or, if no
sale is reported for such day, at the average of their reported
bid and asked prices. The number of shares of our common stock
to be outstanding after giving effect to payment of the dividend
cannot be established until the value per share at which
additional shares will be issued has been determined and
elections of our stockholders have been tabulated.
There are no brokerage charges or other charges to stockholders
who participate in the plan. The plan administrators fees
under the plan is paid by us. If a participant elects by written
notice to the plan administrator to have the plan administrator
sell part or all of the shares held by the plan administrator in
the participants account and remit the proceeds to the
participant, the plan administrator is authorized to deduct a
$15 transaction fee plus a $0.10 per share brokerage
commissions from the proceeds.
Stockholders who receive dividends in the form of stock are
subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as
are stockholders who elect to receive their dividends in cash. A
stockholders basis for determining gain or loss upon the
sale of stock received in a dividend from us will be equal to
the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to the
stockholder. Any stock received in a dividend will have a new
holding period for tax purposes commencing on the day following
the day on which the shares are credited to the
U.S. stockholders account.
Participants may terminate their accounts under the plan by
notifying the plan administrator via its website at
www.amstock.com or by filling out the transaction request form
located at the bottom of their statement and sending it to the
plan administrator at American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, P.O. Box 922, Wall Street Station, New York, NY
10269-0560
or by calling the plan administrators Interactive Voice
Response System at
(888) 888-0313.
The plan may be terminated by us upon notice in writing mailed
to each participant at least 30 days prior to any payable
date for the payment of any dividend by us. All correspondence
concerning the plan should be directed to the plan administrator
by mail at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 59
Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10007 or by telephone at
(718) 921-8200.
Stockholders who purchased their shares through or hold their
shares in the name of a broker or financial institution should
consult with a representative of their broker or financial
institution with respect to their participation in our dividend
reinvestment plan. Such holders of our stock may not be
identified as our
57
registered stockholders with the plan administrator and may not
automatically have their cash dividend reinvested in shares of
our common stock.
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of the material
U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us and
to an investment in our shares. This summary does not purport to
be a complete description of the income tax considerations
applicable to us on such an investment. For example, we have not
described tax consequences that we assume to be generally known
by investors or certain considerations that may be relevant to
certain types of holders subject to special treatment under
U.S. federal income tax laws, including stockholders
subject to the alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt
organizations, insurance companies, dealers in securities,
pension plans and trusts, financial institutions,
U.S. stockholders (as defined below) whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar, persons who
mark-to-market
our shares and persons who hold our shares as part of a
Straddle, Hedge or
conversion transaction. This summary assumes that
investors hold our common stock as capital assets (within the
meaning of the Code). The discussion is based upon the Code,
Treasury regulations, and administrative and judicial
interpretations, each as of the date of this prospectus and all
of which are subject to change, possibly retroactively, which
could affect the continuing validity of this discussion. We have
not sought and will not seek any ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service regarding this offering. This summary does not
discuss any aspects of U.S. estate or gift tax or foreign,
state or local tax. It does not discuss the special treatment
under U.S. federal income tax laws that could result if we
invested in tax-exempt securities or certain other investment
assets.
A U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of
shares of our common stock that is for U.S. federal income
tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or
the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of such trust and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (2) it has a valid
election in place to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is not
a U.S. stockholder.
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership
will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. A prospective stockholder that is
a partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock
should consult its tax advisors with respect to the purchase,
ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an
investor of an investment in our shares will depend on the facts
of his, her or its particular situation. We encourage investors
to consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific
consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting
requirements, the applicability of federal, state, local and
foreign tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable
tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in the tax
laws.
Election
To Be Taxed As A RIC
As a business development company, we have qualified and elected
to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC,
we generally are not subject to corporate-level federal income
taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute
to our stockholders as dividends. To qualify as a RIC, we must,
among other things, meet certain
source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements (as
58
described below). In addition, to obtain RIC tax treatment, we
must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at
least 90% of our investment company taxable income,
which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of
realized net short-term capital gains over realized net
long-term capital losses (the Annual Distribution
Requirement).
Taxation
As A RIC
Provided that we qualify as a RIC and satisfy the Annual
Distribution Requirement, we will not be subject to federal
income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable
income and net capital gain (i.e., net long-term capital gains
in excess of net short-term capital losses) we timely distribute
to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income
tax at the regular corporate rates on any income or capital gain
not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.
We will be subject to a 4% non-deductible federal excise tax on
certain undistributed income of RICs unless we distribute in a
timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of
(1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year,
(2) 98% of our capital gain net income for the one-year
period ending October 31 in that calendar year and
(3) any income realized, but not distributed, in preceding
years. We currently intend to make sufficient distributions each
taxable year such that we will not be subject to federal income
or excise taxes on our net income.
In order to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we
must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
qualify to be treated as a business development company under
the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;
|
|
|
|
derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income
from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain
securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other
securities, or other income derived with respect to our business
of investing in such stock or securities and net income derived
from an interest in a qualified publicly traded
partnership (as defined in the Code) (the 90% Income
Test); and
|
|
|
|
diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the
taxable year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any
one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our
assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
the issuer (which for these purposes includes the equity
securities of a qualified publicly traded
partnership); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the
securities, other than U.S. Government securities or
securities of other RICs, (i) of one issuer (ii) of
two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under
applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or
similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) of one or
more qualified publicly traded partnerships (the
Diversification Tests).
|
To the extent that we invest in entities treated as partnerships
for federal income tax purposes (other than a qualified
publicly traded partnership), we generally must include
the items of gross income derived by the partnerships for
purposes of the 90% Income Test, and the income that is derived
from a partnership (other than a qualified publicly traded
partnership) will be treated as qualifying income for
purposes of the 90% Income Test only to the extent that such
income is attributable to items of income of the partnership
which would be qualifying income if realized by us directly. In
addition, we generally must take into account our proportionate
share of the assets held by partnerships (other than a
qualified publicly traded partnership) in which we
are a partner for purposes of the Diversification Tests.
In order to meet the 90% Income Test, we may establish one or
more special purpose corporations to hold assets from which we
do not anticipate earning dividend, interest or other qualifying
income under the 90% Income Test. Any such special purpose
corporation would generally be subject to U.S. federal
income tax, and could result in a reduced after-tax yield on the
portion of our assets held there.
59
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances
in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt
obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as
having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with
payment-in-kind
interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or
issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a
portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the
life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing
such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Because
any original issue discount accrued will be included in our
investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we
may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in
order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even
though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount.
Gain or loss realized by us from warrants acquired by us as well
as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally
will be treated as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss
generally will be long-term or short-term, depending on how long
we held a particular warrant.
Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized
to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy
distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are
not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while
our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding
unless certain asset coverage tests are met. See
Regulation Senior securities. Moreover,
our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution
requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of
our portfolio
and/or
(2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC,
including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in
order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise
Tax Avoidance Requirement, we may make such dispositions at
times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
If we fail to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement or
otherwise fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we will
be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income,
regardless of whether we make any distributions to our
stockholders. In that case, all of such income will be subject
to corporate-level federal income tax, reducing the amount
available to be distributed to our stockholders. See
Failure to Obtain RIC Tax Treatment below. In
contrast, assuming we qualify as a RIC, our corporate-level
federal income tax should be substantially reduced or
eliminated. See Election to be taxed as a RIC above.
Certain of our investment practices may be subject to special
and complex federal income tax provisions that may, among other
things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the
allowance of certain losses or deductions, (ii) convert
lower taxed long-term capital gain into higher taxed short-term
capital gain or ordinary income, (iii) convert an ordinary
loss or a deduction into a capital loss (the deductibility of
which is more limited), (iv) cause us to recognize income
or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash,
(v) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale
of stock or securities is deemed to occur (vi) adversely
alter the characterization of certain complex financial
transactions, and (vii) produce income that will not be
qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test. We will
monitor our transactions and may make certain tax elections in
order to mitigate the effect of these provisions.
To the extent that we invest in equity securities of entities
that are treated as partnerships for federal income tax
purposes, the effect of such investments for purposes of the 90%
Income Test and the Diversification Tests will depend on whether
the partnership is a qualified publicly traded
partnership or not. If the partnership is a
qualified publicly traded partnership, the net
income derived from such investments will be qualifying income
for purposes of the 90% Income Test and will be
securities for purposes of the Diversification
Tests, as described above. If the partnership, however, is not
treated as a qualified publicly traded partnership,
then the consequences of an investment in the partnership will
depend upon the amount and type of income and assets of the
partnership allocable to us. The income derived from such
investments may not be qualifying income for purposes of the 90%
Income Test and, therefore, could adversely affect our
qualification as a RIC. We intend to monitor our investments in
equity securities of entities that are treated as partnerships
for federal income tax purposes to prevent our disqualification
as a RIC.
We may invest in preferred securities or other securities the
federal income tax treatment of which may not be clear or may be
subject to recharacterization by the IRS. To the extent the tax
treatment of such securities or the income from such securities
differs from the expected tax treatment, it could affect the
timing
60
or character of income recognized, requiring us to purchase or
sell securities, or otherwise change our portfolio, in order to
comply with the tax rules applicable to RICs under the Code.
Taxation
Of U.S. Stockholders
Distributions by us generally are taxable to
U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gains.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income (which is, generally, our ordinary income plus
realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net
long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to
U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. For taxable years
beginning on or before December 31, 2008, to the extent
such distributions paid by us to noncorporate stockholders
(including individuals) are attributable to dividends from
U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign
corporations, such distributions generally will be eligible for
taxation at rates applicable to long term capital gains
(currently a maximum tax rate of 15%) provided that we
properly designate such distribution as derived from
qualified dividend income. In this regard, it is not
anticipated that a significant portion of distributions paid by
us will be attributable to dividends and, therefore, generally
will not qualify for the 15% maximum rate. Distributions of our
net capital gains (which is generally our realized net long-term
capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital
losses) properly designated by us as capital gain
dividends will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as
long-term capital gains at a maximum rate of 15% in the case of
individuals, trusts or estates, regardless of the
U.S. stockholders holding period for his, her or its
common stock and regardless of whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. Distributions in excess
of our current and accumulated earnings and profits first will
reduce a U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in such
stockholders common stock and, after the adjusted basis is
reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such
U.S. stockholder.
Although we currently intend to distribute any long-term capital
gains at least annually, we may in the future decide to retain
some or all of our long-term capital gains, but designate the
retained amount as a deemed distribution. In that
case, among other consequences, we will pay tax on the retained
amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include
his, her or its share of the deemed distribution in income as if
it had been actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder,
and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit
equal to his, her or its allocable share of the tax paid thereon
by us. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax
will be added to the U.S. stockholders tax basis for
his, her or its common stock. Since we expect to pay tax on any
retained capital gains at our regular corporate tax rate, and
since that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently
payable by individuals on long-term capital gains, the amount of
tax that individual stockholders will be treated as having paid
and for which they will receive a credit will exceed the tax
they owe on the retained net capital gain. Such excess generally
may be claimed as a credit against the
U.S. stockholders other federal income tax
obligations or may be refunded to the extent it exceeds a
stockholders liability for federal income tax. A
stockholder that is not subject to federal income tax or
otherwise required to file a federal income tax return would be
required to file a federal income tax return on the appropriate
form in order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. In order
to utilize the deemed distribution approach, we must provide
written notice to our stockholders prior to the expiration of
60 days after the close of the relevant taxable year. We
cannot treat any of our investment company taxable income as a
deemed distribution.
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual
Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and
(2) the amount of capital gain dividends paid for that
year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a
dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it
had been paid during the taxable year in question. If we make
such an election, the U.S. stockholder will still be
treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which
the distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by us
in October, November or December of any calendar year, payable
to stockholders of record on a specified date in any such month
and actually paid during January of the following year, will be
treated as if it had been received by our U.S. stockholders
on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was
declared.
61
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly
before the record date of a distribution, the price of the
shares will include the value of the distribution and the
investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though
it represents a return of his, her or its investment.
A U.S. stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or
loss if the stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her
or its shares of our common stock. Any gain arising from such
sale or disposition generally will be treated as long-term
capital gain or loss if the stockholder has held his, her or its
shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it would be classified
as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss
arising from the sale or disposition of shares of our common
stock held for six months or less will be treated as long-term
capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain
dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed
received, with respect to such shares. In addition, all or a
portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of shares of
our common stock may be disallowed if other substantially
identical shares are purchased (whether through reinvestment of
distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after
the disposition. The ability to otherwise deduct capital losses
may be subject to other limitations under the code.
In general, individual U.S. stockholders currently are
subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 15% on their net
capital gain, i.e., the excess of realized net long-term capital
gain over realized net short-term capital loss for a taxable
year, including a long-term capital gain derived from an
investment in our shares. Such rate is lower than the maximum
rate on ordinary income currently payable by individuals.
Corporate U.S. stockholders currently are subject to
federal income tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35% rate
also applied to ordinary income. Noncorporate stockholders with
net capital losses for a year (i.e., capital losses in excess of
capital gains) generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses
against their ordinary income each year; any net capital losses
of a noncorporate stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may
be carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided in
the Code. Corporate stockholders generally may not deduct any
net capital losses for a year, but may carry back such losses
for three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
We will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly
as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice
detailing, on a per share and per distribution basis, the
amounts includible in such U.S. stockholders taxable
income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital
gain. In addition, the federal tax status of each years
distributions generally will be reported to the Internal Revenue
Service (including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for
the 15% maximum rate). Distributions may also be subject to
additional state, local and foreign taxes depending on a
U.S. stockholders particular situation. Dividends
distributed by us generally will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction or the preferential rate applicable
to qualifying dividends.
We may be required to withhold federal income tax (backup
withholding) currently at a rate of 28% from all taxable
distributions to any noncorporate U.S. stockholder
(1) who fails to furnish us with a correct taxpayer
identification number or a certificate that such stockholder is
exempt from backup withholding, or (2) with respect to whom
the IRS notifies us that such stockholder has failed to properly
report certain interest and dividend income to the IRS and to
respond to notices to that effect. An individuals taxpayer
identification number is his or her social security number. Any
amount withheld under backup withholding is allowed as a credit
against the U.S. stockholders federal income tax
liability and may entitle such shareholder to a refund,
provided that proper information is timely provided to
the IRS.
Taxation
Of
Non-U.S. Stockholders
Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. An
investment in the shares by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
may have adverse tax consequences.
Non-U.S. stockholders
should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common
stock.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income to
Non-U.S. stockholders
that are not effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business carried on by the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
will generally be subject to withholding of federal income tax
at a rate of 30% (or lower rate provided by an applicable
treaty)
62
to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and
profits. However, effective for taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2008, we generally will not be required to
withhold any amounts with respect to distributions of
(i) U.S.-source
interest income that would not have been subject to withholding
of federal income tax if they had been earned directly by a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and (ii) net short-term capital gains in excess of net
long-term capital losses that would not have been subject to
withholding of federal income tax if they had been earned
directly by a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
in each case only to the extent that such distributions are
properly designated by us as interest-related
dividends or short-term capital gain
dividends, as the case may be, and certain other
requirements are met.
Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and gains realized by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
upon the sale of our common stock, that are not effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
will generally not be subject to federal withholding tax and
generally will not be subject to federal income tax unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual and is physically present in
the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable
year and meets certain other requirements. However, withholding
of federal income tax at a rate of 30% on capital gains of
nonresident alien individuals who are physically present in the
United States for more than the 182 day period only applies
in exceptional cases because any individual present in the
United States for more than 182 days during the taxable
year is generally treated as a resident for U.S. income tax
purposes; in that case, he or she would be subject to
U.S. income tax on his or her worldwide income at the
graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens, rather than
the 30% federal withholding tax. In addition, with respect of
dividends paid or deemed paid to
Non-U.S. stockholders
on or before December 31, 2007, that are attributable to
gain from U.S. real property interests
(USRPIs), which the Code defines to include direct
holdings of U.S. real property and interests (other than
solely as a creditor) in U.S. real property holding
corporations such as real estate investment
trusts (REITs) and also may include certain
REIT capital gain dividends, will generally be subject to
federal income tax and will give rise to an obligation for those
Non-U.S. stockholders
to file a federal income tax return, and may be subject to
withholding tax as well under future regulations.
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed
rather than actual distributions (which we may do in the
future), a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will be entitled to a federal income tax credit or tax refund
equal to the stockholders allocable share of the tax we
pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed. In
order to obtain the refund, the
Non-U.S. stockholder
must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file
a federal income tax return even if the
Non-U.S. stockholder
would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer
identification number or file a federal income tax return.
Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be appropriate for
a
Non-U.S. stockholder.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income and net capital gains (including deemed
distributions) to
Non-U.S. stockholders,
and gains realized by
Non-U.S. stockholders
upon the sale of our common stock that is effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by
the
Non-U.S. stockholder
(or if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a
permanent establishment in the United States), will
be subject to federal income tax at the graduated rates
applicable to U.S. citizens, residents and domestic
corporations. Corporate
Non-U.S. stockholders
may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a
rate of 30% imposed by the Code (or lower rate provided by an
applicable treaty). In the case of a non-corporate
Non-U.S. stockholder,
we may be required to withhold federal income tax from
distributions that are otherwise exempt from withholding tax (or
taxable at a reduced rate) unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
certifies his or her foreign status under penalties of perjury
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The tax consequences to a
Non-U.S. stockholder
entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty may
differ from those described herein.
Non-U.S. stockholders
are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to
the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in our
shares.
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
who is a nonresident alien individual may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding of federal income
tax on dividends unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
provides us or the dividend paying agent with an IRS
Form W8BEN (or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise
meets
63
documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a
Non-U.S. stockholder
or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
Non-U.S. persons
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state,
local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the
shares.
Failure
To Obtain RIC Tax Treatment
If we were unable to obtain tax treatment as a RIC, we would be
subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate
rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to
stockholders, nor would they be required to be made.
Distributions would generally be taxable to our stockholders as
ordinary dividend income eligible for the 15% maximum rate to
the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits.
Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate
distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and
accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a
return of capital to the extent of the stockholders tax
basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a
capital gain.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
The following description is based on relevant portions of
the Maryland General Corporation Law and on our charter and
bylaws. This summary is not necessarily complete, and we refer
you to the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and
bylaws for a more detailed description of the provisions
summarized below.
Capital
Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of stock, par value $.001 per share, all of which is
initially classified as common stock. Our common stock is traded
on The NASDAQ National Market under the symbol PSEC.
There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase our
stock. No stock has been authorized for issuance under any
equity compensation plans. Under Maryland law, our stockholders
generally are not personally liable for our debts or obligations.
Under our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to
classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other
classes or series of stock, and to authorize the issuance of
such shares, without obtaining stockholder approval. As
permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter
provides that the Board of Directors, without any action by our
stockholders, may amend the charter from time to time to
increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or
the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we
have authority to issue.
Common
stock
All shares of our common stock have equal rights as to earnings,
assets, dividends and voting and, when they are issued, will be
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
Distributions may be paid to the holders of our common stock if,
as and when authorized by our Board of Directors and declared by
us out of funds legally available therefor. Shares of our common
stock have no preemptive, conversion or redemption rights and
are freely transferable, except where their transfer is
restricted by federal and state securities laws or by contract.
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of us,
each share of our common stock would be entitled to share
ratably in all of our assets that are legally available for
distribution after we pay all debts and other liabilities and
subject to any preferential rights of holders of our preferred
stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Each
share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of
directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or
series of stock, the holders of our common stock will possess
exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the
election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of common stock will elect all of our
directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares
will be unable to elect any director.
64
Preferred
stock
Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to classify and
reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or
series of stock, including preferred stock. Prior to issuance of
shares of each class or series, the Board of Directors is
required by Maryland law and by our charter to set the terms,
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers,
restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of
redemption for each class or series. Thus, the Board of
Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred
stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in
control that might involve a premium price for holders of our
common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. You should
note, however, that any issuance of preferred stock must comply
with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires,
among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and
before any dividend or other distribution is made with respect
to our common stock and before any purchase of common stock is
made, such preferred stock together with all other senior
securities must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total
assets after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution
or purchase price, as the case may be, and (2) the holders
of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be
entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to
elect a majority of the directors if dividends on such preferred
stock are in arrears by two years or more. Certain matters under
the 1940 Act require the separate vote of the holders of any
issued and outstanding preferred stock. For example, holders of
preferred stock would vote separately from the holders of common
stock on a proposal to cease operations as a business
development company. We believe that the availability for
issuance of preferred stock will provide us with increased
flexibility in structuring future financings and acquisitions.
Limitation
On Liability Of Directors And Officers; Indemnification And
Advance Of Expenses
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money
damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or
services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty
established by a final judgment as being material to the cause
of action. Our charter contains such a provision which
eliminates directors and officers liability to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the
requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
obligate ourselves to indemnify any present or former director
or officer or any individual who, while serving as a director or
officer and at our request, serves or has served another
corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a
director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any
claim or liability to which that person may become subject or
which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in
any such capacity and to pay or reimburse their reasonable
expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our
bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
indemnify any present or former director or officer or any
individual who, while serving as a director or officer and at
our request, serves or has served another corporation, real
estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director,
officer, partner or trustee and who is made, or threatened to be
made, a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service
in any such capacity from and against any claim or liability to
which that person may become subject or which that person may
incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and
to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of
final disposition of a proceeding. The charter and bylaws also
permit us to indemnify and advance expenses to any person who
served a predecessor of us in any of the capacities described
above and any of our employees or agents or any employees or
agents of our predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, we
will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such
person would be subject by reason of such persons willful
misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
in the defense of any
65
proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made,
a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity.
Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and
former directors and officers, among others, against judgments,
penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually
incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they
may be made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of
their service in those or other capacities unless it is
established that (a) the act or omission of the director or
officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding
and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the
result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the
director or officer actually received an improper personal
benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case
of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had
reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation
may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the
right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the
basis that a personal benefit was improperly received, unless in
either case a court orders indemnification, and then only for
expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to
advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the
corporations receipt of (a) a written affirmation by
the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he
or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for
indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written
undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the
amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately
determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Our insurance policy does not currently provide coverage for
claims, liabilities and expenses that may arise out of
activities that a present or former director or officer of us
has performed for another entity at our request. There is no
assurance that such entities will in fact carry such insurance.
However, we note that we do not expect to request our present or
former directors or officers to serve another entity as a
director, officer, partner or trustee unless we can obtain
insurance providing coverage for such persons for any claims,
liabilities or expenses that may arise out of their activities
while serving in such capacities.
Provisions
Of The Maryland General Corporation Law And Our Charter And
Bylaws
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws
contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a
potential acquiror to acquire us by means of a tender offer,
proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to
discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire
control of us to negotiate first with our Board of Directors. We
believe that the benefits of these provisions outweigh the
potential disadvantages of discouraging any such acquisition
proposals because, among other things, the negotiation of such
proposals may improve their terms.
Classified
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. The current terms
of the first, second and third classes will expire in 2006, 2007
and 2008 respectively, and in each case, until their successors
are duly elected and qualify. Each year one class of Directors
will be elected by the stockholders. A classified board may
render a change in control of us or removal of our incumbent
management more difficult. We believe, however, that the longer
time required to elect a majority of a classified Board of
Directors will help to ensure the continuity and stability of
our management and policies.
Election
of directors
Our charter and bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock
entitled to vote in the election of directors will be required
to elect a director. Under the charter, our Board of Directors
may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect
directors.
Number
of directors; vacancies; removal
Our charter provides that the number of directors will be set
only by the Board of Directors in accordance with our bylaws.
Our bylaws provide that a majority of our entire Board of
Directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of
directors. However, unless our bylaws are amended, the number of
directors may never be less than three nor more than eight. Our
charter provides that, at such time as we have
66
three independent directors and our common stock is registered
under the Exchange Act, we elect to be subject to the provision
of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the Maryland General
Corporation Law regarding the filling of vacancies on the Board
of Directors. Accordingly, at such time, except as may be
provided by the Board of Directors in setting the terms of any
class or series of preferred stock, any and all vacancies on the
Board of Directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of
a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if the
remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any director
elected to fill a vacancy will serve for the remainder of the
full term of the directorship in which the vacancy occurred and
until a successor is elected and qualifies, subject to any
applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our charter provides that a director may be removed only for
cause, as defined in our charter, and then only by the
affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to
be cast in the election of directors.
Action
by stockholders
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that stockholder
action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders or (unless the charter provides for stockholder
action by less than unanimous written consent, which our charter
does not) by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting.
These provisions, combined with the requirements of our bylaws
regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting
of stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying
consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual
meeting.
Advance
notice provisions for stockholder nominations and stockholder
proposals
Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of
stockholders, nominations of persons for election to the Board
of Directors and the proposal of business to be considered by
stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of
the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3) by a
stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has
complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With
respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business
specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the
meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of
Directors at a special meeting may be made only
(1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by the
Board of Directors or (3) provided that the Board of
Directors has determined that directors will be elected at the
meeting, by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting
and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the
bylaws.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice
of nominations and other business is to afford our Board of
Directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the
qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of
any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary
or desirable by our Board of Directors, to inform stockholders
and make recommendations about such qualifications or business,
as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting
meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our
Board of Directors any power to disapprove stockholder
nominations for the election of directors or proposals
recommending certain action, they may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or the
consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are
not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from
conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of
directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to
whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be
harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling
of special meetings of stockholders
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be
called by our Board of Directors and certain of our officers.
Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the
satisfaction of certain procedural and informational
requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a
special meeting of stockholders will be called by the secretary
of the corporation upon the written request of stockholders
entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes
entitled to be cast at such meeting.
67
Approval
of extraordinary corporate action; amendment of charter and
bylaws
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially
all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in
similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business,
unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled
to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on
the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its
charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage,
but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter. Our charter generally provides for approval
of charter amendments and extraordinary transactions by the
stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter. Our charter also provides
that certain charter amendments and any proposal for our
conversion, whether by merger or otherwise, from a closed-end
company to an open-end company or any proposal for our
liquidation or dissolution requires the approval of the
stockholders entitled to cast at least 80 percent of the
votes entitled to be cast on such matter. However, if such
amendment or proposal is approved by at least two-thirds of our
continuing directors (in addition to approval by our Board of
Directors), such amendment or proposal may be approved by a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter. The
continuing directors are defined in our charter as
our current directors as well as those directors whose
nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by
the directors to fill vacancies is approved by a majority of the
continuing directors then on the Board of Directors.
Our charter and bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will
have the exclusive power to make, alter, amend or repeal any
provision of our bylaws.
No
appraisal rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection
with the Control Share Act discussed below, as permitted by the
Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter provides that
stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights.
Control
share acquisitions
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that control
shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter (the Control Share Act). Shares owned by the
acquiror, by officers or by directors who are employees of the
corporation are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the
matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock which, if
aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror
or in respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or
direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of
a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise
voting power in electing directors within one of the following
ranges of voting power:
|
|
|
|
|
one-tenth or more but less than one-third,
|
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority or
|
|
|
|
a majority or more of all voting power.
|
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an
acquiror crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth
above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person
is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously
obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means
the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share
acquisition may compel the Board of Directors of the corporation
to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within
50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the
shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an
undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request
for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the
question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the
acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement
as required by the statute, then the corporation may repurchase
for fair value any or all of
68
the control shares, except those for which voting rights have
previously been approved. The right of the corporation to
repurchase control shares is subject to certain conditions and
limitations, including, as provided in our bylaws, compliance
with the 1940 Act. Fair value is determined, without regard to
the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the
date of the last control share acquisition by the acquiror or of
any meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of the
shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for
control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the
acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares
entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal
rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes
of appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per
share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition.
The Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired
in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation
is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions
approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation.
Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share
Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares of
stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will not be
amended or eliminated at any time in the future. However, we
will amend our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Act
only if the Board of Directors determines that it would be in
our best interests and if the SEC does not object to our
determination that our being subject to the Control Share Act
does not conflict with the 1940 Act.
Business
combinations
Under Maryland law, business combinations between a
Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an
affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five
years after the most recent date on which the interested
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business
combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or,
in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or
issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested
stockholder is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power
of the corporations shares; or
|
|
|
|
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time
within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was
the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the
then outstanding voting stock of the corporation.
|
A person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if
the Board of Directors approved in advance the transaction by
which he otherwise would have become an interested stockholder.
However, in approving a transaction, the Board of Directors may
provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after
the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined
by the Board.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination
between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder
generally must be recommended by the Board of Directors of the
corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
|
|
|
|
|
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding
shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
|
|
|
|
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting
stock of the corporation other than shares held by the
interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the
business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate
or associate of the interested stockholder.
|
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the
corporations common stockholders receive a minimum price,
as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of
cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid
by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions,
including business combinations that are exempted by the Board
of Directors before the time that the interested stockholder
becomes an interested stockholder. Our Board of Directors has
adopted a resolution that any business combination between us
and
69
any other person is exempted from the provisions of the Business
Combination Act, provided that the business combination
is first approved by the Board of Directors, including a
majority of the directors who are not interested persons as
defined in the 1940 Act. This resolution, however, may be
altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If this
resolution is repealed, or the Board of Directors does not
otherwise approve a business combination, the statute may
discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and
increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Conflict
with 1940 Act
Our bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision
of the Maryland General Corporation Law, including the Control
Share Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to such Act) and
the Business Combination Act, or any provision of our charter or
bylaws conflicts with any provision of the 1940 Act, the
applicable provision of the 1940 Act will control.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR PREFERRED STOCK
General
In addition to shares of common stock, our charter authorizes
the issuance of preferred stock. If we offer preferred stock
under this prospectus, we will issue an appropriate prospectus
supplement. We may issue preferred stock from time to time in
one or more series, without stockholder approval. Our Board of
Directors is authorized to fix for any series of preferred stock
the number of shares of such series and the designation,
relative powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such series; except that, such an
issuance must adhere to the requirements of the 1940 Act,
Maryland law and any other limitations imposed by law.
The 1940 Act requires, among other things, that
(1) immediately after issuance and before any distribution
is made with respect to common stock, the liquidation preference
of the preferred stock, together with all other senior
securities, must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total
assets (taking into account such distribution) and (2) the
holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be
entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to
elect a majority of the directors if dividends on the preferred
stock are in arrears by two years or more.
Terms
For any series of preferred stock that we may issue, our Board
of Directors will determine and the prospectus supplement
relating to such series will describe:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation and number of shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rate and time at which, and the preferences and conditions
under which, any dividends will be paid on shares of such
series, as well as whether such dividends are cumulative or
non-cumulative and participating or non-participating;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to convertibility or exchangeability of
the shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rights and preferences, if any, of holders of shares of such
series upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our
affairs;
|
|
|
|
the voting powers, if any, of the holders of shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to the redemption of the shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
any limitations on our ability to pay dividends or make
distributions on, or acquire or redeem, other securities while
shares of such series are outstanding;
|
|
|
|
any conditions or restrictions on our ability to issue
additional shares of such series or other securities;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. federal income
tax considerations; and
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
any other relative power, preferences and participating,
optional or special rights of shares of such series, and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.
|
Rank
All shares of preferred stock that we may issue will be
identical and of equal rank except as to the particular terms
thereof that may be fixed by our Board of Directors, and all
shares of each series of preferred stock will be identical and
of equal rank except as to the dates from which cumulative
dividends, if any, thereon will be cumulative.
Dividends
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus
supplement, the preferred stock will have the rights with
respect to payment of dividends set forth below.
Holders of the preferred stock of each series will be entitled
to receive, when, as and if authorized by our board of directors
and declared by us, out of our assets legally available for
payment, cash dividends in the amounts and on the dates as will
be set forth in, or pursuant to, the applicable prospectus
supplement. Each dividend will be payable to holders of record
as they appear on our share transfer books on the record dates
as are fixed by our board of directors.
Dividends on any series of preferred stock may be cumulative or
non-cumulative, as provided in the applicable prospectus
supplement. Dividends, if cumulative, will be cumulative from
and after the date set forth in the applicable prospectus
supplement. If the board of directors fails to declare a
dividend payable on a dividend payment date on any series of
preferred stock for which dividends are non-cumulative, then the
holders of this series of preferred stock will have no right to
receive a dividend in respect of the related dividend period and
we will have no obligation to pay the dividend accrued for the
period, whether or not dividends on this series of preferred
stock are declared payable on any future dividend payment date.
If preferred stock of any series is outstanding, no full
dividends will be declared or paid or set apart for payment on
any of our stock of any other series ranking, as to dividends,
on a parity with or junior to the preferred stock of this series
for any period unless:
|
|
|
|
|
if this series of preferred stock has a cumulative dividend,
full cumulative dividends have been or contemporaneously are
declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the
payment thereof set apart for the payment for all past dividend
periods; or
|
|
|
|
if this series of preferred stock does not have a cumulative
dividend, full dividends for the then current dividend period
have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared
and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for the
payment on the preferred stock of this series.
|
When dividends are not paid in full or a sum sufficient for the
full payment is not so set apart upon preferred stock of any
series and the shares of any other series of preferred stock
ranking on a parity as to dividends with the preferred stock of
this series, all dividends declared upon the preferred stock of
this series and any other series of preferred stock ranking on a
parity as to dividends with the preferred stock will be declared
pro rata so that the amount of dividends declared per share of
preferred stock of this series and the other series of preferred
stock will in all cases bear to each other the same ratio that
accrued dividends per share on the preferred stock of this
series and the other series of preferred stock, which shall not
include any accumulation in respect of unpaid dividends for
prior dividend periods if the preferred stock does not have a
cumulative dividend, bear to each other. No interest, or sum of
money in lieu of interest, will be payable in respect of any
dividend payment or payments on preferred stock of this series
which may be in arrears.
Except as provided in the immediately preceding paragraph,
unless (a) if this series of preferred stock has a
cumulative dividend, full cumulative dividends on the preferred
stock of this series have been or contemporaneously are declared
and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment
thereof set apart for payment for all past dividend periods, and
(b) if this series of preferred stock does not have a
cumulative dividend, full dividends on the preferred stock of
this series have been or contemporaneously are declared and
71
paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof
set apart for payment for the then current dividend period, no
dividends, other than in shares of common stock or other stock
ranking junior to the preferred stock of this series as to
dividends and upon liquidation, may be declared or paid or set
aside for payment or other distribution may be declared or made
upon the common stock, or any of our other stock ranking junior
to or on a parity with the preferred stock of this series as to
dividends or upon liquidation, nor may any shares of common
stock, or any other of our capital stock ranking junior to or on
a parity with the preferred stock of this series as to dividends
or upon liquidation, be redeemed, purchased or otherwise
acquired for any consideration or any moneys be paid to or made
available for a sinking fund for the redemption of any of the
shares by us except by conversion into or exchange for other
shares of our stock ranking junior to the preferred stock of
this series as to dividends and upon liquidation.
Redemption
If so provided in the applicable prospectus supplement, the
preferred stock will be subject to mandatory redemption or
redemption at our option, as a whole or in part, in each case
upon the terms, at the times and at the redemption prices set
forth in the prospectus supplement.
The prospectus supplement relating to a series of preferred
stock that is subject to mandatory redemption will specify the
number of shares of the preferred stock that shall be redeemed
by us in each year commencing after a date to be specified, at a
redemption price per share to be specified, together with an
amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon
which will not, if the preferred stock does not have a
cumulative dividend, include any accumulation in respect of
unpaid dividends for prior dividend periods, to the date of
redemption. The redemption price may be payable in cash or other
property, as specified in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless (a) if this series of
preferred stock has a cumulative dividend, full cumulative
dividends on all shares of any series of preferred stock have
been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and
a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for payment
for all past dividend periods, and (b) if this series of
preferred stock does not have a cumulative dividend, full
dividends on the preferred stock of any series have been or
contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum
sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for payment for the
then current dividend period, no shares of any series of
preferred stock may be redeemed unless all outstanding preferred
stock of this series is simultaneously redeemed; provided,
however, that the foregoing shall not prevent the purchase or
acquisition of preferred stock of this series pursuant to a
purchase or exchange offer made on the same terms to holders of
all outstanding preferred stock of this series. In addition,
unless (a) if this series of preferred stock has a
cumulative dividend, full cumulative dividends on all
outstanding shares of any series of preferred stock have been or
contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum
sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for payment for all
past dividend periods, and (b) if this series of preferred
stock does not have a cumulative dividend, full dividends on the
preferred stock of any series have been or contemporaneously are
declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the
payment thereof set apart for payment for the then current
dividend period, we may not purchase or otherwise acquire,
directly or indirectly, any shares of preferred stock of this
series except by conversion into or exchange for our capital
stock ranking junior to the preferred stock of this series as to
dividends and upon liquidation; provided, however, that the
foregoing shall not prevent the purchase or acquisition of
preferred stock of this series pursuant to a purchase or
exchange offer made on the same terms to holders of all
outstanding preferred stock of this series.
If fewer than all of the outstanding shares of preferred stock
of any series are to be redeemed, the number of shares to be
redeemed will be determined by us and the shares may be redeemed
pro rata from the holders of record of the shares in proportion
to the number of the shares held or for which redemption is
requested by the holder, with adjustments to avoid redemption of
fractional shares, or by lot in a manner determined by us.
Notice of redemption will be mailed at least 30 days but
not more than 60 days before the redemption date to each
holder of record of preferred stock of any series to be redeemed
at the address shown on our share transfer books. Each notice
will state:
72
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares and series of the preferred stock to be
redeemed;
|
|
|
|
the redemption price;
|
|
|
|
the place or places where certificates for the preferred stock
are to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price;
|
|
|
|
that dividends on the shares to be redeemed will cease to
accumulate on the redemption date; and
|
|
|
|
the date upon which the holders conversion rights, if any,
as to the shares will terminate.
|
If fewer than all the shares of preferred stock of any series
are to be redeemed, the notice mailed to each holder thereof
shall also specify the number of shares of preferred stock to be
redeemed from each holder. If notice of redemption of any
preferred stock has been given and if the funds necessary for
the redemption have been set aide by us in trust for the benefit
of the holders of any preferred stock so called for redemption,
then from and after the redemption date dividends will cease to
accumulate on the preferred stock, and all rights of the holders
of the preferred stock will terminate, except the right to
receive the redemption price.
Liquidation
Preference
Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of our affairs, then, before any distribution or
payment shall be made to the holders of any common stock or any
other class or series of our stock ranking junior to the
preferred stock of this series in the distribution of assets
upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company,
the holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive out
of our assets of our company legally available for distribution
to stockholders liquidating distributions in the amount of the
liquidation preference per share that is set forth in the
applicable prospectus supplement, plus an amount equal to all
dividends accumulated and unpaid thereon, which will not include
any accumulation in respect of unpaid dividends for prior
dividend periods if the preferred stock does not have a
cumulative dividend. After payment of the full amount of the
liquidating distributions to which they are entitled, the
holders of preferred stock will have no rights or claim to any
of our remaining assets. In the event that, upon any voluntary
or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up, our
available assets are insufficient to pay the amount of the
liquidating distributions on all outstanding preferred stock of
this series and the corresponding amounts payable on all shares
of other classes or series of capital stock of our company
ranking on a parity with the preferred stock in the distribution
of assets, then the holders of the preferred stock and all other
classes or series of capital stock will share ratably in any
distribution of assets in proportion to the full liquidating
distributions to which they would otherwise be respectively
entitled.
Our consolidation or merger with or into any other entity, or
the merger of another entity with or into our company, or a
statutory share exchange by us, or the sale, lease or conveyance
of all or substantially all of our property or business, will
not be deemed to constitute a liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of our company.
In determining whether a distribution (other than upon voluntary
or involuntary liquidation), by dividend, redemption or other
acquisition of shares of our stock or otherwise, is permitted
under Maryland law, amounts that would be needed, if we were to
be dissolved at the time of distribution, to satisfy the
preferential rights upon dissolution of holders of shares of the
preferred stock will not be added to our total liabilities.
Voting
Rights
Except as otherwise provided in the prospectus supplement or as
otherwise required by law, holders of preferred stock will have
equal voting rights (one vote per share) with holders of common
stock and any other preferred stock, and will vote together with
holders of common stock and any other preferred stock as a
single class.
Holders of outstanding preferred stock and other preferred
stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect two of
the Companys directors. The remaining directors are
elected by holders of common stock, preferred stock and other
preferred stock, voting together as a single class. In addition,
if at any time dividends (whether or not earned or declared) on
outstanding preferred stock or other preferred stock are due and
unpaid in an amount equal to two full years of dividends, and
sufficient cash or specified securities have
73
not been deposited with the auction agent for the payment of
such dividends, then, the sole remedy of holders of outstanding
preferred stock and other preferred stock is that the number of
directors constituting the Board will be automatically increased
by the smallest number that, when added to the two directors
elected exclusively by the holders of preferred stock and other
preferred stock, as described above, would constitute a majority
of the Board. The holders of preferred stock and other preferred
stock will be entitled to elect that smallest number of
additional directors at a special meeting of shareholders held
as soon as possible and at all subsequent meetings at which
directors are to be elected. The terms of office of the persons
who are directors at the time of that election will continue. If
the Company thereafter shall pay, or declare and set apart for
payment, in full, all dividends payable on all outstanding
preferred stock and other preferred stock, the special voting
rights stated above will cease, and the terms of office of the
additional directors elected by the holders of preferred stock
and other preferred stock will automatically terminate.
So long as any preferred stock are outstanding, the Company will
not, without the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of a
majority of the preferred stock outstanding at the time (voting
together as a separate class):
(a) authorize, create or issue any class or series of
shares ranking prior to or on a parity with the preferred stock
with respect to payment of dividends or the distribution of
assets on liquidation, or authorize, create or issue additional
shares of any series of the preferred stock or any other class
or series of shares ranking prior to or on a parity with the
preferred stock with respect to the payment of dividends or the
distribution of assets on liquidation, unless, in the case of
other preferred stock on parity with the preferred stock, the
Company obtains written confirmation from a nationally
recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO)or
any substitute rating agency (if any such substitute rating
agency is then rating the preferred stock) that the issuance of
such additional class or series would not impair the rating then
assigned by such rating agency to the preferred stock and the
Company continues to comply with Section 13 of the 1940
Act, the 1940 Act preferred stock Asset Coverage requirements
and the preferred stock Basic Maintenance Amount requirements,
in which case the vote or consent of the holders of the
preferred stock is not required;
(b) amend, alter or repeal the provisions of the Articles
of Incorporation or Bylaws, whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise, so as to materially and adversely affect any
preference, right or power of the preferred stock or holders of
preferred stock; provided, however, that (i) none of the
actions permitted by the exception to (a) above will be
deemed to affect such preferences, rights or powers, (ii) a
division of preferred stock will be deemed to affect such
preferences, rights or powers only if the terms of such division
materially and adversely affect the holders of preferred stock
and (iii) the authorization, creation and issuance of
classes or series of shares ranking junior to the preferred
stock with respect to the payment of dividends and the
distribution of assets upon dissolution, liquidation or winding
up of the affairs of the Company will be deemed to affect such
preferences, rights or powers only if an NRSRO is then rating
the preferred stock and such issuance would, at the time
thereof, cause the Company not to satisfy the 1940 Act preferred
stock asset coverage or the preferred stock basic maintenance
Amount;
(c) authorize the Companys conversion from a
closed-end to an open-end investment company; or
(d) approve any reorganization (as such term is used in the
1940 Act) adversely affecting the preferred stock.
In the case of an event described in (c) or (d) above,
the required approval by holders of preferred stock will be
satisfied if there is an affirmative vote or consent of holders
of a majority of outstanding voting securities
(within the meaning of Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act)
with respect to the preferred stock.
So long as any shares of the preferred stock are outstanding,
the Company shall not, without the affirmative vote or consent
of the holders of at least 66 and 2/3% of the preferred stock
outstanding at the time, in person or by proxy, either in
writing or at a meeting, voting as a separate class, file a
voluntary application for relief under Federal bankruptcy law or
any similar application under state law.
To the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, the Company will not
approve any of the actions set forth in (a) or
(b) above that materially and adversely affects the rights
expressly set forth in the Companys Articles
74
of Incorporation, of a holder of a series of the preferred stock
or other preferred stock differently than those of a holder of
shares of any other series of preferred stock or other preferred
stock without the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of
at least a majority of the shares of each series adversely
affected. However, to the extent permitted by the Companys
Articles of Incorporation, no vote of holders of common stock,
either separately or together with holders of preferred stock
and other preferred stock as a single class, is necessary to
take the actions contemplated by (a) and (b) above.
The holders of common stock will not be entitled to vote in
respect of such matters, unless, in the case of the actions
contemplated by (b) above, the action would materially and
adversely affect the contract rights of the holders of common
stock expressly set forth in the Companys charter.
The foregoing voting provisions will not apply with respect to
the preferred stock if, at or prior to the time when a vote is
required, such shares have been (i) redeemed or
(ii) called for redemption and sufficient funds have been
deposited in trust to effect such redemption.
Conversion
Rights
The terms and conditions, if any, upon which any series of
preferred stock is convertible into shares of common stock will
be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. The terms
will include the number of shares of common stock into which the
shares of preferred stock are convertible, the conversion price,
or manner of calculation thereof, the conversion period,
provisions as to whether conversion will be at the option of the
holders of our preferred stock or us, the events requiring an
adjustment of the conversion price and provisions affecting
conversion in the event of the redemption of the preferred stock.
Stockholder
Liability
Maryland law provides that no stockholder, including holders of
preferred stock, will be personally liable for our acts and
obligations and that our funds and property shall be the only
recourse for these acts or obligations.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR WARRANTS
The following is a general description of the terms of the
warrants we may issue from time to time. Particular terms of any
warrants we offer will be described in the prospectus supplement
relating to such warrants.
We may issue warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
Such warrants may be issued independently or together with
shares of common stock and may be attached or separate from such
shares of common stock. We will issue each series of warrants
under a separate warrant agreement to be entered into between us
and a warrant agent. The warrant agent will act solely as our
agent and will not assume any obligation or relationship of
agency for or with holders or beneficial owners of warrants.
A prospectus supplement will describe the particular terms of
any series of warrants we may issue, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the title of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the aggregate number of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the price or prices at which such warrants will be issued;
|
|
|
|
the currency or currencies, including composite currencies, in
which the price of such warrants may be payable;
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the price at which and the currency or currencies, including
composite currencies, in which the shares of common stock
purchasable upon exercise of such warrants may be purchased;
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
the date on which the right to exercise such warrants will
commence and the date on which such right will expire;
|
|
|
|
whether such warrants will be issued in registered form or
bearer form;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the minimum or maximum amount of such warrants
which may be exercised at any one time;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the number of such warrants issued with each
share of common stock;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the date on and after which such warrants and the
related shares of common stock will be separately transferable;
|
|
|
|
information with respect to book-entry procedures, if any;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. federal income
tax considerations; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms of such warrants, including terms, procedures
and limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such
warrants.
|
Warrant certificates will be exchangeable for new warrant
certificates of different denominations and warrants may be
exercised at the corporate trust office of the warrant agent or
any other office indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement. Prior to the exercise of their warrants, holders of
warrants will not have any of the rights of holders of the
securities purchasable upon such exercise or to any dividend
payments or voting rights as to which holders of the shares of
common stock or preferred stock purchasable upon such exercise
may be entitled.
Each warrant will entitle the holder to purchase for cash such
number of shares of common stock or preferred stock, at such
exercise price as will, in each case, be set forth in, or be
determinable as set forth in, the applicable prospectus
supplement relating to the warrants offered thereby. Unless
otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement,
warrants may be exercised at any time up to 5:00 p.m. New
York City time on the expiration date set forth in applicable
prospectus supplement. After 5:00 p.m. New York City time
on the expiration date, unexercised warrants will be void.
Warrants may be exercised as set forth in the applicable
prospectus supplement relating to the warrants. Upon receipt of
payment and the warrant certificate properly completed and duly
executed at the corporate office of the warrant agent or any
other office indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement,
we will, as soon as practicable, forward the securities
purchasable upon such exercise. If less than all of the warrants
are presented by such warrant certificate of exercise, a new
warrant certificate will be issued for the remaining amount of
warrants.
We and the warrant agent may amend or supplement the warrant
agreement for a series of warrants without the consent of the
holders of the warrants issued thereunder to effect changes that
are not inconsistent with the provisions of the warrants and
that do not materially and adversely affect the interests of the
holders of the warrants.
Under the 1940 Act, we may generally only offer warrants
provided that (1) the warrants expire by their terms
within ten years; (2) the exercise or conversion price is
not less than the current market value at the date of issuance;
(3) our stockholders authorize the proposal to issue such
warrants, and our Board of Directors approves such issuance on
the basis that the issuance is in the best interests of Prospect
Energy and its stockholders; and (4) if the warrants are
accompanied by other securities, the warrants are not separately
transferable unless no class of such warrants and the securities
accompanying them has been publicly distributed. The 1940 Act
also provides that the amount of our voting securities that
would result from the exercise of all outstanding warrants at
the time of issuance may not exceed 25% of our outstanding
voting securities.
76
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR DEBT SECURITIES
General
We may issue debt securities in one or more series under an
indenture to be entered into between us and a trustee. The
specific terms of each series of debt securities will be
described in the particular prospectus supplement relating to
that series. For a complete description of the terms of a
particular series of debt securities, you should read both this
prospectus and the prospectus supplement relating to that
particular series.
The prospectus supplement, which will accompany this prospectus,
will describe the particular series of debt securities being
offered by including:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation or title of the series of debt securities;
|
|
|
|
the total principal amount of the series of debt securities;
|
|
|
|
the percentage of the principal amount at which the series of
debt securities will be offered;
|
|
|
|
the date or dates on which principal will be payable;
|
|
|
|
the rate or rates (which may be either fixed or variable)
and/or the
method of determining such rate or rates of interest, if any;
|
|
|
|
the date or dates from which any interest will accrue, or the
method of determining such date or dates, and the date or dates
on which any interest will be payable;
|
|
|
|
the terms for redemption, extension or early repayment, if any;
|
|
|
|
the currencies in which the series of debt securities are issued
and payable;
|
|
|
|
the provision for any sinking fund;
|
|
|
|
any restrictive covenants;
|
|
|
|
any Events of Default;
|
|
|
|
whether the series of debt securities are issuable in
certificated form;
|
|
|
|
any provisions for defeasance or covenant defeasance;
|
|
|
|
any special federal income tax implications, including, if
applicable, federal income tax considerations relating to
original issue discount;
|
|
|
|
any provisions for convertibility or exchangeability of the debt
securities into or for any other securities;
|
|
|
|
whether the debt securities are subject to subordination and the
terms of such subordination;
|
|
|
|
the listing, if any, on a securities exchange;
|
|
|
|
the name and address of the trustee; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms.
|
The prospectus supplement or other offering material will
describe the federal income tax consequences and other special
considerations applicable to any debt securities.
Covenants
The prospectus supplement or other offering material will
describe any material covenants of a series of debt securities.
77
Events of
Default
With respect to a series of debt securities, any one of the
following events may constitute an event of default as provided
in the prospectus supplement:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay any interest on any debt security of that series
when due, continued for 30 days;
|
|
|
|
failure to pay principal of or any premium on any debt security
of that series when due;
|
|
|
|
failure to deposit any sinking fund payment, when due, in
respect of any debt security of that series;
|
|
|
|
certain events involving our bankruptcy, insolvency or
reorganization; or
|
|
|
|
any other event of default provided with respect to debt
securities of that series.
|
Additional or different events of default applicable to a series
of debt securities may be described in a prospectus supplement
or other offering material. An event of default of one series of
debt securities is not necessarily an event of default for any
other series of debt securities. The prospectus supplement or
other offering material relating to any series of debt
securities that are original issue discount securities will
contain the particular provisions relating to acceleration of
the stated maturity of a portion of the principal amount of that
series of original issue discount securities upon the occurrence
and continuation of an event of default.
Modification
and Waiver
We may modify and amend the indenture with the consent of the
holders of not less than the majority in aggregate principal
amount of the outstanding debt securities of each series which
is affected.
1940 Act
Requirements
The debt securities may be secured or unsecured obligations.
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a
business development company, to issue debt only in amounts such
that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at
least 200% after each issuance of debt. Unless the prospectus
supplement states otherwise, principal (and premium, if any) and
interest, if any, will be paid by us in immediately available
funds.
REGULATION
We are a closed-end, non-diversified investment company that has
filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the 1940 Act and has elected to be treated as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The 1940 Act contains
prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between
business development companies and their affiliates (including
any Investment Advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters
and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters and requires
that a majority of the directors be persons other than
interested persons, as that term is defined in the
1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not
change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to
withdraw our election as, a business development company unless
approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities. We
focus on energy companies and will invest, under normal
circumstances, at least 80% of our net assets (including the
amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in these
companies. This 80% investment policy is not fundamental and, as
a result, we may change this policy without first obtaining your
approval. However, we may not change or modify this policy
unless we provide you with at least 60 days prior
notice pursuant to
Rule 35d-1
under the 1940 Act.
We may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired
directly from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With
respect to such securities, we may, for the purpose of public
resale, be deemed an underwriter as that term is
defined in the Securities Act. Our intention is to not write
(sell) or buy put or call options to manage risks associated
with the publicly traded securities of our portfolio companies,
except that we may enter into hedging transactions to manage the
risks associated with interest rate and other market
fluctuations. However, we may purchase or otherwise receive
warrants to purchase the common stock of our portfolio companies
in connection with acquisition financing or other investment.
Similarly, in connection with
78
an acquisition, we may acquire rights to require the issuers of
acquired securities or their affiliates to repurchase them under
certain circumstances. We also do not intend to acquire
securities issued by any investment company that exceed the
limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, we generally
cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any
registered investment company, invest more than 5% of the value
of our total assets in the securities of one investment company
or invest more than 10% of the value of our total assets in the
securities of more than one investment company. With regard to
that portion of our portfolio invested in securities issued by
investment companies, it should be noted that such investments
might subject our stockholders to additional expenses. None of
these policies are fundamental and may be changed without
stockholder approval.
Qualifying
Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not
acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in
Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as
qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made,
qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the companys
total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets
relevant to our proposed business are the following:
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any
public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer
(subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio
company, or from any person who is, or has been during the
preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible
portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such
rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible
portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer
which:
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal
place of business in, the United States;
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small
business investment company wholly owned by the business
development company) or a company that would be an investment
company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
(c) satisfies any of the following:
1. does not have any class of securities with respect to
which a broker or dealer may extend margin credit;
2. is controlled by a business development company or a
group of companies including a business development company and
the business development company has an affiliated person who is
a director of the eligible portfolio company; or
3. is a small and solvent company having total assets of
not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not
less than $2 million.
(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we
control.
(3) Securities purchased in a private transaction from a
U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an
affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident
thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to
reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the
purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as
they came due without material assistance other than
conventional lending or financing agreements.
(4) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased
from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready
market for such securities and we already own 60% of the
outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
(5) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on
or with respect to securities described in (1) through
(4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or
rights relating to such securities.
(6) Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities
or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less
from the time of investment.
79
In addition, a business development company must have been
organized and have its principal place of business in the United
States and must be operated for the purpose of making
investments in the types of securities described in (1),
(2) or (3) above.
Managerial
Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for
the purpose of the 70% test, the business development company
must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer
to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than
small and solvent companies described above) significant
managerial assistance; except that, where the business
development company purchases such securities in conjunction
with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other
persons in the group may make available such managerial
assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance
means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the business
development company, through its directors, officers or
employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide,
significant guidance and counsel concerning the management,
operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio
company.
Temporary
Investments
Pending investment in other types of qualifying
assets, as described above, our investments may consist of
cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high
quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the
time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as
temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying
assets. Typically, we will invest in U.S. treasury bills or
in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements
are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the
U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement
involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified
security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to
repurchase it at an agreed upon future date and at a price which
is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an
agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on
the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such
repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of our total
assets constitute repurchase agreements from a single
counterparty, we would not meet the Diversification Tests in
order to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes. Thus,
we do not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a
single counterparty in excess of this limit. Our Investment
Adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties
with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.
Senior
Securities
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple
classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our
common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act,
is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance.
In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we
must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our
stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares
unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time
of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up
to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or
emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage. For a
discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see Risk
Factors.
Code of
Ethics
We and Prospect Capital Management have each adopted a code of
ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal
investments and restricts certain personal securities
transactions. Personnel subject to each code may invest in
securities for their personal investment accounts, including
securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such
investments are made in accordance with the codes
requirements. For information on how to obtain a copy of each
code of ethics, see Available Information.
80
Investment
Concentration
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios
total return, principally by investing in the debt
and/or
equity securities of energy companies. In this respect, we
concentrate in the energy sector and invest, under normal
circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets
(including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes)
in energy companies. This 80% policy is not a fundamental policy
and therefore may be changed without the approval of our
stockholders. However, we may not change or modify this policy
unless we provide our stockholders with at least 60 days
prior notice, pursuant to
Rule 35d-1
of the 1940 Act.
Compliance
Policies and Procedures
We and our Investment Adviser have adopted and implemented
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
violation of the federal securities laws, and are required to
review these compliance policies and procedures annually for
their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation,
and to designate a Chief Compliance Officer to be responsible
for administering the policies and procedures. William E.
Vastardis serves as Chief Compliance Officer for both Prospect
Energy and our Investment Adviser.
Proxy
Voting Policies and Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to Prospect
Capital Management. The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of
Prospect Capital Management are set forth below. The guidelines
are reviewed periodically by Prospect Capital Management and our
independent directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change.
Introduction. As an investment adviser
registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Prospect
Capital Management has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the
best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, Prospect
Capital Management recognizes that it must vote client
securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and
in the best interests of its clients.
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for Prospect
Capital Managements Investment Advisory clients are
intended to comply with Section 206 of, and
Rule 206(4)-6
under, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Proxy policies. These policies are designed to
be responsive to the wide range of subjects that may be the
subject of a proxy vote. These policies are not exhaustive due
to the variety of proxy voting issues that Prospect Capital
Management may be required to consider. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will vote proxies in accordance with these
guidelines unless: (1) Prospect Capital Management has
determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case
basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject
matter of the vote is not covered by these guidelines,
(3) a material conflict of interest is present, or
(4) Prospect Capital Management might find it necessary to
vote contrary to its general guidelines to maximize shareholder
value and vote in its clients best interests. In such
cases, a decision on how to vote will be made by the Proxy
Voting Committee (as described below). In reviewing proxy
issues, Prospect Capital Management will apply the following
general policies:
Elections of directors. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will vote in favor of the management-proposed
slate of directors. If there is a proxy fight for seats on the
Board or Prospect Capital Management determines that there are
other compelling reasons for withholding votes for directors,
the Proxy Voting Committee will determine the appropriate vote
on the matter. Prospect Capital Management believes that
directors have a duty to respond to shareholder actions that
have received significant shareholder support. Prospect Capital
Management may withhold votes for directors that fail to act on
key issues such as failure to implement proposals to declassify
boards, failure to implement a majority vote requirement,
failure to submit a rights plan to a shareholder vote and
failure to act on tender offers where a majority of shareholders
have tendered their shares. Finally, Prospect Capital Management
may withhold votes for directors of
non-U.S. issuers
where there is insufficient information about the nominees
disclosed in the proxy statement.
81
Appointment of auditors. Prospect Capital
Management believes that the company remains in the best
position to choose the auditors and will generally support
managements recommendation.
Changes in capital structure. Changes in a
companys charter, articles of incorporation or by-laws may
be required by state or federal regulation. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will cast its votes in accordance with the
companys management on such proposal. However, the Proxy
Voting Committee will review and analyze on a
case-by-case
basis any proposals regarding changes in corporate structure
that are not required by state or federal regulation.
Corporate restructurings, mergers and
acquisitions. Prospect Capital Management
believes proxy votes dealing with corporate reorganizations are
an extension of the investment decision. Accordingly, the Proxy
Voting Committee will analyze such proposals on a
case-by-case
basis.
Proposals affecting shareholder
rights. Prospect Capital Management will
generally vote in favor of proposals that give shareholders a
greater voice in the affairs of the company and oppose any
measure that seeks to limit those rights. However, when
analyzing such proposals, Prospect Capital Management will weigh
the financial impact of the proposal against the impairment of
shareholder rights.
Corporate governance. Prospect Capital
Management recognizes the importance of good corporate
governance in ensuring that management and the Board of
Directors fulfill their obligations to the shareholders.
Prospect Capital Management favors proposals promoting
transparency and accountability within a company.
Anti-takeover measures. The Proxy Voting
Committee will evaluate, on a
case-by-case
basis, proposals regarding anti-takeover measures to determine
the measures likely effect on shareholder value dilution.
Stock splits. Prospect Capital Management will
generally vote with management on stock split matters.
Limited liability of directors. Prospect
Capital Management will generally vote with management on
matters that would affect the limited liability of directors.
Social and corporate responsibility. The Proxy
Voting Committee may review and analyze on a
case-by-case
basis proposals relating to social, political and environmental
issues to determine whether they will have a financial impact on
shareholder value. Prospect Capital Management may abstain from
voting on social proposals that do not have a readily
determinable financial impact on shareholder value.
Proxy voting procedures. Prospect Capital
Management will generally vote proxies in accordance with these
guidelines. In circumstances in which (1) Prospect Capital
Management has determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case
basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject
matter of the vote is not covered by these guidelines,
(3) a material conflict of interest is present, or
(4) Prospect Capital Management might find it necessary to
vote contrary to its general guidelines to maximize shareholder
value and vote in its clients best interests, the Proxy
Voting Committee will vote the proxy.
Proxy voting committee. Prospect Capital
Management has formed a proxy voting committee to establish
general proxy policies and consider specific proxy voting
matters as necessary. In addition, members of the committee may
contact management and interested shareholder groups as
necessary to discuss proxy issues. Members of the committee will
include relevant senior personnel. The committee may also
evaluate proxies where we face a potential conflict of interest
(as discussed below). Finally, the committee monitors adherence
to guidelines, and reviews the policies contained in this
statement from time to time.
Conflicts of interest. Prospect Capital
Management recognizes that there may be a potential conflict of
interest when it votes a proxy solicited by an issuer that is
its advisory client or a client or customer of one of our
affiliates or with whom it has another business or personal
relationship that may affect how it votes on the issuers
proxy. Prospect Capital Management believes that adherence to
these policies and procedures ensures that proxies are voted
with only its clients best interests in mind. To ensure
that its votes are not the product of a conflict of interests,
Prospect Capital Management requires that: (i) anyone
involved in the decision making process (including members of
the Proxy Voting Committee) disclose to the chairman of the
Proxy Voting Committee any potential conflict that he or she is
aware of and any contact that he or she has had with
82
any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and
(ii) employees involved in the decision making process or
vote administration are prohibited from revealing how Prospect
Capital Management intends to vote on a proposal in order to
reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.
Proxy voting. Each accounts custodian
will forward all relevant proxy materials to Prospect Capital
Management, either electronically or in physical form to the
address of record that Prospect Capital Management has provided
to the custodian.
Proxy recordkeeping. Prospect Capital
Management must retain the following documents pertaining to
proxy voting:
|
|
|
|
|
copies of its proxy voting polices and procedures;
|
|
|
|
copies of all proxy statements;
|
|
|
|
records of all votes cast by Prospect Capital Management;
|
|
|
|
copies of all documents created by Prospect Capital Management
that were material to making a decision how to vote proxies or
that memorializes the basis for that decision; and
|
|
|
|
copies of all written client requests for information with
regard to how Prospect Capital Management voted proxies on
behalf of the client as well as any written responses provided.
|
All of the above-referenced records will be maintained and
preserved for a period of not less than five years from the end
of the fiscal year during which the last entry was made. The
first two years of records must be maintained at our office.
Proxy voting records. Clients may obtain
information about how Prospect Capital Management voted proxies
on their behalf by making a written request for proxy voting
information to: Compliance Officer, Prospect Capital Management,
LLC, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY
10016.
CUSTODIAN,
TRANSFER AND DIVIDEND PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our Securities are held under a custody agreement by
U.S. Bank National Association. The address of the
custodian is: 425 Walnut Street, M.L. CN-OH-W6TC, Cincinnati,
Ohio 45202, Attention: Mutual Fund Custody Services,
facsimile:
(651) 767-9164.
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company will act as our
transfer agent, dividend paying agent and registrar. The
principal business address of American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company is 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10007, telephone
number:
(718) 921-8200.
BROKERAGE
ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in
privately negotiated transactions, we infrequently use brokers
in the normal course of our business. From the commencement of
all operations through December 31, 2005, we have not paid
any brokerage commissions. Subject to policies established by
our Board of Directors, the Investment Adviser is primarily
responsible for the execution of the publicly traded securities
portion of our portfolio transactions and the allocation of
brokerage commissions. The Investment Adviser does not expect to
execute transactions through any particular broker or dealer,
but seeks to obtain the best net results for Prospect Energy,
taking into account such factors as price (including the
applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of
order, difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of
the firm and the firms risk and skill in positioning
blocks of securities. While the Investment Adviser generally
seeks reasonably competitive trade execution costs, Prospect
Energy will not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission
available. Subject to applicable legal requirements, the
Investment Adviser may select a broker based partly upon
brokerage or research services provided to the Investment
Adviser and Prospect Energy and any other clients. In return for
such services, we may pay a higher commission than other brokers
would charge if the Investment Adviser determines in good faith
that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services
provided.
83
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We may sell the Securities in any of three ways (or in any
combination): (a) through underwriters or dealers;
(b) directly to a limited number of purchasers or to a
single purchaser, including existing stockholders in a rights
offering; or (c) through agents. In the case of a rights
offering, the applicable prospectus supplement will set forth
the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of each right and the other terms of such rights
offering. Any underwriter or agent involved in the offer and
sale of the Securities will also be named in the applicable
prospectus supplement. The Securities may be sold
at-the-market
to or through a market maker or into an existing trading market
for the securities, on an exchange or otherwise. The prospectus
supplement will set forth the terms of the offering of such
securities, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the name or names of any underwriters, dealers or agents and the
amounts of Securities underwritten or purchased by each of them;
|
|
|
|
the offering price of the Securities and the proceeds to us and
any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed
or paid to dealers; and
|
|
|
|
any securities exchanges on which the Securities may be listed.
|
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will
authorize underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to
solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase the
Securities from us pursuant to contracts providing for payment
and delivery on a future date. Institutions with which such
contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks,
insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies,
educational and charitable institutions and others, but in all
cases such institutions must be approved by us. The obligations
of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject to the
condition that the purchase of the securities not at the time of
delivery be prohibited under the laws of the jurisdiction to
which such purchaser is subject. The underwriters and such other
agents will not have any responsibility in respect of the
validity or performance of such contracts. such contracts will
be subject only to those conditions set forth in the prospectus
supplement, and the prospectus supplement will set forth the
commission payable for solicitation of such contracts.
We may use Stock to acquire investments in companies, the terms
of which will be further disclosed in a prospectus supplement.
Any offering price and any discounts or concessions allowed or
reallowed or paid to dealers may be changed from time to time.
If underwriters are used in the sale of any Securities, the
Securities will be acquired by the underwriters for their own
account and may be resold from time to time in one or more
transactions, including negotiated transactions, at a fixed
public offering price or at varying prices determined at the
time of sale. The Securities may be either offered to the public
through underwriting syndicates represented by managing
underwriters, or directly by underwriters. Generally, the
underwriters obligations to purchase the Securities will
be subject to certain conditions precedent.
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any NASD
member or independent broker-dealer will not exceed 5%. In
connection with any rights offering to our stockholders, we may
also enter into a standby underwriting arrangement with one or
more underwriters pursuant to which the underwriter(s) will
purchase our common stock remaining unsubscribed for after the
rights offering.
We may sell the Securities through agents from time to time. The
prospectus supplement will name any agent involved in the offer
or sale of the Securities and any commissions we pay to them.
Generally, any agent will be acting on a best efforts basis for
the period of its appointment.
We may authorize underwriters, dealers or agents to solicit
offers by certain purchasers to purchase the Securities from us
at the public offering price set forth in the prospectus
supplement pursuant to delayed delivery contracts providing for
payment and delivery on a specified date in the future. The
contracts will be
84
subject only to those conditions set forth in the prospectus
supplement, and the prospectus supplement will set forth any
commissions we pay for soliciting these contracts.
Agents, dealers and underwriters may be entitled to
indemnification by us against certain civil liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act or to
contribution with respect to payments which the agents or
underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof. Agents,
dealers and underwriters may be customers of, engage in
transactions with, or perform services for us in the ordinary
course of business.
We may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or
sell securities not covered by this prospectus to third parties
in privately negotiated transactions. If the applicable
prospectus supplement indicates, in connection with those
derivatives, the third parties may sell securities covered by
this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement,
including in short sale transactions. If so, the third party may
use securities pledged by us or borrowed from us or others to
settle those sales or to close out any related open borrowings
of stock, and may use securities received from us in settlement
of those derivatives to close out any related open borrowings of
stock. The third party in such sale transactions will be an
underwriter and, if not identified in this prospectus, will be
identified in the applicable prospectus supplement (or a
post-effective amendment). We or one of our affiliates may loan
or pledge securities to a financial institution or other third
party that in turn may sell the securities using this
prospectus. Such financial institution or third party may
transfer its short position to investors in our Securities or in
connection with a simultaneous offering of other securities
offered by this prospectus or otherwise.
Any of our common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement
will be listed on The NASDAQ National Market, or another
exchange on which our common stock is traded.
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states,
if applicable, the Securities offered hereby will be sold in
such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers
or dealers. In addition, in certain states, the Securities may
not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for
sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the
registration or qualification requirements is available and is
complied with.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain legal matters regarding the securities offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for Prospect Energy by Clifford
Chance US LLP, New York, NY, and Venable LLP as special Maryland
counsel. Clifford Chance US LLP also represents Prospect Capital
Management.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO Seidman LLP is the independent registered public accounting
firm of Prospect Energy.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to our Securities offered by this
prospectus. The registration statement contains additional
information about us and the Securities being registered by this
prospectus. We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly
and current periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information meeting the informational requirements of the
Exchange Act. This information and the information specifically
regarding how we voted proxies relating to portfolio securities
for the period ended June 30, 2005, are available free of
charge by contacting us at 10 East 40th Street,
44th floor, New York, NY 10016 or by
telephone at toll-free
(888) 748-0702.
You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and
other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
(202) 551-8090.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of these
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic
request at the following
E-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section, Washington, D.C.
20549-0102.
85
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Statements of
Operations for the three and nine months ended March 31,
2006, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005
and for the twelve months ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
|
|
Statements of Cash
Flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2006, for the
nine months ended March 31, 2005 and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
F-19
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
|
|
Statements of
Operations for the year ended June 30, 2005 and for the
period from April 13, 2004* through June 30,
2004
|
|
|
F-23
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
|
|
Statements of Cash
Flows for the year ended June 30, 2005 and for the period
from April 13, 2004* through June 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-25
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Commencement of operations |
F-1
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash held in segregated account
(Note 3)
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
$
|
9,587
|
|
Investment in controlled entity,
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. at value (cost $36,618
and $23,327, respectively, Note 3)
|
|
|
44,045
|
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
Investments in uncontrolled
entities, at value (cost $59,887 and $64,197,
respectively, Note 3)
|
|
|
60,196
|
|
|
|
64,366
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Due from Gas Solutions Holdings,
Inc. (Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Due from Prospect Capital
Management, LLC (Note 5)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from Prospect Administration,
LLC (Note 5)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Deferred financing fees
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
106,082
|
|
|
$
|
103,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
$
|
818
|
|
Due to Prospect Capital
Management, LLC (Note 5)
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Notes 3 and 7) Stockholders equity
(Notes 1, 4 and 6) Common stock, par value
$.001 per share, 100,000,000 and 100,000,000 common
shares authorized, respectively, 7,061,940 and
7,055,100 issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par
|
|
|
97,136
|
|
|
|
96,955
|
|
Distributions in excess of net
investment income
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
7,734
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
104,602
|
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
106,082
|
|
|
$
|
103,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-2
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
March 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locale/
|
|
Amount/
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
Portfolio Investments (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value (2)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(4)
|
|
Texas/Gas
gathering and
processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4,874
|
|
|
$
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Subordinated secured
note, 18.00% due 12/23/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,274
|
|
|
|
30,700
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Company, Inc.(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Preferred stock,
Convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
12.50% due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,591
|
|
|
|
13,344
|
|
|
|
13,344
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,344
|
|
|
|
13,345
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Controlled
Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,618
|
|
|
|
44,045
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC(3)
|
|
Virginia/Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured
note, 30.00% due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,604
|
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC(3)
|
|
Ohio/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares,
Class A
|
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Preferred shares,
Class B
|
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
14.12% due 4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,330
|
|
|
|
13,129
|
|
|
|
13,129
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,599
|
|
|
|
14,599
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal(3)
|
|
Kentucky/
Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares,
Convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
15.00% due 3/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,860
|
|
|
|
6,897
|
|
|
|
6,860
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,897
|
|
|
|
7,005
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Expiring
2/2/2010
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locale/
|
|
Amount/
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
Portfolio Investments (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value (2)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
Warrants, Revocable,
Expiring 2/2/2010
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Warrants, Revocable,
Expiring 2/2/2010
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, revocable,
Expiring 2/2/2010
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
14.00% due 2/2/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,968
|
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.(3)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and gas
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Expiring
5/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Arctic Acquisition Corporation(3)
|
|
Texas/Oilfield
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Common
shares, Expiring 7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
596,251
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Warrants, Preferred
shares, Expiring 7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
13.00% due 6/15/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
8,169
|
|
|
|
8,169
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,183
|
|
|
|
9,183
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis Coal Corporation(3)
|
|
Kentucky/
Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant, Preferred
shares, Expiring 1/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
15.86% due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,758
|
|
|
|
6,758
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(3)
|
|
West Virginia/
Oilfield and
coal services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, Preferred
shares, Expiring 2/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Warrants, Common
shares, Expiring 2/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
14.00% due 2/14/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,130
|
|
|
|
3,130
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,825
|
|
|
|
93,560
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
F-4
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
March 31,
2006 (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield to
|
|
|
Amount/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments (1)
|
|
Maturity (6)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value (2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
U.S. Government
Security
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
Discount Note 1/5/2006
|
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Prime Obligation
Fund (Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Fidelity Institutional Government
Portfolio (Class I)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,882,912
|
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Uncontrolled Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,888
|
|
|
|
60,196
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
96,506
|
|
|
$
|
104,241
|
|
|
|
99.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the Board
of Directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2) |
|
(3) |
|
Non-control/non-affiliate position. |
|
(4) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings Inc. is a wholly owned and controlled
investment of Prospect Energy. |
|
(5) |
|
Worcester Energy Company Inc. is a wholly owned and controlled
investment of Prospect Energy. |
|
(6) |
|
Yield to maturity at time of purchase. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-5
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
June 30,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locale/
|
|
Amount/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(4)
|
|
Texas/Gas
gathering and
processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4,927
|
|
|
$
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
Subordinated
secured note, 18.00% due 12/23/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,327
|
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC(3)
|
|
Virginia/Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock,
100%, non-voting
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Subordinated
secured note, 17.65% due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC(3)
|
|
Ohio/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares,
Class A
|
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Preferred shares,
Class B
|
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured
note, 14.12% due 4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,330
|
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,647
|
|
|
|
9,663
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal(3)
|
|
Kentucky/Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares,
Convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured
note, 15.00% due 3/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
5,008
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured
note, 14.00% due 2/3/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.(3)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Expiring
5/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
12.50% due 8/21/2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
|
|
55,030
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
Maturity(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due 7/7/2005
|
|
2.52%
|
|
$
|
5,518
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due
7/14/2005
|
|
2.49%
|
|
|
9,514
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due
7/21/2005
|
|
2.55%
|
|
|
22,261
|
|
|
|
22,226
|
|
|
|
22,226
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US Government Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,247
|
|
|
|
37,247
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Fund
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Prime Obligation
Fund (Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
1,587,854
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,524
|
|
|
$
|
93,866
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-6
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the Board
of Directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Non-control/non-affiliate position. |
|
(4) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings Inc. is a wholly owned and controlled
investment of Prospect Energy. |
|
(5) |
|
Yield to maturity at time of purchase. |
F-7
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
4,569
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
Interest income, Gas Solutions
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Dividend income, Gas Solutions
Holdings, Inc. (Note 3)
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
income
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Income incentive fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and credit
facility costs
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration costs (Note 5)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Legal fees (Note 3)
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Organizational costs (Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
5,582
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation)
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
2,955
|
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
6,956
|
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net increase in
stockholders equity per common share resulting from operations
(Note 6)
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-8
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENT
OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Excess of Net
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Excess of Par
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Application
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2004
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from
public offering (net of underwriting costs)
|
|
|
7,055,000
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
98,417
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,424
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations for the year ended
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.38 per
share) and paid to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2005
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
96,955
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.20 per
share) and paid to stockholders (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2005
(unaudited)
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
96,955
|
|
|
$
|
(351
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,418
|
|
|
$
|
103,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations for the three months ended
December 31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.28 per
share) and paid to stockholders (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
(unaudited)
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
97,026
|
|
|
$
|
(286
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
|
$
|
103,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.30 per
share) and paid to stockholders (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in connection with
dividend reinvestment (unaudited)
|
|
|
6,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006
(unaudited)
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
97,136
|
|
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,734
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-9
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
6,956
|
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
increase in stockholders equity resulting from operations
to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (appreciation)
depreciation on investments
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
(6,342
|
)
|
Amortization of loan origination
fees
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Change in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(1,500,858
|
)
|
|
|
(111,659
|
)
|
|
|
(701,558
|
)
|
Sale/refinancing of investments
|
|
|
1,492,362
|
|
|
|
26,712
|
|
|
|
614,106
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Increase in accrued interest
receivable
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in due from
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Increase in due from Prospect
Capital Management, LLC
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due from Prospect
Administration, LLC
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred financing fees
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Increase in other current
liabilities
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Increase (decrease) in due to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(3,206
|
)
|
|
|
(82,527
|
)
|
|
|
(84,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
Offering costs from the issuance
of common stock
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
Shares issued in connection with
dividend reinvestment
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(5,502
|
)
|
|
|
(1,587
|
)
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(5,321
|
)
|
|
|
95,374
|
|
|
|
94,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in
cash
|
|
|
(8,527
|
)
|
|
|
12,847
|
|
|
|
9,586
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
9,587
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
$
|
12,848
|
|
|
$
|
9,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-10
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In
thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
|
Note 1.
|
Organization
and Interim Financial Statements
|
Prospect Energy Corporation (Prospect Energy or the
Company), a Maryland corporation, was organized on
April 13, 2004 and is a closed-end investment company that
has filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the 1940 Act. On July 27, 2004, the Company
completed its initial public offering and sold
7,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$15.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and
commissions totaling $1.05 per share. On August 27,
2004, an additional 55,000 shares were issued for a price
of $15.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and
commissions of $1.05 per share in connection with the
exercise of an over-allotment option with respect to the
offering.
Prospect Energy focuses primarily on investments in energy
companies and will invest, under normal circumstances, at least
80.0% of its net assets (including the amount of any borrowings
for investment purposes) in these companies. At March 31,
2006, 89.5% of its net assets were invested in energy companies
with the remainder invested in U.S. government and money
market securities. Prospect Energy is a non-diversified company
within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Prospect Energy concentrates
on making investments in energy companies having annual revenues
of less than $250.0 million and in transaction sizes of
less than $100.0 million. In most cases, these companies
are privately held or have thinly traded public equity.
The accompanying financial statements are unaudited and have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and the instructions to
Form 10-Q.
Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in audited financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such
rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited financial statements that were
included in the Companys
form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2005.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
primarily of normal recurring adjustments) have been made that
are necessary to present fairly the financial position of the
Company. Operating results for the interim periods presented are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a
full year.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the
economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters
used in determining these estimates could cause actual results
to differ.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by Prospect Energy:
Investments:
(a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date
basis.
(b) Valuation:
(1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
(2) Short-term investments which mature in 60 days or
less, such as U.S. Treasury bills, are valued at amortized
cost, which approximates market value. The amortized cost method
involves valuing a security at its cost on the date of purchase
and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of
the difference between the principal amount due at maturity and
cost. Short-term
F-11
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
securities which mature in more than 60 days are valued at
current market quotations by an independent pricing service or
at the mean between the bid and ask prices obtained from at
least two brokers or dealers (if available, or otherwise by a
principal market maker or a primary market dealer). Investments
in money market mutual funds are valued at their net asset value
as of the close of business on the day of valuation.
(3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a valuation policy
and a consistently applied valuation process which is under the
direction of our Board of Directors.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the financial environment in which the portfolio
company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly
traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do
not have a readily available market value, the fair value of
these investments may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for such
investments, and any such differences could be material.
As part of the fair valuation process, the Audit Committee
reviews the preliminary evaluations prepared by the independent
valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors. Management and
the independent valuation firm respond to the preliminary
evaluation to reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews the final valuation report and makes
a recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis
of the methodologies employed and the various weights that
should be accorded to each portion of the valuation as well as
factors that the independent valuation firm and management may
not have included in their evaluation process. The Board of
Directors then evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and
undertakes a similar analysis to determine the fair value of
each investment in the portfolio in good faith.
(c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
(d) Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium
and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
(e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
(f) Loan origination, facility, commitment, consent and
other advance fees received by us on loan agreements or other
investments are accreted into income over the term of the loan.
Federal
and State Income Taxes:
Prospect Energy has elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company, or a RIC and intends to continue
to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code), applicable to regulated investment
companies. Prospect Energy is required to distribute at least
90% of its investment company taxable income and currently
intends to distribute or retain through a deemed distribution
all of its investment company taxable income and net capital
gain to shareholders; therefore, we have made no provision for
income taxes.
The character of income and gains that we will distribute is
determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP.
F-12
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Dividends
and Distributions:
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded
on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a
dividend is approved by the Board of Directors each quarter and
is generally based upon managements estimate of our
earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any,
are distributed at least annually.
Consolidation:
As an investment company, Prospect Energy only consolidates
subsidiaries which are also investment companies. At
March 31, 2006, Prospect Energy did not have any
consolidated subsidiaries.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements:
The Company follows FASB Interpretation Number 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others. (FIN 45). FIN 45 elaborates
on the disclosure requirements of a guarantor in its interim and
annual financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees that it has issued. It also requires a guarantor to
recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the
fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing certain
guarantees. FIN 45 did not have a material effect on the
financial statements. Refer to Note 3 for further
discussion of guarantees and indemnification agreements.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
As required by the 1940 Act, we classify our investments by
level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control
investments are those where there is the ability or power to
exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies
of a company. Control is generally viewed to exist when a
company or individual owns 25% or more of the voting securities
of an investee company. Affiliated investments and affiliated
companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are
deemed to exist through ownership of an amount greater than 5%
but less than 25% of the voting securities of the investee
company. The Company owns 100% of the outstanding common equity
shares of Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. (GSHI) and
therefore, has a controlling interest. The Company has no other
controlled or affiliated investments.
GSHI has indemnified Prospect Energy against any legal action
arising from its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. Prospect
Energy has incurred approximately $0.090 million,
$0.733 million and $0.760 million in fees associated
with this legal action for the three months ended March 31,
2006, for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. GSHI has
reimbursed Prospect Energy $1.173 million as of
March 31, 2006. Prospect Energy has no receivable from GSHI
and $0.201 million as of March 31, 2006 and
June 30, 2005, respectively. The $1.173 million
reimbursement is reflected as dividend income, controlled
entities on the accompanying statement of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, for the nine months
ended March 31, 2006 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively.
The Company provided a limited indemnity to Citibank Texas, N.A.
related to Citibanks term loan to GSHI. The limited
indemnity requires us to indemnify Citibank for up to
$12.0 million if it realizes losses on the term loan
resulting only from potential legal claims that might or could
be asserted by certain third parties. This limited indemnity was
backed by segregated funds in Prospect Energys account
valued at $12.9 million. During the quarter ended
December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005, $9.6 million
and $3.3 million of previously segregated funds were
released to the Company, respectively. These reductions
reflected a waiver of the segregated funds requirement due to
the developments related to legal claims and prior payments by
GSHI to Citibank Texas, N.A., respectively.
F-13
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Energy with a
complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District
for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP
alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached
its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with
DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a
subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with
Prospect Energys alleged agreement in September 2004 to
loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas
Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The
complaint seeks relief not limited to $100 million. We
believe that the DGP complaint is frivolous and without merit,
and intend to defend the matter vigorously. On November 30,
2005, U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
Prospect Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing
all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006 the
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division
issued an order granting Prospect Energys Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by Dallas Gas Partners,
L.P. against Prospect Energy Corporation. DGP has appealed this
decision.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Organizational
and Offering Expenses
|
A portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and
the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option was used
for organizational and offering expenses of $0.125 million
and $1.386 million, respectively. Organizational expenses
were expensed as incurred. Offering expenses were charged
against paid-in capital in excess of par. All organizational and
offering expenses were borne by Prospect Energy.
|
|
Note 5.
|
Related
Party Agreements and Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
Prospect Energy has entered into an Investment Advisory
Agreement with Prospect Capital Management LLC (the
Investment Adviser) under which the Investment
Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of Prospect
Energys board of directors, will manage the
day-to-day
operations of, and provide investment advisory services to,
Prospect Energy. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser will receive a fee from Prospect Energy, consisting of
two components a base management fee and an
incentive fee. The base management fee will be calculated at an
annual rate of 2.00% on Prospect Energys gross assets
(including amounts borrowed). The base management fee is payable
quarterly in arrears based on the average value of Prospect
Energys gross assets at the end of the two most recently
completed calendar quarters and appropriately adjusted for any
share issuances or repurchases during the current calendar
quarter. Base management fees for any partial month or quarter
are appropriately pro rated.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment
income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this
purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest
income, dividend income and any other income (including any
other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees and other fees that Prospect
Energy receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the
calendar quarter, minus Prospect Energys operating
expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee,
expenses payable under the Administration Agreement described
below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the
case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as
original issue discount, debt instruments with payment in kind
interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we
have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment
income does not include any realized capital gains, realized
capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of Prospect Energys net
assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter,
is compared to a hurdle rate of 1.75% per
quarter (7% annualized). However, our Investment
F-14
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Adviser has voluntarily agreed that for each fiscal quarter
after January 1, 2005, the quarterly hurdle rate will be
equal to the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage
equal to the sum of the daily average of the quoted
treasury rate for each month in the immediately preceding
two quarters plus 0.50%. Quoted treasury rate means
the yield to maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond
equivalent basis) at the time of computation for Five Year
U.S. Treasury notes with a constant maturity (as compiled
and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical
Release H). These calculations will be appropriately pro rated
for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any
share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter. The
voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser that the hurdle
rate be fluctuating for each fiscal quarter after
January 1, 2005 (as discussed above) may be terminated by
the Investment Adviser at any time upon 90 days prior
notice. The net investment income used to calculate this part of
the incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross
assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. Prospect
Energy pays the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net
investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
(1) no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which
Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income
does not exceed the hurdle rate; (2) 100% of Prospect
Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income with
respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than
125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming a 7% annualized hurdle rate); and
(3) 20% of the amount of Prospect Energys
pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds
125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming a 7% annualized hurdle rate). These
calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of less
than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter. The investment adviser
intends to use 30% of any incentive fee that it is paid to
purchase shares of our common stock, generally as soon as
practicable following payment of such incentive fee.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.0% of Prospect Energys realized capital gains for the
calendar year, if any, computed net of all realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of such
year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to
the Investment Adviser, Prospect Energy calculates the aggregate
realized capital gains, aggregate realized capital losses and
aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as applicable, with
respect to each of the investments in its portfolio. For this
purpose, aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the
sum of the differences between the net sales price of each
investment, when sold, and the original cost of such investment
since inception. Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum
of the amounts by which the net sales price of each investment,
when sold, is less the original cost of such investment since
inception. Aggregate unrealized capital depreciation equals the
sum of the difference, if negative, between the valuation of
each investment as of the applicable date and the original cost
of such investment. At the end of the applicable period, the
amount of capital gains that serves as the basis for Prospect
Energys calculation of the capital gains incentive fee
equals the aggregate realized capital gains less aggregate
realized capital losses and less aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation with respect to its portfolio of investments. If
this number is positive at the end of such period, then the
capital gains incentive fee for such period is equal to 20% of
such amount, less the aggregate amount of any capital gains
incentive fees paid in respect of its portfolio in all prior
periods.
The Investment Advisory fees were $0.521 million,
$0.485 million, $1.554 million, $1.317 million
and $1.808 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, for the three months ended March 31,
2005, for the nine months ended March 31, 2006, for the
nine months ended March 31, 2005 and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The Income Incentive
fees were $0.533 million, none, $1.041 million, none
and none for the three months ended March 31, 2006, for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, for the nine months
ended March 31, 2006, for the nine months ended
March 31, 2005 and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively. At March 31, 2006 the
Company owed the Investment Adviser
F-15
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
$0.533 million in income incentive fees. Also, the Company
was owed $0.005 million for legal costs and miscellaneous
expenses that it paid on behalf of the Investment Advisor.
Administration
Agreement
Prospect Energy has also entered into an Administration
Agreement with Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect
Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among
other things, provides administrative services and facilities
for Prospect Energy. Prospect Administration has engaged
Vastardis Fund Services LLC (formerly, EOS
Fund Services LLC) to serve as sub-administrator of
Prospect Energy. For providing these services, Prospect Energy
reimburses Prospect Administration for Prospect Energys
allocable portion of overhead incurred by Prospect
Administration in performing its obligations under the
Administration Agreement, including rent, the fees of the
sub-administrator for services provided with respect to Prospect
Energy and Prospect Energys allocable portion of the
compensation of its chief compliance officer and chief financial
officer and their respective staffs. Prospect Administration
also provides on Prospect Energys behalf managerial
assistance to those portfolio companies to which Prospect Energy
is required to provide such assistance. Prospect Administration
is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Investment Adviser.
The Company reimbursed Prospect Administration
$0.082 million, $0.126 million, $0.225 million,
$0.295 million and $0.266 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, for the nine months ended March 31,
2006, for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, for
services it provided to Prospect Energy at cost. The Company
also reimbursed Prospect Administration for certain expenses
which Prospect Administration initially funded on behalf of the
Company. At March 31, 2006, the Company was owed
$0.028 million for tax compliance fees and miscellaneous
expenses that it paid on behalf of Prospect Administration.
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. The company received
$0.071 million, $0.148 and $0.077 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, the nine months ended
March 31, 2006, and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005, respectively, of these assistance fees from
GSHI. These fees are paid to the Investment Adviser.
|
|
Note 6.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the
three and six months ended March 31, 2006 and for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Per share data (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of
period
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Proceeds from initial public
offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
Costs related to the initial public
offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Share issuance related to dividend
reinvestment
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
F-16
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of
period
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
Total return based on market
value(2)
|
|
|
11.08
|
%
|
|
|
8.54
|
%
|
|
|
37.35
|
%
|
|
|
(12.46
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
Total return based on net asset
value(2)
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
(6.88
|
)%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Ratio/supplemental data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in
thousands)
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
96,927
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
96,927
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating
expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of net operating
income to average net assets
|
|
|
8.13
|
%
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
7.12
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights as of March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2005 are based on 7,061,940 shares and
7,055,100 shares outstanding, respectively. Share issuance
of 6,840 shares occurred on March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Energys dividend
reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is
based upon the change in net asset value per share between the
opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and
assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with
Prospect Energys dividend reinvestment plan. The total
return is not annualized. |
The Company is a defendant in two legal actions arising out of
its activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is
inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of
possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be
reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its
understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that
it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We intend to
defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that
resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse
effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Energy with a
complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District
for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP
alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached
its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with
DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a
subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with
Prospect Energys alleged agreement in September 2004 to
loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas
Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The
complaint seeks relief not limited to $100 million. We
believe that the DGP complaint is frivolous and without merit,
and intend to defend the matter vigorously. On November 30,
2005, U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
Prospect Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing
all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006 the
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division
issued an order granting Prospect Energys Motion for
Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by Dallas Gas Partners,
L.P. against Prospect Energy Corporation. DGP has appealed this
decision.
F-17
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a
complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging
discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress
and other claims. This former officer seeks economic
reinstatement and other relief. On September 15, 2005, OSHA
issued findings, including an order dismissing this complaint.
The complainant has filed written objections to the order and
had a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge on
March 16, 2006. On May 5, 2006, the Administrative Law
Judge issued a Decision and Order granting Summary Decision and
dismissing the Complaint. The Company does not believe that
these claims, even if ultimately resolved against the Company,
would be material. The Company believes the complaint is
frivolous and without merit and intends to defend itself
vigorously.
|
|
Note 8.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On April 20, 2006, Prospect Energy conducted its first
borrowing of $13.0 million from its Credit Facility.
On April 20, 2006, Prospect Energy invested
$5.5 million in senior secured debt of Charlevoix Energy
Trading, LLC, and received a net profit interest as part of the
investment.
On April 24, 2006, Prospect Energy invested
$6.3 million and committed $3.0 million for
$9.3 million total in senior secured debt of Iron Horse
Coild Tubing, Inc., and also received equity as part of the
investment.
On April 25, 2006, Prospect Energy invested
$8.0 million in senior secured debt of Central Illinois
Energy, LLC.
On April 27, 2006, Prospect Energy conducted its second
borrowing of $3.5 million from its Credit Facility.
On May 9, 2006, Prospect Energy invested $3.5 million
in senior secured debt of Conquest Cherokee LLC, and also
received an overriding royalty interest as part of the
investment.
From April 1, 2006 to May 10, 2006, Prospect Energy
invested an additional $1.1 million in senior secured debt
of Worcester Energy Company, Inc.
F-18
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
BDO Seidman LLP
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Prospect Energy Corporation
New York, NY
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Prospect
Energy Corporation as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, including
the schedule of investments, as of June 30, 2005, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders equity, and
cash flows for year ended June 30, 2005 and for the period
from April 13, 2004 (inception) through June 30, 2004.
These financial statements and financial highlights are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits, which included confirmation of securities at
June 30, 2005 by correspondence with the custodian and
issuers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Prospect Energy Corporation
at June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the year ended June 30,
2005 and for the period from April 13, 2004 (inception)
through June 30, 2004, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
New York, NY
October 11, 2005
F-19
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
BALANCE
SHEETS
(figures
in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash held in segregated account
(Notes 3 and 8)
|
|
$
|
9,587
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Investment in controlled entity,
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc., at value
(cost $23,327, Notes 3 and 8)
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in un-controlled
entities, at value (cost $64,197, Notes 3 and 8)
|
|
|
64,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from Gas Solutions Holdings,
Inc. (Note 3)
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
103,909
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
818
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Due to Prospect Capital
Management, LLC (Note 5)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Notes 3 and 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
(Notes 1 and 4) Common stock, par value $.001 per
share, 100,000,000 common shares authorized,
7,055,100 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par
|
|
|
96,955
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Distributions in excess of net
investment income
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
103,909
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the audited financial statements
which are an integral part of this statement.
F-20
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locale /
|
|
Amount /
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(4)
|
|
Texas / Gas
gathering and
processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4,927
|
|
|
$
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Subordinated
secured note, 18.00% due 12/23/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,327
|
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC(3)
|
|
Virginia / Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock,
100%, non-voting
|
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Subordinated
secured note, 17.65% due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC(3)
|
|
Ohio / Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares,
Class A
|
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Preferred shares,
Class B
|
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured
note, 14.12% due 4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,330
|
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,647
|
|
|
|
9,663
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal(3)
|
|
Kentucky /
Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares,
Convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured
note, 15.00% due 3/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
5,008
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas / Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured
note, 14.00% due 2/3/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.(3)
|
|
Tennessee / Oil
and gas
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Expiring
5/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
12.50% due 8/21/2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
|
|
55,030
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
Maturity(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due 7/7/2005
|
|
2.52%
|
|
$
|
5,518
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due
7/14/2005
|
|
2.49%
|
|
|
9,514
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due
7/21/2005
|
|
2.55%
|
|
|
22,261
|
|
|
|
22,226
|
|
|
|
22,226
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US Government Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,247
|
|
|
|
37,247
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Fund
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Prime Obligation
Fund (Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
1,587,854
|
|
|
$
|
87,524
|
|
|
$
|
93,866
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-21
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the Board
of Directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Non-control/non-affiliate position. |
|
(4) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings Inc. is a wholly owned and controlled
investment of Prospect Energy. |
|
(5) |
|
Yield to maturity at time of purchase. |
F-22
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) Through
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest income, Gas Solutions
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income, Gas Solutions
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
(Note 5)
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration costs (Note 5)
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Net realized loss
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in
stockholders equity resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net increase
(decrease) in stockholders equity per common share resulting
from operations (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the audited financial statements
which are an integral part of this statement.
F-23
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 13, 2004 (INCEPTION)
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Excess of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance, April 13, 2004
(inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Net decrease in stockholders
equity from operations for the period from April 13, 2004
(inception) to June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2004
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from
public offering (net of underwriting costs)
|
|
|
7,055,000
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
98,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations for the year ended
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.38 per
share) and paid to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30 2005
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
96,955
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,342
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the audited financial statements
which are an integral part of this statement.
F-24
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) Through
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in
stockholders equity resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
increase in stockholders equity resulting from operations
to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(701,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Sale/refinancing of investments
|
|
|
614,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued interest
receivable
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due from Gas Solutions
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
(6,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due diligence deposits
and expenses
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in due to
affiliates
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(84,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Offering costs from the issuance
of common stock
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
94,315
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
9,586
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash, beginning of year
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of year
|
|
$
|
9,587
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the audited financial statements
which are an integral part of this statement.
F-25
Prospect Energy Corporation (Prospect Energy or the
Company), a Maryland corporation, was organized on
April 13, 2004 and is a closed-end investment company that
has filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Act of 1940. On July 27, 2004,
the Company completed its initial public offering and sold
7,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of
$15.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and
commissions totaling $1.05 per share. On August 27,
2004, an additional 55,000 shares were issued for a price
of $15.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and
commissions of $1.05 per share in connection with the
exercise of an over-allotment option with respect to the
offering.
Prospect Energy focuses primarily on investments in energy
companies and will invest, under normal circumstances, at least
80% of its net assets (including the amount of any borrowings
for investment purposes) in these companies. At June 30,
2005, 53.5% of its net assets were invested in energy companies
with the remainder invested in U.S. government and money
market securities. Prospect Energy is a non-diversified company
within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Prospect Energy
concentrates on making investments in energy companies having
annual revenues of less than $250.0 million and in
transaction sizes of less than $100.0 million. In most
cases, these companies are privately held or have thinly traded
public equity securities.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the
economic environment, financial markets, creditworthiness of our
portfolio companies and any other parameters used in determining
these estimates could cause actual results to differ.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by Prospect Energy:
Investments:
(a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date
basis.
(b) Valuation:
(1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
(2) Short-term investments which mature in 60 days or
less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at
amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized
cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date
of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to
maturity of the difference between the principal amount due at
maturity and cost. Short-term securities which mature in more
than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
(3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a documented
valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process
which is under the direction of our board of directors.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations
in interest rates, the financial environment in which the
portfolio company operates,
F-26
comparisons to securities of similar publicly traded companies
and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent uncertainty of
determining the fair value of investments that do not have a
readily available market value, the fair value of these
investments may differ significantly from the values that would
have been used had a ready market existed for such investments,
and any such differences could be material.
(c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
(d) Interest income adjusted for amortization of premium
and accretion of discount is recorded on an accrual basis.
(e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
(f) Loan origination, facility, commitments, consent and
other advance fees received by us on loan agreements or other
investments are accreted into income over the term of the loan.
Federal
and State Income Taxes:
Prospect Energy has elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company and intends to continue to comply with the
requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code), applicable to regulated investment companies.
We are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment
company taxable income and intend to distribute (or retain
through a deemed distribution) all of our investment company
taxable income and net capital gain to stockholders; therefore,
we have made no provision for income taxes.
The character of income and gains that we will distribute is
determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP.
Dividends
and Distributions:
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded
on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a
dividend is approved by the board of directors each quarter and
is generally based upon managements estimate of our
earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any,
are distributed at least annually.
Consolidation:
As an investment company, Prospect Energy only consolidates
subsidiaries which are also investment companies. At
June 30, 2005 Prospect Energy did not have any consolidated
subsidiaries.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements:
The Company follows FASB Interpretation Number 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others. (FIN 45). FIN 45 elaborates
on the disclosure requirements of a guarantor in its interim and
annual financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees that it has issued. It also requires a guarantor to
recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the
fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing certain
guarantees. FIN 45 did not have a material effect on the
financial statements. Refer to Note 3 for further
discussion of guarantees and indemnification agreements.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in
the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the
ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed
to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated
investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser
degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of
5% or more of the outstanding voting
F-27
securities of another person. The Company owns 100% of the
outstanding common equity shares of GSHI and, therefore, has a
controlling interest. The Company has no other controlled or
affiliated investments.
GSHI has indemnified Prospect Energy against any legal action
arising from its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. Prospect
Energy has incurred approximately $0.760 million in fees
associated with this legal action through June 30, 2005.
GSHI has reimbursed Prospect Energy $0.559 million as of
June 30, 2005. Prospect Energy has a receivable from GSHI
of approximately $0.201 million as of June 30, 2005.
The $0.760 million reimbursement is reflected as Dividend
income, Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. on the accompanying
statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2005.
The Company has provided a limited indemnity to Citibank
Texas, N.A. related to Citibanks term loan to GSHI.
The limited indemnity requires us to indemnify Citibank for up
to $12.0 million if it realizes losses on the term loan.
This limited indemnity is backed by segregated funds in Prospect
Energys account valued at $9.6 million. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, $3.3 million of
previously segregated funds were released to the Company. This
reduction reflects 6 quarterly payments by GSHI to Citibank
Texas, N.A. These funds are released upon the earlier of legal
resolution of such claims, should any be made, or 91 days
after the loan with Citibank Texas, N.A. is refinanced or
otherwise repaid.
On December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, LP
(DGP) served Prospect Energy with a Complaint filed
November 30, 2004 in the United States District for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that
DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached its
fiduciary duty to DGP and tortuously interfered with DGPs
contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our
portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with Prospect
Energys alleged agreement in September, 2004 to
loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas
Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The
Complaint seeks relief not limited to $100 million
(Note 7). We believe that the DGP Complaint is frivolous
and without merit, and intend to defend the matter vigorously.
However, as with any litigation, the outcome is uncertain and a
judgment against Prospect Energy could significantly impair the
value of the investment in Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
Debt placements and interests in non-voting equity securities
with an original cost basis of $48.688 million were
acquired during the twelve months ended June 30, 2005.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Organizational
and Offering Expenses
|
A portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and
the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option was used
for organizational and offering expenses of approximately
$0.125 million and $1.463 million, respectively.
Organizational expenses were expensed as incurred. Offering
expenses were charged against paid-in capital in excess of par.
All organizational and offering expenses were borne by Prospect
Energy.
|
|
Note 5.
|
Related
Party Agreements and Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
Prospect Energy has entered into an Investment Advisory
Agreement with Prospect Capital Management LLC (the
Investment Adviser) under which the Investment
Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of Prospect
Energys board of directors, will manage the
day-to-day
operations of, and provide investment advisory services to,
Prospect Energy. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser will receive a fee from Prospect Energy, consisting of
two components a base management fee and an
incentive fee. The base management fee will be calculated at an
annual rate of 2.00% on Prospect Energys gross assets
(including amounts borrowed). For services rendered under the
Investment Advisory Agreement during the period commencing from
the closing of Prospect Energys initial public offering
through and including the first six months of operations, the
base management fee was payable monthly in arrears. For services
currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the
base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. For the
first quarter of Prospect Energys operations commencing
from the closing of Prospect Energys initial public
offering, the base management fee was calculated based on the
value of Prospect Energys gross assets
F-28
at the closing of the initial public offering. Subsequently, the
base management fee is calculated based on the average value of
Prospect Energys gross assets at the end of the two most
recently completed calendar quarters (the closing of Prospect
Energys initial public offering was treated as a quarter
end for these purposes) and appropriately adjusted for any share
issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.
Base management fees for any partial month or quarter are
appropriately pro rated.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment
income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this
purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest
income, dividend income and any other income (including any
other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees and other fees that Prospect
Energy receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the
calendar quarter, minus Prospect Energys operating
expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee,
expenses payable under the Administration Agreement described
below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the
case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as
original issue discount, debt instruments with payment in kind
interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we
have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment
income does not include any realized capital gains, realized
capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of Prospect Energys net
assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter,
is compared to a hurdle rate of 1.75% per
quarter (7% annualized). However, our Investment Adviser has
voluntarily agreed that for each fiscal quarter after
January 1, 2005, the quarterly hurdle rate will be equal to
the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal to
the sum of the daily average of the quoted treasury
rate for each month in the immediately preceding two
quarters plus 0.50%. Quoted treasury rate means 25%
of the yield to maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond
equivalent basis) at the time of computation for Five Year
U.S. Treasury notes with a constant maturity (as compiled
and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical
Release H). These calculations will be appropriately pro rated
for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any
share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter. The
voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser that the hurdle
rate be fluctuating for each fiscal quarter after
January 1, 2005 (as discussed above) may be terminated by
the Investment Adviser at any time upon 90 days prior
notice. The net investment income used to calculate this part of
the incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross
assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. Prospect
Energy pays the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net
investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
(1) no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which
Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income
does not exceed the hurdle rate; (2) 100% of Prospect
Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income with
respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than
125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming a 7% annualized hurdle rate); and
(3) 20% of the amount of Prospect Energys
pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds
125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming a 7% annualized hurdle rate). These
calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of less
than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.0% of Prospect Energys realized capital gains for the
calendar year, if any, computed net of all realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of such
year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to
the Investment Adviser, Prospect Energy calculates the aggregate
realized capital gains, aggregate realized capital losses and
aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as applicable, with
respect to each of the investments in its portfolio. For this
purpose, aggregate realized capital gains, if any, equals the
sum of the differences between the net sales price of each
investment, when sold, and the original cost of such investment
since inception. Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum
of the amounts by which the net sales price of each investment,
when sold, is less the original cost of such investment since
inception. Aggregate unrealized capital depreciation equals the
sum of the difference, if
F-29
negative, between the valuation of each investment as of the
applicable date and the original cost of such investment. At the
end of the applicable period, the amount of capital gains that
serves as the basis for Prospect Energys calculation of
the capital gains incentive fee equals the aggregate realized
capital gains less aggregate realized capital losses and less
aggregate unrealized capital depreciation with respect to its
portfolio of investments. If this number is positive at the end
of such period, then the capital gains incentive fee for such
period is equal to 20% of such amount, less the aggregate amount
of any capital gains incentive fees paid in respect of its
portfolio in all prior periods.
For the year ended June 30, 2005, the Company paid the
Investment Adviser $1.808 million in base management fees
and no incentive fee.
Administration
Agreement
Prospect Energy has also entered into an Administration
Agreement with Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect
Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among
other things, provides administrative services and facilities
for Prospect Energy. Prospect Administration has engaged
Vastardis Capital, LLC to serve as sub-administrator of Prospect
Energy. For providing these services, Prospect Energy reimburses
Prospect Administration for Prospect Energys allocable
portion of overhead incurred by Prospect Administration in
performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement,
including rent, the fees of the sub-administrator for services
provided with respect to Prospect Energy and Prospect
Energys allocable portion of the compensation of its chief
compliance officer and chief financial officer and their
respective staffs. Prospect Administration also provides on
Prospect Energys behalf managerial assistance to those
portfolio companies to which Prospect Energy is required to
provide such assistance. Prospect Administration is a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Investment Adviser.
For the year ended June 30, 2005, the Company reimbursed
Prospect Administration $0.266 million for services it
provided to Prospect Energy at cost. The Company also reimbursed
Prospect Administration for certain expenses which it initially
funded on behalf of the Company.
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We have received $77,000
of these assistance fees from GSHI. These fees are paid to the
Investment Advisor.
F-30
|
|
Note 6.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2005 and for the period
April 13, 2004 (inception) through June 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve Months
|
|
|
(Inception) Through
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2004(1)
|
|
|
Per share data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of
period
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial public
offering
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to the initial
public offering
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of
period
|
|
|
12.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total return based on market
value(2)
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Total return based on net asset
value(2)
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio/supplemental data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in
thousands)
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating
expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized ratio of net operating
income to average net assets
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial Highlights as of June 30, 2004 are considered not
applicable as the initial offering of common stock did not occur
as of this date. However, Financial highlights as of
June 30, 2005 are based on 7,055,100 shares
outstanding. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Energys dividend
reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is
based upon the change in net asset value per share between the
opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and
assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with
Prospect Energys dividend reinvestment plan. The total
return is not annualized. |
The Company is a defendant in legal actions arising out of its
activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is
inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of
possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be
reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its
understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that
it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We intend to
defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that
resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse
effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners, LP
(DGP) served Prospect Energy with a Complaint filed
November 30, 2004 in the United States District for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that
DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached its
fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with DGPs
contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our
portfolio company, Gas Solutions, Holdings, Inc.) in connection
with Prospect Energys alleged agreement in September, 2004
to loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions,
Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The Complaint seeks
relief not limited to $100 million. On August 9, 2005,
we filed our Motion for Summary Judgment requesting dismissal of
the DGP suit in its entirety based on a written agreement dated
F-31
September 23, 2004 that Prospect Energy and the partners of
DGP negotiated under which Prospect Energy paid
$2.5 million and reimbursed all of DGPs expenses
totaling over $1.5 million in return for an assignment of
DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd., and the
parties exchanging mutual releases. The Court has tentatively
set a hearing on our Motion for October 12, 2005. We
believe that the DGP Complaint is frivolous and without merit,
and intend to defend the matter vigorously. More information on
this matter is available from the Federal Court Systems
website, public access to Court electronic records, located at
https:\\ecf.txsd.uscourts.gov\cgi-bin\login.pl.
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a
complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging
discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress
and other claims. This officer seeks economic reinstatement and
other relief. The Company does not believe that these claims,
even if ultimately resolved against the Company, would be
material. The Company believes the complaint is without merit
and intends to defend itself vigorously.
|
|
Note 8.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On July 19, 2005 Prospect Energy provided
$9.250 million of senior secured debt financing to Arctic
Recoil, Inc.
On, September 15, 2005, we provided an additional
$5.0 million of senior secured debt financing to Stryker.
On August 10, 2005, Prospect Energy provided an additional
$0.625 million of senior secured debt and equity financing
to Whymore Coal Company. On September 22, 2005, Prospect
Energy provided a further $300,000 of senior secured debt
financing to Whymore Coal Company.
On September 15, 2005, OSHA issued findings, including an
order dismissing the complaint from a former officer of the
Company as discussed in Note 7. The complainant may file
written objections to the order and request a hearing before an
Administrative Law Judge.
On September 28, we provided $10.75 million of senior
secured debt financing to Worcester Energy Partners, Inc.
(WECO), a wood processing and biomass power
generation business based in Deblois, Maine. WECO is a privately
owned renewable energy company that operates a wood harvesting
and chipping business as well as a newly refurbished
25.85 megawatt wood-fired power plant. Built in 1988, the
plant has operated intermittently over the past decade and
recently has been recommissioned for baseload operations. The
wood harvesting and chipping business has access to more than
16,000 acres of wood fuel, and the plant has long-term
contracts for the sale of electricity as well as renewable
energy credits. Prospect Energys funding has been utilized
to refinance existing debt and to provide working capital to
re-initiate plant operations. Prospect Energy is receiving a
significant equity ownership position in WECO as part of the
investment, including a minimum internal rate of return on
Prospect Energys investment.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (in thousands except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
in Net Assets From
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
on Investments
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
F-32
4,000,000 Shares
Common
Stock
PROSPECTUS
Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc.
Sole Book
Running Manager
Ferris,
Baker Watts
Incorporated
Oppenheimer &
Co.
D.A.
Davidson & Co.
Sterne,
Agee & Leach, Inc.
,
2006
PART C
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 25.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
|
(1) Financial Statements
The following statements of Prospect Energy Corporation (the
Company or the Registrant) are included
in Part A of this Registration Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets as of
March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-2
|
Schedule of Investments as of
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
F-3
|
Schedule of investments as of
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-6
|
Statements of Operations for the
three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, for the Nine months ended
March 31, 2006, for the Nine months ended March 31,
2005 and for the twelve months ended June 30,
2005
|
|
|
F-8
|
Statement of Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
F-9
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, for the Nine months
ended March 31, 2005 and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-10
|
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements
|
|
|
F-11
|
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-18
|
Balance Sheets as of June 30,
2005 and June 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-19
|
Schedule of Investments as of
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-20
|
Statements of Operations for the
year ended June 30, 2005 and for the period from
April 13, 2004* through June 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-22
|
Statement of Stockholders
Equity for the period from April 13, 2004* through
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
F-23
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the
year ended June 30, 2005 and for the period from
April 13, 2004* through June 30, 2004
|
|
|
F-24
|
Notes to Financial
Statements
|
|
|
F-25
|
* Commencement of operations
C-1
(2) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
(a)(1)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation**
|
(a)(2)
|
|
Articles of Amendment and
Restatement***
|
(b)(1)
|
|
Bylaws***
|
(b)(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws***
|
(c)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(d)(1)
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate***
|
(d)(2)
|
|
Form of Indenture
|
(e)
|
|
Form of Dividend Reinvestment
Plan***
|
(f)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(g)
|
|
Form of Investment Advisory
Agreement between Registrant and Prospect Capital Management,
LLC***
|
(h)
|
|
Form of Underwriting
Agreement
|
(i)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(j)
|
|
Form of Custodian Agreement****
|
(k)(1)
|
|
Form of Administration Agreement
between Registrant and Prospect Administration, LLC***
|
(k)(2)
|
|
Form of Transfer Agency and
Registrar Services Agreement****
|
(k)(3)
|
|
Form of Trademark License
Agreement between the Registrant and Prospect Capital
Management***
|
(k)(4)
|
|
Credit Agreement between
Registrant, its domestic subsidiaries, certain Lenders and HSH
Nordbank AG
|
(l)(1)
|
|
Opinion and Consent of Clifford
Chance US LLP, counsel for Registrant
|
(l)(2)
|
|
Opinion and Consent of Venable
LLP, as special Maryland counsel for Registrant
|
(m)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(n)
|
|
Consent of independent registered
public accounting firm for Registrant*
|
(o)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(p)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(q)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(r)
|
|
Code of Ethics***
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Pre-effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement under the securities Act of 1933, as
amended, on Form N-2 (File
No. 333-1322575),
filed on June 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on
Form N-2
(File
No. 333-114552),
filed on April 16, 2004. |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Pre-effective Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, on
Form N-2
(File
No. 333-114552),
filed on July 6, 2004. |
|
|
|
**** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Pre-effective Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, on
Form N-2
(File
No. 333-114552),
filed on July 23, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
To be filed by amendment. |
C-2
|
|
ITEM 26.
|
MARKETING
ARRANGEMENTS
|
The information contained under the heading Plan of
Distribution on this Registration Statement is
incorporated herein by reference and any information concerning
any underwriters will be contained in the accompanying
prospectus supplement, if any.
|
|
ITEM 27.
|
OTHER
EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission registration fee
|
|
$
|
32,000
|
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
$
|
31,000
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
Printing and engraving
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Miscellaneous fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
563,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts are estimates. |
All of the expenses set forth above shall be borne by the
Company.
|
|
ITEM 28.
|
PERSONS
CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL
|
The Registrant owns 100% of the outstanding common stock of Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc. and therefore has a controlling
interest.
Prospect Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, owns shares of the Registrant, representing 0.14% of
the common stock outstanding. Without conceding that Prospect
Capital Management controls the Registrant, an affiliate of
Prospect Capital Management is the general partner of, and may
be deemed to control, the following entities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
Name
|
|
of Organization
|
|
|
Prospect Street Ventures I,
LLC
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Prospect Management Group LLC
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Prospect Street Broadband LLC
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Prospect Street Energy LLC
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
Prospect Administration LLC
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
ITEM 29. NUMBER
OF HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
The following table sets forth the approximate number of record
holders of our common stock at May 27, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Record Holders
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value
$.001 per share
|
|
|
7,100
|
|
ITEM 30. INDEMNIFICATION
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money
damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or
services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty
established by a final judgment as being material to the cause
of action. Our charter
C-3
contains such a provision which eliminates directors and
officers liability to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
obligate ourselves to indemnify any present or former director
or officer or any individual who, while a director or officer
and at our request, serves or has served another corporation,
real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director,
officer, partner or trustee, from and against any claim or
liability to which that person may become subject or which that
person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such
capacity and to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in
advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our bylaws
obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and
subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any
present or former director or officer or any individual who,
while a director or officer and at our request, serves or has
served another corporation, real estate investment trust,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee and
who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding
by reason of his or her service in any such capacity from and
against any claim or liability to which that person may become
subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her
service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse their
reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a
proceeding. The charter and bylaws also permit us to indemnify
and advance expenses to any person who served a predecessor of
us in any of the capacities described above and any of our
employees or agents or any employees or agents of our
predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, we will not
indemnify any person for any liability to which such person
would be subject by reason of such persons willful
misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of the duties involved in the conduct of his office.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or
threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service
in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to
indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among
others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and
reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with
any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be
made, a party by reason of their service in those or other
capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or
omission of the director or officer was material to the matter
giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad
faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate
dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received
an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or
(c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or
officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission
was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland
corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit
by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of
liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly
received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification,
and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a
corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or
officer upon the corporations receipt of (a) a
written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her
good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a
written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to
repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is
ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties
and obligations, Prospect Capital Management, LLC (the
Adviser) and its officers, managers, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or
entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from
the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys fees and amounts
reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of the
Advisers services under the Investment Advisory Agreement
or otherwise as an Investment Adviser of the Company.
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration, LLC and its officers,
manager, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any
other
C-4
person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities,
costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees
and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the
rendering of Prospect Administration, LLCs services under
the Administration Agreement or otherwise as administrator for
the Company.
The Administrator is authorized to enter into one or more
sub-administration agreements with other service providers (each
a
Sub-Administrator)
pursuant to which the Administrator may obtain the services of
the service providers in fulfilling its responsibilities
hereunder. Any such sub-administration agreements shall be in
accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act and other
applicable federal and state law and shall contain a provision
requiring the
Sub-Administrator
to comply with the same restrictions applicable to the
Administrator.
The Underwriting Agreement provides that each Underwriter
severally agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
Company, its directors and officers, and any person who controls
the Company within the meaning of Section 15 of the Act or
Section 20 of the Exchange Act, and the successors and
assigns of all of the foregoing persons, from and against any
loss, damage, expense, liability or claim (including the
reasonable cost of investigation) which, jointly or severally
the Company or any such person may incur under the Act, the
Exchange Act, the 1940 Act, the common law or otherwise, insofar
as such loss, damage, expense, liability or claim arises out of
or is based upon any untrue statement or alleged untrue
statement of a material fact contained in and in conformity with
information concerning such Underwriter furnished in writing by
or on behalf of such Underwriter through the managing
Underwriter to the Company expressly for use in this
Registration Statement (or in the Registration Statement as
amended by any post-effective amendment hereof by the Company)
or in the Prospectus contained in this Registration Statement,
or arises out of or is based upon any omission or alleged
omission to state a material fact in connection with such
information required to be stated in this Registration Statement
or such Prospectus or necessary to make such information not
misleading.
Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers
and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the Company has been advised that in
the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such
liabilities (other than the payment by the Company of expenses
incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of
the Company in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
Company will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
|
|
ITEM 31.
|
BUSINESS
AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISER
|
A description of any other business, profession, vocation or
employment of a substantial nature in which the Adviser, and
each managing member, director or executive officer of the
Adviser, is or has been during the past two fiscal years,
engaged in for his or her own account or in the capacity of
director, officer, employee, partner or trustee, is set forth in
Part A of this Registration Statement in the section
entitled Management. Additional information
regarding the Adviser and its officers and directors is set
forth in its Form ADV, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC File
No. 801-62969),
and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 32.
|
LOCATION
OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
|
All accounts, books and other documents required to be
maintained by Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940, and the rules thereunder are maintained at the offices
of:
(1) the Registrant, Prospect Energy Corporation, 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016;
C-5
(2) the Transfer Agent, American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company;
(3) the Custodian, U.S. Bank National
Association; and
(4) the Adviser, Prospect Capital Management, LLC, 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
|
|
ITEM 33.
|
MANAGEMENT
SERVICES
|
Not Applicable.
1. The Registrant undertakes to suspend the offering of
shares until the prospectus is amended if (1) subsequent to
the effective date of its registration statement, the net asset
value declines more than ten percent from its net asset value as
of the effective date of the registration statement; or
(2) the net asset value increases to an amount greater than
the net proceeds as stated in the prospectus.
2. Any securities not taken in a rights offering by
shareholders are to be reoffered to the public, an undertaking
to supplement the prospectus, after the expiration of the
subscription period, to set forth the results of the
subscription offer, the transactions by underwriters during the
subscription period, the amount of unsubscribed securities to be
purchased by underwriters, and the terms of any subsequent
reoffering thereof. If any public offering by the underwriters
of the securities being registered is to be made on terms
differing from those set forth on the cover page of the
prospectus, we will file a post-effective amendment to set forth
the terms of such offering.
3. The Registrant undertakes that:
(a) to file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement:
(1) to include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the 1933 Act;
(2) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events after
the effective date of the registration statement (or the most
recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or
in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the
information set forth in the registration statement; and
(3) to include any material information with respect to the
plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement.
(b) that, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the 1933 Act, each such post-effective amendment
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to
the securities offered therein, and the offering of those
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof;
(c) to remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering;
(d) that, for the purpose of determining liability under
the 1933 Act to any purchaser, each prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 497(b), (c), (d) or (e) under the
1933 Act as part of a registration statement relating to an
offering, other than prospectuses filed in reliance on
Rule 430A under the 1933 Act, shall be deemed to be
part of and included in the registration statement as of the
date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided,
however, that no statement made in a registration statement
or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made
in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference
into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of
the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time
of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or
C-6
modify any statement that was made in the registration statement
or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or
made in any such document immediately prior to such date of
first use; and
(e) that, for the purpose of determining liability of the
Registrant under the 1933 Act to any purchaser in the
initial distribution of securities: The undersigned Registrant
undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the
undersigned Registrant pursuant to this registration statement,
regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the
securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or
sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned Registrant will be a seller to
the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such
securities to the purchaser: (1) any preliminary prospectus
or prospectus of the undersigned Registrant relating to the
offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 497 under
the 1933 Act; (2) the portion of any advertisement
pursuant to Rule 482 under the 1933 Act relating to
the offering containing material information about the
undersigned Registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned Registrant; and (3) any other
communication that is an offer in the offering made by the
undersigned Registrant to the purchaser.
(f) if the Registrant intends to issue securities other
than its shares of common stock, at or before the time the
Registrant files a prospectus supplement regarding the offering
of such securities pursuant to Rule 497 under the
Securities Act of 1933, it will file a post-effective amendment
with an opinion regarding the validity of such securities
included as an exhibit.
C-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement on
Form N-2
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of New York, in the State of New York,
on the 1st day of August 2006.
PROSPECT ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John
F. Barry III
|
John F. Barry III
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities indicated on August 1, 2006. This
document may be executed by the signatories hereto on any number
of counterparts, all of which constitute one and the same
instrument.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
/s/ John
F. Barry III
John
F. Barry III
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
(principal executive officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ M.
Grier Eliasek
M.
Grier Eliasek
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
E. Vastardis
William
E. Vastardis
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary
(principal financial and accounting officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
E. Basham
Michael
E. Basham
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Robert
A. Davidson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
J. Gremp, Jr.
William
J. Gremp, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Walter
V. Parker
Walter
V. Parker
|
|
Director
|
C-8
EXHIBIT
INDEX
(2) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
(a)(1)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation**
|
(a)(2)
|
|
Articles of Amendment and
Restatement***
|
(b)(1)
|
|
Bylaws***
|
(b)(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws***
|
(c)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(d)(1)
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate***
|
(d)(2)
|
|
Form of Indenture
|
(e)
|
|
Form of Dividend Reinvestment
Plan***
|
(f)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(g)
|
|
Form of Investment Advisory
Agreement between Registrant and Prospect Capital Management,
LLC***
|
(h)
|
|
Form of Underwriting
Agreement
|
(i)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(j)
|
|
Form of Custodian Agreement****
|
(k)(1)
|
|
Form of Administration Agreement
between Registrant and Prospect Administration, LLC***
|
(k)(2)
|
|
Form of Transfer Agency and
Registrar Services Agreement****
|
(k)(3)
|
|
Form of Trademark License
Agreement between the Registrant and Prospect Capital
Management***
|
(k)(4)
|
|
Credit Agreement between
Registrant, its domestic subsidiaries, certain Lenders and HSH
Nordbank AG
|
(l)(1)
|
|
Opinion and Consent of Clifford
Chance US LLP, counsel for Registrant
|
(l)(2)
|
|
Opinion and Consent of Venable
LLP, as special Maryland counsel for Registrant
|
(m)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(n)
|
|
Consent of independent registered
public accounting firm for Registrant*
|
(o)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(p)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(q)
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(r)
|
|
Code of Ethics***
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Pre-effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, on Form N-2 (File
No. 333-1322575),
filed on June 29, 2006. |
|
|
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Registration Statement under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on
Form N-2
(File
No. 333-114552),
filed on April 16, 2004. |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Pre-effective Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, on
Form N-2
(File
No. 333-114552),
filed on July 6, 2004. |
|
|
|
**** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to
the Registrants Pre-effective Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, on
Form N-2
(File
No. 333-114552),
filed on July 23, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
To be filed by amendment. |
C-9