def14a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMB APPROVAL |
|
|
|
|
|
OMB Number:
|
|
3235-0059 |
|
|
Expires:
|
|
February 28, 2006 |
|
|
Estimated average burden hours per
response |
12.75 |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant x |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
x Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
x No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (02-02) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company
Joint Notice of 2007 Annual
Meetings Joint Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2007 |
|
|
|
To the Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company: |
|
|
|
You are cordially invited to attend the 11th annual meeting
of PG&E Corporation and the 101st annual meeting of
Pacific Gas and Electric Company. The meetings will be held
concurrently on Wednesday, April 18, 2007, at
10:00 a.m., at the San Ramon Valley Conference Center,
3301 Crow Canyon Road, San Ramon, California. |
|
|
|
The accompanying Joint Proxy Statement contains information
about matters to be considered at both the PG&E Corporation
and Pacific Gas and Electric Company annual meetings. At the
annual meetings, PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company shareholders will be asked to vote on the
election of directors and ratification of the appointment of the
independent registered public accounting firm for 2007 for each
company. The Boards of Directors and management of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company recommend that
you vote FOR the nominees for directors and the
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche
LLP as each companys independent registered public
accounting firm for 2007, as set forth in the Joint Proxy
Statement. |
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation shareholders also will be asked to vote on
the proposals submitted by individual PG&E Corporation
shareholders described in the Joint Proxy Statement. For the
reasons stated in the Joint Proxy Statement, the PG&E
Corporation Board of Directors and management recommend that
PG&E Corporation shareholders vote AGAINST these
proposals. |
|
|
|
Your vote on the business at the annual meetings is important.
For your convenience, we offer you the option of submitting your
proxy and voting instructions over the Internet, by telephone,
or by mail. Whether or not you plan to attend, please vote as
soon as possible so that your shares can be represented at the
annual meetings. |
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter A. Darbee |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, |
|
|
and President of PG&E Corporation |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of |
|
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company |
|
________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
________________________________________________________________________________
Joint Notice of Annual Meetings of Shareholders
of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
March 13, 2007
To the Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company:
The annual meetings of shareholders of PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company will be held concurrently on
Wednesday, April 18, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., at the
San Ramon Valley Conference Center, 3301 Crow Canyon Road,
San Ramon, California, for the purpose of considering the
following matters:
|
|
1. |
For PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
shareholders, to elect the following 10 and 11 directors,
respectively, to each Board for the ensuing year: |
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Andrews
|
|
Peter A. Darbee |
|
Mary S. Metz |
Leslie S. Biller |
|
Maryellen C. Herringer |
|
Barbara L. Rambo |
David A. Coulter |
|
Thomas B. King* |
|
Barry Lawson Williams |
C. Lee Cox |
|
Richard A. Meserve |
|
|
* Thomas B. King is a nominee for director of Pacific Gas
and Electric Company only. |
|
|
2. |
For PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
shareholders, to ratify each Audit Committees appointment
of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered
public accounting firm for 2007 for PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, |
|
3. |
For PG&E Corporation shareholders only, to act upon
proposals submitted by PG&E Corporation shareholders and
described on pages 34 through 36 of the Joint Proxy
Statement, and |
|
4. |
For PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
shareholders, to transact any other business that may properly
come before the meetings and any adjournments or postponements
of the meetings. |
The Boards of Directors have set the close of business on
February 20, 2007 as the record date for determining which
shareholders are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at
the annual meetings.
By Order of the Boards of Directors of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company,
Linda Y.H. Cheng
Vice President, Corporate Governance and Corporate Secretary
PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
________________________________________________________________________________
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Joint Proxy Statement
The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company (Boards) are soliciting proxies for use at
the companies annual meetings of shareholders, including
any adjournments or postponements.
This Joint Proxy Statement describes certain matters that
management expects will be voted on at the annual meetings,
gives you information about PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company and their respective Boards and management,
and provides general information about the voting process and
attendance at the annual meetings.
A Joint Proxy Statement and a proxy card were sent to anyone who
owned shares of common stock of PG&E Corporation and/or
shares of preferred stock of Pacific Gas and Electric Company at
the close of business on February 20, 2007. This date is
the record date set by the Boards to determine which
shareholders may vote at the annual meetings.
The Joint Proxy Statement and proxy cards, together with the
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2006
annual report to shareholders, were mailed to shareholders
beginning on or about March 13, 2007.
Questions and Answers
When and where will the annual meetings be held?
The annual meetings will be held concurrently on Wednesday,
April 18, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., at the San Ramon
Valley Conference Center, 3301 Crow Canyon Road, San Ramon,
California.
A map and directions to the meeting venue can be found at the
back of this Joint Proxy Statement.
How do I vote?
You can attend and vote at the annual meetings, or the
proxyholders will vote your shares as you indicate on your
proxy. There are three ways to submit your proxy:
|
|
1. |
Over the Internet at http://www.proxyvoting.com/pcg, |
2. |
By telephone by calling toll-free 1-866-540-5760, and |
3. |
By completing your proxy card and mailing it in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope. |
If you submit your proxy over the Internet or by telephone, your
vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on
Tuesday, April 17, 2007. These Internet and telephone
voting procedures comply with California law.
If you submit your proxy by mail, your vote must be received by
10:00 a.m., Pacific time, on Wednesday, April 18, 2007.
What am I voting on and what are each Boards voting
recommendations?
PG&E Corporation shareholders will be voting on the
following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item | |
|
|
|
Boards Voting | |
No. | |
|
Description |
|
Recommendation | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
1 |
|
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
For all nominees |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm |
|
|
For this proposal |
|
|
3-4 |
|
|
Shareholder Proposals |
|
Against these proposals |
Pacific Gas and Electric Company shareholders will be voting on
the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item | |
|
|
|
Boards Voting | |
No. | |
|
Description |
|
Recommendation | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
1 |
|
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
For all nominees |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm |
|
|
For this proposal |
|
What vote is required to approve each item?
To elect directors:
The 10 nominees for director of PG&E Corporation and the 11
nominees for director of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Votes
against a nominee or votes withheld will have no legal effect.
To approve other items described in the Joint Proxy Statement:
For each proposal, a majority of the shares represented and
voting on the proposal must approve the proposal. The approval
votes also must be greater than 25 percent of the shares
entitled to vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a
vote against a proposal. Broker non-votes (see definition below)
1
will not be considered in determining whether or not a proposal
is approved.
What is a broker non-vote?
If you hold your shares indirectly through a broker, bank,
trustee, nominee, or other third party, that party is the
registered holder of your shares and submits the proxy to vote
your shares. You are the beneficial owner of the shares and
typically you will be asked to provide the registered holder
with instructions as to how you want your shares to be voted.
Broker non-votes occur when brokers or nominees have voted on
some of the matters to be acted on at a meeting, but do not vote
on certain other matters because, under the rules of the New
York Stock Exchange, they are not allowed to vote on those other
matters without instructions from the beneficial owners of the
shares. Broker non-votes are counted when determining whether
the necessary quorum of shareholders is present or represented
at each annual meeting.
Will shareholders be asked to vote on matters other than
those described in the Joint Proxy Statement?
Shareholders may be asked to vote on certain administrative
matters, as permitted by law. The companies did not receive
timely advance written notice of any other matters that will be
introduced at the annual meetings.
What shares are included on my proxy card?
For PG&E Corporation registered shareholders, the shares
included on your proxy card represent all the shares of PG&E
Corporation common stock in your account as of February 20,
2007, including shares in the Investor Services Program for
Shareholders of PG&E Corporation. For Pacific Gas and
Electric Company registered shareholders, the shares included on
your proxy card represent all the shares of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company preferred stock in your account as of
February 20, 2007.
If you are a registered shareholder of both PG&E Corporation
common stock and Pacific Gas and Electric Company preferred
stock, you will receive a separate proxy card for each company.
If you receive more than one proxy card for either company, it
means that your shares are held in more than one account. You
should vote the shares on all your proxy cards. If you would
like to consolidate your accounts, please contact our transfer
agent, Mellon Investor Services LLC, toll-free at
1-800-719-9056.
How many copies of the Joint Proxy Statement and annual
report will I receive?
If you are a registered shareholder of PG&E Corporation
common stock and/or Pacific Gas and Electric Company preferred
stock, you will receive one Joint Proxy Statement and one annual
report to shareholders for each account.
If you are a beneficial owner of PG&E Corporation common
stock and/or Pacific Gas and Electric Company preferred stock
and you receive your proxy materials through ADP Investor
Communication Services (ADP), and there are multiple beneficial
owners at the same address, you may receive fewer Joint Proxy
Statements and annual reports than the number of beneficial
owners at that address. Securities and Exchange Commission rules
permit ADP to deliver only one Joint Proxy Statement and annual
report to multiple beneficial owners sharing an address, unless
we receive contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at
that same address.
If you receive your proxy materials through ADP and (1) you
wish to receive a separate copy of this Joint Proxy Statement
and the 2006 annual report to shareholders, or any future proxy
statement or annual report, or (2) you share an address
with other beneficial owners who also receive their proxy
materials through ADP and wish to request delivery of a single
copy of annual reports or proxy statements to the shared
address, please contact the office of the Corporate Secretary of
PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as
appropriate, at One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2400,
San Francisco, CA 94105, or call 1-415-267-7070.
What if I return my proxy but I do not specify how I want my
shares voted?
The PG&E Corporation proxyholders will vote those shares
For Items 1 and 2, and Against
Items 3 and 4. The Pacific Gas and Electric Company
proxyholders will vote those shares For Items 1
and 2.
What if I do not submit my proxy?
Your shares will not be voted if you do not provide a proxy or
vote at the annual meetings.
Can I change my proxy vote?
Yes. You can change your proxy vote or revoke your proxy any
time before it is exercised by (1) returning a signed proxy
card with a later date, (2) entering a new vote over the
Internet or by telephone, (3) notifying the Corporate
Secretary in writing, or (4) submitting a written ballot at
the meetings.
2
Is my vote confidential?
Yes. PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
each have adopted a confidential voting policy under which
shareholder votes are revealed only to a non-employee proxy
tabulator or an independent inspector of election, except
(1) as necessary to meet legal requirements, (2) in a
dispute regarding authenticity of proxies and ballots,
(3) in the event of a proxy contest if the other party does
not agree to comply with the confidential voting policy, and
(4) where disclosure may be necessary for either company to
assert or defend claims.
Who will count the votes?
Mellon Investor Services LLC will act as the proxy tabulators
and the inspectors of election for the 2007 annual meetings.
Mellon Investor Services LLC is independent of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company and the
companies respective directors, officers, and employees.
How many shares are eligible to vote at the annual
meetings?
On February 20, 2007, there were 350,817,275 shares of
PG&E Corporation common stock, without par value,
outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one
vote.
On February 20, 2007, there were 10,319,782 shares of
Pacific Gas and Electric Company preferred stock, $25 par
value, and 279,624,823 shares of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company common stock, $5 par value, outstanding and
entitled to vote. Each share is entitled to one vote.
May I attend the annual meetings?
All shareholders of record as of the close of business on
February 20, 2007 may attend the annual meetings of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. You
must have an admission ticket to attend the annual meetings.
Also, shareholders will be asked to present valid photo
identification, such as a drivers license or passport,
before being admitted to the meetings.
If you are a registered shareholder, you will receive an
admission ticket along with your proxy card. Please bring the
admission ticket to the meetings. If a broker, bank, trustee,
nominee, or other third party holds your shares, please inform
that party that you plan to attend the annual meetings and ask
for a legal proxy. Bring the legal proxy to the shareholder
registration area when you arrive at the meetings and we will
issue an admission ticket to you. If you cannot get a legal
proxy in time, we will issue you an admission ticket if you
bring a copy of your brokerage or bank account statement showing
that you owned PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric
Company stock as of February 20, 2007.
Cameras, tape recorders, and other electronic recording devices
will not be allowed in the meetings, other than for PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company purposes. No
items will be allowed into the meetings that might pose a safety
or security risk.
Real-time captioning services and assistive listening devices
will be available at the meetings. Please contact an usher if
you wish to be seated in the real-time captioning section or if
you need an assistive listening device.
May I bring a guest to the annual meetings?
Each registered shareholder or beneficial owner may bring up to
a total of three of the following individuals to the annual
meetings: (1) a spouse or domestic partner, (2) legal
proxies, (3) qualified representatives presenting the
shareholders proposal, or (4) financial or legal
advisors.
Shareholders must notify the Corporate Secretary of the
appropriate company in advance if they intend to bring any legal
proxy, qualified representative, or advisor to the annual
meeting. The notice must include the name and address of the
legal proxy, representative, or advisor, and must be received at
the principal executive office of the appropriate company by
5:00 p.m., Pacific time, on April 11, 2007, in
order to allow enough time for the issuance of additional
admission tickets. We recommend that shareholders send their
notice by a method that allows them to determine when the notice
was received at the principal executive office of the
appropriate company.
How will the annual meetings be conducted?
The Chairman of the Board of PG&E Corporation and Pacific
Gas and Electric Company has the authority necessary to preside
over the meetings and to make any and all determinations
regarding the conduct of the meetings.
All items of business described in this Joint Proxy Statement
will be deemed presented at the annual meetings.
For each shareholder proposal, a qualified representative will
have an opportunity to discuss that item. Shareholders will have
an opportunity to raise other comments and questions regarding
that proposal.
There also will be a general question and answer period.
Questions and comments should pertain to corporate performance,
items for consideration at the meeting, or other matters of
interest to shareholders
3
generally. The meeting is not a forum to present general
economic, political, or other views that are not directly
related to the business of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas
and Electric Company.
Shareholders will be recognized on a rotating basis. If you wish
to speak, please raise your hand and wait to be recognized. When
you are called upon, please direct your questions and comments
to the company officer chairing the meetings. Each person called
upon during the meetings will have a maximum of three minutes on
any one question or comment.
How do PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company select nominees for director?
The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company each select nominees based on
recommendations received from the PG&E Corporation
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee. The
Committees recommendations are based upon a review of the
qualifications of Board candidates, and consultation with the
PG&E Corporation Chairman of the Board or the Pacific Gas
and Electric Company Chairman of the Board, as applicable, and
the PG&E Corporation Chief Executive Officer.
The Committee receives recommendations for director nominees
from a variety of sources, including shareholders, management,
and Board members. The Committee reviews all recommended
candidates at the same time and uses the same review criteria
for all candidates.
What are the qualifications for director?
Board members should be qualified, dedicated, ethical, and
highly regarded individuals who have experience relevant to the
companys operations and understand the complexities of
that companys business environment. The Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee reviews the appropriate
skills and characteristics required of Board members in the
context of the current composition of each companys Board,
and submits its recommendations to the applicable Board for
review and approval.
In conducting this review, the Nominating, Compensation, and
Governance Committee considers the requirements for director
independence contained in each companys Corporate
Governance Guidelines, as well as diversity, age, skills, and
any other factors that it deems appropriate, given the current
needs of the Board and that company.
May I recommend someone for PG&E Corporation and Pacific
Gas and Electric Company to consider as a director nominee?
Shareholders may recommend a person to be a director of PG&E
Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as applicable,
by writing to that companys Corporate Secretary. Each
recommendation must include:
|
|
1. |
A brief description of the candidate, |
|
2. |
The candidates name, age, business address, and residence
address, |
|
3. |
The candidates principal occupation and the class and
number of shares of the companys stock owned by the
candidate, and |
|
4. |
Any other information that would be required under the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission in a proxy statement
listing the candidate as a nominee for director. |
Recommended candidates may be required to provide additional
information.
May I nominate someone to be a director during the annual
meetings?
If you would like to nominate an individual for director of
either PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company
during the annual meetings, you must provide timely and proper
advance written notice of the nomination in the manner described
in the Bylaws of the appropriate company.
While you should consult the Bylaws for specific requirements,
your notice generally should include:
|
|
1. |
A brief description of your nomination, |
|
2. |
Your name and address, as they appear in the companys
records, |
|
3. |
The class and number of shares of the companys stock that
you own, |
|
4. |
Any material interest you may have in the nomination, |
|
5. |
The nominees name, age, business address, and residence
address, |
|
6. |
The nominees principal occupation and the class and number
of shares of the companys stock owned by the
nominee, and |
|
7. |
Any other information that would be required under the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission in a proxy statement
listing the nominee as a candidate for director. |
4
Advance notices of director nominations that shareholders wish
to bring before the 2008 annual meetings of PG&E Corporation
or Pacific Gas and Electric Company must be received at the
principal executive office of the appropriate company no later
than 5:00 p.m., Pacific time, on January 28,
2008. If you wish to submit a nomination for a director
candidate, we recommend that you use a method that allows you to
determine when the nomination was received at the principal
executive office of the appropriate company.
For a copy of either companys Bylaws, send a written
request to that companys Corporate Secretary.
Where can I obtain information about the PG&E Corporation
or Pacific Gas and Electric Company Corporate Governance
Guidelines and Code of Conduct?
The Corporate Governance Guidelines for PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company are included in this Joint
Proxy Statement on pages 7 through 12.
The following documents are available in the Corporate
Governance section of PG&E Corporations website,
www.pgecorp.com, or Pacific Gas and Electric
Companys website, www.pge.com:
|
|
|
PG&E Corporations and Pacific Gas and Electric
Companys codes of conduct and ethics that apply to each
companys directors and employees, including executive
officers, |
|
|
PG&E Corporations and Pacific Gas and Electric
Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines, and |
|
|
Charters of key Board committees, including charters for the
companies Audit Committees, Executive Committees, the
PG&E Corporation Finance Committee, the PG&E Corporation
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee, and the
PG&E Corporation Public Policy Committee. |
Shareholders also may obtain print copies of these documents by
sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary of the
appropriate company.
When are shareholder proposals (including director
nominations) due for the 2008 annual meetings?
If you would like to submit a proposal to be included in either
companys proxy statement for the 2008 annual meetings,
that companys Corporate Secretary must receive your
proposal by 5:00 p.m., Pacific time, on
November 14, 2007.
If you would like to introduce any other business at either
companys 2008 annual meeting, you must provide timely and
proper advance written notice of the matter in the manner
described in the Bylaws of the appropriate company. For a copy
of either companys Bylaws, send a written request to that
companys Corporate Secretary.
For any other business that shareholders wish to bring before
the 2008 annual meetings of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, advance notices of that business must be
received at the principal executive office of the appropriate
company no later than 5:00 p.m., Pacific time, on
January 28, 2008. However, if the 2008 annual meeting
of either company is scheduled on a date that differs by more
than 30 days from the anniversary date of the 2007 annual
meetings, the shareholders advance notice will be timely
if it is received no later than the tenth day after the date on
which that company publicly discloses the date of its 2008
annual meeting.
If you wish to submit a shareholder proposal or advance notice
of other business to be brought before the 2008 annual meetings,
we recommend that you use a method that allows you to determine
when the shareholder proposal or advance notice of other
business was received at the principal executive office of the
appropriate company.
How much did this proxy solicitation cost?
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company hired
D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the distribution of
proxy materials and solicitation of votes. The estimated fee is
$11,500 plus reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses.
In addition, PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees, and fiduciaries for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses
for forwarding proxy and solicitation material to shareholders.
What is the address of the principal executive office of
PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company?
PG&E Corporation
One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
77 Beale Street, 32nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
How do I contact the directors or officers of PG&E
Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company?
Correspondence to the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company Boards of Directors or any individual directors
(including the non-employee directors as a whole, or the Chair
of the PG&E
5
Corporation Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee,
who serves as lead director) or officers should be sent in care
of the Corporate Secretary to the principal executive office of
the appropriate company. Correspondence addressed to either
companys Board of Directors as a body, or to all of the
directors in their entirety, will be sent to the Chair of the
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee. The
Corporate Secretary will regularly provide each Board with a
summary of all such shareholder communications that the
Corporate Secretary receives on behalf of that Board. A majority
of the independent members of the Boards of Directors of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company have
approved this process for shareholders to send communications to
the Boards of Directors.
6
Corporate Governance Guidelines
December 20, 2006
Corporate Governance Commitment
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company have a
commitment to good corporate governance practices. These
practices provide a framework within which the Boards of
Directors and management of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company can pursue the business objectives of those
companies. Their foundation is the independent nature of the
Board and its fiduciary responsibility to the companys
shareholders.
Our corporate governance practices are documented in Corporate
Governance Guidelines that are adopted by the Boards of
Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company and that are updated from time to time as appropriate,
and as recommended by the PG&E Corporation Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee.
The PG&E Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines are
reprinted below. The Pacific Gas and Electric Company Corporate
Governance Guidelines are identical to the PG&E Corporation
Corporate Governance Guidelines in all material respects.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
|
|
|
All members of the Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation
(the Corporation) are elected each year and serve
one-year terms. Directors are not elected for multiple-year,
staggered terms. |
|
|
2. |
Composition of the Board |
|
|
|
The Boards membership is composed of qualified, dedicated,
ethical, and highly regarded individuals who have experience
relevant to the Corporations operations and understand the
complexities of the Corporations business environment. The
Board seeks to include a diversity of backgrounds, perspectives,
and skills among its members. No member of the Board of
Directors may be an employee of the American Stock Exchange or a
floor member of that exchange. |
|
|
3. |
Independence of Directors |
|
|
|
All members of the Board have a fiduciary responsibility to
represent the best interests of the Corporation and all of its
shareholders. |
|
|
At least 75 percent of the Board is composed of independent
directors, defined as directors who (1) are neither current
nor former officers or employees of nor consultants to the
Corporation or its subsidiaries, (2) are neither current
nor former officers or employees of any other corporation on
whose board of directors any officer of the Corporation serves
as a member, and (3) otherwise meet the definition of
independence set forth in applicable stock exchange
rules. The Board must affirmatively determine whether a director
is independent, and may develop categorical standards to assist
the Board in determining whether a director has a material
relationship with the Corporation, and thus is not independent.
Such standards are set forth in Exhibit A to these
Corporate Governance Guidelines. As provided in
Article III, Section 1 of the Corporations
Bylaws, the Chairman of the Board and the President are members
of the Board. |
|
|
4. |
Selection of Directors |
|
|
|
The Board nominates directors for election at the annual meeting
of shareholders and selects directors to fill vacancies which
occur between annual meetings. The Nominating, Compensation, and
Governance Committee, in consultation with the Chairman of the
Board and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) (if the Chairman is
not the CEO), reviews the qualifications of the Board candidates
and presents recommendations to the full Board for action. |
|
|
5. |
Characteristics of Directors |
|
|
|
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee annually
reviews with the Board, and submits for Board approval, the
appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members
in the context of the current composition of the Board. In
conducting this assessment, the Committee considers diversity,
age, skills, and such other factors as it deems appropriate
given the current needs of the Board and the Corporation. |
|
|
6. |
Selection of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
The Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer are
elected by the Board. |
7
|
|
|
Based on the circumstances existing at a time that there is a
vacancy in the office of either the Chairman of the Board or the
Chief Executive Officer, the Board will consider whether the
role of Chief Executive Officer should be separate from that of
Chairman of the Board, and, if the roles are separate, whether
the Chairman should be selected from the independent directors
or should be an employee of the Corporation. |
|
|
7. |
Assessing the Boards and Committees
Performance |
|
|
|
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee oversees
the process for evaluating and assessing the performance of the
Board, including Board committees. The Board conducts an
evaluation at least annually to determine whether it and its
committees are functioning effectively. The Board evaluation
includes an assessment of the Boards contribution as a
whole and specific areas in which the Board and/or management
believes a better contribution could be made. The purpose of the
review is to increase the effectiveness of the Board as a whole,
not to discuss the performance of individual directors. The
Audit Committee and the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee conduct annual evaluations, and any other permanent
Board committee that meets on a regular basis conducts periodic
evaluations. The Board committees provide the results of any
evaluation to the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee, which will review those results and provide them to
the Board for consideration in the Boards evaluation. |
|
|
|
As provided in paragraph I of Article Third of the
Corporations Articles of Incorporation, the Board is
composed of no less than 7 and no more than
13 members. The exact number of directors is determined by
the Board based on its current composition and requirements, and
is specified in Article II, Section 1 of the
Corporations Bylaws. |
|
|
|
The Board may designate future directors as advisory directors
in advance of their formal election to the Board. Advisory
directors attend Board and committee meetings, and receive the
same compensation as regular directors. They do not, however,
vote on matters before the Board. In this manner, they become
familiar with the Corporations business before assuming
the responsibility of serving as a regular director. |
|
|
10. |
Directors Who Change Responsibilities |
|
|
|
Directors shall offer their resignations when they change
employment or the major responsibilities they held when they
joined the Board. This does not mean that such directors should
leave the Board. However, the Board, via the Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee, should have the
opportunity to review the appropriateness of such
directors nomination for re-election to the Board under
these circumstances. |
|
|
Directors who are officers of the Corporation also shall offer
their resignations upon retirement or other termination of
active PG&E Corporation employment. |
|
|
|
The Board may not designate any person as a candidate for
election or re-election as a director after such person has
reached the age of 70. |
|
|
12. |
Compensation of Directors |
|
|
|
The Board sets the level of compensation for directors, based on
the recommendation of the Nominating, Compensation, and
Governance Committee, and taking into account the impact of
compensation on director independence. Directors who are also
current employees of the Corporation receive no additional
compensation for service as directors. |
|
|
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee reviews
periodically the amount and form of compensation paid to
directors, taking into account the compensation paid to
directors of other comparable U.S. companies. The Committee
conducts its review with the assistance of outside experts in
the field of executive compensation. |
|
|
13. |
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines |
|
|
|
In order to more closely align the interests of directors and
the Corporations shareholders, directors are encouraged to
own a significant equity interest in the Corporation within a
reasonable time after election to the Board. A director should
own shares of the Corporations common stock having a
dollar value of at least $200,000, measured at the time the
stock is acquired or on the first business day of January 2007,
whichever is later. A director should achieve this ownership
target within five years from the date of his or her election to
the Board or the adoption of these guidelines (December 20,
2006), whichever is later. For |
8
|
|
|
purposes of calculating a directors level of share
ownership, the following are included: (1) shares of
PG&E Corporation common stock beneficially owned by the
director (as determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission), and (2) PG&E
Corporation restricted stock units and common stock equivalents
held by the director. |
|
|
14. |
Meetings of the Board |
|
|
|
As provided in Article II, Section 4 of the
Corporations Bylaws, the Board meets regularly on
previously determined dates. Board meetings shall be held at
least quarterly. As provided in Article II, Section 5
of the Bylaws, the Chairman of the Board, the President, the
Chair of the Executive Committee, or any five directors may call
a special meeting of the Board at any time. |
|
|
Each Board member is expected to regularly attend Board meetings
and meetings of the committees on which the director serves
(either in person or by telephone or other similar communication
equipment), and to attend annual meetings of the
Corporations shareholders. Pursuant to proxy disclosure
rules, the Corporations proxy statement identifies each
director who during the last fiscal year attended fewer than
75 percent of the aggregate of the total number of meetings
of the Board and each Board committee on which the director
served. |
|
|
|
The Chair of the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee shall be the lead director, and shall be selected by
the independent directors. The lead director shall act as a
liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent
directors, and shall preside at all meetings at which the
Chairman is not present. The lead director approves the agendas
and schedules for meetings of the Board, and approves
information sent to the members of the Board. The lead director
has authority to call special meetings of the independent
directors. |
|
|
16. |
Meetings of Independent Directors |
|
|
|
The independent directors meet at each regularly scheduled Board
meeting in executive session. These executive session meetings
are chaired by the lead director. Following each such meeting,
the lead director, or one or more other independent directors
designated by the lead director, has a discussion with the
Chairman of the Board (if the Chairman is not an independent
director) and the Chief Executive Officer (if the Chairman is
not the CEO) regarding the executive session meeting. |
|
|
The Chair of the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee, as lead director, establishes the agenda for each
executive session meeting of independent directors, and also
determines which, if any, other individuals, including members
of management and independent advisors, should attend each such
meeting. |
|
|
|
The Chairman of the Board, in consultation with the Chief
Executive Officer (if the Chairman is not the CEO), establishes
the agenda for each meeting. |
|
|
Board members are encouraged to suggest the inclusion of items
on the agenda. |
|
|
18. |
Board Materials and Presentations |
|
|
|
The agenda for each meeting is provided in advance of the
meeting, together with written materials on matters to be
presented for consideration, for the directors review
prior to the meeting. As a general rule, written materials are
provided in advance on all matters requiring Board action.
Written materials are concise summaries of the relevant
information, designed to provide a foundation for the
Boards discussion of key issues and make the most
efficient use of the Boards meeting time. Directors may
request from the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive
Officer (if the Chairman is not the CEO) any additional
information they believe to be necessary to perform their duties. |
|
|
19. |
Regular Attendance of Non-Directors at Board
Meetings |
|
|
|
Members of management, as designated by the Chairman of the
Board and the Chief Executive Officer (if the Chairman is not
the CEO), attend each meeting of the Board. |
|
|
|
The Board establishes committees to assist the Board in
overseeing the affairs of the Corporation. |
|
|
Currently, there are five committees. The Executive Committee
exercises all powers of the Board (subject to the provisions of
law and limits imposed by the Board) and meets only at such
times as it is infeasible to convene a meeting of the full
Board. The Audit Committee, the Finance Committee, the
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee, and the
Public Policy |
9
|
|
|
Committee are each responsible for defined areas delegated by
the Board. |
|
|
21. |
Membership of Board Committees |
|
|
|
All permanent Board committees, other than the Executive
Committee, are chaired by independent directors. Each
independent committee chair shall act as a liaison between the
Chairman of the Board and the respective committee, and shall
preside at all meetings of that committee. Each independent
committee chair approves the agendas and schedules for meetings
of the respective committee, and approves information sent to
the committee members. Each independent committee chair has
authority to call special meetings of the respective committee. |
|
|
The Audit Committee, the Finance Committee, the Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee, and the Public Policy
Committee are composed entirely of independent directors, as
defined in Section 3 of these guidelines. |
|
|
Members of the Audit Committee also must satisfy the audit
committee independence and qualification requirements
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
stock exchange on which securities of the Corporation or Pacific
Gas and Electric Company are listed. If an Audit Committee
member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of three or
more public companies other than the Corporation and its
subsidiaries, that Committee member must inform the
Corporations Board of Directors and, in order for that
member to continue serving on the Corporations Audit
Committee, the Board of Directors must affirmatively determine
that such simultaneous service does not impair the ability of
that member to serve effectively on the Corporations Audit
Committee. |
|
|
22. |
Appointment of Committee Members |
|
|
|
The composition of each committee is determined by the Board of
Directors. |
|
|
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee, after
consultation with the Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Executive Officer (if the Chairman is not the CEO) and with
consideration of the wishes of the individual directors,
recommends to the full Board the chairmanship and membership of
each committee. |
|
|
23. |
Committee Agenda Items |
|
|
|
The chair of each committee, in consultation with the
appropriate members of management, establishes the agenda for
each meeting. |
|
|
At the beginning of the year, each committee issues a work plan
of subjects to be discussed during the year, to the extent such
subjects can be foreseen. Copies of these annual work plans are
provided to all directors. |
|
|
24. |
Committee Materials and Presentations |
|
|
|
The agenda for each committee meeting is provided in advance of
the meeting, together with written materials on matters to be
presented for consideration, for the committee members
review prior to the meeting. As a general rule, written
materials are provided in advance on all matters to be presented
for committee action. |
|
|
25. |
Attendance at Committee Meetings |
|
|
|
The chair of each committee, after consultation with the
Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer (if the
Chairman is not the CEO), determines the appropriate members of
management to attend each meeting of the Committee. |
|
|
Any director or advisory director may attend any meeting of any
committee with the concurrence of the committee chair. |
|
|
26. |
Formal Evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
The independent directors annually review and evaluate the
performance of the Chief Executive Officer. The review is based
upon objective criteria, including the performance of the
business and accomplishment of objectives previously established
in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
The results of the review and evaluation are communicated to the
Chief Executive Officer by the Chair of the Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee, and are used by that
Committee and the Board when considering the compensation of the
CEO. |
|
|
27. |
Management Development and Succession Planning |
|
|
|
The Chief Executive Officer reports annually to the Board on
management development and succession planning. This report
includes the CEOs recommendation for a successor should
the CEO become unexpectedly disabled. |
10
|
|
28. |
Communications with External Entities |
|
|
|
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for all
communications with the media, the financial community, or other
external entities pertaining to the affairs of the Corporation.
Directors refer any inquiries from such entities to the CEO for
handling. |
|
|
29. |
Access to Independent Advisors |
|
|
|
The Board of Directors and its committees have the right to
retain independent outside financial, legal, or other advisors,
as necessary and appropriate. The Corporation shall bear the
costs of retaining such advisors. |
|
|
30. |
Director Orientation and Continuing Education |
|
|
|
The Corporation provides information to new directors on
subjects that would assist them in discharging their duties, and
periodically provides briefing sessions or materials for all
directors on such subjects. |
|
|
31. |
Communications with Shareholders |
|
|
|
The Chair of the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee shall be designated as the director who receives
written communications from the Corporations shareholders,
in care of the Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary
shall forward to the Chair of the Nominating, Compensation, and
Governance Committee any shareholder communications addressed to
the Board of Directors as a body or to all the directors in
their entirety, and such other communications as the Corporate
Secretary, in his or her discretion, determines is appropriate. |
|
|
32. |
Legal Compliance and Business Ethics |
|
|
|
The Board of Directors is responsible for exercising reasonable
oversight with respect to the implementation and effectiveness
of the Corporations legal compliance and ethics program.
In that role, the Board of Directors shall be knowledgeable
about the content and operation of the Corporations
compliance and ethics program, but may delegate more detailed
oversight to a committee of the Board of Directors. |
Exhibit A
PG&E Corporation
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Categorical Standards for Identifying Material
Relationships That May Affect Director Independence
Adopted: December 17, 2003
Amended as of February 18, 2004, December 15, 2004,
and December 20, 2006
The following categories of relationships between a director and
PG&E Corporation shall be considered material.
The existence of a material relationship provides a
rebuttable presumption that the affected director is not
independent, absent a specific determination by the
Board of Directors to the contrary.
A director has a material relationship with the
Corporation in the following circumstances:
Employment
|
|
|
If a director is a current or former employee of the Corporation. |
|
|
If a member of the directors immediate family is or was
employed as a Section 16 Officer of the Corporation, unless
such employment ended more than three years ago. |
Direct Compensation from the Corporation
|
|
|
If a director is a consultant to the Corporation. |
|
|
If a director or his or her immediate family member receives, or
during the past three years received, more than
$100,000 per year or rolling
12-month period in
direct compensation from the Corporation. Direct
compensation does not include director and committee fees
and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior
service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way
on |
11
|
|
|
continued service) or compensation received by a directors
immediate family member for service as an employee (unless the
immediate family member received compensation for services as a
Section 16 Officer, in which case the director has a
material relationship with the Corporation). |
Internal or External Auditors
|
|
|
If a director or his or her immediate family member is, or
during the past three years was, affiliated with, or employed
by, a firm that serves or served during the past three years as
the Corporations internal or external auditor. |
Director Interlock
|
|
|
If a director is a current or former officer or employee of any
other company on whose board of directors any officer of the
Corporation serves as a member. |
|
|
If a directors immediate family member is, or during the
past three years was, employed by another company where any of
the Corporations present Section 16 Officers
concurrently serves on that companys compensation
committee. |
Business Relationships
|
|
|
If a director is a current Section 16 Officer or employee,
or his or her immediate family member is a current
Section 16 Officer, of a company (which does not include
charitable, non-profit, or tax-exempt entities) that makes
payments to, or receives payments from, the Corporation for
property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal
year, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2 percent
of such other companys consolidated gross revenues, during
any of the past three years. The director is not
independent until three years after falling below
such threshold. (Both the payments and the consolidated gross
revenues to be measured shall be those reported in the last
completed fiscal year. The look-back provision for this test
applies solely to the financial relationship between the
Corporation and the directors or immediate family
members current employer; the Corporation need not
consider former employment of the director or immediate family
member.) |
Charitable Relationships
|
|
|
If the director (or a relative) is a trustee, director, or
employee of a charitable or non-profit organization that
receives grants or endowments from the Corporation or its
affiliates exceeding the greater of $200,000 or 2 percent
of the recipients gross revenues during the
Corporations or the recipients most recent completed
fiscal year. |
Notes
|
|
|
Immediate family member includes a persons
spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- and
fathers-in-law, sons-
and daughters-in-law,
brothers-and
sisters-in-law, and
anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such
persons home, or is financially dependent on such person. |
|
|
Corporation includes any consolidated subsidiaries
or parent companies. |
|
|
Section 16 Officer means officer as
defined in
Rule 16a-1(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and includes the
president, the principal financial officer, the principal
accounting officer, any vice president in charge of a principal
business unit, division, or function (such as sales,
administration, or finance), any other officer who performs a
policymaking function, or any other person who performs similar
policymaking functions for that company. |
12
________________________________________________________________________________
Item No. 1:
Election of Directors of PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Shareholders are being asked to elect 10 directors to serve
on the Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation and
11 directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Pacific
Gas and Electric Company. If elected as director, those
individuals will hold office until the next annual meetings or
until their successors shall be elected and qualified, except in
the case of death, resignation, or removal of a director.
The 10 nominees for director of PG&E Corporation and the 11
nominees for director of Pacific Gas and Electric Company whom
the respective Boards propose for election are the same, except
for Thomas B. King, who is a nominee for the Pacific Gas
and Electric Company Board only.
The composition of the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company slates of director nominees are consistent with
the policy set forth in each companys Corporate Governance
Guidelines that at least 75 percent of the Board shall be
composed of independent directors, as defined in the
Corporate Governance Guidelines, and as set forth on
pages 7 through 12 of this Joint Proxy Statement.
Information is provided on the following pages about the
nominees for director, including their principal occupations for
the past five years, certain other directorships, age, and
length of service as a director of PG&E Corporation and/or
Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Membership on Board
committees, attendance at Board and committee meetings, and
ownership of stock of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company are provided in separate sections following the
biographical information on the nominees.
All of the nominees have agreed to serve if elected. If any of
the nominees become unavailable at the time of the annual
meetings to accept nomination or election as a director, the
proxyholders named on the enclosed PG&E Corporation or
Pacific Gas and Electric Company proxy card will vote for
substitute nominees at their discretion.
The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific
Gas and Electric Company Unanimously Recommend the Election of
the Nominees for Director Presented in This Joint Proxy
Statement.
13
________________________________________________________________________________
Nominees for Directors of PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Biographical Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Andrews
Mr. Andrews is retired Senior Vice President, Government
Affairs, General Counsel, and Secretary of PepsiCo, Inc. (food
and beverage businesses). He held that position from February
2002 to November 2004. Prior to joining PepsiCo, Inc.,
Mr. Andrews was a partner in the law firm of McCutchen,
Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP from May 2000 to January
2002 and from 1981 to July 1997. From August 1997 to April 2000,
he served as the legal advisor to the U.S. Department of
State. Mr. Andrews, 65, has been a director of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company since 2000. He
also is a director of the James Campbell Company LLC and
UnionBanCal Corporation. |
|
|
|
Leslie S. Biller
Mr. Biller is retired Vice Chairman and Chief Operating
Officer of Wells Fargo & Company (financial services
and retail banking). Mr. Biller held that position from
November 1998 until his retirement in October 2002.
Mr. Biller, 58, was an advisory director of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company from January
2003 to February 2004, and has been a director of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company since February
2004. He also is a director of Ecolab Inc., Knowledge Schools
Inc., and Knowledge Universe Education. |
|
|
|
David A. Coulter
Mr. Coulter is Managing Director and Senior Advisor of
Warburg Pincus LLC (global private equity firm) and has held
that position since November 2005. Prior to joining Warburg
Pincus LLC, Mr. Coulter was Vice Chairman of JPMorgan
Chase & Co. (financial services and retail banking)
from January 2001 until his retirement in September 2005. Prior
to the merger with J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated,
he was Vice Chairman of The Chase Manhattan Corporation (bank
holding company) from August 2000 to December 2000. He was a
partner in the Beacon Group, L.P. (investment banking firm) from
January 2000 to July 2000, and was Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of BankAmerica Corporation and Bank of America NT&SA
from May 1996 to October 1998. Mr. Coulter, 59, has been a
director of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company since 1996. He also is a director of First Data
Corporation and Strayer Education, Inc. |
|
|
|
C. Lee Cox
Mr. Cox is retired Vice Chairman of AirTouch
Communications, Inc. and retired President and Chief Executive
Officer of AirTouch Cellular (cellular telephone and paging
services). He was an executive officer of AirTouch
Communications, Inc. and its predecessor, PacTel Corporation,
from 1987 until his retirement in April 1997. Mr. Cox, 65,
has been a director of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company since 1996. |
|
|
|
Peter A. Darbee
Mr. Darbee is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, and President of PG&E Corporation and Chairman of
the Board of Pacific Gas and Electric Company and has held those
positions since January 2006. He was President and Chief
Executive Officer of PG&E Corporation from January 2005 to
December 2005 and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of PG&E Corporation from September 1999 to December
2004. Mr. Darbee, 54, has been a director of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company since January
2005. |
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryellen C. Herringer
Ms. Herringer is an attorney-at-law. She held various
executive positions at APL Limited (intermodal shipping and rail
transportation company) from 1991 until it was acquired by
Neptune Orient Lines in December 1997, most recently serving as
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary. Prior
to joining APL Limited, Ms. Herringer was a partner in the
law firm of Morrison & Foerster. Ms. Herringer,
63, has been a director of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company since October 2005. She also is a director
of ABM Industries Incorporated and Wachovia Corporation. |
|
|
|
Thomas B. King*
Mr. King is Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company and a Senior Vice President of PG&E
Corporation, and has held those positions since January 1,
2006. He held various executive positions at Pacific Gas and
Electric Company from November 2003 to December 2005, most
recently serving as President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior
to joining Pacific Gas and Electric Company, he was a Senior
Vice President of PG&E Corporation from January 1999 to
October 2003. From July 2000 to July 2003, he also held various
executive positions at PG&E National Energy Group, Inc., a
former subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. Mr. King, 45,
has been a director of Pacific Gas and Electric Company since
January 2006. |
|
|
|
Richard A. Meserve
Dr. Meserve is President of the Carnegie Institution of
Washington (scientific research institution) and has held that
position since April 2003. He also has served as Senior Of
Counsel to the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP
since April 2004 and was a partner in that firm from 1984
through 1999. Prior to joining the Carnegie Institution of
Washington, Dr. Meserve was Chairman of the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission from October 1999 to
March 2003. Dr. Meserve, 62, has been a director of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company since
December 2006. |
|
|
|
Mary S. Metz
Dr. Metz is retired President of S. H. Cowell Foundation
and held that position from January 1999 to March 2005. She is
Dean Emerita of University Extension of the University of
California, Berkeley, and President Emerita of Mills College.
Dr. Metz, 69, has been a director of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company since 1986 and a director of PG&E
Corporation since 1996. She also is a director of AT&T Inc.,
Longs Drug Stores Corporation, and UnionBanCal Corporation. |
|
|
|
Barbara L. Rambo
Ms. Rambo is Vice Chairman of Nietech Corporation
(payments technology company) and has held that position since
October 2006. Ms. Rambo joined Nietech in November 2002 as
President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining Nietech,
she served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of OpenClose
Technologies (financial services company) from July 2001 to
December 2001 and January 2000 to June 2001, respectively.
Ms. Rambo served as Group Executive Vice President of Bank
of America from 1993 to 1998 and held various positions of
responsibility with the Bank since 1974. Ms. Rambo, 54, has
been a director of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company since January 2005. She also is a director of
The Gymboree Corporation. |
|
|
* |
Thomas B. King is a nominee for director of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company only. |
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barry Lawson Williams
Mr. Williams is President of Williams Pacific Ventures,
Inc. (business investment and consulting) and has held that
position since 1987. He also served as interim President and
Chief Executive Officer of the American Management Association
(management development organization) from November 2000 to June
2001. Mr. Williams, 62, has been a director of Pacific Gas
and Electric Company since 1990 and a director of PG&E
Corporation since 1996. He also is a director of CH2M Hill
Companies, Ltd., The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company,
R.H. Donnelley Corporation, The Simpson Manufacturing Company
Inc., and SLM Corporation. |
16
________________________________________________________________________________
Information Regarding the
Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
The following section describes (1) the composition of the
Boards of Directors and key Board committees of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, (2) the
functioning of the Boards and key Board committees,
(3) qualifications and compensation of directors, and
(4) other information regarding the director nominees.
Director Independence
What independence guidelines apply to the Boards of
Directors?
The PG&E Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines set
forth a policy that 75 percent of the directors should be
independent, as defined in the Guidelines. The Board of
Directors of PG&E Corporation also is subject to New York
Stock Exchange rules, which require that a majority of the
directors be independent, as defined in the stock
exchanges rules, and that independent directors meet
regularly.
The Pacific Gas and Electric Company Corporate Governance
Guidelines also set forth a policy that 75 percent of the
directors should be independent, as defined in the Guidelines.
In addition, the Board of Directors of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company is subject to American Stock Exchange rules requiring
that the independent directors meet regularly. The Pacific Gas
and Electric Company Board is not subject to American Stock
Exchange rules requiring that at least a majority of the
directors meet the stock exchanges definition of
independent director. Pacific Gas and Electric
Company is exempt from these requirements because PG&E
Corporation and a subsidiary hold approximately 96 percent
of the voting power in Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company is a controlled
subsidiary.
Are the directors independent?
The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company each have affirmatively determined that the
following directors are independent: David R. Andrews, Leslie S.
Biller, David A. Coulter, C. Lee Cox, Maryellen C. Herringer,
Richard A. Meserve, Mary S. Metz, Barbara L. Rambo, and Barry
Lawson Williams. These independent directors:
|
|
|
Do not have any material relationship with either PG&E
Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company that would
interfere with the exercise of independent judgment, |
|
|
Are independent as defined by applicable New York
Stock Exchange and American Stock Exchange rules, and |
|
|
Satisfy each of the categorical standards adopted by the Boards
for determining whether a specific relationship is
material and a director is independent. Those
categorical standards are set forth as Exhibit A to the
Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can be found on
pages 11 and 12 of this Joint Proxy Statement and in the
Corporate Governance section of PG&E Corporations
website, www.pgecorp.com, or Pacific Gas and Electric
Companys website, www.pge.com. |
Only independent directors may serve on PG&E
Corporations Audit Committee, Finance Committee,
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee, and Public
Policy Committee, and on Pacific Gas and Electric Companys
Audit Committee. Independent directors also must serve as chairs
of any key committees of the PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas
and Electric Company Board of Directors, with the exception of
the Executive Committees.
In assessing the independence of individual directors, the
Boards of Directors considered transactions for legal and
related services provided by the law firm of
Covington & Burling LLP to either PG&E Corporation
or Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Dr. Richard A. Meserve
is employed by Covington & Burling LLP on a part-time
basis as Senior Of Counsel. Each of these transactions with
Covington & Burling LLP involved services that were
initiated prior to Dr. Meserves election to the
Boards of Directors. The Boards of Directors also considered
amounts owed by the Carnegie Institution of Washington to
Pacific Gas and Electric Company for departing load charges
related to operations in Palo Alto, California. Dr. Meserve is
the President of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. This
relationship does not require disclosure in the Related
Person Transactions section on pages 27 and 28 of
this Joint Proxy Statement because such charges are fixed in
conformity with law or governmental authority.
17
Do the Boards of Directors have an independent lead
director?
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company have
each had an independent lead director since 2003. The lead
director is selected by the independent directors of the
applicable company. Currently, the Chair of the PG&E
Corporation Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee
serves as independent lead director of both PG&E Corporation
and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. The lead director acts as
a liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent
directors. Among other things, the lead director approves the
agendas and schedules for meetings of the Board, and also
determines which, if any, other individuals, including members
of management and independent advisors, should attend each
executive session meeting (see below). The lead director
currently is C. Lee Cox.
Do the independent directors meet without the other
directors?
The independent directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific
Gas and Electric Company meet in executive session without the
other directors at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The
independent lead director establishes the agenda for each
executive session meeting of independent directors, and presides
over these executive session meetings. At the end of each
executive session meeting, the independent lead director has a
discussion with the PG&E Corporation Chairman of the Board
or the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Chairman of the Board,
as applicable, and the PG&E Corporation Chief Executive
Officer regarding the executive session meeting.
18
Board Committees
What are the key committees of the PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Boards of Directors?
The key committees of the PG&E Corporation Board of
Directors are the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee, the
Finance Committee, the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee, and the Public Policy Committee.
The Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board of Directors has two
key committees, the Executive Committee and the Audit Committee.
All committee members are directors of PG&E Corporation or
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as appropriate. To ensure that
all committee members can perform their duties in a fully
informed manner, committee members and other directors have
access to all of PG&E Corporations and Pacific Gas and
Electric Companys books, records, and other documents. The
current membership and duties of these committees are described
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Nominating, | |
|
|
|
|
Compensation, | |
|
Public | |
|
|
Executive | |
|
Audit | |
|
Finance | |
|
and Governance | |
|
Policy | |
|
|
Committees | |
|
Committees | |
|
Committee | |
|
Committee | |
|
Committee | |
| |
Non-Employee Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Andrews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
L. S. Biller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
D. A. Coulter |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Cox |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
*(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Herringer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
R. A. Meserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
M. S. Metz |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
B. L. Rambo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. L. Williams |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
*(2) |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Darbee |
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. B. King |
|
|
X |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Meetings in 2006 (PG&E Corporation/ Pacific Gas
and Electric Company where applicable) |
|
|
0/0 |
|
|
|
4/4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Lead director |
(2) |
Audit Committee financial expert as defined by the Securities
and Exchange Commission |
(3) |
Member of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Executive
Committee only |
Committee Charters
Each companys Board of Directors has adopted a formal
charter for each of the above Board committees. A copy of the
charter for each of the listed PG&E Corporation Board
Committees can be found in the Corporate Governance section of
the corporations website, at www.pgecorp.com. A copy of
the charter for each of the listed Pacific Gas and Electric
Company Board Committees can be found through the Corporate
Governance section of the companys website, at
www.pge.com. Shareholders also may obtain a print copy of any
committees charter by sending a written request to the
appropriate companys Corporate Secretary.
19
Executive Committees
What are the Executive Committees responsibilities?
Each Executive Committee may exercise any of the powers and
perform any of the duties of the PG&E Corporation Board or
the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board (as the case may be).
This authority is subject to provisions of law and certain
limits imposed by the PG&E Corporation Board or the Pacific
Gas and Electric Company Board (as the case may be). The
Executive Committees meet as needed.
Each companys Chairman of the Board serves as the Chair of
that companys Executive Committee.
Audit Committees
What are the Audit Committees responsibilities?
The Audit Committees of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company advise and assist the appropriate Board of
Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities in connection with
financial and accounting practices, internal controls, external
and internal auditing programs, business ethics, and compliance
with laws, regulations, and policies that may have a material
impact on the consolidated financial statements of PG&E
Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and their
respective subsidiaries.
The Audit Committees responsibilities are set forth in
each Committees charter. Among other things, the Audit
Committees:
|
|
|
Are responsible for the selection, appointment, compensation,
and oversight of the work of the independent registered public
accounting firm that PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, as applicable, employ to prepare or issue
audit reports or perform related work, |
|
|
Satisfy themselves as to the independence and competence of the
appropriate companys independent registered public
accounting firm, |
|
|
Pre-approve all auditing and non-auditing services that the
independent registered public accounting firm provides to
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as
applicable, |
|
|
Review and discuss with the independent registered public
accounting firm, and with the appropriate companys
officers and internal auditors, the scope and results of the
independent registered public accounting firms audit work,
consolidated quarterly and annual financial statements, the
quality and effectiveness of internal controls, and compliance
with laws, regulations, policies, and programs, and |
|
|
Make further inquiries as they deem necessary or desirable to
inform themselves of the affairs of the companies and their
subsidiaries. |
One member of each Audit Committee is appointed by the
appropriate Board of Directors as the Committees Chair.
Do special requirements apply to members of the Audit
Committees?
Independence. Each member of the PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Audit Committees must be
independent, as defined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines,
in Securities and Exchange Commission rules regarding audit
committee independence, and in applicable New York Stock
Exchange and American Stock Exchange rules.
Each Board of Directors has determined that all members of each
companys Audit Committee are independent under applicable
regulations.
Financial literacy and expertise. Each member of the
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Audit
Committees must be financially literate, as defined in the
applicable New York Stock Exchange and American Stock Exchange
rules. All members of the Audit Committees are financially
literate.
One member of each Audit Committee also must be an audit
committee financial expert or otherwise have accounting or
related financial management expertise. The Boards of Directors
of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
each have determined that Barry Lawson Williams, the independent
chair of each companys Audit Committee, is an audit
committee financial expert, as defined by the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Service on other audit committees. Each companys
Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth a policy regarding the
number of other public company audit committees on which an
Audit Committee member may serve. If an Audit Committee member
simultaneously serves on the audit committees of three or more
public companies other than PG&E Corporation, Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, and their subsidiaries, that Committee
member must inform the appropriate companys Board of
Directors. In order for that member to continue serving on the
Audit Committee, the Board of Directors must affirmatively
determine that the simultaneous service does not impair that
committee members ability to serve effectively on the
Audit Committee.
20
No member of the Audit Committees currently serves on three or
more additional public company audit committees.
Finance Committee
What are the Finance Committees responsibilities?
The Finance Committee of PG&E Corporation advises and
assists the Board with respect to the financial and capital
investment policies and objectives of PG&E Corporation and
its subsidiaries, including specific actions required to achieve
those objectives. The Finance Committees responsibilities
are set forth in the Committees charter. Among other
things, the Committee reviews:
|
|
|
Long-term financial and investment plans and strategies, |
|
|
Annual financial plans, |
|
|
Dividend policy, |
|
|
Short-term and long-term financing plans, |
|
|
Proposed capital projects, |
|
|
Proposed divestitures, |
|
|
Strategic plans and initiatives, |
|
|
Major commercial banking, investment banking, financial
consulting, and other financial relationships of PG&E
Corporation or its subsidiaries, and |
|
|
Risk management activities. |
Each year the Finance Committee also presents for the Board of
Directors review and approval (1) a five-year
financial plan for PG&E Corporation and its subsidiaries
that incorporates, among other things, the Corporations
business strategy goals, and (2) an annual budget that
reflects elements of the approved five-year plan. Members of the
Board of Directors receive a monthly report that compares the
Corporations performance to the budget and provides other
information about financial performance.
One member of the Committee is appointed by the Board of
Directors as the Committees Chair.
Do special requirements apply to members of the Finance
Committee?
The Finance Committee must be composed entirely of independent
directors, as defined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and
in the New York Stock Exchange rules. All Committee members meet
these independence requirements.
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee
What are the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committees responsibilities?
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee of
PG&E Corporation advises and assists the Boards of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company with respect to:
|
|
|
The selection and compensation of directors, |
|
|
Employment, compensation, and benefits policies and practices, |
|
|
The development, selection, and compensation of policy-making
officers, and |
|
|
Corporate governance matters, including the performance and
effectiveness of the Boards and the companies governance
principles and practices. |
The PG&E Corporation Board of Directors has delegated its
authority to administer the PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP), under which equity-based awards are made,
to the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee. The
Board of Directors also has delegated to the Chief Executive
Officer of PG&E Corporation the authority to make LTIP
awards to certain eligible participants within the guidelines
adopted by the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee. The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee may delegate its authority with respect to ministerial
matters under the LTIP to the Chief Executive Officer or the
Senior Vice President of Human Resources. The Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee also oversees other
employee benefit plans.
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committees
responsibilities are set forth in the Committees charter.
Among other things, the Committee:
|
|
|
Reviews and acts upon the compensation of officers of PG&E
Corporation and its subsidiaries, although the Committee has
delegated to the PG&E Corporation Chief Executive Officer
the authority to approve compensation for certain officers, |
|
|
Recommends to the independent members of the appropriate Board
of Directors the compensation of the Chief Executive Officers of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, |
|
|
Reviews long-range planning for executive development and
succession, |
21
|
|
|
Reviews the composition and performance of the Boards of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, and |
|
|
Reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. |
One member of the Committee is appointed by the independent
members of the Board of Directors as the Committees Chair.
The Chair of the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance
Committee is the lead director of PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and chairs executive session
meetings of the independent directors of both companies.
Do special requirements apply to members of the Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee?
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee must be
composed entirely of independent directors, as defined in the
Corporate Governance Guidelines and in the New York Stock
Exchange rules. All Committee members meet these independence
requirements.
Because PG&E Corporation and a subsidiary hold approximately
96 percent of the voting power in Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, that company is a controlled subsidiary of
PG&E Corporation and will not be subject to certain American
Stock Exchange rules that otherwise would require that all
members of the Committee meet the American Stock Exchange
definition of independent director and would impose
requirements on Pacific Gas and Electric Companys director
nomination process and methods for determining executive
compensation.
What is the compensation setting process?
The PG&E Corporation Nominating, Compensation, and
Governance Committee (Committee) is responsible for overseeing
and establishing officer compensation policies for PG&E
Corporation and its subsidiaries, including Pacific Gas and
Electric Company. The Committee also administers the
LTIP under which equity-based awards are made, and oversees
other employee benefit plans.
The Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas
and Electric Company (as the case may be) is responsible for
approving compensation for the Chief Executive Officers of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company based
on the Committees recommendations.
The Committee retains an independent consulting firm, Hewitt
Associates (Hewitt), to help evaluate PG&E
Corporations compensation policies, to provide information
about industry compensation practices and competitive
compensation levels at companies within selected comparator
groups, and to recommend compensation alternatives that are
consistent with PG&E Corporations compensation
policies.
Each year, the Committee (and with respect to the Chief
Executive Officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
Electric Company, the independent members of the applicable
Board of Directors based on the Committees recommendation)
approves the amounts of total target compensation for executive
officers, based on a review of comparative data as well as
managements recommendations (and Hewitts
recommendations with respect to Chief Executive Officer
compensation only). In addition, the Committee uses comparative
data throughout the year to set the total target compensation of
new executive officers, whether they are promoted internally or
new hires.
In determining specific compensation amounts for individual
officers, the Committee (or the independent members of the
applicable Board of Directors, in the case of the Chief
Executive Officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company) considers such factors as (1) the
officers experience, (2) individual performance,
(3) the officers role in achieving corporate
objectives established at the beginning of the year,
(4) the officers compensation compared to individuals
in similar positions in the comparator group of companies used
for purposes of setting officer compensation, as well as
compared to other officers internally, and (5) when
appropriate, other relevant factors.
Public Policy Committee
What are the Public Policy Committees
responsibilities?
The Public Policy Committee of PG&E Corporation advises and
assists the Board of Directors with respect to public policy
issues that could affect significantly the interests of the
customers, shareholders, or employees of PG&E Corporation,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and their respective
subsidiaries.
The Public Policy Committees responsibilities are set
forth in the Committees charter. Among other things, the
Committee reviews the policies and practices of PG&E
Corporation and its subsidiaries with respect to:
|
|
|
Protection and improvement of the quality of the environment, |
|
|
Charitable and community service organizations and activities, |
22
|
|
|
Political contributions, |
|
|
Equal opportunity in hiring and promoting employees, and |
|
|
Development of minority-owned and women-owned businesses as
suppliers to PG&E Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, and their subsidiaries. |
One member of the Committee is appointed by the Board of
Directors as the Committees Chair.
Do special requirements apply to members of the Public Policy
Committee?
The Public Policy Committee must be composed entirely of
independent directors, as defined in the Corporate Governance
Guidelines and in the New York Stock Exchange rules. All
Committee members meet these independence requirements.
Attendance at Board and Committee Meetings and at the 2006
Annual Meetings of Shareholders
How many Board and committee meetings did the directors
attend during 2006?
During 2006, there were 6 meetings of the PG&E Corporation
Board of Directors and 17 meetings of the PG&E Corporation
Board committees. Overall attendance of incumbent directors at
those meetings was 98 percent. Each PG&E Corporation
director attended at least 87 percent of the total number
of Board and Board committee meetings held during the period of
their service on the Board and Board committees during 2006.
During 2006, there were 7 meetings of the Pacific Gas and
Electric Company Board of Directors and 4 meetings of the
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board committees. Overall
attendance of incumbent directors at those meetings was
98 percent. For Pacific Gas and Electric Company, all
directors except David A. Coulter attended at least
75 percent of the total number of Board and Board committee
meetings held during the period of their service on the Board
and Board committees during 2006.
How many directors attended the 2006 annual meetings?
Each member of the Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation or
Pacific Gas and Electric Company is expected to attend that
companys annual meeting of shareholders.
Eight directors attended PG&E Corporations 2006 annual
meeting of shareholders.
Nine directors attended Pacific Gas and Electric Companys
2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
Compensation of Directors
The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company each establish the level of compensation
for that companys directors, based on the recommendation
of the PG&E Corporation Nominating, Compensation, and
Governance Committee (Committee), and taking into account the
impact of compensation on director independence. Directors who
are also current employees of either company receive no
additional compensation for service as directors.
The Committee periodically reviews the amount and form of
compensation paid to directors of PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, taking into account the
compensation paid to directors of other comparable
U.S. companies. The Committee conducts its review with the
assistance of outside experts in the field of executive
compensation.
In February 2003, the Committee approved the following approach
for determining Board of Directors compensation levels:
|
|
|
Target total compensation (i.e., retainer, meeting fees,
chairperson retainer, and equity) should be equal to the average
of the comparator group; |
|
|
Director compensation should be set for two-year periods, to
achieve the preceding objective at the midpoint of each
period; and |
|
|
Target total compensation for the Audit Committees and their
Chair should reflect a premium to account for their growing
responsibility and accountability due to new stock exchange
requirements and legislation. |
In addition, in June 2004, the Committee and the PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Boards agreed
that target total compensation for the Chair of the Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee, who also serves as lead
director, should reflect the same premium as the Chair of the
Audit Committees.
The following provides additional information regarding
compensation paid to the non-employee directors of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company during the past
year.
23
2006 Director Compensation
This table summarizes the principal components of
compensation paid or granted during 2006, or the compensation
cost of equity-based grants for 2006, to the non-employee
directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or | |
|
Stock | |
|
Option | |
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash | |
|
Awards | |
|
Awards | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Total | |
Name |
|
($)(1) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
($)(3) | |
|
($)(4) | |
|
($) | |
D. R. Andrews
|
|
$ |
73,500 |
|
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
51,849 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
143,444 |
|
L. S. Biller
|
|
$ |
78,750 |
|
|
$ |
38,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,090 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
143,935 |
|
D. A. Coulter
|
|
$ |
78,750 |
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
126,845 |
|
C. L. Cox
|
|
$ |
126,500 |
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
174,595 |
|
M. C. Herringer
|
|
$ |
73,500 |
|
|
$ |
9,750 |
|
|
$ |
5,077 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
88,422 |
|
R. A
Meserve(5)
|
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3,220 |
|
M. S. Metz
|
|
$ |
81,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
$ |
131,555 |
|
B. L. Rambo
|
|
$ |
76,500 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
106,595 |
|
B. L. Williams
|
|
$ |
137,500 |
|
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
51,849 |
|
|
$ |
2,595 |
|
|
$ |
209,944 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Each non-employee director received $45,000 in annual retainers,
except that Dr. Meserve (who was elected as a director on
December 20, 2006) received a pro-rated retainer of $1,467.
The Chairs of the Finance Committee (Mr. Coulter) and the
Public Policy Committee (Dr. Metz) each received an
additional $7,500 in annual retainers. The Chair of the Audit
Committees (Mr. Williams) and the Chair of the Nominating,
Compensation, and Governance Committee, who is the lead director
(Mr. Cox), each received an additional $50,000 in annual
retainers. Non-employee directors also received a fee of $1,750
for each Board or Board committee meeting attended, except that
members of the Audit Committees received a fee of $2,750 for
each Audit Committee meeting attended. Total meeting fees were:
Mr. Andrews $28,500, Mr. Biller $33,750,
Mr. Coulter $26,250, Mr. Cox $31,500,
Ms. Herringer $28,500, Dr. Meserve $1,750,
Dr. Metz $28,500, Ms. Rambo $31,500, and
Mr. Williams $42,500. |
|
(2) |
Represents the 2006 compensation cost of restricted stock,
phantom stock, and restricted stock units granted in 2006 and
prior years, measured in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, without taking into
account an estimate of forfeitures related to service
conditions. In 2006, each non-employee director except
Dr. Meserve (who was elected as a director on
December 20, 2006) received 800 shares of restricted
stock with a grant date value of $29,976. Mr. Biller,
Mr. Coulter, Mr. Cox, Dr. Metz, and
Ms. Rambo each received 801 restricted stock units with a
grant date value of $30,000. Ms. Herringer received 400
restricted stock units with a grant date value of $15,000. The
aggregate number of stock awards outstanding for each
non-employee director at December 31, 2006 was:
Mr. Andrews 2,926, Mr. Biller 3,617, Mr. Coulter
11,007, Mr. Cox 6,132, Ms. Herringer 1,210,
Dr. Meserve 0, Dr. Metz 8,530, Ms. Rambo 3,309,
and Mr. Williams 3,421. |
|
(3) |
Represents the 2006 compensation cost of stock options granted
in 2006 and prior years, measured in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, without taking into account an estimate
of forfeitures related to service conditions. Assumptions used
in determining the grant date fair value are set forth in the
Stock Options section of Note 14 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in the 2005 and 2006 Annual Reports to
Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company. In 2006, Mr. Andrews and
Mr. Williams each received 4,983 stock options with a grant
date value of $40,626 and Ms. Herringer received 2,491
stock options with a grant date value of $20,309. The exercise
price of the stock options, $37.47, is the closing price of
PG&E Corporation common stock on the January 3, 2006
grant date. The aggregate number of option awards outstanding
for each non-employee director at December 31, 2006 was:
Mr. Andrews 24,167, Mr. Biller 9,290, Mr. Coulter
0, Mr. Cox 26,971, Ms. Herringer 2,491,
Dr. Meserve 0, Dr. Metz 15,626, Ms. Rambo 0, and
Mr. Williams 38,802. |
|
(4) |
Represents (i) premiums paid for accidental death and
dismemberment insurance, and (ii) matching gifts to
qualified educational and environmental nonprofit organizations
pursuant to the PG&E Corporation Matching Gifts Program,
which each year establishes a set fund for matching eligible
gifts made by employees and directors on a dollar-for-dollar
basis, up to a total of $2,500 per calendar year per
individual (Dr. Metz $2,460 and Mr. Williams $2,500). |
|
(5) |
Dr. Meserve was elected as a director of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company on
December 20, 2006. |
24
What retainers and fees do directors receive as
compensation?
During 2006, each director who is not an officer or employee of
PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company
received a quarterly retainer of $11,250 (or a pro-rated amount
if the individual did not serve as a non-employee director
during the entire quarter). Effective January 1, 2007, that
quarterly retainer was increased to $12,500. The non-employee
directors who chair the Finance Committee and the Public Policy
Committee each receive an additional quarterly retainer of
$1,875. The non-employee director who chairs the Audit
Committees and the non-employee director who chairs the
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee (who is the
lead director) each receive an additional quarterly retainer of
$12,500.
Non-employee directors also receive a fee of $1,750 for each
Board or Board committee meeting attended, except that members
of the Audit Committees receive a fee of $2,750 for each Audit
Committee meeting attended.
Do directors receive stock-based compensation?
Under the PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
each year on the first business day of January, each
non-employee director of PG&E Corporation is entitled to
receive stock-based grants. During 2006, such grants had a total
aggregate equity value of $60,000, composed of:
|
|
|
Restricted shares of PG&E Corporation common stock valued at
$30,000 (based on the closing price of PG&E Corporation
common stock on the first business day of the year), and |
|
|
A combination, as elected by the director, of non-qualified
stock options and restricted stock units with a total value of
$30,000, based on increments valued at $5,000. |
The per-option value is based on the Black-Scholes stock option
valuation method, discounting the resulting value by
20 percent. The exercise price of stock options is the
market value of PG&E Corporation common stock (i.e., the
closing price) on the date of grant. The value of each
restricted stock unit is based on the closing price of PG&E
Corporation common stock on the first business day of the year.
Restricted stock and stock options vest over the five-year
period following the date of grant, except that restricted stock
and stock options will vest immediately upon mandatory
retirement from the Board, upon a directors death or
disability, or in the event of termination related to a change
in control. If a director ceases to be a member of the Board for
any other reason, any unvested restricted stock and unvested
stock options will be forfeited.
Restricted stock units awarded to non-employee directors are
payable only in the form of PG&E Corporation common stock
following a directors retirement from the Board after five
consecutive years of service or upon reaching mandatory
retirement age, upon a directors death or disability, or
in the event of termination related to a change in control. If a
director ceases to be a member of the Board for any other
reason, all restricted stock units will be forfeited.
A non-employee directors awards also will vest or
accelerate in full if there is a change in control and the
successor company fails to continue those previously granted
awards in a manner that preserves the value of the awards.
Effective January 1, 2007, the total aggregate value of
such stock-based grants was increased to $80,000, consisting of
$40,000 in restricted stock and the remaining $40,000 in a
combination of stock options or restricted stock units, in
$5,000 increments at the directors election.
The increase in total director compensation (retainers, fees,
and equity grants) that became effective on January 1, 2007
reflected an increase in target total compensation of
approximately 16 percent. This increase is expected to
place total compensation for non-employee directors at the
average of the comparator group over the next two-year period
during which the current compensation levels will apply. This is
consistent with the approach adopted by the Committee for
determining director compensation levels.
How much stock-based compensation did directors receive
during 2006?
During 2006, non-employee directors received the following
stock-based compensation under the PG&E Corporation 2006
Long-Term Incentive Plan. On January 3, 2006, each
non-employee director received 800 restricted shares of PG&E
Corporation common stock. In addition, directors who were
granted stock options received options to
purchase 831 shares of PG&E Corporation common
stock for each $5,000 increment of value (subject to a $30,000
limit) at an exercise price of $37.47 per share, and
directors who were granted restricted stock units received 133
restricted stock units for each $5,000 increment of value
(subject to a $30,000 limit).
25
Are directors paid for attending meetings of both PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company?
Directors who serve on both the PG&E Corporation and Pacific
Gas and Electric Company Boards and corresponding committees do
not receive additional compensation for concurrent service on
Pacific Gas and Electric Companys Board or its committees.
However, separate meeting fees are paid for each meeting of the
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board, or a Pacific Gas and
Electric Company Board committee, that is not held concurrently
or sequentially with a meeting of the PG&E Corporation Board
or a corresponding PG&E Corporation Board committee. It is
the usual practice of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company that meetings of the companies Boards and
corresponding committees are held concurrently and, therefore,
that a single meeting fee is paid to each director for each set
of meetings.
May directors defer receiving retainers and fees?
Under the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, directors of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and
Electric Company may elect to defer all or part of their
retainers and fees. Directors who participate in the Deferred
Compensation Plan may elect either to (1) convert their
deferred compensation into common stock equivalents, the value
of which is tied to the market value of PG&E Corporation
common stock, or (2) have their deferred compensation
invested in the Utility Bond Fund.
Are the directors reimbursed for travel and other
expenses?
Directors of PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric
Company are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred for
participating in Board meetings, committee meetings, or other
activities undertaken on behalf of PG&E Corporation or
Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Do directors receive retirement benefits from PG&E
Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company?
The PG&E Corporation Retirement Plan for Non-Employee
Directors was terminated effective January 1, 1998.
Directors who had accrued benefits under the Plan were given a
one-time option of either (1) receiving the benefit accrued
through 1997, upon their retirement, or (2) converting the
present value of their accrued benefit into a PG&E
Corporation common stock equivalent investment held in the
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The
payment of accrued retirement benefits, or distributions from
the Deferred Compensation Plan relating to the conversion of
retirement benefits, cannot be made until the later of
age 65 or retirement from the Board.
Legal Proceedings
California Attorney General Complaint
On January 10, 2002, the California Attorney General filed
a complaint in the Superior Court for the County of
San Francisco (Superior Court) against PG&E Corporation
and its directors, the directors of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, and other parties, alleging unfair or fraudulent
business acts or practices in violation of California Business
and Professions Code Section 17200. The claims are based on
alleged violations of conditions established in the California
Public Utilities Commissions (CPUC) holding company
decisions, caused by PG&E Corporations alleged failure
to provide adequate financial support to Pacific Gas and
Electric Company during the California energy crisis.
The complaint seeks injunctive relief, the appointment of a
receiver, civil penalties of $2,500 against each defendant for
each violation of Section 17200, a total penalty of not
less than $500 million, and costs of suit. The complaint
also seeks restitution of assets allegedly wrongfully
transferred to PG&E Corporation from Pacific Gas and
Electric Company.
The complaint was filed after the CPUC issued two decisions in
its investigative proceeding commenced in April 2001 into
whether the California investor-owned electric utilities,
including Pacific Gas and Electric Company, complied with past
CPUC decisions, rules, and orders regarding holding company
formations, affiliate transactions, and applicable statutes.
The CPUC order states that the CPUC would, among other matters,
investigate the utilities transfer of money to their
holding companies, including during times when their utility
subsidiaries were experiencing financial difficulties, the
failure of the holding companies to financially assist the
utilities when needed, the holding companies transfer of
assets to unregulated subsidiaries, and the holding
companies actions to ringfence their
unregulated subsidiaries. In May 2005, the CPUC closed this
investigation without making any findings.
PG&E Corporation believes that the intercompany transactions
challenged by the Attorney General fully complied with
applicable law and CPUC conditions. The challenged transactions
forming the bulk of the restitution claims were regular
quarterly dividends and stock repurchases. As part of its annual
cost of capital proceedings, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
advised the CPUC in advance of its forecast stock
26
repurchases and dividends. The CPUC did not challenge or
question those payments.
In January 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit (Ninth Circuit) issued a decision on the parties
appeals of various rulings by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of California and the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California (District Court)
concerning jurisdictional issues. The Ninth Circuit found that
the Superior Court had jurisdiction over the Attorney
Generals restitution claims. (In October 2006, the
U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant PG&E
Corporations request to review the Ninth Circuits
decision.) The Ninth Circuit did not address the Attorney
Generals underlying allegations that PG&E Corporation
and the other defendants violated Section 17200. The Ninth
Circuit also did not decide who would be entitled to receive the
proceeds, if any, of a restitution award. PG&E Corporation
continues to believe that any such proceeds would be the
property of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Pursuant to the
December 19, 2003 Settlement Agreement to resolve Pacific
Gas and Electric Companys proceeding under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the CPUC released all claims
against PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company
arising out of or in any way related to the energy crisis,
including the CPUCs investigation into past PG&E
Corporation actions during the energy crisis. Accordingly,
PG&E Corporation believes that any claims for such proceeds
by the CPUC would be precluded.
While the Ninth Circuit appeal was pending, the Superior Court
held a trial in December 2004 to consider the appropriate
standard to determine what constitutes a separate violation of
Section 17200 in order to determine the magnitude of
potential penalties under Section 17200 (up to
$2,500 per separate violation). The Superior
Court did not address the question of whether any violations
occurred. In March 2005, the Superior Court issued a decision
rejecting the per victim and per [customer]
bill approaches advocated by the Attorney General, which
standards potentially could have resulted in millions of
separate violations. The Superior Court found that
the appropriate standard was each transfer of money from Pacific
Gas and Electric Company to PG&E Corporation that the
Attorney General alleges violated Section 17200. In July
2005, the California Court of Appeal summarily denied a petition
filed by the Attorney General seeking to overturn this decision.
The Attorney General has resumed discovery in the Superior Court
action. The next case management conference is scheduled for
April 17, 2007.
Related Person Transactions
The entity Goldman Sachs Asset Management L.P. (GSAM) owns
6.6 percent of PG&E Corporations common stock.
|
|
|
Upon Pacific Gas and Electric Companys emergence from
Chapter 11 in April 2004, the company placed into the
Goldman Sachs FS Federal Fund 520 (Goldman Fund) a portion
of the total funds placed in escrow at Deutsche Bank for
possible payment to members of Class 6 in the
companys Chapter 11 case. This investment was made
before GSAM obtained greater than 5 percent of PG&E
Corporations stock. As of December 31, 2006, Pacific
Gas and Electric Company held $242.7 million in the Goldman
Fund, out of the total $1.25 billion in Class 6
settlement funds placed in escrow at Deutsche Bank. For 2006, it
is estimated that GSAM earned approximately $500,000 from
management of Pacific Gas and Electric Companys investment
in the Goldman Fund. The companys investment in the
Goldman Fund will be reduced to the extent that
(i) Class 6 claims are settled, or (ii) alternate
investment funds are selected. |
|
|
GSAM manages the Goldman Sachs Asset Management Core Flex Fund
(Goldman Core Fund). Approximately $270 million in the
PG&E Corporation Retirement Master Trust and approximately
$35 million in the Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Post-Retirement Medical Trust for Bargaining-Unit Employees are
invested in the Goldman Core Fund. Investment decisions for
these pension trusts are made by the PG&E Corporation
Employee Benefit Committee, which is comprised of officers from
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. For
2006, it is estimated that GSAM earned approximately
$1 million in fees from management of this investment. Such
management services are expected to continue in the future. |
The fees for managing these funds are calculated in accordance
with the management fee formula stated in the applicable
funds prospectus to investors. As such, the terms of
engagement for these services are comparable to those that could
be obtained in arms-length dealings with an unrelated
third party.
During 2006, several affiliates of GSAM provided investment
banking-related services to PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, with a value of approximately
$1.23 million. It is contemplated that affiliates of GSAM
may provide other investment banking-related services to
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company during
2007. These services are provided under customary terms and
conditions. As such, the terms of engagement for these services
are comparable to those
27
that could be obtained in arms-length dealings with an
unrelated third party.
Review, Approval, and Ratification of Related Person
Transactions
The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company each have adopted identical written
policies regarding review, approval, and ratification of related
party transactions involving the companies. The policy requires
the appropriate Audit Committees review and approval or
ratification of any related party transaction in which either
company is a participant, including, among other things, any
related party transaction that would be required to be disclosed
under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. All related
party transactions (as defined in the policy) must be disclosed
to the appropriate Audit Committee, and all material related
party transactions must be disclosed to the full Board of
Directors.
During 2006, all related party transactions
involving either company were in conformance with this policy.
28
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth the number of shares of PG&E
Corporation common stock beneficially owned (as defined in the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission) as of
February 7, 2007 by the directors, the nominees for
director, and the individuals named in the Summary Compensation
Table on pages 46 and 47, and all directors and executive
officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company as a group. As of February 7, 2007, no listed
individual owned shares of any class of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company securities. The table also sets forth common stock
equivalents credited to the accounts of directors and executive
officers under PG&E Corporations deferred compensation
and equity plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Stock | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Name |
|
Ownership(1)(2)(3) | |
|
Class(4) | |
|
Equivalents(5) | |
|
Total | |
David R.
Andrews(6)
|
|
|
18,879 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
19,691 |
|
Leslie S.
Biller(6)
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
10,399 |
|
|
|
16,941 |
|
David A.
Coulter(6)
|
|
|
8,702 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
34,192 |
|
|
|
42,894 |
|
C. Lee
Cox(6)
|
|
|
65,957 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
|
|
72,452 |
|
Peter A.
Darbee(7)
|
|
|
231,877 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
11,153 |
|
|
|
243,030 |
|
Maryellen C. Herringer
(6)
|
|
|
3,746 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
Thomas B.
King(8)
|
|
|
189,105 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
199,230 |
|
Richard A.
Meserve(6)
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
Mary S.
Metz(6)
|
|
|
26,648 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
33,950 |
|
Barbara L.
Rambo(6)
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
Barry Lawson Williams
(6)
|
|
|
37,772 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
6,918 |
|
|
|
44,690 |
|
Christopher P.
Johns(9)
|
|
|
107,607 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
23,830 |
|
|
|
131,437 |
|
Leslie H.
Everett(9)
|
|
|
34,156 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34,156 |
|
Kent M.
Harvey(10)
|
|
|
47,146 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
5,211 |
|
|
|
52,357 |
|
Thomas E.
Bottorff(11)
|
|
|
50,811 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
50,869 |
|
All PG&E Corporation directors and executive officers as a
group (17 persons) |
|
|
834,863 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
118,595 |
|
|
|
953,458 |
|
All Pacific Gas and Electric Company directors and executive
officers as a group (21 persons) |
|
|
1,051,896 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
113,442 |
|
|
|
1,165,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This column includes any shares held in the name of the spouse,
minor children, or other relatives sharing the home of the
listed individuals and, in the case of current and retired
executive officers, includes shares of PG&E Corporation
common stock held in the defined contribution retirement plan
maintained by PG&E Corporation. Except as otherwise
indicated below, the listed individuals have sole voting and
investment power over the shares shown in this column. Voting
power includes the power to direct the voting of the shares
held, and investment power includes the power to direct the
disposition of the shares held. |
|
|
|
This column also includes the following shares of PG&E
Corporation common stock in which the listed individuals share
voting and investment power: Mr. Andrews 4,630 shares,
Mr. Biller 3,605 shares, Mr. Coulter
8,703 shares, Mr. Cox 38,986 shares,
Mr. Darbee 15,950 shares, Ms. Herringer
2,100 shares, Dr. Metz 8,793 shares, all PG&E
Corporation directors and executive officers as a group
82,767 shares, and all Pacific Gas and Electric Company
directors and executive officers as a group 83,434 shares.
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
This column includes the following shares of PG&E
Corporation common stock which the listed individuals have the
right to acquire within 60 days of February 7, 2007
through the exercise of vested stock options granted under the
PG&E Corporation Long-Term Incentive Program or the PG&E
Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as follows:
Mr. Andrews 14,249 shares, Mr. Biller
2,937 shares, Mr. Cox 26,971 shares,
Mr. Darbee 69,300 shares, Mr. King
139,252 shares, Dr. Metz 15,628 shares,
Mr. Williams 28,884 shares, Mr. Johns
80,100 shares, Ms. Everett 12,575 shares,
Mr. Harvey 26,538 shares, Mr. Bottorff
15,850 shares, all PG&E Corporation directors and
executive officers as a group 416,434 shares, and all
Pacific Gas and Electric Company directors and executive
officers as a group 450,612 shares. The listed individuals
have neither voting power nor investment power with respect to
these shares unless and until they are purchased through the
exercise of the options, under the terms of the PG&E
Corporation Long-Term Incentive Program. |
29
|
|
|
|
(3) |
This column includes restricted shares of PG&E Corporation
common stock awarded under the PG&E Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Program and the PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term
Incentive Plan. As of February 7, 2007, the listed
individuals held the following numbers of restricted shares that
may not be sold or otherwise transferred until certain vesting
conditions are satisfied: Mr. Andrews 4,630 shares,
Mr. Biller 3,650 shares, Mr. Coulter
6,257 shares, Mr. Cox 6,257 shares,
Mr. Darbee 126,494 shares, Ms. Herringer
1,646 shares, Mr. King 38,527 shares,
Dr. Meserve 846 shares, Dr. Metz
6,610 shares, Ms. Rambo 2,554 shares,
Mr. Williams 6,610 shares, Mr. Johns
25,035 shares, Ms. Everett 11,473 shares,
Mr. Harvey 12,514 shares, Mr. Bottorff
12,059 shares, all PG&E Corporation directors and
executive officers as a group 305,679 shares, and all
Pacific Gas and Electric Company directors and executive
officers as a group 446,095 shares. |
|
|
(4) |
The percent of class calculation is based on the number of
shares of PG&E Corporation common stock outstanding as of
February 7, 2007, excluding shares held by a subsidiary. |
|
|
(5) |
This column reflects the number of stock units that were
purchased by listed individuals through salary and other
compensation deferrals or that were awarded under equity
compensation plans. The value of each stock unit is equal to the
value of a share of PG&E Corporation common stock and
fluctuates daily based on the market price of PG&E
Corporation common stock. The listed individuals who own these
stock units share the same market risk as PG&E Corporation
shareholders, although they do not have voting rights with
respect to these stock units. |
|
|
(6) |
Mr. Andrews, Mr. Biller, Mr. Coulter,
Mr. Cox, Ms. Herringer, Dr. Meserve,
Dr. Metz, Ms. Rambo, and Mr. Williams are
directors of both PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company. |
|
|
(7) |
Mr. Darbee is a director and an executive officer of both
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. He is
named in the Summary Compensation Table on pages 46 and 47. |
|
|
(8) |
Mr. King is a director and an executive officer of Pacific
Gas and Electric Company, and also is an executive officer of
PG&E Corporation. He is named in the Summary Compensation
Table on pages 46 and 47. |
|
|
(9) |
Mr. Johns and Ms. Everett are executive officers of
both PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
and are named in the Summary Compensation Table on pages 46
and 47. |
|
|
(10) |
Mr. Harvey is an executive officer of PG&E Corporation
and is named in the Summary Compensation Table on pages 46
and 47. |
|
(11) |
Mr. Bottorff is an executive officer of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company and is named in the Summary Compensation Table
on pages 46 and 47. |
30
________________________________________________________________________________
Item No. 2:
Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm for PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
The Audit Committees of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company each have selected and appointed
Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered
public accounting firm for that company to audit the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007, and to audit the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and managements
assessment of internal control over financial reporting, as of
December 31, 2007. Deloitte & Touche LLP is a
major national accounting firm with substantial expertise in the
energy and utility businesses. Deloitte & Touche LLP
has served as independent public accountants for PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company since 1999.
One or more representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP
are expected to be present at the annual meetings. They will
have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish, and are
expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions
from shareholders.
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company are
not required to submit these appointments to a vote of their
shareholders. If the shareholders of either PG&E Corporation
or Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not ratify the
appointment, the appropriate Audit Committee will investigate
the reasons for rejection by the shareholders and will
reconsider the appointment.
The Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific
Gas and Electric Company Unanimously Recommend a Vote FOR
the Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP.
31
________________________________________________________________________________
Information Regarding the Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm for PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Audit Committees have reviewed the audit and non-audit fees that
PG&E Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and
their respective subsidiaries have paid to the independent
registered public accounting firm, in order to consider whether
those fees are compatible with maintaining the accounting
firms independence.
Table 1:
Estimated Fees Billed to PG&E Corporation
(Amounts include Estimated Fees Billed to Pacific Gas and
Electric Company and its Subsidiaries shown in Table 2 below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
4.2 million |
|
|
$ |
4.2 million |
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
0.3 million |
|
|
$ |
0.3 million |
|
|
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 million |
|
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Table 2:
Estimated Fees Billed to Pacific Gas and Electric Company
and its Subsidiaries
(Amounts are included in Estimated Fees Billed to PG&E
Corporation shown in Table 1 above)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
3.5 million |
|
|
$ |
3.4 million |
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
0.2 million |
|
|
$ |
0.2 million |
|
|
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Audit Fees. Audit fees billed for 2006 and 2005 relate to
services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP in
connection with reviews of Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, certain
limited procedures on registration statements, the audits of the
financial statements of PG&E Corporation and its
subsidiaries and Pacific Gas and Electric Company and its
subsidiaries, and the audits of both PG&E Corporations
and Pacific Gas and Electric Companys internal control
over financial reporting and managements assessment of
internal control over financial reporting, as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Audit-Related Fees. Fees billed for 2006 and 2005 relate
to services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP to both
PG&E Corporation and its subsidiaries and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company and its subsidiaries for employee benefit plan
audits, nuclear decommissioning trust audits, consultations on
financial accounting and reporting standards, and required
agreed-upon procedure reports related to contractual obligations
of Pacific Gas and Electric Company and its subsidiaries.
Tax Fees. For 2006, no tax fees were billed and no
related services were provided to PG&E Corporation and its
subsidiaries nor to Pacific Gas and Electric Company and its
subsidiaries. Tax fees billed for 2005 relate to services
rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP to PG&E
Corporation and its subsidiaries to support Internal Revenue
Service audit appeals and questions, and tax strategy services.
No tax fees were billed and no related services were provided to
Pacific Gas and Electric Company or its subsidiaries for 2005.
All Other Fees. Deloitte & Touche LLP provided
no services in this category to PG&E Corporation and its
subsidiaries or to Pacific Gas and Electric Company and its
subsidiaries during 2006 and 2005.
Obtaining Services from the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
The following section describes policies and procedures
regarding how PG&E Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, and their consolidated affiliates may obtain services
from Deloitte & Touche LLP, including limitations on
the types of services that the companies may obtain, and
approval procedures relating to those services.
Services Provided by the Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
In June 2002, PG&E Corporation adopted a policy providing
that the corporation and its controlled subsidiaries only could
enter into new engagements with Deloitte & Touche LLP
and its affiliate, Deloitte Consulting, for three types of
services. The three permitted categories of services are:
|
|
|
Audit services, |
|
|
Audit-related services, and |
|
|
Tax services that Deloitte & Touche LLP and its
affiliates are allowed to provide to Deloitte & |
32
|
|
|
Touche LLPs audit clients under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
PG&E Corporation and its subsidiaries traditionally have
obtained these types of services from its independent registered
public accounting firm.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for Services Provided by
the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
At the beginning of each year, the PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Audit Committees approve the
selection of the independent registered public accounting firm
for that fiscal year, and approve obtaining from the accounting
firm a detailed list of (1) audit services,
(2) audit-related services, and (3) tax services, all
up to specified fee amounts.
|
|
(1) |
Audit services generally include audit and
review of annual and quarterly financial statements and services
that only the independent registered public accounting firm
reasonably can provide (e.g., comfort letters, statutory audits,
attest services, consents, and assistance with and review of
documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission). |
|
(2) |
Audit-related services generally include
assurance and related services that traditionally are performed
by the independent registered public accounting firm (e.g.,
employee benefit plan audits, due diligence related to mergers
and acquisitions, accounting consultations and audits in
connection with acquisitions, internal control reviews,
agreed-upon procedure reports related to contractual
obligations, and attest services that are not required by
statute or regulation). |
|
(3) |
Tax services generally include compliance,
tax strategy, tax appeals, and specialized tax issues, all of
which also must be permitted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
In determining whether to pre-approve any services from the
independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit
Committees assess, among other things, the impact of that
service on the accounting firms independence.
Additional Services. After the initial annual
pre-approval, the Audit Committees must pre-approve any proposed
engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm
for any audit, audit-related, and tax services that are not
included on the list of pre-approved services, and must
pre-approve any listed pre-approved services that would cause
PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company to
exceed the authorized fee amounts. Other services may be
obtained from the independent registered public accounting firm
only following review and approval from the applicable
companys management and review and pre-approval by the
applicable Audit Committee.
Delegation of Pre-Approval Authority. Each Audit
Committee has delegated to the Committee Chair, or to any other
independent Committee member if the Chair is not available, the
authority to pre-approve audit and non-audit services provided
by the companys independent registered public accounting
firm. Any pre-approvals granted under this authority must be
presented to the full Audit Committee at the next regularly
scheduled Committee meeting.
Monitoring Pre-Approved Services. At each regular meeting
of the Audit Committees, management provides a report on the
nature of specific audit and non-audit services being performed
by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the company and its
subsidiaries, the
year-to-date fees paid
for those services, and a comparison of
year-to-date fees to
the pre-approved amounts.
Pre-Approval of Services During 2006 and 2005. During
2006 and 2005, all services provided by Deloitte &
Touche LLP to PG&E Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, and their consolidated affiliates were approved under
the applicable pre-approval procedures.
33
________________________________________________________________________________
Item Nos. 3 and 4:
PG&E Corporation Shareholder Proposals
To Be Voted on by PG&E Corporation Shareholders Only
The following shareholder proposals and related supporting
statements represent the views of the shareholders who submitted
them, and not the views of PG&E Corporation. PG&E
Corporation is not responsible for, and does not endorse, the
content of any shareholder proposal or supporting statement.
These shareholder proposals and supporting statements are
included in this proxy statement pursuant to rules established
by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item No. 3: Shareholder Proposal
Mr. Ray T. Chevedden, 5965 S. Citrus Avenue, Los
Angeles, California 90043, beneficial owner of 3,000 shares
of PG&E Corporation common stock, has given notice of his
intention to present the following proposal for action at the
PG&E Corporation annual meeting:
|
|
|
3 Performance Based Stock Options |
|
|
Resolved, Shareholders request that our Board of Directors adopt
a policy whereby at least 75% of future equity compensation
(stock options and restricted stock) awarded to senior
executives shall be performance-based, and the performance
criteria adopted by the Board disclosed to shareowners. |
|
|
Performance-based equity compensation is defined
here as: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Indexed stock options, the exercise price of which is linked to
an industry index; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Premium-priced stock options, the exercise price of which is
substantially above the market price on the grant date; or |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Performance-vesting options or restricted stock, which vest only
when the market price of the stock exceeds a specific target for
a substantial period. |
|
|
|
This is not intended to unlawfully interfere with existing
employment contracts. However, if there is a conflict with any
existing employment contract, our Compensation Committee is
urged for the good of our company to negotiate revised contracts
that are consistent with this proposal. |
|
|
As a long-term shareholder, I support compensation policies for
senior executives that provide challenging performance
objectives that motivate executives to achieve long-term
shareowner value. I believe that a greater reliance on
performance-based equity grants is particularly warranted at
PG&E. |
|
|
Many leading investors criticize standard options as
inappropriately rewarding mediocre performance. Warren Buffett
has characterized standard stock options as really a
royalty on the passage of time and has spoken in favor of
indexed options. |
|
|
In contrast, peer-indexed options reward executives for
outperforming their direct competitors and discourage
re-pricing. Premium-priced options reward executives who enhance
overall shareholder value. Performance-vesting equity grants tie
compensation more closely to key measures of shareholder value,
such as share appreciation and net operating income, thereby
encouraging executives to set and meet performance targets. |
|
|
Performance Based Stock Options |
Yes on 3
The Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation Recommends a
Vote AGAINST This Proposal.
We believe PG&E Corporations equity compensation
policies already meet the goals of this proposal.
PG&E Corporations executive officer compensation is
comprised of base salary, short-term incentives, and long-term
incentives (consisting of restricted stock and performance
shares). We believe that performance-based compensation is
important. Thus, a significant portion of both the short-term
and long-term incentive compensation paid to our executive
officers is performance-based. Like indexed stock options, our
performance-based long-term incentive awards align
employees and shareholders interests in achieving
superior stock-based performance relative to performance of peer
companies in PG&E Corporations comparator group.
Target awards are paid only if PG&E Corporations total
shareholder return is in the top quartile, as compared to peer
companies. Additional details regarding the Corporations
executive officer compensation practices
34
and policies can be found in the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis section on pages 37 to 44 of this proxy
statement.
PG&E Corporation believes that its current compensation
philosophy and program, including the allocation of compensation
between different types of equity-based compensation, meet the
proponents goal of aligning executive compensation
incentives with the Corporations long-term performance for
shareholders, while still meeting the Corporations
specific business, management, and organizational needs.
For this reason, the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors
unanimously recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST
this proposal.
Item No. 4: Shareholder Proposal
Mr. Simon Levine, 960 Shorepoint Ct., No. 306,
Alameda, California 94501, holder of 3,000 shares of
PG&E Corporation common stock, has given notice of his
intention to present the following proposal for action at the
PG&E Corporation annual meeting:
|
|
|
4 Cumulative Voting |
|
|
RESOLVED: Cumulative Voting. Shareholders recommend that our
Board adopt cumulative voting. Cumulative voting means that each
shareholder may cast as many votes as equal to number of shares
held, multiplied by the number of directors to be elected. A
shareholder may cast all such cumulated votes for a single
candidate or split votes between multiple candidates, as that
shareholder sees fit. Under cumulative voting shareholders can
withhold votes from certain nominees in order to cast multiple
votes for others. |
|
|
Mr. Simon Levine, 960 Shorepoint Ct., No. 306,
Alameda, CA 94501 sponsors this proposal. |
|
|
Cumulative voting won impressive yes-votes of 54% at Aetna and
56% at Alaska Air in 2005 and 55% at GM in 2006. The GM 55% vote
was up from 49% in 2005. The Council of Institutional Investors
www.cii.org formally recommends adoption of this proposal
topic. |
|
|
Cumulative voting allows a significant group of shareholders to
elect a director of its choice safeguarding minority
shareholder interests and bringing independent perspectives to
Board decisions. |
|
|
Cumulative Voting could increase the possibility of electing at
least one director with a specialized expertise and advocacy
needed at our company to improve our corporate governance. For
instance to convince other directors that we need an independent
board chairman, especially since we do not even have an
independent lead director. Also to guard against a repeat of our
dividend suspension for years while our former Chairman,
Mr. Glynn was paid buckets of money like $14 million
in one year. |
|
|
And furthermore to repeat a reoccurrence of a fiasco like this:
Court Rejects PG&E Appeal of State Case Bloomberg News,
October 3, 2006 |
|
|
PG&E Corp. lost a U.S. Supreme Court appeal aimed at
thwarting Californias effort to recoup $5 billion
transferred by the companys Pacific Gas &
Electric utility unit before its 2001 bankruptcy filing. The
justices, without comment, refused to consider PG&Es
arguments. |
|
|
Pacific Gas & Electric, Californias largest
utility, filed for bankruptcy protection in April 2001 after
accruing $9 billion in losses by buying power for more than
it could charge customers. |
|
|
Cumulative voting allows a significant group of shareholders to
elect a director of its choice safeguarding minority
shareholder interests and bringing independent perspectives to
Board decisions. |
|
|
Cumulative Voting |
Yes on 4
The Board of Directors of PG&E Corporation Recommends a
Vote AGAINST This Proposal.
PG&E Corporation believes that cumulative voting would erode
shareholders ability to elect directors who represent the
interests of the shareholders as a whole. Instead, adoption of
cumulative voting for directors could unduly aggrandize the
views of a minority of shareholders.
Under cumulative voting, the total number of votes that each
shareholder may cast in an election for directors is determined
by multiplying the number of directors to be elected by the
number of votes to which the shareholders shares are
entitled. Each shareholder may cumulate his or her
votes by giving them all to one candidate, or may distribute his
or her votes among as many candidates as the shareholder sees
fit. For example, if 10 directors were to be elected,
application of the cumulative voting formula indicates that a
shareholder or group of shareholders holding approximately
9 percent of the shares voting at the meeting would be
capable of electing a director. This is true even if the holders
of the remaining 91 percent of the voting shares are
opposed to the election of that candidate and cast their votes
to elect 10 other directors.
35
Cumulative voting would give a disproportionate and unfair
weight to the votes cast by a minority shareholder or
shareholders. Not adopting cumulative voting ensures that all
directors are elected in a manner that preserves equal rights
for all shares.
The proponents comments regarding corporate governance
fail to mention that PG&E Corporations corporate
governance practices are highly regarded. As of February 1,
2007, PG&E Corporations Corporate Governance Quotient
(CGQ) is better than 98.1 percent of companies in the
S&P 500 index and 99.2 percent of the utility
companies, as rated by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS),
an independent corporate governance firm. The CGQ rating is a
commonly referenced measure of corporate governance practices,
and is included in company profiles on Yahoo! Finance. Also,
contrary to the proponents statement, the Corporation has
had a designated independent lead director since 2003.
PG&E Corporation believes that its existing corporate
governance structure and policies, including its position on
cumulative voting, protect the interests of all shareholders
equally.
For these reasons, the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors
unanimously recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST
this proposal.
36
________________________________________________________________________________
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following section provides information about compensation
objectives, policies, and decisions applicable to the executive
officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company who are named in the Summary Compensation Table (on
pages 46 and 47 of this Joint Proxy Statement). This
section also discusses the compensation that was awarded to,
earned by, or paid during 2006 to these executive officers, as
detailed in the tables and the narrative disclosure that follow
this section.
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee of the
PG&E Corporation Board of Directors (Committee) is
responsible for overseeing and establishing officer compensation
policies for PG&E Corporation and its subsidiaries,
including Pacific Gas and Electric Company. The Committee also
administers the PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (LTIP) under which equity-based awards are made, and
oversees other employee benefit plans. The Board of Directors of
PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company (as the
case may be) is responsible for approving compensation for the
Chief Executive Officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company based on the Committees
recommendations.
The Committee retains an independent consulting firm, Hewitt
Associates (Hewitt), to help evaluate PG&E
Corporations compensation policies, to provide information
about industry compensation practices and competitive
compensation levels at companies within a comparator
group,1
and to recommend compensation alternatives that are consistent
with PG&E Corporations compensation policies.
How Does the Committee Define the Compensation Program and
Philosophy?
In establishing levels of executive compensation, each year the
Committee reviews the appropriateness of the comparator groups
used to assess the competitiveness of PG&E
Corporations compensation programs (Pay Comparator Group)
and PG&E Corporations corporate performance
(Performance Comparator Group), and approves the objectives,
general framework, and elements of officer compensation for the
following year. After the Committee approves the comparator
groups, Hewitt undertakes a comparative study of the
compensation practices at the Pay Comparator Group.
Market practices among general industry companies with annual
revenues ranging from $8 billion to $20 billion also
are reviewed for selected officer positions whose job scope and
skill set are easily transferable to other industries.
After reviewing the comparative data as well as
managements recommendations (and Hewitts
recommendations with respect to Chief Executive Officer
compensation only), the Committee (and with respect to the Chief
Executive Officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
Electric Company, the independent members of the applicable
Board of Directors based on the Committees recommendation)
approves the amounts of total target compensation for executive
officers. In addition, the Committee uses comparative data
throughout the year to set the total target compensation of new
executive officers, whether they are promoted internally or new
hires.
|
|
1 |
The primary comparator group used for purposes of setting 2006
officer compensation consists of all companies listed in the Dow
Jones Utility Index and the Standard & Poors
Electrics Index, and all California investor-owned utilities
(the Pay Comparator Group): AES Corporation,
Allegheny Energy, Inc., Ameren Corporation, American Electric
Power Company, Inc., CenterPoint Energy, Inc., Cinergy Corp.,
Consolidated Edison, Inc., DTE Energy Company, Dominion
Resources, Inc., Duke Energy Group, Edison International,
Entergy Corporation, Exelon Corporation, First Energy Corp., FPL
Group, Inc., NiSource Inc., PPL Corporation, Pinnacle West
Capital Corporation, Progress Energy, Inc., Public Service
Enterprise Group, Sempra Energy, Southern Company, TECO Energy,
Inc., TXU Corp., Williams Companies, and Xcel Energy Inc. This
group of companies is broad enough to provide statistical
validity and data availability, represents the segment of the
market where PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company recruit officers with industry-specific experience, and
is determined on an objective and transparent basis. For
purposes of corporate performance comparisons (including the
relative total shareholder return measured for the 2006-2008
performance share award cycle), the Committee uses a subgroup of
12 companies that have similar characteristics and business
models as PG&E Corporation (the Performance Comparator
Group): Ameren Corporation, American Electric Power,
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., Consolidated Edison, Entergy
Corporation, FPL Group, NiSource Inc., Pinnacle West Capital,
Progress Energy, Inc., Southern Company, TECO Energy, and Xcel
Energy. This group of companies is a subset of the Pay
Comparator Group and, like PG&E Corporation, is focused on
core regulated-utility activities with either a distribution or
an integrated-utility focus. |
37
In determining specific compensation amounts for individual
officers, the Committee (or the independent members of the
applicable Board of Directors, in the case of the Chief
Executive Officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company) considers such factors as (1) the
officers experience, (2) individual performance,
(3) the officers role in achieving corporate
objectives established at the beginning of the year,
(4) the officers compensation compared to individuals
in similar positions in the Pay Comparator Group as well as
compared to other officers internally, and (5) when
appropriate, other relevant factors.
The Committee seeks to design competitive, performance-based
compensation programs that meet the Committees stated
objectives and protect shareholders interests. Although
the Committee considers the potential impact on PG&E
Corporations compensation programs of the tax
deductibility limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Committee does not limit
compensation to those levels or types of compensation that will
be deductible.
What Were the Committees 2006 Compensation Program
Objectives?
The Committee established compensation programs for 2006 to meet
three objectives:
|
|
|
To emphasize long-term incentives to further align
shareholders and officers interests, and focus
employees on enhancing total return for shareholders. |
|
|
To attract, retain, and motivate employees with the necessary
mix of skills and experience for the development and successful
operation of PG&E Corporations businesses. |
|
|
To manage the delivery of compensation in a cost-efficient and
transparent manner. |
In addition, the Committee defined specific objectives for
officer compensation as follows:
|
|
|
A significant component of every officers compensation
should be tied directly to PG&E Corporations
performance for shareholders. |
|
|
Target cash compensation (base salary and target short-term
incentive) should be equal to the average target cash
compensation for comparable officers in the Pay Comparator Group. |
|
|
The Committees objective is to provide long-term
compensation in line with PG&E Corporations
performance for shareholders. Performance is defined as total
shareholder return (TSR). The terms of performance-based
long-term incentive awards are designed to track PG&E
Corporations TSR relative to companies in the Performance
Comparator Group. For example, if PG&E Corporation performs
only at the 50th percentile of the Performance Comparator
Group, the total long-term incentive value realized by grant
recipients would be approximately equal to long-term
compensation at the 50th percentile of the Pay Comparator
Group. |
2006 Officer Compensation Program
In the fall of 2005, Hewitt conducted a detailed
position-by-position benchmark job review of the companies in
the Pay Comparator Group as well as a group of general industry
companies, and a review of salary-related budget projections for
2006. Managements recommendations for 2006 compensation
were based on the comparative data gathered by Hewitt. All of
managements recommendations were reviewed with Hewitt.
Based on Hewitts comparative data analysis and
managements recommendation, in October and December 2005,
the Committee approved the elements of the 2006 officer
compensation program discussed below.
Total target compensation includes (1) base
salary, (2) the target amount of the annual cash
incentive that could be received under the PG&E Corporation
Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) based on a percentage of
base salary, i.e., short-term incentives, and
(3) the target value of LTIP awards, i.e., long-term
incentives. The actual value of incentive awards is
variable and reflects performance during the relevant
measurement period.
Base Salary. Base salary is the fixed cash amount paid to
an officer each year. The Committee aims to set base salary at
levels that are equal to the average base salary for comparable
officers in the Pay Comparator Group. For 2006, the Committee
approved a base salary increase budget of 3.5 percent for
base salary adjustments, mid-year discretionary salary
increases, and lump-sum payments. The comparative data showed
that the companies in the Pay Comparator Group expected to
provide officers a 3.4 percent average salary increase in
2006, and that those companies actual average salary
increase in 2005 was 3.6 percent. The overall market
position of executive officers at PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, including the named executive
officers, is comparable to the comparator group average. The
Committee believes this position is appropriate.
Consistent with the Committees objective of tying a
significant component of every executive officers
38
compensation directly to PG&E Corporations performance
for shareholders through short-term and long-term incentives,
base salary comprises only 18 percent to 37 percent of
executive officer compensation, depending on officer level.
The Committee also believes that this proportion of base salary
to short-term and long-term incentives provides the right mix to
attract, retain, and motivate officers with the necessary mix of
skills and experience for the development and successful
operation of PG&E Corporations businesses. It also
provides a direct connection between compensation and
performance as described below.
In December 2005, the Committee (and with regard to Peter A.
Darbee and Thomas B. King, the independent members of the Boards
of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, respectively) approved 2006 base salaries for
the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table
on pages 46 and 47.
Short-Term Incentive. Target STIP awards are short-term
cash incentive opportunities that are realized only to the
extent that the performance measures stated in the annual STIP
are achieved. The Committee aims to have target STIP awards that
are equal to the average short-term incentive awards for
comparable officers in the Pay Comparator Group. For 2006, the
Committee approved target STIP awards that range from
50 percent of base salary for lower-level executive
officers to 100 percent of base salary for the Chief
Executive Officer of PG&E Corporation, with a maximum payout
of two times the target STIP award (depending on the extent to
which certain pre-established performance goals are met, as
determined by the Committee). This range of target STIP awards
is consistent with the Pay Comparator Groups practice, and
reflects no change from 2005.
For 2006, the Chief Executive Officer of PG&E Corporation
had the discretion to recommend to the Committee an additional
performance rating for an individual officer, to recognize that
officers efforts to manage his or her organizations
financial budget. This additional performance rating could
modify (up or down) an individual officers final STIP
award by no more than 15 percent. The Committee continues
to retain full discretion as to the determination of final
officer STIP awards.
Under the 2006 STIP structure approved by the Committee in
December 2005, 70 percent of the officer STIP awards is
based on whether the corporate financial performance objective,
as measured by corporate earnings from operations, is achieved.
The corporate financial performance measure is based on PG&E
Corporations budgeted earnings from operations that were
previously approved by the Board of Directors, consistent with
the basis for reporting and guidance to the financial community.
Unbudgeted items impacting results, such as changes in
accounting methods, workforce restructuring, and one-time
occurrences, are excluded. The remaining 30 percent of the
2006 officer STIP awards is based on the extent to which key
strategic and operational objectives (aimed at the achievement
of operational excellence and improved customer service, as
measured by 11 equally weighted financial, operating, and
service measures) are met. These weightings balance direct
(through earnings) and indirect (through key strategic and
operation-specific objectives) returns to shareholders. The
measures are disclosed in PG&E Corporations Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
This performance incentive structure reinforces the
Committees objectives of aligning officer compensation
with the successful management of assets and resources to
generate stable and growing financial results for the benefit of
shareholders as well as to deliver safe, reliable, and
exceptional service to utility customers.
In December 2005, the Committee (and with regard to Peter A.
Darbee and Thomas B. King, the independent members of the Boards
of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, respectively) approved 2006 target STIP award
values (based on a percentage of base salary) for the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on
pages 46 and 47.
The Committee establishes a threshold or minimum performance
requirement for each STIP performance objective in addition to
target and maximum performance levels. The Committee then
determines individual award levels at the end of the year based
on actual performance. The actual STIP awards reported in the
Summary Compensation Table as Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation on page 46 were based on financial
objectives (70 percent weighting) as measured by earnings
from operations, and eleven equally-weighted operating and
service measures (30 percent weighting). This approach
balanced direct (through earnings) and indirect (through
operation-specific objectives) returns to shareholders. The
financial result was a score of 1.651 based on earnings from
operations of $921 million compared to a budget of
$875 million. The operating/service result was a score of
1.226 based on aggregate performance against the eleven
measures. Those results translate to actual STIP awards equal to
76 percent of the maximum award opportunity.
39
Long-Term Incentives. The LTIP permits the award of
various types of stock-based incentives to officers and other
key employees. The PG&E Corporation Board of Directors has
delegated the administration of the LTIP to the Committee,
including the power to determine the types of awards to be
granted, the amounts, terms, and conditions of LTIP awards, and
the individuals to whom LTIP awards are granted. Grants to the
Chief Executive Officers of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company also are approved by the independent
members of the applicable Board of Directors. The PG&E
Corporation Board of Directors has delegated to the Chief
Executive Officer of PG&E Corporation the authority to
approve LTIP awards, within guidelines approved by the
Committee, to lower-level officers and to non-officer employees.
The Committee approves guidelines that include the LTIP award
value ranges for different categories of employees, as well as
the terms and conditions of all LTIP awards to be made in the
following year. The guidelines also specify that the grant date
for all annual LTIP awards will be the first business day of
January of the following year. Actual awards are generally made
within the range of target LTIP values previously approved by
the Committee.
The grant of any LTIP awards for new executive officers occurs
on the officers prospective start date or the date on
which the Committee has approved the individual awards,
whichever is later. The amount of LTIP awards for new executive
officers is determined by reference to the range of LTIP values
specified in the guidelines approved by the Committee, as well
as any unique factors taken into account in the recruiting
process in order to induce the officer to join PG&E
Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Consistent with its stated compensation philosophy, the
Committee establishes LTIP award value guidelines that generally
reach the 75th percentile of the Pay Comparator Group for
delivering 75th percentile performance, as measured by the
TSR of the companies in the Performance Comparator Group.
For 2006, the Committee approved target LTIP values ranging from
$400,000 for lower-level executive officers to $4,500,000 for
the Chief Executive Officer of PG&E Corporation.
In December 2005, the Committee (and with regard to Peter A.
Darbee and Thomas B. King, the independent members of the Boards
of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, respectively) approved the recommended 2006
target LTIP award values for the executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table on pages 46 and 47.
At its October 2005 meeting, the Committee determined that the
2006 LTIP target award values for all award recipients,
including executive officers, would be equally allocated between
restricted stock and performance shares. This allocation
balances the interests of shareholders for increased value with
the interests of officers for long-term compensation as
expressed by stock price appreciation and TSR. The restricted
stock provides a tangible retention incentive aligned with
shareholders interests (i.e., increasing the stock price
and avoiding decreasing stock price). The performance shares
reward recipients for achieving superior returns to
shareholders, as measured by TSR relative to the Performance
Comparator Group. Based on an analysis of competitive market
trends and the impact of new accounting rules for expensing
stock-based awards, the Committee determined to discontinue
granting stock options as part of the annual LTIP award value.
Restricted stock. The number of shares of restricted
stock granted in 2006 was determined by dividing one-half of the
LTIP award value by the average daily closing price of a share
of PG&E Corporation common stock for the month of November
2005 (or the closing price on the date of grant for a newly
hired officer), as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Actual restricted stock grants for 2006 are included in the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2006 table on page 48.
Shares of restricted stock granted in 2006 will vest in
20 percent increments over three years, with an
acceleration of the remaining 40 percent on the third
anniversary of the date of grant if PG&E Corporations
TSR for the prior three-year period is in the top quartile
relative to the Performance Comparator Group. If PG&E
Corporations TSR for that period is not in the top
quartile, the restrictions will continue, and the remaining
40 percent of the restricted stock will vest on the fifth
anniversary of the date of grant. This acceleration feature adds
a performance component to the restricted stock grant that
further aligns the motivation of award recipients with those of
shareholders by emphasizing increasing returns to shareholders.
The terms of these restricted stock grants align officers
interests with those of shareholders (i.e., increasing the stock
price and dividends), in addition to rewarding officers for top
quartile performance. Restricted stock also provides a tangible
retention incentive to officers because it vests over a three-
or five-year period depending on PG&E Corporations TSR.
Performance shares. The number of performance shares
granted in 2006 was determined by dividing one-half of the
target LTIP award value by the average daily closing price of a
share of PG&E Corporation common stock for the month of
November 2005 (or the closing price on the date of grant for a
newly
40
hired officer), as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Actual performance shares awards for 2006 are included in the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2006 table on page 48.
The Committee determined that performance shares granted in 2006
will vest, if at all, at the end of a three-year period,
depending on PG&E Corporations TSR relative to the
Performance Comparator Group for the period. The payment for
performance shares will be in cash and will be calculated by
multiplying (1) the number of vested performance shares,
(2) the average closing price of PG&E Corporation
common stock over the last 30 calendar days of the year
preceding the vesting date, and (3) a payout factor based
on corporate performance.
There will be no payout for TSR performance below the
25th percentile of the Performance Comparator Group; there
will be a 25 percent payout if TSR is at the
25th percentile; there will be a 100 percent payout if
TSR is at the 75th percentile; and there will be a
200 percent payout if PG&E Corporations TSR ranks
first in the Performance Comparator Group. If PG&E
Corporations TSR is between the 25th percentile and
the 75th percentile, or above the 75th percentile,
award payouts will be determined by straight-line interpolation,
adjusted to round numbers (i.e., the nearest multiple of five).
The performance shares are tied directly to PG&E
Corporations performance for shareholders and align
officers interests with those of shareholders.
Other Compensation
Perquisites. The Committee (and with regard to Peter A.
Darbee and Thomas B. King, the independent members of the Boards
of Directors of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, respectively) also approved the 2006
perquisite amount for each executive officer, ranging from
$20,000 to $35,000, depending on officer level. In addition,
executive officers receive a partial subsidy for financial
planning services from a third-party financial advisory firm and
the other perquisites described in the Summary Compensation
Table on pages 46 and 47.
Executive Stock Ownership Program. PG&E Corporation
has adopted an executive stock ownership program to encourage
senior officers to achieve and maintain a minimum investment in
PG&E Corporation common stock at levels set by the
Committee. The program provides incentives for senior officers
to focus on improving long-term shareholder value. Executive
stock ownership guidelines have been adopted by most of the
companies in the Pay Comparator Group, and are increasingly
viewed as an important element of a companys governance
policies.
PG&E Corporations executive stock ownership targets
are based on a multiple of base salary and are designed to be
met within five years. The stock ownership target for the Chief
Executive Officer of PG&E Corporation is three times base
salary. The target ownership level for the Chief Executive
Officer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the President and
Chief Operating Officer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and
certain other senior officers is two times base salary. The
target ownership level for other senior officers is
one-and-one-half times base salary.
The program features annual milestones equal to 20 percent
of the target. Incentives called Special Incentive Stock
Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) are provided to encourage
participants to use their own monies to meet their targets as
soon as possible. The incentives are granted only during the
first three years of the officers eligibility, and are
awarded only for stock that is beneficially owned by
the
officer.2
When participants meet a milestone, they receive an incentive
equal to 20 percent of that milestone. When participants
exceed a milestone, the incentive equals 30 percent. The
incentive takes the form of additional common stock which is
automatically deferred to the 2005 PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (SRSP), a deferred
compensation plan, upon grant and is converted to units in the
PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund under the SRSP. The
units vest in full on the third anniversary of the date of
grant, and are subject to forfeiture if the participant fails to
maintain the applicable stock ownership target. Upon retirement
or termination, the vested units are distributed in the form of
an equivalent number of shares of PG&E Corporation common
stock. The vesting of SISOPs can be accelerated under certain
circumstances, as specified in the discussion regarding
Potential Payments Upon Resignation, Retirement,
Termination, Change in Control, Death, or Disability on
pages 56 to 61 of this proxy statement.
Actual SISOPs for 2006 are included in the Grants of Plan-Based
Awards in 2006 table on page 48. If an officer fails to
meet or maintain the applicable stock ownership target,
cash-based awards that the officer would otherwise be entitled
to receive (such as a STIP payment) are
|
|
2 |
Beneficially owned stock includes actual shares of
stock held in the name of the officer (or his/her immediate
family members) and stock held in a 401(k) or deferred
compensation plan. It does not include stock options or
restricted stock. |
41
converted into phantom stock units and credited to the
officers account under the SRSP until the stock ownership
target is met.
All officers who are currently subject to stock ownership
targets under the Executive Stock Ownership Program have met or
exceeded their targets.
Retention Awards
In July 2006, the independent members of the Board of Directors
of Pacific Gas and Electric Company approved an arrangement for
Thomas B. King, Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, that provides a retention mechanism. This
mechanism will entitle Mr. King to an unreduced pension
benefit if he remains employed by PG&E Corporation or its
subsidiaries until age 55. Under the defined benefit
pension plan, employees who are at least 55 years old with
a minimum of five years of consecutive service may retire
before age 65 with a reduced pension benefit. The
applicable early retirement reduction factors depend on the age
of the retiring employee and years of service. Under the
arrangement approved by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Board of Directors, Mr. Kings pension benefit will
not be reduced by the reduction factor that would otherwise
apply if he retires before age 65. Assuming that
Mr. Kings salary will increase 4 percent
annually and that he will retire at age 55, the net present
value of the elimination of the early retirement reduction
factors is $1.5 million. Any enhanced pension benefit that
may become payable to Mr. King would be paid from the
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(described below under Retirement Benefits).
As part of this arrangement, the independent members of the
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board of Directors also awarded
Mr. King 25,233.41 restricted phantom stock units with an
aggregate value of $1 million, based on the closing stock
price of PG&E Corporation common stock on July 12, 2006
(the date of grant) of $39.63, as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange. The restricted phantom stock units will vest five
years after the date of grant, provided that Mr. King is
still an employee of PG&E Corporation or its subsidiaries at
that time. These restricted stock units are included in the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2006 table on page 48.
Mr. Kings right to receive the unreduced pension
benefit and the vesting of the restricted phantom stock units
are subject to either partial or full acceleration under certain
circumstances associated with his death, disability, or
termination of employment. Mr. Kings right to the
unreduced pension benefit and the vesting of the restricted
phantom stock units also would accelerate in full upon a Change
in Control of PG&E Corporation (as defined in the LTIP) if
these modifications to Mr. Kings compensation
arrangements are not assumed by the Acquiror (as defined in the
LTIP).
On January 3, 2007, Mr. Darbee, Chief Executive
Officer of PG&E Corporation, received a grant of
21,155 shares of restricted stock, with a grant date value
of approximately $1 million. The grant was approved by the
independent members of the PG&E Corporation Board of
Directors and serves as a retention mechanism for
Mr. Darbee. The restrictions on the restricted shares will
lapse five years after the date of grant, provided that
Mr. Darbee is still employed by PG&E Corporation or any
of its affiliates. Vesting of the restricted shares is subject
to either partial or full acceleration under certain
circumstances associated with Mr. Darbees death,
disability, or termination of employment. The vesting of the
restricted shares would accelerate in full upon a Change in
Control of PG&E Corporation (as defined in the LTIP) if this
modification to Mr. Darbees compensation arrangements
is not assumed by the Acquiror (as defined in the LTIP). If
Mr. Darbee retires from PG&E Corporation and its
affiliates before the five-year vesting period lapses, a portion
of these restricted shares will vest, in a ratio of the number
of months worked after the grant date divided by 60 months
(i.e., the normal vesting period).
Retirement Benefits
Pacific Gas and Electric Company provides retirement benefits
under a tax-qualified defined benefit plan to a number of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on
page 46, as well as to all other eligible employees. In
addition, PG&E Corporation has adopted a Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), a non-tax-qualified defined
benefit pension plan that provides officers and key employees of
PG&E Corporation and its subsidiaries, including Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, with a pension benefit based on a
combination of base salary and payments under the STIP. PG&E
Corporation also has established a grantor trust to set aside
funds to pay for a portion of the non-qualified benefits payable
to officers. Assets held in the trust are subject to claims of
creditors and, upon the commencement of a bankruptcy case,
become part of the debtors estate subject to the
jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court.
In addition, PG&E Corporation provides a matching
contribution to officers who participate in the PG&E
Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (RSP), a qualified
42
401(k) plan. For all executives and most employees, PG&E
Corporation provides a maximum matching contribution of 75 cents
for each dollar contributed up to 6 percent of base salary.
To the extent that matching contributions cannot be made to an
officers RSP account because the Internal Revenue Code
limits would be exceeded, PG&E Corporation contributes the
excess amount to the PG&E Corporation Supplemental
Retirement Savings Plan (SRSP).
The majority of companies in the Pay Comparator Group provide
tax-qualified defined benefit plans, other tax-qualified defined
contribution plans (i.e., 401(k) plans), and
non-tax-qualified retirement plans.
In 2003, Mr. Darbee and Mr. King were credited with an
additional five years of service under the SERP. Mr. Darbee
and Mr. King each also are eligible to earn an additional
five years of credited service under the SERP, provided that
they are employed by PG&E Corporation or a subsidiary on
July 1, 2008. Mr. King also may qualify for an
unreduced pension benefit at age 55, pursuant to a July
2006 arrangement that is more fully described above in the
discussion regarding Retention Awards.
The value of pension benefits accumulated as of
December 31, 2006 for the executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table is reported in the table entitled
Pension Benefits on pages 53 and 54.
Compensation Related to Termination of Employment or
Termination of Employment Following a Change in Control or
Potential Change in Control of PG&E Corporation
In February 2006, the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors
amended the Corporations plans and policies to ensure that
any compensation related to a change in control is contingent on
a double trigger, and is paid only if certain events
occur in addition to the change in control. These changes are
discussed below.
The PG&E Corporation Board of Directors has adopted an
Officer Severance Policy to provide certain officers with
severance benefits if their employment is terminated without
cause. The severance benefits are described on pages 57 to 61
under the sections entitled Potential Payments Upon
Termination Without Cause and Potential Payments
Following a Change in Control and Other Triggering Events.
The purpose of the severance policy is to (1) attract and
retain senior management by defining the terms and conditions
for severance benefits, (2) provide severance benefits that
are part of a competitive total compensation package,
(3) provide consistent treatment for all terminated
officers, and (4) minimize potential litigation costs
associated with officers termination of employment.
On November 13, 2006, PG&E Corporation announced the
departure of Bruce R. Worthington, who had served as Senior Vice
President and General Counsel of PG&E Corporation from 1997
to November 10, 2006. Mr. Worthington will receive
severance benefits in accordance with the PG&E Corporation
Officer Severance Policy, contingent upon his execution of a
severance agreement as called for under the Officer Severance
Policy.
If a covered officer is actually or constructively terminated
following a change in control or potential
change in control of PG&E Corporation, the severance
policy provides covered officers with certain benefits. The
benefits payable under these circumstances are described below
under the section entitled Potential Payments Following a
Change in Control and Other Triggering Events. The
PG&E Corporation Board of Directors has determined that the
Officer Severance Policys provision of such benefits in
these circumstances is an integral part of PG&E
Corporations officer compensation program. In a hostile
takeover or change in control situation, it is important for
management to remain focused on maximizing shareholder value and
protecting shareholders interests, and not be distracted
by concerns about the security of their jobs.
In addition, upon the occurrence of a change in control of
PG&E Corporation, all outstanding stock-based awards granted
before December 31, 2006 will accelerate, regardless of
whether an officer has been terminated. For grants made in 2007
and after, acceleration will occur only if either (1) the
successor company fails to continue previously granted awards in
a manner that preserves the value of those awards, or
(2) the award recipient is terminated during a specified
period of time before or after the change in control. The
PG&E Corporation Board of Directors made this change to more
closely align PG&E Corporations policies with market
trends and to better balance the interests of award recipients
and shareholders, maintaining security for award recipients in a
time of uncertainty and maintaining an incentive to stay with
PG&E Corporation even following a transaction.
In February 2006, the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors
adopted a policy, the Golden Parachute Restriction Policy
(described below in the section entitled Potential
Payments Following a Change in Control and Other Triggering
Events), that requires shareholder approval of executive
severance payments provided in connection with a change in
control of PG&E Corporation, to the extent that those
payments exceed 2.99 times the sum of a covered officers
base
43
salary and target annual bonus. This policy responds to a
shareholder proposal that was approved by shareholders at
PG&E Corporations 2005 annual meeting.
In addition, in February 2006, the PG&E Corporation Board of
Directors amended the definition of change in
control to narrow the circumstances under which a change
in control would be deemed to have occurred. Before these
amendments were made, the definition of change in
control included shareholder approval of certain
consolidation or merger transactions. The amendments provide
that a change in control occurs upon the
consummation of a transaction following shareholder approval,
rather than upon shareholder approval alone. The Board of
Directors made this change to more closely align PG&E
Corporations policies with those of the companies in the
Pay Comparator Group. In addition, the amendment addresses an
issue raised in a shareholder proposal that was approved by
shareholders at PG&E Corporations 2005 annual meeting.
Conclusion
The amount of executive compensation provided by PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company reflects the
Committees compensation objectives and policies to
(1) provide long-term incentives to align
shareholders and officers interests and enhance
total return for shareholders, (2) attract, retain, and
motivate employees with the necessary mix of skills and
experience for the development and successful operation of
PG&E Corporations businesses, and (3) compensate
officers in a cost-efficient and transparent manner.
44
________________________________________________________________________________
Compensation Committee Report
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee of
PG&E Corporation is comprised of independent directors and
operates under a written charter adopted by the PG&E
Corporation Board of Directors. The Nominating, Compensation,
and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing and
establishing officer compensation policies for PG&E
Corporation and its subsidiaries, including Pacific Gas and
Electric Company.
The Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee has
reviewed and discussed the section of this Joint Proxy Statement
entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis with
management. Based on its review and discussion with management,
the Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee has
recommended to the Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation
and Pacific Gas and Electric Company that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section be included in this Joint
Proxy Statement.
March 13, 2007
C. Lee Cox, Chair
David A. Coulter
Barbara L. Rambo
Barry Lawson Williams
45
________________________________________________________________________________
Executive Officer Compensation Information
Summary Compensation Table 2006
This table summarizes the principal components of
compensation paid or granted during 2006, or the compensation
cost of equity-based grants for 2006, to the Chief Executive
Officers and the Chief Financial Officer of PG&E Corporation
and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and certain other officers
of those entities, including the next three most highly
compensated executive officers during the past year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Value and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Nonqualified | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive | |
|
Deferred | |
|
All | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Option | |
|
Plan | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Other | |
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
Salary | |
|
Awards | |
|
Award(s) | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Total | |
Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
($)(1) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
($)(3) | |
|
($)(4) | |
|
($)(5) | |
|
($)(6) | |
|
($) | |
Peter A.
Darbee(7)
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
975,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,666,389 |
|
|
$ |
604,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,028,440 |
|
|
$ |
230,237 |
|
|
$ |
7,990,058 |
|
|
Christopher P.
Johns(8)
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
494,000 |
|
|
$ |
931,415 |
|
|
$ |
221,802 |
|
|
$ |
414,071 |
|
|
$ |
157,985 |
|
|
$ |
94,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,911 |
|
|
Leslie H. Everett
(9)
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
|
$ |
762,746 |
|
|
$ |
101,552 |
|
|
$ |
220,980 |
|
|
$ |
332,140 |
|
|
$ |
33,050 |
|
|
$ |
1,740,468 |
|
|
Kent M.
Harvey(10)
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
352,085 |
|
|
$ |
565,087 |
|
|
$ |
182,526 |
|
|
$ |
268,290 |
|
|
$ |
116,713 |
|
|
$ |
44,919 |
|
|
$ |
1,529,620 |
|
|
Bruce R.
Worthington(11)
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
489,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,793,902 |
|
|
$ |
374,182 |
|
|
$ |
410,090 |
|
|
$ |
518,882 |
|
|
$ |
65,008 |
|
|
$ |
3,651,314 |
|
|
Thomas B.
King(12)
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
615,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,590,363 |
|
|
$ |
395,251 |
|
|
$ |
702,945 |
|
|
$ |
855,085 |
|
|
$ |
69,465 |
|
|
$ |
4,228,109 |
|
|
Thomas E. Bottorff
(13)
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
282,500 |
|
|
$ |
557,625 |
|
|
$ |
134,151 |
|
|
$ |
215,265 |
|
|
$ |
204,202 |
|
|
$ |
46,106 |
|
|
$ |
1,439,849 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 2006 base salary deferred at the election of the
officer (Mr. Johns $163,020, Ms. Everett $81,200, and
Mr. Worthington $244,625). |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the 2006 compensation cost of restricted stock,
performance shares, common stock equivalents called Special
Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums (SISOPs), and a retention
award in the form of restricted phantom stock units, granted in
2006 and prior years, measured in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, without taking into account an estimate
of forfeitures related to service-based vesting. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the 2006 compensation cost of stock options granted
in prior years, measured in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R without taking into account an estimate
of forfeitures related to service-based vesting. Assumptions
used in determining the grant date fair value are set forth in
the Stock Options section of Note 14 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in the 2005 and 2006 Annual Reports to
Shareholders of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts represent payments received or deferred in 2007 for
achievement of corporate or organizational objectives in 2006
under the Short-Term Incentive Plan. |
|
(5) |
|
Amounts consist of (i) the change in pension value during
2006 (Mr. Darbee $1,023,619, Mr. Johns $157,918,
Ms. Everett $330,681, Mr. Harvey $116,623,
Mr. Worthington $502,001, Mr. King $853,356, and
Mr. Bottorff $204,139), and (ii) the above-market
earnings on deferred compensation (Mr. Darbee $4,821,
Mr. Johns $67, Ms. Everett $1,459, Mr. Harvey
$90, Mr. Worthington $16,881, Mr. King $1,729, and
Mr. Bottorff $63). The above-market earnings are calculated
as the difference between actual earnings from the Utility Bond
Fund investment option of the Supplemental Retirement Savings
Plan and hypothetical earnings that would have resulted using an
interest rate equal to 120% of the applicable federal rate.
Earnings for the Utility Bond Fund are based on Moodys
Investors Services long-term Aa bond rate for utilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Amounts consist of (i) perquisites and personal benefits,
as detailed below (Mr. Darbee $181,494, Mr. Johns
$40,405, Ms. Everett $20,000, Mr. Harvey $23,613,
Mr. Worthington $39,488, Mr. King $41,790, and
Mr. Bottorff $24,943, (ii) tax reimbursement payments
(Mr. Darbee $4,868, Mr. Johns $3,504, Mr. Harvey
$994, and Mr. Worthington $3,504), (iii) sale of
vacation (Mr. Johns $28,499, Mr. Harvey $20,312, and
Mr. Bottorff $8,451), and (iv) contributions to
defined contribution retirement plans (Mr. Darbee $43,875,
Mr. Johns $22,230, Ms. Everett $13,050,
Mr. Worthington $22,016, Mr. King $27,675, and
Mr. Bottorff $12,712). |
|
(7) |
|
During 2006, Mr. Darbee served as Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer, and President of PG&E Corporation
and Chairman of the Board of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. |
46
Summary Compensation Table 2006
Continued
|
|
|
(8) |
|
During 2006, Mr. Johns served as Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of PG&E Corporation
and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. |
|
(9) |
|
During 2006, Ms. Everett served as Senior Vice President,
Communications and Public Affairs of PG&E Corporation. |
|
(10) |
|
During 2006, Mr. Harvey served as Senior Vice President and
Chief Risk and Audit Officer of PG&E Corporation. |
|
(11) |
|
Mr. Worthington served as Senior Vice President and General
Counsel of PG&E Corporation through November 10, 2006. |
|
(12) |
|
Mr. King served as Senior Vice President of PG&E
Corporation and President and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific
Gas and Electric Company through August 14, 2006, and as
Senior Vice President of PG&E Corporation and Chief
Executive Officer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company thereafter. |
|
(13) |
|
During 2006, Mr. Bottorff served as Senior Vice President,
Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. |
The following chart provides additional information regarding
perquisites that are included in the Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transpor- | |
|
Life | |
|
|
|
|
|
Execu- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisite | |
|
tation | |
|
Insur- | |
|
|
|
|
|
tive | |
|
Financial | |
|
|
|
|
Allowance | |
|
Services | |
|
ance | |
|
Parking | |
|
Fitness | |
|
Health | |
|
Services | |
|
Total | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
127,883 |
|
|
$ |
2,208 |
|
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,495 |
|
|
$ |
7,158 |
|
|
$ |
181,494 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,085 |
|
|
$ |
6,570 |
|
|
$ |
40,405 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,613 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,145 |
|
|
$ |
7,593 |
|
|
$ |
39,488 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
$ |
3,377 |
|
|
$ |
5,916 |
|
|
$ |
41,790 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,843 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,943 |
|
The above perquisites consist of the following:
|
|
|
A lump-sum perquisite
allowance. |
|
|
Transportation services for Mr. Darbee, consisting of car
transportation for Mr. Darbees commute and
non-business travel. Amounts include the pro-rated salary and
burden of the driver and vehicle costs. |
|
|
The cost of life insurance coverage exceeding amounts available
to all employees (i.e., $50,000). |
|
|
The cost of parking. |
|
|
The value of reimbursements for health club fees, pursuant to a
program available to certain management employees. |
|
|
The cost of executive health services provided to executive
officers. Amounts vary between officers, reflecting the
decisions of each individual officer regarding the specific
types of tests and consultations provided, and the exact value
of reimbursed expenses. |
|
|
Fees paid for financial services provided by an independent
contractor selected by PG&E Corporation to provide such
services. |
Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section on
pages 37 to 44 of this Joint Proxy Statement for additional
information regarding the elements of compensation discussed
above, including salary,
short-term incentives,
and long term-
incentives. Additional information regarding grants of LTIP
awards can be found following the table entitled Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in 2006.
47
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2006
This table provides information regarding incentive awards
and other stock-based awards granted during 2006 to individuals
named in the Summary Compensation Table. The compensation cost
from 2006 of these awards also is reflected in the Summary
Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non- | |
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under | |
|
Number | |
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | |
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | |
|
of Shares | |
|
Fair Value of | |
|
|
|
|
Committee | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
of Stock | |
|
Stock and | |
|
|
Grant | |
|
Action | |
|
Threshold | |
|
Target | |
|
Maximum | |
|
Threshold | |
|
Target | |
|
Maximum | |
|
or Units | |
|
Option | |
Name |
|
Date | |
|
Date | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#)(3) | |
|
Awards | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
975,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,950,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
48,705 |
|
|
|
97,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,824,976 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,705 |
|
|
$ |
1,824,976 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
271,700 |
|
|
$ |
543,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
|
25,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
469,124 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
$ |
469,124 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
145,000 |
|
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,521 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
$ |
208,521 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
$ |
26,053 |
|
K. M Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
176,043 |
|
|
$ |
352,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,521 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
$ |
208,521 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
269,088 |
|
|
$ |
538,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
|
22,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
417,041 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
$ |
417,041 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
461,250 |
|
|
$ |
922,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
|
40,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
755,957 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
$ |
755,957 |
|
|
|
|
7/12/06 |
|
|
|
7/12/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,233 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
141,250 |
|
|
$ |
282,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,910 |
|
|
|
11,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
221,448 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
12/21/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,910 |
|
|
$ |
221,448 |
|
|
|
|
1/3/06 |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
113,400 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Compensation opportunity granted for 2006 under the Short-Term
Incentive Plan (STIP). Actual amounts earned are reported in the
Summary Compensation Table in the Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation column. |
|
(2) |
Represents performance shares granted under the PG&E
Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). |
|
(3) |
Represents shares of restricted stock granted under the LTIP. In
addition, Mr. King received a retention award in the form
of a grant of 25,233 restricted phantom stock units.
Ms. Everett received 695 common stock equivalents called
Special Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) and
Mr. Bottorff received 3,026 SISOPs. |
|
(4) |
Award of SISOPs under the Executive Stock Ownership Program. No
specific action is required by the PG&E Corporation
Nominating, Compensation, and Governance Committee, or by the
PG&E Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board
of Directors. |
Information regarding specific grants is provided below.
STIP Awards. Information regarding the terms and basis of
STIP awards can be found in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section on pages 37 to 44 of this Joint Proxy
Statement.
Restricted Stock Grants. Shares of restricted stock carry
the same dividend rights as shares of PG&E Corporation
common stock. Shares of restricted stock granted in 2006 will
vest in 20 percent increments over three years, with an
acceleration of the remaining 40 percent on the third
anniversary of the date of grant if PG&E Corporations
total shareholder return (TSR) for the prior three-year
period is in the top quartile relative to the Performance
Comparator Group. If PG&E Corporations TSR for that
period is not in the top quartile, the restrictions will
continue, and the remaining 40 percent of the restricted
stock will vest on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant.
Performance Shares. The Committee determined that
performance shares granted in 2006 will vest at the end of a
three-year period, depending on PG&E Corporations TSR
relative to the Performance Comparator Group for the period. The
payment for performance shares will be in cash and will be
48
calculated by multiplying (1) the number of vested
performance shares (2) the average closing price of
PG&E Corporation common stock over the last 30 calendar days
of the year preceding the vesting date, and (3) a payout
factor based on corporate performance.
There will be no payout for TSR performance below the
25th percentile of the Performance Comparator Group; there
will be a 25 percent payout if TSR is at the
25th percentile; there will be a 100 percent payout if
TSR is at the 75th percentile; and there will be a
200 percent payout if PG&E Corporations TSR ranks
first in the Performance Comparator Group. If PG&E
Corporations TSR is between the 25th percentile and
the 75th percentile, or above the 75th percentile,
award payouts will be determined by straight-line interpolation,
adjusted to round numbers (i.e., the nearest multiple of five).
Each time that a cash dividend is paid on PG&E Corporation
common stock, an amount equal to the cash dividend per share
multiplied by the number of shares held by the recipient will be
accrued on behalf of the recipient. At the end of the vesting
period, the amount of accrued dividend equivalents will be
increased or decreased by the same percentage used to increase
or decrease the number of vested performance shares for the
period.
SISOPs As part of the Executive Stock
Ownership Program, eligible officers may receive Special
Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) that are designed to
encourage new participants to meet certain stock ownership
milestones. Upon grant, SISOPs are automatically deferred to the
recipients account in the PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (SRSP), a deferred
compensation plan, and are converted to units in the PG&E
Corporation Phantom Stock Fund under the SRSP. The units vest in
full on the third anniversary of the date of grant, and are
subject to forfeiture if the participant fails to maintain the
applicable stock ownership target. Upon retirement or
termination, the vested units are distributed in the form of an
equivalent number of shares of PG&E Corporation common
stock. Dividends are converted into additional units of phantom
stock.
Retention Award. During 2006, Mr. King was awarded
25,233.41 restricted phantom stock units in the PG&E
Corporation Phantom Stock Fund under the SRSP. The restricted
phantom stock units will vest five years after the date of
grant, provided that Mr. King is still an employee of
PG&E Corporation or its subsidiaries at that time. Upon
retirement or termination, the vested units will be distributed
in cash. Dividends are converted into additional units of
phantom stock.
For more information regarding the terms of plan-based awards,
please see the discussion in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section on pages 37 to 44 of this Joint Proxy Statement.
49
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
2006
This table provides additional information regarding stock
options, restricted stock, performance shares, and other
equity-based awards that were held as of December 31, 2006
by the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table,
including awards granted prior to 2006. Any awards described
below that were granted in 2006 are also reflected in the Grants
of Plan-Based Awards in 2006 table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards | |
|
|
Stock Awards | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Incentive Plan | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan | |
|
Awards: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: | |
|
Market or | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market | |
|
Number of | |
|
Payout Value | |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Value of | |
|
Unearned | |
|
of Unearned | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Shares or | |
|
Shares or | |
|
Shares, Units | |
|
Shares, Units | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
Units of | |
|
Units of | |
|
or Other | |
|
or Other | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Underlying | |
|
Option | |
|
|
|
|
Stock That | |
|
Stock That | |
|
Rights That | |
|
Rights That | |
|
|
Unexercised | |
|
Unexercised | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Option | |
|
|
Have Not | |
|
Have Not | |
|
Have Not | |
|
Have Not | |
|
|
Options (#) | |
|
Options (#) | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
|
Vested | |
|
Vested | |
|
Vested | |
|
Vested | |
Name |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
($) | |
|
Date | |
|
|
(#)(1) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
(#)(3) | |
|
($) (2) | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,325 |
(4) |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
1/3/13 |
|
|
|
|
83,625 |
(5) |
|
$ |
3,957,971 |
|
|
|
89,766 |
(6) |
|
$ |
8,387,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,600 |
(7) |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
|
|
1/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,525 |
(8) |
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
1/4/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.125 |
|
|
|
1/3/07 |
|
|
|
|
27,561 |
(9) |
|
$ |
1,304,462 |
|
|
|
27,278 |
(10) |
|
$ |
2,539,160 |
|
|
|
|
29,775 |
|
|
|
9,925 |
(11) |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
1/3/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
16,800 |
(12) |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
|
|
1/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
22,800 |
(13) |
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
1/4/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,425 |
(14) |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
1/3/13 |
|
|
|
|
12,534 |
(15) |
|
$ |
593,234 |
|
|
|
13,248 |
(16) |
|
$ |
1,234,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,874 |
(17) |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
|
|
1/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
(18) |
|
$ |
28.40 |
|
|
|
8/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,050 |
(19) |
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
1/4/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,175 |
(20) |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
1/3/13 |
|
|
|
|
15,507 |
(21) |
|
$ |
733,946 |
|
|
|
16,567 |
(22) |
|
$ |
1,524,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,274 |
(23) |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
|
|
1/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
13,837 |
(24) |
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
1/4/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,825 |
(25) |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
1/3/13 |
|
|
|
|
31,314 |
(26) |
|
$ |
1,482,092 |
|
|
|
34,276 |
(27) |
|
$ |
3,158,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,250 |
(28) |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
|
|
1/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
29,325 |
(29) |
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
1/4/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. B. King
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.00 |
|
|
|
12/17/08 |
|
|
|
|
67,129 |
(30) |
|
$ |
3,177,216 |
|
|
|
45,501 |
(31) |
|
$ |
4,221,173 |
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30.9375 |
|
|
|
1/5/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,825 |
(32) |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
1/3/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,250 |
|
|
|
30,250 |
(33) |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
|
|
1/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
(34) |
|
$ |
28.40 |
|
|
|
8/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,863 |
|
|
|
32,587 |
(35) |
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
1/4/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,800 |
(36) |
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
|
1/3/13 |
|
|
|
|
16,417 |
(37) |
|
$ |
777,017 |
|
|
|
14,371 |
(38) |
|
$ |
1,330,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,400 |
(39) |
|
$ |
27.23 |
|
|
|
1/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,050 |
(40) |
|
$ |
33.02 |
|
|
|
1/14/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes restricted stock and stock-based awards such as
restricted stock units and phantom stock awards granted under
the PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
and its predecessor (the PG&E Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Program), common stock equivalents called Special
Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) that were granted
under the Executive Stock Ownership Program, and individual
retention and incentive awards. See the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis section on pages 37 to 44 of this Joint
Proxy Statement for additional details regarding grants in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Value based on the December 29, 2006 closing price of
PG&E Corporation common stock ($47.33). Consistent with
Securities and Exchange Commission rules, performance shares are
valued at the maximum payout because PG&E Corporation
exceeded its target performance measure in the previous year. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes performance shares and restricted stock with a
performance requirement granted under the LTIP and its
predecessor. See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
section on pages 37 to 44 of this Joint Proxy
Statement for additional details regarding grants in 2006. |
50
|
|
|
|
(4) |
25,325 stock options vested on January 2, 2007. |
|
|
(5) |
Restrictions on 28,711 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. Restrictions on 19,426 shares will
lapse January 2, 2008, and on 16,006 shares
January 2, 2009. Restrictions on an additional
19,482 shares will lapse January 4, 2011 but may lapse
earlier, on January 2, 2009, if PG&E Corporations
three-year total shareholder return for the period ending
December 31, 2008 is in the top quartile of the comparator
group. |
|
|
(6) |
Restrictions on 2,321 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. 13,680 performance shares vested on
January 3, 2007 (10,944 actually paid out following
application of the performance-based payout factor). 25,060
performance shares are scheduled to vest January 2, 2008
and 48,705 performance shares are scheduled to vest
January 2, 2009. |
|
|
(7) |
16,800 stock options vested on January 2, 2007 and 16,800
stock options vest January 2, 2008. |
|
|
(8) |
27,175 stock options vested on January 3, 2007,
27,175 stock options vest January 3, 2008, and 27,175
stock options vest January 3, 2009. |
|
|
(9) |
Restrictions on 9,602 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. Restrictions on 5,966 shares will
lapse January 2, 2008, and on 4,256 shares
January 2, 2009. Restrictions on an additional
5,008 shares will lapse January 4, 2011, but may lapse
earlier, on January 2, 2009, if PG&E Corporations
three-year total shareholder return for the period ending
December 31, 2008 is in the top quartile of the comparator
group. 75 SISOPs vested January 2, 2007. 2,654 SISOPs
will vest January 3, 2008. |
|
|
(10) |
Restrictions on 908 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. 6,840 performance shares vested on
January 3, 2007 (5,472 actually paid out following
application of the performance-based payout factor).
7,010 performance shares are scheduled to vest
January 2, 2008 and 12,520 performance shares are scheduled
to vest January 2, 2009. |
|
(11) |
9,925 stock options vested on January 2, 2007. |
|
(12) |
8,400 stock options vested on January 2, 2007, and 8,400
stock options vest January 2, 2008. |
|
(13) |
7,600 stock options vested on January 3, 2007, 7,600 stock
options vest January 3, 2008, and 7,600 stock options vest
January 3, 2009. |
|
(14) |
4,425 stock options vested on January 2, 2007. |
|
(15) |
Restrictions on 4,548 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. Restrictions on 2,932 shares will
lapse January 2, 2008, and on 2,115 shares
January 2, 2009. Restrictions on an additional
2,226 shares will lapse January 4, 2011, but may lapse
earlier, on January 2, 2009, if PG&E Corporations
three-year total shareholder return for the period ending
December 31, 2008 is in the top quartile of the comparator
group. 713 SISOPs will vest January 3, 2009. |
|
(16) |
Restrictions on 403 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. 3,270 performance shares vested on
January 3, 2007 (2,616 actually paid out following
application of the performance-based payout factor).
4,010 performance shares are scheduled to vest
January 2, 2008 and 5,565 performance shares are scheduled
to vest January 2, 2009. |
|
(17) |
2,937 stock options vested on January 2, 2007 and 2,937
stock options vest January 2, 2008. |
|
(18) |
862 stock options vest August 2, 2007 and 862 stock options
vest August 2, 2008. |
|
(19) |
4,350 stock options vested on January 3, 2007, 4,350 stock
options vest January 3, 2008, and 4,350 stock options vest
January 3, 2009. |
|
(20) |
10,175 stock options vested on January 2, 2007. |
|
(21) |
Restrictions on 7,360 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. Restrictions on 3,630 shares will
lapse January 2, 2008, and 2,178 shares
January 2, 2009. Restrictions on an additional
2,226 shares will lapse January 4, 2011, but may lapse
earlier, on January 2, 2009, if PG&E Corporations
three-year total shareholder return for the period ending
December 31, 2008 is in the top quartile of the comparator
group. Of 113 SISOPs scheduled to vest January 2,
2007, 68 vested. |
|
(22) |
Restrictions on 932 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. 5,810 performance shares vested on
January 3, 2007 (4,648 actually paid out following
application of the performance-based payout factor).
4,260 performance shares are scheduled to vest
January 2, 2008 and 5,565 performance shares are
scheduled to vest January 2, 2009. |
|
(23) |
7,137 stock options vested on January 2, 2007 and
7,137 stock options vest January 2, 2008. |
51
|
|
(24) |
4,613 stock options vested on January 3, 2007,
4,612 stock options vest January 3, 2008, and
4,612 stock options vest January 3, 2009. |
|
(25) |
19,825 stock options vested on January 2, 2007. |
|
(26) |
Restrictions on 14,823 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. Restrictions on 7,558 shares will
lapse January 2, 2008, and on 4,481 shares
January 2, 2009. Restrictions on an additional
4,452 shares will lapse January 4, 2011, but may lapse
earlier, on January 2, 2009, if PG&E Corporations
three-year total shareholder return for the period ending
December 31, 2008 is in the top quartile of the comparator
group. |
|
(27) |
Restrictions on 1,816 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. 12,310 performance shares vested on
January 3, 2007 (9,848 actually paid out following
application of the performance-based payout factor).
9,020 performance shares are scheduled to vest
January 2, 2008 and 11,130 performance shares are
scheduled to vest January 2, 2009. |
|
(28) |
15,125 stock options vested on January 2, 2007, and
15,125 stock options vest January 2, 2008. |
|
(29) |
9,775 stock options vested on January 3, 2007,
9,775 stock options vest January 3, 2008, and
9,775 stock options vest January 3, 2009. |
|
(30) |
Restrictions on 17,177 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. Restrictions on 9,912 shares will
lapse January 2, 2008, and on 6,540 shares
January 2, 2009. Restrictions on an additional
8,070 shares will lapse January 4, 2011, but may lapse
earlier, on January 2, 2009, if PG&E Corporations
three-year total shareholder return for the period ending
December 31, 2008 is in the top quartile of the comparator
group. 25,430 restricted phantom stock units will vest
May 12, 2011. |
|
(31) |
Restrictions on 1,816 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. 13,490 performance shares vested on
January 3, 2007 (10,792 actually paid out following
application of the performance-based payout factor).
10,020 performance shares are scheduled to vest
January 2, 2008 and 20,175 performance shares are
scheduled to vest January 2, 2009. |
|
(32) |
19,825 stock options vested on January 2, 2007. |
|
(33) |
15,125 stock options vested on January 2, 2007 and
15,125 stock options vest January 2, 2008. |
|
(34) |
1,162 stock options vested on August 2, 2007 and
1,162 stock options vest August 2, 2008. |
|
(35) |
10,863 stock options vested on January 3, 2007,
10,862 stock options vest January 3, 2008, and 10,862
stock options vest January 3, 2009. |
|
(36) |
6,800 stock options vested on January 2, 2007. |
|
(37) |
Restrictions on 5,627 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. Restrictions on 3,141 shares will
lapse January 2, 2008, and on 2,184 shares
January 2, 2009. Restrictions on an additional
2,364 shares will lapse January 4, 2011, but may lapse
earlier, on January 2, 2009, if PG&E Corporations
three-year total shareholder return for the period ending
December 31, 2008 is in the top quartile of the comparator
group. 3,101 SISOPs will vest January 3, 2009. |
|
(38) |
Restrictions on 621 shares of restricted stock lapsed
January 3, 2007. 3,830 performance shares vested on
January 3, 2007 (3,064 actually paid out following
application of the performance-based payout factor).
4,010 performance shares are scheduled to vest
January 2, 2008 and 5,910 performance shares are
scheduled to vest January 2, 2009. |
|
(39) |
4,700 stock options vested on January 2, 2007 and
4,700 stock options vest January 2, 2008. |
|
(40) |
4,350 stock options vested on January 3, 2007,
4,350 stock options vest January 3, 2008, and 4,350
stock options vest January 3, 2009. |
The table includes stock options that were issued to executive
officers in previous years. No options have been awarded to
executive officers since 2005. The options listed above were
granted to the named executive officers under the PG&E
Corporation Long-Term Incentive Program, which was the
predecessor to the currently effective PG&E Corporation 2006
Long-Term Incentive Plan. Stock options issued in and after
January 2003 are exercisable on a cumulative basis at the rate
of one-fourth each year, commencing one year from the date of
grant. Stock options issued before January 2003 are exercisable
on a cumulative basis at the rate of one-third each year,
commencing two years from the date of grant. All options expire
10 years and one day after the date of grant. The option
exercise price was set as the closing price of a share of
PG&E Corporation common stock on the date of grant, as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
52
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2006
This table provides additional information regarding the
amounts received during 2006 by individuals named in the Summary
Compensation Table upon exercise, vesting, or transfer of stock
options, restricted stock, and other stock-based awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards | |
|
Stock Awards | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value Realized on | |
|
Acquired on Vesting | |
|
Value Realized on | |
Name |
|
Exercise (#) | |
|
Exercise ($) | |
|
(#)(1) | |
|
Vesting ($)(1) | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
|
69,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,016,034 |
|
|
|
18,970 |
|
|
$ |
698,616 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
|
36,300 |
|
|
$ |
889,590 |
|
|
|
9,819 |
|
|
$ |
363,501 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
|
11,713 |
|
|
$ |
174,961 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
$ |
127,420 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
$ |
341,705 |
|
|
|
10,262 |
|
|
$ |
380,188 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
|
202,475 |
|
|
$ |
2,845,725 |
|
|
|
12,598 |
|
|
$ |
464,456 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
|
101,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,509,948 |
|
|
|
13,143 |
|
|
$ |
484,576 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
$ |
272,541 |
|
|
|
4,446 |
|
|
$ |
165,223 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects both restricted stock and common stock equivalents
called Special Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) that
were granted under the Executive Stock Ownership Program and
that vested on January 2, 2006. For Mr. Johns, stock
awards include 2,721 SISOPs and the value realized on vesting
was $100,995. For Mr. Harvey, stock awards include 4,014
SISOPs and the value realized on vesting was $148,985. Receipt
has been deferred until the seventh month following the
termination of Mr. Johns and Mr. Harveys
employment. |
Pension Benefits 2006
This table provides information for each individual named in
the Summary Compensation Table relating to accumulated benefits
as of December 31, 2006 under any plan that provides for
payments or other benefits at, after, or relating to
retirement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Present Value of | |
|
Payments | |
|
|
|
|
Years Credited | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
During Last | |
Name |
|
Plan Name |
|
Service (#) | |
|
Benefits ($) | |
|
Fiscal Year ($) | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
8.5 |
(1) |
|
$ |
2,500,911 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
480,040 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
170,438 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,552,296 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
749,658 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,030,464 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
$ |
648,172 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,614,365 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,554,603 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
53
Pension Benefits 2006
Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Present Value of | |
|
Payments | |
|
|
|
|
Years Credited | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
During Last | |
Name |
|
Plan Name |
|
Service (#) | |
|
Benefits ($) | |
|
Fiscal Year ($) | |
T. B. King
|
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
175,888 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
8.5 |
(2) |
|
$ |
1,511,717 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Retirement Plan |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,289,924 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
PG&E Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
358,456 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Effective July 1, 2003, Mr. Darbee became a
participant in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(SERP) with five years of credited service. |
|
(2) |
Effective July 1, 2003, Mr. King became a participant
in the SERP with five years of credited service. |
Assumptions used in calculating the present value of accumulated
pension benefits are the same as were used in preparing the
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2006
financial statements. Assumptions are set forth in the Annual
Report to Shareholders.
Pension benefits are provided to executive officers under two
plans. Pacific Gas and Electric Company provides retirement
benefits to all of its employees, including its officers, under
a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, the Pacific Gas
and Electric Company Retirement Plan (Retirement Plan). The
Retirement Plan also covers a significant number of PG&E
Corporations employees and officers. A participant may
begin receiving pension benefits at age 55, but benefits
will be reduced unless the individual has at least 35 years
of service. At age 65, a participant becomes eligible for
an unreduced pension, irrespective of the years of service.
Between age 55 and age 65, any pension benefit may be
reduced based on the number of years of service, and in
accordance with pre-set charts set forth in the Retirement Plan.
The benefit formula is 1.7 percent of the average annual
salary for the last 36 months of service multiplied by
years of credited service. Payments are in the form of a single
life annuity or, at the election of the participant, a joint
spousal annuity.
PG&E Corporation has also adopted a non-tax qualified
defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits to officers
and key employees. The benefit formula for the PG&E
Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) is
1.7 percent of the average of the three highest combined
salary and annual Short-Term Incentive Plan payments during the
last 10 years of service multiplied by years of credited
service. The benefit payable from the SERP is reduced by any
benefit payable from the Retirement Plan. Payments are in the
form of a single life annuity or, at the election of the
officer, a joint spousal annuity. Normal retirement age is 65.
Benefits may begin earlier, subject to reduction depending on
years of credited service. Mr. Darbee and Mr. King
will each earn an additional five years of credited service
under the SERP, provided that they are employed by PG&E
Corporation or a subsidiary on July 1, 2008. If
Mr. King remains employed by PG&E Corporation or a
subsidiary until age 55, any early retirement reduction
factors will be eliminated.
54
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
This table provides information for 2006 for each individual
named in the Summary Compensation Table regarding such
individuals accounts in non-qualified defined contribution
plans and other deferred compensation plans as of
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive | |
|
Registrant | |
|
|
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
Contributions in | |
|
Contributions in | |
|
Aggregate Earnings | |
|
Withdrawals/ | |
|
Aggregate Balance | |
|
|
Last FY | |
|
Last FY | |
|
in Last FY | |
|
Distribution | |
|
at Last FYE | |
Name |
|
($)(1) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
($)(3) | |
|
($) | |
|
($)(4) | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
31,875 |
|
|
$ |
326,625 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,946 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
$ |
454,467 |
|
|
$ |
14,001 |
|
|
$ |
336,798 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,915,542 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
$ |
101,200 |
|
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
13,367 |
|
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
|
$ |
288,545 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
$ |
148,985 |
|
|
$ |
5,895 |
|
|
$ |
60,400 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
268,203 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
$ |
650,528 |
|
|
$ |
17,813 |
|
|
$ |
214,921 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,764,404 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
16,200 |
|
|
$ |
127,646 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
713,600 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,607 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
16,456 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes the following amounts which were reported as
compensation in the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Johns
$163,020, Ms. Everett $101,200, and Mr. Worthington
$269,625. |
|
(2) |
Represents amounts earned in 2005 and credited to the
officers deferred compensation account on the first
business day of 2006. |
|
(3) |
Represents earnings from the Supplemental Retirement Savings
Plan (SRSP). Includes the following amounts which were reported
as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table:
Mr. Darbee $4,821, Mr. Johns $67, Ms. Everett
$1,459, Mr. Harvey $90, Mr. Worthington $16,881,
Mr. King $1,729, and Mr. Bottorff $63. |
|
(4) |
Includes the following amounts which were reported as
compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2006 and
prior years: Mr. Darbee $1,704,356, Mr. Johns
$979,399, Ms. Everett $102,659, Mr. Harvey $5,430,
Mr. Worthington $1,885,559, and Mr. King $432,797. |
The table presents balances from both the PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, for deferrals made prior
to January 1, 2005, and the 2005 PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, for deferrals made on and
after January 1, 2005.
To the extent that matching contributions to a 401(k) plan
cannot be made to an officers Retirement Savings Plan
account because the Internal Revenue Code limits would be
exceeded, PG&E Corporation contributes the excess amount to
the PG&E Corporation Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan
(SRSP). Under the SRSP, officers may defer 5 percent to
50 percent of their base salary, and all or part of their
perquisite allowance, Short-Term Incentive Plan award, and
performance share award. PG&E Corporation will also
contribute an amount equal to any employer contributions due
under the qualified Retirement Savings Plan that were not made
due to limitations under Internal Revenue Code
Sections 401(m), 401(a)(17), or 415. Special Incentive
Stock Option Premiums (SISOPs) granted under the Executive Stock
Ownership Program must be deferred pursuant to the terms of that
program.
Earnings are calculated based on the performance of the
following funds available in the qualified Retirement Savings
Plan: Large Company Stock Index Fund (2006 return of 15.78%),
International Stock Index Fund (2006 return of 26.31%),
Conservative Asset Allocation Fund (2006 return of 9.38%),
Moderate Asset Allocation Fund (2006 return of 12.22%),
Aggressive Asset Allocation Fund (2006 return of 15.02%), Stable
Value Fund (2006 return of 4.51%), Bond Index Fund (2006 return
of 4.33%), and the Small Company Stock Index Fund (2006 return
of 14.93%). Other available measures are the PG&E
Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, which mirrors an investment in
PG&E Corporation common stock (2006 return of 31.58%), and
the AA Utility Bond Fund. The AA Utility Bond Fund accrues
interest based on the long-term corporate bond yield average for
Aa utilities reported by Moodys Investors Service (yields
reported during 2006 ranged from 5.45% to 6.26%). Pre-2005
deferrals are limited to the Large Company Stock Index Fund, the
PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund, and the AA Utility Bond
Fund. With the exception of SISOP deferrals, the earnings
measures are selected by the officer and may be reallocated
subject to restrictions imposed by regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. SISOP deferrals may only be invested in
the PG&E Corporation Phantom Stock Fund and may not be
reallocated.
Pre-2005 deferrals may be distributed in 1 to 10 installments
commencing in January of the year following termination of
employment. For deferrals made in 2005 and thereafter,
distributions may be made in the seventh month following
termination of employment or in January of a year specified by
the officer.
55
Potential Payments Upon Resignation, Retirement, Termination,
Change in Control, Death, or Disability
The executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table
are eligible to receive certain benefits upon termination, a
change in the officers responsibilities, or a change in
control. PG&E Corporations and Pacific Gas and
Electric Companys policy is not to provide benefits
conditioned solely upon a change in control. In general,
payments are triggered only if (1) the change in control
has been implemented (not just approved by shareholders),
(2) there has been termination or constructive termination
of the individual, and (3) with respect to vesting of
equity-based awards, the successor entity has elected not to
continue any equity-based grants in a manner that preserves the
value of those grants.
The following discussions of potential payments upon termination
or a change in control assume that the executive officer left
employment on December 31, 2006, and that the value of any
stock-based compensation received was $47.33 per share,
which was the closing price of a share of PG&E Corporation
common stock on December 29, 2006. The tables below exclude
amounts that represent payment for services rendered (such as
unpaid and earned salary or Short-Term Incentive Plan awards)
and that would be due to the executive officer even if the
individual had remained employed with PG&E Corporation or
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (as the case may be).
Potential Payments Upon Resignation/ Retirement
This table estimates potential payments for each individual
named in the Summary Compensation Table, if that individual were
to resign from employment effective December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualified | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Equity-Based | |
|
|
|
|
Of Accumulated | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Grants | |
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
That Accelerate | |
|
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Balance | |
|
Upon Retirement(1) | |
|
Total | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
$ |
2,036,302 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,419,248 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
$ |
744,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,915,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,660,038 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
$ |
2,510,992 |
|
|
$ |
288,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,827,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,627,477 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
$ |
1,760,491 |
|
|
$ |
268,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,028,694 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
$ |
5,625,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,764,404 |
|
|
$ |
5,034,322 |
|
|
$ |
13,424,364 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
$ |
892,508 |
|
|
$ |
713,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,606,108 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
$ |
1,729,979 |
|
|
$ |
16,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,746,435 |
|
|
|
(1) |
If Ms. Everett or Mr. Worthington had resigned
effective December 31, 2006, they would have been eligible
for retirement benefits under the PG&E Corporation 2006
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and its predecessor, the
PG&E Corporation Long-Term Incentive Program. Those payments
are discussed separately in the narrative discussion following
this table, below. |
If an officer resigns, he or she is entitled to receive accrued
pension benefits and the aggregate balance in the officers
deferred compensation account, as described in the narrative
accompanying the Pension Benefits table and the Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation table.
In general, vested stock options are exercisable within
30 days after resignation or the original option term,
whichever is shorter. Unvested stock options, restricted stock,
performance shares, and Special Incentive Stock Ownership
Premiums (SISOPs) are cancelled upon resignation.
However, if the individuals resignation also qualifies as
a retirement under the LTIP or its predecessor (the
PG&E Corporation Long-Term Incentive Program), all unvested
options immediately vest and are exercisable for the shorter of
five years or the option term, the restrictions on restricted
stock continue to lapse as if the officer remained employed,
performance shares continue to vest as if the officer remained
employed, and unvested SISOPs immediately vest and are payable
in the seventh month following termination of employment.
56
Potential Payments Upon Termination With Cause
This table estimates potential payments for each individual
named in the Summary Compensation Table, if that individual were
to be terminated with cause effective December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualified | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Equity-Based | |
|
|
|
|
Of Accumulated | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Grants | |
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
That Accelerate | |
|
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Balance | |
|
Upon Retirement(1) | |
|
Total | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
$ |
2,036,302 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,419,248 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
$ |
744,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,915,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,660,038 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
$ |
2,510,992 |
|
|
$ |
288,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,827,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,627,477 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
$ |
1,760,491 |
|
|
$ |
268,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,028,694 |
|
B.R. Worthington
|
|
$ |
5,625,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,764,404 |
|
|
$ |
5,034,322 |
|
|
$ |
13,424,364 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
$ |
892,508 |
|
|
$ |
713,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,606,108 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
$ |
1,729,979 |
|
|
$ |
16,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,746,435 |
|
|
|
(1) |
If Ms. Everett or Mr. Worthington had been terminated
for cause effective December 31, 2006, they would have been
eligible for retirement benefits under the LTIP. Those payments
are discussed separately in the narrative discussion following
this table, below. |
If an officer is terminated for cause, he or she is not eligible
to receive an award under the Short-Term Incentive Plan for that
year. All outstanding unvested stock options, restricted stock,
performance shares, and unvested Special Incentive Stock
Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) are cancelled.
The officer is entitled to receive accrued pension benefits and
the aggregate balance in the officers deferred
compensation account, as described in the narrative accompanying
the Pension Benefits table and the Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation table.
However, if the individuals termination also qualifies as
a retirement under the LTIP or its predecessor, all
unvested options become immediately vested and are exercisable
for the shorter of five years or the option term, the
restrictions on restricted stock continue to lapse as if the
officer remained employed, performance shares continue to vest
as if the officer remained employed, and unvested SISOPs
immediately vest and are payable in the seventh month following
termination of employment.
Potential Payments Upon Termination Without Cause
This table estimates potential payments for each individual
named in the Summary Compensation Table, if that individual were
terminated without cause effective December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualified | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of | |
|
Value of | |
|
Value of | |
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Accum. | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance | |
|
Options | |
|
Awards | |
|
Pension | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
Career | |
|
|
|
|
Payment | |
|
Vesting(1) | |
|
Vesting(2) | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Balance | |
|
COBRA(3) | |
|
Transition | |
|
Total | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
$ |
3,750,401 |
|
|
$ |
2,281,743 |
|
|
$ |
5,051,869 |
|
|
$ |
2,185,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,946 |
|
|
$ |
32,266 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,700,126 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
$ |
913,060 |
|
|
$ |
879,938 |
|
|
$ |
1,719,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,362,836 |
|
|
$ |
1,915,542 |
|
|
$ |
31,571 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,837,606 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
$ |
870,000 |
|
|
$ |
482,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,345,706 |
|
|
$ |
2,510,992 |
|
|
$ |
288,545 |
|
|
$ |
16,786 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,529,263 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
$ |
163,532 |
|
|
$ |
751,843 |
|
|
$ |
1,123,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,653,214 |
|
|
$ |
268,203 |
|
|
$ |
31,571 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,006,925 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
$ |
1,516,675 |
|
|
$ |
1,676,340 |
|
|
$ |
3,357,982 |
|
|
$ |
5,625,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,764,404 |
|
|
$ |
17,798 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,973,837 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
$ |
1,300,002 |
|
|
$ |
1,611,577 |
|
|
$ |
3,830,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,745,006 |
|
|
$ |
713,600 |
|
|
$ |
32,266 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,248,415 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
$ |
587,027 |
|
|
$ |
535,933 |
|
|
$ |
1,300,552 |
|
|
$ |
1,990,452 |
|
|
$ |
16,456 |
|
|
$ |
17,640 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,463,060 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Value based on the difference between the option exercise price
and $47.33, which was the closing price of PG&E Corporation
common stock on December 29, 2006. |
|
(2) |
Value based on the December 29, 2006 closing price of
$47.33. |
|
(3) |
As required by the health benefit provisions in the Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). |
57
The PG&E Corporation Officer Severance Policy, which covers
most officers of PG&E Corporation and its subsidiaries,
including the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table,
provides benefits if a covered officer is terminated without
cause. In most situations, benefits under the policy include:
|
|
1. |
A lump sum payment of one and one-half or two times annual base
salary and Short-Term Incentive Plan target (the applicable
severance multiple being dependent on an officers level), |
|
2. |
Continued vesting of equity-based incentives for one and
one-half or two years after termination (depending on the
applicable severance multiple), |
|
3. |
Accelerated vesting of up to two-thirds of the Special Incentive
Stock Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) granted under the Executive
Stock Ownership Program (depending on an officers
level), and |
|
4. |
Payment of health care insurance premiums for 18 months
after termination. |
The severance benefit is generally paid to the officer in a lump
sum. However, if the officer is covered by the PG&E
Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and is under
age 55, a portion of that officers severance benefits
will be automatically converted to additional years of age, up
to 55 years, for purposes of calculating pension benefits,
with the remaining portion of the severance benefit, if any,
paid in a lump sum. If the additional age resulting from such
conversion does not result in an age of 55, the officer will be
paid the entire severance benefit in a lump sum.
If an officer is terminated without cause before
December 31 of a given year and has less than six months of
service in the year, the officer is not eligible for that
years Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) award. If the
officer is terminated before December 31 and has at least
six months of service in the year, he or she is eligible for a
prorated STIP award for that year, if any. If the officer is
terminated on December 31, he or she is eligible for that
years STIP award, if any.
Unvested stock options and restricted stock continue to vest for
a number of months equivalent to the severance multiple set
forth in the Officer Severance Policy. Stock options are
exercisable within five years after termination or the original
option term, whichever is shorter. Restrictions on restricted
stock continue to lapse for a number of months equal to the
severance multiple. Performance shares vest proportionately
based on the number of months during the performance period that
the officer was employed divided by 36 months. Two-thirds
of unvested SISOPs vest and one-third are forfeited. If the
officer is at least 55 years of age with at least
5 years of service, his or her termination is treated as a
retirement under the terms of the LTIP (and its predecessor). In
that case, any unvested stock options immediately vest. Stock
options are exercisable within five years after termination or
the original option term, whichever is shorter. Restrictions on
restricted stock continue to lapse and performance shares
continue to vest as if the officer remained employed. Unvested
SISOPs immediately vest. The restricted phantom stock units
granted to Mr. King under his retention arrangement vest in
proportion to the months of service completed during the
60-month performance
period.
The officer is entitled to receive accrued pension benefits and
the aggregate balance in the officers deferred
compensation account, as described in the narrative accompanying
the Pension Benefits Table and the Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Table. Career transition services and COBRA
premiums for a period of 18 months are also provided.
The officer agrees not to divulge any confidential or privileged
information obtained during his or her employment. During a
period equal to the severance multiple, the officer agrees to a
covenant not to compete and to refrain from soliciting customers
and employees. He or she also agrees to assist in legal
proceedings as reasonably required during this period.
On November 13, 2006, PG&E Corporation announced the
departure of Bruce R. Worthington, who had served as Senior Vice
President and General Counsel of PG&E Corporation from 1997
until November 10, 2006. His employment will terminate in
April 2007. Mr. Worthington will receive severance benefits
in accordance with the PG&E Corporation Officer Severance
Policy, contingent upon his execution of a severance agreement,
as called for under the Officer Severance Policy. These benefits
include a lump sum payment of $1,516,675 and payment of health
insurance premiums for 18 months.
Mr. Worthingtons termination is treated as a
retirement under the terms of the LTIP (and its predecessor).
Unvested stock options immediately vest. Restrictions on
restricted stock continue to lapse and performance shares
continue to vest as if he had remained employed.
58
Potential Payments Following a Change in Control and Other
Triggering Events
This table estimates potential payments for each individual
named in the Summary Compensation Table, if there were a change
in control of PG&E Corporation and its affiliates, and
(1) the successor company does not continue the outstanding
awards in a manner that preserves their value, and (2) the
individual is terminated or constructively terminated effective
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present | |
|
Non-Qualified | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of | |
|
Value of | |
|
Value of | |
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
Short-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
Incentive | |
|
Severance | |
|
Tax | |
|
Options | |
|
Awards | |
|
Pension | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
Plan Award | |
|
Payment | |
|
Restoration | |
|
Vesting(1) | |
|
Vesting(2) | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Balance | |
|
Total | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
$ |
975,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,850,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,670,617 |
|
|
$ |
8,829,955 |
|
|
$ |
3,234,128 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,946 |
|
|
$ |
23,942,646 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
$ |
271,700 |
|
|
$ |
2,297,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,881,886 |
|
|
$ |
988,694 |
|
|
$ |
2,751,751 |
|
|
$ |
744,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,915,542 |
|
|
$ |
10,851,169 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
$ |
145,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,305,000 |
|
|
$ |
920,917 |
|
|
$ |
482,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,307,862 |
|
|
$ |
2,510,992 |
|
|
$ |
288,545 |
|
|
$ |
6,960,550 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
$ |
176,043 |
|
|
$ |
1,584,383 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
817,841 |
|
|
$ |
1,602,264 |
|
|
$ |
1,760,491 |
|
|
$ |
268,203 |
|
|
$ |
6,209,225 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
$ |
269,088 |
|
|
$ |
2,275,014 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,676,340 |
|
|
$ |
3,278,916 |
|
|
$ |
5,625,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,764,404 |
|
|
$ |
15,889,400 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
$ |
461,250 |
|
|
$ |
3,228,750 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,767,012 |
|
|
$ |
5,543,873 |
|
|
$ |
2,022,930 |
|
|
$ |
713,600 |
|
|
$ |
13,737,415 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
$ |
141,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,271,250 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
598,182 |
|
|
$ |
1,545,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,729,979 |
|
|
$ |
16,456 |
|
|
$ |
5,302,197 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Value based on the difference between the option exercise price
and $47.33, which was the closing price of PG&E Corporation
common stock on December 29, 2006. |
|
(2) |
Value based on the December 29, 2006 closing price of
$47.33. |
PG&E Corporation Officer Severance Policy. The
PG&E Corporation Officer Severance Policy provides covered
officers with alternative benefits that apply upon a
double trigger, i.e., after (1) actual or
constructive termination of the covered officer
(2) following a change in control or potential change in
control. Constructive termination includes certain changes to a
covered officers responsibilities, compensation, or place
of employment.
In the event of an officers termination following a change
in control or potential change in control, the policy provides
for a lump sum payment equal to the total of:
|
|
1. |
Unpaid base salary earned through the termination date, |
|
2. |
Short-Term Incentive Plan target calculated for the fiscal year
in which termination occurs (Target Bonus), |
|
3. |
Any accrued but unpaid vacation pay, and |
|
4. |
Three times the sum of Target Bonus and the officers
annual base salary in effect immediately before either the date
of termination or the change in control, whichever base salary
is greater. |
Change in control termination benefits also include
reimbursement of excise taxes levied upon the severance benefit
under Internal Revenue Code Section 4999. In addition,
benefits conditioned upon continued future employment will
accelerate in full.
Benefits provided under the Officer Severance Policy also are
subject to the Golden Parachute Restriction Policy, which is
discussed below.
PG&E Corporation Golden Parachute Restriction Policy.
On February 15, 2006, the PG&E Corporation Board of
Directors adopted a policy requiring shareholder approval of
executive severance payments provided in connection with a
change in control of PG&E Corporation, to the extent that
those payments exceed 2.99 times the sum of a covered
officers base salary and target annual bonus. This policy
was adopted in response to a shareholder proposal that was
approved by shareholders at PG&E Corporations 2005
annual meeting.
The Golden Parachute Restriction Policy applies to the value of
cash, special benefits, or perquisites that are due to the
executive following both (1) a change in control,
and (2) the termination or constructive termination
of an officer covered by the Officer Severance Policy. It does
not apply to the value of benefits that would be triggered by a
change in control without severance, or to the value of benefits
that would be triggered by severance in the absence of a change
in control. The Golden Parachute Restriction Policy also does
not apply to certain enumerated payments, including,
among others, compensation for services rendered prior to
termination, tax restoration payments, and accelerated vesting
or settlement of equity awards.
The Golden Parachute Restriction Policy became effective upon
adoption on February 15, 2006, subject to existing
contractual obligations in the Officer
59
Severance Policy. The Officer Severance Policy provides that if
the Policy is amended in a manner that creates an aggregate
negative impact on officers covered by the Policy, those
amendments do not become effective until three years after those
covered officers receive notice of the change. For officers who
were subject to the Officer Severance Policy on
February 15, 2006, benefits provided under the Officer
Severance Policy will not be subject to the Golden Parachute
Restriction Policy until 2009.
The PG&E Corporation Long-Term Incentive Program and
PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Effective January 1, 2006, the prior PG&E Corporation
Long-Term Incentive Program (Prior LTIP) was replaced by the
PG&E Corporation 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). For
awards granted under the Prior LTIP and awards granted in 2006
under the LTIP, upon a change in control:
|
|
1. |
Any time periods relating to the exercise or realization of any
stock-based incentive (including performance shares, stock
options, performance units, and Special Incentive Stock
Ownership Premiums (SISOPs) granted under the Executive Stock
Ownership Program) will be accelerated so that such incentive
may be exercised or realized in full immediately upon the change
in control, |
|
2. |
All shares of restricted stock will immediately cease to be
forfeitable, and |
|
3. |
All conditions relating to the realization of any stock-based
incentive will terminate immediately. |
Starting with grants made for 2007 under the LTIP, such
acceleration and automatic vesting upon a change in control will
occur only if either (1) the successor company fails to
continue previously granted awards in a manner that preserves
the value of those awards, or (2) the award recipient is
terminated during a set period of time before and after the
change in control.
What constitutes a change in control?
On February 15, 2006, the PG&E Corporation Board of
Directors amended the definition of change in
control reflected in the PG&E Corporation Officer
Severance Policy and the LTIP. Prior to the effective date of
these amendments, the definition of change in
control included shareholder approval of certain
consolidation or merger transactions. The amendments provide
that a change in control occurs upon the
consummation of a transaction following shareholder approval,
rather than upon shareholder approval alone. The amendments
address issues raised in a shareholder proposal that was
approved by shareholders at PG&E Corporations 2005
annual meeting.
Specifically, the PG&E Corporation Officer Severance Policy
and LTIP, as amended, define a change in control as follows:
|
|
1. |
Any person (as such term is used in
Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, but excluding any benefit plan for employees or any
trustee, agent, or other fiduciary for any such plan acting in
such persons capacity as such fiduciary), directly or
indirectly, becomes the beneficial owner of securities of
PG&E Corporation representing 20 percent or more of the
combined voting power of PG&E Corporations then
outstanding securities, |
|
2. |
During any two consecutive years, individuals who at the
beginning of that period constitute the Board of Directors cease
for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board of
Directors, unless the election, or the nomination for election
by the shareholders of PG&E Corporation, of each new
director was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the
directors then still in office who were directors at the
beginning of the period, or |
|
3. |
Any consolidation or merger of PG&E Corporation shall have
been approved by the shareholders and consummated, other than a
merger or consolidation that would result in the voting
securities of the Corporation outstanding immediately prior
thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding
or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving
entity or any parent of such surviving entity) at least
70 percent of the combined voting power of the Corporation,
such surviving entity, or the parent of such surviving entity
outstanding immediately after the merger or consolidation, |
|
4. |
The shareholders of PG&E Corporation shall have approved: |
|
|
|
|
a. |
Any sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer (in one transaction
or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all
of the assets of the Corporation, or |
|
|
b. |
Any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the
Corporation. |
For purposes of this definition, the term combined voting
power means the combined voting power of the then
outstanding voting securities of PG&E Corporation or the
other relevant entity.
60
The amended definition of change in control in the
LTIP will become effective starting with grants for 2007. The
amendments to the Officer Severance Policy became effective upon
adoption, subject to existing contractual obligations in the
Officer Severance Policy (discussed above under Golden
Parachute Restriction Policy). For officers covered by the
Officer Severance Policy on February 15, 2006, the
Policys amended definition of change in
control will become effective during 2009.
The officer is entitled to receive accrued pension benefits and
the aggregate balance in the officers deferred
compensation account, as described in the narrative accompanying
the Pension Benefits table and the Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation table.
Potential Payments Upon Termination Due to Death or
Disability
This table estimates potential payments for each individual
named in the Summary Compensation Table, if that
individuals employment were terminated due to death or
disability effective December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of | |
|
Non-Qualified | |
|
|
|
|
Value of | |
|
Value of | |
|
Accum. | |
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Pension | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
Awards | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
Vesting | |
|
Vesting | |
|
(Upon Death) | |
|
Balance | |
|
Total | |
P. A. Darbee
|
|
$ |
2,670,617 |
|
|
$ |
9,003,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,253 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,946 |
|
|
$ |
15,117,009 |
|
C. P. Johns
|
|
$ |
988,694 |
|
|
$ |
2,797,296 |
|
|
$ |
384,260 |
|
|
$ |
1,915,542 |
|
|
$ |
6,085,792 |
|
L. H. Everett
|
|
$ |
482,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,329,699 |
|
|
$ |
1,452,127 |
|
|
$ |
288,545 |
|
|
$ |
3,552,605 |
|
K. M. Harvey
|
|
$ |
817,841 |
|
|
$ |
1,624,547 |
|
|
$ |
1,898,506 |
|
|
$ |
268,203 |
|
|
$ |
4,609,097 |
|
B. R. Worthington
|
|
$ |
1,676,340 |
|
|
$ |
3,324,373 |
|
|
$ |
3,490,883 |
|
|
$ |
2,764,404 |
|
|
$ |
11,256,000 |
|
T. B. King
|
|
$ |
1,767,012 |
|
|
$ |
5,614,991 |
|
|
$ |
460,117 |
|
|
$ |
713,600 |
|
|
$ |
8,555,720 |
|
T. E. Bottorff
|
|
$ |
598,182 |
|
|
$ |
1,567,828 |
|
|
$ |
1,445,996 |
|
|
$ |
16,456 |
|
|
$ |
3,628,462 |
|
If an officers employment is terminated by reason of
disability, the officer is entitled to pension payments
consistent with benefits paid upon resignation. These payments
are detailed above in the table entitled Potential
Payments Upon Resignation/ Retirement.
If an officers employment is terminated due to the
officers death, the amount of pension benefits depends on
the officers age and the number of years worked at
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. If
(1) the officer was 55 years of age or (2) the
combined total of his or her age and the number of years worked
exceeded 70, then the officers surviving spouse would be
entitled to an immediate payment of 50 percent of the
single life pension benefit that would have otherwise been
available to the officer at age 65. For all other officers,
the surviving spouse pension benefits would commence in the
month that starts the day after that officer would have turned
55 years old. The value of this benefit would be
50 percent of the single life pension benefit that would
have otherwise been available to the participant at age 55.
Upon termination following death or disability, the
officers designated beneficiary(ies) or the officer would
be entitled to receive the aggregate balance in the
officers deferred compensation account.
Upon death or disability, the LTIP (and its predecessor)
provides for accelerated vesting of awards, as detailed below.
|
|
|
All unvested options vest immediately and are exercisable for
the shorter of one year or the option term. |
|
|
Restrictions on restricted stock vest on the first business day
of January of the following year. |
|
|
Unvested performance shares vest immediately. Vested shares are
payable, if at all, as soon as practicable after completion of
the performance period relevant to the performance share grant.
The payout percentage is based on the same formula applied to
active employees performance shares. Beneficiaries also
may receive a cash payment equal to the amount of dividends
accrued over a performance period with respect to the
performance shares, multiplied by the same payout percentage
used to determine the amount, if any, of the performance shares. |
|
|
Unvested Special Incentive Stock Ownership Premiums (SISOPs)
vest immediately and are payable in the seventh month following
termination. |
Vested LTIP awards are payable to the officers designated
beneficiary(ies), or otherwise in accordance with the
officers instructions or by law.
61
________________________________________________________________________________
Report of the Audit Committees
The Audit Committees of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company are comprised of independent directors and
operate under written charters adopted by their respective
Boards of Directors. The members of the Audit Committees of
PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company are
identical. At both PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, management is responsible for internal
controls and the integrity of the financial reporting process.
In this regard, management has assured the Audit Committees that
the consolidated financial statements of PG&E Corporation
and Pacific Gas and Electric Company were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the
Audit Committees reviewed and discussed these audited
consolidated financial statements with management and the
independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit
Committees also reviewed with the independent registered public
accounting firm matters that are required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with
Audit Committees).
Deloitte & Touche LLP was the independent registered
public accounting firm for PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
and Electric Company in 2006. The independent registered public
accounting firm provided to the Committees the written
disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1 (Independence Discussion with Audit Committees), and
the Committees discussed with the independent registered public
accounting firm that firms independence.
Based on the Committees reviews and discussion with
management and the independent registered public accounting
firm, the Committees recommended to the Boards of Directors that
the audited consolidated financial statements for PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company be included in
the PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
March 13, 2007
Audit Committees of the Boards of Directors of PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Barry Lawson Williams, Chair
David R. Andrews
Maryellen C. Herringer
Mary S. Metz
62
________________________________________________________________________________
Other Information
Principal Shareholders
The following table presents certain information regarding
shareholders that PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company know are the beneficial owners of more than
5 percent of any class of voting securities of PG&E
Corporation or Pacific Gas and Electric Company as of
February 9, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of |
|
Amount and Nature of | |
|
Percent | |
Class of Stock |
|
Beneficial Owner |
|
Beneficial Ownership | |
|
of Class | |
Pacific Gas and Electric
Company
stock(1) |
|
PG&E
Corporation(2)
One Market, Spear Tower,
Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105 |
|
|
279,624,823 |
|
|
|
96.44% |
|
PG&E Corporation
Common stock |
|
Goldman Sachs Asset Management,
L.P.(3)
32 Old Slip
New York, NY 10005 |
|
|
23,027,874 |
|
|
|
6.60% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Pacific Gas and Electric Companys common stock and
preferred stock vote together as a single class. Each share is
entitled to one vote. |
|
(2) |
As a result of the formation of the holding company on
January 1, 1997, PG&E Corporation became the holder of
all issued and outstanding shares of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company common stock. As of February 7, 2007, PG&E
Corporation and a subsidiary held 100 percent of the issued
and outstanding shares of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
common stock, and neither PG&E Corporation nor any of its
subsidiaries held shares of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
preferred stock. |
|
(3) |
The information relating to Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P.
is based on beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2006,
as reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 9, 2007. Goldman Sachs
Asset Management, L.P. has sole voting power with respect to
18,855,442 of these shares and sole dispositive power with
respect to 23,027,874 of these shares. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
In accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission regulations,
PG&E Corporations and Pacific Gas and Electric
Companys directors and certain officers, and persons who
own greater than 10 percent of PG&E Corporations
or Pacific Gas and Electric Companys equity securities
must file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such
equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the principal national securities exchange on which those
securities are registered, and must furnish PG&E Corporation
or Pacific Gas and
Electric Company with copies of all such reports they file.
Based solely on review of copies of such reports received or
written representations from certain reporting persons, PG&E
Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company believe that
during 2006 all filing requirements applicable to their
respective directors, officers, and 10 percent shareholders
were satisfied. No information is reported for individuals
during periods in which they were not directors, officers, or
10 percent shareholders of the respective company.
By Order of the Boards of Directors of
PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company,
Linda Y.H. Cheng
Vice President, Corporate Governance and Corporate Secretary
PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
63
________________________________________________________________________________
Map and Directions to the PG&E Corporation
and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Joint Annual Meeting
San Ramon Valley Conference Center
3301 Crow Canyon Road, San Ramon, CA
The San Ramon Valley Conference Center is located in
San Ramon right off Interstate 680, approximately
35 miles east of San Francisco. From Highway 680, take
the Crow Canyon Road exit. Go east on Crow Canyon Road past
Camino Ramon. Turn right into the Conference Center parking lot.
There is ample free parking on the grounds.
Your vote is important.
If you are not executing and submitting your proxy and voting
instructions over the Internet or by telephone, please mark,
sign, date, and mail the enclosed proxy card as soon as
possible.
Printed
with soybean ink on recycled/recyclable paper.
|
|
|
|
|
Your proxy is solicited on behalf of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board of Directors. Unless contrary instructions are given below, |
|
Please
|
|
o |
the designated proxies will vote the Pacific Gas and Electric Company shares for which they hold proxies FOR Items 1 and 2.
|
|
Mark Here |
|
|
|
for Address Change |
|
|
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR MANAGEMENT ITEMS 1 AND 2. |
|
|
|
FOR ALL |
|
WITHHOLD FOR ALL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES ARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01David R. Andrews, 02Leslie S. Biller, 03David A. Coulter, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04C. Lee Cox, 05Peter A. Darbee, 06Maryellen C. Herringer, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07Thomas B. King, 08Richard A. Meserve, 09Mary S. Metz, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10Barbara L. Rambo, 11Barry Lawson Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WITHHOLD vote only for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILL ATTEND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please mark the Will Attend box |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you
are signing for the shareholder, please sign the shareholders name and your name, and specify the capacity in which you act.
5
If you are not submitting your proxy over the Internet or by telephone, please detach here and mail this proxy card in the enclosed envelope.5
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
PROXIES AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS SUBMITTED OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE MUST BE
RECEIVED BY 11:59 P.M., EASTERN TIME, ON TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 2007.
PRIOR TO VOTING, READ THE ACCOMPANYING JOINT PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ABOVE PROXY CARD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mail |
|
|
http://www.proxyvoting.com/pcg
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-866-540-5760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use the internet to vote your proxy.
Have your proxy card in hand when
you access the web site.
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
Use any touch-tone telephone in the U.S. or Canada to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
Mark, sign and date
your proxy card
and
return it in the
enclosed postage-paid
envelope. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you vote your proxy over the Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to return your proxy card.
You can view the Proxy Statement and Annual Report on the Internet at www.pgecorp.com
6Please use the attached ticket to attend the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Annual Meeting.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Annual Meeting Ticket |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ticket for the annual meeting on Wednesday, April 18, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., to be held at the San Ramon Valley Conference Center, 3301 Crow Canyon Road, San Ramon, California. Doors open at 9:00 a.m. You may bypass the shareholder registration area and present this ticket at the entrance to the meeting room. |
(See
reverse side for additional information.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned hereby appoints Peter A. Darbee, Thomas B. King, and Linda Y.H. Cheng, or any of them severally, proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the stock of the undersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, to be held at the San Ramon Valley Conference Center, 3301 Crow Canyon Road, San Ramon, California, on Wednesday, April 18, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., and at any adjournment
or postponement thereof, as indicated on this proxy card, and in their discretion to the extent permitted by law, upon all motions and resolutions which may properly come before said meeting, adjournments, or postponements thereof. |
|
|
(Continued, and to be marked, signed, and dated on the reverse side.)
|
|
|
|
|
As an alternative to completing and mailing this proxy card, you may submit your proxy and voting instructions over the Internet at http://www.proxyvoting.com/pcg or by touch-tone telephone at 1-866-540-5760 (from anywhere in the United States or Canada). Please have your proxy card in hand when voting over the Internet or by telephone. These Internet and telephone voting procedures comply with California law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address
Change (Mark the corresponding box on the
reverse side) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 If
you are not submitting your proxy over the Internet or by
telephone, please detach here and mail this proxy card in the enclosed envelope. 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be held at: |
|
|
|
|
|
San Ramon Valley Conference Center |
|
|
3301 Crow Canyon Road |
|
|
San Ramon, California |
|
|
|
|
|
April 18, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. |
6 Please use the attached ticket to attend the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Annual Meeting. 6
|
|
|
|
There is free parking at the San Ramon Valley Conference Center.
Note: Shareholders will be asked to present valid photo identification, such as a drivers license or passport, before being admitted to the meeting. Cellular telephones and pagers must be turned off prior to entering the meeting. Cameras, tape recorders, and other electronic recording devices will not be allowed in the meeting, other than for Pacific Gas and Electric Company purposes. A checkroom will be available. For your protection, all briefcases, purses, packages, etc., will be
subject to inspection as you enter the meeting. No items will be allowed into the meeting that might pose a safety or security risk. We regret any inconvenience this may cause. |
|
|
|
|
|
Real-time captioning services and assistive listening devices will be available. Please contact an usher if you wish to be seated in the real-time captioning section or require an assistive listening device. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your proxy is solicited on behalf of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Board of Directors. Unless contrary instructions are given below, |
|
Please
|
|
o |
the designated proxies will vote the Pacific Gas and Electric Company shares for which they hold proxies FOR Items 1 and 2.
|
|
Mark Here |
|
|
|
for Address Change |
|
|
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR MANAGEMENT ITEMS 1 AND 2. |
|
|
|
FOR ALL |
|
WITHHOLD FOR ALL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES ARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01David
R. Andrews, 02Leslie S. Biller, 03David A. Coulter, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04C. Lee Cox, 05Peter A. Darbee, 06Maryellen C. Herringer, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07Thomas B. King, 08Richard A. Meserve, 09Mary S. Metz, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10Barbara L. Rambo, 11Barry Lawson Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WITHHOLD vote only for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILL ATTEND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please mark the Will Attend box |
|
o |
If you are signing for the shareholder, please sign the shareholders name and your name, and specify the capacity in which you act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned hereby appoints Peter A. Darbee, Thomas B. King, and Linda Y.H. Cheng, or any of them severally, proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the stock of the undersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, to be held at the San Ramon Valley Conference Center, 3301 Crow Canyon Road, San Ramon, California, on Wednesday, April 18, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., and at any adjournment or
postponement thereof, as indicated on this proxy card, and in their discretion to the extent permitted by law, upon all motions and resolutions which may properly come before said meeting, adjournments, or postponements thereof. |
|
|
(Continued, and to be marked, signed, and dated on the reverse side.)
|
|
|
|
|
As an alternative to
completing and mailing this proxy card, you may submit your proxy and
voting instructions over the Internet at http://www.proxyvoting.com/pcg or by touch-tone telephone at 1-866-540-5760 (from anywhere in the United States or Canada). Please have your proxy card in hand when voting over the Internet or by telephone. These Internet and telephone voting procedures comply with California law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address
Change (Mark the corresponding box on the
reverse side) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|