def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.
|
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
June 17, 2005
To Introgens Stockholders:
We cordially invite you to attend Introgens 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) to be
held on Friday, June 17, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., local
time, at The University Club, Terrace Rooms 2 & 3,
5051 Westheimer, Suite 355, Houston, Texas 77056. At the
Annual Meeting we will vote on proposals to:
|
|
|
1. Elect two (2) Class II directors to the Board
of Directors, each to serve a term of three (3) years; |
|
|
2. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
Introgens independent registered public accounting firm
for the current fiscal year ending December 31,
2005; and |
|
|
3. Transact such other business as may properly come before
the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Stockholders who owned stock at the close of business on
April 25, 2005 may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting.
If you cannot attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote
electronically using the Internet or by telephone, in each case
as instructed on the enclosed Proxy Card or by mailing the Proxy
Card in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope. Any stockholder
attending the Annual Meeting may vote in person, even though he
or she has already returned a Proxy Card.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
/s/ RODNEY VARNER |
|
|
|
Rodney Varner |
|
Secretary |
Austin, Texas
May 9, 2005
INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for our 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting). This
Proxy Statement contains important information for you to
consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before
the Annual Meeting. Please read it carefully.
This Proxy Statement, a Proxy Card and the 2004 Annual Report to
Stockholders will be mailed to stockholders on or about
May 9, 2005.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the record date for the Annual Meeting and how many
shares of our common stock were outstanding on the record
date? |
|
A: |
|
Our Board of Directors has set April 25, 2005 as the record
date for the Annual Meeting. On April 25, 2005
approximately 30,919,068 shares of our common stock were
outstanding. |
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote and how many votes do I have? |
|
A: |
|
All stockholders who owned shares of our common stock on
April 25, 2005 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Every stockholder is entitled to one (1) vote for each
share of common stock held. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote? |
|
A: |
|
You may vote in person by attending the Annual Meeting or by
completing and returning your proxy by mail or electronically
using the Internet or by telephone. To vote your proxy by mail,
mark your vote on the enclosed Proxy Card, then follow the
directions on the Proxy Card. To vote your proxy using the
Internet, see the instructions on the Proxy Card, and have the
Proxy Card available when you access the Internet website. The
home page will prompt you to enter your control number, then
follow the instructions to record your vote. To vote your proxy
using the telephone, see the instructions on the Proxy Card and
have the Proxy Card available during the call. If you send in
your card but do not mark any selections, your shares will be
voted as recommended by our Board of Directors. Whether you plan
to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we encourage you to vote by
proxy as soon as possible. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote? |
|
A: |
|
You can revoke your proxy before the time of voting at the
Annual Meeting in several ways: |
|
|
|
|
|
by mailing a revised proxy dated later than the
prior proxy; |
|
|
|
by voting again at the Internet website; |
|
|
|
by voting again using the telephone; |
|
|
|
by voting in person at the Annual Meeting; or |
|
|
|
by notifying our corporate secretary in writing that
you are revoking your proxy. Your revocation must be received
before the Annual Meeting to be counted. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum for the Annual
Meeting? |
|
A: |
|
At least a majority of the shares of our common stock
outstanding as of the record date must be present at the Annual
Meeting in person or by proxy in order to hold the Annual
Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your
shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you are
either (i) present and vote in person at the Annual Meeting
or (ii) have properly submitted a proxy via mail, Internet
or telephone. Abstentions, broker non-votes and votes withheld
from director nominees are considered as shares present at the
Annual Meeting for the purposes of determining a quorum. A
broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee who holds
shares for the owner of the shares does not vote on a particular
proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting
authority for that proposal and has not received voting
instructions from the owner of the shares. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the voting requirement to approve each of the
proposals? |
|
A: |
|
For Proposal I, the election of directors, the two
(2) individuals receiving the highest number of
FOR votes will be elected. To pass,
Proposal II, the ratification of the appointment of the
independent registered public accounting firm, requires the
affirmative FOR vote of at least a majority of the
shares of our common stock present or represented by proxy at
the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. |
|
Q: |
|
How are votes counted? |
|
A: |
|
For Proposal I, you may vote FOR all of the
nominees or you may elect to have your vote WITHHELD
with respect to one or more of the nominees. Votes that are
withheld will be excluded entirely and will have no effect in
the election of directors. Similarly, if you hold your shares in
a brokerage account in your brokers name (this is called
street name) and you do not vote or instruct the
broker how to vote the shares, or your broker does not have
discretionary authority to vote in the election of directors,
your shares will have no effect in the election of directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
For Proposal II you may vote FOR,
AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you abstain from
voting on Proposal II, it has the same effect as a vote
against the proposal. If you hold your shares in a street
name and you do not vote or instruct the broker how to
vote the shares, or your broker does not have discretionary
authority to vote, your shares will not be counted in the tally
of the number of shares cast on Proposal II and therefore
may have the effect of reducing the number of shares needed to
approve the Proposal. |
|
|
|
Finally, if you just sign and return your Proxy Card with no
further instructions, your shares will be counted as a vote
FOR each director nominee and FOR the
ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who is soliciting my vote and who pays for the solicitation
of proxies? |
|
A: |
|
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation of your vote by our Board of Directors. We pay the
costs of soliciting proxies from stockholders. We may reimburse
brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners
of shares for their expenses in forwarding the voting materials
to the beneficial owners. Directors, officers and regular
employees may solicit proxies on our behalf personally, by
telephone or by facsimile, without additional compensation. |
|
Q: |
|
How does the Board of Directors recommend voting on the
proposals? |
|
A: |
|
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares
FOR each of the nominees to the Board of Directors
and FOR the ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005. |
|
Q: |
|
When are the stockholder proposals for the 2006 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders due? |
|
A: |
|
We anticipate holding our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on
or about June 15, 2006. Stockholder proposals for our 2006
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, whether intended for inclusion
in the Proxy Statement for such meeting or for presentation
directly at such meeting, must be received at our principal
executive offices by the close of business on January 9,
2006. In addition, notice of any stockholder proposals must be
given in accordance with our Bylaws and all other applicable
requirements including the rules and regulations of the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission. If a stockholder
fails to give notice of a stockholder proposal as required by
our Bylaws or other applicable requirements, then the proposal
will not be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual
Meeting and the stockholder will not be permitted to present the
proposal to the stockholders for a vote at the 2006 Annual
Meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
Where are Introgens principal executive offices? |
|
A: |
|
Our principal executive offices are located at 301 Congress
Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701. Our telephone
number is (512) 708-9310. |
2
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our
common stock as of March 31, 2005 by (i) all persons
known to us, based on statements filed by such persons pursuant
to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of
our common stock and based on the records of EquiServe, N.A.,
our transfer agent, (ii) each director, (iii) each of
the executive officers named in the table under Executive
Compensation Summary Compensation Table, and
(iv) all current directors and executive officers as a
group.
Except as otherwise noted, and subject to applicable community
property laws, the persons named in this table have, to our
knowledge, sole voting and investing power for all of the shares
of common stock held by them.
This table lists applicable percentage ownership based on
30,848,721 shares of common stock outstanding as of
March 31, 2005. Options to purchase shares of our common
stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31,
2005 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the persons holding
these options for the purpose of computing percentage ownership
of that person, but are not treated as outstanding for the
purpose of computing any other persons ownership
percentage.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each stockholder on
this table is c/o Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress
Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sanofi-Aventis(1)
|
|
|
5,009,664 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
174 avenue de France
75013 Paris France |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR Corp.(2)
|
|
|
2,129,460 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John N. Kapoor, Ph.D.(3)
|
|
|
3,416,709 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
David G. Nance(4)
|
|
|
3,029,295 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
William H. Cunningham, Ph.D.(5)
|
|
|
195,650 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Charles E. Long(6)
|
|
|
219,066 |
|
|
|
* |
|
S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D.(7)
|
|
|
41,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Peter Barton Hutt(8)
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James W. Albrecht, Jr.(9)
|
|
|
282,138 |
|
|
|
* |
|
J. David Enloe, Jr.(10)
|
|
|
189,530 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D.(11)
|
|
|
302,349 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert E. Sobol, M.D.(12)
|
|
|
262,342 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D.(13)
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 people)(14)
|
|
|
8,046,979 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common
stock. |
|
|
(1) |
Based on the 13G/ A filed by Sanofi-Aventis with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2005. The share
number includes 2,343,721 shares of our common stock
issuable within 60 days of March 31, 2005 upon
conversion of Series A non-voting convertible preferred
stock held by Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Pursuant to a Voting
Agreement dated June 30, 2001 by and between Introgen and
Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Aventis) related to
such shares, Aventis must vote all these shares in the same
manner as the shares voted by a majority of the our other
stockholders on any corporate action put to a vote of our
stockholders. The Voting Agreement will terminate on
June 30, 2011, unless terminated earlier in accordance with
the terms thereof. |
3
|
|
(2) |
Based on the 13G filed by FMR Corp. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005. |
|
(3) |
Consists of 202,109 shares held by EJ Financial
Enterprises, Inc., 3,099,067 shares held by EJ Financial/
Introgen Management L.P. and 115,533 shares held by
Dr. Kapoor subject to stock options that are exercisable
within 60 days of March 31, 2005. EJ Financial/
Introgen Management L.P. is controlled by its general partner,
EJ Financial Enterprises. Dr. Kapoor is Chairman of the
Board of Directors of EJ Financial Enterprises. Dr. Kapoor
disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by EJ
Financial Enterprises and EJ Financial/ Introgen Management L.P. |
|
(4) |
Consists of 1,346,979 shares held by Developtech Resource
Corporation, 18,130 shares held by Domecq Technologies,
Inc., 850,496 shares held by Debouchement, Ltd., and
813,690 shares held by Mr. Nance subject to stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 31, 2005. Mr. Nance is President and Chief
Executive Officer of Developtech Resource Corporation, Domecq
Technologies, Inc. and Debouchement, Ltd. Solely by virtue of
his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of each of
the foregoing entities, Mr. Nance holds the right to vote
for each entity and has dispositive control over the shares. |
|
(5) |
Includes 188,650 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(6) |
Includes 209,066 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(7) |
Consists of 41,500 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(8) |
Consists of 8,400 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(9) |
Includes 280,538 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 188,650 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(11) |
Includes 260,538 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(12) |
Includes 10,000 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(13) |
Consists of 100,000 shares subject to stock options that
are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
|
(14) |
Includes an aggregate of 2,216,565 shares subject to stock
options held by our directors and executive officers as a group
that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following sets forth information concerning the persons
currently serving as our executive officers, including
information as to each executive officers age, position
and business experience as of the record date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
David G. Nance
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D.
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Commercial Development |
Robert E. Sobol, M.D.
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Medical and Scientific Affairs |
James W. Albrecht, Jr.
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
J. David Enloe, Jr.
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Operations |
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D.
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President, Intellectual Property |
David G. Nance has served as a member of our Board of
Directors and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since
our inception in June 1993. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Nance
served as the Managing Partner of Texas Biomedical Development
Partners, the investment group that founded us.
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D. joined Introgen in February
2002 as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Commercial
Development. From 2000 to 2002, Dr. Talbott was Senior Vice
President, Worldwide Regulatory Affairs and Pharmacovigilance at
DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceuticals
4
Company, which merged during this period. From 1996 to 2000, he
served in various positions with Aventis Pharmaceuticals and
Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, most recently as
Senior Vice President, Drug Regulatory Affairs and Quality
Assurance. Prior to 1996, Dr. Talbott occupied several
management positions with Eli Lilly and Company, a major
pharmaceuticals company, and he spent five years with the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, first as a Reviewer and
then as a Branch Chief and Acting Division Director. He received
his Ph.D. in immunology and pharmacology from Rutgers University.
Robert E. Sobol, M.D. joined Introgen in September
2003 as our Senior Vice President, Medical and Scientific
Affairs. Dr. Sobol was a founder and Vice President of IDEC
Pharmaceuticals Corporation, the company that pioneered
monoclonal antibody based treatments for cancer and autoimmune
disorders. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of
Magnum Therapeutics Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company
that Introgen acquired in October 2004, and previously served as
President of Corautus Genetics Inc., a biopharmaceutical
company. From 1998 to 2003, Dr. Sobol served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of Genstar Therapeutics, a company
that developed gene therapy products, which he founded in 1996.
Dr. Sobol received his M.D. from The Chicago Medical School.
James W. Albrecht, Jr. joined Introgen in November
1994 as our Vice President, Operations and Administration, and
he has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 1995.
From 1993 to 1996, he operated a consulting business providing
chief financial officer services to the technology and real
estate industries. Mr. Albrecht worked previously at Arthur
Andersen LLP as an accountant and he is a Certified Public
Accountant. He received his B.B.A. in accounting from The
University of Texas at Austin.
J. David Enloe, Jr. joined Introgen in March
1995. He has served as our General Business Manager and Vice
President, Administration, and he is currently Senior Vice
President, Operations. From 1989 to 1995, he held various
positions at Centrilift, a division of Baker Hughes, Inc., an
energy services company, including Region General Manager,
Southeast Asia, and he worked at Arthur Andersen LLP as an
accountant prior to that time. Mr. Enloe is a Certified
Public Accountant. He received his B.B.A. in accounting from The
University of Texas at Austin.
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D. joined Introgen
in March 1999 as our Vice President, Intellectual Property.
Since February 2000, Dr. Parker has been a partner with the
law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, and head of the
firms Intellectual Property and Technology section in its
Austin office. From 1992 to January 2000, he was a shareholder
of the patent law firm of Arnold White & Durkee,
Professional Corporation, where he was an associate and patent
agent since 1983. Starting in 1997, Dr. Parker has served
as an adjunct professor at The University of Texas School of
Law. Dr. Parker received his Ph.D. in molecular
pharmacology and molecular biology from Baylor College of
Medicine in 1981, served on the faculty at Baylor College of
Medicine from 1981 to 1983, and received his J.D. from The
University of Texas School of Law in 1986.
SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES
The following sets forth information concerning persons
currently employed by us who make or are expected to make
significant contributions to our business, including information
as to each persons age, position and business experience
as of the record date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Peter Clarke, Ph.D.
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Vice President, Production and Technical Processes |
Kerstin B. Menander, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Vice President, Clinical Development |
Peter Clarke, Ph.D. joined Introgen in February 2004
as our Vice President, Production and Technical Processes, after
23 years working in the field of biotechnology in both
research and manufacturing. Dr. Clarke has held positions
of increasing importance in both start-up and established
European and U.S.-based biopharmaceutical companies such as
Medeva Pharma and Chiron Vaccines. Most recently,
Dr. Clarke worked for Bayer Biological Products, where he
was Director of Manufacturing and was closely involved in the
North American licensure and launch of a novel immunoglobulin.
Dr. Clarke received his BSC in
5
biochemistry from Sheffield University in England. His Ph.D. in
microbial physiology and DIC in biochemistry were completed at
the Imperial College of Science and Technology in London.
Kerstin B. Menander, M.D., Ph.D. joined
Introgen in November 2002 as our Vice President, Clinical
Development. From 1997 to 2002, Dr. Menander held various
regulatory and clinical development vice president positions at
Cell Pathways, Inc., a pharmaceutical oncology company, most
recently as Vice President, International Operations. Prior to
1997, she occupied senior management positions at Curative
Technologies, Inc., a biotechnology company concentrating on
wound healing, US 3 D Development, Inc., a strategic regulatory
and clinical development consulting company, and Collagen
Corporation, a biotechnology and facial aesthetics technology
company. She also spent several years at Syntex, a
pharmaceutical products and medical diagnostic systems company,
and Abbott, a diversified healthcare products company. She
received her M.D. and Ph.D. from the University of Lund in Lund,
Sweden.
6
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
General
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the
term of office of one class expiring each year. We currently
have six directors with two directors in each class. The terms
of office of our Class II directors, Peter Barton Hutt and
Charles E. Long, will expire at the 2005 Annual Meeting. The
terms of office of our Class III directors, John N.
Kapoor, Ph.D. and David G. Nance, will expire at the 2006
Annual Meeting. The terms of office of our Class I
directors, William H. Cunningham, Ph.D., and S. Malcolm
Gillis, Ph.D., will expire at the 2007 Annual Meeting. At
the 2005 Annual Meeting, stockholders will elect two
Class II directors, each for a term of three years.
Nominees for Election at the 2005 Annual Meeting
The following sets forth information concerning the nominees for
election as directors at the 2005 Annual Meeting, including
information as to each nominees age and business
experience as of the record date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director | |
Name of Nominee |
|
Age | |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Since | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Peter Barton Hutt
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Partner of the law firm of Covington & Burling |
|
|
2004 |
|
Charles E. Long(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director; Retired |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Member of Audit Committee |
|
(2) |
Member of Compensation Committee |
|
(3) |
Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
Peter Barton Hutt has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since August 2004. Mr. Hutt has been a partner
specializing in food and drug law in the Washington, D.C.
law firm of Covington & Burling since 1960, except when
he served as Chief Counsel for the FDA from 1971 to 1975.
Mr. Hutt was also a member of the board of directors of
IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a company that pioneered
monoclonal antibody based treatments for cancer and autoimmune
disorders. He is the co-author of a casebook used to teach food
and drug law throughout the country and teaches a full course on
this subject each year at Harvard Law School. Mr. Hutt
currently serves on the board of directors of Favrille, Inc., a
biopharmaceutical company, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a
biopharmaceutical company, ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a
specialty pharmaceutical company, Phase Forward Incorporated, a
provider of integrated enterprise-level software products,
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biotechnology company, all of
which are publicly-traded companies. Mr. Hutt also serves
on the board of directors of several privately-held
biopharmaceutical companies and on several venture capital
advisory boards, including Polaris Venture Partners and the
Sprout Group. Mr. Hutt received his B.A. in Economics and
Political Science from Yale University, an L.L.B. from Harvard
Law School and an L.L.M. in Food and Drug Law from New York
University Law School.
Charles E. Long has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since January 2001. Mr. Long is former vice
chairman of Citicorp and its principal subsidiary, Citibank.
Mr. Long held various positions during his career with
Citicorp, which began in 1972. From 1982 to 1998, he headed
Citicorps External Affairs Division, which includes the
Government Relations Division in Washington, D.C. From 1976
to 1982, he was responsible for managing Citicorps
international consumer banking business, as well as legal and
external affairs for consumer banking worldwide. Mr. Long
is a trustee of the Midwest Research Institute and the National
Forest Foundation. He has served as an officer, director or
trustee on a number of corporate, charitable and public boards,
including vice chairman of Georgetown University, vice chairman
and director of Woodrow Wilson House Museum and Fords
Theater in Washington, D.C. Mr. Long is a director of
Atlas Copco North America and The Drummong Co. Mr. Long is
also a member of the board of directors of
7
Gendux AB, our wholly-owned subsidiary. Mr. Long received
his B.B.A. in business from St. Johns University. In 1998,
he received an Honorary Doctor of Business Degree from St.
Johns University.
Incumbent Directors Whose Terms of Office Continue After the
Annual Meeting
The following sets forth information concerning the directors
whose terms of office continue after the 2005 Annual Meeting,
including information as to each directors age and
business experience as of the record date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director | |
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position/Principal Occupation |
|
Since | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
William H. Cunningham(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Professor, The University of Texas at Austin |
|
|
2000 |
|
S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D.(1)
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Professor, Rice University |
|
|
2004 |
|
John N. Kapoor, Ph.D.
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board; Chairman of the Board of EJ Financial
Enterprises, Inc. |
|
|
1993 |
|
David G. Nance
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Introgen Therapeutics,
Inc. |
|
|
1993 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Member of Audit Committee |
|
(2) |
Member of Compensation Committee |
|
(3) |
Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
William H. Cunningham, Ph.D., has served as a member
of our Board of Directors since July 2000. Dr. Cunningham
served as Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer of The
University of Texas System from 1992 to 2000, in addition to
holding the Lee Hage and Joseph D. Jamail Regents Chair in
Higher Education Leadership. He served as President of The
University of Texas at Austin, a component institution of the
University of Texas System, from 1985 to 1992. He is currently a
Professor of Marketing at The University of Texas at Austin.
Dr. Cunningham serves on a number of public commissions,
private corporate boards and in a number of advisory roles to
corporations. Dr. Cunningham serves on the board of
directors of John Hancock Advisers, Inc. He also serves on the
board of directors of Jefferson Pilot Corporation, Southwest
Airlines, Inc., LIN Television and Hayes Lemmerz International,
Inc., each of which is a publicly-traded corporation.
Dr. Cunningham received his Ph.D. and M.B.A. from Michigan
State University. In 1993, he received an Honorary Doctor of
Laws Degree and the Distinguished Alumnus Award from Michigan
State University.
S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., has served as a
member of our Board of Directors since February 2004.
Dr. Gillis served as the President of Rice University from
1993 through June 2004. He is also the Ervin Kenneth Zingler
Professor of Economics and continues to teach at Rice
University. Dr. Gillis has been honored with the
designation of University Professor, the highest faculty
designation at Rice University. Before entering university
leadership, he spent the first 25 years of his professional
life teaching economics and applying economic analysis to public
policy in almost 20 countries, from the United States and
Canada, to Ecuador, Colombia, Ghana and Indonesia. His research
and teaching have mainly been in the areas of fiscal economics
and environmental policy. Dr. Gillis served as Dean of the
Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Duke University from 1991 to
1993, and he served as Dean of the Graduate School and Vice
Provost for Academic Affairs at Duke University from 1986 to
1991. He is presently a member of the board of directors of
Service Corporation International, a publicly-traded
corporation. Dr. Gillis also serves on the board of
directors and board of trustees of many foundations, educational
associations and community organizations. In 2002, he was
appointed to the Governors Task Force for Texas Economic
Growth. Dr. Gillis received his Ph.D. from the University
of Illinois. He received his M.A. and B.A. from the University
of Florida. In 1992, he was awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws
Degree from Rocky Mountain College.
John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. has served as Chairman of our
Board of Directors since our inception in June 1993. In 1990,
Dr. Kapoor founded EJ Financial Enterprises, Inc., a
healthcare investment company, and he is presently the chairman
of its board of directors. He is also presently chairman of the
board of directors of Akorn, Inc., Option Care, Inc., and First
Horizon Pharmaceuticals Corporation, each of which is a publicly-
8
traded corporation. Dr. Kapoor also serves as a member of
the board of directors of NeoPharm, Inc., a publicly traded
corporation, and Duska Scientific Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Duska Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly-traded corporation.
Dr. Kapoor received his Ph.D. in medicinal chemistry from
the State University of New York at Buffalo.
Please see Executive Officers for information with
respect to Mr. Nance.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or
executive officers.
Board Meetings and Committees
Our Board of Directors held a total of six meetings during the
calendar year ended December 31, 2004. During such period,
the Board of Directors had a standing Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee and Executive Committee. Each director attended at
least 75% of his Board of Directors and Board committee
meetings, except S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., who attended 60%
of the Board of Directors meetings for which he was a director
and 100% of his Board committee meetings.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, which, during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2004, consisted of directors William H.
Cunningham, Ph.D. (Chairman), Charles E. Long and S.
Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., met four times and acted by written
consent twice during the year. The Audit Committee monitors our
system of internal controls, provides our Board of Directors
with the results of its examinations and recommendations derived
therefrom, outlines to the Board of Directors improvements made,
or to be made, in internal accounting controls, monitors the
qualifications and independence of our independent registered
public accounting firm, pre-approves non-audit services of our
independent registered public accounting firm, oversees our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and provides
to our Board of Directors such additional information and
materials as it may deem necessary to make our Board of
Directors aware of significant financial matters that require
their attention. In discharging its duties, the Audit Committee
is expected to:
|
|
|
|
|
have the sole authority to appoint, retain, compensate, oversee,
evaluate and replace the independent registered public
accounting firm; |
|
|
|
review and approve the scope of the annual internal and external
audit; |
|
|
|
review and pre-approve the engagement of our independent
registered public accounting firm to perform audit and non-audit
services and the related fees; |
|
|
|
meet independently with our internal auditing staff, independent
registered public accounting firm and senior management; |
|
|
|
review the integrity of our financial reporting process; |
|
|
|
review our financial statements and disclosures in Securities
and Exchange Commission filings; |
|
|
|
monitor compliance with our corporate codes of ethics; and |
|
|
|
review disclosures from our independent registered public
accounting firm regarding Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1. |
The Board of Directors believes that each member of the Audit
Committee is an independent director as that term is
defined by the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors has
determined that S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D. is an audit
committee financial expert, as defined by the Securities
and Exchange Commission guidelines. The Second Amended and
Restated Audit Committee Charter is attached hereto as
Exhibit A and can be accessed free of charge electronically
on our website at www.introgen.com or by writing to us at
Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue,
Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701, Attention: Investor
Relations.
9
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee, which currently consists of
directors William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. and Charles E. Long
(Chairman), met three times and acted by written consent three
times during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004. The
Compensation Committee administers our 1995 Stock Plan and 2000
Stock Option Plan, reviews compensation to be provided to our
officers, employees and consultants, including stock
compensation, grants options to purchase our common stock to our
employees, executive officers, directors and consultants, and
reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors
regarding all forms of compensation to be provided to the
members of the Board of Directors, including stock compensation.
The Compensation Committee is governed by a charter, which can
be accessed free of charge electronically on our website at
www.introgen.com or by writing to us at Introgen Therapeutics,
Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas
78701, Attention: Investor Relations.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of
directors William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. and Charles E. Long.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met once and
acted by written consent twice during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2004. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee proposes a slate of directors for election by our
stockholders at each annual meeting and nominates candidates for
appointment by the Board of Directors to fill any vacancies on
the Board of Directors. It is also responsible for determining
the appropriate Board of Directors size, composition and
committee structure and developing and reviewing applicable
corporate governance principles. We believe that each of the
members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
meets the director independence requirements set forth in the
Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is governed by a charter, which can be
accessed free of charge electronically on our website at
www.introgen.com or by writing to us at Introgen Therapeutics,
Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701,
Attention: Investor Relations.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
nominees recommended by stockholders provided that the
recommendations are made in accordance with the procedures
described in Article II, Section 2.5 of our Bylaws and
in this proxy statement under Information Concerning
Solicitation and Voting. To be considered timely, such
stockholders recommendation must be delivered to or mailed
and received at our principal executive offices as set forth
below not less than one hundred twenty (120) calendar days
in advance of the first anniversary date of mailing of our proxy
statement released to stockholders in connection with the
previous years annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholder
recommendations for candidates to the Board of Directors must be
directed in writing to the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary of Introgen
Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850,
Austin, Texas 78701, and must include the candidates name,
biographical data and qualifications. It is our policy that
stockholder nominees nominated in compliance with these
procedures will receive the same consideration that the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees nominees
receive.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies
director nominees through a combination of referrals, including
by management, existing board members and stockholders, third
party search firms and direct solicitations, where warranted.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may request
references and additional information from the candidate prior
to reaching a conclusion. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is under no obligation to formally respond
to recommendations, although as a matter of practice, every
effort is made to do so.
To be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, a director nominee must meet the following minimum
criteria: (i) the highest personal and professional
integrity; (ii) a record of exceptional ability and
judgment; (iii) the ability and willingness to devote the
required amount of time to the Companys affairs, including
attendance at Board and committee meetings; (iv) the
interest, capacity and willingness, in conjunction with the
other members of the Board, to serve the long-term interests of
our stockholders; (v) freedom from any personal or
professional relationships that would adversely affect his or
her ability to serve the best interests of Introgen and our
stockholders.
10
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes
into account that the Board as a whole shall have competency in
the following areas: business judgment, industry knowledge,
accounting and finance, leadership, corporate governance,
business strategy, management and crisis management.
Any of our stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board
of Directors, a committee of the Board, the non-management
directors as a group or any individual member of the Board, may
send correspondence to Mr. Rodney Varner, Corporate
Secretary of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue,
Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701. The Corporate Secretary
will compile and submit on a periodic basis all stockholder
correspondence to the entire Board of Directors, or, if and as
designated in the communication, to a committee of the Board,
the non-management directors as a group or an individual Board
member. The independent directors of the Board review and
approve the stockholders communication process
periodically to ensure effective communication with stockholders.
Statement on Corporate Governance
We have had formal corporate governance standards in place since
our inception in 1993. We have reviewed internally and with the
Board the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Sarbanes-Oxley Act), the rules of the SEC and the
Nasdaq National Markets new corporate governance listing
standards regarding corporate governance policies and processes,
and we believe that we are in compliance with the rules and
listing standards. You can access our corporate governance
principles and our committee charters for our Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee free of charge on our website at www.introgen.com or
by writing to us at Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress
Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701, Attention:
Investor Relations. We encourage, but do not require, our board
members to attend the annual stockholders meeting. Last year,
three of our directors attended the annual stockholders meeting.
We have adopted the following standards for director
independence in compliance with the Nasdaq National Market
corporate governance listing standards:
|
|
|
|
|
No director qualifies as independent if such person
has a relationship, which, in the opinion of the Board, would
interfere with exercise of independent judgment in carrying out
the responsibilities of a director; |
|
|
|
A director who is an officer or employee of us or our
subsidiaries, or one whose immediate family member is an
executive officer of us or our subsidiaries is not
independent until three years after the end of such
employment relationship; |
|
|
|
A director who accepts, or whose immediate family member
accepts, more than $60,000 in compensation from us or any of our
subsidiaries during any period of twelve consecutive months
within the three years preceding the determination of
independence, other than certain permitted payments such as
compensation for board or board committee service, payments
arising solely from investments in the our securities,
compensation paid to a family member who is a non-executive
employee of us or a subsidiary of ours, or benefits under a
tax-qualified retirement plan, is not independent
until three years after he or she ceases to accept more than
$60,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within
the three years preceding the determination of independence; |
|
|
|
A director who is, or who has a family member who is, a partner
in, or a controlling stockholder or an executive officer of, any
organization in which we made, or from which we received,
payments for property or services that exceed 5% of the
recipients consolidated gross revenues for that year, or
$200,000, whichever is more, is not independent
until three years after falling below such threshold; |
|
|
|
A director who is employed, or one whose immediate family member
is employed, as an executive officer of another company where
any of our or any of our subsidiaries present executives
serve on that companys compensation committee is not
independent until three years after the end of such
service or employment relationship; and |
|
|
|
A director who is, or who has a family member who is, a current
partner of our independent registered public accounting firm,
Ernst & Young LLP, or was a partner or employee of
Ernst & Young LLP who |
11
|
|
|
|
|
worked on our audit is not independent until three
years after the end of such affiliation or employment
relationship. |
The Board has determined that William H. Cunningham, Ph.D.,
Charles E. Long, S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D. and Peter Barton
Hutt meet the aforementioned independence standards. David G.
Nance does not meet the aforementioned independence standards
because he is our current President and Chief Executive Officer
and is an employee of Introgen. John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. does
not meet the aforementioned independence standards because of
his relationship with EJ Financial Enterprises, Inc., which is
detailed below in Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee currently consists of directors David G.
Nance and John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. The Executive Committee
held one meeting during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2004. The Executive Committee acts on behalf
of our Board of Directors to the extent permitted under Delaware
law.
Board Compensation
Each non-employee director is granted an option to
purchase 33,600 shares of our common stock
(exercisable at the fair market value on the date of grant) upon
first becoming a director. The option vests ratably each month
after the date of grant of such option, so that the entire
option is fully vested three years after the date of grant. Each
incumbent director is annually granted an option to
purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock
(exercisable at the fair market value on the date of grant) on
the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. That option
vests ratably each month after the date of grant of such option,
so that the entire option is fully vested one year after the
date of grant. In addition, the chairman of each of the Audit
Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and the designated audit committee
financial expert on the Audit Committee are all granted
annually a fully-vested option to
purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock. Directors
do not receive any cash or other additional compensation, other
than reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses, for services
provided as a director.
The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote
FOR the election of both nominees to the Board of
Directors named above.
12
PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors has appointed, subject to ratification by
our stockholders, Ernst & Young LLP, as independent
registered public accounting firm, to audit our books, records
and accounts for the current fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005. Ernst & Young has audited our
financial statements beginning with the year ended
December 31, 2002.
Fees Paid to Ernst & Young LLP
The following table sets forth the costs incurred by the Company
for services provided by Ernst & Young LLP, the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm,
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
Fee Category |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
113,250 |
|
|
$ |
214,300 |
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
122,895 |
|
|
$ |
226,800 |
|
Audit Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional
services rendered in connection with the audit of our
consolidated financial statements and review of the interim
consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly
reports and services that are normally provided by
Ernst & Young LLP in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements and includes accounting
services in connection with securities offerings.
Audit-Related Fees. Consists of fees billed for assurance
and related services that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial
statements and are not reported under Audit Fees.
These services include employee benefit plan audits, accounting
consultations in connection with acquisitions and divestitures,
attest services that are not required by statute or regulation
and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting
standards.
Tax Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional
services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These
services include assistance regarding federal, state and
international tax compliance, tax audit defense, customs and
duties, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and international
tax planning.
All Other Fees. We did not engage Ernst & Young
LLP to perform services not covered by the preceding three
categories.
We do not expect a representative of Ernst & Young LLP
to be present at the Annual Meeting.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible
Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve all services
provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.
These services may include audit services, audit-related
services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee
may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case
basis. The independent registered public accounting firm is
required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding
the extent of services provided by the independent registered
public accounting firm in accordance with such pre-approval. The
Audit Committee may also delegate pre-approval authority to one
of its members. Such members(s) must report any such
pre-approval to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled
meeting.
The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote
FOR the ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year
13
ending December 31, 2005. In the event of a negative
vote on such ratification, the Board of Directors will
reconsider its appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the compensation paid by us to our
Chief Executive Officer and our five other most highly
compensated executive officers (collectively, the Named
Executive Officers) during the last three fiscal periods,
including the fiscal year 2004 (January 1,
2004-December 31, 2004), fiscal year 2003 (January 1,
2003-December 31, 2003) and fiscal year 2002
(January 1, 2002-December 31, 2002):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options (# of |
|
All Other |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Period |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Shares) |
|
Compensation(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David G. Nance
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
$ |
494,333 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
President and |
|
|
1/1/2003 12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
412,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
1/1/2002 12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
344,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,600 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Robert E. Sobol, M.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
291,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
1/1/2003 12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
78,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Medical and Scientific |
|
|
1/1/2002 12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Albrecht, Jr.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
206,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
1/1/2003 12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/2002 12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
J. David Enloe, Jr.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
1/1/2003 12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
191,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
1/1/2002 12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
178,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Vice President, |
|
|
1/1/2003 12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
1/1/2002 12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
1/1/2003 12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
168,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Worldwide Commercial |
|
|
1/1/2002 12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
112,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the full dollar value of premiums paid by the Company
for term life insurance on behalf of the Named Executive
Officers for 2004, 2003, and 2002. |
14
Option Grants Made During the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2004
The following table sets forth grants of stock options made
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 to each
Named Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
Value at Assumed |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Options |
|
|
|
Annual Rates of Stock |
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Granted to |
|
|
|
Price Appreciation for |
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Employees |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Option Term(2) |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
During |
|
or Base |
|
Expiration |
|
|
Name |
|
Period |
|
Granted |
|
Period(1) |
|
Price |
|
Date |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David G. Nance
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
10.9% |
|
|
$ |
6.30 |
|
|
|
11/4/2014 |
|
|
$ |
495,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,255,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
8.3% |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
6/8/2014 |
|
|
|
317,843 |
|
|
|
805,477 |
|
Robert E. Sobol, M.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
4.3% |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
6/8/2014 |
|
|
|
167,286 |
|
|
|
423,935 |
|
James W. Albrecht, Jr.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
6/8/2014 |
|
|
|
250,929 |
|
|
|
635,903 |
|
J. David Enloe, Jr.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
|
8.48 |
|
|
|
12/31/2013 |
|
|
|
213,321 |
|
|
|
540,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
5.7% |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
6/8/2014 |
|
|
|
217,472 |
|
|
|
551,116 |
|
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
6/8/2014 |
|
|
|
133,829 |
|
|
|
339,148 |
|
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
4.3% |
|
|
|
8.48 |
|
|
|
12/31/2013 |
|
|
|
266,651 |
|
|
|
675,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
4.3% |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
6/8/2014 |
|
|
|
167,286 |
|
|
|
423,935 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on the grant of stock options representing
1,149,871 shares to employees during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of
calculations at the 5% and 10% rates set by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and therefore are not intended to forecast
possible future appreciation, if any, of our stock price. We did
not use an alternative formula for a grant date valuation, as we
do not believe that any formula will determine with reasonable
accuracy a present value based on future unknown or volatile
factors. |
Aggregated Option Exercises During the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2004 and Option Values as of the End of Such
Period
The following table sets forth, for each of the Named Executive
Officers, the number of options exercised during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, as well as the value of
unexercised options at the end of such period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised |
|
Value of Unexercised |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Options at |
|
In-the-Money Options at |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-End(1) |
|
Fiscal Year-End(2) |
|
|
|
|
Acquired |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Period |
|
on Exercise |
|
Realized |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David G. Nance
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828,340 |
|
|
|
182,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,553,378 |
|
|
$ |
605,500 |
|
Robert E. Sobol, M.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
9,400 |
|
|
|
184,200 |
|
James W. Albrecht, Jr.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,788 |
|
|
|
132,500 |
|
|
|
1,812,524 |
|
|
|
438,100 |
|
J. David Enloe, Jr.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,700 |
|
|
|
162,500 |
|
|
|
1,458,358 |
|
|
|
406,900 |
|
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
81,210 |
(3) |
|
|
241,788 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
1,647,845 |
|
|
|
328,900 |
|
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D.
|
|
|
1/1/2004 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
337,500 |
|
|
|
264,000 |
|
|
|
1,169,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
These amounts represent the total number of shares subject to
stock options held by the Named Executive Officer as of
December 31, 2004. Unexercisable options are those that are
not yet vested. |
|
(2) |
These amounts represent the difference between the exercise
price of the stock options and the price of our common stock on
December 31, 2004 for all in-the-money options held by the
Named Executive Officer. These amounts are based on a fair
market value of $8.44 per share, which was the closing
price of our common stock on December 31, 2004, as reported
on the Nasdaq National Market. Unexercisable options are those
that are not yet vested. |
15
|
|
(3) |
Based on a fair market value of $8.64 per share, which was
the closing price of our common stock on February 6, 2004,
the date of exercise, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market. |
Employment Contracts and Change-In-Control Arrangements
We have an employment agreement with David G. Nance, entered
into on August 1, 2003, under which Mr. Nance serves
as our President and Chief Executive Officer. The employment
agreement with Mr. Nance continues through July 31,
2006, and thereafter renews automatically for one-year terms
until either party gives timely written notice of non-renewal.
Mr. Nances base salary under the employment agreement
is $520,000 per annum effective August 1, 2004. His
compensation under the employment agreement is subject to review
annually. Under the terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Nance may receive bonuses in the form of cash, stock
options, restricted stock or other consideration as determined
by our Compensation Committee, which reviews his compensation
annually. Mr. Nance has also received bonuses from time to
time in the form of options to purchase our common stock, as
contemplated in his employment agreement. The terms of such
options, such as the exercise price and vesting dates, are
determined by the administrator of our 2000 Stock Option Plan.
In the event of Mr. Nances termination by the Company
other than for cause, the Company may be required to continue to
pay Mr. Nance compensation otherwise payable to him under
the employment agreement.
All of the options granted under our 1995 Stock Plan and the
2000 Stock Option Plan shall immediately vest and become
exercisable upon our merger with or into another corporation,
entity or person, or the sale of all or substantially all our
assets to another corporation, entity or person, unless such
options are assumed or an equivalent option or right substituted
by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of the
successor corporation.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Pursuant to a purchase agreement executed on June 30, 2001,
we sold and issued 100,000 shares of a new class of
Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock,
$.001 par value per share, convertible into
2,343,721 shares of our common stock, to Aventis
Pharmaceuticals Inc. for $25,000,000. We received the cash
payment and issued the shares on July 2, 2001. Aventis
Pharmaceuticals Inc., formerly known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals
Products Inc., is an affiliate of Aventis Holdings Inc., which
recently merged with Sanofi-Synthélabo to
form Sanofi-Aventis, which holds greater than five percent
of our outstanding common stock.
John N. Kapoor, Ph.D., the Chairman of our Board of
Directors, is the sole stockholder of EJ Financial Enterprises,
Inc. We have a consulting agreement with EJ Financial
Enterprises pursuant to which EJ Financial Enterprises provides
services to us for $175,000 per year. The agreement
provides for the assistance of EJ Financial Enterprises with our
business development, license negotiation, market analysis and
general corporate development. This agreement is automatically
renewable each July 1 for one-year terms, unless either
party gives 30 days advance notice of termination.
David Parker, Ph.D., J.D., our Vice President,
Intellectual Property, is a partner with the law firm
Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, which provides legal services
to us as our primary outside counsel for intellectual property
matters.
In October 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding capital
stock of Magnum Therapeutics Corporation (Magnum), a company for
which Dr. Robert Sobol, our Senior Vice President, Medical
and Scientific Affairs, was the sole stockholder. We paid
approximately $1.75 million for the Magnum stock by
(1) issuing approximately 252,000 shares of our common
stock valued at approximately $1.48 million at the
acquisition date and (2) assuming liabilities of
approximately $272,000. With respect to the common stock we
issued pursuant to the acquisition, 50% of the shares are held
by an independent escrow agent for a period of one year
subsequent to the acquisition date to satisfy the
indemnification obligations of the selling shareholder under
terms of the purchase agreement. The shares were issued to
Dr. Sobol, as the sole stockholder of the Company, pursuant
to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933.
Magnums primary asset is the right to receive funding
under a grant from the National Institutes of Health. During the
year ended December 31, 2004, we earned approximately
$1.1 million of revenue under this grant. In the event
certain of Magnums
16
technologies result in commercial products, we may be obligated
to pay royalties related to the sales of those products to
certain third parties. Our Audit Committee reviewed and approved
the acquisition of Magnum.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
None of the members of the Compensation Committee is currently,
or has ever been at any time since our formation, one of our
officers or employees. No member of the Compensation Committee
serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation
committee of any entity that has one or more officers serving as
a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
17
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee is composed of two independent
directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the
Board of Directors. Introgen believes that each member of the
Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements set
forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. The members of the
Compensation Committee are Charles E. Long (Chairman) and
William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. The Compensation Committee
administers our 1995 Stock Plan and 2000 Stock Option Plan,
reviews forms of compensation to be provided to our officers,
employees and consultants, including stock compensation, grants
options to purchase our common stock to our employees, executive
officers and consultants, and reviews and makes recommendations
to the Board of Directors regarding all forms of compensation to
be provided to the members of the Board of Directors, including
stock compensation. The Compensation Committee believes it has
fulfilled its responsibilities under its charter for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives. Our basic
philosophy is to align executive compensation with increases in
stockholder value through achievement of certain milestones,
including milestones related to the pre-clinical and clinical
development of our product candidates. This is primarily
accomplished through the use of stock options, which provide
compensation in direct proportion to increases in stockholder
value. In addition, we believe it is important to emphasize
teamwork, entrepreneurship and active participation by all
employees. This is accomplished through providing options to a
majority of full-time domestic employees and similarly situated
international employees, and through cash incentives, through
which both executives and employees may receive cash bonuses
based on company-wide financial goals.
Executive Compensation Programs. Our executive
compensation programs consist of three principal elements: base
salary, cash bonus and stock options. We emphasize incentive
compensation in the form of stock options and bonuses, rather
than base salary. The Compensation Committee has adopted a
guideline that executives should be paid competitive base
salaries. The Board of Directors sets the initial compensation
for executives after consideration of the recommendations of the
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee annually
reviews and in some cases adjusts compensation for executives.
Prior to making its recommendations and determinations, the
Compensation Committee reviews historical compensation levels of
the executives, evaluations of past performance, assessments of
expected future contributions of the executives, competitive pay
levels and programs provided by other comparable companies, and
general industry pay practices. In making its recommendations
and determinations, the Committee does not utilize any
particular indices or formulae to arrive at each
executives recommended pay level.
Total compensation for executive officers also includes
long-term incentives in the form of stock options, which are
generally provided through initial stock option grants at the
date of hire and periodic additional stock option grants. Stock
options are instrumental in promoting the alignment of long-term
interests between our executive officers and stockholders due to
the fact that executives realize gains only if the stock price
increases over the fair market value at the date of grant and
the executives exercise their options and sell the shares. In
determining the amount of such grants, the Committee evaluates
the job level of the executive, responsibilities of the
executive, and competitive practices in the industry. Options
are generally granted at 100% of fair market value at the date
of grant or at 110% of fair market value at the date of grant
for stockholders who hold greater than 10% of Introgens
combined voting power. Options generally vest ratably over a
period of four years on each anniversary of the grant date.
In 2004, executive compensation was also based on the
achievement of the Companys 2004 corporate goals
including, but not limited to, the furtherance of the
Companys clinical trial activities, the execution of its
research and development programs, the protection of its
intellectual property, and the attainment of financial goals.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation. The compensation of
our chief executive officer is determined using the same
philosophy and policies as for all executive officers as well as
by the terms of his employment agreement. The compensation
includes base salary, cash bonus and stock options as
compensation for his services as an officer and director. Our
chief executive officer currently has an employment agreement
that is described under Executive Compensation
Employment Contracts and Change-In-Control Arrangements.
The annual compensation for Mr. Nance for his service as
our chief executive officer was based upon
18
the written employment agreement we executed with Mr. Nance
and as adopted by the Board of Directors in the year 2003.
Mr. Nances base salary under the current employment
agreement is $520,000 per annum effective August 1,
2004. The Compensation Committee evaluates the employment
agreement in relation to Introgens achievement of
corporate goals, Mr. Nances performance on an annual
basis and salary surveys. In 2004, Mr. Nance demonstrated
leadership in establishing Introgens long-term and
short-term strategic, clinical, operational and financial goals.
The Compensation Committee expects to review
Mr. Nances compensation again in August 2005.
Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes a limit on tax
deductions for annual compensation in excess of one million
dollars paid by a corporation to its chief executive officer and
the other four most highly compensated executive officers.
Deductions are, however, permitted if certain conditions are
met, including a requirement that the plan under which such
compensation is paid be re-approved by stockholders every five
years. None of the compensation paid by us in the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 was subject to the limitation on
deductibility. The Compensation Committee will continue to
assess the impact of Section 162(m) on its compensation
practices and determine what further action, if any, is
appropriate.
|
|
|
Respectfully submitted, |
|
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
|
|
William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. |
|
Charles E. Long |
THE FOREGOING COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED
TO BE SOLICITING MATERIAL OR TO BE FILED
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, NOR SHALL SUCH
INFORMATION BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY PAST OR FUTURE
FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT WE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATE IT BY REFERENCE INTO ANY SUCH
FILING.
19
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee is composed of three independent directors
in compliance with the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock
Market and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board
of Directors, as amended in 2005, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A. The members of the Audit Committee are
William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. (Chairman), Charles E. Long
and S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D. During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, in accordance with Section 407 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Introgen identified Dr. Gillis as
the audit committee financial expert. We believe
that each member of the Audit Committee meets the director
independence requirements set forth in the applicable SEC and
Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. The Audit Committee believes it has
fulfilled its responsibilities under its charter for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004.
Our management is responsible for our internal controls and the
financial reporting process. Our independent registered public
accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent
audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) and for issuing a report thereon. The
Audit Committees responsibility is to monitor and oversee
these processes.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 with our management and our independent registered public
accounting firm who performed such audit, Ernst & Young
LLP. The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst &
Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit
Committees, as amended. The Audit Committee has also received
the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst &
Young LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and
the Audit Committee has discussed the independence of
Ernst & Young LLP with that firm.
Based upon the Audit Committees review and discussions
referred to in the immediately preceding paragraph, the Audit
Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the
audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 15, 2005. Each of the services rendered by
Ernst & Young LLP was pre-approved by the Audit
Committee.
|
|
|
Respectfully submitted, |
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
|
|
William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. |
|
Charles E. Long |
|
S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D. |
THE FOREGOING AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE
SOLICITING MATERIAL OR TO BE FILED WITH
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, NOR SHALL SUCH
INFORMATION BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY PAST OR FUTURE
FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, EXCEPT TO THE
EXTENT WE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATE IT BY REFERENCE INTO ANY SUCH
FILING.
20
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following line graph compares the cumulative total return to
stockholders of our common stock from October 12, 2000 (the
date of our initial public offering) to December 31, 2004
to the cumulative total return over such period of (i) the
Nasdaq National Market System Composite Index and (ii) the
S&P Biotechnology Index. The graph assumes that $100.00 was
invested on October 12, 2000 in our common stock at its
initial public offering price of $8.00 per share and in
each of the other two indices as of September 30, 2000, and
the reinvestment of all dividends, if any.
The information contained in the Performance Graph shall not be
deemed to be soliciting material or to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any
past or future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference
into any such filing. The graph is presented in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission requirements. Stockholders
are cautioned against drawing any conclusions from the data
contained therein, as past results are not necessarily
indicative of future performance.
COMPARISON OF 50 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC., THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET
(U.S.) INDEX
AND THE S&P BIOTECHNOLOGY INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
10/12/00 or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/30/00 |
|
|
6/30/01 |
|
|
12/31/01 |
|
|
12/31/02 |
|
|
12/31/03 |
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
59.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
69.25 |
|
|
|
$ |
26.88 |
|
|
|
$ |
106.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
105.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq National Market System Composite Index
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
58.89 |
|
|
|
|
53.11 |
|
|
|
|
36.72 |
|
|
|
|
54.90 |
|
|
|
|
59.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P Biotechnology Index
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
84.67 |
|
|
|
|
84.29 |
|
|
|
|
67.09 |
|
|
|
|
86.44 |
|
|
|
|
93.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
$100 invested on 10/12/00 in stock or on 9/30/00 in
indices including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal
year ending December 31. |
21
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more
than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file
reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on
Form 4 or Form 5 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders are
also required by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms we
received, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, all Section 16(a) filing
requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10%
stockholders were satisfied.
CODE OF ETHICS
On February 18, 2004, the Company adopted a Corporate Code
of Ethics for All Employees and Directors, and a Corporate Code
of Ethics for Financial Officers, which specifically applies to
the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and persons performing similar functions. A copy of each
of the codes of ethics is available on our website at
www.introgen.com.
We intend to post on our website any amendment to, or waiver
from, a provision of our codes of ethics within four business
days following the date of such amendment or waiver.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors is not aware of any other matters to be
presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should
properly come before the Annual Meeting, however, the enclosed
Proxy Card confers discretionary authority with respect to such
matter.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
/s/ RODNEY VARNER |
|
|
|
Rodney Varner |
|
Secretary |
Austin, Texas
May 9, 2005
22
EXHIBIT A
INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
a Delaware corporation
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PURPOSES
The purpose of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of
Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), shall be to:
|
|
|
1. Oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes
of the Company and audits of the financial statements of the
Company; and |
|
|
2. Provide the Companys Board of Directors with the
results of its monitoring and recommendations derived therefrom. |
In addition, the Audit Committee will, where required by law,
and to the extent it otherwise finds appropriate, perform the
specific duties and responsibilities listed below and such other
duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe.
MEMBERSHIP
The Audit Committee members will be appointed by, and will serve
at the discretion of, the Board of Directors and will consist of
at least three members of the Board of Directors, each of whom
will meet the independence and experience requirements of NASDAQ
and applicable federal law. The Audit Committee will select its
own chairperson, who will serve at the will of the Audit
Committee.
RESPONSIBILITIES
The responsibilities of the Audit Committee will include the
following, to the extent that the Audit Committee finds proper
or as required by law:
|
|
|
1. Exercising its sole authority to appoint or replace the
Companys independent auditors (subject, if applicable, to
stockholder ratification); |
|
|
2. Reviewing and discussing with management and the
independent auditors from time to time the adequacy of the
Companys system of internal controls, any special steps
adopted in light of material control deficiencies and the
adequacy of disclosures about changes in internal control over
financial reporting; |
|
|
3. Reviewing with the independent auditors and management
the Companys financial reporting and accounting and
disclosure principles, policies and practices to be used;
alternative treatments within generally accepted accounting
principles for material items discussed with management,
including the ramifications of such alternatives and the
treatment preferred by the auditors; and other written
communications between the auditor and management that are
material to the financial statements. The Audit Committee shall
discuss generally the Companys annual audited financial
statements and quarterly financial statements with management
and the independent auditors, including the Companys
disclosures under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
as well as the Companys earnings press releases and
financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts
and rating agencies; |
|
|
4. Discussing the Companys major financial risk
exposures and its policies with respect to risk assessment and
risk management; |
A-1
|
|
|
5. Reviewing the independent auditors proposed audit
scope and approach; |
|
|
6. Reviewing the performance of the independent auditors,
who will report directly to the Audit Committee, and who shall
be ultimately accountable to the Board of Directors and the
Audit Committee, as representatives of the Companys
shareholders; |
|
|
7. Reviewing fee arrangements with the independent
auditors, including pre-approving all auditing services,
internal control related services and permitted non-audit
services provided to the Company by the independent auditors (or
subsequently approving non-audit services in those circumstances
where a subsequent approval is necessary and permissible) and in
this regard, the Audit Committee shall have the sole
authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms, all
internal control engagements and all non-audit engagements, as
may be permissible, with the independent auditors; |
|
|
8. Monitor the rotation of certain members of the
independent auditors team every five years, pursuant to
applicable SEC Rules; |
|
|
9. Overseeing the independence of the independent auditors
and the Companys compliance with SEC Rules for disclosure
of auditors services by, among other things: |
|
|
|
(a) Requiring the independent auditors to deliver to the
Audit Committee on a periodic basis a formal written statement
delineating all relationships between the auditors and the
Company, consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1, and engaging in a dialogue with the auditors with
respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may
impact the objectivity and independence of the auditors; |
|
|
(b) Actively engaging in dialogue with the independent
auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services
that may impact the objectivity and independence of the
independent auditors and recommending that the Board of
Directors take appropriate action to satisfy itself with regard
to the auditors independence; |
|
|
(c) Reviewing the independent auditors peer review
conducted every three years or any inquiry or investigation by
governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding
five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried
out by the firm and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; |
|
|
(d) Discussing with the independent auditors the financial
statements and audit findings, including any significant
adjustments, management judgments and accounting estimates,
significant new accounting policies and disagreements with
management and any other matters described in Statement of
Accounting Standards (SAS) No. 61, as
may be modified or supplemented; and |
|
|
(e) Reviewing reports submitted to the Audit Committee by
the independent auditors in accordance with applicable SEC
requirements; |
|
|
|
10. Discussing with the Companys legal counsel legal
matters that may have a material impact on the financial
statements of the Companys compliance policies; |
|
|
11. Reviewing with management and the independent auditors
the Companys interim financial statements and the related
Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations included in Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, including the results of the independent
auditors reviews of the quarterly financial statements; |
|
|
12. Reviewing with management and the independent auditors,
before release, and recommending to the Board of Directors for
inclusion in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K,
the audited financial statements and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations; |
|
|
13. Reviewing disclosures made to the Audit Committee by
the Companys CEO and CFO during their certification
process for the Form 10-K and Form 10-Q about any
significant deficiencies in the |
A-2
|
|
|
design or operation of internal controls or material weaknesses
therein and any fraud involving management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal
controls; |
|
|
14. Reviewing with management and the independent auditors
any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies and
any employee complaints or published reports which raise
material issues regarding the Companys financial
statements or accounting policies; |
|
|
15. Reviewing and monitoring the Companys code of
ethics for its senior financial officers and employees, and
granting waivers to such code if deemed appropriate; |
|
|
16. Meeting periodically with the Chief Financial Officer
and the independent auditors in separate executive sessions; |
|
|
17. Resolving disagreements, if any, between the
Companys management and the Companys independent
auditors regarding financial reporting; |
|
|
18. Establishing procedures for receiving, retaining and
treating complaints received by the Company regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and
procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by
employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or
auditing matters; |
|
|
19. Reviewing on an annual basis the adequacy of the Audit
Committees charter and submitting any recommended changes
to the Board of Directors for consideration; |
|
|
20. Providing oversight and review of the Companys
asset management policies, including periodic review of the
Companys investment policies and performance for cash and
short-term investments; |
|
|
21. If it finds necessary, securing independent expert
advice, including retaining independent counsel, accountants,
consultants or others, to assist the Audit Committee in
fulfilling its duties and responsibilities; |
|
|
22. Exercising its sole discretion to determine the
appropriate funding for payment of compensation to the
independent auditors for the purpose of rendering or issuing an
audit report, to any advisors employed by the Audit Committee
and for ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee
that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties,
all of which will be paid by the Company; |
|
|
23. Reviewing related party transactions for potential
conflicts of interest and approving all appropriate related
party transactions; |
|
|
24. Providing a report in the Companys proxy
statement in accordance with the requirements of Item 306
of Regulations S-K and S-B and Item 7(d)(3) of
Schedule 14A; and |
|
|
25. Performing such other duties as may be requested or
delegated by the Board of Directors. |
The Audit Committee may rely on the expertise and knowledge of
management, the internal auditors, the independent auditors and
counsel, advisors and experts in carrying out its oversight
responsibilities. Management is responsible for determining that
the Companys financial statements are complete and
accurate in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles statements and that they accurately represent the
financial condition of the Company. Management is also
responsible for the effectiveness of disclosure controls and
procedures and internal controls and procedures for financial
reporting. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing
the Companys financial statements. It is not the duty of
the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits, to determine that
the financial statements are complete and accurate and are in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
applicable rules and regulations, to conduct investigations, to
assure the adequacy or effectiveness of the Companys
internal controls or disclosure procedures or to assure
compliance with laws and regulations or the Companys
internal policies, procedures and controls. The Audit Committee
may elect to form and delegate authority to subcommittees
consisting of one or more members when it deems appropriate,
including the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and
permitted non-audit services, provided that decisions of such
subcommittee to grant pre-approvals shall be presented to the
full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
A-3
MEETINGS
The Audit Committee will meet as often as it determines, but at
least quarterly. The Audit Committee may establish its own
schedule.
The Audit Committee, at its own discretion, may ask members of
management or others to attend its meetings (or portions
thereof) and to provide pertinent information as necessary. The
Audit Committee will meet separately with the Companys
president and chief executive officer and separately with the
Companys chief financial officer at such times as it deems
appropriate to review the financial affairs and controls of the
Company. The Audit Committee will meet in separate executive
session with the independent auditors of the Company at such
times as it deems appropriate to review the independent
auditors examination and management report, to review the
internal controls of the Company and to otherwise fulfill the
responsibilities of the Audit Committee under this Charter. The
Audit Committee may also meet with the Companys investment
bankers or financial analysts who follow the Companys
business.
A-4
INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
9 a.m. (CST), Friday, June 17, 2005
The University Club Terrace Rooms 2 & 3
Post Oak Tower
5051 Westheimer, Suite 355
Houston, Texas 77056
Admission Ticket
(Not Transferable)
Please present this admission ticket to gain
admittance to the meeting. This ticket admits
only the stockholder listed on the reverse side
and his or her family members and is not
transferable.
[ITTCM INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.] [FILE NAME: ZITT22.ELX] [VERSION (3)] [04/12/05] [orig. 03/18/05]
PROXY
INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
This Proxy Is Solicited By The Board Of Directors
Proxy For The Annual Meeting Of Stockholders
To Be Held On Friday, June 17, 2005
The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints David G. Nance and James W.
Albrecht, Jr., and each of them, as Proxies of the undersigned, with full power to appoint his
substitute, and authorizes each of them to represent and to vote all shares of common stock of
Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) held of record by the undersigned as of the close of
business on Monday, April 25, 2005 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) to
be held at The University Club, Terrace Rooms 2 & 3, Post Oak Tower, 5051 Westheimer, Suite 355,
Houston, Texas 77056, at 9:00 a.m., local time, on Friday, June 17, 2005, and at any adjournments
or postponements thereof.
When properly executed, this proxy will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder(s). If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted FOR the election
of the two nominees of the Board of Directors listed in Proposal 1, and FOR the ratification of
the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 listed in Proposal 2. In their discretion, the
Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. A stockholder wishing to vote in accordance
with the Board of Directors recommendations need only sign and date this proxy and return it in
the enclosed envelope.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the accompanying Notice of the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement with respect thereto and the Companys 2004 Annual
Report to Stockholders, and hereby revokes any proxy or proxies heretofore given. This proxy may be
revoked at any time before it is exercised.
Please vote and sign on the other side and return promptly in the enclosed envelope (which
requires no postage if mailed within the United States).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
|
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE |
Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.
C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08818-8694
Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.
|
|
|
Vote-by-Internet
Log on to the Internet and go to
http://www.eproxyvote.com/ingn
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote-by-Telephone
Call toll-free
1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683)
|
|
|
If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.
[ITTCM INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS INC.] [FILE NAME: ZITT21.ELX] [VERSION (2)] [04/11/05] [orig. 03/18/05]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Please mark
votes as in
this example.
|
|
|
|
#ITT |
1. |
Elect two (2) Class II directors to the Board of
Directors, each to serve a term of three (3) years.
Nominees: (01) Peter Barton Hutt (02) Charles E. Long |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
BOTH
NOMINEES
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
WITHHELD
FROM BOTH
NOMINEES |
|
|
|
o
|
|
For both nominees except as noted above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
2.
|
|
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the
Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
To transact such other business as may properly come
before the Annual Meeting including any motion to adjourn
to a later date to permit further solicitation of proxies
if necessary or before any adjournment thereof.
The shares represented by this Proxy Card will be voted as
specified above, but if no specification is made they will
be voted FOR Proposals 1 and 2 and at the discretion of
the Proxies on any other matter that may properly come
before the meeting.
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint
owners should each sign. When signing as attorney,
executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, give full
name and title as such. If a corporation, please sign in
full corporate name by the President or other authorized
officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name
by authorized person. If shares are held by joint tenants
or community property, all joint owners should sign.
Please sign, date and return promptly in the accompanying envelope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARK HERE
FOR ADDRESS
CHANGE AND
NOTE AT LEFT
|
|
o
|
|
MARK HERE
IF YOU PLAN
TO ATTEND
THE MEETING
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|