def14a
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

             
Check the appropriate box:
 
           
o   Preliminary Proxy Statement
 
           
o   Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 
           
þ   Definitive Proxy Statement
 
           
o   Definitive Additional Materials
 
           
o   Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
 
           
Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.

 
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
           
 
           
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
 
           
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
 
           
þ   No fee required.
 
           
o   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
 
           
    1 )   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
           
 
 
           
    2 )   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
           
 
 
           
    3 )   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
           
 
 
           
    4 )   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
           
 
 
           
    5 )   Total fee paid:
 
           
 
 
           
o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
           
o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 
           
    1 )   Amount Previously Paid:
 
           
 
 
           
    2 )   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
           
 
 
           
    3 )   Filing Party:
 
           
 
 
           
    4 )   Date Filed:
 
           
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES
PROPOSAL ONE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL TWO RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
CODE OF ETHICS
OTHER MATTERS
EXHIBIT A


Table of Contents

INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
June 17, 2005
To Introgen’s Stockholders:
      We cordially invite you to attend Introgen’s 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Friday, June 17, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at The University Club, Terrace Rooms 2 & 3, 5051 Westheimer, Suite 355, Houston, Texas 77056. At the Annual Meeting we will vote on proposals to:
        1. Elect two (2) Class II directors to the Board of Directors, each to serve a term of three (3) years;
 
        2. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Introgen’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2005; and
 
        3. Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
      Stockholders who owned stock at the close of business on April 25, 2005 may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. If you cannot attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote electronically using the Internet or by telephone, in each case as instructed on the enclosed Proxy Card or by mailing the Proxy Card in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope. Any stockholder attending the Annual Meeting may vote in person, even though he or she has already returned a Proxy Card.
  Sincerely,
 
  /s/ RODNEY VARNER
 
 
  Rodney Varner
  Secretary
Austin, Texas
May 9, 2005


Table of Contents

INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
      Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting. Please read it carefully.
      This Proxy Statement, a Proxy Card and the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders will be mailed to stockholders on or about May 9, 2005.
Q: What is the record date for the Annual Meeting and how many shares of our common stock were outstanding on the record date?
 
A: Our Board of Directors has set April 25, 2005 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. On April 25, 2005 approximately 30,919,068 shares of our common stock were outstanding.
 
Q: Who is entitled to vote and how many votes do I have?
 
A: All stockholders who owned shares of our common stock on April 25, 2005 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Every stockholder is entitled to one (1) vote for each share of common stock held.
 
Q: How do I vote?
 
A: You may vote in person by attending the Annual Meeting or by completing and returning your proxy by mail or electronically using the Internet or by telephone. To vote your proxy by mail, mark your vote on the enclosed Proxy Card, then follow the directions on the Proxy Card. To vote your proxy using the Internet, see the instructions on the Proxy Card, and have the Proxy Card available when you access the Internet website. The home page will prompt you to enter your control number, then follow the instructions to record your vote. To vote your proxy using the telephone, see the instructions on the Proxy Card and have the Proxy Card available during the call. If you send in your card but do not mark any selections, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board of Directors. Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we encourage you to vote by proxy as soon as possible.
 
Q: Can I change my vote?
 
A: You can revoke your proxy before the time of voting at the Annual Meeting in several ways:
• by mailing a revised proxy dated later than the prior proxy;
 
• by voting again at the Internet website;
 
• by voting again using the telephone;
 
• by voting in person at the Annual Meeting; or
 
• by notifying our corporate secretary in writing that you are revoking your proxy. Your revocation must be received before the Annual Meeting to be counted.
Q: What constitutes a “quorum” for the Annual Meeting?
 
A: At least a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding as of the record date must be present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you are either (i) present and vote in person at the Annual Meeting or (ii) have properly submitted a proxy via mail, Internet or telephone. Abstentions, broker non-votes and votes withheld from director nominees are considered as shares present at the Annual Meeting for the purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee who holds shares for the owner of the shares does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting authority for that proposal and has not received voting instructions from the owner of the shares.


Table of Contents

Q: What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?
 
A: For Proposal I, the election of directors, the two (2) individuals receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes will be elected. To pass, Proposal II, the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, requires the affirmative “FOR” vote of at least a majority of the shares of our common stock present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote.
 
Q: How are votes counted?
 
A: For Proposal I, you may vote “FOR” all of the nominees or you may elect to have your vote “WITHHELD” with respect to one or more of the nominees. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely and will have no effect in the election of directors. Similarly, if you hold your shares in a brokerage account in your broker’s name (this is called “street name”) and you do not vote or instruct the broker how to vote the shares, or your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote in the election of directors, your shares will have no effect in the election of directors.
For Proposal II you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” If you abstain from voting on Proposal II, it has the same effect as a vote against the proposal. If you hold your shares in a “street name” and you do not vote or instruct the broker how to vote the shares, or your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote, your shares will not be counted in the tally of the number of shares cast on Proposal II and therefore may have the effect of reducing the number of shares needed to approve the Proposal.
 
Finally, if you just sign and return your Proxy Card with no further instructions, your shares will be counted as a vote “FOR” each director nominee and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
Q: Who is soliciting my vote and who pays for the solicitation of proxies?
 
A: This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of your vote by our Board of Directors. We pay the costs of soliciting proxies from stockholders. We may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding the voting materials to the beneficial owners. Directors, officers and regular employees may solicit proxies on our behalf personally, by telephone or by facsimile, without additional compensation.
 
Q: How does the Board of Directors recommend voting on the proposals?
 
A: Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” each of the nominees to the Board of Directors and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
 
Q: When are the stockholder proposals for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders due?
 
A: We anticipate holding our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on or about June 15, 2006. Stockholder proposals for our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, whether intended for inclusion in the Proxy Statement for such meeting or for presentation directly at such meeting, must be received at our principal executive offices by the close of business on January 9, 2006. In addition, notice of any stockholder proposals must be given in accordance with our Bylaws and all other applicable requirements including the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. If a stockholder fails to give notice of a stockholder proposal as required by our Bylaws or other applicable requirements, then the proposal will not be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting and the stockholder will not be permitted to present the proposal to the stockholders for a vote at the 2006 Annual Meeting.
 
Q: Where are Introgen’s principal executive offices?
 
A: Our principal executive offices are located at 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701. Our telephone number is (512) 708-9310.

2


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP
      The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2005 by (i) all persons known to us, based on statements filed by such persons pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock and based on the records of EquiServe, N.A., our transfer agent, (ii) each director, (iii) each of the executive officers named in the table under “Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table,” and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group.
      Except as otherwise noted, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in this table have, to our knowledge, sole voting and investing power for all of the shares of common stock held by them.
      This table lists applicable percentage ownership based on 30,848,721 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2005. Options to purchase shares of our common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the persons holding these options for the purpose of computing percentage ownership of that person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing any other person’s ownership percentage.
      Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each stockholder on this table is c/o Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701.
                   
    Shares   Percent
    Beneficially   Beneficially
Beneficial Owner   Owned   Owned
         
Sanofi-Aventis(1)
    5,009,664       16.2 %
  174 avenue de France
75013 Paris France
               
FMR Corp.(2)
    2,129,460       6.9 %
  82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
               
John N. Kapoor, Ph.D.(3)
    3,416,709       11.0 %
David G. Nance(4)
    3,029,295       9.6 %
William H. Cunningham, Ph.D.(5)
    195,650       *  
Charles E. Long(6)
    219,066       *  
S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D.(7)
    41,500       *  
Peter Barton Hutt(8)
    8,400       *  
James W. Albrecht, Jr.(9)
    282,138       *  
J. David Enloe, Jr.(10)
    189,530       *  
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D.(11)
    302,349       *  
Robert E. Sobol, M.D.(12)
    262,342       *  
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D.(13)
    100,000       *  
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 people)(14)
    8,046,979       24.3 %
 
  * Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
(1)    Based on the 13G/ A filed by Sanofi-Aventis with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2005. The share number includes 2,343,721 shares of our common stock issuable within 60 days of March 31, 2005 upon conversion of Series A non-voting convertible preferred stock held by Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Pursuant to a Voting Agreement dated June 30, 2001 by and between Introgen and Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Aventis”) related to such shares, Aventis must vote all these shares in the same manner as the shares voted by a majority of the our other stockholders on any corporate action put to a vote of our stockholders. The Voting Agreement will terminate on June 30, 2011, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms thereof.

3


Table of Contents

(2)    Based on the 13G filed by FMR Corp. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005.
 
(3)    Consists of 202,109 shares held by EJ Financial Enterprises, Inc., 3,099,067 shares held by EJ Financial/ Introgen Management L.P. and 115,533 shares held by Dr. Kapoor subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. EJ Financial/ Introgen Management L.P. is controlled by its general partner, EJ Financial Enterprises. Dr. Kapoor is Chairman of the Board of Directors of EJ Financial Enterprises. Dr. Kapoor disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by EJ Financial Enterprises and EJ Financial/ Introgen Management L.P.
 
(4)    Consists of 1,346,979 shares held by Developtech Resource Corporation, 18,130 shares held by Domecq Technologies, Inc., 850,496 shares held by Debouchement, Ltd., and 813,690 shares held by Mr. Nance subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005. Mr. Nance is President and Chief Executive Officer of Developtech Resource Corporation, Domecq Technologies, Inc. and Debouchement, Ltd. Solely by virtue of his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of each of the foregoing entities, Mr. Nance holds the right to vote for each entity and has dispositive control over the shares.
 
(5)    Includes 188,650 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(6)    Includes 209,066 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(7)    Consists of 41,500 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(8)    Consists of 8,400 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(9)    Includes 280,538 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
(10)  Includes 188,650 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(11)  Includes 260,538 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(12)  Includes 10,000 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(13)  Consists of 100,000 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
 
(14)  Includes an aggregate of 2,216,565 shares subject to stock options held by our directors and executive officers as a group that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2005.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
      The following sets forth information concerning the persons currently serving as our executive officers, including information as to each executive officer’s age, position and business experience as of the record date.
             
Name   Age   Position
         
David G. Nance
    53     President and Chief Executive Officer
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D. 
    56     Senior Vice President, Worldwide Commercial Development
Robert E. Sobol, M.D. 
    53     Senior Vice President, Medical and Scientific Affairs
James W. Albrecht, Jr. 
    50     Chief Financial Officer
J. David Enloe, Jr. 
    41     Senior Vice President, Operations
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D. 
    50     Vice President, Intellectual Property
      David G. Nance has served as a member of our Board of Directors and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since our inception in June 1993. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Nance served as the Managing Partner of Texas Biomedical Development Partners, the investment group that founded us.
      Max W. Talbott, Ph.D. joined Introgen in February 2002 as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Commercial Development. From 2000 to 2002, Dr. Talbott was Senior Vice President, Worldwide Regulatory Affairs and Pharmacovigilance at DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals

4


Table of Contents

Company, which merged during this period. From 1996 to 2000, he served in various positions with Aventis Pharmaceuticals and Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, most recently as Senior Vice President, Drug Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance. Prior to 1996, Dr. Talbott occupied several management positions with Eli Lilly and Company, a major pharmaceuticals company, and he spent five years with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, first as a Reviewer and then as a Branch Chief and Acting Division Director. He received his Ph.D. in immunology and pharmacology from Rutgers University.
      Robert E. Sobol, M.D. joined Introgen in September 2003 as our Senior Vice President, Medical and Scientific Affairs. Dr. Sobol was a founder and Vice President of IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation, the company that pioneered monoclonal antibody based treatments for cancer and autoimmune disorders. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Magnum Therapeutics Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company that Introgen acquired in October 2004, and previously served as President of Corautus Genetics Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. From 1998 to 2003, Dr. Sobol served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Genstar Therapeutics, a company that developed gene therapy products, which he founded in 1996. Dr. Sobol received his M.D. from The Chicago Medical School.
      James W. Albrecht, Jr. joined Introgen in November 1994 as our Vice President, Operations and Administration, and he has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 1995. From 1993 to 1996, he operated a consulting business providing chief financial officer services to the technology and real estate industries. Mr. Albrecht worked previously at Arthur Andersen LLP as an accountant and he is a Certified Public Accountant. He received his B.B.A. in accounting from The University of Texas at Austin.
      J. David Enloe, Jr. joined Introgen in March 1995. He has served as our General Business Manager and Vice President, Administration, and he is currently Senior Vice President, Operations. From 1989 to 1995, he held various positions at Centrilift, a division of Baker Hughes, Inc., an energy services company, including Region General Manager, Southeast Asia, and he worked at Arthur Andersen LLP as an accountant prior to that time. Mr. Enloe is a Certified Public Accountant. He received his B.B.A. in accounting from The University of Texas at Austin.
      David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D. joined Introgen in March 1999 as our Vice President, Intellectual Property. Since February 2000, Dr. Parker has been a partner with the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, and head of the firm’s Intellectual Property and Technology section in its Austin office. From 1992 to January 2000, he was a shareholder of the patent law firm of Arnold White & Durkee, Professional Corporation, where he was an associate and patent agent since 1983. Starting in 1997, Dr. Parker has served as an adjunct professor at The University of Texas School of Law. Dr. Parker received his Ph.D. in molecular pharmacology and molecular biology from Baylor College of Medicine in 1981, served on the faculty at Baylor College of Medicine from 1981 to 1983, and received his J.D. from The University of Texas School of Law in 1986.
SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES
      The following sets forth information concerning persons currently employed by us who make or are expected to make significant contributions to our business, including information as to each person’s age, position and business experience as of the record date:
             
Name   Age   Position
         
Peter Clarke, Ph.D. 
    45     Vice President, Production and Technical Processes
Kerstin B. Menander, M.D., Ph.D. 
    67     Vice President, Clinical Development
      Peter Clarke, Ph.D. joined Introgen in February 2004 as our Vice President, Production and Technical Processes, after 23 years working in the field of biotechnology in both research and manufacturing. Dr. Clarke has held positions of increasing importance in both start-up and established European and U.S.-based biopharmaceutical companies such as Medeva Pharma and Chiron Vaccines. Most recently, Dr. Clarke worked for Bayer Biological Products, where he was Director of Manufacturing and was closely involved in the North American licensure and launch of a novel immunoglobulin. Dr. Clarke received his BSC in

5


Table of Contents

biochemistry from Sheffield University in England. His Ph.D. in microbial physiology and DIC in biochemistry were completed at the Imperial College of Science and Technology in London.
      Kerstin B. Menander, M.D., Ph.D. joined Introgen in November 2002 as our Vice President, Clinical Development. From 1997 to 2002, Dr. Menander held various regulatory and clinical development vice president positions at Cell Pathways, Inc., a pharmaceutical oncology company, most recently as Vice President, International Operations. Prior to 1997, she occupied senior management positions at Curative Technologies, Inc., a biotechnology company concentrating on wound healing, US 3 D Development, Inc., a strategic regulatory and clinical development consulting company, and Collagen Corporation, a biotechnology and facial aesthetics technology company. She also spent several years at Syntex, a pharmaceutical products and medical diagnostic systems company, and Abbott, a diversified healthcare products company. She received her M.D. and Ph.D. from the University of Lund in Lund, Sweden.

6


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
General
      Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the term of office of one class expiring each year. We currently have six directors with two directors in each class. The terms of office of our Class II directors, Peter Barton Hutt and Charles E. Long, will expire at the 2005 Annual Meeting. The terms of office of our Class III directors, John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. and David G. Nance, will expire at the 2006 Annual Meeting. The terms of office of our Class I directors, William H. Cunningham, Ph.D., and S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., will expire at the 2007 Annual Meeting. At the 2005 Annual Meeting, stockholders will elect two Class II directors, each for a term of three years.
Nominees for Election at the 2005 Annual Meeting
      The following sets forth information concerning the nominees for election as directors at the 2005 Annual Meeting, including information as to each nominee’s age and business experience as of the record date.
                     
            Director
Name of Nominee   Age   Principal Occupation   Since
             
Peter Barton Hutt
    70     Partner of the law firm of Covington & Burling     2004  
Charles E. Long(1)(2)(3)
    65     Director; Retired     2001  
 
(1)  Member of Audit Committee
 
(2)  Member of Compensation Committee
 
(3)  Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
      Peter Barton Hutt has served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2004. Mr. Hutt has been a partner specializing in food and drug law in the Washington, D.C. law firm of Covington & Burling since 1960, except when he served as Chief Counsel for the FDA from 1971 to 1975. Mr. Hutt was also a member of the board of directors of IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a company that pioneered monoclonal antibody based treatments for cancer and autoimmune disorders. He is the co-author of a casebook used to teach food and drug law throughout the country and teaches a full course on this subject each year at Harvard Law School. Mr. Hutt currently serves on the board of directors of Favrille, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, CV Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company, Phase Forward Incorporated, a provider of integrated enterprise-level software products, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biotechnology company, all of which are publicly-traded companies. Mr. Hutt also serves on the board of directors of several privately-held biopharmaceutical companies and on several venture capital advisory boards, including Polaris Venture Partners and the Sprout Group. Mr. Hutt received his B.A. in Economics and Political Science from Yale University, an L.L.B. from Harvard Law School and an L.L.M. in Food and Drug Law from New York University Law School.
      Charles E. Long has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2001. Mr. Long is former vice chairman of Citicorp and its principal subsidiary, Citibank. Mr. Long held various positions during his career with Citicorp, which began in 1972. From 1982 to 1998, he headed Citicorp’s External Affairs Division, which includes the Government Relations Division in Washington, D.C. From 1976 to 1982, he was responsible for managing Citicorp’s international consumer banking business, as well as legal and external affairs for consumer banking worldwide. Mr. Long is a trustee of the Midwest Research Institute and the National Forest Foundation. He has served as an officer, director or trustee on a number of corporate, charitable and public boards, including vice chairman of Georgetown University, vice chairman and director of Woodrow Wilson House Museum and Ford’s Theater in Washington, D.C. Mr. Long is a director of Atlas Copco North America and The Drummong Co. Mr. Long is also a member of the board of directors of

7


Table of Contents

Gendux AB, our wholly-owned subsidiary. Mr. Long received his B.B.A. in business from St. John’s University. In 1998, he received an Honorary Doctor of Business Degree from St. John’s University.
Incumbent Directors Whose Terms of Office Continue After the Annual Meeting
      The following sets forth information concerning the directors whose terms of office continue after the 2005 Annual Meeting, including information as to each director’s age and business experience as of the record date.
                     
            Director
Name   Age   Position/Principal Occupation   Since
             
William H. Cunningham(1)(2)(3)
    61     Professor, The University of Texas at Austin     2000  
S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D.(1)
    64     Professor, Rice University     2004  
John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. 
    61     Chairman of the Board; Chairman of the Board of EJ Financial Enterprises, Inc.     1993  
David G. Nance
    53     President and Chief Executive Officer of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.     1993  
 
(1)  Member of Audit Committee
 
(2)  Member of Compensation Committee
 
(3)  Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
      William H. Cunningham, Ph.D., has served as a member of our Board of Directors since July 2000. Dr. Cunningham served as Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer of The University of Texas System from 1992 to 2000, in addition to holding the Lee Hage and Joseph D. Jamail Regents Chair in Higher Education Leadership. He served as President of The University of Texas at Austin, a component institution of the University of Texas System, from 1985 to 1992. He is currently a Professor of Marketing at The University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Cunningham serves on a number of public commissions, private corporate boards and in a number of advisory roles to corporations. Dr. Cunningham serves on the board of directors of John Hancock Advisers, Inc. He also serves on the board of directors of Jefferson Pilot Corporation, Southwest Airlines, Inc., LIN Television and Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., each of which is a publicly-traded corporation. Dr. Cunningham received his Ph.D. and M.B.A. from Michigan State University. In 1993, he received an Honorary Doctor of Laws Degree and the Distinguished Alumnus Award from Michigan State University.
      S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2004. Dr. Gillis served as the President of Rice University from 1993 through June 2004. He is also the Ervin Kenneth Zingler Professor of Economics and continues to teach at Rice University. Dr. Gillis has been honored with the designation of University Professor, the highest faculty designation at Rice University. Before entering university leadership, he spent the first 25 years of his professional life teaching economics and applying economic analysis to public policy in almost 20 countries, from the United States and Canada, to Ecuador, Colombia, Ghana and Indonesia. His research and teaching have mainly been in the areas of fiscal economics and environmental policy. Dr. Gillis served as Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Duke University from 1991 to 1993, and he served as Dean of the Graduate School and Vice Provost for Academic Affairs at Duke University from 1986 to 1991. He is presently a member of the board of directors of Service Corporation International, a publicly-traded corporation. Dr. Gillis also serves on the board of directors and board of trustees of many foundations, educational associations and community organizations. In 2002, he was appointed to the Governor’s Task Force for Texas Economic Growth. Dr. Gillis received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois. He received his M.A. and B.A. from the University of Florida. In 1992, he was awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws Degree from Rocky Mountain College.
      John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors since our inception in June 1993. In 1990, Dr. Kapoor founded EJ Financial Enterprises, Inc., a healthcare investment company, and he is presently the chairman of its board of directors. He is also presently chairman of the board of directors of Akorn, Inc., Option Care, Inc., and First Horizon Pharmaceuticals Corporation, each of which is a publicly-

8


Table of Contents

traded corporation. Dr. Kapoor also serves as a member of the board of directors of NeoPharm, Inc., a publicly traded corporation, and Duska Scientific Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Duska Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly-traded corporation. Dr. Kapoor received his Ph.D. in medicinal chemistry from the State University of New York at Buffalo.
      Please see “Executive Officers” for information with respect to Mr. Nance.
      There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Board Meetings and Committees
      Our Board of Directors held a total of six meetings during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004. During such period, the Board of Directors had a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Executive Committee. Each director attended at least 75% of his Board of Directors and Board committee meetings, except S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., who attended 60% of the Board of Directors meetings for which he was a director and 100% of his Board committee meetings.
Audit Committee
      The Audit Committee, which, during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004, consisted of directors William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. (Chairman), Charles E. Long and S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., met four times and acted by written consent twice during the year. The Audit Committee monitors our system of internal controls, provides our Board of Directors with the results of its examinations and recommendations derived therefrom, outlines to the Board of Directors improvements made, or to be made, in internal accounting controls, monitors the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approves non-audit services of our independent registered public accounting firm, oversees our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and provides to our Board of Directors such additional information and materials as it may deem necessary to make our Board of Directors aware of significant financial matters that require their attention. In discharging its duties, the Audit Committee is expected to:
  •  have the sole authority to appoint, retain, compensate, oversee, evaluate and replace the independent registered public accounting firm;
 
  •  review and approve the scope of the annual internal and external audit;
 
  •  review and pre-approve the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to perform audit and non-audit services and the related fees;
 
  •  meet independently with our internal auditing staff, independent registered public accounting firm and senior management;
 
  •  review the integrity of our financial reporting process;
 
  •  review our financial statements and disclosures in Securities and Exchange Commission filings;
 
  •  monitor compliance with our corporate codes of ethics; and
 
  •  review disclosures from our independent registered public accounting firm regarding Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1.
      The Board of Directors believes that each member of the Audit Committee is an “independent director” as that term is defined by the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors has determined that S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D. is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines. The Second Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter is attached hereto as Exhibit A and can be accessed free of charge electronically on our website at www.introgen.com or by writing to us at Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701, Attention: Investor Relations.

9


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee
      The Compensation Committee, which currently consists of directors William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. and Charles E. Long (Chairman), met three times and acted by written consent three times during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004. The Compensation Committee administers our 1995 Stock Plan and 2000 Stock Option Plan, reviews compensation to be provided to our officers, employees and consultants, including stock compensation, grants options to purchase our common stock to our employees, executive officers, directors and consultants, and reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding all forms of compensation to be provided to the members of the Board of Directors, including stock compensation. The Compensation Committee is governed by a charter, which can be accessed free of charge electronically on our website at www.introgen.com or by writing to us at Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701, Attention: Investor Relations.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of directors William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. and Charles E. Long. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met once and acted by written consent twice during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee proposes a slate of directors for election by our stockholders at each annual meeting and nominates candidates for appointment by the Board of Directors to fill any vacancies on the Board of Directors. It is also responsible for determining the appropriate Board of Directors size, composition and committee structure and developing and reviewing applicable corporate governance principles. We believe that each of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the director independence requirements set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is governed by a charter, which can be accessed free of charge electronically on our website at www.introgen.com or by writing to us at Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701, Attention: Investor Relations.
      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders provided that the recommendations are made in accordance with the procedures described in Article II, Section 2.5 of our Bylaws and in this proxy statement under “Information Concerning Solicitation and Voting.” To be considered timely, such stockholder’s recommendation must be delivered to or mailed and received at our principal executive offices as set forth below not less than one hundred twenty (120) calendar days in advance of the first anniversary date of mailing of our proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholder recommendations for candidates to the Board of Directors must be directed in writing to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701, and must include the candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications. It is our policy that stockholder nominees nominated in compliance with these procedures will receive the same consideration that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s nominees receive.
      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies director nominees through a combination of referrals, including by management, existing board members and stockholders, third party search firms and direct solicitations, where warranted. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may request references and additional information from the candidate prior to reaching a conclusion. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is under no obligation to formally respond to recommendations, although as a matter of practice, every effort is made to do so.
      To be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a director nominee must meet the following minimum criteria: (i) the highest personal and professional integrity; (ii) a record of exceptional ability and judgment; (iii) the ability and willingness to devote the required amount of time to the Company’s affairs, including attendance at Board and committee meetings; (iv) the interest, capacity and willingness, in conjunction with the other members of the Board, to serve the long-term interests of our stockholders; (v) freedom from any personal or professional relationships that would adversely affect his or her ability to serve the best interests of Introgen and our stockholders.

10


Table of Contents

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes into account that the Board as a whole shall have competency in the following areas: business judgment, industry knowledge, accounting and finance, leadership, corporate governance, business strategy, management and crisis management.
      Any of our stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board of Directors, a committee of the Board, the non-management directors as a group or any individual member of the Board, may send correspondence to Mr. Rodney Varner, Corporate Secretary of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701. The Corporate Secretary will compile and submit on a periodic basis all stockholder correspondence to the entire Board of Directors, or, if and as designated in the communication, to a committee of the Board, the non-management directors as a group or an individual Board member. The independent directors of the Board review and approve the stockholders’ communication process periodically to ensure effective communication with stockholders.
Statement on Corporate Governance
      We have had formal corporate governance standards in place since our inception in 1993. We have reviewed internally and with the Board the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), the rules of the SEC and the Nasdaq National Market’s new corporate governance listing standards regarding corporate governance policies and processes, and we believe that we are in compliance with the rules and listing standards. You can access our corporate governance principles and our committee charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee free of charge on our website at www.introgen.com or by writing to us at Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1850, Austin, Texas 78701, Attention: Investor Relations. We encourage, but do not require, our board members to attend the annual stockholders meeting. Last year, three of our directors attended the annual stockholders meeting. We have adopted the following standards for director independence in compliance with the Nasdaq National Market corporate governance listing standards:
  •  No director qualifies as “independent” if such person has a relationship, which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director;
 
  •  A director who is an officer or employee of us or our subsidiaries, or one whose immediate family member is an executive officer of us or our subsidiaries is not “independent” until three years after the end of such employment relationship;
 
  •  A director who accepts, or whose immediate family member accepts, more than $60,000 in compensation from us or any of our subsidiaries during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence, other than certain permitted payments such as compensation for board or board committee service, payments arising solely from investments in the our securities, compensation paid to a family member who is a non-executive employee of us or a subsidiary of ours, or benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, is not “independent” until three years after he or she ceases to accept more than $60,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence;
 
  •  A director who is, or who has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or an executive officer of, any organization in which we made, or from which we received, payments for property or services that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, is not “independent” until three years after falling below such threshold;
 
  •  A director who is employed, or one whose immediate family member is employed, as an executive officer of another company where any of our or any of our subsidiaries’ present executives serve on that company’s compensation committee is not “independent” until three years after the end of such service or employment relationship; and
 
  •  A director who is, or who has a family member who is, a current partner of our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, or was a partner or employee of Ernst & Young LLP who

11


Table of Contents

  worked on our audit is not “independent” until three years after the end of such affiliation or employment relationship.
      The Board has determined that William H. Cunningham, Ph.D., Charles E. Long, S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D. and Peter Barton Hutt meet the aforementioned independence standards. David G. Nance does not meet the aforementioned independence standards because he is our current President and Chief Executive Officer and is an employee of Introgen. John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. does not meet the aforementioned independence standards because of his relationship with EJ Financial Enterprises, Inc., which is detailed below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Executive Committee
      The Executive Committee currently consists of directors David G. Nance and John N. Kapoor, Ph.D. The Executive Committee held one meeting during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004. The Executive Committee acts on behalf of our Board of Directors to the extent permitted under Delaware law.
Board Compensation
      Each non-employee director is granted an option to purchase 33,600 shares of our common stock (exercisable at the fair market value on the date of grant) upon first becoming a director. The option vests ratably each month after the date of grant of such option, so that the entire option is fully vested three years after the date of grant. Each incumbent director is annually granted an option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock (exercisable at the fair market value on the date of grant) on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. That option vests ratably each month after the date of grant of such option, so that the entire option is fully vested one year after the date of grant. In addition, the chairman of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the designated “audit committee financial expert” on the Audit Committee are all granted annually a fully-vested option to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock. Directors do not receive any cash or other additional compensation, other than reimbursement of their out-of-pocket expenses, for services provided as a director.
      The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the election of both nominees to the Board of Directors named above.

12


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
      The Board of Directors has appointed, subject to ratification by our stockholders, Ernst & Young LLP, as independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our books, records and accounts for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. Ernst & Young has audited our financial statements beginning with the year ended December 31, 2002.
Fees Paid to Ernst & Young LLP
      The following table sets forth the costs incurred by the Company for services provided by Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
                   
    Year Ended December 31,
     
Fee Category   2003   2004
         
Audit Fees
  $ 113,250     $ 214,300  
Audit-Related Fees
           
Tax Fees
    9,375       10,000  
All Other Fees
           
 
Total Fees
  $ 122,895     $ 226,800  
      Audit Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and includes accounting services in connection with securities offerings.
      Audit-Related Fees. Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include employee benefit plan audits, accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
      Tax Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, tax audit defense, customs and duties, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and international tax planning.
      All Other Fees. We did not engage Ernst & Young LLP to perform services not covered by the preceding three categories.
      We do not expect a representative of Ernst & Young LLP to be present at the Annual Meeting.
      Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
      The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The independent registered public accounting firm is required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with such pre-approval. The Audit Committee may also delegate pre-approval authority to one of its members. Such members(s) must report any such pre-approval to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting.
      The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year

13


Table of Contents

ending December 31, 2005. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the Board of Directors will reconsider its appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
      The following table shows the compensation paid by us to our Chief Executive Officer and our five other most highly compensated executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) during the last three fiscal periods, including the fiscal year 2004 (January 1, 2004-December 31, 2004), fiscal year 2003 (January 1, 2003-December 31, 2003) and fiscal year 2002 (January 1, 2002-December 31, 2002):
                                           
                Long-Term    
                Compensation    
                Awards    
                     
            Securities    
        Compensation   Underlying    
            Options (# of   All Other
Name and Principal Position   Period   Salary   Bonus   Shares)   Compensation(1)
                     
David G. Nance
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004     $ 494,333     $       220,000     $ 162  
  President and     1/1/2003 – 12/31/2003       412,124             170,000       162  
  Chief Executive Officer     1/1/2002 – 12/31/2002       344,784             114,600       162  
Robert E. Sobol, M.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       291,250             50,000       162  
  Senior Vice President,     1/1/2003 – 12/31/2003       78,082             40,000       162  
  Medical and Scientific     1/1/2002 – 12/31/2002                         162  
  Affairs                                        
James W. Albrecht, Jr. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       206,250             75,000       162  
  Chief Financial Officer     1/1/2003 – 12/31/2003       180,000             40,000       162  
        1/1/2002 – 12/31/2002       180,000                   162  
J. David Enloe, Jr. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       205,000             105,000       162  
  Senior Vice President,     1/1/2003 – 12/31/2003       191,710             40,000       162  
  Operations     1/1/2002 – 12/31/2002       178,200             35,000       162  
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       200,000             40,000       162  
  Vice President,     1/1/2003 – 12/31/2003       200,000             40,000       162  
  Intellectual Property     1/1/2002 – 12/31/2002       200,000             35,000       162  
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       200,000             100,000       162  
  Senior Vice President,     1/1/2003 – 12/31/2003       168,973             50,000       162  
  Worldwide Commercial     1/1/2002 – 12/31/2002       112,329             250,000       162  
  Development                                        
 
(1)  Represents the full dollar value of premiums paid by the Company for term life insurance on behalf of the Named Executive Officers for 2004, 2003, and 2002.

14


Table of Contents

Option Grants Made During the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
      The following table sets forth grants of stock options made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 to each Named Executive Officer.
                                                         
            Individual Grants    
                Potential Realizable
            % of Total       Value at Assumed
        Number of   Options       Annual Rates of Stock
        Securities   Granted to       Price Appreciation for
        Underlying   Employees   Exercise       Option Term(2)
        Options   During   or Base   Expiration    
Name   Period   Granted   Period(1)   Price   Date   5%   10%
                             
David G. Nance
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       125,000       10.9%     $ 6.30       11/4/2014     $ 495,253     $ 1,255,072  
              95,000       8.3%       5.32       6/8/2014       317,843       805,477  
Robert E. Sobol, M.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       50,000       4.3%       5.32       6/8/2014       167,286       423,935  
James W. Albrecht, Jr. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       75,000       6.5%       5.32       6/8/2014       250,929       635,903  
J. David Enloe, Jr. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       40,000       3.5%       8.48       12/31/2013       213,321       540,597  
              65,000       5.7%       5.32       6/8/2014       217,472       551,116  
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       40,000       3.5%       5.32       6/8/2014       133,829       339,148  
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       50,000       4.3%       8.48       12/31/2013       266,651       675,747  
              50,000       4.3%       5.32       6/8/2014       167,286       423,935  
 
(1)  Based on the grant of stock options representing 1,149,871 shares to employees during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
 
(2)  The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of calculations at the 5% and 10% rates set by the Securities and Exchange Commission and therefore are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation, if any, of our stock price. We did not use an alternative formula for a grant date valuation, as we do not believe that any formula will determine with reasonable accuracy a present value based on future unknown or volatile factors.
      Aggregated Option Exercises During the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 and Option Values as of the End of Such Period
      The following table sets forth, for each of the Named Executive Officers, the number of options exercised during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as well as the value of unexercised options at the end of such period:
                                                         
                Number of Securities    
                Underlying Unexercised   Value of Unexercised
        Number of       Options at   In-the-Money Options at
        Shares       Fiscal Year-End(1)   Fiscal Year-End(2)
        Acquired   Value        
Name   Period   on Exercise   Realized   Exercisable   Unexercisable   Exercisable   Unexercisable
                             
David G. Nance
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004                   828,340       182,500     $ 4,553,378     $ 605,500  
Robert E. Sobol, M.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004                   10,000       80,000       9,400       184,200  
James W. Albrecht, Jr. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004                   261,788       132,500       1,812,524       438,100  
J. David Enloe, Jr. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004                   216,700       162,500       1,458,358       406,900  
David L. Parker, Ph.D., J.D.
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004       10,000     $ 81,210 (3)     241,788       97,500       1,647,845       328,900  
Max W. Talbott, Ph.D. 
    1/1/2004 – 12/31/2004                   62,500       337,500       264,000       1,169,000  
 
(1)  These amounts represent the total number of shares subject to stock options held by the Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2004. Unexercisable options are those that are not yet vested.
 
(2)  These amounts represent the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the price of our common stock on December 31, 2004 for all in-the-money options held by the Named Executive Officer. These amounts are based on a fair market value of $8.44 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2004, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market. Unexercisable options are those that are not yet vested.

15


Table of Contents

(3)  Based on a fair market value of $8.64 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on February 6, 2004, the date of exercise, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
Employment Contracts and Change-In-Control Arrangements
      We have an employment agreement with David G. Nance, entered into on August 1, 2003, under which Mr. Nance serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement with Mr. Nance continues through July 31, 2006, and thereafter renews automatically for one-year terms until either party gives timely written notice of non-renewal. Mr. Nance’s base salary under the employment agreement is $520,000 per annum effective August 1, 2004. His compensation under the employment agreement is subject to review annually. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Nance may receive bonuses in the form of cash, stock options, restricted stock or other consideration as determined by our Compensation Committee, which reviews his compensation annually. Mr. Nance has also received bonuses from time to time in the form of options to purchase our common stock, as contemplated in his employment agreement. The terms of such options, such as the exercise price and vesting dates, are determined by the administrator of our 2000 Stock Option Plan. In the event of Mr. Nance’s termination by the Company other than for cause, the Company may be required to continue to pay Mr. Nance compensation otherwise payable to him under the employment agreement.
      All of the options granted under our 1995 Stock Plan and the 2000 Stock Option Plan shall immediately vest and become exercisable upon our merger with or into another corporation, entity or person, or the sale of all or substantially all our assets to another corporation, entity or person, unless such options are assumed or an equivalent option or right substituted by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of the successor corporation.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
      Pursuant to a purchase agreement executed on June 30, 2001, we sold and issued 100,000 shares of a new class of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value per share, convertible into 2,343,721 shares of our common stock, to Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. for $25,000,000. We received the cash payment and issued the shares on July 2, 2001. Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., formerly known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals Products Inc., is an affiliate of Aventis Holdings Inc., which recently merged with Sanofi-Synthélabo to form Sanofi-Aventis, which holds greater than five percent of our outstanding common stock.
      John N. Kapoor, Ph.D., the Chairman of our Board of Directors, is the sole stockholder of EJ Financial Enterprises, Inc. We have a consulting agreement with EJ Financial Enterprises pursuant to which EJ Financial Enterprises provides services to us for $175,000 per year. The agreement provides for the assistance of EJ Financial Enterprises with our business development, license negotiation, market analysis and general corporate development. This agreement is automatically renewable each July 1 for one-year terms, unless either party gives 30 days advance notice of termination.
      David Parker, Ph.D., J.D., our Vice President, Intellectual Property, is a partner with the law firm Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, which provides legal services to us as our primary outside counsel for intellectual property matters.
      In October 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Magnum Therapeutics Corporation (Magnum), a company for which Dr. Robert Sobol, our Senior Vice President, Medical and Scientific Affairs, was the sole stockholder. We paid approximately $1.75 million for the Magnum stock by (1) issuing approximately 252,000 shares of our common stock valued at approximately $1.48 million at the acquisition date and (2) assuming liabilities of approximately $272,000. With respect to the common stock we issued pursuant to the acquisition, 50% of the shares are held by an independent escrow agent for a period of one year subsequent to the acquisition date to satisfy the indemnification obligations of the selling shareholder under terms of the purchase agreement. The shares were issued to Dr. Sobol, as the sole stockholder of the Company, pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933. Magnum’s primary asset is the right to receive funding under a grant from the National Institutes of Health. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we earned approximately $1.1 million of revenue under this grant. In the event certain of Magnum’s

16


Table of Contents

technologies result in commercial products, we may be obligated to pay royalties related to the sales of those products to certain third parties. Our Audit Committee reviewed and approved the acquisition of Magnum.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
      None of the members of the Compensation Committee is currently, or has ever been at any time since our formation, one of our officers or employees. No member of the Compensation Committee serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

17


Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
      The Compensation Committee is composed of two independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. Introgen believes that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. The members of the Compensation Committee are Charles E. Long (Chairman) and William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. The Compensation Committee administers our 1995 Stock Plan and 2000 Stock Option Plan, reviews forms of compensation to be provided to our officers, employees and consultants, including stock compensation, grants options to purchase our common stock to our employees, executive officers and consultants, and reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding all forms of compensation to be provided to the members of the Board of Directors, including stock compensation. The Compensation Committee believes it has fulfilled its responsibilities under its charter for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
      Compensation Philosophy and Objectives. Our basic philosophy is to align executive compensation with increases in stockholder value through achievement of certain milestones, including milestones related to the pre-clinical and clinical development of our product candidates. This is primarily accomplished through the use of stock options, which provide compensation in direct proportion to increases in stockholder value. In addition, we believe it is important to emphasize teamwork, entrepreneurship and active participation by all employees. This is accomplished through providing options to a majority of full-time domestic employees and similarly situated international employees, and through cash incentives, through which both executives and employees may receive cash bonuses based on company-wide financial goals.
      Executive Compensation Programs. Our executive compensation programs consist of three principal elements: base salary, cash bonus and stock options. We emphasize incentive compensation in the form of stock options and bonuses, rather than base salary. The Compensation Committee has adopted a guideline that executives should be paid competitive base salaries. The Board of Directors sets the initial compensation for executives after consideration of the recommendations of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and in some cases adjusts compensation for executives. Prior to making its recommendations and determinations, the Compensation Committee reviews historical compensation levels of the executives, evaluations of past performance, assessments of expected future contributions of the executives, competitive pay levels and programs provided by other comparable companies, and general industry pay practices. In making its recommendations and determinations, the Committee does not utilize any particular indices or formulae to arrive at each executive’s recommended pay level.
      Total compensation for executive officers also includes long-term incentives in the form of stock options, which are generally provided through initial stock option grants at the date of hire and periodic additional stock option grants. Stock options are instrumental in promoting the alignment of long-term interests between our executive officers and stockholders due to the fact that executives realize gains only if the stock price increases over the fair market value at the date of grant and the executives exercise their options and sell the shares. In determining the amount of such grants, the Committee evaluates the job level of the executive, responsibilities of the executive, and competitive practices in the industry. Options are generally granted at 100% of fair market value at the date of grant or at 110% of fair market value at the date of grant for stockholders who hold greater than 10% of Introgen’s combined voting power. Options generally vest ratably over a period of four years on each anniversary of the grant date.
      In 2004, executive compensation was also based on the achievement of the Company’s 2004 corporate goals including, but not limited to, the furtherance of the Company’s clinical trial activities, the execution of its research and development programs, the protection of its intellectual property, and the attainment of financial goals.
      Chief Executive Officer Compensation. The compensation of our chief executive officer is determined using the same philosophy and policies as for all executive officers as well as by the terms of his employment agreement. The compensation includes base salary, cash bonus and stock options as compensation for his services as an officer and director. Our chief executive officer currently has an employment agreement that is described under “Executive Compensation — Employment Contracts and Change-In-Control Arrangements.” The annual compensation for Mr. Nance for his service as our chief executive officer was based upon

18


Table of Contents

the written employment agreement we executed with Mr. Nance and as adopted by the Board of Directors in the year 2003. Mr. Nance’s base salary under the current employment agreement is $520,000 per annum effective August 1, 2004. The Compensation Committee evaluates the employment agreement in relation to Introgen’s achievement of corporate goals, Mr. Nance’s performance on an annual basis and salary surveys. In 2004, Mr. Nance demonstrated leadership in establishing Introgen’s long-term and short-term strategic, clinical, operational and financial goals. The Compensation Committee expects to review Mr. Nance’s compensation again in August 2005.
      Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes a limit on tax deductions for annual compensation in excess of one million dollars paid by a corporation to its chief executive officer and the other four most highly compensated executive officers. Deductions are, however, permitted if certain conditions are met, including a requirement that the plan under which such compensation is paid be re-approved by stockholders every five years. None of the compensation paid by us in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 was subject to the limitation on deductibility. The Compensation Committee will continue to assess the impact of Section 162(m) on its compensation practices and determine what further action, if any, is appropriate.
  Respectfully submitted,
 
  COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
 
  William H. Cunningham, Ph.D.
  Charles E. Long
      THE FOREGOING COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE “SOLICITING MATERIAL” OR TO BE “FILED” WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, NOR SHALL SUCH INFORMATION BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY PAST OR FUTURE FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT WE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATE IT BY REFERENCE INTO ANY SUCH FILING.

19


Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
      The Audit Committee is composed of three independent directors in compliance with the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, as amended in 2005, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The members of the Audit Committee are William H. Cunningham, Ph.D. (Chairman), Charles E. Long and S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, in accordance with Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Introgen identified Dr. Gillis as the “audit committee financial expert.” We believe that each member of the Audit Committee meets the director independence requirements set forth in the applicable SEC and Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. The Audit Committee believes it has fulfilled its responsibilities under its charter for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
      Our management is responsible for our internal controls and the financial reporting process. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
      The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm who performed such audit, Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and the Audit Committee has discussed the independence of Ernst & Young LLP with that firm.
      Based upon the Audit Committee’s review and discussions referred to in the immediately preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005. Each of the services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP was pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
  Respectfully submitted,
 
  AUDIT COMMITTEE
 
  William H. Cunningham, Ph.D.
  Charles E. Long
  S. Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D.
      THE FOREGOING AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE “SOLICITING MATERIAL” OR TO BE “FILED” WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, NOR SHALL SUCH INFORMATION BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY PAST OR FUTURE FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT WE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATE IT BY REFERENCE INTO ANY SUCH FILING.

20


Table of Contents

STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
      The following line graph compares the cumulative total return to stockholders of our common stock from October 12, 2000 (the date of our initial public offering) to December 31, 2004 to the cumulative total return over such period of (i) the Nasdaq National Market System Composite Index and (ii) the S&P Biotechnology Index. The graph assumes that $100.00 was invested on October 12, 2000 in our common stock at its initial public offering price of $8.00 per share and in each of the other two indices as of September 30, 2000, and the reinvestment of all dividends, if any.
      The information contained in the Performance Graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any past or future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into any such filing. The graph is presented in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission requirements. Stockholders are cautioned against drawing any conclusions from the data contained therein, as past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.
COMPARISON OF 50 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC., THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET (U.S.) INDEX
AND THE S&P BIOTECHNOLOGY INDEX
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
                                                               
                                             
      10/12/00 or                                
      9/30/00     6/30/01     12/31/01     12/31/02     12/31/03     12/31/04  
                                             
 Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. 
    $ 100.00       $ 59.75       $ 69.25       $ 26.88       $ 106.00       $ 105.75    
                                                   
 Nasdaq National Market System Composite Index
      100.00         58.89         53.11         36.72         54.90         59.75    
                                                   
 S&P Biotechnology Index
      100.00         84.67         84.29         67.09         86.44         93.02    
                                                   
$100 invested on 10/12/00 in stock or on 9/30/00 in indices — including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

21


Table of Contents

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
      Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms we received, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10% stockholders were satisfied.
CODE OF ETHICS
      On February 18, 2004, the Company adopted a Corporate Code of Ethics for All Employees and Directors, and a Corporate Code of Ethics for Financial Officers, which specifically applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and persons performing similar functions. A copy of each of the codes of ethics is available on our website at www.introgen.com.
      We intend to post on our website any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our codes of ethics within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.
OTHER MATTERS
      The Board of Directors is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should properly come before the Annual Meeting, however, the enclosed Proxy Card confers discretionary authority with respect to such matter.
  By Order of the Board of Directors
 
  /s/ RODNEY VARNER
 
 
  Rodney Varner
  Secretary
Austin, Texas
May 9, 2005

22


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT A
INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
a Delaware corporation
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PURPOSES
      The purpose of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), shall be to:
        1. Oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of the financial statements of the Company; and
 
        2. Provide the Company’s Board of Directors with the results of its monitoring and recommendations derived therefrom.
      In addition, the Audit Committee will, where required by law, and to the extent it otherwise finds appropriate, perform the specific duties and responsibilities listed below and such other duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe.
MEMBERSHIP
      The Audit Committee members will be appointed by, and will serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors and will consist of at least three members of the Board of Directors, each of whom will meet the independence and experience requirements of NASDAQ and applicable federal law. The Audit Committee will select its own chairperson, who will serve at the will of the Audit Committee.
RESPONSIBILITIES
      The responsibilities of the Audit Committee will include the following, to the extent that the Audit Committee finds proper or as required by law:
        1. Exercising its sole authority to appoint or replace the Company’s independent auditors (subject, if applicable, to stockholder ratification);
 
        2. Reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditors from time to time the adequacy of the Company’s system of internal controls, any special steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies and the adequacy of disclosures about changes in internal control over financial reporting;
 
        3. Reviewing with the independent auditors and management the Company’s financial reporting and accounting and disclosure principles, policies and practices to be used; alternative treatments within generally accepted accounting principles for material items discussed with management, including the ramifications of such alternatives and the treatment preferred by the auditors; and other written communications between the auditor and management that are material to the financial statements. The Audit Committee shall discuss generally the Company’s annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements with management and the independent auditors, including the Company’s disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as the Company’s earnings press releases and financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies;
 
        4. Discussing the Company’s major financial risk exposures and its policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

A-1


Table of Contents

        5. Reviewing the independent auditors’ proposed audit scope and approach;
 
        6. Reviewing the performance of the independent auditors, who will report directly to the Audit Committee, and who shall be ultimately accountable to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee, as representatives of the Company’s shareholders;
 
        7. Reviewing fee arrangements with the independent auditors, including pre-approving all auditing services, internal control related services and permitted non-audit services provided to the Company by the independent auditors (or subsequently approving non-audit services in those circumstances where a subsequent approval is necessary and permissible) and in this regard, the Audit Committee shall have the sole authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms, all internal control engagements and all non-audit engagements, as may be permissible, with the independent auditors;
 
        8. Monitor the rotation of certain members of the independent auditors’ team every five years, pursuant to applicable SEC Rules;
 
        9. Overseeing the independence of the independent auditors and the Company’s compliance with SEC Rules for disclosure of auditors’ services by, among other things:
        (a) Requiring the independent auditors to deliver to the Audit Committee on a periodic basis a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the auditors and the Company, consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, and engaging in a dialogue with the auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the auditors;
 
        (b) Actively engaging in dialogue with the independent auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent auditors and recommending that the Board of Directors take appropriate action to satisfy itself with regard to the auditors’ independence;
 
        (c) Reviewing the independent auditors’ peer review conducted every three years or any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm and any steps taken to deal with any such issues;
 
        (d) Discussing with the independent auditors the financial statements and audit findings, including any significant adjustments, management judgments and accounting estimates, significant new accounting policies and disagreements with management and any other matters described in Statement of Accounting Standards (“SAS”) No. 61, as may be modified or supplemented; and
 
        (e) Reviewing reports submitted to the Audit Committee by the independent auditors in accordance with applicable SEC requirements;
        10. Discussing with the Company’s legal counsel legal matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company’s compliance policies;
 
        11. Reviewing with management and the independent auditors the Company’s interim financial statements and the related Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, including the results of the independent auditors’ reviews of the quarterly financial statements;
 
        12. Reviewing with management and the independent auditors, before release, and recommending to the Board of Directors for inclusion in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, the audited financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;
 
        13. Reviewing disclosures made to the Audit Committee by the Company’s CEO and CFO during their certification process for the Form 10-K and Form 10-Q about any significant deficiencies in the

A-2


Table of Contents

  design or operation of internal controls or material weaknesses therein and any fraud involving management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls;
 
        14. Reviewing with management and the independent auditors any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies and any employee complaints or published reports which raise material issues regarding the Company’s financial statements or accounting policies;
 
        15. Reviewing and monitoring the Company’s code of ethics for its senior financial officers and employees, and granting waivers to such code if deemed appropriate;
 
        16. Meeting periodically with the Chief Financial Officer and the independent auditors in separate executive sessions;
 
        17. Resolving disagreements, if any, between the Company’s management and the Company’s independent auditors regarding financial reporting;
 
        18. Establishing procedures for receiving, retaining and treating complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
 
        19. Reviewing on an annual basis the adequacy of the Audit Committee’s charter and submitting any recommended changes to the Board of Directors for consideration;
 
        20. Providing oversight and review of the Company’s asset management policies, including periodic review of the Company’s investment policies and performance for cash and short-term investments;
 
        21. If it finds necessary, securing independent expert advice, including retaining independent counsel, accountants, consultants or others, to assist the Audit Committee in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities;
 
        22. Exercising its sole discretion to determine the appropriate funding for payment of compensation to the independent auditors for the purpose of rendering or issuing an audit report, to any advisors employed by the Audit Committee and for ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties, all of which will be paid by the Company;
 
        23. Reviewing related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest and approving all appropriate related party transactions;
 
        24. Providing a report in the Company’s proxy statement in accordance with the requirements of Item 306 of Regulations S-K and S-B and Item 7(d)(3) of Schedule 14A; and
 
        25. Performing such other duties as may be requested or delegated by the Board of Directors.
      The Audit Committee may rely on the expertise and knowledge of management, the internal auditors, the independent auditors and counsel, advisors and experts in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. Management is responsible for determining that the Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles statements and that they accurately represent the financial condition of the Company. Management is also responsible for the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements. It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits, to determine that the financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable rules and regulations, to conduct investigations, to assure the adequacy or effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls or disclosure procedures or to assure compliance with laws and regulations or the Company’s internal policies, procedures and controls. The Audit Committee may elect to form and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more members when it deems appropriate, including the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and permitted non-audit services, provided that decisions of such subcommittee to grant pre-approvals shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

A-3


Table of Contents

MEETINGS
      The Audit Committee will meet as often as it determines, but at least quarterly. The Audit Committee may establish its own schedule.
      The Audit Committee, at its own discretion, may ask members of management or others to attend its meetings (or portions thereof) and to provide pertinent information as necessary. The Audit Committee will meet separately with the Company’s president and chief executive officer and separately with the Company’s chief financial officer at such times as it deems appropriate to review the financial affairs and controls of the Company. The Audit Committee will meet in separate executive session with the independent auditors of the Company at such times as it deems appropriate to review the independent auditors’ examination and management report, to review the internal controls of the Company and to otherwise fulfill the responsibilities of the Audit Committee under this Charter. The Audit Committee may also meet with the Company’s investment bankers or financial analysts who follow the Company’s business.

A-4


Table of Contents

 

INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.

2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

9 a.m. (CST), Friday, June 17, 2005
The University Club — Terrace Rooms 2 & 3
Post Oak Tower
5051 Westheimer, Suite 355
Houston, Texas 77056

Admission Ticket

 
(Not Transferable)

Please present this admission ticket to gain admittance to the meeting. This ticket admits only the stockholder listed on the reverse side and his or her family members and is not transferable.


 

 

 

[ITTCM — INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.] [FILE NAME: ZITT22.ELX] [VERSION — (3)] [04/12/05] [orig. 03/18/05]

         
  DETACH HERE   ZITT22   

PROXY
INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.

This Proxy Is Solicited By The Board Of Directors

Proxy For The Annual Meeting Of Stockholders
To Be Held On Friday, June 17, 2005

     

      The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints David G. Nance and James W. Albrecht, Jr., and each of them, as Proxies of the undersigned, with full power to appoint his substitute, and authorizes each of them to represent and to vote all shares of common stock of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) held of record by the undersigned as of the close of business on Monday, April 25, 2005 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at The University Club, Terrace Rooms 2 & 3, Post Oak Tower, 5051 Westheimer, Suite 355, Houston, Texas 77056, at 9:00 a.m., local time, on Friday, June 17, 2005, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

     

      When properly executed, this proxy will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder(s). If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the election of the two nominees of the Board of Directors listed in Proposal 1, and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 listed in Proposal 2. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. A stockholder wishing to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations need only sign and date this proxy and return it in the enclosed envelope.

     

      The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement with respect thereto and the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders, and hereby revokes any proxy or proxies heretofore given. This proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised.

     

      Please vote and sign on the other side and return promptly in the enclosed envelope (which requires no postage if mailed within the United States).
         
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
  CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE  
SEE REVERSE
SIDE

 


Table of Contents

Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.

C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08818-8694

 

 

 

 
 

Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.

     Vote-by-Internet
 
Log on to the Internet and go to
http://www.eproxyvote.com/ingn
  (GRAPHIC OF COMPUTER)

 

OR

Vote-by-Telephone
 
Call toll-free
1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683)
  (GRAPHIC OF TELEPHONE)


If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.

 

 

[ITTCM — INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS INC.] [FILE NAME: ZITT21.ELX] [VERSION — (2)] [04/11/05] [orig. 03/18/05]

         
  DETACH HERE   ZITT21   
             
x  
Please mark
votes as in
this example.
 
 
  
  #ITT

      

1.  
Elect two (2) Class II directors to the Board of Directors, each to serve a term of three (3) years.
Nominees: (01) Peter Barton Hutt (02) Charles E. Long
             
FOR
BOTH
NOMINEES
  o   o   WITHHELD
FROM BOTH
NOMINEES
     
o
 
 
 
For both nominees except as noted above
                 
        FOR   AGAINST   ABSTAIN
2.
 
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
  o   o   o

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting including any motion to adjourn to a later date to permit further solicitation of proxies if necessary or before any adjournment thereof.

The shares represented by this Proxy Card will be voted as specified above, but if no specification is made they will be voted FOR Proposals 1 and 2 and at the discretion of the Proxies on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.

NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, give full name and title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by the President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. If shares are held by joint tenants or community property, all joint owners should sign.

Please sign, date and return promptly in the accompanying envelope.
             
MARK HERE
FOR ADDRESS
CHANGE AND
NOTE AT LEFT
  o   MARK HERE
IF YOU PLAN
TO ATTEND
THE MEETING
  o


                             
Signature:
      Date:       Signature:       Date: