e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
Commission File Number 1-5794 |
MASCO CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
38-1794485
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
21001 Van Born Road, Taylor, Michigan
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
48180
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
313-274-7400
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Each Exchange
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
On Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value
Zero Coupon Convertible Senior
Notes Series B Due 2031
|
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Registrants Common Stock
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 29, 2007
(based on the closing sale price of $28.47 of the
Registrants Common Stock, as reported by the New York
Stock Exchange on such date) was approximately $10,405,753,000.
Number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common
Stock at January 31, 2008:
364,700,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $1.00 per
share
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement to
be filed for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
Masco
Corporation
2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
Masco Corporation manufactures, distributes and installs home
improvement and building products, with emphasis on brand name
consumer products and services holding leadership positions in
their markets. The Company is among the largest manufacturers in
North America of a number of home improvement and building
products, including faucets, cabinets, architectural coatings
and windows and is one of the largest installers of building
products for the new home construction market. The Company
generally provides broad product offerings in a variety of
styles and price points and distributes products through
multiple channels including home builders and wholesale and
retail channels. Approximately 80 percent of the
Companys 2007 sales were generated by North American
operations. The balance of sales were made by our other
operations, located principally in Belgium, China, Denmark,
Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
The Companys businesses operate in five segments arranged
by similarity in products and services. The following table sets
forth, for the three years ended December 31, 2007, the
contribution of the Companys segments to net sales and
operating profit. Additional financial information concerning
the Companys operations by segment and by geographic
regions, as well as general corporate expense, as of and for the
three years ended December 31, 2007, is set forth in
Note P to the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 8 of this Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales (1)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
$
|
2,829
|
|
|
$
|
3,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,324
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
3,296
|
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit (1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts exclude discontinued operations.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Operating profit is before general corporate expense and gains
on sale of corporate fixed assets, net.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Operating profit is before income regarding the Behr litigation
settlement of $1 million and $6 million in 2006 and
2005, respectively, pertaining to the Decorative Architectural
Products segment.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Operating profit includes impairment charges for goodwill and
other intangible assets as follows: For 2007
Plumbing Products $69 million; and Other
Specialty Products $158 million. For
2006 Cabinets and Related Products
$316 million; and Plumbing Products
$1 million. For 2005 Plumbing
Products $7 million; and Other Specialty
Products $36 million.
|
2
Except as the context otherwise indicates, the terms
Masco and the Company refer to Masco
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Cabinets and
Related Products
In North America, the Company manufactures and sells economy,
stock, semi-custom, assembled and
ready-to-assemble
cabinetry for kitchen, bath, storage, home office and home
entertainment applications in a broad range of styles and price
points. In Europe, the Company manufactures and sells assembled
and
ready-to-assemble
kitchen, bath, storage, home office and home entertainment
cabinetry. These products are sold under a number of trademarks
including
KRAFTMAID®,
MILLS
PRIDE®,
TVILUM-
SCANBIRKtm
and
WOODGATEtm
primarily to dealers and home centers, and under the names
MERILLAT®,
MOOREStm
and QUALITY
CABINETS®
primarily to distributors and homebuilders for both the home
improvement and new home construction markets. Cabinet sales are
significantly affected by levels of activity in both new home
construction and retail consumer spending, particularly spending
for major home improvement products. A significant portion of
our sales for the home improvement market are made through home
center retailers.
The cabinet manufacturing industry in the United States and
Europe is highly competitive, with several large competitors and
numerous local and regional competitors. In addition to price,
the Company believes that competition in this industry is based
largely on product quality, responsiveness to customer needs and
product features. Significant North American competitors include
American Woodmark Corporation, Fortune Brands, Inc. and Cardell
Cabinetry.
In 2007, the Company completed additions to its North American
cabinet manufacturing capacity, which were undertaken in order
to meet increased demand for cabinet products. The anticipated
benefits of the new capacity have not been realized due to the
decline in new home construction and consumer spending activity
since 2006.
Plumbing
Products
In North America, the Company sells a wide variety of faucet and
showering devices that are manufactured by or for the Company.
Products are sold under various brand names including
DELTA®,
PEERLESS®,
HANSGROHE®,
BRASSTECH®,
BRIZO®,
NEWPORT
BRASS®,
AXOR®,
ALSONS®
and PLUMB
SHOP®.
Products include single- and double-handle faucets, showerheads,
handheld showers and valves, which are sold by
manufacturers representatives and Company sales personnel
to major retail accounts and to distributors who sell these
products to plumbers, building contractors, remodelers, smaller
retailers and others. The Company sells kitchen and bath
faucets, showering devices and various other plumbing products
for European markets under the brand names HANSGROHE,
BRISTANtm,
AXOR and
DAMIXA®,
which are sold through multiple distribution channels.
Masco believes that its faucet operations are among the leaders
in sales in the North American market, with American Standard,
Kohler, Moen and Price Pfister as major brand competitors. The
Company also has several major competitors among the European
manufacturers, primarily in Germany and Italy, including
Friedrich Grohe. The Company faces significant competition from
private label products (including house brands sold by certain
of the Companys customers). Many of the faucet and
showering products with which the Companys products
compete are manufactured in Asia. As part of the Companys
strategy for the Plumbing Products segment, these businesses
have been reducing the volume of products manufactured
domestically and increasing their Asian manufacturing and
sourcing of products.
Other plumbing products manufactured and sold by the Company
include AQUA
GLASS®,
MIROLIN®
and AMERICAN SHOWER &
BATHtm
acrylic and gelcoat bath and shower enclosure units, shower
trays and laundry tubs, which are sold primarily to wholesale
plumbing distributors and home center retailers for the North
American home improvement and new home construction markets. The
Companys spas are manufactured and sold under HOT
SPRING®,
CALDERA®
and other trademarks directly to independent dealers. Major
competitors include Kohler, Lasco, Maax and Jacuzzi.
HÜPPE®
and
BREUERtm
shower enclosures are sold by the Company through wholesale
channels and home
3
centers primarily in Germany and western Europe.
HERITAGEtm
ceramic and acrylic bath fixtures and faucets are principally
sold in the United Kingdom directly to selected retailers.
GLASStm
and
PHAROtm
acrylic bathtubs and steam shower enclosures are also sold in
Europe.
Also included in the Plumbing Products segment are brass and
copper plumbing system components and other plumbing
specialties, which are sold to plumbing, heating and hardware
wholesalers and to home center retailers, hardware stores,
building supply outlets and other mass merchandisers. These
products are marketed in North America for the wholesale trade
under the
BRASSCRAFT®
and BRASSTECH trademarks and for the do-it-yourself
market under the MASTER
PLUMBER®
and PLUMB SHOP trademarks and are also sold under private label.
In addition to price, the Company believes that competition in
its Plumbing Products markets is based largely on brand
reputation, product quality, product features, and breadth of
product offering.
A substantial portion of the Companys plumbing products
are made from brass, the major components of which are copper
and zinc. From time to time, the Company has encountered
volatility in the price of brass. In addition, legislation
enacted in California to become effective in January 2010
mandates new standards for acceptable lead content in plumbing
products sold in California. Similar legislation is being
considered by other states. Faucet manufacturers, including the
Company, will be required to obtain adequate supplies of
lead-free brass or suitable alternative materials for continued
production of faucets. An increase in the demand for lead-free
brass may cause a shortage of supply and resulting price
increases and could adversely impact this segments
operating results.
Installation and
Other Services
The Companys Installation and Other Services segment sells
installed building products and distributes building products
primarily to the new home construction industry, and to a lesser
extent, the commercial construction market, throughout the
United States. Historically, the Company concentrated on the
installation and distribution of insulation, which comprised
approximately 12 percent, 15 percent and
15 percent of the Companys consolidated net sales for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Net sales of non-insulation products (both
installed and distributed) in 2007 represented approximately
46 percent of the segments net sales. Our offering of
installed building products includes insulation, cabinetry,
gutters, fireplaces, garage doors and framing components.
Distributed products include insulation, insulation accessories,
gutters, roofing, cabinetry and fireplaces. Collaboration with
other Company businesses has resulted in sales of installed
Company products, such as cabinetry, windows, paint and bath
accessories. Installed building products are sold primarily to
custom and production homebuilders by the Companys network
of branch locations throughout most of the United States.
Distributed products are sold primarily to contractors and
dealers from distribution centers in various parts of the United
States. As discussed under Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, sales and operating results for the
Installation and Other Services segment are significantly
affected by the level of new home construction activity.
In addition to price, the Company believes that competition in
this industry is based largely on customer service, range of
products and services offered, and quality of installation
service. The Company believes it is the largest national
provider of installed insulation in the United States.
Competitors include several regional contractors, as well as
numerous local contractors and lumber yards.
The Company buys insulation from a limited number of large
suppliers in the United States market. Historically, during
periods of rapid growth in the new home construction market, the
industry has encountered shortages of insulation, leading to
price volatility and allocations of supply. As one of the
countrys largest purchasers of insulation, the Company has
been able to successfully meet its needs in the past, although
the volatility of material costs does impact our financial
performance.
4
The Installation and Other Services segment is a labor-intensive
business. Significant changes in federal, state and local
regulations addressing immigration and wages, as well as
collective bargaining arrangements affecting wages and working
conditions, could adversely affect the financial performance of
the Companys business.
Decorative
Architectural Products
The Company manufactures architectural coatings including
paints, specialty paint products, stains, varnishes and
waterproofing products. The products are sold in the United
States and Canada under the brand names
BEHR®,
KILZ®
and
EXPRESSIONS®
to the do-it-yourself and professional markets
through home centers, paint stores and other retailers. BEHR
products were also recently introduced in China. The KILZ brand
is sold in North America through home center retailers and
discount retailers, and through hardware stores, paint stores
and dealers. Net sales of architectural coatings comprised
approximately 13 percent, 11 percent and
11 percent of the Companys consolidated net sales for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Competitors in the architectural coatings market
include large national and international brands such as Benjamin
Moore, Glidden, Olympic, Sherwin-Williams, Valspar and Zinsser,
as well as many regional and other national brands. In addition
to price, the Company believes that competition in this industry
is based largely on product quality, technology and product
innovation, customer service and brand reputation.
The BEHR brand is sold through The Home Depot, the
segments and the Companys largest customer. The
paint departments at The Home Depot stores include the Behr
color center and computer kiosk with the COLOR SMART BY
BEHR®
computerized color-matching system that enables consumers to
select and coordinate their paint-color selection. The loss of
The Home Depot as a customer would significantly impact the
segments business and that of the Company as a whole.
Titanium dioxide is a major ingredient in the manufacture of
paint. Shortages of supply and cost increases for titanium
dioxide in the past have resulted from surges in global demand
and from disruption of refining capacity (i.e., Hurricane
Katrina in the fall of 2005). Similar events in the future could
adversely impact the financial performance of the Companys
business. Petroleum products are also used in the manufacture of
architectural coatings. Significant increases in the cost of
crude oil lead to higher raw material costs (i.e., for resins,
solvents, packaging), which can adversely affect the
segments results of operations.
The Decorative Architectural Products segment also includes
LIBERTY®
door, window and other hardware, which is manufactured for the
Company and sold to home centers, other retailers, original
equipment manufacturers and wholesale markets. Key competitors
in North America include Amerock, Belwith, Umbra and Stanley.
Decorative bath hardware and shower accessories are sold under
the brand names FRANKLIN
BRASS®
and DECOR
BATHWARE®
to distributors, home center retailers and other retailers.
Competitors include Moen and Globe Union.
Other Specialty
Products
The Company manufactures and sells vinyl, fiberglass and
aluminum windows and doors under the MILGARD
WINDOWS®
brand name to the new home construction and home improvement
markets, principally in the western United States. MILGARD
WINDOWS products are sold primarily through dealers and, to a
lesser extent, direct to production homebuilders and through
lumberyards and home center retailers. The segments
competitors in North America include national brands, such as
Jeld-Wen, Simonton, Pella and Andersen, and numerous regional
brands. In the United Kingdom, the Company manufactures and
sells windows, related products and components under several
brand names including
GRIFFINtm,
CAMBRIANtm,
PREMIERtm
and
DURAFLEXtm.
Sales are primarily through dealers and wholesalers to the
repair and remodeling markets. United Kingdom competitors
include many small and mid-sized firms and a few large,
vertically integrated competitors. In addition to price, the
Company believes that competition in this industry is based
largely on customer service and product quality.
5
The Company manufactures and sells a complete line of manual and
electric staple gun tackers, staples and other fastening tools
under the brand names
ARROW®
and
POWERSHOT®.
These products are sold through various distribution channels
including home center and other retailers and wholesalers. The
principal North American competitor in this product line is
Stanley.
The Company also manufactures residential hydronic radiators and
heat convectors under the brand names
BRUGMAN®,
SUPERIAtm,
THERMICtm
and
VASCO®,
which are sold to the European wholesale market and to retail
home centers from operations in Belgium, The Netherlands and
Poland.
Additional
Information
|
|
|
|
|
The Company holds United States and foreign patents, patent
applications, licenses, trademarks and trade names. As a
manufacturer and distributor of brand name products, we view our
trademarks and other proprietary rights as important, but do not
believe that there is any reasonable likelihood of a loss of
such rights that would have a material adverse effect on our
present business as a whole.
|
|
|
|
All of the Companys operating segments, except the
Plumbing Products segment, normally experience stronger sales
during the second and third calendar quarters, corresponding
with the peak season for new home construction and remodeling.
|
|
|
|
Compliance with federal, state and local regulations relating to
the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise
relating to the protection of the environment, is not expected
to result in material capital expenditures by the Company or to
have a material adverse effect on the Companys earning or
competitive position.
|
|
|
|
The Company does not consider backlog orders to be material.
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, the Company employed approximately
52,000 people. Satisfactory relations have generally
prevailed between the Company and its employees.
|
Available
Information
The Companys website is www.masco.com. The Companys
periodic reports and all amendments to those reports required to
be filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are
available free of charge through its website. The Company will
continue to post its periodic reports on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and its current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those documents to its website as soon as
reasonably practicable after those reports are filed with or
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Material
contained on the Companys website is not incorporated by
reference into this Report on
Form 10-K.
There are a number of business risks and uncertainties that may
affect our Company. These risks and uncertainties could cause
future results to differ from past performance or expected
results, including results described in statements elsewhere in
this Report that constitute forward-looking
statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. The impact on our Company of certain of these risk
factors is discussed below under Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently
believe to be immaterial, also may adversely impact our Company.
Should any risks or uncertainties develop into actual events,
these developments could have material adverse effects on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the
following, which we consider to be most relevant to our specific
business activities.
6
A significant
portion of our business relies on residential construction
activity and general economic conditions.
A significant part of our business is affected by levels of home
improvement (including repair and remodeling) and new home
construction activity, principally in North America and Europe.
Demographic factors, such as changes in population growth and
household formations, affect levels of home improvement and new
home construction over the long term. Significant factors that
impact demand for home improvement and new home construction in
the short term include the inventory levels of unsold new and
existing homes, general and regional economic conditions,
consumer confidence and credit, terms and availability of
financing, affordability of homes, interest rates, energy costs,
and, on a more localized basis, weather conditions and natural
disasters. The new home construction market, in particular, is
cyclical in nature. A discussion of the impact of the decline in
new home construction and in consumer spending for home
improvement items on our various segments and on the
Companys operating results is located under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7 of
this Report.
We rely on key
customers and may encounter conflicts within and between our
distribution channels.
The size and importance of individual customers to our
businesses has increased as customers in our major distribution
channels have consolidated. Larger customers can effect
significant changes in their volume of purchases and can
otherwise significantly affect the terms and conditions on which
we do business. Further, during downturns in our markets,
declines in the financial condition and creditworthiness of
significant customers may impact the volume of our business, the
credit risk involved and our terms of doing business with them.
Sales of our home improvement and building products to home
center retailers are substantial. In 2007, sales to the
Companys largest customer, The Home Depot, were
$2.4 billion (approximately 20 percent of the
Companys consolidated net sales). Although builders,
dealers and other retailers represent other channels of
distribution for the Companys products and services, the
loss of a substantial portion of our sales to The Home Depot
would have a material adverse impact on the Company.
As some of our customers expand their markets and their targeted
customers, conflicts occur and in some instances we may also
become their competitor. Increasingly, we are transacting
business directly with our larger customers. These arrangements
may undermine the business relationships we have with customers
who purchase our products through traditional wholesale means.
In addition, our large retail customers are increasingly
requesting product exclusivity, which may impact our product
offerings to other customers.
Our principal
markets are becoming more competitive.
The major geographic markets for our products and services are
highly competitive and, in recent years, competition has
intensified significantly. Competition is further exacerbated
during economic downturns. Home center retailers are increasing
their purchases of products directly from manufacturers,
particularly low-cost suppliers in Asia, for sale as private
label and house brand merchandise. Also, home center retailers,
which have historically concentrated their sales efforts on
retail consumers and remodelers, are increasingly turning their
marketing efforts directly toward professional contractors and
installers. The Company believes that competition in our
industries is based largely on price, product and service
quality, brand reputation, customer service and product
features. Although the relative importance of such factors
varies among customers and product categories, price is often a
primary factor.
Although we view the long term demographic trends for our
markets as generally favorable, our markets are mature, cyclical
and growing slowly. Additionally, our market position in and the
competitive composition of our traditional markets affect our
ability to expand our market share. In recent years, we have
directed our strategic focus to organic growth and on developing
new products and
7
expanding our services, rather than on growth through
acquisitions. However, our ability to maintain our competitive
positions in our markets and to grow our businesses is
challenged since it depends to a large extent upon successfully
maintaining our relationships with major customers, implementing
growth strategies in our existing markets and entering new
geographic markets, capitalizing on and strengthening our brand
names, managing our cost structure, accommodating shorter
life-cycles for our products and identifying and effectively
responding to changing consumer preferences and spending
patterns through product development and innovation.
The importance of sophisticated information technology to our
industry is increasing. In order to remain competitive and
respond to customer requirements and changes in their business
processes, such as inventory replenishment, merchandise
ordering, transportation and payment processing, the Company
must be able to identify and implement comprehensive enterprise
resource planning (ERP) systems. ERP systems are
also critical to our supply chain management and logistics
capabilities. The successful implementation of ERP systems also
requires significant investment by the Company of both time and
capital. Difficulties encountered in the deployment of
significant new systems and other technology could be disruptive
to the operation of our businesses.
The cost and
availability of materials and labor and the performance of our
supply chain affect our operating results.
When we incur cost increases for commodities or materials that
are major components of our products or services, such as brass,
insulation or titanium dioxide, it can be difficult for us to
offset the impact on our operating results on a timely basis.
Delays in adjusting or inability to adjust prices may be due to
such factors as our existing arrangements with customers,
competitive considerations, or customer resistance to such price
increases. When the number of available sources for raw
materials is limited, price volatility is more likely to occur
and with longer duration when demand exceeds supply. In addition
to their impact on our production expenses, increased costs of
energy and other commodities, such as crude oil, can
significantly affect the cost to transport our products and
adversely affect our results of operations. See
Installation and Other Services for a discussion of
the impact of cost of raw materials and availability of labor
and materials on that segment of our business.
We may also be adversely affected if our homebuilder customers
encounter difficulty or delays in obtaining required materials
from their other suppliers or if they encounter labor shortages.
This is particularly likely to occur during periods of rapid
growth in the new home construction market. Under such
circumstances, homebuilders may delay their construction
schedules and, as a result, may reduce or delay their purchase
of products and services from us.
We rely heavily or exclusively on outside suppliers for certain
of our products or key components. If there is an interruption
in these sources of supply, we may experience difficulty or
delay in substituting alternatives and our business may be
disrupted.
International
political, economic and social developments impact our
business.
Over 20 percent of our sales are derived outside of North
America (principally in Europe) and are transacted in currencies
other than U.S. dollars (principally European euros and
Great Britain pounds). Our international business faces risks
associated with changes in political, monetary, economic and
social environments, local labor conditions and practices, the
laws, regulations and policies of foreign governments, cultural
differences and differences in enforcement of contract and
intellectual property rights. The financial reporting of our
consolidated operating results is affected by fluctuations in
currency exchange rates, which may present challenges in
comparing operating performance from period to period and in
forecasting future performance. U.S. laws affecting
activities of U.S. companies doing business abroad,
including tax laws and laws regulating various business
practices, also impact our international business. Our
international operating results may be influenced, when compared
to our North American results, in part due to relative economic
conditions in the European markets and due to competitive
pricing pressures on certain products.
8
Increasingly, we are manufacturing in Asia and sourcing products
and components from third parties in Asia. The distances
involved in these arrangements, together with differences in
business practices, shipping and delivery requirements, the
limited number of suppliers, and laws and regulations, have
increased the difficulty of managing our supply chain, the
complexity of our supply chain logistics and the potential for
interruptions in our production scheduling.
We have financial
commitments and investments in financial assets, including
assets that are not readily marketable and involve financial
risk.
We have maintained investments in
available-for-sale
securities (including marketable and auction rate securities)
and a number of private equity funds. Since there is no active
trading market for investments in private equity funds, they are
for the most part illiquid. These investments, by their nature,
can also have a relatively higher degree of business risk,
including financial leverage, than other financial investments.
Future changes in market conditions, the future performance of
the underlying investments or new information provided by
private equity fund managers could affect the recorded values of
such investments or the amounts realized upon liquidation. In
addition, we have commitments that require us to contribute
additional capital to these private equity funds upon receipt of
a capital call from the private equity fund.
Product liability
claims and other litigation could be costly.
Increasingly, homebuilders, including our customers, are subject
to construction defect and home warranty claims in the ordinary
course of their business. Our contractual arrangements with
these customers typically include the agreement to indemnify
them against liability for the performance of our products or
services or the performance of other products that we install.
These claims frequently result in lawsuits against the
homebuilders and many of their subcontractors, including the
Company, and require defense costs even when such products or
services are not the principal basis for the claims.
We are also subject to product safety regulations, recalls and
direct claims for product liability, including putative class
actions. Product liability claims can result in significant
liability and, regardless of the ultimate outcome, can be costly
to defend. Also, we increasingly rely on other manufacturers to
provide us with products or components for products that we
sell. Because of the difficulty of controlling the quality of
products or components sourced from other manufacturers, we are
exposed to risks relating to the quality of such products and to
limitations on our recourse against such suppliers.
The Company has experienced an increase in the number of
putative class action lawsuits in recent years predicated upon
claims for antitrust violations, product liability, wage and
hour issues and other matters. The Company has generally denied
liability and vigorously defends these cases. However, even when
there is no basis for imposing liability on the Company, such
lawsuits are particularly costly to resolve due to their scope,
complexity and the potentially significant exposure that is
alleged.
See Note T to the consolidated financial statements
included in Item 8 of this Report for additional
information about litigation involving our businesses.
Government and
industry responses to environmental and health and safety
concerns could impact our capital expenditures and operating
results.
Government and other regulations pertaining to health and safety
(including protection of employees as well as consumers) and
environmental concerns continue to emerge, domestically as well
as internationally. In addition to having to comply with current
requirements (including requirements that do not become
effective until a future date), even more stringent requirements
could be imposed on our industries in the future. Compliance
with these regulations (such as the restrictions on lead content
in plumbing products and on volatile organic compounds and
formaldehyde emissions that are applicable to certain of our
businesses), may require us to alter our manufacturing and
installation processes and our sourcing. Such actions could
adversely impact our operating results, and our ability to
effectively and timely meet such regulations could adversely
impact our competitive position.
9
The long-term
performance of our businesses relies on our ability to attract,
develop and retain talented management.
To be successful, we must attract, develop and retain highly
qualified and talented personnel in management, sales,
marketing, research and development and, as we enter new
international markets, skilled personnel familiar with these
markets. We compete with multinational firms in manufacturing
and other industries for these employees and we invest
significant resources in recruiting, developing and motivating
them. The failure to attract, motivate, develop and retain key
managers and other key employees could negatively affect our
competitive position and our operating results.
Item 1B. Unresolved
Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
The table below lists the Companys principal North
American properties for segments other than Installation and
Other Services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse and
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the Companys North American manufacturing
facilities range in size from single buildings of approximately
10,000 square feet to complexes that exceed
1,000,000 square feet. The Company owns most of its North
American manufacturing facilities, none of which are subject to
significant encumbrances. A substantial number of our warehouse
and distribution facilities are leased.
In addition, the Companys Installation and Other Services
segment operates over 230 local installation branch locations
and over 60 local distribution centers in the United States,
most of which are leased.
The table below lists the Companys principal properties
outside of North America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse and
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of these international facilities are located in Belgium,
China, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
The Company generally owns its international manufacturing
facilities, none of which are subject to significant
encumbrances, and leases its warehouse and distribution
facilities.
The Companys corporate headquarters are located in Taylor,
Michigan and are owned by the Company. The Company owns an
additional building near its corporate headquarters that is used
by our corporate research and development department.
10
Each of the Companys operating divisions assesses the
manufacturing, distribution and other facilities needed to meet
its operating requirements. The Companys buildings,
machinery and equipment have been generally well maintained and
are in good operating condition. In general, the Companys
facilities have sufficient capacity and are adequate for its
production and distribution requirements.
Item 3. Legal
Proceedings.
Information regarding legal proceedings involving the Company is
set forth in Note T to the Companys consolidated
financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.
Item 4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Supplementary
Item. Executive Officers of the Registrant
(Pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of
Regulation S-K).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Richard A. Manoogian
|
|
Executive Chairman
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
1962
|
|
Timothy Wadhams
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Donald J. DeMarie
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Eugene A. Gargaro, Jr.
|
|
Vice President and Secretary
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1993
|
|
John R. Leekley
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1979
|
|
John G. Sznewajs
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Executive officers are elected annually by the Board of
Directors. Each of the above executive officers has been
employed in a managerial capacity with the Company for at least
five years. Mr. DeMarie was elected Executive Vice
President in July 2007 and became Chief Operating Officer in
December 2007. He had previously served as Group President of
the Companys Installation and Other Services segment since
2003. Previously, he had served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Masco Contractor Services and in other managerial
roles since 1995. Mr. Sznewajs was elected to his current
position in July 2007. He had previously served as Vice
President and Treasurer since 2005 and Vice
President Business Development since 2003 and before
that time served in various capacities in the Business
Development Department from 1996 to 2003.
11
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
The New York Stock Exchange is the principal market on which the
Companys common stock is traded. The following table
indicates the high and low sales prices of the Companys
common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange and the
cash dividends declared per common share for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Quarter
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
25.28
|
|
|
$
|
20.89
|
|
|
$
|
.23
|
|
Third
|
|
|
29.00
|
|
|
|
22.65
|
|
|
|
.23
|
|
Second
|
|
|
31.58
|
|
|
|
26.26
|
|
|
|
.23
|
|
First
|
|
|
34.72
|
|
|
|
27.00
|
|
|
|
.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
30.53
|
|
|
$
|
26.85
|
|
|
$
|
.22
|
|
Third
|
|
|
29.90
|
|
|
|
25.85
|
|
|
|
.22
|
|
Second
|
|
|
33.70
|
|
|
|
27.63
|
|
|
|
.22
|
|
First
|
|
|
32.95
|
|
|
|
29.00
|
|
|
|
.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 15, 2008 there were approximately 5,500 holders
of record of the Companys common stock.
The Company expects that its practice of paying quarterly
dividends on its common stock will continue, although the
payment of future dividends is at the discretion of the
Companys Board of Directors and will depend upon the
Companys earnings, capital requirements, financial
condition and other factors.
12
Performance
Graph
The table below sets forth a line graph comparing the cumulative
total shareholder return on Mascos common stock with the
cumulative total return of (i) the Standard &
Poors 500 Composite Stock Index (S&P
500), (ii) The Standard & Poors
Industrials Index (S&P Industrials Index) and
(iii) the Standard & Poors Consumer
Durables & Apparel Index (S&P Consumer
Durables & Apparel Index), from
December 31, 2002 through December 31, 2007, when the
closing price of Mascos common stock was $21.61. The graph
assumes investments of $100 on December 31, 2002 in Masco
common stock and in each of these three indices and the
reinvestment of dividends.
The table below sets forth the value, as of December 31 for each
of the years indicated, of a $100 investment made on
December 31, 2002 in each of Masco common stock, the
S&P 500 Index, the S&P Industrials Index and the
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index and the
reinvestment of dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
Masco
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
132.97
|
|
|
$
|
180.41
|
|
|
$
|
152.95
|
|
|
$
|
155.69
|
|
|
$
|
117.38
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
128.36
|
|
|
$
|
142.14
|
|
|
$
|
149.01
|
|
|
$
|
172.27
|
|
|
$
|
181.72
|
|
S&P Industrials Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
131.79
|
|
|
$
|
155.28
|
|
|
$
|
158.77
|
|
|
$
|
179.65
|
|
|
$
|
201.19
|
|
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
124.66
|
|
|
$
|
154.04
|
|
|
$
|
156.87
|
|
|
$
|
166.53
|
|
|
$
|
132.55
|
|
13
The following table provides information regarding the
Companys purchase of Company common stock for the three
months ended December 31, 2007, in millions except average
price paid per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
|
Shares That May Yet
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Per Common Share
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
the Plans or Programs
|
|
|
10/01/07 10/31/07
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
22.92
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
11/01/07 11/30/07
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
22.21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
12/01/07 12/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for the quarter
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
22.31
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized
the purchase of up to 50 million shares of the
Companys common stock in open-market transactions or
otherwise, replacing the May 2006 authorization.
On October 17, 2007 the Company redeemed the outstanding
balance of its Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031
(Old Notes) for cash of $85,000. This redemption
retired the balance of a $1.9 billion series originally
issued in 2001 that was exchanged in December 2004 for the
Companys Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes
Series B due July 2031 (New Notes). See
Note K to the consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of this Report for additional information about the
Old Notes and the New Notes.
For information regarding securities authorized for issuance
under the Companys equity compensation plans, see
Part III, Item 12 of this Report.
14
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars In Millions, Except Per Common Share Data)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Net sales (1)
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
$
|
11,713
|
|
|
$
|
10,251
|
|
Operating profit (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6)
|
|
$
|
959
|
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
$
|
1,651
|
|
|
$
|
1,504
|
|
Income from continuing operations (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6)
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
Per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.11
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
2.23
|
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
$
|
.92
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
$
|
.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
Income from continuing operations as a % of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
Shareholders equity (7)
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
At December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,907
|
|
|
$
|
12,325
|
|
|
$
|
12,559
|
|
|
$
|
12,541
|
|
|
$
|
12,173
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
|
$
|
3,915
|
|
|
$
|
4,187
|
|
|
$
|
3,848
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
|
$
|
4,471
|
|
|
$
|
4,848
|
|
|
$
|
5,423
|
|
|
$
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts exclude discontinued operations.
|
|
(2)
|
The year 2007 includes non-cash impairment charges for goodwill
and other intangible assets aggregating $208 million after
tax ($227 million pre-tax).
|
|
(3)
|
The year 2006 includes non-cash impairment charges for goodwill
aggregating $317 million after tax ($317 million
pre-tax) and income of $1 million after tax
($1 million pre-tax) regarding the Behr litigation
settlement.
|
|
(4)
|
The year 2005 includes non-cash impairment charges for goodwill
aggregating $43 million after tax ($43 million
pre-tax) and income of $4 million after tax
($6 million pre-tax) regarding the Behr litigation
settlement.
|
|
(5)
|
The year 2004 includes non-cash impairment charges for goodwill
aggregating $42 million after tax ($50 million
pre-tax) and income of $19 million after tax
($30 million pre-tax) regarding the Behr litigation
settlement.
|
|
(6)
|
The year 2003 includes non-cash impairment charges for goodwill
aggregating $42 million after tax ($48 million
pre-tax) and income of $45 million after tax
($72 million pre-tax) regarding the Behr litigation
settlement.
|
|
(7)
|
Based on shareholders equity as of the beginning of the
year.
|
15
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The financial and business analysis below provides information
which the Company believes is relevant to an assessment and
understanding of its consolidated financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. This financial and business analysis
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes.
The following discussion and certain other sections of this
Report contain statements reflecting the Companys views
about its future performance and constitute
forward-looking statements under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These views involve
risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and,
accordingly, the Companys actual results may differ
materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking
statements. Readers should consider that various factors,
including those discussed in Item 1A Risk
Factors of this Report, the Executive
Level Overview, Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates and Outlook for the Company
sections, may affect the Companys performance. The Company
undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking
statements as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Executive
Level Overview
The Company manufactures, distributes and installs home
improvement and building products. These products are sold to
the home improvement and new home construction markets through
mass merchandisers, hardware stores, home centers, builders,
distributors and other outlets for consumers and contractors.
Factors that affect the Companys results of operations
include the levels of new home construction and home improvement
activity principally in North America and Europe, the importance
of and the Companys relationships with key customers
(including The Home Depot, which represented approximately
20 percent of the Companys net sales in 2007), the
Companys ability to maintain its leadership positions in
its U.S. and global markets in the face of increasing
competition, the Companys ability to effectively manage
its overall cost structure, and the cost and availability of
labor and materials. The Companys international business
faces political, monetary, economic and other risks that vary
from country to country, as well as fluctuations in currency
exchange rates. Further, the Company has financial commitments
and investments in financial assets that are not readily
marketable and that involve financial risk. In addition, product
liability claims and other litigation could be costly. These and
other factors are discussed in more detail in Item 1A
Risk Factors of this Report.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial
condition and results of operations are based upon the
Companys consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of
these financial statements requires the Company to make certain
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. The Company regularly reviews its estimates and
assumptions, which are based upon historical experience, as well
as current economic conditions and various other factors that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of certain assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
from these estimates and assumptions.
The Company believes that the following critical accounting
policies are affected by significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
16
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognition and Receivables
|
The Company recognizes revenue as title to products and risk of
loss is transferred to customers or when services are rendered.
The Company records revenue for unbilled services performed
based upon estimates of labor incurred in the Installation and
Other Services segment; such amounts are recorded in
Receivables. The Company records estimated reductions to revenue
for customer programs and incentive offerings, including special
pricing and co-operative advertising arrangements, promotions
and other volume-based incentives. Allowances for doubtful
accounts receivable are maintained for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of customers to make required
payments.
Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable
value, with expense estimates made for obsolescence or
unsaleable inventory equal to the difference between the
recorded cost of inventories and their estimated market value
based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. On an on-going basis, the Company monitors these
estimates and records adjustments for differences between
estimates and actual experience. Historically, actual results
have not significantly deviated from those determined using
these estimates.
The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale and
marketable securities and a number of private equity funds,
which aggregated $114 million and $173 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2007. Investments in
available-for-sale and marketable securities are recorded at
fair value, and unrealized gains or losses (that are deemed to
be temporary) are recognized, net of tax, through
shareholders equity, as a component of other comprehensive
income in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The
Company records an impairment charge to earnings when an
investment has experienced a decline in value that is deemed to
be other-than-temporary. During 2007, the Company recognized
non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges of $6 million related
to its investment in Furniture Brands International common stock
and $3 million related to its investment in Asahi Tec
common stock.
From time to time, the Company invests its excess cash in
short-term financial instruments including auction rate
securities. Auction rate securities are investment securities
that have interest rates which are reset every 7, 28 or
35 days. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company
revised the classification of investments in auction rate
securities from cash and cash investments to available-for-sale
securities included in other assets on the consolidated balance
sheet. The Company has also made corresponding adjustments to
the consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, to reflect the gross cash
purchases and sales of these securities in cash flows (for) from
investing activities. These changes in classification do not
affect previously reported consolidated statements of income or
cash flows from operating activities in any prior period. During
2007, the Company recognized a non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charge of $3 million related to auction rate securities.
On January 11, 2007, the acquisition of Metaldyne
Corporation (Metaldyne) (formerly MascoTech, Inc.)
by Asahi Tec Corporation (Asahi Tec), a Japanese
automotive supplier, was finalized. The combined fair value of
the Asahi Tec common and preferred stock, as well as the
derivative related to the conversion feature on the preferred
stock, received in exchange for the Companys investment in
Metaldyne, was $72 million. As a result of the transaction,
the Company recognized a gain of $14 million, net of
transaction fees, included in the Companys consolidated
statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2007,
in income from other investments, net. Subsequent to the
transaction, the Companys investment in Asahi Tec common
and preferred stock is accounted for as available-for-sale and
unrealized gains or losses related to the change in fair value
of the Asahi Tec common and preferred stock at December 31,
2007 have been recognized, net of tax, through
shareholders equity, as a component of other comprehensive
income in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. For the
year ended December 31, 2007, the unrealized loss of
$17 million related to the change in fair value of the
derivative
17
related to the conversion feature on the preferred stock, has
been included in income from other investments, net.
In addition, immediately prior to its sale, Metaldyne
distributed shares of TriMas Corporation (TriMas)
common stock as a dividend to the holders of Metaldyne common
stock; the Company recognized income of $4 million included
in the Companys consolidated statement of income, in
dividend income from other investments. In May 2007, TriMas made
an initial public offering; subsequent to the offering, the
Companys investment in TriMas is accounted for as
available-for-sale and unrealized gains or losses related to the
change in fair value of the investment have been recognized, net
of tax, through shareholders equity, as a component of
other comprehensive income in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet.
The Companys investments in private equity funds and other
private investments are carried at cost and are evaluated for
potential impairment when impairment indicators are present, or
when an event or change in circumstances has occurred, that may
have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the
investment. Impairment indicators the Company considers include
the following: whether there has been a significant
deterioration in earnings performance, asset quality or business
prospects; a significant adverse change in the regulatory,
economic or technological environment; a significant adverse
change in the general market condition or geographic area in
which the investment operates; and any bona fide offers to
purchase the investment for less than the carrying value. Since
there is no active trading market for these investments, they
are for the most part illiquid. These investments, by their
nature, can also have a relatively higher degree of business
risk, including financial leverage, than other financial
investments. Future changes in market conditions, the future
performance of the underlying investments or new information
provided by private equity fund managers could affect the
recorded values of such investments and the amounts realized
upon liquidation. During 2007, the Company recognized non-cash,
pre-tax impairment charges of $10 million related to
certain of its investments in private equity funds.
|
|
|
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
|
The Company records the excess of purchase cost over the fair
value of net tangible assets of acquired companies as goodwill
or other identifiable intangible assets. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
in the fourth quarter of each year, or as an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting business unit below its carrying
amount, the Company completes the impairment testing of goodwill
utilizing a discounted cash flow method.
Determining market values using a discounted cash flow method
requires the Company to make significant estimates and
assumptions, including long-term projections of cash flows,
market conditions and appropriate discount rates. The
Companys judgments are based upon historical experience,
current market trends, consultations with external valuation
specialists and other information. While the Company believes
that the estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation
methodology are reasonable, different estimates and assumptions
could result in a different outcome. In estimating future cash
flows, the Company relies on internally generated five-year
forecasts for sales and operating profits, including capital
expenditures, and generally a one to three percent long-term
assumed annual growth rate of cash flows for periods after the
five-year forecast. The Company generally develops these
forecasts based upon, among other things, recent sales data for
existing products, planned timing of new product launches,
estimated housing starts and repair and remodeling estimates for
existing homes.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company estimated that future
discounted cash flows projected for most of its reporting
business units were greater than the carrying values. Any
increases in estimated discounted cash flows would have no
impact on the reported value of goodwill.
If the carrying amount of a reporting business unit exceeds its
fair value, the Company measures the possible goodwill
impairment based upon an allocation of the estimate of fair
value of the reporting business unit to all of the underlying
assets and liabilities of the reporting business unit, including
any
18
previously unrecognized intangible assets. The excess of the
fair value of a reporting business unit over the amounts
assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value
of goodwill. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that
a reporting business units recorded goodwill exceeds the
implied fair value of goodwill.
In 2007, the Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charges for goodwill of $177 million ($177 million,
after tax). The pre-tax impairment charges recorded in 2007 were
as follows: Plumbing Products segment
$69 million related to a North American manufacturer of
plumbing-related products; and Other Specialty Products
segment $108 million related to a European
manufacturer of heating products.
The Company reviews its other indefinite-lived intangible assets
for impairment annually or as events occur or circumstances
change that indicate the assets may be impaired without regard
to the reporting unit. The Company considers the implications of
both external (e.g., market growth, competition and local
economic conditions) and internal (e.g., product sales and
expected product growth) factors and their potential impact on
cash flows related to the intangible asset in both the near-and
long-term. In 2007, the Company recognized a non-cash, pre-tax
impairment charge for other indefinite-lived intangible assets
of $50 million ($31 million, after tax) in the Other
Specialty Products segment related to the value of a registered
trademark.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over
their estimated useful lives. The Company evaluates the
remaining useful lives of amortizable identifiable intangible
assets at each reporting period to determine whether events and
circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining periods of
amortization.
The Companys 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the
2005 Plan) replaced the 1991 Long Term Stock
Incentive Plan (the 1991 Plan) in May 2005 and
provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various
forms. At December 31, 2007, outstanding stock-based
incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock
options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights.
Additionally, the Companys 1997 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Plan (the 1997 Plan) provides for the payment
of part of the compensation to non-employee Directors in Company
common stock. The 1997 Plan expired in May 2007; subsequently,
compensation to non-employee Directors in Company common stock
will be made from the 2005 Plan.
The Company elected to begin recording expense for stock options
granted or modified subsequent to January 1, 2003.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,
(SFAS No. 123R) using the Modified
Prospective Application (MPA) method. The MPA method
requires the Company to recognize expense for unvested stock
options that were awarded prior to January 1, 2003 through
the remaining vesting periods. The MPA method did not require
the restatement of prior-year information. In accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, the Company utilized the shortcut
method to determine the tax windfall pool associated with stock
options as of the date of adoption.
Long-term stock awards are granted to key employees and
non-employee Directors of the Company and do not cause net share
dilution inasmuch as the Company continues the practice of
repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open
market. There was $175 million (9 million common
shares) of total unrecognized compensation expense related to
unvested stock awards at December 31, 2007, which was
included as a reduction of common stock and retained earnings.
Effective January 1, 2006, such expense is being recognized
ratably over the shorter of the vesting period of the stock
awards, typically 10 years (except for stock awards held by
grantees age 66 or older, which vest over five years), or
the length of time until the grantee becomes retirement-eligible
at age 65. For stock awards granted prior to
January 1, 2006, such expense is being recognized over the
vesting period of the stock awards, typically
19
10 years, or for executive grantees that are, or will
become, retirement-eligible during the vesting period, the
expense is being recognized over five years, or immediately upon
a grantees retirement. Pre-tax compensation expense for
the annual vesting of long-term stock awards was
$52 million for 2007.
Stock options are granted to key employees and non-employee
Directors of the Company. The exercise price equals the market
price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over
five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of
grant and expire no later than 10 years after the grant
date. The 2005 Plan does not permit the granting of restoration
stock options, except for restoration options resulting from
options granted under the 1991 Plan. Restoration stock options
become exercisable six months from the date of grant.
The Company measures compensation expense for stock options
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. For stock options
granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, such expense is
being recognized ratably over the shorter of the vesting period
of the stock options, typically five years, or the length of
time until the grantee becomes retirement-eligible at
age 65. The expense for unvested stock options at
January 1, 2006 is based upon the grant date fair value of
those options as calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.
For stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006, such
expense is being recognized ratably over the vesting period of
the stock options, typically five years. Pre-tax compensation
expense for stock options was $49 million for 2007.
The fair value of stock options was estimated at the grant date
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions for 2007: risk-free interest rate 4.74%,
dividend yield 3.0%, volatility factor
31.8% and expected option life 7 years. For
SFAS No. 123R calculation purposes, the weighted
average grant-date fair value of option shares, including
restoration options, granted in 2007 was $8.92 per option share.
If the Company increased its assumptions for the risk-free
interest rate and the volatility factor by 50 percent, the
expense related to the fair value of stock options granted in
2007 would increase 48 percent. If the Company decreased
its assumptions for the risk-free interest rate and the
volatility factor by 50 percent, the expense related to the
fair value of stock options granted in 2007 would decrease
59 percent.
|
|
|
Employee
Retirement Plans
|
Accounting for defined-benefit pension plans involves estimating
the cost of benefits to be provided in the future, based upon
vested years of service, and attributing those costs over the
time period each employee works. Pension costs and obligations
of the Company are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent
in these valuations are key assumptions regarding inflation,
expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, compensation
increases and discount rates for obligations and expenses. The
Company considers current market conditions, including changes
in interest rates, in selecting these assumptions. Changes in
assumptions used could result in changes to reported pension
costs and obligations within the Companys consolidated
financial statements in any given period.
In 2007, the Company increased its discount rate for obligations
to an average of 6.25 percent from 5.50 percent. The
discount rate for obligations was based upon the expected
duration of each defined-benefit pension plans liabilities
matched to the December 31, 2007 Citigroup Pension Discount
Curve. Such rates for the Companys defined-benefit pension
plans ranged from 5.00 percent to 6.50 percent, with
the most significant portion of the liabilities having a
discount rate for obligations of 6.25 percent or higher.
The assumed asset return was primarily 8.25 percent,
reflecting the expected long-term return on plan assets.
The Companys net underfunded amount for its qualified
defined-benefit pension plans, the difference between the
projected benefit obligation and plan assets, decreased to
$114 million at December 31, 2007 from
$186 million at December 31, 2006, primarily due to
asset returns and funding
20
contributions; in accordance with SFAS No. 158, the
underfunded amount has been recognized on the Companys
consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Qualified domestic pension plan assets in 2007 had a net return
of approximately seven percent compared to average returns of
six percent for the largest 1,000 Plan Benchmark.
The Companys projected benefit obligation for its unfunded
non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans was
$138 million at December 31, 2007 compared with
$144 million at December 31, 2006; in accordance with
SFAS No. 158, the unfunded amount has been recognized
on the Companys consolidated balance sheets at
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The Company expects pension expense for its qualified
defined-benefit pension plans to be $13 million in 2008
compared with $17 million in 2007. If the Company assumed
that the future return on plan assets was one-half percent lower
than the assumed asset return, the 2008 pension expense would
increase by $3 million. The Company expects pension expense
for its non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans to decrease
by $1 million in 2008 compared with 2007.
The Company has considered potential sources of future foreign
taxable income in assessing the need for establishing a
valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets related to
its foreign tax credit carryforward of $45 million at
December 31, 2007. Should the Company determine that it
would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax
assets in the future, a valuation allowance would be recorded in
the period such determination is made.
Historically, the Company established reserves for tax
contingencies in accordance with SFAS 5, Accounting
for Contingencies, (SFAS No. 5).
Under this standard, reserves for tax contingencies were
established when it was probable that an additional tax may be
owed and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In July 2006,
the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109,
(FIN No. 48). FIN No. 48 allows
the recognition of only those income tax benefits that have a
greater than 50 percent likelihood of being sustained upon
examination by the taxing authorities. The adoption of
FIN No. 48 was effective January 1, 2007.
FIN No. 48 establishes a lower threshold than
SFAS No. 5 for recognizing reserves for income tax
contingencies on uncertain tax positions (referred to by
FIN No. 48 as unrecognized tax benefits).
Therefore, the Company believes that there is a greater
potential for volatility in its effective tax rate because this
lower threshold allows changes in the income tax environment and
the inherent complexities of income tax law in a substantial
number of jurisdictions to affect our unrecognized tax benefits
computation to a greater degree than with SFAS No. 5.
While the Company believes it has adequately provided for its
uncertain tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities
could vary from our accrued liability for unrecognized tax
benefits. Accordingly, additional provisions for tax-related
matters, including interest and penalties, could be recorded in
income tax expense in the period revised estimates are made or
the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
|
|
|
Other
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Certain of the Companys products and product finishes and
services are covered by a warranty to be free from defects in
material and workmanship for periods ranging from one year to
the life of the product. At the time of sale, the Company
accrues a warranty liability for estimated costs to provide
products, parts or services to repair or replace products in
satisfaction of warranty obligations. The Companys
estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based
upon historical experience and expectations of future
conditions. To the extent that the Company experiences any
changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with
servicing those claims, its warranty liability is adjusted
accordingly.
21
A significant portion of the Companys business is at the
consumer retail level through home centers and major retailers.
A consumer may return a product to a retail outlet that is a
warranty return. However, certain retail outlets do not
distinguish between warranty and other types of returns when
they claim a return deduction from the Company. The
Companys revenue recognition policy takes into account
this type of return when recognizing revenue, and deductions are
recorded at the time of sale.
The Company is subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted
claims with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary
course of business. Liabilities and costs associated with these
matters require estimates and judgments based upon the
professional knowledge and experience of management and its
legal counsel. When estimates of the Companys exposure for
lawsuits and pending or asserted claims meet the criteria for
recognition under SFAS No. 5, amounts are recorded as
charges to earnings. The ultimate resolution of any such
exposure to the Company may differ due to subsequent
developments. See Note T to the Companys consolidated
financial statements for information regarding certain legal
proceedings involving the Company.
Corporate
Development Strategy
In past years, acquisitions have enabled the Company to build
strong positions in the markets it serves and have increased the
Companys importance to its customers. The Companys
focus includes the rationalization of its business units,
including consolidations, as well as pursuing synergies among
the Companys business units. The Company expects to
maintain a more balanced growth strategy with emphasis on
organic growth, share repurchases and fewer acquisitions with
increased emphasis on cash flow and return on invested capital.
As part of its strategic planning, the Company continues to
review all of its businesses to determine which businesses may
not be core to the Companys long-term growth strategy.
During 2007, the Company completed the sale of a European
business unit in the Decorative Architectural Products segment.
In 2006, the Company completed the sale of a North American
business unit in the Other Specialty Products segment. These
dispositions were completed pursuant to the Companys
determination that these business units were not core to the
Companys long-term growth strategy. The Company recognized
a net loss of $10 million in 2007, primarily related to the
2007 discontinued operation. The Company recognized a net gain
of $50 million in 2006, primarily related to the 2006
discontinued operation.
During 2005, in separate transactions, the Company completed the
sale of three business units in Europe, including two in the
Cabinets and Related Products segment and one in the Other
Specialty Products segment, as well as one business unit in
North America in the Cabinets and Related Products segment. The
Company recognized a net gain of $63 million in 2005,
primarily related to the 2005 discontinued operations.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the
Company accounted for the business units which were sold in
2007, 2006 and 2005, except as noted below, as discontinued
operations. There were no businesses held for sale at
December 31, 2007.
The sales, results of operations and the (losses) gains from the
2007, 2006 and 2005 discontinued operations were included in
(loss) income from discontinued operations, net, in the
consolidated statements of income.
During 2007 and 2006, the Company completed the sale of several
small businesses, primarily in the Plumbing Products segment,
the results of which were included in continuing operations
through the dates of sale. The Company received cash proceeds of
$10 million and $72 million, respectively, and
recognized a pre-tax net (loss) gain of $(8) million and
$1 million, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, included in other, net, in
continuing operations, related to the 2007 and 2006 sales of
business units.
During 2007, the Company acquired several relatively small
installation service businesses (Installation and Other Services
segment), as well as Erickson Construction Company and Guy
Evans, Inc.
22
(Installation and Other Services segment). Erickson Construction
Company, headquartered in Arizona, provides pre-fabricated wall
panels and millwork for residential builders in Arizona,
California and Nevada. Guy Evans, Inc., headquartered in
California, is an installer of millwork, doors, windows and bath
hardware for residential builders in California and Nevada.
These two acquisitions allow the Company to expand the products
and services it offers to its installation customers, and had
combined annual sales in 2006 of approximately
$200 million. The results of these acquisitions are
included in the consolidated financial statement from the
respective dates of acquisition. The aggregate net purchase
price for all of these acquisitions was $202 million and
included cash of $195 million and assumed debt of
$7 million.
During 2006 and 2005, the Company acquired several relatively
small businesses (primarily in the Installation and Other
Services segment). The results of these acquisitions are
included in the consolidated financial statements from the
respective dates of acquisition.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Historically, the Company has largely funded its growth through
cash provided by a combination of its operations, long-term bank
debt and the issuance of notes in the financial markets, and by
the issuance of Company common stock, including issuances for
certain mergers and acquisitions.
Bank credit lines are maintained to ensure the availability of
funds. At December 31, 2007, the Company had a
$2.0 billion
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement with a group of banks syndicated in
the United States and internationally which expires in February
2011. This agreement allows for borrowings denominated in
U.S. dollars or European euros with interest payable based
upon various floating-rate options as selected by the Company.
There were no amounts outstanding under the
5-year
Revolving Credit Agreement at December 31, 2007.
The 5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement contains limitations on additional
borrowings; at December 31, 2007, the Company had
additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to
$1.9 billion. The
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement also contains a requirement for
maintaining a certain level of net worth; at December 31,
2007, the Companys net worth exceeded such requirement by
$895 million.
The Company had cash and cash investments of $922 million
at December 31, 2007 principally as a result of strong cash
flows from operations.
The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale and
marketable securities and a number of private equity funds,
principally as part of its tax planning strategies, as any gains
enhance the utilization of any current and future tax capital
losses. The Company determined that the longer maturity of
private equity funds would be advantageous to the Company and
complement the Companys investment in more liquid
available-for-sale and marketable securities to balance risk.
Since the Company has significantly reduced tax capital losses
in part by generating capital gains from investments and other
sources, the Company has and will continue to reduce its
investments in financial assets.
In 2007, the Company increased its quarterly common stock
dividend five percent to $.23 per common share. This marks the
49th consecutive year in which dividends have been
increased.
Maintaining high levels of liquidity and cash flow are among the
Companys financial strategies. The Companys total
debt as a percent of total capitalization decreased to
50 percent at December 31, 2007 from 53 percent
at December 31, 2006. The decrease in the Companys
debt to total capitalization percent is primarily due to the
repurchase of the Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes in
January 2007.
On January 20, 2007, holders of $1.8 billion
(94 percent) principal amount at maturity of the
Companys Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes
(Notes) required the Company to repurchase their
Notes at a cash value of $825 million. At December 31,
2007, there were outstanding $108 million principal amount
at maturity of such Notes, with an accreted value of
$52 million, which has been
23
included in long-term debt, as the next put option date is
July 20, 2011. The Company may at any time redeem all or
part of the Notes at their then accreted value.
During 2007, the Company also retired $300 million of
floating-rate notes due March 9, 2007 and $300 million
of 4.625% notes due August 15, 2007. On March 14,
2007, the Company issued $300 million of floating-rate
notes due 2010; the interest rate is determined based upon the
three-month LIBOR plus 30 basis points. On March 14,
2007, the Company also issued $300 million of fixed-rate
5.85% notes due 2017. These debt issuances provided net
proceeds of $596 million and were in consideration of the
March and August 2007 debt maturities.
The Companys working capital ratio was 2.0 to 1 and 1.5 to
1 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
improvement in the Companys working capital ratio is
primarily due to the January 2007 payment of $825 million
to repurchase the Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes which
were included in short-term notes payable at December 31,
2006.
The derivatives used by the Company during 2007 consist of
interest rate swaps entered into in 2004, for the purpose of
effectively converting a portion of fixed-rate debt to
variable-rate debt. Generally, under interest rate swap
agreements, the Company agrees with a counterparty to exchange
the difference between fixed-rate and variable-rate interest
amounts calculated by reference to an agreed notional principal
amount. The derivative contracts are with two major creditworthy
institutions, thereby minimizing the risk of credit loss. The
interest rate swap agreements are designated as fair-value
hedges, and the interest rate differential on interest rate
swaps used to hedge existing debt is recognized as an adjustment
to interest expense over the term of the agreement. For
fair-value hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the
derivative and changes in the fair value of the item hedged are
recognized in determining earnings.
The average variable interest rates are based upon the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus fixed adjustment
factors. The average effective rate for 2007 on the interest
rate swaps was 6.264%. At December 31, 2007, the interest
rate swap agreements covered a notional amount of
$850 million of the Companys fixed-rate debt due
July 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 5.875%. The hedges
are considered 100 percent effective because all of the
critical terms of the derivative financial instruments match
those of the hedged item. Accordingly, no gain or loss on the
value of the hedges was recognized in the Companys
consolidated statements of income for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. In 2007, the Company
recognized an increase in interest expense of $3 million
related to this swap agreement, due to increasing interest rates.
Certain of the Companys European operations also entered
into foreign currency forward contracts for the purpose of
managing exposure to currency fluctuations, primarily related to
the European euro, the Great Britain pound and the
U.S. dollar.
24
Cash
Flows
Significant sources and (uses) of cash in the past three years
are summarized as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
$
|
1,270
|
|
|
$
|
1,208
|
|
|
$
|
1,374
|
|
(Decrease) increase in debt, net
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Businesses, net of cash disposed
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Proceeds from financial investments, net
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Issuance of Company common stock
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
(854
|
)
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash investments
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (decrease) increase
|
|
$
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys cash and cash investments decreased
$1.0 billion to $922 million at December 31,
2007, from $1,958 million at December 31, 2006.
Net cash provided by operations of $1.3 billion consisted
primarily of net income adjusted for non-cash and certain other
items, including depreciation and amortization expense of
$248 million, net loss on disposition of businesses of
$18 million, net gain on disposition of financial
investments of $41 million, a $227 million charge for
the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, a
$22 million charge for the impairment of financial
investments and other non-cash items, including stock-based
compensation expense, amortization expense related to in-store
displays and interest expense on the Zero Coupon Convertible
Senior Notes, as well as a net decrease in working capital of
$283 million.
The Company continues to emphasize balance sheet management,
including working capital management and cash flow generation.
Days sales in accounts receivable were 49 days at
December 31, 2007 compared with 50 days at
December 31, 2006, and days sales in inventories were
48 days at December 31, 2007 compared with
49 days at December 31, 2006. Accounts payable days
improved to 43 days from 40 days at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Working capital (defined as
accounts receivable and inventories less accounts payable) as a
percent of sales was 15.4 percent and 16.1 percent at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Net cash used for financing activities was $2.0 billion,
and included cash outflows of $347 million for cash
dividends paid, $1,425 million for the retirement of notes
and $857 million for the acquisition and retirement of
31 million shares of Company common stock in open-market
transactions. Cash provided by financing activities primarily
included $596 million from the issuance of notes (net of
issuance costs) and $60 million from the issuance of
Company common stock, primarily from the exercise of stock
options.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had remaining Board of
Directors authorization to repurchase up to an additional
41 million shares of its common stock in open-market
transactions or otherwise. In January 2008, the Company
repurchased an additional three million shares of Company common
stock and expects to continue its share repurchase program
throughout 2008.
25
Net cash used for investing activities was $347 million,
and included $248 million for capital expenditures and
$203 million for acquisitions. Cash provided by investing
activities included primarily $45 million of net proceeds
from the disposition of businesses and $108 million from
the net sale of financial investments.
The Company invests in automating its manufacturing operations
to increase its productivity to improve customer service.
Capital expenditures for 2007 were $248 million, compared
with $388 million for 2006 and $282 million for 2005;
for 2008, capital expenditures, excluding any potential 2008
acquisitions, are expected to approximate $240 million.
Depreciation and amortization expense for 2007 totaled
$248 million, compared with $244 million for 2006 and
$241 million for 2005; for 2008, depreciation and
amortization expense, excluding any potential 2008 acquisitions,
is expected to approximate $260 million. Amortization
expense totaled $20 million, $14 million and
$28 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Costs of environmental responsibilities and compliance with
existing environmental laws and regulations have not had, nor,
in the opinion of the Company, are they expected to have, a
material effect on the Companys capital expenditures,
financial position or results of operations.
The Company believes that its present cash balance and cash
flows from operations are sufficient to fund its near-term
working capital and other investment needs. The Company believes
that its longer-term working capital and other general corporate
requirements will be satisfied through cash flows from
operations and, to the extent necessary, from bank borrowings,
future financial market activities and proceeds from asset sales.
Consolidated
Results of Operations
The Company reports its financial results in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in
the United States. However, the Company believes that certain
non-GAAP performance measures and ratios, used in managing the
business, may provide users of this financial information with
additional meaningful comparisons between current results and
results in prior periods. Non-GAAP performance measures and
ratios should be viewed in addition to, and not as an
alternative for, the Companys reported results.
Net sales for 2007 were $11.8 billion, representing a
decrease of seven percent from 2006. Excluding results from
acquisitions and the effect of currency translation, net sales
decreased 11 percent compared with 2006. The following
table reconciles reported net sales to net sales excluding
acquisitions and the effect of currency translation, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net sales, as reported
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding acquisitions
|
|
|
11,595
|
|
|
|
12,718
|
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, excluding acquisitions and the effect of currency
|
|
$
|
11,388
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for 2007 were adversely affected by a continued
decline in the new home construction market, which reduced sales
volume, and contributed to a nine percent decline in net sales.
Economic conditions remain difficult in the new home
construction market. Full-year housing starts have declined from
2.1 million in 2005 to 1.3 million in 2007. Net sales
for 2007 were also negatively affected by a decline in consumer
spending for home improvement products, which contributed to
lower sales volume, reducing net sales by two percent compared
to 2006. Retail sales volume benefited from increased sales
volume of paints and stains and International plumbing products.
26
The Companys gross profit margins were 27.3 percent,
27.6 percent and 28.5 percent in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The decrease in the 2007 gross profit margin
reflects lower sales volume of certain products, which more than
offset the benefits associated with the Companys business
rationalizations and other initiatives. The decrease in the
2006 gross profit margins reflects increased commodity,
energy and freight costs, as well as a less favorable product
mix, offset in part by increased selling prices for certain
products.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of
sales were 17.2 percent in 2007 compared with
16.1 percent in 2006 and 15.5 percent in 2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2007 reflect
lower sales volume, as well as increased advertising costs of
2.9 percent of sales compared to 2.6 percent of sales
in 2006. The year 2007 also includes increased severance costs
of $16 million, increased bad debt expense of
$13 million and increased systems implementation costs of
$7 million, which, on a combined basis, increased
.3 percent of sales compared to 2006. Increased selling,
general and administrative expenses in 2006, compared to 2005,
reflect increased stock-based compensation expense of
.8 percent of sales compared to .6 percent of sales in
2005, in part reflecting the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, and increased information systems
implementation costs and other expenses.
Operating profit in 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes
$79 million, $47 million and $12 million,
respectively, of costs and charges related to the Companys
business rationalizations and other initiatives. Operating
profit in 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes $227 million,
$317 million and $43 million, respectively, of
impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets.
Operating profit in 2006 and 2005 includes $1 million and
$6 million, respectively, of income regarding the Behr
litigation settlement. Operating profit margins, as reported,
were 8.1 percent, 9.0 percent and 12.7 percent in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Operating profit margins,
excluding the items above, were 10.7 percent,
11.8 percent and 13.1 percent in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Operating profit margins in 2007 were adversely affected by a
continuing decline in new home construction and a moderation in
consumer spending in North America, both of which negatively
impacted the sales volume of installation and other services,
assembled cabinets and windows and doors; such sales volume
declines negatively impacted operating profit margin by
1.6 percentage points compared to 2006. Operating profit
margins benefited from the Companys business
rationalizations and other initiatives. Operating profit margins
in 2006 were negatively affected by an accelerating decline in
the new home construction market and a moderation in consumer
spending for certain big ticket home improvement
items, such as cabinets, in the last half of 2006, both of which
negatively impacted the sales volume of certain products and
reduced operating profit margin by approximately one percent in
2006 compared to 2005. Operating profit margins in 2006 were
also affected by the continuing negative impact of higher
commodity costs partially offset by certain selling price
increases. Operating profit margins in 2005 were impacted by
increased commodity, energy and freight costs, which had only
been partially offset by selling price increases.
|
|
|
Other Income
(Expense), Net
|
During 2007, the Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charges aggregating $22 million related to financial
investments in Furniture Brands International common stock
($6 million), Asahi Tec common stock ($3 million),
auction rate securities ($3 million) and private equity
funds ($10 million).
Other, net, for 2007 included $5 million of realized gains,
net, from the sale of marketable securities, $6 million of
dividend income and $38 million of income from other
investments, net. Other, net, for 2007 also included
$9 million of realized currency gains and other
miscellaneous items.
During 2006, the Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charges aggregating $101 million for its investments
related to Metaldyne ($40 million), TriMas
($16 million), the Heartland fund ($29 million) and
other funds ($16 million).
27
Other, net, for 2006 included $4 million of realized gains,
net, from the sale of marketable securities, $10 million of
dividend income and $30 million of income from other
investments, net. Other, net, for 2006 also included realized
currency gains of $14 million and other miscellaneous items.
During 2005, the Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charges aggregating $45 million primarily related to its
investment in Furniture Brands International common stock
($30 million) and private equity funds ($15 million).
Other, net, for 2005 included $30 million of realized
gains, net, from the sale of marketable securities,
$16 million of dividend income and $69 million of
income from other investments, net. Other, net, for 2005 also
included realized currency losses of $25 million and other
miscellaneous items.
Interest expense was $258 million, $240 million and
$247 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase in interest expense in 2007 is primarily due to
increasing interest rates and the issuance of higher interest
rate debt of 6.125% notes in October 2006 and floating-rate
notes and 5.85% notes in March 2007. These debt issuances
were in consideration of the 2007 debt payments. The decrease in
interest expense in 2006 is primarily the result of the
repayment of $800 million of 6.75% notes in March
2006, partially offset by the issuance of $1 billion of
6.125% notes in October 2006, as well as the impact of
increasing interest rates.
|
|
|
Income and
Earnings Per Common Share from Continuing
Operations
|
Income and diluted earnings per common share from continuing
operations for 2007 were $397 million and $1.06 per common
share, respectively. Income from continuing operations for 2007
included non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill and
other intangible assets of $227 million ($208 million
or $.56 per common share, after tax). Income and diluted
earnings per common share from continuing operations for 2006
were $478 million and $1.20 per common share, respectively.
Income from continuing operations for 2006 included non-cash,
pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill of $317 million
($317 million or $.79 per common share, after tax). Income
and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations
for 2005 were $889 million and $2.07 per common share,
respectively. Income from continuing operations for 2005
included non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill of
$43 million ($43 million or $.10 per common share,
after tax) and income regarding the litigation settlement of
$6 million pre-tax ($4 million or $.01 per common
share, after tax).
The Companys effective tax rate for income from continuing
operations was 44 percent, 45 percent, and
36 percent in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increased tax rates in 2007 and 2006 are primarily due to the
impairment charges for goodwill not being deductible for tax
purposes. The Companys effective tax rate for income from
continuing operations, excluding the impairment charges for
goodwill and other intangible assets, was 36 percent,
33 percent and 35 percent in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The Company estimates that its effective tax rate should
approximate 42 to 43 percent in 2008. The expected tax rate
for 2008 is higher than the statutory rate primarily due to the
U.S. tax on anticipated dividend distributions from certain
foreign subsidiaries whose earnings are taxed at rates less than
the U.S. Federal rate of 35 percent. These dividends
are being distributed to utilize certain favorable provisions of
the U.S. income tax law that are scheduled to expire at
December 31, 2008. The majority of the U.S. tax
currently payable on these dividends will be offset by the
Companys $45 million foreign tax credit carryforward;
such utilization of the foreign tax credit carryforward will be
accounted for as a reversal of the $45 million deferred tax
asset.
28
Outlook for the
Company
Economic conditions remain difficult in a number of the
Companys markets. Housing starts declined 25 percent
in 2007 due to excessive inventories of homes and less
attractive mortgage terms. As a result, full-year 2007 housing
starts declined to 1.3 million from 2.1 million in
2005 and the Company expects a further decline in housing starts
in 2008. In addition, the Company anticipates a decline in
consumer spending for home improvement products and,
notwithstanding recent actions by the Federal Reserve and the
government to stimulate economic growth, the Company believes
that 2008 will be a difficult year for the overall
U.S. economy. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company
also experienced a softening of demand for certain of its
International products due to declining European economies.
The Company expects market conditions in its industry, in the
next several quarters, to be very challenging. The Company is
confident of its strategy of dividend increases and share
repurchases while concentrating on organic growth, improving
returns and generating superior cash flow. The Companys
strategy, together with the leveraging of the combined market
strength of its retail service, distribution and installation
capabilities, brands and scale, should allow Masco to continue
to drive long-term growth and value for its shareholders.
29
Business Segment
and Geographic Area Results
The following table sets forth the Companys net sales and
operating profit information by business segment and geographic
area, dollars in millions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,829
|
|
|
$
|
3,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,324
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
3,296
|
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,271
|
|
|
$
|
10,537
|
|
|
$
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
International, principally Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,499
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007 (B)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006 (B)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005 (B)
|
|
|
Operating Profit (Loss): (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
1,359
|
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
|
$
|
1,659
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
$
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
1,008
|
|
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
|
$
|
1,417
|
|
|
$
|
1,428
|
|
|
$
|
1,567
|
|
|
$
|
1,567
|
|
International, principally Europe
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
General corporate expense, net
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Gains on sale of corporate fixed assets, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Income regarding litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
$
|
959
|
|
|
$
|
1,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007 (B)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006 (B)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005 (B)
|
|
|
Operating Profit (Loss) Margin: (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
International, principally Europe
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
Total operating profit margin, as reported
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
Before: general corporate expense,
net, gains on sale of corporate fixed assets, net, and income
regarding the Behr litigation settlement (related to the
Decorative Architectural Products segment).
|
|
|
(B)
|
Excluding impairment charges for
goodwill and other intangible assets. The 2007 impairment
charges for goodwill and other intangible assets were as
follows: Plumbing Products $69 million; and
Other Specialty Products $158 million. The 2006
impairment charges for goodwill were as follows: Cabinets and
Related Products $316 million; and Plumbing
Products $1 million. The 2005 impairment
charges for goodwill were as follows: Plumbing
Products $7 million; and Other Specialty
Products $36 million.
|
30
Business Segment
Results Discussion
Changes in operating profit margins in the following Business
Segment and Geographic Area Results discussion exclude general
corporate expense, net, gains on sale of corporate fixed assets,
net, income regarding the litigation settlement, and impairment
charges for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2007, 2006
and 2005.
Business
Rationalizations and Other Initiatives
Over the past several years, the Company has been focused on the
rationalization of its businesses, including sourcing programs,
business consolidations, plant closures, headcount reductions,
plant
start-ups,
systems implementations and other initiatives. For the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred net costs and
charges of $79 million related to these initiatives, net of
an $8 million gain from the sale of fixed assets.
During 2006, the Company incurred $39 million pre-tax of
costs and charges (primarily accelerated depreciation and
severance expense) related to a plant closure and other profit
improvement programs in the Plumbing Products segment. In
addition, in 2006, the Company incurred $8 million pre-tax
of costs and charges (including the write-down of inventories
and accelerated depreciation) related to the closure of a
relatively small ready-to-assemble cabinet manufacturing
facility in the Cabinets and Related Products segment. In 2005,
the Company also incurred approximately $12 million pre-tax
of charges related to headcount reductions and the
discontinuance of a product line in the Plumbing Products
segment.
|
|
|
Cabinets and
Related Products
|
Net sales of Cabinets and Related Products decreased in 2007
primarily due to a decline in sales volume of assembled cabinets
in the new home construction market, which reduced sales in this
segment by 11 percent compared to 2006. A decline in net
sales of ready-to-assemble cabinets reduced sales in this
segment by five percent in 2007 compared to 2006. A weaker
U.S. dollar had a positive effect on the translation of
local currencies of European operations included in this segment
and increased sales by two percent in 2007 compared to 2006. Net
sales in this segment decreased in 2006 primarily due to lower
sales of ready-to-assemble cabinets in North America and Europe,
which more than offset certain selling price increases and sales
volume increases of assembled cabinets in North America in the
first half of 2006. Net sales in this segment in 2005 were
affected by increased sales volume in the new construction
market, as well as certain selling price increases.
Operating profit margins in the Cabinets and Related Products
segment were negatively affected by the decline in sales volume
in 2007, which reduced operating profit margin by three
percentage points, as well as increased
start-up
costs and the under-utilization of two new plants in this
segment, and increased severance costs. Such declines were
partially offset by a gain on the sale of a manufacturing
facility of $8 million and benefits associated with
business rationalizations and other initiatives. In 2006,
operating profit margins in this segment were negatively
affected by a decline in sales volume in the last half of the
year, as well as increased commodity, freight and plant
start-up
costs and lower results of European operations, offset in part
by selling price increases. In 2006, operating profit margins in
this segment were also negatively affected by $8 million of
costs and charges related to the closure of a relatively small
ready-to-assemble cabinet manufacturing facility. Operating
profit margins in 2005 reflect increased commodity and freight
costs and manufacturing and distribution inefficiencies in North
America, as well as a shift to a less favorable product mix,
which offset the positive impact of higher unit sales volume.
Net sales of Plumbing Products increased in 2007 and 2006
primarily due to increased sales volume of certain European
operations, which increased sales in this segment by three
percent in 2007 compared to 2006. In 2007, increased selling
prices also increased sales in this segment by three percent
compared to
31
2006. These results were partially offset by declining sales
volume to North American retail and wholesale customers, which
reduced sales in this segment by four percent in 2007 compared
to 2006. A weaker U.S. dollar also had a positive effect on
the translation of local currencies of European operations
included in this segment and increased sales by four percent in
2007 compared to 2006 and increased sales by one percent in 2006
compared to 2005. Net sales in this segment in 2005 were
affected by increased sales through the Companys wholesale
distribution channel and the increased sales of certain European
operations included in this segment.
Operating profit margins in the Plumbing Products segment in
2007 were negatively affected by increased commodity costs in
early 2007, which reduced operating profit margin by
1.7 percentage points compared to 2006. Such declines were
partially offset by selling price increases and the reduction of
certain variable expenses. Operating profit margins in this
segment were adversely affected by costs and charges aggregating
$39 million and $12 million in 2006 and 2005,
respectively, related to certain profit improvement initiatives;
excluding such charges, operating profit margins in this segment
would have been 9.7 percent and 12.2 percent in 2006
and 2005, respectively. In 2006, operating profit margins in
this segment were negatively affected by increased commodity
costs, as well as a less favorable product mix and declining
sales volume to certain retail customers. Operating profit
margins in 2005 were affected by increased commodity costs,
which were not offset by selling price increases and a less
favorable product mix, which more than offset increased sales
volume in the wholesale distribution channel.
The Companys Plumbing Products segment continues to be
negatively impacted by import competition, as well as a product
mix shift towards lower-margin faucets within the North American
retail channels. As part of the Companys strategic review
of its businesses, the Company determined that in order to
remain competitive, it is necessary to increase off-shore
sourcing at lower costs, while consolidating and reducing
manufacturing operations in North America. Consistent with this
determination, in 2006, the Company closed a North American
plant in this segment.
|
|
|
Installation
and Other Services
|
Net sales of Installation and Other Services decreased in 2007
primarily due to lower sales volume related to the continued
slowdown in the new home construction market, which reduced
sales in this segment by 20 percent compared to 2006 and
declines in selling prices, partially offset by acquisitions
which increased sales in this segment by six percent compared to
2006. Net sales in this segment increased in 2006 primarily due
to increased sales volume of non-insulation products and selling
price increases in the first half of 2006. However, the slowdown
in the new home construction market significantly reduced sales
in the second half of 2006 compared to 2005. Net sales in this
segment in 2005 were affected by increased selling prices, as
well as increased sales volume of non-insulation products and
strength in the new home construction market.
Operating profit margins in the Installation and Other Services
segment were lower in 2007 primarily due to lower sales volume
and the related under-absorption of fixed costs, which decreased
operating profit margin in this segment by approximately three
percentage points compared to 2006, and lower selling prices.
The year 2007 also included increased bad debt expense,
increased severance and location closure costs and increased
systems implementation expenses, which, on a combined basis,
reduced operating profit margin in this segment by one
percentage point compared to 2006. Partially offsetting these
declines were reductions in material costs, as well as benefits
associated with the business rationalizations and other
initiatives. In 2006, the operating profit margin decline in
this segment was primarily attributable to increased sales
volume of generally lower-margin, non-insulation products, as
well as increased operating costs to support the segments
growth in non-insulation products, new product development and
technology initiatives. Operating profit margins in 2005 were
affected by increases in sales of generally lower-margin,
non-insulation products, as well as the time lag in implementing
selling price increases related to material cost increases,
partially offset by the favorable impact of higher sales volume.
32
|
|
|
Decorative
Architectural Products
|
Net sales of Decorative Architectural Products increased in 2007
primarily due to higher retail sales volume from new product
introductions of paints and stains, which increased sales in
this segment by four percent compared to 2006, which was
partially offset by sales declines related to builders
hardware. Net sales in this segment increased in 2006 primarily
due to selling price increases of paints and stains. Net sales
in this segment increased in 2005 primarily due to increased
sales volume of paints and stains.
Operating profit margins in the Decorative Architectural
Products segment in 2007 primarily reflect increased sales
volume of paints and stains, offset by increased advertising
expenses. In 2006, operating profit margins in this segment
improved due to increased selling prices of paints and stains,
which partially offset commodity cost increases experienced in
late 2004 and during 2005. Operating profit margins in this
segment in 2005 were impacted by increased material and freight
costs, which were not completely offset by increased selling
prices related to paints and stains.
Net sales of Other Specialty Products decreased principally due
to lower sales volume of windows and doors, primarily resulting
from the continued slowdown in the new home construction market,
particularly in the Western United States, which decreased sales
in this segment by 14 percent in 2007 compared to 2006 and
four percent in 2006 compared to 2005. A weaker U.S. dollar
had a positive effect on the translation of local currencies of
European operations included in this segment and increased sales
by two percent in 2007 compared to 2006. Net sales in this
segment in 2005 were affected by increased sales volume and
certain selling price increases of windows and doors to the
North American new home construction market, partially offset by
reduced sales of European operations included in this segment.
Operating profit margins in the Other Specialty Products segment
declined in 2007 due to lower sales volume of windows and doors
in the new home construction market, which decreased operating
profit margin by 3.2 percentage points compared to 2006,
and lower results of European operations, which reduced
operating profit by 1.6 percentage points compared to 2006.
Operating profit margins in this segment declined in 2006 due to
lower sales volume of windows and doors, which offset improved
European operating results. Operating profit margins in this
segment in 2005 were affected by increased commodity costs and
the lower results of European operations, reflecting charges
related to profit improvement initiatives, offset in part by
reduced state use tax expense.
Geographic Area
Results Discussion
Net sales from North American operations decreased in 2007
primarily due to the continued decline in the new home
construction market, which declined 25 percent in 2007
compared to 2006 and a decline in consumer spending for home
improvement products. North American sales in 2007 were
negatively affected by lower sales volume of installation and
other services, assembled cabinets and windows and doors in the
new home construction market which decreased sales from North
American operations by 11 percent compared to 2006. In
addition, North American net sales were negatively affected by
lower retail sales volume of certain products, partially offset
by increased retail sales volume of paint and stains, which
aggregated a net decrease to sales from North American
operations of one percent in 2007 compared to 2006. Net sales
from North American operations increased slightly in 2006
benefiting from relatively stronger market conditions in the
first half of 2006, as well as increased selling prices. An
accelerating decline in the new home construction market and a
moderation in consumer spending reduced sales volume in the
second half of 2006 particularly for assembled cabinets, windows
and doors and sales of insulation products. Net sales from North
American operations in 2005 were affected by the strength in the
new home construction market and increased sales volume of
cabinets, installation sales of insulation and non-insulation
products, and sales of vinyl and fiberglass windows and patio
doors, as well as increased selling prices for certain products.
33
In North America, the Company manufactures products (principally
windows, doors and cabinets) and provides installation of
insulation and other services to homebuilders. The Company has
relationships with 90 of the top 100 builders in the United
States. The Company has seen an increase in bad debt expense,
related to homebuilders, from $7 million in 2006 to
$22 million in 2007. The Company monitors its customer
receivable balances and the credit worthiness of its customers
on an ongoing basis. Currently, the top ten
U.S. homebuilders represent less than three percent of the
Companys consolidated receivable balance of
$1.4 billion.
The decline in operating profit margin from North American
operations in 2007 is primarily due to declines in new home
construction and consumer spending, which negatively impacted
the sales volume of certain products, and decreased operating
profit margin by two percentage points compared to 2006. The
declines in 2007 were partially offset by selling price
increases, and the benefits associated with the Companys
business rationalizations and other initiatives. In 2006, the
operating profit margins declined from North American operations
due to sales volume declines in the second half of 2006 of
ready-to-assemble
cabinets, windows and doors and the installation of insulation
products. Operating profit margins in 2006 were also negatively
affected by increased commodity costs, partially offset by
selling price increases. Operating profit margins in 2005 were
impacted by continued increases in commodity, energy, freight
and other petroleum-based product costs, which were only
partially offset by selling price increases, and increased sales
volume of cabinets, installation services and windows and patio
doors to the new home construction market.
|
|
|
International,
Principally Europe
|
Net sales from International operations increased in 2007
primarily due to increased sales volume of plumbing products
which increased sales from International operations in local
currencies by five percent compared to 2006. A weaker
U.S. dollar had a positive effect on the translation of
International results in 2007, increasing International net
sales by ten percent compared to 2006. Net sales from
International operations increased in 2006 primarily due to
increased sales of plumbing products, which increased sales from
International operations in local currencies by six percent
compared to 2005. A weaker U.S. dollar had a positive
effect on the translation of European results, increasing
European net sales by one percent in 2006 compared to 2005. Net
sales from International operations in 2005 were affected by the
increased local currency sales of exported plumbing products and
ready-to-assemble cabinets, offset in part by declining sales of
windows and other plumbing products.
Operating profit margins in 2007 were negatively affected by a
less favorable product mix and material cost increases.
Operating profit margins in 2006 were negatively affected by the
lower operating results for European ready-to-assemble cabinets,
which more than offset the positive effect of increased sales
volume of plumbing products and improved operating results of
other European operations. Operating profit margins in 2005 were
negatively affected by increased commodity costs and costs
associated with certain profit improvement initiatives, as well
as a less favorable product mix.
34
Other
Matters
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Information regarding legal proceedings involving the Company is
set forth in Note T to the consolidated financial
statements.
With respect to the Companys investments in private equity
funds, the Company had, at December 31, 2007, commitments
to contribute up to $49 million of additional capital to
such funds, representing the Companys aggregate capital
commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to
date. The Company is contractually obligated to make additional
capital contributions to its private equity funds upon receipt
of a capital call from the private equity fund. The Company has
no control over when or if the capital calls will occur. Capital
calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in
the carrying value of the Companys investment in the
private equity fund when paid.
The Company enters into contracts, which include reasonable and
customary indemnifications that are standard for the industries
in which it operates. Such indemnifications include claims made
against builders by homeowners for issues relating to the
Companys products and workmanship. In conjunction with
divestitures and other transactions, the Company occasionally
provides reasonable and customary indemnifications relating to
various items, including: the enforceability of trademarks;
legal and environmental issues; provisions for sales returns;
and asset valuations. The Company has never had to pay a
material amount related to these indemnifications, and evaluates
the probability that amounts may be incurred and appropriately
records an estimated liability when probable.
35
Contractual
Obligations
The following table provides payment obligations related to
current contracts at December 31, 2007, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Other (D)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Debt (A)
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,088
|
|
Interest (A)
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
Currently payable income taxes
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Defined-benefit plans
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Private equity funds (B)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Acquisition-related commitments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Post-retirement obligations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Purchase commitments (C)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and
penalties (D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
1,027
|
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
|
$
|
4,044
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
7,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
The Company assumed that all debt would be held to maturity,
except for the Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes, which would
be held until the next put option date of July 20, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
There is no schedule for the capital commitments to the private
equity funds; such allocation was estimated by the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
Excludes contracts that do not require volume commitments and
open or pending purchase orders.
|
|
|
|
|
(D)
|
Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of
future cash outflows associated with unrecognized tax benefits,
the Company is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the
period beyond the next year in which cash settlements may occur
with applicable tax authorities.
|
Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements,
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 is effective January 1,
2008 for financial assets and liabilities and is not expected to
have a material effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 is
effective January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and
liabilities, and the Company is currently evaluating the impact
these provisions will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of
SFAS No. 115,
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value. The adoption of
SFAS No. 159 is optional and is effective
January 1, 2008. The Company has elected not to adopt
SFAS No. 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R
requires that the acquisition method be applied to all business
combinations and it establishes requirements for the recognition
and measurement of the acquired assets and liabilities by the
36
acquiring company. Further, it requires that costs incurred to
complete any acquisition be recognized as expense in the
consolidated statement of income. SFAS No. 141R also
requires that contingent assets and liabilities be recorded at
fair value and marked to market quarterly until they are
settled, with any changes to the fair value to be recorded as
income or expense in the consolidated statement of income.
SFAS No. 141R is effective for any business
combinations that are completed subsequent to January 1,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the
provisions of SFAS No. 141R will have on its
consolidated financial statements and its method of accounting
for business combinations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
requires the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties
other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and
presented in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of
shareholders equity. It also requires the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on
the face of the consolidated statement of income.
SFAS No. 160 is effective January 1, 2009, and
the Company is currently evaluating the impact of this
pronouncement to its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The Company has considered the provisions of Financial Reporting
Release No. 48, Disclosure of Accounting Policies for
Derivative Financial Instruments and Derivative Commodity
Instruments, and Disclosure of Quantitative and Qualitative
Information about Market Risk Inherent in Derivative Financial
Instruments, Other Financial Instruments and Derivative
Commodity Instruments.
The Company is exposed to the impact of changes in interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates in the normal course
of business and to market price fluctuations related to its
marketable securities and other investments. The Company has
limited involvement with derivative financial instruments and
uses such instruments to the extent necessary to manage exposure
to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency
fluctuations. See Note F to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information regarding the
Companys derivative instruments.
The derivatives used by the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2007 consist of interest rate swap agreements
entered into in 2004 for the purpose of effectively converting a
portion of fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt. The Company,
including certain European operations, also entered into foreign
currency forward contracts to manage exposure to currency
fluctuations related primarily to the European euro, the Great
Britain pound and the U.S. dollar.
At December 31, 2007, the Company performed sensitivity
analyses to assess the potential loss in the fair values of
market risk sensitive instruments resulting from a hypothetical
change of 200 basis points in average interest rates, a
10 percent change in foreign currency exchange rates or a
10 percent decline in the market value of the
Companys long-term investments. Based upon the analyses
performed, such changes would not be expected to materially
affect the Companys consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
37
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of Masco Corporation is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Masco Corporations internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
The management of Masco Corporation assessed the effectiveness
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2007 using the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal Control Integrated
Framework. Based on this assessment, management has
determined that the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, performed an audit of the Companys
consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of
Masco Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007. Their report expressed
an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Masco
Corporations internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007 and expressed an unqualified opinion
on the Companys 2007 consolidated financial statements.
This report appears under Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data under the heading Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
38
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Masco Corporation:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Masco
Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition,
in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the
index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein when read
in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for these financial
statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under
Item 8. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these
financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note R to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
unrecognized tax benefits in 2007. As discussed in Note M
to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed
its method of accounting for stock-based compensation in 2006.
In addition, as discussed in Note N to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company changed its method of
accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans effective December 31, 2006.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 22, 2008
39
MASCO CORPORATION
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
at
December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions, Except Share Data)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash investments
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
1,958
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
|
|
5,115
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
3,957
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
10,907
|
|
|
$
|
12,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,966
|
|
|
|
3,533
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
6,882
|
|
|
|
7,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares authorized: 1,400,000,000; issued and
outstanding:
2007 358,900,000; 2006 383,890,000
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Preferred shares authorized: 1,000,000; issued and outstanding:
2007 None; 2006 None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
3,575
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
10,907
|
|
|
$
|
12,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
MASCO CORPORATION
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions, Except Per Common Share Data)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
8,559
|
|
|
|
9,212
|
|
|
|
8,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
3,506
|
|
|
|
3,568
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
Income regarding litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
Impairment charges for financial investments
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority
interest and cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before minority interest and
cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change, net
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change, net
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.11
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
(.03
|
)
|
|
|
.03
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
2.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change, net
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
(.03
|
)
|
|
|
.03
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
MASCO CORPORATION
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash Flows From (For) Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposition of businesses, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of investments, net
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Income regarding litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial investments
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other items, net
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
net
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From (For) Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in debt
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Payment of debt
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Issuance of notes, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
Retirement of notes
|
|
|
(1,425
|
)
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
(854
|
)
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
Issuance of Company common stock
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash for financing activities
|
|
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
(885
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From (For) Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
Purchases of auction rate securities
|
|
|
(1,047
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposition of auction rate securities
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Businesses, net of cash disposed
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Other financial investments, net
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (for) from investing activities
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash investments
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase for the year
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Cash at businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
At January 1
|
|
|
1,958
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
1,958
|
|
|
$
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
MASCO CORPORATION
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($1 par value)
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
5,423
|
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
|
$
|
642
|
|
|
$
|
3,880
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
|
$
|
(173
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of income tax
benefit of $5
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of income tax
benefit of $23
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares retired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrendered (non-cash)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
4,848
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,286
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of income tax
benefit of $6
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of income tax of $33
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax
benefit of $38
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares retired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
(854
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrendered (non-cash)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
4,471
|
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,575
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of income tax
benefit of $5
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax
of $27
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change regarding income tax
uncertainties (Note R)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares retired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrendered (non-cash)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
4,025
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,969
|
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Masco Corporation
and all majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The Company
consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations
of variable interest entities, for which the Company is the
primary beneficiary, in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46 Revised, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions in the Preparation of
Financial Statements. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to
make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of any
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from
these estimates and assumptions.
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue
as title to products and risk of loss is transferred to
customers or when services are rendered, net of applicable
provisions for discounts, returns and allowances. The Company
records revenue for unbilled services performed based upon
estimates of labor incurred in the Installation and Other
Services segment; such amounts are recorded in receivables.
Amounts billed for shipping and handling are included in net
sales, while costs incurred for shipping and handling are
included in cost of sales.
Customer Promotion Costs. The Company records
estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and
incentive offerings, including special pricing and co-operative
advertising arrangements, promotions and other volume-based
incentives. In-store displays that are owned by the Company and
used to market the Companys products are included in other
assets in the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized
using the straight-line method over the expected useful life of
three years; related amortization expense is classified as a
selling expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Foreign Currency. The financial statements of the
Companys foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local
currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of
these subsidiaries are translated at exchange rates as of the
balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at
average exchange rates in effect during the year. The resulting
cumulative translation adjustments have been recorded in the
accumulated other comprehensive income component of
shareholders equity. Realized foreign currency transaction
gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of
income in other income (expense), net.
Cash and Cash Investments. The Company considers all
highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three
months or less to be cash and cash investments.
Receivables. The Company does significant business
with a number of customers, including certain home centers and
homebuilders. The Company monitors its exposure for credit
losses and records related allowances for doubtful accounts.
Allowances are estimated based upon specific customer balances,
where a risk of default has been identified, and also include a
provision for non-customer specific defaults based upon
historical collection, return and write-off activity. A separate
allowance is recorded for customer incentive rebates and is
generally based upon sales activity. Receivables are presented
net of certain allowances (including allowances for doubtful
accounts) of $85 million and $84 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Receivables
include unbilled revenue related to the Installation and Other
Services segment of $31 million and $40 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment,
including significant betterments to existing facilities, are
recorded at cost. Upon retirement or disposal, the cost and
accumulated depreciation
44
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
A. |
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included
in the consolidated statements of income. Maintenance and repair
costs are charged against earnings as incurred.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense is computed
principally using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets. Annual depreciation rates are as
follows: buildings and land improvements, 2 to 10 percent,
and machinery and equipment, 5 to 33 percent. Depreciation
expense was $226 million, $228 million and
$207 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires
goodwill and other intangible assets to be tested for impairment
annually and under certain circumstances. The Company performs
such testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible
assets in the fourth quarter of each year or as events occur or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting business unit below its carrying
amount. The Company compares the fair value of the reporting
business units to the carrying value of the reporting business
units for goodwill impairment testing. Fair value is determined
using a discounted cash flow method.
The Company reviews its other indefinite-lived intangible assets
for impairment annually or as events occur or circumstances
change that indicate the assets may be impaired. The Company
considers the implications of both external (e.g., market
growth, competition and local economic conditions) and internal
(e.g., product sales and expected product growth) factors and
their potential impact on cash flows related to the intangible
asset in both the near- and long-term.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized using
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The
Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of amortizable
identifiable intangible assets at each reporting period to
determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to
the remaining periods of amortization. See Note H for
additional information regarding Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Derivative
Instruments. The carrying value of financial
instruments reported in the consolidated balance sheets for
current assets, current liabilities and long-term floating-rate
debt approximates fair value. The fair value of financial
instruments that are carried as non-current investments is based
principally upon information from investment fund managers and
other assumptions, on quoted market prices for those or similar
investments, by estimating the fair value of consideration to be
received or by discounting future cash flows using a discount
rate that reflects the risk of the underlying investments. The
fair value of the Companys long-term fixed-rate debt
instruments is based principally upon quoted market prices for
the same or similar issues or the current rates available to the
Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
The aggregate estimated market value of non-current investments
and long-term debt at December 31, 2007 was approximately
$150 million and $4,073 million, compared with the
aggregate carrying value of $150 million and
$3,966 million, respectively. The aggregate estimated
market value of non-current investments and long-term debt at
December 31, 2006 was approximately $246 million and
$3,616 million, compared with the aggregate carrying value
of $246 million and $3,533 million, respectively.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage
certain exposure to fluctuations in earnings and cash flows
resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates. Derivative financial instruments are recorded in
the consolidated balance sheets as either an asset or liability
measured at fair value. For each derivative financial instrument
that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, the gain
or loss on the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting
loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk,
are recognized in determining current earnings during the period
of the change in fair values. For derivative instruments not
designated as hedging
45
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
A. |
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
instruments, the gain or loss is recognized in determining
current earnings during the period of the change in fair value.
Warranty. At the time of sale, the Company accrues a
warranty liability for estimated costs to provide products,
parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction
of warranty obligations. The Companys estimate of costs to
service its warranty obligations is based upon historical
experience and expectations of future conditions.
A significant portion of the Companys business is at the
consumer retail level through home centers and major retailers.
A consumer may return a product to a retail outlet that is a
warranty return. However, certain retail outlets do not
distinguish between warranty and other types of returns when
they claim a return deduction from the Company. The
Companys revenue recognition policy takes into account
this type of return when recognizing revenue, and deductions are
recorded at the time of sale.
Product Liability. The Company provides for expenses
associated with product liability obligations when such amounts
are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The accruals are
adjusted as new information develops or circumstances change
that would effect the estimated liability.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company elected to
change its method of accounting for stock-based compensation and
implemented the fair value method prescribed by
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, effective January 1, 2003. The Company
used the prospective method, as defined by
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure
an amendment to SFAS No. 123, for determining
stock-based compensation expense. Accordingly, options granted,
modified or settled subsequent to January 1, 2003 have been
accounted for using the fair value method and options granted
prior to January 1, 2003 were accounted for using the
intrinsic value method.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,
(SFAS No. 123R) using the Modified
Prospective Application (MPA) method. The MPA method
requires the Company to recognize expense for unvested stock
options that were awarded prior to January 1, 2003 through
the remaining vesting periods. The MPA method did not require
the restatement of prior-year information. In accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, the Company utilized the shortcut
method to determine the tax windfall pool associated with stock
options as of the date of adoption.
46
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
A. |
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
|
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net
income and earnings per common share for 2005, as if the fair
value method were applied to all previously issued stock
options, in millions, except per common share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported
net income, net of tax
|
|
|
47
|
|
Deduct:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense, net of tax
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the
fair value method for stock options granted prior to 2003, net
of tax
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
2.23
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
Interest and Penalties on Unrecognized Tax
Benefits. The Company records interest and penalties on
its unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Reclassifications. Certain prior-year amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation in the
consolidated financial statements. The results of operations
related to 2007, 2006 and 2005 discontinued operations have been
reclassified and separately stated in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income for 2007, 2006 and 2005. In
the Companys consolidated statements of cash flows, the
cash flows from discontinued operations are not separately
classified.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements,
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 is effective January 1,
2008 for financial assets and liabilities and is not expected to
have a material effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 is
effective January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and
liabilities, and the Company is currently evaluating the impact
these provisions will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of
SFAS No. 115,
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value. The adoption of
SFAS No. 159 is optional and is effective
January 1, 2008. The Company has elected not to adopt
SFAS No. 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R
requires that the acquisition method be applied to all business
combinations and it establishes requirements for the recognition
and measurement of the acquired assets and liabilities by the
acquiring company. Further, it requires that costs incurred to
complete any acquisition be recognized as expense in the
consolidated statement of income. SFAS No. 141R also
requires that contingent assets and
47
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
A. |
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Concluded)
|
liabilities be recorded at fair value and marked to market
quarterly until they are settled, with any changes to the fair
value to be recorded as income or expense in the consolidated
statement of income. SFAS No. 141R is effective for
any business combinations that are completed subsequent to
January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact the provisions of SFAS No. 141R will have on
its consolidated financial statements and its method of
accounting for business combinations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
requires the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties
other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and
presented in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of
shareholders equity. It also requires the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on
the face of the consolidated statement of income.
SFAS No. 160 is effective January 1, 2009, and
the Company is currently evaluating the impact of this
pronouncement to its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
B.
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
(SFAS No. 144) addresses the accounting
and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived
assets. SFAS No. 144 broadens the presentation of
discontinued operations to include a component of the Company,
which comprises operations and cash flows, that can be clearly
distinguished from the rest of the Company. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, the Company has accounted for the
business units which were sold in 2007, 2006 and 2005, except as
noted, as discontinued operations.
During 2007, the Company completed the sale of Avocet, a
European business unit in the Decorative Architectural Products
segment. This disposition was completed pursuant to the
Companys determination that this business unit was not
core to the Companys long-term growth strategy. Total
gross proceeds from the sale were $41 million; the Company
recognized a pre-tax net loss on the disposition of Avocet of
$11 million. During 2007, the Company recorded other net
gains of $1 million, reflecting the receipt of additional
purchase price payments related to businesses disposed in 2006
and 2005.
During 2006, the Company completed the sale of Computerized
Security Systems (CSS), a North American business
unit in the Other Specialty Products segment. This disposition
was completed pursuant to the Companys determination that
this business unit was not core to the Companys long-term
growth strategy. Total gross proceeds from the sale were
$92 million; the Company recognized a pre-tax net gain on
the disposition of CSS of $51 million. During 2006, the
Company recorded additional net expenses of $1 million,
reflecting the final purchase price payments related to
businesses disposed in 2005.
During 2005, in separate transactions, the Company completed the
sale of its Gebhardt Consolidated (Other Specialty Products
segment) and GMU Group (Cabinets and Related Products segment)
business units in Europe, as part of the Companys 2004
Plan, as well as its Zenith Products (North America) and Aran
Group (Europe) business units in the Cabinets and Related
Products segment. Total gross proceeds from the sale of these
businesses were $319 million; the Company recognized a
pre-tax net gain (principally related to the sale of Gebhardt
Consolidated and Zenith Products) on the disposition of these
businesses of $59 million. During 2005, the Company
recorded a gain on the disposition of discontinued operations of
$4 million related to the reversal of certain fee and
expense accruals that were recorded in 2004. During 2005, the
Company also recorded income from discontinued operations of
$3 million related to the reversal of severance accruals
that were recorded in 2004.
48
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
B. |
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS (Concluded)
|
(Losses) gains from these 2007, 2006 and 2005 discontinued
operations discussed above were included in (loss) income from
discontinued operations, net, in the consolidated statements of
income.
Selected financial information for the discontinued operations
during the period owned by the Company, were as follows, in
millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
(Loss) gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations also includes
non-cash, pre-tax and after tax impairment charges for goodwill
of $14 million and $26 million in 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Included in income tax above was income tax
expense related to income from discontinued operations of
$2 million, $7 million and $15 million in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
During 2007, the Company completed the sale of two small
businesses, the results of which were included in continuing
operations through the dates of sale. These small businesses in
the Plumbing Products segment had combined net sales and
operating (loss) of $12 million and $(400,000),
respectively, in 2007 through the respective dates of sale and
combined net sales and operating profit of $33 million and
$3 million, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Gross proceeds from the sale of these
businesses were $10 million; the Company recognized a net
loss of $8 million included in other, net, in continuing
operations, related to the sale of these businesses, for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
During 2006, the Company completed the sale of several
relatively small businesses, the results of which were included
in continuing operations in the Other Specialty Products and
Plumbing Products segments through the dates of sale. These
businesses had combined net sales and operating profit of
$16 million and $5 million, respectively, in 2006
through the respective dates of sale and combined net sales and
operating profit of $55 million and $12 million,
respectively, in 2005. Gross proceeds from the sale of these
businesses were $72 million; the Company recognized a net
gain of $1 million in 2006 included in other, net, in
continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
During 2007, the Company acquired several relatively small
installation service businesses (Installation and Other Services
segment), as well as Erickson Construction Company and Guy
Evans, Inc. (Installation and Other Services segment). Erickson
Construction Company, headquartered in Arizona, provides
pre-fabricated wall panels and millwork for residential builders
in Arizona, California and Nevada. Guy Evans, Inc.,
headquartered in California, is an installer of millwork, doors,
windows and bath hardware for residential builders in California
and Nevada. These two acquisitions allow the Company to expand
the products and services it offers to its installation
customers, and had combined annual sales in 2006 of
approximately $200 million. These acquisitions had 2007
sales and operating profit of $119 million and
$5 million (including $5 million of additional
expenses as a result of the acquisition), respectively, since
the dates of acquisition. The results of these acquisitions are
included in the consolidated financial statement from the
respective dates of acquisition.
49
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
C. ACQUISITIONS (Concluded)
During 2006 and 2005, the Company acquired several relatively
small businesses (primarily in the Installation and Other
Services segment). The results of these acquisitions are
included in the consolidated financial statements from the
respective dates of acquisition.
The total net purchase price of these acquisitions was as
follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash, net
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Assumed debt
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain purchase agreements provided for the payment of
additional consideration in either cash or Company common stock,
contingent upon whether certain conditions are met, including
the operating performance of the acquired business and the price
of the Companys common stock. In 2007 and 2005, the
Company paid in cash an additional $1 million and
$15 million, respectively, of acquisition-related
consideration, contingent consideration and other purchase price
adjustments, relating to previously acquired companies. At
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had additional
consideration payable in cash of $10 million and
$6 million, respectively, contingent upon the operating
performance of the acquired businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
Raw material
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, which include purchased parts, materials, direct
labor and applied manufacturing overhead, are stated at the
lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined by
use of the
first-in,
first-out method.
50
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale
securities and a number of private equity funds, principally as
part of its tax planning strategies, as any gains enhance the
utilization of any current and future tax capital losses.
Financial investments included in other assets were as follows,
in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asahi Tec Corporation common and preferred stock
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriMas Corporation
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Private equity funds
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Metaldyne Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in marketable securities are accounted for as
available-for-sale. Accordingly, the Company records these
investments at fair value, and unrealized gains or losses (that
are deemed to be temporary) are recognized, net of tax effect,
through shareholders equity, as a component of other
comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses and charges for
other-than-temporary impairments are included in determining net
income, with related purchase costs based upon specific
identification.
The Company reviews industry analyst reports, key ratios and
statistics, market analyses and other factors for each
investment to determine if an unrealized loss is
other-than-temporary. Based upon this review, in 2007 and 2005,
the Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges of
$6 million and $28 million, respectively, related to
its investment in Furniture Brands International common stock
(NYSE: FBN). Based upon this review during 2007, the Company
also recognized a non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge of
$3 million related to its investment in Asahi Tec (Tokyo
Stock Exchange: 5606.T) common stock.
From time to time, the Company invests its excess cash in
short-term financial instruments including auction rate
securities. Auction rate securities are investment securities
that have interest rates which are reset every 7, 28 or
35 days. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company
revised the classification of investments in auction rate
securities from cash and cash investments to available-for-sale
securities included in other assets on the consolidated balance
sheet. The Company has also made corresponding adjustments to
the consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, to reflect the gross cash
purchases and sales of these securities in cash flows (for) from
investing activities. These changes in classification do not
affect previously reported consolidated statements of income or
cash flows from operating activities in any prior period. During
2007, the Company recognized a non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charge of $3 million related to auction rate securities.
On January 11, 2007, the acquisition of Metaldyne
Corporation (Metaldyne) (formerly MascoTech, Inc.)
by Asahi Tec Corporation (Asahi Tec), a Japanese
automotive supplier, was finalized. The combined fair value of
the Asahi Tec common and preferred stock, as well as the
derivative related to the conversion feature on the preferred
stock, received in exchange for the Companys investment in
Metaldyne, was $72 million. The Asahi Tec common and
preferred stock are restricted from sale for up to
24 months from the transaction date. The preferred stock
accrues dividends at an annual rate of 3.75%
pay-in-kind
or 1.75% cash at the discretion of Asahi Tec; the Company has
elected to record such dividends when cash proceeds are
received. As a result of the transaction, the Company recognized
a
51
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
E. FINANCIAL
INVESTMENTS (Continued)
gain of $14 million, net of transaction fees, included in
the Companys consolidated statement of income for the year
ended December 31, 2007, in income from other investments,
net. Subsequent to the transaction, the Companys
investment in Asahi Tec common and preferred stock is accounted
for as available-for-sale and unrealized gains or losses related
to the change in fair value of the Asahi Tec common and
preferred stock at December 31, 2007 have been recognized,
net of tax, through shareholders equity, as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31,
2007, the unrealized loss of $17 million related to the
change in fair value of the derivative related to the conversion
feature on the preferred stock, has been included in the
Companys consolidated statement of income, in income from
other investments, net. At December 31, 2007, the Company
had a net investment in Asahi Tec of $59 million, including
$57 million of common and preferred stock and
$2 million, included in other investments, related to the
conversion derivative.
In addition, immediately prior to its sale, Metaldyne
distributed shares of TriMas Corporation (TriMas)
common stock as a dividend to the holders of Metaldyne common
stock; the Company recognized income of $4 million included
in the Companys consolidated statement of income, in
dividend income from other investments. In May 2007, TriMas made
an initial public offering; subsequent to the offering, the
Companys investment in TriMas is accounted for as
available-for-sale and unrealized gains or losses related to the
change in fair value of the investment have been recognized, net
of tax, through shareholders equity, as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet.
The Companys investments in available-for-sale securities
at December 31, 2007 (including marketable securities,
auction rate securities, Asahi Tec Corporation common and
preferred stock and TriMas Corporation) were as follows, in
millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Cost Basis
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Basis
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
The Companys investments in private equity funds and other
private investments are carried at cost and are evaluated for
potential impairment when impairment indicators are present, or
when an event or change in circumstances has occurred, that may
have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the
investment. Impairment indicators the Company considers include
the following: whether there has been a significant
deterioration in earnings performance, asset quality or business
prospects; a significant adverse change in the regulatory,
economic or technological environment; a significant adverse
change in the general market condition or geographic area in
which the investment operates; and any bona fide offers to
purchase the investment for less than the carrying value. Since
there is no active trading market for these investments, they
are for the most part illiquid. These investments, by their
nature, can also have a relatively higher degree of business
risk, including financial leverage, than other financial
investments. Future changes in market conditions, the future
performance of the underlying investments or new information
provided by private equity fund managers could affect the
recorded values of such investments and the amounts realized
upon liquidation.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had investments in 49
private equity funds, split between buyout funds and venture
capital funds, with a carrying value of $173 million. The
31 buyout funds, which constitute approximately 72 percent
of the invested value, invest in established businesses, and,
other than the Heartland fund, no buyout funds have a
concentration in a particular sector that is undergoing a
fundamental change, such as the automotive-related market. The
venture capital funds,
52
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
E. FINANCIAL
INVESTMENTS (Continued)
which constitute approximately 28 percent of the invested
value, invest in
start-up or
smaller established businesses, principally in the areas of
information technology, bio-technology and healthcare. Of the 49
funds, there are four funds with a carrying value greater than
$10 million that aggregate $75 million of carrying
value. It is not practical for the Company to estimate a fair
value because the private equity funds have no quoted market
price and sufficient information is not readily available for
the Company to utilize a valuation model to determine a fair
value for each fund.
During 2007, the Company determined that the decline in the
estimated value of certain private equity fund investments, with
an aggregate carrying value of $54 million prior to the
impairment, was other-than-temporary. Accordingly, for the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized non-cash,
pre-tax impairment charges of $10 million.
During 2006, based upon a review of new information from the
Heartland fund concerning fund investments and the continued
deterioration of conditions in the automotive supplier and
transportation products markets served by Metaldyne and TriMas,
the Company determined that the decline in the estimated value
of certain of its financial investments was
other-than-temporary. Accordingly, in 2006, the Company
recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges aggregating
$88 million for its investments in Metaldyne
($40 million), TriMas ($16 million), the Heartland
fund ($29 million) and another fund ($3 million) which
invested in automotive and transportation-related suppliers,
including Metaldyne and TriMas. Additionally, based upon the
Companys review, the Company considered the decline in the
fair value of certain of its other private equity fund
investments and other investments to be other-than-temporary
and, accordingly, recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment
charges of $13 million and $15 million in 2006 and
2005, respectively.
The Companys investments in private equity funds for which
fair value was determined with unrealized losses, were as
follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
Over 12 Months
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The remaining private equity investments in 2007 and 2006 with
an aggregate carrying value of $119 million and
$211 million, respectively, were not evaluated for
impairment, as there were no indicators of impairment or
identified events or changes in circumstances that would have a
significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.
53
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
E. |
FINANCIAL
INVESTMENTS (Concluded)
|
Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net,
within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for
financial investments were as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Realized gains from marketable securities
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Realized losses from marketable securities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Dividend income from marketable securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Income from other investments, net
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Dividend income from other investments
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from financial investments, net
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity funds
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Metaldyne Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
TriMas Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment charges
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment charges, related to the Companys financial
investments, recognized during 2007, 2006 and 2005 were based
upon then-current estimates for the fair value of certain
financial investments; such estimates could change in the
near-term based upon future events and circumstances.
F. DERIVATIVES
During 2003, the Company entered into interest rate swap
agreements for the purpose of effectively converting a portion
of fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt. In 2004, the Company
terminated two interest rate swaps relating to $850 million
of fixed-rate debt. These swap agreements were accounted for as
fair value hedges. The gain of approximately $45 million
from the termination of these swaps is being amortized as a
reduction of interest expense over the remaining term of the
debt, through July 2012.
In early 2004, the Company entered into two new interest rate
swap agreements for the purpose of effectively converting a
portion of fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt. The derivative
contracts are with two major creditworthy institutions, thereby
minimizing the risk of credit loss. The interest rate swap
agreements are designated as fair-value hedges, and the interest
rate differential on the interest rate swaps used to hedge
existing debt is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense
over the term of the agreement. The average variable interest
rates are based upon LIBOR plus fixed adjustment factors. The
average effective rate on the interest rate swaps was 6.264% in
2007. At December 31, 2007, the interest rate swap
agreements covered a notional amount of $850 million of the
Companys fixed-rate debt due July 15, 2012 with an
interest rate of 5.875%. The hedges are considered
100 percent effective.
In 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized an increase in interest
expense of $3 million and $8 million, respectively,
related to these swap agreements, due to increasing interest
rates. In 2005, the Company recognized a reduction of interest
expense of $3 million.
At December 31, 2007, the Company, including certain
European operations, had entered into foreign currency forward
contracts with notional amounts of $23 million,
$7 million and $4 million to
54
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
F. DERIVATIVES (Concluded)
manage exposure to currency fluctuations in the European euro,
the Great Britain pound and the U.S. dollar, respectively.
At December 31, 2006, the Company, including certain
European operations, had entered into foreign currency forward
contracts with notional amounts of $72 million and
$51 million to manage exposure to currency fluctuations in
the European euro and the Great Britain pound, respectively.
Based upon year-end market prices, no asset or liability was
recorded at December 31, 2007 and 2006, as the forward
prices were substantially the same as the contract prices. Gains
(losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the
Companys consolidated statements of income in other income
(expense), net. The counterparties to the Companys forward
contracts are major financial institutions. In the unlikely
event that the counterparties fail to meet the terms of the
foreign currency forward contracts, the Companys exposure
is limited to the aggregate foreign currency rate differential
with such institutions.
|
|
G.
|
PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,367
|
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases certain equipment and plant facilities under
noncancellable operating leases. Rental expense recorded in the
consolidated statements of income totaled approximately
$166 million, $163 million and $144 million
during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Future minimum lease
payments at December 31, 2007 were approximately as
follows: 2008 $110 million; 2009
$75 million; 2010 $50 million;
2011 $28 million; and 2012 and
beyond $88 million.
The Company leases operating facilities from certain related
parties, primarily former owners (and in certain cases, current
management personnel) of companies acquired. The Company
recorded rental expense to such related parties of approximately
$7 million, $9 million and $12 million in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
55
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
H.
|
GOODWILL AND
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for 2007 and
2006, by segment, were as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Additions (A)
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
Other (C)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
(177
|
)
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions (B)
|
|
|
Pre-tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Additions (A)
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
Other (C)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(316
|
)
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,171
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(331
|
)
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
3,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Additions include acquisitions. |
|
(B) |
|
Includes the disposition of CSS (discontinued operation) and
Faucet Queens in the Other Specialty Products segment. |
|
(C) |
|
Other principally includes the effect of foreign currency
translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year
acquisitions. |
The Company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill
in the fourth quarters of 2007 and 2006. This test indicated
that goodwill recorded for certain of the Companys
business units was impaired. The Company recognized the
non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill of
$177 million ($177 million, after tax) and
$331 million ($331 million, after tax) for 2007 and
2006, respectively. The pre-tax impairment charge recognized in
2007, in the Other Specialty Products segment, related to the
Companys European manufacturer of heating products; in the
Plumbing Products segment the charge related to a North American
manufacturer of plumbing-related products. The pre-tax
impairment charge recognized in 2006 in the Cabinets and Related
Products segment related to the Companys European
manufacturer of ready-to-assemble cabinets. These charges
reflect the long-term outlook for the business units, including
declining demand for certain products, as well as decreased
operating profit margins.
Other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $208 million
and $246 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and principally included registered trademarks.
The Company completed its annual impairment testing of other
indefinite-lived intangible assets in the fourth quarters of
2007 and 2006. In 2007, this test indicated that the registered
trademark for a North American business unit in the Other
Specialty Products segment in 2007 was impaired due to changes
in the long-term outlook for the
56
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
H. |
GOODWILL AND
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Concluded)
|
business unit, particularly in the new home construction market.
The Company recognized a non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge for
other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $50 million
($31 million, after tax) in 2007. In 2006, this test
indicated that other indefinite-lived intangible assets were not
impaired.
The carrying value of the Companys definite-lived
intangible assets was $115 million at December 31,
2007 (net of accumulated amortization of $67 million) and
$60 million at December 31, 2006 (net of accumulated
amortization of $51 million) and principally included
customer relationships and non-compete agreements, with a
weighted average amortization period of 14 years and
13 years in 2007 and 2006, respectively. In 2007, the
Company increased its definite-lived intangible assets by
$69 million primarily related to the acquisitions of
Erickson Construction Company and Guy Evans, Inc. Amortization
expense related to the definite-lived intangible assets was
$15 million, $10 million and $22 million in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
At December 31, 2007, amortization expense related to the
definite-lived intangible assets during each of the next five
years was as follows: 2008 - $14 million; 2009
$14 million; 2010 $13 million;
2011 $11 million; and 2012
$9 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Financial investments (Note E)
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
In-store displays, net
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Debenture expense
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost (Note N)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
|
$
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-store displays are amortized using the straight-line method
over the expected useful life of three years; the Company
recognized amortization expense related to in-store displays of
$46 million, $55 million and $63 million in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash spent for displays was
$43 million, $45 million and $48 million in 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
57
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and commissions
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Advertising and sales promotion
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Warranty (Note T)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Employee retirement plans
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Property, payroll and other taxes
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,072
|
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Notes and debentures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.625%, due Aug. 15, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
5.75%, due Oct. 15, 2008
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
5.875%, due July 15, 2012
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
7.125%, due Aug. 15, 2013
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
4.8%, due June 15, 2015
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
6.125%, due Oct. 3, 2016
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
5.85%, due Mar. 15, 2017
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.625%, due Apr. 15, 2018
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
7.75%, due Aug. 1, 2029
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
6.5%, due Aug. 15, 2032
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (accreted value)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Floating-Rate Notes, due Mar. 12, 2010
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating-Rate Notes, due Mar. 9, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Notes payable to banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
All of the notes and debentures above are senior indebtedness
and, other than the 6.625% notes due 2018 and the
7.75% notes due 2029, are redeemable at the Companys
option.
In July 2001, the Company issued $1.9 billion principal
amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due
2031 (Old Notes), resulting in gross proceeds of
$750 million. The issue price per Note was $394.45 per
$1,000 principal amount at maturity, which represented a yield
to maturity of 3.125% compounded semi-annually. In December
2004, the Company completed an exchange of the outstanding Old
Notes for Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes Series B due
July 2031 (New Notes or Notes). The
Company will not pay interest in cash on the Notes prior to
maturity, except in certain circumstances, including possible
contingent interest payments that are not expected to be
material. Holders of the Notes have the option to require that
the Notes be repurchased by the Company on July 20, 2011
and every five years thereafter. Upon conversion of the Notes,
the Company will pay the principal return, equal to the lesser
of (1) the accreted value of the Notes in only cash, and
(2) the conversion value, as defined, which will be settled
in cash or shares of Company common stock, or a combination of
both, at the option of the Company. The Notes are convertible if
the average price of Company common stock for the 20 days
immediately prior to the conversion date exceeds
1181/3%,
declining by 1/3% each year thereafter, of the accreted value of
the Notes divided by the conversion rate of 12.7317 shares
for each $1,000 principal amount at maturity of the Notes. Notes
also become convertible if the Companys credit rating is
reduced to below investment grade, or if certain actions are
taken by the Company. The Company may at any time redeem all or
part of the Notes at their then accreted value.
On January 20, 2007, holders of $1.8 billion
(94 percent) principal amount at maturity of the Notes
required the Company to repurchase their Notes at a cash value
of $825 million. As a result of this repurchase, a
$93 million deferred income tax liability was paid in 2007.
On October 17, 2007, the Company repurchased the remaining
Old Notes for cash of $85,000. At December 31, 2007, there
were outstanding $108 million principal amount at maturity
of Notes, with an accreted value of $52 million, which has
been included in long-term debt, as the next put option date is
July 20, 2011.
During 2007, the Company also retired $300 million of
floating-rate notes due March 9, 2007 and $300 million
of 4.625% notes due August 15, 2007. On March 14,
2007, the Company issued $300 million of floating-rate
notes due 2010; the interest rate is determined based upon the
three-month LIBOR plus 30 basis points. On March 14,
2007, the Company also issued $300 million of fixed-rate
5.85% notes due 2017. These debt issuances provided net
proceeds of $596 million and were in consideration of the
March and August 2007 debt maturities.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had a $2.0 billion
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement with a group of banks syndicated in
the United States and internationally, which expires in February
2011. This agreement allows for borrowings denominated in
U.S. dollars or European euros with interest payable based
upon various floating-rate options as selected by the Company.
There were no amounts outstanding under the
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
In February 2006, the Company amended the terms of the
$2.0 billion
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement; the amendment primarily affected the
requirement for the Company to maintain certain levels of net
worth. At December 31, 2007, the Companys net worth
exceeded such requirement by $895 million. The
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended, also contains
limitations on additional borrowings; at December 31, 2007,
the Company had additional borrowing capacity, subject to
availability, of up to $1.9 billion.
At December 31, 2007, the maturities of long-term debt
during each of the next five years were as follows:
2008 $122 million; 2009
$12 million; 2010 $302 million;
2011 $53 million; and 2012
$873 million.
59
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Interest paid was $262 million, $238 million and
$246 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Company owned 68 percent and 64 percent of
Hansgrohe AG at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The aggregate minority interest, net of dividends, of
$117 million and $108 million at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively, was recorded in deferred income
taxes and other liabilities on the Companys consolidated
balance sheets.
As part of the agreement relating to the Companys
acquisition of an additional 37 percent equity ownership of
Hansgrohe AG in December 2002 (increasing such ownership to
64 percent), certain minority shareholders of Hansgrohe AG,
representing four percent of Hansgrohe AG outstanding shares,
held a put option which required the Company to purchase such
shares in Hansgrohe AG with Company common stock. In May 2007,
the put option was exercised and the Company issued two million
shares of Company common stock with a value of $56 million
for the additional four percent ownership in Hansgrohe AG.
|
|
M.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
The Company elected to change its method of accounting for
stock-based compensation and implemented the fair value method
prescribed by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, effective January 1, 2003.
The Company used the prospective method, as defined by
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure
an amendment to SFAS No. 123, for determining
stock-based compensation expense. Accordingly, options granted,
modified or settled subsequent to January 1, 2003 have been
accounted for using the fair value method and options granted
prior to January 1, 2003 were accounted for using the intrinsic
value method.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123R, using the Modified Prospective
Application (MPA) method. The MPA method requires
the Company to recognize expense for unvested stock options that
were awarded prior to January 1, 2003 through the remaining
vesting periods. The MPA method did not require the restatement
of prior-year information. In accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, the Company utilized the shortcut
method to determine the tax windfall pool associated with stock
options as of the date of adoption.
The Companys 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the
2005 Plan) replaced the 1991 Long Term Stock
Incentive Plan (the 1991 Plan) in May 2005 and
provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various
forms. At December 31, 2007, outstanding stock-based
incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock
options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights.
Additionally, the Companys 1997 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Plan (the 1997 Plan) provides for the payment
of part of the compensation to non-employee Directors in Company
common stock. The 1997 Plan expired in May 2007; subsequently,
compensation to non-employee Directors in Company common
60
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
M. |
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION (Continued)
|
stock will be made from the 2005 Plan. Pre-tax compensation
expense (income) and the related income tax benefit, related to
these stock-based incentives were as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Long-term stock awards
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, a total of 16,158,460 shares of
Company common stock were available under the 2005 Plan for the
granting of stock options and other long-term stock incentive
awards.
Long-Term Stock
Awards
Long-term stock awards are granted to key employees and
non-employee Directors of the Company and do not cause net share
dilution inasmuch as the Company continues the practice of
repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open
market.
The Companys long-term stock award activity was as
follows, shares in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Unvested stock award shares at January 1
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Stock award shares granted
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Stock award shares vested
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Stock award shares forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Unvested stock award shares at December 31
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
The Company measures compensation expense for stock awards at
the market price of the Companys common stock at the grant
date. Effective January 1, 2006, such expense is being
recognized ratably over the shorter of the vesting period of the
stock awards, typically 10 years (except for stock awards
held by grantees age 66 or older, which vest over five
years), or the length of time until the grantee becomes
retirement-eligible at age 65. For stock awards granted
prior to January 1, 2006, such expense is being recognized
over the vesting period of the stock awards, typically
10 years, or for executive grantees that are, or will
become, retirement-eligible during the vesting period, the
expense is being recognized over five years. At
December 31, 2007, the Company had remaining
$12 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to
stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 to grantees
that will or have become retirement-eligible before such awards
will have been fully expensed; such expense will be recognized
over the next five years, or immediately upon a grantees
retirement.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there was $175 million
and $195 million, respectively, of unrecognized
compensation expense related to unvested stock awards; such
awards had a weighted average remaining vesting period of seven
years. There was $185 million of unrecognized compensation
expense,
61
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
M. |
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION (Continued)
|
which was included as a reduction of shareholders equity,
at December 31, 2005; such expense was reclassified to
common stock and retained earnings on January 1, 2006 in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R. At January 1,
2006, the Company estimated a forfeiture rate for long-term
stock awards and applied that rate to all previously expensed
stock awards; such application did not result in a change in the
expense to be recorded as a cumulative effect of accounting
change.
The total market value (at the vesting date) of stock award
shares which vested during 2007, 2006 and 2005 was
$48 million, $51 million and $60 million,
respectively.
Stock
Options
Stock options are granted to key employees and non-employee
Directors of the Company. The exercise price equals the market
price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over
five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of
grant and expire no later than 10 years after the grant
date. The 2005 Plan does not permit the granting of restoration
stock options, except for restoration options resulting from
options previously granted under the 1991 Plan. Restoration
stock options become exercisable six months from the date of
grant.
The Company granted 4,862,680 of stock option shares, including
restoration stock option shares, during 2007 with a grant date
exercise price range of $22 to $34 per share. During 2007,
2,032,510 stock option shares were forfeited (including options
that expired unexercised).
62
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
M. |
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION (Continued)
|
The Companys stock option activity was as follows, shares
in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Option shares outstanding at January 1
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Option shares granted, including restoration options
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
Option shares exercised
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value on date of exercise (A)
|
|
$
|
26 million
|
|
|
$
|
27 million
|
|
|
$
|
32 million
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Option shares forfeited
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Option shares outstanding at
December 31
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Option shares vested and expected to vest at December 31
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)
|
|
$
|
7 million
|
|
|
$
|
106 million
|
|
|
$
|
124 million
|
|
Weighted average remaining option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
term (in years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Option shares exercisable (vested) at December 31
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)
|
|
$
|
7 million
|
|
|
$
|
75 million
|
|
|
$
|
93 million
|
|
Weighted average remaining option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
term (in years)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the Companys
stock price at each respective date, less the exercise price
(grant date price) multiplied by the number of shares. |
The Company measures compensation expense for stock options
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. For stock options
granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, such expense is
being recognized ratably over the shorter of the vesting period
of the stock options, typically five years, or the length of
time until the grantee becomes retirement-eligible at
age 65. The expense for unvested stock options at
January 1, 2006 is based upon the grant date fair value of
those options as calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.
For stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006, such
expense is being recognized ratably over the vesting period of
the stock options, typically five years. At December 31,
2007, the Company had $7 million of unrecognized
compensation expense related to stock options granted prior to
January 1, 2006 to grantees that will or have become
retirement-eligible before such options will have been fully
expensed; such expense will be recognized over the next three
years, or immediately upon a grantees retirement.
63
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
M. |
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION (Continued)
|
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there was $73 million
and $90 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation
expense (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model at the
grant date) related to unvested stock options; such options had
a weighted average remaining vesting period of three years. At
January 1, 2006, the Company estimated a forfeiture rate
for stock options and applied that rate to all previously
expensed stock options; such application did not result in a
change in the expense to be recorded as a cumulative effect of
accounting change.
The Company received cash of $60 million, $28 million
and $33 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for
the exercise of stock options.
The weighted average grant date fair value of option shares
granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using
a Black-Scholes option pricing model, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
8.92
|
|
|
$
|
8.24
|
|
|
$
|
10.33
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.74%
|
|
|
|
4.89%
|
|
|
|
4.10%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
3.0%
|
|
|
|
3.1%
|
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
Volatility factor
|
|
|
31.8%
|
|
|
|
34.0%
|
|
|
|
35.8%
|
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
The following table summarizes information for stock option
shares outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007,
shares in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Option Shares Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$
|
20-23
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
4 Years
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
$
|
24-28
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7 Years
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
$
|
29-32
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
8 Years
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
$
|
33-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20-38
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
6 Years
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phantom Stock
Awards and Stock Appreciation Rights
(SARs)
The Company grants phantom stock awards and SARs to certain
non-U.S. employees.
Phantom stock awards are linked to the value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant and are settled
in cash upon vesting, typically over 10 years. The Company
accounts for phantom stock awards as liability-based awards; the
compensation expense is initially measured as the market price
of the Companys common stock at the grant date and is
recognized over the vesting period. The liability is remeasured
and adjusted at the end of each reporting period until the
awards are fully-vested and paid to the employees. The Company
recognized (income) expense of $(2) million and
$1 million related to the valuation of phantom stock awards
for 2007 and 2006, respectively. In 2007 and 2006, the Company
granted 130,000 shares and 175,000 shares,
respectively, of phantom stock awards with an aggregate fair
value of $4 million and $5 million, respectively, and
paid $4 million of cash in both years to settle phantom
stock awards.
64
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
M. |
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION (Concluded)
|
SARs are linked to the value of the Companys common stock
on the date of grant and are settled in cash upon exercise. On
January 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of
accounting for SARs, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R, from the intrinsic value method to the
fair value method. The fair value method requires outstanding
SARs to be classified as liability-based awards and valued using
a Black-Scholes option pricing model at the grant date; such
fair value is recognized as compensation expense over the
vesting period, typically five years. The liability is
remeasured and adjusted at the end of each reporting period
until the SARs are exercised and payment is made to the
employees or the SARs expire. As a result of implementing this
change, during 2006, the Company recognized expense of
$3 million (net of income tax benefit of $2 million)
as a cumulative effect of accounting change, net. The Company
recognized (income) expense of $(5) million and $400,000
related to the valuation of SARs for 2007 and 2006,
respectively. During 2007 and 2006, the Company granted SARs for
521,100 shares and 422,300 shares, respectively, with
an aggregate fair value of $4 million in both years.
Information related to phantom stock awards and SARs was as
follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phantom Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accrued compensation cost liability
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Unrecognized compensation cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Equivalent common shares
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
N.
|
EMPLOYEE
RETIREMENT PLANS
|
The Company sponsors qualified defined-benefit and
defined-contribution retirement plans for most of its employees.
In addition to the Companys qualified defined-benefit
pension plans, the Company has unfunded non-qualified
defined-benefit pension plans covering certain employees, which
provide for benefits in addition to those provided by the
qualified pension plans. Substantially all salaried employees
participate in non-contributory defined-contribution retirement
plans, to which payments are determined annually by the
Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. Aggregate charges to earnings under the
Companys defined-benefit and defined-contribution
retirement plans were $44 million and $47 million in
2007, $54 million and $44 million in 2006 and
$51 million and $42 million in 2005, respectively.
During 2006, the Company implemented SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R),
(SFAS No. 158). Among other things,
SFAS No. 158 requires companies to prospectively
recognize a net liability or asset and to report the funded
status of their defined-benefit pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans on their balance sheets, with an
offsetting adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income;
such recognition did not affect the Companys consolidated
statements of income.
65
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
N. |
EMPLOYEE
RETIREMENT PLANS (Continued)
|
Changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of
plan assets, and the funded status of the Companys
defined-benefit pension plans were as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at January 1
|
|
$
|
780
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
771
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss, net
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at December 31
|
|
$
|
748
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
780
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at January 1
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at December 31:
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in the Companys consolidated balance sheets were
as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes and other
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net liability
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
N. |
EMPLOYEE
RETIREMENT PLANS (Continued)
|
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income before income
taxes were as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Net transition obligation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior service cost
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information for defined-benefit pension plans with an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets was as
follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
613
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The projected benefit obligation was in excess of plan assets
for all except two of the Companys qualified
defined-benefit pension plans at December 31, 2007 and for
all except one of the Companys qualified defined-benefit
pension plans at December 31, 2006.
Net periodic pension cost for the Companys defined-benefit
pension plans was as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Recognized curtailment (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized settlement loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net loss
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to recognize $2 million and
$1 million of pre-tax net loss and prior service cost,
respectively, from accumulated other comprehensive income into
net periodic pension cost in 2008 related to its defined-benefit
pension plans.
67
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
N. |
EMPLOYEE
RETIREMENT PLANS (Continued)
|
Plan
Assets
The Companys qualified defined-benefit pension plan
weighted average asset allocation, which is based upon fair
value, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
67%
|
|
|
|
69%
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment objectives of the Companys qualified
defined-benefit pension plans are: 1) to earn a return, net
of fees, greater than or equal to the expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets; 2) to diversify the portfolio among
various asset classes with the goal of reducing volatility of
return and reducing principal risk; and 3) to maintain
liquidity sufficient to meet Plan obligations. Long-term target
allocations are: equity securities (80%), debt securities (10%)
and other investments (10%).
Plan assets included 1.4 million shares of Company common
stock valued at $31 million and $42 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Assumptions
Major assumptions used in accounting for the Companys
defined-benefit pension plans were primarily as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate for obligations
|
|
|
6.25%
|
|
|
|
5.50%
|
|
|
|
5.25%
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.25%
|
|
|
|
8.50%
|
|
|
|
8.50%
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00%
|
|
|
|
4.00%
|
|
|
|
4.00%
|
|
Discount rate for net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
5.50%
|
|
|
|
5.25%
|
|
|
|
5.75%
|
|
The discount rate for obligations was based upon the expected
duration of each defined-benefit pension plans liabilities
matched to the December 31, 2007 Citigroup Pension Discount
Curve. Such rates for the Companys defined-benefit pension
plans ranged from 5.00 percent to 6.50 percent, with
the most significant portion of the liabilities having a
discount rate for obligations of 6.25 percent or higher at
December 31, 2007.
The Company determined the expected long-term rate of return on
plan assets by reviewing an analysis of expected and historical
rates of return of various asset classes based upon the current
and long-term target asset allocation of the plan assets. The
measurement date used to determine the defined-benefit pension
expense was primarily December 31.
Other
The Company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans that
provide medical, dental and life insurance coverage for eligible
retirees and dependents in the United States based upon age and
length of service. The aggregate present value of the unfunded
accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was
$9 million at both December 31, 2007 and 2006.
68
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
N. |
EMPLOYEE
RETIREMENT PLANS (Concluded)
|
Cash
Flows
At December 31, 2007, the Company expected to contribute
approximately $11 million to its qualified defined-benefit
pension plans in 2008. The Company also expected to pay benefits
of $3 million and $8 million to participants of its
unfunded qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension
plans, respectively, in 2008.
At December 31, 2007, the benefits expected to be paid in
each of the next five years, and in aggregate for the five years
thereafter, relating to the Companys defined-benefit
pension plans, were as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
In July 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized
the repurchase for retirement of up to 50 million shares of
the Companys common stock in open-market transactions or
otherwise, replacing a previous Board of Directors authorization
established in 2006. At December 31, 2007, the Company had
remaining authorization to repurchase up to 41 million
shares of its common stock in open-market transactions or
otherwise. The Company repurchased and retired 31 million
common shares in 2007, 29 million common shares in 2006 and
31 million common shares in 2005 for cash aggregating
$857 million, $854 million and $986 million in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On the basis of amounts paid (declared), cash dividends per
common share were $.91 ($.92) in 2007, $.86 ($.88) in 2006 and
$.78 ($.80) in 2005, respectively. In 2007, the Company
increased its quarterly cash dividend by five percent to $.23
per common share from $.22 per common share.
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
The Companys total comprehensive income was as follows, in
millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Prior service cost and net loss, net
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
742
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized loss on marketable securities, net, is net of
income tax benefit of $5 million, $6 million and
$5 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The prior
service cost and net loss, net, is net of income tax of
$27 million for 2007. The minimum pension liability, net,
is net of income tax expense (benefit) of $33 million and
$(23) million for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
69
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
O.
|
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY (Concluded)
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as
follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities, net
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities, net, is
reported net of income tax expense (benefit) of
$(3) million and $2 million at December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The unrecognized prior service cost and
net loss, net, is reported net of income tax benefit of
$39 million and $66 million at December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
The realized gains, net, on marketable securities of
$3 million, net of tax effect, for both 2007 and 2006 were
included in determining net income and were reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income.
The Companys reportable segments are as follows:
Cabinets and Related Products principally includes
assembled and ready-to-assemble kitchen and bath cabinets; home
office workstations; entertainment centers; storage products;
bookcases; and kitchen utility products.
Plumbing Products principally includes faucets;
plumbing fittings and valves; showerheads and hand showers;
bathtubs and shower enclosures; and spas.
Installation and Other Services principally includes
the sale, installation and distribution of insulation and other
building products.
Decorative Architectural Products principally
includes paints and stains; and door, window and other hardware.
Other Specialty Products principally includes
windows, window frame components and patio doors; staple gun
tackers, staples and other fastening tools; and hydronic
radiators and heat convectors.
The above products and services are sold and provided to the
home improvement and new home construction markets through mass
merchandisers, hardware stores, home centers, homebuilders,
distributors and other outlets for consumers and contractors.
The Companys operations are principally located in North
America and Europe. The Companys country of domicile is
the United States of America.
Corporate assets consist primarily of real property, equipment,
cash and cash investments and other investments.
The Companys segments are based upon similarities in
products and services and represent the aggregation of operating
units, for which financial information is regularly evaluated by
the Companys corporate operating executives in determining
resource allocation and assessing performance and is
periodically reviewed by the Board of Directors. Accounting
policies for the segments are the same as those for the Company.
The Company primarily evaluates performance based upon operating
profit and, other than general corporate expense, allocates
specific corporate overhead to each segment. Income regarding
the Behr litigation settlement has also been excluded from the
evaluation of segment operating profit.
70
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
P. |
SEGMENT
INFORMATION (Continued)
|
Information about the Company by segment and geographic area was
as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
Operating Profit(5)(9)
|
|
|
Assets at December 31(6)(10)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
The Companys operations by segment were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
$
|
2,829
|
|
|
$
|
3,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,324
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
1,769
|
|
|
$
|
1,860
|
|
|
$
|
2,017
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
3,296
|
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
|
$
|
1,768
|
|
|
$
|
9,547
|
|
|
$
|
9,844
|
|
|
$
|
9,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys operations by geographic area were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
9,271
|
|
|
$
|
10,537
|
|
|
$
|
10,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,008
|
|
|
$
|
1,417
|
|
|
$
|
1,567
|
|
|
$
|
7,089
|
|
|
$
|
7,390
|
|
|
$
|
7,443
|
|
International, principally Europe
|
|
|
2,499
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
2,454
|
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, as above
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
9,547
|
|
|
|
9,844
|
|
|
|
9,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General corporate expense, net (7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of corporate fixed assets, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income regarding litigation settlement(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit, as reported
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes,
minority
interest and cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
914
|
|
|
$
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate assets
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
2,481
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,907
|
|
|
$
|
12,325
|
|
|
$
|
12,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Additions (10)
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization (5)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
The Companys operations by segment were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabinets and Related Products
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Plumbing Products
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Installation and Other Services
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Decorative Architectural Products
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other Specialty Products
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Unallocated amounts, principally related to corporate assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Assets of dispositions (acquisitions), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
P.
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION (Concluded)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Included in net sales were export sales from the U.S. of
$291 million, $253 million and $244 million in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
Intra-company sales between segments represented approximately
two percent of net sales in both 2007 and 2006 and one percent
of net sales in 2005.
|
|
(3)
|
Included in net sales were sales to one customer of
$2,403 million, $2,547 million and $2,654 million
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Such net sales were
included in the following segments: Cabinets and Related
Products, Plumbing Products, Decorative Architectural Products
and Other Specialty Products.
|
|
(4)
|
Net sales from the Companys operations in the U.S. were
$8,910 million, $10,188 million and
$10,120 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
(5)
|
Net sales, operating profit and depreciation and amortization
expense for 2007, 2006 and 2005 excluded the results of
businesses reported as discontinued operations in 2007, 2006 and
2005.
|
|
(6)
|
Long-lived assets of the Companys operations in the U.S.
and Europe were $4,987 million and $1,477 million,
$4,959 million and $1,510 million, and
$4,892 million and $1,610 million at December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
(7)
|
General corporate expense included those expenses not
specifically attributable to the Companys segments.
|
|
(8)
|
The income regarding litigation settlement related to the
Companys subsidiary, Behr Process Corporation, which is
included in the Decorative Architectural Products segment.
|
|
(9)
|
Included in segment operating profit for 2007 were impairment
charges for goodwill and other intangible assets as follows:
Plumbing Products $69 million; and Other
Specialty Products $158 million. Included in
segment operating profit for 2006 were impairment charges for
goodwill as follows: Cabinets and Related Products
$316 million; and Plumbing Products
$1 million. Included in segment operating profit for 2005
were impairment charges for goodwill as follows: Plumbing
Products $7 million; and Other Specialty
Products $36 million. The impairment charges
for goodwill were principally related to certain of the
Companys European businesses.
|
|
|
(10) |
Segment assets excluded the assets of businesses reported as
discontinued operations.
|
|
|
Q.
|
OTHER INCOME
(EXPENSE), NET
|
Other, net, which is included in other income (expense), net,
was as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Income from cash and cash investments
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Other interest income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Income from financial investments, net (Note E)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Other items, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other, net
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items, net, included realized foreign currency transaction
gains (losses) of $9 million, $14 million and
$(25) million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as well
as other miscellaneous items.
72
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority
interest and cumulative effect of accounting change, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S
|
|
$
|
606
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
914
|
|
|
$
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes on income from continuing
operations before minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, including stock-based compensation
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, principally notes payable
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability at December 31
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the net deferred tax
liability consisted of net short-term deferred tax assets
included in prepaid expenses and other of $216 million and
$137 million, respectively, and net long-term deferred tax
liabilities included in deferred income taxes and other of
$510 million and $467 million, respectively.
The Company made dividend distributions of accumulated earnings
from certain of its foreign subsidiaries from 2004 to 2007. A
substantial portion of these dividend distributions generated
significant foreign tax credits that were used to offset the
majority of the U.S. tax on the dividend distributions and
resulted in a $45 million and $61 million foreign tax
credit carryforward at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The Company believes that the foreign tax credit
carryforward will be utilized before the
10-year
carryforward periods, from December 31, 2014 to
December 31, 2016, expire principally with
73
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
R. |
INCOME
TAXES (Continued)
|
identified potential sources of future income taxed in foreign
jurisdictions at rates less than the present U.S. Federal
rate of 35 percent; therefore, a valuation allowance was
not required at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
A reconciliation of the U.S. Federal statutory rate to the
provision for income taxes on income from continuing operations
before minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting
change, net, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
U.S. Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
State and local taxes, net of U.S. Federal tax benefit
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Lower taxes on foreign earnings
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in U.S. and foreign taxes on distributed and
undistributed foreign earnings, including the impact of foreign
tax credit
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charges providing no tax benefit
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Domestic production deduction
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in foreign tax rates
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid were $363 million, $496 million and
$457 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
During 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
(FIN No. 48). FIN No. 48 allows
the recognition of only those tax benefits that the Company
estimates have a greater than 50 percent likelihood of
being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities.
FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on financial
statement classification and disclosure, and the accounting for
interest, penalties, interim periods and transition.
Historically, the Company has established reserves for tax
contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies,
(SFAS No. 5). Under this standard,
accounting reserves for tax contingencies are established when
it is probable that an additional tax may be owed and the amount
can be reasonably estimated. FIN No. 48 establishes a
threshold for recognizing accounting reserves for income tax
contingencies on uncertain tax positions lower than the
threshold under SFAS No. 5. Therefore, as a result of
adopting FIN No. 48, the Company has increased its
accounting reserves for income tax contingencies (referred to by
FIN No. 48 as unrecognized tax benefits)
to $91 million as of January 1, 2007, the date of
adoption. If recognized, $62 million, net of any
U.S. Federal tax benefit, would affect the Companys
effective tax rate. The cumulative effect of adopting
FIN No. 48 resulted in a reduction to beginning
retained earnings of $26 million, net of any
U.S. Federal tax benefit, as of January 1, 2007, and
the majority of the Companys unrecognized tax benefits
were reclassified from current to non-current liabilities in
accordance with the provisions of FIN No. 48.
74
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
R. |
INCOME
TAXES (Concluded)
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits, including related interest and
penalties, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized
|
|
|
Interest and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Benefits
|
|
|
Penalties
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
Current year tax positions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Prior year tax positions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Settlements with tax authorities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest and penalties recognized in income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If recognized, $50 million of the unrecognized tax benefits
at December 31, 2007, net of any U.S. Federal tax
benefit, would affect the Companys effective tax rate.
At December 31, 2007, the total unrecognized tax benefits,
including related interest and penalties, is recorded in
deferred income taxes and other.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal
jurisdiction, and various local, state and foreign
jurisdictions. Beginning with the 2006 consolidated
U.S. Federal income tax return, the Company has been
selected by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to
participate in the Compliance Assurance Program
(CAP). CAP is a real-time audit of the
U.S. Federal income tax return that allows the IRS, working
in conjunction with the Company, to determine tax return
compliance with the U.S. Federal tax law prior to filing
the return. This program provides the Company with greater
certainty about its tax liability for a given year within
months, rather than years, of filing its annual tax return and
greatly reduces the need for recording U.S. Federal
unrecognized tax benefits. The IRS has completed their
examination of the Companys consolidated U.S. Federal
tax returns through 2006. With few exceptions, the Company is no
longer subject to state or foreign income tax examinations on
filed returns for years before 2000.
The Company does not anticipate that it is reasonably possible
that any material increase or decrease in its liability for
unrecognized tax benefits will occur within the next twelve
months.
75
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
S.
|
EARNINGS PER
COMMON SHARE
|
Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used in the
computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share were
as follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Numerator (basic and diluted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change, net
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic common shares (based on weighted average)
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent common shares
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Stock option dilution
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted common shares
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not
include any common shares related to the Zero Coupon Convertible
Senior Notes (Notes) in the calculation of diluted
earnings per common share, as the price of the Companys
common stock at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 did not
exceed the equivalent accreted value of the Notes.
Additionally, 19 million common shares, 16 million
common shares and 13 million common shares for 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively, related to stock options were excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to
their antidilutive effect.
Common shares outstanding included on the Companys balance
sheet and for the calculation of earnings per common share do
not include unvested stock awards (nine million common shares at
both December 31, 2007 and 2006); shares outstanding for
legal requirements included all common shares that have voting
rights (including unvested stock awards).
|
|
T.
|
OTHER COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Litigation
The Company is subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted
claims with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary
course of business.
Early in 2003, a suit was brought against the Company and a
number of its insulation installation companies in the federal
court in Atlanta, Georgia, alleging that certain practices
violate provisions of federal and state antitrust laws. The
plaintiff publicized the lawsuit with a press release and stated
in that release that the U.S. Department of Justice was
investigating the business practices of the Companys
insulation installation companies. Although the Company was
unaware of any investigation at that time, the Company was later
advised that an investigation had been commenced but was
subsequently closed without any enforcement action recommended.
Two additional lawsuits were subsequently brought in Virginia
making similar claims under the antitrust laws. Both of these
lawsuits have since been dismissed without any payment or
requirement for any change in business practices. During the
second half of 2004, the same counsel who commenced the initial
action in Atlanta filed six additional lawsuits on
76
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
T. |
OTHER COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
|
behalf of several of Mascos competitors in the insulation
installation business. The plaintiffs then dismissed all of
these lawsuits and, represented by the same counsel, filed
another action in the same federal court as a putative class
action against the Company, a number of its insulation
installation companies and certain of their suppliers. All of
the Companys suppliers, who are co-defendants in this
lawsuit, have settled this case. This suit currently seeks class
representation for residential insulation contractors (other
than the defendants and their affiliates) that have directly
purchased fiberglass insulation suitable for residential
installation from certain insulation manufacturers. The Company
is opposing certification of this lawsuit which seeks to proceed
on a class representation basis. Two additional lawsuits,
seeking class action status and alleging anticompetitive
conduct, were filed against the Company and a number of its
insulation suppliers. One of these lawsuits was filed in a
Florida state court and has been dismissed by the court with
prejudice. The other lawsuit was filed in federal court in
northern California and was recently transferred to federal
court in Atlanta, Georgia. The Company is vigorously defending
these remaining cases, including opposing class certification of
the direct purchasers of insulation who are competitors of the
Company and who constitute the purported class in one such case,
and California indirect purchasers of insulation who are either
consumers or builders and who constitute the purported class in
the other such case. Based upon the advice of its outside
counsel, the Company believes that the conduct of the Company
and its insulation installation companies, which has been the
subject of the above-described lawsuits, has not violated any
antitrust laws. There cannot, however, be any assurance that the
Company will ultimately prevail in the remaining lawsuits or, if
unsuccessful, that the ultimate liability would not be material.
The Company is unable at this time to reliably estimate any
potential liability which might occur from an adverse judgment
but does not believe that any adverse judgment would have a
material adverse effect on its businesses or the methods used by
its insulation installation companies in doing business.
In February 2003, a suit was served upon the Companys
subsidiary, Milgard Manufacturing, in the Solano County,
California Superior Court, alleging design defects in certain of
Milgards aluminum windows. The complaint requests class
action status for all owners of homes in California in which the
windows are installed, and seeks replacement costs and other
damages. Milgard denies that the windows are defective and is
vigorously defending the case. In August 2006 the trial court
denied plaintiffs motion for class certification.
Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the California Court of
Appeals. Based upon the advice of its outside counsel, Milgard
believes that the trial court ruling should be affirmed by the
appellate court. The Company believes that it will not incur
material liability as a result of this lawsuit.
In 2004, the Company learned that European governmental
authorities were investigating possible anticompetitive business
practices relating to the plumbing and heating industries in
Europe. The investigations involve a number of European
companies, including certain of the Companys European
manufacturing divisions and a number of other large businesses.
As part of its broadened governance activities, the Company,
with the assistance of its outside counsel, completed a review
of the competition practices of its European divisions,
including those in the plumbing and heating industries, and the
Company is cooperating fully with the European governmental
authorities. Several private antitrust lawsuits have been filed
in the United States as putative class actions against, among
others, the Company and certain of the other companies being
investigated relating to the defendants plumbing
operations. These appear to be an outgrowth of the
investigations being conducted by European governmental
authorities. These lawsuits have been dismissed, however, the
Company has been notified that a notice of appeal has been filed
in one of these lawsuits. Based upon the advice of its outside
counsel, the review of the competition practices of its European
divisions referred to above and other factors, the Company
believes that it will not incur material liability as a result
of the matters that are the subject of these investigations.
77
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
T. |
OTHER COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
|
Warranty
Certain of the Companys products and product finishes and
services are covered by a warranty to be free from defects in
material and workmanship for periods ranging from one year to
the life of the product. At the time of sale, the Company
accrues a warranty liability for estimated costs to provide
products, parts or services to repair or replace products in
satisfaction of warranty obligations. The Companys
estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based
upon historical experience and expectations of future
conditions. To the extent that the Company experiences any
changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with
servicing those claims, its warranty liability is adjusted
accordingly.
Changes in the Companys warranty liability were as
follows, in millions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the year
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Settlements made (in cash or kind) during the year
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Other, net (including currency translation)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-Related
Commitments
The Company, as part of certain acquisition agreements, provided
for the payment of additional consideration in either cash or
Company common stock, contingent upon whether certain conditions
are met, including the operating performance of the acquired
business and the price of the Companys common stock. At
December 31, 2007, the Company had additional consideration
payable in cash of $10 million contingent upon the
operating performance of the acquired businesses.
Investments
With respect to the Companys investments in private equity
funds, the Company had, at December 31, 2007, commitments
to contribute up to $49 million of additional capital to
such funds representing the Companys aggregate capital
commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to
date. The Company is contractually obligated to make additional
capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds
upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund. The
Company has no control over when or if the capital calls will
occur. Capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in
an increase in the carrying value of the Companys
investment in the private equity fund when paid.
Residual Value
Guarantees
The Company has residual value guarantees resulting from
operating leases, primarily related to certain of the
Companys trucks and other vehicles, in the Installation
and Other Services segment. The operating leases are generally
for a minimum term of 24 months and are renewable monthly
after the initial term. After the end of the initial term, if
the Company cancels the leases, the Company must pay the lessor
the difference between the guaranteed residual value and the
fair market value of the related vehicles. The value of
lease-related guarantees, including the obligation payable under
the residual value guarantees, assuming the fair value at lease
termination is zero, was approximately $88 million at
December 31, 2007.
78
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
T. |
OTHER COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (Concluded)
|
For all operating leases that contain residual value guarantee
provisions (principally related to vehicles), the Company
calculates the amount due under the guarantees and compares such
amount to the fair value of the leased assets. If the amount
payable under the residual value guarantee exceeds the fair
value at lease termination, the Company would record a liability
equal to such excess with a corresponding charge to earnings. At
December 31, 2007, the estimated fair market value exceeded
the amount payable under the residual value guarantees and no
liability was recorded.
Other
Matters
The Company enters into contracts, which include reasonable and
customary indemnifications that are standard for the industries
in which it operates. Such indemnifications include customer
claims against builders for issues relating to the
Companys products and workmanship. In conjunction with
divestitures and other transactions, the Company occasionally
provides reasonable and customary indemnifications relating to
various items including: the enforceability of trademarks; legal
and environmental issues; provisions for sales returns; and
asset valuations. The Company has never had to pay a material
amount related to these indemnifications and evaluates the
probability that amounts may be incurred and appropriately
records an estimated liability when probable.
The Company reviews its business portfolio on an ongoing basis
as part of its corporate strategic planning and has determined
that several of its European business units are not core to the
Companys long-term growth strategy and, accordingly, has
embarked on a plan of disposition. These business units had
combined 2007 net sales in excess of $270 million and
aggregate operating profit of $13 million (excluding an
impairment charge for goodwill of $108 million), or an
operating loss of $(95) million, including the impairment
charge for goodwill. The Company expects proceeds from the
dispositions to exceed $140 million. The dispositions are
expected to be completed within the next twelve months.
79
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
V.
|
INTERIM FINANCIAL
INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions, Except Per Common Share Data)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
11,770
|
|
|
$
|
2,698
|
|
|
$
|
3,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
2,865
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
3,211
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
862
|
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
752
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
(.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
.57
|
|
|
$
|
.50
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.56
|
|
|
$
|
.51
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
(.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
.57
|
|
|
$
|
.50
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.56
|
|
|
$
|
.51
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
2,931
|
|
|
$
|
3,279
|
|
|
$
|
3,354
|
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
3,506
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
$
|
919
|
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change, net
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
|
$
|
(169
|
)
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
(187
|
)
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change, net
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
(.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
|
$
|
.54
|
|
|
$
|
.51
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
(.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
.65
|
|
|
$
|
.55
|
|
|
$
|
.50
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change, net
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
(.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
.57
|
|
|
$
|
.53
|
|
|
$
|
.50
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
(.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
.64
|
|
|
$
|
.54
|
|
|
$
|
.50
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share amounts for the four quarters
of 2007 and 2006 may not total to the earnings per common
share amounts for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 due to the timing of common stock repurchases. The first
quarters of 2007 and 2006 have been restated to reflect the 2007
discontinued operation.
Fourth quarter 2007 loss from continuing operations and net loss
include non-cash impairment charges for goodwill and other
intangible assets of $208 million after tax
($227 million pre-tax). Income from continuing operations
and net income include after-tax impairment charges for
financial investments of $7 million ($10 million
pre-tax) and $8 million ($12 million pre-tax) in the
second and third quarters of 2007, respectively. Net income for
2007 includes after-tax (loss) income, net, related to
80
MASCO
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Concluded)
|
|
V. |
INTERIM FINANCIAL
INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) (Concluded)
|
discontinued operations of $1 million ($1 million
pre-tax), $3 million ($4 million pre-tax),
$(4) million ($(4) million pre-tax) and
$(11) million ($(9) million pre-tax) in the first,
second, third and fourth quarters of 2007, respectively.
Fourth quarter 2006 loss from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting change, net and net loss include
non-cash impairment charges for goodwill of $307 million
after tax ($307 million pre-tax), and income regarding
litigation settlement of $1 million after tax
($1 million pre-tax). Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of accounting change, net and net
income include after-tax impairment charges for financial
investments of $51 million ($78 million pre-tax),
$5 million ($8 million pre-tax) and $10 million
($15 million pre-tax) in the second, third and fourth
quarters of 2006, respectively. Net income for 2006 includes
after-tax income (loss), net, related to discontinued operations
of $0 million ($1 million pre-tax), $4 million
($5 million pre-tax), $27 million ($53 million
pre-tax) and $(18) million ($(15) million pre-tax) in
the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2006,
respectively.
81
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of
its disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange
Act
Rules 13a-15(b)
and
15d-15(b) as
of December 31, 2007. Based on this evaluation, the
Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting.
Managements report on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) is included in this Report under
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data under
the heading Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting and the report of our independent registered
public accounting firm is included under the heading
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm under the same Item.
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
In connection with the evaluation of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2007, which
is required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by
paragraph (d) of Exchange
Rules 13a-15
or 15d-15,
(as defined in paragraph (f) of
Rule 13a-15),
management determined that, except as noted below, there was no
change that materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect internal control over financial reporting.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company continued a
phased deployment of a new Enterprise Resource Planning
(ERP) system at Masco Contractor Services, one of
the Companys larger business units. The new ERP system is
a process improvement initiative and is not in response to any
identified deficiency or weakness in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. The business process
engineering of this initiative is significant in scale and
complexity, and will result in significant modifications to
certain internal controls. The implementation of the new ERP
system has been designed to enhance the overall system of
internal control over financial reporting through further
automation and integration of business processes.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
Certain information regarding executive officers required by
this Item is set forth as a Supplementary Item at the end of
Part I hereof (pursuant to Instruction 3 to
Item 401(b) of
Regulation S-K).
The Companys Code of Business Ethics applies to all
employees, officers and directors including the Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer, and is posted on the Companys website
at www.masco.com. Other information required by this Item will
be contained in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement
for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or
before April 29, 2008, and such information is incorporated
herein by reference.
82
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
Information required by this Item will be contained in the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or before April 29,
2008, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The Company has three equity compensation plans, the 1991 Long
Term Stock Incentive Plan (under which further grants have been
discontinued), the 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan and the
1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (under which further
grants have been discontinued). The following table sets forth
information as of December 31, 2007 concerning the
Companys three equity compensation plans, each of which
was approved by stockholders. The Company does not have any
equity compensation plans that are not approved by stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Reflected in the
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
First Column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
26,139,400
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
|
16,158,500
|
|
The remaining information required by this Item will be
contained in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement for
its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or
before April 29, 2008, and such information is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
Information required by this Item will be contained in the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or before April 29,
2008, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
Information required by this Item will be contained in the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or before April 29,
2008, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
83
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule.
|
(a) Listing of Documents.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Financial Statements. The Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8
hereof, as required at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, consist
of the following:
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Financial Statement Schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Financial Statement Schedule of the Company appended hereto, as
required for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, consists of the following:
|
II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
3.i
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Masco Corporation and
amendments thereto (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.i of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
3.ii
|
|
Bylaws of Masco Corporation, as Amended and Restated
June 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.ii of Mascos
Form 8-K
filed 6-6-2007).
|
4.a.i
|
|
Indenture dated as of December 1, 1982 between Masco
Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
successor trustee under agreement originally with Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.a.i of
Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-07) and Directors resolutions establishing
Masco Corporations
|
|
|
(i) 71/8% Debentures
Due August 15, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.a.i of Mascos 2003
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2004);
|
|
|
(ii) 6.625% Debentures Due April 15, 2018
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.a.i of
Mascos 2003
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2004);
|
|
|
(iii) 5.75% Notes Due October 15, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.a.i of
Mascos 2003
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2004); and
|
|
|
(iv) 73/4% Debentures
Due August 1, 2029 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.a.i of Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed 3-16-2005).
|
4.a.ii
|
|
Agreement of Appointment and Acceptance of Successor Trustee
dated as of July 25, 1994 among Masco Corporation, Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York and The First National
Bank of Chicago (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.a.ii of Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed 3-16-2005).
|
4.a.iii
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 26, 1994 between
Masco Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,
as successor trustee under agreement originally with The First
National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.a.iii of Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed 3-16-2005).
|
84
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
4.b.i
|
|
Indenture dated as of February 12, 2001 between Masco
Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
successor trustee under agreement originally with Bank One
Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.b.i of
Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-07) and Directors Resolutions establishing
Masco Corporations
|
|
|
(i) 57/8% Notes
Due July 15, 2012 (Filed herewith);
|
|
|
(ii) 61/2% Notes
Due August 15, 2032 (Filed herewith);
|
|
|
(iii) 4.80% Notes Due June 15, 2015
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.b.i of
Mascos 2nd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed 8-4-2005);
|
|
|
(iv) 6.125% Notes Due October 3, 2016
(Incorporated by reference to Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007);
|
|
|
(v) Floating Rate Notes Due 2010 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.b.i of Mascos
Form 10-Q
filed 5-3-2007); and
|
|
|
(vi) 5.85% Notes Due 2017 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.b.ii of Mascos
Form 10-Q
filed 5-3-2007).
|
4.b.ii
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 30, 2006 to the
Indenture dated February 12, 2001 by and among Masco
Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.b.iii of
Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007).
|
4.b.iii
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture between Masco Corporation and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as
trustee dated as of December 23, 2004 (including form of
Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Note, Series B due 2031)
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
Mascos
Form 8-K
filed
12-23-2004).
|
4.c
|
|
U.S. $2 billion
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004
among Masco Corporation and Masco Europe, S.á r.l. as
borrowers, the banks party thereto, as lenders, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as Joint
Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners and Citibank, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as
Documentation Agent, and Bank One, N.A. (Main Office Chicago),
as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4 of Mascos
Form 8-K
filed
11-12-2004),
as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated February 10, 2006
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of Mascos
Form 8-K
filed February 15, 2006).
|
Note:
|
|
Other instruments, notes or extracts from agreements defining
the rights of holders of long-term debt of Masco Corporation or
its subsidiaries have not been filed since(i) in each case the
total amount of long-term debt permitted thereunder does not
exceed 10 percent of Masco Corporations consolidated
assets, and (ii) such instruments, notes and extracts will
be furnished by Masco Corporation to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
|
Note:
|
|
Exhibits 10.a through 10.j constitute the management
contracts and executive compensatory plans or arrangements in
which certain of the Directors and executive officers of the
Company participate.
|
10.a
|
|
Masco Corporation 1991 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (as
amended and restated October 26, 2006) Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.a of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007)
|
|
|
(i) Forms of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for
awards prior to January 1, 2005 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.a.i of Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-04-2004)
and for awards on and after January 1, 2005
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
Mascos
Form 8-K
filed 1-06-2005);
|
|
|
(ii) Forms of Restoration Stock Option
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.a.ii of
Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-4-2004);
|
85
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Forms of Stock Option Grant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.a.iii of Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-4-2004);
|
|
|
(iv) Forms of Stock Option Grant for Non-Employee
Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.a.iv
of Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-4-2004);
and
|
|
|
(v) Forms of amendment to Award Agreements
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.a of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
10.b.i
|
|
Masco Corporation 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (as
amended and restated October 26, 2006) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.b if Mascos 2006
Form 10-k
filed 2-27-2007)
|
|
|
(i) Form of Restricted Stock Award (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.b of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2- 2006);
|
|
|
(ii) Form of Stock Option Grant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.b of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006);
|
|
|
(iii) Form of Restoration Stock Option
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.b of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006); and
|
|
|
(iv) Form of Stock Option Grant for Non-Employee
Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.b of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
10.b.ii
|
|
Non-Employee Directors Equity Program under Mascos 2005
Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (Filed herewith)
|
|
|
(i) Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement
(Filed herewith); and
|
|
|
(ii) Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement (Filed
herewith).
|
10.c
|
|
Forms of Masco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement and
Disability Plan and amendments (Filed herewith).
|
10.d
|
|
Masco Corporation 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (as
amended and restated October 27, 2005) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.e of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006)
|
|
|
(i) Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.e of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006);
|
|
|
(ii) Form of Stock Option Grant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.e of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006); and
|
|
|
(iii) Form of amendment to Award Agreements
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.e of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
10.e
|
|
Other compensatory arrangements for executive officers
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.f of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
10.f
|
|
Masco Corporation 2004 Restricted Stock Award Program
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.b of
Mascos
Form 10-Q
filed 8-5-2004).
|
10.g
|
|
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors (Filed herewith).
|
10.h
|
|
Masco Corporation Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated
January 1, 1995, as amended October 1, 2004
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.p of
Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed 3-16-2005).
|
10.i
|
|
Agreement dated as of April 3, 2007 between Richard A.
Manoogian and Masco Corporation (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10 of Mascos Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed 4-9-2007).
|
10.j
|
|
Letter from Masco Corporation to Donald DeMarie regarding
relocation arrangements (Filed herewith).
|
86
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
10.k
|
|
Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated as of
November 27, 2006, between RHJ International SA, Asahi Tec
Corporation and The Principal Company Shareholders Listed on
Schedule I thereto (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.i of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007).
|
10.l
|
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2002, as
amended and restated as of July 19, 2002, by and among
Trimas Corporation, Metaldyne Company LLC, and the Heartland
Entities listed therein and the Other Shareholders named therein
or added as parties thereto from time to time (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.j of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007).
|
10.m
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 31, 2006, to
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2002, as
amended and restated as of July 19, 2002, by and among
Trimas Corporation, Metaldyne Company LLC, Heartland Industrial
Partners, L.P. and the Heartland Entities listed therein and the
parties identified on the signature pages thereto as
Metaldyne Shareholder Parties (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.k of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed
2-27-2007).
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends (Filed herewith).
|
21
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (Filed herewith).
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
relating to Masco Corporations Consolidated Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedule (Filed
herewith).
|
31.a
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(Filed herewith).
|
31.b
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(Filed herewith).
|
32
|
|
Certifications required by
Rule 13a-14(b)
or
Rule 15d-14(b)and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of the United States Code
(Filed herewith).
|
The Company will furnish to its stockholders a copy of any of
the above exhibits not included herein upon the written request
of such stockholder and the payment to the Company of the
reasonable expenses incurred by the Company in furnishing such
copy or copies.
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
MASCO CORPORATION
John G. Sznewajs
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
February 22, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy
Wadhams
Timothy
Wadhams
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer and
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
G. Sznewajs
John
G. Sznewajs
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dennis
W. Archer
Dennis
W. Archer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
G. Denomme
Thomas
G. Denomme
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
A. Dow
Peter
A. Dow
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony
F. Earley, Jr.
Anthony
F. Earley, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Verne
G. Istock
Verne
G. Istock
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
L. Johnston
David
L. Johnston
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
Michael Losh
J.
Michael Losh
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
A. Manoogian
Richard
A. Manoogian
|
|
Executive Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lisa
A. Payne
Lisa
A. Payne
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mary
Ann Van Lokeren
Mary
Ann Van Lokeren
|
|
Director
|
|
|
88
MASCO
CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In Millions)
|
|
Column A
|
|
Column B
|
|
|
Column C
|
|
|
Column D
|
|
|
Column E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts (a)
|
|
|
Deductions (b)
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts, deducted from accounts
receivable in the balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
2005
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Allowance of companies acquired and companies disposed of, net. |
|
(b) |
|
Deductions, representing uncollectible accounts written off,
less recoveries of accounts written off in prior years. |
89
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
|
3
|
.i
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Masco Corporation and
amendments thereto (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.i of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
|
3
|
.ii
|
|
Bylaws of Masco Corporation, as Amended and Restated
June 2, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.ii of Mascos
Form 8-K
filed 6-6-2007).
|
|
4
|
.a.i
|
|
Indenture dated as of December 1, 1982 between Masco
Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,
as successor trustee under agreement originally with Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.a.i of
Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-07) and Directors resolutions establishing
Masco Corporations
|
|
|
|
|
(i) 71/8% Debentures
Due August 15, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.a.i of Mascos 2003
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2004);
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) 6.625% Debentures Due April 15, 2018
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.a.i of
Mascos 2003
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2004);
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) 5.75% Notes Due October 15, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.a.i of
Mascos 2003
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2004); and
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) 73/4% Debentures
Due August 1, 2029 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.a.i of Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed 3-16-2005).
|
|
4
|
.a.ii
|
|
Agreement of Appointment and Acceptance of Successor Trustee
dated as of July 25, 1994 among Masco Corporation, Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York and The First National
Bank of Chicago (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.a.ii of Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed 3-16-2005).
|
|
4
|
.a.iii
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 26, 1994 between
Masco Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,
as successor trustee under agreement originally with The First
National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.a.iii of Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed 3-16-2005).
|
|
4
|
.b.i
|
|
Indenture dated as of February 12, 2001 between Masco
Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
successor trustee under agreement originally with Bank One
Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.b.i of
Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-07) and Directors Resolutions establishing
Masco Corporations
|
|
|
|
|
(i) 57/8% Notes
Due July 15, 2012 (Filed herewith);
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) 61/2% Notes
Due August 15, 2032 (Filed herewith);
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) 4.80% Notes Due June 15, 2015
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.b.i of
Mascos 2nd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed 8-4-2005);
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) 6.125% Notes Due October 3, 2016
(Incorporated by reference to Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007);
|
|
|
|
|
(v) Floating Rate Notes Due 2010 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.b.i of Mascos
Form 10-Q
filed 5-3-2007); and
|
|
|
|
|
(vi) 5.85% Notes Due 2017 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.b.ii of Mascos
Form 10-Q
filed 5-3-2007).
|
|
4
|
.b.ii
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 30, 2006 to the
Indenture dated February 12, 2001 by and among Masco
Corporation and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.b.iii of
Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007).
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
|
4
|
.b.iii
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture between Masco Corporation and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as
trustee dated as of December 23, 2004 (including form of
Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Note, Series B due 2031)
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
Mascos
Form 8-K
filed
12-23-2004).
|
|
4
|
.c
|
|
U.S. $2 billion
5-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004
among Masco Corporation and Masco Europe, S.á r.l. as
borrowers, the banks party thereto, as lenders, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as Joint
Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners and Citibank, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as
Documentation Agent, and Bank One, N.A. (Main Office Chicago),
as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4 of Mascos
Form 8-K
filed
11-12-2004),
as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated February 10, 2006
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of Mascos
Form 8-K
filed February 15, 2006).
|
|
Note:
|
|
|
Other instruments, notes or extracts from agreements defining
the rights of holders of long-term debt of Masco Corporation or
its subsidiaries have not been filed since(i) in each case the
total amount of long-term debt permitted thereunder does not
exceed 10 percent of Masco Corporations consolidated
assets, and (ii) such instruments, notes and extracts will
be furnished by Masco Corporation to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
|
|
Note:
|
|
|
Exhibits 10.a through 10.j constitute the management
contracts and executive compensatory plans or arrangements in
which certain of the Directors and executive officers of the
Company participate.
|
|
10
|
.a
|
|
Masco Corporation 1991 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (as
amended and restated October 26, 2006) Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.a of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed
2-27-2007)
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Forms of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for
awards prior to January 1, 2005 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.a.i of Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-04-2004)
and for awards on and after January 1, 2005
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
Mascos
Form 8-K
filed 1-06-2005);
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Forms of Restoration Stock Option
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.a.ii of
Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-4-2004);
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Forms of Stock Option Grant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.a.iii of Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-4-2004);
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) Forms of Stock Option Grant for Non-Employee Directors
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.a.iv of
Mascos 3rd Quarter
Form 10-Q
filed
11-4-2004);
and
|
|
|
|
|
(v) Forms of amendment to Award Agreements (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.a of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
|
10
|
.b.i
|
|
Masco Corporation 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (as
amended and restated October 26, 2006) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.b if Mascos 2006
Form 10-k
filed
2-27-2007)
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Form of Restricted Stock Award (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.b of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006);
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Form of Stock Option Grant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.b of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006);
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Form of Restoration Stock Option (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.b of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006); and
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) Form of Stock Option Grant for Non-Employee Directors
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.b of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
|
10
|
.b.ii
|
|
Non-Employee Directors Equity Program under Mascos 2005
Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (Filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement
(Filed herewith); and
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement (Filed
herewith).
|
|
10
|
.c
|
|
Forms of Masco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement and
Disability Plan (Filed herewith).
|
|
10
|
.d
|
|
Masco Corporation 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (as
amended and restated October 27, 2005) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.e of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed
3-2-2006).
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.e of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006);
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Form of Stock Option Grant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.e of Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006); and
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Form of amendment to Award Agreements
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.e of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
|
10
|
.e
|
|
Other compensatory arrangements for executive officers
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.f of
Mascos 2005
Form 10-K
filed 3-2-2006).
|
|
10
|
.f
|
|
Masco Corporation 2004 Restricted Stock Award Program
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.b of
Mascos
Form 10-Q
filed 8-5-2004).
|
|
10
|
.g
|
|
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors (Filed herewith).
|
|
10
|
.h
|
|
Masco Corporation Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan dated
January 1, 1995, as amended October 1, 2004
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.p of
Mascos 2004
Form 10-K
filed
3-16-2005).
|
|
10
|
.i
|
|
Agreement dated as of April 3, 2007 between Richard A.
Manoogian and Masco Corporation (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10 of Mascos Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed 4-9-2007).
|
|
10
|
.j
|
|
Letter from Masco Corporation to Donald DeMarie regarding
relocation arrangements (Filed herewith).
|
|
10
|
.k
|
|
Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated as of
November 27, 2006, between RHJ International SA, Asahi Tec
Corporation and The Principal Company Shareholders Listed on
Schedule I thereto (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.i of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed 2-27-2007).
|
|
10
|
.l
|
|
Shareholders Agreement dated, as of June 6, 2002, as
amended and restated as of July 19, 2002, by and among
Trimas Corporation, Metaldyne Company LLC, and the Heartland
Entities listed therein and the Other Shareholders named therein
or added as parties thereto from time to time (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.j of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed
2-27-2007).
|
|
10
|
.m
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 31, 2006, to
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2002, as
amended and restated as of July 19, 2002, by and among
Trimas Corporation, Metaldyne Company LLC, Heartland Industrial
Partners, L.P. and the Heartland Entities listed therein and the
parties identified on the signature pages thereto as
Metaldyne Shareholder Parties (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.k of Mascos 2006
Form 10-K
filed
2-27-2007).
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends (Filed herewith).
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (Filed herewith).
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
relating to Masco Corporations Consolidated Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedule (Filed
herewith).
|
|
31
|
.a
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(Filed herewith).
|
|
31
|
.b
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
(Filed herewith).
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certifications required by
Rule 13a-14(b)
or
Rule 15d-14(b)and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of the United States Code
(Filed herewith).
|
93