e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-11953
Willbros Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(Jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
30-0513080
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
4400 Post Oak Parkway
Suite 1000
Houston, TX 77027
Telephone No.: 713-403-8000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of principal executive offices of registrant)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o
No þ
The
number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.05 par
value, outstanding as of October
28, 2011 was 48,547,302.
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
2
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
68,333 |
|
|
$ |
134,150 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
345,441 |
|
|
|
305,293 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
36,266 |
|
|
|
23,757 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
37,944 |
|
|
|
54,753 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
10,108 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,146 |
|
|
|
11,004 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
48,995 |
|
|
|
61,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
555,491 |
|
|
|
600,385 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
180,653 |
|
|
|
219,878 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
67,632 |
|
|
|
211,753 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
183,848 |
|
|
|
195,457 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
16,570 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
44,929 |
|
|
|
41,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,036,010 |
|
|
$ |
1,285,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
253,884 |
|
|
$ |
188,386 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
21,147 |
|
|
|
14,927 |
|
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility |
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
71,594 |
|
Current portion of government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,575 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
32,526 |
|
|
|
27,548 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
375,859 |
|
|
|
321,584 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
230,569 |
|
|
|
305,227 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
3,617 |
|
|
|
5,741 |
|
Contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Long-term liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
15,226 |
|
|
|
76,020 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
43,346 |
|
|
|
38,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
673,262 |
|
|
|
762,262 |
|
Contingencies and commitments (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share, 70,000,000 shares
authorized and 49,356,665 shares issued at September 30,
2011 (48,546,817 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
678,304 |
|
|
|
674,173 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(321,596 |
) |
|
|
(161,824 |
) |
Treasury
stock at cost, 789,693 shares at September 30, 2011
(629,320 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
(10,799 |
) |
|
|
(10,045 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
17,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Willbros Group, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
361,847 |
|
|
|
522,669 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
362,748 |
|
|
|
523,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,036,010 |
|
|
$ |
1,285,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
466,103 |
|
|
$ |
403,959 |
|
|
$ |
1,253,325 |
|
|
$ |
789,255 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
415,695 |
|
|
|
343,898 |
|
|
|
1,139,311 |
|
|
|
678,894 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,918 |
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
11,752 |
|
|
|
5,826 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
32,668 |
|
|
|
34,009 |
|
|
|
102,162 |
|
|
|
78,455 |
|
Settlement of project dispute |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582,544 |
|
|
|
356,435 |
|
|
|
1,385,724 |
|
|
|
739,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(116,441 |
) |
|
|
47,524 |
|
|
|
(132,399 |
) |
|
|
49,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(11,029 |
) |
|
|
(11,875 |
) |
|
|
(36,275 |
) |
|
|
(16,084 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,290 |
) |
|
|
(11,251 |
) |
|
|
(40,683 |
) |
|
|
(14,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(127,731 |
) |
|
|
36,273 |
|
|
|
(173,082 |
) |
|
|
34,889 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(28,321 |
) |
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
(41,759 |
) |
|
|
(3,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(99,410 |
) |
|
|
38,411 |
|
|
|
(131,323 |
) |
|
|
38,702 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision
(benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(11,563 |
) |
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
|
|
(27,571 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(110,973 |
) |
|
|
35,701 |
|
|
|
(158,894 |
) |
|
|
31,635 |
|
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Willbros
Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(111,269 |
) |
|
$ |
35,408 |
|
|
$ |
(159,772 |
) |
|
$ |
30,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income attributable to Willbros
Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(99,706 |
) |
|
$ |
38,118 |
|
|
$ |
(132,201 |
) |
|
$ |
37,800 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(11,563 |
) |
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
|
|
(27,571 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Willbros
Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(111,269 |
) |
|
$ |
35,408 |
|
|
$ |
(159,772 |
) |
|
$ |
30,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share attributable to Company
shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
(2.79 |
) |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
(3.37 |
) |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share attributable to
Company Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
(2.79 |
) |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2.34 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(3.37 |
) |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
47,533,967 |
|
|
|
46,997,431 |
|
|
|
47,429,059 |
|
|
|
41,651,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
47,533,967 |
|
|
|
52,154,029 |
|
|
|
47,429,059 |
|
|
|
44,890,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(158,894 |
) |
|
$ |
31,635 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
27,571 |
|
|
|
7,067 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
50,629 |
|
|
|
33,150 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout liability |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
7,103 |
|
|
|
6,489 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(49,384 |
) |
|
|
(7,437 |
) |
Settlement of project dispute |
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Other non-cash |
|
|
7,053 |
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(51,229 |
) |
|
|
(93,768 |
) |
Payments on government fines |
|
|
(6,575 |
) |
|
|
(6,575 |
) |
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
(12,535 |
) |
|
|
7,054 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
18,302 |
|
|
|
15,682 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
62,694 |
|
|
|
13,373 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
8,911 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
6,218 |
|
|
|
5,339 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(3,915 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
35,758 |
|
|
|
(6,217 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
(27,493 |
) |
|
|
16,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,265 |
|
|
|
10,532 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired and earnout |
|
|
9,402 |
|
|
|
(421,182 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
33,045 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(9,302 |
) |
|
|
(13,070 |
) |
Maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,755 |
|
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
33,145 |
|
|
|
(417,362 |
) |
Cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
7,739 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
40,884 |
|
|
|
(416,085 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from term loan issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,000 |
|
Proceeds from stock issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,078 |
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility |
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital leases |
|
|
(8,204 |
) |
|
|
(5,579 |
) |
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(65,725 |
) |
|
|
(8,326 |
) |
Payments on term loan |
|
|
(94,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments to reacquire common stock |
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
(894 |
) |
Costs of debt issues |
|
|
(4,935 |
) |
|
|
(16,384 |
) |
Stock-based compensation tax deficiency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(956 |
) |
Dividend distribution to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
(115,788 |
) |
|
|
306,997 |
|
Cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used) in financing activities |
|
|
(115,793 |
) |
|
|
306,886 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(66,897 |
) |
|
|
(97,887 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations at beginning of period |
|
|
134,150 |
|
|
|
196,903 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at beginning of period |
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
141,101 |
|
|
|
198,684 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
74,204 |
|
|
|
100,797 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at end of period |
|
|
(5,871 |
) |
|
|
(21,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations at end of period |
|
$ |
68,333 |
|
|
$ |
78,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
23,955 |
|
|
$ |
9,007 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
$ |
3,180 |
|
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial contingent earnout liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,340 |
|
Prepaid insurance obtained by note payable |
|
$ |
6,829 |
|
|
$ |
11,687 |
|
Equipment received through like-kind exchange |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,355 |
|
Equipment surrendered through like-kind exchange |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. The Company and Basis of Presentation
Willbros Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (the Company, Willbros
or WGI), is a global contractor specializing in energy infrastructure, serving the oil, gas,
petrochemical and power industries. The Companys offerings
include: engineering, procurement and
construction (either individually or as an integrated EPC
service offering); ongoing maintenance;
and other specialty services. The Companys principal markets for continuing operations are the
United States, Canada, and Oman. The Company obtains its work through competitive bidding and
through negotiations with prospective clients. Contract values range from several thousand dollars
to several hundred million dollars and contract durations range from a few weeks to more than two
years.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010, which has been
derived from audited consolidated financial statements, and the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2010 and 2011, have been prepared pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, certain
information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
those rules and regulations. However, the Company believes the presentations and disclosures herein
are adequate to make the information not misleading. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys December 31, 2010 audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
reflect all adjustments necessary to fairly state the financial position as of September 30, 2011,
and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for all interim periods presented. The
results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results and cash flows to be achieved for the full year.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include certain estimates and assumptions made
by management. These estimates and assumptions relate to the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the dates of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported
amounts of revenue and expense during those periods. Significant items subject to such estimates
and assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and parts
and supplies inventories; quantification of amounts recorded for contingencies, tax accruals and
certain other accrued liabilities; valuation allowances for accounts receivable and deferred income
tax assets; and revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting,
including estimates of progress toward completion and estimates of gross profit or loss accrual on
contracts in progress. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other
assumptions that it believes to be relevant under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
As discussed in Note 17 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition
Services Agreement, the Company has disposed of certain assets and operations and intends to
dispose of others that are together classified as discontinued operations (collectively the
Discontinued Operations). Accordingly, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect
these operations as Discontinued Operations in all periods presented. The disclosures in the Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements relate to continuing operations except as
otherwise indicated.
The carrying value of financial instruments does not materially differ from fair value.
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to
conform to the current period financial statement presentation. These reclassifications relate
primarily to the classification of the Companys Libya operations and the Companys Canadian
cross-country pipeline construction operations as discontinued operations as determined during the
fourth quarter of 2010, and the second quarter of 2011, respectively.
Historically, the Company classified cash flows associated with government obligations,
specifically the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC, as cash flows from
financing activities based on the presence of financing elements in the final settlement agreements
with these entities. However, as these obligations also possess elements of operating activities,
the Company has determined that it will classify the related cash flows as cash flows from
operating activities. Accordingly, prior period amounts were reclassified in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows to conform to the current year presentation. See Note 7 Government
Obligations for additional information pertaining to these obligations.
6
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. The Company and Basis of Presentation (continued)
Out-of-Period Adjustments The Company
recorded out-of-period adjustments during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 to correct errors primarily related
to income taxes and revenue. The tax adjustments related to an error in the calculation of the income tax provision and over-accrual of
interest associated with estimated tax contingencies. Revenue was overstated as a result of the use of incorrect data for two contracts
in the Companys Downstream Oil & Gas segment. The net impact of these adjustments had no impact to pre-tax loss and was a decrease to
net loss in the amount of $600 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The net impact of these adjustments was an increase to
pre-tax loss in the amount of $1,208 and a decrease to net loss in the amount of $85, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The Company
does not believe these adjustments are material to its unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months or nine
months ended September 30, 2011 after considering its expected 2011 annual financial results, nor does it believe such items are material
to any of its prior annual or quarterly financial statements.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amendments to disclosure
requirements for common fair value measurements. These amendments, effective for the interim and
annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), result in a
common definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement and disclosure between U.S.
GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Consequently, the amendments change
some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The implementation of this
amended accounting guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued a revised standard on goodwill impairment, which is
intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing both
public and nonpublic entities with the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine
whether further impairment testing is necessary. The revised standard is effective for annual and
interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.
However, an entity can choose to early adopt the revised standard even if its annual test date is
before September 15, 2011 (the date on which the revised standard was issued), provided that the
entity has not yet issued its financial statements for the period that includes its annual test
date. The implementation of this revised standard is not expected to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued an update that requires employers that participate in
multiemployer pension plans to provide additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The
amended disclosures provide users with more detailed information about an employers involvement in
multiemployer pension plans and are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2011. The
Company is currently evaluating the disclosure requirements of this update.
3. Acquisition
On July 1, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding stock
of InfrastruX Group, Inc. (InfrastruX) for a purchase price of $476,398, inclusive of certain
working capital adjustments. The Company paid $362,980 in cash, a portion of which was used to
retire InfrastruX indebtedness and pay InfrastruX transaction expenses, and issued 7,923,308 shares
of the Companys common stock to the shareholders of InfrastruX. Cash paid was comprised of $62,980
in cash on hand and $300,000 from a new term loan facility. The acquisition was completed pursuant
to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated March 11, 2010.
InfrastruX was a privately held firm based in Seattle, Washington and provided design,
construction, maintenance, engineering and other infrastructure services to the utility industry
across the U.S. market.
7
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
3. Acquisition (continued)
Consideration
Total consideration transferred in acquiring InfrastruX is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from newly issued term loan facility |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
Cash on hand |
|
|
62,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash consideration |
|
|
362,980 |
|
Issuance of WGI common stock |
|
|
58,078 |
(1) |
Contingent consideration |
|
|
55,340 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
Total Consideration |
|
$ |
476,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 7,923,308 shares issued, which have been
valued at the closing price of Company stock on July 1, 2010, the acquisition date. |
|
(2) |
|
Estimated as of acquisition announcement based on a
probability estimate of InfrastruXs EBITDA achievements during the earnout period.
See Note 15 Fair Value Measurements. |
This transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting which
requires that, among other things, assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at their
fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the consideration transferred over those fair
values is recorded as goodwill. The allocation of purchase price to acquired assets and
liabilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,278 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
124,856 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
4,501 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
39,565 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
156,160 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
168,409 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
175,420 |
(3) |
Other long-term assets |
|
|
21,924 |
|
Liabilities assumed: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(97,985 |
) |
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
(4,977 |
) |
Vendor related debt |
|
|
(2,761 |
) |
Deferred income taxes and other tax liabilities |
|
|
(95,902 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(22,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired |
|
$ |
476,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes post acquisition purchase price adjustment
of $9,402, related to settlement of working capital balance in the first quarter of
2011. |
The Company has consolidated InfrastruX in its financial results as the Utility T&D
segment from the date of the acquisition.
Pro Forma Impact of the Acquisition
The following unaudited supplemental pro forma results present consolidated information as if
the acquisition had been completed as of January 1, 2010. The pro forma results include: (i) the
amortization associated with an estimate of the acquired intangible assets, (ii) interest expense
associated with debt used to fund a portion of the acquisition and reduced interest income
associated with cash used to fund a portion of the acquisition, (iii) the impact of certain fair
value adjustments such as additional depreciation expense for adjustments to property, plant and
equipment and reduction to interest expense for adjustments to debt, and (iv) costs directly
related to acquiring InfrastruX. The pro forma results do not include any potential synergies, cost
savings or other expected benefits of the acquisition. Accordingly, the pro forma results should
not be considered indicative of the results that would have occurred if the acquisition and related
borrowings had been consummated as of January 1, 2010, nor are they indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,102,333 |
|
Net income attributable to Company shareholders |
|
$ |
12,008 |
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
4. Contracts in Progress
Contract costs and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts arise when
revenues have been recorded, but the amounts cannot be billed under the terms of the contracts.
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income arise when billed amounts exceed revenues
recorded. Amounts are billable to customers upon various measures of performance, including
achievement of certain milestones, completion of specified units or completion of the contract.
Also included in contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts are
amounts the Company seeks to collect from customers for change orders approved in scope but not for
price associated with that scope change (unapproved change orders). Revenue for these amounts is
recorded equal to cost incurred when realization of price approval is probable and the estimated
amount is equal to or greater than the Companys cost related to the unapproved change order.
Unapproved
change orders involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that revisions to the
estimated recoverable amounts of recorded unapproved change orders may be made in the near-term. If
the Company does not successfully resolve these matters, revenues that have been previously
recorded may be required to be reduced.
8
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Contracts in Progress (continued)
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed and related amounts billed as of September
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost incurred on contracts in progress |
|
$ |
689,537 |
|
|
$ |
701,974 |
|
Recognized income |
|
|
68,475 |
|
|
|
139,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758,012 |
|
|
|
841,895 |
|
Progress billings and advance payments |
|
|
(742,893 |
) |
|
|
(833,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,119 |
|
|
$ |
8,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
$ |
36,266 |
|
|
$ |
23,757 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
(21,147 |
) |
|
|
(14,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,119 |
|
|
$ |
8,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed includes $2,493 and $3,216 at September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, on completed contracts.
The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to retainage provisions in certain
contracts will be due upon completion of the contracts and acceptance by the customer. Based on the
Companys experience with similar contracts in recent years, the majority of the retention balances
at each balance sheet date will be collected within the next twelve months. Retainage balances at
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, were approximately $26,149 and $14,674, respectively, and
are included in accounts receivable.
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2011,
by business segment, are detailed below:
9
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream Oil & Gas |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Impairment Reserves |
|
|
Total, Net |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,177 |
|
Reorganization of reporting structure |
|
|
8,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,353 |
|
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
21,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream Oil & Gas |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Impairment Reserves |
|
|
Total, Net |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
136,049 |
|
|
|
(122,295 |
) |
|
$ |
13,754 |
|
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
136,049 |
|
|
|
(122,295 |
) |
|
$ |
13,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility T&D |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Impairment Reserves |
|
|
Total, Net |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
184,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184,822 |
|
Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
(9,402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,402 |
) |
Reorganization of reporting structure |
|
|
(8,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,353 |
) |
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,263 |
) |
|
|
(134,263 |
) |
Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
167,067 |
|
|
|
(134,263 |
) |
|
$ |
32,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under U.S. GAAP, a company has up to one year subsequent to closing an acquisition to
perform its annual testing for goodwill impairment, unless events occur or circumstances change at
an earlier date that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its
carrying value. On March 11, 2010, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement to acquire InfrastruX. The Company closed on the acquisition, which created its Utility
T&D segment, on July 1, 2010. As such, the Company performed its annual testing for goodwill
impairment for the Utility T&D segment in the third quarter of 2011. The impairment test consists
of company estimates of the current fair value of the segment, compared to the segments carrying
amount.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company recorded an estimated impairment charge of $134,263 related to
its Utility T&D segment which reduced its consolidated
goodwill to $67,632 at September 30, 2011.
Given that the Companys step two analysis for the segment has
not been finalized, the $134,263 impairment charge represents the Companys best
estimate at September 30, 2011.
The Companys original
March 2010 growth projections in the electric transmission and distribution business have not
materialized. The continued slow economic recovery, exacerbated by the recent recurrence of
instability in the world financial markets, and the hard-hit U.S. housing sector, have resulted in
a reassessment of future growth rates and led to a reduction in
the outlook for expected future cash
flows in this segment.
The initial purchase price allocation to acquired
assets and liabilities for the InfrastruX acquisition included a $55,340 liability for the estimated fair value of the 2010, 2011 and
combined two-year earnout provisions in the Merger Agreement. At the time of the purchase price allocation, recognition of this $55,340 liability
resulted in goodwill increasing by a corresponding amount. No payments have occurred or are expected to occur; and accordingly, the
liability was reduced to zero as of September 30, 2011. Reductions to the liability resulted in corresponding increases in operating
income and net income of $4,000 and $10,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $45,340 during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The Companys weighted average cost of capital used for the original purchase price valuation has
increased 1.6 percentage points from 14.4 percent at the time of the InfrastruX acquisition to 16.0
percent on July 1, 2011. The primary driver of the percentage increase was related to higher levels
of risk associated with increased leverage. The Companys fair value analysis is heavily (65
percent) weighted on discounted cash flows.
The Companys fair value analysis is
supported by a weighting of the following three generally accepted valuation approaches:
Income Approach
discounted cash flows of future benefit streams;
Market Approach
public comparable company multiples of sales and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); and
Market Approach multiples
generated from recent transactions comparable in size, nature and industry.
These approaches include numerous assumptions with respect to future
circumstances, such as industry and/or local market conditions that might directly impact operations in the future, and are, therefore,
uncertain. These approaches are utilized to develop a range of fair values and a weighted average of these approaches are utilized to
determine the best fair value estimate within that range.
Income Approach Discounted Cash Flows.
This valuation approach derives a present value of the reporting units projected future annual cash flows over the next 8 years and
the present residual value of the segment. The Company uses a variety of underlying assumptions to estimate these future cash flows,
including assumptions relating to future economic market conditions, sales volumes, costs and expenses and capital expenditures.
These assumptions are dependent on regional market conditions, including competitive position, degree of vertical integration,
supply and demand for materials and other industry conditions. The discount rate used in the Income Approach, specifically, the
weighted average cost of capital, used in the Companys analysis during the third quarter was 16 percent. The revenue compounded
annual growth rates used in the Income Approach varied from 3 percent to 20 percent. The Companys EBITDA margins derived from these
underlying assumptions varied between approximately 9 percent and 13 percent. The terminal growth rate used was 3 percent.
Market Approach Multiples of Sales and
EBITDA. This valuation approach utilizes publicly traded construction companies enterprise values, as compared to their recent sales
and EBITDA information. The Company used an average EBITDA multiple of 5.5 times in determining this market approach metric. This
multiple is used as a valuation metric to its most recent financial performance. The Company used EBITDA as an indicator of demand
because it is a widely used key indicator of the cash generating capacity of similar companies.
Market Approach Comparisons of Recent
Transactions. This valuation approach uses publicly available information regarding recent third-party sales transactions in our
industry to derive a valuation metric of the targets respective enterprise values over their EBITDA amounts. The Company utilizes
this valuation metric with its most recent financial performance to derive a what if sales transaction comparable fair value estimate.
The Company selected these valuation approaches
because it believes the combination of these approaches, along with its best judgment regarding underlying assumptions and estimates,
provides the Company with the best estimate of fair value. The Company believes these valuation approaches are proven and appropriate
for its industry and widely accepted by investors. The estimated fair value would change if the Companys weighting assumptions under
the three valuation approaches were materially modified. The Company weighted the Income Approach at 65 percent, the Market
Approach Multiples of Sales and EBITDA at 25 percent and the Market Approach Comparison of Recent Transactions at 10 percent.
This weighting was utilized to reflect fair value in current market conditions.
The Companys valuation model utilizes
assumptions, which represent its best estimate of future events, but would be sensitive to positive or negative changes in each of
the underlying assumptions as well as an alternative weighting of valuation methods, which would result in a potentially higher or
lower goodwill impairment charge. The Company can provide no assurance that future goodwill impairments will not occur.
During the third quarter of 2010,
in connection with the completion of the preliminary forecast for 2011, it became evident that a goodwill impairment at Downstream Oil & Gas was
probable. As a result, a preliminary step one analysis for that segment was performed. Using a
discounted cash flow analysis supported by comparative market multiples to determine the fair value
of the segment versus its carrying value, a range of likely impairment was generated. The low end
of this range was approximately $12,000. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$12,000 during the third quarter of 2010.
10
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
The changes in the carrying amounts of intangible assets for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Trademark / |
|
|
Non-compete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Tradename |
|
|
Agreements |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
176,213 |
|
|
$ |
13,249 |
|
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
195,457 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(10,121 |
) |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
(11,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
166,092 |
|
|
$ |
12,338 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
4,813 |
|
|
$ |
183,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Amortization Period |
|
12.6 yrs |
|
8.6 yrs |
|
2.8 yrs |
|
8.8 yrs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
lives, which range from 5 to 15 years.
Amortization expense included in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was
$11,752. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2011 and each of the subsequent five
years and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year: |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
2012 |
|
|
15,638 |
|
2013 |
|
|
15,638 |
|
2014 |
|
|
15,528 |
|
2015 |
|
|
15,418 |
|
2016 |
|
|
15,418 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
102,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization |
|
$ |
183,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
6. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
149,197 |
|
|
$ |
90,617 |
|
Payroll and payroll liabilities |
|
|
42,796 |
|
|
|
40,945 |
|
Provision for loss contract costs |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
29,225 |
|
|
|
27,524 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
|
27,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
253,884 |
|
|
$ |
188,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Government Obligations
Government obligations represent amounts due to government entities, specifically the DOJ and
the SEC, in final settlement of the investigations involving violations of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (the FCPA) and violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). These investigations stemmed primarily from
the Companys former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria. In May 2008, the Company reached
final settlement agreements with the DOJ and the SEC to settle their investigations. As previously
disclosed, the agreements provided for an aggregate payment of $32,300, including $22,000 in fines
to the DOJ related to the FCPA violations, consisting of $10,000 paid on signing and $4,000
annually for three years thereafter, with no interest due on unpaid amounts, and $10,300 to the
SEC, consisting of $8,900 of profit disgorgement and $1,400 of pre-judgment interest, payable in
four equal annual installments of $2,575 with the first installment paid on signing and annually
for three years thereafter. Post-judgment interest was payable on the outstanding $7,725.
In May 2008, the Company paid $12,575 of the aggregate obligation, which consisted of the
initial $10,000 payment to the DOJ, and the first installment of $2,575 to the SEC, inclusive of
all pre-judgment interest. In 2009 and 2010, the Company paid $6,575 of the aggregated obligation
each year, which consisted of the $4,000 annual installment to the DOJ and the $2,575 annual
installment to the SEC, inclusive of all pre-judgment interest.
In May 2011, the Company paid the remaining related aggregated obligation of $6,575,
consisting of $4,000 and $2,575 to the DOJ and SEC, respectively, and
in October 2011 paid $118, which completed payment of the post-judgment interest owed under the settlement agreements. All sums due under the settlement agreements have now been paid in full.
8. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Term loan, net of unamortized
discount of $9,012 and $16,126 |
|
$ |
195,559 |
|
|
$ |
283,124 |
|
Borrowings under credit facility |
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.75% convertible senior notes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,675 |
|
6.5% senior convertible notes, net |
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
32,050 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
|
11,107 |
|
Other obligations |
|
|
3,481 |
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
297,097 |
|
|
|
387,928 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(62,911 |
) |
|
|
(76,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net |
|
$ |
234,186 |
|
|
$ |
310,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Credit Facility
The Company entered into a new credit agreement dated June 30, 2010 (the 2010 Credit
Agreement), among Willbros United States Holdings, Inc. (WUSH), a subsidiary of the Company
(formerly known as Willbros
USA, Inc.) as borrower, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as Guarantors, the lenders
from time to time party thereto (the Lenders), Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
(Crédit Agricole), as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, Issuing Bank, Revolving Credit
Facility Sole Lead Arranger, Sole Bookrunner and Participating Lender, UBS Securities LLC (UBS),
as Syndication Agent, Natixis, The Bank of Nova Scotia and
12
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Long-term Debt (continued)
Capital One, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, and Crédit Agricole and UBS as Term Loan Facility
Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners. The 2010 Credit Agreement consists of a four year,
$300,000 term loan facility (Term Loan) maturing in July 2014 and a three year revolving credit
facility of $175,000 maturing in July 2013 (the Revolving Credit Facility or the 2010 Credit
Facility) and replaced the Companys existing three-year $150,000 senior secured credit facility,
which was scheduled to expire in November 2010. The proceeds from the Term Loan were used to pay
part of the cash portion of the merger consideration payable in connection with the Companys
acquisition of InfrastruX.
The initial aggregate amount of commitments for the Revolving Credit Facility totaled
$175,000, including an accordion feature enabling the Company to increase the size of the facility
by an incremental $75,000 if it is in compliance with certain terms of the Revolving Credit
Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility is available for letters of credit and for revolving loans,
which may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Company is able to
utilize 100 percent of the Revolving Credit Facility to obtain letters of credit and will have a
sublimit of $150,000 for revolving loans.
On March 4, 2011, the 2010 Credit Agreement was amended to allow the Company to make certain
dispositions of equipment, real estate and business units. In most cases, proceeds from these
dispositions would be required to pay down the existing Term Loan made pursuant to the 2010 Credit
Agreement. Financial covenants and associated definitions, such as Consolidated EBITDA, were also
amended to permit the Company to carry out its business plan and to clarify the treatment of
certain items. Further, the Company has agreed to limit its revolver borrowings to $25,000, with
the exception of proceeds from revolving borrowings used to make any payments in respect of both
the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes (the 2.75% Notes) and the 6.5% Senior Convertible Notes (the
6.5% Notes), until its maximum total leverage ratio is 3.00 to 1.00 or less. This amendment does
not change the limit on obtaining letters of credit. The amendment also modifies the definition of
Excess Cash Flow to include proceeds from the TransCanada Pipeline Arbitration, which required
the Company to use a portion of such proceeds to further pay
down the existing Term Loan. For prepayments made with Net Debt Proceeds or Equity Issuance
Proceeds (as those terms are defined in the 2010 Credit Agreement), the amendment requires a
prepayment premium of 4% of the principal amount of the Term Loans to be paid before December 31,
2011 and 1% of the principal amount of the Term Loans to be paid on or after December 31, 2011 but
before December 31, 2012. Premiums for prepayments made with proceeds other than Net Debt Proceeds
or Equity Issuance Proceeds remain the same as set forth under the 2010 Credit Agreement.
Subsequent to this amendment, on March 15, 2011, the Company borrowed $59,357 under the
Revolving Credit Facility to fund the purchase of its 2.75% Notes. These borrowings are included
in Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility at September 30, 2011.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company made accelerated payments of
$94,679 against its Term Loan. Certain of these payments resulted in the recognition of a $4,124
loss on early extinguishment of debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. These losses
represent the write-off of unamortized Original Issue Discount and financing costs inclusive of
early payment fees.
Interest payable under the 2010 Credit Agreement is determined by the loan type. Base rate
loans require annual interest payments equal to the adjusted base rate plus the applicable margin
for base rate loans. The adjusted base rate is equal to the highest of (a) the Prime Rate in
effect for such day, (b) the sum of the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect for such day plus
1/2 of 1.0% per annum, (c) the sum of the Prime, London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or
Eurocurrency Rate in effect for such day with a maturity of one month plus 1.0% per annum and (d)
with respect to Term Loans only is 3.0% per annum. The applicable margin for base rate loans is
6.50% per annum for Term Loans and a fixed margin based on the Companys leverage ratio for
revolving advances. Eurocurrency rate loans require annual interest payments equal to the
Eurocurrency Rate plus the applicable margin for Eurocurrency rate loans. The Eurocurrency Rate is
equal to the LIBOR rate in effect for such day, subject to a 2.0% floor for Term Loans only. The
applicable margin for Eurocurrency rate loans is 7.50% per annum for Term Loans and a fixed margin
based on the Companys leverage ratio for revolving advances. As of September 30, 2011, the
interest rate on the Term Loan (currently a Eurocurrency rate loan) was 9.5%. Interest payments on
the Eurocurrency rate loans are payable in arrears on the last day of such interest period, and, in
the case of interest periods of greater than three months, on each business day which occurs at
three month intervals from the first day of such interest period. Interest payments on base rate
loans are
13
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Long-term Debt (continued)
payable quarterly in arrears on the last business day of each calendar quarter. Additionally, the
Company is required under the terms of the 2010 Credit Agreement to maintain in effect one or more
hedging arrangements to fix or otherwise limit the interest cost with respect to at least 50
percent of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan.
The Term Loan was issued at a discount such that the funded portion was equal to 94 percent of
the principal amount of the Term Loan. Accordingly, the Company recognized an $18,000 discount on
the Term Loan that is being amortized over the four-year term of the Term Loan.
The 2010 Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of WUSH, the Company
and the other Guarantors. The 2010 Credit Agreement prohibits the Company from paying cash
dividends on its common stock.
The 2010 Credit Agreement includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including:
|
|
|
Maintenance of a minimum interest coverage ratio, as defined in the 2010 Credit
Agreement, of at least 2.00 to 1.00. |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance of a maximum total leverage ratio, as defined under the 2010 Credit
Agreement, not to exceed 5.00 to 1.00. |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance of a minimum tangible net worth requirement of $240,000, as defined under
the 2010 Credit Agreement, plus 50% of consolidated net income plus 75% of equity
issuance proceeds plus 75% of the increase in stockholders equity after the conversion of
the 2.75% Notes and the 6.5% Notes. |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on capital expenditures (greater of $70,000 or 25% of EBITDA). |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on indebtedness. |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on liens. |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on certain asset sales and dispositions. |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on certain acquisitions and asset purchases if certain liquidity levels are
not maintained. |
A default under the 2010 Credit Agreement may be triggered by events such as a failure to
comply with financial covenants or other covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement; a failure to
make payments when due under the 2010 Credit Agreement; a failure to make payments when due in
respect of, or a failure to perform obligations relating to, debt obligations in excess of $15,000;
a change of control of the Company; and certain insolvency proceedings. A default under the 2010
Credit Agreement would permit Crédit Agricole and the lenders to terminate their commitment to make
cash advances or issue letters of credit, require the immediate repayment of any outstanding cash
advances with interest and require the cash collateralization of outstanding letter of credit
obligations. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the
2010 Credit Agreement.
In addition, any material adverse change could restrict the
Companys ability to borrow under the 2010 Credit Agreement and could also be deemed an event of default under the 2010 Credit
Agreement. A material adverse change is defined as a change in the Companys business, results of operations, properties or
condition that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect, as defined in the 2010 Credit Agreement.
Incurred unamortized debt issue costs associated with the 2010 Credit Agreement are $11,491 as
of September 30, 2011. These debt issue costs are included in Other assets at September 30,
2011. These costs will be amortized to interest expense over the three and four-year terms of the
Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan, respectively.
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
In December 2005, the Company completed a private placement of $65,000 aggregate principal
amount of its 6.5% Notes, pursuant to a purchase agreement (the Purchase Agreement). During the
first quarter of 2006, the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes exercised their options to purchase
an additional $19,500 aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes. The primary offering and the
purchase option of the 6.5% Notes totaled $84,500.
The 6.5% Notes are governed by an indenture by and among the Company, as issuer, WUSH, as
guarantor, and Bank of Texas, N.A. (as successor to the original trustee), as Trustee (the
Indenture), and were issued under the Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and the initial
purchasers of the 6.5% Notes (the Purchasers), in a transaction exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act. The 6.5% Notes
are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion rate of 56.9606 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes representing a conversion price of approximately
$17.56 per share. If
14
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Long-term Debt (continued)
all notes had been converted to common stock at September 30, 2011, 1,825,587 shares would have
been issuable based on the principal amount of the 6.5% Notes that remain outstanding, subject to
adjustment in certain circumstances. The 6.5% Notes are general senior unsecured obligations.
Interest is due semi-annually on June 15 and December 15.
The 6.5% Notes mature on December 15, 2012 unless the notes are repurchased or converted
earlier. The Company does not have the right to redeem the 6.5% Notes prior to maturity. Upon
maturity, the principal amount plus the accrued interest through the day prior to the maturity date
is payable only in cash. The 6.5% Notes remain outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and continue to
be subject to the terms and conditions of the Indenture governing the 6.5% Notes. An aggregate
principal amount of $32,050 remains outstanding (net of $0 discount) and has been classified as
long-term and included within Long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30,
2011. The holders of the 6.5% Notes have the right to require the Company to purchase the 6.5%
Notes for cash upon the occurrence of a Fundamental Change, as defined in the Indenture. In
addition to the amounts described above, the Company will be required to pay a make-whole premium
to the holders of the 6.5% Notes who elect to convert their notes into the Companys common stock
in connection with a Fundamental Change. The make-whole premium is payable in additional shares of
common stock and is calculated based on a formula with the premium ranging from 0.0 percent to 28.0
percent depending on when the Fundamental Change occurs and the price of the Companys stock at the
time the Fundamental Change occurs.
Upon conversion of the 6.5% Notes, the Company has the right to deliver, in lieu of shares of
its common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. Under the
Indenture, the Company is required to notify holders of the 6.5% Notes of its method for settling
the principal amount of the 6.5% Notes upon conversion. This notification, once provided, is
irrevocable and legally binding upon the Company with regard to any conversion of the 6.5% Notes.
On March 21, 2006, the Company notified holders of the 6.5% Notes of its election to satisfy its
conversion obligation with respect to the principal amount of any 6.5% Notes surrendered for
conversion by paying the holders of such surrendered 6.5% Notes 100 percent of the principal
conversion obligation in the form of common stock of the Company. Until the 6.5% Notes are
surrendered for conversion, the Company will not be required to notify holders of its method for
settling the excess amount of the conversion obligation relating to the amount of the conversion
value above the principal amount, if any. In the event of a default of $10,000 or more on any
credit agreement, including the 2010 Credit Facility, a corresponding event of default would result
under the 6.5% Notes.
On March 10, 2010, the Company entered into Consent Agreements (the Consent Agreements) with
Highbridge International LLC, Whitebox Combined Partners, LP, Whitebox Convertible Arbitrage
Partners, LP, IAM Mini-Fund 14 Limited, HFR Combined Master Trust and Wolverine Convertible
Arbitrage Trading Limited (the Consenting Holders), who collectively held a majority of the
$32,050 in aggregate principal amount outstanding of the 6.5% Notes. Pursuant to the Consent
Agreements, the Consenting Holders consented to modifications and amendments to the Indenture
substantially in the form and substance set forth in a third supplemental indenture (the Third
Supplemental Indenture) to the indenture for the 6.5% Notes. The Third Supplemental Indenture
initially provided, among other things, for an amendment to Section 6.13 of the Indenture so that
certain restrictions on the Companys ability to incur indebtedness would not be applicable to the
borrowing by the Company of an amount not to exceed $300,000 under a new credit facility to be
entered into in connection with the acquisition of InfrastruX.
On May 10, 2010, the Company entered into an Amendment to Consent Agreement (the Amendment)
with the Consenting Holders. Pursuant to the Amendment, the Consenting Holders consented to
modifications to the Third Supplemental Indenture to clarify that certain restrictions on the
Companys ability to incur indebtedness would not be applicable to certain borrowings by the
Company to acquire InfrastruX regardless of whether the borrowing consisted of a term loan under a
new credit agreement, a new series of notes or bonds or a combination thereof.
On September 16, 2011, following receipt of the requisite consents of the holders of the 6.5%
Notes, the Company entered into a fourth supplemental indenture (the Fourth Supplemental
Indenture) to the Indenture for the 6.5% Notes. The Fourth Supplemental Indenture amends Section
6.13 of the Indenture to change the maximum consolidated leverage ratio from 4.00 to 1.00 to 6.00
to 1.00 during the fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011, 5.50 to 1.00
during the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012, 3.75 to 1.00 during the fiscal quarter ending June
30, 2012 and 3.50 to 1.00 during the fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2012 and December 31,
2012. In addition, the Fourth Supplemental Indenture conforms the
definition of Consolidated EBITDA in the Indenture to the definition of Consolidated EBITDA in
the 2010 Credit Agreement.
15
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Long-term Debt (continued)
The Company is required to separately account for the debt and equity components of the 6.5% Notes
in a manner that reflects its nonconvertible debt-borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The
difference between the fair value and the principal amount was recorded as a debt discount and as a
component of equity. The debt discount was fully amortized in 2010 and as such, the carrying amount of the 6.5% Notes was $32,050 at both September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The amount of interest expense recognized and effective interest rate related to this debt for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Contractual coupon interest |
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
Amortization of discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
|
$ |
2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate |
|
|
8.46 |
% |
|
|
8.46 |
% |
|
|
8.46 |
% |
|
|
8.46 |
% |
2.75% Convertible Senior Notes
In 2004, the Company completed a primary offering of $60,000 of the 2.75% Notes. In addition,
the initial purchasers of the 2.75% Notes exercised their option to purchase an additional $10,000
aggregate principal amount of the 2.75% Notes. The primary offering and purchase option of the
2.75% Notes totaled $70,000. The holders of the 2.75% Notes had the right to require the Company to
purchase the 2.75% Notes, including unpaid interest, on March 15, 2011, 2014, and 2019 or upon a
change of control related event. On March 15, 2011, the holders exercised their right and the
Company made a cash payment of $59,357 to the holders, which included $332 of unpaid interest. In
order to fund the purchase, the Company borrowed $59,357 under the Revolving Credit Facility. The
2.75% Notes were general senior unsecured obligations. Interest was paid semi-annually on March 15
and September 15. The 2.75% Notes would have matured on March 15, 2024 if the notes had not been
repurchased earlier. Upon maturity, the principal amount plus the accrued
interest through the day prior to the maturity date was payable only in cash.
The amount of interest expense recognized and the effective interest rate for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
16
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Long-term Debt (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Contractual coupon interest |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
1,224 |
|
Amortization of discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
3,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
Capital Leases
The Company has entered into multiple capital lease agreements to acquire various units of
construction equipment, which have a weighted average interest rate of 6.8 percent. Assets held
under capital leases at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Construction equipment |
|
$ |
3,806 |
|
|
$ |
13,706 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
5,085 |
|
|
|
9,630 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held under capital lease |
|
|
11,576 |
|
|
|
25,221 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(10,733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets under capital lease |
|
$ |
8,384 |
|
|
$ |
14,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Retirement Benefits
The Company has defined contribution plans that are funded by participating employee
contributions and the Company. The Company matches employee contributions, up to a maximum of five
percent of salary, in the form of cash. The Company match was suspended in March 2011. Company
contributions for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $2,317 and $2,420,
respectively.
In connection with the Companys acquisition of InfrastruX, the Company is subject to
additional collective bargaining agreements with various unions. As a result, the Company
participates with other companies in the unions multi-employer pension and other postretirement
benefit plans. These plans cover all employees who are members of such unions. The Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendments
Act of 1980, imposes certain liabilities upon employers who are contributors to a multi-employer
plan in the event of the employers withdrawal from, or upon termination of, such plan. The Company
has no intention to withdraw from these plans. The plans do not maintain information on the net
assets and actuarial present value of the plans unfunded vested benefits allocable to the Company,
and the amounts, if any, for which the Company may be contingently liable, are not ascertainable at
this time. Contributions to all union multi-employer pension and other postretirement plans by the
Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $36,622 and $13,046,
respectively.
10. Income Taxes
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011,
the Companys effective tax rate from continuing operations was approximately 24.1 percent. For the same nine-month period in 2010, the
Companys effective tax rate was (10.9) percent. Tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2011 for discrete items totals $27,603.
The discrete items are comprised primarily of $25,671 deferred tax benefit associated with the estimated impairment of goodwill related to the
Utility T&D segment, $1,955 of additional tax expense associated with the provision for the repatriation of foreign earnings and profits,
and $3,250 associated with the $10,000 reduction of contingent earnout liability in connection with the acquisition of InfrastruX that
has no tax benefit.
In April 2011, the Company discontinued its strategy of reinvesting non-U.S. earnings in foreign
operations. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has repatriated $37,500 of cash from its
principal foreign holding company and used the cash to repay the Term Loan. The provision for taxes
was $1,955 expense in the first nine months of 2011 associated with the repatriation of foreign
earnings and profits. Subsequently, actual and projected foreign earnings and profits were reduced
as a result of increased losses in Canada and WAPCo litigation costs; such losses resulted in a
third quarter tax benefit of $2,186 and a net first nine months of 2011 tax expense of $1,955. The
Company may repatriate available foreign cash throughout the year to further reduce Term Loan debt
and fund U.S. working capital needs and use its available U.S. net operating losses to offset
dividend income recognized in the U.S. Additionally, the Company does not anticipate recording
additional tax expense related to additional repatriations of previously recognized non-U.S.
earnings to the U.S.
17
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
10. Income Taxes (continued)
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Companys effective tax rate was 22.0 percent
resulting primarily from certain discrete items representing an aggregate benefit of $30,209,
comprised of deferred tax benefit of $25,671 recorded on the estimated goodwill impairment loss of $134,263
on the Utility T&D segment, and a significant reduction in the provision for taxes of $2,186 on
repatriation of foreign earnings and profits. Other discrete items impacting the effective tax rate
include $676 tax benefit from the true-up of taxes following completion of the year 2010 tax
filings and $600 tax benefit recorded on out-of-period items. For the
same three-month period in
2010, the Companys effective tax rate from continuing
operations was (5.9) percent, primarily due
to deal costs and release of contingent earnout liability in connection with the acquisition of
InfrastruX. There was no tax expense required to be recorded in connection with the $45,340 release
of contingent earnout liability, and the $3,453 deal costs received no tax benefit.
11. Stockholders Equity
The information contained in this note pertains to continuing and discontinued operations.
Comprehensive Income
The Companys foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars and a translation adjustment
is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, as a result. Additionally, changes in
fair value on cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, until
the hedged transactions occur. The following table presents the components of comprehensive loss
for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(110,973 |
) |
|
$ |
35,701 |
|
|
$ |
(158,894 |
) |
|
$ |
31,635 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
(5,726 |
) |
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
(2,617 |
) |
|
|
2,407 |
|
Change in fair value on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
(117,430 |
) |
|
|
38,136 |
|
|
|
(163,361 |
) |
|
|
33,331 |
|
Less: income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Willbros
Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(117,726 |
) |
|
$ |
37,843 |
|
|
$ |
(164,239 |
) |
|
$ |
32,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Ownership Plans
In May 1996, the Company established the Willbros Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan (the 1996
Plan) with 1,125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for awards to key
employees of the Company, and the Willbros Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan (the Director Plan)
with 125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for the grant of stock
options to non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 1996
Plan, and the Director Plan, was increased to 4,825,000 and 225,000, respectively, by stockholder
approval. The Director Plan expired August 16, 2006.
18
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
11. Stockholders Equity (continued)
In 2006, the Company established the 2006 Director Restricted Stock Plan (the 2006 Director
Plan) with 50,000 shares authorized for issuance to grant shares of restricted stock and
restricted stock rights to non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for issuance
under the 2006 Director Plan was increased in 2008 to 250,000 by stockholder approval.
On May 26, 2010, the Company established the Willbros Group, Inc. 2010 Stock and Incentive
Compensation Plan (the 2010 Plan) with 2,100,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance
to provide for awards to key employees of the Company. All future grants of stock awards to key
employees will be made through the 2010 Plan. As a result, the 1996 Plan was frozen, with the
exception of normal vesting, forfeiture and other activity associated with awards previously
granted under the 1996 Plan. At September 30, 2011, the 2010 Plan had 1,196,807 shares available
for grant.
Restricted stock and restricted stock units or rights, also described collectively as
restricted stock units (RSUs), and options granted to employees vest generally over a three to
four year period. Options granted under the 2010 Plan expire 10 years subsequent to the grant date.
Upon stock option exercise, common shares are issued from treasury stock. Options granted under the
Director Plan are fully vested. Restricted stock and restricted stock rights granted under the 2006
Director Plan vest one year after the date of grant. At September 30, 2011, the 2006 Director Plan
had 46,373 shares available for grant. For RSUs granted prior to March of 2009, certain
provisions allow for accelerated vesting upon eligible retirement. Additionally, certain
provisions allow for accelerated vesting in the event of involuntary termination not for cause or a
change of control of the Company. During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, $97
and $223, respectively, of compensation expense was recognized due to accelerated vesting of RSUs
due to retirement and separation from the Company.
Share-based compensation related to RSUs is recorded based on the Companys stock price as of
the grant date. Expense from both stock options and RSUs totaled $5,155 and $1,911, respectively,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
The Company determines fair value of stock options as of its grant date using the
Black-Scholes valuation method. No options were granted during the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010.
The Companys stock option activity and related information consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2011 |
|
|
227,750 |
|
|
$ |
15.28 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
227,750 |
|
|
$ |
15.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
227,750 |
|
|
$ |
15.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and stock
options exercisable was $0 and $0, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual term of
outstanding options and exercisable options is 3.54 years and 3.54 years, respectively, at
September 30, 2011. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $0 and $0 during the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The total fair value of options vested
during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $135 and $0, respectively.
19
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
11. Stockholders Equity (continued)
The Companys non-vested options at September 30, 2011 and the changes in non-vested options
during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested, January 1, 2011 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.77 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
6.77 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys RSU activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2011 |
|
|
888,853 |
|
|
$ |
13.54 |
|
Granted |
|
|
814,963 |
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(426,142 |
) |
|
|
14.00 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(119,794 |
) |
|
|
13.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,157,880 |
|
|
$ |
11.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of RSUs vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
was $5,970 and $7,406, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, there was a total of $9,991 of unrecognized compensation cost, net
of estimated forfeitures, related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted
under the Companys stock ownership plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.59 years.
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
In 2006, the Company completed a private placement of equity to certain accredited investors
pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 3,722,360 shares of the Companys common stock
resulting in net proceeds of $48,748. In conjunction with the private placement, the Company also
issued warrants to purchase an additional 558,354 shares of the Companys common stock. Each
warrant was exercisable, in whole or in part, until 60 months from the date of issuance at an exercise price of $19.03 per share. The fair value of the warrants was $3,423 on the date of the grant, as calculated using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were 536,925 warrants outstanding at September 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. These warrants expired, unexercised, on October 27, 2011.
12. Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is
based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period and the assumed
exercise of potentially dilutive stock options and warrants and vesting of RSUs less the number of
treasury shares assumed to be purchased from the proceeds using the average market price of the
Companys stock for each of the periods presented. The Companys convertible notes are included in
the calculation of diluted income per share under the if-converted method. Additionally, diluted
income (loss) per share for continuing operations is calculated excluding the after-tax interest
expense associated with the convertible notes since these notes are treated as if converted into
common stock.
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share from continuing operations for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are computed as follows:
20
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
12. Income (Loss) Per Share (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(99,410 |
) |
|
$ |
38,411 |
|
|
$ |
(131,323 |
) |
|
$ |
38,702 |
|
Less: Income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations attributable to Willbros
Group, Inc. (numerator for basic
calculation) |
|
|
(99,706 |
) |
|
|
38,118 |
|
|
|
(132,201 |
) |
|
|
37,800 |
|
Add: Interest and debt issuance
costs associated with convertible
notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations applicable to common
shares (numerator for diluted
calculation) |
|
$ |
(99,706 |
) |
|
$ |
39,364 |
|
|
$ |
(132,201 |
) |
|
$ |
39,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for basic
income (loss) per share |
|
|
47,533,967 |
|
|
|
46,997,431 |
|
|
|
47,429,059 |
|
|
|
41,651,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
potentially dilutive common shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,156,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,238,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for diluted
income per share |
|
|
47,533,967 |
|
|
|
52,154,029 |
|
|
|
47,429,059 |
|
|
|
44,890,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(2.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
(2.79 |
) |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(2.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
(2.79 |
) |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has excluded shares potentially issuable under the terms of use of the securities
listed below from the computation of diluted income (loss) per share, as the effect would be
anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes |
|
|
1,825,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
227,750 |
|
|
|
187,860 |
|
Warrants to purchase common stock |
|
|
536,925 |
|
|
|
536,925 |
|
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights |
|
|
183,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,773,843 |
|
|
|
724,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the FASBs standard on income (loss) per share contingently convertible
instruments, the shares issuable upon conversion of the 6.5% Notes, would have been included
in diluted income (loss) per share, if those securities were dilutive, regardless of whether the
Companys stock price was greater than or equal to the conversion price of $17.56. However, these securities are only dilutive to the extent that interest per weighted
average convertible share does not exceed basic income (loss) per share. For the three months ended
September 30, 2011, the related interest per convertible share associated with the 6.5%
Notes did exceed basic income (loss) per share for the current period. As such, those
shares have not been included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share.
13. Segment Information
The Companys segments are comprised of strategic businesses that are defined by the
industries they serve. Each is managed as an operation with well established strategic directions
and performance requirements.
Prior to the InfrastruX acquisition, the Company operated through two business segments:
Upstream Oil & Gas
21
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Segment Information (continued)
and Downstream Oil & Gas. These segments operate primarily in the United States, Canada, and Oman.
On July 1, 2010, the Company closed on the acquisition of InfrastruX, which diversified the
Companys capabilities and expanded its geographic footprint. InfrastruX provided maintenance and
construction solutions to customers in the electric power and natural gas transmission and
distribution markets. Post acquisition, the Company established a third business segment, Utility
Transmission & Distribution Utility T&D, which includes electric power transmission and
distribution and low-pressure, inside the gate natural gas distribution. The natural gas
transmission division of InfrastruX, which is similar to Willbros legacy U.S. pipeline
construction business unit, was incorporated into the Companys Upstream Oil & Gas segment
effective January 1, 2011. Management evaluates the performance of each operating segment based on
operating income. Corporate operations include the executive management, general, administrative,
and financing functions of the organization. The costs to provide these services are allocated, as
are certain other corporate assets, among the three operating segments. There were no material
inter-segment revenues in the periods presented.
The following tables reflect the Companys reconciliation of segment operating results to net
income (loss) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
For the three months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Utility T&D |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
226,372 |
|
|
$ |
53,680 |
|
|
$ |
186,051 |
|
|
$ |
466,103 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
212,791 |
|
|
|
57,553 |
|
|
|
181,937 |
|
|
|
452,281 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
|
$ |
(3,873 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,149 |
) |
|
|
(116,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,290 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,410 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations
net of benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,973 |
) |
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributable to Willbros Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(111,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Utility T&D |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
189,359 |
|
|
$ |
80,870 |
|
|
$ |
133,730 |
|
|
$ |
403,959 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
159,674 |
|
|
|
80,486 |
|
|
|
149,615 |
|
|
|
389,775 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
29,685 |
|
|
$ |
(11,616 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,885 |
) |
|
|
47,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,251 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,411 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,701 |
|
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Willbros Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Segment Information (continued)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Utility T&D |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
579,375 |
|
|
$ |
165,376 |
|
|
$ |
508,574 |
|
|
$ |
1,253,325 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
562,954 |
|
|
|
178,024 |
|
|
|
512,247 |
|
|
|
1,253,225 |
|
Settlement of project termination |
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,185 |
|
|
$ |
(12,648 |
) |
|
$ |
(137,936 |
) |
|
|
(132,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,683 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,323 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations net of benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,894 |
) |
Less:
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributable to Willbros Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(159,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Oil & Gas |
|
|
Utility T&D |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
452,630 |
|
|
$ |
202,895 |
|
|
$ |
133,730 |
|
|
$ |
789,255 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
405,510 |
|
|
|
217,962 |
|
|
|
149,615 |
|
|
|
773,087 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
47,120 |
|
|
$ |
(27,067 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,885 |
) |
|
|
49,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,619 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,702 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,635 |
|
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Willbros Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Upstream Oil & Gas |
|
$ |
197,792 |
|
|
$ |
239,488 |
|
Downstream Oil & Gas |
|
|
109,075 |
|
|
|
126,095 |
|
Utility T&D |
|
|
510,932 |
|
|
|
661,386 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
174,106 |
|
|
|
210,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets, continuing operations |
|
$ |
991,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,237,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances
Contingencies
Resolution of criminal and regulatory matters
In May 2008, the United States Department of Justice filed an Information and Deferred
Prosecution Agreement (DPA) in the United States District Court in Houston concluding its
investigation into violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, by Willbros
Group, Inc. and its subsidiary Willbros International, Inc. (WII). Also in May 2008, WGI reached
a final settlement with the SEC to resolve its previously disclosed investigation of possible
violations of the FCPA and possible violations of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. These
investigations stemmed primarily from the Companys former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and
Nigeria. The settlements together required the Company to pay a total of $32,300 in penalties and
disgorgement, over approximately three years, plus post-judgment interest on $7,725, all of which
has now been paid. As part of its agreement with the SEC, the Company is subject to a permanent
injunction barring future violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws. As to
its agreement with the DOJ, both WGI and WII for a period of three years from May 2008, were
subject to the DPA, which among its terms provides that, in exchange for WGIs and WIIs full
compliance with the DPA, the DOJ will not continue a criminal prosecution of WGI and WII and with
the successful completion of the DPAs terms, the DOJ will move to dismiss the criminal
information. The Company believes that the DPA has now expired and has asked the DOJ to dismiss the
criminal information, but the DOJ has declined to do so because the monitorship (described in the
next paragraph) has not yet been completed.
WGI and WII intend to fully cooperate with the government and comply with all federal criminal
laws, including but not limited to the FCPA. As provided for in the DPA, with the approval of the
DOJ and effective September 25, 2009, the Company retained a government-approved independent
monitor, at the Companys expense, for a two and one-half year period, who is reporting to the DOJ
on the Companys compliance with the FCPA and other applicable laws. Although the Company believes
the DPA has expired, the Company remains subject to the monitorship. The monitors term ends in
March 2012, unless extended.
Since the appointment of the monitor, the Company has cooperated and provided the monitor with
access to information, documents, records, facilities and employees. On March 1, 2010, the monitor
filed with the DOJ the first of three required reports under the DPA. In the report, the monitor
made numerous findings and recommendations to the Company with respect to the improvement of its
internal controls and policies and procedures for detecting and preventing violations of applicable
anti-corruption laws. On March 11, 2011, the monitor filed the second of the three required reports
with the DOJ. In the second report, the monitor made additional findings and recommendations to the
Company. The monitor will continue to review the Companys operations through the term of the
monitorship.
The Company is obligated to adopt the recommendations in the monitors reports unless the
Company advises the monitor and the DOJ that it considers the recommendations unduly burdensome,
impractical, costly or otherwise inadvisable. The Company has advised the DOJ that it intends to
implement all of the recommendations in the first and second reports. The Company will require
increased resources, costs and management oversight in order to effectively implement the
recommendations.
Failure by the Company to abide by the FCPA or other laws could result in prosecution and
other regulatory sanctions.
Settlement Facility Construction Project Dispute
In
September 2008, TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd. (TransCanada) awarded the Company the
cost-reimbursable plus fixed fee construction contract for seven pump stations in Nebraska and
Kansas. On January 13, 2010, TransCanada notified the Company that it was in breach of the contract and
was being terminated for cause immediately. At the time of termination, the Company had completed
approximately 91.0 percent of its scope of work.
The Company disputed the validity of the termination for cause and challenged the contractual
procedure followed by TransCanada for termination for cause, which allows for a 30 day notification period
during which time the Company is granted the opportunity to remedy the alleged default. Despite not
being granted this time, the Company agreed in good faith to cooperate with TransCanada in an orderly
demobilization and handover of the remaining work. Prior to the settlement of this claim in June 2011, the Company had outstanding receivables related to this project of $71,159 and unapproved
change orders for additional work of $4,223, which had not been billed. Additionally, there were
claims for additional fees totaling $16,442. It is the Companys policy not to recognize income on
unapproved change orders or claims until they have been approved. Accordingly, the $4,223 in
pending change orders and the $16,442 of claims were excluded from the Companys revenue
recognition. The preceding balances were partially offset by an unissued billing credit of $2,000
related to a TransCanada mobilization prepayment.
24
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
In May and June of 2010, the Company filed liens on the constructed facilities. On June 16,
2010, the Company notified TransCanada that the Company intended to exercise its rights to conflict
resolution under the contract, and on July 6, 2010, the International Chamber of Commerce received
the Companys request for arbitration. On September 15, 2010, the Company received TransCanadas response
to the Notice of Arbitration, which included a counterclaim for damages of $23,000 for the alleged
breach of contract. In addition, TransCanada disclaimed its responsibility for payment of the current
receivable balance outstanding as of June 30, 2011, the unapproved change orders for additional
work and claims for additional fees.
On June 24, 2011, the Company and TransCanada entered into an agreement that settled all of the
outstanding claims between the parties related to the contract. Under terms of the settlement
agreement, the Company received a payment of $61,000, waived all claims for additional costs, fees
and change orders, was relieved of any further warranty obligations on the project, agreed to
release the liens it had filed, and has been reinstated as an approved bidder to TransCanada and its
affiliates. TransCanada also waived its counterclaim. The Company remains in a dispute with one
subcontractor on the project and, under the settlement agreement, is obligated to resolve the
dispute and remove liens filed against the project by the subcontractor. The Company believes it
has an adequate reserve for this matter. As a result of the settlement, the Company incurred a
non-cash charge in its second quarter 2011 results of $8,236, which is included in the Settlement
of project dispute line item for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Other
In addition to the matters discussed above and in Note 17 Discontinuance of Operations,
Asset Disposals, and Transition Service Agreement, the Company is party to a number of other legal
proceedings. Management believes that the nature and number of these proceedings are typical for a
firm of similar size engaged in a similar type of business and that none of these proceedings is
material to the Companys results of operations, consolidated financial position or cash flows.
Commitments
From time to time, the Company enters into commercial commitments, usually in the form of
commercial and standby letters of credit, surety bonds and financial guarantees. Contracts with the
Companys customers may require the Company to secure letters of credit or surety bonds with regard
to the Companys performance of contracted services. In such cases, the commitments can be called
upon in the event of failure to perform contracted services. Likewise, contracts may allow the
Company to issue letters of credit or surety bonds in lieu of contract retention provisions, where
the client withholds a percentage of the contract value until project completion or expiration of a
warranty period. Retention commitments can be called upon in the event of warranty or project
completion issues, as prescribed in the contracts. At September 30, 2011, the Company had
approximately $21,382 of outstanding letters of credit, all of which related to continuing
operations. This amount represents the maximum amount of payments the Company could be required to
make if these letters of credit are drawn upon. Additionally, the Company issues surety bonds
customarily required by commercial terms on construction projects. At September 30, 2011, the
Company had bonds outstanding, primarily performance bonds, with a face value at $599,098 related
to continuing operations. This amount represents the bond penalty amount of future payments the
Company could be required to make if the Company fails to perform its obligations under such
contracts. The performance bonds do not have a stated expiration date; rather, each is released
when the contract is accepted by the owner. The Companys maximum exposure as it relates to the
value of the bonds outstanding is lowered on each bonded project as the cost to complete is
reduced. As of September 30, 2011, no liability has been recognized for letters of credit or surety
bonds.
Other Circumstances
Operations outside the United States may be subject to certain risks, which ordinarily would
not be expected to exist in the United States, including foreign currency restrictions; extreme
exchange rate fluctuations; expropriation of assets; civil uprisings, riots, and war; unanticipated
taxes including income taxes, excise duties, import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or other
governmental assessments; availability of suitable personnel and equipment; termination of existing
contracts and leases; government instability and legal systems of decrees, laws, regulations,
interpretations and court decisions which are not always fully developed and which may be
retroactively applied. Management is not presently aware of any events of the type described in the
countries in which it operates that would have a material effect on the financial statements, and
no such events have been provided for in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
25
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
14. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
Based upon the advice of local advisors in the various work countries concerning the
interpretation of the laws, practices and customs of the countries in which the Company operates,
management believes the Company follows the current practices in those countries and as applicable
under the FCPA. However, because of the nature of these potential risks, there can be no assurance
that the Company may not be adversely affected by them in the future.
The Company insures substantially all of its equipment in countries outside the United States
against certain political risks and terrorism through political risk insurance coverage. The
Company has the usual liability of contractors for the completion of contracts and the warranty of
its work. Where work is performed through a joint venture, the Company also has possible liability
for the contract completion and warranty responsibilities of its joint venture partners. In
addition, the Company acts as prime contractor on a majority of the projects it undertakes and is
normally responsible for the performance of the entire project, including subcontract work.
Management is not aware of any material exposure related thereto which has not been provided for in
the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company attempts to manage contract risk by implementing a standard contracting philosophy
to minimize liabilities assumed in the agreements with the Companys clients. With the acquisitions
the Company has made in the last few years, however, there may be contracts or master service
agreements in place that do not meet the Companys current contracting standards. While the Company
has made efforts to improve its contractual terms with its clients, this process takes time to
implement. The Company has attempted to mitigate the risk by requesting amendments with its clients
and by maintaining primary and excess insurance, of certain specified limits, in the event a loss
was to ensue.
See Note 17 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services
Agreement for discussion of commitments and contingencies associated with Discontinued Operations.
15. Fair Value Measurements
The FASBs standard on fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be
received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for
assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers
the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that
market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer
restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The FASBs standard on fair value measurements establishes a fair value hierarchy that
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value
hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. This standard establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement
of fair value of assets or liabilities.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company measures its financial assets and financial liabilities, specifically its hedging
arrangements and contingent earnout liability, at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value
of these financial assets and liabilities was determined using the following inputs as of September
30, 2011:
26
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
15. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent earnout liability
In connection with the acquisition of InfrastruX on July 1, 2010, InfrastruX shareholders are
eligible to receive earnout payments of up to $125,000 if certain EBITDA targets are met. These
payments will be paid to former InfrastruX shareholders who qualify as accredited investors as
defined by the SEC in a combination of cash and non-convertible, non-voting preferred stock of the
Company, pursuant to the terms within the Merger Agreement, and to non-accredited former InfrastruX
shareholders and former holders of InfrastruX RSUs in the form of cash.
As a result, the Company estimated the fair value of the contingent earnout liability based on
its probability assessment of InfrastruXs EBITDA achievements during the earnout period. In
developing these estimates, the Company considered its revenue and EBITDA projections, its
historical results, and general macro-economic environment and industry trends. This fair value
measurement is based on significant revenue and EBITDA inputs not observed in the market, which
represents a Level 3 measurement. Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that
are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the Companys own assumptions in
measuring fair value.
In accordance with the FASBs standard on business combinations, the Company reviews the
contingent earnout liability on a quarterly basis in order to determine its fair value. Changes in
the fair value of the liability are recorded within operating expenses in the period in which the
change is made and the liability may increase or decrease on a quarterly basis until the earnout
period has concluded.
The following table represents a reconciliation of the change in the fair value measurement of
the contingent earnout liability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,340 |
|
Change in fair value of contingent earnout
liability included in operating expenses |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value of contingent earnout liability
initially recorded in connection with the
acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,340 |
|
Change in fair value of contingent earnout
liability included in operating expenses |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded a $4,000 and $10,000 adjustment to the estimated fair value of the
contingent earnout liability for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, due to a decrease in the probability-weighted estimated achievement of InfrastruXs
EBITDA targets as set forth in the Merger Agreement.
27
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
15. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
Hedging Arrangements
The Company attempts to negotiate contracts that provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but it
may be required to take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To
mitigate non-U.S. currency exchange risk, the Company seeks to match anticipated non-U.S. currency
revenue with expenses in the same currency whenever possible. To the extent it is unable to match
non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the same currency; the Company may use forward
contracts, options or other common hedging techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. The Company
had no derivative financial instruments to hedge currency risk at September 30, 2011 or December
31, 2010.
Interest Rate Swaps
In conjunction with the 2010 Credit Agreement, the Company is subject to hedging arrangements
to fix or otherwise limit the interest cost of the term loans. The Company is subject to interest
rate risk on its debt and investment of cash and cash equivalents arising in the normal course of
business, as the Company does not engage in speculative trading strategies.
In September 2010, the Company entered into two 18-month forward-starting interest rate swap
agreements for a total notional amount of $150,000 in order to hedge changes in the variable rate
interest expense of half of the $300,000 Term Loan maturing on June 30, 2014. Under each swap
agreement, the Company receives interest at a floating rate of three-month Libor, conditional on
three-month LIBOR exceeding 2 percent (to mirror variable rate interest provisions of the
underlying hedged debt), and pays interest at a fixed rate of 2.685 percent, effective March 28,
2012 through June 30, 2014. The swap agreements are designated and qualify as cash flow hedging
instruments, with the effective portion of the swaps change in fair value recorded in Other
Comprehensive Income (OCI). The interest rate swaps are deemed to be highly effective hedges,
and resulted in no gain or loss recorded for hedge ineffectiveness in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations. Amounts in OCI are reported in interest expense when the hedged interest
payments on the underlying debt are recognized. The fair value of each swap agreement was
determined using a model with Level 2 inputs including quoted market prices for contracts with
similar terms and maturity dates.
Interest Rate Caps
In September 2010, the Company entered into two interest rate cap agreements for notional
amounts of $75,000 each in order to limit its exposure to an increase of the interest rate above 3
percent, effective September 28, 2010 through March 28, 2012. Total premiums of $98 were paid for
the interest rate cap agreements. Through June 1, 2011, the cap agreements were designated and
qualified as cash flow hedging instruments, with the effective portion of the caps change in fair
value recorded in OCI. Amounts in OCI and the premiums paid for the caps were reported in interest
expense as the hedged interest payments on the underlying debt were recognized during the period
when the caps were designated as cash flow hedges. Through June 1, 2011, the interest rate caps
were deemed to be highly effective, resulting in an immaterial amount of hedge ineffectiveness
recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. On June 1, 2011, the caps were
de-designated due the interest rate being fixed on the underlying debt through the remaining term
of the caps; changes in the value of the caps subsequent to that date will be reported in earnings.
The amount reported in earnings for the undesignated interest rate caps for the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2011 is immaterial. The fair value of the interest rate cap
agreements was determined using a model with Level 2 inputs including quoted market prices for
contracts with similar terms and maturity dates. An immaterial amount of OCI relating to the
interest rate swap and caps is expected to be recognized in earnings in the coming 12 months.
28
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
15. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Interest rate contracts- swaps |
|
Other short-term Liabilities |
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts- swaps |
|
Other long-term Liabilities |
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
Other long-term Assets |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
|
Derivatives in ASC |
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Income on |
|
Income on |
|
815 Cash Flow |
|
Recognized in |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
Hedging |
|
OCI on Derivative |
|
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
(Ineffective |
|
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Portion ) |
|
Portion ) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(731 |
) |
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(731 |
) |
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
|
Derivatives in ASC |
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Income on |
|
Income on |
|
815 Cash Flow |
|
Recognized in |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
Hedging |
|
OCI on Derivative |
|
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
(Ineffective |
|
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Portion ) |
|
Portion ) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, which are used to secure debt or are subject to lien, as of
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Construction equipment |
|
$ |
106,085 |
|
|
$ |
108,949 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
51,437 |
|
|
|
50,605 |
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
27,953 |
|
|
|
39,398 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
159,669 |
|
|
|
155,326 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
17,590 |
|
|
|
17,748 |
|
Marine equipment |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
362,844 |
|
|
|
372,146 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(182,191 |
) |
|
|
(152,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
180,653 |
|
|
$ |
219,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Amounts above include $6,603 and $3,698 of construction in progress as of September 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively. Depreciation expense included in operating expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 was $38,877 and $42,245,
respectively.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold approximately $11,049 in
equipment and facilities through sales-leaseback arrangements. As a result of these transactions,
the Company made an accelerated payment against its Term Loan of approximately $22,179.
17. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement
Strategic Decisions
In 2006, the Company announced that it intended to sell its assets and operations in Venezuela
and Nigeria.
In 2010, the Company recognized that its investment in establishing a presence in Libya, while
resulting in contract awards, had not yielded any notice to proceed on these awards. As a result,
the Company exited this market due to the project delays coupled with the identification of other
more attractive opportunities.
In April 2011, as part of its ongoing strategic evaluation of operations, the Companys Board
of Directors made the decision to exit the Canadian cross-country pipeline construction market and
liquidate its investment in the related business.
30
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
17. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement
(continued)
Nigeria Assets and Nigeria-Based Operations
Share Purchase Agreement
On February 7, 2007, Willbros Global Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Willbros Group, Inc., a
Panama corporation (WGHI), which is now a subsidiary of the Company and holds a portion of the
Companys non-U.S. operations, sold its Nigeria assets and Nigeria-based operations in West Africa
to Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (Ascot), a Nigerian oilfield services company, for total
consideration of $155,250 (later adjusted to $130,250). The sale was pursuant to a Share Purchase
Agreement by and between WGHI and Ascot dated as of February 7, 2007 (the Agreement), providing
for the purchase by Ascot of all of the share capital of WG Nigeria Holdings Limited (WGNHL), the
holding company for Willbros West Africa, Inc. (WWAI), Willbros (Nigeria) Limited, Willbros
(Offshore) Nigeria Limited and WG Nigeria Equipment Limited.
In connection with the sale of its Nigeria assets and operations, WGHI and WII, another
subsidiary of the Company, entered into an indemnity agreement with Ascot and Berkeley Group plc
(Berkeley), the parent company of Ascot (the Indemnity Agreement), pursuant to which Ascot and
Berkeley agreed to indemnify WGHI and WII for any obligations incurred by WGHI or WII in connection
with the parent company guarantees (the Guarantees) that WGHI and WII previously issued and
maintained on behalf of certain former subsidiaries now owned by Ascot under certain working
contracts between the subsidiaries and their customers. Either WGHI, WII or both may continue to be
contractually obligated, in varying degrees, under the Guarantees with respect to the performance
of work related to several ongoing projects. Among the Guarantees covered by the Indemnity
Agreement are five contracts under which the Company estimates that, at February 7, 2007, there was
aggregate remaining contract revenue, excluding any additional claim revenue, of $352,107 and
aggregate estimated cost to complete of $293,562. At the February 7, 2007 sale date, one of the
contracts covered by the Guarantees was estimated to be in a loss position with an accrual for such
loss of $33,157. The associated liability was included in the liabilities acquired by Ascot and
Berkeley.
Approximately one year after the sale of the Nigeria assets and operations, WGHI received its
first notification asserting various rights under one of the outstanding Guarantees. On February 1,
2008, WWAI, the Ascot company performing the West African Gas Pipeline (WAGP) contract, received
a letter from West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited (WAPCo), the owner of WAGP, wherein WAPCo
gave written notice alleging that WWAI was in default under the WAGP contract, as amended, and
giving WWAI a brief cure period to remedy the alleged default. The Company understands that WWAI
responded by denying being in breach of its WAGP contract obligations, and apparently also advised
WAPCo that WWAI requires a further $55 million, without which it will not be able to complete the
work which it had previously undertaken to perform. The Company understands that, on February 27,
2008, WAPCo terminated the WAGP contract for the alleged continuing non-performance of WWAI.
Also, in February 2008, WGHI received a letter from WAPCo reminding WGHI of its parent
guarantee on the WAGP contract and requesting that WGHI remedy WWAIs default under that contract,
as amended. WGHI responded to WAPCo, consistent with its earlier communications, that, for a
variety of legal, contractual, and other reasons, it did not consider the prior WAGP contract
parent guarantee to have continued application. In February 2009, WGHI received another letter from
WAPCo formally demanding that WGHI pay all sums payable in consequence of the non-performance by
WWAI with WAPCo and stating that quantification of that amount would be provided sometime in the
future when the work was completed. In spite of this letter, the Company continued to believe that
the parent guarantee was not valid. WAPCo disputed WGHIs position that it is no longer bound by
the terms of WGHIs prior parent guarantee of the WAGP contract and has reserved all its rights in
that regard.
On February 15, 2010, WGHI received a letter from attorneys representing WAPCo seeking to
recover from WGHI under its prior WAGP contract parent company guarantee for losses and damages
allegedly incurred by WAPCo in connection with the alleged non-performance of WWAI under the WAGP
contract. The letter purports to be a formal notice of a claim for purposes of the Pre-Action
Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes under the rules of the High Court in London,
England. The letter claims damages in the amount of $264,834. At February 7, 2007, when WGHI sold
its Nigeria assets and operations to Ascot, the total WAGP contract value was $165,300 and the WAGP
project was estimated to be approximately 82.0 percent complete. The remaining costs to complete
the project at that time were estimated at slightly under $30,000. The Company is seeking to
understand the magnitude of the WAPCo claim relative to the WAGP projects financial status three
years earlier.
31
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
17. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
On August 2, 2010, the Company received notice that WAPCo had filed suit against WGHI under
English law in the London High Court on July 30, 2010, for the sum of $273,386 plus costs and
interest. WGHI has several defenses to this claim and is contesting the matter
vigorously, but the Company cannot provide any assurance as to the outcome. The Company expects
the litigation process to be lengthy and that WGHI will incur significant legal fees and expenses
as the trial approaches. Trial of the matter is expected to commence in June of 2012. The Company
began to engage in a mediation process in September of 2011 in an effort to resolve the matter and expects to continue the process in December 2011.
The Company currently has no employees working in Nigeria and has no intention of returning to
Nigeria. The Company does not expect that Ascot or Berkeley will have sufficient assets to meet
their indemnification obligations to WGHI. If ultimately it is determined by an English Court that
WGHI is liable, in whole or in part, for damages that WAPCo may establish against WWAI for WWAIs
alleged non-performance of the WAGP contract, or if WAPCo is able to establish liability against
WGHI directly under the parent company guarantee, WGHI may experience substantial losses. At this
time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of the London High Court litigation.
Results of Discontinued Operations
The major classes of revenue and losses with respect to these discontinued operations are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAPCo / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Libya |
|
|
Total |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
27,314 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(7,388 |
) |
|
|
(6,506 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(14,057 |
) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(7,384 |
) |
|
|
(6,506 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(14,053 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(2,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,490 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(4,894 |
) |
|
|
(6,506 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(11,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAPCo / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Libya |
|
|
Total |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(3,309 |
) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(3,259 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAPCo / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Libya |
|
|
Total |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
119,792 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
119,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(20,439 |
) |
|
|
(12,115 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(33,013 |
) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(20,384 |
) |
|
|
(12,115 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(32,958 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(4,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
(5,387 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(15,409 |
) |
|
|
(12,115 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(27,571 |
) |
32
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAPCo / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Libya |
|
|
Total |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
4,662 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(4,938 |
) |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(2,480 |
) |
|
|
(8,742 |
) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(4,523 |
) |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
|
|
(8,328 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(1,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,261 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
Total assets with respect to these discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAPCo / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Libya |
|
|
Total |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
44,016 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
44,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAPCo / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Libya |
|
|
Total |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
47,780 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
48,021 |
|
18. Condensed Consolidating Guarantor Financial Statements
Willbros Group, Inc. (the Parent) and its 100% owned U.S. subsidiaries (the Guarantors)
may fully and unconditionally guarantee, on a joint and several basis, the obligations of the
Company under debt securities that it may issue pursuant to a universal shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 filed by the Company with the SEC. There are currently no restrictions on the
ability of the Guarantors to transfer funds to the Parent in the form of cash dividends or
advances. Condensed consolidating financial information for a) the Parent, b) the Guarantors and c)
all other direct and indirect subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) as of September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 and for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 follows.
Condensed consolidated financial information for a) the Parent, b) the Guarantors and c) the
Non-Guarantors at December 31, 2010 have been revised to properly reflect certain errors in
Guarantor and Non-Guarantor financial information previously presented, to properly reflect certain
errors in intercompany transactions previously presented, as well as, to properly present
non-controlling interest within the Eliminations column under the equity method of accounting.
Such adjustments increased total assets $22,800 for the Parent, decreased total assets $52,900 for
the Guarantors and increased total assets $64,000 for the Non-Guarantors. These revisions had no
impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows for
all periods presented.
33
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,153 |
|
|
$ |
20,206 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
68,333 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
293,619 |
|
|
|
51,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,441 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,971 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,266 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
12,530 |
|
|
|
33,411 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
(8,351 |
) |
|
|
37,944 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,146 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,995 |
|
Receivables from affiliated companies |
|
|
78,970 |
|
|
|
52,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
100,929 |
|
|
|
464,129 |
|
|
|
130,530 |
|
|
|
(140,097 |
) |
|
|
555,491 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
140,819 |
|
|
|
7,767 |
|
|
|
(42,827 |
) |
|
|
(102,302 |
) |
|
|
3,457 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,587 |
|
|
|
19,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,653 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,015 |
|
|
|
10,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,632 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,848 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
164,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
44,936 |
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
406,935 |
|
|
$ |
919,282 |
|
|
$ |
117,143 |
|
|
$ |
(407,350 |
) |
|
$ |
1,036,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
226,118 |
|
|
|
27,200 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
253,884 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,058 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,147 |
|
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,357 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
9,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
(8,351 |
) |
|
|
3,498 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,526 |
|
Payables to affiliated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,283 |
|
|
|
120,437 |
|
|
|
(131,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
10,273 |
|
|
|
322,131 |
|
|
|
183,552 |
|
|
|
(140,097 |
) |
|
|
375,859 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
198,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,569 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
Contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,645 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,862 |
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
(102,302 |
) |
|
|
15,226 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,114 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
44,187 |
|
|
|
679,131 |
|
|
|
192,343 |
|
|
|
(242,399 |
) |
|
|
673,262 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
362,748 |
|
|
|
240,151 |
|
|
|
(75,200 |
) |
|
|
(164,951 |
) |
|
|
362,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
406,935 |
|
|
$ |
919,282 |
|
|
$ |
117,143 |
|
|
$ |
(407,350 |
) |
|
$ |
1,036,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,328 |
|
|
$ |
73,822 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
134,150 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
253,617 |
|
|
|
50,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,293 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,178 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,757 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
18,490 |
|
|
|
35,720 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,753 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,108 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
11,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,004 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,166 |
|
|
|
52,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,320 |
|
Receivables from affiliated companies |
|
|
198,909 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
229,223 |
|
|
|
387,789 |
|
|
|
184,957 |
|
|
|
(201,584 |
) |
|
|
600,385 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
47,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(31,157 |
) |
|
|
16,570 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,293 |
|
|
|
28,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,878 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,680 |
|
|
|
11,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,753 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,457 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
350,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
42,225 |
|
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
627,076 |
|
|
$ |
1,017,444 |
|
|
$ |
224,085 |
|
|
$ |
(582,803 |
) |
|
$ |
1,285,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
58,671 |
|
|
$ |
12,923 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71,594 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
153,488 |
|
|
|
34,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,386 |
|
Contract
billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,899 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,927 |
|
Current portion of government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,575 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,237 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
8,495 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
(8,370 |
) |
|
|
2,356 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to affiliated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,584 |
|
|
|
(201,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
69,492 |
|
|
|
187,654 |
|
|
|
274,392 |
|
|
|
(209,954 |
) |
|
|
321,584 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
32,054 |
|
|
|
273,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,227 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,741 |
|
Contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Long-term liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,725 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
(22,787 |
) |
|
|
76,020 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,743 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
103,536 |
|
|
|
611,818 |
|
|
|
279,649 |
|
|
|
(232,741 |
) |
|
|
762,262 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
523,540 |
|
|
|
405,626 |
|
|
|
(55,564 |
) |
|
|
(350,062 |
) |
|
|
523,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
627,076 |
|
|
$ |
1,017,444 |
|
|
$ |
224,085 |
|
|
$ |
(582,803 |
) |
|
$ |
1,285,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,085,894 |
|
|
$ |
167,431 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,253,325 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
990,523 |
|
|
|
148,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,139,311 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,752 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
16,855 |
|
|
|
78,055 |
|
|
|
7,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,162 |
|
Goodwill Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
Settlement of project dispute |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
Acquisition Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(16,855 |
) |
|
|
(126,935 |
) |
|
|
11,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(185,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
185,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(2,672 |
) |
|
|
(33,703 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,275 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,124 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(204,774 |
) |
|
|
(164,951 |
) |
|
|
10,655 |
|
|
|
185,988 |
|
|
|
(173,082 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(45,003 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(159,771 |
) |
|
|
(164,957 |
) |
|
|
7,417 |
|
|
|
185,988 |
|
|
|
(131,323 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(27,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(159,771 |
) |
|
|
(165,475 |
) |
|
|
(19,636 |
) |
|
|
185,988 |
|
|
|
(158,894 |
) |
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Willbros Group,
Inc. |
|
$ |
(159,771 |
) |
|
$ |
(165,475 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,636 |
) |
|
$ |
185,110 |
|
|
$ |
(159,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
625,422 |
|
|
$ |
163,833 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
789,255 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
543,831 |
|
|
|
135,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678,894 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,826 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
23,461 |
|
|
|
46,373 |
|
|
|
8,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,455 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
Other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(23,461 |
) |
|
|
55,643 |
|
|
|
17,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,508 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
52,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
(51,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(5,823 |
) |
|
|
(10,363 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,084 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
23,010 |
|
|
|
45,884 |
|
|
|
17,387 |
|
|
|
(51,392 |
) |
|
|
34,889 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(7,723 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
30,733 |
|
|
|
45,941 |
|
|
|
13,420 |
|
|
|
(51,392 |
) |
|
|
38,702 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of
provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
30,733 |
|
|
|
45,941 |
|
|
|
6,353 |
|
|
|
(51,392 |
) |
|
|
31,635 |
|
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Willbros Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
30,733 |
|
|
$ |
45,941 |
|
|
$ |
6,353 |
|
|
$ |
(52,294 |
) |
|
$ |
30,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
405,492 |
|
|
$ |
60,611 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
466,103 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,150 |
|
|
|
42,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,695 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,918 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,595 |
|
|
|
22,947 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,668 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,263 |
|
Settlement of project dispute |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout
liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(5,595 |
) |
|
|
(124,786 |
) |
|
|
13,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(137,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
137,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(10,530 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,029 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(143,558 |
) |
|
|
(135,366 |
) |
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
|
137,511 |
|
|
|
(127,731 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(32,289 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
4,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(111,269 |
) |
|
|
(134,967 |
) |
|
|
9,315 |
|
|
|
137,511 |
|
|
|
(99,410 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of
provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(11,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(111,269 |
) |
|
|
(135,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,730 |
) |
|
|
137,511 |
|
|
|
(110,973 |
) |
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) attributable to Willbros Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
(111,269 |
) |
|
$ |
(135,485 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,730 |
) |
|
$ |
137,215 |
|
|
$ |
(111,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
340,638 |
|
|
$ |
63,321 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
403,959 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,948 |
|
|
|
51,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,898 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,111 |
|
|
|
29,015 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,009 |
|
Goodwill Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Changes in the fair value of contingent earnout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,340 |
) |
Acquisition Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
Other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(4,111 |
) |
|
|
43,970 |
|
|
|
7,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
36,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(36,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1,959 |
) |
|
|
(9,953 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,875 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
30,683 |
|
|
|
34,406 |
|
|
|
7,644 |
|
|
|
(36,460 |
) |
|
|
36,273 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(4,725 |
) |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
35,408 |
|
|
|
34,092 |
|
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
(36,460 |
) |
|
|
38,411 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of
provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
35,408 |
|
|
|
34,092 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
(36,460 |
) |
|
|
35,701 |
|
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Willbros
Group, Inc. |
|
$ |
35,408 |
|
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
|
$ |
2,661 |
|
|
$ |
(36,753 |
) |
|
$ |
35,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(56,240 |
) |
|
$ |
64,036 |
|
|
$ |
27,962 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,758 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,493 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,568 |
|
|
|
32,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,884 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
56,240 |
|
|
|
(84,779 |
) |
|
|
(87,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,793 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,175 |
) |
|
|
(54,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,897 |
) |
Cash and
cash equivalents of continuing operations at beginning of period (12/31/10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,328 |
|
|
|
73,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,150 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued
operations at beginning of period (12/31/10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
(12/31/10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,328 |
|
|
|
80,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,101 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period (9/30/11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,153 |
|
|
|
26,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,204 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued
operations at end of period (9/30/11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations
at end of period (9/30/11) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,153 |
|
|
$ |
20,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(29,054 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,112 |
) |
|
$ |
30,949 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,217 |
) |
Cash flows from operating activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,749 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412,775 |
) |
|
|
(3,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416,085 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
23,619 |
|
|
|
304,883 |
|
|
|
(21,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,886 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(5,435 |
) |
|
|
(116,004 |
) |
|
|
23,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,887 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued
operations at beginning of period (12/31/09) |
|
|
5,463 |
|
|
|
133,263 |
|
|
|
58,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,903 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinuing
operations at beginning of period (12/31/09) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
(12/31/09) |
|
|
5,463 |
|
|
|
133,263 |
|
|
|
59,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,684 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period (9/30/10) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
17,259 |
|
|
|
83,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,797 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents of discontinued
operations at end of period (9/30/10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations
at end of period (9/30/10) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
17,259 |
|
|
$ |
61,670 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
78,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010, included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, including
Critical Accounting Policies, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
OVERVIEW
Willbros is a global contractor specializing in energy infrastructure serving the oil, gas,
petrochemical and power industries. Our offerings include engineering, procurement and construction
(either individually or as an integrated EPC service offering), ongoing maintenance and other
specialty services.
Our Vision
We continue to believe that long-term fundamentals support increasing demand for our services
and substantiate our vision for Willbros to be a multi-billion dollar engineering and construction
company with a diversified revenue stream, stable and predictable results, and high growth
opportunities.
To accomplish this, we are actively working towards achieving the following objectives:
|
|
|
Diversifying geographically to broaden regional presence and exposure to customers who
demand local service providers; |
|
|
|
|
Increasing professional services (project/program management, engineering, design,
procurement and logistics) capabilities to minimize cyclicality and risk associated with
large capital projects in favor of recurring service work; |
|
|
|
|
Managing our resources to mitigate the seasonality of our business model; |
|
|
|
|
Positioning Willbros as a service provider and employer of choice; |
|
|
|
|
Developing long-term client partnerships and alliances by focusing team driven sales
efforts on key clients and exceeding performance expectations at competitive prices; and |
|
|
|
|
Establishing industry best practices, particularly for safety and performance. |
Our Values
We believe the values we adhere to as an organization shape the relationships and performance
of our Company. We are committed to strong leadership across the organization to achieve
Excellence, Accountability and Compliance in everything we do, recognizing that compliance is the
catalyst for successfully applying all of our values. Our core values are:
|
|
|
Safety always perform safely for the protection of our people and our stakeholders; |
|
|
|
|
Honesty & Integrity always do the right thing; |
|
|
|
|
Our People respect and care for their well being and development; maintain an
atmosphere of trust, empowerment and teamwork; ensure the best people are in the right
position; |
|
|
|
|
Our Customers understand their needs and develop responsive solutions; promote
mutually beneficial relationships and deliver a good job on time; |
|
|
|
|
Superior Financial Performance deliver earnings per share and cash flow and maintain
a balance sheet which places us at the forefront of our peer group; |
|
|
|
|
Vision & Innovation understand the drivers of our business environment; promote
constant curiosity, imagination and creativity about our business and opportunities; seek
continuous improvement; and |
|
|
|
|
Effective Communications present a clear, consistent and accurate message to our
people, our customers and the public. |
We believe that adhering to and living these values will result in a high performance
organization, which can differentiate itself and compete effectively, providing incremental value
to our customers, our employees and all our stakeholders.
2011 Goals and Objectives
Our foremost priority for 2011 is to strengthen the Companys financial position. To
accomplish this we have established four primary goals and objectives:
|
|
|
Reduce beginning of the year debt by approximately $50,000 to $100,000 to significantly
reduce interest |
41
|
|
|
expense and provide better financial flexibility. During the first nine
months of 2011, we have made significant progress towards our goal of reducing debt by
making $94,679 of payments against our Term Loan. |
|
|
|
|
Continue to emphasize and improve our project management tools and capabilities. These
tools have been proven successful in our U.S. mainline pipeline construction business and,
we believe, even better results will be recognized in the future as they are introduced and
integrated into all of our segments. |
|
|
|
|
Maintain focus on North America. Our expanded presence in the shale plays and
conventional basins, the Canadian oil sands and the U.S. electric transmission markets
present the best growth and risk adjusted return opportunities for Willbros. We also
recognize an emerging opportunity for pipeline integrity management services. |
|
|
|
|
Remain focused on safety. Our objective for the year is to reduce injuries by 50
percent. We differentiate Willbros on this Value, both as an employer and as a provider of
services. Improvements in safety lowers our costs and also positions us for more
opportunities to bid and win contracts as customers are increasing the value placed on
historical safety performance. |
A related financial goal for 2011 is to reduce general and administrative costs to 6 to 8
percent of contract revenue. Steps to bring general and administrative costs in line with our goals
are beginning to produce results. General and administrative costs were 7 percent of revenue for
the third quarter.
2011 Third Quarter
In the third quarter of 2011, we generated revenue of $466,103 and net loss from continuing operations of $99,706,
or $2.10 per share. Net loss from continuing operations includes an estimated pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $134,263
within our Utility T&D segments operating results ($108,592, net of taxes) and a $4,000 reduction of our contingent
earnout liability (no tax effect). Excluding the impact of these two non-cash special items, as well as two second
quarter transactions, the $8,236 non-cash settlement charge associated with the resolution of the TransCanada
Pipelines, Ltd. (TransCanada) facility construction project dispute ($5,065, net of taxes), and the downward
revision of estimated taxes associated with the repatriation of foreign profits ($9,841) along with an additional
downward tax adjustment in the third quarter, normalized sequential quarter results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations before special items (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(99,706 |
) |
|
$ |
7,754 |
|
Goodwill impairment, net of taxes |
|
|
108,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of project dispute, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,065 |
|
Reduction in the repatriation of foreign profit taxes |
|
|
(2,186 |
) |
|
|
(9,841 |
) |
Contingent earnout liability |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations before special items |
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
2,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share before special items (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Income per share before special items |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations before special items, a non-GAAP
financial measure, excludes special items that management believes affect the comparison
of results for the periods presented. Management also believes results excluding these
items are more comparable to estimates provided by securities analysts and therefore are
useful in evaluating operational trends of the Company and its performance relative to
other engineering and construction companies. |
Our Upstream Oil & Gas segment produced $13,581 of operating income. The segment benefitted
from successful completion of the Acadian Pipeline construction project and continued growth of our
regional offices in the major shale plays. Further, we had significant improvement in our
engineering and EPC offerings, and
continued success within our pipeline integrity management services.
42
Exclusive of the estimated $134,263 goodwill impairment charge, our Utility T&D segment produced operating income of $4,114 for the third quarter as compared
to operating income of $8,815 for the second quarter. The segment operating results were
unfavorably impacted by margin erosion on several Northeast construction projects caused mainly by
labor and weather related issues. The distribution business continues to incur operating losses;
however, continued strong performance by transmission construction projects and our UtilX
subsidiary, which handles underground electric cable remediation, more than offset the distribution
operating losses. The construction activity in Texas for Oncors portion of the Competitive
Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ) continues at a high level of activity.
Our Downstream Oil & Gas segment continues to be impacted by delayed turnaround spending and
uncertain timing of small capital projects by our customers; however, its operating loss of $3,873
is an improvement over the second quarter operating loss of $4,107.
Interest expense of $11,029 included the write-off of unamortized Original Issue Discount
(OID) and debt issuance costs, which totaled $1,646, inclusive of a 1 percent early payment fee.
At the end of the third quarter, we paid down an additional $22,179 against our $300,000 original
Term Loan balance, reducing it to $204,571. On October 11, 2011, we paid an additional $18,700, as
a result of the sale of a non-strategic business unit reducing our Term Loan balance to $185,871. The cumulative pay-down of $113,379,
including the October 11, 2011 pay-down results in annual
cash interest savings of $10,771.
Balance Sheet
As of October 11, 2011, we have exceeded our $50,000 to $100,000 debt reduction goal for 2011.
During the third quarter of 2011, we realized proceeds of $23,065 related to the sale of
underutilized equipment, and the sale and lease back of Canada based equipment and U.S.
realty holdings. The sale proceeds were used to pay-down the Term Loan. On October 11, 2011, we
sold a non-strategic Utility T&D segment subsidiary and utilized the proceeds to further pay-down
our Term Loan to $185,871. We will continue to pursue opportunities to monetize selective assets
and non-strategic subsidiaries. Several parties have expressed interest in acquiring our Canada
cross-country pipeline business.
We continue to monitor opportunities to reduce the cost of our existing debt through
replacement debt or equity. An effective shelf registration statement is on file with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission under which we may issue, from time to time, up to $300,000 of
senior debt securities, subordinated debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants and
other securities. This shelf gives us the flexibility to take advantage of favorable capital
market conditions as they arise, to grow our businesses or to optimize our balance sheet in order
to improve or maintain our financial flexibility.
Outlook
We have generated positive results from operations in two successive quarters. We recognize
that there are additional improvements necessary to reach the levels of profitability that we
believe Willbros is capable of achieving.
We believe that positive changes are beginning to occur, especially with our primary
indicators of future work, such as increased engineering services demand. Historically, an increase
in engineering services demand is an accurate indicator of a future increase in construction
activity. Engineering businesses within our Upstream Oil & Gas and our Downstream Oil & Gas
segments experienced successive quarter revenue increases of $27,024 and $844, respectively.
Additionally, we have secured five new EPC projects, an indication that our EPC offering is
valuable to customers, and we expect this upward trend to continue.
Further, our services historically peak late in the business cycle, therefore we are
encouraged to see strong activity and earnings in the oil services sector, which serves many common
customers and generally experiences peak activity before our sector. We also believe the strong
financial returns available to E&P operators in the liquids-rich shale plays diminish the
likelihood of a decline in levels of activity as domestic production displaces imported crude oil.
The shift to lighter, sweeter production also leads us to believe that the refining sector will
consider more small capital project upgrades and modifications to handle this new crude
composition. This is a reversal of the trend toward heavier crudes and associated projects.
Our geographic expansion in our Upstream Oil & Gas segment, driven by the shift to drilling
and development of liquids-rich hydrocarbon deposits in the shale formations, continues to generate
quality prospects. We expect to see continued growth in activity levels in the Bakken and Eagle
Ford and new activity in the Utica and Niobrara areas. We believe we have made significant progress
in transforming our business model to deliver services locally into the shale areas in the United
States. Both our Engineering and EPC service offerings are also experiencing growth, which we
expect to continue throughout 2012.
Additionally, we see significant opportunities presented by expected new pipeline integrity
regulations. Pipeline failures such as in San Bruno, California and Allentown, Pennsylvania have
moved pipeline safety to the forefront of the public and regulatory spotlight. As a result, we
believe the implementation of more stringent
pipeline integrity management regulations will result in significant additional business
opportunities for Willbros. Willbros is uniquely positioned with experienced professional staff to
handle the entire assessment, engineering,
43
construction and ongoing pipeline integrity management
and pipeline maintenance efforts. We expect increased demand for these services to be driven by
these new, more stringent regulations. These opportunities should also generate more recurring
services and help mitigate the seasonal downturns we historically have experienced in the fourth
and first quarters.
We are beginning to see the benefits of implementing our project management systems and tools
into our Utility T&D segment which, led by our Chapman transmission construction business,
contributed significantly to our third quarter performance. Our electric transmission construction
resources in Texas and the Northeast have achieved much improved utilization compared to 2010, and
we also have increased utilization of our distribution resources by expanding our customer base and
employing our resources on lower voltage transmission projects. While the distribution side of the
business has not returned to activity levels experienced in 2008, we continue to believe the
distribution business has stabilized, with some small improvements in the Texas market.
The Utility T&D segment continues to benefit from electric transmission construction required
both to improve reliability and to connect new renewable generation sources (wind and solar farms)
to demand centers. Recent government funding for additional solar projects and acceleration of
regulatory review of certain transmission projects support our view that the market for our
transmission construction services is growing. We maintain our view that we can build our
capabilities and experience by performing our significant CREZ backlog and compete for larger
projects going forward.
In addition to pursuing organic growth opportunities, we continue to look for opportunities to
improve the profitability of our core businesses. Our Downstream Oil & Gas segments performance
does not reflect the market conditions in the industry. We believe we can participate profitably in
an improving market through more focus on our sales effort to expand our customer base and leverage
our integrated service offering, led by our engineering services. We have opened an office on the
Houston Ship Channel to capture growth opportunities on the Gulf Coast. We believe the market for
turnaround services will be improved in 2012, as better refinery margins generate cash flow for our
customers. In Canada, we see higher bidding activity for tank projects and we anticipate there will
be a market for our Once-Through Steam Generator (OTSG) heater offering with the growth in
Steam-assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) production facilities.
Work commitments for the fourth quarter of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012 are significantly greater
than the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011. We also are experiencing stronger bidding
activity across both our Upstream Oil & Gas and Utility T&D segments. We expect this increased activity
level and committed revenues to produce better results than we reported in the fourth and first quarters of
2010 and 2011, respectively.
Significant Business Developments
InterCon Sale
On October 11, 2011, we closed on the sale of InterCon Construction, Inc. in an all cash
transaction.
Hovensa Project
Our Downstream Oil & Gas segment was awarded a multi-year contract to provide project
engineering services at the HOVENSA Refinery in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition to
providing front-end engineering and detailed design for multiple projects throughout the facility,
we have also been awarded a small capital project at the site.
Haynesville Region Gathering
Our Upstream Oil & Gas segment performed phase 5 of a 24-inch gathering system in the
Haynesville region of Louisiana, valued at approximately $15,000.
Oman Awards
We were successful in winning an additional oilfield construction service award in the
Mukhaizna field area, valued at approximately $30,000.
In October, our maintenance contract at the Oman LNG plant was renewed for another 5-year
period with the option to extend for another 3 years.
Coker Replacement
Our Downstream Oil & Gas segment won a coker replacement program management project for an
independent refiner in the heartland of the United States, valued at approximately $14,000.
44
API Storage Tank Award
In Canada, we were awarded tank construction
contracts at two separate projects in the oil sands area near Ft. McMurray, Alberta, Both awards are for multiple tanks and are valued in aggregate at approximately $44,000.
TransCanada Contract Dispute Settlement
In June 2011, we reached full and final agreement with TransCanada on the amount due to our
U.S. construction subsidiary under a cost reimbursable fixed fee construction contract for seven
pump stations in Nebraska and Kansas. We received $61,000 in cash as payment for our outstanding
receivables of $71,159 and agreed to waive all claims for additional fees and change orders.
TransCanada agreed to relieve Willbros of any further liability with respect to the contract and to
restore Willbros to its bid list for future work. As noted above, we incurred a non-cash charge of
$8,236. We used $40,000 of the cash settlement to retire debt.
Goodwill Impairment
Under U.S. GAAP, a company has up to one year subsequent to closing an acquisition to perform
its annual testing for goodwill impairment, unless events occur or circumstances change that would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.
On March 11, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) to acquire InfrastruX.
We closed
on the acquisition, which created our Utility T&D segment, on July 1, 2010. As such, we performed our annual testing for goodwill impairment for the
Utility T&D segment in the third quarter of 2011. The impairment test consists of company
estimates of the current fair value of the segment, compared to the segments carrying amount.
During the third quarter of 2011, we recorded an estimated impairment charge of
$134,263 related to our Utility T&D segment
which reduced our consolidated goodwill of $67,632 at September 30, 2011. Given that our step two analysis for the segment has not
been finalized, the $134,263 impairment charge represents our best estimate at September 30, 2011. Our original March 2010 growth projections in the electric
transmission and distribution business have not materialized. The continued slow economic recovery, exacerbated by
the recent recurrence of instability in the world financial markets, and the hard-hit U.S. housing sector, have
resulted in a reassessment of future growth rates and led to a reduction in the outlook for expected future cash flows in this segment.
The initial purchase price allocation to acquired assets and liabilities for the InfrastruX acquisition
included a $55,340 liability for the estimated fair value of the 2010, 2011 and combined two-year earnout
provisions in the Merger Agreement. At the time of the purchase price allocation, recognition of this $55,340 liability
resulted in goodwill increasing by a corresponding amount. No payments have occurred or are expected
to occur; and accordingly, the liability was reduced to zero as of September 30, 2011. Reductions to the
liability resulted in corresponding increases in operating income and net income of $4,000 and $10,000
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $45,340 during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Our weighted average cost of capital used for the original purchase price valuation has increased 1.6 percentage
points from 14.4 percent at the time of the InfrastruX acquisition to 16.0 percent on July 1, 2011. The primary
driver of the percentage increase was related to higher levels of risk associated with increased leverage. Our
fair value analysis as further discussed below, is heavily (65 percent) weighted on discounted cash flows
(DCF).
The resulting DCFs would have been $65,000 higher if the discount rate was reduced to 14.4 percent.
Our fair value analysis is supported by a weighting of the following three generally accepted
valuation approaches:
|
|
|
Income Approach discounted cash flows of future benefit streams; |
|
|
|
|
Market Approach public comparable company multiples of sales and earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); and |
|
|
|
|
Market Approach multiples generated from recent transactions comparable in size,
nature and industry. |
These approaches include numerous assumptions with respect to future circumstances, such as
industry and/or local market conditions that might directly impact operations in the future, and
are, therefore, uncertain. These approaches are utilized to develop a range of fair values and a
weighted average of these approaches are utilized to determine the best fair value estimate within
that range.
Income Approach Discounted Cash Flows. This valuation approach derives a present value of
the reporting units projected future annual cash flows over the next 8 years and the present
residual value of the segment. We use a variety of underlying assumptions to estimate these future
cash flows, including assumptions relating to future economic market conditions, sales volumes,
costs and expenses and capital expenditures. These assumptions are dependent on regional market
conditions, including competitive position, degree of vertical integration, supply and demand for
materials and other industry conditions. The discount rate used in the Income Approach,
specifically, the weighted average cost of capital, used in our analysis during the third quarter
was 16 percent. The revenue compounded annual growth rates used in the Income Approach varied from
3 percent to 20 percent. Our EBITDA margins derived from these underlying assumptions varied
between approximately 9 percent and 13 percent. The terminal growth rate used was 3 percent.
Market Approach Multiples of Sales and EBITDA. This valuation approach utilizes publicly
traded construction companies enterprise values, as compared to their recent sales and EBITDA
information. We used an average EBITDA multiple of 5.5 times in determining this market approach
metric. This multiple is used as a
valuation metric to our most recent financial performance. We used EBITDA as an indicator of
demand because it is a widely used key indicator of the cash generating capacity of similar
companies.
Market Approach Comparisons of Recent Transactions. This valuation approach uses publicly
available
45
information regarding recent third-party sales transactions in our industry to derive a
valuation metric of the targets respective enterprise values over their EBITDA amounts. We
utilize this valuation metric with our most recent financial performance to derive a what if
sales transaction comparable fair value estimate.
We selected these valuation approaches because we believe the combination of these approaches,
along with our best judgment regarding underlying assumptions and estimates, provides us with the best
estimate of fair value. We believe these valuation approaches are
proven and appropriate for our industry and widely accepted by investors. The estimated fair value would
change if our weighting assumptions under the three valuation approaches were materially modified.
We weighted the Income Approach at 65 percent, the Market Approach Multiples of Sales and EBITDA
at 25 percent and the Market Approach Comparison of Recent Transactions at 10 percent. This
weighting was utilized to reflect fair value in current market conditions.
Our valuation model utilizes assumptions, which represent our best estimate of future events,
but would be sensitive to positive or negative changes in each of the underlying assumptions as
well as an alternative weighting of valuation methods, which would result in a potentially higher
or lower goodwill impairment charge. We can provide no assurance that future goodwill impairments
will not occur.
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Earnout Liability
During the third quarter of 2011, we reduced the estimated fair value of the contingent
earnout liability to the former InfrastruX shareholders to zero, resulting in a favorable impact to
both operating income and net income. The reduction was due to a third quarter decrease in the
probability-weighted estimated achievement of EBITDA targets as set forth in the Merger Agreement. This reduction was driven primarily by lower expectations for significant
storm work during the remainder of the year which led us to conclude that the full year 2011
EBITDA targets, that would trigger recognition of the earnout, are no longer attainable.
Financial Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
Percent |
|
|
9/30/2011 |
|
6/30/2011 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Change |
Revenue |
|
$ |
466,103 |
|
|
$ |
458,336 |
|
|
$ |
7,767 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
$ |
32,668 |
|
|
$ |
30,028 |
|
|
$ |
2,640 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Operating
income (loss) |
|
$ |
(116,441 |
) |
|
$ |
8,596 |
|
|
$ |
(125,037 |
) |
|
|
(1,454.6 |
%) |
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
$ |
10,446 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
$ |
(28,321 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,480 |
) |
|
|
104.6 |
% |
Results and Financial Position
For
the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded a net loss from continuing operations
of $99,706 or $2.10 per share on revenue of $466,103. This compares
to net income from continuing operations of $7,754 or $0.16 per share on
revenue of $458,336 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Continuing operations revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased $7,767
(1.7 percent) to $466,103 as compared to $458,336 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
The revenue improvement is a result of increased business
activity predominantly within our Upstream Oil & Gas segment. Increases in revenue within Upstream
Oil & Gas segment were driven primarily from an increase in
EPC projects.
General and administrative costs remained consistent over the sequential quarter increasing $2,640 as a
result of a $2,625 decrease in gain on sale of assets recognized in the third quarter compared to the second quarter.
Operating income, exclusive
of the estimated $134,263 goodwill impairment charge and the $4,000 reduction in the contingent earnout liability, decreased
$3,010 in comparison to the second quarter, exclusive of the $8,236 settlement charge related to TransCanada. The
decrease is primarily attributed to the gain on the sale of the Ft. McMurray property in the second quarter.
Interest expense, net increased $583 (5.6 percent) to $11,029 for the three months ended
September 30, 2011 compared to $10,446 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase is
primarily attributable to the write-off of $1,646 in unamortized OID and debt issuance costs
inclusive of a 1 percent early payment fee in connection with an accelerated payment against our
Term Loan during the third quarter. In the second quarter, approximately $4,124 of OID and
financing costs inclusive of a 2 percent early payment fee, were classified as
loss on early extinguishment of debt.
Provision (benefit) for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased
$14,480 to a benefit of $28,321 from a benefit of $13,841 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
This increase is primarily attributable to the recognition of a $25,671 benefit related to the estimated impairment of
goodwill in the Utility T&D segment. Other discrete items impacting the effective tax rate for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 include $676 tax benefit from the true-up of taxes following
completion of the year 2010 tax filings, $2,186 tax benefit associated with the provision for repatriation of
foreign earnings and profits and $1,313 associated with the $4,000 reduction of contingent earnout
liability in connection with the acquisition of InfrastruX that has no tax benefit.
46
Other Financial Measures
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA from Continuing Operations
We use EBITDA as part of our overall assessment of financial performance by comparing EBITDA
between accounting periods. We believe that EBITDA is used by the financial community as a method
of measuring our performance and of evaluating the market value of companies considered to be in
businesses similar to ours.
EBITDA from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased
$10,105 (45.8 percent) to $32,186 from $22,081 during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The
increase in EBITDA results primarily from the TransCanada settlement charge in the second quarter
of $8,236, which did not recur in the third quarter of 2011.
In addition to EBITDA, management uses Adjusted EBITDA for:
|
|
|
Comparing normalized operating results with corresponding historical periods and with
the operational performance of other companies in our industry; and |
|
|
|
|
Presentations made to analysts, investment banks and other members of the financial
community who use this information in order to make investment decisions about
us. |
Adjustments to EBITDA broadly consist of items which management does not consider
representative of the ongoing operations of the Company. These generally include costs or benefits
that are unusual, non-cash or one-time in nature. These adjustments are included in various
performance metrics under our credit facilities and other financing arrangements. The EBITDA
adjustments to determine Adjusted EBITDA are itemized in the following table. You are encouraged
to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate for supplemental
analysis. In evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we may incur
expenses that are the same as, or similar to, some of the adjustments in this presentation. Our
presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results
will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not financial measurements recognized under U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance,
investors should use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net
income, operating income, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or
as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. Because not
all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may be
different from similarly titled measures of other companies.
A reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations to U.S. GAAP
financial information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
30, 2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
attributable to Willbros Group |
|
$ |
(99,706 |
) |
|
$ |
7,754 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
11,029 |
|
|
|
10,446 |
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(28,321 |
) |
|
|
(13,841 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,921 |
|
|
|
17,722 |
|
Goodwill
impairment |
|
|
134,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
32,186 |
|
|
|
22,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of contingent earnout
liability |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
Restructuring and reorganization costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Acquisition related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
(Gains) losses on sales of assets |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
(3,734 |
) |
DOJ monitor cost |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
31,620 |
|
|
$ |
21,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
In our industry, backlog is considered an indicator of potential future performance as it
represents a portion of the future revenue stream. Our strategy is focused on capturing quality
backlog with margins commensurate with
47
the risks associated with a given project, and for the past
several years, we have put processes and procedures in place to identify contractual and execution
risks in new work opportunities. We believe we have instilled in the organization the discipline
to price, accept and book only work which meets stringent criteria for commercial success and
profitability.
We believe the backlog figures are firm, subject only to the cancellation and modification
provisions contained in various contracts. We generate revenue from numerous sources, including
contracts of long or short duration entered into during a year as well as from various contractual
processes, including change orders, extra work and variations in the scope of work.
Backlog broadly consists of anticipated revenue from the uncompleted portions of existing
contracts and contracts whose award is reasonably assured. Prior to
December 31, 2010, our backlog has only
included estimated work under Master Service Agreements (MSAs) for a period of 12 months or the
remaining term of the contract, whichever is less. However, with the July 2010 acquisition of
InfrastruX, we gained a significant alliance agreement with Oncor and other customers with work
defined by MSAs. Under the Oncor MSA, we are the preferred contractor for the construction of
Oncors portion of the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ) work that is scheduled to be
completed in 2013. We expect to generate over $500 million in overhead transmission construction
revenue over the next three years on the Oncor MSA in which CREZ work is a material component. With
this as the primary catalyst, we have updated our backlog presentation to reflect not only the 12
month MSA work estimate, but also the full-term value of the contract, as we believe that this
information is helpful in providing additional long-term visibility. We determine the amount of
backlog for work under ongoing MSA maintenance and construction contracts by using recurring
historical trends inherent in the MSAs, factoring in seasonal demand and projecting customer needs
based upon ongoing communications with the customer. We also include in backlog our share of work
to be performed under contracts signed by joint ventures in which we have an ownership interest.
Our 12 month and total backlog increased $82,189 and $259,673, respectively, from $828,582 and
$2,038,294 at December 31, 2010 to $910,771 and $2,297,967 at September 30, 2011. Historically, a
substantial amount of our pipeline construction revenue in a given year has not been in our backlog
at the beginning of that year. Additionally, due to the short duration of many jobs, revenue
associated with jobs performed within a reporting period will not be reflected in quarterly backlog
reports.
The following table shows our backlog from continuing operations by operating segment and
geographic location as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
12 Month |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
12 Month |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Percent |
|
Upstream Oil & Gas |
|
$ |
326,068 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
$ |
545,518 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
$ |
224,996 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
$ |
547,341 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream Oil & Gas |
|
|
122,529 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
159,919 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
107,077 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
107,077 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Utility T&D |
|
|
462,174 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
1,592,530 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
% |
|
|
496,509 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
% |
|
|
1,383,876 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog |
|
$ |
910,771 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,297,967 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
828,582 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,038,294 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Percent |
|
Total Backlog by Geographic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,909,877 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,593,241 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
334,985 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
394,856 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
Middle East/North Africa |
|
|
44,243 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
45,728 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Other International |
|
|
8,862 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog |
|
$ |
2,297,967 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,038,294 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
In 2006, we announced our intention to sell our assets and operations in Nigeria, which led to
their classification as discontinued operations. We sold our Nigeria assets and operations on
February 7, 2007 to
48
Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (Ascot) pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement
by and between us and Ascot.
In 2010, we recognized that our investment in establishing a presence in Libya, while
resulting in contract awards, had not yielded any notice to proceed on subject awards. As a result,
we exited this market due to the project delays coupled with the identification of other more
attractive opportunities.
In April 2011, as part of our ongoing strategic evaluation of operations, we made the decision
to exit the Canada cross-country pipeline construction market and monetize our investment
in this business.
We
realized a loss from discontinued operations of $11,563
or $0.24 loss per
share for the third quarter of 2011. The loss is related to $6,506 in legal costs attributed to
the West Africa Gas Pipeline (WAGP) project litigation initiated by the West Africa Pipeline Company Ltd.
(WAPCo). We expect legal expenses to remain significant through the June 2012 expected trial
date. The remaining loss of $5,057 is primarily attributed to continued losses within our
discontinued Canadian cross-country pipeline operations. While we pursue a sale of these
operations, we continue to take steps to minimize our future cash exposure.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, we identified and
disclosed our significant accounting policies. Subsequent to December 31, 2010, there has been no
change to our significant accounting policies.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our contract revenue and contract costs are significantly impacted by the capital budgets of
our clients and the timing and location of development projects in the oil and gas, refinery,
petrochemical and power industries worldwide. Contract revenue and cost vary by country from
year-to-year as the result of: (a) entering and exiting work countries; (b) the execution of new
contract awards; (c) the completion of contracts; and (d) the overall level of demand for our
services.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Contract Revenue
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, contract revenue increased $62,144 (15.4
percent) to $466,103 from $403,959 during the same period in 2010. A quarter-to-quarter comparison
of revenue by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream Oil & Gas |
|
$ |
226,372 |
|
|
$ |
189,359 |
|
|
$ |
37,013 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
Downstream Oil & Gas |
|
|
53,680 |
|
|
|
80,870 |
|
|
|
(27,190 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
)% |
Utility T&D |
|
|
186,051 |
|
|
|
133,730 |
|
|
|
52,321 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
466,103 |
|
|
$ |
403,959 |
|
|
$ |
62,144 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Upstream Oil & Gas segment revenue increased $37,013 (19.5 percent) driven primarily by
strong operating results with our United States engineering business and our Canadian business,
offset by decreases in our United States Construction and Oman businesses.
Our U.S. businesses increased revenue $32,968 (24.8 percent) to $165,942 for the third quarter
of 2011, driven by our core engineering service business, which increased $35,103 (207.2 percent)
as we continue to experience strong demand for their services. This increase was offset by a
reduction in revenue within our U.S. Construction business of $2,135 (1.8 percent) driven primarily
by a decrease in the size of major pipeline projects performed during the third quarter of 2011
relative to those of 2010. However, our regional offices are replacing large diameter project pipeline revenue.
In Canada, revenue increased $6,863 (19.4 percent) to $42,161 driven primarily by increased
demand for small capital projects in Field Services.
In Oman, revenue decreased $2,818 (13.4 percent) to $18,269, driven by a slight decrease in
demand by our customers for construction and maintenance services we provide in a more competitive
market.
Our Downstream Oil & Gas segment revenue decreased primarily as a result of reduced activity
in maintenance and turnaround, tank construction, and government services, partially offset by
increased activity in engineering, fabrication, and construction services.
Our maintenance and turnaround revenue decreased $24,532 (57.8 percent) to $17,906 for the
third quarter of 2011 as a result of continued poor spending levels in the refinery sector for
maintenance and turnaround work. Our tank services revenue decreased $7,093 (38.0 percent) to
$11,574 for the third quarter of 2011 due to
49
a significant tank and facility
construction project in Canada that was completed in the fourth quarter of 2010. Our
government services revenue decreased $110 (5.8 percent) to $1,774 for the third quarter of 2011,
reflecting a relatively consistent volume of work for the U.S. Navy under the Engineering Service
Centers IDIQ contract. We continue to bid on task orders as they are released.
Our Downstream engineering revenue increased $2,800 (24.3 percent) to $14,327 for the third
quarter of 2011 primarily due to improved demand for our engineering services as well as an EPC
contract awarded during the third quarter of 2010 that continues to generate revenue. Our
fabrication services revenue increased $1,707 (29.2 percent) to $7,563 for the third quarter of
2011, as a result of increased demand for the fabrication of process heaters. Our construction
services revenue remained flat at $536 for the third quarter of 2011, reflecting a similar level of
consulting services contracts for our customers long-term capital expansion projects as in the
third quarter of 2010.
Our Utility T&D segment revenue increased $52,321 (39.1 percent) for the third quarter of 2011
primarily as a result of an increase in activity from large projects in the Northeast as well as
increased activity with our Oncor MSA in Texas.
In the third quarter of 2011, the construction projects located in the Northeast produced $15,822 in revenue. In addition to
revenue generated from these larger projects, storm work, primarily from Hurricane Irene, produced
$12,392 in revenue for the quarter. Storm work revenue was primarily reported within our Hawkeye
business, but we were able to mobilize approximately 600 personnel from across the Utility T&D
segment to assist with restoring power after Hurricane Irene.
Revenue associated with our Chapman business increased significantly with additional projects
performed under our Oncor contract. For the quarter, revenue from these projects increased $18,904
(96.3 percent) to $38,545. Overhead and underground transmission services specific to Oncor also
increased $1,218 (13.1 percent) to $10,546 for the quarter.
Our cable restoration revenue remained strong increasing $403 (2.5 percent) to $16,326 for the
quarter.
Operating Income
For
the three months ended September 30, 2011, operating income
decreased $163,965 to a loss of $116,441 from $47,524 during the same period in 2010. The change in fair value of the contingent earnout
was characterized as a corporate change in estimate and is not allocated to the reporting segments.
For information regarding the contingent earnout, see discussion in
Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements. A quarter-to-quarter
comparison of operating income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream Oil & Gas |
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
$ |
29,685 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
$ |
(16,104 |
) |
|
|
(54.2 |
)% |
Downstream Oil & Gas |
|
|
(3,873 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
)% |
|
|
(11,616 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
)% |
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
% |
Utility T&D |
|
|
(130,149 |
) |
|
|
(70.0 |
)% |
|
|
(15,885 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
)% |
|
|
(114,264 |
) |
|
|
(719.3 |
)% |
Corporate |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
45,340 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(41,340 |
) |
|
|
(91.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(116,441 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
47,524 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
$ |
(163,965 |
) |
|
|
(345.0) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
Upstream Oil & Gas segments operating income
decrease of $16,104 (54.2 percent)
quarter-over-quarter is attributed to our operations within the United States, which reported operating
income of $5,895, a $17,337 decrease in comparison to the third quarter of 2010. This decrease was
primarily from our U.S. Construction business.
Our
U.S. Construction business reported a third quarter of 2011 operating
income of $3,336, a
decrease of $17,277 (83.8 percent) in comparison to the third quarter of 2010. This decrease is
mainly related to a negotiated, large diameter pipeline project completed in 2010 that was
partially replaced by smaller diameter pipeline projects and an increase in our regional delivery
work during the same period in 2011. Over the course of the past year, we have seen a shift in
both bid and awarded projects from large, cross-country pipelines to smaller, regional pipelines in
a more competitive bidding environment. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company incurred
additional costs to support these regional offices, which serve our customers in the Permian Basin
and the Eagle Ford and Bakken Shale areas. We have invested in these offices and incurred certain
start-up costs in order to make these offices operational.
Our
Upstream engineering business reported third quarter 2011 operating income of $2,558, a
decrease of $61 (2.3 percent) compared to the third quarter of 2010. Demand for our engineering
services remains strong;
50
however, margins have slightly declined due to a higher mix of EPC
projects, which traditionally generate lower blended margins than engineering-only projects.
Regional office expansion required additional start up costs.
In Canada, operating income increased $1,520 (42.3 percent) to operating income of $5,114 for
the third quarter of 2011 in comparison to the third quarter of 2010. This increase was driven by
higher demand for small capital projects in the oil sands, offset in part by a 0.7 percentage point
reduction in operating margin primarily attributable to the mix of services on our MSAs in
construction and maintenance services.
In Oman, operating income decreased $1,479 (40.7 percent) to $2,153 for the third quarter of
2011. This decrease is primarily the result of the aforementioned reduction in revenue, amplified
by a decrease in margin attributable to an increase in wage requirements to Omani nationals and
higher competitive market prices. Additional operating income of $419 was generated due to an
international tax settlement.
Our third quarter Downstream Oil & Gas segment operating loss (excluding the goodwill
impairment charge of $12,000 in 2010) increased to $3,873 as compared to the same quarter last
year. The overall contract margin for the segment decreased 5.4 percentage points
quarter-over-quarter (excluding the 2010 goodwill unfavorable impact), primarily as a result of
cost overruns on several fixed-price fabrication and tank construction projects. This decrease was
partially offset by continued overhead cost reductions that have occurred since the third quarter
of 2010. General and administrative expenses were reduced by $1,230 quarter-over-quarter.
Exclusive of the estimated goodwill impairment charge of $134,263, our Utility T&D segment reported a third quarter of 2011 operating income of $4,114 which is
an increase of $19,999 (125.9 percent) in comparison to the third quarter of 2010. This increase
is primarily attributable to the increased revenue and utilization previously discussed. Contract
income increased $11,968 (4.2 percent) in 2011 with a majority of the improvement at Chapman and
Hawkeye; specifically contract income increased $6,627 (12.9 percent) and $2,582 (5.9 percent)
respectively. Further, one-time deal costs of $9,550 were incurred in the third quarter of 2010
associated with the purchase of InfrastruX, which did not recur in 2011.
Non-Operating Items
Interest expense, net decreased $846 (7.1 percent) to $11,029 for the third quarter of 2011.
This decrease is attributable to a $1,146 reduction in interest expense and associated amortization
of our 2.75% Notes, which were repurchased on March 15, 2011, and a third quarter 2011 cash
interest reduction of $1,435 attributed to previous accelerated payments against our Term Loan.
This decrease was offset by approximately $1,646 of accelerated amortization of OID and debt
issuance costs associated with our third quarter 2011 accelerated payment of $22,179 against our
Term Loan. Third quarter 2011 cash interest expense associated with our Term Loan totaled $5,853
compared to $7,288 for 2010.
Other, net decreased by $885 (141.8 percent) to an expense of $261 for the third quarter of 2011. This decrease is
mostly attributable to a combination of foreign transactions and miscellaneous income recognized in the third quarter of 2010.
Provision (benefit) for income taxes increased $26,183 to a benefit of $28,321 compared to a benefit
of $2,138 for the same period in 2010. This increase is primarily attributed to a deferred tax payment of
$25,671 recorded in connection with the estimated impairment of goodwill in the
Utility T&D segment. Other
discrete items impacting the effective tax rate include $676 tax benefit from the true-up of taxes following
completion of the year 2010 tax filings, $1,955 additional tax expense associated with the provision for
the repatriation of foreign earnings and profits, and $3,250 associated with the $10,000 reduction of
contingent earnout liability in connection with the acquisition of InfratruX that has no tax benefit.
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes increased $8,853 to $11,563 from $2,710 during
the same period in 2010. The loss is primarily related to our Canadian cross-country pipeline
construction business and legal fees incurred in connection with the WAPCo litigation. The legal
fees are expected to continue to be significant through the June 2012 trial of the matter.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Contract Revenue
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, contract revenue increased $464,070 (58.8
percent) to $1,253,325 from $789,255 during the same period in 2010. A period-to-period comparison
of revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream Oil & Gas |
|
$ |
579,375 |
|
|
$ |
452,630 |
|
|
$ |
126,745 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Downstream Oil & Gas |
|
|
165,376 |
|
|
|
202,895 |
|
|
|
(37,519 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
)% |
Utility T&D |
|
|
508,574 |
|
|
|
133,730 |
|
|
|
374,844 |
|
|
|
280.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,253,325 |
|
|
$ |
789,255 |
|
|
$ |
464,070 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Upstream Oil & Gas segment revenue increased $126,745 (28.0 percent). Our U.S.
Construction business
reported revenue of $316,403, an increase of $64,150 (25.4 percent) from the same period of
2010. This increase was driven, in part, by a full nine months of operating results of B&H
Construction, acquired in July 2010, which
51
contributed revenue of $74,058 through nine months of
operations in 2011, versus $24,443 in only three months of 2010. In February of 2011, our large
diameter pipeline construction business commenced work on Segment 1 of the Acadian Haynesville
Extension Project, which completed in September of 2011. By contrast, U.S. Construction was fully
engaged on the construction of the Fayetteville Express Pipeline (FEP) projects. Also, we are
beginning to realize additional revenue contributed from the previously discussed regional
expansion, primarily in the Eagle Ford region in South Texas.
Our Upstream engineering business reported revenue of $97,744, an increase of $53,312 (120.0
percent) in comparison to the same period in 2010 as we continue to experience strong demand for
our engineering and EPC services.
In Canada, revenue increased $10,149 (10.1 percent) to $110,244 driven by increased
construction and fabrication of three major pump-stations during the year. This increase was
offset by lower levels of maintenance and capital projects performed pursuant to MSAs.
In Oman, revenue decreased $866 (1.6 percent) to $54,984 for the first nine months of 2011
driven by increased competition and a slight decrease in demand for our construction and
maintenance services by our customers.
Our Downstream Oil & Gas segment revenue decreased primarily as a result of a reduction in
activity within maintenance and turnaround, fabrication, tank services, and construction services,
partially offset by increased activity within our engineering and government services businesses.
Our maintenance and turnaround revenue decreased $41,089 (38.4 percent), to $65,978 for the
first nine months of 2011 primarily as a result of continued poor spending levels in the refinery
sector for maintenance and turnaround work. We were also unsuccessful in replacing several
significant turnaround contracts in 2011. Our fabrication services revenue decreased $1,776 (8.8
percent), to $18,402, primarily due to a decrease in demand for the fabrication of process heaters
during the first six months of 2011. We experienced an increase in demand for process heaters
during the third quarter of 2011. Our tank services revenue decreased $1,551 (4.6 percent), to
$31,917 for the first nine months of 2011 due to the completion of a significant tank and facility
construction project in Canada in the fourth quarter of 2010, partially offset by the commencement
of several new domestic multiple tank construction contracts in 2011. Our construction services
revenue decreased $1,056 (40.3 percent) to $1,561 for the first nine months of 2011 due to the
completion of several multi-year consulting services contracts for our customers long-term capital
expansion projects.
Our Downstream engineering revenue increased $5,728 (16.2 percent), to $41,064 for the first
nine months of 2011 primarily due to improved demand for our engineering services as well as an EPC
contract awarded during the third quarter of 2010 that continues to generate revenue. This
increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenue resulting from the completion of a one-year
capital expansion program management contract that was finalized in 2010. Our government services
revenue increased $2,225 (52.6 percent), to $6,454 for the first nine months of 2011 due to 5
additional task order awards from the U.S. Navy under the Engineering Service Centers IDIQ
contract. We continued work on the 11 task orders from 2010 and received 3 modifications to
existing fuel storage tank inspection task orders, which expanded our scope from tank inspection to
performing repairs on the storage tanks.
The Utility T&D segment was created from the acquisition of InfrastruX on July 1, 2010,
therefore, the first nine months of 2010 is not comparable to the same period in 2011. Total
Utility T&D segment revenue for the first nine months of 2011 was $508,574, including the BP Solar
and Bangor Hydro projects which produced revenue of $48,793 and $13,821, respectively. Both
projects are expected to be completed in the fourth quarter. Storm work from Hurricane Irene,
which occurred in the third quarter of 2011 generated revenue of $12,392.
Revenue at Chapman for overhead electric, substation and wireless communication was $90,920,
$26,016 and $6,542, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Revenue specific to
our MSA contract with Oncor was $108,357 for the period and is expected to remain strong for the
rest of the year. Work performed under the contract is primarily overhead electric transmission and
substation work.
Revenue from our cable restoration services was $44,684 for the first nine months of 2011 and
is expected to remain strong the rest of the year.
Operating Income
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, operating income decreased $181,907 to a loss of
$132,399 from income of $49,508 during the same period in 2010. The change in fair value of the
contingent earnout was characterized as a corporate change in estimate and is not allocated to the
reporting segments. For information regarding the contingent earnout, see discussion in Note 15 - Fair Value Measurements.
A period-to-period comparison of operating income (loss) is as follows:
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Margin% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Margin% |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream Oil & Gas |
|
$ |
8,185 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
$ |
47,120 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(38,935 |
) |
|
|
(82.6 |
)% |
Downstream Oil & Gas |
|
|
(12,648 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
|
|
(27,067 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
)% |
|
|
14,419 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
% |
Utility T&D |
|
|
(137,936 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
)% |
|
|
(15,885 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
)% |
|
|
(122,051 |
) |
|
|
(768.3 |
)% |
Corporate |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
45,340 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(35,340 |
) |
|
|
(77.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(132,399 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
49,508 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
$ |
(181,907 |
) |
|
|
(367.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
Upstream Oil & Gas segment reported operating income of
$8,185, a $38,935 decrease from
the same period in 2010 which is attributed primarily to our U.S. Construction, engineering and
Canada businesses.
Our
U.S. Construction business reported an operating loss of $4,851, a
$34,365 (116.4 percent)
decrease in comparison to the first nine months of 2010. This business was unfavorably impacted by
the settlement of the facility construction project dispute with TransCanada, which resulted in a
pre-tax, non-cash charge of $8,236 in the second quarter of 2011. As discussed above, we have
replaced one negotiated large pipeline project from 2010 with several smaller projects in a more
competitive market in 2011. Further, our pipeline construction business incurred additional costs
as we continue to expand our regional delivery business.
Our
engineering business reported operating income of $3,046, a decrease
of $2,723 (47.2
percent) in comparison to the first nine months of 2010. This reduction was driven, in part, by the
settlement of a dispute stemming from a contract completed in 2009, which resulted in an additional
pre-tax charge of $1,000 during the first quarter of 2011.
In
Canada, we reported operating income of $3,568, a decrease in
operating income of $2,354
in comparison to the first nine months of 2010. This decrease was driven by the first quarter of
2011 operating loss of $5,085 resulting from several loss projects within facilities and
construction services, as well as reduced third quarter margins primarily attributable to the mix
of services on our MSAs in construction and maintenance services.
In
Oman, operating income decreased by $1,200 (14.8 percent) to
$6,929 for the first nine
months of 2011. This decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in margin driven by an
increase in wage requirements to Omani nationals as dictated by the Omani government early in 2011.
In addition, other operating income increased due to an international tax settlement.
Our Downstream Oil & Gas
segment operating loss decreased primarily because of reduced
corporate general and administrative expenses allocated to the segment and the $12,000 goodwill
impairment charge in the third quarter of 2010. The overall contract margin for the segment
decreased 3.1 percentage points period-over-period, primarily because of cost overruns on several
fixed-price fabrication and tank construction projects. This decrease was offset by overhead cost
reductions since the third quarter of 2010. General and administrative expenses were reduced by
$4,501 period-over-period.
Exclusive
of the estimated goodwill impairment charge of $134,263, our Utility T&D
segment had an operating loss of $3,673 for the nine months ended September
30, 2011. The loss is attributable to $7,788 of losses incurred during the first half of the year,
primarily related to operating losses on our projects due to adverse weather conditions. These
early losses were offset by the previously discussed operating income
of $4,114 in the third
quarter. Due to the acquisition of InfrastruX on July 1, 2010, year-over-year comparison data is
not available for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Non-Operating Items
Interest expense, net increased $20,191 (125.5 percent) to $36,275 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011. The increase was largely attributed to our 2010 Credit Agreement entered into
on June 30, 2010 for which we have incurred cash interest charges of $19,207 for the period, or an
increase of $11,919 in comparison to the same period in 2010. In addition, amortization charges of
$4,362 relating to the accelerated amortization of OID and debt issuance costs, inclusive of early
payment fees, were incurred in 2011 due to certain accelerated payments against our Term Loan. The
period-over-period increase was partially offset by a $2,306 reduction in interest expense and
associated amortization of our 2.75% Notes, which we repurchased on March 15, 2011.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded a $4,124 loss attributed to the
write-off of unamortized OID and financing costs inclusive of an early payment fee in connection
with an accelerated payment of $40,000 against our Term Loan in June 2011. The loss is recorded in
the line item Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the period.
Other
net decreased $1,749 (119.4 percent) to expense of $284 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, primarily due to certain foreign
transactions recorded during the period.
Provision (benefit) for income taxes increased $37,946 from a benefit of $3,813 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, to a benefit of $41,759 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The
increase is primarily attributable to the recognition of a $25,671 deferred tax benefit recorded in
connection with the estimated impairment of goodwill in the Utility T&D segment. Other discrete items impacting the
effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2011 include $676 tax benefit from the true-up of taxes
following completion of the year 2010 tax filings, $1,955 additional tax expense associated with the
provision for the repatriation of foreign earnings and profits, and $3,250 associated with the $10,000
reduction of contingent earnout liability in connection with the acquisition of InfrastruX that has no tax
benefit.
53
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of taxes increased $20,504 to
$27,571 from $7,067
during the same period in 2010. The loss is primarily related to our Canadian cross-country
pipeline construction business and legal fees incurred in connection with the WAPCo litigation. The
legal fees are expected to continue to be significant through the June 2012 trial of the matter.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our financing objective is to maintain financial flexibility to meet the material, equipment
and personnel needs to support our work commitments, and pursue our expansion and diversification
objectives, while reducing our level and cost of debt. As of September 30, 2011, we had cash and
cash equivalents from continuing operations of $68,333. Our cash and cash equivalent balances held in the United States and
foreign countries were $48,934 and $19,399, respectively. In April 2011, we discontinued our
strategy of reinvesting non-U.S. earnings in foreign operations. In
the first quarter, we
repatriated $25,500 of cash from our principal foreign holding company to repay Term Loan debt. In the third quarter, we repatriated another $12,000 for a total of $37,500 for the first nine months of 2011.
The 2010 Credit Agreement consists of a four year, $300,000 Term Loan maturing in July 2014
and a three year Revolving Credit Facility of $175,000. The proceeds from the Term Loan were used
to pay part of the cash portion of the merger consideration payable in connection with our
acquisition of InfrastruX. The Revolving Credit Facility is primarily used to provide letters of
credit; however, it does allow for borrowings. Our ability to use the Revolving Credit Facility for
borrowings, however, has been restricted because of the amendment discussed in the next
paragraph. The maximum total leverage ratio covenant in our 6.5% Notes may also restrict our
ability to use the Revolving Credit Facility for revolving loans from time to time.
On March 4, 2011, the 2010 Credit Agreement was amended to allow us to make certain
dispositions of equipment, real estate and business units. In most cases, proceeds from these
dispositions will be required to be used to pay-down the existing Term Loan. Financial covenants
and associated definitions, such as Consolidated EBITDA, were also amended to permit us to carry
out our business plan and to clarify the treatment of certain items. Until our maximum total
leverage ratio is 3.00 to 1.00 or less, we have agreed to limit our revolver borrowings to $25,000,
with the exception of proceeds from revolving borrowings used to make payments on the 6.5% Senior Convertible Notes (the 6.5% Notes) and to make $59,357 in payments to the
2.75% Convertible Senior Notes that were submitted to us for cash payment in the first quarter. The
amendment does not change the limit on obtaining letters of credit. The amendment also modifies
the definition of Excess Cash Flow to include proceeds from the TransCanada arbitration, which
required us to use a portion of such proceeds to further pay-down the existing Term Loan. In late
June 2011, we received $61,000 from TransCanada as a settlement and used $40,000 to pay-down the
Term Loan. For prepayments made with Net Debt Proceeds or Equity Issuance Proceeds (as those terms
are defined in the 2010 Credit Agreement), the amendment requires a prepayment premium of 4% of the
principal amount of the Term Loans prepaid before December 31, 2011; and 1% of the principal amount
of the Term Loans prepaid on and after December 31, 2011, but before December 31, 2012. Premiums
for prepayments made with proceeds other than Net Debt Proceeds or Equity Issuance Proceeds remain
the same as set forth under the 2010 Credit Agreement.
On September 16, 2011, following receipt of the requisite consents of the holders of our 6.5%
Notes, the Indenture for our 6.5% Notes was amended, in part, to increase the maximum total
leverage ratio from 4.00 to 1.00 to 6.00 to 1.00 for the remainder of 2011. The Indenture was also
amended to conform the definition of Consolidated EBITDA in the Indenture to the definition of
Consolidated EBITDA in the 2010 Credit Agreement. We believe that these amendments enhance our
financial flexibility for the remainder of 2011 by enabling us to borrow up to $25,000 available under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Covenants
The table below sets forth the primary covenants in the 2010 Credit Agreement and the
status with respect to these covenants as of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants |
|
|
Actual Ratios at |
|
|
Actual Ratios at |
|
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Maximum Total Leverage Ratio (debt
divided by Covenant EBITDA) should be
less than: |
|
|
5.00 to 1 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Interest Coverage Ratio
(Covenant EBITDA divided by interest
expense as defined in the 2010 Credit
Agreement) should be greater than: |
|
|
2.00 to 1 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Net Tangible Worth
(stockholders equity less goodwill and
plus or minus allowed 2010 Credit
Agreement adjustments) should be
greater than: |
|
$ |
262,019 |
|
|
$ |
298,006 |
|
|
$ |
278,694 |
|
The Maximum Total Leverage Ratio declines to 4.75 to 1 as of December 31, 2011. The value of the
trailing 12-month EBITDA as defined in the 2010 Credit Agreement (or Covenant EBITDA), was
negatively impacted by two underperforming quarters, the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of
2011 with Covenant EBITDA of $5,753 and ($7,656), respectively. We expect to achieve significant
Covenant EBITDA improvement in the equivalent quarters in 2011 and 2012. In addition, we continue to
improve the primary covenant ratios and the Minimum Net Tangible Worth value through accelerated
payments against our Term Loan. The December 31, 2011 primary covenant calculations will benefit
from a fourth quarter $18,700 accelerated payment against our Term Loan. Based on our current operating
projections, we believe that we will remain in compliance with the above primary covenants. However,
depending on market conditions, we may need to request amendments, or waivers for the primary
covenants, or obtain refinancing in future periods. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
obtain amendments or waivers, or negotiate agreeable refinancing terms should it become needed.
The 2010 Credit Agreement also includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including:
|
|
|
Limitations on capital expenditures (greater of $70,000 or 25% of EBITDA). |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on indebtedness. |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on liens. |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on certain asset sales and dispositions. |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on certain acquisitions and asset purchases if certain liquidity levels are not
maintained. |
54
A default under the 2010 Credit Agreement may be triggered by events such as a failure to
comply with financial covenants or other covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement; a failure to
make payments when due under the 2010 Credit Agreement; a failure to make payments when due in
respect of, or a failure to perform obligations relating to, debt obligations in excess of $15,000;
a change of control of the Company; and certain insolvency proceedings. A default under the 2010
Credit Agreement would permit Crédit Agricole and the lenders to terminate their commitment to make
cash advances or issue letters of credit, require the immediate repayment of any outstanding cash
advances with interest and require the cash collateralization of outstanding letter of credit
obligations. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2010
Credit Agreement.
In addition, any material adverse change could restrict our ability to borrow under the
2010 Credit Agreement and could also be deemed an event of default under the 2010
Credit Agreement. A material adverse change is defined as a change in our business,
results of operations, properties or condition that could reasonably be expected to have
a material adverse effect, as defined in the 2010 Credit Agreement.
Under the 6.5% Notes Indenture, we are not permitted to incur debt, excluding capital lease
obligations, insurance premium notes and certain other debt, if it would cause the maximum total
leverage ratio to exceed 6.00 to 1.00 during the fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2011, 5.50 to 1.00 during the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012, 3.75 to 1.00
during the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2012 and 3.50 to 1.00 during the fiscal quarters ending
September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2012. Based on our results in the third quarter of 2011, our
6.5% Notes do not currently restrict our ability to borrow under the 2010 Credit Agreement, as
amended.
Other
As of September 30, 2011, we had $59,357 in short-term borrowings and $21,382 in letter of
credit outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit
Facility has total capacity of $175,000 with a $150,000 sublimit for cash.
As of September 30, 2011, we are able to only draw up to $25,000 under the
Revolving Credit Facility, subject to the maximum total leverage ratio covenant
under the 6.5% Notes Indenture. If we achieve a maximum total leverage ratio
of 3.00 to 1.00 or less, we may borrow up to $90,643 under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Our
working capital position for continuing operations decreased $90,275
(34.9 percent) to
$168,053 at September 30, 2011 from $258,328 at December 31, 2010. This was primarily attributed to
$94,679 in payments against our Term Loan as well as other project related working capital
requirements during the year.
Cash Flows
Statements of cash flows for entities with international operations that use the local
currency as the functional currency exclude the effects of the changes in foreign currency exchange
rates that occur during any given period, as these are non-cash charges. As a result, changes
reflected in certain accounts on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows may not
reflect the changes in corresponding accounts on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
55
Cash flows provided by (used in) continuing operations by type of activity were as follows for
the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
35,758 |
|
|
$ |
(6,217 |
) |
|
$ |
41,975 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
33,145 |
|
|
|
(417,362 |
) |
|
|
450,507 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(115,788 |
) |
|
|
306,997 |
|
|
|
(422,785 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in all continuing activities |
|
$ |
(47,138 |
) |
|
$ |
(115,802 |
) |
|
$ |
68,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash flow from operations is primarily influenced by demand for our services, operating
margins and the type of services we provide, but can also be influenced by working capital needs
such as the timing of collection of receivables and the settlement of payables and other
obligations. Working capital needs are generally higher during the summer and fall months when the
majority of our capital intensive projects are executed. Conversely, working capital assets are
typically converted to cash during the late fall and winter months. Operating activities from
continuing operations provided net cash of $35,758 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011
as compared to $6,217 used during the same period of 2010. The $41,975 increase in cash flow
provided by operating activities is primarily a result of the following:
|
|
|
An increase in cash flow provided by working capital accounts
of $64,271, driven
primarily by the $61,000 in outstanding receivables received from TransCanada during the
second quarter of 2011. This increase can also be attributed to a greater focus on our
overall working capital management by aligning payments on obligations with current
contractual arrangements; and |
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash consumed by continuing operations of
$22,296, net of non-cash
effects driven primarily by our net loss from continuing operations for the first nine
months of 2011. |
Investing Activities
Investing activities provided net cash of $33,145 during the nine months ended September 30,
2011 as compared to $417,362 used during the same period of 2010. The $450,507 increase in cash
flow provided by investing activities is primarily a result of the following:
|
|
|
The acquisition of InfrastruX in the third quarter of 2010, which resulted in cash used
of $421,182, as compared to cash provided of $9,402 in the same period of 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
$33,045 in proceeds from the sale of certain equipment and facilities during the first
nine months of 2011; offset by |
|
|
|
|
$16,755 in maturities of short-term investments during the first nine months of 2010. |
Financing Activities
Financing activities used net cash of $115,788 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011
as compared to $306,997 provided during the same period of 2010. The $422,785 decrease in cash flow
provided by financing activities is primarily a result of the following:
|
|
|
A $282,000 reduction in proceeds from our Term Loan issued in connection with our
acquisition of InfrastruX; |
|
|
|
|
A $58,078 reduction in proceeds from the issuance of common stock; |
|
|
|
|
$87,179 in accelerated payments against our Term Loan during the first nine months of
2011; and |
|
|
|
|
$7,500 in scheduled payments against our Term Loan during the first nine months of 2011. |
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to hedging arrangements to fix or otherwise limit the interest cost of the Term
Loan. We are subject to interest rate risk on our debt and investment of cash and cash equivalents
arising in the normal course of business, as we do not engage in speculative trading strategies.
In September 2010, we entered into two 18-month forward-starting interest rate swap agreements
for a total notional amount of $150,000 in order to hedge changes in the variable rate interest
expense of half of the
$300,000 Term Loan maturing on June 30, 2014. Under each swap agreement, we receive interest
at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR, conditional on three-month LIBOR exceeding 2 percent (to
mirror variable rate
56
interest provisions of the underlying hedged debt), and pay interest at a
fixed rate of 2.685 percent, effective March 28, 2012 through June 30, 2014. Each swap agreement
is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedging instrument, with the effective portion of the
swaps change in fair value recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). The interest rate
swaps are deemed to be highly effective hedges, and resulted in no gain or loss recorded for hedge
ineffectiveness in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Amounts in OCI are reported
in interest expense when the hedged interest payments on the underlying debt are recognized. The
fair value of each swap agreement was determined using a model with Level 2 inputs including quoted
market prices for contracts with similar terms and maturity dates.
Interest Rate Caps
In September 2010, we entered into two interest rate cap agreements for notional amounts of
$75,000 each in order to limit our exposure to an increase of the interest rate above 3 percent,
effective September 28, 2010 through March 28, 2012. Total premiums of $98 were paid for the
interest rate cap agreements. Through June 1, 2011, the cap agreements were designated and
qualified as cash flow hedging instruments, with the effective portion of the caps change in fair
value recorded in OCI. Amounts in OCI and the premiums paid for the caps were reported in interest
expense as the hedged interest payments on the underlying debt were recognized during the period
when the caps were designated as cash flow hedges. Through June 1, 2011, the interest rate caps
were deemed to be highly effective, resulting in an immaterial amount of hedge ineffectiveness
recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. On June 1, 2011, the caps were
de-designated due to the interest rate being fixed on the underlying debt through the remaining
term of the caps; changes in the value of the caps subsequent to that date will be reported in
earnings. The amount reported in earnings from the undesignated interest rate caps for the three
months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 is immaterial. The fair value of the interest rate
cap agreements was determined using a model with Level 2 inputs including quoted market prices for
contracts with similar terms and maturity dates. An immaterial amount of OCI relating to the
interest rate swap and caps is expected to be recognized in earnings in the coming 12 months.
Capital Requirements
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, continuing operations provided cash of
$35,758. We believe that our financial results combined with our current liquidity and financial
management will ensure sufficient cash to meet our capital requirements for continuing operations.
As such, we are focused on the following significant capital requirements:
|
|
|
Providing working capital for projects in process and those scheduled to begin in 2012;
or |
|
|
|
|
Funding our 2011 capital budget of approximately $29,700, of which approximately $23,000
has been spent and committed to date. |
We believe that we will be able to support our ongoing working capital needs through our cash
on hand and operating cash flows.
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2011, we had $32,050 aggregate 6.5% Notes principal outstanding. In
addition, we have various capital leases of construction equipment and property resulting in
aggregate capital lease obligations of $6,650.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, in addition to two scheduled payments of
$3,750, we made accelerated payments of $87,179 against the Term Loan. On June 30, 2011, a $40,000
accelerated payment of the Term Loan resulted in the recognition of a $4,124 loss attributed to the
write-off of unamortized OID and financing costs inclusive of a 2 percent early payment fee. Such
loss is recorded in the line item Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011.
As of September 30, 2011, there were $59,357 in outstanding borrowings under the 2010 Credit
Facility and there were $21,382 in outstanding letters of credit. All outstanding letters of credit
relate to continuing operations.
57
During the third quarter of 2011, we realized proceeds of $23,065 related to the sale of
underutilized equipment and the sale and lease back of Canada based equipment and U.S. realty
holdings. As a result, our future contractual obligations as of September 30, 2011, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Term Loan |
|
$ |
204,571 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
204,571 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Convertible notes |
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
7,615 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
4,674 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
161,552 |
|
|
|
12,610 |
|
|
|
69,346 |
|
|
|
34,056 |
|
|
|
45,540 |
|
Equipment financing obligations |
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax liabilities |
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
411,507 |
|
|
$ |
13,859 |
|
|
$ |
311,399 |
|
|
$ |
35,715 |
|
|
$ |
45,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial commitments, as detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, did not materially change except for payments made in the normal course of
business.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for a summary of any recently issued accounting
standards.
58
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-Q that
address activities, events or developments which we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the
future, including such things as future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature
thereof), oil, gas, gas liquids and power prices, demand for our services, future financial
performance, the amount and nature of future investments by governments, expansion and other
development trends of the oil and gas, refinery, petrochemical and power industries, business
strategy, expansion and growth of our business and operations, the outcome of government
investigations and legal proceedings and other such matters are forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and analyses we made in light of our experience
and our perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as
well as other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual
results and developments will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of
risks and uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ materially from our expectations.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contemplated by our forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
curtailment of capital expenditures and the unavailability of project funding in the oil
and gas, refinery, petrochemical and power industries; |
|
|
|
|
increased capacity and decreased demand for our services in the more competitive
industry segments that we serve; |
|
|
|
|
reduced creditworthiness of our customer base and higher risk of non-payment of
receivables; |
|
|
|
|
inability to lower our cost structure to remain competitive in the market; |
|
|
|
|
inability of the energy service sector to reduce costs in the short term to a level
where our customers project economics support a reasonable level of development work; |
|
|
|
|
inability to predict the timing of an increase in energy sector capital spending, which
results in staffing below the level required when the market recovers; |
|
|
|
|
reduction of services to existing and prospective clients as they bring historically
out-sourced services back in-house to preserve intellectual capital and minimize layoffs; |
|
|
|
|
the consequences we may encounter if we fail to comply with the terms and conditions of
our final settlements with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), including the imposition of civil or criminal fines,
penalties, enhanced monitoring arrangements, or other sanctions that might be imposed by
the DOJ and SEC; |
|
|
|
|
the issues we may encounter with respect to the federal monitor appointed under our
Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the DOJ and any changes in our business practices which
the monitor may require; |
|
|
|
|
the commencement by foreign governmental authorities of investigations into the actions
of our current and former employees, and the determination that such actions constituted
violations of foreign law; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties we may encounter in connection with the previous sale and disposition of
our Nigeria assets and Nigeria based operations, including obtaining indemnification for
any losses we may experience if, due to the non-performance by the purchaser of these
assets, claims are made against any parent company guarantees we provided, to the extent
those guarantees may be determined to have continued validity, see Note 17 in the Notes to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for further
discussion; |
|
|
|
|
the dishonesty of employees and/or other representatives or their refusal to abide by
applicable laws and our established policies and rules; |
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions not anticipated in bids and estimates; |
|
|
|
|
project cost overruns, unforeseen schedule delays and the application of liquidated
damages; |
|
|
|
|
the occurrence during the course of our operations of accidents and injuries to our
personnel, as well as to third parties, that negatively affect our safety record, which is
a factor used by many clients to pre-qualify and otherwise award work to contractors in our
industry; |
|
|
|
|
cancellation of projects, in whole or in part, for any reason; |
59
|
|
|
failing to realize cost recoveries on claims or change orders from projects completed or
in progress within a reasonable period after completion of the relevant project; |
|
|
|
|
political or social circumstances impeding the progress of our work and increasing the
cost of performance; |
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain and maintain legal registration status in one or more foreign
countries in which we are seeking to do business; |
|
|
|
|
failure to obtain the timely award of one or more projects; |
|
|
|
|
inability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets or to finance such
acquisitions on reasonable terms; |
|
|
|
|
inability to hire and retain sufficient skilled labor to execute our current work, our
work in backlog and future work we have not yet been awarded; |
|
|
|
|
inability to execute cost-reimbursable projects within the target cost, thus eroding
contract margin and, potentially, contract income on any such project; |
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain sufficient surety bonds or letters of credit; |
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain adequate financing; |
|
|
|
|
loss of the services of key management personnel; |
|
|
|
|
the demand for energy moderating or diminishing; |
|
|
|
|
downturns in general economic, market or business conditions in our target markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in and interpretation of U.S. and foreign tax laws that impact our worldwide
provision for income taxes and effective income tax rate; |
|
|
|
|
the potential adverse effects on our operating results if our non-U.S. operations became
taxable in the U.S; |
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, or changed interpretations thereof, including
climate change legislation; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the scope of our expected insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
|
inability to manage insurable risk at an affordable cost; |
|
|
|
|
enforceable claims for which we are not fully insured; |
|
|
|
|
incurrence of insurable claims in excess of our insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
|
the occurrence of the risk factors listed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q or described in
our periodic filings with the SEC; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors, most of which are beyond our control. |
Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q are qualified by
these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments
we anticipate will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the
consequences for, or effects on, our business or operations that we anticipate today. We assume no
obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether because of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Form 10-Q to Willbros, the
Company, we, us and our refer to Willbros Group, Inc., its consolidated subsidiaries and
their predecessors. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Form 10-Q to
dollar amounts, except share and per share amounts, are expressed in thousands.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary market risk is our exposure to changes in non-U.S. (primarily Canada) currency
exchange rates. We attempt to negotiate contracts which provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but we
may be required to take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To
mitigate non-U.S. currency exchange risk, we seek to match anticipated non-U.S. currency revenue
with expenses in the same currency whenever possible. To the
60
extent we are unable to match non-U.S.
currency revenue with expenses in the same currency, we may use forward contracts, options or other
common hedging techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. We had no forward contracts or options
at September 30, 2011 and 2010 or during the three months and
nine months then ended.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable and
accounts payable, and accrued liabilities shown in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
approximated fair value at September 30, 2011, due to the generally short maturities of these
items. At September 30, 2011, our investments were primarily in short-term dollar denominated bank
deposits with maturities of a few days, or in longer-term deposits where funds can be withdrawn on
demand without penalty. We have the ability and expect to hold our investments to maturity.
Under the 2010 Credit Agreement, we are subject to hedging arrangements to fix or otherwise
limit the interest cost of the Term Loan. Therefore, as of June 30, 2011, we have two 18-month
forward-starting interest rate swap agreements entered into in September 2010 for a total notional
amount of $150,000 in order to hedge changes in the variable rate interest expense of half of the
$300,000 Term Loan maturing on June 30, 2014. Under each swap agreement, we receive interest at a
floating rate of three-month LIBOR, conditional on three-month LIBOR exceeding 2 percent (to mirror
variable rate interest provisions of the underlying hedged debt), and pay interest at a fixed rate
of 2.685 percent, effective March 28, 2012 through June 30, 2014. Each swap agreement is
designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedging instrument and is deemed a highly effective hedge.
The fair value of the swap agreements was $1,747 at September 30, 2011 and was based on using a
model with Level 2 inputs including quoted market prices for contracts with similar terms and
maturity dates.
We also entered into two interest rate cap agreements for notional amounts of $75,000 each in
order to limit exposure to an increase of the interest rate above 3 percent, effective September
28, 2010 through March 28, 2012. Through June 1, 2011, the cap agreements were designated and
qualified as cash flow hedging instruments and were deemed to be highly effective hedges. On June
1, 2011, the caps were de-designated due to the interest rate being fixed on the underlying debt
through the remaining term of the caps. The fair value of the interest rate cap agreements was $0
at September 30, 2011 and was determined using a model with Level 2 inputs including quoted market
prices for contracts with similar terms and maturity dates.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management,
including principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are
inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures,
including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and
procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
As of September 30, 2011, we have carried out an evaluation under the supervision of, and with
the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on our evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011.
Remediation of Prior Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2010, management identified a
material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to compliance with the
established estimation process for contracts under the percentage of completion method of
accounting at the Companys subsidiary in Canada. Specifically, project cost estimations were not
prepared in sufficient detail to enable proper analysis of contract margin and management review
did not include follow through on open issues.
In response to the identified material weakness, our management, with oversight from our Audit
Committee,
implemented additional monitoring controls to ensure the proper collection, evaluation and
disclosure of information relating to contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion
method included in our consolidated financial statements.
Based on the actions taken by management and the testing of the design and operating
effectiveness of
61
internal controls related to project estimation, including the monitoring controls
discussed above, we have concluded that the previously identified and disclosed material weakness
has been remediated as of September 30, 2011.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding legal proceedings, see the discussion under the captions
Contingencies Settlement Facility Construction Project Dispute in Note 14 Contingencies,
Commitments and Other Circumstances and Nigeria Assets and Nigeria-Based Operations Share
Purchase Agreement in Note 17 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition
Services Agreement of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part
I of this Form 10-Q, which information from Notes 14 and 17 is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors
involving us from those previously disclosed in Item 1A of Part II in our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, which superseded all of the risk
factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2010.
Our goodwill may become impaired.
Our assets include a substantial amount of goodwill following our acquisitions of
InfrastruX, Integrated Service Company, Midwest Management (1987) Ltd. and Wink
Companies, LLC. At least annually, we evaluate our goodwill for impairment based on
the fair value of each operating segment. This estimated fair value could change if there
were future changes in our capital structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital
expenditure levels or ability to perform at levels that were forecasted. These changes
could result in an impairment that would require a material non-cash charge to our
results of operations. A significant decrease in expected cash flows or changes in
market conditions may indicate potential impairment of recorded goodwill.
Based on the annual July 1, 2011 Utility T&D segment impairment test, we recorded
an estimated third quarter impairment charge of $134,263 which reduced our consolidated goodwill
to $67,632 at September 30, 2011. Our original March 2010 growth projections in the
electric transmission and distribution business have not materialized. The continued
slow economic recovery, exacerbated by the recent recurrence of instability in the world
financial markets, and the hard-hit U.S. housing sector, have resulted in a
reassessment of future growth rates and led to a reduction in the outlook for expected
future cash flows in this segment.
Our annual goodwill impairment test for our Upstream Oil and Gas and our
Downstream Oil and Gas segments will be performed as of December 1, 2011. Our
market capitalization has been at lower levels than the July 1, 2011 level of
$421,405 which was used for the Utility T&D segment goodwill
impairment test, and was based on a closing stock price of $8.68. Based on the average
October 2011 Willbros stock closing price, our average market capitalization during
October has been just over one-half of the July 1 level. The fair value of the Upstream
Oil and Gas and the Downstream Oil and Gas segments will be partially based on
market valuation techniques. To the extent that our stock value remains at its current
low levels, this will place additional downward pressure on the market values used in
the fair value determination. We are unable to predict the future value of Willbros stock
or the impact the market capitalization will have on the future goodwill impairment tests.
62
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information about purchases of our common stock by us during the
quarter ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Price Paid Per |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased (1) |
|
|
Share (2) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
July 1, 2011 July 31, 2011 |
|
|
3,566 |
|
|
$ |
8.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2011 August 31, 2011 |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2011 September
30, 2011 |
|
|
22,188 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25,984 |
|
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares of common stock acquired from certain of our officers and key
employees under the share withholding provisions of our 1996 Stock Plan and 2010 Stock and
Incentive Compensation Plan for the payment of taxes associated with the vesting of shares of
restricted stock granted under such plans. |
|
(2) |
|
The price paid per common share represents the closing sales price of a share
of our common stock, as reported in the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions, on the day
that the stock was acquired by us. |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
63
Item 6. Exhibits
The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits below
incorporated by reference herein are indicated as such by the information supplied in the
parenthetical thereafter. If no parenthetical appears after an exhibit, such exhibit is filed
herewith.
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture date as of September 16, 2011 among Willbros Group,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Willbros United States Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (formerly known as Willbros USA, Inc.), and BOKF, NA dba Bank of Texas, as
trustee (filed as Exhibit 4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2011,
filed September 16, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
64
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
|
|
Date: November 7, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Van A. Welch
|
|
|
|
Van A. Welch |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal
Accounting Officer) |
|
|
65
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits below
incorporated by reference herein are indicated as such by the information supplied in the
parenthetical thereafter. If no parenthetical appears after an exhibit, such exhibit is filed
herewith.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
4.1
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture date as of September 16, 2011 among Willbros Group,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Willbros United States Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (formerly known as Willbros USA, Inc.), and BOKF, NA dba Bank of Texas, as
trustee (filed as Exhibit 4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2011,
filed September 16, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
66