e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended
March 31, 2011
Commission file number 1-5805
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-2624428 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
270 Park Avenue, New York, New York
|
|
10017 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) (212) 270-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Number
of shares of common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2011:
3,973,684,787
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share, headcount and ratio data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the period ended, |
|
1Q11 |
|
4Q10 |
|
3Q10 |
|
2Q10 |
|
1Q10 |
|
Selected income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
25,221 |
|
|
$ |
26,098 |
|
|
$ |
23,824 |
|
|
$ |
25,101 |
|
|
$ |
27,671 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
15,995 |
|
|
|
16,043 |
|
|
|
14,398 |
|
|
|
14,631 |
|
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
Pre-provision profit(a) |
|
|
9,226 |
|
|
|
10,055 |
|
|
|
9,426 |
|
|
|
10,470 |
|
|
|
11,547 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
3,043 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
3,363 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
|
6,203 |
|
|
|
7,107 |
|
|
|
4,537 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
2,312 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
$ |
4,831 |
|
|
$ |
4,418 |
|
|
$ |
4,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
Per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: Basic |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Book value per share |
|
|
43.34 |
|
|
|
43.04 |
|
|
|
42.29 |
|
|
|
40.99 |
|
|
|
39.38 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average: Basic |
|
|
3,981.6 |
|
|
|
3,917.0 |
|
|
|
3,954.3 |
|
|
|
3,983.5 |
|
|
|
3,970.5 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
4,014.1 |
|
|
|
3,935.2 |
|
|
|
3,971.9 |
|
|
|
4,005.6 |
|
|
|
3,994.7 |
|
Common shares at period-end |
|
|
3,986.6 |
|
|
|
3,910.3 |
|
|
|
3,925.8 |
|
|
|
3,975.8 |
|
|
|
3,975.4 |
|
Share price(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
48.36 |
|
|
$ |
43.12 |
|
|
$ |
41.70 |
|
|
$ |
48.20 |
|
|
$ |
46.05 |
|
Low |
|
|
42.65 |
|
|
|
36.21 |
|
|
|
35.16 |
|
|
|
36.51 |
|
|
|
37.03 |
|
Close |
|
|
46.10 |
|
|
|
42.42 |
|
|
|
38.06 |
|
|
|
36.61 |
|
|
|
44.75 |
|
Market capitalization |
|
|
183,783 |
|
|
|
165,875 |
|
|
|
149,418 |
|
|
|
145,554 |
|
|
|
177,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity (ROE) |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Return on assets (ROA) |
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Deposits-to-loans ratio |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Tier 1 capital ratio |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Total capital ratio |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Tier 1 common capital ratio(c) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
$ |
501,148 |
|
|
$ |
489,892 |
|
|
$ |
475,515 |
|
|
$ |
397,508 |
|
|
$ |
426,128 |
|
Securities |
|
|
334,800 |
|
|
|
316,336 |
|
|
|
340,168 |
|
|
|
312,013 |
|
|
|
344,376 |
|
Loans |
|
|
685,996 |
|
|
|
692,927 |
|
|
|
690,531 |
|
|
|
699,483 |
|
|
|
713,799 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,198,161 |
|
|
|
2,117,605 |
|
|
|
2,141,595 |
|
|
|
2,014,019 |
|
|
|
2,135,796 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
995,829 |
|
|
|
930,369 |
|
|
|
903,138 |
|
|
|
887,805 |
|
|
|
925,303 |
|
Long-term debt(d) |
|
|
269,616 |
|
|
|
270,653 |
|
|
|
271,495 |
|
|
|
260,442 |
|
|
|
278,685 |
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
172,798 |
|
|
|
168,306 |
|
|
|
166,030 |
|
|
|
162,968 |
|
|
|
156,569 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
180,598 |
|
|
|
176,106 |
|
|
|
173,830 |
|
|
|
171,120 |
|
|
|
164,721 |
|
Headcount |
|
|
242,929 |
|
|
|
239,831 |
|
|
|
236,810 |
|
|
|
232,939 |
|
|
|
226,623 |
|
Credit quality metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
30,438 |
|
|
$ |
32,983 |
|
|
$ |
35,034 |
|
|
$ |
36,748 |
|
|
$ |
39,126 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to total retained loans |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
4.97 |
% |
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to retained loans
excluding purchased credit-impaired
loans(e) |
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
5.34 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
Nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
14,986 |
|
|
$ |
16,557 |
|
|
$ |
17,656 |
|
|
$ |
18,156 |
|
|
$ |
19,019 |
|
Net charge-offs(f) |
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
5,104 |
|
|
|
4,945 |
|
|
|
5,714 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
Net charge-off rate(f) |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
Wholesale net charge-off rate |
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
Consumer net charge-off rate(f) |
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pre-provision profit is total net revenue less noninterest expense. The Firm believes
that this financial measure is useful in assessing the ability of a lending institution to
generate income in excess of its provision for credit losses. |
|
(b) |
|
Share prices shown for JPMorgan Chases common stock are from the New York Stock Exchange.
JPMorgan Chases common stock is also listed and traded on the London Stock Exchange and the
Tokyo Stock Exchange. |
|
(c) |
|
The Firm uses Tier 1 common capital (Tier 1 common) along with the other capital measures
to assess and monitor its capital position. The Tier 1 common capital ratio (Tier 1 common
ratio) is Tier 1 common divided by risk-weighted assets. For further discussion, see
Regulatory capital on pages 4951 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(d) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, the long-term portion of advances from Federal Home Loan Banks
(FHLBs) was reclassified from other borrowed funds to long-term debt. Prior periods have
been revised to conform with the current presentation. |
|
(e) |
|
Excludes the impact of home lending purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans. For further
discussion, see Allowance for credit losses on pages 7981 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(f) |
|
Net charge-offs and net charge-off rates for the fourth quarter of 2010 include the effect of
$632 million of charge-offs related to the estimated net realizable value of the collateral
underlying delinquent residential home loans. Because these losses were previously recognized
in the provision and allowance for loan losses, this adjustment had no impact on the Firms
net income. |
3
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section of the Form 10-Q provides managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the
financial condition and results of operations of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMorgan Chase or the
Firm). See the Glossary of terms on pages 174177 for definitions of terms used throughout this
Form 10-Q. The MD&A included in this Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on
the current beliefs and expectations of JPMorgan Chases management and are subject to significant
risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could cause the Firms actual results to
differ materially from those set forth in such forward-looking statements. For a discussion of such
risks and uncertainties, see Forward-looking Statements on pages
180181 and Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, on pages 512 of JPMorgan
Chases Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (2010 Annual Report or 2010 Form 10-K), to which reference
is hereby made.
INTRODUCTION
JPMorgan Chase & Co., a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a
leading global financial services firm and one of the largest banking institutions in the United
States of America (U.S.), with $2.2 trillion in assets, $180.6 billion in stockholders equity
and operations in more than 60 countries as of March 31, 2011. The Firm is a leader in investment
banking, financial services for consumers and small business, commercial banking, financial
transaction processing, asset management and private equity. Under the J.P. Morgan and Chase
brands, the Firm serves millions of customers in the U.S. and many of the worlds most prominent
corporate, institutional and government clients.
JPMorgan Chases principal bank subsidiaries are JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), a national bank with branches in 23 states in the U.S.; and Chase
Bank USA, National Association (Chase Bank USA, N.A.), a national bank that is the Firms credit
card issuing bank. JPMorgan Chases principal nonbank subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
(JPMorgan Securities), the Firms U.S. investment banking firm.
JPMorgan Chases activities are organized, for management reporting purposes, into six business
segments, as well as Corporate/Private Equity. The Firms wholesale businesses comprise the
Investment Bank, Commercial Banking, Treasury & Securities Services and Asset Management segments.
The Firms consumer businesses comprise the Retail Financial Services and Card Services segments. A
description of the Firms business segments, and the products and services they provide to their
respective client bases, follows.
Investment Bank
J.P. Morgan is one of the worlds leading investment banks, with deep client relationships and
broad product capabilities. The clients of the Investment Bank (IB) are corporations, financial
institutions, governments and institutional investors. The Firm offers a full range of investment
banking products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate
strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, sophisticated risk management,
market-making in cash securities and derivative instruments, prime brokerage, and research.
Retail Financial Services
Retail Financial Services (RFS) serves consumers and businesses through personal service at bank
branches and through ATMs, online banking and telephone banking, as well as through auto
dealerships and school financial-aid offices. Customers can use nearly 5,300 bank branches
(third-largest nationally) and more than 16,200 ATMs (second-largest nationally), as well as online
and mobile banking around the clock. More than 29,200 branch salespeople assist customers with
checking and savings accounts, mortgages, home equity and business loans, and investments across
the 23-state footprint from New York and Florida to California. Consumers also can obtain loans
through more than 16,300 auto dealerships and 1,300 schools and universities nationwide.
Card Services
Card Services (CS) is one of the nations largest credit card issuers, with over $128 billion in
loans and over 91 million open accounts. In the three months ended March 31, 2011, customers used
Chase cards to meet over $77 billion of their spending needs. Through its merchant acquiring
business, Chase Paymentech Solutions, CS is a global leader in payment processing and merchant
acquiring.
4
Commercial Banking
Commercial Banking (CB) delivers extensive industry knowledge, local expertise and dedicated
service to nearly 24,000 clients nationally, including corporations, municipalities, financial
institutions and not-for-profit entities with annual revenue generally ranging from $10 million to
$2 billion, and nearly 35,000 real estate investors/owners. CB partners with the Firms other
businesses to provide comprehensive solutions, including lending, treasury services, investment
banking and asset management, to meet its clients domestic and international financial needs.
Treasury & Securities Services
Treasury & Securities Services (TSS) is a global leader in transaction, investment and
information services. TSS is one of the worlds largest cash management providers and a leading
global custodian. Treasury Services (TS) provides cash management, trade, wholesale card and
liquidity products and services to small- and mid-sized companies, multinational corporations,
financial institutions and government entities. TS partners with IB, CB, RFS and Asset Management
businesses to serve clients firmwide. Certain TS revenue is included in other segments results.
Worldwide Securities Services holds, values, clears and services securities, cash and alternative
investments for investors and broker-dealers, and manages depositary receipt programs globally.
Asset Management
Asset Management (AM), with assets under supervision of $1.9 trillion, is a global leader in
investment and wealth management. AM clients include institutions, retail investors and
high-net-worth individuals in every major market throughout the world. AM offers global investment
management in equities, fixed income, real estate, hedge funds, private equity and liquidity
products, including money-market instruments and bank deposits. AM also provides trust and estate,
banking and brokerage services to high-net-worth clients, and retirement services for corporations
and individuals. The majority of AMs client assets are in actively managed portfolios.
5
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
This executive overview of MD&A highlights selected information and may not contain all of the
information that is important to readers of this Form 10-Q. For a complete description of events,
trends and uncertainties, as well as the capital, liquidity, credit and market risks, and the
critical accounting estimates affecting the Firm and its various lines of business, this Form 10-Q
should be read in its entirety.
Economic environment
The U.S. economic recovery continued in the first quarter of 2011 as the labor market appeared to
strengthen, even though disruptive winter weather appeared to slow the economys momentum. Despite
growing confidence that the U.S. and global economic recovery remains on track, new threats to the
global economy emerged that could disrupt activity, at least for a short while. The earthquake and
tsunami in Japan represented a significant setback to that countrys important economy and probably
disrupted activity elsewhere as well. Furthermore, a surge in oil prices in the wake of political
unrest in the Middle East threatened to slow global demand. Concerns about inflation, driven by
rising commodity prices, including the impact of widespread crop destruction in 2010 on food prices
around the world, resulted in varying actions being taken by several central banks.
The pace
of growth in the U.S. economy, which has been unusually slow for a recovery, has been hampered by the depressed housing market. Growth is
likely to remain moderate as a result of the planned phase-out of the 2008 fiscal stimulus
initiative and additional spending cuts agreed to as part of the
final 2011 federal budget plan.
The Federal Reserve maintained its accommodative stance in the first quarter of 2011, holding the
target range for the federal funds rate steady at zero to one-quarter percent, and continued to
indicate that economic conditions were likely to warrant a low federal funds rate for an extended
period. To promote a stronger pace of economic recovery, the Federal Reserve also decided to
continue expanding its holdings of securities as announced in the fourth quarter of 2010. In
particular, the Federal Reserve is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal
payments from its securities holdings and intends to purchase $600 billion of longer-term Treasury
securities by the end of the second quarter of 2011. The Federal Reserve downplayed recent
commodity pressures as transitory, while noting that it would be monitoring inflation developments
carefully.
Financial performance of JPMorgan Chase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except per share data and ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Selected income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
25,221 |
|
|
$ |
27,671 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
15,995 |
|
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Pre-provision profit |
|
|
9,226 |
|
|
|
11,547 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
5,555 |
|
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business overview
JPMorgan Chase reported first-quarter 2011 net income of $5.6 billion, or $1.28 per share, on net
revenue of $25.2 billion. Net income was up 67%, compared with net income of $3.3 billion, or $0.74
per share, in the first quarter of 2010. Return on common equity for the quarter was 13%, compared
with 8% in the prior year. Current-quarter EPS included a $2.0 billion pretax ($0.29 per share
after-tax) benefit from a reduction in the allowance for loan losses for credit card loans; a $1.1
billion pretax ($0.16 per share after-tax) decrease in the fair value of the mortgage servicing
rights asset to reflect higher estimated servicing costs to enhance servicing processes (for additional information
regarding mortgage servicing rights, see Note 16 on pages 149152 of this Form 10-Q); and a $650
million pretax ($0.10 per share after-tax) expense for estimated costs of foreclosure-related
matters.
The increase in net income for the first quarter of 2011 was driven by a significantly lower
provision for credit losses, partially offset by lower net revenue. The decrease in the provision
for credit losses reflected improvements in both the consumer and wholesale provisions. The decline
in net revenue was due to lower net interest income, reflecting a decline in loan and securities
balances, lower mortgage fees and related income in Retail Financial Services and lower securities
gains in the Corporate/Private Equity segment. These declines were partially offset by higher
investment banking fees in the Investment Bank. Noninterest expense was flat compared with the
first quarter of 2010, as lower noncompensation expense offset higher compensation expense.
6
The Firms first-quarter results reflected a strong quarter across the Investment Bank
and solid performance from Card Services, Commercial Banking, Treasury & Securities Services and
Asset Management. Retail Financial Services demonstrated good underlying performance, as the
business continued to invest in building branches and adding to its
sales force. However, RFS
results were more than offset by very high expenses for mortgage-related issues, including the
provision for credit losses, the impact of increased servicing costs on the fair value of the
Firms mortgage servicing rights asset, expense for the estimated costs of foreclosure-related
matters, and mortgage repurchase losses.
The continued improvement in the credit environment during the first quarter of 2011 benefited all
of JPMorgan Chases businesses. Delinquency trends in the consumer businesses were favorable, and
lower estimated losses in the credit card portfolio resulted in a reduction in the allowance for
credit losses in CS. In addition, net charge-offs were lower in most businesses compared with the
prior year. Total firmwide credit reserves at March 31, 2011, were $30.4 billion, resulting in a
firmwide loan loss coverage ratio of 4.10% of total loans.
JPMorgan Chases balance sheet remained strong, ending the first quarter with a Tier 1 Common ratio
of 10.0%. In the quarter, the Firms Board of Directors increased the annual dividend to $1.00 per
share, up from $0.20 per share, and authorized a new $15 billion multi-year common stock repurchase
program, of which up to $8.0 billion of common stock repurchases is approved for 2011. The Firm
intends to operate its business with the objectives of maintaining a Basel I Tier 1 Common ratio of
at least 9.0% and meeting the Basel III requirements substantially ahead of time. Total
stockholders equity at March 31, 2011, was $180.6 billion.
The Firm provided credit to and raised capital for its clients of over $450 billion during the
quarter. These efforts have a meaningful impact on the communities in which the Firm operates.
JPMorgan Chase originated mortgages to over 180,000 people; provided credit cards to approximately
2.6 million people; lent or increased credit to over 7,500 small businesses; lent to over 500
not-for-profit and government entities, including states, municipalities, hospitals and
universities; extended or increased loan limits to approximately 1,500 middle-market companies; and
lent to or raised capital for more than 3,500 corporations. In addition, the Firm added 16,300
employees over the last twelve months, including more than 9,800 in the U.S. JPMorgan Chase remains
committed to helping homeowners and preventing foreclosures. Since the beginning of 2009, the Firm
has offered 1,098,000 trial modifications to struggling homeowners, with 324,000 modifications
completed.
The discussion that follows highlights the performance of each business segment compared with the
prior-year quarter and presents results on a managed basis. For more information about managed
basis, as well as other non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate the performance
of each line of business, see pages 1315 of this Form 10-Q.
Investment Bank net income decreased slightly from the prior-year record, reflecting higher
noninterest expense, slightly lower net revenue and a lower benefit from the provision for credit
losses. Net revenue reflected higher investment banking fees, including record debt underwriting
fees, and strong client revenues in Fixed Income and Equity Markets. Credit Portfolio revenue was a
loss, primarily reflecting the negative net impact of credit-related valuation adjustments, largely offset
by net interest income and fees on retained loans. The provision for credit losses was a smaller
benefit in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2010, reflecting a
reduction in the allowance for loan losses, primarily as a result of loan sales and net repayments.
Noninterest expense increased, driven by higher compensation expense, partially offset by lower
noncompensation expense.
Retail Financial Services reported a larger net loss compared with the prior year. Net revenue
decreased, driven by lower mortgage fees and related income, lower loan balances due to portfolio
runoff, and narrower loan spreads. The provision for credit losses decreased, as delinquency trends
and net charge-offs improved compared with the prior year. However, the current-quarter provision
continued to reflect elevated losses in the mortgage and home equity portfolios. Noninterest
expense increased, due largely to an expense taken for estimated costs of foreclosure-related
matters.
Card Services reported net income compared with a net loss in the prior year, as a lower provision
for credit losses was partially offset by lower net revenue. The decrease in net revenue was driven
by a decline in net interest income, reflecting lower average loan balances, the impact of
legislative changes and a decreased level of fees. These decreases were largely offset by a
decrease in revenue reversals associated with lower net charge-offs. The provision for credit
losses decreased from the prior year, reflecting lower net charge-offs and a reduction in the
allowance for loan losses due to lower estimated losses. Noninterest expense increased, due to the
transfer of the Commercial Card business to CS from TSS and higher
marketing expense. Sales volume, excluding the Commercial Card
portfolio, was $77.5 billion, an increase of 12% from the prior
year.
Commercial Banking net income increased, driven by a reduction in the provision for credit losses
and higher net revenue. The increase in net revenue was driven by growth in liability balances,
wider loan spreads, and growth in loan balances, partially offset by spread compression on
liability products. The provision for credit losses decreased from the
7
prior year, reflecting stabilization of the credit quality of the loan portfolio. Noninterest
expense increased, primarily reflecting higher headcount-related expense.
Treasury & Securities Services net income increased from the prior year, driven by higher net
revenue, largely offset by higher noninterest expense. Worldwide Securities Services net revenue
increased, driven by net inflows of assets under custody, higher market levels and higher net
interest income. Assets under custody were a record $16.6 trillion, an increase of 9% from the prior year.
Treasury Services net revenue increased as well, driven by higher net interest
income and higher trade loan volumes, offset by the transfer of the Commercial Card business to CS.
Noninterest expense for TSS increased, driven by continued investment in new product platforms,
primarily related to international expansion, partially offset by the transfer of the Commercial
Card business to CS.
Asset Management net income increased from the prior year, reflecting higher net revenue and a
lower provision for credit losses, largely offset by higher noninterest expense. The growth in net
revenue was driven by the effect of higher market levels, net inflows to products with higher
margins and higher loan originations, partially offset by lower performance fees. Assets under
supervision increased 12% from the prior year due to the effect of higher market levels and record
net inflows to long-term products, partially offset by net outflows in liquidity products.
Noninterest expense increased, largely resulting from an increase in headcount.
Corporate/Private Equity net income increased from the prior year, driven by significantly lower
noninterest expense. Noninterest expense in the first quarter of 2010 included significant
additions to litigation reserves. Private equity gains increased compared with the prior year,
while net interest income and securities gains decreased.
2011 Business outlook
The following forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of
JPMorgan Chases management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. As noted above,
these risks and uncertainties could cause the Firms actual results to differ materially from those
set forth in such forward-looking statements. See Forward-Looking Statements on pages 180-181 and
Risk Factors on page 181 of this Form 10-Q.
JPMorgan Chases outlook for the remainder of 2011 should be viewed against the backdrop of the
global and U.S. economies, financial markets activity, the geopolitical environment, the
competitive environment, client activity levels, and regulatory, litigation and legislative developments in the
U.S. and other countries where the Firm does business. Each of these linked factors will affect the
performance of the Firm and its lines of business. Economic and macroeconomic factors, such as
market and credit trends, customer behavior, client business strategies and competition, are all
expected to affect the Firms businesses.
In the Mortgage Banking, Auto & Other Consumer Lending business within RFS, if mortgage interest
rates remain at current levels or rise in the future, management anticipates that loan production
and margins will be negatively affected, resulting in lower revenue for this business
for full-year 2011 when compared with 2010. In addition, revenue in 2011 will continue to be negatively
affected by continued elevated levels of repurchases of mortgages previously sold, predominantly to
U.S. government-sponsored entities (GSEs). Management estimates that realized repurchase losses
could be approximately $1.2 billion on an annualized basis for the remainder of 2011.
The Firm
expects noninterest expense in Mortgage Banking, Auto & Other
Consumer Lending to remain at the elevated level seen in the first
quarter of 2011 (excluding the $650 million expense for
foreclosure-related matters) for the remainder of the year reflecting increased
servicing costs to enhance its mortgage servicing processes,
particularly loan modification and foreclosure procedures, and to comply with the Consent Orders
entered into with the banking regulators. (See Note 23 on pages 160169 of this Form 10-Q for
further information about the Consent Orders). In addition to increased
noninterest expense resulting from increased servicing costs, it is
also likely that the Firm will
incur fines and penalties as well as other costs in connection with
the settlement of the governmental
investigations related to its mortgage servicing procedures.
In the Real Estate Portfolios business within RFS, management believes that, based on the current
outlook for delinquencies and loss severity, total quarterly net charge-offs could be
approximately $1.2 billion for the remainder of 2011. Given current origination and production
levels, combined with managements current estimate of portfolio runoff levels, the residential
real estate portfolio is expected to decline by approximately 10% to 15% annually for the
foreseeable future. The annual reduction in the residential real estate portfolio is expected to
reduce net interest income in
8
each period, including a reduction of approximately $700 million for full-year 2011 from the 2010
level, assuming no changes in interest rates during the year. However, over time, the reduction in
net interest income is expected to be more than offset by an improvement in credit costs and lower
expenses. As the portfolio continues to run off, management anticipates that approximately $1.0
billion of capital may become available for redeployment each year, subject to the capital
requirements associated with the remaining portfolio.
In CS, management expects end-of-period outstandings for the Chase portfolio (excluding the
Washington Mutual and Commercial Card portfolios) to stabilize in the second half of 2011, and that
outstandings for such portfolio will be approximately $120 billion by the end of 2011, reflecting a
better mix of customers. However, if current high repayment rates persist,
outstandings could be lower than $120 billion by the end of
2011. Management estimates that the Washington Mutual portfolio could decline to
$10 billion by the end of 2011.
The annual impact of the portfolio runoff will result in an
approximately $1.4 billion reduction in net interest income from
the 2010 level. Net interest income for 2011 will also be reduced by
the full-year impact from implementation of the CARD Act. In addition, if higher repayment rates persist,
as noted above, net
interest income could also be negatively affected.
Net charge-off rates for both the Chase and Washington Mutual credit card portfolios are
anticipated to continue to improve. If current delinquency trends
continue, management anticipates the net charge-off rate
for the Chase portfolio (excluding the Washington Mutual and Commercial Card portfolios) could be
approximately 5.5% for the second quarter of 2011. Furthermore, if current delinquency trends
continue, management believes the net charge-off rate for the Chase portfolio could approach 4.5%
by the middle of 2012, which management believes represents the through-the-cycle net charge off
rate for this portfolio.
Management expectations related to future RFS and CS results depend on the health of the U.S.
economic environment. Although the positive economic data seen in early 2011 seemed to imply that
the U.S. economy is not falling back into recession, high unemployment rates and the difficult
housing market have been persistent. Further declines in U.S. housing prices and increases in the
unemployment rate remain possible; were this to occur, currently anticipated results for both RFS
and CS could be adversely affected.
In IB, TSS and AM, revenue will be affected by market levels, volumes and volatility, which will
influence client flows and assets under management, supervision and custody. In addition, IB and CB
results will be affected by the credit environment, which will influence levels of charge-offs,
repayments and provision for credit losses.
In Private Equity, within the Corporate/Private Equity segment, earnings will likely continue to be
volatile and be influenced by capital markets activity, market levels, the performance of the
broader economy and investment-specific issues. Corporates net interest income levels will
generally trend with the size and duration of the investment securities portfolio. Corporate net
income, excluding Private Equity, and excluding material litigation expense and significant
nonrecurring items, if any, is anticipated to trend toward approximately $300 million per quarter.
Furthermore, continued repositioning of the investment securities portfolio in Corporate, changes
in the mix of loans within the consumer loan portfolio and other factors could result in modest
downward pressure on the Firms net interest margin in the second quarter of 2011.
The Firm faces litigation in its various roles as issuer and/or underwriter in mortgage-backed
securities (MBS) offerings, primarily related to offerings involving third parties other
than the GSEs. The Firm separately evaluates its exposure to such litigation in establishing its
litigation reserves. It is possible
that these matters will take a number of years to resolve; their
ultimate resolution is inherently uncertain and reserves for such
litigation matters may need to be increased in the future.
Regarding regulatory reform, JPMorgan Chase intends to continue to work with its regulators as they
proceed with the extensive rulemaking required to implement financial reform. The Firm will
continue to devote substantial resources to achieving implementation of regulatory reforms to meet
all the new rules and regulations, both in letter and spirit. The Firm expects to make numerous
changes in its business as it implements regulatory reforms in ways that meet the needs and
expectations of its customers. In February 2011, the FDIC issued, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, a
final rule
9
changing its methodology for calculating the assessment rate. Under the new rule, the assessment
base changes from domestic deposits to average consolidated total assets less average tangible
equity. These changes became effective on April 1, 2011, and, based on the Firms understanding of
the final rule, are expected to result in an aggregate annualized increase of approximately $500
million in the assessments that the Firms bank subsidiaries pay to the deposit insurance fund.
Management and the Firms Board of Directors continually evaluate ways to deploy the Firms strong
capital base in order to enhance shareholder value. Such alternatives could include the repurchase
of common stock, increasing the common stock dividend and pursuing alternative investment
opportunities. During the first quarter of 2011, the Firm increased its quarterly dividend to $0.25
per share, an increase of $0.20 per share from the prior-quarter level. The Firm expects to return
to a payout ratio of approximately 30% of normalized earnings over time.
In addition, the Board authorized a
new $15 billion, multi-year repurchase program
for its common stock, of
which up to $8.0 billion is approved for 2011. The Firm expects to utilize the repurchase program to, at a minimum, essentially repurchase
the same amount of shares that it issues for employee stock-based incentive awards. Beyond this,
the Firm intends to repurchase common stock only when it is generating capital in excess of what is needed
to fund its organic growth and when, in managements judgment, such repurchases provide excellent value to the
Firms existing shareholders. Management and the Board will continue to assess and make decisions
regarding alternatives for deploying capital, as appropriate, over the course of the year. Any
planned future dividend increases over the current level, or planned
use of the repurchase program over the repurchases approved for 2011, will be reviewed by the Firm with its banking
regulators before taking action.
10
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following section provides a comparative discussion of JPMorgan Chases Consolidated
Results of Operations on a reported basis for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Factors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that
business segment. For a discussion of the Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm that
affect the Consolidated Results of Operations, see pages 8689 of this Form 10-Q and pages
149154 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Principal transactions |
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
4,548 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees |
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
658 |
|
|
NM |
Credit card income |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other income |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
13,316 |
|
|
|
13,961 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
11,905 |
|
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
25,221 |
|
|
$ |
27,671 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
Total net revenue for the first quarter of 2011 was $25.2 billion, down by $2.5 billion, or
9%, from the first quarter of 2010. Results were driven by lower net interest income, mortgage fees
and related income in RFS, and securities gains in Corporate/Private Equity. These declines were
partially offset by higher investment banking fees in IB.
Investment banking fees included record debt underwriting fees and higher advisory fees, related to
stronger industry-wide loan syndication and M&A volumes compared with the prior year; these were
partially offset by lower equity underwriting fees. For additional information on investment
banking fees, which are primarily recorded in IB, see IB segment results on pages 1619 of this
Form 10-Q.
Principal transactions revenue, which consists of revenue from trading and private equity investing
activities, increased compared with the first quarter of 2010, driven by higher private equity
gains, as a result of continued improvement in market conditions related to certain portfolio
investments. Trading revenue, although lower than the record level of the prior year, reflected
strong client revenue in IB. For additional information on principal transactions revenue, see IB
and Corporate/Private Equity segment results on pages 1619 and 3839, respectively, and Note 6
on page 113 of this Form 10-Q.
Lending- and deposit-related fees decreased, reflecting lower deposit-related fees in RFS
associated, in part, with legislation on non-sufficient funds and overdraft fees. For additional
information on lending- and deposit-related fees, which are mostly recorded in RFS, CB, TSS and IB,
see RFS on pages 2027, CB on pages 3031, TSS on pages 3234 and IB segment results on pages
1619 of this Form 10-Q.
Asset management, administration and commissions revenue increased from the first quarter of 2010.
The increase largely reflected higher asset management fees in AM, driven by the effect of higher
market levels and net inflows to products with higher margins, partially offset by lower
performance fees. Also contributing to the increase were higher administration fees in TSS,
reflecting net inflows of assets under custody and the effects of higher market levels; and higher
Equity Markets-related commissions revenue in IB. For additional information on these fees and
commissions, see the segment discussions for AM on pages 3437 and TSS on pages 3234 of this
Form 10-Q.
Securities gains decreased from the first quarter of 2010, due to a lower volume of securities
sales in the Firms investment portfolio. For additional information on securities gains, which are
mostly recorded in the Firms Corporate segment, see the Corporate/Private Equity segment
discussion on pages 3839 of this Form 10-Q.
Mortgage fees and related income decreased compared with the first quarter of 2010, driven by an
MSR risk management loss; this loss reflected a $1.1 billion decrease in the fair value of the MSR
asset related to the estimated impact of higher servicing costs to enhance servicing processes,
particularly loan modification and foreclosure procedures, and costs to comply with Consent Orders
entered into with banking regulators. An increase in production revenue, driven by higher mortgage
origination volumes and wider margins, partially offset the decline. For additional information on
mortgage fees and related income, which is recorded primarily in RFS, see RFSs Mortgage Banking,
Auto & Other Consumer
11
Lending discussion on pages 2325 of this Form 10-Q. For additional information on repurchase
losses, see the repurchase liability discussion on pages 4648 and Note 21 on pages 156159 of
this Form 10-Q.
Credit card income increased in the first quarter of 2011, largely reflecting higher customer
charge volume on debit and credit cards. For additional information on credit card income, see the
CS and RFS segment results on pages 2830, and pages 2027, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Other income increased compared with the first quarter of 2010, driven by valuation adjustments on
certain assets in IB, as well as higher auto operating lease income in RFS, as a result of growth
in lease volume.
Net interest income decreased in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the prior year. The
decrease was driven by lower yields on securities and lower average securities balances in
Corporate, resulting from investment portfolio repositioning; lower average loan balances,
primarily in CS and RFS, reflecting the expected runoff of credit card balances and residential
real estate loans; and lower fees on credit card receivables, reflecting the impact of legislative
changes. The decrease was offset partially by lower revenue reversals associated with lower credit
card charge-offs, and higher deposit balances. The Firms average interest-earning assets were $1.7
trillion in the first quarter of 2011, and the net yield on those assets, on a fully
taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis, was 2.89%, a decrease of 43 basis points from the first quarter
of 2010. For further information on the impact of the legislative changes on the Consolidated
Statements of Income, see CS discussion on Credit Card Legislation on page 79 of JPMorgan Chases
2010 Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
(386 |
) |
|
$ |
(236 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
)% |
Consumer, excluding credit card |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Credit card |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
7,246 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
|
(83 |
)% |
|
The provision for credit losses decreased compared with the first quarter of 2010, due to a
decrease in both the consumer and wholesale provisions. The consumer, excluding credit card,
provision was down from the prior year, driven by the absence of additions to the allowance for
loan losses and lower net charge-offs. The credit card provision was down from the prior year,
driven primarily by improved delinquency trends and a reduction in the allowance for loan losses as
a result of lower estimated losses. The wholesale provision reflected a higher benefit compared
with the prior year, primarily reflecting continued improvement in the credit environment from the
prior year. For a more detailed discussion of the loan portfolio and the allowance for credit
losses, see the segment discussions for RFS on pages 2027, CS on pages 2830, IB on pages 1619
and CB on pages 3031, and the Allowance for credit losses section on pages 7981 of this Form
10-Q.
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Compensation expense |
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
7,276 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Noncompensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Technology, communications and equipment |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Professional and outside services |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other(a)(b) |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncompensation expense |
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
8,848 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
15,995 |
|
|
$ |
16,124 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included litigation expense of $1.1 billion and $2.9 billion for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Included foreclosed property expense of $210 million and $303 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
Total noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2011 was $16.0 billion, down slightly from
$16.1 billion in the first quarter of 2010. A decrease in noncompensation expense, largely due to
lower additions to litigation reserves in the first quarter of 2011, offset the increase in
compensation expense.
12
Compensation expense increased from the prior year, predominantly due to higher salary and benefits
expense in support of on-going initiatives in IB, as well as additions for sales force and
default-related employees in RFS, and front office staff in AM.
The aforementioned decrease in noncompensation expense from the first quarter of 2010 was
predominantly related to a net decline in mortgage-related litigation expense (Corporate and IB
decreased, partially offset by an increase in RFS). The following items in noncompensation expense
were higher in the first quarter of 2011: other expense for the estimated costs of
foreclosure-related matters in RFS; professional services expense, due to continued investments in
new product platforms in the businesses, including those related to international expansion;
occupancy expense, largely reflecting a net increase in charges for excess real estate and higher
depreciation expense; marketing expense in CS; and all other expense, reflecting additional
operating expense related to business activity in IB. For a further discussion of litigation
expense, see the Litigation reserve discussion in Note 23 on pages 160169 of this Form 10-Q. For
a discussion of amortization of intangibles, refer to the Balance Sheet Analysis on pages 4143,
and Note 16 on pages 149152 of this Form 10-Q.
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except rate) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
$ |
8,057 |
|
|
$ |
4,537 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
The increase in the effective tax rate compared with the prior year was primarily the result
of higher reported pretax income and changes in the mix of income subject to U.S. federal and state
and local taxes, as well as significantly lower tax benefits recognized upon the resolution of tax
audits. These factors were partially offset by deferred tax benefits associated with state and
local income taxes. For additional information on income taxes, see Critical Accounting Estimates
Used by the Firm on pages 8689 of this Form 10-Q.
EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF THE FIRMS USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Firm prepares its consolidated financial statements using accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP); these financial statements appear on pages 9093 of this Form
10-Q. That presentation, which is referred to as reported basis, provides the reader with an
understanding of the Firms results that can be tracked consistently from year to year and enables
a comparison of the Firms performance with other companies U.S. GAAP financial statements.
In addition to analyzing the Firms results on a reported basis, management reviews the Firms
results and the results of the lines of business on a managed basis, which is a non-GAAP
financial measure. The Firms definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP
results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm (and each
of the business segments) on a FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from tax-exempt securities and
investments that receive tax credits is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to
taxable securities and investments. This non-GAAP financial measure allows management to assess the
comparability of revenue arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income
tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense. These adjustments
have no impact on net income as reported by the Firm as a whole or by the lines of business.
Tangible common equity (TCE) represents common stockholders equity (i.e., total stockholders
equity less preferred stock) less identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) and goodwill,
net of related deferred tax liabilities. ROTCE, a non-GAAP financial ratio, measures the Firms
earnings as a percentage of TCE and is, in managements view, a meaningful measure to assess the
Firms use of equity.
Management also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures at the business-segment level, because it
believes these other non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors about the
underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment and, therefore,
facilitate a comparison of the business segment with the performance of its competitors. Non-GAAP
financial measures used by the Firm may not be comparable to similarly named non-GAAP financial
measures used by other companies.
13
The following summary table provides a reconciliation from the Firms reported U.S. GAAP results to
managed basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
tax-equivalent |
|
Managed |
(in millions, except per share and ratios) |
|
results |
|
adjustments |
|
basis |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,745 |
|
Lendingand depositrelated fees |
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
Credit card income |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
Other income |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
13,316 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
13,767 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
11,905 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
12,024 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
25,221 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
25,791 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
15,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,995 |
|
|
Pre-provision profit |
|
|
9,226 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
9,796 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
8,627 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
Return on assets |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
NM |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
63 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Fully |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
tax-equivalent |
|
Managed |
(in millions, except per share and ratios) |
|
results |
|
adjustments |
|
basis |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
4,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,548 |
|
Lendingand depositrelated fees |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
Other income |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
13,961 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
14,372 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
27,671 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
28,172 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
Pre-provision profit |
|
|
11,547 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
12,048 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
4,537 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
Return on assets |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
NM |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
58 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
57 |
|
|
Average tangible common equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
169,415 |
|
|
$ |
166,812 |
|
|
$ |
163,962 |
|
|
$ |
159,069 |
|
|
$ |
156,094 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
48,846 |
|
|
|
48,831 |
|
|
|
48,745 |
|
|
|
48,348 |
|
|
|
48,542 |
|
Less: Certain identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
3,928 |
|
|
|
4,054 |
|
|
|
4,094 |
|
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
Add: Deferred tax liabilities(a) |
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
2,541 |
|
|
Tangible common equity (TCE) |
|
$ |
119,236 |
|
|
$ |
116,548 |
|
|
$ |
113,743 |
|
|
$ |
109,020 |
|
|
$ |
105,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable
intangibles created in non-taxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other
intangibles when calculating TCE. |
14
Other financial measures
The Firm also discloses the allowance for loan losses to total retained loans, excluding home
lending purchased credit-impaired loans. For a further discussion of this credit metric, see
Allowance for credit losses on pages 7981 of this Form 10-Q.
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS
The Firm is managed on a line of business basis. The business segment financial results
presented reflect the current organization of JPMorgan Chase. There are six major reportable
business segments: the Investment Bank, Retail Financial Services, Card Services, Commercial
Banking, Treasury & Securities Services and Asset Management, as well as a Corporate/Private Equity
segment. The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the
type of customer served, and reflect the manner in which financial information is currently
evaluated by management. Results of these lines of business are presented on a managed basis.
Description of business segment reporting methodology
Results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a
stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results
allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies. For a further discussion of those
methodologies, see Business Segment Results Description of business segment reporting
methodology on pages 6768 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. The Firm continues to assess
the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and
further refinements may be implemented in future periods.
Business segment capital allocation changes
Each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand-alone peer
comparisons, economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements. The amount of capital
assigned to each business is referred to as equity. Effective January 1, 2011, capital allocated to
CS was reduced and that of TSS was increased. For further information about these capital changes,
see Line of business equity on pages 5253 of this Form 10-Q.
Segment Results Managed Basis(a)
The following table summarizes the business segment results for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Total net revenue |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
Pre-provision profit |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Investment Bank(b) |
|
$ |
8,233 |
|
|
$ |
8,319 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
$ |
5,016 |
|
|
$ |
4,838 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
|
$ |
3,481 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
6,275 |
|
|
|
7,776 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Card Services |
|
|
3,982 |
|
|
|
4,447 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Commercial Banking |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity(b) |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
2,327 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
2,336 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,791 |
|
|
$ |
28,172 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
$ |
15,995 |
|
|
$ |
16,124 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
$ |
9,796 |
|
|
$ |
12,048 |
|
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
March 31, |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
on equity |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Investment Bank(b) |
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
$ |
(462 |
) |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,370 |
|
|
$ |
2,471 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Card Services |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Commercial Banking |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity(b) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
NM |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
|
(83 |
)% |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents reported results on a tax-equivalent basis. |
|
(b) |
|
Corporate/Private Equity includes an adjustment to offset IBs inclusion of a credit
allocation income/(expense) to TSS in total net revenue; TSS reports the credit allocation as
a separate line on its income statement (not within total net revenue). |
15
INVESTMENT BANK
For a discussion of the business profile of IB, see pages 6971 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report and Introduction on page 4 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,779 |
|
|
$ |
1,446 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Principal transactions |
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Lending- and deposit-related fees |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
All other income(a) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
6,176 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue(b) |
|
|
8,233 |
|
|
|
8,319 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
4,838 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,370 |
|
|
$ |
2,471 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Return on assets |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense as a percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory |
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Equity underwriting |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Debt underwriting |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking fees |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Fixed income markets(c) |
|
|
5,238 |
|
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Equity markets(d) |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Credit portfolio(a)(e) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
8,233 |
|
|
$ |
8,319 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
IB manages credit exposures related to Global Corporate Bank (GCB) on behalf of IB and
TSS. Effective January 1, 2011, IB and TSS will share the economics related to the Firms GCB
clients. IB recognizes this sharing agreement within all other income. The prior-year period
reflected the reimbursement from TSS for a portion of the total costs of managing the credit
portfolio on behalf of TSS. |
|
(b) |
|
Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to income tax
credits related to affordable housing and alternative energy investments as well as tax-exempt
income from municipal bond investments of $438 million and $403 million for the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Fixed income markets primarily include revenue related to market-making across global fixed
income markets, including foreign exchange, interest rate, credit and commodities markets. |
|
(d) |
|
Equities markets primarily include revenue related to market-making across global equity
products, including cash instruments, derivatives, convertibles and Prime Services. |
|
(e) |
|
Credit portfolio revenue includes net interest income, fees and loan sale activity, as well
as gains or losses on securities received as part of a loan restructuring, for IBs credit
portfolio. Credit portfolio revenue also includes the results of risk management related to
the Firms lending and derivative activities. See pages 5981 of the Credit Risk Management
section of this Form 10-Q for further discussion. |
16
Quarterly results
Net income was $2.4 billion, down 4% from the prior-year record, reflecting higher noninterest
expense, slightly lower net revenue and a lower benefit from the provision for credit losses.
Net revenue was $8.2 billion, compared with $8.3 billion in the prior year. Investment banking fees
were $1.8 billion, up 23% from the prior year; these consisted of record debt underwriting fees of
$971 million (up 33%), equity underwriting fees of $379 million (down 8%), and advisory fees of
$429 million (up 41%). Fixed Income and Equity Markets revenue was $6.6 billion, compared with $6.9
billion in the prior year, reflecting strong client revenues. Credit Portfolio revenue was a loss
of $190 million, primarily reflecting the negative net impact of credit-related valuation adjustments
largely offset by net interest income and fees on retained loans.
The provision for credit losses was a benefit of $429 million, compared with a benefit of $462
million in the prior year. The current-quarter benefit primarily reflected a reduction in the
allowance for loan losses, primarily related to loan sales and net repayments. The ratio of the
allowance for loan losses to end-of-period loans retained was 2.52%, compared with 4.91% in the
prior year, driven by the improved quality of the loan portfolio. Net charge-offs were $123
million, compared with net charge-offs of $697 million in the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $5.0 billion, up 4% from the prior year driven by higher compensation
expense, partially offset by lower noncompensation expense.
ROE was 24% on $40.0 billion of allocated capital.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount and ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained(a) |
|
$ |
52,712 |
|
|
$ |
53,010 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
57,782 |
|
|
|
56,604 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Equity |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
815,828 |
|
|
$ |
676,122 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Trading assetsdebt and equity instruments |
|
|
368,956 |
|
|
|
284,085 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Trading assetsderivative receivables |
|
|
67,462 |
|
|
|
66,151 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained(a) |
|
|
53,370 |
|
|
|
58,501 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
57,205 |
|
|
|
61,651 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Adjusted assets(b) |
|
|
611,038 |
|
|
|
506,635 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Equity |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
26,494 |
|
|
|
24,977 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
Nonperforming assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans retained(a)(c) |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale
and loans at fair value |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Derivative receivables |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
3,289 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
2,601 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Net charge-off rate(a)(d) |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained(a)(d) |
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a)(c)(d) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans |
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market riskaverage trading and credit portfolio VaR 95% confidence level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Foreign exchange |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Equities |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Commodities and other |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Diversification(e) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading VaR(f) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Credit portfolio VaR(g) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Diversification(e) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading and credit portfolio VaR |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans retained included credit portfolio loans, leveraged leases and other accrual loans,
and excluded loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
Adjusted assets, a non-GAAP financial measure, equals total assets minus: (1) securities
purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed less securities sold, not yet
purchased; (2) assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs); (3) cash and
securities segregated and on deposit for regulatory and other purposes; (4) goodwill and
intangibles; (5) securities received as collateral. The amount of adjusted assets is presented
to assist the reader in comparing IBs asset and capital levels to other investment banks in
the securities industry. Asset-to-equity leverage ratios are commonly used as one measure to
assess a companys capital adequacy. IB believes an adjusted asset amount that excludes the
assets discussed above, which were considered to have a low risk profile, provides a more
meaningful measure of balance sheet leverage in the securities industry. |
|
(c) |
|
Allowance for loan losses of $567 million and $811 million were held against these nonaccrual
loans at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the allowance
coverage ratio and net charge-off rate. |
18
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Average value-at-risk (VaR) was less than the sum of the VaR of the components described
above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect reflects the fact
that the risks were not perfectly correlated. The risk of a portfolio of positions is
therefore usually less than the sum of the risks of the positions themselves. |
|
(f) |
|
Trading VaR includes substantially all trading activities in IB, including the credit spread
sensitivities of certain mortgage products and syndicated lending facilities that the Firm
intends to distribute; however, particular risk parameters of certain products are not fully
captured, for example, correlation risk. Trading VaR does not include the debit valuation
adjustments (DVA) taken on derivative and structured liabilities to reflect the credit
quality of the Firm. See VaR discussion on pages 8184 and the DVA Sensitivity table on page
84 of this Form 10-Q for further details. |
|
(g) |
|
Credit portfolio VaR includes the derivative credit valuation adjustments (CVA), hedges of
the CVA and mark-to-market (MTM) hedges of the retained loan portfolio, which are all
reported in principal transactions revenue. This VaR does not include the retained loan
portfolio, which is not MTM. |
According to Dealogic, for the first three months of 2011, the Firm was ranked #1 in
Investment Banking fees generated based on revenue, and #1 in Global Announced M&A; #1 in Global
Syndicated Loans; #3 in Global Debt, Equity and Equity-related; #3 in Global Long-Term Debt; and #7
in Global Equity and Equity-related, based on volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Full-year 2010 |
Market shares and rankings(a) |
|
Market Share |
|
Rankings |
|
Market Share |
|
Rankings |
|
Global investment banking fees(b) |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
#1 |
|
Debt, equity and equity-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
U.S. |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Syndicated loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
U.S. |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Long-term debt(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
U.S. |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Equity and equity-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global(d) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
U.S. |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Announced M&A(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
U.S. |
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Source: Dealogic. Global Investment Banking fees reflects ranking of fees and market
share. Remainder of rankings reflects transaction volume rank and market share. |
|
(b) |
|
Global IB fees exclude money market, short-term debt and shelf deals. |
|
(c) |
|
Long-term debt tables include investment-grade, high-yield, supranationals, sovereigns,
agencies, covered bonds, asset-backed securities (ABS) and mortgage-backed securities; and
exclude money market, short-term debt, and U.S. municipal securities. |
|
(d) |
|
Equity and equity-related rankings include rights offerings and Chinese A-Shares. |
|
(e) |
|
Global announced M&A is based on transaction value at announcement; all other rankings are
based on transaction proceeds, with full credit to each book manager/equal if joint. Because
of joint assignments, market share of all participants will add up to more than 100%. M&A for
year-to-date 2011 and full-year 2010 reflects the removal of any withdrawn transactions. U.S.
announced M&A represents any U.S. involvement ranking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Total net revenue:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
$ |
1,122 |
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Latin America/Caribbean |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
North America |
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
4,146 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
8,233 |
|
|
$ |
8,319 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (period-end): (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
$ |
5,472 |
|
|
$ |
6,195 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Latin America/Caribbean |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
14,059 |
|
|
|
12,510 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
North America |
|
|
30,991 |
|
|
|
32,270 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
52,712 |
|
|
$ |
53,010 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Regional revenues are based primarily on the domicile of the client and/or location of
the trading desk. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes retained loans based on the domicile of the customer. Excludes loans held-for-sale
and loans at fair value. |
19
RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES
For a discussion of the business profile of RFS, see pages 72-78 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report and Introduction on page 4 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees |
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
655 |
|
|
NM |
Credit card income |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other income |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue(a) |
|
|
6,275 |
|
|
|
7,776 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(208 |
) |
|
$ |
(131 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio excluding core deposit intangibles(b) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments associated with tax-exempt loans to
municipalities and other qualified entities of $3 million and $5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
RFS uses the overhead ratio (excluding the amortization of core deposit intangibles (CDI)),
a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the underlying expense trends of the business.
Including CDI amortization expense in the overhead ratio calculation would result in a higher
overhead ratio in the earlier years and a lower overhead ratio in later years; this method
would therefore result in an improving overhead ratio over time, all things remaining equal.
The non-GAAP ratio excluded Retail Bankings CDI amortization expense related to prior
business combination transactions of $60 million and $70 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
Quarterly results
Retail Financial Services reported a net loss of $208 million, compared with a net loss of $131
million in the prior year.
Net revenue was $6.3 billion, a decrease of $1.5 billion, or 19%, compared with the prior year. Net
interest income was $4.6 billion, down by $394 million, or 8%, reflecting the impact of lower loan
balances due to portfolio runoff and narrower loan spreads. Noninterest revenue was $1.6 billion,
down by $1.1 billion, or 40%, driven by lower mortgage fees and related income.
The provision for credit losses was $1.3 billion, a decrease of $2.4 billion from the prior year.
While delinquency trends and net charge-offs improved compared with the prior year, the
current-quarter provision continued to reflect elevated losses in the mortgage and home equity
portfolios. See page 71 of this Form 10-Q for the net charge-off amounts and rates. To date, no
charge-offs have been recorded on PCI loans.
Noninterest expense was $5.3 billion, an increase of $1.0 billion, or 24%, from the prior year.
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount and ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
355,394 |
|
|
$ |
382,475 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
|
308,827 |
|
|
|
339,002 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a) |
|
|
12,234 |
|
|
|
11,296 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
321,061 |
|
|
|
350,298 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
380,494 |
|
|
|
362,470 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Equity |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
364,266 |
|
|
$ |
393,867 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
|
312,543 |
|
|
|
342,997 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a) |
|
|
17,519 |
|
|
|
17,055 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
330,062 |
|
|
|
360,052 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
372,634 |
|
|
|
356,934 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Equity |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
123,550 |
|
|
|
112,616 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans retained |
|
|
8,499 |
|
|
|
10,769 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans(b)(c)(d) |
|
|
8,649 |
|
|
|
10,986 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Nonperforming assets(b)(c)(d) |
|
|
9,905 |
|
|
|
12,191 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
16,453 |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Net charge-off rate(e) |
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate excluding PCI loans(e)(f) |
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to ending loans retained(e) |
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to ending loans retained excluding PCI loans(e)(f) |
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(b)(e)(f) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to total loans |
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to total loans excluding PCI loans(b) |
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans at fair value consist of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are
accounted for at fair value and classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. These loans totaled $12.0 billion and $8.4 billion at March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Average balances of these loans totaled $17.4 billion and $14.2 billion for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes PCI loans that were acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction, which are
accounted for on a pool basis. Since each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a
single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows, the past-due status
of the pools, or that of the individual loans within the pools, is not meaningful. Because the
Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of loans, they are all considered to be
performing. |
|
(c) |
|
Certain of these loans are classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(d) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S.
government agencies of $9.8 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, that are accruing at the
guaranteed reimbursement rate; (2) real estate owned insured by U.S. government agencies of
$2.3 billion and $707 million, respectively; and (3) student loans that are 90 days or more
past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal
Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), of $615 million and $581 million, respectively. These
amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
|
(e) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans accounted for at fair value were excluded when calculating the
allowance coverage ratio and the net charge-off rate. |
|
(f) |
|
Excludes the impact of PCI loans that were acquired as part of the Washington Mutual
transaction. These loans were accounted for at fair value on the acquisition date, which
incorporated managements estimate, as of that date, of credit losses over the remaining life
of the portfolio. An allowance for loan losses of $4.9 billion and $2.8 billion was recorded
for these loans at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which was also excluded from the
applicable ratios. To date, no charge-offs have been recorded for these loans. |
21
RETAIL BANKING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Net interest income |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
4,337 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio excluding core deposit intangibles(a) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Retail Banking uses the overhead ratio (excluding the amortization of CDI), a non-GAAP
financial measure, to evaluate the underlying expense trends of the business. Including CDI
amortization expense in the overhead ratio calculation would result in a higher overhead ratio
in the earlier years and a lower overhead ratio in later years; this method would therefore
result in an improving overhead ratio over time, all things remaining equal. The non-GAAP
ratio excluded Retail Bankings CDI amortization expense related to prior business combination
transactions of $60 million and $70 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. |
Quarterly results
Retail Banking reported net income of $891 million, flat compared with the prior year. Net revenue
was $4.4 billion, up 2% from the prior year. The increase was driven by higher debit card and
investment sales revenue, largely offset by lower deposit-related fees. Retail Banking net
charge-offs were $119 million, compared with $191 million in the prior year. Noninterest expense
was $2.8 billion, up 9% from the prior year, resulting from sales force increases and new branch
builds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business banking origination volume (in millions) |
|
$ |
1,425 |
|
|
$ |
905 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
End-of-period loans owned |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
End-of-period deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking |
|
$ |
137.4 |
|
|
$ |
123.8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Savings |
|
|
176.3 |
|
|
|
163.4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Time and other |
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total end-of-period deposits |
|
|
357.7 |
|
|
|
340.4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Average loans owned |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking |
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
$ |
119.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Savings |
|
|
171.1 |
|
|
|
158.6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Time and other |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
|
348.1 |
|
|
|
333.9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Deposit margin |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics
(in millions, except ratio) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
4.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail branch business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment sales volume (in millions) |
|
$ |
6,584 |
|
|
$ |
5,956 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branches |
|
|
5,292 |
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
ATMs |
|
|
16,265 |
|
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Personal bankers |
|
|
21,875 |
|
|
|
19,003 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Sales specialists |
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
|
6,315 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Active online customers (in thousands) |
|
|
18,318 |
|
|
|
16,208 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Checking accounts (in thousands) |
|
|
26,622 |
|
|
|
25,830 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
22
MORTGAGE BANKING, AUTO & OTHER CONSUMER LENDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratio) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
NM |
Net interest income |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
448 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(937 |
) |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
302 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly results
Mortgage Banking, Auto & Other Consumer Lending reported a net loss of $937 million, compared with
net income of $257 million in the prior year.
Net revenue was $696 million, a decrease of $1.2 billion, or 64%, from the prior year. Mortgage
Banking net revenue was a loss of $114 million, compared with net revenue of $962 million in the
prior year. Auto & Other Consumer Lending net revenue was $810 million, down by $139 million,
predominantly as a result of the discontinuation of tax refund anticipation lending.
Mortgage Banking net revenue in the first quarter of 2011 included $271 million of net interest
income and $104 million of other noninterest revenue, offset by a loss of $489 million for mortgage
fees and related income. Mortgage fees and related income comprised $259 million of net production
revenue, $489 million of servicing operating revenue and a $1.2 billion MSR risk management loss.
Production revenue, excluding repurchase losses, was $679 million, an increase of $246 million,
reflecting higher mortgage origination volumes and wider margins. Total production revenue was
reduced by $420 million of repurchase losses, compared with repurchase losses of $432 million in
the prior year. Servicing operating revenue declined 3% from the prior year. MSR risk management
revenue declined by $1.4 billion from the prior year, reflecting a $1.1 billion decrease in the
fair value of the MSR asset related to the estimated impact of higher servicing costs to enhance
servicing processes.
The provision for credit losses, predominantly related to the student and auto loan portfolios, was
$131 million, compared with $217 million in the prior year. Auto loan net charge-offs were $47
million, compared with $102 million in the prior year. Student loan and other net charge-offs were
$80 million, compared with $64 million in the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $2.1 billion, up by $859 million, or 69%, from the prior year, driven by
$650 million recorded for estimated costs of foreclosure-related matters, as well as an increase in
default-related expense for the serviced portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End-of-period loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs(a) |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Student and other |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total end-of-period loans owned |
|
|
75.8 |
|
|
|
78.5 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
$ |
47.7 |
|
|
$ |
46.9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs (a) |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Student and other |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average loans owned(b) |
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Credit data and quality statistics (in millions, except ratios) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
|
(54 |
)% |
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Student and other |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Student and other |
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-off rate(b) |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ day delinquency rate(c)(d)(e) |
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets (in millions)(f) |
|
$ |
931 |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Origination volume: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage origination volume by channel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Wholesale(g) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Correspondent(g) |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
CNT (negotiated transactions) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage origination volume |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Auto |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Application volume: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage application volume by channel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
31.3 |
|
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Wholesale(g) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Correspondent(g) |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage application volume |
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
39.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average mortgage loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(h) |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
124.8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Repurchase reserve (ending) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Third-party mortgage loans serviced (ending) |
|
|
955.0 |
|
|
|
1,075.0 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Third-party mortgage loans serviced (average) |
|
|
958.7 |
|
|
|
1,076.4 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
MSR net carrying value (ending) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Ratio of MSR net carrying value (ending) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (ending) |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of annualized loan servicing revenue to third-party mortgage loans serviced (average) |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
MSR revenue multiple(i) |
|
|
3.04x |
|
|
|
3.43x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental mortgage fees and related income details |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net production revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production revenue |
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Repurchase losses |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net production revenue |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Net mortgage servicing revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan servicing revenue |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other changes in MSR asset fair value |
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenue |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Risk management: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in MSR asset fair value due to inputs or assumptions in model |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
NM |
Derivative valuation adjustments and other |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk management |
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net mortgage servicing revenue |
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
654 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
$ |
(489 |
) |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominantly represents prime loans repurchased from Government National Mortgage
Association (Ginnie Mae) pools, which are insured by U.S. government agencies. See further
discussion of loans repurchased from Ginnie Mae pools in Repurchase liability on pages 4648
of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(b) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, total average loans owned included loans
held-for-sale of $133 million and $2.9 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded
when calculating the net charge-off rate. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, total end-of-period loans owned included loans held-for-sale of
$188 million and $2.9 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating the
30+ day delinquency rate. |
24
|
|
|
(d) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of
$10.4 billion and $11.2 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement
of insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
|
(e) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, excluded loans that are 30 days or more past due and still
accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP, of $1.0 billion and
$965 million, respectively. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts
is proceeding normally. |
|
(f) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by
U.S. government agencies of $9.8 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, that are accruing
at the guaranteed reimbursement rate; (2) real estate owned insured by U.S. government
agencies of $2.3 billion and $707 million, respectively; and (3) student loans that are 90
days or more past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under
the FFELP, of $615 million and $581 million, respectively. These amounts were excluded as
reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes rural housing loans sourced through brokers and correspondents, which are
underwritten under U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines. |
|
(h) |
|
Loans at fair value consist of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are
accounted for at fair value and classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Average balances of these loans totaled $17.4 billion and $14.2 billion for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(i) |
|
Represents the ratio of MSR net carrying value (ending) to third-party mortgage loans
serviced (ending) divided by the ratio of annualized loan servicing revenue to third-party
mortgage loans serviced (average). |
REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratio) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
(75 |
)% |
Net interest income |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
3,325 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(2,216 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,286 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly results
Real Estate Portfolios reported a net loss of $162 million, compared with a net loss of $1.3
billion in the prior year. The improvement was driven by a lower provision for credit losses.
Net revenue was $1.2 billion, down by $364 million, or 24%, from the prior year. The decrease was
driven by a decline in net interest income as a result of lower loan balances due to portfolio
runoff, and narrower loan spreads.
The provision for credit losses was $1.1 billion, compared with $3.3 billion in the prior year. The
current-quarter provision reflected a $1.0 billion reduction in net charge-offs driven by improved
delinquency trends. Also, the prior-year provision included an addition to the allowance for loan
losses of $1.2 billion for the Washington Mutual PCI portfolios.
Noninterest expense was $355 million, down by $64 million, or 15%, from the prior year, reflecting
a decrease in foreclosed asset expense.
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in billions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Loans excluding PCI loans(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End-of-period loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
97.7 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total end-of-period loans owned |
|
$ |
145.4 |
|
|
$ |
167.3 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average loans owned |
|
$ |
148.1 |
|
|
$ |
171.0 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCI loans(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End-of-period loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Prime mortgage |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Option ARMs |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total end-of-period loans owned |
|
$ |
70.8 |
|
|
$ |
79.3 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Prime mortgage |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Option ARMs |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average loans owned |
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
|
$ |
80.2 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End-of-period loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
109.3 |
|
|
$ |
123.7 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total end-of-period loans owned |
|
$ |
216.2 |
|
|
$ |
246.6 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
111.1 |
|
|
$ |
125.7 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average loans owned |
|
$ |
219.7 |
|
|
$ |
251.2 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
207.2 |
|
|
$ |
240.2 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Home equity origination volume |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
PCI loans represent loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction for which a
deterioration in credit quality occurred between the origination date and JPMorgan Chases
acquisition date. These loans were initially recorded at fair value and accrete interest
income over the estimated lives of the loans as long as cash flows are reasonably estimable,
even if the underlying loans are contractually past due. |
Included within Real Estate Portfolios are PCI loans that the Firm acquired in the Washington
Mutual transaction. For PCI loans, the excess of the undiscounted gross cash flows expected to be
collected over the carrying value of the loans (the accretable yield) is accreted into interest
income at a level rate of return over the expected life of the loans.
The net spread between the PCI loans and the related liabilities are expected to be relatively
constant over time, except for any basis risk or other residual interest rate risk that remains and
for certain changes in the accretable yield percentage (e.g., from extended loan liquidation
periods and from prepayments). As of March 31, 2011, the remaining weighted-average life of the PCI
loan portfolio is expected to be 6.9 years. For further information, see Note 13, PCI loans, on
pages 134136 of this Form 10-Q. The loan balances are expected to decline more rapidly in the
earlier years as the most troubled loans are liquidated, and more slowly thereafter as the
remaining troubled borrowers have limited refinancing opportunities. Similarly, default and
servicing expense are expected to be higher in the earlier years and decline over time as
liquidations slow down.
26
To date the impact of the PCI loans on Real Estate Portfolios net income has been modestly
negative. This is due to the current net spread of the portfolio, the provision for loan losses
recognized subsequent to its acquisition, and the higher level of default and servicing expense
associated with the portfolio. Over time, the Firm expects that this portfolio will contribute
positively to net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Net charge-offs excluding PCI loans(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
1,126 |
|
|
|
(36 |
)% |
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Other |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
1,076 |
|
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate excluding PCI loans(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
13.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-off rate excluding PCI loans |
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
9.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-off rate reported |
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ day delinquency rate excluding PCI loans(b) |
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
7.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
14,659 |
|
|
$ |
14,127 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Nonperforming assets(c) |
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
10,313 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses to ending loans retained |
|
|
6.78 |
% |
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to ending loans retained excluding PCI loans(a) |
|
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes the impact of PCI loans that were acquired as part of the Washington Mutual
transaction. These loans were accounted for at fair value on the acquisition date, which
incorporated managements estimate, as of that date, of credit losses over the remaining life
of the portfolio. An allowance for loan losses of $4.9 billion and $2.8 billion was recorded
for these loans at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which was also excluded from the
applicable ratios. To date, no charge-offs have been recorded for these loans. |
|
(b) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the delinquency rate for PCI loans was 27.36% and 28.49%,
respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Excludes PCI loans that were acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction, which
are accounted for on a pool basis. Since each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a
single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows, the past-due
status of the pools, or that of the individual loans within the pools, is not meaningful.
Because the Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of loans, they are all
considered to be performing. |
27
CARD SERVICES
For a discussion of the business profile of CS, see pages 7981 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report and Introduction on page 4 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data(a) |
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card income |
|
$ |
898 |
|
|
$ |
813 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
All other income(b) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
3,689 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
3,982 |
|
|
|
4,447 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
NM |
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
1,343 |
|
|
$ |
(303 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, the commercial card business that was previously in TSS was
transferred to CS. There is no material impact on the financial data; the prior period was not
revised. The commercial card portfolio is excluded from business metrics and supplemental
information where noted. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes the impact of revenue sharing agreements with other JPMorgan Chase
business segments. |
Quarterly results
Net income was $1.3 billion, compared with a net loss of $303 million in the prior year. The
improved results were driven by a lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by lower net
revenue.
End-of-period loans were $128.8 billion, a decrease of $20.5 billion, or 14%, from the prior year.
Average loans were $132.5 billion, a decrease of $23.3 billion, or 15%, from the prior year. The
declines in both end-of-period and average loans were consistent with expected portfolio runoff.
Net revenue was $4.0 billion, a decrease of $465 million, or 10%, from the prior year. Net interest
income was $3.2 billion, down by $489 million, or 13%. The decrease in net interest income was
driven by lower average loan balances, the impact of legislative changes and a decreased level of
fees. These decreases were largely offset by lower revenue reversals associated with lower
charge-offs. Noninterest revenue was $782 million, an increase of $24 million, or 3%. The increase
was driven by the transfer of the Commercial Card business to CS from TSS in the first quarter of
2011 and higher net interchange income, partially offset by lower revenue from fee-based products.
The provision for credit losses was $226 million, compared with $3.5 billion in the prior year. The
current-quarter provision reflected lower net charge-offs and a reduction of $2.0 billion to the
allowance for loan losses due to lower estimated losses. The prior-year provision included a
reduction of $1.0 billion to the allowance for loan losses. Excluding the Washington Mutual and
Commercial Card portfolios, the net charge-off rate1 was 6.20%, down from 10.54% in the
prior year; and the 30-day delinquency rate1 was 3.25%, down from 4.99% in the prior
year. Including the Washington Mutual and Commercial Card portfolios, the net charge-off rate was
6.97% (6.81% including loans held-for-sale), down from 11.75% in the prior year; the 30-day
delinquency rate was 3.57% (3.55% including loans held-for-sale), down from 5.62% in the
prior year.
Noninterest expense was $1.6 billion, an increase of $153 million, or 11%, due to the transfer of
the Commercial Card business and higher marketing expense.
1. |
|
Includes loans held-for-sale, which are non-GAAP financial measures, to provide more
meaningful measures that enable comparability with the prior period. |
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount, ratios and where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Financial ratios(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of average loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
9.79 |
% |
|
|
9.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
9.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk adjusted margin(b) |
|
|
11.49 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income/(loss) (ROO) |
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business metrics, excluding Commercial Card(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales volume (in billions) |
|
$ |
77.5 |
|
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
New accounts opened |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Open accounts |
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchant acquiring business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank card volume (in billions) |
|
$ |
125.7 |
|
|
$ |
108.0 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Total transactions (in billions) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans(c) |
|
$ |
128,803 |
|
|
$ |
149,260 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Equity |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
138,113 |
|
|
$ |
156,968 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Loans(d) |
|
|
132,537 |
|
|
|
155,790 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Equity |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount(e) |
|
|
21,774 |
|
|
|
22,478 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit quality statistics retained(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
2,226 |
|
|
$ |
4,512 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Net charge-off rate(d)(f) |
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
|
11.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Delinquency rates(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ day |
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
90+ day |
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
9,041 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans(c) |
|
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
10.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information(a)(g)(h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase, excluding Washington Mutual portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (period-end) |
|
$ |
116,395 |
|
|
$ |
132,056 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Average loans |
|
|
119,411 |
|
|
|
137,183 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Net interest income(i) |
|
|
9.09 |
% |
|
|
8.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Risk adjusted margin(b)(i) |
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
30+ day delinquency rate |
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
90+ day delinquency rate |
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase, excluding Washington Mutual and Commercial Card portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (period-end) |
|
$ |
115,016 |
|
|
$ |
132,056 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Average loans |
|
|
118,145 |
|
|
|
137,183 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Net interest income(i) |
|
|
9.25 |
% |
|
|
8.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Risk adjusted margin(b)(i) |
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
6.20 |
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
30+ day delinquency rate |
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
90+ day delinquency rate |
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, the commercial card business that was previously in TSS was
transferred to CS. There is no material impact on the financial data; the prior period was not
revised. The commercial card portfolio is excluded from business metrics and supplemental
information where noted. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents total net revenue less provision for credit losses. |
|
(c) |
|
Total period-end loans include loans held-for-sale of $4.0 billion at March 31, 2011. There
were no loans held-for-sale at March 31, 2010. No allowance for loan losses was recorded for
these loans. Loans held-for-sale are excluded when calculating the allowance for loan losses
to period-end loans and delinquency rates. The 30+ day delinquency rate including loans
held-for-sale, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, was 3.55% at March 31, 2011. The 90+ day
delinquency rate including loans held-for-sale, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, was
1.92% at March 31, 2011. |
|
(d) |
|
Total average loans include loans held-for-sale of $3.0 billion for the quarter ended March
31, 2011. There were no loans held-for-sale for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. This amount
is excluded when calculating the net charge-off rate. The net charge-off rate including loans
held-for-sale, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, was 6.81% for the quarter ended March
31, 2011. |
|
(e) |
|
The first quarter of 2011 headcount includes 1,274 employees related to the transfer of the
commercial card business from TSS to CS. |
|
(f) |
|
Results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 reflect the impact of fair value accounting
adjustments related to the consolidation of the Washington Mutual Master Trust (WMMT) in the
second quarter of 2009. |
|
(g) |
|
Supplemental information is provided for Chase, excluding Washington Mutual and Commercial
Card portfolios and including loans held-for-sale, which are non-GAAP financial measures, to
provide more meaningful measures that enable comparability with prior periods. |
29
|
|
|
(h) |
|
For additional information on loan balances, delinquency rates, and net charge-off rates for
the Washington Mutual portfolio, see Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 7078, and Note 13 on
pages 122138 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(i) |
|
As a percentage of average loans. |
COMMERCIAL BANKING
For a discussion of the business profile of CB, see pages 8283 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report and Introduction on page 5 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending- and deposit-related fees |
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
All other income(a) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
Total net revenue(b) |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending(c) |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Treasury services(c) |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Investment banking |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
Total Commercial Banking revenue |
|
$ |
1,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IB revenue, gross(d) |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by client segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market Banking |
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Commercial Term Lending |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Corporate Client Banking(e) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Real Estate Banking |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Other |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
Total Commercial Banking revenue |
|
$ |
1,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
CB client revenue from investment banking products and commercial card transactions is
included in all other income. |
|
(b) |
|
Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments from income tax credits related to
equity investments in designated community development entities that provide loans to
qualified businesses in low-income communities as well as tax-exempt income from municipal
bond activity of $65 million and $45 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, product revenue from commercial card and standby letters of credit
transactions is included in lending. For the period ending March 31, 2011, the impact of the
change was $107 million. In prior quarters, it was reported in treasury services. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents the total revenue related to investment banking products sold to CB clients. |
|
(e) |
|
Corporate Client Banking was known as Mid-Corporate Banking prior to January 1, 2011. |
Quarterly results
Net income was $546 million, an increase of $156 million, or 40%, from the prior year. The increase
was driven by a reduction in the provision for credit losses and higher net revenue.
Net revenue was $1.5 billion, up by $100 million, or 7%, from the prior year. Net interest income
was $1.0 billion, up by $98 million, or 11%, driven by growth in liability balances, wider loan
spreads, and growth in loan balances, partially offset by spread compression on liability products.
Noninterest revenue was $502 million, flat compared with the prior year.
Revenue from Middle Market Banking was $755 million, an increase of $9 million, or 1%, from the
prior year. Revenue from Commercial Term Lending was $286 million, an increase of $57 million, or
25%. Revenue from Corporate Client Banking (formerly Mid-Corporate Banking) was $290 million, an
increase of $27 million, or 10%. Revenue from Real Estate Banking was $88 million, a decrease of
$12 million, or 12%.
30
The provision for credit losses was $47 million, compared with $214 million in the prior year.
Net charge-offs were $31 million (0.13% net charge-off rate) and were largely related to commercial
real estate; this compared with net charge-offs of $229 million (0.96% net charge-off rate) in the
prior year. The allowance for loan losses to end-of-period loans retained was 2.59%, down from
3.15% in the prior year. Nonaccrual loans were $2.0 billion, down by $1.0 billion, or 35%, from the
prior year, reflecting decreases in commercial real estate.
Noninterest expense was $563 million, an increase of $24 million, or 4%, from the prior year,
primarily reflecting higher headcount-related expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount and ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
$ |
99,334 |
|
|
$ |
95,435 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
100,169 |
|
|
|
95,729 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Equity |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
140,400 |
|
|
$ |
133,013 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
|
98,829 |
|
|
|
96,317 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
99,585 |
|
|
|
96,614 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Liability balances |
|
|
156,200 |
|
|
|
133,142 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Equity |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans by client segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market Banking |
|
$ |
38,207 |
|
|
$ |
33,919 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Commercial Term Lending |
|
|
37,810 |
|
|
|
36,057 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Corporate Client Banking(a) |
|
|
12,374 |
|
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Real Estate Banking |
|
|
7,607 |
|
|
|
10,438 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Banking loans |
|
$ |
99,585 |
|
|
$ |
96,614 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
Nonperforming assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans retained |
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
3,186 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses(b) |
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained |
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to total period-end loans |
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Corporate Client Banking was known as Mid-Corporate Banking prior to January 1, 2011. |
|
(b) |
|
Allowance for loan losses of $360 million and $612 million were held against nonaccrual loans
retained for the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
31
TREASURY & SECURITIES SERVICES
For a discussion of the business profile of TSS, see pages 8485 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report and Introduction on page 5 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount and ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending and depositrelated fees |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
All other income |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
NM |
Credit allocation income/(expense)(a) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services |
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Worldwide Securities Services |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by geographic region(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
North America |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade finance loans by geographic region (period-end)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
$ |
14,607 |
|
|
$ |
7,679 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean |
|
|
4,014 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
5,794 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
North America |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trade finance loans |
|
$ |
25,499 |
|
|
$ |
13,719 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax margin ratio |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans(c) |
|
$ |
31,020 |
|
|
$ |
24,066 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Equity |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
47,873 |
|
|
$ |
38,273 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Loans(c) |
|
|
29,290 |
|
|
|
19,578 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Liability balances |
|
|
265,720 |
|
|
|
247,905 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Equity |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
28,040 |
|
|
|
27,223 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
IB manages credit exposures related to the GCB on behalf of IB and TSS. Effective January 1,
2011, IB and TSS will share the economics related to the Firms GCB clients. Included within
this allocation are net revenues, provision for credit losses, as well as expenses. The
prior-year period reflected a reimbursement to IB for a portion of the total costs of managing
the credit portfolio. IB recognizes this credit allocation as a component of all other income. |
|
(b) |
|
Revenue and trade finance loans are based on TSS managements view of the domicile of
clients. |
|
(c) |
|
Loan balances include trade finance loans, wholesale overdrafts and commercial card.
Effective January 1, 2011, the commercial card loan portfolio (of approximately $1.2 billion)
that was previously in TSS was transferred to CS. There is no material impact on the financial
data; the prior-year period was not revised. |
32
Quarterly results
Net income was $316 million, an increase of $37 million, or 13%, from the prior year.
Net revenue was $1.8 billion, an increase of $84 million, or 5%, from the prior year. Worldwide
Securities Services net revenue was $949 million, an increase of $75 million, or 9%. The increase
was driven by net inflows of assets under custody, higher market levels and higher net interest
income. Treasury Services net revenue was $891 million, an increase of $9 million, or 1%. The
increase was driven by higher net interest income and higher international trade loan volumes,
offset by the transfer of the Commercial Card business to CS in the first quarter of 2011.
TSS generated firmwide net revenue of $2.4 billion, including $1.5 billion by Treasury Services; of
that amount, $891 million was recorded in Treasury Services, $542 million in Commercial Banking and
$63 million in other lines of business. The remaining $949 million of firmwide net revenue was
recorded in Worldwide Securities Services.
Noninterest expense was $1.4 billion, an increase of $52 million, or 4%, from the prior year. The
increase was mainly driven by continued investment in new product platforms, primarily related to
international expansion, partially offset by the transfer of the Commercial Card business to Card
Services.
Results for the current quarter include a $27 million pretax benefit related to the allocation
between IB and TSS associated with credit extended to GCB clients. IB manages credit exposures
related to the GCB on behalf of IB and TSS. Effective January 1, 2011, IB and TSS will share the
economics related to the Firms GCB clients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except ratios and where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
TSS firmwide disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services revenue reported |
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Treasury Services revenue reported in CB(a) |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Treasury Services revenue reported in other lines of business |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services firmwide revenue(b) |
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Worldwide Securities Services revenue |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury & Securities Services firmwide revenue(b) |
|
$ |
2,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services firmwide liability balances (average)(c) |
|
$ |
339,240 |
|
|
$ |
305,105 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services firmwide liability balances (average)(c) |
|
|
421,920 |
|
|
|
381,047 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSS firmwide financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services firmwide overhead ratio(a)(d) |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Treasury & Securities Services firmwide overhead ratio(a)(d) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firmwide business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under custody (in billions) |
|
$ |
16,619 |
|
|
$ |
15,283 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ ACH transactions originated |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Total U.S.$ clearing volume (in thousands) |
|
|
30,971 |
|
|
|
28,669 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
International electronic funds transfer volume (in thousands)(e) |
|
|
60,942 |
|
|
|
55,754 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Wholesale check volume |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Wholesale cards issued (in thousands)(f) |
|
|
23,170 |
|
|
|
27,352 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans |
|
NM |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, certain CB revenues were excluded in the TS firmwide metrics; they
are instead directly captured within CBs lending revenue by product. For the three months
ended March 31, 2011, the impact of this change was $107 million. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010, these revenues were included in CBs treasury services revenue by product. |
|
(b) |
|
TSS firmwide revenue includes foreign exchange (FX) revenue recorded in TSS and FX revenue
associated with TSS customers who are FX customers of IB. However, some of the FX revenue
associated with TSS customers who are FX customers of IB is not included in TS and TSS |
33
|
|
|
|
|
firmwide revenue. The total FX revenue generated was $160 million and $137 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Firmwide liability balances include liability balances recorded in CB. |
|
(d) |
|
Overhead ratios have been calculated based on firmwide revenue and TSS and TS expense,
respectively, including those allocated to certain other lines of business. FX revenue and
expense recorded in IB for TSS-related FX activity are not included in this ratio. |
|
(e) |
|
International electronic funds transfer includes non-U.S. dollar Automated Clearing House
(ACH) and clearing volume. |
|
(f) |
|
Wholesale cards issued and outstanding include U.S. domestic commercial, stored value,
prepaid and government electronic benefit card products. Effective January 1, 2011, the
commercial card business was transferred from TSS to CS. |
ASSET MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of the business profile of AM, see pages 8688 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report and Introduction on page 5 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
All other income |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by client segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Banking(a) |
|
$ |
1,317 |
|
|
$ |
1,150 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Retail |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
2,406 |
|
|
$ |
2,131 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax margin ratio |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Private Banking is a combination of the previously disclosed client segments: Private Bank,
Private Wealth Management and JPMorgan Securities. |
Quarterly results
Net income was $466 million, an increase of $74 million, or 19%, from the prior year. These results
reflected higher net revenue and a lower provision for credit losses, largely offset by higher
noninterest expense.
Net revenue was $2.4 billion, an increase of $275 million, or 13%, from the prior year. Noninterest
revenue was $2.0 billion, up by $246 million, or 14%, due to the effect of higher market levels,
net inflows to products with higher margins and higher loan originations, partially offset by lower
performance fees. Net interest income was $386 million, up by $29 million, or 8%, due to higher
deposit and loan balances, partially offset by narrower deposit spreads.
Revenue from Private Banking was $1.3 billion, up 15% from the prior year. Revenue from
Institutional was $549 million, up 1%. Revenue from Retail was $540 million, up 24%.
The provision for credit losses was $5 million, compared with $35 million in the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $1.7 billion, an increase of $218 million, or 15%, from the prior year,
largely resulting from an increase in headcount.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business metrics |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount, ranking data, and where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Number of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client advisors(a) |
|
|
2,288 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Retirement planning services participants (in thousands) |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
JPMorgan Securities brokers |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of customer assets in 4 & 5 Star Funds(b) |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
% of AUM in 1st and 2nd quartiles(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
3 years |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
5 years |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
46,454 |
|
|
$ |
37,088 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Equity |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
68,918 |
|
|
$ |
62,525 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Loans |
|
|
44,948 |
|
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
95,250 |
|
|
|
80,662 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Equity |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
17,203 |
|
|
|
15,321 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans |
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans |
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, the methodology used to determine client advisors was revised.
The prior period has been revised. |
|
(b) |
|
Derived from Morningstar for the U.S., the U.K., Luxembourg, France, Hong Kong and Taiwan;
and Nomura for Japan. |
|
(c) |
|
Quartile ranking sourced from: Lipper for the U.S. and Taiwan; Morningstar for the
U.K., Luxembourg, France and Hong Kong; and Nomura for Japan. |
35
Assets under supervision
Assets under supervision were $1.9 trillion, an increase of $201 billion, or 12%, from the prior
year. Assets under management were $1.3 trillion, an increase of $111 billion, or 9%. Both
increases were due to the effect of higher market levels and record net inflows to long-term
products, partially offset by net outflows in liquidity products. Custody, brokerage,
administration and deposit balances were $578 billion, up by $90 billion, or 18%, due to the effect
of higher market levels and custody and brokerage inflows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS UNDER SUPERVISION(a) (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the quarter ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets by asset class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Equities and multi-asset |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
Alternatives |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
Custody/brokerage/administration/deposits |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
Total assets under supervision |
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets by client segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Banking(b) |
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
Retail |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Banking(b) |
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
666 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
Retail |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
Total assets under supervision |
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual fund assets by asset class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Equities and multi-asset |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Alternatives |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total mutual fund assets |
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes assets under management of American Century Companies, Inc., in which the
Firm had a 40% and 42% ownership at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Private Banking is a combination of the previously disclosed client segments: Private Bank,
Private Wealth Management and JPMorgan Securities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
(in billions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets under management rollforward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
Net asset flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
Fixed income |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Equities, multi-asset and alternatives |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Market/performance/other impacts |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Ending balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under supervision rollforward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
Net asset flows |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Market/performance/other impacts |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Ending balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
International metrics |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue: (in millions)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Latin America/Caribbean |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
North America |
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
2,406 |
|
|
$ |
2,131 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management: (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
North America |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under supervision: (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Latin America/Caribbean |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
North America |
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under supervision |
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Regional revenue is based on the domicile of clients. |
37
CORPORATE / PRIVATE EQUITY
For a discussion of the business profile of Corporate/Private Equity, see pages 8990 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except headcount) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
|
137 |
% |
Securities gains |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
All other income |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Net interest income(a) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue(b) |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Noncompensation expense(c) |
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Net expense allocated to other businesses |
|
|
(1,238 |
) |
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
2,336 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
NM |
Income tax expense/(benefit)(d) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Equity |
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
NM |
Corporate |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Equity |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
NM |
Corporate |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
20,927 |
|
|
|
19,307 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Net interest income was $34 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, a decrease
of $1.0 billion from the prior year, primarily driven by lower yields and lower average
securities balances due to portfolio repositioning. |
|
(b) |
|
Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to tax-exempt income
from municipal bond investments of $64 million and $48 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes litigation expense of $363 million and $2.3 billion for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
Income tax in the first quarter of 2010 includes significantly higher tax benefits recognized
upon the resolution of tax audits. |
Quarterly results
Net income was $722 million, compared with net income of $228 million in the prior year.
Private Equity net income was $383 million, compared with $55 million in the prior year. Net
revenue was $699 million, an increase of $584 million, driven by gains on sales and net increases
in investment valuations. Noninterest expense was $113 million, an increase of $83 million from the
prior year.
Corporate reported net income of $339 million, compared with net income of $173 million in the
prior year. Net revenue was $813 million, including $102 million of securities gains. Noninterest
expense was $449 million, a decrease of $1.9 billion from the prior year; the prior year included
significant additions to litigation reserves.
Treasury and Chief Investment Office (CIO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement and |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
balance sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Securities gains(a) |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
|
(83 |
)% |
Investment securities portfolio (average) |
|
|
313,319 |
|
|
|
330,584 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Investment securities portfolio (ending) |
|
|
328,013 |
|
|
|
337,442 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Mortgage loans (average) |
|
|
11,418 |
|
|
|
8,162 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Mortgage loans (ending) |
|
|
12,171 |
|
|
|
8,368 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects repositioning of the Corporate investment securities portfolio. |
38
For further information on the investment securities portfolio, see Note 3 and Note 11 on
pages 94105 and 116120, respectively, of this Form 10-Q. For further information on CIO VaR and
the Firms earnings-at-risk, see the Market Risk Management section on pages 8184 of this Form
10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement and balance sheet data |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
Private equity gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
Unrealized gains/(losses)(a) |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct investments |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
NM |
Third-party fund investments |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private equity gains/(losses)(b) |
|
$ |
727 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity portfolio information(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Publicly held securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
|
(16 |
)% |
Cost |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Quoted public value |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately held direct securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
5,882 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Cost |
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
6,887 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party fund investments(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Cost |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private equity portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
10,122 |
|
|
$ |
8,737 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Cost |
|
$ |
10,841 |
|
|
$ |
10,023 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) contain reversals of unrealized gains and losses that were
recognized in prior periods and have now been realized. |
|
(b) |
|
Included in principal transactions revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. |
|
(c) |
|
For more information on the Firms policies regarding the valuation of the private equity
portfolio, see Note 3 on pages 170187 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. |
|
(d) |
|
Unfunded commitments to third-party private equity funds were $943 million and $1.0 billion
at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
The carrying value of the private equity portfolio at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
was $10.1 billion and $8.7 billion, respectively. The increase in the portfolio during the three
months ended March 31, 2011, is primarily due to net increases
in investment valuations in the portfolio and
incremental new investment. The portfolio represented 7.7% and 6.9% of the Firms stockholders
equity less goodwill at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.
39
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Firm reported approximately
$6.8 billion of revenue derived from clients, customers and counterparties domiciled outside of
North America. Of that amount, approximately 66% and 71%, respectively, was derived from
Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA), approximately 26% and 22%, respectively, from Asia/Pacific, and
approximately 8% and 7%, respectively, from Latin America/Caribbean.
The Firm is committed to further expanding its wholesale business activities outside the United
States, and it intends to add additional client-serving bankers, as well as more product and sales
support personnel, to address the needs of the Firms clients located in these regions. With a
comprehensive and coordinated international business strategy and growth plan, efforts and
investments for growth outside the United States will be accelerated and prioritized.
Set forth below are certain key metrics related to the Firms wholesale international operations
including, for each of EMEA, Asia/Pacific and Latin America/Caribbean, the number of countries in
each such region in which it operates, front office headcount, number of clients, revenue and
selected balance sheet data. For additional information regarding international operations, see
International Operations on page 91, and Note 33 on page 290 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the three months ended March 31 |
|
EMEA |
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
Latin America/Caribbean |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
4,490 |
|
|
$ |
4,760 |
|
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
Countries with operations |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Total headcount(a) |
|
|
16,268 |
|
|
|
15,552 |
|
|
|
19,511 |
|
|
|
16,825 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
Front office headcount |
|
|
5,898 |
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
3,758 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Significant clients(b) |
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Deposits (average)(c) |
|
$ |
146,559 |
|
|
$ |
140,215 |
|
|
$ |
47,392 |
|
|
$ |
54,002 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
Loans (period end)(d) |
|
|
30,360 |
|
|
|
26,640 |
|
|
|
23,144 |
|
|
|
16,385 |
|
|
|
17,745 |
|
|
|
13,294 |
|
Assets under management (in billions) |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Assets under supervision (in
billions) |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Wholesale international operations is comprised of IB, AM,
TSS, CB and CIO/Treasury. |
|
(a) |
|
Total headcount includes all employees, including those in service centers,
located in the region. |
|
(b) |
|
Significant clients are defined as companies with over $1 million in revenue in the region
(excludes private banking clients). |
|
(c) |
|
Deposits are based on booking location. |
|
(d) |
|
Loans outstanding are based predominantly on the domicile of the borrower, and exclude loans
held-for-sale and loans carried at fair value. |
40
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheets data (in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
23,469 |
|
|
$ |
27,567 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
80,842 |
|
|
|
21,673 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
217,356 |
|
|
|
222,554 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
|
123,587 |
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
422,404 |
|
|
|
409,411 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
78,744 |
|
|
|
80,481 |
|
Securities |
|
|
334,800 |
|
|
|
316,336 |
|
Loans |
|
|
685,996 |
|
|
|
692,927 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(29,750 |
) |
|
|
(32,266 |
) |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
|
|
656,246 |
|
|
|
660,661 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
79,236 |
|
|
|
70,147 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
48,856 |
|
|
|
48,854 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
13,649 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
106,836 |
|
|
|
105,291 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,198,161 |
|
|
$ |
2,117,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
995,829 |
|
|
$ |
930,369 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
285,444 |
|
|
|
276,644 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
46,022 |
|
|
|
35,363 |
|
Other borrowed funds(a) |
|
|
36,704 |
|
|
|
34,325 |
|
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
80,031 |
|
|
|
76,947 |
|
Derivative payables |
|
|
61,362 |
|
|
|
69,219 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
171,638 |
|
|
|
170,330 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
70,917 |
|
|
|
77,649 |
|
Long-term debt(a) |
|
|
269,616 |
|
|
|
270,653 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,017,563 |
|
|
|
1,941,499 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
180,598 |
|
|
|
176,106 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,198,161 |
|
|
$ |
2,117,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, $23.0 billion of long-term advances from FHLBs were reclassified
from other borrowed funds to long-term debt. The prior-year period has been revised to conform
with the current presentation. For additional information, see Note 3 and Note 18 on pages
94105 and 153, respectively, of this Form 10-Q. |
Consolidated Balance Sheets overview
JPMorgan Chases assets and liabilities increased from December 31, 2010, largely due to a
significant increase in deposit inflows toward the end of the first quarter of 2011. The inflows
contributed to higher deposits with banks in particular, balances due from Federal Reserve
Banks. A higher level of securities and commercial paper also contributed to the increase in assets
and liabilities. The increase in stockholders equity predominantly reflected net income for the
three months ended March 31, 2011.
The following is a discussion of the significant changes in the specific line captions of the
Consolidated Balance Sheets from December 31, 2010. For a description of the specific line captions
discussed below, see pages 9294 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Deposits with banks; federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements; and
securities borrowed
Deposits with banks increased significantly and reflected a higher level of balances due from
Federal Reserve Banks; the increase was largely the result of inflows of short-term wholesale
deposits from TSS clients toward the end of March 2011 (see deposits discussion for further
details). Securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed decreased, largely
in IB, reflecting lower client financing needs. For additional information on the Firms Liquidity
Risk Management, see pages 5358 of this Form 10-Q.
41
Trading assets and liabilities debt and equity instruments
Trading assets debt and equity instruments increased, largely driven by growth in customer
demand; market activity, including a significant level of new issuances; and rising global indices.
Trading liabilities debt and equity instruments increased, largely due to growth in customer
demand, market activity and economic hedging activity. For additional information, refer to Note 3
on pages 94105 of this Form 10-Q.
Trading assets and liabilities derivative receivables and payables
Derivative receivables and payables decreased, largely due to a reduction in foreign exchange
derivatives, which declined primarily due to the Japanese yen depreciation relative to the U.S.
dollar. Interest rate contracts also decreased as a result of higher interest rate yields during
the quarter. These items were partially offset by increases in equity derivatives, as a result of
growth in activity in the EMEA and Latin American markets, and commodity derivatives, primarily as
a result of higher oil prices. For additional information, refer to Derivative contracts on pages
6667, and Note 3 and Note 5 on pages 94105 and 107113, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Securities
Securities increased, largely due to repositioning of the portfolio in Corporate, in response to
changes in the interest rate environment. The repositioning increased non-U.S. government debt and
mortgage-backed securities, increased corporate debt, and reduced U.S. government agency
securities. For information related to securities, refer to the Corporate/Private Equity segment on
pages 3839, and Note 3 and Note 11 on pages 94105 and 116120, respectively, of this Form
10-Q.
Loans and allowance for loan losses
Loans decreased, reflecting seasonality and higher repayment rates of credit card loans; runoff of
the Washington Mutual credit card portfolio; and lower consumer loans, excluding credit card,
predominantly as a result of paydowns and charge-offs in RFS. The decrease was offset partially by
an increase in wholesale loans, reflecting growth in client activity. The allowance for loan losses
decreased, primarily as a result of lower estimated losses in the credit card loan portfolio, as
well as wholesale loan sales. For a more detailed discussion of the loan portfolio and the
allowance for loan losses, refer to Credit Risk Management on pages 5981, and Notes 3, 4, 13 and
14 on pages 94105, 105106, 122138 and 139140, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Accrued interest and accounts receivable
Accrued interest and accounts receivable increased, reflecting higher customer receivables in IBs
Prime Services business due to growth in client activity.
Mortgage servicing rights
MSRs decreased, due to changes to inputs and assumptions in the MSR valuation model; these changes
resulted in a $1.1 billion decrease in the fair value of the MSR asset related to the estimated
impact of higher servicing costs to enhance servicing processes, particularly loan modification and
foreclosure procedures, and costs to comply with Consent Orders entered into with banking
regulators. This decrease was partially offset by increases related to changes in market interest
rates during the quarter. For additional information on MSRs, see Note 3 and Note 16 on pages
94105 and 149152, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Other intangible assets
The decrease in other intangible assets was predominantly due to amortization. For additional
information on other intangible assets, see Note 16 on pages 149152 of this Form 10-Q.
Deposits
Deposits increased, largely as a result of inflows toward the end of March 2011 of short-term
wholesale deposits from TSS clients; also contributing were growth in the level of retail deposits,
from the combined effect of seasonal factors, such as tax refunds and bonus payments, and general
growth in business volumes. For more information on deposits, refer to the RFS and AM segment
discussions on pages 2027 and 3437, respectively; the Liquidity Risk Management discussion on
pages 5358; and Note 3 and Note 17 on pages 94105 and 153, respectively, of this Form 10-Q. For
more information on wholesale liability balances, which includes deposits, refer to the CB and TSS
segment discussions on pages 3031 and 3234, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements
Securities sold under repurchase agreements increased, due to higher securities financing balances,
in connection with repositioning of the securities portfolio in Corporate. For additional
information on the Firms Liquidity Risk Management, see pages 5358 of this Form 10-Q.
42
Commercial paper and other borrowed funds
Commercial paper and other borrowed funds increased, due to growth in the volume of liability
balances in sweep accounts, in connection with TSSs cash management product, and modest
incremental short-term borrowing by the Firm under cost-effective terms. For additional information
on the Firms Liquidity Risk Management and other borrowed funds, see pages 5358, and Note 18 on
page 153 of this Form 10-Q.
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs
Beneficial interests decreased, predominantly due to maturities of Firm-sponsored credit card
securitization transactions. For additional information on Firm-sponsored VIEs and loan securitization
trusts, see OffBalance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Cash Obligations below, and Note 15 on
pages 141149 of this Form 10-Q.
Long-term debt
Long-term debt decreased, due to net repayments of long-term borrowings. For additional information
on the Firms long-term debt activities, see the Liquidity Risk Management discussion on pages
5358 of this Form 10-Q.
Stockholders equity
Total stockholders equity increased, predominantly due to net income and net issuances and
commitments to issue under the Firms employee stock-based compensation plans. The increase was
offset by the declaration of cash dividends on common and preferred stock; a net decrease in
accumulated other comprehensive income, due primarily to decreased market value on pass-through
agency MBS and agency collateralized mortgage obligations, as well as on foreign government debt,
partially offset by the narrowing of spreads on collateralized loan obligations and foreign
residential MBS; and stock repurchases.
43
OFFBALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
JPMorgan Chase is involved with several types of offbalance sheet arrangements, including
through special-purpose entities (SPEs), which are a type of VIE, and through lending-related
financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees). For further discussion, see OffBalance
Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Cash Obligations on pages 95101 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report.
Special-purpose entities
SPEs are the most common type of VIE, used in securitization transactions
in order to isolate certain assets and distribute related cash flows to investors. SPEs continue to
be an important part of the financial markets, including the mortgage- and ABS and commercial paper
markets, as they provide market liquidity by facilitating investors access to specific portfolios
of assets and risks. The Firm holds capital, as deemed appropriate, against all SPE-related
transactions and related exposures, such as derivative transactions and lending-related commitments
and guarantees. For further information on the Firms involvement with SPEs, see Note 15 on pages
141149 of this Form 10-Q; and Note 1 on pages 164165 and Note 15 on pages 244259 of JPMorgan
Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Implications of a credit rating downgrade to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
For certain liquidity commitments to SPEs, the Firm could be required to provide funding if the
short-term credit rating of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., were downgraded below specific levels,
primarily P-1, A-1 and F1 for Moodys, Standard & Poors and Fitch, respectively. The
aggregate amounts of these liquidity commitments, to both consolidated and nonconsolidated SPEs,
were $33.5 billion and $34.2 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Alternatively, if JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., were downgraded, the Firm could be replaced by another
liquidity provider in lieu of providing funding under the liquidity commitment or, in certain
circumstances, the Firm could facilitate the sale or refinancing of the assets in the SPE in order
to provide liquidity.
Special-purpose entities revenue
The following table summarizes certain revenue information related
to consolidated and nonconsolidated VIEs with which the Firm has significant involvement. The
revenue reported in the table below primarily represents contractual servicing and credit fee
income (i.e., income from acting as administrator, structurer or liquidity provider). It does not
include gains and losses from changes in the fair value of trading positions (such as derivative
transactions) entered into with VIEs. Those gains and losses are recorded in principal transactions
revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from VIEs and securitization entities(a) |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Multi-seller conduits |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
Investor intermediation |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other securitization entities(b) |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes revenue associated with both consolidated VIEs and significant nonconsolidated
VIEs. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes servicing revenue from loans sold to and securitized by third parties. |
Offbalance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments
JPMorgan Chase provides lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees) to
meet the financing needs of its customers. The contractual amount of these financial instruments
represents the maximum possible credit risk to the Firm should the counterparty draw upon the
commitment or the Firm be required to fulfill its obligation under the guarantee, and should the
counterparty subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of the contract. Most of these
commitments and guarantees expire without being drawn or a default occurring. As a result, the
total contractual amount of these instruments is not, in the Firms view, representative of its
actual future credit exposure or funding requirements. For further discussion of lending-related
commitments and guarantees and the Firms accounting for them, see Lending-related commitments on
page 68 and Note 21 on pages 156159 of this Form 10-Q; and Lending-related commitments on page
128 and Note 30 on pages 275280 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
44
The following table presents, as of March 31, 2011, the amounts by contractual maturity of
offbalance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments. The
amounts in the table for credit card and home equity lending-related commitments represent the
total available credit to borrowers for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not
anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these products would be used by borrowers at the
same time. The Firm can reduce or cancel credit card lines of credit by providing the borrower
prior notice or, in some cases, without notice as permitted by law. The Firm may reduce or close
home equity lines of credit when there are significant decreases in the value of the underlying
property or when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower. The
accompanying table excludes certain guarantees that do not have a contractual maturity date (e.g.,
loan sale and securitization-related indemnification obligations). For further information, see
discussion of Loan sale and securitization-related indemnification obligations in Note 21 on pages
156159 of this Form 10-Q, and Loan sale and securitization-related indemnification obligations in
Note 30 on pages 275280 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Offbalance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Dec. 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after |
|
3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By remaining maturity |
|
Due in 1 year |
|
1 year through |
|
through |
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
or less |
|
3 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Lending-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, excluding credit card: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity senior lien |
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
$ |
3,560 |
|
|
$ |
5,715 |
|
|
$ |
7,434 |
|
|
$ |
17,406 |
|
|
$ |
17,662 |
|
Home equity junior lien |
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
7,739 |
|
|
|
10,294 |
|
|
|
10,706 |
|
|
|
30,146 |
|
|
|
30,948 |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5,947 |
|
|
|
5,246 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
9,093 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
|
9,702 |
|
Student and other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
Total consumer, excluding credit card |
|
|
17,691 |
|
|
|
11,867 |
|
|
|
16,080 |
|
|
|
18,922 |
|
|
|
64,560 |
|
|
|
65,403 |
|
|
Credit card |
|
|
565,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565,813 |
|
|
|
547,227 |
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
583,504 |
|
|
|
11,867 |
|
|
|
16,080 |
|
|
|
18,922 |
|
|
|
630,373 |
|
|
|
612,630 |
|
|
Wholesale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit(a)(b) |
|
|
63,549 |
|
|
|
96,073 |
|
|
|
41,657 |
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
206,679 |
|
|
|
199,859 |
|
Standby letters of credit and other financial
guarantees(a)(b)(c)(d) |
|
|
26,233 |
|
|
|
44,633 |
|
|
|
20,091 |
|
|
|
4,404 |
|
|
|
95,361 |
|
|
|
94,837 |
|
Unused advised lines of credit |
|
|
39,796 |
|
|
|
7,412 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
47,578 |
|
|
|
44,720 |
|
Other letters of credit(a)(d) |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
6,663 |
|
|
Total wholesale |
|
|
133,153 |
|
|
|
150,090 |
|
|
|
62,309 |
|
|
|
10,009 |
|
|
|
355,561 |
|
|
|
346,079 |
|
|
Total lending-related |
|
$ |
716,657 |
|
|
$ |
161,957 |
|
|
$ |
78,389 |
|
|
$ |
28,931 |
|
|
$ |
985,934 |
|
|
$ |
958,709 |
|
|
Other guarantees and commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities lending guarantees(e) |
|
$ |
200,627 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200,627 |
|
|
$ |
181,717 |
|
Derivatives qualifying as guarantees(f) |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
47,348 |
|
|
|
35,990 |
|
|
|
87,360 |
|
|
|
87,768 |
|
Unsettled reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements |
|
|
47,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,021 |
|
|
|
39,927 |
|
Other guarantees and commitments(g) |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
4,352 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, represented the contractual amount net of risk
participations totaling $570 million and $542 million, respectively, for other unfunded
commitments to extend credit; $22.8 billion and $22.4 billion, respectively, for standby
letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion,
respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve
these commitments are shown gross of risk participations. |
|
(b) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included credit enhancements and bond and
commercial paper liquidity commitments to U.S. states and municipalities, hospitals and other
not-for-profit entities of $43.9 billion and $43.4 billion, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, includes unissued standby letters of credit
commitments of $41.5 billion and $41.6 billion, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, JPMorgan Chase held collateral relating to $38.0
billion and $37.8 billion, respectively, of standby letters of credit; and $2.0 billion and
$2.1 billion, respectively, of collateral related to other letters of credit. |
|
(e) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, collateral held by the Firm in support of
securities lending indemnification agreements totaled $203.4 billion and $185.0 billion,
respectively. Securities lending collateral comprises primarily cash, and securities issued by
governments that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) and U.S. government agencies. |
|
(f) |
|
Represents the notional amounts of derivative contracts qualifying as guarantees. For further
discussion of guarantees, see Note 5 on pages 107113 and Note 21 on pages 156159 of this
Form 10-Q. |
|
(g) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included unfunded commitments of $943 million and
$1.0 billion, respectively, to third-party private equity funds; and $1.3 billion and $1.4
billion, respectively, to other equity investments. These commitments included $885 million
and $1.0 billion, respectively, related to investments that are generally fair valued at net
asset value as discussed in Note 3 on pages 94105 of this Form 10-Q. In addition, at both
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included letters of credit hedged by derivative
transactions and managed on a market risk basis of $3.8 billion. |
45
Repurchase
liability
In connection with the Firms loan sale and securitization activities with Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac (the GSEs) and other loan sale and private-label securitization transactions, the Firm has
made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements. The Firm may be,
and has been, required to repurchase loans and/or indemnify the GSEs and other investors for losses
due to material breaches of these representations and warranties; however, predominantly all of the
repurchase demands received by the Firm and the Firms losses realized to date are related to loans
sold to the GSEs.
From 2005 to 2008, excluding Washington Mutual, loans sold to the GSEs subject to certain
representations and warranties for which the Firm may be liable were approximately $380 billion;
this amount represents the principal amount sold and has not been adjusted for subsequent activity,
such as borrower repayments of principal or repurchases completed to date. In addition, from 2005
to 2008, Washington Mutual sold approximately $150 billion of loans to the GSEs subject to certain
representations and warranties. Subsequent to the Firms acquisition of certain assets and
liabilities of Washington Mutual from the FDIC in September 2008, the Firm resolved and/or limited
certain current and future repurchase demands for loans sold to the GSEs by Washington Mutual,
although it remains the Firms position that such obligations remain with the FDIC receivership.
For additional information regarding loans sold to the GSEs, see page 98 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report.
The Firm also sells loans in securitization transactions with Ginnie Mae; these loans are typically
insured or guaranteed by a government agency. The Firm, in its role as servicer, may elect to
repurchase delinquent loans securitized by Ginnie Mae; however, amounts due under the terms of
these repurchased loans continue to be insured and the reimbursement of insured amounts is
proceeding normally. Accordingly, the Firm has not recorded any repurchase liability related to
these loans.
From 2005
to 2008, the Firm and certain acquired entities made certain loan
level representations and warranties in connection with approximately $450
billion of residential mortgage loans that were sold or deposited into private-label securitizations.
Of the $450 billion originally sold or deposited (including $165 billion by Washington
Mutual, as to which the Firm maintains that certain of the repurchase obligations remain with the FDIC
receivership), approximately $185 billion of principal has been repaid (including $65 billion
related to Washington Mutual). Approximately $85 billion of the principal has been liquidated
(including $30 billion related to Washington Mutual), with an
average loss severity of 57%. The
remaining outstanding principal balance of these loans (including
Washington Mutual) was, as of March 31, 2011, approximately $180
billion of which $65 billion was 60 days or more past due. The remaining outstanding principal
balance of loans related to Washington Mutual was approximately $70 billion of which $24
billion were 60 days or more past due. For additional information regarding loans sold to private
investors, see page 98 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
To date, loan-level repurchase demands in private-label securitizations have been limited. As a
result, the Firms repurchase reserve primarily relates to loan sales to the GSEs and is
predominantly calculated based on the Firms repurchase activity experience with the GSEs. While it
is possible that the volume of repurchase demands in private-label securitizations will increase in
the future, the Firm cannot offer a reasonable estimate of those future demands based on historical
experience to date. To the extent that repurchase demands are
received related to loans that the Firm
purchased from third parties that remain viable, the Firm typically will have the right to seek a recovery
of related repurchase losses from the related third party.
Thus far, claims related to private-label
securitizations (including claims from
insurers that have guaranteed certain obligations of the securitization trusts) have generally
manifested themselves through securities-related litigation. The Firm separately evaluates its
exposure to such litigation in establishing its litigation reserves. For additional information
regarding litigation, see Note 23 on pages 160169 of this Form 10-Q.
46
Estimated Repurchase Liability
To estimate the Firms repurchase liability arising from breaches of representations and
warranties, the Firm considers:
(i) |
|
the level of current unresolved repurchase demands and mortgage insurance rescission notices, |
|
(ii) |
|
estimated probable future repurchase demands considering historical experience, |
|
(iii) |
|
the potential ability of the Firm to cure the defects identified in the repurchase demands
(cure rate), |
|
(iv) |
|
the estimated severity of loss upon repurchase of the loan or collateral, make-whole
settlement, or indemnification, |
|
(v) |
|
the Firms potential ability to recover its losses from third-party originators, and |
|
(vi) |
|
the terms of agreements with certain mortgage insurers and other parties. |
Based on these factors, the Firm has recognized a repurchase liability of $3.5 billion and $3.3
billion as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. For further discussion of the
repurchase demand process and the approach used by the Firm to estimate the repurchase liability,
see Repurchase liability on pages 98101 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table provides information about outstanding repurchase demands and mortgage
insurance rescission notices, excluding those related to Washington Mutual, at each of the past
five quarter-end dates.
Outstanding repurchase demands and mortgage insurance rescission notices by counterparty type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
GSEs and other |
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,071 |
|
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
Mortgage insurers |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
Overlapping population(a) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
1,632 |
|
|
$ |
1,550 |
|
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
|
$ |
2,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Because the GSEs may make repurchase demands based on mortgage insurance rescission
notices that remain unresolved, certain loans may be subject to both an unresolved mortgage
insurance rescission notice and an unresolved repurchase demand. |
The following tables show the trend in repurchase demands and mortgage insurance rescission
notices received by loan origination vintage, excluding those related to Washington Mutual, for the
past five quarters. While repurchase demands declined in the first quarter of 2011 relative to
preceding quarters, the Firm does not believe that this represents a trend; instead, the Firm
expects repurchase demands to remain at elevated levels.
Quarterly repurchase demands received by loan origination vintage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Pre-2005 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
2005 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
2006 |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
2007 |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
2008 |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Post-2008 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total repurchase demands received |
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
$ |
1,123 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
Quarterly mortgage insurance rescission notices received by loan origination vintage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Pre-2005 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
2005 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
2006 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
2007 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
2008 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Post-2008 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage insurance rescissions received(a) |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Mortgage insurance rescissions may ultimately result in a repurchase demand from the
GSEs on a lagged basis. This table includes mortgage insurance rescissions where the GSEs have
also issued a repurchase demand. |
47
Because the Firm has demonstrated an ability to cure certain types of defects more frequently
than others (e.g., missing documents), trends in the types of defects identified as well as the
Firms historical data are considered in estimating the future cure rate. Since the beginning of
2010, the Firms overall cure rate, excluding Washington Mutual, has been approximately 50%. While
the actual cure rate may vary from quarter to quarter, the Firm expects that the overall cure rate
will remain in the 4050% range for the foreseeable future.
The Firm has not observed a direct relationship between the type of defect that causes the breach
of representations and warranties and the severity of the realized loss. Therefore, the loss
severity assumption is estimated using the Firms historical experience and projections regarding
home price appreciation. Actual loss severities on finalized repurchases and make-whole
settlements to date, excluding any related to Washington Mutual, currently average approximately
50%, but may vary from quarter to quarter based on the characteristics of the underlying loans and
changes in home prices.
When a loan was originated by a third-party correspondent, the Firm typically has the right to seek
a recovery of related repurchase losses from the correspondent originator. Correspondent-originated
loans comprise approximately 40% of loans underlying outstanding repurchase demands, excluding
those related to Washington Mutual. The actual third-party recovery rate may vary from quarter to
quarter based upon the underlying mix of correspondents (e.g., active, inactive, out-of-business
originators) from which recoveries are being sought.
Substantially all of the estimates and assumptions underlying the Firms established methodology
for computing its recorded repurchase liabilityincluding the amount of probable future demands
from purchasers (which is in part based on the historical experience), the ability of the Firm to
cure identified defects, the severity of loss upon repurchase or foreclosure and recoveries from
third partiesrequire application of a significant level of management judgment. Estimating the
repurchase liability is further complicated by limited and rapidly changing historical data and
uncertainty surrounding numerous external factors, including: (i) economic factors (for example,
further declines in home prices and changes in borrower behavior may lead to increases in the
number of defaults, the severity of losses, or both), and (ii) the level of future demands, which
is dependent, in part, on actions taken by third parties, such as the GSEs and mortgage insurers.
While the Firm uses the best information available to it in estimating its repurchase liability,
the estimation process is inherently uncertain, imprecise and potentially volatile as additional
information is obtained and external factors continue to evolve.
The following table summarizes the change in the repurchase liability for each of the periods
presented.
Summary of changes in repurchase liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Repurchase liability at beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,285 |
|
|
$ |
1,705 |
|
Realized losses(a) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
Provision for repurchase losses |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
Repurchase liability at end of period |
|
$ |
3,474 |
|
|
$ |
1,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans, make-whole
settlements, settlements with claimants, and certain related expenses. Make-whole settlements
were $115 million and $105 million at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
The following table summarizes the total unpaid principal balance of repurchases during the
periods indicated.
Unpaid principal balance of loan repurchases(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Ginnie Mae(b) |
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
GSEs and other(c)(d) |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
|
$ |
2,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes mortgage insurers. While the rescission of mortgage insurance may ultimately
trigger a repurchase demand, the mortgage insurers themselves do not present repurchase
demands to the Firm. |
|
(b) |
|
In substantially all cases, these repurchases represent the Firms voluntary repurchase of
certain delinquent loans from loan pools or packages as permitted by Ginnie Mae guidelines
(i.e., they do not result from repurchase demands due to breaches of representations and
warranties). In certain cases, the Firm repurchases these delinquent loans as it continues to
service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with applicable requirements
of Ginnie Mae, the FHA, RHA and/or the VA. |
|
(c) |
|
Predominantly all of the repurchases related to GSEs. |
|
(d) |
|
Nonaccrual loans held-for-investment included $347 million and $270 million at March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively, of loans repurchased as a result of breaches of representations
and warranties. |
48
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The following discussion of JPMorgan Chases capital management highlights developments since
December 31, 2010, and should be read in conjunction with Capital Management on pages 102106 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The Firms capital management objectives are to hold capital sufficient to:
|
|
Cover all material risks underlying the Firms business activities; |
|
|
|
Maintain well-capitalized status under regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
Achieve debt rating targets; |
|
|
|
Retain flexibility to take advantage of future investment opportunities; and |
|
|
|
Build and invest in businesses, even in a highly stressed environment. |
Regulatory capital
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) establishes capital
requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the consolidated financial holding company.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) establishes similar capital requirements and
standards for the Firms national banks, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Bank USA,
N.A. As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, JPMorgan Chase and all of its banking
subsidiaries were well-capitalized and met all capital requirements to which each was subject.
The following table presents the regulatory capital, assets and risk-based capital ratios for
JPMorgan Chase and its significant banking subsidiaries at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
These amounts are determined in accordance with regulations issued by the Federal Reserve and/or
OCC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co.(i) |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(i) |
|
Chase Bank USA, N.A.(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well- |
|
Minimum |
(in millions, |
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
capitalized |
|
capital |
except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
ratios(j) |
|
ratios(j) |
|
Regulatory capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1(a) |
|
$ |
147,234 |
|
|
$ |
142,450 |
|
|
$ |
92,594 |
|
|
$ |
91,764 |
|
|
$ |
13,330 |
|
|
$ |
12,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
186,417 |
|
|
|
182,216 |
|
|
|
131,545 |
|
|
|
130,444 |
|
|
|
16,881 |
|
|
|
16,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common(b) |
|
|
119,598 |
|
|
|
114,763 |
|
|
|
91,810 |
|
|
|
90,981 |
|
|
|
13,330 |
|
|
|
12,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted(c)(d) |
|
|
1,192,536 |
|
|
|
1,174,978 |
|
|
|
980,051 |
|
|
|
965,897 |
|
|
|
107,160 |
|
|
|
116,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted average(e) |
|
|
2,041,153 |
|
|
|
2,024,515 |
|
|
|
1,621,263 |
|
|
|
1,611,486 |
|
|
|
112,349 |
|
|
|
117,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1(a)(f) |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Total(g) |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Tier 1 leverage(h) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
(k) |
|
|
3.0 |
(l) |
Tier 1 common(b) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At March 31, 2011, for JPMorgan Chase and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., trust preferred capital
debt securities were $19.7 billion and $600 million, respectively. If these securities were
excluded from the calculation at March 31, 2011, Tier 1 capital would be $127.5 billion and
$92.0 billion, respectively, and the Tier 1 capital ratio would be 10.7% and 9.4%,
respectively. At March 31, 2011, Chase Bank USA, N.A. had no trust preferred capital debt
securities. |
|
(b) |
|
The Tier 1 common ratio is Tier 1 common capital divided by risk-weighted assets. Tier 1
common capital is defined as Tier 1 capital less elements of capital not in the form of common
equity, such as perpetual preferred stock, noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries, and trust
preferred capital debt securities. Tier 1 common capital, a non-GAAP financial measure, is
used by banking regulators, investors and analysts to assess and compare the quality and
composition of the Firms capital with the capital of other financial services companies. The
Firm uses Tier 1 common capital along with the other capital measures to assess and monitor
its capital position. |
|
(c) |
|
Risk-weighted assets consist of on and offbalance sheet assets that are assigned to one
of several broad risk categories and weighted by factors representing their risk and potential
for default. Onbalance sheet assets are risk-weighted based on the perceived credit risk
associated with the obligor or counterparty, the nature of any collateral, and the guarantor,
if any. Offbalance sheet assets such as lending-related commitments, guarantees, derivatives
and other offbalance sheet positions are risk-weighted by multiplying the contractual amount
by the appropriate credit conversion factor to determine the onbalance sheet
credit-equivalent amount, which is then risk-weighted based on the same factors used for
onbalance sheet assets. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for the market risk
related to applicable trading assetsdebt and equity instruments, and foreign exchange and
commodity derivatives. The resulting risk-weighted values for each of the risk categories are
then aggregated to determine total risk-weighted assets. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes offbalance sheet risk-weighted assets at March 31, 2011, of $294.6 billion, $283.3
billion and $31 million, and at December 31, 2010, of $282.9 billion, $274.2 billion and $31
million, for JPMorgan Chase, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Bank USA, N.A., respectively. |
|
(e) |
|
Adjusted average assets, for purposes of calculating the leverage ratio, include total
quarterly average assets adjusted for unrealized gains/(losses) on securities, less deductions
for disallowed goodwill and other intangible assets, investments in certain subsidiaries, and
the total adjusted carrying value of nonfinancial equity investments that are subject to
deductions from Tier 1 capital. |
|
(f) |
|
Tier 1 capital ratio is Tier 1 capital divided by risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital
consists of common stockholders equity, perpetual preferred stock, noncontrolling interests
in subsidiaries, and trust preferred capital debt securities, less goodwill and certain other
adjustments. |
49
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Total capital ratio is Total capital divided by risk-weighted assets. Total capital is Tier 1
capital plus Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital consists of preferred stock not qualifying as Tier
1, subordinated long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2, and the aggregate
allowance for credit losses up to a certain percentage of risk-weighted assets. |
|
(h) |
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio is Tier 1 capital divided by adjusted quarterly average assets. |
|
(i) |
|
Asset and capital amounts for JPMorgan Chases banking subsidiaries reflect intercompany
transactions; whereas the respective amounts for JPMorgan Chase reflect the elimination of
intercompany transactions. |
|
(j) |
|
As defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC. |
|
(k) |
|
Represents requirements for banking subsidiaries pursuant to regulations issued under the
FDIC Improvement Act. There is no Tier 1 leverage component in the definition of a
well-capitalized bank holding company. |
|
(l) |
|
The minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio for bank holding companies and banks is 3% or 4%, depending
on factors specified in regulations issued by the Federal Reserve and OCC. |
|
|
|
Note: Rating agencies allow measures of capital to be adjusted upward for deferred tax
liabilities, which have resulted from both nontaxable business combinations and from
tax-deductible goodwill. At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm had deferred tax
liabilities resulting from nontaxable business combinations totaling $610 million and $647
million, respectively; and deferred tax liabilities resulting from tax-deductible goodwill of
$2.0 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively. |
A reconciliation of Total stockholders equity to Tier 1 common capital, Tier 1 capital and
Total qualifying capital is presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-based capital components and assets |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
180,598 |
|
|
$ |
176,106 |
|
Less: Preferred stock |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
172,798 |
|
|
|
168,306 |
|
Effect of certain items in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) excluded from
Tier 1 common equity |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
(748 |
) |
Less: Goodwill(a) |
|
|
46,863 |
|
|
|
46,915 |
|
Fair value DVA on derivative and structured note liabilities related to the Firms
credit quality |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
Investments in certain subsidiaries and other |
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
Other intangible assets(a) |
|
|
3,483 |
|
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
Tier 1 common |
|
|
119,598 |
|
|
|
114,763 |
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Qualifying hybrid securities and noncontrolling interests(b) |
|
|
19,836 |
|
|
|
19,887 |
|
|
Total Tier 1 capital |
|
|
147,234 |
|
|
|
142,450 |
|
|
Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 |
|
|
24,250 |
|
|
|
25,018 |
|
Qualifying allowance for credit losses |
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
14,959 |
|
Adjustment for investments in certain subsidiaries and other |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
Total Tier 2 capital |
|
|
39,183 |
|
|
|
39,766 |
|
|
Total qualifying capital |
|
$ |
186,417 |
|
|
$ |
182,216 |
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
1,192,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,174,978 |
|
|
Total adjusted average assets |
|
$ |
2,041,153 |
|
|
$ |
2,024,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets are net of any associated deferred tax liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily includes trust preferred capital debt securities of certain business trusts. |
The Firms Tier 1 common capital was $119.6 billion at March 31, 2011, compared with $114.8
billion at December 31, 2010, an increase of $4.8 billion. The increase was predominantly due to
net income (adjusted for DVA) of $5.6 billion, and net issuances and commitments to issue common
stock under the Firms employee stock-based compensation plans of $532 million. The increase was
partially offset by $1.2 billion of dividends on common and preferred stock and $95 million of
repurchases of common stock. The Firms Tier 1 capital was $147.2 billion at March 31, 2011,
compared with $142.5 billion at December 31, 2010, an increase of $4.7 billion. The increase in
Tier 1 capital reflected the increase in Tier 1 common. Additional information regarding the Firms
capital ratios and the federal regulatory capital standards to which it is subject is presented in
Note 29 on pages 273274 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Basel II
The minimum risk-based capital requirements adopted by the U.S. federal banking agencies follow the
Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel I). In 2004, the Basel
Committee published a revision to the Accord (Basel II). The goal of the Basel II Framework is to
provide more risk-sensitive regulatory capital calculations and promote enhanced risk management
practices among large, internationally active banking organizations. U.S. banking regulators
published a final Basel II rule in December 2007, which requires JPMorgan Chase to implement Basel
II at the holding company level, as well as at certain of its key U.S. bank subsidiaries.
50
Prior to full implementation of the new Basel II Framework, JPMorgan Chase is required to complete
a qualification period of four consecutive quarters during which it needs to demonstrate that it
meets the requirements of the rule to the satisfaction of its primary U.S. banking regulators.
JPMorgan Chase is currently in the qualification period and expects to be in compliance with all
relevant Basel II rules within the established timelines. In addition, the Firm has adopted, and
will continue to adopt, based on various established timelines, Basel II rules in certain non-U.S.
jurisdictions, as required.
Basel III
In addition to the Basel II Framework, on December 16, 2010, the Basel Committee issued the final
version of the Capital Accord, called Basel III, which
revised Basel II by among other things, narrowing the definition of
capital, increasing capital requirements for specific exposures, introducing short-term liquidity
coverage and term funding standards, and establishing an international leverage ratio. The Basel
Committee also announced higher capital ratio requirements under Basel III which provide that the
common equity requirement will be increased to 7%, comprised of a minimum of 4.5% plus a 2.5%
capital conservation buffer.
In addition, the U.S. federal banking agencies have published for public comment proposed
risk-based capital floors pursuant to the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act to establish a
permanent Basel I floor under Basel II / Basel III capital calculations.
The Firm fully expects to be in compliance with the higher Basel III capital standards when they
become effective on January 1, 2019, as well as any additional Dodd-Frank Act capital requirements
when they are implemented. The Firm estimates that its Tier 1 common ratio under Basel III rules
(including the changes for calculating capital on trading assets and securitizations) would be 7.3%
as of March 31, 2011. Management considers this estimate, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as
a key measure to assess the Firms capital position in conjunction with its capital ratios under
Basel I requirements, in order to enable management, investors and analysts to compare the Firms capital
under the Basel III capital standards with similar estimates provided by other financial services
companies.
The Firms estimate of its Tier 1 common ratio under Basel III reflect its current understanding of
the Basel III rules and the application of such rules to its businesses as currently conducted. The
Firms understanding of the Basel III rules are based upon information currently published by the
Basel Committee and U.S. federal banking agencies. Accordingly, the Firms estimates will evolve
over time as the Firms businesses change, and as a result of further rule-making on Basel III
implementation from U.S. federal banking agencies. The Firm also believes it may need to modify the
liquidity profile of its assets and liabilities in response to the short-term liquidity coverage
and term funding standards contained in Basel III. Management
believes that the basis for its calculation of its estimates of Tier 1 common
capital and risk-weighted assets under Basel III rules differs so
significantly from the current Tier 1 capital and risk-weighted
assets calculation under the Basel I rules that numerical reconciliation between the
two calculations would not be meaningful.
The Basel III revisions governing liquidity and capital requirements are subject to prolonged
observation and transition periods. The observation periods for both the liquidity coverage ratio
and term funding standards begin in 2011, with implementation in 2015 and 2018, respectively. The
transition period for banks to meet the revised common equity requirement will begin in 2013, with
implementation on January 1, 2019. The Firm will continue to monitor the ongoing rule-making
process to assess both the timing and the impact of Basel III on its businesses and financial
condition.
Broker-dealer regulatory capital
JPMorgan Chases principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
(JPMorgan Securities), and J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp. (JPMorgan Clearing). JPMorgan Clearing is
a subsidiary of JPMorgan Securities and provides clearing and settlement services. JPMorgan
Securities and JPMorgan Clearing are each subject to Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Net Capital Rule). JPMorgan Securities and JPMorgan Clearing are also registered as
futures commission merchants and subject to Rule 1.17 of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC).
JPMorgan Securities and JPMorgan Clearing have elected to compute their minimum net capital
requirements in accordance with the Alternative Net Capital Requirements of the Net Capital Rule.
At March 31, 2011, JPMorgan Securities net capital, as defined by the Net Capital Rule, was $7.8
billion, exceeding the minimum requirement by $7.3 billion; and JPMorgan Clearings net capital was
$6.1 billion, exceeding the minimum requirement by $4.2 billion.
In addition to its minimum net capital requirement, JPMorgan Securities is required to hold
tentative net capital in excess of $1.0 billion and is also required to notify the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) in the event that tentative net capital is less than $5.0 billion, in
accordance with the market and credit risk standards of Appendix E of the Net Capital Rule. As of
March 31, 2011, JPMorgan Securities had tentative net capital in excess of the minimum and
notification requirements.
51
Economic risk capital
JPMorgan Chase assesses its capital adequacy relative to the risks underlying its business
activities, using internal risk-assessment methodologies. The Firm measures economic capital
primarily based on four risk factors: credit, market, operational and private equity risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic risk capital |
|
Quarterly Averages |
(in billions) |
|
1Q11 |
|
4Q10 |
|
1Q10 |
|
Credit risk |
|
$ |
48.6 |
|
|
$ |
50.9 |
|
|
$ |
49.3 |
|
Market risk |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Operational risk |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Private equity risk |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
Economic risk capital |
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
Other(a) |
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
169.4 |
|
|
$ |
166.8 |
|
|
$ |
156.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects additional capital required, in the Firms view, to meet its regulatory and
debt rating objectives. |
Line of business equity
Equity for a line of business represents the amount the Firm believes the business would require if
it were operating independently, incorporating sufficient capital to address regulatory capital
requirements (including Basel III Tier 1 common capital requirements) economic risk measures, and
capital levels for similarly rated peers. Capital is also allocated to each line of business for,
among other things, goodwill and other intangibles associated with acquisitions effected by the
line of business. ROE is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as key
measures of a business segments performance. Effective January 1, 2011, capital allocated to CS
was reduced by $2.0 billion, to $13.0 billion, largely reflecting portfolio runoff and the
improving risk profile of the business; capital allocated to TSS was increased by $500 million, to
$7.0 billion, reflecting growth in the underlying business. The Firm continues to assess the level of capital required for each line of business,
as well as the assumptions and methodologies used to allocate capital to the business segments, and
further refinements may be implemented in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of business equity |
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
172.8 |
|
|
$ |
168.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of business equity |
|
Quarterly Averages |
(in billions) |
|
1Q11 |
|
4Q10 |
|
1Q10 |
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
169.4 |
|
|
$ |
166.8 |
|
|
$ |
156.1 |
|
|
Capital actions
Dividends
On March 18, 2011, the Board of Directors increased the Firms quarterly common stock dividend from
$0.05 to $0.25 per share, effective with the dividend paid on April 30, 2011, to shareholders of
record on April 6, 2011. The Firms common stock dividend policy reflects JPMorgan Chases earnings
outlook; desired dividend payout ratio; capital objectives of maintaining a Basel I Tier 1 common
ratio of at least 9.0% and meeting Basel III requirements substantially ahead of time; and
alternative investment opportunities. The Firms current expectation is to return to a payout ratio
of approximately 30% of normalized earnings over time. When management and the Board determine that it
is appropriate to consider further increasing the common stock dividend, the Firm expects to review
those plans with its regulators
52
before taking action. For a further discussion of the Firms
dividend payments, see Dividends on page 106 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Stock repurchases
On March 18, 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $15.0 billion of the
Firms common stock, of which up to $8.0 billion is approved for 2011.
The authorization commenced on March 22, 2011, and replaced the Firms previous $10.0 billion
repurchase program. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Firm repurchased an
aggregate of 2 million shares for $95 million at an average
price per share of $45.66. For the four months ended April 30,
2011, the Firm has repurchased an aggregate of 18 million shares
for $820 million at an average price per share of $45.11. As of March 31, 2011, $14.9 billion
of authorized repurchase capacity remained, of which $7.9 billion of approved capacity remains for
use during 2011.
Management
and the Board will continue to assess and make decisions regarding alternatives for deploying
capital, as appropriate, over the course of the year. Any planned use of the repurchase program over
the repurchases approved for
2011, will be reviewed by the Firm with the banking regulators before taking action. For a further discussion of
the Firms stock repurchase program, see Stock repurchases on page 106 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report.
The Firm may, from time to time, enter into written trading plans under Rule
10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to facilitate repurchases in accordance with the repurchase program. A Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plan allows the Firm
to repurchase its equity during periods when it would not otherwise be repurchasing common stock
for example during internal trading black-out periods. All purchases under a Rule 10b5-1 plan
must be made according to a predefined plan established when the Firm is not aware of material
nonpublic information. For additional information regarding repurchases of the Firms equity
securities, see Part II, Item 2, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, on
pages 181182 of this Form 10-Q.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk is an inherent part of JPMorgan Chases business activities. The Firms risk management
framework and governance structure are intended to provide comprehensive controls and ongoing
management of the major risks inherent in its business activities. The Firm employs a holistic
approach to risk management to ensure the broad spectrum of risk types are considered in managing
its business activities. The Firms risk management framework is intended to create a culture of
risk awareness and personal responsibility throughout the Firm where collaboration, discussion,
escalation and sharing of information is encouraged.
The Firms overall risk appetite is established in the context of the Firms capital, earnings
power, and diversified business model. The Firm employs a formalized risk appetite framework to
clearly link risk appetite and return targets, controls and capital management. There are
eight major types of risk identified in the business activities of the Firm: liquidity, credit,
market, interest rate, operational, legal and reputation, fiduciary, and private equity risk.
For further discussion of these risks, as well as how they are managed by the Firm, see Risk
Management on pages 107109 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report and the information below.
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT
The following discussion of JPMorgan Chases liquidity risk management framework highlights
developments since December 31, 2010, and should be read in conjunction with pages 110115 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The ability to maintain surplus levels of liquidity through economic cycles is crucial to financial
services companies, particularly during periods of adverse conditions. The Firms funding strategy
is intended to ensure liquidity and diversity of funding sources to meet actual and contingent
liabilities through both normal and stress periods.
JPMorgan Chases primary sources of liquidity include a diversified deposit base, which was $995.8
billion at March 31, 2011, and access to the equity capital markets and long-term unsecured and
secured funding sources, including through asset securitizations and borrowings from FHLBs.
Additionally, JPMorgan Chase maintains significant amounts of highly liquid, unencumbered assets.
The Firm actively monitors the availability of funding in the wholesale markets across various
geographic regions and in various currencies. The Firms ability to generate funding from a broad
range of sources in a variety of geographic locations and in a range of tenors is intended to
enhance financial flexibility and limit funding concentration risk.
53
Management considers the Firms liquidity position to be strong, based on its liquidity metrics as
of March 31, 2011, and believes that the Firms unsecured and secured funding capacity is
sufficient to meet its on and offbalance sheet obligations. The Firm was able to access the
funding markets as needed during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Governance
The Firms governance process is designed to ensure that its liquidity position remains strong. The
Asset-Liability Committee reviews and approves the Firms liquidity policy and contingency funding
plan. Corporate Treasury formulates and is responsible for executing the Firms liquidity policy
and contingency funding plan as well as measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firms
liquidity risk profile. JPMorgan Chase centralizes the management of global funding and liquidity
risk within Corporate Treasury to maximize liquidity access, minimize funding costs and enhance
global identification and coordination of liquidity risk. This centralized approach involves
frequent communication with the business segments, disciplined management of liquidity at the
parent holding company, comprehensive market-based pricing of all assets and liabilities,
continuous balance sheet monitoring, frequent stress testing of liquidity sources, and frequent
reporting to and communication with senior management and the Board of Directors regarding the
Firms liquidity position.
Liquidity monitoring
The Firm employs a variety of metrics to monitor and manage liquidity. One set of analyses used by
the Firm relates to the timing of liquidity sources versus liquidity uses (e.g., funding gap
analysis and parent holding company funding, as discussed below). A second set of analyses focuses
on measurements of the Firms reliance on short-term unsecured funding as a percentage of total
liabilities, as well as the relationship of short-term unsecured funding to highly liquid assets,
the deposits-to-loans ratio and other balance sheet measures.
The Firm performs regular liquidity stress tests as part of its liquidity monitoring. The purpose
of the liquidity stress tests is intended to ensure sufficient liquidity for the Firm under both
idiosyncratic and systemic market stress conditions. These scenarios measure the Firms liquidity
position across a full-year horizon by analyzing the net funding gaps resulting from contractual
and contingent cash and collateral outflows versus the Firms ability to generate additional
liquidity by pledging or selling excess collateral and issuing unsecured debt. The scenarios are
produced for the parent holding company and major bank subsidiaries as well as the Firms major
U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries.
The idiosyncratic stress scenario employed by the Firm is a JPMorgan Chase-specific event that
evaluates the Firms net funding gap after a short-term ratings downgrade to A-2/P-2. The systemic
market stress scenario evaluates the Firms net funding gap during a period of severe market stress
similar to market conditions in 2008 and assumes the Firm is not uniquely stressed versus its
peers. The Firms liquidity position is strong under the Firm-defined stress scenarios described
above.
Parent holding company
Liquidity monitoring of the parent holding company takes into consideration regulatory restrictions
that limit the extent to which bank subsidiaries may extend credit to the parent holding company
and other nonbank subsidiaries. Excess cash generated by parent holding company issuance activity
is used to purchase liquid collateral through reverse repurchase agreements or is placed with both
bank and nonbank subsidiaries in the form of deposits and advances to satisfy a portion of
subsidiary funding requirements. The Firms liquidity management is also intended to ensure that
its subsidiaries have the ability to generate replacement funding in the event the parent holding
company requires repayment of the aforementioned deposits and advances.
The Firm closely monitors the ability of the parent holding company to meet all of its obligations
with liquid sources of cash or cash equivalents for an extended period of time without access to
the unsecured funding markets. The Firm targets pre-funding of parent holding company obligations
for at least 12 months; however, due to conservative liquidity management actions taken by the Firm
in the current environment, the current pre-funding of such obligations is significantly greater
than target.
Global Liquidity Reserve
In addition to the parent holding company, the Firm maintains a significant amount of liquidity
primarily at its bank subsidiaries, but also at its nonbank subsidiaries. The Global Liquidity
Reserve represents consolidated sources of available liquidity to the Firm, including cash on
deposit at central banks, and cash proceeds reasonably expected to be received in secured
financings of highly liquid, unencumbered securities such as government-issued debt, government-
and FDIC-guaranteed corporate debt, U.S. government agency debt and agency mortgage-backed
securities (MBS). The liquidity amount estimated to be realized from secured financings is
based on managements current judgment and assessment of the Firms ability to quickly raise
secured financings. The Global Liquidity Reserve also includes the Firms borrowing capacity at
various FHLBs, the Federal Reserve Bank discount window and various other central banks from
54
collateral pledged by the Firm to such banks. Although considered as a source of available
liquidity, the Firm does not view borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank discount window
and various other central banks as a primary source of funding. As of March 31, 2011, the Global
Liquidity Reserve was estimated to be approximately $316 billion.
In addition to the Global Liquidity Reserve, the Firm has significant amounts of other
high-quality, marketable securities available to raise liquidity, such as corporate debt and equity
securities.
Funding
Sources of funds
A key strength of the Firm is its diversified deposit franchise through the RFS, CB, TSS and AM
lines of business, which provides a stable source of funding and decreases reliance on the
wholesale markets. As of March 31, 2011, total deposits for the Firm were $995.8 billion, compared
with $930.4 billion at December 31, 2010. Average total deposits for the Firm were $930.4 billion
and $877.5 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Firm
typically experiences higher customer deposit inflows at period ends. A significant portion of the
Firms deposits are retail deposits (38% and 40% at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively), which are considered particularly stable as they are less sensitive to interest rate
changes or market volatility. A significant portion of the Firms wholesale deposits are also
considered stable sources of funding due to the nature of the relationships from which they are
generated, particularly customers operating service relationships with the Firm. As of March 31,
2011, the Firms deposits-to-loans ratio was 145%, compared with 134% at December 31, 2010. For
further discussions of deposit and liability balance trends, see the discussion of the results for
the Firms business segments and the Balance Sheet Analysis on page 15 and 4143, respectively, of
this Form 10-Q.
Additional sources of funding include a variety of unsecured and secured short-term and long-term
instruments. Short-term unsecured funding sources include federal funds and Eurodollars purchased,
certificates of deposit, time deposits, commercial paper and other borrowed funds. Long-term
unsecured funding sources include long-term debt, trust preferred capital debt securities,
preferred stock and common stock.
The Firms short-term secured sources of funding consist of securities loaned or sold under
agreements to repurchase and borrowings from the Chicago, Pittsburgh and San Francisco FHLBs.
Secured long-term funding sources include asset-backed securitizations, and borrowings from the
Chicago, Pittsburgh and San Francisco FHLBs.
Funding markets are evaluated on an ongoing basis to achieve an appropriate global balance of
unsecured and secured funding at favorable rates.
Short-term funding
The Firms reliance on short-term unsecured funding sources is limited. Short-term unsecured
funding sources include federal funds and Eurodollars purchased, which represent overnight funds;
certificates of deposit; time deposits; commercial paper, which is generally issued in amounts not
less than $100,000 and with maturities of 270 days or less; and other borrowed funds, which consist
of demand notes, term federal funds purchased, and various other borrowings that generally have
maturities of one year or less.
Total commercial paper liabilities for the Firm were $46.0 billion as of March 31, 2011, compared
with $35.4 billion as of December 31, 2010. However, of those totals, $35.2 billion and $29.2
billion as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, originated from deposits that
customers chose to sweep into commercial paper liabilities as a cash management product offered by
the Firm. Therefore, commercial paper liabilities sourced from wholesale funding markets were $10.8
billion as of March 31, 2011, compared with $6.2 billion as of December 31, 2010; in addition, the
average balance of commercial paper liabilities sourced from wholesale funding markets was $8.4
billion for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, generally mature between one day and
three months, are secured predominantly by high-quality securities collateral, including
government-issued debt, agency debt and agency MBS. The balances of securities loaned or sold under
agreements to repurchase, which constitute a significant portion of the federal funds purchased and
securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, was $282.3 billion as of March 31, 2011,
compared with $273.3 billion as of December 31, 2010. There were no material differences between
the average and period-end balances of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase for
the three months ended and as of March 31, 2011. The balances associated with securities loaned or
sold under agreements to repurchase fluctuate over time due to customers investment and financing
activities; the Firms demand for financing; the Firms matched book activity; the ongoing
management of the mix of the Firms liabilities, including its secured and unsecured financing (for
both the investment and trading portfolios); and other market and portfolio factors. For additional
55
information, see the Balance Sheet Analysis on pages 4143, Note 12 on page 121 and Note 18 on
page 153 of this Form 10-Q.
Total other borrowed funds for the Firm was $36.7 billion as of March 31, 2011, compared with $34.3
billion as of December 31, 2010. There were no material differences between the average and
period-end balances of other borrowed funds for the three months ended and as of March 31, 2011.
Long-term funding and issuance
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Firm issued $13.0 billion of long-term debt,
including $7.0 billion of senior notes issued in the U.S. market, $2.7 billion of senior notes
issued in the non-U.S. markets, and $3.3 billion of IB structured notes. In addition, in April
2011, the Firm issued $4.4 billion of senior notes in the U.S. market. During the first three
months of 2010, the Firm issued $10.9 billion of long-term debt, including $5.6 billion of senior
notes issued in U.S. markets, $904 million of senior notes issued in non-U.S. markets and $4.4
billion of IB structured notes. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, $18.1 billion of
long-term debt matured or was redeemed, including $5.6 billion of IB structured notes. During the
first three months of 2010, $14.1 billion of long-term debt matured or was redeemed, including $7.4
billion of IB structured notes.
In addition to the unsecured long-term funding and issuances discussed above, the Firm securitizes
consumer credit card loans, residential mortgages, auto loans and student loans for funding
purposes. Loans securitized by the Firms wholesale businesses are related to client-driven
transactions and are not considered to be a source of funding for the Firm. During the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the Firm did not securitize any credit card loans,
residential mortgage loans, auto loans or student loans through consolidated or nonconsolidated
securitization trusts for funding purposes. In April 2011, the Firm securitized $500 million of
credit card loans. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, $6.7 billion of loan
securitizations matured or were redeemed, including $6.6 billion of credit card loan
securitizations, $44 million of residential mortgage loan securitizations and $76 million of
student loan securitizations. During the three months ended
March 31, 2010, $6.7 billion of loan securitizations
matured or were redeemed, including $6.5 billion of credit card
loan securitizations, $43 million of residential mortgage loan
securitizations, $84 million of student loan securitizations,
and $39 million of auto loan securitizations. For further discussion of loan
securitizations, see Note 15 on pages
141149 in this Form 10-Q.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Firm borrowed $4.0 billion of new long-term
advances from the FHLBs, which were partially offset by $2.5 billion of maturities. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, the Firm borrowed $1.5 billion of new long-term advances from the
FHLBs, which were more than offset by $8.5 billion of maturities.
Cash flows
Cash and due from banks was $23.5 billion and $31.4 billion at March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. These balances decreased by $4.1 billion from December 31, 2010, and increased by
$5.2 billion from December 31, 2009, respectively. The following discussion highlights the major
activities and transactions that affected JPMorgan Chases cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Cash flows from operating activities
JPMorgan Chases operating assets and liabilities support the Firms capital markets and lending
activities, including the origination or purchase of loans initially designated as held-for-sale.
Operating assets and liabilities can vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the
amount and timing of cash flows, which are affected by client-driven activities, market conditions
and trading strategies. Management believes cash flows from operations, available cash balances and
the Firms ability to generate cash through short- and long-term borrowings are sufficient to fund
the Firms operating liquidity needs.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net cash used in operating activities was $6.0 billion.
This resulted from a decrease in trading liabilities derivative payables largely due to a
reduction in foreign exchange derivatives, which declined primarily due to the Japanese yen
depreciation relative to the U.S. dollar, and a reduction in interest rate contracts as a result of
higher interest rate yields during the quarter; an increase in trading assets debt and equity
instruments largely driven by growth in customer demand, market activity, including a significant
level of new issuances, and rising global indices; and an increase in accrued interest and accounts
receivable reflecting higher customer receivables in IBs Prime Services business due to growth in
client activity. Partially offsetting these cash outflows were an increase in trading liabilities
debt and equity instruments largely due to growth in customer demand, market activity and
economic hedging activity, and a decrease in trading assets derivative receivables largely due
to reductions in the aforementioned foreign exchange derivatives and interest rate contracts.
Additionally, cash used to acquire loans originated or purchased with an initial intent to sell was
higher than proceeds from sales and paydowns of such loans. Net cash was provided by net income and
from adjustments for non-cash items such as the provision for credit losses, depreciation and
amortization, and stock-based compensation.
56
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities was $17.4
billion, primarily driven by a net increase in trading liabilities reflecting favorable
developments in financial markets, as well as an increase in business activity in markets outside
of the United States, partially offset by sales of debt securities. Also, net cash generated from
operating activities was higher than net income, largely as a result of adjustments for non-cash
items such as the provision for credit losses, stock-based compensation, and depreciation and
amortization. Proceeds from sales and paydowns of loans originated or purchased with an initial
intent to sell were higher than cash used to acquire such loans.
Cash flows from investing activities
The Firms investing activities predominantly include loans originated to be held for investment,
the available-for-sale securities (AFS) portfolio and other short-term interest-earning assets.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net cash of $65.8 billion was used in investing
activities. This resulted from a significant increase in deposits with banks reflecting a higher
level of deposit balances at Federal Reserve Banks largely the result of inflows of short-term
wholesale deposits from TSS clients toward the end of March 2011, net purchases of AFS securities,
largely due to repositioning of the portfolio in Corporate, in response to changes in the interest
rate environment, and an increase in wholesale loans reflecting growth in client activity.
Partially offsetting these cash outflows were a net decrease in loans reflecting seasonality and
higher repayment rates of credit card loans, runoff of the Washington Mutual credit card portfolio,
and lower consumer loans, excluding credit card, predominantly as a result of paydowns in RFS, and
a decline in securities purchased under resale agreements, largely in IB, reflecting lower client
financing needs.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash of $13.9 billion was used in investing
activities. This was primarily due to an increase in securities purchased under resale agreements
largely due to higher financing volume in IB resulting from increased client flows, partially
offset by a net decrease in the loan portfolio, driven by seasonally lower charge volume on credit
cards, continued runoff in the residential real estate portfolios, and repayments and loan sales,
predominantly in IB. Proceeds from sales and maturities of AFS securities used in the Firms
interest rate risk management activities were slightly higher than cash used to acquire such
securities.
Cash flows from financing activities
The Firms financing activities primarily reflect cash flows related to taking customer deposits,
and issuing long-term debt as well as preferred and common stock. For the three months ended March
31, 2011, net cash provided by financing activities was $67.3 billion. This was largely driven by
an increase in deposits as a result of inflows of short-term wholesale deposits from TSS clients
toward the end of March 2011, also contributing were growth in the level of retail deposits from
the combined effect of seasonal factors such as tax refunds and bonus payments, and general growth
in business volumes; an increase in commercial paper and other borrowed funds due to growth in the
volume of liability balances in sweep accounts in connection with TSSs cash management product,
and modest incremental short-term borrowings by the Firm under cost-effective terms; and an
increase in securities sold under repurchase agreements due to higher securities financing balances
in connection with repositioning of the securities portfolio in Corporate. Partially offsetting
these cash proceeds were net repayments of long-term borrowings, including a decline in long-term
beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs due to maturities of Firm-sponsored credit card
securitization transactions; the payments of cash dividends; and repurchases of common stock.
In the first three months of 2010, net cash provided by financing activities was $2.0 billion,
which reflected increased cash proceeds from securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements
primarily to facilitate the increase in IBs securities purchased under resale agreements. Cash was
used as TSS deposits declined reflecting the normalization of deposit levels; offset partially by
net inflows from existing customers and new business in CB, RFS and AM; a decline in short-term
beneficial interest issued by consolidated VIEs; for net payments of long-term borrowings and trust
preferred capital debt securities as new issuances were more than offset by payments; and for the
payment of cash dividends.
Credit ratings
The cost and availability of financing are influenced by credit ratings. Reductions in these
ratings could have an adverse effect on the Firms access to liquidity sources, increase the cost
of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements and decrease the number of
investors and counterparties willing to lend to the Firm. Additionally, the Firms funding
requirements for VIEs and other third-party commitments may be adversely affected by a decline in
credit ratings. For additional information on the impact of a credit ratings downgrade on the
funding requirements for VIEs, and on derivatives and collateral agreements, see Special-purpose
entities on page 44, and Note 5 on pages 107113, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Critical factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a stable and diverse earnings stream,
strong capital ratios, strong credit quality and risk management controls, diverse funding sources,
and disciplined liquidity monitoring procedures.
57
The credit ratings of the parent holding company and each of the Firms significant banking
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
Senior long-term debt |
|
|
Moodys |
|
S&P |
|
Fitch |
|
Moodys |
|
S&P |
|
Fitch |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
P |
-1 |
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
F1+ |
|
|
Aa3 |
|
|
A+ |
|
|
AA |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
P |
-1 |
|
|
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
F1+ |
|
|
Aa1 |
|
AA |
|
AA |
Chase Bank USA, N.A. |
|
P |
-1 |
|
|
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
F1+ |
|
|
Aa1 |
|
AA |
|
AA |
|
The senior unsecured ratings from Moodys, S&P and Fitch on JPMorgan Chase and its principal
bank subsidiaries remained unchanged at March 31, 2011, from December 31, 2010. On February 25,
2011, S&P revised its outlook on the Firm from negative to stable. At March 31, 2011, Moodys
outlook was negative, while S&Ps and Fitchs outlook was stable.
If the Firms senior long-term debt ratings were downgraded by one notch, the Firm believes the
incremental cost of funds or loss of funding would be manageable, within the context of current
market conditions and the Firms liquidity resources. JPMorgan Chases unsecured debt does not
contain requirements that would call for an acceleration of payments, maturities or changes in the
structure of the existing debt, provide any limitations on future borrowings or require additional
collateral, based on unfavorable changes in the Firms credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings,
or stock price.
Several rating agencies have announced that they will be evaluating the effects of the financial
regulatory reform legislation in order to determine the extent, if any, to which financial
institutions, including the Firm, may be negatively impacted. There is no assurance the Firms
credit ratings will not be downgraded in the future as a result of any such reviews.
58
CREDIT PORTFOLIO
For a further discussion on the Firms credit risk management framework, see pages 116-118 of
JP Morgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table presents JPMorgan Chases credit portfolio as of March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010. Total credit exposure of $1.8 trillion at March 31, 2011, increased by $23.8 billion from
December 31, 2010, reflecting increases in the wholesale and consumer portfolios of $21.4 billion
and $2.4 billion, respectively. During the first three months of 2011, increases in lending-related
commitments and receivables from customers of $27.2 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively were
partly offset by decreases in loans and derivative receivables of $6.9 billion and $1.7 billion,
respectively.
The Firm provided credit to and raised capital of over $450 billion for our clients during the
first three months of 2011. The Firm also originated mortgages to over 180,000 people; provided
credit cards to approximately 2.6 million people; lent or increased credit to over 7,500 small
businesses; lent to over 500 not-for-profit and government entities, including states,
municipalities, hospitals and universities; extended or increased loan limits to approximately
1,500 middle market companies; and lent to or raised capital for more than 3,500 corporations.
In the table below, reported loans include loans retained (i.e., held-for-investment); loans
held-for-sale (which are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, with changes in value recorded
in noninterest revenue); and loans accounted for at fair value. For additional information on the
Firms loans and derivative receivables, including the Firms accounting policies, see Notes 13 and
5 on pages 122138 and 107113, respectively, of this Form 10-Q. Average retained loan balances
are used for net charge-off rate calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
exposure |
|
Nonperforming(e)(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
net charge-off rate(g) |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Total credit portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
$ |
675,437 |
|
|
$ |
685,498 |
|
|
$ |
13,152 |
|
|
$ |
14,345 |
|
|
$ |
3,720 |
|
|
$ |
7,910 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
8,754 |
|
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at fair value |
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans reported |
|
|
685,996 |
|
|
|
692,927 |
|
|
|
13,441 |
|
|
|
14,841 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
78,744 |
|
|
|
80,481 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
Receivables from customers(a) |
|
|
38,053 |
|
|
|
32,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest in purchased receivables(b) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit-related assets |
|
|
802,970 |
|
|
|
806,340 |
|
|
|
13,462 |
|
|
|
14,875 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
Lending-related commitments(c) |
|
|
985,934 |
|
|
|
958,709 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
Other |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
Total credit portfolio |
|
$ |
1,788,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,765,049 |
|
|
$ |
15,881 |
|
|
$ |
17,562 |
|
|
$ |
3,720 |
|
|
$ |
7,910 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
Net credit derivative hedges
notional(d) |
|
$ |
(24,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
Liquid securities and other cash collateral
held against derivatives |
|
|
(16,185 |
) |
|
|
(16,486 |
) |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents primarily margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers, which are
included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents an ownership interest in cash flows of a pool of receivables transferred by a
third-party seller into a bankruptcy-remote entity, generally a trust. |
|
(c) |
|
The amounts in nonperforming represent unfunded commitments that are risk rated as
nonaccrual. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold of single-name and
portfolio credit derivatives used to manage both performing and non-performing credit
exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. For
additional information, see Credit derivatives on page 67 and Note 5 on pages 107113 of this
Form 10-Q. |
|
(e) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage loans
insured by U.S. government agencies of $9.8 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, that are
accruing at the guaranteed reimbursement rate; (2) real estate owned insured by U.S.
government agencies of $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively; and (3) student loans that
are 90 days or more past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies
under the FFELP, of $615 million and $625 million, respectively. These amounts were excluded
as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. In addition, the Firms policy is
generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by
regulatory guidance issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
(FFIEC). Credit card loans are |
59
|
|
|
|
|
charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60
days from receiving notification about a specified event (e.g., bankruptcy of the borrower),
whichever is earlier. |
|
(f) |
|
Excludes PCI loans acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction, which are accounted
for on a pool basis. Since each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single
composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows, the past due status of the
pools, or that of individual loans within the pools, is not meaningful. Because the Firm is
recognizing interest income on each pool of loans, they are all considered to be performing. |
|
(g) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, net charge-off rates were calculated
using average retained loans of $680.0 billion and $718.5 billion, respectively. These average
retained loans include average PCI loans of $71.6 billion and $80.3 billion, respectively.
Excluding the impact of PCI loans, the Firms total charge-off rate would have been 2.48% and
5.03% respectively. |
WHOLESALE CREDIT PORTFOLIO
As of March 31, 2011, wholesale exposure (IB, CB, TSS and AM) increased by $21.4 billion from
December 31, 2010. The overall increase was primarily driven by increases of $9.5 billion in
lending-related commitments, $8.4 billion in loans and $5.5 billion of receivables from customers.
The growth in wholesale credit exposure represented increased client activity across all businesses
and all regions. Effective January 1, 2011, the commercial card credit portfolio (of approximately
$5.3 billion of lending-related commitments and $1.2 billion of loans) that was previously in TSS
was transferred to CS.
Wholesale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exposure |
|
|
Nonperforming(e) |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Loans retained |
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
222,510 |
|
|
$ |
4,578 |
|
|
$ |
5,510 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Loans at fair value |
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
Loans reported |
|
|
236,007 |
|
|
|
227,633 |
|
|
|
4,867 |
|
|
|
6,006 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
78,744 |
|
|
|
80,481 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Receivables from customers(a) |
|
|
38,053 |
|
|
|
32,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in purchased receivables(b) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale credit-related assets |
|
|
352,981 |
|
|
|
341,046 |
|
|
|
4,888 |
|
|
|
6,040 |
|
Lending-related commitments(c) |
|
|
355,561 |
|
|
|
346,079 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
Total wholesale credit exposure |
|
$ |
708,542 |
|
|
$ |
687,125 |
|
|
$ |
5,783 |
|
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
|
Net credit derivative hedges notional(d) |
|
$ |
(24,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives |
|
|
(16,185 |
) |
|
|
(16,486 |
) |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents primarily margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers, which are included
in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents an ownership interest in cash flows of a pool of receivables transferred by a
third-party seller into a bankruptcy-remote entity, generally a trust. |
|
(c) |
|
The amounts in nonperforming represent unfunded commitments that are risk rated as
nonaccrual. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold of single-name and
portfolio credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming credit
exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. For
additional information, see Credit derivatives on page 67, and Note 5 on pages 107113 of
this Form 10-Q. |
|
(e) |
|
Excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. |
60
The following table presents summaries of the maturity and ratings profiles of the wholesale
portfolio as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The ratings scale is based on the Firms
internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by S&P and Moodys.
Also included in this table is the notional value of net credit derivative hedges; the
counterparties to these hedges are predominantly investment grade banks and finance companies.
Wholesale credit exposure maturity and ratings profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity profile(e) |
|
Ratings profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment- |
|
Noninvestment- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grade (IG) |
|
grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Due in 1 year |
|
Due after 1 year |
|
Due after 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa to |
|
BB+/Ba1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total % |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
or less |
|
through 5 years |
|
years |
|
Total |
|
BBB-/Baa3 |
|
& below |
|
Total |
|
of IG |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
89,044 |
|
|
$ |
82,128 |
|
|
$ |
58,476 |
|
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
153,159 |
|
|
$ |
76,489 |
|
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
Derivative receivables(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Liquid securities and other
cash collateral held against
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative receivables,
net of all collateral |
|
|
11,894 |
|
|
|
22,351 |
|
|
|
28,314 |
|
|
|
62,559 |
|
|
|
48,871 |
|
|
|
13,688 |
|
|
|
62,559 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Lending-related commitments |
|
|
133,153 |
|
|
|
212,399 |
|
|
|
10,009 |
|
|
|
355,561 |
|
|
|
285,010 |
|
|
|
70,551 |
|
|
|
355,561 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
234,091 |
|
|
|
316,878 |
|
|
|
96,799 |
|
|
|
647,768 |
|
|
|
487,040 |
|
|
|
160,728 |
|
|
|
647,768 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at
fair value(b)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from
customers(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in purchased
receivables(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exposure net of liquid
securities and other cash
collateral held against derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
692,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
692,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit derivative hedges
notional(d) |
|
$ |
(1,621 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,284 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,826 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,811 |
) |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
(24,731 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity profile(e) |
|
Ratings profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment- |
|
Noninvestment- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grade (IG) |
|
grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Due in 1 year |
|
Due after 1 year |
|
Due after 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa to |
|
BB+/Ba1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total % |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
or less |
|
through 5 years |
|
years |
|
Total |
|
BBB-/Baa3 |
|
& below |
|
Total |
|
of IG |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
78,017 |
|
|
$ |
85,987 |
|
|
$ |
58,506 |
|
|
$ |
222,510 |
|
|
$ |
146,047 |
|
|
$ |
76,463 |
|
|
$ |
222,510 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
Derivative receivables(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Liquid securities and other
cash collateral held against
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative receivables,
net of all collateral |
|
|
11,499 |
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
|
|
28,081 |
|
|
|
63,995 |
|
|
|
47,557 |
|
|
|
16,438 |
|
|
|
63,995 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Lending-related commitments |
|
|
126,389 |
|
|
|
209,299 |
|
|
|
10,391 |
|
|
|
346,079 |
|
|
|
276,298 |
|
|
|
69,781 |
|
|
|
346,079 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
215,905 |
|
|
|
319,701 |
|
|
|
96,978 |
|
|
|
632,584 |
|
|
|
469,902 |
|
|
|
162,682 |
|
|
|
632,584 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at
fair value(b)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from
customers(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in purchased
receivables(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exposure net of liquid
securities and other cash
collateral held against derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
670,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
670,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit derivative hedges
notional(d) |
|
$ |
(1,228 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,415 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,465 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,159 |
) |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
(23,108 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the fair value of derivative receivables as reported on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value relate primarily to syndicated loans and loans
transferred from the retained portfolio. |
|
(c) |
|
From a credit risk perspective maturity and ratings profiles are not meaningful. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold of single-name and
portfolio credit derivatives used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not
qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. |
|
(e) |
|
The maturity profile of loans and lending-related commitments is based on the remaining
contractual maturity. The maturity profile of derivative receivables is based on the maturity
profile of average exposure. For further discussion of average exposure, see Derivative
receivables marked to market on page 66 of this Form 10-Q. |
61
Customer receivables of $38.1 billion and $32.5 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010, respectively, representing primarily margin loans to prime and retail brokerage clients, are
included in the table. These margin loans are collateralized through a pledge of assets maintained
in clients brokerage accounts and are subject to daily minimum collateral requirements. In the
event that the collateral value decreases, a maintenance margin call is made to the client to
provide additional collateral into the account. If additional collateral is not provided by the
client, the clients positions may be liquidated by the Firm to meet the minimum collateral
requirements.
Wholesale credit exposure selected industry exposures
The Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry exposures, with particular
attention paid to industries with actual or potential credit concerns. Exposures deemed criticized
generally represent a ratings profile similar to a rating of CCC+"/Caa1 and lower, as defined by
S&P and Moodys. The total criticized component of the portfolio, excluding loans held-for-sale and
loans at fair value, decreased to $20.8 billion at March 31, 2011, from $22.4 billion from December
31, 2010. The decrease was primarily related to loan sales and net repayments.
Below are summaries of the top 25 industry exposures as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
Wholesale credit exposure selected industry exposures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
collateral |
As of or for the year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninvestment-grade |
|
more past due |
|
Year-to-date |
|
Credit |
|
held against |
March 31, 2011 |
|
Credit |
|
Investment- |
|
|
|
|
|
Criticized |
|
Criticized |
|
and accruing |
|
net charge-offs/ |
|
derivative |
|
derivative |
(in millions) |
|
exposure(c) |
|
grade |
|
Noncriticized |
|
performing |
|
nonperforming |
|
loans |
|
(recoveries) |
|
hedges(d) |
|
receivables |
|
Top 25 industries(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and finance companies |
|
$ |
65,982 |
|
|
$ |
55,393 |
|
|
$ |
9,979 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,097 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,173 |
) |
Real estate |
|
|
62,927 |
|
|
|
34,216 |
|
|
|
20,476 |
|
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
39,280 |
|
|
|
32,633 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
State and municipal
governments |
|
|
34,315 |
|
|
|
33,324 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Asset managers |
|
|
30,393 |
|
|
|
25,898 |
|
|
|
4,040 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,057 |
) |
Oil and gas |
|
|
28,789 |
|
|
|
20,514 |
|
|
|
8,187 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
Utilities |
|
|
27,628 |
|
|
|
22,635 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
Consumer products |
|
|
26,468 |
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
|
9,289 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Retail and consumer services |
|
|
20,183 |
|
|
|
12,010 |
|
|
|
7,649 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Technology |
|
|
13,816 |
|
|
|
9,826 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Machinery and equipment
manufacturing |
|
|
13,804 |
|
|
|
7,904 |
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Building materials/
construction |
|
|
13,176 |
|
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Media |
|
|
13,165 |
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Metals/mining |
|
|
12,643 |
|
|
|
6,038 |
|
|
|
6,168 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Telecom services |
|
|
12,613 |
|
|
|
9,486 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Central government |
|
|
12,497 |
|
|
|
12,014 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,071 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
Chemicals and plastics |
|
|
11,674 |
|
|
|
7,650 |
|
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Insurance |
|
|
11,634 |
|
|
|
8,563 |
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
(706 |
) |
Holding companies |
|
|
11,035 |
|
|
|
8,804 |
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
Securities firms and exchanges |
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
|
9,473 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(1,980 |
) |
Business services |
|
|
10,885 |
|
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
4,653 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Automotive |
|
|
9,612 |
|
|
|
4,296 |
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Agriculture/paper
manufacturing |
|
|
7,140 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Aerospace |
|
|
6,086 |
|
|
|
5,153 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
All other(b) |
|
|
147,329 |
|
|
|
129,028 |
|
|
|
15,175 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5,884 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
663,953 |
|
|
|
502,091 |
|
|
|
141,022 |
|
|
|
16,241 |
|
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
(24,731 |
) |
|
|
(16,185 |
) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans
at fair value |
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
38,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest in purchased
receivables |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
708,542 |
|
|
$ |
502,091 |
|
|
$ |
141,022 |
|
|
$ |
16,241 |
|
|
$ |
4,599 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
(24,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,185 |
) |
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash collateral |
As of or for the year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninvestment-grade |
|
more past due |
|
Year-to-date |
|
Credit |
|
held against |
December 31, 2010 |
|
Credit |
|
Investment- |
|
|
|
|
|
Criticized |
|
Criticized |
|
and accruing |
|
net charge-offs/ |
|
derivative |
|
derivative |
(in millions) |
|
exposure(c) |
|
grade |
|
Noncriticized |
|
performing |
|
nonperforming |
|
loans |
|
(recoveries) |
|
hedges(d) |
|
receivables |
|
Top 25 industries(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and finance companies |
|
$ |
65,867 |
|
|
$ |
54,839 |
|
|
$ |
10,428 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
(3,456 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,216 |
) |
Real estate |
|
|
64,351 |
|
|
|
34,440 |
|
|
|
20,569 |
|
|
|
6,404 |
|
|
|
2,938 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
41,093 |
|
|
|
33,752 |
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
State and municipal
governments |
|
|
35,808 |
|
|
|
34,641 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
Asset managers |
|
|
29,364 |
|
|
|
25,533 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,948 |
) |
Oil and gas |
|
|
26,459 |
|
|
|
18,465 |
|
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Utilities |
|
|
25,911 |
|
|
|
20,951 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Consumer products |
|
|
27,508 |
|
|
|
16,747 |
|
|
|
10,379 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Retail and consumer services |
|
|
20,882 |
|
|
|
12,021 |
|
|
|
8,316 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Technology |
|
|
14,348 |
|
|
|
9,355 |
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
manufacturing |
|
|
13,311 |
|
|
|
7,690 |
|
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Building materials/
construction |
|
|
12,808 |
|
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Media |
|
|
10,967 |
|
|
|
5,808 |
|
|
|
3,945 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Metals/mining |
|
|
11,426 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
5,748 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Telecom services |
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
7,582 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Central government |
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
10,677 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,897 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Chemicals/plastics |
|
|
12,312 |
|
|
|
8,375 |
|
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
10,918 |
|
|
|
7,908 |
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(567 |
) |
Holding companies |
|
|
10,504 |
|
|
|
8,375 |
|
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
Securities firms and exchanges |
|
|
9,415 |
|
|
|
7,678 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(2,358 |
) |
Business services |
|
|
11,247 |
|
|
|
6,351 |
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
9,652 |
|
|
|
6,630 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Automotive |
|
|
9,011 |
|
|
|
3,915 |
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Agriculture/paper
manufacturing |
|
|
7,368 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Aerospace |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
4,903 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
All other(b) |
|
|
140,926 |
|
|
|
122,594 |
|
|
|
14,924 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
(5,867 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
649,070 |
|
|
|
485,557 |
|
|
|
141,133 |
|
|
|
16,836 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
(23,108 |
) |
|
|
(16,486 |
) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans
at fair value |
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
32,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest in purchased
receivables |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
687,125 |
|
|
$ |
485,557 |
|
|
$ |
141,133 |
|
|
$ |
16,836 |
|
|
$ |
5,544 |
|
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,727 |
|
|
$ |
(23,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All industry rankings are based on exposure at March 31, 2011. The industry rankings
presented in the table as of December 31, 2010 are based on the industry rankings of the
corresponding exposures at March 31, 2011, not actual rankings of such exposures at December
31, 2010. |
|
(b) |
|
For more information on exposures to SPEs included in all other, see Note 15 on pages
141149 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
(c) |
|
Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of credit derivative
hedges and collateral held against derivative receivables or loans. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold of single-name and
portfolio credit derivatives used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not
qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. |
63
The following table presents the geographic distribution of wholesale credit, nonperforming
assets and past due loans as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The geographic distribution
of the wholesale portfolio is determined based predominantly on the domicile of the borrower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
30 days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquired |
|
more past |
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
related |
|
Derivative |
|
Total credit |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
|
|
Lending-related |
|
Total non- |
|
in loan |
|
due and |
(in millions) |
|
Loans |
|
commitments |
|
receivables |
|
exposure |
|
loans(a) |
|
Derivatives |
|
commitments |
|
performing |
|
satisfactions |
|
accruing loans |
|
Europe/Middle East
and Africa |
|
$ |
30,360 |
|
|
$ |
60,560 |
|
|
$ |
33,201 |
|
|
$ |
124,121 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Asia and Pacific |
|
|
23,144 |
|
|
|
15,479 |
|
|
|
10,993 |
|
|
|
49,616 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Latin America and
the
Caribbean |
|
|
17,745 |
|
|
|
14,185 |
|
|
|
5,247 |
|
|
|
37,177 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
9,597 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total non-U.S. |
|
|
72,462 |
|
|
|
96,484 |
|
|
|
51,565 |
|
|
|
220,511 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Total U.S. |
|
|
157,186 |
|
|
|
259,077 |
|
|
|
27,179 |
|
|
|
443,442 |
|
|
|
3,996 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
Loans held-for-sale
and loans at fair
value |
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
Receivables from
customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,053 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
Interests in
purchased
receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
236,007 |
|
|
$ |
355,561 |
|
|
$ |
78,744 |
|
|
$ |
708,542 |
|
|
$ |
4,867 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
$ |
5,783 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
30 days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquired |
|
more past |
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
related |
|
Derivative |
|
Total credit |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
|
|
Lending-related |
|
Total non- |
|
in loan |
|
due and |
(in millions) |
|
Loans |
|
commitments |
|
receivables |
|
exposure |
|
loans(a) |
|
Derivatives |
|
commitments |
|
performing |
|
satisfactions |
|
accruing loans |
|
Europe/Middle East
and Africa |
|
$ |
27,934 |
|
|
$ |
58,418 |
|
|
$ |
35,196 |
|
|
$ |
121,548 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Asia and Pacific |
|
|
20,552 |
|
|
|
15,002 |
|
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
46,545 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
Latin America and
the
Caribbean |
|
|
16,480 |
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
|
|
5,634 |
|
|
|
34,284 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
9,373 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-U.S. |
|
|
66,151 |
|
|
|
91,739 |
|
|
|
53,860 |
|
|
|
211,750 |
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Total U.S. |
|
|
156,359 |
|
|
|
254,340 |
|
|
|
26,621 |
|
|
|
437,320 |
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
Loans held-for-sale
and loans at fair
value |
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
Receivables from
customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,541 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
Interests in
purchased
receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
227,633 |
|
|
$ |
346,079 |
|
|
$ |
80,481 |
|
|
$ |
687,125 |
|
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Firm held allowance for loan losses of $1.0 billion and $1.6 billion related to
nonaccrual retained loans resulting in allowance coverage ratios of 22% and 29% at March 31,
2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. Wholesale nonaccrual loans represent 2.06% and
2.64% of total wholesale loans at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
64
Loans
In the normal course of business, the Firm provides loans to a variety of wholesale customers, from
large corporate and institutional clients to high-net-worth individuals. For further discussion on
loans, including information on credit quality indicators, see Note 13 on pages 122138 of this
Form 10-Q.
Retained wholesale loans were $229.6 billion at March 31, 2011, compared with $222.5 billion at
December 31, 2010. The $7.1 billion increase was primarily related to increased client activity.
The Firm actively manages wholesale credit exposure through sales of loans and lending-related
commitments. During the first three months of 2011, the Firm sold $1.5 billion of loans and
commitments, recognizing revenue gains of $5 million. During the first three months of 2010, the
Firm sold $2.6 billion of loans and commitments, recognizing net revenue gains of $19 million.
These results included gains or losses on sales of nonaccrual loans, if any, as discussed below.
These sale activities are not related to the Firms securitization activities. For further
discussion of securitization activity, see Liquidity Risk Management and Note 15 on pages 5358
and 141149 respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
The following table presents the change in the nonaccrual loan portfolio for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale nonaccrual loan activity |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
6,904 |
|
Additions |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
Reductions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paydowns and other |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Gross charge-offs |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
Returned to performing |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Sales |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
Total reductions |
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
3,395 |
|
|
Net additions/(reductions) |
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
4,867 |
|
|
$ |
6,226 |
|
|
Nonaccrual wholesale loans decreased by $1.1 billion, from December 31, 2010, primarily
reflecting loan sales and repayments.
The following table presents net charge-offs, which are defined as gross charge-offs less
recoveries, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The amounts in the table below do
not include revenue gains from sales of nonaccrual loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, (in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Loans reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans retained |
|
$ |
226,544 |
|
|
$ |
211,599 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
Average annual net charge-off ratio |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
65
Derivative contracts
In the normal course of business, the Firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for
market-making activity. Derivatives enable customers and the Firm to manage exposures to
fluctuations in interest rates, currencies and other markets. The Firm also uses derivative
instruments to manage its credit exposure. For further discussion of derivative contracts, see Note
6 on page 113 of this Form 10-Q.
The following tables summarize the net derivative receivables MTM for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables MTM |
|
Derivative receivables MTM |
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
31,182 |
|
|
$ |
32,555 |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
|
8,026 |
|
|
|
7,725 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
18,333 |
|
|
|
25,858 |
|
Equity |
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
12,845 |
|
|
|
10,139 |
|
|
Total, net of cash collateral |
|
|
78,744 |
|
|
|
80,481 |
|
Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables |
|
|
(16,185 |
) |
|
|
(16,486 |
) |
|
Total, net of all collateral |
|
$ |
62,559 |
|
|
$ |
63,995 |
|
|
Derivative receivables reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $78.7 billion and
$80.5 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. These represent the fair
value (e.g. MTM) of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master
netting agreements, cash collateral held by the Firm and the credit valuation adjustment (CVA).
However, in managements view, the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also reflect
additional liquid securities and other cash collateral held by the Firm of $16.2 billion and $16.5
billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, as shown in the table above.
Derivative receivables decreased from December 31, 2010, largely due to a reduction in foreign
exchange derivative balances, which declined primarily due to the Japanese Yen depreciation
relative to the U.S. dollar. Interest rate contracts also decreased as a result of higher interest
rate yields during the quarter. These decreases were partially offset by increases in derivative
receivables related to equity derivatives as a result of increased activity in the EMEA and Latin
American markets, and to commodity derivatives primarily as a result of higher oil prices.
The Firm also holds additional collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions,
as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that
the Firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date. Though this
collateral does not reduce the balances noted in the table above, it is available as security
against potential exposure that could arise should the MTM of the clients derivative transactions
move in the Firms favor. As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm held $20.5 billion
and $18.0 billion, respectively, of this additional collateral. The derivative receivables MTM, net
of all collateral, also do not include other credit enhancements, such as letters of credit.
The following table summarizes the ratings profile of the Firms derivative receivables MTM, net of
other liquid securities collateral, for the dates indicated.
Ratings profile of derivative receivables MTM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
Rating equivalent |
|
Exposure net of |
|
% of exposure net |
|
Exposure net of |
|
% of exposure net |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
all collateral |
|
of all collateral |
|
all collateral |
|
of all collateral |
|
AAA/Aaa to AA-/Aa3 |
|
$ |
25,062 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
$ |
23,342 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
A+/A1 to A-/A3 |
|
|
15,313 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
15,812 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 |
|
|
8,496 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8,403 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 |
|
|
11,161 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
13,716 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
CCC+/Caa1 and below |
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
62,559 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
63,995 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
As noted above, the Firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk. The
percentage of the Firms derivatives transactions subject to collateral agreements - excluding
foreign exchange spot trades, which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their
short maturity - remained unchanged at 88% as of March 31, 2011, when compared to December 31,
2010. The Firm posted $52.8 billion and $58.3 billion of collateral at March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, respectively.
66
Credit derivatives
For a detailed discussion of credit derivatives, including types of derivatives, see Note 5, Credit
derivatives, on pages 107113 of this Form 10-Q, and Credit derivatives on pages 126127 and Note
6, Credit derivatives, on pages 197199 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table presents the Firms notional amounts of credit derivatives protection purchased
and sold as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, distinguishing between dealer/client activity
and credit portfolio activity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Dealer/client |
|
Credit portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer/client |
|
Credit portfolio |
|
|
|
|
Protection |
|
Protection |
|
Protection |
|
Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
Protection |
|
Protection |
|
Protection |
|
Protection |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
purchased(b) |
|
sold |
|
purchased |
|
sold |
|
Total |
|
purchased(b) |
|
sold |
|
purchased |
|
sold |
|
Total |
|
Credit default swaps |
|
$ |
2,818,450 |
|
|
$ |
2,840,813 |
|
|
$ |
24,913 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
5,684,358 |
|
|
$ |
2,661,657 |
|
|
$ |
2,658,825 |
|
|
$ |
23,523 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
5,344,420 |
|
Other credit
derivatives(a) |
|
|
56,379 |
|
|
|
104,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,785 |
|
|
|
34,250 |
|
|
|
93,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,026 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,874,829 |
|
|
$ |
2,945,219 |
|
|
$ |
24,913 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
5,845,143 |
|
|
$ |
2,695,907 |
|
|
$ |
2,752,601 |
|
|
$ |
23,523 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
5,472,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily consists of total return swaps and credit default swap options. |
|
(b) |
|
Included $2,835 billion and $2,662 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively, of notional exposure where the Firm has sold protection on the identical
underlying reference instruments. |
Dealer/client business
Within the dealer/client business, the Firm actively manages credit derivatives by buying and
selling credit protection, predominantly on corporate debt obligations, according to client demand.
For further information, see Note 5 on pages 107113 of this Form 10-Q.
At March 31, 2011, the total notional amount of protection purchased and sold increased by $371.5
billion from December 31, 2010, primarily due to increased activity, particularly in the EMEA
region.
Credit portfolio activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of single-name and portfolio credit derivatives |
|
Notional amount of protection purchased and sold |
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Credit derivatives used to manage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and lending-related commitments |
|
$ |
6,668 |
|
|
$ |
6,698 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
18,245 |
|
|
|
16,825 |
|
|
Total protection purchased |
|
|
24,913 |
|
|
|
23,523 |
|
Total protection sold |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
Credit derivatives hedges notional, net |
|
$ |
24,731 |
|
|
$ |
23,108 |
|
|
The credit derivatives used by JPMorgan Chase for credit portfolio management activities do
not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP; these derivatives are reported at fair value,
with gains and losses recognized in principal transactions revenue. In contrast, the loans and
lending-related commitments being risk-managed are accounted for on an accrual basis. This
asymmetry in accounting treatment, between loans and lending-related commitments and the credit
derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities, causes earnings volatility that is not
representative, in the Firms view, of the true changes in value of the Firms overall credit
exposure. The MTM value related to the Firms credit derivatives used for managing credit exposure,
as well as the MTM value related to the CVA (which reflects the credit quality of derivatives
counterparty exposure) are included in the gains and losses realized on credit derivatives
disclosed in the table below. These results can vary from period to period due to market conditions
that affect specific positions in the portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Hedges of lending-related commitments |
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
CVA and hedges of CVA |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Net gains/(losses) |
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
67
Lending-related commitments
JPMorgan Chase uses lending-related financial instruments, such as commitments and guarantees, to
meet the financing needs of its customers. The contractual amount of these financial instruments
represents the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these
commitments or the Firm fulfills its obligation under these guarantees, and should the
counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts.
Wholesale lending-related commitments were $355.6 billion at March 31, 2011, compared with $346.1
billion at December 31, 2010, reflecting increased client activity.
In the Firms view, the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is
not representative of the Firms actual credit risk exposure or funding requirements. In
determining the amount of credit risk exposure the Firm has to wholesale lending-related
commitments, which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments,
the Firm has established a loan-equivalent amount for each commitment; this amount represents the
portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected, based on average
portfolio historical experience, to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor. The
loan-equivalent amounts of the Firms lending-related commitments were $182.9 billion and $178.9
billion as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Country exposure
The Firms wholesale portfolio includes country risk exposures to both developed and emerging
markets. The Firm seeks to diversify its country exposures, including its credit-related lending,
trading and investment activities, whether cross-border or locally funded.
Country exposure under the Firms internal risk management approach is reported based on the
country where the assets of the obligor, counterparty or guarantor are located. Exposure amounts,
including resale agreements, are adjusted for collateral and for credit enhancements (e.g.,
guarantees and letters of credit) provided by third parties; outstandings supported by a guarantor
located outside the country or backed by collateral held outside the country are assigned to the
country of the enhancement provider. In addition, the effect of credit derivative hedges and other
short credit or equity trading positions are taken into consideration. Total exposure measures include activity with
both government and private-sector entities in a country.
Several European countries, including Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy and Ireland, have been subject
to credit deterioration due to weaknesses in their economic and fiscal situations. The Firm is
closely monitoring its exposures to these five countries. Aggregate net exposures to these five
countries as measured under the Firms internal approach were less than $20.0 billion at March 31,
2011, with no one country representing a majority of the exposure. Sovereign exposure in all five
countries represented less than half the aggregate net exposure, with the majority of the exposure
in credit assets. The Firm currently believes its exposure to these five countries is modest
relative to the Firms overall risk exposures and is manageable given the size and types of
exposures to each of the countries and the diversification of the aggregate exposure. The Firm
continues to conduct business and support client activity in these countries and, therefore, the
Firms aggregate net exposures may vary over time. In addition, the net exposures may be affected
by changes in market conditions, including the effects of interest rates and credit spreads on
market valuations.
68
As part of its ongoing country risk management process, the Firm monitors exposure to emerging
market countries, and utilizes country stress tests to measure and manage the risk of extreme loss
associated with a sovereign crisis in one or more countries. There is no common definition of
emerging markets, but the Firm generally includes in its definition those countries whose sovereign
debt ratings are equivalent to A+ or lower. The table below presents the Firms exposure to its
top 10 emerging markets countries based on its internal measurement approach. The selection of
countries is based solely on the Firms largest total exposures by country and does not represent
its view of any actual or potentially adverse credit conditions.
Top 10 emerging markets country exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
Cross-border |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
(in billions) |
|
Lending(a) |
|
Trading(b) |
|
Other(c) |
|
Total |
|
Local(d) |
|
exposure |
|
India |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
South Korea |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
China |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Malaysia |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Chile |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Thailand |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
Cross-border |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
(in billions) |
|
Lending(a) |
|
Trading(b) |
|
Other(c) |
|
Total |
|
Local(d) |
|
exposure |
|
Brazil |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
South Korea |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
India |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
China |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Malaysia |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Thailand |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Russia |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Lending includes loans and accrued interest receivable, interest-earning deposits with banks,
acceptances, other monetary assets, issued letters of credit net of participations, and
undrawn commitments to extend credit. |
|
(b) |
|
Trading includes: (1) issuer exposure on cross-border debt and equity instruments, held both
in trading and investment accounts and adjusted for the impact of issuer hedges, including
credit derivatives; and (2) counterparty exposure on derivative and foreign exchange contracts
as well as securities financing trades (resale agreements and securities borrowed). |
|
(c) |
|
Other represents mainly local exposure funded cross-border, including capital investments in
local entities. |
|
(d) |
|
Local exposure is defined as exposure to a country denominated in local currency and booked
locally. Any exposure not meeting these criteria is defined as cross-border exposure. |
69
CONSUMER CREDIT PORTFOLIO
JPMorgan Chases consumer portfolio consists primarily of residential mortgages, home equity
loans, credit cards, auto loans, student loans and business banking loans. The Firms primary focus
is on serving the prime consumer credit market. For further information on the consumer loans, see
Note 13 on pages 122138 of this Form 10-Q.
A substantial portion of the consumer loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction were
identified as purchased credit-impaired based on an analysis of high-risk characteristics,
including product type, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, FICO scores and delinquency status. These PCI
loans are accounted for on a pool basis, and the pools are considered to be performing. For further
information on PCI loans see Note 13 on pages 122138 of this Form 10Q and Note 14 on pages
220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The credit performance of the consumer portfolio across the entire product spectrum has improved,
but high unemployment and weak overall economic conditions continued to result in elevated
charge-offs, while weak housing prices continued to negatively affect the severity of loss
recognized on residential real estate loans that default. Delinquencies and nonaccrual loans remain
elevated but have improved. Early-stage residential real estate delinquencies (3089 days
delinquent) continued to show improvement in the first quarter of 2011, while late-stage
residential real estate delinquencies (150+ days delinquent) stabilized but remained elevated. The
elevated level of these credit quality metrics is due, in part, to loss-mitigation activities
currently being undertaken and elongated foreclosure processing timelines. Losses related to these
loans continued to be recognized in accordance with the Firms standard charge-off practices, but
some delinquent loans that would otherwise have been foreclosed upon remain in the mortgage and
home equity loan portfolios.
Actions taken by the Firm since 2007 to tighten underwriting and loan qualification standards, and
to eliminate certain products and loan origination channels, have resulted in the reduction of
credit risk and improved credit performance for recent loan vintages.
70
The following table presents managed consumer creditrelated information (including RFS, CS and
residential real estate loans reported in the Corporate/Private Equity segment) for the dates
indicated. For further information about the Firms nonaccrual and charge-off accounting policies,
see Note 14 on pages 220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
Credit |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual |
|
|
exposure |
|
loans(h)(i) |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
net charge-off rates(j) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Consumer, excluding credit card
Loans, excluding PCI loans and loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity senior lien(a) |
|
$ |
24,071 |
|
|
$ |
24,376 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
Home equity junior lien(b) |
|
|
61,182 |
|
|
|
64,009 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
Prime mortgage, including
option ARMs |
|
|
74,682 |
|
|
|
74,539 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
10,841 |
|
|
|
11,287 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
13.43 |
|
Auto(c) |
|
|
47,411 |
|
|
|
48,367 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
16,957 |
|
|
|
16,812 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
Student and other |
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
15,311 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
Total loans, excluding PCI
loans and loans held-for-sale |
|
|
250,233 |
|
|
|
254,701 |
|
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
|
8,833 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
Loans PCI(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
23,973 |
|
|
|
24,459 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
Prime mortgage |
|
|
16,725 |
|
|
|
17,322 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
Option ARMs |
|
|
24,791 |
|
|
|
25,584 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
Total loans PCI |
|
|
70,765 |
|
|
|
72,763 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
Total loans retained |
|
|
320,998 |
|
|
|
327,464 |
|
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
|
8,833 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
Loans held-for-sale(e) |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer, excluding credit card loans |
|
|
321,186 |
|
|
|
327,618 |
|
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
|
8,833 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
Lending-related commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity senior lien(a)(f) |
|
|
17,406 |
|
|
|
17,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity junior lien(b)(f) |
|
|
30,146 |
|
|
|
30,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
5,947 |
|
|
|
5,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business banking |
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student and other |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lending-related
commitments |
|
|
64,560 |
|
|
|
65,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer exposure, excluding credit card |
|
|
385,746 |
|
|
|
393,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained(g) |
|
|
124,791 |
|
|
|
135,524 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
11.75 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
4,012 |
|
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit card loans |
|
|
128,803 |
|
|
|
137,676 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
11.75 |
|
|
Lending-related commitments(f) |
|
|
565,813 |
|
|
|
547,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit card exposure |
|
|
694,616 |
|
|
|
684,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer credit portfolio |
|
$ |
1,080,362 |
|
|
$ |
1,077,924 |
|
|
$ |
8,574 |
|
|
$ |
8,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
|
$ |
6,951 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
Memo: Total consumer credit portfolio,
excluding PCI |
|
$ |
1,009,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,005,161 |
|
|
$ |
8,574 |
|
|
$ |
8,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
|
$ |
6,951 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents loans where JPMorgan Chase holds the first security interest on the property. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents loans where JPMorgan Chase holds a security interest that is subordinate in rank
to other liens. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, excluded operating leaserelated assets of $3.9
billion and $3.7 billion, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
Charge-offs are not recorded on PCI loans until actual losses exceed estimated losses that
were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. To date, no
charge-offs have been recorded for these loans. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents prime mortgage loans held-for-sale. |
|
(f) |
|
The credit card and home equity lending-related commitments represent the total available
lines of credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate,
that all available lines of credit would be used at the same time. For credit card commitments
and home equity commitments (if certain conditions are met), the Firm can reduce or cancel
these lines of credit by providing the borrower prior notice or, in some cases, without notice
as permitted by law. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes billed finance charges and fees net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. |
|
(h) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, nonaccrual loans excluded: (1) mortgage loans
insured by U.S. government agencies of $9.8 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, that are
accruing at the guaranteed reimbursement rate; and (2) student loans that are 90 days or more
past due and still |
71
|
|
|
|
|
accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP, of $615 million and $625
million, respectively. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is
proceeding normally. In addition, the Firms policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from
being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance. Under guidance issued by
the FFIEC, credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes
180 days past due or within 60 days from receiving notification about a specified event (e.g.,
bankruptcy of the borrower), whichever is earlier. |
|
(i) |
|
Excludes PCI loans that were acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction, which are
accounted for on a pool basis. Since each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a
single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows, the past-due status
of the pools, or that of individual loans within the pools, is not meaningful. Because the
Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of loans, they are all considered to be
performing. |
|
(j) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, average consumer loans held-for-sale were
$3.1 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating net
charge-off rates. |
Consumer, excluding credit card
Portfolio analysis
The following discussion relates to the specific loan and lending-related categories. Purchased
credit-impaired loans are excluded from individual loan product discussions and are addressed
separately below.
Home equity: Home equity loans at March 31, 2011, were $85.3 billion, compared with $88.4 billion
at December 31, 2010. The decrease in this portfolio primarily reflected loan paydowns and
charge-offs. Both senior lien and junior lien nonaccrual loans remained relatively flat compared
with the prior year. Early-stage delinquencies modestly improved from December 31, 2010, while net
charge-offs improved from the prior year. In addition to delinquent accounts, the Firm monitors
current junior lien loans where the borrower has a first mortgage loan which is either delinquent
or has been modified, as such junior lien loans are considered to be at higher risk of delinquency.
The portfolio contained an estimated $4 billion of such junior lien loans. The risk associated with
these junior lien loans was considered in establishing the allowance for loan losses at March 31,
2011.
Mortgage: Mortgage loans at March 31, 2011, including prime, subprime and loans held-for-sale, were
$85.7 billion, compared with $86.0 billion at December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to
charge-offs on delinquent loans, partially offset by prime mortgage originations. Net charge-offs
decreased from the prior year but remained elevated.
Prime mortgages, including option adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) and loans held-for-sale at
March 31, 2011, were $74.9 billion, compared with $74.7 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase
in loans was due to originations, partially offset by charge-offs on delinquent loans. Both
early-stage and late-stage delinquencies showed modest improvement during the first quarter but
remained elevated. Nonaccrual loans showed improvement, but also remained elevated as a result of
ongoing modification activity and foreclosure processing delays. Net charge-offs declined year over
year but remained high.
Option ARM loans, which are included in the prime mortgage portfolio, were $8.2 billion and $8.1
billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, and represented 11% of the prime
mortgage portfolio in both periods. The increase in option ARM loans resulted from the repurchase
of loans previously securitized as the securitization entities were terminated. Option ARM loans
are primarily loans with low LTV ratios and high borrower FICOs. Accordingly, the Firm expects
substantially lower losses on this portfolio when compared with the PCI option ARM pool. As of
March 31, 2011, approximately 7% of the option ARM borrowers were delinquent, 3% were making
interest-only or negatively amortizing payments, and 90% were making amortizing payments.
Substantially all borrowers within the portfolio are subject to risk of payment shock due to future
payment recast as a limited number of these loans have been modified. The cumulative amount of
unpaid interest added to the unpaid principal balance due to negative amortization of option ARMs
was not material at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The Firm estimates the following
balances of option ARM loans will experience a recast that results in a payment increase: $47
million in 2011, $216 million in 2012 and $681 million in 2013. The Firm did not originate option
ARMs and new originations of option ARMs were discontinued by Washington Mutual prior to the date
of JPMorgan Chases acquisition of its banking operations.
Subprime mortgages at March 31, 2011, were $10.8 billion, compared with $11.3 billion at December
31, 2010. The decrease was due to paydowns and charge-offs on delinquent loans. Early-stage
delinquencies improved during the first quarter of 2011. However, delinquencies and nonaccrual
loans remained at elevated levels. Net charge-offs improved significantly from the prior year.
Auto: Auto loans at March 31, 2011, were $47.4 billion, compared with $48.4 billion at December 31,
2010. Loan balances declined due to the impact of increased competition. Delinquent and nonaccrual
loans have decreased. Net charge-offs declined 54% from the prior year as a result of lower
delinquencies and a decline in loss severity due to a strong used-car market nationwide. The auto
loan portfolio reflected a high concentration of prime quality credits.
72
Business banking: Business banking loans at March 31, 2011, were $17.0 billion, compared with $16.8
billion at December 31, 2010. These loans primarily include loans that are collateralized, and
generally include personal loan guarantees, and may also include Small Business Administration
guarantees. Delinquent loans and nonaccrual loans have shown some improvement but nonaccrual loans
continued to remain elevated. Net charge-offs declined from the prior year.
Student and other: Student and other loans at March 31, 2011, were $15.1 billion, compared with
$15.3 billion at December 31, 2010. Other loans primarily include other secured and unsecured
consumer loans. Delinquencies and nonaccrual loans remained elevated, while charge-offs increased
slightly from the prior year quarter.
Purchased credit-impaired loans: PCI loans at March 31, 2011, were $70.8 billion compared with
$72.8 billion at December 31, 2010. This portfolio represents loans acquired in the Washington
Mutual transaction that were recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition.
The Firm regularly updates the amount of principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected
for these loans. Probable decreases in expected loan principal cash flows would trigger the
recognition of impairment through the provision for loan losses. Probable and significant increases
in expected cash flows (e.g., decreased principal credit losses, the net benefit of modifications)
would first reverse any previously recorded allowance for loan losses, with any remaining increase
in the expected cash flows recognized prospectively in interest income over the remaining estimated
lives of the underlying loans.
The Firms allowance for loan losses for the home equity, prime mortgage, subprime mortgage and
option ARM PCI pools was $1.6 billion, $1.8 billion, $98 million and $1.5 billion, respectively, at
both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
Approximately 38% of the option ARM PCI loans were delinquent, 4% were making interest-only or
negatively amortizing payments, and 58% were making amortizing payments. Approximately 35% of
current borrowers are subject to risk of payment shock due to future payment recast; substantially
all of the remaining loans have been modified to a fixed rate fully amortizing loan. The cumulative
amount of unpaid interest added to the unpaid principal balance of the option ARM PCI pool was $1.3
billion and $1.4 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Firm estimates
the following balances of option ARM PCI loans will experience a recast that results in a payment
increase: $745 million in 2011, $2.3 billion in 2012 and $379 million in 2013.
The following table provides a summary of lifetime loss estimates included in both the
nonaccretable difference and the allowance for loan losses. Principal charge-offs will not be
recorded on these pools until the nonaccretable difference has been fully depleted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lifetime loss estimates(a) |
|
|
LTD liquidation losses(b) |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in billions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the original nonaccretable difference established in purchase accounting of $30.5
billion for principal losses only plus additional principal losses recognized subsequent to
acquisition through the provision and allowance for loan losses. The remaining nonaccretable
difference for principal losses only was $12.8 billion and $14.1 billion at March 31, 2011,
and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Life-to-date (LTD) liquidation losses represent realization of loss upon loan resolution. |
Geographic composition and current LTVs of residential real estate loans
The consumer credit portfolio is geographically diverse. The greatest concentration of residential
real estate loans is in California. Excluding mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies
and PCI loans, California-based loans retained represented 24% of total residential real estate
loans retained at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. Of the total residential real estate
loan portfolio retained, excluding mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies and PCI
loans, $84.4 billion, or 54%, were concentrated in California, New York, Arizona, Florida and
Michigan at March 31, 2011, compared with $86.4 billion, or 54%, at December 31, 2010.
The current estimated average LTV ratio for residential real estate loans retained, excluding
mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies and PCI loans, was 84% at March 31, 2011,
compared with 83% at December 31, 2010. Excluding mortgage loans insured by U.S. government
agencies and PCI loans, 25% of the retained portfolio had a current estimated LTV ratio greater
than 100%, and 11% of the retained portfolio had a current estimated LTV ratio greater than 125% at
March 31, 2011, compared with 24% with a current estimated LTV ratio greater than 100%, and
10% with a current estimated LTV ratio greater than 125%, at December 31, 2010. The decline in home
prices since 2007 has a
73
significant impact on the collateral value underlying the Firms residential real
estate loan portfolio. In general, the delinquency rate for loans with high LTV ratios is greater
than the delinquency rate for loans in which the borrower has equity in the collateral. While a
large portion of the loans with current estimated LTV ratios greater than 100% continue to pay and
are current, the continued willingness and ability of these borrowers to pay remains uncertain.
The following table presents the current estimated LTV ratio, as well as the ratio of the carrying
value of the underlying loans to the current estimated collateral value, for PCI loans. Because
such loans were initially measured at fair value, the ratio of the carrying value to the current
estimated collateral value will be lower than the current estimated LTV ratio, which is based on
the unpaid principal balance. The estimated collateral values used to calculate these ratios do not
represent actual appraised loan-level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are
necessarily imprecise and should therefore be viewed as estimates.
LTV ratios and ratios of carrying values to current estimated collateral values PCI loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Ratio of net carrying value |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Unpaid principal |
|
|
Current estimated |
|
|
carrying |
|
|
to current estimated |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
balance(a) |
|
|
LTV ratio(b) |
|
|
value(d) |
|
|
collateral value(d) |
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
27,397 |
|
|
|
119 |
%(c) |
|
$ |
22,390 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
Prime mortgage |
|
|
18,155 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
14,959 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
7,845 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
5,178 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
29,559 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
23,297 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Ratio of net carrying value |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Unpaid principal |
|
|
Current estimated |
|
|
carrying |
|
|
to current estimated |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
balance(a) |
|
|
LTV ratio(b) |
|
|
value(d) |
|
|
collateral value(d) |
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
28,312 |
|
|
|
117 |
%(c) |
|
$ |
22,876 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
Prime mortgage |
|
|
18,928 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
15,556 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
8,042 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
30,791 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
24,090 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current
property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home
valuation models utilizing nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates
incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not
available. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents current estimated combined LTV, which considers all available lien positions
related to the property. All other products are presented without consideration of subordinate
liens on the property. |
|
(d) |
|
Net carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the
consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition and is also net of the allowance for loan
losses, which was $1.6 billion for home equity, $1.8 billion for prime mortgage, $98 million
for subprime mortgage and $1.5 billion for option ARMs at both March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current period
presentation. |
PCI loans in the states of California and Florida represented 53% and 10%, respectively, of
total PCI loans at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The current estimated average LTV
ratios were 120% and 144% for California and Florida loans, respectively, at March 31, 2011,
compared with 118% and 135%, respectively, at December 31, 2010. Continued pressure on housing
prices in California and Florida have contributed negatively to both the current estimated average
LTV ratio and the ratio of net carrying value to current estimated collateral value for loans in
the PCI portfolio. For the PCI portfolio, 64% had a current estimated LTV ratio greater than 100%,
and 33% of the PCI portfolio had a current estimated LTV ratio greater than 125% at March 31, 2011;
this compared with 63% of the PCI portfolio with a current estimated LTV ratio greater than 100%,
and 31% with a current estimated LTV ratio greater than 125%, at December 31, 2010.
While the
current estimated collateral value is greater than the net carrying
value of PCI loans, the ultimate performance of this portfolio is highly dependent on borrowers behavior and ongoing
ability and willingness to continue to make payments on homes with negative equity, as well as on
the cost of alternative housing. For further information on the geographic composition and
current estimated LTVs of residential real estate non PCI and PCI loans, see Note 13 on pages
122138 of this Form 10-Q.
74
Loan modification activities
For additional information about consumer loan modification activities, including consumer loan
modifications accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), see Note 13 on pages 122138
of this Form 10-Q, and Note 14 on pages 139140 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Residential real estate loans: For both the Firms on-balance sheet loans and loans serviced for
others, more than 1,098,000 mortgage modifications have been offered to borrowers and approximately
344,000 have been approved since the beginning of 2009. Of these, approximately 324,000 have
achieved permanent modification as of March 31, 2011. Of the remaining 754,000 modifications, 30%
are in a trial period or still being reviewed for a modification, while 70% have dropped out of the
modification program or otherwise were not eligible for final modification.
The Firm is participating in the U.S. Treasurys MHA programs and is continuing to expand its other
loss-mitigation efforts for financially distressed borrowers who do not qualify for the U.S.
Treasurys programs. The MHA programs include the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and
the Second Lien Modification Program (2MP). The Firms other loss-mitigation programs for
troubled borrowers who do not qualify for HAMP include the traditional modification programs
offered by the GSEs and Ginnie Mae, as well as the Firms proprietary modification programs, which
include concessions similar to those offered under HAMP but with expanded eligibility criteria. In
addition, the Firm has offered modification programs targeted specifically to borrowers with
higher-risk mortgage products.
MHA, as well as the Firms other loss-mitigation programs, generally provide various concessions to
financially troubled borrowers, including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term or
payment extensions, and deferral or forgiveness of principal payments that would have otherwise
been required under the terms of the original agreement. For the 70,200 onbalance sheet loans
modified under HAMP and the Firms other loss-mitigation programs since July 1, 2009, 51% of
permanent loan modifications have included interest rate reductions, 54% have included term or
payment extensions, 10% have included principal deferment and 19% have included principal
forgiveness. Principal forgiveness has been limited to specific modification programs to
higher-risk borrowers. The sum of the percentages of the types of loan modifications exceeds 100%
because, in some cases, the modification of an individual loan includes more than one type of
concession.
Generally, borrowers must make at least three payments under the new terms during a trial
modification period and be successfully re-underwritten with income verification before a mortgage
or home equity loan can be permanently modified. When the Firm modifies home equity lines of
credit, future lending commitments related to the modified loans are canceled as part of the terms
of the modification.
The ultimate success of these modification programs and their impact on reducing credit losses
remains uncertain given the short period of time since modification. The primary indicator used by
management to monitor the success of these programs is the rate at which the modified loans
redefault. Modification redefault rates are affected by a number of factors, including the type of
loan modified, the borrowers overall ability and willingness to repay the modified loan and other
macroeconomic factors. Reduction in payment size for a borrower has shown to be the most
significant driver in improving redefault rates. Modifications completed after July 1, 2009,
whether under HAMP or under the Firms other modification programs, differ from modifications
completed under prior programs in that they are generally fully underwritten after a successful
trial payment period of at least three months. Performance metrics to date for modifications
seasoned more than six months show weighted average redefault rates of 24% and 28% for HAMP and the
Firms other modification programs, respectively. These redefault rates exclude certain recent
modifications that were offered to borrowers who were current on their loans prior to modification,
but who were subject to future recast risk. Redefault rates for these recent modifications are not
meaningful because they have not yet seasoned. While the redefault rates for HAMP and the Firms
other modification programs compare favorably to equivalent metrics for modifications completed
under programs in effect prior to July 1, 2009, ultimate redefault rates will remain uncertain
until modified loans have seasoned.
75
The following table presents information as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, relating
to restructured onbalance sheet residential real estate loans for which concessions have been
granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Modifications of PCI loans continue to be
accounted for and reported as PCI loans, and the impact of the modification is incorporated into
the Firms quarterly assessment of estimated future cash flows. Modifications of consumer loans
other than PCI loans are generally accounted for and reported as TDRs.
Restructured residential real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
On balance |
|
|
on balance |
|
|
On balance |
|
|
on balance |
|
(in millions) |
|
sheet loans |
|
|
sheet loans(d) |
|
|
sheet loans |
|
|
sheet loans(d) |
|
|
Restructured residential real estate loans excluding PCI loans(a)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity senior lien |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Home equity junior lien |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
Total restructured residential real estate loans excluding PCI loans |
|
$ |
6,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,381 |
|
|
$ |
5,344 |
|
|
$ |
1,267 |
|
|
Restructured PCI loans(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
NA | |
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
NA | |
Prime mortgage |
|
|
3,251 |
|
|
NA | |
|
|
3,018 |
|
|
NA | |
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
NA | |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
NA | |
Option ARMs |
|
|
11,832 |
|
|
NA | |
|
|
9,396 |
|
|
NA | |
|
Total restructured PCI loans |
|
$ |
19,109 |
|
|
NA | |
|
$ |
16,235 |
|
|
NA | |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts represent the carrying value of restructured residential real estate loans. |
|
(b) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, $3.6 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, of
loans modified subsequent to repurchase from Ginnie Mae were excluded from loans accounted for
as TDRs. When such loans perform subsequent to modification they are generally sold back into
Ginnie Mae loan pools. Modified loans that do not re-perform become subject to foreclosure.
Substantially all amounts due under the terms of these loans continue to be insured and where
applicable, reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of restructured PCI loans. |
|
(d) |
|
Nonaccrual loans modified in a TDR may be returned to accrual status when repayment is
reasonably assured and the borrower has made a minimum of six payments under the new terms or
three payments subsequent to permanent modification if trial modification payments were made.
As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, nonaccrual loans of $640 million and $580
million, respectively, were TDRs for which the borrowers had not yet made six payments under
their modified terms. |
Foreclosure prevention: Foreclosure is a last resort and the Firm makes significant efforts to
help borrowers stay in their homes. Since the first quarter of 2009, the Firm has prevented two
foreclosures (through loan modification, short sales and other foreclosure prevention means) for
every foreclosure completed.
The Firm has a well-defined foreclosure prevention process when a borrower fails to pay on his or
her loan. Customer contacts are attempted multiple times in various ways to pursue options other
than foreclosure. In addition, if the Firm is unable to contact a customer, various reviews are
completed of a borrowers facts and circumstances before a foreclosure sale is completed. By the
time of a foreclosure sale, borrowers have not made a payment on average for more than 14 months.
The foreclosure process is governed by laws and regulations established on a state-by-state basis.
In some states, the foreclosure process involves a judicial process requiring filing documents with
a court. In other states, the process is mostly non-judicial, involving various processes, some of
which require filing documents with governmental agencies. During the third quarter of 2010, the
Firm became aware that certain documents executed by Firm personnel in connection with the
foreclosure process may not have complied with all applicable procedural requirements. For example,
in certain instances, the underlying loan file review and verification of information for inclusion
in an affidavit was performed by Firm personnel other than the affiant, or the affidavit may not
have been properly notarized. The Firm instructed its outside foreclosure counsel to temporarily
suspend foreclosures, foreclosure sales and evictions in 43 states so that it could review its
processes. These matters are the subject of investigation by federal and state officials. For
further discussion, see Mortgage Foreclosure Investigations and Litigation in Note 23 on pages
160169 of this Form 10-Q.
As a result of these foreclosure process issues, the Firm has undertaken remedial actions to ensure
that it satisfies all procedural requirements relating to mortgage foreclosures. These actions
include:
|
|
A complete review of the foreclosure document execution policies and procedures; |
|
|
|
The creation of model affidavits that will comply with all local law requirements and be
used in every case; |
|
|
|
Implementation of enhanced procedures designed to ensure that employees who execute
affidavits personally verify their contents and that the affidavits are executed only in the
physical presence of a licensed notary; |
76
|
|
Extensive training for all personnel who will have responsibility for document execution
going forward and certification of those personnel by outside counsel; |
|
|
|
Implementation of a rigorous quality control double-check review of affidavits completed by
the Firms employees; and |
|
|
|
Review and verification of our revised procedures by outside experts. |
In addition, the Firm has entered into Consent Orders with banking regulators relating to its
residential mortgage servicing, foreclosure and loss mitigation
activities. In their Orders, the regulators have mandated significant
changes to the Firms servicing and default business and outlined
requirements to implement these changes. The Consent Orders require,
among other things, the Firm to submit, within 60 days of the Consent
Orders, a comprehensive action plan setting forth the steps necessary
to ensure the Firms residential mortgage servicing, foreclosure and
loss mitigation activities are conducted in accordance with the
requirements of the Consent Orders, and with respect to certain of
the matters that are the subject of the action plan, they are
required to implement corrective actions within 120 days of the
Consent Orders. Additionally, pursuant to the Consent
Orders, the Firm is required to retain an independent consultant to conduct a review of its
residential foreclosure actions during the period from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2010
(including foreclosure actions brought in respect to loans being serviced), and to remediate any
errors or deficiencies identified by the independent consultant, including, if required, by
reimbursing borrowers for any identified financial injury they may
have incurred. For additional information, see Note 23 on pages
160-169 of this Form 10-Q.
As of
March 31, 2011, the Firm has resumed initiation of new
foreclosure proceedings in nearly all states in which it had
previously suspended such proceedings.
Nonperforming assets
The following table presents information as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, about
consumer, excluding credit card nonperforming assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets(a)
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Nonaccrual loans(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity senior lien |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
Home equity junior lien |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
Prime mortgage, including option ARMs |
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
Auto |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
Student and other |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
|
8,833 |
|
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
Other |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
9,835 |
|
|
$ |
10,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage
loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $9.8 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively,
that are accruing at the guaranteed reimbursement rate; (2) real estate owned insured by U.S.
government agencies of $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion million, respectively; and (3) student
loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S.
government agencies under the FFELP, of $615 million and $625 million, respectively. These
amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes PCI loans that were acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction, which are
accounted for on a pool basis. Since each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a
single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows, the past-due status
of the pools, or that of individual loans within the pools, is not meaningful. Because the
Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of loans, they are all considered to be
performing. |
Nonaccrual loans: Total consumer nonaccrual loans, excluding credit card, were $8.6 billion,
compared with $8.8 billion at December 31, 2010. Nonaccrual loans have stabilized, but remained at
elevated levels. The increase in loan modification activities is expected to continue to result in
elevated levels of nonaccrual loans in the residential real estate portfolios as a result of both
redefault of modified loans as well as a result of the Firms policy that modified loans remain in
nonaccrual status until repayment is reasonably assured and the borrower has made a minimum of six
payments under the new terms or three payments subsequent to permanent modification if trial
modification payments were made. Nonaccrual loans in the residential real estate portfolio totaled
$7.5 billion at March 31, 2011, of which 74% were greater than 150 days past due; this compared
with nonaccrual residential real estate loans of $7.8 billion at December 31, 2010, of which 71%
were greater than 150 days past due. Modified residential real estate loans of $1.4 billion and
$1.3 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, were classified as nonaccrual
loans. Of these modified residential real estate loans, $640 million and $580 million had yet to
make six payments under their modified terms at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively, with the remaining nonaccrual modified loans having redefaulted. In the aggregate,
the unpaid principal balance of residential real estate loans greater than 150 days past due was
charged down by approximately 47% and 46% to estimated collateral value at March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
77
Real estate owned (REO): REO assets, excluding those insured by U.S. government agencies,
decreased by $83 million from December 31, 2010, to $1.2 billion.
Credit Card
Total
credit card loans were $128.8 billion at March 31, 2011,
a decrease of $8.9 billion from December 31, 2010, due to seasonality, higher repayment rates, and
runoff of the Washington Mutual portfolio.
For the
retained credit card loan portfolio the 30+ day delinquency rate decreased to 3.57% at March 31, 2011,
from 4.14% at December 31, 2010, while the net charge-off rate decreased to 6.97%, for the three
months ended March 31, 2011, from 11.75% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The delinquency
trend is showing improvement, especially within early-stage delinquencies. Charge-offs have
improved as a result of lower delinquent loans. The credit card portfolio continues to reflect a
well-seasoned, largely rewards-based portfolio that has good U.S. geographic diversification. The
greatest geographic concentration of credit card retained loans is in California which represented 13% of
total retained loans at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. Loan concentration for the top five
states of California, New York, Texas, Florida and Illinois consisted
of $50.3 billion in
receivables, or 40% of the retained loan portfolio, at March 31,
2011, compared with $54.4 billion, or 40%, at
December 31, 2010.
Total
retained credit card loans, excluding the Washington Mutual portfolio, were
$112.4 billion at March 31, 2011, compared with
$121.8 billion at December 31, 2010. The 30+ day
delinquency rate was 3.23% at March 31, 2011, down from
3.73% at December 31, 2010, while the net charge-off rate decreased to 6.29% for the three months
ended March 31, 2011, from 10.54% for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Retained
credit card loans in the Washington Mutual portfolio were $12.4 billion at March 31, 2011,
compared with $13.7 billion at December 31, 2010. The
Washington Mutual portfolios 30+ day
delinquency rate was 6.63% at March 31, 2011, down from 7.74% at December 31, 2010. The net
charge-off rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and 2010 was 12.98%, and 20.62%,
respectively.
Modifications of credit card loans
For additional information about loan modification programs to borrowers, see Modifications of
credit card loans on pages 137138 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm had $9.2 billion and $10.0 billion,
respectively, of onbalance sheet credit card loans outstanding that have been modified in TDRs.
These balances include both credit card loans with modified payment terms and credit card loans
that have reverted back to their pre-modification payment terms. The decrease in modified credit
card loans outstanding from December 31, 2010, to March 31, 2011, is primarily attributable to
a reduction in new modifications, while on-going payments or charge-offs on previously
modified credit card loans also contributed to reducing the balance.
Consistent with the Firms policy, all credit card loans typically remain on accrual status.
However, the Firm establishes an allowance for the estimated uncollectible portion of billed and
accrued interest and fee income on credit card loans, which is reflected as a charge to interest
income.
78
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT EXPOSURE
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) encourages banks to meet the credit needs of borrowers
in all segments of their communities, including neighborhoods with low or moderate incomes.
JPMorgan Chase is a national leader in community development by providing loans, investments and
community development services in communities across the United States.
At both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firms CRA loan portfolio was approximately $16
billion. At March 31, 2001, and December 31, 2010, 64% and 65%, respectively, of the CRA portfolio
were residential mortgage loans; 17% and 15%, respectively, were business banking loans; 9% were
commercial real estate loans at both periods; and 10% and 11%, respectively, were other loans. CRA
nonaccrual loans were 5% and 6% of the Firms nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010, respectively. Net charge-offs in the CRA portfolio were 2% and 3%, respectively, of the
Firms net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
JPMorgan Chases allowance for loan losses covers the wholesale (risk-rated), and consumer
(primarily scored) portfolios. The allowance represents managements estimate of probable credit
losses inherent in the Firms loan portfolio. Management also determines an allowance for wholesale
and consumer (excluding credit card) lending-related commitments using a methodology similar to
that used for the wholesale loans.
For a further discussion of the components of the allowance for credit losses, see Critical
Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 8689 and Note 14
on pages 139140 of this Form
10-Q.
At least quarterly, the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by the Chief Risk Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer and the Controller of the Firm and discussed with the Risk Policy and Audit
Committees of the Board of Directors of the Firm. As of March 31, 2011, JPMorgan Chase deemed the
allowance for credit losses to be appropriate (i.e., sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the
portfolio).
The allowance for credit losses was $30.4 billion at March 31, 2011, a decrease of $2.5 billion
from $33.0 billion at December 31, 2010. The credit card allowance for loan losses decreased $2.0
billion from December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of lower estimated losses. The wholesale
allowance for loan losses decreased by $527 million from December 31, 2010, primarily related to
the impact of loan sales.
The allowance for lending-related commitments for both wholesale and consumer, excluding credit
card, which is reported in other liabilities, was $688 million and $717 million at March 31, 2011,
and December 31, 2010, respectively.
79
The credit ratios in the table below are based on retained loan balances, which exclude loans
held-for-sale and loans accounted for at fair value.
Summary of changes in the allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Wholesale |
|
|
credit card |
|
|
Credit Card |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
credit card |
|
|
Credit Card |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
4,761 |
|
|
$ |
16,471 |
|
|
$ |
11,034 |
|
|
$ |
32,266 |
|
|
$ |
7,145 |
|
|
$ |
14,785 |
|
|
$ |
9,672 |
|
|
$ |
31,602 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
7,353 |
|
|
|
7,494 |
|
Gross charge-offs |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
4,882 |
|
|
|
8,451 |
|
Gross (recoveries) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(624 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
6,991 |
|
Other |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
4,234 |
|
|
$ |
16,475 |
|
|
$ |
9,041 |
|
|
$ |
29,750 |
|
|
$ |
5,942 |
|
|
$ |
16,212 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
$ |
38,186 |
|
|
Impairment methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific(b)(c)(d) |
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
5,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
$ |
5,402 |
|
|
$ |
7,870 |
|
Formula-based(d) |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
10,467 |
|
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
18,893 |
|
|
|
4,385 |
|
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
10,630 |
|
|
|
27,505 |
|
PCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
4,234 |
|
|
$ |
16,475 |
|
|
$ |
9,041 |
|
|
$ |
29,750 |
|
|
$ |
5,942 |
|
|
$ |
16,212 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
$ |
38,186 |
|
|
Allowance for lending-related
commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
711 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
939 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Provision for lending-related
commitments |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
Impairment methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
Formula-based |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
Total allowance for lending-related
commitments |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
4,916 |
|
|
$ |
16,481 |
|
|
$ |
9,041 |
|
|
$ |
30,438 |
|
|
$ |
6,872 |
|
|
$ |
16,222 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
$ |
39,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained loans, end of period |
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
320,998 |
|
|
$ |
124,791 |
|
|
$ |
675,437 |
|
|
$ |
210,211 |
|
|
$ |
347,370 |
|
|
$ |
149,260 |
|
|
$ |
706,841 |
|
Retained loans, average |
|
|
226,544 |
|
|
|
323,961 |
|
|
|
129,535 |
|
|
|
680,040 |
|
|
|
211,599 |
|
|
|
351,159 |
|
|
|
155,790 |
|
|
|
718,548 |
|
PCI loans |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
70,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,821 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
79,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to retained loans |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
|
10.74 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to
retained nonaccrual loans(d) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to
retained nonaccrual loans excluding credit
card |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Net charge-off rates(e) |
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
11.75 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
Credit ratios excluding home lending PCI loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to retained
loans(f) |
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
10.74 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to
retained nonaccrual loans(d)(f) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to
retained nonaccrual loans excluding credit
card(d)(f) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2010, the Firm adopted accounting guidance related to VIEs. Upon
adoption of the guidance, the Firm consolidated its Firm-sponsored credit card securitization
trusts, its Firm-administered multi-seller conduits and certain other consumer loan
securitization entities, primarily mortgage-related. As a result, $7.4 billion, $14 million
and $127 million, respectively, of allowance for loan losses were recorded on-balance sheet
with the consolidation of these entities. For further discussion, see Note 16 on pages
244259 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been
modified in a TDR. |
|
(c) |
|
The asset-specific consumer, excluding credit card, allowance for loan losses includes TDR
reserves of $970 million and $754 million at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
80
|
|
|
(d) |
|
The Firms policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual
status as permitted by regulatory guidance. Under the guidance issued by the FFIEC, credit
card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past
due or within 60 days from receiving notification about a specified event (e.g., bankruptcy of
the borrower), whichever is earlier. |
|
(e) |
|
Charge-offs are not recorded on PCI loans until actual losses exceed estimated losses
recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. |
|
(f) |
|
Excludes the impact of PCI loans acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction. |
Provision for credit losses
The provision for credit losses was $1.2 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2011, down by
$5.8 billion, or 83%, from the prior year. Excluding credit card, the consumer provision for credit
losses was $1.3 billion, down by $2.4 billion, or 64%, from the prior-year driven by the absence of
additions to the allowance for loan losses and lower net charge-offs. The credit card provision for
credit losses was $226 million, down by $3.3 billion, or 94%, from the prior-year driven primarily
by improved delinquency trends and a reduction in the allowance for loan losses as a result of
lower estimated losses. The wholesale provision for credit losses was a benefit of $386 million,
compared with a benefit of $236 million from the prior-year primarily reflecting continued
improvement in the credit environment from the year-ago period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for lending- |
|
Total provision |
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
related commitments |
|
for credit losses |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
(359 |
) |
|
$ |
(257 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(386 |
) |
|
$ |
(236 |
) |
Consumer, excluding credit card |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
3,734 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
Total provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
$ |
6,991 |
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
$ |
7,010 |
|
|
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of the Firms market risk management organization, major market risk drivers
and classification of risks, see pages 142146 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Value-at-risk
JPMorgan Chase utilizes VaR, a statistical risk measure, to estimate the potential loss from
adverse market moves. Each business day, as part of its risk management activities, the Firm
undertakes a comprehensive VaR calculation that includes the majority of its material market risks.
VaR provides a consistent cross-business measure of risk profiles and levels of diversification and
is used for comparing risks across businesses and monitoring limits. These VaR results are reported
to senior management and regulators, and they are utilized in regulatory capital calculations.
The Firm calculates VaR to estimate possible economic outcomes for current positions using
historical data from the previous 12 months. This approach assumes that historical changes in
market values are representative of current risk; this assumption may not always be valid. VaR is
calculated using a one-day time horizon and an expected tail-loss methodology, which approximates a
95% confidence level. This means the Firm would expect to incur losses greater than that predicted
by VaR estimates five times in every 100 trading days, or about 12 to 13 times a year.
81
The table below shows the results of the Firms VaR measure using a 95% confidence level.
Total IB trading VaR by risk type, credit portfolio VaR and other VaR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
At March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
Avg. |
|
|
Min. |
|
|
Max |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
Min. |
|
|
Max |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
IB VaR by risk type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Equities |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Commodities and other |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Diversification benefit to IB trading
VaR |
|
|
(38 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(49 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(37 |
)(a) |
|
|
(43 |
)(a) |
|
IB trading VaR |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Credit portfolio VaR |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Diversification benefit to IB trading
and credit portfolio VaR |
|
|
(7 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(9 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(7 |
)(a) |
|
|
(8 |
)(a) |
|
Total IB trading and credit portfolio VaR |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
Mortgage Banking VaR |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Chief Investment Office (CIO) VaR |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Diversification benefit to total other
VaR |
|
|
(14 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(13 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(13 |
)(a) |
|
|
(16 |
)(a) |
|
Total other VaR |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
Diversification benefit to total IB and
other VaR |
|
|
(57 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(66 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(56 |
)(a) |
|
|
(83 |
)(a) |
|
Total IB and other VaR |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Average VaR and period-end VaR were less than the sum of the VaR of the components
described above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect
reflects the fact that the risks were not perfectly correlated. The risk of a portfolio of
positions is therefore usually less than the sum of the risks of the positions themselves. |
|
(b) |
|
Designated as not meaningful (NM), because the minimum and maximum may occur on different
days for different risk components, and hence it is not meaningful to compute a
portfolio-diversification effect. |
VaR Measurement
IB trading VaR includes substantially all trading activities in IB, including the credit spread
sensitivities of certain mortgage products and syndicated lending facilities that the Firm intends
to distribute. The Firm uses proxies to estimate the VaR for these products, since daily time
series are largely not available. It is likely that using an actual price-based time series for
these products, if available, would affect the VaR results presented. In addition, for certain
products included in IB trading and credit portfolio VaR, particular risk parameters are not fully
captured for example, correlation risk.
Credit portfolio VaR includes the derivative credit valuation adjustment (CVA), hedges of the CVA
and mark-to-market (MTM) hedges of the retained loan portfolio, which are reported in principal
transactions revenue. However, Credit portfolio VaR does not include the retained portfolio, which
is not MTM.
Total other VaR includes certain positions employed as part of the Firms risk management function
within the Chief Investment Office (CIO) and in the Mortgage Banking business. CIO VaR includes
positions, primarily in debt securities and credit products, used to manage structural and other
risks including interest rate, credit and mortgage risks arising from the Firms ongoing business
activities. Mortgage Banking VaR includes the Firms mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans, MSRs
and all related hedges.
In the Firms view, including IB trading and credit portfolio VaR within total other VaR produces a
more complete and transparent perspective of the Firms market risk profile.
As noted above, IB, Credit portfolio and other VaR does not include the retained credit portfolio,
which is not marked to market; however, it does include hedges of those positions. It also does not
include debit valuation adjustments (DVA) taken on derivative and structured liabilities to
reflect the credit quality of the Firm, principal investments (mezzanine financing, tax-oriented
investments, etc.), and certain securities and investments held by the Corporate/Private Equity
line of business, including private equity investments, capital management positions and
longer-term investments managed by CIO. These longer-term positions are managed through the Firms
earnings at risk and other cash flow monitoring processes, rather than by using a VaR measure.
Principal investing activities and Private Equity positions are managed using stress and scenario
analyses. See the DVA Sensitivity table on page 84 of this Form 10-Q for further details. For a
discussion of Corporate/Private Equity, see pages 3839 of this Form 10-Q.
82
First-quarter 2011 VaR results
As presented in the table, average total IB and other VaR totaled $88 million for the first three
months of 2011, compared with $98 million for the comparable 2010 period. The decrease in average
VaR was driven by a decline in market volatility, as well as a reduction in exposures, primarily in
CIO and Mortgage Banking. Average total IB trading and credit portfolio VaR for the first three
months of 2011 was $83 million, compared with $82 million for the first quarter of 2010.
CIO VaR averaged $60 million for the first three months of 2011, compared with $70 million a year
ago. Mortgage Banking VaR averaged $16 million for the first three months of 2011, compared with
$25 million a year ago. Decreases in CIO and Mortgage Banking VaR for 2011 were driven by the
decline in market volatility and position changes.
The Firms average IB and other VaR diversification benefit was $57 million or 39% of the sum for
the first three months of 2011, compared with $66 million or 40% of the sum for the first three
months of 2010. In general, over the course of the year, VaR exposure can vary significantly as
positions change, market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change.
VaR back-testing
The Firm conducts daily back-testing of VaR against its market risk-related revenue, which is
defined as the change in value of: principal transactions revenue for IB and CIO (less Private
Equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term CIO investments); trading-related net interest
income for IB, CIO and Mortgage Banking; IB brokerage commissions, underwriting fees or other
revenue; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the Firm intends to distribute; and
mortgage fees and related income for the Firms mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans, MSRs, and
all related hedges. Daily firmwide market riskrelated revenue excludes gains and losses from DVA.
The following histogram illustrates the daily market riskrelated gains and losses for IB, CIO and
Mortgage Banking positions for the first three months of 2011. The chart shows that the Firm posted
market riskrelated gains on each of the 64 days in this period, with seven days exceeding $160
million.
83
The following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of DVA to a one-basis-point
increase in JPMorgan Chases credit spreads. This sensitivity represents the impact from a
one-basis-point parallel shift in JPMorgan Chases entire credit curve. As credit curves do not
typically move in a parallel fashion, the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a
single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized.
Debit valuation adjustment sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Basis point increase |
(in millions) |
|
in JPMorgan Chases credit spread |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
$35 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
Economic-value stress testing
While VaR reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical
market behavior as an indicator of losses, stress testing captures the Firms exposure to unlikely
but plausible events in abnormal markets using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes
in credit spreads, equity prices, interest rates, currency rates or commodity prices. Scenarios are
updated dynamically and may be redefined on an ongoing basis to reflect current market conditions.
Along with VaR, stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk; it enhances
understanding of the Firms risk profile and loss potential, as stress losses are monitored against
limits. Stress testing is also employed in cross-business risk management. Stress-test results,
trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the Firms senior
management and to the lines of business to allow them to better understand event risksensitive
positions and manage risks with more transparency.
Earnings-at-risk stress testing
The VaR and stress-test measures described above illustrate the total economic sensitivity of the
Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets to changes in market variables. The effect of interest rate
exposure reported on net income is also important. For further discussion on the effect of interest
rate exposure, see pages 145146 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The Firm conducts simulations of changes in net interest income from its nontrading activities
under a variety of interest rate scenarios. Earnings-at-risk tests measure the potential change in
the Firms net interest income, and the corresponding impact to the Firms pretax earnings, over
the following 12 months. These tests highlight exposures to various rate-sensitive factors, such as
the rates themselves (e.g., the prime lending rate), pricing strategies on deposits, optionality
and changes in product mix. The tests include forecasted balance sheet changes, such as asset sales
and securitizations, as well as prepayment and reinvestment behavior. Mortgage prepayment
assumptions are based on current interest rates compared with underlying contractual rates, the
time since origination, and other factors which are updated periodically based on historical
experience and forward market expectations. The balance and pricing assumptions of deposits that
have no stated maturity are based on historical performance, the competitive environment, customer
behavior, and product mix.
Immediate changes in interest rates present a limited view of risk, and so a number of alternative
scenarios are also reviewed. These scenarios include the implied forward curve, nonparallel rate
shifts and severe interest rate shocks on selected key rates. These scenarios are intended to
provide a comprehensive view of JPMorgan Chases earnings at risk over a wide range of outcomes.
JPMorgan Chases 12-month pretax earnings sensitivity profiles as of March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate change in rates |
(in millions) |
|
+200bp |
|
|
+100bp |
|
|
-100bp |
|
|
-200bp |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
|
NM(a) |
|
NM(a) |
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
NM(a) |
|
NM(a) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Downward 100- and 200-basis-point parallel shocks result in a Fed Funds target rate of
zero and negative three- and six-month treasury rates. The earnings-at-risk results of such a
low-probability scenario are not meaningful. |
The change in earnings at risk from December 31, 2010, resulted from investment portfolio
repositioning, partially offset by assumed higher levels of deposit balances. The Firms risk to
rising rates was largely the result of widening deposit margins, which are currently compressed due
to very low short-term interest rates.
Additionally, under another interest rate scenario used by the Firm involving a steeper yield
curve with long-term rates rising by 100 basis points and short-term rates staying at current
levels results in a 12-month pretax earnings benefit of $691 million. The increase in earnings
under this scenario is due to reinvestment of maturing assets at the higher long-term rates, with
funding costs remaining unchanged.
84
PRIVATE EQUITY RISK MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of Private Equity Risk Management, see page 147 of JPMorgan Chases 2010
Annual Report. At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Private Equity
portfolio was $10.1 billion and $8.7 billion, respectively, of which $731 million and $875 million,
respectively, represented securities with publicly available market quotations.
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of JPMorgan Chases Operational Risk Management, see pages 147148 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
REPUTATION AND FIDUCIARY RISK MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of the Firms Reputation and Fiduciary Risk Management, see page 148 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Supervision and Regulation
section on pages 15 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Form 10-K.
Dividends
At March 31, 2011, JPMorgan Chases bank subsidiaries could pay, in the aggregate, $3.1 billion in
dividends to their respective bank holding companies without the prior approval of their relevant
banking regulators.
85
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES USED BY THE FIRM
JPMorgan Chases accounting policies and use of estimates are integral to understanding its
reported results. The Firms most complex accounting estimates require managements judgment to
ascertain the value of assets and liabilities. The Firm has established detailed policies and
control procedures intended to ensure that valuation methods, including any judgments made as part
of such methods, are well-controlled, independently reviewed and applied consistently from period
to period. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for
changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The Firm believes its estimates for
determining the value of its assets and liabilities are appropriate. The following is a brief
description of the Firms critical accounting estimates involving significant valuation judgments.
Allowance for credit losses
JPMorgan Chases allowance for credit losses covers the retained wholesale and consumer loan
portfolios, as well as the Firms wholesale and consumer lending-related commitments. The allowance
for loan losses is intended to adjust the value of the Firms loan assets to reflect probable
credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The allowance for
lending-related commitments is established to cover probable losses in the lending-related
commitments portfolio. For a further discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the
Firms allowance for credit losses, see Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 149150, and Note 15
on pages 239243 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report; for amounts recorded as of March 31, 2011
and 2010, see Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 7981, and Note 14 on pages 139140 of this
Form 10-Q.
As noted in the discussion on page 149 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report, the Firms wholesale
allowance is sensitive to the risk rating assigned to a loan. As of March 31, 2011, assuming a
one-notch downgrade in the Firms internal risk ratings for its entire wholesale portfolio, the
allowance for loan losses for the wholesale portfolio would increase by approximately $1.2 billion.
This sensitivity analysis is hypothetical. In the Firms view, the likelihood of a one-notch
downgrade for all wholesale loans within a short timeframe is remote. The purpose of this analysis
is to provide an indication of the impact of risk ratings on the estimate of the allowance for loan
losses for wholesale loans. It is not intended to imply managements expectation of future
deterioration in risk ratings. Given the process the Firm follows in determining the risk ratings
of its loans, management believes the risk ratings currently assigned to wholesale loans are
appropriate.
86
The allowance for credit losses for the consumer portfolio, including credit card, is sensitive to
changes in the economic environment, delinquency status, the realizable value of collateral, FICO
scores, borrower behavior and other risk factors, and is intended to represent managements best
estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The credit
performance of the consumer portfolio across the entire consumer credit product spectrum has
stabilized but high unemployment and weak overall economic conditions continue to result in an
elevated level of charge-offs, while weak housing prices continue to negatively affect the severity
of losses realized on residential real estate loans that default. Significant judgment is required
to estimate the duration and severity of the recent economic downturn, as well as its potential
impact on housing prices and the labor market. While the allowance for credit losses is highly
sensitive to both home prices and unemployment rates, in the current market it is difficult to
estimate how potential changes in one or both of these factors might affect the allowance for
credit losses. For example, while both factors are important determinants of overall allowance
levels, changes in one factor or the other may not occur at the same rate, or changes may be
directionally inconsistent such that improvement in one factor may offset deterioration in the
other. In addition, changes in these factors would not necessarily be consistent across all
geographies or product types. Finally, it is difficult to predict the extent to which changes in
both or either of these factors would ultimately affect the frequency of losses, the severity of
losses or both; overall loss rates are a function of both the frequency and severity of individual
loan losses.
Fair value of financial instruments, MSRs and commodities inventory
JPMorgan Chase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. The majority of such
assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Certain assets and
liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including loans accounted for at
the lower of cost or fair value that are only subject to fair value adjustments under certain
circumstances.
Assets measured at fair value
The following table includes the Firms assets measured at fair value and the portion of such
assets that are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Total at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at |
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
fair value |
|
|
Level 3 total |
|
fair value |
|
|
Level 3 total |
|
Trading debt and equity instruments(a) |
|
$ |
422.4 |
|
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
$ |
409.4 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
Derivative receivables gross |
|
|
1,340.5 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
1,529.4 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
Netting adjustment |
|
|
(1,261.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,448.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables net |
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
(d) |
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
(d) |
AFS securities |
|
|
334.8 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
316.3 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Loans |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
MSRs |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Private equity investments |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Other(b) |
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
|
905.8 |
|
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
874.3 |
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis(c) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
913.2 |
|
|
$ |
116.1 |
(e) |
|
$ |
884.4 |
|
|
$ |
114.8 |
(e) |
|
Total Firm assets |
|
$ |
2,198.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,117.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as a percentage of total Firm assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Level 3 assets as a percentage of total Firm assets at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes physical commodities generally carried at the lower of cost or fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes certain securities purchased under resale agreements, securities borrowed, accrued
interest receivable and other investments. |
|
(c) |
|
Predominantly includes mortgage, home equity and other loans, where the carrying value is
based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, and on credit card and leveraged lending
loans carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of cost or fair value. |
|
(d) |
|
Derivative receivable and derivative payable balances, and the related cash collateral
received and paid, are presented net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets where there is a
legally enforceable master netting agreement in place with counterparties. For purposes of the
table above, the Firm does not reduce level 3 derivative receivable balances for netting
adjustments, as such an adjustment is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency
of inputs to the valuation. Therefore, the derivative balances reported in the fair value
hierarchy levels are gross of any counterparty netting adjustments. However, if the Firm were
to net such balances within level 3, the reduction in the level 3 derivative receivable and
payable balances would be $12.1 billion and $12.7 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010, respectively, exclusive of the netting benefit associated with cash collateral, which
would further reduce the level 3 balances. |
|
(e) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included $63.0 billion and $66.0 billion,
respectively, of level 3 assets, consisting of recurring and nonrecurring assets carried by
IB. |
87
Valuation
For instruments classified within level 3 of the hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value
may be significant. In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3,
management must first determine the appropriate model to use. Second, due to the lack of
observability of significant inputs, management must assess all relevant empirical data in deriving
valuation inputs including, but not limited to, yield curves, interest rates, volatilities,
equity or debt prices, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. In addition to market information,
models also incorporate transaction details, such as maturity. Finally, management judgment must be
applied to assess the appropriate level of valuation adjustments to reflect counterparty credit
quality, the Firms creditworthiness, constraints on liquidity and unobservable parameters, where
relevant. The judgments made are typically affected by the type of product and its specific
contractual terms, and the level of liquidity for the product or within the market as a whole. For
further discussion of changes in level 3 assets, see Note 3 on pages 94105 of this Form 10-Q.
Imprecision in estimating unobservable market inputs can affect the amount of revenue or loss
recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are
appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different
methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could
result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. For a detailed discussion of
the determination of fair value for individual financial instruments, see Note 3 on pages 170187
of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Purchased credit-impaired loans
In connection with the Washington Mutual transaction, JPMorgan Chase acquired certain loans with
evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and for which it was probable, at
acquisition, that the Firm would be unable to collect all contractually required payments
receivable. These loans are considered to be PCI loans and are accounted for as described in Note
14 on pages 220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. The application of the accounting
guidance for PCI loans requires a number of significant estimates and judgments, such as
determining: (i) which loans are within the scope of PCI accounting guidance, (ii) the fair value
of the PCI loans at acquisition, (iii) how loans are aggregated to apply the guidance on accounting
for pools of loans, and (iv) estimates of cash flows to be collected over the term of the loans.
For additional information on PCI loans, including the significant assumptions, estimates and
judgment involved, see PCI loans on pages 152153 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report and Note
14 on pages 139140 of this Form 10-Q.
As of March 31, 2011, a 1% decrease in expected future principal cash payments for the entire
portfolio of PCI loans would result in the recognition of an allowance for loan losses for these
loans of approximately $650 million.
Goodwill impairment
Management applies significant judgment when testing goodwill for impairment. For a description of
the significant valuation judgments associated with goodwill impairment, see Goodwill impairment on
page 153 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Firm updated the discounted cash flow valuations
of certain consumer lending businesses in RFS and CS, which continue to have elevated risk for
goodwill impairment due to their exposure to U.S. consumer credit risk and the effects of
regulatory and legislative changes. The assumptions used in the valuation of these businesses
include a) estimates of future cash flows for the business (which are dependent on portfolio
outstanding balances, net interest margin, operating expense, credit losses and the amount of
capital necessary given the risk of business activities to meet regulatory capital requirements),
and (b) the cost of equity used to discount those cash flows to a present value. Each of these
factors requires significant judgment and the assumptions used are based on managements best
estimate and most current projections, including the anticipated effects of regulatory and
legislative changes, derived from the Firms business forecasting process reviewed with senior
management. These projections are consistent with the short-term assumptions discussed in the
Business Outlook on pages 810 of this Form 10-Q, and, in the longer term, incorporate a set of
macroeconomic assumptions and the Firms best estimates of long-term growth and returns of its
businesses. Where possible, the Firm uses third-party and peer data to benchmark its assumptions
and estimates.
88
In addition, for its other businesses, the Firm reviewed current conditions (including the
estimated effects of regulatory and legislative changes) and prior projections of business
performance. Based upon the updated valuations for its consumer lending businesses and reviews of
its other businesses, the Firm concluded that goodwill allocated to all of its reporting units was
not impaired at March 31, 2011. However, the fair value of the Firms consumer lending businesses
in RFS and CS each exceeded their carrying values by approximately 18% and 7% respectively and the
associated goodwill remains at an elevated risk of impairment due to their exposure to U.S.
consumer credit risk and the effects of economic, regulatory and legislative changes. For example, in RFS,
such declines could result from deterioration in economic conditions that result in increased
credit losses, including decreases in home prices beyond management expectations. In CS, such
declines could result from deterioration in economic conditions such as increased unemployment
claims or bankruptcy filings that result in increased credit losses or changes in customer behavior
that cause decreased account activity or receivable balances. In both
RFS and CS, such declines could also result from unanticipated effects of
regulatory or legislative changes.
Deterioration in economic market conditions, increased estimates of the effects of recent
regulatory or legislative changes, or additional regulatory or legislative changes may result in
declines in projected business performance beyond managements current expectations. Such declines
in business performance, or increases in the estimated cost of equity, could cause the estimated
fair values of the Firms reporting units or their associated goodwill to decline, which could
result in a material impairment charge to earnings in a future period related to some portion of
the associated goodwill.
For additional information on goodwill, see Note 16 on pages 149150 of this Form 10-Q.
Income taxes
For a description of the significant assumptions, judgments and interpretations associated with the
accounting for income taxes, see Income taxes on page 154 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DEVELOPMENTS
Fair value measurements and disclosures
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance that requires new disclosures, and clarifies existing
disclosure requirements, about fair value measurements. The clarifications and the requirement to
separately disclose transfers of instruments between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy are effective for interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009; the Firm
adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2010. For additional information about the impact of
the adoption of the new fair value measurements guidance, see Note 3 on pages 94105 of this Form
10-Q. In addition, a new requirement to provide purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the
level 3 rollforward on a gross basis is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010. The Firm adopted the new guidance, effective January 1, 2011.
Disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses
In July 2010, the FASB issued guidance that requires enhanced disclosures surrounding the credit
characteristics of the Firms loan portfolio. Under the new guidance, the Firm is required to
disclose its accounting policies; the methods it uses to determine the components of the allowance
for credit losses; and qualitative and quantitative information about the credit risk inherent in
the loan portfolio, including additional information on certain types of loan modifications. For
the Firm, the new disclosures, other than those related to loan modifications, became effective for
the 2010 Annual Report. For additional information, see Notes 13 and 14 on pages 122140 of this
Form 10-Q. The adoption of this guidance only affected JPMorgan Chases disclosures of financing
receivables and not its Consolidated Balance Sheets or results of operations. New disclosures
regarding TDRs will become effective for the third quarter 2011 Form 10-Q.
Determining whether a restructuring is a troubled debt restructuring
In April 2011, the FASB issued guidance to clarify existing standards for determining whether a
restructuring represents a TDR from the perspective of the creditor. The guidance is effective in
the third quarter of 2011, and must be applied retrospective to January 1, 2011. The Firm does not
expect that the implementation of this new guidance will have a
significant impact on the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets or
results of operations.
Accounting
for repurchase and similar agreements
In April
2011, the FASB issued guidance that amends the criteria used to
assess whether repurchase and similar agreements should be accounted
for as financings or sales (purchases) with forward agreements to
repurchase (resell). Specifically, the guidance eliminates
circumstances in which the lack of adequate collateral maintenance
requirements could result in a repurchase agreement being accounted
for as a sale. The guidance is effective for new transactions or
existing transactions that are modified beginning January 1,
2012. The Firm has accounted for its repurchase and similar
agreements as secured financings, and therefore, the Firm does not
expect the application of this guidance will have a significant
impact on the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets or results of
operations.
89
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
4,548 |
|
Lending-and deposit-related fees |
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
Securities gains(a) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
658 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
Other income |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
13,316 |
|
|
|
13,961 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
15,447 |
|
|
|
16,845 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
11,905 |
|
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
25,221 |
|
|
|
27,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
8,263 |
|
|
|
7,276 |
|
Occupancy expense |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
Technology, communications and equipment expense |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
Professional and outside services |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
15,995 |
|
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
4,537 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,136 |
|
|
$ |
2,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average basic shares |
|
|
3,981.6 |
|
|
|
3,970.5 |
|
Weighted-average diluted shares |
|
|
4,014.1 |
|
|
|
3,994.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The following other-than-temporary impairment losses are included in securities gains for
the periods presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
Losses recorded in/(reclassified from) other comprehensive income |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Total credit losses recognized in income |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
90
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions, except share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
23,469 |
|
|
$ |
27,567 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
80,842 |
|
|
|
21,673 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements (included $19,998 and $20,299
at fair value) |
|
|
217,356 |
|
|
|
222,554 |
|
Securities borrowed (included $15,334 and $13,961 at fair value) |
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
|
123,587 |
|
Trading assets (included assets pledged of $100,385 and $73,056) |
|
|
501,148 |
|
|
|
489,892 |
|
Securities (included $334,784 and $316,318 at fair value and assets pledged of $93,668 and $86,891) |
|
|
334,800 |
|
|
|
316,336 |
|
Loans (included $1,805 and $1,976 at fair value) |
|
|
685,996 |
|
|
|
692,927 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(29,750 |
) |
|
|
(32,266 |
) |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
|
|
656,246 |
|
|
|
660,661 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
79,236 |
|
|
|
70,147 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
48,856 |
|
|
|
48,854 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
13,649 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
Other assets (included $19,610 and $18,201 at fair value and assets pledged of $1,603 and $1,485) |
|
|
106,836 |
|
|
|
105,291 |
|
|
Total assets(a) |
|
$ |
2,198,161 |
|
|
$ |
2,117,605 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (included $4,277 and $4,369 at fair value) |
|
$ |
995,829 |
|
|
$ |
930,369 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements (included $6,214
and $4,060 at fair value) |
|
|
285,444 |
|
|
|
276,644 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
46,022 |
|
|
|
35,363 |
|
Other borrowed funds (included $10,616 and $9,931 at fair value) |
|
|
36,704 |
|
|
|
34,325 |
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
141,393 |
|
|
|
146,166 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities (included the allowance for lending-related commitments of
$688 and $717 and $146 and $236 at fair value) |
|
|
171,638 |
|
|
|
170,330 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities (included $1,276 and $1,495
at fair value) |
|
|
70,917 |
|
|
|
77,649 |
|
Long-term debt (included $37,915 and $38,839 at fair value) |
|
|
269,616 |
|
|
|
270,653 |
|
|
Total liabilities(a) |
|
|
2,017,563 |
|
|
|
1,941,499 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 21 and 23 of this Form 10-Q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($1 par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued 780,000 shares) |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Common stock ($1 par value; authorized 9,000,000,000 shares; issued 4,104,933,895 shares) |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
4,105 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
94,660 |
|
|
|
97,415 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
78,342 |
|
|
|
73,998 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
Shares held in RSU Trust, at cost (1,191,389 and 1,192,712 shares) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost (118,308,413 and 194,639,785 shares) |
|
|
(4,968 |
) |
|
|
(8,160 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
180,598 |
|
|
|
176,106 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,198,161 |
|
|
$ |
2,117,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are
consolidated by the Firm at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The difference between
total VIE assets and liabilities represents the Firms interests in those entities, which were
eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
$ |
10,303 |
|
|
$ |
9,837 |
|
Loans |
|
|
84,208 |
|
|
|
95,587 |
|
All other assets |
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
97,852 |
|
|
$ |
108,918 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities |
|
$ |
70,917 |
|
|
$ |
77,649 |
|
All other liabilities |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
72,664 |
|
|
$ |
79,571 |
|
|
The assets of the consolidated VIEs are used to settle the liabilities of those entities.
The holders of the beneficial interests do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan
Chase. At both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm provided limited program-wide
credit enhancement of $2.0 billion related to its Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. For
further discussion, see Note 15 on pages 141149 of this Form 10-Q.
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
91
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except per-share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 and March 31 |
|
$ |
7,800 |
|
|
$ |
8,152 |
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 and March 31 |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
97,415 |
|
|
|
97,982 |
|
Shares issued and commitments to issue common stock for employee
stock-based compensation awards, and related tax effects |
|
|
(2,755 |
) |
|
|
(471 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
|
94,660 |
|
|
|
96,450 |
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
73,998 |
|
|
|
62,481 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,391 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
5,555 |
|
|
|
3,326 |
|
Dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
Common stock ($0.25 and $0.05 per share) |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
|
78,342 |
|
|
|
61,043 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
981 |
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
Shares held in RSU Trust, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 and March 31 |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
(8,160 |
) |
|
|
(7,196 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reissuance from treasury stock |
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
|
(4,968 |
) |
|
|
(5,722 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
180,598 |
|
|
$ |
164,721 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
981 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
5,266 |
|
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
92
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)/provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Investment securities gains |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(610 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(22,920 |
) |
|
|
(6,503 |
) |
Proceeds from sales, securitizations and paydowns of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
21,773 |
|
|
|
7,806 |
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
|
(5,451 |
) |
|
|
(5,979 |
) |
Securities borrowed |
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
(7,099 |
) |
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
(9,051 |
) |
|
|
16,645 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
Trading liabilities |
|
|
(13,879 |
) |
|
|
15,027 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
(8,237 |
) |
Other operating adjustments |
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities |
|
|
(5,979 |
) |
|
|
17,394 |
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
(59,164 |
) |
|
|
4,282 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
(34,703 |
) |
Held-to-maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities |
|
|
20,591 |
|
|
|
37,323 |
|
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
20,945 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
(39,679 |
) |
|
|
(57,647 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
Other changes in loans, net |
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
13,997 |
|
Net cash (used in) business acquisitions or dispositions |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
All other investing activities, net |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
515 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(65,810 |
) |
|
|
(13,862 |
) |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
56,230 |
|
|
|
(19,927 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
8,835 |
|
|
|
33,749 |
|
Commercial paper and other borrowed funds |
|
|
13,294 |
|
|
|
9,102 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings and trust preferred capital debt securities |
|
|
17,056 |
|
|
|
12,352 |
|
Payments of long-term borrowings and trust preferred capital debt securities |
|
|
(27,250 |
) |
|
|
(30,121 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
All other financing activities, net |
|
|
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
67,328 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(4,098 |
) |
|
|
5,216 |
|
Cash and due from banks at the beginning of the period |
|
|
27,567 |
|
|
|
26,206 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at the end of the period |
|
$ |
23,469 |
|
|
$ |
31,422 |
|
|
Cash interest paid |
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
Cash income taxes paid, net |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Effective January 1, 2010, the Firm adopted accounting guidance related to VIEs. Upon
adoption of the guidance, the Firm consolidated noncash assets and liabilities of $87.7
billion and $92.2 billion, respectively. |
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
93
See Glossary of Terms on pages 174177 of this Form 10-Q for definitions of terms used
throughout the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMorgan Chase or the Firm), a financial holding company incorporated
under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading global financial services firm and one of the largest
banking institutions in the United States of America
(U.S.), with operations in more than 60 countries. The Firm
is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers
and small business, commercial
banking, financial transaction processing, asset management and private equity. For a discussion of
the Firms business-segment information, see Note 24 on pages 169171 of this Form 10-Q.
The accounting and financial reporting policies of JPMorgan Chase and its subsidiaries conform to
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP). Additionally, where applicable,
the policies conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory
authorities.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expense, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual
results could be different from these estimates. In the opinion of management, all normal,
recurring adjustments have been included for a fair statement of this interim financial
information.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements, and related notes thereto, included in JPMorgan Chases Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the 2010 Annual Report).
Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
NOTE 2 BUSINESS CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS
Increase in common stock dividend
On March 18, 2011, the Board of Directors raised the Firms quarterly common stock dividend from
$0.05 to $0.25 per share, effective with the dividend paid on April 30, 2011, to shareholders of
record on April 6, 2011.
Stock repurchases
On March 18, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that authorizes the
repurchase of up to $15.0 billion of the Firms common
stock, which supersedes a $10.0 billion
repurchase program approved in 2007. The $15.0 billion authorization
includes shares to be repurchased to offset issuances under the Firms employee stock-based
incentive plans. The actual number of shares repurchased is subject to various factors, including
market conditions, the Firms capital position, internal capital generation, and investment
opportunities. The repurchase program does not include specific price targets or timetables, may be
executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or utilizing Rule
10b5-1 programs, and may be suspended at any time.
For additional information on repurchases see Item 2, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds, on pages 181182 of this Form 10-Q.
NOTE 3 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
For a further discussion of the Firms valuation methodologies for assets, liabilities and
lending-related commitments measured at fair value and the fair value hierarchy, see Note 3 on
pages 170187 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
During the first three months of 2011, no changes were made to the Firms valuation models that
had, or were expected to have, a material impact on the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets or
results of operations.
94
The following table presents the assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31,
2011, and December 31, 2010, by major product category and fair value hierarchy.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hierarchy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Total |
|
March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
Level 1(i) |
|
|
Level 2(i) |
|
|
Level 3(i) |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
resale agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,998 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies(a) |
|
|
27,862 |
|
|
|
9,422 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,475 |
|
Residential nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
Commercial nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
27,862 |
|
|
|
13,010 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,730 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies(a) |
|
|
19,282 |
|
|
|
8,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,111 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11,418 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,390 |
|
Certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances and
commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
NonU.S. government debt securities |
|
|
30,359 |
|
|
|
47,780 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,779 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,708 |
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,331 |
|
Loans(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,759 |
|
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,249 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,434 |
|
|
|
8,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,790 |
|
|
Total debt instruments |
|
|
77,504 |
|
|
|
157,686 |
|
|
|
31,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,128 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
127,889 |
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,406 |
|
Physical commodities(c) |
|
|
16,801 |
|
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,465 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
Total debt and equity instruments(d) |
|
|
222,196 |
|
|
|
166,657 |
|
|
|
33,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422,404 |
|
Derivative receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
931,980 |
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
(906,685 |
) |
|
|
31,182 |
|
Credit(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,368 |
|
|
|
15,605 |
|
|
|
(113,947 |
) |
|
|
8,026 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
155,845 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
(142,969 |
) |
|
|
18,333 |
|
Equity |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
42,520 |
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
|
|
(40,043 |
) |
|
|
8,358 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
67,030 |
|
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
(58,118 |
) |
|
|
12,845 |
|
|
Total derivative receivables(f) |
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
1,303,743 |
|
|
|
33,725 |
|
|
|
(1,261,762 |
) |
|
|
78,744 |
|
|
Total trading assets |
|
|
225,234 |
|
|
|
1,470,400 |
|
|
|
67,276 |
|
|
|
(1,261,762 |
) |
|
|
501,148 |
|
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies(a) |
|
|
103,692 |
|
|
|
18,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,854 |
|
Residential nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,234 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,239 |
|
Commercial nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
103,692 |
|
|
|
78,131 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,076 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies(a) |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,055 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
11,155 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,438 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
NonU.S. government debt securities |
|
|
18,386 |
|
|
|
14,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,250 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
63,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
Collateralized loan obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
14,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,868 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,132 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,407 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
|
125,864 |
|
|
|
193,395 |
|
|
|
15,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,784 |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments(g) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
8,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,584 |
|
All other |
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,026 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
5,471 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
13,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,610 |
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis(h) |
|
$ |
356,569 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,287 |
|
|
$ |
110,678 |
|
|
$ |
(1,261,762 |
) |
|
$ |
905,772 |
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hierarchy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Total |
|
March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
Level 1(i) |
|
|
Level 2(i) |
|
|
Level 3(i) |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,656 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned
or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,214 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,143 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments(d) |
|
|
61,666 |
|
|
|
18,192 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,031 |
|
Derivative payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
895,092 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
(884,016 |
) |
|
|
14,527 |
|
Credit(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,089 |
|
|
|
11,232 |
|
|
|
(112,775 |
) |
|
|
5,546 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
154,407 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
(141,393 |
) |
|
|
18,550 |
|
Equity |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
39,320 |
|
|
|
7,969 |
|
|
|
(35,910 |
) |
|
|
11,453 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
64,276 |
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
|
|
(57,788 |
) |
|
|
11,286 |
|
|
Total derivative payables(f) |
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
1,260,184 |
|
|
|
29,891 |
|
|
|
(1,231,882 |
) |
|
|
61,362 |
|
|
Total trading liabilities |
|
|
64,835 |
|
|
|
1,278,376 |
|
|
|
30,064 |
|
|
|
(1,231,882 |
) |
|
|
141,393 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
13,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,915 |
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis |
|
$ |
64,835 |
|
|
$ |
1,322,965 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
$ |
(1,231,882 |
) |
|
$ |
201,837 |
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hierarchy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2010 (in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
resale
agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,299 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,299 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,961 |
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies(a) |
|
|
36,813 |
|
|
|
10,738 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,725 |
|
Residential nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,494 |
|
Commercial nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,162 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
36,813 |
|
|
|
14,638 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,381 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies(a) |
|
|
12,863 |
|
|
|
9,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,889 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,715 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,972 |
|
Certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances and
commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
31,127 |
|
|
|
38,482 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,306 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,280 |
|
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,226 |
|
Loans(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,736 |
|
|
|
13,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,880 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
7,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,708 |
|
|
Total debt instruments |
|
|
80,803 |
|
|
|
143,868 |
|
|
|
31,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,610 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
124,400 |
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,238 |
|
Physical commodities(c) |
|
|
18,327 |
|
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,035 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and equity instruments(d) |
|
|
223,530 |
|
|
|
152,004 |
|
|
|
33,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,411 |
|
|
Derivative receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
1,120,282 |
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
(1,095,427 |
) |
|
|
32,555 |
|
Credit(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,827 |
|
|
|
17,902 |
|
|
|
(122,004 |
) |
|
|
7,725 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
163,114 |
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
(142,613 |
) |
|
|
25,858 |
|
Equity |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
38,041 |
|
|
|
5,562 |
|
|
|
(39,429 |
) |
|
|
4,204 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
56,076 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
(49,458 |
) |
|
|
10,139 |
|
|
Total derivative receivables(f) |
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
1,489,340 |
|
|
|
35,319 |
|
|
|
(1,448,931 |
) |
|
|
80,481 |
|
|
Total trading assets |
|
|
228,283 |
|
|
|
1,641,344 |
|
|
|
69,196 |
|
|
|
(1,448,931 |
) |
|
|
489,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies(a) |
|
|
104,736 |
|
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,226 |
|
Residential nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,969 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,974 |
|
Commercial nonagency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,403 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
104,736 |
|
|
|
69,862 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,854 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies(a) |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
10,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,348 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
11,272 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,559 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
13,107 |
|
|
|
7,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,777 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
61,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,794 |
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,608 |
|
Collateralized loan obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
13,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,598 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,777 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,082 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
|
120,401 |
|
|
|
181,630 |
|
|
|
14,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,649 |
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments(g) |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,737 |
|
All other |
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
4,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,464 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
5,142 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
12,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,201 |
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis(h) |
|
$ |
353,826 |
|
|
$ |
1,858,762 |
|
|
$ |
110,639 |
|
|
$ |
(1,448,931 |
) |
|
$ |
874,296 |
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hierarchy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2010 (in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,736 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,369 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
loaned or sold under repurchase
agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,959 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,931 |
|
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments(d) |
|
|
58,468 |
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,947 |
|
Derivative payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
1,085,233 |
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
(1,070,057 |
) |
|
|
20,387 |
|
Credit(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,545 |
|
|
|
12,516 |
|
|
|
(119,923 |
) |
|
|
5,138 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
158,908 |
|
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
(139,715 |
) |
|
|
25,015 |
|
Equity |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
39,046 |
|
|
|
7,331 |
|
|
|
(35,949 |
) |
|
|
10,450 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
54,611 |
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
(50,246 |
) |
|
|
8,229 |
|
|
Total derivative payables(f) |
|
|
4,481 |
|
|
|
1,450,343 |
|
|
|
30,285 |
|
|
|
(1,415,890 |
) |
|
|
69,219 |
|
|
Total trading liabilities |
|
|
62,949 |
|
|
|
1,468,768 |
|
|
|
30,339 |
|
|
|
(1,415,890 |
) |
|
|
146,166 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,795 |
|
|
|
13,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,839 |
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
62,949 |
|
|
$ |
1,511,940 |
|
|
$ |
46,097 |
|
|
$ |
(1,415,890 |
) |
|
$ |
205,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise
obligations of $126.3 billion and $137.3 billion respectively, which were predominantly
mortgage-related. |
|
(b) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included within trading loans were $18.9 billion
and $22.7 billion, respectively, of residential first-lien mortgages and $2.5 billion and $2.6
billion, respectively, of commercial first-lien mortgages. Residential mortgage loans include
conforming mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell to U.S. government agencies of
$10.2 billion and $13.1 billion, respectively, and reverse mortgages of $3.9 billion and $4.0
billion, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Physical commodities inventories are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or fair
value. |
|
(d) |
|
Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of
securities sold but not yet purchased (short positions) when the long and short positions have
identical Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures numbers (CUSIPs). |
|
(e) |
|
The level 3 amounts for derivative receivables and derivative payables related to credit
primarily include structured credit derivative instruments. For further information on the
classification of instruments within the valuation hierarchy, see Note 3 on pages 170187 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. |
|
(f) |
|
As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and
derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally
enforceable master netting agreement exists. For purposes of the tables above, the Firm does
not reduce derivative receivables and derivative payables balances for this netting
adjustment, either within or across the levels of the fair value hierarchy, as such netting is
not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an
asset or liability. Therefore, the balances reported in the fair value hierarchy table are
gross of any counterparty netting adjustments. However, if the Firm were to net such balances
within level 3, the reduction in the level 3 derivative receivable and payable balances would
be $12.1 billion and $12.7 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively;
this is exclusive of the netting benefit associated with cash collateral, which would further
reduce the level 3 balances. |
|
(g) |
|
Private equity instruments represent investments within the Corporate/Private Equity line of
business. The cost basis of the private equity investment portfolio totaled $10.1 billion and
$10.0 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(h) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, balances included investments valued at net asset
values of $12.5 billion and $12.1 billion, respectively, of which $6.2 billion and $5.9
billion, respectively, were classified in level 1, $1.9 billion and $2.0 billion,
respectively, in level 2 and $4.4 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively, in level 3. |
|
(i) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the transfers between levels 1, 2 and 3,
were not significant. |
Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements
The following tables include a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts (including changes in fair
value) for financial instruments classified by the Firm within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. When a determination is made to classify a
financial instrument within level 3, the determination is based on the significance of the
unobservable parameters to the overall fair value measurement. However, level 3 financial
instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable
components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources);
accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to
observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology. Also, the Firm risk-manages the
observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions
that are classified within level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy; as these level 1 and level 2
risk management instruments are not included below, the gains or losses in the following tables do
not reflect the effect of the Firms risk management activities related to such level 3
instruments.
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
Three months ended |
|
Fair value |
|
|
realized/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into and/or |
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
related to financial |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
at January 1, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
instruments held |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
Purchases(g) |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
level 3(e) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Residential nonagency |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Commercial nonagency |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and
municipalities |
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Loans |
|
|
13,144 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
7,965 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
(1,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
8,356 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
Total debt instruments |
|
|
31,939 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
4,675 |
|
|
|
(4,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
31,938 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Other |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total debt and equity instruments |
|
|
33,877 |
|
|
|
746 |
(a) |
|
|
4,717 |
|
|
|
(4,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
33,551 |
|
|
|
434 |
(a) |
|
Net derivative receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Credit |
|
|
5,386 |
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
Foreign exchange |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Equity |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(2,146 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
209 |
|
|
Total net derivative receivables |
|
|
5,034 |
|
|
|
516 |
(a) |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,427 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
(537) |
(a) |
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
13,775 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,016 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Other |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
|
14,287 |
|
|
|
487 |
(b) |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,525 |
|
|
|
482 |
(b) |
|
Loans |
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
120 |
(a) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
108 |
(a) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
13,649 |
|
|
|
(751) |
(c) |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
(751) |
(c) |
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments |
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
905 |
(a) |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,853 |
|
|
|
845 |
(a) |
All other |
|
|
4,179 |
|
|
|
60 |
(d) |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
60 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(gains)/losses |
|
Three months ended |
|
Fair value |
|
|
realized/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into and/or |
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
related to financial |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
at January 1, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
instruments held |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
(gains)/losses |
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
level 3(e) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Liabilities(f): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
(4) |
(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
(4) |
(a) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
58 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
58 |
(a) |
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(37) |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
4 |
(d) |
Beneficial interests issued by
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
(6) |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
(7) |
(a) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
13,044 |
|
|
|
62 |
(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
(971 |
) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
13,027 |
|
|
|
258 |
(a) |
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains/(losses) related |
|
Three months ended |
|
Fair value at |
|
|
realized/ |
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
into and/or |
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
to financial |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
January 1, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
settlements, |
|
|
out of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
instruments held |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
net |
|
|
level 3(e) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
Residential nonagency |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Commercial nonagency |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Obligations of U.S. states and
municipalities |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Non-U.S. government debt
securities |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
4,947 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Loans |
|
|
13,218 |
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
15,776 |
|
|
|
(369 |
) |
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
7,975 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
8,078 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Total debt instruments |
|
|
32,284 |
|
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
34,218 |
|
|
|
(483 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Other |
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Total debt and equity
instruments |
|
|
35,166 |
|
|
|
(544 |
)(a) |
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
36,359 |
|
|
|
(391 |
)(a) |
|
Net of derivative receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Credit |
|
|
10,350 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
9,186 |
|
|
|
(718 |
) |
Foreign exchange |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
Equity |
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
247 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
Total net derivative receivables |
|
|
11,352 |
|
|
|
(712 |
)(a) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
10,407 |
|
|
|
(1,131 |
)(a) |
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
12,732 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,571 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Other |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
13,193 |
|
|
|
(143 |
)(b) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,934 |
|
|
|
(55 |
)(b) |
|
Loans |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
1 |
(a) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)(a) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
15,531 |
|
|
|
(96 |
)(c) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
|
|
(96 |
)(c) |
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments |
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
|
148 |
(a) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
31 |
(a) |
All other |
|
|
9,521 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)(d) |
|
|
(5,140 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
4,352 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(gains)/losses |
|
Three months ended |
|
Fair value at |
|
|
realized/ |
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
into and/or |
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
related to financial |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
January 1, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
settlements, |
|
|
out of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
instruments held |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
(gains)/losses |
|
|
net |
|
|
level 3(e) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Liabilities(f): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
)(a) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
)(a) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
(52 |
)(a) |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
(73 |
)(a) |
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
(a) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2 |
(a) |
Accounts payable and other
liabilities |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)(d) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(20 |
)(d) |
Beneficial interests issued by
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)(a) |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)(a) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
18,287 |
|
|
|
(403 |
)(a) |
|
|
(668 |
) |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
17,518 |
|
|
|
(402 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominantly reported in principal transactions revenue, except for changes in fair
value for Retail Financial Services (RFS) mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell,
which are reported in mortgage fees and related income. |
|
(b) |
|
Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale (AFS) securities, as well as
other-than-temporary impairment losses that are recorded in earnings, are reported in
securities gains. Unrealized gains and losses are reported in other comprehensive income
(OCI). Realized gains and losses and foreign exchange remeasurement adjustments recorded in income on AFS
securities were $330 million and $79
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Unrealized gains and losses reported on AFS securities in OCI were $156 million and
$65 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Changes in fair value for RFS mortgage servicing rights are reported in mortgage fees and
related income. |
|
(d) |
|
Predominantly reported in other income. |
|
(e) |
|
All transfers into and/or out of level 3 are assumed to occur at the beginning of the
reporting period. |
|
(f) |
|
Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total Firm liabilities accounted for at fair value
(including liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) were 23% and 22% at
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(g) |
|
Loan originations are included in purchases. |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
Certain assets, liabilities and unfunded lending-related commitments are measured at fair value on
a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are
subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is
evidence of impairment). The following tables present the assets and liabilities carried on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets by caption and level within the valuation hierarchy as of March 31,
2011, and December 31, 2010, for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during
the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hierarchy |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
Level 1(d) |
|
|
Level 2(d) |
|
|
Level 3(d) |
|
|
Total fair value |
|
|
Loans retained(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,418 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
Loans held-for-sale(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
5,011 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
5,179 |
|
|
|
7,054 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,933 |
|
|
$ |
5,431 |
|
|
$ |
7,364 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities(c) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hierarchy |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 (in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total fair value |
|
|
Loans retained(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,484 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
6,174 |
|
Loans held-for-sale(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,796 |
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
9,686 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,874 |
|
|
$ |
4,203 |
|
|
$ |
10,077 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities(c) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects mortgage, home equity and other loans where the carrying value is based on the fair
value of the underlying collateral. |
|
(b) |
|
Predominantly includes credit card loans at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. Loans
held-for-sale are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of cost or fair
value. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents, at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, fair value adjustments associated with
$828 million and $517 million, respectively, of unfunded held-for-sale lending-related
commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio. |
|
(d) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the transfers between levels 1, 2 and 3
were not significant. |
The method used to estimate the fair value of impaired collateral-dependent loans, and other
loans where the carrying value is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral (e.g.,
residential mortgage loans charged off in accordance with regulatory guidance), depends on the type
of collateral (e.g., securities, real estate, nonfinancial assets) underlying the loan. Fair value
of the collateral is estimated based on quoted market prices, broker quotes or independent
appraisals, or by using a discounted cash flow model. For further information, see Note 14 on pages
139140 of this Form 10-Q.
101
Nonrecurring fair value changes
The following table presents the total change in value of assets and liabilities for which a fair
value adjustment has been included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, related to financial instruments held at those dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Loans retained |
|
$ |
(690 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,338 |
) |
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total nonrecurring fair value gains/(losses) |
|
$ |
(682 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,283 |
) |
|
Level 3 analysis
Level 3 assets at March 31, 2011, predominantly include derivative receivables, mortgage servicing
rights (MSRs), collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) held within the AFS securities portfolio,
trading loans, asset-backed trading securities and private equity investments.
|
|
Derivative receivables included $33.7 billion of interest rate, credit, foreign exchange,
equity and commodity contracts classified within level 3 at March 31, 2011. Included within
this balance was $9.8 billion of structured credit derivatives with corporate debt underlying.
In assessing the Firms risk exposure to structured credit derivatives, the Firm believes
consideration should also be given to derivative liabilities with similar, and therefore
offsetting, risk profiles. At March 31, 2010, $5.1 billion of level 3 derivative liabilities
had risk characteristics similar to those of the derivative receivable assets classified in
level 3. |
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights represent the fair value of future cash flows for performing
specified mortgage servicing activities for others (predominantly with respect to residential
mortgage loans). For a further description of the MSR asset, the interest rate risk management
and valuation methodology used for MSRs, including valuation assumptions and sensitivities,
see Note 17 on pages 260263 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report and Note 16 on pages
149152 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
CLOs totaling $14.7 billion were securities backed by corporate loans held in the Firms
AFS securities portfolio. Substantially all of these securities are rated AAA, AA and A
and had an average credit enhancement of 30%. Credit enhancement in CLOs is primarily in the
form of subordination, which is a form of structural credit enhancement where realized losses
associated with assets held by the issuing vehicle are allocated to the various tranches of
securities issued by the vehicle considering their relative seniority. For further discussion,
see Note 11 on pages 116120 of this Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
Trading loans totaling $12.5 billion included $6.5 billion of residential
mortgage whole loans and commercial mortgage loans for which there is limited price
transparency; and $3.9 billion of reverse mortgages for which the principal risk sensitivities
are mortality risk and home prices. The fair value of the commercial and residential mortgage
loans is estimated by projecting expected cash flows, considering relevant borrower-specific
and market factors, and discounting those cash flows at a rate reflecting current market
liquidity. Loans are partially hedged by level 2 instruments, including credit default swaps
and interest rate derivatives, which are observable and liquid. |
Consolidated Balance Sheets changes
Level 3 assets (including assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) were 5% of total
Firm assets at March 31, 2011. The following describes significant changes to level 3 assets during
the quarter.
102
For the three months ended March 31, 2011
Level 3 assets were $116.1 billion at March 31, 2011, reflecting an increase of $1.3 billion
largely by:
|
|
$1.4 billion increase in nonrecurring loans held-for-sale, largely driven by an increase in
credit card balances; |
|
|
|
$1.3 billion increase in asset-backed AFS securities, predominantly driven by purchases of
new issuance CLOs; |
|
|
|
$1.0 billion increase in private equity, largely driven by net increases in investment
valuations in the portfolio and incremental new investments; and |
|
|
|
$1.6 billion decrease in derivative receivables, largely due to tightening of credit
spreads and unwinds. |
Gains and Losses
Included in the tables for the three months ended March 31, 2011
|
|
$905 million gain in private equity, largely driven by net increases in investment
valuations in the portfolio. |
Included in the tables for the three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$1.4 billion of net losses and $493 million of net gains on assets and liabilities,
respectively, measured at fair value on a recurring basis, none of which were individually
significant. |
Credit adjustments
When determining the fair value of an instrument, it may be necessary to record a valuation
adjustment to arrive at an exit price under U.S. GAAP. Valuation adjustments include, but are not
limited to, amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Firms own creditworthiness. The
markets view of the Firms credit quality is reflected in credit spreads observed in the credit
default swap market. For a detailed discussion of the valuation adjustments the Firm considers, see
Note 3 on pages 170187 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table provides the credit adjustments, excluding the effect of any hedging activity,
reflected within the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Derivative receivables balance |
|
$ |
78,744 |
|
|
$ |
80,481 |
|
Derivatives CVA(a) |
|
|
(3,827 |
) |
|
|
(4,362 |
) |
Derivative payables balance |
|
|
61,362 |
|
|
|
69,219 |
|
Derivatives DVA |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(882 |
) |
Structured notes balance(b)(c) |
|
|
52,808 |
|
|
|
53,139 |
|
Structured notes DVA |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(1,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Derivatives credit valuation adjustments (CVA), gross of hedges, includes results managed
by credit portfolio and other lines of business within the Investment Bank (IB). |
|
(b) |
|
Structured notes are recorded within long-term debt, other borrowed funds or deposits on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, based on the tenor and legal form of the note. |
|
(c) |
|
Structured notes are measured at fair value based on the Firms election under the fair value
option. For further information on these elections, see Note 4 on pages 105106 of this Form
10-Q. |
The following table provides the impact of credit adjustments on earnings in the respective
periods, excluding the effect of any hedging activity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Credit adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative CVA(a) |
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
Derivative DVA |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Structured note DVA(b) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Derivatives CVA, gross of hedges, includes results managed by credit portfolio and other
lines of business within IB. |
|
(b) |
|
Structured notes are measured at fair value based on the Firms election under the fair value
option. For further information on these elections, see Note 4 on pages 105106 of this Form
10-Q. |
Additional disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments (including financial
instruments not carried at fair value)
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of financial assets and
liabilities. For additional information regarding the financial instruments within the scope of
this disclosure, and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair value, see
Note 3 on pages 170187 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
103
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of financial assets and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Appreciation/ |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Appreciation/ |
(in billions) |
|
value |
|
fair value |
|
(depreciation) |
|
value |
|
fair value |
|
(depreciation) |
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets for which fair value approximates carrying value |
|
$ |
104.3 |
|
|
$ |
104.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements (included $20.0 and $20.3 at fair value) |
|
|
217.4 |
|
|
|
217.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222.6 |
|
|
|
222.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities borrowed (included $15.3 and $14.0 at fair
value) |
|
|
119.0 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.6 |
|
|
|
123.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
|
501.1 |
|
|
|
501.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489.9 |
|
|
|
489.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities (included $334.8 and $316.3 at fair value) |
|
|
334.8 |
|
|
|
334.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316.3 |
|
|
|
316.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (included $1.8 and $2.0 at fair value)(a) |
|
|
656.2 |
|
|
|
658.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
660.7 |
|
|
|
663.5 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights at fair value |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (included $19.6 and $18.2 at fair value) |
|
|
66.8 |
|
|
|
67.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Total financial assets |
|
$ |
2,091.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,094.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,010.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,013.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (included $4.3 and $4.4 at fair value) |
|
$ |
995.8 |
|
|
$ |
996.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
930.4 |
|
|
$ |
931.5 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold
under repurchase agreements (included $6.2 and $4.1 at
fair value) |
|
|
285.4 |
|
|
|
285.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276.6 |
|
|
|
276.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds (included $10.6 and $9.9 at fair
value)(b) |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.2 |
|
|
|
146.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities (included $0.1 and
$0.2 at fair value) |
|
|
142.6 |
|
|
|
142.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs
(included $1.3 and $1.5 at fair value) |
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Long-term debt and junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures (included $37.9 and $38.8 at fair
value)(b) |
|
|
269.6 |
|
|
|
270.8 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
270.7 |
|
|
|
271.9 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
Total financial liabilities |
|
$ |
1,988.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,990.8 |
|
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1,909.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,912.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
Net appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the
characteristics of the underlying loans (including principal, contractual interest rate and
contractual fees) and other key inputs, including expected lifetime credit losses, interest
rates, prepayment rates, and primary origination or secondary market
spreads. For certain loans, the fair value is measured based upon the
value of the underlying collateral. The difference
between the estimated fair value and carrying value of a financial asset or liability is the
result of the different methodologies used to determine fair value as compared to carrying
value. For example, credit losses are estimated for a financial assets remaining life in a
fair value calculation but are estimated for a loss emergence period in a loan loss reserve
calculation; future loan income (interest and fees) is incorporated in a fair value
calculation but is generally not considered in a loan loss reserve calculation. For a further
discussion of the Firms methodologies for estimating the fair value of loans and
lending-related commitments, see Note 3 pages 171173 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. |
|
(b) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, $23.0 billion of long-term advances from Federal Home Loan Banks
(FHLBs) were reclassified from other borrowed funds to long-term debt. The prior-year period
has been revised to conform with the current presentation. |
The majority of the Firms unfunded lending-related commitments are not carried at fair value
on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, nor are they actively traded. The carrying
value and estimated fair value of the Firms wholesale lendingrelated commitments were as follows
for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
(in billions) |
|
value(a) |
|
fair value |
|
value(a) |
|
fair value |
|
Wholesale lendingrelated commitments |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the allowance for wholesale unfunded lending-related commitments. Excludes the
current carrying values of the guarantee liability and the offsetting asset each recognized at
fair value at the inception of guarantees. |
The Firm does not estimate the fair value of consumer lendingrelated commitments. In many
cases, the Firm can reduce or cancel these commitments by providing the borrower prior notice or,
in some cases, without notice as permitted by law. For a further discussion of the valuation of
lending-related commitments, see Note 3 on pages 171173 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
104
Trading assets and liabilities average balances
Average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Trading assets debt and equity instruments(a) |
|
$ |
417,463 |
|
|
$ |
331,763 |
|
Trading assets derivative receivables |
|
|
85,437 |
|
|
|
78,683 |
|
Trading liabilities debt and equity instruments(a)(b) |
|
|
82,919 |
|
|
|
70,882 |
|
Trading liabilities derivative payables |
|
|
71,288 |
|
|
|
59,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of
securities sold, but not yet purchased (short positions) when the long and short positions
have identical CUSIPs. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily represent securities sold, not yet purchased. |
NOTE 4 FAIR VALUE OPTION
For a discussion of the primary financial instruments for which the fair value option was
previously elected, including the basis for those elections and the determination of
instrument-specific credit risk, where relevant, see Note 4 on pages 187189 of JPMorgan Chases
2010 Annual Report.
Changes in fair value under the fair value option election
The following table presents the changes in fair value included in the Consolidated Statements of
Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, for items for which the fair value
election was made. The profit and loss information presented below only includes the financial
instruments that were elected to be measured at fair value; related risk management instruments,
which are required to be measured at fair value, are not included in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes |
|
|
Principal |
|
Other |
|
in fair value |
|
Principal |
|
Other |
|
in fair value |
(in millions) |
|
transactions |
|
Income |
|
recorded |
|
transactions |
|
income |
|
recorded |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements |
|
$ |
(118 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(118 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
3 |
(c) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
1 |
(c) |
|
|
157 |
|
Loans reported as trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)(c) |
|
|
403 |
|
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
723 |
(c) |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
755 |
(c) |
|
|
371 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
)(d) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Deposits(a) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or
sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Other borrowed funds(a) |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2) |
(d) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk(a) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other changes in fair value(b) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total changes in instrument-specific credit risk related to structured notes were $23
million and $108 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Those totals include adjustments for structured notes classified within deposits and other
borrowed funds, as well as long-term debt. |
|
(b) |
|
Structured notes are debt instruments with embedded derivatives that are tailored to meet a
clients need. The embedded derivative is the primary driver of risk. Although the risk
associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains reported in this table do
not include the income statement impact of such risk management instruments. |
|
(c) |
|
Reported in mortgage fees and related income. |
|
(d) |
|
Reported in other income. |
105
Difference between aggregate fair value and aggregate remaining contractual principal balance
outstanding
The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate
remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
for , long-term debt and long-term beneficial interests for which the fair value option has
been elected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
over/(under) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
over/(under) |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
|
principal |
|
|
|
|
|
principal |
|
principal |
|
|
|
|
|
principal |
(in millions) |
|
outstanding |
|
Fair value |
|
outstanding |
|
outstanding |
|
Fair value |
|
outstanding |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
90 days or more past due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported as trading assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported as trading assets |
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
(4,123 |
) |
|
|
5,246 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
(4,007 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
(4,955 |
) |
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
(4,802 |
) |
All other
performing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported as trading assets |
|
|
38,107 |
|
|
|
32,740 |
|
|
|
(5,367 |
) |
|
|
39,490 |
|
|
|
33,641 |
|
|
|
(5,849 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
46,877 |
|
|
$ |
35,584 |
|
|
$ |
(11,293 |
) |
|
$ |
48,159 |
|
|
$ |
36,446 |
|
|
$ |
(11,713 |
) |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principalprotected debt |
|
$ |
19,820 |
(b) |
|
$ |
20,207 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
20,761 |
(b) |
|
$ |
21,315 |
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
Nonprincipalprotected debt(a) |
|
NA |
|
|
|
17,708 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
17,524 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
NA |
|
|
|
37,915 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
38,839 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
Long-term
beneficial interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principalprotected debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Nonprincipalprotected debt(a) |
|
NA |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
Total long-term beneficial interests |
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected notes. Unlike
principal-protected notes, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of
principal at the maturity of the note, nonprincipal-protected notes do not obligate the Firm
to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but to return an amount based on the
performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note. |
|
(b) |
|
Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance
reflected as the remaining contractual principal is the final principal payment at maturity. |
At both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the contractual amount of letters of credit for
which the fair value option elected was $3.8 billion, with a corresponding fair value of $6
million. For further information regarding off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments,
see Note 30 on pages 275280 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
106
NOTE 5 DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
For a further discussion of the Firms use and accounting policies regarding derivative
instruments, see Note 6 on pages 191199 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Notional amount of derivative contracts
The following table summarizes the notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding as of March
31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amounts(b) |
(in billions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$ |
45,632 |
|
|
$ |
46,299 |
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
9,408 |
|
|
|
9,298 |
|
Written options |
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
4,075 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
Total interest rate contracts |
|
|
63,804 |
|
|
|
63,640 |
|
|
Credit derivatives(a) |
|
|
5,845 |
|
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps |
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
Spot, futures and forwards |
|
|
4,698 |
|
|
|
3,893 |
|
Written options |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
Total foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
8,863 |
|
|
|
7,784 |
|
|
Equity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Written options |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
Total equity contracts |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Spot, futures and forwards |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Written options |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
Total commodity contracts |
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
Total derivative notional amounts |
|
$ |
80,832 |
|
|
$ |
78,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily consists of credit default swaps. For more information on volumes and types of
credit derivative contracts, see the Credit derivatives discussion on pages 112113 of this
Note. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts. |
While the notional amounts disclosed above give an indication of the volume of the Firms
derivatives activity, the notional amounts significantly exceed, in the Firms view, the possible
losses that could arise from such transactions. For most derivative transactions, the notional
amount is not exchanged; it is used simply as a reference to calculate payments.
107
Impact of derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The following tables summarize information on derivative fair values that are reflected on the
Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, by accounting
designation (e.g., whether the derivatives were designated as hedges or not) and contract type.
Free-standing derivatives(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables |
|
Derivative payables |
March 31, 2011 |
|
Not designated |
|
Designated |
|
Total derivative |
|
Not designated |
|
Designated |
|
Total derivative |
(in millions) |
|
as hedges |
|
as hedges |
|
receivables |
|
as hedges |
|
as hedges |
|
payables |
|
Trading assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
932,405 |
|
|
$ |
5,462 |
|
|
$ |
937,867 |
|
|
$ |
897,665 |
|
|
$ |
878 |
|
|
$ |
898,543 |
|
Credit |
|
|
121,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,973 |
|
|
|
118,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,321 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) |
|
|
158,305 |
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
161,302 |
|
|
|
158,890 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
159,943 |
|
Equity |
|
|
48,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,401 |
|
|
|
47,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,363 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
70,850 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
70,963 |
|
|
|
66,896 |
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
69,074 |
|
|
Gross fair value of trading
assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
1,331,934 |
|
|
$ |
8,572 |
|
|
$ |
1,340,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,289,135 |
|
|
$ |
4,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,244 |
|
Netting adjustment(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,261,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,231,882 |
) |
|
Carrying value of derivative
trading assets and trading
liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables |
|
Derivative payables |
December 31, 2010 |
|
Not designated |
|
Designated |
|
Total derivative |
|
Not designated |
|
Designated |
|
Total derivative |
(in millions) |
|
as hedges |
|
as hedges |
|
receivables |
|
as hedges |
|
as hedges |
|
payables |
|
Trading assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
1,121,703 |
|
|
$ |
6,279 |
|
|
$ |
1,127,982 |
|
|
$ |
1,089,604 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
1,090,444 |
|
Credit |
|
|
129,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,729 |
|
|
|
125,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,061 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) |
|
|
165,240 |
|
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
168,471 |
|
|
|
163,671 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
164,730 |
|
Equity |
|
|
43,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,633 |
|
|
|
46,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,399 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
59,573 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
59,597 |
|
|
|
56,397 |
|
|
|
2,078 |
(d) |
|
|
58,475 |
|
|
Gross fair value of trading
assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
1,519,878 |
|
|
$ |
9,534 |
|
|
$ |
1,529,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,481,132 |
|
|
$ |
3,977 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,109 |
|
Netting adjustment(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,448,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,415,890 |
) |
|
Carrying value of derivative
trading assets and trading
liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
80,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected. See Note 4 on
pages 105106 of this Form 10-Q and Note 4 on pages 187189 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report for further information. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes $20 million and $21 million of foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a net
investment hedge at March 31, 2011, and December, 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
U.S. GAAP permits the netting of derivative receivables and payables, and the related cash
collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists
between the Firm and a derivative counterparty. |
|
(d) |
|
Excludes $1.0 billion related to commodity derivatives that are embedded in a debt instrument
and used as fair value hedging instruments that are recorded in the line item of the host
contract (other borrowed funds) for December 31, 2010. |
Derivative receivables and payables fair value
The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative receivables and payables, including
those designated as hedges by contract type after netting adjustments as of March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets-Derivative receivables |
|
Trading liabilities-Derivative payables |
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Contract type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
31,182 |
|
|
$ |
32,555 |
|
|
$ |
14,527 |
|
|
$ |
20,387 |
|
Credit |
|
|
8,026 |
|
|
|
7,725 |
|
|
|
5,546 |
|
|
|
5,138 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
18,333 |
|
|
|
25,858 |
|
|
|
18,550 |
|
|
|
25,015 |
|
Equity |
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
11,453 |
|
|
|
10,450 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
12,845 |
|
|
|
10,139 |
|
|
|
11,286 |
|
|
|
8,229 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
78,744 |
|
|
$ |
80,481 |
|
|
$ |
61,362 |
|
|
$ |
69,219 |
|
|
108
Impact of derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Income
Fair value hedge gains and losses
The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in fair value hedge
accounting relationships, as well as pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives and the
related hedged items for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Firm
includes gains/(losses) on the hedging derivative and the related hedged item in the same line item
in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(losses) recorded in income |
|
Income statement impact due to: |
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
statement |
|
Hedge |
|
Excluded |
(in millions) |
|
Derivatives |
|
Hedged items |
|
impact |
|
ineffectiveness(d) |
|
components(e) |
|
Contract type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate(a) |
|
$ |
(718 |
) |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) |
|
|
(3,206) |
(f) |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
Commodity(c) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
361 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3,997 |
) |
|
$ |
4,357 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(losses) recorded in income |
|
Income statement impact due to: |
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
statement |
|
Hedge |
|
Excluded |
(in millions) |
|
Derivatives |
|
Hedged items |
|
impact |
|
ineffectiveness(d) |
|
components(e) |
|
Contract type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate(a) |
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
(498 |
) |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) |
|
|
1,647 |
(f) |
|
|
(1,657 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Commodity(c) |
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
(1,759 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily consists of hedges of the benchmark (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR))
interest rate risk of fixed-rate long-term debt and AFS securities. Gains and losses were
recorded in net interest income. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of long-term debt and AFS
securities for changes in spot foreign currency rates. Gains and losses related to the
derivatives and the hedged items, due to changes in spot foreign currency rates, were recorded
in principal transactions revenue. |
|
(c) |
|
Consists of overall fair value hedges of certain commodities inventories. Gains and losses
were recorded in principal transactions revenue. |
|
(d) |
|
Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the gain or loss on the designated derivative
instrument does not exactly offset the gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the
hedged risk. |
|
(e) |
|
Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of
hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on a futures or forward contract. Amounts related
to excluded components are recorded in current-period income. |
|
(f) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, included $(3.2) billion and $1.7 billion,
respectively, of revenue related to certain foreign exchange trading derivatives designated as
fair value hedging instruments. |
109
Cash flow hedge gains and losses
The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in cash flow hedge
accounting relationships, and the pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives, for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Firm includes the gain/(loss) on the
hedging derivative in the same line item as the offsetting change in cash flows on the hedged item
in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income (OCI)/(loss)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
ineffectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effective portion |
|
recorded directly |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Total change |
Three months ended |
|
reclassified from |
|
in |
|
Total income |
|
effective portion |
|
in OCI |
March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
AOCI to income |
|
income(d) |
|
statement impact |
|
recorded in OCI |
|
for period |
|
Contract type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate(a) |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
Foreign exchange(b) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
ineffectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effective portion |
|
recorded directly |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Total change |
Three months ended |
|
reclassified from |
|
in |
|
Total income |
|
effective portion |
|
in OCI |
March 31, 2010 (in millions) |
|
AOCI to income |
|
income(d) |
|
statement impact |
|
recorded in OCI |
|
for period |
|
Contract type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate(a) |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
Foreign exchange(b) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily consists of benchmark interest rate hedges of LIBOR-indexed floating-rate
assets and floating-rate liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of non-U.S. dollar-denominated
revenue and expense. The income statement classification of gains and losses follows the
hedged item - primarily net interest income, compensation expense and other expense. |
|
(c) |
|
The Firm did not experience any forecasted transactions that failed to occur for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the cumulative gain or loss on the designated
derivative instrument exceeds the present value of the cumulative expected change in cash
flows on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk. |
Over the next 12 months, the Firm expects that $159 million (after-tax) of net losses recorded
in AOCI at March 31, 2011, related to cash flow hedges will be recognized in income. The maximum
length of time over which forecasted transactions are hedged is 10 years, and such transactions
primarily relate to core lending and borrowing activities.
Net investment hedge gains and losses
The following tables present hedging instruments, by contract type, that were used in net
investment hedge accounting relationships, and the pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such
instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
Excluded components |
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded components |
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
recorded directly |
|
Effective portion |
|
recorded directly |
|
Effective portion |
(in millions) |
|
in income(a) |
|
recorded in OCI |
|
in income(a) |
|
recorded in OCI |
|
Contract type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives |
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
(390 |
) |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
285 |
|
Foreign currency denominated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
(390 |
) |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on a futures or forward contract.
Amounts related to excluded components are recorded in current-period income. There was no
ineffectiveness for net investment hedge accounting relationships during the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. |
110
Risk management derivatives gains and losses (not designated as hedging instruments)
The following table presents nontrading derivatives, by contract type, that were not designated in
hedge relationships, and the pretax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. These derivatives are risk management instruments used to
mitigate or transform the market risk exposures arising from banking activities other than trading
activities, which are discussed separately below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Contract type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate(a) |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
Credit(b) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
Foreign exchange(c) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Commodity(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue, mortgage fees and
related income, and net interest income. |
|
(b) |
|
Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. |
|
(c) |
|
Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue and net interest income. |
Trading derivative gains and losses
The following table presents trading derivatives gains and losses, by contract type, that are
recorded in principal transactions revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The Firm has elected to present derivative gains and losses
related to its trading activities together with the cash instruments with which they are risk
managed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Gains/(losses) recorded in principal transactions revenue |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Type of instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
Credit |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
Foreign exchange(a) |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
Equity |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,157 |
|
|
$ |
4,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2010, the reporting of trading gains and losses was enhanced to include trading gains
and losses related to certain trading derivatives designated as fair value hedging
instruments. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation. |
Credit risk, liquidity risk and credit-related contingent features
The aggregate fair value of net derivative payables that contain contingent collateral or
termination features triggered upon a downgrade was $16.3 billion at March 31, 2011, for which the
Firm has posted collateral of $11.4 billion in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2011,
the impact of a single-notch and two-notch ratings downgrade to JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its
subsidiaries, primarily JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.),
would have required $1.9 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, of additional collateral to be
posted by the Firm. In addition, at March 31, 2011, the impact of single-notch and two-notch
ratings downgrades to JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries, primarily JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., related to contracts with termination triggers would have required the Firm to settle trades
with a fair value of $382 million and $1.1 billion, respectively.
The following tables show the carrying value of derivative receivables and payables after netting
adjustments and collateral received as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables |
|
Derivative payables |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Gross derivative fair value |
|
$ |
1,340,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,529,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,109 |
|
Netting adjustment offsetting
receivables/payables |
|
|
(1,197,097 |
) |
|
|
(1,376,969 |
) |
|
|
(1,197,097 |
) |
|
|
(1,376,969 |
) |
Netting adjustment cash collateral received/paid |
|
|
(64,665 |
) |
|
|
(71,962 |
) |
|
|
(34,785 |
) |
|
|
(38,921 |
) |
|
Carrying value on Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
$ |
78,744 |
|
|
$ |
80,481 |
|
|
$ |
61,362 |
|
|
$ |
69,219 |
|
|
111
In addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the tables above, at March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010, the Firm had received liquid securities and other cash collateral in the amount
of $16.2 billion and $16.5 billion, respectively, and had posted liquid securities and other cash
collateral in the amount of $10.2 billion and $10.9 billion, respectively. The Firm also receives
and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions, which is available as
security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions
move, respectively, in the Firms or clients favor. Furthermore, the Firm and its counterparties
hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be
posted, and collateral that the Firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled
as of the reporting date. At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm had received $20.5
billion and $18.0 billion, respectively, and delivered $7.6 billion and $8.4 billion, respectively,
of such additional collateral. These amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and
payables in the tables above, because, at an individual counterparty level, the collateral exceeded
the fair value exposure at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
Credit derivatives
For a more detailed discussion of credit derivatives, including a description of the different
types used by the Firm, see Note 6 on pages 191199 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following tables present a summary of the notional amounts of credit derivatives and
credit-related notes the Firm sold and purchased as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. Upon
a credit event, the Firm as a seller of protection would typically pay out only a percentage of the
full notional amount of net protection sold, as the amount actually required to be paid on the
contracts takes into account the recovery value of the reference obligation at the time of
settlement. The Firm manages the credit risk on contracts to sell protection by purchasing
protection with identical or similar underlying reference entities. Other purchased protection
referenced in the following tables include credit derivatives bought on related, but not identical,
reference positions (including indices, portfolio coverage and other reference points) as well as
protection purchased through credit-related notes.
The Firm does not use notional amounts of credit derivatives as the primary measure of risk
management for such derivatives, because the notional amount does not take into account the
probability of the occurrence of a credit event, the recovery value of the reference obligation, or
related cash instruments and economic hedges, each of which reduces, in the Firms view, the risks
associated with such derivatives.
Total credit derivatives and credit-related notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum payout/Notional amount |
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Protection purchased with |
|
Net protection |
|
Other protection |
(in millions) |
|
Protection sold |
|
identical underlyings(b) |
|
(sold)/purchased(c) |
|
purchased(d) |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
default swaps |
|
$ |
(2,840,995 |
) |
|
$ |
2,809,606 |
|
|
$ |
(31,389 |
) |
|
$ |
33,757 |
|
Other credit
derivatives(a) |
|
|
(104,406 |
) |
|
|
25,687 |
|
|
|
(78,719 |
) |
|
|
30,692 |
|
|
Total credit derivatives |
|
|
(2,945,401 |
) |
|
|
2,835,293 |
|
|
|
(110,108 |
) |
|
|
64,449 |
|
Credit-related notes |
|
|
(1,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,965 |
) |
|
|
3,701 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,947,366 |
) |
|
$ |
2,835,293 |
|
|
$ |
(112,073 |
) |
|
$ |
68,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum payout/Notional amount |
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Protection purchased with |
|
Net protection |
|
Other protection |
(in millions) |
|
Protection sold |
|
identical underlyings(b) |
|
(sold)/purchased(c) |
|
purchased(d) |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
default swaps |
|
$ |
(2,659,240 |
) |
|
$ |
2,652,313 |
|
|
$ |
(6,927 |
) |
|
$ |
32,867 |
|
Other credit
derivatives(a) |
|
|
(93,776 |
) |
|
|
10,016 |
|
|
|
(83,760 |
) |
|
|
24,234 |
|
|
Total credit derivatives |
|
|
(2,753,016 |
) |
|
|
2,662,329 |
|
|
|
(90,687 |
) |
|
|
57,101 |
|
Credit-related notes |
|
|
(2,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,008 |
) |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,755,024 |
) |
|
$ |
2,662,329 |
|
|
$ |
(92,695 |
) |
|
$ |
60,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily consists of total return swaps and credit default swap options. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference
instrument is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of
protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be
greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold. |
|
(c) |
|
Does not take into account the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of
settlement, which would generally reduce the amount the seller of protection pays to the buyer
of protection in determining settlement value. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents protection purchased by the Firm through single-name and index credit default swap
or credit-related notes. |
112
The following tables summarize the notional and fair value amounts of credit derivatives and
credit-related notes as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, where JPMorgan Chase is the
seller of protection. The maturity profile is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the
credit derivative contracts. The ratings profile is based on the rating of the reference entity on
which the credit derivative contract is based. The ratings and maturity profile of protection
purchased are comparable to the profile reflected below.
Protection sold credit derivatives and credit-related notes ratings(a)/maturity profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
<1 year |
|
1-5 years |
|
>5 years |
|
notional amount |
|
Fair value(b) |
|
Risk rating of reference entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
$ |
(186,684 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,224,970 |
) |
|
$ |
(381,466 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,793,120 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,129 |
) |
Noninvestment-grade |
|
|
(163,679 |
) |
|
|
(759,126 |
) |
|
|
(231,441 |
) |
|
|
(1,154,246 |
) |
|
|
(54,503 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(350,363 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,984,096 |
) |
|
$ |
(612,907 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,947,366 |
) |
|
$ |
(66,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
December 31, 2010 (in millions) |
|
<1 year |
|
1-5 years |
|
>5 years |
|
notional amount |
|
Fair value(b) |
|
Risk rating of reference entity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
$ |
(175,618 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,194,695 |
) |
|
$ |
(336,309 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,706,622 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,261 |
) |
Noninvestment-grade |
|
|
(148,434 |
) |
|
|
(702,638 |
) |
|
|
(197,330 |
) |
|
|
(1,048,402 |
) |
|
|
(59,939 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(324,052 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,897,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(533,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,755,024 |
) |
|
$ |
(77,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The ratings scale is based on the Firms internal ratings, which generally correspond to
ratings as defined by S&P and Moodys. |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts are shown on a gross basis, before the benefit of legally enforceable master netting
agreements and cash collateral held by the Firm. |
NOTE 6 NONINTEREST REVENUE
For a discussion of the components of and accounting policies for the Firms other noninterest
revenue, see Note 7 on pages 199200 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table presents the components of investment banking fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Underwriting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
Debt |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
Total underwriting |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
Advisory |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
Total investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
The following table presents principal transactions revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Trading revenue |
|
$ |
3,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,386 |
|
Private equity gains/(losses)(a) |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
$ |
4,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes revenue on private equity investments held in the Private Equity business within
Corporate/Private Equity, as well as those held in other business segments. |
The following table presents components of asset management, administration and commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Asset management: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment management fees
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,327 |
|
All other asset management fees
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
Total asset management fees
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
Total administration fees(a)
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
Commission and other fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage commissions
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
All other commissions and fees
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
Total commissions and fees
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
Total asset management, administration and commissions
|
|
$ |
3,606 |
|
|
$ |
3,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fees for custody, securities lending, funds services and securities clearance. |
113
NOTE 7 INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
For a description of JPMorgan Chases accounting policies regarding interest income and interest
expense, see Note 8 on page 200 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Details of interest income and interest expense were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
9,507 |
|
|
$ |
10,557 |
|
Securities |
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
Trading assets |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Other assets(a) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
15,447 |
|
|
|
16,845 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
Short-term and other liabilities(b)(c) |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
Long-term debt(c) |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
11,905 |
|
|
|
13,710 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
10,736 |
|
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominantly margin loans. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes brokerage customer payables. |
|
(c) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, the long-term portion of advances from FHLBs was reclassified from
other borrowed funds to long-term debt. The related interest expense for the prior-year period
has also been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. |
NOTE 8 PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
For a discussion of JPMorgan Chases pension and other postretirement employee benefit (OPEB)
plans, see Note 9 on pages 201210 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost reported in the
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Firms U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension, defined
contribution and OPEB plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
OPEB plans |
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits earned during the period |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost on benefit obligations |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost/(credit) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Net periodic defined benefit cost |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Other defined benefit pension plans(a) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
Total defined benefit plans |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Total defined contribution plans |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
Total pension and OPEB cost included in compensation expense |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes various defined benefit pension plans which are individually immaterial. |
114
The fair values of plan assets for the U.S. defined benefit pension and OPEB plans and for the
material non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans were $12.5 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively,
as of March 31, 2011, and $12.2 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2010.
See Note 20 on page 155 of this Form 10-Q for further information on unrecognized amounts (i.e.,
net loss and prior service costs/(credit)) reflected in AOCI for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The amount of potential 2011 contributions to the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plans, if
any, is not determinable at this time. For the full year 2011, the cost of funding benefits under
the Firms U.S. non-qualified defined benefit pension plans is expected to total $42 million. The
2011 contributions to the non-U.S. defined benefit pension and OPEB plans are expected to be $166
million and $2 million, respectively.
NOTE 9 EMPLOYEE STOCK-BASED INCENTIVES
For a discussion of the accounting policies and other information relating to employee stock-based
incentives, see Note 10 on pages 210212 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The Firm recognized the following noncash compensation expense related to its various employee
stock-based incentive plans in its Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Cost of prior grants of restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock appreciation
rights (SARs) that are amortized over their applicable vesting periods |
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
Accrual of estimated costs of RSUs and SARs to be granted in future periods
including those to full-career eligible employees |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
Total noncash compensation expense related to employee stock-based incentive plans |
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
941 |
|
|
In the first quarter of 2011, in connection with its annual incentive grant, the Firm granted
55 million RSUs and 14 million SARs with weighted-average grant date fair values of $44.31 per RSU
and $13.12 per SAR.
NOTE 10 NONINTEREST EXPENSE
The following table presents the components of noninterest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Compensation expense |
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
7,276 |
|
Noncompensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy expense |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
Technology, communications and equipment expense |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
Professional and outside services |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
Other expense(a)(b) |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
Total noncompensation expense |
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
8,848 |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
15,995 |
|
|
$ |
16,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, included litigation expense of $1.1 billion
and $2.9 billion, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
The three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, included foreclosed property expense of $210
million and $303 million, respectively. |
115
NOTE 11 SECURITIES
Securities are classified as AFS, held-to-maturity (HTM) or trading. For additional information
regarding AFS and HTM securities, see Note 12 on pages 214218 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report. Trading securities are discussed in Note 3 on pages 94105 of this Form 10-Q.
Securities gains and losses
The following table presents realized gains and losses and credit losses that were recognized in
income from AFS securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
752 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
Net realized gains(a) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Credit losses included in securities gains(b) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
Net securities gains |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Proceeds from securities sold were within approximately 2% of amortized cost. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in income on certain prime
mortgage-backed securities for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and on certain prime
mortgage-backed securities and obligations of U.S. states and municipalities for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. |
The amortized costs and estimated fair values of AFS and HTM securities were as follows for the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
unrealized |
|
unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
unrealized |
|
unrealized |
|
Fair |
(in millions) |
|
cost |
|
gains |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
cost |
|
gains |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
Available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies(a) |
|
$ |
119,503 |
|
|
$ |
2,762 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
121,854 |
|
|
$ |
117,364 |
|
|
$ |
3,159 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
120,226 |
|
Residential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime and Alt-A |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
173 |
(d) |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
250 |
(d) |
|
|
2,004 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
52,946 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
52,977 |
|
|
|
47,089 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
46,970 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
179,393 |
|
|
|
3,626 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
182,076 |
|
|
|
171,795 |
|
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
174,854 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government
agencies(a) |
|
|
7,002 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
7,055 |
|
|
|
11,258 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
11,348 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
11,688 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
11,438 |
|
|
|
11,732 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
11,559 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
33,194 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
33,250 |
|
|
|
20,614 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
20,777 |
|
Corporate debt securities(b) |
|
|
63,455 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
|
|
61,718 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
61,794 |
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
6,085 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
7,278 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7,608 |
|
Collateralized loan
obligations |
|
|
14,459 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
14,868 |
|
|
|
13,336 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
13,598 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,286 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9,407 |
|
|
|
8,968 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9,082 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
328,048 |
|
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
|
2,047 |
(d) |
|
|
331,539 |
|
|
|
310,347 |
|
|
|
5,939 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
(d) |
|
|
314,267 |
|
Available-for-sale equity securities |
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
331,119 |
|
|
$ |
5,712 |
|
|
$ |
2,047 |
(d) |
|
$ |
334,784 |
|
|
$ |
312,241 |
|
|
$ |
6,102 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
(d) |
|
$ |
316,318 |
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities(c) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations with fair values of $91.7
billion and $94.2 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, which were
predominantly mortgage-related. |
|
(b) |
|
Consists primarily of bank debt including sovereign government guaranteed bank debt. |
|
(c) |
|
Consists primarily of mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes a total of $106 million and $133 million (pretax) of unrealized losses related to
prime mortgage-backed securities for which credit losses have been recognized in income at
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. These unrealized losses are not
credit-related and remain reported in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) (AOCI). |
116
Securities impairment
The following tables present the fair value and gross unrealized losses for AFS securities by aging
category at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with gross unrealized losses |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Total |
|
gross |
|
|
Fair |
|
unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
unrealized |
|
fair |
|
unrealized |
March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
Available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
17,342 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
17,511 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
Residential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime and Alt-A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
29,713 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
33,074 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
47,554 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
4,726 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
52,280 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
7,198 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7,216 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
20,103 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20,202 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized loan obligations |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
6,434 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
90,168 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
10,570 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
100,738 |
|
|
|
2,047 |
|
Available-for-sale equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities with gross unrealized losses |
|
$ |
90,168 |
|
|
$ |
1,607 |
|
|
$ |
10,570 |
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
100,738 |
|
|
$ |
2,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with gross unrealized losses |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Total |
|
gross |
|
|
Fair |
|
unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
unrealized |
|
fair |
|
unrealized |
December 31, 2010 (in millions) |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
Available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
14,039 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,039 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
Residential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime and Alt-A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
35,166 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
36,246 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
49,753 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
52,037 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
18,783 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18,873 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Collateralized loan obligations |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6,321 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
6,781 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
88,153 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
9,092 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
97,245 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
Available-for-sale equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total securities with gross unrealized losses |
|
$ |
88,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
$ |
9,094 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
97,247 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
|
117
Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI)
The following table presents credit losses that are included in the securities gains and losses
table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Debt securities the Firm does not intend to sell that have credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses(a) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
Losses recorded in/(reclassified from) other comprehensive income |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Credit losses recognized in income(b) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For initial OTTI, represents the excess of the amortized cost over the fair value of AFS
debt securities. For subsequent impairments of the same security, represents additional
declines in fair value subsequent to previously recorded OTTI, if applicable. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the credit loss component of certain prime mortgage-backed securities and
obligations of U.S. states and municipalities that the Firm does not intend to sell.
Subsequent credit losses may be recorded on securities without a corresponding further decline
in fair value if there has been a decline in expected cash flows. |
Changes in the credit loss component of credit-impaired debt securities
The following table presents a rollforward for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, of
the credit loss component of OTTI losses that have been recognized in income, related to debt
securities that the Firm does not intend to sell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
578 |
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newly credit-impaired securities
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in losses on previously credit-impaired securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
Losses reclassified from other comprehensive income on previously credit-impaired securities
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Reductions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of credit-impaired securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Impact of new accounting guidance related to VIEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
Gross unrealized losses
Gross unrealized losses have generally increased since December 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2011, the
Firm does not intend to sell the securities with a loss position in AOCI, and it is not likely that
the Firm will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Except for the securities reported in the table above for which credit losses have been recognized
in income, the Firm believes that the securities with an unrealized loss in AOCI are not
other-than-temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2011.
Following is a description of the Firms principal security investments with the most significant
unrealized losses that have been existing for 12 months or more as of March 31, 2011, and the key
assumptions used in the Firms estimate of the present value of the cash flows most likely to be
collected from these investments.
Mortgage-backed securities Prime and Alt-A nonagency
As of March 31, 2011, gross unrealized losses related to prime and Alt-A residential
mortgage-backed securities issued by private issuers were $173 million, all of which related to
securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. Approximately 57%
of the total portfolio (by amortized cost) are currently rated below investment- grade; the Firm
has recorded OTTI losses on 67% of the below investment-grade positions. In analyzing prime and
Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities for potential credit losses, the Firm utilizes a
methodology that focuses on loan-level detail to estimate future cash flows, which are then
allocated to the various tranches of the securities. The loan-level analysis primarily considers
current home value, loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, loan type and geographical location of the
underlying property to forecast prepayment, home price, default rate and loss severity. The
forecasted weighted average underlying default rate on the positions was 24% and the related
weighted average loss severity was 49%. Based on this analysis, an OTTI loss of $30 million was
recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2011, on certain
securities related to higher default
rate assumptions, partially offset by lower loss severities. Overall unrealized losses have
decreased since December 31, 2010, as a result of the recovery in security prices due to increased
demand for higher-yielding asset classes and a deceleration in the pace of home price declines due
in part to the U.S. government programs to facilitate financing and to spur home purchases. The
unrealized loss of $173 million is considered temporary, based on managements assessment that the
estimated future cash flows together with the credit enhancement levels for those
118
securities remain sufficient to support the Firms investment. The credit enhancements associated
with the below investment-grade and investment-grade positions are 9% and 43%, respectively.
Asset-backed securities Collateralized loan obligations
As of March 31, 2011, gross unrealized losses related to CLOs were $172 million, of which $167
million related to securities that were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more.
Overall losses have decreased since December 31, 2010, mainly as a result of lower default
forecasts and spread tightening across various asset classes. Substantially all of these securities
are rated AAA, AA and A and have an average credit enhancement of 30%. Credit enhancement in
CLOs is primarily in the form of subordination, which is a form of structural credit enhancement
where realized losses associated with assets held in an issuing vehicle are allocated to the
various tranches of securities issued by the vehicle considering their relative seniority. The key
assumptions considered in analyzing potential credit losses were underlying loan and debt security
defaults and loss severity. Based on current default trends, the Firm assumed collateral default
rates of 2.1% for the first quarter 2011, and 5% thereafter. Further, loss severities were assumed
to be 48% for loans and 82% for debt securities. Losses on collateral were estimated to occur
approximately 18 months after default.
119
Contractual maturities and yields
The following table presents the amortized cost and estimated fair value at March 31, 2011, of
JPMorgan Chases AFS and HTM securities by contractual maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after five |
|
|
|
|
By remaining maturity |
|
Due in one |
|
Due after one year |
|
years through 10 |
|
Due after |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
year or less |
|
through five years |
|
years |
|
10 years(c) |
|
Total |
|
Available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
3,196 |
|
|
$ |
175,844 |
|
|
$ |
179,393 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
|
|
178,484 |
|
|
|
182,076 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
4.77 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
3.71 |
% |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
7,002 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
7,055 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
2.08 |
% |
Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
11,170 |
|
|
$ |
11,688 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
10,895 |
|
|
|
11,438 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
4.68 |
% |
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
4.84 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
3,393 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
Non-U.S. government debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
7,892 |
|
|
$ |
22,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,872 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
33,194 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
7,927 |
|
|
|
22,319 |
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
33,250 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
7.73 |
% |
|
|
2.09 |
% |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
17,255 |
|
|
$ |
40,548 |
|
|
$ |
5,651 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
63,455 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
17,359 |
|
|
|
40,501 |
|
|
|
5,679 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
63,540 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
3,301 |
|
|
$ |
13,704 |
|
|
$ |
12,784 |
|
|
$ |
29,830 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
14,246 |
|
|
|
12,992 |
|
|
|
30,691 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
31,508 |
|
|
$ |
70,581 |
|
|
$ |
25,760 |
|
|
$ |
200,199 |
|
|
$ |
328,048 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
31,667 |
|
|
|
70,775 |
|
|
|
26,352 |
|
|
|
202,745 |
|
|
|
331,539 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
Available-for-sale equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,071 |
|
|
$ |
3,071 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
31,508 |
|
|
$ |
70,581 |
|
|
$ |
25,760 |
|
|
$ |
203,270 |
|
|
$ |
331,119 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
31,667 |
|
|
|
70,775 |
|
|
|
26,352 |
|
|
|
205,990 |
|
|
|
334,784 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Average yield(b) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
|
6.82 |
% |
|
|
6.47 |
% |
|
|
6.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises were the only issuers
whose securities exceeded 10% of JPMorgan Chases total stockholders equity at March 31,
2011. |
|
(b) |
|
The average yield is computed using the effective yield of each security owned at the end of
the period, weighted based on the amortized cost of each security. The effective yield
considers the contractual coupon, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and the
effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable equivalent amounts are used where applicable. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes securities with no stated maturity. Substantially all of the Firms residential
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are due in 10 years or
more, based on contractual maturity. The estimated duration, which reflects anticipated future
prepayments based on a consensus of dealers in the market, is approximately five years for
agency residential mortgage-backed securities, three years for agency residential
collateralized mortgage obligations and five years for nonagency residential collateralized
mortgage obligations. |
120
NOTE 12 SECURITIES FINANCING ACTIVITIES
For a discussion of accounting policies relating to securities financing activities, see Note 13 on
page 219 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. For further information regarding securities
borrowed and securities lending agreements for which the fair value option has been elected, see
Note 4 on pages 105106 of this Form 10-Q.
The following table details the Firms securities financing agreements, all of which are accounted
for as collateralized financings during the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Securities purchased under resale agreements(a) |
|
$ |
216,988 |
|
|
$ |
222,302 |
|
Securities borrowed(b) |
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
|
123,587 |
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements(c) |
|
$ |
259,147 |
|
|
$ |
262,722 |
|
Securities loaned |
|
|
23,124 |
|
|
|
10,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included resale agreements of $20.0 billion and
$20.3 billion, respectively, accounted for at fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included securities borrowed of $15.3 billion and
$14.0 billion, respectively, accounted for at fair value. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included repurchase agreements of $6.2 billion and
$4.1 billion, respectively, accounted for at fair value. |
The amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $125.3 billion and $112.7 billion at
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, as a result of agreements in effect that meet
the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance.
For further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing
agreements, see Note 22 on page 160 of this Form 10-Q.
121
NOTE 13 LOANS
Loan accounting framework
The accounting for a loan depends on managements strategy for the loan, and on whether the loan
was credit-impaired at the date of acquisition. The Firm accounts for and measures the loans as
follows:
|
|
Originated or purchased loans held-for-investment (i.e., retained), other than PCI loans,
are measured at the principal amount outstanding, net of the following: allowance for loan
losses; net charge-offs; interest applied to principal (for loans accounted for on the cost
recovery method); unamortized discounts and premiums; and deferred loan fees or costs. |
|
|
|
Held-for-sale loans are measured at the lower of cost or fair value, with valuation changes
recorded in noninterest revenue. |
|
|
|
Loans used in a trading strategy or risk managed on a fair value basis are measured at fair
value, with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue. |
|
|
|
PCI loans held-for-investment are initially recorded at fair value upon acquisition. |
For a detailed discussion of loans, including accounting policies, see Note 14 on pages 220238 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. See Note 4 on pages 105106 of this Form 10-Q for further
information on the Firms elections of fair value accounting under the fair value option. See Note
3 on pages 94105 of this Form 10-Q for further information on loans carried at fair value and
classified as trading assets.
Loan portfolio
The Firms loan portfolio is divided into three portfolio segments, which are the same segments
used by the Firm to determine the allowance for loan losses: Wholesale; Consumer, excluding credit
card; and Credit Card. Within each portfolio segment, the Firm monitors and assesses the credit
risk in the following classes of loans, based on the risk characteristics of each loan class:
|
|
Wholesale(a) |
Commercial and industrial
Real estate
Financial institutions
Government agencies
Other
|
|
Consumer, excluding |
credit card(b) |
Residential real estate excluding PCI
Home equity senior lien
Home equity junior lien
Prime mortgage, including option
adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs)
Subprime mortgage
Other consumer loans
Auto(c)
Business
banking(c)
Student and other
Residential real estate PCI
Home equity
Prime mortgage
Subprime mortgage
Option ARMs
|
|
|
Credit Card |
Chase, excluding accounts originated by Washington Mutual
Accounts originated by Washington Mutual
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes loans reported in IB, Commercial Banking (CB), Treasury & Securities
Services (TSS), Asset Management (AM) and Corporate/Private Equity segments. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes RFS and residential real estate loans reported in the
Corporate/Private Equity segment. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes risk-rated loans that apply the Firms wholesale methodology
for determining the allowance for loan losses; these loans are managed by RFS
and therefore, for consistency in presentation, are included with the other
consumer loan classes. |
122
The following table summarizes the Firms loan balances by portfolio segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, excluding |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
Wholesale |
|
credit card |
|
Credit Card |
|
Total |
|
Retained |
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
320,998 |
|
|
$ |
124,791 |
|
|
$ |
675,437 |
(a) |
Held-for-sale |
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
4,012 |
|
|
|
8,754 |
|
At fair value |
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
236,007 |
|
|
$ |
321,186 |
|
|
$ |
128,803 |
|
|
$ |
685,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, excluding |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 (in millions) |
|
Wholesale |
|
credit card |
|
Credit Card |
|
Total |
|
Retained |
|
$ |
222,510 |
|
|
$ |
327,464 |
|
|
$ |
135,524 |
|
|
$ |
685,498 |
(a) |
Held-for-sale |
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
5,453 |
|
At fair value |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
227,633 |
|
|
$ |
327,618 |
|
|
$ |
137,676 |
|
|
$ |
692,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans (other than PCI loans and those for which the fair value option has been
selected) are presented net of unearned income, unamortized discounts and premiums, and net
deferred loan costs of $2.4 billion and $1.9 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively. |
The following table provides information about the carrying value of retained loans purchased,
retained loans sold and retained loans reclassified to loans held-for-sale during the periods
indicated. This table excludes loans recorded at fair value. On an on-going basis, the Firm manages
its exposure to credit risk. Selling loans is one way that the Firm reduces its credit exposures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, excluding |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 (in millions) |
|
Wholesale |
|
credit card |
|
Credit Card |
|
Total |
|
Purchases: |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
1,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,115 |
|
Sales: |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
Retained loans reclassified to
held-for-sale |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
The following table provides information about gains and losses on loan sales by portfolio
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Net gains/(losses) on sales of loans (including lower of cost or fair value adjustments)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
Consumer, excluding credit card |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Credit Card |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gains/(losses) on sales of loans (including lower of cost or fair value
adjustments)(a) |
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes sales related to loans accounted for at fair value. |
123
Wholesale loan portfolio
Wholesale loans include loans made to a variety of customers from large corporate and
institutional clients to certain high-net worth individuals. The primary credit quality indicator
for wholesale loans is the risk rating assigned each loan. For further information on the risk
ratings, see Note 14 on pages 220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The table below provides information by class of receivable for the retained loans in the Wholesale
portfolio segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
and industrial |
|
Real estate |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Loans by risk ratings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
$ |
33,942 |
|
|
$ |
31,697 |
|
|
$ |
28,884 |
|
|
$ |
28,504 |
|
Noninvestment-grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncriticized |
|
|
31,943 |
|
|
|
30,874 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
16,425 |
|
Criticized performing |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
5,769 |
|
Criticizedtotal nonaccrual |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
Total noninvestment grade |
|
|
35,793 |
|
|
|
34,879 |
|
|
|
23,936 |
|
|
|
25,131 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
69,735 |
|
|
$ |
66,576 |
|
|
$ |
52,820 |
|
|
$ |
53,635 |
|
|
% of total criticized to total retained loans |
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
14.71 |
% |
|
|
16.23 |
% |
% of nonaccrual loans to total retained loans |
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans by geographic distribution(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-U.S. |
|
$ |
19,298 |
|
|
$ |
17,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
Total U.S. |
|
|
50,437 |
|
|
|
48,845 |
|
|
|
51,307 |
|
|
|
51,672 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
69,735 |
|
|
$ |
66,576 |
|
|
$ |
52,820 |
|
|
$ |
53,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan delinquency(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing |
|
$ |
68,092 |
|
|
$ |
64,501 |
|
|
$ |
50,162 |
|
|
$ |
50,299 |
|
3089 days past due and still accruing |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
90 or more days past due and still accruing(c) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
69,735 |
|
|
$ |
66,576 |
|
|
$ |
52,820 |
|
|
$ |
53,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
U.S. and non-U.S. distribution is determined based predominantly on the domicile of the
borrower. |
|
(b) |
|
For wholesale loans, the past due status of a loan is generally not a significant
indicator of credit quality due to the ongoing review and monitoring of an obligors ability
to meet contractual obligations. For a discussion of more significant factors, see Note 14 on
page 223 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due as to principal and/or interest, but
that are still accruing interest; these loans are considered well-collateralized. |
|
(d) |
|
Other primarily includes loans to special purpose entities and loans to private banking
clients. See Note 1 on pages 164165 of the Firms 2010 Annual
Report for additional information on SPEs. |
The following table presents additional information on the real estate class of loans within
the wholesale portfolio segment for the periods indicated. For further information on real estate
loans, see Note 14 on pages 220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family |
|
Commercial lessors |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Real estate retained loans |
|
$ |
30,501 |
|
|
$ |
30,604 |
|
|
$ |
15,226 |
|
|
$ |
15,796 |
|
Criticized exposure |
|
|
3,623 |
|
|
|
3,798 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
3,593 |
|
% of total real estate retained loans |
|
|
11.88 |
% |
|
|
12.41 |
% |
|
|
18.72 |
% |
|
|
22.75 |
% |
Criticized nonaccrual |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
% of total real estate retained loans |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
6.57 |
% |
|
|
9.81 |
% |
|
124
(table continued from previous page)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
institutions |
|
Government agencies |
|
Other(d) |
|
retained loans |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,940 |
|
|
$ |
22,525 |
|
|
$ |
6,304 |
|
|
$ |
6,871 |
|
|
$ |
59,089 |
|
|
$ |
56,450 |
|
|
$ |
153,159 |
|
|
$ |
146,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,312 |
|
|
|
8,480 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
7,642 |
|
|
|
6,012 |
|
|
|
63,419 |
|
|
|
62,173 |
|
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
8,492 |
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,699 |
|
|
|
8,933 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
8,679 |
|
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
|
76,489 |
|
|
|
76,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,639 |
|
|
$ |
31,458 |
|
|
$ |
6,686 |
|
|
$ |
7,278 |
|
|
$ |
67,768 |
|
|
$ |
63,563 |
|
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
222,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,704 |
|
|
$ |
19,756 |
|
|
$ |
834 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
27,113 |
|
|
$ |
25,831 |
|
|
$ |
72,462 |
|
|
$ |
66,151 |
|
|
|
|
8,935 |
|
|
|
11,702 |
|
|
|
5,852 |
|
|
|
6,408 |
|
|
|
40,655 |
|
|
|
37,732 |
|
|
|
157,186 |
|
|
|
156,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,639 |
|
|
$ |
31,458 |
|
|
$ |
6,686 |
|
|
$ |
7,278 |
|
|
$ |
67,768 |
|
|
$ |
63,563 |
|
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
222,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,454 |
|
|
$ |
31,289 |
|
|
$ |
6,658 |
|
|
$ |
7,222 |
|
|
$ |
66,362 |
|
|
$ |
61,837 |
|
|
$ |
223,728 |
|
|
$ |
215,148 |
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,639 |
|
|
$ |
31,458 |
|
|
$ |
6,686 |
|
|
$ |
7,278 |
|
|
$ |
67,768 |
|
|
$ |
63,563 |
|
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
222,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(table continued from previous page)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial construction and development |
|
Other |
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,294 |
|
|
$ |
3,395 |
|
|
$ |
3,799 |
|
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
$ |
52,820 |
|
|
$ |
53,635 |
|
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
7,769 |
|
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
|
16.24 |
% |
|
|
18.23 |
% |
|
|
20.03 |
% |
|
|
18.13 |
% |
|
|
14.71 |
% |
|
|
16.23 |
% |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
2,364 |
|
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
5.16 |
% |
|
|
5.16 |
% |
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
125
Wholesale impaired loans and loan modifications
Wholesale impaired loans include loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and/or that have
been modified in a TDR. All impaired loans are evaluated for an asset-specific allowance as
described in Note 14 on pages 139140 of this Form 10-Q.
The table below set forth information about the Firms wholesale impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
and industrial |
|
Real estate |
|
institutions |
|
agencies |
|
Other |
|
retained loans |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an
allowance |
|
$ |
1,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
|
$ |
2,510 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
$ |
4,069 |
|
|
$ |
4,868 |
|
Without an
allowance(a) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
Total
impaired
loans |
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
|
$ |
1,669 |
|
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,955 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
$ |
4,498 |
|
|
$ |
5,486 |
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses related to
impaired
loans(b) |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,574 |
|
Unpaid principal balance
of impaired
loans(c) |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
When the discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the
recorded investment in the loan, then the loan does not require an allowance. This typically
occurs when the impaired loans have been partially charged-off and/or there have been interest
payments received and applied to the loan balance. |
|
(b) |
|
The allowance for impaired loans is included in JPMorgan Chases asset-specific
allowance for loan losses. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at March 31, 2001 and December
31, 2010. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various
factors, including charge-offs; interest payments received and applied to the carrying value;
net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discount or premiums on purchased loans. |
The following table presents the Firms average impaired loans for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Average impaired loans |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Government agencies |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
Total(a) |
|
$ |
5,036 |
|
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The related interest income on accruing impaired loans and interest income recognized on
a cash basis were not material for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. |
The following table provides information about the Firms wholesale loans modified in troubled
debt restructurings (TDRs). These TDR loans are included as impaired loans in the above tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
and industrial |
|
Real estate |
|
institutions |
|
agencies |
|
Other |
|
retained loans |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Loans modified in troubled
debt
restructurings(a) |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
TDRs on nonaccrual status |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Additional commitments to
lend to borrowers whose loans
have been modified in TDRs |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These modifications generally provided interest rate concessions to the borrower or
deferral of principal repayments. |
126
Consumer loan portfolio
Consumer loans, excluding credit card loans, consist primarily of residential mortgages, home
equity loans, auto loans, business banking loans, and student and other loans, with a primary focus
on serving the prime consumer credit market. The portfolio also includes home equity loans secured
by junior liens and mortgage loans with interest-only payment options to predominantly prime
borrowers, as well as certain payment-option loans originated by Washington Mutual that may result
in negative amortization.
The table below provides information about consumer retained loans by class, excluding the credit
card loan portfolio segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Residential real estate excluding PCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior lien(a) |
|
$ |
24,071 |
|
|
$ |
24,376 |
|
Junior lien(b) |
|
|
61,182 |
|
|
|
64,009 |
|
Mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime, including option ARMs |
|
|
74,682 |
|
|
|
74,539 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
10,841 |
|
|
|
11,287 |
|
Other consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
47,411 |
|
|
|
48,367 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
16,957 |
|
|
|
16,812 |
|
Student and other |
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
15,311 |
|
Residential real estate PCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
23,973 |
|
|
|
24,459 |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
16,725 |
|
|
|
17,322 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
24,791 |
|
|
|
25,584 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
320,998 |
|
|
$ |
327,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents loans where JPMorgan Chase holds the first security interest on the
property. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents loans where JPMorgan Chase holds a security interest that is subordinate
in rank to other liens. |
Delinquency rates are a primary credit quality indicator for consumer loans. Other credit
quality indicators for consumer loans include:
|
|
For residential real estate loans, including both non-PCI and PCI portfolios: The
current estimated loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, or the combined LTV ratio in the case of loans
with a junior lien, the geographic distribution of the loan collateral, and the borrowers
current or refreshed FICO score. |
|
|
For auto, scored business banking and student loans: Geographic distribution. |
|
|
For risk-rated business banking and auto loans: Risk ratings of the loan, geographic
considerations and whether the loan is considered to be criticized and/or nonaccrual. |
For further information on consumer credit quality indicators, see Note 14 on pages 220238 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
127
Residential real estate excluding PCI loans
The tables below provide information by class for residential real estate (excluding PCI) retained
loans in the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
Senior lien |
|
Junior lien |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Loan delinquency(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and less than 30 days past due |
|
$ |
23,354 |
|
|
$ |
23,615 |
|
|
$ |
59,676 |
|
|
$ |
62,315 |
|
30149 days past due |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
150 or more days past due |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
24,071 |
|
|
$ |
24,376 |
|
|
$ |
61,182 |
|
|
$ |
64,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
90 or more days past due and still accruing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Nonaccrual loans(b) |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
Current estimated LTV ratios(c)(d)(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 125% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
7,026 |
|
|
$ |
6,928 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101% to 125% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
9,390 |
|
|
|
9,403 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80% to 100% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
|
12,603 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 80% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
|
15,478 |
|
|
|
15,994 |
|
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
22,527 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-guaranteed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
24,071 |
|
|
$ |
24,376 |
|
|
$ |
61,182 |
|
|
$ |
64,009 |
|
|
Geographic region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$ |
3,336 |
|
|
$ |
3,348 |
|
|
$ |
14,037 |
|
|
$ |
14,656 |
|
New York |
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
|
|
12,278 |
|
Texas |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
Florida |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
4,248 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
Arizona |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
Washington |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
All other(f) |
|
|
5,175 |
|
|
|
5,264 |
|
|
|
14,471 |
|
|
|
15,194 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
24,071 |
|
|
$ |
24,376 |
|
|
$ |
61,182 |
|
|
$ |
64,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies are included in the delinquency
classifications presented. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current
period presentation. |
|
(b) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, nonaccrual loans excluded mortgage loans
insured by U.S. government agencies of $9.8 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, that are
accruing at the guaranteed reimbursement rate. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of
insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated
current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based
on home valuation models utilizing nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates
incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not
available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral
values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as
estimates. |
|
(d) |
|
Junior lien represents combined LTV, which considers all available lien positions
related to the property. All other products are presented without consideration of subordinate
liens on the property. |
|
(e) |
|
Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrowers most recent credit score, which is
obtained by the Firm at least on a quarterly basis. |
|
(f) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included mortgage loans insured by U.S.
government agencies of $13.0 billion and $12.9 billion, respectively. |
|
(g) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S.
government agencies of $10.4 billion and $11.4 billion, respectively. These amounts were
excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
128
|
|
|
|
|
(table continued from previous page) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages |
|
Total residential real |
|
|
Prime, including option ARMs |
|
Subprime |
|
estate (excluding PCI) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,399 |
|
|
$ |
59,223 |
|
|
$ |
8,236 |
|
|
$ |
8,477 |
|
|
$ |
151,665 |
|
|
$ |
153,630 |
|
|
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
5,784 |
|
|
|
7,158 |
|
|
|
|
11,128 |
|
|
|
11,264 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
13,327 |
|
|
|
13,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,682 |
|
|
$ |
74,539 |
|
|
$ |
10,841 |
|
|
$ |
11,287 |
|
|
$ |
170,776 |
|
|
$ |
174,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.36% |
(g) |
|
|
6.68 |
%(g) |
|
|
24.03 |
% |
|
|
24.90 |
% |
|
|
5.61% |
(g) |
|
|
5.88 |
%(g) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
7,535 |
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,250 |
|
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
11,211 |
|
|
$ |
10,833 |
|
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
5,585 |
|
|
|
5,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
4,733 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
15,799 |
|
|
|
15,616 |
|
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
6,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,652 |
|
|
|
10,720 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
27,078 |
|
|
|
27,838 |
|
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
8,317 |
|
|
|
8,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
|
32,385 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
70,493 |
|
|
|
73,158 |
|
|
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
12,822 |
|
|
|
13,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,995 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,995 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,682 |
|
|
$ |
74,539 |
|
|
$ |
10,841 |
|
|
$ |
11,287 |
|
|
$ |
170,776 |
|
|
$ |
174,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,070 |
|
|
$ |
19,278 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
$ |
1,730 |
|
|
$ |
38,103 |
|
|
$ |
39,012 |
|
|
|
|
9,745 |
|
|
|
9,587 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
26,152 |
|
|
|
26,518 |
|
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
8,634 |
|
|
|
8,747 |
|
|
|
|
4,709 |
|
|
|
4,840 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
10,820 |
|
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
10,020 |
|
|
|
10,116 |
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
4,315 |
|
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
6,732 |
|
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
3,936 |
|
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
5,221 |
|
|
|
|
27,857 |
|
|
|
27,673 |
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
51,685 |
|
|
|
52,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,682 |
|
|
$ |
74,539 |
|
|
$ |
10,841 |
|
|
$ |
11,287 |
|
|
$ |
170,776 |
|
|
$ |
174,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
Residential real estate impaired loans and loan modifications excluding PCI loans
The Firm is participating in the U.S. Treasurys Making Home Affordable (MHA) programs and is
continuing to expand its other loss-mitigation efforts for financially distressed borrowers who do
not qualify for the MHA programs. For further information, see Note 14 on pages 220238 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The tables below set forth information about the Firms residential real estate impaired loans,
excluding PCI. These loans are considered to be impaired as they have been modified in a TDR. All
impaired loans are evaluated for an asset-specific allowance as described in Note 14 on pages
139140 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
Mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime, including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential real |
|
|
Senior lien |
|
Junior lien |
|
option ARMs |
|
Subprime |
|
estate (excluding PCI) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Impaired loans(a)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance |
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
$ |
5,591 |
|
|
$ |
4,557 |
|
Without an
allowance(c) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
Total impaired loans(d) |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
2,990 |
|
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
|
$ |
2,754 |
|
|
$ |
2,751 |
|
|
$ |
6,387 |
|
|
$ |
5,344 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses related
to impaired loans |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
Unpaid principal balance of
impaired loans(e) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
8,461 |
|
|
|
7,195 |
|
Impaired loans on nonaccrual
status |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents loans modified in a TDR. These modifications generally provided interest rate
concessions to the borrower or deferral of principal repayments. |
|
(b) |
|
There were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose loans have been modified in
TDRs as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. |
|
(c) |
|
When discounted cash flows or collateral value equals or exceeds the recorded investment in
the loan, the loan does not require an allowance. This result typically occurs when an
impaired loan has been partially charged off. |
|
(d) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, $3.6 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, of
loans modified subsequent to repurchase from Ginnie Mae were excluded from loans accounted for
as TDRs. When such loans perform subsequent to modification they are generally sold back into
Ginnie Mae loan pools. Modified loans that do not re-perform become subject to foreclosure.
Substantially all amounts due under the terms of these loans continue to be insured, and where
applicable, reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors,
including charge-offs; net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discounts or premiums
on purchased loans. |
The following table presents average impaired loans and the related interest income reported
by the Firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on impaired |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Average impaired loans |
|
|
Interest income on impaired loans(a) |
|
|
loans on a cash basis(a) |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior lien |
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Junior lien |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime, including option ARMs |
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total residential real estate
(excluding PCI) |
|
$ |
5,811 |
|
|
$ |
3,616 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Generally, interest income on loans modified in a TDR is recognized on a cash basis
until such time as the borrower has made a minimum of six payments under the new terms. As of
March 31, 2011 and 2010, loans of $640 million and $663 million, respectively, were TDRs for
which the borrowers had not yet made six payments under their modified terms. |
130
Other consumer loans
The tables below provide information for other consumer retained loan classes, including auto,
business banking and student loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
Business banking |
|
Student and other |
|
Total other consumer |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
31, 2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Loan delinquency(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and less than
30 days past due |
|
$ |
46,949 |
|
|
$ |
47,778 |
|
|
$ |
16,443 |
|
|
$ |
16,240 |
|
|
$ |
13,744 |
|
|
$ |
13,998 |
|
|
$ |
77,136 |
|
|
$ |
78,016 |
|
30119 days past due |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
120 or more days past due |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
47,411 |
|
|
$ |
48,367 |
|
|
$ |
16,957 |
|
|
$ |
16,812 |
|
|
$ |
15,089 |
|
|
$ |
15,311 |
|
|
$ |
79,457 |
|
|
$ |
80,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of 30+ days past due to total retained
loans |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
1.99% |
(d) |
|
1.61%(d) |
|
|
1.61% |
(d) |
|
1.75%(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 or more days past due and still
accruing(b) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
Geographic region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$ |
4,214 |
|
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
$ |
966 |
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
6,494 |
|
|
$ |
6,488 |
|
New York |
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
3,875 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
2,877 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
8,057 |
|
Texas |
|
|
4,385 |
|
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
8,328 |
|
Florida |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
5,452 |
|
|
|
5,618 |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
|
|
4,564 |
|
Arizona |
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
Washington |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
All other |
|
|
21,390 |
|
|
|
21,697 |
|
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
6,731 |
|
|
|
6,834 |
|
|
|
32,534 |
|
|
|
32,722 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
47,411 |
|
|
$ |
48,367 |
|
|
$ |
16,957 |
|
|
$ |
16,812 |
|
|
$ |
15,089 |
|
|
$ |
15,311 |
|
|
$ |
79,457 |
|
|
$ |
80,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans by risk ratings(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncriticized |
|
$ |
5,840 |
|
|
$ |
5,803 |
|
|
$ |
11,153 |
|
|
$ |
10,831 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
$ |
16,993 |
|
|
$ |
16,634 |
|
Criticized performing |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
Criticized nonaccrual |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan
Program (FFELP) are included in the delinquency
classifications presented based on their payment status. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current
period presentation. |
|
(b) |
|
These amounts represent student loans, which are insured by U.S. government agencies
under the FFELP. These amounts were accruing as reimbursement of insured amounts is
proceeding normally. |
|
(c) |
|
For risk-rated business banking and auto loans, the primary credit quality indicator
is the risk rating of the loan, including whether the loans are considered to be criticized
and/or nonaccrual. |
|
(d) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, excluded loans 30 days or more past due
and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP, of $1.0
billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of
insured amounts is proceeding normally. |
131
Other consumer impaired loans
The tables below set forth information about the Firms other consumer impaired loans, including
risk-rated business banking and auto loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status, and any
loan that has been modified in a TDR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
Business banking |
|
Total other consumer(c) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
Without an allowance(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
Unpaid principal balance of impaired loans(b) |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
Impaired loans on nonaccrual status |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
When discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the recorded
investment in the loan, then the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs
when the impaired loans have been partially charged off and/or there have been interest
payments received and applied to the loan balance. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various
factors, including charge-offs; interest payments received and applied to the principal
balance; net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discounts or premiums on purchased
loans. |
|
(c) |
|
There were no impaired student and other loans at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. |
132
The following table presents average impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Average impaired loans(b) |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Auto |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Total other consumer(a) |
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
There were no student and other loans modified in TDRs at March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010. |
|
(b) |
|
The related interest income on impaired loans, including those on cash basis, was not
material for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. |
The following table provides information about the Firms other consumer loans modified in
TDRs. These TDR loans are included as impaired loans in the tables above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
Business banking |
|
Total other consumer(c) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Loans modified in troubled debt
restructurings(a)(b) |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
TDRs on nonaccrual status |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These modifications generally provided interest rate concessions to the borrower or
deferral of principal repayments. |
|
(b) |
|
Additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose loans have been modified in TDRs as
of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were immaterial. |
|
(c) |
|
There were no student and other loans modified in TDRs at March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010. |
133
Purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans
For a detailed discussion of PCI loans, including the related accounting policies, see Note 14 on
pages 220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Residential real estate PCI loans
The table below sets forth information about the Firms consumer, excluding credit card PCI loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Carrying value(a) |
|
$ |
23,973 |
|
|
$ |
24,459 |
|
|
$ |
16,725 |
|
|
$ |
17,322 |
|
Related allowance for loan losses(b) |
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan delinquency (based on unpaid principal balance) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and less than 30 days past due |
|
$ |
24,956 |
|
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
$ |
12,632 |
|
|
$ |
13,035 |
|
30149 days past due |
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
150 or more days past due |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
27,397 |
|
|
$ |
28,312 |
|
|
$ |
18,155 |
|
|
$ |
18,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of 30+ days past due to total loans |
|
|
8.91 |
% |
|
|
8.93 |
% |
|
|
30.42 |
% |
|
|
31.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current estimated LTV ratios (based on unpaid principal balance)(c)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 125% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
$ |
6,466 |
|
|
$ |
6,324 |
|
|
$ |
2,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
4,065 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
2,897 |
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101% to 125% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
6,097 |
|
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,701 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80% to 100% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
|
4,019 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower than 80% and refreshed FICO scores: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Less than 660 |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
Total unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
27,397 |
|
|
$ |
28,312 |
|
|
$ |
18,155 |
|
|
$ |
18,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic region (based on unpaid principal balance) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$ |
16,466 |
|
|
$ |
17,012 |
|
|
$ |
10,405 |
|
|
$ |
10,891 |
|
New York |
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
Texas |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Florida |
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Arizona |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
Washington |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
All other |
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
|
2,985 |
|
|
Total unpaid principal balance |
|
$ |
27,397 |
|
|
$ |
28,312 |
|
|
$ |
18,155 |
|
|
$ |
18,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the
consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition. |
|
(b) |
|
Management concluded as part of the Firms regular assessment of the PCI loan pools
that it was probable that higher expected principal credit losses would result in a decrease
in expected cash flows. As a result, an allowance for loan losses for impairment of these
pools has been recognized. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated
current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based
on home valuation models utilizing nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates
incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not
available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral
values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as
estimates. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all
available lien positions related to the property. |
|
(d) |
|
Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrowers most recent credit score obtained by
the Firm. The Firm obtains refreshed FICO scores at least quarterly. |
134
|
|
|
|
|
(table continued from previous page) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
Option ARMs |
|
Total PCI |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,276 |
|
|
$ |
5,398 |
|
|
$ |
24,791 |
|
|
$ |
25,584 |
|
|
$ |
70,765 |
|
|
$ |
72,763 |
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,352 |
|
|
$ |
4,312 |
|
|
$ |
18,317 |
|
|
$ |
18,672 |
|
|
$ |
60,257 |
|
|
$ |
61,802 |
|
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
6,051 |
|
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
9,310 |
|
|
|
9,904 |
|
|
|
17,456 |
|
|
|
18,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
$ |
8,042 |
|
|
$ |
29,559 |
|
|
$ |
30,791 |
|
|
$ |
82,956 |
|
|
$ |
86,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.53 |
% |
|
|
46.38 |
% |
|
|
38.03 |
% |
|
|
39.36 |
% |
|
|
27.36 |
% |
|
|
28.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
$ |
12,092 |
|
|
$ |
11,837 |
|
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
6,315 |
|
|
|
6,330 |
|
|
|
15,451 |
|
|
|
15,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
4,292 |
|
|
|
13,830 |
|
|
|
14,628 |
|
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
4,814 |
|
|
|
5,005 |
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
|
|
12,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
9,541 |
|
|
|
10,515 |
|
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
8,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
6,449 |
|
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
6,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
$ |
8,042 |
|
|
$ |
29,559 |
|
|
$ |
30,791 |
|
|
$ |
82,956 |
|
|
$ |
86,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,971 |
|
|
$ |
15,430 |
|
|
$ |
16,130 |
|
|
$ |
44,190 |
|
|
$ |
46,004 |
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
8,646 |
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
5,314 |
|
|
|
13,863 |
|
|
|
14,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
$ |
8,042 |
|
|
$ |
29,559 |
|
|
$ |
30,791 |
|
|
$ |
82,956 |
|
|
$ |
86,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
The table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the Firms PCI consumer loans for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and represents the Firms estimate of gross
interest income expected to be earned over the remaining life of the PCI loan portfolios. This
table excludes the cost to fund the PCI portfolios, and therefore does not represent net interest
income expected to be earned on these portfolios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
Total PCI |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
19,097 |
|
|
$ |
25,544 |
|
Accretion into interest income |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
(886 |
) |
Changes in interest rates on variable rate loans |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
Other changes in expected cash flows(a) |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(3,693 |
) |
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
18,816 |
|
|
$ |
20,571 |
|
Accretable yield percentage |
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the Firm continues to
refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions. For the three months
ended March 31, 2011, other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes
in prepayment assumptions. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, other changes in
expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions, as well as
reclassification to the nonaccretable difference. Changes to prepayment assumptions change the
expected remaining life of the portfolio, which drives changes in expected future interest
cash collections. Such changes do not have a significant impact on the accretable yield
percentage. |
The factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be
collected, and accordingly the accretable yield balance, include: (i) changes in the benchmark
interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option ARM and home equity loans; and (ii)
changes in prepayment assumptions.
Since the date of purchase, the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily
related to a decrease in interest rates on variable-rate loans and, to a lesser extent, extended
loan liquidation periods. Certain events, such as extended loan liquidation periods, affect the
timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received (i.e., the
accretable yield balance). Extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage
because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance
over a longer-than-expected period of time.
136
Credit card loans
The credit card portfolio segment includes credit card loans originated and purchased by the Firm,
including those acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction. Delinquency rates are the primary
credit quality indicator for credit card loans. In addition to delinquency rates, the geographic
distribution of the loans provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio based on the
regional economy.
The borrowers credit score is another general indicator of credit quality. Because the credit
score tends to be a lagging indicator of credit quality, the Firm does not use credit scores as a
primary indicator of credit quality. For more information on credit quality indicators, see Note 14
on pages 220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. The Firm generally originates new card
accounts to prime consumer borrowers. However, certain cardholders refreshed FICO scores may
change over time, depending on the performance of the cardholder and changes in credit score
technology.
The table below sets forth information about the Firms Credit Card loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase, excluding |
|
Washington Mutual |
|
|
|
|
Washington Mutual portfolio(c) |
|
portfolio(c) |
|
Total credit card |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Loan delinquency(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and less than 30 days past
due and still accruing |
|
$ |
108,748 |
|
|
$ |
117,248 |
|
|
$ |
11,585 |
|
|
$ |
12,670 |
|
|
$ |
120,333 |
|
|
$ |
129,918 |
|
3089 days past due and
still accruing |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
90 or more days past due
and still accruing |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
112,383 |
|
|
$ |
121,791 |
|
|
$ |
12,408 |
|
|
$ |
13,733 |
|
|
$ |
124,791 |
|
|
$ |
135,524 |
|
|
Loan delinquency ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of 30 plus days past due to total
retained loans |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
6.63 |
% |
|
|
7.74 |
% |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
% of 90 plus days past due to total
retained loans |
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card loans by geographic region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$ |
14,269 |
|
|
$ |
15,454 |
|
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
|
$ |
16,660 |
|
|
$ |
18,104 |
|
New York |
|
|
8,839 |
|
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
9,772 |
|
|
|
10,572 |
|
Texas |
|
|
8,700 |
|
|
|
9,217 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
9,615 |
|
|
|
10,223 |
|
Florida |
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
6,724 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
7,289 |
|
|
|
7,889 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
6,961 |
|
|
|
7,619 |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
4,628 |
|
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
5,564 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
4,521 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
4,456 |
|
|
|
4,945 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
4,229 |
|
Virginia |
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
3,069 |
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
Washington |
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
All other |
|
|
43,710 |
|
|
|
47,290 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
4,615 |
|
|
|
47,881 |
|
|
|
51,905 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
112,383 |
|
|
$ |
121,791 |
|
|
$ |
12,408 |
|
|
$ |
13,733 |
|
|
$ |
124,791 |
|
|
$ |
135,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of portfolio based on
carrying value with estimated
refreshed FICO scores(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to or greater than 660 |
|
|
80.9 |
% |
|
|
80.6 |
% |
|
|
58.2 |
% |
|
|
56.4 |
% |
|
|
78.4 |
% |
|
|
77.9 |
% |
Less than 660 |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Firms policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on
nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance. Under guidance issued by the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), credit card loans are charged off by the
end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from
receiving notification about a specified event (e.g., bankruptcy of the borrower), whichever
is earlier. |
|
(b) |
|
Refreshed FICO scores are estimated based on a statistically significant random
sample of credit card accounts in the credit card portfolio for the period shown. The Firm
obtains refreshed FICO scores at least quarterly. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes billed finance charges and fees net of an allowance for uncollectible
amounts. |
137
Credit card impaired loans
For a detailed discussion of impaired credit card loans, including credit card loan modifications,
see Note 14 on pages 220238 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The tables below set forth information about the Firms impaired credit card loans. All of these
loans are considered to be impaired as they have been modified in TDRs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase, excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Mutual |
|
Washington Mutual |
|
|
|
|
portfolio |
|
portfolio |
|
Total credit card |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Impaired loans with an allowance(a)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card loans with modified payment
terms(c) |
|
$ |
6,303 |
|
|
$ |
6,685 |
|
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,570 |
|
|
$ |
7,775 |
|
|
$ |
8,255 |
|
Modified credit card loans that have reverted to
pre-modification payment terms(d) |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
8,124 |
|
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
|
$ |
1,881 |
|
|
$ |
9,236 |
|
|
$ |
10,005 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired
loans |
|
$ |
3,013 |
|
|
$ |
3,175 |
|
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
4,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The carrying value and the unpaid principal balance are the same for credit card
impaired loans. |
|
(b) |
|
There were no impaired loans without an allowance. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents credit card loans outstanding to borrowers then enrolled in a credit card
modification program. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents credit card loans that were modified in TDRs but that have subsequently
reverted back to the loans pre-modification payment terms. At March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, of the $1.5 billion and $1.8 billion total loan amount, respectively, approximately
$934 million and $1.2 billion, respectively, of loans have reverted back to the
pre-modification payment terms of the loans due to noncompliance with the terms of the
modified loans. A substantial portion of these loans is expected to be charged-off in
accordance with the Firms standard charge-off policy. The remaining $527 million and $590
million at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, of these loans are to
borrowers who have successfully completed a short-term modification program. The Firm
continues to report these loans as TDRs since the borrowers credit lines remain closed. |
The following table presents average balances of impaired credit card loans and interest
income recognized on those loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Average impaired loans |
|
Interest income on impaired loans(a) |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Chase, excluding Washington Mutual portfolio |
|
$ |
7,709 |
|
|
$ |
8,911 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
Washington Mutual portfolio |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Total credit card |
|
$ |
9,494 |
|
|
$ |
10,882 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As permitted by regulatory guidance, credit card loans are generally exempt from being
placed on nonaccrual status; accordingly, interest and fees related to credit card loans
continue to accrue until the loan is charged off or paid in full. However, the Firm separately
establishes an allowance for the estimated uncollectible portion of billed and accrued
interest and fee income on credit card loans. |
138
NOTE 14 ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
For detailed discussion of the allowance for credit losses and the related accounting policies, see
Note 15 on pages 239-243 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Allowance for credit losses and loans and lending-related commitments by impairment methodology
The table below summarizes information about the allowance for loan losses and the loans by
impairment methodology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Three months |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, |
|
|
|
|
ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Wholesale |
|
credit card |
|
Credit Card |
|
Total |
|
Wholesale |
|
credit card |
|
Credit Card |
|
Total |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at
January 1, |
|
$ |
4,761 |
|
|
$ |
16,471 |
|
|
$ |
11,034 |
|
|
$ |
32,266 |
|
|
$ |
7,145 |
|
|
$ |
14,785 |
|
|
$ |
9,672 |
|
|
$ |
31,602 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
7,353 |
|
|
|
7,494 |
|
Gross charge-offs |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
4,882 |
|
|
|
8,451 |
|
Gross (recoveries) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(624 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
6,991 |
|
Other |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Ending balance at
March 31 |
|
$ |
4,234 |
|
|
$ |
16,475 |
|
|
$ |
9,041 |
|
|
$ |
29,750 |
|
|
$ |
5,942 |
|
|
$ |
16,212 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
$ |
38,186 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses by
impairment methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific(b)(c)(d) |
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,067 |
|
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
5,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
$ |
5,402 |
|
|
$ |
7,870 |
|
Formula-based(d) |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
10,467 |
|
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
18,893 |
|
|
|
4,385 |
|
|
|
12,490 |
|
|
|
10,630 |
|
|
|
27,505 |
|
PCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
4,234 |
|
|
$ |
16,475 |
|
|
$ |
9,041 |
|
|
$ |
29,750 |
|
|
$ |
5,942 |
|
|
$ |
16,212 |
|
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
$ |
38,186 |
|
|
Loans by impairment methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific |
|
$ |
4,498 |
|
|
$ |
7,254 |
|
|
$ |
9,236 |
|
|
$ |
20,988 |
|
|
$ |
6,286 |
|
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
|
$ |
11,020 |
|
|
$ |
21,712 |
|
Formula-based |
|
|
225,094 |
|
|
|
242,979 |
|
|
|
115,555 |
|
|
|
583,628 |
|
|
|
203,818 |
|
|
|
263,641 |
|
|
|
138,240 |
|
|
|
605,699 |
|
PCI |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
70,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,821 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
79,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,430 |
|
|
Total retained loans |
|
$ |
229,648 |
|
|
$ |
320,998 |
|
|
$ |
124,791 |
|
|
$ |
675,437 |
|
|
$ |
210,211 |
|
|
$ |
347,370 |
|
|
$ |
149,260 |
|
|
$ |
706,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2010, the Firm adopted accounting guidance related to VIEs. Upon
adoption of the guidance, the Firm consolidated its Firm-sponsored credit card securitization
trusts, its Firm-administered multi-seller conduits and certain other consumer loan
securitization entities, primarily mortgage-related. As a result, $7.4 billion, $14 million
and $127 million, respectively, of allowance for loan losses were recorded on-balance sheet
with the consolidation of these entities. For further discussion, see Note 16 on pages
244259 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. |
|
(b) |
|
Relates to risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that
have been modified in a TDR. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the asset-specific consumer, excluding credit card
allowance for loan losses included TDR reserves of $970 million and $754 million,
respectively. The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses is related to loans
modified in TDRs. |
|
(d) |
|
Prior period has been revised to reflect the reclassification of the Firms allowance
for loan losses on all impaired credit card loans from formula-based into asset-specific
allowance. |
139
The table below summarizes information about the allowance for lending-related commitments and
lending-related commitments by impairment methodology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excluding |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Wholesale |
|
credit card |
|
Credit Card |
|
Total |
|
Wholesale |
|
credit card |
|
Credit Card |
|
Total |
|
Allowance for lending-related
commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
711 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
939 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting
principles(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Provision for lending-related
commitments |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for lending-related
commitments by impairment
methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
Formula-based |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
Total allowance for
lending-related commitments |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending-related commitments by
impairment methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific |
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
Formula-based |
|
|
354,666 |
|
|
|
64,560 |
|
|
|
565,813 |
|
|
|
985,039 |
|
|
|
325,369 |
|
|
|
72,243 |
|
|
|
556,207 |
|
|
|
953,819 |
|
|
Total lending-related
commitments |
|
$ |
355,561 |
|
|
$ |
64,560 |
|
|
$ |
565,813 |
|
|
$ |
985,934 |
|
|
$ |
326,921 |
|
|
$ |
72,243 |
|
|
$ |
556,207 |
|
|
$ |
955,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired collateral-dependent
loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
Loans measured at fair value
of collateral less cost to
sell |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
864 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
545 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2010, the Firm adopted accounting guidance related to VIEs. Upon
adoption of the guidance, the Firm consolidated its Firm-administered multi-seller conduits.
As a result, related assets are now primarily recorded in loans and other assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes collateral-dependent residential mortgage loans that are charged off to the
fair value of the underlying collateral. These loans are considered collateral-dependent
under regulatory guidance because they involve modifications where an interest-only period is
provided or a significant portion of principal is deferred. |
140
NOTE 15 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
For a further description of JPMorgan Chases accounting policies regarding consolidation of VIEs
and a detailed discussion of the Firms principal involvement with VIEs, see Note 1 on pages
164165, and Note 16 on pages 244259, respectively, of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table summarizes the most significant types of Firm-sponsored VIEs by business
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form 10-Q |
Line-of-Business |
|
Transaction Type |
|
Activity |
|
page reference |
|
Card Services
|
|
Credit card securitization trusts
|
|
Securitization of
both originated and
purchased credit
card receivables
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
RFS
|
|
Mortgage and other securitization trusts
|
|
Securitization of
originated and
purchased
residential
mortgages,
automobile and
student loans
|
|
|
141-143 |
|
|
IB
|
|
Mortgage and other securitization trusts
|
|
Securitization of
both originated and
purchased
residential and
commercial
mortgages,
automobile and
student loans
|
|
|
141-143 |
|
|
IB
|
|
Multi-seller conduits
Investor intermediation activities:
|
|
Assist clients in
accessing the
financial markets
in a cost-efficient
manner and
structures
transactions to
meet investor needs
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
IB
|
|
Municipal bond vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
143-144 |
|
|
|
|
Credit-related note and asset swap vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
The Firm also invests in and provides financing and other services to VIEs sponsored by third
parties, as described on page 144 of this Note and on page 253 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report.
Significant Firm-sponsored variable interest entities
Credit card securitizations
For a more detailed discussion of JPMorgan Chases involvement with credit card securitizations,
see pages 245246 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
As a result of the Firms continuing involvement, the Firm is considered to be the primary
beneficiary of the Firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts. This includes the Firms
primary card securitization trust, Chase Issuance Trust. The Firm consolidated $58.4 billion and
$68.5 billion of assets held by Firm-administered credit-card securitization trusts and $37.7
billion and $44.3 billion of beneficial interests issued to third parties at March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
The underlying securitized credit card receivables and other assets are available only for payment
of the beneficial interests issued by the securitization trusts; they are not available to pay the
Firms other obligations or the claims of the Firms other creditors.
Firm-sponsored mortgage and other securitization trusts
For a detailed description of the Firms involvement with Firm-sponsored mortgage and other
securitization trusts, as well as accounting treatment, see Note 16 on page 246 of JPMorgan Chases
2010 Annual Report.
The following table presents the total unpaid principal amount of assets held in JPMorgan
Chasesponsored securitization entities in which the Firm has continuing involvement, including
those that are consolidated or not consolidated by the Firm. Continuing involvement includes
servicing the loans; holding senior interests or subordinated interests; recourse or guarantee
arrangements; and derivative transactions. In certain instances, the Firms only continuing
involvement is servicing the loans. In the table below, the amount of beneficial interests held by
JPMorgan Chase does not equal the assets held in nonconsolidated VIEs because of the existence of
beneficial interests held by third parties, which are reflected at their current outstanding par
amounts; and because a portion of the Firms retained interests (trading assets and AFS securities)
are reflected at their fair values. See Securitization activity on pages 146148 of this Note for
further information regarding the Firms cash flows with and interests retained in nonconsolidated
VIEs.
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase interest in securitized assets |
|
|
Principal amount outstanding |
|
in nonconsolidated VIEs(d)(e)(f)(g)(h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nonconsolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
Assets held in |
|
securitization VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interests |
March 31, 2011(a) |
|
held by |
|
consolidated |
|
with continuing |
|
Trading |
|
AFS |
|
held by |
(in billions) |
|
securitization VIEs |
|
securitization VIEs |
|
involvement |
|
assets |
|
securities |
|
JPMorgan Chase |
|
Securitization-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
$ |
145.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
138.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and other(c) |
|
|
146.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Student |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
374.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
304.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase interest in securitized assets |
|
|
Principal amount outstanding |
|
in nonconsolidated VIEs(d)(e)(f)(g)(h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nonconsolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
Assets held in |
|
securitization VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interests |
December 31, 2010(a) |
|
held by |
|
consolidated |
|
with continuing |
|
Trading |
|
AFS |
|
held by |
(in billions) |
|
securitization VIEs |
|
securitization VIEs |
|
involvement |
|
assets |
|
securities |
|
JPMorgan Chase |
|
Securitization-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
$ |
153.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
143.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and other(c) |
|
|
153.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Student |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
391.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
326.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes loan sales to U.S. government agencies. See page 147 of this Note for information on
the Firms loan sales to U.S. government agencies. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans. |
|
(c) |
|
Consists of securities backed by commercial loans (predominantly real estate) and
non-mortgage-related consumer receivables purchased from third parties. The Firm generally
does not retain a residual interest in its sponsored commercial mortgage securitization
transactions. Includes co-sponsored commercial securitizations and, therefore, includes
nonJPMorgan Chaseoriginated commercial mortgage loans. |
|
(d) |
|
Excludes retained servicing (for a discussion of MSRs, see Note 16 on pages 149152 of this
Form 10-Q) and securities retained from loan sales to U.S. government agencies. |
|
(e) |
|
Excludes senior and subordinated securities of $130 million and $67 million, respectively, at
March 31, 2011, and $182 million and $18 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010, which
the Firm purchased in connection with IBs secondary market-making activities. |
|
(f) |
|
Excludes interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives primarily used to manage the interest
rate and foreign exchange risks of the securitization entities. See Note 5 on pages 107113
of this Form 10-Q for further information on derivatives. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes interests held in re-securitization transactions. |
|
(h) |
|
As of both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, 66% of the Firms retained securitization
interests, which are carried at fair value, were risk-rated A or better, on an
S&P-equivalent basis. This includes $207 million and $157 million of investment-grade and $495
million and $552 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests in prime residential
mortgages at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, and $2.0 billion and $2.6
billion of investment-grade and $259 million and $250 million of noninvestment-grade retained
interests in commercial and other securitization trusts. |
142
Re-securitizations
The Firm also engages in certain re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are
transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. These transfers occur to both agency
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae) and nonagency (private-label) sponsored VIEs, which may be
backed by either residential or commercial mortgages and are often structured on behalf of clients.
As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm did not consolidate any agency
re-securitizations, as it did not have the power to direct the significant activities of the trust.
As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, the Firm consolidated $387 million and
$477 million of assets, and $167 million and $230 million of liabilities of private-label
re-securitizations, as the Firm had both the power to direct the significant activities of, and
retained an interest that is deemed to be significant in, the trust. For other nonconsolidated
private-label re-securitizations, the Firm shares control over the resecuritization VIEs (i.e.,
established the VIE jointly with the investors) and therefore did not have unilateral ability to
direct the significant activities of the entity. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, the Firm transferred $8.8 billion and $6.5 billion, respectively, of securities to agency
VIEs, and $192 million and $383 million, respectively, of securities to private-label VIEs. At
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm held approximately $2.8 billion and $3.5 billion of
interests in nonconsolidated agency re-securitization entities, and $49 million and $46 million of
senior and subordinated interests in nonconsolidated private-label re-securitization entities. See
page 148 of this Note for further information on interests held in nonconsolidated securitization
VIEs.
Multi-seller conduits
For a more detailed description of JPMorgan Chases principal involvement with Firm-administered,
multi-seller conduits, see Note 16 on pages 249250 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
As a result of the Firms continuing involvement, the Firm consolidates its Firm-administered
multi-seller conduits, as the Firm has both the power to direct the significant activities of the
conduits and a potentially significant economic interest. The Firm consolidated $20.6 billion and
$21.7 billion of assets held by Firm-administered multi-seller conduits and $20.5 billion and $21.6
billion of beneficial interests in commercial paper issued to third parties at March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
The Firm provides deal-specific liquidity as well as program-wide liquidity and credit enhancement
to the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits, which have been eliminated in consolidation. The
Firm-administered multi-seller conduits then provide certain of their
clients with lending-related
commitments. The unfunded portion of these commitments
was $10.3 billion and $10.0 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, and are
included as off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. For more information on off-balance
sheet lending-related commitments, see Note 21 on pages 156159 of this Form 10-Q.
VIEs associated with investor intermediation activities
Municipal bond vehicles
For a more detailed description of JPMorgan Chases principal involvement with municipal bond
vehicles, see Note 16 on pages 250251 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The Firms exposure to nonconsolidated municipal bond VIEs at March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010, including the ratings profile of the VIEs assets, was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
(in billions) |
|
held by VIEs |
|
Liquidity facilities(a) |
|
Excess/(deficit)(b) |
|
exposure |
|
Nonconsolidated municipal bond vehicles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings profile of VIE assets(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
Noninvestment-grade |
|
Fair value of |
|
Wt. avg. |
(in billions, except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets held |
|
expected life |
where otherwise noted) |
|
AAA to AAA- |
|
AA+ to AA- |
|
A+ to A- |
|
BBB to BBB- |
|
BB+ and below |
|
by VIEs |
|
of assets (years) |
|
Nonconsolidated
municipal bond
vehicles |
March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Firm may serve as credit enhancement provider to municipal bond vehicles in which it
serves as liquidity provider. The Firm provided insurance on underlying municipal bonds, in
the form of letters of credit, of $10 million at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the excess/(deficit) of the fair values of municipal bond assets available to
repay the liquidity facilities, if drawn. |
|
(c) |
|
The ratings scale is based on the Firms internal risk ratings and is presented on an
S&P-equivalent basis. |
143
The Firm consolidated $5.9 billion and $4.6 billion of municipal bond vehicles as of March 31,
2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, due to the Firm owning the residual interests.
Credit-related note and asset swap vehicles
For a more detailed description of JPMorgan Chases principal involvement with credit-related note
and asset swap vehicles, see Note 16 on pages 244259 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Exposure to nonconsolidated credit-related note and asset swap VIEs at March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value |
|
|
Net derivative |
|
Trading |
|
Total |
|
of collateral |
March 31, 2011 (in billions) |
|
receivables |
|
assets(a) |
|
exposure(b) |
|
held by VIEs(c) |
|
Credit-related notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Static structure |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
Managed structure |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Total credit-related notes |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
Asset swaps |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
28.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value |
|
|
Net derivative |
|
Trading |
|
Total |
|
of collateral |
December 31, 2010 (in billions) |
|
receivables |
|
assets(a) |
|
exposure(b) |
|
held by VIEs(c) |
|
Credit- related notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Static structure |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
Managed structure |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
Total credit-related notes |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
Asset swaps |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
27.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Trading assets principally comprise notes issued by VIEs, which from time to time are held
as part of the termination of a deal or to support limited market-making. |
|
(b) |
|
Onbalance sheet exposure that includes net derivative receivables and trading assets
debt and equity instruments. |
|
(c) |
|
The Firms maximum exposure arises through the derivatives executed with the VIEs; the
exposure varies over time with changes in the fair value of the derivatives. The Firm relies
on the collateral held by the VIEs to pay any amounts due under the derivatives; the vehicles
are structured at inception so that the par value of the collateral is expected to be
sufficient to pay amounts due under the derivative contracts. |
The Firm consolidated credit-related note vehicles with collateral fair values of $137 million
and $142 million, respectively, and asset swap vehicles with collateral fair values of zero at both
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The Firm consolidated these vehicles because in its role as
secondary market-maker, it held positions in these entities that
provided the Firm with control of certain vehicles.
VIEs sponsored by third parties
The Firm also invests in and provides financing and other services to VIEs sponsored by third
parties, as described on page 253 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Investment in a third-party credit card securitization trust
The Firm holds two interests in a third-party-sponsored VIE, which is a credit card securitization
trust that owns credit card receivables issued by a national retailer. The Firm is not the primary
beneficiary of the trust. The Firms interest in the VIEs include investments classified as AFS
securities that had a fair value of $3.2 billion and $3.1 billion at March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, respectively, and other interests which are classified as loans and have a fair value of
approximately $1.0 billion at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. For more information on
AFS securities and loans, see Notes 11 and 13 on pages 116120 and 122138, respectively, of this
Form 10-Q.
144
Consolidated VIE assets and liabilities
The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs consolidated by
the Firm as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Trading assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
debt and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Beneficial interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
instruments |
|
Loans |
|
Other(a) |
|
assets(b) |
|
in VIE assets(c) |
|
Other(d) |
|
Total liabilities |
|
VIE program type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm-sponsored credit
card trusts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
58.4 |
|
|
$ |
37.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37.7 |
|
Firm-administered
multi-seller conduits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
Mortgage
securitization
entities(e) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Other(f) |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
97.9 |
|
|
$ |
70.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Trading assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
debt and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Beneficial interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
instruments |
|
Loans |
|
Other(a) |
|
assets(b) |
|
in VIE assets(c) |
|
Other(d) |
|
Total liabilities |
|
VIE program type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm-sponsored credit
card trusts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
67.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
Firm-administered
multi-seller conduits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
Mortgage
securitization
entities(e) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Other(f) |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
95.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
108.9 |
|
|
$ |
77.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
79.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included assets classified as cash, derivative receivables, AFS securities and other
assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
The assets of the consolidated VIEs included in the program types above are used to settle
the liabilities of those entities. The difference between total assets and total liabilities
recognized for consolidated VIEs represents the Firms interest in the consolidated VIEs for
each program type. |
|
(c) |
|
The interest-bearing beneficial-interest liabilities issued by consolidated VIEs are
classified in the line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets titled, Beneficial interests
issued by consolidated variable interest entities. The holders of these beneficial interests
do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. Included in beneficial interests
in VIE assets are long-term beneficial interests of $45.6 billion and $52.6 billion at March
31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. The maturities of the long-term beneficial
interests as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were as follows: $7.5 billion and $13.9
billion under one year, $29.1 billion and $29.0 billion between one and five years, and $9.0
billion and $9.7 billion over five years. |
|
(d) |
|
Included liabilities classified as accounts payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes residential and commercial mortgage securitizations as well as re-securitizations. |
|
(f) |
|
Primarily comprised of municipal bond vehicles and student loans. |
Supplemental information on loan securitizations
The Firm securitizes and sells a variety of loans, including residential mortgage, credit card,
automobile, student and commercial (primarily related to real estate) loans, as well as debt
securities. The primary purposes of these securitization transactions are to satisfy investor
demand and to generate liquidity for the Firm.
145
Securitization activity
The following tables provide information related to the Firms securitization activities for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, related to assets held in JPMorgan Chasesponsored
securitization entities that were not consolidated by the Firm, as sale accounting was achieved
based on the accounting rules in effect at the time of the securitization. For the three month
period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no mortgage loans that were securitized, except
for commercial and other in 2011, and there were no cash flows from the Firm to the SPEs related to
recourse or guarantee arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
(in millions) |
|
Prime(e) |
|
Subprime |
|
Option ARMs |
|
and other |
|
Principal securitized |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,493 |
|
All cash flows during the period(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from new securitizations(b) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,558 |
|
Servicing fees collected |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Purchases of previously transferred financial
assets (or the underlying
collateral)(c) |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows received on the interests that
continue to be held by the Firm(d) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
(in millions) |
|
Prime(e) |
|
Subprime |
|
Option ARMs |
|
and other |
|
All cash flows during the period(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees collected |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Purchases of previously transferred financial
assets (or the underlying
collateral)(c) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows received on the interests that
continue to be held by the Firm(d) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes sales for which the Firm did not securitize the loan (including loans sold to Ginnie
Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). |
|
(b) |
|
Includes $1.6 billion and zero of proceeds from new securitizations received as securities
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These securities were
predominantly classified as level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes cash paid by the Firm to reacquire assets from the offbalance sheet,
nonconsolidated entities for example, servicer clean-up calls. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes cash flows received on retained interests including, for example, principal
repayments and interest payments. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans and re-securitization transactions. |
146
Loans sold to agencies and other third-party sponsored securitization entities
In addition to the amounts reported in the securitization activity tables above, the Firm, in the
normal course of business, sells originated and purchased mortgage loans, predominantly to Ginnie
Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Agencies). These loans are sold primarily for the purpose of
securitization by the Agencies, which also provide credit enhancement of the loans through certain
guarantee provisions. The Firm does not consolidate these securitization vehicles, as it is not the
primary beneficiary. In connection with these loan sales, the Firm makes certain representations
and warranties. For additional information about the Firms loan sale- and securitization-related
indemnifications, see Note 21 on pages 156159 of this Form 10-Q.
For a more detailed description of JPMorgan Chases principal involvement with loans sold to
government-sponsored agencies and other third-party sponsored securitization entities, see Note 16
on page 257 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
The following table summarizes the activities related to loans sold to U.S. government-sponsored
agencies and third-party sponsored securitization entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Carrying value of loans sold(a)(b) |
|
$ |
39,247 |
|
|
$ |
35,374 |
|
|
Proceeds received from loan sales as cash |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Proceeds received from loan sales as securities(c) |
|
|
38,172 |
|
|
|
34,370 |
|
|
Total proceeds received from loan sales |
|
$ |
38,512 |
|
|
$ |
34,706 |
|
|
Gains on loan sales |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominantly to U.S. government agencies. |
|
(b) |
|
MSRs were excluded from the above table. See Note 16 on pages 149152 of this Form 10-Q for
further information on originated MSRs. |
|
(c) |
|
Predominantly includes securities from U.S. government agencies that are generally sold
shortly after receipt. |
As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, loans repurchased, or loans with the option to
repurchase, were $13.1 billion and $13.0 billion, respectively, primarily related to loans sold to
U.S. government agencies. Additionally, real estate owned resulting from repurchases of loans sold
to U.S. government agencies was $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion as of March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, respectively. Substantially all of these loans and real estate owned continue to be
insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, and where applicable, reimbursement is
proceeding normally.
147
JPMorgan Chases interest in securitized assets held at fair value
The following table outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value, as of
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, of certain of the Firms retained interests in
nonconsolidated VIEs (other than MSRs), that are valued using modeling techniques. The table also
outlines the sensitivities of those fair values to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in
assumptions used to determine fair value. For a discussion of MSRs, see Note 16 on pages 149152
of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
(in millions, except rates and where otherwise noted) |
|
Prime(a) |
|
and other |
|
JPMorgan Chase interests in securitized assets(b)(c) |
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate(d) |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
CPR |
|
CPR |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average loss assumption |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
(in millions, except rates and where otherwise noted) |
|
Prime(a) |
|
and other |
|
JPMorgan Chase interests in securitized assets(b)(c) |
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
2,906 |
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate(d) |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
CPR |
|
CPR |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average loss assumption |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes retained interests in Alt-A loans and re-securitization transactions. |
|
(b) |
|
The Firms interests in subprime securitizations were $23 million and $14 million, as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Additionally, the Firm had interests in
Option ARM securitizations of $29 million at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes certain investments acquired in the secondary market but predominantly held for
investment purposes. |
|
(d) |
|
CPR: constant prepayment rate. |
The sensitivity analysis in the preceding table is hypothetical. Changes in fair value based
on a 10% or 20% variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated easily, because the
relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also,
in the table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is
calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in
changes in another, which might counteract or magnify the sensitivities. The above sensitivities
also do not reflect risk management practices the Firm may undertake to mitigate such risks.
148
Loan delinquencies and net charge-offs
The table
below includes information about delinquencies, liquidation losses and components of
off-balance sheet securitized financial assets as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation losses |
|
|
Credit exposure |
|
90 days past due |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Securitized loans(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime mortgage(b) |
|
$ |
138,064 |
|
|
$ |
143,764 |
|
|
$ |
32,924 |
|
|
$ |
33,093 |
|
|
$ |
1,490 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
39,628 |
|
|
|
40,721 |
|
|
|
15,518 |
|
|
|
15,456 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
34,648 |
|
|
|
35,786 |
|
|
|
10,733 |
|
|
|
10,788 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
Commercial and other |
|
|
92,212 |
|
|
|
106,245 |
|
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Total loans securitized(c) |
|
$ |
304,552 |
|
|
$ |
326,516 |
|
|
$ |
64,105 |
|
|
$ |
65,128 |
|
|
$ |
3,137 |
|
|
$ |
3,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total assets held in securitization-related SPEs were $374.8 billion and $391.1 billion at
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. The $304.6 billion and $326.5 billion of
loans securitized at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, excludes: $62.5
billion and $56.0 billion of securitized loans in which the Firm has no continuing
involvement, and $7.7 billion and $8.6 billion of loan securitizations consolidated on the
Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes securitized loans that were previously recorded at fair value and classified as
trading assets. |
NOTE 16 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
For a discussion of accounting policies related to goodwill and other intangible assets, see Note
17 on pages 260263 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Goodwill and other intangible assets consist of the following.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
48,856 |
|
|
$ |
48,854 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
13,649 |
|
|
Other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
Other credit cardrelated intangibles |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,857 |
|
|
$ |
4,039 |
|
|
Goodwill
The following table presents goodwill attributed to the business segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
5,249 |
|
|
$ |
5,278 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
16,807 |
|
|
|
16,813 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
14,247 |
|
|
|
14,205 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
7,643 |
|
|
|
7,635 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
Total goodwill |
|
$ |
48,856 |
|
|
$ |
48,854 |
|
|
The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Balance at January 1,(a) |
|
$ |
48,854 |
|
|
$ |
48,357 |
|
Changes during the period from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business combinations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Other(b) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Balance at March 31,(a) |
|
$ |
48,856 |
|
|
$ |
48,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects gross goodwill balances as the Firm has not recognized any impairment losses to
date. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes foreign currency translation adjustments and other tax-related adjustments. |
149
Goodwill was not impaired at March 31, 2011, or December 31, 2010, nor was any goodwill
written off due to impairment during the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 or 2010. During
the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Firm reviewed current conditions and prior projections
for all of its reporting units. In addition, the Firm updated the discounted cash flow valuations
of its consumer lending businesses in RFS and Card Services (CS), as these businesses continue to
have elevated risk for goodwill impairment due to their exposure to U.S. consumer credit risk and
the effects of regulatory and legislative changes. As a result of these reviews, the Firm concluded
that goodwill for these businesses and the Firms other reporting units was not impaired at March
31, 2011.
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights represent the fair value of expected future cash flows for
performing servicing activities for others. The fair value considers estimated future fees and
ancillary revenues, offset by estimated costs to service the loans. The fair value of mortgage
servicing rights naturally declines over time as net servicing cash flows are received, effectively
amortizing the MSR asset against contractual and ancillary fee income. For a further description of
the MSR asset, interest rate risk management, and the valuation of MSRs, see Notes 17 on pages
260263, respectively of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report and Note 3 on pages 94105 of this
Form 10-Q.
In the first quarter of 2011, the Firm determined that the fair value of the MSR asset had
declined, reflecting higher estimated future servicing costs related to enhanced servicing
processes, particularly loan modification and foreclosure procedures, including costs to comply
with Consent Orders entered into with the banking regulators. The increase in the cost to service
assumption contemplates significant and prolonged increases in staffing levels in the core and
default servicing functions, and specifically considers the higher cost to service certain
high-risk vintages. These higher estimated future costs resulted in a $1.1 billion decrease in the
fair value of the MSR asset during the three months ended March 31,
2011. This decrease partially offset by an increase in fair value due to the
effects of higher market interest rates (which tend to decrease prepayments and therefore extend
the expected life of the net servicing cash flows that comprise the MSR asset).
The decrease in the fair value of the MSR in the current quarter results in a lower asset value
that will amortize in future periods against contractual and ancillary fee income
received in future periods. While there is expected to be higher levels of noninterest expense associated with higher
servicing costs in those future periods, there will also be less MSR
amortization, which will have the effect of increasing mortgage fees
and related income. The amortization of the MSR is
reflected in the tables below in the row Other changes in fair value.
The following table summarizes MSR activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Fair value at January 1, |
|
$ |
13,649 |
|
|
$ |
15,531 |
|
MSR activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originations of MSRs |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
Purchase of MSRs |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Disposition of MSRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net additions |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
Change in valuation due to inputs and assumptions(a) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Other changes in fair value(b) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
Total change in fair value of MSRs(c) |
|
|
(1,314 |
) |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
Fair value at March 31(d) |
|
$ |
13,093 |
|
|
$ |
15,531 |
|
|
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in income related to MSRs held at March 31 |
|
$ |
(751 |
) |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
Contractual service fees, late fees and other ancillary fees included in income |
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
Third-party mortgage loans serviced at March 31 (in billions) |
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
|
Servicer advances, net at March 31 (in billions)(e) |
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents MSR asset fair value adjustments due to changes in inputs, such as interest
rates and volatility, as well as updates to assumptions used in the valuation model. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes changes in MSR value due to modeled servicing portfolio runoff (i.e., amortization
or time decay). |
|
(c) |
|
Includes changes related to commercial real estate of $(2) million for both the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes $38 million and $39 million related to commercial real estate at March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents amounts the Firm pays as the servicer (e.g., scheduled principal and interest to a
trust, taxes and insurance), which will generally be reimbursed within a short period of time
after the advance from future cash flows from the trust or the underlying loans. The Firms
credit risk associated with these advances is minimal because reimbursement of the advances is
senior to all cash payments to investors. In addition, the Firm maintains the right to stop
payment if the collateral is insufficient to cover the advance. |
150
The following table presents the components of mortgage fees and related income (including the
impact of MSR risk management activities) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
RFS mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net production revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production revenue |
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
Repurchase losses |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
Net production revenue |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Net mortgage servicing revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan servicing revenue |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
Other changes in MSR asset fair value(a) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
Total operating revenue |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
Risk management: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in MSR asset fair value due to inputs or assumptions in model(b) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Derivative valuation adjustments and other |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
Total risk management |
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
Total RFS net mortgage servicing revenue |
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
654 |
|
|
All other(c) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
$ |
(487 |
) |
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes changes in the MSR value due to modeled servicing portfolio runoff (i.e.,
amortization or time decay). |
|
(b) |
|
Represents MSR asset fair value adjustments due to changes in inputs, such as interest rates
and volatility, as well as updates to assumptions used in the MSR valuation model. |
|
(c) |
|
Primarily represents risk management activities performed by the Chief Investment Office
(CIO) in the Corporate sector. |
The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the
Firms MSRs at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010; and it outlines the sensitivities of those
fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions, as defined below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except rates) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (CPR) |
|
|
10.15 |
% |
|
|
11.29 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(727 |
) |
|
$ |
(809 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
(1,568 |
) |
|
Weighted-average option adjusted spread |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 100 basis points adverse change |
|
$ |
(592 |
) |
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 200 basis points adverse change |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
CPR: Constant prepayment rate.
The sensitivity analysis in the preceding table is hypothetical and should be used with
caution. Changes in fair value based on variation in assumptions generally cannot be easily
extrapolated, because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value
may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may
have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in
one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
151
Other intangible assets
The $182 million decrease in other intangible assets during the three months ended March 31, 2011,
was predominantly due to $217 million in amortization.
The components of credit card relationships, core deposits and other intangible assets were as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
carrying |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
carrying |
(in millions) |
|
amount(a) |
|
amortization(a) |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
value |
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
$ |
3,829 |
|
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
5,789 |
|
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
Other credit cardrelated intangibles |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
4,132 |
|
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The decrease in the gross amount and accumulated amortization from December 31, 2010 was
due to the removal of fully amortized assets. |
Intangible assets of approximately $600 million consisting primarily of asset management
advisory contracts, were determined to have an indefinite life and are not amortized.
Amortization expense
The following table presents amortization expense related to credit card relationships, core
deposits and other intangible assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
All other intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other credit cardrelated intangibles |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Total amortization expense |
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
Future amortization expense
The following table presents estimated future amortization expense related to credit card
relationships, core deposits and other intangible assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit |
|
card related |
|
Core deposit |
|
Other |
|
For the year: (in millions) |
|
card relationships |
|
intangibles |
|
intangibles |
|
intangibles |
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
826 |
|
2012 |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
2013 |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
2014 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
2015 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
152
NOTE 17 DEPOSITS
For further discussion of deposits, see Note 19 on pages 263264 in JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report.
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits were as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
244,136 |
|
|
$ |
228,555 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand(a) |
|
|
34,944 |
|
|
|
33,368 |
|
Savings(b) |
|
|
345,558 |
|
|
|
334,632 |
|
Time (included $3,062 and $2,733 at fair value)(c) |
|
|
88,152 |
|
|
|
87,237 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
468,654 |
|
|
|
455,237 |
|
|
Total deposits in U.S. offices |
|
|
712,790 |
|
|
|
683,792 |
|
|
Non-U.S. offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
|
11,644 |
|
|
|
10,917 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
|
194,726 |
|
|
|
174,417 |
|
Savings |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
Time (included $1,215 and $1,636 at fair value)(c) |
|
|
75,959 |
|
|
|
60,636 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
271,395 |
|
|
|
235,660 |
|
|
Total deposits in non-U.S. offices |
|
|
283,039 |
|
|
|
246,577 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
995,829 |
|
|
$ |
930,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) accounts, and certain trust accounts. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes Money Market Deposit Accounts (MMDAs). |
|
(c) |
|
Includes structured notes classified as deposits for which the fair value option has been
elected. For further discussion, see Note 4 on pages 187189 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report. |
NOTE 18 OTHER BORROWED FUNDS
The following table details the components of other borrowed funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Banks(a) |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
Other |
|
|
35,204 |
|
|
|
32,075 |
|
|
Total other borrowed funds(b)(c) |
|
$ |
36,704 |
|
|
$ |
34,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, $23.0 billion of long-term advances from FHLBs were
reclassified from other borrowed funds to long-term debt. The prior-year period has been
revised to conform with the current presentation. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes other borrowed funds of $10.6 billion and $9.9 billion accounted for at fair value
at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes other borrowed funds of $16.4 billion and $14.8 billion secured by assets totaling
$16.3 billion and $15.0 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, JPMorgan Chase had no significant lines of credit
for general corporate purposes.
153
NOTE 19 EARNINGS PER SHARE
For a discussion of the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS), see Note 25 on
page 269 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. The following table presents the calculation of
basic and diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common equity |
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,136 |
|
|
$ |
2,974 |
|
Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
3,981.6 |
|
|
|
3,970.5 |
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,136 |
|
|
$ |
2,974 |
|
Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
3,981.6 |
|
|
|
3,970.5 |
|
Add: Employee stock options, SARs and warrants(a) |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
Total weighted-average diluted shares outstanding(b) |
|
|
4,014.1 |
|
|
|
3,994.7 |
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excluded from the computation of diluted EPS (due to the antidilutive effect) were
options issued under employee benefit plans and the warrants originally issued in 2008 under
the U.S. Treasurys Capital Purchase Program to purchase shares of the Firms common stock.
The aggregate number of shares issuable upon the exercise of such options and warrants was 85
million and 239 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Participating securities were included in the calculation of diluted EPS using the two-class
method, as this computation was more dilutive than the calculation using the treasury stock
method. |
154
NOTE 20 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
AOCI includes the after-tax change in unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities, foreign
currency translation adjustments (including the impact of related derivatives), cash flow hedging
activities, and net loss and prior service costs/(credit) related to the Firms defined benefit
pension and OPEB plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
service costs/(credit) |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
As of or for the three months ended |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of defined benefit |
|
|
other |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
gains/(losses) on |
|
|
adjustments, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pension and |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
(in millions) |
|
AFS securities(b) |
|
|
net of hedges |
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
OPEB plans |
|
|
income/(loss) |
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,498 |
(c) |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
(1,956 |
) |
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
Net change |
|
|
(251) |
(d) |
|
|
24 |
(e) |
|
|
(79) |
(f) |
|
|
17 |
(g) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,247 |
(c) |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
(1,939 |
) |
|
$ |
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
service costs/(credit) |
|
Accumulated |
As of or for the three months ended |
|
Unrealized |
|
Translation |
|
|
|
|
|
of defined benefit |
|
other |
March 31, 2010 |
|
gains/(losses) on |
|
adjustments, |
|
|
|
|
|
pension and |
|
comprehensive |
(in millions) |
|
AFS securities(b) |
|
net of hedges |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
OPEB plans |
|
income/(loss) |
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,032 |
(c) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
(2,288 |
) |
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle(a) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Net change |
|
|
796 |
(d) |
|
|
31 |
(e) |
|
|
85 |
(f) |
|
|
69 |
(g) |
|
|
981 |
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,699 |
(c) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
(2,219 |
) |
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the effect of adoption of accounting guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs.
AOCI decreased by $129 million due to the adoption of the accounting guidance related to VIEs,
as a result of the reversal of the fair value adjustments taken on retained AFS securities
that were eliminated in consolidation; for further discussion see
Note 16 on pages 244259 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the after-tax difference between the fair value
and amortized cost of securities accounted for as AFS. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011, January 1, 2011, March 31, 2010, and January 1, 2010, included after-tax
unrealized losses not related to credit on debt securities for which credit losses have been
recognized in income of $(65) million, $(81) million, $(193) million and $(226) million,
respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
The net change for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was due primarily to decreased
market value on pass-through agency MBS and agency collateralized mortgage obligations, as
well as on foreign government debt, partially offset by the narrowing of spreads on
collateralized loan obligations and foreign residential MBS. The net change for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, was due primarily to the narrowing of spreads on commercial and
nonagency residential MBS, as well as on collateralized loan obligations; also reflected
increased market value on pass-through agency residential MBS. |
|
(e) |
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, included after-tax gains/(losses) on foreign currency translation
from operations for which the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar of $262
million and $(170) million, respectively, partially offset by after-tax gains/(losses) on
hedges of $(238) million and $201 million, respectively. The Firm may not hedge its entire
exposure to foreign currency translation on net investments in foreign operations. |
|
(f) |
|
The net change for the three months ended March 31, 2011, included $71 million of after-tax
gains recognized in income, and $(8) million of after-tax losses, representing the net change
in derivative fair value that was reported in comprehensive income. The net change for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, included $(2) million of after-tax losses recognized in
income and $83 million of after-tax gains, representing the net change in derivative fair
value that was reported in comprehensive income. |
|
(g) |
|
The net changes for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, were due to
after-tax adjustments based on the final year-end actuarial valuations for the U.S. and
non-U.S. defined benefit pension and OPEB plans (for 2010 and 2009, respectively); and the
amortization of net loss and prior service credit into net periodic benefit cost. |
155
NOTE 21 OFFBALANCE SHEET LENDING-RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, GUARANTEES AND OTHER
COMMITMENTS
JPMorgan Chase provides lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees) to
meet the financing needs of its customers. The contractual amount of these financial instruments
represents the Firms maximum possible credit risk should the counterparty draw upon the commitment
or the Firm be required to fulfill its obligation under the guarantee, and the counterparty
subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of the contract. Most of these commitments and
guarantees expire without being drawn or a default occurring. As a result, the total contractual
amount of these instruments is not, in the Firms view, representative of its actual future credit
exposure or funding requirements. For a discussion of offbalance sheet lending-related financial
instruments and guarantees, and the Firms related accounting policies, see Note 30 on pages
275280 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
To provide for the risk of loss inherent in wholesale and consumer (excluding credit card) related
contracts, an allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments is maintained. See Note 14
on pages 139140 of this Form 10-Q for further discussion regarding the allowance for credit
losses on lending-related commitments.
The following table summarizes the contractual amounts and carrying values of offbalance sheet
lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments at March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010. The amounts in the table below for credit card and home equity lending-related
commitments represent the total available credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced,
and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these products will be utilized at
the same time. The Firm can reduce or cancel credit card lines of credit by providing the borrower
prior notice or, in some cases, without notice as permitted by law. The Firm may reduce or close
home equity lines of credit when there are significant decreases in the value of the underlying
property, or when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower.
Offbalance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual amount |
|
Carrying value(j) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Lending-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, excluding credit card: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity senior lien |
|
$ |
17,406 |
|
|
$ |
17,662 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home equity junior lien |
|
|
30,146 |
|
|
|
30,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
5,947 |
|
|
|
5,246 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Student and other |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer, excluding credit card |
|
|
64,560 |
|
|
|
65,403 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Credit card |
|
|
565,813 |
|
|
|
547,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
630,373 |
|
|
|
612,630 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Wholesale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit(a)(b) |
|
|
206,679 |
|
|
|
199,859 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Standby letters of credit and other financial
guarantees(a)(b)(c)(d) |
|
|
95,361 |
|
|
|
94,837 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
Unused advised lines of credit |
|
|
47,578 |
|
|
|
44,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other letters of credit(a)(d) |
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
6,663 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total wholesale |
|
|
355,561 |
|
|
|
346,079 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
Total lending-related |
|
$ |
985,934 |
|
|
$ |
958,709 |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
|
Other guarantees and commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities lending indemnifications(e) |
|
$ |
200,627 |
|
|
$ |
181,717 |
|
|
$NA |
|
$NA |
Derivatives qualifying as guarantees(f) |
|
|
87,360 |
|
|
|
87,768 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Unsettled reverse repurchase and securities borrowing
agreements(g) |
|
|
47,021 |
|
|
|
39,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other guarantees and commitments(h) |
|
|
6,373 |
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Loan sale and securitization-related indemnifications: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase liability(i) |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
3,285 |
|
Loans sold with recourse |
|
|
10,823 |
|
|
|
10,982 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, represents the contractual amount net of risk
participations totaling $570 million and $542 million, respectively, for other unfunded
commitments to extend credit; $22.8 billion and $22.4 billion, respectively, for standby
letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion,
respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve
Board these commitments are shown gross of risk participations. |
156
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Included credit enhancements and bond and commercial paper liquidity commitments to U.S.
states and municipalities, hospitals and other not-for-profit entities of $43.9 billion and
$43.4 billion, at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included unissued standby letters of credit
commitments of $41.5 billion and $41.6 billion, respectively. |
|
(d) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, JPMorgan Chase held collateral relating to $38.0
billion and $37.8 billion, respectively, of standby letters of credit; and $2.0 billion and
$2.1 billion, respectively, of other letters of credit. |
|
(e) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, collateral held by the Firm in support of
securities lending indemnification agreements was $203.4 billion and $185.0 billion,
respectively. Securities lending collateral comprises primarily cash, and securities issued by
governments that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) and U.S. government agencies. |
|
(f) |
|
Represents notional amounts of derivatives qualifying as guarantees. The carrying value at
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, reflected derivative payables of $467 million and $390
million, respectively, less derivative receivables of $95 million and $96 million,
respectively. |
|
(g) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the amount of commitments related to forward
starting reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements were $12.5 billion
and $14.4 billion, respectively. Commitments related to unsettled reverse repurchase
agreements and securities borrowing agreements with regular way settlement periods were $34.5
billion and $25.5 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(h) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included unfunded commitments of $943 million and
$1.0 billion, respectively, to third-party private equity funds; and $1.3 billion and $1.4
billion, respectively, to other equity investments. These commitments included $885 million
and $1.0 billion, respectively, related to investments that are generally fair valued at net
asset value as discussed in Note 3 on pages 94105 of this Form 10-Q. In addition, at both
March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included letters of credit hedged by derivative
transactions and managed on a market risk basis of $3.8 billion. |
|
(i) |
|
Represents estimated repurchase liability related to indemnifications for breaches of
representations and warranties in loan sale and securitization agreements. For additional
information, see Loan sale and securitization-related indemnifications on pages 158159 of
this Note. |
|
(j) |
|
For lending-related products, the carrying value represents the allowance for lending-related
commitments and the guarantee liability, for derivative-related products the carrying value
represents the fair value. For all other products the carrying value represents the valuation
reserve. |
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit are generally compromised of commitments for working
capital and general corporate purposes, as well as extensions of credit to support commercial paper
facilities and bond financings in the event that those obligations cannot be remarketed to new
investors.
Also included in other unfunded commitments to extend credit are commitments to noninvestment-grade
counterparties in connection with leveraged and acquisition finance activities, which were $5.5
billion and $5.9 billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. For further
information, see Note 3 and Note 4 on pages 94105 and 105106 respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Guarantees
The Firm considers the following offbalance sheet lending-related arrangements to be guarantees
under U.S. GAAP: standby letters of credit and financial guarantees, securities lending
indemnifications, certain indemnification agreements included within third-party contractual
arrangements and certain derivative contracts. For a further discussion of the offbalance sheet
lending-related arrangements the Firm considers to be guarantees, and the related accounting
policies, see Note 30 on pages 275280 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. The recorded
amounts of the liabilities related to guarantees and indemnifications at March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010, excluding the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments, are
discussed on pages 158159 of this Note.
Standby letters of credit
Standby letters of credit (SBLC) and other financial guarantees are conditional lending
commitments issued by the Firm to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party under
certain arrangements, such as commercial paper facilities, bond financings, acquisition financings,
trade and similar transactions. The carrying values of standby and other letters of credit were
$707 million at both March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, which were classified in
accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets; these carrying values
include $342 million and $347 million, respectively, for the allowance for lending-related
commitments, and $365 million and $360 million, respectively, for the guarantee liability and
corresponding asset.
157
The following table summarizes the types of facilities under which standby letters of credit and
other letters of credit arrangements are outstanding by the ratings profiles of the Firms
customers, as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees and other letters of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Standby letters of |
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of |
|
|
|
|
credit and other |
|
Other letters |
|
credit and other |
|
Other letters |
(in millions) |
|
financial guarantees |
|
of credit |
|
financial guarantees |
|
of credit |
|
Investment-grade(a) |
|
$ |
71,244 |
|
|
$ |
4,761 |
|
|
$ |
70,236 |
|
|
$ |
5,289 |
|
Noninvestment-grade(a) |
|
|
24,117 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
24,601 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
Total contractual amount(b) |
|
$ |
95,361 |
(c) |
|
$ |
5,943 |
|
|
$ |
94,837 |
(c) |
|
$ |
6,663 |
|
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Commitments with collateral |
|
|
38,034 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The ratings scale is based on the Firms internal ratings which generally correspond to
ratings as defined by S&P and Moodys. |
|
(b) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, represented contractual amount net of risk
participations totaling $22.8 billion and $22.4 billion, respectively, for standby letters of
credit and other financial guarantees; and $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, for
other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve these commitments are
shown gross of risk participations. |
|
(c) |
|
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, included unissued standby letters of credit
commitments of $41.5 billion and $41.6 billion, respectively. |
Derivatives qualifying as guarantees
In addition to the contracts described above, the Firm transacts certain derivative contracts that
meet the characteristics of a guarantee under U.S. GAAP. For further information on these
derivatives, see Note 30 on pages 275280 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report. The total
notional value of the derivatives that the Firm deems to be guarantees was $87.4 billion and $87.8
billion at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. The notional amount generally
represents the Firms maximum exposure to derivatives qualifying as guarantees. However, exposure
to certain stable value derivatives is contractually limited to a substantially lower percentage of
the notional amount; the notional amount on these stable value contracts was $26.1 billion and
$25.9 billion and the maximum exposure to loss was $2.7 billion, at both March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010. The fair values of the contracts reflects the probability of whether the Firm
will be required to perform under the contract. The fair value related to derivative guarantees
were derivative payables of $467 million and $390 million and derivative receivables of $95 million
and $96 million at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Firm reduces exposures
to these contracts by entering into offsetting transactions, or by entering into contracts that
hedge the market risk related to the derivative guarantees.
In addition to derivative contracts that meet the characteristics of a guarantee, the Firm is both
a purchaser and seller of credit protection in the credit derivatives market. For a further
discussion of credit derivatives, see Note 5 on pages 107113 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 6 on
pages 191199 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Loan sale- and securitization-related indemnifications
Indemnifications for breaches of representations and warranties
In connection with the Firms loan sale and securitization activities with the GSEs and other loan
sale and private-label securitization transactions, as described in Notes 13 and 15 on pages
122138 and 141149, respectively, of this Form 10-Q, and Notes 14 and 16 on pages 220238 and
244259, respectively of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report, the Firm has made representations
and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements. The Firm may be, and has been,
required to repurchase loans and/or indemnify the GSEs and other investors for losses due to
material breaches of these representations and warranties; however, predominantly all of the
repurchase demands received by the Firm and the Firms losses realized to date are related to loans
sold to the GSEs.
The Firm has recognized a repurchase liability of $3.5 billion and $3.3 billion, as of March 31,
2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, which is reported in accounts payable and other
liabilities net of probable recoveries from third parties.
Substantially all of the estimates and assumptions underlying the Firms established methodology
for computing its recorded repurchase liability including factors such as the amount of probable
future demands from purchasers, the ability of the Firm to cure identified defects, the severity of
loss upon repurchase or foreclosure, and recoveries from third parties require application of a
significant level of management judgment. Estimating the repurchase liability is further
complicated by limited and rapidly changing historical data and uncertainty surrounding numerous
external factors, including: (i) macro-economic factors and (ii) the level of future demands, which
is dependent, in part, on actions taken by third parties such as the GSEs and mortgage insurers.
While the Firm uses the best information available to it in
158
estimating its repurchase liability, the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise
and, accordingly, losses in excess of the amounts accrued as of March 31, 2011, are reasonably
possible.
The Firm believes the estimate of the range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of reserves
established, for its repurchase liability is from $0 to approximately
$1.8 billion at March 31, 2011.
This estimated range of reasonably possible loss is based on an assumed peak to trough decline in
home prices of 44%, which is an additional 11 percentage point decline in home prices beyond the
Firms current assumptions. Such a decline could increase the level of loan delinquencies, thereby
potentially increasing the repurchase demand rate from the GSEs and increasing loss severity on
repurchased loans, each of which could affect the Firms repurchase liability. The Firm does not
consider such a further decline in home prices to be likely to occur, and actual repurchase losses
could vary significantly from the Firms recorded repurchase liability or this estimate of
reasonably possible additional losses, depending on the outcome of various factors, including those
considered above.
The following table summarizes the change in the repurchase liability for each of the periods
presented.
Summary of changes in repurchase liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, (in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Repurchase liability at beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,285 |
|
|
$ |
1,705 |
|
Realized losses(a) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
Provision for repurchase losses |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
Repurchase liability at end of period |
|
$ |
3,474 |
|
|
$ |
1,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans, make-whole
settlements, settlements with claimants, and certain related expenses. Make-whole settlements
were $115 million and $105 million at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
Loans sold with recourse
The Firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a
recourse and nonrecourse basis. In nonrecourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Firm is
the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds (i.e., normal servicing advances). In recourse
servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing
predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are
less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance, plus accrued interest on the loan and the
cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Firms securitizations are
predominantly nonrecourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the
purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust. At March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, the unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse totaled $10.8 billion and $11.0
billion, respectively. The carrying value of the related liability that the Firm has recorded,
which is representative of the Firms view of the likelihood it will have to perform under this
guarantee, was $148 million and $153 million at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
159
NOTE 22 PLEDGED ASSETS AND COLLATERAL
For a discussion of the Firms pledged assets and collateral, see Note 31 on pages 280281 of
JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
Pledged assets
At March 31, 2011, assets were pledged to collateralize repurchase agreements, other securities
financing agreements, derivative transactions and for other purposes, including to secure
borrowings and public deposits. Certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged by the
secured parties and are identified as financial instruments owned (pledged to various parties) on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm
had pledged $305.4 billion and $288.7 billion, respectively, of financial instruments it owns that
may not be sold or repledged by the secured parties. Total assets pledged do not include assets of
consolidated VIEs; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. See Note 15
on pages 141149 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 16 on pages 244259 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report, for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs. For further
information regarding pledged assets, see Note 31 on page 281 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual
Report.
Collateral
At March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Firm had accepted assets as collateral that it could
sell or repledge, deliver or otherwise use with a fair value of approximately $730.4 billion and
$655.0 billion, respectively. This collateral was generally obtained under resale agreements,
securities borrowing agreements, customer margin loans and derivative agreements. Of the collateral
received, approximately $544.2 billion and $521.3 billion, respectively, were sold or repledged,
generally as collateral under repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements or to cover
short sales and to collateralize deposits and derivative agreements. For further information
regarding collateral, see Note 31 on page 281 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
NOTE 23 LITIGATION
As of March 31, 2011, the Firm and its subsidiaries are defendants or putative defendants in more
than 10,000 legal proceedings, in the form of regulatory/government investigations as well as
private, civil litigations. The litigations range from individual actions involving a single
plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially millions of class members. Investigations
involve both formal and informal proceedings, by both governmental agencies and self-regulatory
organizations. These legal proceedings are at varying stages of adjudication, arbitration or
investigation, and involve each of the Firms lines of business and geographies and a wide variety
of claims (including common law tort and contract claims and statutory antitrust, securities and
consumer protection claims), some of which present novel claims or legal theories.
The Firm believes the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of
reserves established, for its legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $4.5 billion at March
31, 2011. This estimated aggregate range of reasonably possible losses is based upon currently
available information for those proceedings in which the Firm is involved, taking into account the
Firms best estimate of such losses for those cases for which such estimate can be made. For
certain cases, the Firm does not believe that an estimate can currently be made. The Firms
estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the
fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants
(including the Firm) in many of such proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined,
the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings (including issues regarding class
certification and the scope of many of the claims), and the attendant uncertainty of the various
potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, the Firms estimate will change from time to
time, and actual losses may be more than the current estimate.
Set forth below are descriptions of the Firms material legal proceedings.
Auction-Rate Securities Investigations and Litigation. Beginning in March 2008, several regulatory
authorities initiated investigations of a number of industry participants, including the Firm,
concerning possible state and federal securities law violations in connection with the sale of
auction-rate securities. The market for many such securities had frozen and a significant number of
auctions for those securities began to fail in February 2008.
The Firm, on behalf of itself and affiliates, agreed to a settlement in principle with the New York
Attorney Generals Office which provided, among other things, that the Firm would offer to purchase
at par certain auction-rate securities purchased from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMorgan
Securities; formerly J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.), Chase Investment Services Corp. and Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc. by individual investors, charities and small- to medium-sized
businesses. The Firm also agreed to a substantively similar settlement in principle with the Office
of Financial Regulation
160
for the State of Florida and the North American Securities Administrator
Association (NASAA) Task Force, which agreed to recommend approval of the settlement to all
remaining states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Firm has finalized the settlement
agreements with the New York Attorney Generals Office and the Office of Financial Regulation for
the State of Florida. The settlement agreements provide for the payment of penalties totaling $25
million to all states. The Firm is currently in the process of finalizing consent agreements with
NASAAs member states; over 40 of these consent agreements have been finalized to date.
The Firm also faces a number of civil actions relating to the Firms sales of auction-rate
securities, including a putative securities class action in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York that seeks unspecified damages, and individual arbitrations and
lawsuits in various forums brought by institutional and individual investors that, together, seek
damages totaling more than $200 million relating to the Firms sales of auction-rate securities.
One action is brought by an issuer of auction-rate securities. The actions generally allege that
the Firm and other firms manipulated the market for auction-rate securities by placing bids at
auctions that affected these securities clearing rates or otherwise supported the auctions without
properly disclosing these activities. Some actions also allege that the Firm misrepresented that
auction-rate securities were short-term instruments. The Firm has filed motions to dismiss each of
the actions pending in federal court, which are being coordinated before the Southern District.
These motions are currently pending.
Additionally, the Firm was named in two putative antitrust class actions in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York. The actions allege that the Firm, along with
numerous other financial institution defendants, colluded to maintain and stabilize the
auction-rate securities market and then to withdraw their support for the auction-rate securities
market. In January 2010, the District Court dismissed both actions. An appeal is pending in the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
Bear Stearns Hedge Fund Matters. Bear Stearns, certain current or former subsidiaries of Bear
Stearns, including Bear Stearns Asset Management, Inc. (BSAM) and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., and
certain current or former Bear Stearns employees are named defendants (collectively the Bear
Stearns defendants) in multiple civil actions and arbitrations relating to alleged losses
resulting from the failure of the Bear Stearns High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Master Fund,
Ltd. (the High Grade Fund) and the Bear Stearns High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced
Leverage Master Fund, Ltd. (the Enhanced Leverage Fund) (collectively, the Funds). BSAM served
as investment manager for both of the Funds, which were organized such that there were U.S. and
Cayman Islands feeder funds that invested substantially all their assets, directly or indirectly,
in the Funds. The Funds are in liquidation.
There are currently four civil actions pending in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York relating to the Funds. Two of these actions involve derivative lawsuits
brought on behalf of purchasers of partnership interests in the two U.S. feeder funds, alleging
that the Bear Stearns defendants mismanaged the Funds and made material misrepresentations to
and/or withheld information from investors in the feeder funds. These actions seek, among other
things, unspecified compensatory damages based on alleged investor losses. The third action,
brought by the Joint Voluntary Liquidators of the Cayman Islands feeder funds, makes allegations
similar to those asserted in the derivative lawsuits related to the U.S. feeder funds, and seeks
compensatory and punitive damages. Motions to dismiss in these three cases have been granted in
part and denied in part. An agreement in principle has been reached, pursuant to which BSAM would
pay a maximum of approximately $19 million to settle the one derivative action relating to the
feeder fund to the High Grade Fund. BSAM has reserved the right not to proceed with this settlement
if plaintiff is unable to secure the participation of investors whose net contributions meet a
prescribed percentage of the aggregate net contributions to the High Grade Fund. The agreement in
principle remains subject to documentation and approval by the Court. In the other two actions, the
parties have been ordered by the Court to engage in settlement discussions and discovery has been
limited for the duration of that process. Total alleged losses in these three actions exceed $1
billion.
The fourth action was brought by Bank of America and Banc of America Securities LLC (together
BofA) alleging breach of contract and fraud in connection with a May 2007 $4 billion
securitization, known as a CDO-squared, for which BSAM served as collateral manager. This
securitization was composed of certain collateralized debt obligation (CDO) holdings that were
purchased by BofA from the Funds. Bank of America seeks in excess of $3 billion in damages.
Defendants motion to dismiss in this action was largely denied, an amended complaint was filed and
discovery is ongoing.
Bear Stearns Shareholder Litigation and Related Matters. Various shareholders of Bear Stearns have
commenced purported class actions against Bear Stearns and certain of its former officers and/or
directors on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired common stock of Bear Stearns
between December 14, 2006 and March 14, 2008 (the Class Period). During the Class Period, Bear
Stearns had between 115 and 120 million common shares
outstanding, and the price of those securities declined from a high of $172.61 to a low of $30 at
the end of the period. The
161
actions, originally commenced in several federal courts, allege that the
defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding Bear Stearns business and
financial results and that, as a result of those false statements, Bear Stearns common stock
traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period. Separately, several individual
shareholders of Bear Stearns have commenced or threatened to commence arbitration proceedings and
lawsuits asserting claims similar to those in the putative class actions. Certain of these matters
have been dismissed or settled. In addition, Bear Stearns and certain of its former officers and/or
directors have also been named as defendants in a number of purported class actions commenced in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking to represent the
interests of participants in the Bear Stearns Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) during the
time period of December 2006 to March 2008. These actions, brought under the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA), allege that defendants breached their fiduciary duties to plaintiffs
and to the other participants and beneficiaries of the ESOP by (a) failing to manage prudently the
ESOPs investment in Bear Stearns securities; (b) failing to communicate fully and accurately about
the risks of the ESOPs investment in Bear Stearns stock; (c) failing to avoid or address alleged
conflicts of interest; and (d) failing to monitor those who managed and administered the ESOP.
Bear Stearns, former members of Bear Stearns Board of Directors and certain of Bear Stearns
former executive officers have also been named as defendants in a shareholder derivative and class
action suit which is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York. Plaintiffs are asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, violations of federal
securities laws, waste of corporate assets and gross mismanagement, unjust enrichment, abuse of
control and indemnification and contribution in connection with the losses sustained by Bear
Stearns as a result of its purchases of subprime loans and certain repurchases of its own common
stock. Certain individual defendants are also alleged to have sold their holdings of Bear Stearns
common stock while in possession of material nonpublic information. Plaintiffs seek compensatory
damages in an unspecified amount.
All of the above-described actions filed in federal courts were ordered transferred and joined for
pre-trial purposes before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Defendants moved to dismiss the purported securities class action, the shareholders derivative
action and the ERISA action. In January 2011, the District Court granted the motions to dismiss the
derivative and ERISA actions, and denied the motion as to the securities action. Plaintiffs in the
derivative action have filed a motion for reconsideration of the dismissal as well as an appeal.
Plaintiffs in the ESOP action have filed a motion to alter the judgment and for leave to amend
their amended consolidated complaint. Discovery will now commence in the securities action.
City of Milan Litigation and Criminal Investigation. In January 2009, the City of Milan, Italy (the
City) issued civil proceedings against (among others) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J.P. Morgan
Securities Ltd. (together, JPMorgan Chase) in the District Court of Milan. The proceedings relate
to (a) a bond issue by the City in June 2005 (the Bond), and (b) an associated swap transaction,
which was subsequently restructured on a number of occasions between 2005 and 2007 (the Swap).
The City seeks damages and/or other remedies against JPMorgan Chase (among others) on the grounds
of alleged fraudulent and deceitful acts and alleged breach of advisory obligations in connection
with the Swap and the Bond, together with related swap transactions with other counterparties. The
judge directed four current and former JPMorgan Chase personnel and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as
well as other individuals and three other banks) to go forward to a full trial that started in May
2010. Although the Firm is not charged with any crime and does not face criminal liability, if one
or more of its employees were found guilty, the Firm could be subject to administrative sanctions,
including restrictions on its ability to conduct business in Italy and monetary penalties. Hearings
have continued on a weekly basis since May 2010.
Enron Litigation. JPMorgan Chase and certain of its officers and directors are involved in several
lawsuits that together seek substantial damages arising out of the Firms banking relationships
with Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries (Enron). A number of actions and other proceedings against
the Firm previously were resolved, including a class action lawsuit captioned Newby v. Enron Corp.
and adversary proceedings brought by Enrons bankruptcy estate. The remaining Enron-related actions
include individual actions by Enron investors, an action by an Enron counterparty, and a purported
class action filed on behalf of JPMorgan Chase employees who participated in the Firms 401(k) plan
asserting claims under the ERISA for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by JPMorgan Chase, its
directors and named officers. That action has been dismissed, and is on appeal to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Interchange Litigation. A group of merchants has filed a series of putative class action complaints
in several federal courts. The complaints allege that VISA and MasterCard, as well as certain other
banks and their respective bank holding companies, conspired to set the price of credit and debit
card interchange fees, enacted respective association rules in violation of antitrust laws, and
engaged in tying/bundling and exclusive dealing. The complaint seeks unspecified
damages and injunctive relief based on the theory that interchange would be lower or eliminated but
for the challenged
162
conduct. Based on publicly available estimates, Visa and MasterCard branded
payment cards generated approximately $40 billion of interchange fees industry-wide in 2009. All
cases have been consolidated in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New
York for pretrial proceedings. The Court has dismissed all claims relating to periods prior to
January 2004. The Court has not yet ruled on motions relating to the remainder of the case. Fact
and expert discovery in the case have closed. The Court has not yet ruled on plaintiffs class
certification motion.
In addition to the consolidated class action complaint, plaintiffs filed supplemental complaints
challenging the initial public offerings (IPOs) of MasterCard and Visa (the IPO Complaints).
With respect to the MasterCard IPO, plaintiffs allege that the offering violated Section 7 of the
Clayton Act and Section 1 of the Sherman Act and that the offering was a fraudulent conveyance.
With respect to the Visa IPO, plaintiffs are challenging the Visa IPO on antitrust theories
parallel to those articulated in the MasterCard IPO pleading. Defendants have filed motions to
dismiss the IPO Complaints. The Court has not yet ruled on those motions.
The parties also have filed motions seeking summary judgment as to various claims in the
complaints. Briefing is expected to be completed in June 2011.
Investment Management Litigation. Four cases have been filed claiming that investment portfolios
managed by JPMorgan Investment Management Inc. (JPMorgan Investment Management) were
inappropriately invested in securities backed by subprime residential real estate collateral.
Plaintiffs claim that JPMorgan Investment Management and related defendants are liable for losses
of more than $1 billion in market value of these securities. The first case was filed by NM Homes
One, Inc. in federal District Court in New York. Following rulings on motions addressed to the
pleadings, plaintiffs claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and
gross negligence survive, and discovery is proceeding. In the second case, which was filed by
Assured Guaranty (U.K.) in New York state court, the New York State Appellate Division allowed
plaintiff to proceed with its claims for breach of fiduciary duty and gross negligence, and for
breach of contract based on alleged violations of the Delaware Insurance Code. JPMorgan Investment
Managements appeal is pending in the New York State Court of Appeals. Discovery is also
proceeding. In the third case, filed by Ambac Assurance UK Limited in New York state court, the
lower court granted JPMorgan Investment Managements motion to dismiss. Plaintiff appealed and the
appeal is pending. The fourth case was filed by CMMF LLP in New York state court. The amended
complaint asserts claims under New York law for breach of fiduciary duty, gross negligence, breach
of contract and negligent misrepresentation. The lower court denied in part defendants motion to
dismiss and discovery is proceeding.
Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy Proceedings. In May 2010, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI) and its
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed a complaint (and later an amended complaint)
against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of New York that asserts both federal bankruptcy law and state common law claims, and seeks, among
other relief, to recover $8.6 billion in collateral that was transferred to JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. in the weeks preceding LBHIs bankruptcy. The amended complaint also seeks unspecified damages
on the grounds that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s collateral requests hastened LBHIs demise. The
Firm has moved to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint in its entirety. The Firm also filed
counterclaims against LBHI alleging that LBHI fraudulently induced the Firm to make large clearing
advances to Lehman against inappropriate collateral, which left the Firm with more than $25 billion
in claims against the estate of Lehmans broker-dealer, which could be unpaid if the Firm is
required to return any collateral to Lehman. Discovery is underway with a trial scheduled for 2012.
In addition, in April 2011 the Firm and the SIPA Trustee for LBHIs U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary,
Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI) announced that they had reached an agreement to return more than $800
million in alleged LBI customer assets to the LBI Estate for distribution to its customer
claimants. The agreement is subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. The Firm has also
responded to various regulatory inquiries regarding the Lehman matter.
Madoff Litigation. JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Securities LLC,
and JPMorgan Securities Ltd. have been named as defendants in a lawsuit brought by the trustee for
the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (the Trustee). The Trustee asserts
28 causes of action against JPMorgan Chase, 16 of which seek to avoid certain transfers (direct or
indirect) made to JPMorgan Chase that are alleged to have been preferential or fraudulent under the
federal Bankruptcy Code and the New York Debtor and Creditor Law. The remaining causes of action
are for, among other things, aiding and abetting fraud, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary
duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. The complaint generally alleges that JPMorgan Chase, as
Madoffs long-time bank, facilitated the maintenance of Madoffs Ponzi scheme and overlooked signs
of wrongdoing in order to obtain profits and fees. The complaint purports to seek approximately $6
billion in damages from JPMorgan Chase, and to recover approximately $425 million in transfers that
JPMorgan Chase allegedly received directly or indirectly from Bernard
163
Madoffs brokerage firm. JPMorgan Chase has filed a motion to return the case from the Bankruptcy
Court to the District Court, and intends to seek the dismissal of all or most of the Trustees
claims once that motion is decided.
Separately, J.P. Morgan Trust Company (Cayman) Limited, JPMorgan (Suisse) SA, J.P. Morgan
Securities Ltd., and Bear Stearns Alternative Assets International Ltd. have been named as
defendants in several suits in Bankruptcy Court and state and federal courts in New York arising
out of the liquidation proceedings of Fairfield Sentry Limited and Fairfield Sigma Limited
(together, Fairfield), so-called Madoff feeder funds. These actions advance theories of mistake
and restitution and seek to recover payments previously made to defendants by the funds totaling
approximately $140 million.
In addition, a purported class action is pending against JPMorgan Chase in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, as is a motion by separate potential class
plaintiffs to add claims against JPMorgan Chase, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities
LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. to an already-pending purported class action in the same court.
The allegations in these complaints largely track those raised by the Trustee. Defendants motions
to dismiss and opposition to the motions for leave to amend are currently due on June 29, 2011.
Finally, JPMorgan Chase is a defendant in five actions pending in the New York state court and one
individual action in federal court in New York. The allegations in all of these actions are
essentially identical, and involve claims against the Firm for aiding and abetting fraud, aiding
and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. In the federal action, the
Firm prevailed on its motion to dismiss before the District Court, and plaintiff appealed. In the
state court actions, the Firms motion to dismiss has been fully-briefed and the parties are
awaiting the courts decision. The Firm has also responded to various governmental inquiries
concerning the Madoff matter.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation and Regulatory Investigations. JPMorgan Chase and affiliates,
Bear Stearns and affiliates and Washington Mutual affiliates have been named as defendants in a
number of cases in their various roles as issuer or underwriter in mortgage-backed securities
(MBS) offerings. These cases include purported class action suits, actions by individual
purchasers of securities, actions by insurance companies that guaranteed payments of principal and
interest for particular tranches and an action by a trustee. Although the allegations vary by
lawsuit, these cases generally allege that the offering documents for more than $100 billion of
securities issued by dozens of securitization trusts contained material misrepresentations and
omissions, including statements regarding the underwriting standards pursuant to which the
underlying mortgage loans were issued, or assert that various representations or warranties
relating to the loans were breached at the time of origination.
In the actions against the Firm as an MBS issuer (and, in some cases, also as an underwriter of its
own MBS offerings), three purported class actions are pending against JPMorgan Chase and Bear
Stearns, and/or certain of their affiliates and current and former employees, in the United States
District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York. Defendants have moved to
dismiss these actions. One of those motions has been granted in part to dismiss all claims relating
to MBS offerings in which a named plaintiff was not a purchaser or the claims were barred by
statutes of limitations. The other two motions remain pending. In addition, Washington Mutual
affiliates, WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. and WaMu Capital Corp., along with certain former officers
or directors of WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp., have been named as defendants in three
now-consolidated purported class action cases pending in the Western District of Washington.
Defendants motion to dismiss was granted in part to dismiss all claims relating to MBS offerings
in which a named plaintiff was not a purchaser. Plaintiffs are seeking class certification, and
discovery is ongoing.
In other actions brought against the Firm as an MBS issuer (and, in some cases, also as an
underwriter) certain JPMorgan Chase entities, several Bear Stearns entities, and certain Washington
Mutual affiliates are defendants in ten separate individual actions commenced by the Federal Home
Loan Banks of Pittsburgh, Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago, Indianapolis, Atlanta and Boston in various
state courts around the country; and certain JPMorgan Chase, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual
entities are also among the defendants named in separate individual actions commenced by various
institutional investors in federal and states courts. Certain of the state court proceedings have
been removed to federal court, and motions to remand are pending.
EMC Mortgage Corporation (EMC), a subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase, and certain other JPMorgan Chase
entities are defendants in four pending actions commenced by bond insurers that guaranteed payments
of principal and interest on approximately $3.6 billion of certain classes of seven different MBS
offerings sponsored by EMC. Two of those actions, commenced by Assured Guaranty Corp. and Syncora
Guarantee, Inc., respectively, are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York. The third action, filed by Ambac Assurance Corporation, was dismissed on
jurisdictional grounds by the United States District for the Southern District of New York. The
dismissal is on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Ambac has also
filed a nearly identical complaint
164
in New York state court. Defendants have moved to stay the state court proceeding pending the
outcome of the federal appeal. The fourth action, commenced by CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.,
is pending in state court in Texas. In each action, plaintiff claims that the underlying mortgage
loans had origination defects that purportedly violate certain representations and warranties given
by EMC to plaintiffs, and that EMC has breached the relevant agreements between the parties by
failing to repurchase allegedly defective mortgage loans. In addition, the Ambac and CIFG
complaints allege fraudulent inducement. Each action seeks unspecified damages and an order
compelling EMC to repurchase those loans. The CIFG complaint seeks punitive damages.
In the actions against the Firm solely as an underwriter of other issuers MBS offerings, the Firm
has contractual rights to indemnification from the issuers, but those indemnity rights may prove
effectively unenforceable where the issuers are now defunct, such as affiliates of IndyMac Bancorp
(IndyMac Trusts) and Thornburg Mortgage (Thornburg). With respect to the IndyMac Trusts,
JPMorgan Securities, along with numerous other underwriters and individuals, is named as a
defendant, both in its own capacity and as successor to Bear Stearns in a purported class action
pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York brought on behalf
of purchasers of securities in various Indy-Mac Trust MBS offerings. The Court in that action has
dismissed claims as to certain such securitizations, including all offerings in which no named
plaintiff purchased securities, and allowed claims as to other offerings to proceed. Plaintiffs
motion to certify a class of investors in certain offerings is pending, and discovery is ongoing.
In addition, JPMorgan Securities and JPMorgan Chase are named as defendants in an individual action
filed by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh in connection with a single offering by an
affiliate of IndyMac Bancorp. Discovery in that action is ongoing. Separately, JPMorgan Securities,
as successor to Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., along with other underwriters and certain individuals,
are defendants in an action pending in state court in California brought by MBIA Insurance Corp.
(MBIA). The action relates to certain securities issued by IndyMac trusts in offerings in which
Bear Stearns was an underwriter, and as to which MBIA provided guaranty insurance policies. MBIA
purports to be subrogated to the rights of the MBS holders, and seeks recovery of sums it has paid
and will pay pursuant to those policies. Discovery is ongoing. With respect to Thornburg, a Bear
Stearns subsidiary is also a named defendant in a purported class action pending in the United
States District Court for the District of New Mexico along with a number of other financial
institutions that served as depositors and/or underwriters for three Thornburg MBS offerings.
Defendants have moved to dismiss this action.
In addition to the above-described litigation, the Firm has also received, and responded to, a
number of subpoenas and informal requests for information from federal and state authorities
concerning mortgage-related matters, including inquiries concerning a number of transactions
involving the Firms underwriting and issuance of MBS and its participation in offerings of certain
collateralized debt obligations. As has been previously reported,
JPMorgan Securities has been cooperating with the staff of the
SECs Division of Enforcement regarding its investigation of
certain collateralized debt obligations, and is currently in
advanced discussions with the staff concerning a potential resolution
of that investigation. There can be no assurance that any such
resolution will be finalized or approved.
In addition to the above mortgage-related matters, the Firm is now a defendant in an action
commenced by Deutsche Bank, described in more detail below with respect to the Washington Mutual
Litigations.
Mortgage Foreclosure Investigations and Litigation. Multiple state and federal officials have
announced investigations into the procedures followed by mortgage servicing companies and banks,
including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates, relating to foreclosure and loss mitigation
processes. The Firm is cooperating with these investigations, and these investigations could result
in material fines, penalties, equitable remedies (including requiring default servicing or other
process changes), or other enforcement actions, as well as significant legal costs in responding to
governmental investigations and additional litigation. The Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency and the Federal Reserve have issued Consent Orders as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and
JPMorgan Chase & Co., respectively. In their Orders, the regulators have mandated significant
changes to the Firms servicing and default business and outlined requirements to implement these
changes. Included in these requirements is the retention of an independent consultant to conduct an
independent review of certain residential foreclosure actions or proceedings for loans serviced by
the Firm that have been pending at any time from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010, as well as
residential foreclosure sales that occurred during this time period. These regulators have reserved
the right to impose civil monetary penalties at a later date. Investigations by other state and
federal authorities remain pending.
Four purported class action lawsuits have also been filed against the Firm relating to its mortgage
foreclosure procedures. Additionally, Bank of America has tendered defense of a purported class
action brought against it involving an EMC loan. One of the cases has been voluntarily dismissed
with prejudice by the plaintiff. The Firm has moved to dismiss the remaining cases.
As of January 2011, the Firm had resumed initiation of new foreclosure proceedings in nearly all
states in which it had previously suspended such proceedings, utilizing revised procedures in
connection with the execution of affidavits and other documents used by Firm employees in the
foreclosure process. The Firm is also in the process of reviewing pending
165
foreclosure matters to determine whether remediation of specific documentation is necessary, and is
resuming pending foreclosures as the review, and if necessary, remediation, of each pending matter
is completed.
Municipal Derivatives Investigations and Litigation. The Department of Justice (in conjunction with
the Internal Revenue Service), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a group of state
attorneys general and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have been investigating
JPMorgan Chase and Bear Stearns for possible antitrust, securities and tax-related violations in
connection with the bidding or sale of guaranteed investment contracts and derivatives to municipal
issuers. The Philadelphia Office of the SEC provided notice to JPMorgan Securities that it intends
to recommend that the SEC bring civil charges in connection with its investigation. JPMorgan
Securities has responded to that notice, as well as to a separate notice that the Philadelphia
Office of the SEC provided to Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. The Firm has been cooperating with all of
these investigations, and is seeking to resolve them on a negotiated basis.
Purported class action lawsuits and individual actions (the Municipal Derivatives Actions) have
been filed against JPMorgan Chase and Bear Stearns, as well as numerous other providers and
brokers, alleging antitrust violations in the reportedly $100 billion to $300 billion annual market
for financial instruments related to municipal bond offerings referred to collectively as
municipal derivatives. The Municipal Derivatives Actions have been consolidated in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Court denied in part and granted
in part defendants motions to dismiss the purported class and individual actions, permitting
certain claims to proceed against the Firm and others under federal and California state antitrust
laws and under the California false claims act. Subsequently, a number of additional individual
actions asserting substantially similar claims, including claims under New York and West Virginia
state antitrust statutes, were filed against JPMorgan Chase, Bear Stearns and numerous other
defendants. All of these cases have been coordinated for pretrial purposes in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York. Discovery is ongoing.
Following J.P. Morgan Securities settlement with the SEC in connection with certain Jefferson
County, Alabama (the County) warrant underwritings and swap transactions, various parties have
brought civil litigation against the Firm. The County and a putative class of sewer rate payers
have filed complaints against the Firm and several other defendants in Alabama state court. The
suits allege that the Firm made payments to certain third parties in exchange for being chosen to
underwrite more than $3 billion in warrants issued by the County and chosen as the counterparty for
certain swaps executed by the County. The complaints also allege that the Firm concealed these
third-party payments and that, but for this concealment, the County would not have entered into the
transactions. The Court denied the Firms motions to dismiss the complaints in both proceedings.
The Firm filed a mandamus petition with the Alabama Supreme Court, seeking immediate appellate
review of this decision. The mandamus petition in the Countys lawsuit was denied in April 2011.
The mandamus petition in the lawsuit brought by sewer ratepayers remains pending.
Separately, two insurance companies that guaranteed the payment of principal and interest on
warrants issued by Jefferson County have filed separate actions against the Firm in New York state
court. Their complaints assert that the Firm fraudulently misled them into issuing insurance based
upon substantially the same alleged conduct described above and other alleged non-disclosures. One
insurer claims that it insured an aggregate principal amount of nearly $1.2 billion and seeks
unspecified damages in excess of $400 million, as well as unspecified punitive damages. The other
insurer claims that it insured an aggregate principal amount of more than $378 million and seeks
recovery of $4 million allegedly paid under the policies to date as well as any future payments and
unspecified punitive damages. In December 2010, the court denied the Firms motions to dismiss each
of the complaints. Discovery is proceeding.
Overdraft Fee/Debit Posting Order Litigation. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. has been named as a
defendant in several purported class actions relating to its practices in posting debit card
transactions to customers deposit accounts. Plaintiffs allege that the Firm improperly re-ordered
debit card transactions from the highest amount to lowest amount before processing these
transactions in order to generate unwarranted overdraft fees. Plaintiffs contend that the Firm
should have processed such transactions in the chronological order they were authorized. Plaintiffs
seek the disgorgement of all overdraft fees paid to the Firm by plaintiffs, since approximately
2003, as a result of the re-ordering of debit card transactions. The claims against the Firm have
been consolidated with numerous complaints against other national banks in Multi-District
Litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The
Firms motion to compel arbitration of certain plaintiffs claims was denied by the District Court.
That ruling is currently on appeal. Discovery is proceeding in the District Court. Plaintiffs
motion for class certification is pending.
Petters Bankruptcy and Related Matters. JPMorgan Chase and certain of its affiliates, including One
Equity Partners, LLC (OEP), have been named as defendants in several actions filed in connection
with the receivership and bankruptcy proceedings pertaining to Thomas J. Petters and certain
entities affiliated with Petters (collectively, Petters) and the
166
Polaroid Corporation. The principal actions against JPMorgan Chase and its affiliates have been
brought by the receiver in Petters personal bankruptcy and the trustees in the bankruptcy
proceedings for three Petters entities, and generally seek to avoid, on fraudulent transfer and
preference grounds, certain purported transfers in connection with (i) the 2005 acquisition of
Polaroid by Petters, which at the time was majority-owned by OEP; (ii) two credit facilities that
JPMorgan Chase and other financial institutions entered into with Polaroid; and (iii) a credit line
and investment accounts held by Petters. The actions collectively seek recovery of approximately
$450 million. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaints in the actions filed by the Petters
bankruptcy trustees and have also sought to transfer those actions to the United States District
Court for the District of Minnesota, where the receivers action is pending.
Securities Lending Litigation. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. has been named as a defendant in four
putative class actions asserting ERISA and other claims pending in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York brought by participants in the Firms securities lending
business. A fifth lawsuit was filed in New York state court by an individual participant in the
program. Three of the purported class actions, which have been consolidated, relate to investments
of approximately $500 million in medium-term notes of Sigma Finance Inc. (Sigma). In August 2010,
the Court certified a plaintiff class consisting of all securities lending participants that held
Sigma medium-term notes on September 30, 2008, including those that held the notes by virtue of
participation in the investment of cash collateral through a collective fund, as well as those that
held the notes by virtue of the investment of cash collateral through individual accounts. All
discovery has been completed. JPMorgan Chase has moved for partial summary judgment as to
plaintiffs duty of loyalty claim, in which it is alleged that the Firm created an impermissible
conflict of interest by providing repurchase financing to Sigma while also holding Sigma
medium-term notes in securities lending accounts.
The fourth putative class action concerns investments of approximately $500 million in Lehman
Brothers medium-term notes. The Firm has moved to dismiss the amended complaint and is awaiting a
decision. Discovery is proceeding while the motion is pending. The New York state court action,
which is not a class action, concerns the plaintiffs alleged loss of money in both Sigma and
Lehman Brothers medium-term notes. The Firm has answered the complaint. Discovery is proceeding.
Service Members Civil Relief Act and Housing and Economic Recovery Act Investigations and
Litigation. Multiple government officials have announced inquiries into the Firms procedures
related to the Service Members Civil Relief Act (SCRA) and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act
of 2008 (HERA). These inquiries have been prompted by the Firms public statements about its SCRA
and HERA compliance and actions to remedy certain instances in which the Firm mistakenly charged
active or recently-active military personnel mortgage interest and fees in excess of that permitted
by SCRA and HERA, and in a number of instances, foreclosed on borrowers protected by SCRA and HERA.
The Firm has implemented a number of procedural enhancements and controls to strengthen its SCRA
and HERA compliance. In addition, an individual borrower filed a nationwide class action in United
States District Court for South Carolina against the Firm alleging violations of the SCRA related
to home loans. The Firm agreed to pay $27 million plus attorneys fees, in addition to
reimbursements previously paid by the Firm, to settle the class action. The settlement is subject
to court approval.
Washington Mutual Litigations. Subsequent to JPMorgan Chases acquisition from the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) of substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities
of Washington Mutual Bank (Washington Mutual Bank) in September 2008, Washington Mutual Banks
parent holding company, Washington Mutual, Inc. (WMI) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, WMI
Investment Corp. (together, the Debtors), both commenced voluntary cases under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware (the Bankruptcy Case). In the Bankruptcy Case, the Debtors have asserted rights and
interests in certain assets. The assets in dispute include principally the following: (a)
approximately $4 billion in trust securities contributed by WMI to Washington Mutual Bank (the
Trust Securities); (b) the right to tax refunds arising from overpayments attributable to
operations of Washington Mutual Bank and its subsidiaries; (c) ownership of and other rights in
approximately $4 billion that WMI contends are deposit accounts at Washington Mutual Bank and one
of its subsidiaries; and (d) ownership of and rights in various other contracts and other assets
(collectively, the Disputed Assets).
WMI, JPMorgan Chase and the FDIC have since been involved in litigations over these and other
claims pending in the Bankruptcy Court and the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia.
In May 2010, WMI, JPMorgan Chase and the FDIC announced a global settlement agreement among
themselves and significant creditor groups (the Global Settlement Agreement). The Global
Settlement Agreement is incorporated into WMIs proposed Chapter 11 plan (the Plan) that has been
submitted to the Bankruptcy Court. If approved by the Bankruptcy Court, the Global Settlement would
resolve numerous disputes among WMI, JPMorgan Chase, the FDIC in
167
its capacity as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank and the FDIC in its corporate capacity, as well
as those of significant creditor groups, including disputes relating to the Disputed Assets.
Other proceedings related to Washington Mutuals failure are also pending before the Bankruptcy
Court. Among other actions, in July 2010, certain holders of the Trust Securities commenced an
adversary proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court against JPMorgan Chase, WMI, and other entities
seeking, among other relief, a declaratory judgment that WMI and JPMorgan Chase do not have any
right, title or interest in the Trust Securities. In early January 2011, the Bankruptcy Court
granted summary judgment to JPMorgan Chase and denied summary judgment to the plaintiffs in the
Trust Securities adversary proceeding.
The Bankruptcy Court considered confirmation of the Plan, including the Global Settlement
Agreement, in hearings in early December 2010. In early January 2011, the Bankruptcy Court issued
an opinion in which it concluded that the Global Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable, but
that the Plan cannot be confirmed until the parties correct certain deficiencies, which include the
scope of releases. None of these deficiencies relates to the Disputed Assets. The Equity Committee
has filed a petition seeking a direct appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit from so much of the Bankruptcy Courts ruling that found the settlement to be fair and
reasonable. A revised Plan was filed with the Bankruptcy Court in February 2011, and the Bankruptcy
Court has scheduled confirmation hearings for early June 2011. If the Global Settlement is effected
and the Plan is confirmed, then the Firm currently estimates it will not incur net additional
liabilities beyond those already reflected in its balance sheet for the numerous disputes covered
by the Global Settlement.
Other proceedings related to Washington Mutuals failure are pending before the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia and include a lawsuit brought by Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, initially against the FDIC, asserting an estimated $6 billion to $10 billion in
damages based upon alleged breach of various mortgage securitization agreements and alleged
violation of certain representations and warranties given by certain WMI subsidiaries in connection
with those securitization agreements. The case includes assertions that JPMorgan Chase may have
assumed liabilities relating to the mortgage securitization agreements. In April 2011, the District
Court denied as premature motions by the Firm and the FDIC that sought a ruling on whether the FDIC
retained liability for Deutsche Banks claims.
In addition, JPMorgan Chase was sued in an action originally filed in State Court in Texas (the
Texas Action) by certain holders of WMI common stock and debt of WMI and Washington Mutual Bank
who seek unspecified damages alleging that JPMorgan Chase acquired substantially all of the assets
of Washington Mutual Bank from the FDIC at an allegedly too-low price. The Texas Action was
transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which ultimately
granted JPMorgan Chases and the FDICs motions to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs appeal of
this dismissal is pending.
* * *
In addition to the various legal proceedings discussed above, JPMorgan Chase and its subsidiaries
are named as defendants or otherwise involved in a substantial number of other legal proceedings.
The Firm believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently
outstanding legal proceedings and it intends to defend itself vigorously in all such matters.
Additional legal proceedings may be initiated from time to time in the future.
The Firm has established reserves for several hundred of its currently outstanding legal
proceedings. The Firm accrues for potential liability arising from such proceedings when it is
probable that such liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably
estimated. The Firm evaluates its outstanding legal proceedings each quarter to assess its
litigation reserves, and makes adjustments in such reserves, upwards or downwards, as appropriate,
based on managements best judgment after consultation with counsel. During the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Firm incurred $1.1 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, of
litigation expense. There is no assurance that the Firms litigation reserves will not need to be
adjusted in the future.
In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, particularly
where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the matters present novel
legal theories, involve a large number of parties or are in early stages of discovery, the Firm
cannot state with confidence what the eventual outcome of the currently pending matters will be,
what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these pending matters will be or what the eventual
loss, fines, penalties or impact related to each currently pending matter may be. JPMorgan Chase
believes, based upon its current knowledge, after consultation with counsel and after taking into
account its current litigation reserves, that the legal proceedings currently pending against it
should not have a material adverse effect on the Firms consolidated financial condition. The Firm
notes, however, that in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, there is no
168
assurance the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves
currently accrued by the Firm; as a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to
JPMorgan Chases operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the
size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of JPMorgan Chases income for that period.
NOTE 24 BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Firm is managed on a line of business basis. There are six major reportable business segments
Investment Bank, Retail Financial Services, Card Services, Commercial Banking, Treasury &
Securities Services and Asset Management, as well as a Corporate/Private Equity segment. The
business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the type of
customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated
by management. Results of these lines of business are presented on a managed basis. For a
definition of managed basis, see the footnotes to the table below. For a further discussion
concerning JPMorgan Chases business segments, see Business Segment Results on page 15 of this Form
10-Q, and pages 6768 and Note 34 on pages 290293 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
169
Segment results
The following tables provide a summary of the Firms segment results for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, on a managed basis. Total net revenue (noninterest revenue and net
interest income) for each of the segments is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis.
Accordingly, revenue from tax-exempt securities and investments that receive tax credits are
presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable securities and investments. This
approach allows management to assess the comparability of revenue arising from both taxable and
tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to these items is recorded within
income tax expense/(benefit).
Effective
January 1, 2011, capital allocated to CS was reduced, largely reflecting portfolio runoff and the improving risk profile of the business;
capital allocated to TSS was increased. The Firm continues to
assess the level of capital required for each line of business, as well as the assumptions and
methodologies used to allocate capital to the business segments, and further refinements may be
implemented in future periods.
Segment results and reconciliation(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Investment |
|
Retail Financial |
|
Card |
|
Commercial |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Bank |
|
Services |
|
Services |
|
Banking |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
6,176 |
|
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
$ |
782 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
8,233 |
|
|
|
6,275 |
|
|
|
3,982 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Credit allocation income(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
5,262 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
2,370 |
|
|
$ |
(208 |
) |
|
$ |
1,343 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
28,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
815,828 |
|
|
|
364,266 |
|
|
|
138,113 |
|
|
|
140,400 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Treasury & |
|
Asset |
|
Corporate/ |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Securities Services |
|
Management |
|
Private Equity |
|
Items(c) |
|
Total |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
2,020 |
|
|
$ |
1,478 |
|
|
$ |
(424 |
) |
|
$ |
13,316 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
11,905 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
25,221 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
Credit allocation income/(expense)(b) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,995 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
8,057 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,555 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
$ |
66,915 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
169,415 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
47,873 |
|
|
|
68,918 |
|
|
|
529,054 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
2,104,452 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
NM |
|
NM |
|
|
13 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
NM |
|
NM |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Investment |
|
Retail Financial |
|
Card |
|
Commercial |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Bank |
|
Services |
|
Services |
|
Banking |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
6,191 |
|
|
$ |
2,752 |
|
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
3,689 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
8,319 |
|
|
|
7,776 |
|
|
|
4,447 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Credit allocation income(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
4,838 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
663 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
273 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
2,471 |
|
|
$ |
(131 |
) |
|
$ |
(303 |
) |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
28,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
676,122 |
|
|
|
393,867 |
|
|
|
156,968 |
|
|
|
133,013 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Treasury & |
|
Asset |
|
Corporate/ |
|
Reconciling |
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Securities Services |
|
Management |
|
Private Equity |
|
Items(c) |
|
Total |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
$ |
1,774 |
|
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
$ |
(441 |
) |
|
$ |
13,961 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
27,671 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
Credit allocation income/(expense)(b) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
2,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
Income/(loss) before income tax
expense/(benefit) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
4,537 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
Average common equity |
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
$ |
52,094 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
156,094 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
38,273 |
|
|
|
62,525 |
|
|
|
577,912 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
2,038,680 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
NM |
|
NM |
|
|
8 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
NM |
|
NM |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In addition to analyzing the Firms results on a reported basis, management reviews the
Firms lines of business results on a managed basis, which is a non-GAAP financial measure.
The Firms definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes
certain reclassifications as discussed below that do not have any impact on net income as
reported by the lines of business or by the Firm as a whole. |
|
(b) |
|
IB manages credit exposures related to the Global Corporate Bank (GCB) on behalf of IB and
TSS. Effective January 1, 2011, IB and TSS will share the economics related to the Firms GCB
clients. Included within this allocation are net revenues, provision for credit losses, as
well as expenses. Prior-year period reflected a reimbursement to IB for a portion of the total
costs of managing the credit portfolio. IB recognizes this credit allocation as a component of
all other income. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Segment managed results reflect revenue on a fully tax-equivalent basis, with the
corresponding income tax impact recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These
adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firms reported U.S. GAAP
results. Tax-equivalent adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, were
as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
171
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
JPMorgan Chase & Co.:
We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries (the
Firm) as of March 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, and the consolidated statements of cash flows and
consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity and comprehensive income for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, included in the Firms Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011. These interim financial statements are the
responsibility of the Firms management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
consolidated interim financial statements, for them to be in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 28,
2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2010, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet
from which it has been derived.
May 6, 2011
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017
172
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, INTEREST AND RATES
(Taxable-Equivalent Interest and Rates; in millions, except rates)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(annualized) |
|
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(annualized) |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with banks |
|
$ |
37,155 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
$ |
64,229 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
% |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreements |
|
|
202,481 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
170,036 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
114,589 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
114,636 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Trading assets debt instruments |
|
|
275,512 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
|
248,089 |
|
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
Securities |
|
|
318,936 |
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
(d) |
|
|
337,441 |
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
(d) |
Loans |
|
|
688,133 |
|
|
|
9,531 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
725,136 |
|
|
|
10,576 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
Other assets(a) |
|
|
49,887 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
27,885 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,686,693 |
|
|
|
15,566 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
1,687,452 |
|
|
|
16,935 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(31,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
29,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets equity instruments |
|
|
141,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets derivative receivables |
|
|
85,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
48,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
126,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,104,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,038,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
700,921 |
|
|
$ |
922 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
|
$ |
677,431 |
|
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
% |
Short-term and other liabilities(b)(c) |
|
|
508,902 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
478,629 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
72,932 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
98,104 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
Long-term debt(c) |
|
|
269,156 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
281,744 |
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,551,911 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
1,535,908 |
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
229,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities equity instruments |
|
|
7,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities derivative payables |
|
|
71,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other liabilities, including the allowance
for lending-related commitments |
|
|
66,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,927,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
169,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
177,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,104,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,038,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.24 |
% |
Net interest income and net yield on
interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,024 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,800 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes margin loans. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes brokerage customer payables. |
|
(c) |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, long-term advances from FHLBs were reclassified from other borrowed
funds to long-term debt. The prior-year period has been revised to
conform with the current presentation; average long-term FHLBs advances for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 were $19.2 billion. |
|
(d) |
|
For the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the annualized rates for AFS securities,
based on amortized cost, were 2.92% and 3.59%, respectively. |
173
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
ACH: Automated Clearing House.
Advised lines of credit: An authorization which specifies the maximum amount of a credit facility
the Firm has made available to an obligor on a revolving but nonbinding basis. The borrower
receives written or oral advice of this facility. The Firm may cancel this facility at any time.
Allowance for loan losses to total loans: Represents period-end allowance for loan losses divided
by retained loans.
Assets under management: Represent assets actively managed by AM on behalf of Private Banking,
Institutional and Retail clients. Includes Committed capital not Called, on which AM earns fees.
Excludes assets managed by American Century Companies, Inc., in which the Firm has a 40% ownership
interest as of March 31, 2011.
Assets under supervision: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage,
administration and deposit accounts.
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs: Represents the interests of third-party holders
of debt/equity securities, or other obligations, issued by VIEs that JPMorgan Chase consolidates.
The underlying obligations of the VIEs consist of short-term borrowings, commercial paper and
long-term debt. The related assets consist of trading assets, available-for-sale securities, loans
and other assets.
Contractual credit card charge-off: In accordance with the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council policy, credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the
account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiving notification about a specific
event (e.g., bankruptcy of the borrower), whichever is earlier.
Corporate/Private Equity: Includes Private Equity, Treasury and the Chief Investment Office, as
well as Corporate Other, which includes other centrally managed expense and discontinued
operations.
Credit derivatives: Contractual agreements that provide protection against a credit event on one or
more referenced credits. The nature of a credit event is established by the protection buyer and
protection seller at the inception of a transaction, and such events include bankruptcy, insolvency
or failure to meet payment obligations when due. The buyer of the credit derivative pays a periodic
fee in return for a payment by the protection seller upon the occurrence, if any, of a credit
event.
Deposit margin: Represents net interest income expressed as a percentage of average deposits.
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
FICO: Fair Isaac Corporation.
Forward points: Represents the interest rate differential between two currencies, which is either
added to or subtracted from the current exchange rate (i.e., spot rate) to determine the forward
exchange rate.
Global Corporate Bank: TSS and IB formed a joint venture to create the Firms Global Corporate
Bank. With a team of bankers, the Global Corporate Bank serves multinational clients by providing
them access to TSS products and services and certain IB products, including derivatives, foreign
exchange and debt. The cost of this effort and the credit that the Firm extends to these clients is
shared between TSS and IB.
Headcount-related expense: Includes salary and benefits (excluding performance-based incentives),
and other noncompensation costs related to employees.
Interchange income: A fee paid to a credit card issuer in the clearing and settlement of a sales or
cash advance transaction.
Interests in purchased receivables: Represents an ownership interest in cash flows of an underlying
pool of receivables transferred by a third-party seller into a bankruptcy-remote entity, generally
a trust.
Investment-grade: An indication of credit quality based on JPMorgan Chases internal risk
assessment system. Investment grade generally represents a risk profile similar to a rating of a
BBB-/ Baa3 or better, as defined by independent rating agencies.
LLC: Limited Liability Company.
174
Loan-to-value (LTV) ratio: For residential real estate loans, the relationship, expressed as a
percentage, between the principal amount of a loan and the appraised value of the collateral (i.e.,
residential real estate) securing the loan.
Origination date LTV ratio
The LTV ratio at the origination date of the loan. Origination date LTV ratios are calculated based
on the actual appraised values of collateral (i.e., loan-level data) at the origination date.
Current estimated LTV ratio
An estimate of the LTV as of a certain date. The current estimated LTV ratios are calculated using
estimated collateral values derived from a nationally recognized home price index measured at the
MSA level. These MSA-level home price indices comprise actual data to the extent available and
forecasted data where actual data is not available. As a result, the estimated collateral values
used to calculate these ratios do not represent actual appraised loan-level collateral values; as
such, the resulting LTV ratios are necessarily imprecise and should therefore be viewed as
estimates.
Combined LTV ratio
The LTV ratio considering all lien positions related to the property. Combined LTV ratios are used
for junior lien home equity products.
Managed basis: A non-GAAP presentation of financial results that includes reclassifications to
present revenue on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Management uses this non-GAAP financial
measure at the segment level, because it believes this provides information to enable investors to
understand the underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment and
facilitates a comparison of the business segment with the performance of competitors.
Master netting agreement: An agreement between two counterparties who have multiple derivative
contracts with each other that provides for the net settlement of all contracts, as well as cash
collateral, through a single payment, in a single currency, in the event of default on or
termination of any one contract.
Mortgage product types:
Alt-A
Alt-A loans are generally higher in credit quality than subprime loans but have characteristics
that would disqualify the borrower from a traditional prime loan. Alt-A lending characteristics may
include one or more of the following: (i) limited documentation; (ii) a high combined-loan-to-value
(CLTV) ratio; (iii) loans secured by non-owner occupied properties; or (iv) a debt-to-income
ratio above normal limits. Perhaps the most important characteristic is limited documentation. A
substantial proportion of traditional Alt-A loans are those where a borrower does not provide
complete documentation of his or her assets or the amount or source of his or her income.
Option ARMs
The option ARM real estate loan product is an adjustable-rate mortgage loan that provides the
borrower with the option each month to make a fully amortizing, interest-only, or minimum payment.
The minimum payment on an option ARM loan is based on the interest rate charged during the
introductory period. This introductory rate is usually significantly below the fully indexed rate.
The fully indexed rate is calculated using an index rate plus a margin. Once the introductory
period ends, the contractual interest rate charged on the loan increases to the fully indexed rate
and adjusts monthly to reflect movements in the index. The minimum payment is typically
insufficient to cover interest accrued in the prior month, and any unpaid interest is deferred and
added to the principal balance of the loan. Option ARM loans are subject to payment recast, which
converts the loan to a variable-rate fully amortizing loan upon meeting specified loan balance and
anniversary date triggers.
Prime
Prime mortgage loans generally have low default risk and are made to borrowers with good credit
records and monthly income at least three to four times greater than their monthly housing expense
(mortgage payments plus taxes and other debt payments). These borrowers provide full documentation
and generally have reliable payment histories.
Subprime
Subprime loans are designed for customers with one or more high risk characteristics, including but
not limited to: (i) unreliable or poor payment histories; (ii) a high LTV ratio of greater than 80%
(without borrower-paid mortgage insurance); (iii) a high debt-to-income ratio; (iv) an occupancy
type for the loan is other than the borrowers primary residence; or (v) a history of delinquencies
or late payments on the loan.
175
MSR risk management revenue: Includes changes in the fair value of the MSR asset due to
market-based inputs, such as interest rates and volatility, as well as updates to assumptions used
in the MSR valuation model; and derivative valuation adjustments and other, which represents
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used to offset the impact of changes in the
market-based inputs to the MSR valuation model.
Multi-asset: Any fund or account that allocates assets under management to more than one asset
class (e.g., long-term fixed income, equity, cash, real assets, private equity or hedge funds).
NA: Data is not applicable or available for the period presented.
Net charge-off rate: Represents net charge-offs (annualized) divided by average retained loans for
the reporting period.
Net yield on interest-earning assets: The average rate for interest-earning assets less the average
rate paid for all sources of funds.
NM: Not meaningful.
OPEB: Other postretirement employee benefits.
Overhead ratio: Noninterest expense as a percentage of total net revenue.
Participating securities: Represents unvested stock-based compensation awards containing
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (collectively, dividends), which are
included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method. JPMorgan Chase grants
restricted stock and RSUs to certain employees under its stock-based compensation programs, which
entitle the recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis
equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the
definition of participating securities. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and
undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating securities, based on
their respective rights to receive dividends.
Personal bankers: Retail branch office personnel who acquire, retain and expand new and existing
customer relationships by assessing customer needs and recommending and selling appropriate banking
products and services.
Portfolio activity: Describes changes to the risk profile of existing lending-related exposures and
their impact on the allowance for credit losses from changes in customer profiles and inputs used
to estimate the allowances.
Pre-provision profit: Pre-provision profit is total net revenue less noninterest expense. The Firm
believes that this financial measure is useful in assessing the ability of a lending institution to
generate income in excess of its provision for credit losses.
Pretax margin: Represents income before income tax expense divided by total net revenue, which is,
in managements view, a comprehensive measure of pretax performance derived by measuring earnings
after all costs are taken into consideration. It is, therefore, another basis that management uses
to evaluate the performance of TSS and AM against the performance of their respective competitors.
Principal transactions: Realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities (including
physical commodities inventories that are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value) and
changes in fair value associated with financial instruments held predominantly by IB for which the
fair value option was elected. Principal transactions revenue also includes private equity gains
and losses.
Purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans: Acquired loans deemed to be credit-impaired under the FASB
guidance for PCI loans. The guidance allows purchasers to aggregate credit-impaired loans acquired
in the same fiscal quarter into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk
characteristics (e.g., FICO score, geographic location). A pool is then accounted for as a single
asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Wholesale
loans are determined to be credit-impaired if they meet the definition of an impaired loan under
U.S. GAAP at the acquisition date. Consumer loans are determined to be credit-impaired based on
specific risk characteristics of the loan, including product type, LTV ratios, FICO scores, and
past due status.
Receivables from customers: Primarily represents margin loans to prime and retail brokerage
customers which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets for the wholesale lines of business.
Reported basis: Financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP, which excludes the impact of
taxable-equivalent adjustments.
176
Retained loans: Loans that are held-for-investment excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair
value.
Risk-weighted assets (RWA): Risk-weighted assets consist of on and offbalance sheet assets
that are assigned to one of several broad risk categories and weighted by factors representing
their risk and potential for default. Onbalance sheet assets are risk-weighted based on the
perceived credit risk associated with the obligor or counterparty, the nature of any collateral,
and the guarantor, if any. Offbalance sheet assets, such as lending-related commitments,
guarantees, derivatives and other applicable offbalance sheet positions, are risk-weighted by
multiplying the contractual amount by the appropriate credit conversion factor to determine the
onbalance sheet credit equivalent amount, which is then risk-weighted based on the same factors
used for onbalance sheet assets. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for the market
risk related to applicable trading assetsdebt and equity instruments, and foreign exchange and
commodity derivatives. The resulting risk-weighted values for each of the risk categories are then
aggregated to determine total risk-weighted assets.
Sales specialists: Retail branch office personnel who specialize in the marketing of a single
product, including mortgages, investments and business banking, by partnering with the personal
bankers.
Stress testing: A scenario that measures market risk under unlikely but plausible events in
abnormal markets.
Taxable-equivalent basis: Total net revenue for each of the business segments and the Firm is
presented on a taxable-equivalent basis. Accordingly, revenue from tax-exempt securities and
investments that receive tax credits is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to
fully taxable securities and investments. This non-GAAP financial measure allows management to
assess the comparability of revenue arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The
corresponding income tax impact related to these items is recorded within income tax expense.
Troubled debt restructuring (TDR): Occurs when the Firm modifies the original terms of a loan
agreement by granting a concession to a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulty.
Unaudited: Financial statements and information that have not been subjected to auditing procedures
sufficient to permit an independent certified public accountant to express an opinion.
U.S. GAAP: Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations: Obligations of agencies originally established or
chartered by the U.S. government to serve public purposes as specified by the U.S. Congress; these
obligations are not explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the
full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
U.S. Treasury: U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Value-at-risk (VaR): A measure of the dollar amount of potential loss from adverse market moves
in an ordinary market environment.
Washington Mutual transaction: On September 25, 2008, JPMorgan Chase acquired the banking
operations of Washington Mutual Bank (Washington Mutual) from the FDIC. For additional
information, see Note 2 on pages 166170 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
LINE OF BUSINESS METRICS
Investment Banking
IBs revenue comprises the following:
Investment banking fees include advisory, equity underwriting, bond underwriting and loan
syndication fees.
Fixed income markets primarily include revenue related to market-making across global fixed income
markets, including foreign exchange, interest rate.
Equity markets primarily include revenue related to market-making across global equity products,
including cash instruments, derivatives, convertibles and Prime Services.
Credit portfolio revenue includes net interest income, fees and loan sale activity, as well as
gains or losses on securities received as part of a loan restructuring, for IBs credit portfolio.
Credit portfolio revenue also includes the results of risk management related to the Firms lending
and derivative activities.
177
Retail Financial Services
Description of selected business metrics within Retail Banking:
Personal bankers Retail branch office personnel who acquire, retain and expand new and existing
customer relationships by assessing customer needs and recommending and selling appropriate banking
products and services.
Sales specialists Retail branch office personnel who specialize in the marketing of a single
product, including mortgages, investments and business banking, by partnering with the personal
bankers.
Mortgage banking revenue comprises the following:
Net production revenue includes net gains or losses on originations and sales of prime and subprime
mortgage loans, other production-related fees and losses related to the repurchase of
previously-sold loans.
Net mortgage servicing revenue includes the following components:
(a) Operating revenue comprises:
|
|
|
All gross income earned from servicing third-party mortgage loans, including stated
service fees, excess service fees, late fees and other ancillary fees; and |
|
|
|
|
Modeled servicing portfolio runoff (or time decay). |
(b) Risk management comprises:
|
|
|
Changes in the MSR asset fair value due to market-based inputs, such as interest rates and
volatility, as well as updates to assumptions used in the MSR valuation model; and |
|
|
|
|
Derivative valuation adjustments and other, which represents changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments used to offset the impact of changes in the market-based inputs to the
MSR valuation model. |
Mortgage origination channels comprise the following:
Retail Borrowers who are buying or refinancing a home through direct contact with a mortgage
banker employed by the Firm using a branch office, the Internet or by phone. Borrowers are
frequently referred to a mortgage banker by a banker in a Chase branch, real estate brokers, home
builders or other third parties.
Wholesale A third-party mortgage broker refers loan applications to a mortgage banker at the
Firm. Brokers are independent loan originators that specialize in finding and counseling borrowers
but do not provide funding for loans. The Firm exited the broker channel during 2008.
Correspondent Banks, thrifts, other mortgage banks and other financial institutions that sell
closed loans to the Firm.
Correspondent negotiated transactions (CNTs) These transactions occur when mid-to large-sized
mortgage lenders, banks and bank-owned mortgage companies sell servicing to the Firm, on an
as-originated basis, and exclude purchased bulk servicing transactions. These transactions
supplement traditional production channels and provide growth opportunities in the servicing
portfolio in stable and periods of rising interest rates.
Card Services
Description of selected business metrics within CS:
Sales volume Dollar amount of cardmember purchases, net of returns.
Open accounts Cardmember accounts with charging privileges.
Merchant acquiring business A business that processes bank card transactions for merchants.
|
|
Bank card volume Dollar amount of transactions processed for merchants. |
|
|
Total transactions Number of transactions and authorizations processed for merchants. |
Commercial Card provides a wide range of payment services to corporate and public sector clients
worldwide through the commercial card products. Services include procurement, corporate travel and
entertainment, expense management services, and Business-to-Business payment solutions.
178
Commercial Banking
CB Client Segments:
Middle Market Banking covers corporate, municipal, financial institution and not-for-profit
clients, with annual revenue generally ranging between $10 million and $500 million.
Corporate Client Banking covers clients with annual revenue generally ranging between $500 million
and $2 billion and focuses on clients that have broader investment banking needs.
Commercial Term Lending primarily provides term financing to real estate investors/owners for
multi-family properties as well as financing office, retail and industrial properties.
Real Estate Banking provides full-service banking to investors and developers of
institutional-grade real estate properties.
Other primarily includes lending and investment activity within the Community Development Banking
and Chase Capital segments.
CB revenue:
Lending includes a variety of financing alternatives, which are primarily provided on a basis
secured by receivables, inventory, equipment, real estate or other assets. Products include term
loans, revolving lines of credit, bridge financing, asset-based structures, leases, commercial card
products and standby letters of credit.
Treasury services includes a broad range of products and services enabling clients to transfer,
invest and manage the receipt and disbursement of funds, while providing the related information
reporting. These products and services include U.S. dollar and multi-currency clearing, ACH,
lockbox, disbursement and reconciliation services, check deposits, other check and
currencyrelated services, trade finance and logistics solutions, deposit products, sweeps and
money market mutual funds.
Investment banking products provide clients with sophisticated capital-raising alternatives, as
well as balance sheet and risk management tools through loan syndications, investment-grade debt,
asset-backed securities, private placements, high-yield bonds, equity underwriting, advisory,
interest rate derivatives, foreign exchange hedges and securities sales.
Other product revenue primarily includes tax-equivalent adjustments generated from Community
Development Banking segment activity and certain income derived from principal transactions.
CB selected business metrics:
Liability balances include deposits, as well as deposits that are swept to onbalance sheet
liabilities (e.g., commercial paper, federal funds purchased, time deposits and securities loaned
or sold under repurchase agreements) as part of customer cash management programs.
IB revenue, gross represents total revenue related to investment banking products sold to CB
clients.
Treasury & Securities Services
Treasury & Securities Services firmwide metrics include certain TSS product revenue and liability
balances reported in other lines of business related to customers who are also customers of those
other lines of business. In order to capture the firmwide impact of Treasury Services and TSS
products and revenue, management reviews firmwide metrics such as liability balances, revenue and
overhead ratios in assessing financial performance for TSS. Firmwide metrics are necessary, in
managements view, in order to understand the aggregate TSS business.
Description of a business metric within TSS:
Liability balances include deposits, as well as deposits that are swept to onbalance sheet
liabilities (e.g., commercial paper, federal funds purchased, time deposits and securities loaned
or sold under repurchase agreements) as part of customer cash management programs.
Asset Management
Assets under management Represent assets actively managed by AM on behalf of Private Banking,
Institutional, and Retail clients. Includes committed capital not called, on which AM earns fees.
Excludes assets managed by American Century Companies, Inc., in which the Firm has a 40% ownership
interest as of March 31, 2011.
Assets under supervision Represents assets under management as well as custody, brokerage,
administration and deposit accounts.
179
Multi-asset Any fund or account that allocates assets under management to more than one asset
class (e.g., long term fixed income, equity, cash, real assets, private equity, or hedge funds).
Alternative assets The following types of assets constitute alternative investments hedge
funds, currency, real estate and private equity.
AMs client segments comprise the following:
Institutional brings comprehensive global investment services including asset management,
pension analytics, asset/liability management and active risk budgeting strategies to corporate
and public institutions, endowments, foundations, not-for-profit organizations and governments
worldwide.
Retail provides worldwide investment management services and retirement planning and administration
through third-party and direct distribution of a full range of investment vehicles.
Private Banking offers investment advice and wealth management services to high- and
ultra-high-net-worth individuals, families, money managers, business owners and small corporations
worldwide, including investment management, capital markets and risk management, tax and estate
planning, banking, capital raising and specialty-wealth advisory services.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
From time to time, the Firm has made and will make forward-looking statements. These
statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current
facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as anticipate, target, expect,
estimate, intend, plan, goal, believe, or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking
statements provide JPMorgan Chases current expectations or forecasts of future events,
circumstances, results or aspirations. JPMorgan Chases disclosures in this Form 10-Q contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. The Firm also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Firms senior management may make
forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.
All forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties, many of
which are beyond the Firms control. JPMorgan Chases actual future results may differ materially
from those set forth in its forward-looking statements. While there is no assurance that any list
of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause
actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
Local, regional and international business, economic and political conditions and
geopolitical events; |
|
|
|
Changes in laws and regulatory requirements, including as a result of the newly-enacted
financial services legislation; |
|
|
|
Changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws; |
|
|
|
Securities and capital markets behavior, including changes in market liquidity and
volatility; |
|
|
|
Changes in investor sentiment or consumer spending or savings behavior; |
|
|
|
Ability of the Firm to manage effectively its liquidity; |
|
|
|
Changes in credit ratings assigned to the Firm or its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
Damage to the Firms reputation; |
|
|
|
Ability of the Firm to deal effectively with an economic slowdown or other economic or
market disruption; |
|
|
|
Technology changes instituted by the Firm, its counterparties or competitors; |
|
|
|
Mergers and acquisitions, including the Firms ability to integrate acquisitions; |
|
|
|
Ability of the Firm to develop new products and services, and the extent to which products
or services previously sold by the Firm require the Firm to incur liabilities or absorb losses
not contemplated at their initiation or origination; |
|
|
|
Ability of the Firm to address enhanced regulatory requirements affecting its mortgage
business; |
|
|
|
Acceptance of the Firms new and existing products and services by the marketplace and the
ability of the Firm to increase market share; |
|
|
|
Ability of the Firm to attract and retain employees; |
|
|
|
Ability of the Firm to control expense; |
180
|
|
Competitive pressures; |
|
|
|
Changes in the credit quality of the Firms customers and counterparties; |
|
|
|
Adequacy of the Firms risk management framework; |
|
|
|
Adverse judicial or regulatory proceedings; |
|
|
|
Changes in applicable accounting policies; |
|
|
|
Ability of the Firm to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities; |
|
|
|
Occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or calamities or conflicts, including any
effect of any such disasters, calamities or conflicts on the Firms power generation
facilities and the Firms other commodity-related activities; |
|
|
|
The other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part 1, Item 1A: Risk Factors in the Firms
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. |
Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Firm speak only as of the date they are
made, and JPMorgan Chase does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the
impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements were
made. The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature the
Firm may make in any subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, or
Current Reports on Form 8-K.
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
For a discussion of the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see the Market
Risk Management section of the Managements discussion and analysis on pages 8184 of this Form
10-Q.
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of the Firms management, including its Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on
that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded
that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 for the
Certification statements issued by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer.
The Firm is committed to maintaining high standards of internal control over financial reporting.
Nevertheless, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not prevent or detect misstatements.
Part II Other Information
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
For
information that updates the disclosures set forth under Part 1, Item 3
Legal Proceedings in the Firms 2010 Annual Report
on Form 10-K, see the discussion of the Firms
material litigation in Note 23 on pages 160169 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 1A Risk Factors
For a discussion of certain risk factors affecting the Firm, see Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors, on
pages 512 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and Forward-Looking Statements on
pages 180181 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the first quarter of 2011, shares of common stock of JPMorgan Chase & Co. were issued in
transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to Section 4(2)
thereof, as follows: (i) on January 20, 2011, 9,172 shares were issued to retired directors who had
deferred receipt of such common stock pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors; and (ii) on January 26, 2011, 17,566 shares were issued to retired employees who had
deferred receipt of such common shares pursuant to the Corporate Performance Incentive Plan.
Stock repurchases under the stock repurchase program
On March 18, 2011, the Board of Directors authorized
the repurchase of up to $15.0 billion of the
Firms common stock, of which up to $8.0 billion is approved for 2011.
The authorization commenced on March 22, 2011, and replaced the Firms previous $10.0 billion
repurchase program. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Firm repurchased an
aggregate of 2 million shares for $95 million at an average
price per share of $45.66. For the four months ended April 30,
2011, the Firm has repurchased an aggregate of 18 million shares
for $820 million at an average price per share of $45.11.
As of March 31, 2011, $14.9 billion of authorized repurchase capacity remained, of which $7.9 billion
of approved capacity remains for use during 2011.
Management
and the Board will continue to assess and make decisions regarding alternatives for deploying
capital, as appropriate, over the course of the year. Any planned use of the repurchase
181
program
over the repurchases approved for 2011, will be reviewed by the Firm with the banking
regulators before taking action.
The Firm may, from time to time, enter into written trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to facilitate repurchases in
accordance with the repurchase program. A Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plan allows the Firm to repurchase
its equity during periods when it would not otherwise be repurchasing common stock for example
during internal trading black-out periods. All purchases under a Rule 10b5-1 plan must be made
according to a predefined plan established when the Firm is not aware of material nonpublic
information.
The authorization to repurchase common stock will be utilized at managements
discretion, and the timing of purchases and the exact number of shares purchased is
subject to various factors, including market conditions; legal considerations affecting the amount
and timing of repurchase activity; the Firms capital position (taking into account goodwill and
intangibles); internal capital generation; and alternative potential investment opportunities. The
repurchase program does not include specific price targets or timetables; may be executed through
open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through the use of Rule
10b5-1 programs; and may be suspended at any time. For a discussion of restrictions on stock
repurchases, see Note 23 on pages 267268 of JPMorgan Chases 2010 Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar value of remaining |
Three months ended |
|
Total shares |
|
Average price paid |
|
authorized repurchase |
March 31, 2011 |
|
repurchased |
|
per share(a) |
|
(in millions)(b) |
|
January |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,222 |
|
February |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
March |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases under the $10.0 billion program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Repurchases under the $15.0 billion program |
|
|
2,081,440 |
|
|
|
45.66 |
|
|
|
14,905 |
(d) |
|
First quarter |
|
|
2,081,440 |
|
|
$ |
45.66 |
|
|
$ |
14,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes commissions cost. |
|
(b) |
|
The amount authorized by the Board of Directors excludes commissions cost. |
|
(c) |
|
The unused portion of the $10.0 billion program was cancelled when the $15.0 billion program
was authorized. |
|
(d) |
|
Dollar value remaining under the new $15.0 billion program. |
Stock repurchases under the stock-based incentive plans
Participants in the Firms stock-based incentive plans may have shares withheld to cover income
taxes. Shares withheld to pay income taxes are repurchased pursuant to the terms of the applicable
plan and not under the Firms share repurchase program. Shares repurchased pursuant to these plans
during the first quarter of 2011 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Total shares |
|
Average price paid |
March 31, 2011 |
|
repurchased |
|
per share |
|
January |
|
|
124 |
|
|
$ |
44.78 |
|
February |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
46.33 |
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
442 |
|
|
$ |
45.89 |
|
|
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 5 Other Information
None.
182
Item 6 Exhibits
15 Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.
31.1 Certification(a)
31.2 Certification(a)
32 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(a)(b)
101.INS XBRL Instance Document(a)(c)
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(a)
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document(a)
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document(a)
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document(a)
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document(a)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(b) |
|
This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit
shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under `the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
(c) |
|
Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, includes the following financial information
included in the Firms Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, (ii)
the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, (iii) the
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and (v) the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
183
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2011
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Louis Rauchenberger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Rauchenberger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managing Director and Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Principal Accounting Officer] |
|
|
184
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
EXHIBITS |
|
|
|
15
|
|
Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such
exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
otherwise subject to liability under those sections. |
185