def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the
Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
x
|
No fee required.
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless
the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.
3D
SYSTEMS CORPORATION
333 Three D Systems Circle
Rock Hill, SC 29730
March 30,
2011
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of 3D Systems Corporation scheduled to be held on
Tuesday, May 17, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight
Time, at our offices at 333 Three D Systems Circle, Rock
Hill, South Carolina 29730. Your Board of Directors and senior
management look forward to greeting you at the meeting.
At the meeting, you will be asked to approve the following
proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
To elect eight directors, constituting the whole Board of
Directors, to serve until the next Annual Meeting;
|
|
|
|
To provide an advisory vote (say on pay) on the 2010
compensation of our five most highly compensated executives;
|
|
|
|
To provide an advisory vote on the frequency with which we
should submit
say-on-pay
proposals to our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
To ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP (BDO) as
our independent registered public accounting firm for
2011; and
|
|
|
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
These proposals are important, and we urge you to vote in favor
of them. For the frequency of
say-on-pay
votes, the Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor
of a triennial vote.
The
say-on-pay
proposals referred to above are new this year as a result of the
adoption of the
Dodd-Frank
legislation by the U.S. Congress last July. We are pleased
to have the opportunity to present these proposals to you and to
discuss with you any concerns that you have about our executive
compensation practices, which are discussed in detail in this
Proxy Statement. We are committed to meeting the needs of our
stockholders, who include all of the members of our Board of
Directors and senior management, and we believe that our
executive compensation practices operate to meet the needs of
all of our constituencies.
It is important that your shares are represented and voted at
the Annual Meeting. Those of you who are street-name
stockholders are no longer permitted to allow your broker, bank
or other nominee to vote on your behalf with respect to any of
the matters to be considered at the meeting other than the
ratification of the appointment of BDO. For your vote on these
matters to be counted, you will now need to cast your vote and
communicate your voting decisions to your broker, bank or other
financial institution no later than May 16, 2011.
To ensure that you as a street-name stockholder are able to
participate in our upcoming Annual Meeting, please review our
proxy materials and follow the instructions for voting your
shares on the voting instruction form that you will be receiving
from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or your nominee
holder. If you are a stockholder of record who receives a Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials from us, you will
need to follow the instructions sent to you in that Notice.
Voting your shares is important, among other things, to ensure
that we get the minimum quorum required for the Annual Meeting.
Your affirmative participation in the voting process also helps
us avoid the need and the added expense of having to contact you
to solicit your vote and helps us avoid the need of having to
reschedule our Annual Meeting. We hope that you will exercise
your legal rights and fully participate as a stockholder in our
future.
We encourage you to attend the Annual Meeting so that we can
review the past year with you, listen to your suggestions, and
answer any questions that you may have. It is important that as
many stockholders as possible be represented at the Annual
Meeting, so please review the attached Proxy Statement promptly
and vote your shares today by following the instructions for
voting in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
or in the attached Proxy Statement. Also, if you hold shares
through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, please follow
the instructions on the voting instruction forms that they
furnish to you, and vote your shares.
Once again this year, we are using the SECs notice
and access procedure for the Annual Meeting. This
procedure permits us to deliver a Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders of record
and to provide you with online access to our Proxy Statement and
Annual Report, replacing the requirement that we automatically
send you a paper copy of our proxy materials and an annual
report to stockholders. Consistent with the announced objectives
of notice and access, we believe that it enables us
to provide you with the information that you need to determine
how to vote on the proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement
while lowering the costs of our Annual Meeting and contributing
environmental benefits by reducing our use of paper and other
resources to produce, print and mail to you our proxy materials
and an annual report to stockholders.
We are also proud to offer you an opportunity to be
environmentally responsible by choosing to have all future
stockholder materials that we send delivered to you
electronically. We will plant a tree on your behalf if you sign
up to receive all future stockholder materials online. Its
fast and easy, and you can change your electronic delivery
options at any time. Sign up at www.eTree.com/3DSystems or call
(800) 962-4284.
The close of business on March 21, 2011 is the record date
for our Annual Meeting. On or about March 30, 2011, we
began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials to all of our stockholders of record as of the record
date, and we have posted this Proxy Statement and our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 on the internet as
described in that Notice. You may also choose to have a paper
copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report sent to you by
following the instructions on the Notice.
On behalf of your Board of Directors, we thank you for your
continued support.
Sincerely,
Abraham N. Reichental
President and Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
March 30, 2011
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of 3D Systems Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the Company), will be held on
Tuesday, May 17, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight
Time, at our offices at 333 Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill,
South Carolina 29730, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
To elect eight directors, constituting the whole Board of
Directors, to serve until the next Annual Meeting;
|
|
|
|
To provide an advisory vote (say on pay) on the 2010
compensation of our five most highly compensated executives;
|
|
|
|
To provide an advisory vote on the frequency with which we
should submit
say-on-pay
proposals to our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
To ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP (BDO) as
our independent registered public accounting firm for
2011; and
|
|
|
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy
Statement accompanying this Notice of Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on
March 21, 2011 as the record date for determining the
stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual
Meeting. We are mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials commencing on or about March 30, 2011 to
all stockholders of record as of the record date for the Annual
Meeting. Copies of the attached Proxy Statement and our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 are available upon
request by following the instructions in our Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials.
We encourage you to cast your votes on the proposals to be
considered at the Annual Meeting electronically by using the
website that hosts our Proxy Statement and Annual Report as
described on the Notice of Internet Availability that you
receive. If you have requested delivery of a printed version of
the materials, you will receive a proxy card that you may use to
vote your shares. You may also vote by telephone as set forth on
your proxy card. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the
Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares
electronically on the internet, by proxy card or by telephone in
case your plans change. Please vote today to ensure that your
votes are counted.
If you hold our shares in street name, please follow the
instructions set forth below in How to Cast Your Vote
if You Are a Street-Name Holder, and vote your shares.
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please
vote today to ensure that your votes are counted, in case your
plans change. If you are a stockholder of record and attend the
Annual Meeting in person, you will be able to vote your shares
personally at the meeting if you so desire, even if you
previously voted.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
Secretary
Rock Hill, South Carolina
March 30, 2011
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
3D
SYSTEMS CORPORATION
333 Three D Systems
Circle
Rock Hill, South Carolina
29730
PROXY STATEMENT
Dated March 30,
2011
For the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
To Be Held on May 17,
2011
Our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual
Meeting) is scheduled to be held at our offices at 333
Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730 at
11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 17, 2011. We
are furnishing this Proxy Statement to the holders of our Common
Stock in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our
Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting and any
adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
This Proxy Statement and related materials are first being made
available to stockholders on or about March 30, 2011.
VOTING
SECURITIES, RECORD DATE AND QUORUM
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on
March 21, 2011 as the record date for determining the
stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual
Meeting. Holders of record of shares of our Common Stock
outstanding as of the close of business on the record date are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As
required by Delaware law, a list of the stockholders of record
as of the record date will be kept at our principal office at
333 Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730 for
a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.
Our voting securities consist of our Common Stock, par value
$0.001 per share (the Common Stock). As of the
record date for the Annual Meeting, there were
24,869,159 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.
Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each
matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
You are considered to be a holder of record of each share that
is registered in your name on the records of the transfer agent
for our Common Stock.
Most of you hold your shares in a brokerage account or bank or
through another nominee holder. In that case, you are considered
the beneficial owner of shares held in street
name. As a beneficial owner, you generally have the right
to instruct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares, and
that party is required to vote your shares in accordance with
your instructions. The firm that maintains the account holding
shares of Common Stock that you beneficially own is generally
viewed as the stockholder of record of those shares and has the
right to vote them, generally pursuant to your instructions. In
the discussion in this Proxy Statement, we refer to these
stockholdings as street-name holdings and to you as
a street-name holder.
1
Under the SECs rules and the applicable listing rules of
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, for those of you who are
street-name holders, you may no longer permit your broker, bank
or other nominee to vote on your behalf in an election of
directors or on any of the other matters to be considered at the
meeting other than the ratification of our appointment of BDO.
For your vote to be counted, you will need to communicate your
voting decisions to your broker, bank or other financial
institution before the date of our Annual Meeting. If you are a
street-name holder and your broker, bank or other nominee
exercises discretion in voting on your behalf on the
ratification of the appointment of BDO, your shares will be
treated as present at the meeting for all quorum purposes.
To ensure that you as a street-name holder are able to
participate in our upcoming Annual Meeting, please review our
proxy materials and follow the instructions for voting your
shares on the voting instruction form that you will be receiving
from your nominee. If you are a stockholder of record who
receives a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
from us, you should follow the instructions sent to you in that
Notice.
Voting your shares is important, among other things, to ensure
that we get the minimum quorum required for the Annual Meeting.
Your affirmative participation in the voting process also
fosters your active participation as a stockholder and helps us
avoid the need and the added expense of having to contact you to
solicit your vote and helps us avoid the need of having to
reschedule our Annual Meeting. We hope that you will exercise
your legal rights and fully participate as a stockholder in our
future.
In limited circumstances, a nominee for a street name holder is
entitled to vote your shares in the absence of specific voting
instructions from you on matters that are considered
routine. We understand that the only proposal to be
voted on at the Annual Meeting that is considered to be a
routine proposal is the ratification of the
selection of BDO as our independent registered accounting firm.
Accordingly, if you do not give voting instructions to your
broker or other nominee holder, that party will not be entitled
to vote your shares on the other matters to be considered at the
Annual Meeting but will be entitled to vote your shares in its
discretion on the ratification of the appointment of BDO.
A majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the
record date that are present in person or represented by proxy
will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the
Annual Meeting.
VOTES
REQUIRED
Once a quorum of the shares entitled to vote is present in
person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, the votes
required to approve the matters to be considered at the Annual
Meeting are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Election of Directors. The directors are
elected by a plurality of the votes cast in the election.
|
|
|
|
Advisory Vote on the Compensation of our Named Executive
Officers. We intend to evaluate votes received on
this matter based upon a plurality of the votes cast at the
meeting.
|
|
|
|
Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Votes on the Compensation
of our Named Executive Officers. We intend to
evaluate votes received on this matter based upon a plurality of
the votes cast at the meeting.
|
|
|
|
Ratification of Selection of Auditors. This
proposal must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
|
Voting on Other Matters. We do not know of any
other matters to be presented for consideration at the Annual
Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly presented
for consideration, the proxy holders will have the discretion to
vote your shares on those matters in accordance with the Board
of Directors recommendations. If the Board of Directors
does not make a recommendation on any such matters, the proxy
holders will be entitled to vote in their discretion on those
matters.
|
VOTING
MATTERS
Your vote is very important regardless of whether you are a
holder of record or a street-name holder.
Regardless of the method by which you vote or hold the shares
that you are entitled to vote, if you specify how your shares
are to be voted on a matter, the shares represented by your
proxy or other voting
2
instructions will be voted in accordance with your instructions.
If you do not give specific voting instructions when you grant
an otherwise valid proxy, your shares will be voted as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the election of the eight nominees for director described
below;
|
|
|
|
FOR the approval of the advisory vote on the compensation of our
named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
FOR the recommendation of our Board of Directors that an
advisory vote be conducted every three years on the compensation
of our named executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the selection of BDO as our independent
registered public accounting firm.
|
On any other matters that properly may come before the Annual
Meeting, your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of
Directors or, if no recommendation is made, in the discretion of
the proxy holders named on the proxy card.
HOW TO
CAST YOUR VOTE IF YOU ARE A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD
All stockholders of record will receive a Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials. In the event that you request a
set of printed proxy materials as directed on such Notice, we
will send you proxy materials along with a proxy card.
Stockholders of record may vote electronically by using a
website that provides links to our Proxy Statement and Annual
Report. You may access your records on this website by using a
control number printed on the Notice of Internet Availability.
Internet voting on our dedicated site is available 24 hours
a day, seven days a week, except that no internet votes will be
accepted after 11:59 P.M., Eastern Daylight Time, on
Monday, May 16, 2011, the day prior to the Annual Meeting.
This cut-off time is necessary to enable us to complete a final
vote tabulation.
Alternatively, if you asked to receive printed materials, you
may vote:
|
|
|
|
|
by mail by using the proxy card and postage-paid return envelope
that you receive; or
|
|
|
|
by using the toll-free telephone number that is included on your
proxy card.
|
Your voting alternatives are more fully described in the Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that we are mailing
to you.
As a stockholder of record, if you vote by mail, simply mark,
sign and date the proxy card, and return it in the postage-paid
envelope that you will receive.
As a stockholder of record, you may also vote by calling the
toll-free number listed on the proxy card. Telephone voting on
our dedicated site is available 24 hours a day, seven days
a week, except that, as is the case with internet voting, no
telephone votes will be accepted after 11:59 P.M., Eastern
Daylight Time, on Monday, May 16, 2011, the day prior to
the Annual Meeting.
Easy-to-follow
telephone voice prompts enable you to vote your shares and
confirm that your voting instructions have been properly
recorded. Our telephone voting procedures are designed to
authenticate stockholders by using the individual control
numbers provided on each proxy card. Accordingly, please have
your proxy card available when you call. If you vote by
telephone or on the internet, you do not need to return your
proxy card.
HOW TO
CAST YOUR VOTE IF YOU ARE A STREET-NAME HOLDER
Street-name holders will generally receive a voting instruction
form from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or another firm
that is hired by your nominee holder to solicit votes on its
behalf. That voting instruction form will generally afford you
the opportunity to request a set of printed proxy materials, and
you will be sent proxy materials if you request them.
Street-name holders will also generally be able to vote
electronically on the internet by using a control number
provided on the instruction form and a website identified on the
voting instruction form that provides
3
links to our Proxy Statement and Annual Report. You are
encouraged to review our Proxy Statement and Annual Report
before you cast your vote.
We understand that internet voting will generally be available
to street-name holders 24 hours a day, seven days a week,
except that street-name holders should cast their internet votes
before 11:59 P.M., Eastern Daylight Time, on Monday,
May 16, 2011, the day prior to the Annual Meeting to allow
us adequate time for the final tabulation of votes.
Street-name holders will also generally be entitled to vote:
|
|
|
|
|
by mail by using the voting instruction form and postage-paid
return envelope that you receive; or
|
|
|
|
by using the toll-free telephone number that is included on your
voting instruction form.
|
As a street-name holder, if you vote by mail, simply mark, sign
and date the voting instruction form, and return it in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope.
Similarly, we understand that telephone voting will be available
for holders of shares in street name. You may vote by calling
the toll-free number listed on the voting instruction form that
you receive. We understand that telephone voting should be
available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, except that,
as is the case with internet voting, you should cast any
telephone votes prior to 11:59 P.M., Eastern Daylight Time,
on Monday, May 16, 2011, the day prior to the Annual
Meeting.
Easy-to-follow
telephone voice prompts enable you to vote your shares and
confirm that your voting instructions have been properly
recorded. Broadridges telephone voting procedures are
designed to authenticate stockholders by using the individual
control numbers provided on each voting instruction form.
Accordingly, please have your voting instruction form available
when you call. If you vote by telephone or internet, you do not
need to return your voting instruction form.
OTHER
VOTING MATTERS
Voting in Person at the Annual Meeting
Any stockholder of record may vote in person at the Annual
Meeting whether or not he or she has previously voted, and
regardless of whether the prior vote was cast by internet,
telephone or mail. If you attend the Annual Meeting and vote
your shares at that meeting, those shares will be counted as
present for quorum purposes.
If you hold your shares in street name, you must obtain a
written proxy, executed in your favor, from the nominee holding
your shares of record in order to vote your shares in person at
the Annual Meeting.
If You Wish to Revoke Your Proxy
Regardless of the method you use to vote, you may revoke your
proxy at any time before your shares are voted at the Annual
Meeting by:
|
|
|
|
|
voting electronically by internet at a later time;
|
|
|
|
voting by telephone at a later time;
|
|
|
|
submitting a properly signed proxy or voting instruction form
with a later date; or
|
|
|
|
voting in person at the Annual Meeting if you are a stockholder
of record (or hold a valid proxy from the nominee who holds your
shares in their name).
|
Please remember that, as described above, there will be no
internet or telephone voting available after 11:59 P.M.,
Eastern Daylight Time, on Monday May 16, 2011, the day
prior to the Annual Meeting.
Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes
Any shares for which a valid proxy is granted will be treated as
shares that are present for the purpose of determining the
presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If you or your
street-name nominee do not grant
4
a valid proxy on any matter to be considered at the Annual
Meeting, your shares will not be considered in determining the
presence of a quorum.
If you or your nominee grant a valid proxy but abstain from
voting on the ratification of the appointment of our independent
public accountants, withhold a vote on any or all of the
directors, or abstain from voting on the frequency of
say-on-pay
votes or vote against Proposal Two, your shares will count
for the purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but
will otherwise be voted in accordance with your directions.
For street-name holders, as discussed above, your broker or
other nominee may exercise its discretion in granting a valid
proxy on the ratification of the appointment of our independent
public accountants. For the purposes of our Annual Meeting, a
broker non-vote will occur when a bank, broker or
other nominee holder has not received voting instructions with
respect to the election of directors or the
say-on-pay
proposals contained in this Proxy Statement. The rules
applicable to the election of directors require that each
stockholder either vote on each proposal as recommended by the
Board of Directors or vote in favor of the election of the
directors or withhold such stockholders vote for one or
more of the directors. The rules applicable to advisory
say-on-pay
proposals require that each stockholder either vote as
recommended by our Board of Directors, vote against the
say-on-pay
proposal contained in Proposal Two below or, for the
frequency of
say-on-pay
votes covered by Proposal Three below, abstain from voting
or indicate a preference for a one-year or two-year frequency of
votes.
Multiple Accounts
If you hold shares in more than one account, shares that are
registered in different names or shares that are held through
one or more banks, brokerage firms or other nominees, you may
receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, more than one proxy card or more than one voting
instruction form. Each of these Notices, proxy cards or voting
instruction forms will likely relate to shares that you own in
different accounts, in different names or with different banks,
brokerage firms or other nominees.
We ask that you please follow the instructions on each Notice
that you receive. We also ask that you please either vote the
shares covered by each Notice electronically or sign, date and
return all proxy cards and voting instruction forms that you
receive. This will ensure that all of your shares are
represented and voted at the Annual Meeting.
Householding; Delivery of Documents to Security Holders
Sharing an Address
We are making this Proxy Statement, our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
available to all stockholders of record as of the record date
for the Annual Meeting. This includes all financial institutions
in which you have been identified to us as holding our shares in
street name.
If you and other family members are street-name stockholders
residing in the same household, you may receive only one 2010
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
one Proxy Statement and one voting instruction form if you have
previously made an election with your bank, broker or other
nominee holder to deliver only one copy to you. This process of
delivering only one set of these materials to multiple security
holders sharing an address is called householding.
Householding may provide convenience for you and cost savings
for us. If you are participating in a householding program, it
may continue until one or more of the stockholders within the
household provides instructions to the contrary to their nominee.
If you are a street-name stockholder who is receiving multiple
copies, you may elect to participate in a householding program.
You can do that by requesting that only a single set of
materials be sent to you in the future by following the
householding instructions on the voting instruction form
provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee holder.
Alternatively, if you are a street-name holder whose nominee
holder utilizes the services of Broadridge Financial Solutions,
Inc. (as indicated on the voting instruction form that
Broadridge sends to you), you may send written householding
instructions to Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way,
Edgewood, New York 11717 or call
(800) 542-1061.
The instructions must include your name and account number and
the name of the bank, broker or other nominee holder. Otherwise,
you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee holder.
5
If you are a street-name stockholder who has requested printed
materials and you participate in a householding
program, upon your request to receive separate copies in the
future, you will receive an additional copy of the 2010 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
the Proxy Statement and the Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials. Instructions to request additional copies of
these documents should be provided on the voting instruction
form that your bank, broker or other holder of record provides
to you.
Copies of this Proxy Statement, our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials are
available upon request by calling
(803) 326-4010
or by writing to Investor Relations, 3D Systems Corporation, 333
Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730.
Stockholder Proposals for the 2012 Annual Meeting
Under
Rule 14a-8
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, certain
stockholder proposals may be eligible for inclusion in our 2012
Proxy Statement and form of proxy. The date by which we must
receive stockholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in
the Proxy Statement and form of proxy for the 2012 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders is December 1, 2011 or (if the date
of our 2012 Annual Meeting is changed by more than 30 days
from May 17, 2012) a reasonable time before we begin
to print and mail the proxy materials for the 2012 Annual
Meeting).
Our By-Laws set forth certain procedures that stockholders must
follow in order to properly nominate a person for election to
the Board of Directors or to present any other business at an
annual meeting of stockholders, other than proposals included in
our Proxy Statement pursuant to
Rule 14a-8.
In addition to any other applicable requirements, to properly
nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors or for
a stockholder to properly bring other business before the 2012
Annual Meeting, a stockholder of record must give timely notice
thereof in proper written form to our Corporate Secretary. To be
timely, a stockholders notice to the Corporate Secretary
must be received at our principal office between
January 15, 2012 and February 14, 2012;
provided that, if the 2012 Annual Meeting is called for a
date that is not within 30 days before or after
May 17, 2011, then the notice by the stockholder must be so
received a reasonable time before we make available our Proxy
Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting. The notice also must
contain specific information regarding the nomination or the
other business proposed to be brought before the meeting, as set
forth in our By-Laws. The By-Law provisions relating to advance
notice of business to be transacted at annual meetings are
contained in Section 2.13 of our By-Laws, which are
available on our website and can be viewed by going to
www.3DSystems.com and clicking on the Investor
Relations tab, then the Corporate Governance
tab and then selecting the document titled Amended and
Restated By-Laws from the list of documents on the web
page.
Stockholder Nominees to the Board
Apart from any proposals made pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
as discussed above, our Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee will consider director nominees recommended by
stockholders in accordance with our Corporate Governance
Guidelines and a policy adopted by the Board. Recommendations
should be submitted to our Corporate Secretary in writing at our
offices in Rock Hill, South Carolina, along with additional
required information about the nominee and the stockholder
making the recommendation. Copies of our Corporate Governance
Guidelines and our stockholder nomination policy are posted on
our website, which can be viewed by going to
www.3DSystems.com and clicking on the Investor
Relations tab, then the Corporate Governance
tab and then selecting the appropriate document from the list of
documents on the web page.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board
have also approved qualifications for nomination to the Board.
In determining whether to recommend particular individuals to
the Board, the Committee will consider, among other factors, a
directors ethical character, a directors experience
and diversity of background as well as whether a director is
independent under applicable listing standards and financially
literate. As noted above, a complete copy of our
Qualifications for Nomination to the Board is posted
on our website at www.3DSystems.com under the
Investor Relations tab and then the Corporate
Governance tab. The process by which the Committee
identifies and evaluates nominees for director is the same
regardless of whether the nominee is recommended by a
stockholder.
When the Board or the Committee has identified the need to add a
new Board member with specific qualifications or to fill a
vacancy on the Board, the chairman of the Committee will
initiate a search, seeking
6
input from other directors and senior management and hiring a
search firm, if necessary. The initial list of candidates that
satisfy the specific criteria, if any, and otherwise qualify for
membership on the Board will be identified by the Committee. At
least one member of the Committee (generally the Chairman) and
the Chief Executive Officer will interview each qualified
candidate. Other directors will also interview the candidate if
possible. Based on a satisfactory outcome of those reviews, the
Committee will make its recommendation for approval of the
candidate to the Board.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth (a) as of the date indicated
in the applicable Schedule 13D or 13G with respect to each
person identified as having filed a Schedule 13G and
(b) as of the date of this Proxy Statement with respect to
the other persons listed in the table, the number of outstanding
shares of Common Stock and the percentage beneficially owned:
|
|
|
|
|
by each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more
than five percent of our Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
by each current director, nominee for election as a director and
each executive officer identified in the Summary Compensation
Table; and
|
|
|
|
by all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table, and
subject to any applicable community property laws, each person
has the sole voting and investment power with respect to the
shares beneficially owned. The address of each person listed is
in care of 3D Systems Corporation, 333 Three D Systems Circle,
Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730, unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned(1)
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percentage
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
Ownership
|
|
St. Denis J. Villere & Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
2,869,128
|
(2)
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Suite 1808
601 Poydras St.
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
3,281,480
|
(3)
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
100 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Clark Estates, Inc.
|
|
|
1,560,857
|
(4)
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
One Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Curran
|
|
|
10,970
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Charles W. Hull
|
|
|
345,505
|
(6)
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Jim D. Kever
|
|
|
163,282
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
G. Walter Loewenbaum, II
|
|
|
1,472,602
|
(8)
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Kevin S. Moore
|
|
|
1,616,007
|
(9)
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
731,616
|
(10)
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Daniel S. Van Riper
|
|
|
20,323
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
|
95,112
|
(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
73,000
|
(13)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
120,728
|
(14)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Karen E. Welke
|
|
|
10,000
|
(15)
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and officers as a group (11 persons)
|
|
|
4,659,145
|
(16)
|
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
7
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percentage ownership is based on the number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date for
the Annual Meeting. Common Stock numbers include, with respect
to the stockholder in question, Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of vested options. |
|
(2) |
|
St. Denis J. Villere & Company is a Louisiana limited
liability company and an investment advisor registered under the
Investment Advisors Act of 1940. As of December 31, 2010,
Villere was deemed to have or to share voting or dispositive
power over and therefore to own beneficially
2,869,128 shares of Common Stock. Of that amount, Villere
had sole voting and dispositive power over 449,285 shares
of Common Stock and shared voting and dispositive power over
2,419,843 shares of Common Stock. Information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our securities by Villere is taken from
the most recent Amendment to the Schedule 13G filed by
Villere dated January 14, 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
These securities are owned by various individual and
institutional investors, including T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value
Fund, Inc. (which owns 2,070,000 shares of Common Stock
directly, representing 8.8% of the shares of the Common Stock
outstanding), which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price
Associates) serves as investment advisor with power to direct
investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For
purposes of the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act,
Price Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such
securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that
it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.
Information regarding the beneficial ownership of our securities
by T. Rowe Price is taken exclusively from Amendment
No. 9 to the Schedule 13G filed by T. Rowe Price dated
February 14, 2011. |
|
(4) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, The Clark Estates, Inc., a private
investment firm, was deemed to have voting and dispositive power
over and therefore to own beneficially these
2,240,857 shares of Common Stock. Kevin S. Moore, one of
our directors, is the President and a director of that firm.
Information regarding the beneficial ownership of our securities
by The Clark Estates, Inc. is taken from Amendment No. 8 to
the Schedule 13D filed by that firm on February 14,
2011. We have been advised that these shares of Common Stock are
owned by various investment accounts for which The Clark
Estates, Inc. provides administrative and management services.
Certain of those accounts sold 680,000 of these shares in our
public offering that was completed on March 16, 2011. We
have also been advised that The Clark Estates, Inc. and
Mr. Moore disclaim beneficial ownership of such securities
as well as any pecuniary interest in those securities. |
|
(5) |
|
All shares beneficially owned by Mr. Curran were issued
under the Directors Stock Plan and are subject to restrictions
on transfer. For a discussion of the Restricted Stock Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (the Directors Stock Plan),
see Director CompensationDirectors Stock
Plan below. |
|
(6) |
|
Consists of (a) 15,500 shares of Common Stock that
Mr. Hull holds directly and (b) 330,005 shares of
Common Stock held in the Charles William Hull and Charlene
Antoinette Hull 1992 Revocable Living Trust (the Hull
Trust) for which Mr. and Mrs. Hull serve as trustees.
The shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Hull
include 5,000 shares of Common Stock granted to him under
the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan, which are subject to forfeiture
in certain circumstances. Mr. Hull maintains a
Rule 10b5-1
Sales Plan pursuant to which his brokerage firm sells a
designated number of shares of Common Stock each month for the
account of the Hull Trust; provided that the market price
of the Common Stock on the date of sale is above a specified
price. |
|
(7) |
|
Consists of (a) 100,391 shares of Common Stock that
Mr. Kever holds directly, (b) 30,000 shares of
Common Stock covered by outstanding options that are currently
exercisable and (c) 32,891 shares of Common Stock held
by an irrevocable trust for the benefit of Mr. Kevers
minor children. Mr. Kever disclaims beneficial ownership of
the shares and other securities held by that trust except to the
extent of his pecuniary interest in them. The shares of Common
Stock held directly by Mr. Kever include 21,000 shares
of Common Stock issued under the Directors Stock Plan, which are
subject to restrictions on transfer. See Director
Option Exercises in 2009 below. |
|
(8) |
|
Consists of (a) 708,924 shares of Common Stock that
Mr. Loewenbaum holds directly, (b) 110,847 shares
held in the name of Lillian Shaw Loewenbaum,
Mr. Loewenbaums spouse, (c) 11,093 shares
held in the name of The Lillian Shaw Loewenbaum Trust for which
Mr. and Mrs. Loewenbaum serve as trustees,
(d) 132,147 shares held in the name of The Loewenbaum
1992 Trust for which Mr. and |
8
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs. Loewenbaum serve as trustees,
(e) 33,509 shares held in the name of the Anna Willis
Loewenbaum 1993 Trust for which Mr. and Mrs. Loewenbaum
serve as trustees, (f) 19,295 shares held in the name
of the Elizabeth Scott Loewenbaum 1993 Trust for which Mr. and
Mrs. Loewenbaum serve as trustees,
(g) 21,824 shares held in the name of Wallys
Trust u/w/o Joel Simon Loewenbaum for which Mr. Loewenbaum
serves as trustee, (h) 21,855 shares held in the name
of Waterproof Partnership, L.P. of which Mr. Loewenbaum and
his wife are the general partners, (i) 50,057 shares
held in the name of The GWL 2008 Annuity Trust for which G.
Walter Loewenbaum serves as trustee,
(j) 181,526 shares held in the name of The GWL3D 2010
Annuity Trust for which G. Walter Loewenbaum serves as trustee,
and (k) 181,525 shares held in the name of The LSL3D
2010 Annuity Trust for which Mrs. Loewenbaum serves as
trustee. Mr. Loewenbaum disclaims beneficial ownership
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein of any
securities not directly held by him. The shares of Common Stock
held directly by Mr. Loewenbaum include 21,000 shares
of Common Stock issued under the Directors Stock Plan, which are
subject to restrictions on transfer. See 1996
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan below. |
|
(9) |
|
Consists of (a) 25,150 shares of Common Stock that
Mr. Moore holds directly, (b) 30,000 shares
issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable outstanding
options and (c) the 1,560,857 shares discussed in note
(4) above beneficially owned by The Clark Estates, Inc.,
with respect to which Mr. Moore disclaims beneficial
ownership as well as any pecuniary interest. The shares of
Common Stock held directly by Mr. Moore include
21,000 shares of Common Stock issued under the Directors
Stock Plan, which are subject to restrictions on transfer. |
|
(10) |
|
Consists of (a) 331,616 shares of Common Stock that
Mr. Reichental owns directly and
(b) 400,000 shares covered by currently exercisable
outstanding options. The shares of Common Stock held directly by
Mr. Reichental include (i) 100,000 shares of
Common Stock granted to him under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan,
which are subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances, and
(ii)100,000 shares that are pledged pursuant to a customary
margin account arrangement. For information relating to the 2004
Incentive Stock Plan, see Executive
CompensationCompensation Discussion and
AnalysisLong-Term Equity Compensation below. |
|
(11) |
|
All shares beneficially owned by Mr. Van Riper were issued
under the Directors Stock Plan and are subject to restrictions
on transfer. |
|
(12) |
|
Consists of (a) 55,112 shares of Common Stock that
Mr. Grace holds directly and (b) 40,000 shares
covered by currently exercisable outstanding options. The shares
of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Grace include
15,000 shares of Common Stock granted to him under the 2004
Incentive Stock Plan, which are subject to forfeiture in certain
circumstances. |
|
(13) |
|
The shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Gregoire
include 55,000 shares of Common Stock granted to him under
the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan, which are subject to forfeiture
in certain circumstances. |
|
(14) |
|
Consists of (a) 40,728 shares of Common Stock that
Mr. McAlea owns directly, and (b) 80,000 shares
covered by currently exercisable outstanding options. The shares
of Common Stock held directly by Mr. McAlea include
25,000 shares of Common Stock granted to him under the 2004
Incentive Stock Plan, which are subject to forfeiture in certain
circumstances. |
|
(15) |
|
All shares beneficially owned by Ms. Welke were issued
under the Directors Stock Plan and are subject to restrictions
on transfer. |
|
(16) |
|
Consists of an aggregate of (a) 4,079,145 shares of
outstanding Common Stock beneficially owned, directly or
indirectly, by all 12 directors and executive officers as a
group and (b) 580,000 shares covered by currently
exercisable outstanding options. A total of 100,000 of the
shares of Common Stock owned directly by such persons are
pledged pursuant to customary margin account arrangements. The
amounts of these securities beneficially owned by directors and
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below are
referred to in the notes above. |
9
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will elect the whole
Board of Directors to serve until the 2012 Annual Meeting and
until their successors are elected and qualified. The Board of
Directors, based upon the recommendation of the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee, has designated as nominees
for election the eight persons named below, all of whom
currently serve as directors.
In nominating each of those individuals, the Governance
Committee and the Board considered, among other things, the
Boards Corporate Governance Guidelines and Qualifications
for Nomination to the Board, which were adopted in 2004 and are
posted on our website at www.3DSystems.com. These
qualifications include, among other factors, a candidates
ethical character, experience and diversity of background as
well as whether the candidate is independent under applicable
listing standards and financially literate. In considering the
re-nomination of these individuals, the Committee and the Board
also took into consideration the following additional factors
relating to each director since the 2010 Annual Meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
Such directors contributions to the Board;
|
|
|
|
The absence of any material change in such directors
employment or responsibilities with any other organization;
|
|
|
|
Such directors attendance at meetings of the Board and the
Board committees on which such director serves and such
directors participation in the activities of the Board and
such committees;
|
|
|
|
The absence of any relationships with the Company or another
organization, or any other circumstances that have arisen, that
might make it inappropriate for the director to continue serving
on the Board; and
|
|
|
|
The directors age and length of service on the Board. We
have not adopted a retirement policy for directors.
|
The background and experience of each of the nominees for
director that the Governance Committee and the Board considered
in evaluating each nominee is set forth opposite their
respective names in Information Concerning
Nominees below. See also Corporate Governance
Matters below, which discloses additional information
about the nominees. The Governance Committee and the Board
considered each nominees overall business experience,
contributions to Board activities during the preceding year and
independence in their evaluation of each nominee in conjunction
with the factors discussed above, but did not otherwise give
greater weight to any of the factors cited above compared with
any of the others. While the Board considers diversity of
background and experience in its nomination decisions, we do not
maintain a diversity policy relating to the composition of our
board of directors. The Board believes that each of the nominees
for director is well qualified to continue to serve as a
director of the Company.
Shares of Common Stock properly voted at the Annual Meeting by
any of the means discussed above will be voted FOR the election
of the nominees named below unless you otherwise withhold your
vote for any or all of the nominees in your voting instructions
or your proxy. If any nominee becomes unavailable for any reason
or if a vacancy should occur before the election (which events
are not anticipated), the holders of such proxies may vote
shares represented by a duly executed proxy in favor of such
other person as they may determine.
10
The Board
of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR
the nominees listed below.
Information
Concerning Nominees
The following table sets forth for each nominee for director,
his or her business experience, the year in which he or she
first became a director, his or her age as of the record date
for the Annual Meeting, and any directorships in publicly owned
companies or registered investment companies that such nominee
has held during the past five years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
Age
|
|
William E. Curran
|
|
Mr. Curran served as non-executive Chairman and Director of
Resonant Medical, an early-stage privately owned company
specializing in three-dimensional ultrasound image-guided
adaptive radio therapy products, until May 2010 at which time
Resonant was sold to Elekta A.B. He also served until May 2009
as a director of Ventracor, a global medical device company
which produced an implantable blood pump, at which time the
directors brought in an administrator under Australian law. For
more than five years prior to 2004, he held diverse functional
and senior management positions with Philips Electronics and
Philips Medical Systems. His experience at Philips Medical
Systems, a medical device manufacturer, included positions as
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and while
at Philips Electronics North America he served as President and
Chief Executive Officer as well as Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
First elected a director in 2008, Mr. Curran brings to the Board
wide experience in operations, finance and executive management
both in the United States and abroad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles W. Hull
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of the
Company. He has served as a director and in various executive
positions with us for more than five years. He is a founder of
the Company and has served as Chief Technology Officer since
1997 and as Executive Vice President since 2000. He has also
previously served in various other of our executive capacities,
including Chief Executive Officer, Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors and President and Chief Operating Officer.
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
One of our founders and a director since 1993, Mr. Hull brings
to the Board a broad understanding of the technologies of our
industry as well as a wide-ranging historical perspective on our
strategy and growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
Age
|
|
Jim D. Kever
|
|
Mr. Kever has been a Principal in Voyent Partners, LLC, a
venture capital firm, since 2001. He is also a director of
Luminex Corporation, a manufacturer of laboratory testing
equipment, Tyson Foods, Inc., an integrated processor of food
products, and Emdeon Business Services LLC and EBS Master, a
provider of healthcare revenue and payment cycle solutions. He
previously served as a director of Transaction Systems
Architects, Inc., a supplier of electronic payment software
products and network integration solutions until 2007 and as the
President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Transaction
Services Division of WebMD Corporation (formerly Envoy
Corporation), an internet healthcare services company, from 1995
to 2001, and prior to 1995 he served as Envoy Corporations
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel.
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
A director since 1996, Mr. Kever brings to our Board wide
experience in operations, finance and executive management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Walter Loewenbaum, II
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Loewenbaum is the
Chairman of Finetooth Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Mumboe (formerly
STI Healthcare, Inc.), a software developer that develops and
hosts contract management applications. Until 2004, he was a
director, and for a time Managing Director, of LeCorgne
Loewenbaum LLC, an investment banking firm. Previously, he
served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Loewenbaum
& Company (formerly Southcoast Capital Corp.), an
investment banking and investment management firm that he
founded. Mr. Loewenbaum also serves as the Chairman of the
Board of Luminex Corporation, a manufacturer of laboratory
testing equipment.
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
Chairman of our Board of Directors since 1999, Mr. Loewenbaum
brings to our Board wide experience in operations, finance and
executive management and, as a major stockholder, perspective on
strategy and growth for the benefit of our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin S. Moore
|
|
Mr. Moore has been with The Clark Estates, Inc., a private
investment firm, for more than ten years, where he is currently
President and a director. He is also a director of Aspect
Resources LLC, The Clark Foundation and the National Baseball
Hall of Fame & Museum, Inc. He previously served as a
director of Cyberonics, Inc., a manufacturer of implantable
medical devices, until 2006.
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
A director since 1999, Mr. Moore brings to our Board wide
experience in operations, finance and executive management and,
as a major beneficial owner of our Common Stock, perspective on
strategy and growth for the benefit of our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Business Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
Age
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for more
than five years. He is also a director of Finetooth
Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Mumboe. He became our President and
Chief Executive Officer in September 2003. Previously, for more
than five years, he served in various executive management
positions with Sealed Air Corporation, a global manufacturer of
protective, specialty and food packaging materials, most
recently serving as Vice President and General Manager of Sealed
Airs Shrink Packaging Division from May 2001 until
September 2003 and previously as Vice President Asia-Pacific.
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
Appointed President and Chief Executive Officer as well as a
director in 2003, Mr. Reichental provides leadership to our
company reflecting almost 30 years of business leadership
both in the United States as well as in various other countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel S. Van Riper
|
|
Mr. Van Riper is an independent financial consultant and from
January 2002 to June 2005 was Special Advisor to Sealed Air
Corporation. Previously, he was Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of that company. He is a director of Hubbell
Incorporated, a manufacturer of electrical and electronics
products. He previously served as a director of DOV
Pharmaceutical, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, until 2008
and New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc., a manufacturer of
biotechnology equipment, until 2007 and was Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Sealed Air Corporation
between July 1998 and January 2002. Prior to July 1998, he was
a partner of KPMG LLP, a public accounting firm, for more than
25 years.
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
First elected a director in 2004, Mr. Van Riper brings to our
company extensive experience in public accounting and finance as
well as in operations and executive management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karen E. Welke
|
|
Ms. Welke held executive positions for more than 25 years
at 3M Corporation where she last served as Group Vice President
of its Medical Markets Group. During her tenure at 3M, she also
had significant international experience, having served as
Managing Director of 3M France for four years and previously as
the European Healthcare Group Product Director headquartered in
Brussels, Belgium. She served as a director of Millipore
Corporation from 2002 until July 2010, when Millipore was merged
with Merck KGaA. She previously served as a director of
Pentair, Inc. from 1995 until 2006, including 9 years as
the Chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Welke is also a director
of Project HOPE, based in Millwood, Virginia.
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
First elected a director in 2008, Ms. Welke has extensive
executive, financial and operating experience in both the United
States and Europe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Our Board of Directors is committed to sound and effective
corporate governance practices, to diligently exercising its
oversight responsibilities with respect to our business and
affairs consistent with the highest principles of business
ethics, and to meeting the corporate governance requirements
that apply to us.
Corporate
Governance Guidelines
In 2004, the Board adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that
address various governance matters, including, among others, the
functions of the Board, Board committees, director qualification
standards and the director nomination process; director
responsibilities; director access to management and, as
necessary and appropriate, independent advisors; director
compensation; director stock ownership; director orientation and
continuing education; management succession; and a periodic
performance evaluation of the Board. The Corporate Governance
and Nominating Committee, discussed below, is responsible for
overseeing these Guidelines, periodically assessing their
adequacy and modifying them to meet new circumstances. These
Guidelines were most recently revised and approved by the whole
Board of Directors on November 15, 2010, and they are
posted on our website at www.3dsystems.com under the
Investor Relations tab and then under the tab for
Corporate Governance.
Director
Independence
Our Board of Directors is comprised of a majority of independent
directors. The Board has determined that Ms. Welke and
Messrs. Curran, Kever, Loewenbaum, Moore and Van Riper are
independent directors as defined in the listing standards of The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC and that they have no relationships with
us that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with their
exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their
responsibilities as a director.
Mr. Reichental, our Chief Executive Officer, and
Mr. Hull, one of our founders and our Chief Technology
Officer, are also executive officers of our company and as such
are not independent directors.
Responsibility
and Oversight
Consistent with Delaware law, our business is managed by our
officers under the direction and oversight of the Board of
Directors. In this regard, our management, including our
corporate officers, is responsible for the
day-to-day
management of the risks facing us, including macroeconomic,
financial, strategic, operational, public reporting, legal,
regulatory, political, compliance, and reputational risks. They
carry out this responsibility through a coordinated effort among
themselves in the management of our business.
In exercising its oversight responsibilities, as permitted by
law, the Board receives and relies on reports and other
information provided by management, reviews and approves matters
that it is required or permitted by law or our certificate of
incorporation or by-laws, each as amended, to approve, and
receives information relating to, and inquires into, such other
matters as it deems appropriate, including our business plans,
prospects and performance, succession planning, risk management
and other matters for which it has oversight responsibility. The
Board carries out its general oversight responsibility both by
acting as a whole as well as through its committees. Among other
things, the Board as a whole periodically reviews our processes
for identifying, ranking and assessing risks that affect our
organization as well as the output of those processes. The Board
as a whole also receives periodic reports from our management on
various risks, including risks of the types mentioned above
facing our businesses, risks presented by transactions that are
presented to the Board for approval and risks arising out of our
corporate strategy.
As discussed below, the Board also maintains several standing
committees with oversight responsibility for various Board
functions. Although the Board has ultimate responsibility for
overseeing risk, it has delegated certain oversight
responsibilities to its standing committees. For example, in
accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee engages in
ongoing discussions regarding major financial and accounting
risk exposures and the process and system employed to monitor
and control such exposures. In addition, consistent with its
charter, the Audit Committee engages in periodic discussions
with management concerning the
14
process by which risk assessment and management are undertaken,
and it exercises oversight with regard to the risk assessment
and management processes related to, among other things,
internal controls, credit, capital structure, liquidity and
insurance programs. In carrying out these responsibilities the
Audit Committee, among other things, regularly reviews with the
head of Internal Audit the audits or assessments of significant
accounting and audit risks conducted by Internal Audit personnel
based on their audit plan, and the committee regularly meets in
executive sessions with the head of Internal Audit. The Audit
Committee also regularly reviews with management our internal
control over financial reporting, including any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses. As part of these reviews,
the Audit Committee reviews steps taken by management to
monitor, control and mitigate risks. The Audit Committee also
regularly reviews with the General Counsel and Chief Compliance
Officer significant legal, regulatory and compliance matters
that could have a material impact on our financial statements or
business. Finally, from time to time executives who are
responsible for managing particular risks report to the Audit
Committee on how those risks are being controlled and mitigated.
The Board has also delegated to other committees the
responsibility to oversee risk within their areas of
responsibility and expertise. For example, as noted in the
section below entitled Risk Assessment of Compensation
Policies and Practices, the Compensation Committee
oversees risk assessment and management with respect to the
Companys compensation policies and practices, and it
exercises oversight with respect to our retirement and 401(k)
plans.
In those cases in which committees have risk oversight
responsibilities, the Chairs of the committees regularly report
to the full Board the significant risks facing the Company, as
identified by management, and the measures undertaken by
management for controlling and mitigating those risks.
Risk
Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices
We have reviewed our material compensation policies and
practices and have concluded that these policies and practices
are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on
us. Specifically, our compensation programs contain many design
features that mitigate the likelihood of inducing behavior that
may be considered as excessive risk-taking. These features
include:
|
|
|
|
|
A balance of fixed and variable compensation, with variable
compensation tied to defined objectives that are approved by our
Compensation Committee;
|
|
|
|
Reasonable goals and objectives in our incentive programs;
|
|
|
|
Payouts to highly compensated employees and officers modified
based upon individual performance, as assessed by management and
approved by the Compensation Committee;
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committees ability to exercise downward
discretion in determining incentive program payouts; and
|
|
|
|
The requirement that all conduct be in compliance with our Codes
of Conduct and Ethics as a condition to the receipt of any
incentive compensation.
|
Based on the foregoing, we believe that our compensation
policies and practices do not create inappropriate or unintended
significant risk to us as a whole. We also believe that our
incentive compensation arrangements do not provide incentives
that encourage risk-taking beyond our ability to effectively
identify and manage significant risks, are compatible with
effective internal controls and our risk management practices,
and are supported by the oversight and administration of the
Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation
programs.
Board
Leadership Structure
As noted above, Mr. Loewenbaum, an independent director,
serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors, a position that he
has held since 1999. As a result, the Board has separated the
position of its Chairman from the position of Chief Executive
Officer.
15
Nevertheless, as a company we do not have a policy regarding
whether the Chairman and CEO roles should be combined or
separated. Rather, our Board of Directors prefers to retain
flexibility to choose its leadership structure and Chairman in
any way that it deems best for us at any given time. The Board
periodically reviews the appropriateness and effectiveness of
its leadership structure given numerous factors. Currently, the
Board believes that it is appropriate for Mr. Loewenbaum to
remain as Chairman given his independence as a director, his
background and experience and his significant holdings of our
Common Stock, which enable him to reflect the views of
stockholders in the deliberations of the Board of Directors.
With the foregoing in mind, the Board believes that the current
Board leadership structure has promoted decisive leadership,
ensured clear accountability and enhanced our ability to
communicate with a consistent voice to stockholders, customers,
employees and other stakeholders. The Board also believes that
it has assisted in the efficient conduct of Board meetings as
the directors discuss key business and strategic matters and
other critical issues.
While the Board believes that the separation of the positions of
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has been beneficial to the
Company, the Board does not view any particular Board leadership
structure as being preferable to any other. Accordingly, in the
event that any future change in the Boards leadership
structure occurs (which the Board does not currently expect to
happen), the Board will take such actions with respect to its
leadership structure as it then considers to be appropriate.
Succession
Planning
We maintain a succession plan for the CEO and other executive
officers. To assist the Board with this requirement, our CEO
annually leads the Board of Directors in a discussion of CEO and
senior management succession. The annual review includes an
evaluation of the requirements for the CEO and each senior
management position and an examination of potential permanent
and interim candidates for CEO and senior management positions.
Meetings
and Meeting Attendance
During 2010, the Board of Directors held nine meetings. Each
member of the Board of Directors attended at least
75 percent of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board
of Directors and of the committees of the Board on which he or
she served during 2010. A discussion of the number of committee
meetings held during 2010 appears below.
The Board holds executive sessions with only independent
directors in attendance at its regular meetings and at other
meetings when circumstances warrant those sessions. The CEO, any
other non-independent director and other members of management
are excused from these executive sessions.
We encourage, but do not require, all incumbent directors and
director nominees to attend our annual meetings of stockholders.
All of the directors then in office attended our 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors maintains an Audit Committee, a
Compensation Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee, and an Executive Committee as standing committees of
the Board. As a matter of policy, all of the members of these
committees are independent directors, except that
Mr. Reichental, as CEO, serves on the Executive Committee
and, as noted above, is not regarded as an independent director.
Each of these committees operates under a written charter that
has been approved by the Board and is posted on our website,
which can be viewed by going to www.3DSystems.com and
clicking on the Investor Relations tab, then the
Corporate Governance tab and then selecting the
appropriate charter from the list of documents on the web page.
Each of these committees periodically reviews and updates its
written charter as necessary.
16
The following table below provides membership information for
each of the Boards standing committees as of the date of
this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governance and
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Nominating
|
|
Executive
|
Director Name
|
|
Committee
|
|
Committee
|
|
Committee
|
|
Committee
|
|
William E. Curran
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Jim D. Kever
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Walter Loewenbaum, II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
Kevin S. Moore
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Daniel S. Van Riper
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karen E. Welke
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Committee
In addition to the risk oversight matters discussed above, the
principal responsibilities of the Audit Committee are to assist
the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities for:
|
|
|
|
|
monitoring and overseeing our systems of internal accounting and
financial controls;
|
|
|
|
our public reporting processes;
|
|
|
|
the retention, performance, qualifications and independence of
our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
the performance of our internal audit function;
|
|
|
|
the annual independent audit of our consolidated financial
statements;
|
|
|
|
the integrity of our consolidated financial statements; and
|
|
|
|
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
|
The Audit Committee has the ultimate authority and
responsibility to select, evaluate and approve the terms of
retention and compensation of, and, where appropriate, to
replace our independent registered public accounting firm,
subject to ratification of the selection of that public
accounting firm by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The
current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Van
Riper (Chairman), Curran and Moore.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the
Audit Committee is an audit committee financial
expert as defined in the regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and therefore meets the requirement of the
listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC of having
accounting or related financial management expertise.
The Audit Committee held seven meetings in 2010. It also held
private sessions with our independent registered public
accounting firm and the Director of Internal Audit at several of
its meetings. Our Director of Internal Audit reports to the
Chairman of the Audit Committee.
The report of the Audit Committee is set forth beginning on
page 47 of this Proxy Statement.
Compensation
Committee
In addition to the risk oversight matters discussed above, the
principal responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to:
|
|
|
|
|
review the performance and compensation of our Chief Executive
Officer;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
determine the compensation of all of our other executive
officers and of any of our other employees or employees of any
of our subsidiaries with a base annual salary of $200,000 or
more;
|
|
|
|
administer our equity compensation plans and authorize the
issuance of shares of Common Stock and other equity instruments
under those plans; and
|
|
|
|
perform the duties and responsibilities of the Board of
Directors under our Section 401(k) Plan.
|
Consistent with the requirements of the listing standards of The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, the Chief Executive Officer may not be
present during voting or deliberations regarding his or her
compensation.
The members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Welke
(Chair) and Messrs. Loewenbaum and Van Riper. The
Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2010, in addition
to various unanimous consents.
The report of the Compensation Committee appears on page 39
of this Proxy Statement.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Since 2006, Mr. Reichental, our President and CEO, has
served as a director of Finetooth Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a
Mumboe, a company for which Mr. Loewenbaum currently serves
as Chairman and, prior to 2008, served as an executive officer.
There has been no financial transaction, arrangement or
relationship between the Company and Mr. Loewenbaum or any
immediate family member since 2006 in which Mr. Loewenbaum
or any immediate family member had or will have a direct or
indirect material interest. See Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management above and
Director Compensation below.
None of our other current executive officers served during 2010
as a director of any entity with which any of our outside
directors is associated or whose executive officers served as
one of our directors, and, except as noted below, none of the
members of the Compensation Committee has been an officer or
employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries.
Mr. Loewenbaum, while previously elected as a director of
the Company, was an employee of the Company from 1999 until 2002.
Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee
The principal responsibilities of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee are to:
|
|
|
|
|
assist the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become
Board members;
|
|
|
|
recommend to the Board nominees to be elected at annual meetings
of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
fill vacancies or newly created directorships at other times;
|
|
|
|
recommend to the Board the corporate governance guidelines
applicable to the Company;
|
|
|
|
lead the Board in its reviews of the performance of the Board
and its committees; and
|
|
|
|
recommend to the Board nominations of the directors to serve on
each committee.
|
The current members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee are Messrs. Moore (Chairman) and Kever and
Ms. Welke. The Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee held three meetings in 2010.
Executive
Committee
The principal responsibilities of the Executive Committee are to
function on behalf of the Board of Directors during intervals
between meetings of the Board and to guide our strategic
planning.
The members of the Executive Committee are
Messrs. Loewenbaum (Chair), Curran, Moore and Reichental.
The Executive Committee held three meetings in 2010.
18
Stockholdings
of Directors
Among the factors considered under our Qualifications
for Nomination to the Board discussed above is an
expectation that each director will hold during his or her term
of office a meaningful number of shares of our Common Stock.
Shares awarded under the Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors and shares acquired upon the exercise of options
granted under our 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors are taken into account as are any other securities
that the director holds. It is expected that directors will
retain during their term of office at least 50% of the shares of
Common Stock acquired under those Plans. Several of our
directors beneficially own substantial numbers of shares of our
Common Stock. See Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management above and
Director Compensation below.
Stockholder
Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders may communicate with the Board by sending an email
to BoardofDirectors@3DSystems.com or by sending a letter to the
Board of Directors of 3D Systems Corporation,
c/o Corporate
Secretary, 333 Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill, South Carolina
29730. All communications must contain a clear notation
indicating that they are a Stockholder-Board
Communication or a
Stockholder-Director
Communication and must identify the author as a
stockholder.
The office of the Corporate Secretary will receive the
correspondence and forward appropriate correspondence to the
Chairman of the Board or to any individual director or directors
to whom the communication is directed. We reserve the right not
to forward to the Board any communication that is hostile,
threatening or illegal, does not reasonably relate to the
Company or its business, or is similarly inappropriate. The
office of the Corporate Secretary has authority to discard or
disregard any inappropriate communication or to take any other
action that it deems to be appropriate with respect to any
inappropriate communications.
We also welcome communications from our stockholders that are
consistent with applicable law and are initiated through our
Investor Relations Coordinator, who may be contacted at
(803) 326-4010.
Code of
Conduct and Code of Ethics
Our Code of Conduct applies to all of our employees worldwide,
including all of our officers. We separately maintain a Code of
Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, all other senior financial executives and to
directors of the Company when acting in their capacity as
directors.
These documents are designed to set high standards of business
conduct and ethics for our activities and to help directors,
officers and employees resolve ethical issues. The purpose of
our Code of Conduct and our Code of Ethics is to provide
assurance to the greatest possible extent that our business is
conducted in a consistently legal and ethical manner. Employees
may submit concerns or complaints regarding ethical issues on a
confidential basis by means of a toll-free telephone call to an
assigned voicemail box. We investigate all concerns and
complaints.
We intend to disclose amendments to, or waivers from, any
provision of the Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, principal accounting
officer or controller and persons performing similar functions
and that relates to any element of the Code of Ethics described
in Item 406(b) of
Regulation S-K
by posting such information on our website, which can be viewed
by going to www.3DSystems.com and clicking on the
Investor Relations tab, then the Corporate
Governance tab and then selecting the document titled
Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics from
the list of documents on the web page. There have been no such
waivers or amendments since the date of our 2010 Proxy Statement.
Related
Party Transaction Policies and Procedures
In addition to the provisions of our Code of Conduct and Code of
Ethics that deal with conflicts of interest and related-party
transactions, we have adopted a Related Party Transaction Policy
that is designed to confirm our position that related-party
transactions should be avoided except when they are in our
interests and to require that certain types of transactions that
may create conflicts of interest or other relationships with
19
related parties are approved in advance by the Board of
Directors and a committee composed of directors who are
independent and disinterested with respect to the matter under
consideration. This policy applies to transactions meeting the
following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000
in any calendar year;
|
|
|
|
we or any of our subsidiaries would be a participant; and
|
|
|
|
any person who is or was in the current or immediately preceding
calendar year an executive officer, director, director nominee,
greater than five percent beneficial owner of our Common Stock
or immediate family member of any of the foregoing has or will
have a direct or indirect interest.
|
In adopting this policy, the Board reviewed certain types of
transactions and deemed them to be pre-approved even if the
amount involved exceeds $120,000. These types of transactions
include:
|
|
|
|
|
employment arrangements with executive officers where such
executive officers employment in that capacity and
compensation for serving as an executive officer has been
approved by the Board, the Compensation Committee or another
committee of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
director compensation arrangements where such arrangement has
been approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee (or another committee of independent directors) and
the Board;
|
|
|
|
awards to executive officers and directors under compensatory
plans and arrangements pursuant to our 2004 Incentive Stock Plan
and 2004 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the
exercise by any executive officer or director of any previously
awarded stock option that is exercised in accordance with its
terms and any grants or awards made to any director or executive
officer under any other equity compensation plan that has been
approved by our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
certain transactions with other companies where a related party
has a de minimis relationship (as described in the
policy) with the other company and the amount involved in the
transaction does not exceed the lesser of $500,000 or two
percent of the other companys total annual revenue;
|
|
|
|
charitable contributions made by us to a charitable organization
where a related party has a de minimis relationship and
the amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $10,000 or two
percent of the charitable organizations total annual
receipts and charitable contributions under any matching program
maintained by us that is available on a broad basis to employees
generally; and
|
|
|
|
other transactions where all security holders receive
proportional benefits.
|
Under the terms of our Related Party Transaction Policy, when
considering whether to approve a proposed related party
transaction, factors to be considered include, among other
things, whether such transaction is on terms no less favorable
than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party
under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the
related partys interest in the transaction. No
transactions that would constitute related-party transactions or
which would otherwise be reportable transactions or
relationships under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
were considered by the Board or any of its committees since the
beginning of 2010.
A copy of our Related Party Transaction Policy is posted on our
website, which can be viewed by going to www.3DSystems.com
and clicking on the Investor Relations tab, then
the Corporate Governance tab and then selecting the
document titled Related Party Transaction Policies and
Procedures from the list of documents on the web page.
Policy on
Hedging Transactions
Since 2005, our Insider Trading Policy has contained provisions
to the effect that we consider it inappropriate for anyone who
is employed by or associated with us to engage in short-term or
speculative transactions in our securities. This policy includes
within its coverage short sales, which for directors and
executive officers of the company are prohibited by
Section 16(c) of the Securities Exchange Act. It also
20
prohibits transactions in publicly traded options, such as puts,
calls and other derivative securities, or other hedging
transactions on a securities exchange or other organized market.
Our Insider Trading Policy requires that our executive officers
and directors pre-clear any transactions in our securities with
our general counsel, chief executive officer or chief financial
officer.
Claw
Backs of Incentive Compensation
As part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has
adopted a policy on the claw back of incentive compensation.
Under the terms of that policy, if the Board or an appropriate
Board committee has determined that any fraud or intentional
misconduct by one or more executive officers caused, directly or
indirectly, the Company to restate its financial statements, the
Board shall take, in its sole discretion, such action as it
deems necessary to remedy the misconduct and prevent its
recurrence. The Board may require reimbursement of any bonus or
incentive compensation awarded to such officers
and/or
effect the cancellation of unvested restricted stock or
outstanding stock option awards previously granted to such
officers in the amount by which such compensation exceeded any
lower payment that would have been made based on the restated
financial results.
The Board recognizes that the Dodd-Frank legislation enacted in
2010 would, following rule making, likely require the
modification of this policy. The Board intends to review any
rules adopted as a result of that legislation and to adopt any
modifications to this policy that become required by applicable
law.
Availability
of Information
As noted above:
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors has adopted a series of corporate
governance documents, including Corporate Governance Guidelines,
a Code of Conduct for our employees, a Code of Ethics for Senior
Financial Executives and Directors and a Related Party
Transaction Policy; and
|
|
|
|
Each standing committee of the Board operates under a written
charter that has been approved by the Board.
|
Each of these documents is available online and can be viewed on
our website by going to www.3DSystems.com and clicking on
the Investor Relations tab, then the Corporate
Governance tab and then selecting the appropriate document
from the list on the web page.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Director
Compensation for 2010
The following table sets forth information concerning all
compensation paid to each of our independent directors for their
services as a director during the year ended December 31,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in Cash
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Total(2)
|
|
|
G. Walter Loewenbaum, II
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
42,867
|
|
|
$
|
222,867
|
|
William E. Curran
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
42,867
|
|
|
|
99,867
|
|
Jim D. Kever
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
42,867
|
|
|
|
71,367
|
|
Kevin S. Moore
|
|
|
61,250
|
|
|
|
42,867
|
|
|
|
104,117
|
|
Daniel S. Van Riper
|
|
|
93,250
|
|
|
|
42,867
|
|
|
|
136,117
|
|
Karen E. Welke
|
|
|
39,750
|
|
|
|
42,867
|
|
|
|
82,617
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value of awards (the Grant
Date Fair Value) made in 2010 under the Directors Stock
Plan. Grant Date Fair Value includes awards of 3,000 shares
of Common Stock made to each such director on May 18, 2010
minus the $3.00 purchase price for the shares covered by each
award |
21
|
|
|
|
|
paid by the recipients. Such awards were, as provided for by
such Plan, valued based on the closing market price of our
Common Stock ($14.29 per share) on May 18, 2010, the date
of grant. We have accounted for all of such shares in accordance
with Accounting Standards Codification Section 718
(ASC 718), Stock Compensation. |
As of December 31, 2010, each of our independent directors
then in office had received since the Plans adoption in
2004 awards covering 21,000 shares of restricted stock
pursuant to this Plan, except for Mr. Van Riper who was
first elected to the Board of Directors in 2004 and had received
awards covering 20,323 shares of restricted stock pursuant
to this Plan, Mr. Curran who was first elected to the Board
on January 24, 2008 and had received awards covering
10,970 shares of restricted stock pursuant to this Plan,
and Ms. Welke who was first elected to the Board on
May 20, 2008 and had received awards covering
10,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to this Plan.
See Directors Stock Plan below.
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, certain of our independent
directors held vested, unexercised stock options granted to them
prior to December 31, 2003 covering the following number of
shares of Common Stock:
Mr. Loewenbaum85,000 shares;
Mr. Kever30,000 shares; and
Mr. Moore30,000 shares. The other independent
directors held no options. See 1996 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan below. |
Directors
Fees
Director compensation is set by the Board, based upon the
recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee. We pay the following cash compensation to directors:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Mr. Loewenbaum, as the Chairman of the Board of Directors,
receives a fee of $180,000 per annum for serving as Chairman.
|
|
|
2.
|
Through the date of this Proxy Statement, directors (other than
the Chairman of the Board) who are not officers or employees of
the Company receive an annual retainer of $15,000.
|
|
|
3.
|
Each member of the Audit Committee (other than its Chairman)
receives a $10,000 annual retainer.
|
|
|
4.
|
The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives a $50,000 retainer.
|
|
|
5.
|
The Chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee each receive $5,000
retainers.
|
|
|
6.
|
The following meeting fees are paid to independent directors
other than the Chairman of the Board:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
A meeting fee of $2,000 for each regular or special Board
meeting attended.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Members of the Audit Committee receive a fee of $2,000 for each
committee meeting attended on a day other than a day on which
the Board is holding a regularly scheduled Board meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
For meetings of other standing committees of the Board, members
of those committees receive a fee of $1,500 for each committee
meeting attended on a day other than a day on which the Board is
holding a regularly scheduled Board meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
For meetings of any standing committee of the Board attended by
a member of such committee on a day on which the Board is
holding a regularly scheduled Board meeting, attendees receive
50% of the meeting fee that would otherwise be payable to such
director.
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
A director who attends by invitation a meeting of a committee
that he or she is not a member of is similarly entitled to
receive a meeting fee.
|
Ms. Welke and Messrs. Curran, Kever, Moore and Van
Riper are entitled to receive these cash directors fees.
As discussed below, independent directors also participate in
the Directors Stock Plan, and, prior to its termination in 2004,
certain of them participated in the 1996 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan. Directors are also entitled to be reimbursed
for their expenses of attendance at meetings of the Board of
Directors or its committees.
22
Messrs. Reichental and Hull, our other directors, are also
executive officers of the Company. Their compensation is
described below under Executive Compensation.
Effective April 1, 2011, the Board of Directors approved an
increase in the annual retainer to be paid to directors (other
than the Chairman) who are entitled to receive cash
directors fees from $15,000 to $50,000 per year. At the
same time, the Board amended the Directors Stock Plan to limit
the value of any award of shares made to an eligible director to
$50,000 valued on the date of the award.
Directors
Stock Plan
The stockholders approved the Directors Stock Plan in May 2004.
Under this Plan, each director who is neither one of our
officers or employees nor an officer or employee of any of our
subsidiaries or affiliates (referred to in the Plan as a
Non-Employee Director) is eligible to receive grants
of Common Stock under the Plan as described below. Of the
current directors, Messrs. Curran, Loewenbaum, Kever, Moore
and Van Riper and Ms. Welke are entitled to participate in
this Plan and to receive stock grants, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Grants. Upon the adjournment of each
annual meeting of the stockholders, each Non-Employee Director
who has been elected a director at that annual meeting receives
a grant of 3,000 shares of Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
Interim Grants. Any Non-Employee Director who
is first elected a director other than at an annual meeting
receives on the date of election a pro rata portion of the
annual grant that the director would have received if elected at
the preceding annual meeting.
|
|
|
|
Initial Grants. Each newly elected
Non-Employee Director receives an initial grant of
1,000 shares of Common Stock when he or she is first
elected to the Board.
|
As a condition of each award under this Plan, each participant
is required to pay an issue price equal to the $0.001 par
value per share of Common Stock issued under the Plan, to
execute an agreement to hold the shares covered by such grant in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan (including
without limitation restrictions on transferability provided for
in the Plan) and to comply with certain other terms and
conditions of the grant. Except in limited circumstances
provided for in the Plan, a Non-Employee Director is not
permitted to sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of
shares of Common Stock awarded under the Plan as long as
(a) the Non-Employee Director remains a director of the
Company or (b) a change of control as provided for in the
Plan has not occurred. Non-Employee Directors who hold shares of
Common Stock under the Plan are entitled to voting rights and
any dividends paid with respect to such shares. Shares of Common
Stock issued under the Plan are considered to be fully vested
when issued.
The Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of
Common Stock for awards under the Plan, subject to adjustment in
the event of changes in the Common Stock by reason of any stock
dividend, stock split, combination of shares, reclassification,
recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization or
liquidation. No such adjustment had occurred as of the date of
this Proxy Statement. At December 31, 2010,
68,707 shares of Common Stock remained available for
issuance under this Plan. We record an amount equal to the fair
market value of each award on the date of grant less the amount
paid by the director for the number of shares awarded as
director compensation expense in our accounts as of the date of
grant.
The Directors Stock Plan does not prevent the Board of Directors
from exercising its authority to approve the payment of
additional fees to members of the Board of Directors, to adopt
additional plans or arrangements relating to the compensation of
directors or to amend the existing cash fees paid to directors.
23
The number of shares awarded to each Non-Employee Director since
the adoption of the Plan in 2004 and their aggregate fair market
value at December 31, 2010 ($31.49 per share), without
deduction for the purchase price of these shares, is set forth
in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Name
|
|
Years
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
G. Walter Loewenbaum, II
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
661,290
|
|
Jim D. Kever
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
661,290
|
|
Kevin S. Moore
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
661,290
|
|
Daniel S. Van Riper
|
|
|
17,323
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
639,971
|
|
William E. Curran
|
|
|
7,970
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
345,445
|
|
Karen E. Welke
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
314,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
86,293
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,284,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
Our 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan was terminated
except as to outstanding options following the approval of the
Directors Stock Plan at the 2004 Annual Meeting. Under the 1996
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, each independent
director received stock options covering 10,000 shares of
Common Stock at the first meeting of the Board of Directors
following each annual meeting of the stockholders.
Messrs. Kever, Loewenbaum and Moore participated in this
Plan.
These options were granted with an exercise price equal to 100%
of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of
grant. These options vested as to one-third of the shares
covered by each grant on the first, second and third
anniversaries of the date of grant, and are thereafter
exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the grant date,
subject to certain limitations if the option holder ceases to be
a director. All options previously granted under this plan
became fully vested in accordance with their terms in 2006, and
no options were granted under it subsequent to 2003.
The following table sets forth for each of the current directors
who hold options granted to them under the 1996 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan, the number of shares of Common
Stock underlying outstanding stock options previously granted
under that Plan held at December 31, 2010 and the option
exercise prices and expiration dates of each of those options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
G. Walter Loewenbaum, II
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
8/26/2013
|
(1)
|
Jim D. Kever
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
16.06
|
|
|
|
5/9/2011
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
14.24
|
|
|
|
5/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
8/26/2013
|
|
Kevin S. Moore
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
16.06
|
|
|
|
5/9/2011
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
14.24
|
|
|
|
5/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
8/26/2013
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At December 31, 2010, Mr. Loewenbaum held fully vested
options covering an additional 75,000 shares of Common
Stock. These options had an exercise price of $11.75 per share
and an expiration date of February 12, 2012. After
December 31, 2010, Mr. Loewenbaum exercised all of his
85,000 options and continued to hold such shares valued at
$2,612,050 as of their January 4, 2011 date of exercise
based on a closing price on that date of $30.73 per share, which
value is shown without giving effect to the aggregate exercise
price of those options. |
24
Director
Option Exercises in 2010
The following table reflects the amounts received by directors
upon the exercise of outstanding options during 2010. Each of
these options had an exercise price of $10.6875 per share and an
expiration date of May 5, 2010. These options were
exercised prior to their expiration date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise(1)
|
|
|
Kevin S. Moore
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
$
|
30,324
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount set forth in this column reflects the difference
between the market price of our Common Stock at which the shares
acquired on exercise of that stock option were sold on the date
of exercise and the $10.6875 per share exercise price of the
options. |
25
PROPOSAL TWO
ADVISORY
VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors values and encourages constructive
dialogue on compensation and other topics of concern to our
stockholders at any time. Under legislation enacted during 2010,
our stockholders are entitled to conduct an advisory vote,
sometimes referred to as say on pay, to approve the
compensation that we paid to our named executive officers
(NEOs) for 2010, which is disclosed in this Proxy
Statement pursuant to Item 402 of
Regulation S-K.
That compensation is described in the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis as well as in the Summary Compensation Table and
related disclosures, all of which appear below in the section
entitled Executive Compensation.
As described in that section of this Proxy Statement, we design
our executive compensation program, and we pay executive
compensation, in order to, among other things, attract,
motivate, and retain the key executives who drive our success
and industry leadership. Compensation that reflects performance
and alignment of that compensation with the interests of
long-term stockholders are key principles that underlie our
compensation program design.
Our compensation program consists of the following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
base annual salaries;
|
|
|
|
when earned, incentive awards under our annual incentive
programs; and
|
|
|
|
long-term equity compensation under our 2004 Incentive Stock
Plan.
|
As a retirement program, we also maintain a Section 401(k)
defined contribution plan that is available to all eligible
U.S. employees, and we provide our employees with benefit
programs that we believe are reasonable, competitive and
consistent with the objectives of our compensation program. Our
NEOs are eligible to participate in these programs. As a matter
of policy, we do not award personal benefits or perquisites that
are unrelated to our business to our NEOs or any other employee.
Our annual incentive compensation programs are designed to
provide appropriate incentives toward achieving the objectives
of rewarding performance and motivating our executives to attain
our strategic objectives. These programs are revised and
readopted annually and focus on the achievement of
pre-determined corporate financial objectives as well as, for
each executive, personal objectives. We place greater emphasis
on our financial objectives than on personal objectives, such
that 55% of each executives annual incentive compensation
target is based on the achievement of pre-approved corporate
financial objectives with the remainder based on the achievement
of personal objectives. As an overriding condition that we apply
to each year, a failure to perform in accordance with our Code
of Conduct or Code of Ethics may serve as a basis for a
participant in this program to not receive an incentive award.
We consider this aspect of our incentive compensation program to
be consistent with sound principles of corporate governance, and
we are pleased that it has not been necessary for us to invoke
it with respect to any NEO.
Financial objectives are determined based on our business plan
for the year in question. This business plan is developed by
management and approved by the Board of Directors. Personal
objectives are prepared by each executive in discussions with
the CEO and submitted by the CEO to the Compensation Committee
for its review and approval. That Committee maintains discretion
to adjust performance objectives for extraordinary items and
other items as it deems appropriate. A discussion of the manner
in which our annual incentive compensation programs have
operated in 2010, 2009 and 2008 is set forth in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, the dollar amounts of incentive
compensation awarded to our NEOs in each of those years is set
forth in the Summary Compensation Table, and the footnotes and
other disclosure related to that Table contain additional
information with respect to the compensation of our NEOs.
With respect to long-term equity compensation, the Compensation
Committee administers our 2004 Incentive Stock Plan and has
granted restricted stock awards under this Plan to the NEOs and
other employees both to reward short-term performance with
equity-based compensation and to motivate the recipients
long-term performance. This Plan is intended to provide an
effective method of motivating performance from key
26
employees, including our NEOs, and of creating an identity of
interests in participants with the interests of our
stockholders. We expect recipients of awards to retain a
substantial portion of the shares awarded to them in order to
foster a mutuality of interests with our stockholders, and the
failure of a participant to act in accordance with that
expectation may adversely affect the decision to make future
awards to such participant. Additional discussion of this Plan
is set forth in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.
The Board of Directors recommends that you indicate your support
for our executive compensation for 2010 as described in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section as well as in the
Summary Compensation Table and related disclosures that appear
below in the section entitled Executive
Compensation of this Proxy Statement by adopting the
following resolution that will be submitted for a stockholder
vote at the 2011 Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED that the stockholders of 3D Systems Corporation
(the Corporation) approve, on an advisory basis, the
2010 executive compensation for its named executive officers
listed in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Proxy
Statement for this Annual Meeting, as disclosed in
Executive Compensation set forth in such
Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of
Regulation S-K.
Shares of Common Stock properly voted at the Annual Meeting
by any of the means discussed in this Proxy Statement will be
voted FOR the approval of Proposal Two unless you otherwise
direct.
Although this vote is only advisory and is non-binding, the
Board and the Compensation Committee will review the voting
results. To the extent there is any significant negative
say-on-pay
vote, we plan to consult directly with stockholders who have
identified themselves as having concerns with our executive
compensation practices or the amount of executive compensation
that we pay to better understand the concerns that influenced
their vote. The Board and the Compensation Committee would
welcome constructive feedback obtained through this process, as
well as through stockholder communications made generally, in
making future decisions about executive compensation programs.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this
proposal.
27
PROPOSAL THREE
ADVISORY
VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Under rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 25, 2011, in addition to the advisory vote that
stockholders are authorized to conduct as set forth in
Proposal Two above, you have the right to conduct another
advisory vote to indicate your preference for the frequency with
which we are obligated to enable you to conduct such a vote (a
say-on-frequency
proposal). The Dodd-Frank legislation enacted during 2010
requires that we submit a
say-on-pay
proposal to you at least every six years. The SECs rules
provide that we may recommend a time period of every year, every
two years or every three years for which we would submit
say-on-pay
proposals to you, and you have the right on an advisory,
non-binding basis either to recommend an alternate time period
or to abstain from any vote on the selection of a time period.
The SECs rules also require that we submit a
say-on-frequency
proposal to you at least every six years.
The Board of Directors believes that providing stockholders with
the opportunity to conduct an advisory vote on executive
compensation every three years will enhance shareholder
communication by providing another avenue to obtain information
on stockholder sentiment about our NEOs compensation. This
would mean that we would submit the next
say-on-pay
advisory vote to you at our 2014 Annual Meeting and our next
say-on-frequency
advisory vote to you at our 2017 Annual Meeting.
We have followed a consistent approach to executive compensation
for the past several years. Accordingly, we believe that holding
an advisory vote every three years (a triennial
vote) will be the most effective means for conducting and
responding to the requirement for a
say-on-pay
vote. We also believe that a triennial vote would provide an
opportunity for you to consider any meaningful changes that are
adopted by our Board or our Compensation Committee to our
executive compensation program in light of then current trends
in our business.
The Board of Directors recommends that you indicate your support
for a triennial
say-on-pay
vote by adopting the following resolution that will be submitted
for a stockholder vote at the 2011 Annual Meeting. You also have
the right to abstain from voting on this resolution or to
indicate your preference for a one-year or two-year period.
RESOLVED that the stockholders of 3D Systems Corporation
(the Corporation) approve, on an advisory basis,
managements recommendation that the stockholders conduct a
triennial
say-on-pay
vote as described in Proposal Three of the Proxy Statement
for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Shares of Common Stock properly voted at the Annual Meeting by
any of the means discussed in this Proxy Statement will be voted
FOR the approval of the Boards recommendation on
this proposal unless you direct that your shares ABSTAIN from a
vote on this Proposal Three or you direct that your shares
be voted in favor of a one-year or two-year alternative.
Although this vote is only advisory and is non-binding, the
Board and the Compensation Committee will review the voting
results. To the extent there is any significant vote expressing
a preference for a voting frequency other than a triennial vote,
we plan to consult directly with stockholders who have
identified themselves as having concerns with the Boards
recommendation for a triennial vote to better understand the
concerns that influenced the vote of those stockholders. The
Board and the Compensation Committee would welcome constructive
feedback obtained through this process, as well as through
stockholder communications made outside of the say on pay
framework, in making future decisions about the frequency of
say-on-pay
votes.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the
resolution set forth above.
28
EMPLOYEE
COMPENSATION AND ATTENDANT RISKS
We maintain a compensation program for all of our employees
(including our executives) that is based upon the following
objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
To attract employees, and once hired retain employees, with the
skills and attributes that we need to promote the growth and
success of our business;
|
|
|
|
To motivate our employees to achieve our annual and long-term
strategic objectives;
|
|
|
|
To reward performance based on the attainment of goals and
objectives that are approved by management and the Board of
Directors or its committees that are intended to benefit us and
our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
To create an identity of interests between our employees and our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
To encourage our employees to promote and conduct themselves in
accordance with our values and Code of Conduct.
|
All of our employees receive either fixed annual salaries or
hourly wages for performing their services to the Company.
Certain of them, including our executive officers, participate
in annual incentive compensation programs that are approved by
the Board of Directors or its committees as part of the annual
budgeting process, and participants in those programs have fixed
incentive compensation targets that are approved in advance. See
Executive Compensation below. Other employees
receive commissions at pre-established percentages based on
their sales or related activities with customers that are
intended to provide incentives to their achieving previously
approved sales or service objectives.
The compensation of each of our employees is subject to the
oversight and approval of our Chief Executive Officer (the
CEO), who reviews recommendations from our managers
to whom each employee reports relating to the compensation of
these individuals. Following a review of those recommendations,
the CEO makes such modifications to each managers
recommendations as he considers to be appropriate and approves
the amount of any annual incentive compensation to be awarded to
any employee with respect to the preceding calendar year,
determines the amount of any adjustments to be made to the
annual compensation of each such individual for the current
year, and establishes target incentive bonuses for the current
calendar year for each employee. He may also adjust compensation
for specific individuals at other times during the year when
there are significant changes in the responsibilities of such
individuals or under other circumstances that he considers
appropriate.
For the reasons discussed above under Corporate Governance
MattersRisk Assessment of Compensation Policies and
Practices, we believe that there are no substantial risks
associated with our compensation practices and that any such
risks that do exist are not reasonably likely to result in a
material adverse effect on us. We endeavor to manage any of
these risks that may arise through our system of internal
financial and operational controls and our Board and management
oversight processes.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Notwithstanding the discussion above, the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors is responsible for setting the
compensation of all executive officers, including the persons
named in the Summary Compensation Table below (referred to below
as NEOs). It is also responsible for setting the
compensation of any other employees of the Company or our
subsidiaries who have base annual salaries of $200,000 or more.
As an overview, our compensation program consists of the
following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
base annual salaries;
|
|
|
|
when earned, incentive awards under our annual incentive
programs; and
|
|
|
|
long-term equity compensation under our 2004 Incentive Stock
Plan.
|
29
As a retirement program, we maintain a Section 401(k)
defined contribution plan that is available to all eligible
U.S. employees, including our NEOs. Outside the United
States, we provide retirement programs to employees of our local
subsidiaries, most of which provide benefits that are prescribed
by law. Our executive officers do not participate in these
non-U.S. programs.
We also provide our employees, including the NEOs, with benefit
programs that we believe are reasonable, competitive and
consistent with the objectives of our compensation program. As a
matter of policy, we do not award personal benefits or
perquisites that are unrelated to our business.
Each of these elements of our executive compensation program is
discussed below, accompanied by disclosure of the compensation
that we have paid to our NEOs during 2010, 2009 and 2008, that
we expect to pay in 2011, and other information that is included
in the Summary Compensation Table that appears below and its
related disclosures.
Our executive compensation program generally applies to all of
our executive officers and management employees, and the
compensation paid to management employees is generally subject
to the same principles and guidelines that apply to our
executive compensation program. Nevertheless, the following is a
discussion and analysis of the material elements of our
compensation program as it relates to the NEOs. As noted above,
similar considerations apply to all of our employees except
that, in the case of employees whose compensation is not subject
to the Committees approval, the CEO is responsible for
compensation matters relating to those employees. The following
discussion focuses on:
|
|
|
|
|
the objectives of our compensation program, including the
results and behaviors the program is designed to reward;
|
|
|
|
the process used to determine executive compensation;
|
|
|
|
each element of compensation;
|
|
|
|
the reasons why the Committee chooses to pay each element;
|
|
|
|
how the Committee determines the amount of or the formula used
for each element; and
|
|
|
|
how each element and the Committees decisions regarding
that element fit into the Committees stated objectives and
affect the Committees decisions regarding other elements.
|
The purpose of this discussion is to put into perspective the
Summary Compensation Table that is set forth below and the other
tables and narrative disclosure that follow this discussion.
Objectives
of Executive Compensation Program
The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are
to:
|
|
|
|
|
attract executives, and once hired retain executives, with the
skills and attributes that we need to promote the growth and
success of our business;
|
|
|
|
motivate our executives to achieve our annual and long-term
strategic objectives;
|
|
|
|
reward performance based on the attainment of goals and
objectives that are approved by the Compensation Committee and
are intended to benefit us and our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
create an identity of interests between our executives and our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
encourage our executives to promote and conduct themselves in
accordance with our values and Code of Conduct.
|
30
Determining
Executive Compensation
The Committee conducts an annual review of the NEOs
performance and compensation during the first quarter of each
year, for example the first quarter of 2011. The purpose this
annual review is:
|
|
|
|
|
To determine the amount of any annual incentive compensation to
be awarded with respect to the preceding calendar year;
|
|
|
|
To determine the amount of any adjustments to be made to the
annual salary of each such individual for the current
year; and
|
|
|
|
To approve our incentive compensation program for the current
year and establish target incentive bonuses for the current
calendar year for each of our officers.
|
As part of this review, our CEO submits recommendations to the
Committee covering the compensation of these individuals within
the framework of our incentive compensation program for the year
in question. That incentive compensation program is designed to
provide incentives for achieving the objectives established for
our business for the year in question. The Committee reviews
those recommendations and modifies them to the extent the
Committee considers appropriate. As part of this process, the
Committee approves the amount of any annual incentive
compensation to be awarded to each individual with respect to
the preceding calendar year (2010, for example), determines the
amount of any adjustments to be made to the annual salary of
each such individual for the current year (2011, for example),
approves the terms of our incentive compensation program for the
current calendar year, and establishes target incentive bonuses
for the current year for each of our NEOs and each other
individuals whose compensation it oversees. The Committee may
also adjust compensation for specific individuals at other times
during any year when there are significant changes in the
responsibilities of such individuals or under other
circumstances that the Committee considers appropriate.
Our CEOs compensation is determined under similar
principles but follows a different process. This process is
designed to comply with applicable law and listing requirements
under which, after discussing his self-evaluation with him and
receiving the views of other independent directors, the
Compensation Committee evaluates his performance, reviews the
Committees evaluation with him, and, based on that
evaluation and review, determines his compensation and
performance and personal annual incentive objectives. Consistent
with the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, our
CEO is excused from meetings of the Committee during voting or
deliberations regarding his compensation.
Elements
of Executive Compensation
Our compensation program consists of the following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
base annual salaries;
|
|
|
|
incentive awards under our annual incentive programs; and
|
|
|
|
long-term equity compensation under our 2004 Incentive Stock
Plan.
|
In setting compensation levels, the Committee considers
primarily the base annual salary and target annual incentive
awards for each NEO. It also reviews summaries of each
executives compensation history with the Company and prior
equity awards or grants. The Committee is guided by its own
judgment and those sources of information (including, when
deemed appropriate, compensation surveys) that the Committee
considers relevant. Neither we nor the Committee currently
retain or use executive compensation consultants.
As a general principle, the Committee believes that compensation
of our executives should not be based upon fixed formulas and
that the prudent use of discretion in determining compensation
will generally be in our best interests and those of our
stockholders. Accordingly, from time to time in the exercise of
its discretion, the Committee may approve changes in
compensation that it considers to be appropriate to award
performance or otherwise to provide incentives toward achieving
the objectives of our executive compensation program.
31
The Committee also seeks to strike a balance that it considers
to be appropriate in its discretion between fixed elements of
compensation, such as base salaries, and variable
performance-based elements represented by annual incentive
awards and long-term equity compensation. As a general matter,
the Committee believes that our executives should have at least
20% of their annual compensation opportunity at risk under
variable performance-based elements of our incentive
compensation program, including in particular our annual
incentive program. In most cases, the portion of our NEOs
compensation opportunity that is at risk in any year exceeds
that level. See, e.g., 2011 Incentive
Compensation Program below.
Base
Salaries
We pay annual salaries to provide executives with a base level
of monthly compensation to achieve our objectives of attracting
and retaining executive talent, to maintain their standard of
living and to reward performance and responsibility. Adjustments
to base salaries are based principally on the responsibilities
of the executives, the Committees evaluation of the market
demand for executives with similar capability and experience,
and our corporate performance and the performance of each
executive in relation to our strategic objectives.
Annual
Incentive Program
Our annual incentive compensation program is designed to provide
appropriate incentives toward achieving the objectives of
rewarding performance and motivating our executives, including
the NEOs, to attain our strategic objectives.
In 2010, our strategic objectives included:
|
|
|
|
|
Building our
3Dpropartstm
global services;
|
|
|
|
Accelerating personal and professional 3D printer
penetration; and
|
|
|
|
Growing healthcare solutions revenue.
|
Building
3Dpropartstm
global services. We introduced our
3Dpropartstm
services in October 2009 to enable us to impart the latest
technology to customers months or years in advance of their
ability to invest in new printers, and this service grew in 2010
both organically and through several acquisitions in the United
States and Europe. We view this as an opportunity to introduce
customers to the newest technologies and to build a brand
experience and customer loyalty.
Accelerating 3D printer penetration. We
believe that accelerating personal and professional 3D printer
penetration through channel expansion and new products will
provide a growing installed base to promote higher revenue from
recurring sales of print materials and services.
Growing healthcare solutions revenue. We
believe that, by leveraging our core competencies in healthcare
solutions applications and printing capabilities, we can grow
revenue within this marketplace.
While there can be no assurance that we will succeed in
accomplishing our strategic initiatives, our consolidated
revenue increased 41.7% in 2010 primarily due to higher sales
across all of our revenue categories to $159.9 million from
$112.8 million in 2009. These results reflected growth in
demand for 3D printers from a continued global economic
recovery, favorable impact and market acceptance of several of
our new printers, increased print material sales from a growing
installed base, and higher service revenue.
For 2010, healthcare solutions revenue accounted for 13.5%, or
$21.6 million, of our total revenue and included sales of
printers, print materials and services for hearing aid, dental,
medical device and other health-related applications.
Our gross profit margin percentage improved to 46.3% in 2010
from 44.1% in 2009, and operating expenses as a percentage of
revenue declined. As a result, our operating income improved by
$17.8 million to $20.9 million from operating income
of $3.1 million in 2009, and we reported $0.83 of diluted
earnings per share.
32
Even though we used $17.9 million of cash to acquire seven
businesses to augment our 3D printing and
3Dpropartstm
services during 2010, our working capital increased by
$5.8 million during 2010, and we finished the year with
$37.3 million of cash and cash equivalents.
Our annual incentive compensation programs are revised and
readopted annually, are designed with our strategic objectives
in mind, and focus on the achievement of pre-determined
corporate financial objectives as well as, for each executive,
personal objectives. In setting performance objectives, the
Committee generally places greater emphasis on our financial
objectives than on personal objectives, such that 55% of each
executives annual incentive compensation target is based
on the achievement of pre-approved corporate financial
objectives with the remainder based on the achievement of
personal objectives. As an overriding condition that applies to
each year, a failure to perform in accordance with our Code of
Conduct or Code of Ethics may serve as a basis for a participant
in this program to not receive an incentive award. We consider
this aspect of our incentive compensation program to be
consistent with sound principles of corporate governance, and we
are pleased that it has not been necessary for us to invoke it
with respect to any NEO.
Financial objectives are determined based on our business plan
for the year in question. This business plan is developed by
management and approved by the Board of Directors. Personal
objectives are prepared by each executive in discussions with
the CEO and submitted by the CEO to the Committee for its review
and approval. The Committee maintains discretion to adjust
performance objectives for extraordinary items and other items
as it deems appropriate.
With respect to financial measures, 100% of each
executives bonus related to each financial measure would
generally be deemed to have been earned if the target for that
financial measure were fully achieved, and under certain
circumstances an executives bonus related to a financial
measure may be deemed by the Compensation Committee to have been
more than fully earned, and as a consequence increased, if the
target for that financial measure is more than fully achieved.
For 2010, for example, 25% of each NEOs target incentive
award was based on our achievement of a budgeted level of
diluted earnings per share in excess of that which we achieved
for 2009. An additional 30% was based on our achievement of a
budgeted level of cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2010
that was also in excess of that which we achieved for 2009. We
exceeded both of these financial targets in 2010 and, as
discussed below, we made incentive awards reflecting attainment
of these objectives for 2010.
For 2009, 25% of each NEOs target incentive award was
based on our achievement of a budgeted level of diluted earnings
per share in excess of that which we achieved for 2008. An
additional 30% was based on our achievement of a budgeted level
of cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2009 that was also in
excess of that which we achieved for 2008. For 2008, 25% of each
NEOs target incentive award was based on our achievement
of a pre-approved target for operating income, and an additional
30% was based on our achievement of a pre-approved target for
fully diluted net income per share or divisional financial
objectives. We did not attain these financial objectives in 2009
or 2008. Accordingly, we made no incentive awards with respect
to the financial objectives established for 2009 or 2008.
However, as discussed below, we did make incentive awards with
respect to personal achievements in 2009.
In each year, the remaining 45% was based on the
individuals attainment of his or her pre-approved
individual objectives. The Committee considers both quantitative
and qualitative factors in determining the extent to which the
financial and personal targets and objectives have been
achieved, and credit may be awarded for the partial attainment
of these objectives.
Individual objectives, which are revised annually and approved
by the Committee, relate to matters such as the
individuals execution of projects that fall within our
strategic objectives, timely completion of specified projects
within budget, enhancements to sales and service productivity
and other matters involved in our annual budget and business
plans. The types and relative importance of an executives
individual performance objectives varies from year to year
depending on the executives areas of responsibility. We
awarded bonuses to the NEOs with respect to the attainment of
these objectives in respect of 2010 and 2009, as discussed below.
33
As part of this goal-setting process, the Committee establishes
target incentive awards for each executive with the following
principles in mind:
|
|
|
|
|
Targets are used to determine the amount of any annual incentive
to be paid to a participant based upon the Committees
assessment of the extent to which we have achieved the financial
objectives of the incentive program for the year in question and
such individual has achieved his or her personal objectives for
that year. In setting these target incentive awards, the
Committee considers each executives level of
responsibility and the recommendations of our CEO.
|
|
|
|
Target incentive awards are set at levels that are designed to
link a substantial portion of each individuals total
annual compensation opportunity to attaining the corporate and
personal objectives applicable to the year in question in order
to provide appropriate incentives to achieving those objectives.
As noted above, in general, more than 20% and in most cases at
least one-third of each NEOs annual compensation
opportunity is at risk. See Grants of Plan Based
Awards in 2010 below for a summary of target incentive
awards for the NEOs applicable to 2010.
|
|
|
|
No minimum awards are guaranteed to NEOs. The threshold amounts
under our annual incentive programs are zero.
|
|
|
|
Base target amounts represent the incentive awards that may be
awarded assuming achievement of 100% of the pre-determined
financial and individual objectives.
|
|
|
|
Maximum amounts represent the maximum amount that could have
been awarded to each NEO under the program. In most cases, these
are the same as the base target amounts, but as noted above the
Committee reserves discretion to increase awards for performance
that it considers to be exemplary.
|
For a discussion of bonus awards made for 2010, see the
discussions below at 2010 Incentive Compensation
Program. We have also included a discussion of 2011
targets under 2011 Incentive Compensation
Program below.
Long-Term
Equity Compensation
The Committee administers our 2004 Incentive Stock Plan. Under
this Plan, the Committee is authorized to grant restricted stock
awards, stock options and other awards that are provided for
under the Plan to such of our employees and employees of our
subsidiaries as the Committee determines to be eligible for
awards. Awards granted to a participant are based upon a number
of factors, including the recipients position, salary and
performance as well as our overall corporate performance.
The 2004 Incentive Stock Plan is intended to provide an
effective method of motivating performance from key employees,
including our NEOs, and of creating an identity of interests in
participants with the interests of our stockholders. Awards are
made under this Plan as long-term incentive compensation to
executives and other key employees when the Committee feels such
awards are appropriate. We expect that participants who receive
these awards will retain a substantial portion of the shares
awarded to them to foster a mutuality of interests with our
stockholders, and the failure of a participant to act in
accordance with that expectation may adversely affect the
decision to make future awards to such participant.
The Committee makes awards under this Plan both to reward
short-term performance with equity-based compensation and to
motivate the recipients long-term performance. The
Committee does not follow the practice of making annual or other
periodic awards to participants who are determined to be
eligible to participate in the Plan. However, the Committee
periodically reviews the stock ownership of key employees and,
when it deems appropriate, makes awards under the Plan to
reflect the contributions of those participants to specific
corporate achievements and to provide motivation toward
achieving strategic objectives.
As a matter of practice adopted by the Compensation Committee,
all awards made under this Plan through the date of this Proxy
Statement have been restricted stock awards.
Restricted stock awards made under this Plan require the
recipient to pay $1.00 for each share of Common Stock granted
(but not more than 10% of the fair market value of the Common
Stock on the date of
34
grant) and are subject to an option in our favor for three years
after they are awarded, or such other period as may be
determined by the Committee, to repurchase the shares upon
payment of an amount equal to their per share issue price. We
can exercise this option only upon the termination of an
employees employment during the vesting period other than
as a result of death or total disability. Such option terminates
upon the occurrence of any of the events related to a change of
control as specified in the Plan.
Shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to this Plan may not be
sold, transferred or encumbered by the employee while our option
to repurchase the shares remains in effect. The compensation
associated with these awards is expensed over the vesting
period, shares covered by these awards are considered
outstanding upon issuance following the acceptance of each award
for the purpose of calculating diluted earnings (loss) per
common share, and holders of shares issued pursuant to such
awards are entitled to vote such shares and to receive any
dividends declared in respect of our Common Stock.
With our long-term performance objectives in mind, at a meeting
on November 15, 2010, the Committee reviewed the stock
ownership of our executive officers and other key employees. The
Committee made restricted stock awards under the 2004 Incentive
Stock Plan to a number of employees, including certain of the
NEOs, to reflect the contributions that those individuals have
made to the improvement in our operations and financial
condition, to provide motivation toward achieving our future
strategic objectives and to further align the interests of those
individuals with our stockholders. The awards made to these NEOs
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,315,000
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
789,000
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
263,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,367,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, the Committee also made restricted stock awards
under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan to a number of employees,
including the NEOs. The Fair Market Value of those shares on
that date was $6.81 per share, and the amounts shown in this
table are shown before deducting the purchase price for these
shares. See Summary Compensation Table and
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2010 below. No
awards under this Plan have been made to NEOs since
November 15, 2010.
2010
Incentive Compensation Program
At its meeting on February 23, 2010, the Compensation
Committee approved an annual incentive program that was similar
to the 2009 annual incentive program and included the NEOs
target annual incentive awards for 2010, our targeted financial
objectives for 2010 and individual performance objectives to be
used in the determination of incentive awards for 2010. The 2010
target incentive awards for the NEOs are set forth in the table
that appears in Grants of Plan-Based Awards in
2010 below.
At that time, the Committee also granted the following salary
increases to the NEOs, effective April 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
an 8.2% increase in Mr. Reichentals base salary to
$625,000.
|
|
|
|
a 20% increase in Mr. Gregoires base salary to
$300,000.
|
|
|
|
a 3.8% increase in Mr. Graces base salary to $267,000.
|
|
|
|
a 3.4% increase in Mr. Hulls base salary to $300,000.
|
|
|
|
a 3.6% increase in Mr. McAleas base salary to
$285,000.
|
The performance objectives established for the 2010 annual
incentive program were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
25% of each NEOs base target incentive award was based on
the achievement of our budgeted level of diluted earnings per
share as approved by the Board of Directors, which was in excess
of the $0.05 per share diluted earnings per share that we
achieved in 2009;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
30% of each NEOs base target incentive award was based on
the achievement of our budgeted level of cash and cash
equivalents at the end of 2010 as approved by the Board of
Directors, which was in excess of our $24.9 million of cash
and cash equivalents at the end of 2009; and
|
|
|
|
the 45% remainder was based upon the achievement of personal
objectives for each NEO that were approved by the Compensation
Committee.
|
We reported $0.83 diluted earnings per share and
$37.3 million of cash and cash equivalents at the end of
2010, exceeding the corporate financial targets established by
the Compensation Committee for 2010.
On February 18, 2011, the Committee completed its annual
compensation review of the NEOs. After reviewing our financial
results for 2010 and the NEOs performance of their individual
performance objectives for 2010, the Committee made incentive
compensation awards to the NEOs that are set forth in the
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary
Compensation Table set forth below. These incentive awards were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a $938,000 cash award to Mr. Reichental, which was
essentially equivalent to his maximum target incentive award for
2010.
|
In making this award, the Committee considered
Mr. Reichentals performance in 2010 and the
achievement of his 2010 objectives, with particular notice being
given to our exceeding our pre-established 2010 financial
targets, the favorable reception of the stock market, our
organic growth as well as our growth through acquisitions, the
achievement of our current long-term operating model targets,
and successful balance sheet management.
|
|
|
|
|
a $200,000 cash award to Mr. Gregoire, which amounted to
133% of his 2010 base target incentive award.
|
In making this award, the Committee considered
Mr. Gregoires efforts in building our
3Dpropartstm
services, his efforts to improve organizational and operational
quality and his management of operating costs.
|
|
|
|
|
cash awards to Messrs. Grace, Hull and McAlea in the
amounts of $133,500, $100,000 and $150,000, representing 100%,
91% and 130% of their base target incentive awards, respectively.
|
In making these awards, the Committee considered the achievement
by each of these individuals of their pre-approved 2010
objectives, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to Mr. Grace, his efforts to reduce litigation
exposure, his litigation management and his leadership over
foreign legal matters.
|
|
|
|
With respect to Mr. Hull, his work on developing new
technologies.
|
|
|
|
With respect to Mr. McAlea, his work in increasing revenue
from our production systems and printers, his work in building
the
3Dpropartstm
business and his efforts to improve organizational and
operational efficiency.
|
2011
Incentive Compensation Program
At its meeting on February 18, 2011, the Compensation
Committee also approved an annual incentive program for 2011
that is similar to the 2010 annual incentive program and
includes the NEOs target annual incentive awards for 2011,
our targeted financial objectives for 2011 and individual
performance objectives to be used in the determination of
incentive awards for 2011. The 2011 target incentive awards for
the NEOs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for Mr. Reichental, a base target of 100% of his 2011
annual base salary, discussed below, with a maximum potential
incentive award equal to 150% of his annual base salary;
|
|
|
|
for Messrs. Grace and Gregoire, a base and maximum target
of 50% of their respective 2011 base annual salaries;
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
for Mr. McAlea, a base and maximum target of approximately
42% of his 2011 base annual salary; and
|
|
|
|
for Mr. Hull, a base and maximum target of approximately
39% of his 2011 base annual salary.
|
The range of these target incentive awards is presented in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
|
2011 Incentive Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,500
|
|
|
|
138,500
|
|
Charles W. Hull
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
At that time, the Committee also granted the following salary
increases to the NEOs, effective April 1, 2011, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a 12% increase in Mr. Reichentals base salary to
$700,000.
|
|
|
|
a 10% increase in Mr. Gregoires base salary to
$330,000.
|
|
|
|
a 3.8% increase in Mr. Graces base salary to $277,000.
|
|
|
|
a 3.3% increase in Mr. Hulls base salary to $310,000.
|
|
|
|
a 5.3% increase in Mr. McAleas base salary to
$300,000.
|
The performance objectives established for the 2011 annual
incentive program are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
25% of each NEOs base target incentive award will be based
on the achievement of our budgeted level of diluted earnings per
share as approved by the Board of Directors, which is in excess
of the $0.83 per share diluted earnings per share that we
achieved in 2010;
|
|
|
|
30% of each NEOs base target incentive award will be based
on the achievement of our budgeted level of cash and cash
equivalents at the end of 2011 as approved by the Board of
Directors, which is in excess of our $37.3 million of cash
and cash equivalents at the end of 2010; and
|
|
|
|
the 45% remainder will be based upon the achievement of personal
objectives for each NEO that have been approved by the
Compensation Committee.
|
Other
Compensation Matters
Benefits
and Perquisites
We provide our employees, including the NEOs, with a benefit
program that the Committee believes is reasonable, competitive
and consistent with the objectives of our compensation program.
As a matter of policy, the Committee does not award personal
benefits or perquisites that are unrelated to our business.
However, under certain circumstances discussed below, during the
period covered by the Summary Compensation Table, the Committee
has approved certain personal benefits or perquisites that it
deemed to be in our interests in order to induce executives to
maintain employment with us. All other perquisites for the NEOs
amount to less than $10,000 per person.
Our executives, including the NEOs, are eligible to participate
in our employee benefit programs, which include a group
insurance program providing group health, dental, vision, life
and long-term disability insurance. Other benefits include a
Section 401(k) plan, flexible spending accounts, paid sick
leave, paid holiday time and paid vacation time. Certain
benefits and perquisites provided to the NEOs are described in
the Summary Compensation Table below.
37
Payments
and Benefits Upon Termination or Change of Control
Our CEO is entitled under his employment agreement to severance
payments in connection with the occurrence of certain events,
including non-renewal of that employment agreement, his death
and termination of his employment by us without cause. We
negotiated these provisions, and the Board of Directors approved
them, when Mr. Reichental was hired in 2003.
While not triggering severance payments, other events such as a
change of control may result in our becoming
obligated to otherwise compensate executives through the early
vesting of unvested shares of restricted stock or other equity
compensation awards that we may make under our 2004 Incentive
Stock Plan. For example, a change in control is
defined under that Plan as an event that has the effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
our being merged or consolidated with another corporation or
entity such that less than 70% of the voting securities of the
resulting entity are owned by our former stockholders;
|
|
|
|
our selling all or substantially all of our assets;
|
|
|
|
any person becoming the beneficial owner of 30% or more of the
voting power of our outstanding securities;
|
|
|
|
as the result of a solicitation under
Rule 14a-11
of the Exchange Act, one or more persons not recommended by one
third or more of our Board of Directors being elected to our
Board of Directors; or
|
|
|
|
our becoming subject to dissolution or liquidation.
|
We do not currently anticipate that any of these events will
occur in the foreseeable future.
We have also entered into:
|
|
|
|
|
an arrangement with Mr. Hull, pursuant to which he will
become a consultant for a period of four years after his
retirement; and
|
|
|
|
a severance arrangement with Mr. McAlea, pursuant to which
he would become entitled to severance payments if his employment
is terminated other than for cause.
|
In addition, any share of restricted stock granted to an NEO, as
well as other recipients of restricted stock awards, under the
2004 Incentive Stock Plan will no longer be subject to our
option to repurchase that share, as described above, if the
recipient leaves our employ due to death or disability or in the
event of a change in control.
For additional information regarding each of the foregoing
arrangements, see Employment and Other Agreements
with NEOs below.
Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, we are generally not entitled to deduct for federal
income tax purposes non-performance-based compensation paid to
our NEOs to the extent that any such individuals
compensation in any year exceeds $1.0 million. Special
rules apply for performance-based compensation,
including the pre-approval of performance goals applicable to
that compensation.
Certain of the compensation that we pay to our NEOs may be
considered to be non-performance based compensation, and in
certain instances such compensation may exceed
$1.0 million. However, in order to maintain flexibility in
compensating executives in a manner designed to promote our
corporate goals, the Committee has not adopted a policy that all
compensation must be deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Stock
Performance
While some people consider stock performance to be a significant
factor in compensation decisions, we generally do not consider
stock performance in making compensation decisions since
short-term movements in
38
our stock price and total return to stockholders as reflected in
the performance of our stock price are subject to factors,
including factors affecting the securities markets generally,
that are unrelated to our performance.
Our priorities and the priorities of our management are centered
on achieving our strategic objectives, meeting customer needs,
new product development, building cash flow, identifying,
completing and successfully integrating strategic investments,
and promoting operational excellence and innovation in the
pursuit of our business. The pursuit of such longer range
objectives is not necessarily consistent with producing
short-term results to increase our stock price, but we believe
that pursuing these longer range objectives should, as we
believe was the case in 2010, result in performance that is more
likely to maximize total return to our stockholders over time.
Since our executive compensation is based upon factors relating
to our growth and profitability and the performance of our
business as well as the contributions of each of our executives
to achieving our objectives, we believe that we have provided
appropriate incentives to align managements interests with
our long-term growth and development and the interests of our
stockholders. We also believe that there are many ways in which
our executives contribute to building a successful company.
While our financial statements and stock price have begun to
reflect the results of those efforts, many long-term strategic
decisions made in pursuing our growth and development may have
little visible impact on our stock price in the short term.
Compensation
Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with
management and, based on such review and discussion, recommended
to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Compensation Committee:
Karen E. Welke, Chair
G. Walter Lowenbaum, II
Daniel S. Van Riper
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information concerning all
compensation paid to the CEO, the CFO and to each of the three
other most highly compensated officers (collectively referred to
below as NEOs) for services provided to us in all capacities for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2010.
The Summary Compensation Table sets forth the total compensation
during 2010, 2009 and 2008 paid to or earned by each of the
NEOs. That compensation is explained above.
We have included Notes to this Table to explain various items of
compensation in the Table. We also call your attention to the
following general matters affecting the Table:
1. Salary is the gross amount of salary paid to each NEO in
the year concerned before any deductions or exclusions.
2. The dollar amounts in the column labeled
Restricted Stock Awards are the Grant Date Fair
Value of awards that we made in 2010 and 2009 in accordance with
ASC 718, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), and are presented after deducting the
amount paid for each award in accordance with our 2004 Incentive
Stock Plan. Each of those awards was a restricted stock award
made under our 2004 Incentive Stock Plan. This plan requires
that each recipient pay the lesser of $1.00 per share and 10% of
the fair market value of the shares covered by the award at the
time the award is made. Because our stock price was then less
than $10.00 per share, each recipient was required to pay $0.68
for each share of Common Stock covered by such recipients
award on March 20, 2009 and $0.74 for each share of Common
Stock covered by such recipients award on July 21,
2009. Each recipient paid $1.00 for each share of Common Stock
covered by such recipients award in 2010. The shares
covered by each award are subject to forfeiture if the recipient
leaves our employ before the third
39
anniversary of the date of the award other than as a result of
death or disability. See Long-Term Equity
Compensation above.
3. With respect to Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,
each of the NEOs participates in the annual incentive program
described above that provides for an annual target incentive
award that is approved by the Compensation Committee. This
column shows the amount that was awarded to each NEO for the
year concerned. See Executive Compensation
above.
4. As discussed above, the NEOs also participate in
employee benefit programs that we provide to our employees
generally. All Other Compensation in the table below
does not include our cost of providing benefits that are
generally available to all of our employees on a
non-discriminatory basis or perquisites or personal benefits
where the aggregate amount of such perquisites and personal
benefits is less than $10,000 for a particular NEO.
5. Total Compensation for each year equals the sum of the
items set forth in each column of the Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Compensation(2)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
612,212
|
|
|
$
|
1,265,000
|
|
|
$
|
938,000
|
|
|
$
|
32,487
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
2,847,699
|
|
President and Chief Executive
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
577,500
|
|
|
|
306,500
|
|
|
|
310,000
|
|
|
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
1,225,732
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
569,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,726
|
|
|
|
604,294
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
286,923
|
|
|
|
759,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245,923
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
158,750
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,750
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
244,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,231
|
|
Charles W. Hull
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
293,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,385
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
290,000
|
|
|
|
30,650
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,650
|
|
Technology Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
285,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,674
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
282,385
|
|
|
|
253,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685,385
|
|
Vice President
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
91,950
|
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,950
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
270,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,674
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
264,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,885
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
257,000
|
|
|
|
91,950
|
|
|
|
55,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,205
|
|
and Secretary
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
253,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,539
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On November 15, 2010, the Compensation Committee made the
following restricted stock awards under the 2004 Incentive Stock
Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 15,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Shares
|
Name
|
|
Granted
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the terms of the Plan, these awards will vest in
accordance with their terms on November 15, 2013. The Grant
Date Fair Value of these shares is based on the $26.30 per share
closing price on that date. See Long-Term Equity
Compensation above. |
40
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, the Compensation Committee made the following
restricted stock awards under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 20,
|
|
|
July 21,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Name
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Charles W. Hull
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the terms of the Plan, these awards will vest in
accordance with their terms on March 20, 2012 and
July 21, 2012, as the case may be. The Grant Date Fair
Value for these shares is based on the $6.81 per share closing
price on March 20, 2009. Mr. Gregoire was granted
additional shares on July 21, 2009. The Grant Date Fair
Value for these shares is based on the $7.42 per share closing
price on that date. |
|
(2) |
|
On February 18, 2011, the Compensation Committee granted
the annual cash incentive awards for 2010 to the NEOs that are
shown in the table above as Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation. See 2010 Incentive Compensation
Program above. |
|
|
|
On February 23, 2010, the Compensation Committee granted
the annual cash incentive awards to the NEOs that are shown in
the table above as 2009 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. |
|
|
|
On March 20, 2009, the Compensation Committee determined
that no annual incentive awards would be made to the NEOs for
2008 due to our financial performance during that year and the
then current recessionary business environment. |
|
|
|
See Executive Compensation above. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Reichentals other compensation includes amounts
that we paid for living expenses and costs for an automobile
that we provide for his general use. The living expenses relate
to residences that he maintained in the Rock Hill, South
Carolina area, away from his primary residence. Such items,
certain of which included income tax reimbursements, were as
follows in each year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Living expenses
|
|
$
|
21,100
|
|
|
$
|
20,152
|
|
|
$
|
20,159
|
|
Automobile expenses
|
|
|
11,387
|
|
|
|
11,580
|
|
|
|
14,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,487
|
|
|
$
|
31,732
|
|
|
$
|
34,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information concerning his compensation, see
Employment and Other Agreements with
NEOs below. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in 2010
The following table sets forth the amounts of target incentive
awards established for each of the NEOs under the 2010 incentive
compensation program that the Compensation Committee established
on February 23, 2010. The threshold amounts are zero
because no minimum awards are guaranteed to NEOs under this
program.
In the case of Messrs. Gregoire, Grace, Hull and McAlea,
the base target and maximum amounts represent the incentive
awards that could have been awarded assuming achievement of 100%
of the pre-determined financial and individual performance
objectives for 2010. In the case of Mr. Reichental, the
base target amount represents the incentive award that could
have been awarded assuming achievement of 100% of the
pre-determined financial and individual performance objectives
for 2010 and the maximum amount represents the maximum amount
that could have been awarded assuming achievement of 150% or
greater of the financial performance measures and
41
individual performance measures for 2010. The Compensation
Committee awarded 2010 incentive compensation to
Messrs. Reichental, Gregoire and McAlea based on its
determination that their performance in 2010 exceeded their base
targets. See 2010 Executive Compensation
Program above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
All Other Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Shares of Stock
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
2010 Incentive Compensation
Program
|
|
|
2/23/10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
625,000
|
|
|
$
|
937,500
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,315,000
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
2010 Incentive Compensation
Program
|
|
|
2/23/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
789,000
|
|
Charles W. Hull
|
|
2010 Incentive Compensation
Program
|
|
|
2/23/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
2010 Incentive Compensation
Program
|
|
|
2/23/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
263,000
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
2010 Incentive Compensation
Program
|
|
|
2/23/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,500
|
|
|
|
133,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
and Other Agreements with NEOs
Abraham
N. Reichental
Mr. Reichental became President and Chief Executive Officer
and a member of the Board of Directors effective
September 19, 2003, and we entered into an employment
agreement with him on that date. Pursuant to this agreement, he
is entitled to an annual base salary of at least $450,000 per
year, subject to increase at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. His current annual base
salary is $625,000 and will be increased to $700,000 effective
April 1, 2011.
In addition to standard employee benefits, under the terms of
his employment agreement, as amended, he is also entitled to
participate in our annual incentive program, with a target
annual incentive award of 100% of his base annual salary with a
maximum target incentive award of 150% of his base annual
salary, subject to the attainment of the performance objectives
set forth in our annual incentive program. He is also entitled
to be reimbursed for certain relocation and living expenses.
His employment agreement is renewable automatically for
succeeding terms of one year on each September 19, unless
either party gives written notice of an intent not to renew. If
we give notice to him of our intention not to renew the
employment agreement, or if his employment is terminated by
reason of death or by us without cause (cause being
defined as conduct involving moral turpitude or gross or
habitual neglect of duties during the term of the agreement),
he or his estate will be entitled to receive the following
severance benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
the same health and disability benefits as he receives under the
employment agreement for two years or until he obtains other
employment providing for these benefits; and
|
|
|
|
two years of his then current base salary, in the total sum of
at least $1,250,000 (based on his salary in effect at
December 31, 2010), together with an incentive award with
respect to the year of termination equal to a pro rata amount of
the incentive award which he would have received for that year
based on our annualized performance up to the date of
termination.
|
In addition, he has been granted restricted stock under our 2004
Incentive Stock Plan. The shares of restricted stock granted
under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan are subject to an option in
our favor for three years after they are awarded to repurchase
them for the lesser of $1.00 per share and 10% of their fair
market value on the date of grant. This option does not apply,
however, if participants under the Plan leave our employ as a
result of death or disability, and it will terminate in the
event of a change in control (as defined in the 2004
Incentive Stock Plan).
42
The following table sets forth the estimated post-employment
compensation and benefits that would have been payable to
Mr. Reichental under his employment agreement and the 2004
Incentive Stock Plan, assuming that each covered circumstance
under such arrangements occurred on December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reasons,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
Non-Renewal
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resignation,
|
|
|
|
by Us of
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement, or
|
|
Benefits and Payments
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Upon Termination
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Years Base Salary(1)
|
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Award(2)
|
|
|
938,000
|
|
|
|
938,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
938,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,149,000
|
|
|
|
3,149,000
|
|
|
|
3,149,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health, Dental and Vision Insurance(4)
|
|
|
41,474
|
|
|
|
41,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance(5)
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability Insurance(5)
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
2,233,512
|
|
|
$
|
2,233,512
|
|
|
$
|
3,149,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,382,512
|
|
|
$
|
3,149,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents two years of his base salary of $625,000 for 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the amount of his annual incentive award for 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
This amount reflects the value of 100,000 shares of
restricted stock held by Mr. Reichental at the end of 2010
based on the closing market price of our Common Stock on
December 31, 2010 ($31.49 per share) before deducting the
$1.00 per share purchase price for those shares. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the estimated incremental cost to us of health,
dental and vision plan continuation for two years. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the estimated incremental cost for us of such
continuing insurance coverage of two years. |
Charles
W. Hull
We and Mr. Hull are parties to a consulting arrangement
pursuant to which, upon his retirement, he will become a
consultant to us for a period of four years at a fixed
consulting fee that will decline from $275,000 in the first year
to $100,000 in the fourth year, and he will remain entitled to
continuing life and health insurance coverage.
The following table sets forth the consulting fees and estimated
benefits payable under his consulting arrangement, assuming that
he retired on December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and Payments
|
|
|
|
Upon Termination
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Consulting Fees (4 Years)(1)
|
|
$
|
625,000
|
|
Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Health, Dental and Vision Insurance(2)
|
|
|
53,019
|
|
Life Insurance(3)
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
680,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consulting fees payable to Mr. Hull under this consulting
arrangement will be $275,000 for the first year, $150,000 for
the second year and $100,000 for the third and fourth years. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the estimated incremental cost to us of health,
dental and vision plan continuation for four years. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the estimated incremental cost to us of such
continuing insurance coverage for two years. |
43
Other
NEOs
We and Mr. McAlea are parties to a severance arrangement
pursuant to which Mr. McAlea would become entitled to
severance payments equal to nine months of his then current
salary if his employment is terminated other than for cause. If
Mr. McAlea had been terminated without cause on
December 31, 2010, he would have been entitled to severance
payments totaling $213,750.
Messrs. McAlea, Grace and Gregoire each hold restricted
stock granted under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan that is
subject to forfeiture if any of the individuals leaves our
employ within three years after the date of grant. As described
above under Payments and Benefits Upon
Termination or Change of Control, each share of
restricted stock granted to Messrs. McAlea, Grace and
Gregoire under the 2004 Incentive Stock Plan will no longer be
subject to our option to repurchase that share if any of those
individuals leaves our employ due to death or disability or in
the event of a change of control.
If Mr. Grace had left our employ on December 31, 2010
due to death or disability or if a change of control had
occurred on such date, 15,000 shares of restricted stock
owned by him (valued at $472,350 as of such date) would have
become vested. If Mr. McAlea had left our employ on
December 31, 2010 due to death or disability or if a change
of control had occurred on such date, 25,000 shares of
restricted stock owned by him (valued at $787,250 as of such
date) would have become vested. If Mr. Gregoire had left
our employ on December 31, 2010 due to death or disability
or if a change of control had occurred on such date,
55,000 shares of restricted stock owned by him (valued at
$1,731,950 as of such date) would have become vested. We do not
currently expect any such change in control to occur.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Year-End 2010
The following table sets forth, for each of the NEOs, certain
information regarding the number of shares of Common Stock
underlying stock options held at the end of 2010, all of which
were then currently exercisable, and the number and market value
of shares covered by unvested restricted stock awards held at
the end of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Outstanding Unvested
|
|
|
|
Exercisable Stock Options
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Units of
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option Exercise
|
|
|
Option Expiration
|
|
|
Stock that
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Name
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Have Not Vested(1)
|
|
|
Vested(2)
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.22
|
|
|
|
9/19/2013
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,149,000
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
1,731,950
|
|
Charles W. Hull(3)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
12.59
|
|
|
|
2/28/2011
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
157,450
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
5/15/2013
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
787,250
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
15.16
|
|
|
|
8/24/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
11/2/2013
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
472,350
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares set forth in this column consist of shares of
restricted Common Stock awarded on (a) March 20, 2009,
as a long-term incentive award, that vest on March 20,
2012, (b) July 21, 2009, as a long-term incentive
award, that vest on July 21, 2012 and
(c) November 15, 2010, as a long-term incentive award,
that vest on November 15, 2013. Each award of restricted
stock is subject to forfeiture if the recipient leaves our
employ within three years after the date of grant of the award
other than as a result of death or disability. See
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts set forth in this column were calculated by
multiplying the closing market price of our Common Stock on
December 31, 2010 ($31.49 per share) by the number of
shares set forth in the column titled Number of Shares or
Units of Stock that Have Not Vested and have not been
reduced to reflect the amount paid for any of the shares in this
column. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Hull exercised all of his 10,000 options on
February 17, 2011 and continued to hold such shares valued
at $493,600 as of that date based on the closing price on that
date of $49.36 per share, which value is shown without giving
effect to the aggregate exercise price of those options. |
44
The manner of each grant of restricted stock reported in the
table above that we awarded to each of the individuals
identified in that table is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 20, 2009
|
|
|
July 21, 2009
|
|
|
November 15, 2010
|
|
|
|
as a Long-Term
|
|
|
as a Long-Term
|
|
|
as a Long-Term
|
|
Name
|
|
Incentive Award
|
|
|
Incentive Award
|
|
|
Incentive Award
|
|
|
Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Damon J. Gregoire
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Charles W. Hull
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in 2010
The following table reflects the amounts received by the named
executive officers upon the exercise of options during 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
on Exercise(1)
|
|
|
Kevin P. McAlea
|
|
|
50,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
628,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
628,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount set forth in this column reflects the difference
between the closing market price of our Common Stock on each
date of exercise and the exercise price of the options. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the aggregate number of options exercised. Each of
such options had an exercise price of $15.16 and an expiration
date of August 24, 2011. |
Shares of restricted Common Stock held by the NEOs vested as
follows during 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Vesting Date
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value(1)
|
|
|
Fair Value(2)
|
|
|
Damon Gregoire
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
315,000
|
|
|
$
|
232,650
|
|
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
54,990
|
|
|
|
37,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17,600
|
|
|
$
|
369,990
|
|
|
$
|
270,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Gregoires restricted shares were granted on
May 14, 2007. The Grant Date Fair Value of these shares is
based on the closing price on that date of $21.00 per share.
Mr. Graces restricted shares were granted on
July 24, 2007. The Grant Date Fair Value of these shares is
based on a closing price on that date of $21.15 per share. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Gregoires restricted shares vested on
May 14, 2010. The Vesting Date Fair Value of these shares
is based on a closing price on that date of $15.51 per share.
Mr. Graces restricted shares vested on July 24,
2010. The Vesting Date Fair Value of these shares is based on a
closing price on that date of $14.49 per share. |
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our executive officers and directors and any person
owning ten percent or more of the outstanding shares of our
Common Stock to file reports with SEC to report their beneficial
ownership of and transactions in our securities and to furnish
us with copies of those reports. Based upon a review of those
reports filed with us, along with written representations from
or on behalf of certain executive officers and directors that
they were not required to file any reports during 2010, we
believe that all of these reports were timely filed during 2010.
45
PROPOSAL FOUR
RATIFICATION
OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Audit Committee has approved the retention of BDO USA, LLP
(BDO) as our independent registered public
accounting firm to examine and report on our financial
statements for the year ending December 31, 2011, subject
to the ratification of its retention by the stockholders at the
Annual Meeting. BDO has examined and reported on our financial
statements for each of the five years ended December 31,
2010.
Valid proxies will be voted on this proposal in accordance with
the voting directions specified on the proxy or, if no
directions are given, will be voted FOR the proposal to ratify
the appointment of BDO as our independent registered public
accounting firm.
Representatives of BDO are expected to be present at the Annual
Meeting. Those representatives will have the opportunity to make
a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be
available to respond to appropriate questions.
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends you vote FOR
the proposal to ratify the selection of BDO as our independent
registered public accounting firm for 2011.
FEES OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting the
compensation of and overseeing the work of our independent
registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this
responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to
pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services
provided by BDO. BDO did not perform any non-audit services for
us in 2010 or 2009.
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees that BDO
billed us for professional services rendered for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Audit fees(1)
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
Audit-related fees(2)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
780
|
|
|
$
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees consisted of audit work performed in the preparation
of financial statements as well as fees for services provided in
connection with (i) statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements, (ii) comfort letters, statutory audits, attest
services, consents, assistance with and review of documents
filed with the SEC, and (iii) fees relating to
acquisitions, and any other services that only the audit firm
could reasonably provide. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-related fees consisted primarily of services related to
employee benefit plans. |
46
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is currently
composed of three directors, each of whom is independent as
defined by the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
and is an audit committee financial expert as
defined in the regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee
operates under a written charter approved by the Board of
Directors. A copy of the current charter is available on our
website, which can be viewed by going to www.3DSystems.com
and clicking the Investor Relations tab, then
the Corporate Governance tab and then selecting the
document titled Audit Committee Charter from the
list of documents on the web page.
Responsibility
The Audit Committee is responsible for providing independent,
objective oversight of our financial reporting processes and
internal controls.
Management is responsible for our system of internal controls
and its financial reporting processes, including the preparation
of its financial statements in conformity with United
States generally accepted accounting principles.
BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm,
is responsible for performing an independent audit of our
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and
for issuing a report based on this audit expressing its opinion
as to whether our financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows in conformity with United States generally
accepted accounting principles.
The Audit Committees responsibility is to review and
monitor, in an oversight capacity, the financial reporting and
auditing processes. The Audit Committee has relied, without
independent verification, on managements representations
that the financial statements are complete, free of material
misstatement and prepared in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles, and on the opinion and
representations made by BDO in its report on our financial
statements, including its representations that BDO is
independent and that its audit was performed in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States. The Audit Committees oversight does not
provide assurance that managements and BDOs opinion
and representations referred to above are correct.
2010
Consolidated Financial Statements
In connection with these responsibilities, the Audit Committee
met with management and representatives of BDO to review and
discuss the audited consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2010. The Audit Committee discussed
with the representatives of BDO the matters required by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with
Audit Committees), as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards,
Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T, as amended, which
include, among other items, matters relating to the conduct of
an audit of our financial statements. The Audit Committee
received written disclosures and the letter from BDO required by
applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board for independent auditor communications with
Audit Committees concerning independence, and the Audit
Committee discussed with the representatives of BDO that
firms independence. The Audit Committee also pre-approved
the services that BDO was engaged to provide during 2010, noted
that BDO was not engaged to provide any non-audit services,
evaluated and approved the fees charged for engagements that BDO
undertook, and considered whether BDOs provision of the
services that were provided was compatible with maintaining that
firms independence.
Based upon the Audit Committees discussions with
management and BDO and the Audit Committees review of the
representations of management and BDO, the Audit Committee
recommended that the Board of Directors approve including the
audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2010 in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for that year for filing with the SEC.
47
Internal
Control Audit
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Audit Committee
reviewed and monitored, on an oversight basis, managements
activities undertaken to comply with our internal control
evaluation responsibilities under Section 404 of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In connection with this oversight,
the Audit Committee met with management and representatives of
BDO to review and discuss managements assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2010. Managements assessment is
contained in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Audit Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel S. Van Riper, Chairman
William E. Curran
Kevin S. Moore
|
OTHER
MATTERS
This Proxy Statement is being delivered to you on our behalf. We
are bearing the expenses of preparing, printing, web hosting and
mailing this Proxy Statement and other proxy materials and all
other expenses of soliciting proxies. We have retained Georgeson
Shareholder Communications, Inc. (Georgeson) to
solicit proxies by personal interview, mail, telephone,
facsimile, internet or other means of electronic transmission
and to request brokerage houses, banks and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries to forward soliciting material to the
beneficial owners of the Common Stock held of record by those
persons. We agreed to pay Georgeson a fee of $9,500 for these
services and will reimburse it for payments made to brokers and
other nominee holders for their expenses in forwarding
soliciting material. We have also agreed that Georgesons
fees may increase if certain changes in the scope of its
services occur. In addition, our directors, officers and
employees may solicit proxies by personal interview, mail,
telephone, facsimile, internet or other means of electronic
transmission, although they will receive no additional
compensation for such solicitation.
We do not know of any matters to be presented at the meeting
other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement. However, if
any other matters come before the meeting, the proxy holders
will vote the shares represented by any proxy granted in their
favor in such manner as the Board of Directors may recommend and
otherwise in the proxy holders discretion.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Robert M. Grace, Jr.
Secretary
Rock Hill, South Carolina
March 30, 2011
48
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
|
|
x |
Using a black ink pen, mark your
votes with an X as shown
in this example. Please do not
write outside the designated areas.
|
|
Electronic Voting Instructions
You can vote by Internet or telephone!
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your
proxy, you may choose one of the
two voting methods outlined below
to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION
DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by the Internet
or telephone must be received by
11:59 P.M., E.D.T., on May 16,
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Internet
Log on to the
Internet and go to
www.envisionreports.com/TDSY
Follow the steps outlined on the secured website. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by telephone
Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the United States, Canada & Puerto Rico any time on a
touch tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call.
Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message. |
|
|
|
|
Annual
Meeting Proxy Card |
|
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE
PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
A |
Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 4 and every 3 Years for Proposal 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Election of Directors: |
|
For |
|
Withhold |
|
|
|
For |
|
Withhold |
|
|
|
For |
Withhold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 - William E. Curran
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
02 - Charles W. Hull
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
03 - Jim D. Kever
|
|
o
|
o |
|
|
|
04 - G. Walter Loewenbaum, II
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
05 - Kevin S. Moore
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
06 - Abraham N. Reichental
|
|
o
|
o |
|
|
|
07 - Daniel S. Van Riper
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
08 - Karen E. Welke
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Yrs |
|
2 Yrs |
|
1 Yr |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
Approval of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
3. Advisory vote on frequency of advisory vote on executive compensation. |
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
Ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for
the year ending December 31, 2011. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change of Address Please print your new address below.
|
|
Comments Please print your comments below.
|
|
Meeting Attendance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
Authorized
Signatures
This section must be completed for your vote to be counted.
Date and Sign Below
|
Please sign EXACTLY as name(s) appears below. When signing on behalf of a corporation,
estate, trust or other stockholder, please give its full name and state your full title or
capacity or otherwise indicate that you are authorized to sign.
|
|
|
|
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below.
|
|
Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box.
|
|
Signature 2 Please keep signature within the box. |
/ / |
|
|
|
|
01AK2E
IF YOU
HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH
AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Proxy 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF
3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION
The undersigned hereby appoints Abraham N. Reichental, Robert M. Grace, Jr. and Andrew
M. Johnson, or any of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution,
on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned and, to vote the
shares of the undersigned which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally
present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of 3D Systems Corporation (the 2011 Annual
Meeting) to be held at 11:00 a.m., E.D.T., on May 17, 2011 at the offices of the Company
at 333 Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730 and at any adjournments or
postponements thereof.
THE PROXY HOLDERS WILL VOTE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ANY OTHER MATTERS
THAT MAY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS OR POSTPONEMENTS THEREOF OR, IN
THE ABSENCE OF A BOARD RECOMMENDATION ON ANY SUCH OTHER PROPER MATTERS, IN THE PROXY
HOLDERS DISCRETION.
The undersigned hereby revokes all proxies previously given by the undersigned to vote at
the 2011 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof and acknowledges
receipt of 3D Systems Corporations Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2011 for the 2011
Annual Meeting.
This proxy will be voted as directed, or, if no contrary direction is indicated, will be
voted FOR the Election of all of the Director Nominees, FOR Proposal
No. 2 and 4 and every 3 Years for Proposal No. 3 and as recommended by the Board of Directors on any
other matters that may come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof or, in the absence of a board recommendation on any
such other proper matters, in the proxy holders discretion.
SEE REVERSE SIDE
Your vote is important. Please vote Today!
Please mark, sign, date and return your proxy form in the envelope provided.
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)