Edgar Filing: PENNS WOODS BANCORP INC

Q1 2014 - 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



ý	Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2014.



o	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act

For the Transition Period from to .

No. 0-17077

(Commission File Number)

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



PENNSYLVANIA		23-2226454
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)



300 Market Street, P.O. Box 967 Williamsport, Pennsylvania		17703-0967
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(570) 322-1111

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o		Small reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO ý

On May 2, 2014 there were 4,820,204 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q



		Page
		Number

Part I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013		3

Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013		4

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013		4

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013		6

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013		7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	40

Part II	Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	41

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	41

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	41

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	41

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	41

Item 5.	Other Information	41

Item 6.	Exhibits	41

Signatures		42

Exhibit Index and Exhibits		43

Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(UNAUDITED)



	March 31,			December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)	2014			2013
ASSETS:
Noninterest-bearing balances	$	24,913		$	23,723
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions	14,582			770
Federal funds sold	168			113
Total cash and cash equivalents	39,663			24,606
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value	276,033			288,612
Loans held for sale	1,647			1,626
Loans	820,611			818,344
Allowance for loan losses	(8,520		)	(10,144		)
Loans, net	812,091			808,200
Premises and equipment, net	20,418			20,184
Accrued interest receivable	4,514			4,696
Bank-owned life insurance	25,430			25,410
Investment in limited partnerships	2,056			2,221
Goodwill	17,104			17,104
Intangibles	1,709			1,801
Deferred tax asset	7,984			9,889
Other assets	8,488			7,646
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,217,137		$	1,211,995

LIABILITIES:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	764,286		$	755,625
Noninterest-bearing deposits	218,740			217,377
Total deposits	983,026			973,002
Short-term borrowings	14,127			26,716
Long-term borrowings	71,202			71,202
Accrued interest payable	388			405
Other liabilities	16,089			12,855
TOTAL LIABILITIES	1,084,832			1,084,180

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued	—			—
Common stock, par value $8.33, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,000,561 and 4,999,929 shares issued	41,671			41,665
Additional paid-in capital	49,823			49,800
Retained earnings	48,758			47,554
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities	1,088			(2,169		)
Defined benefit plan	(2,725		)	(2,725		)
Treasury stock at cost, 180,596 shares	(6,310		)	(6,310		)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	132,305			127,815
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	1,217,137		$	1,211,995

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	2014		2013
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans, including fees	$	8,813	$	6,768
Investment securities:
Taxable	1,458		1,443
Tax-exempt	931		1,267
Dividend and other interest income	127		62
TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME	11,329		9,540
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	758		791
Short-term borrowings	15		25
Long-term borrowings	469		519
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE	1,242		1,335
NET INTEREST INCOME	10,087		8,205
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	485		500
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	9,602		7,705
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges	595		442
Securities gains, net	393		986
Bank-owned life insurance	370		138
Gain on sale of loans	290		351
Insurance commissions	420		264
Brokerage commissions	271		248
Other	872		304
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME	3,211		2,733
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	4,503		3,068
Occupancy	630		351
Furniture and equipment	671		408
Pennsylvania shares tax	244		184
Amortization of investment in limited partnerships	165		165
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance	178		129
Marketing	110		95
Intangible amortization	92		—
Other	2,050		1,451
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE	8,643		5,851
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION	4,170		4,587
INCOME TAX PROVISION	701		903
NET INCOME	$	3,469	$	3,684
EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC	$	0.72	$	0.96
EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED	$	0.72	$	0.96
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC	4,819,575		3,838,671
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - DILUTED	4,819,575		3,838,671
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE	$	0.47	$	0.72

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2014			2013
Net Income	$	3,469		$	3,684
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities	5,328			(1,511		)
Tax effect	(1,812		)	514
Net realized gain included in net income	(393		)	(986		)
Tax effect	134			335
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	3,257			(1,648		)
Comprehensive income	$	6,726		$	2,036

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)



	COMMON STOCK			ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL		RETAINED EARNINGS			ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)			TREASURY STOCK			TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	SHARES	AMOUNT		ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL		RETAINED EARNINGS			ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)			TREASURY STOCK			TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Balance, December 31, 2012	4,019,112	$	33,492	$	18,157	$	43,030		$	5,357		$	(6,310	)	$	93,726
Net income						3,684									3,684
Other comprehensive loss									(1,648		)				(1,648		)
Dividends declared, ($0.72 per share)						(2,766		)							(2,766		)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan	410	4		13											17
Balance, March 31, 2013	4,019,522	$	33,496	$	18,170	$	43,948		$	3,709		$	(6,310	)	$	93,013



	COMMON STOCK			ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL		RETAINED EARNINGS			ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)			TREASURY STOCK			TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	SHARES	AMOUNT		ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL		RETAINED EARNINGS			ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)			TREASURY STOCK			TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Balance, December 31, 2013	4,999,929	$	41,665	$	49,800	$	47,554		$	(4,894	)	$	(6,310	)	$	127,815
Net income						3,469									3,469
Other comprehensive income									3,257						3,257
Dividends declared, ($0.47 per share)						(2,265		)							(2,265		)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan	632	6		23											29
Balance, March 31, 2014	5,000,561	$	41,671	$	49,823	$	48,758		$	(1,637	)	$	(6,310	)	$	132,305

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2014			2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	3,469		$	3,684
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	366			194
Amortization of intangible assets	92			—
Provision for loan losses	485			500
Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums	146			(125		)
Securities gains, net	(393		)	(986		)
Originations of loans held for sale	(8,561		)	(11,636		)
Proceeds of loans held for sale	8,830			13,336
Gain on sale of loans	(290		)	(351		)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance	(370		)	(138		)
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax asset	227			(171		)
Other, net	(2,279		)	(62		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,722			4,245
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment securities available for sale:
Proceeds from sales	43,794			20,492
Proceeds from calls and maturities	2,496			3,309
Purchases	(24,476		)	(23,685		)
Net (increase) decrease in loans	(4,376		)	523
Acquisition of bank premises and equipment	(609		)	(1,014		)
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets	460			—
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance	(26		)	(26		)
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance death benefit	367			—
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock	1,053			479
Purchases of regulatory stock	(547		)	(315		)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities	18,136			(237		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits	8,661			11,760
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits	1,363			5,518
Repayment of long-term borrowings	—			(5,000		)
Net decrease in short-term borrowings	(12,589		)	(16,572		)
Dividends paid	(2,265		)	(1,805		)
Issuance of common stock	29			17
Net cash used for financing activities	(4,801		)	(6,082		)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	15,057			(2,074		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING	24,606			15,142
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING	$	39,663		$	13,068



SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Dividends payable	$	—	$	961
Interest paid	1,259		1,344
Income taxes paid	950		600

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Woods Investment Company, Inc., Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc., Luzerne Bank and Jersey Shore State Bank (Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank are referred to together as the “Bank”) and Jersey Shore State Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, The M Group, Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The interim financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results for such periods. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are the same as those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented on pages 38 through 43 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

In reference to the attached financial statements, all adjustments are of a normal recurring nature pursuant to Rule 10-01(b) (8) of Regulation S-X.

Note 2. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income by component as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014									Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
(In Thousands)	Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available for Sale Securities			Defined Benefit Plan			Total			Net Unrealized Gain on Available for Sale Securities			Defined Benefit Plan			Total
Balance, December 31,	$	(2,169	)	$	(2,725	)	$	(4,894	)	$	10,164		$	(4,807	)	$	5,357
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	3,516			—			3,516			(997		)	—			(997		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(259		)	—			(259		)	(651		)	—			(651		)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	3,257			—			3,257			(1,648		)	—			(1,648		)
Balance, March 31,	$	1,088		$	(2,725	)	$	(1,637	)	$	8,516		$	(4,807	)	$	3,709

The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:



Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income						Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Income
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014			Three Months Ended March 31, 2013			Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Income
Net unrealized loss on available for sale securities	$	393		$	986		Securities gains, net
Income tax effect	(134		)	(335		)	Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period	$	259		$	651		Net of tax

Note 3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This Update applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available

Table of Contents

at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-01, Investments - Equity Method and Join Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects. The amendments in this Update permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The amendments in this Update clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments in this Update using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 4. Per Share Data

There are no convertible securities which would affect the denominator in calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share. Net income as presented on the consolidated statement of income will be used as the numerator. The following table sets forth the composition of the weighted average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and dilutive earnings per share computation.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013
Weighted average common shares issued	5,000,171		4,019,267
Average treasury stock shares	(180,596	)	(180,596	)
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share	4,819,575		3,838,671

Note 5. Investment Securities

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows:

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2014
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In Thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Available for sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	9,403	$	34	$	(191	)	$	9,246
Mortgage-backed securities	13,037		644		(59		)	13,622
Asset-backed securities	2,629		38		(5		)	2,662
State and political securities	132,585		3,155		(2,757		)	132,983
Other debt securities	104,802		872		(1,851		)	103,823
Total debt securities	262,456		4,743		(4,863		)	262,336
Financial institution equity securities	8,079		1,760		(1		)	9,838
Other equity securities	3,849		92		(82		)	3,859
Total equity securities	11,928		1,852		(83		)	13,697
Total investment securities AFS	$	274,384	$	6,595	$	(4,946	)	$	276,033



	December 31, 2013
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In Thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Available for sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	9,989	$	17	$	(83	)	$	9,923
Mortgage-backed securities	9,966		694		(68		)	10,592
Asset-backed securities	6,700		43		(179		)	6,564
State and political securities	145,121		2,120		(5,446		)	141,795
Other debt securities	108,939		879		(3,045		)	106,773
Total debt securities	280,715		3,753		(8,821		)	275,647
Financial institution equity securities	8,842		1,820		—			10,662
Other equity securities	2,342		28		(67		)	2,303
Total equity securities	11,184		1,848		(67		)	12,965
Total investment securities AFS	$	291,899	$	5,601	$	(8,888	)	$	288,612

The following tables show the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time, that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2014
	Less than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or Greater					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(In Thousands)	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	3,696	$	(32	)	$	3,837	$	(159	)	$	7,533	$	(191	)
Mortgage-backed securities	6,386		(59		)	—		—			6,386		(59		)
Asset-backed securities	—		—			660		(5		)	660		(5		)
State and political securities	22,563		(674		)	11,217		(2,083		)	33,780		(2,757		)
Other debt securities	57,270		(1,262		)	12,032		(589		)	69,302		(1,851		)
Total debt securities	89,915		(2,027		)	27,746		(2,836		)	117,661		(4,863		)
Financial institution equity securities	182		(1		)	—		—			182		(1		)
Other equity securities	1,373		(40		)	800		(42		)	2,173		(82		)
Total equity securities	1,555		(41		)	800		(42		)	2,355		(83		)
Total	$	91,470	$	(2,068	)	$	28,546	$	(2,878	)	$	120,016	$	(4,946	)



	December 31, 2013
	Less than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or Greater					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(In Thousands)	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	7,740	$	(83	)	$	—	$	—		$	7,740	$	(83	)
Mortgage-backed securities	2,483		(68		)	—		—			2,483		(68		)
Asset-backed securities	3,847		(177		)	712		(2		)	4,559		(179		)
State and political securities	42,577		(2,558		)	8,233		(2,888		)	50,810		(5,446		)
Other debt securities	73,254		(3,045		)	—		—			73,254		(3,045		)
Total debt securities	129,901		(5,931		)	8,945		(2,890		)	138,846		(8,821		)
Financial institution equity securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Other equity securities	274		(22		)	655		(45		)	929		(67		)
Total equity securities	274		(22		)	655		(45		)	929		(67		)
Total	$	130,175	$	(5,953	)	$	9,600	$	(2,935	)	$	139,775	$	(8,888	)

At March 31, 2014 there were a total of 86 securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and 35 individual securities that were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or greater.

The Company reviews its position quarterly and has determined that, at March 31, 2014, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity. The Company has concluded that the unrealized losses disclosed above are not other than temporary but are the result of interest rate changes, sector credit ratings changes, or company-specific ratings changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Table of Contents



(In Thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	2,287	$	2,293
Due after one year to five years	31,363		31,641
Due after five years to ten years	122,156		121,061
Due after ten years	106,650		107,341
Total	$	262,456	$	262,336

Total gross proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $43,794,000 and $20,492,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The following table represents gross realized gains and losses on those transactions:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2014		2013
Gross realized gains:
State and political securities	$	345	$	579
Other debt securities	307		121
Financial institution equity securities	112		130
Other equity securities	55		216
Total gross realized gains	$	819	$	1,046

Gross realized losses:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	31	$	—
State and political securities	320		60
Other debt securities	75		—
Total gross realized losses	$	426	$	60

There were no impairment charges included in gross realized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note 6. Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank are both members of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh and as such, are required to maintain a minimum investment in stock of the FHLB that varies with the level of advances outstanding with the FHLB. The stock is bought from and sold to the FHLB based upon its $100 par value. The stock does not have a readily determinable fair value and as such is classified as restricted stock, carried at cost and evaluated for impairment as necessary. The stock’s value is determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. The determination of whether the par value will ultimately be recovered is influenced by criteria such as the following: (a) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount and the length of time this situation has persisted (b) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance (c) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the FHLB and (d) the liquidity position of the FHLB.

Management evaluated the stock and concluded that the stock was not impaired for the periods presented herein. Management considered that the FHLB maintains regulatory capital ratios in excess of all regulatory capital requirements, liquidity appears adequate, new shares of FHLB stock continue to change hands at the $100 par value, and the payment of dividends.

Note 7. Credit Quality and Related Allowance for Loan Losses

Management segments the Bank’s loan portfolio to a level that enables risk and performance monitoring according to similar risk characteristics. Loans are segmented based on the underlying collateral characteristics. Categories include commercial and agricultural, real estate, and installment loans to individuals. Real estate loans are further segmented into three categories: residential, commercial and construction.

The following table presents the related aging categories of loans, by segment, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2014
				Past Due		Past Due 90
				30 To 89		Days Or More		Non-
(In Thousands)	Current			Days		& Still Accruing		Accrual		Total
Commercial and agricultural	$	107,699		$	502	$	7	$	106	$	108,314
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	397,002			5,726		144		422		403,294
Commercial	264,599			2,498		—		8,709		275,806
Construction	14,460			320		—		1,224		16,004
Installment loans to individuals	17,745			355		2		—		18,102
	801,505			$	9,401	$	153	$	10,461	821,520
Net deferred loan fees and discounts	(909		)							(909		)
Allowance for loan losses	(8,520		)							(8,520		)
Loans, net	$	792,076								$	812,091



	December 31, 2013
				Past Due		Past Due 90
				30 To 89		Days Or More		Non-
(In Thousands)	Current			Days		& Still Accruing		Accrual		Total
Commercial and agricultural	$	104,419		$	502	$	—	$	108	$	105,029
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	392,300			6,424		531		526		399,781
Commercial	272,745			2,533		—		7,198		282,476
Construction	15,967			—		73		1,242		17,282
Installment loans to individuals	14,170			477		—		—		14,647
	799,601			$	9,936	$	604	$	9,074	819,215
Net deferred loan fees and discounts	(871		)							(871		)
Allowance for loan losses	(10,144		)							(10,144		)
Loans, net	$	788,586								$	808,200

Purchased loans acquired are recorded at fair value on their purchase date without a carryover of the related allowance for loan losses.

Upon the acquisition of Luzerne Bank on June 1, 2013, the Company evaluated whether each acquired loan (regardless of size) was within the scope of ASC 310-30, Receivables-Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Purchased credit-impaired loans are loans that have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. There were no material increases or decreases in the expected cash flows of these loans between June 1, 2013 (the “acquisition date”) and March 31, 2014. The fair value of purchased credit-impaired loans, on the acquisition date, was determined, primarily based on the fair value of loan collateral. The carrying value of purchased loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality was $866,000 at March 31, 2014.

On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of the unpaid principal balance for all loans evidencing credit impairment acquired in the Luzerne Bank acquisition was $1,211,000 and the estimated fair value of the loans was $878,000. Total contractually required payments on these loans, including interest, at the acquisition date was $1,783,000. However, the Company’s preliminary estimate of expected cash flows was $941,000. At such date, the Company established a credit risk related non-accretable discount (a discount representing amounts which are not expected to be collected from the customer nor liquidation of collateral) of $842,000 relating to these impaired loans, reflected in the recorded net fair value. Such amount is reflected as a non-accretable fair value adjustment to loans. The Company further estimated the timing and amount of expected cash flows in excess of the estimated fair value and established an accretable discount of $63,000 on the acquisition date relating to these impaired loans.

Table of Contents

The carrying value of the loans acquired in the Luzerne Bank transaction with specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality was determined by projecting discounted contractual cash flows. The table below presents the components of the purchase accounting adjustments related to the purchased impaired loans acquired in the Luzerne Bank acquisition as of June 1, 2013:

Changes in the amortizable yield for purchased credit-impaired loans were as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2014:



(In Thousands)	March 31, 2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	35
Accretion	(7		)
Balance at end of period	$	28

The following table presents additional information regarding loans acquired in the Luzerne Bank transaction with specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality:



(In Thousands)	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Outstanding balance	$	1,222	$	1,224
Carrying amount	866		868

There were no material increases or decreases in the expected cash flows of these loans between June 1, 2013 (the “acquisition date”) and March 31, 2014. There has been no allowance for loan losses recorded for acquired loans with or without specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality as of March 31, 2014.

The following table presents interest income the Bank would have recorded if interest had been recorded based on the original loan agreement terms and rate of interest for non-accrual loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis for non-accrual loans for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014				2013
(In Thousands)	Interest Income That Would Have Been Recorded Based on Original Term and Rate		Interest Income Recorded on a Cash Basis		Interest Income That Would Have Been Recorded Based on Original Term and Rate		Interest Income Recorded on a Cash Basis
Commercial and agricultural	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	8		4		32		9
Commercial	131		34		85		50
Construction	19		8		41		11
	$	160	$	46	$	158	$	70

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Bank will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Bank evaluates such loans for impairment individually and does not aggregate loans by major risk classifications. The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “non-accrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Bank may choose to place a loan on non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired. A loan evaluated for impairment is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loan. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.

Table of Contents

Management evaluates individual loans in all of the commercial segments for possible impairment if the loan is greater than $100,000 and if the loan is either on non-accrual status or has a risk rating of substandard. Management may also elect to measure an individual loan for impairment if less than $100,000 on a case-by-case basis.

Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans and are measured for impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Interest income for impaired loans is recorded consistent with the Bank’s policy on nonaccrual loans.

The following table presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans by segment as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	March 31, 2014
	Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related
(In Thousands)	Investment		Balance		Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	831		962		—
Commercial	2,254		2,654		—
Construction	522		522		—
	3,607		4,138		—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	522		522		216
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	319		351		54
Commercial	8,681		9,036		2,848
Construction	507		1,361		108
	10,029		11,270		3,226
Total:
Commercial and agricultural	522		522		216
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	1,150		1,313		54
Commercial	10,935		11,690		2,848
Construction	1,029		1,883		108
	$	13,636	$	15,408	$	3,226

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2013
	Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related
(In Thousands)	Investment		Balance		Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	$	—	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	916		1,173		—
Commercial	623		879		—
Construction	528		528		—
	2,067		2,580		—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and agricultural	532		532		224
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	319		342		65
Commercial	7,598		7,742		2,153
Construction	512		1,367		113
	8,961		9,983		2,555
Total:
Commercial and agricultural	532		532		224
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	1,235		1,515		65
Commercial	8,221		8,621		2,153
Construction	1,040		1,895		113
	$	11,028	$	12,563	$	2,555

The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the three months ended for March 31, 2014 and 2013:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014						2013
(In Thousands)	Average Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized on an Accrual Basis on Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized on a Cash Basis on Impaired Loans		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized on an Accrual Basis on Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized on a Cash Basis on Impaired Loans
Commercial and agricultural	$	528	$	7	$	—	$	529	$	6	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	1,170		13		4		1,559		8		5
Commercial	9,492		42		15		8,693		47		46
Construction	1,120		—		8		4,988		—		539
	$	12,310	$	62	$	27	$	15,769	$	61	$	590

There is approximately $299,000 committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

Modifications

The loan portfolio also includes certain loans that have been modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months.

Table of Contents

There were no loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the three months ended March 31, 2013 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
(In Thousands, Except Number of Contracts)	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial	2	264		264
Construction	—	—		—
	2	$	264	$	264

There were two loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings made during the twelve months previous to March 31, 2014 that defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The loans that defaulted are commercial real estate loans that are currently in litigation with a recorded investment of $1,634,000 at March 31, 2014.

Troubled debt restructurings amounted to $11,378,000 and $11,472,000 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Internal Risk Ratings

Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The special mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a substandard classification. Loans in the substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due are considered Substandard. Loans in the doubtful category exhibit the same weaknesses found in the substandard loans, however, the weaknesses are more pronounced. Such loans are static and collection in full is improbable. However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt. Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and charge-off is imminent.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Bank has a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the pass category unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. An external annual loan review of all commercial relationships $800,000 or greater is performed, as well as a sample of smaller transactions. Confirmation of the appropriate risk category is included in the review. Detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, are performed on loans classified as substandard, doubtful, or loss on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents the credit quality categories identified above as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	March 31, 2014
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Totals
Pass	$	101,785	$	401,898	$	255,639	$	14,779	$	18,101	$	792,202
Special Mention	5,299		603		9,487		207		—		15,596
Substandard	1,230		793		10,680		1,018		1		13,722
	$	108,314	$	403,294	$	275,806	$	16,004	$	18,102	$	821,520

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2013
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Totals
Pass	$	99,256	$	398,327	$	259,505	$	13,608	$	14,647	$	785,343
Special Mention	4,529		598		10,181		214		—		15,522
Substandard	1,244		856		12,790		3,460		—		18,350
	$	105,029	$	399,781	$	282,476	$	17,282	$	14,647	$	819,215

Allowance for Loan Losses

An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated future loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.

The Bank’s methodology for determining the ALL is based on the requirements of ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment (previously discussed) and ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, as well as the Interagency Policy Statements on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and other bank regulatory guidance. The total of the two components represents the Bank’s ALL.

Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. Allowances are segmented based on collateral characteristics previously disclosed, and consistent with credit quality monitoring. Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped into two classes for evaluation. A general allowance is determined for “Pass” rated credits, while a separate pool allowance is provided for “Criticized” rated credits that are not individually evaluated for impairment.

For the general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss amounts are modified by other qualitative factors. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a twelve quarter moving average. Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the historical charge-off factor because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ from historical loss experience. The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from internal, regulatory, and governmental sources are: national and local economic trends and conditions; levels of and trends in delinquency rates and non-accrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policies; experience, ability, and depth of lending staff; value of underlying collateral; and concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry and/or geographic standpoint.

Loans in the criticized pools, which possess certain qualities or characteristics that may lead to collection and loss issues, are closely monitored by management and subject to additional qualitative factors. Management also monitors industry loss factors by loan segment for applicable adjustments to actual loss experience.

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.

There has been no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans acquired in the Luzerne Bank transaction with or without specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality as of June 1, 2013 as well as those acquired without specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality as of March 31, 2014.

Activity in the allowance is presented for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages								Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential			Commercial			Construction		to Individuals			Unallocated			Totals
Beginning Balance	$	474	$	3,917		$	4,079		$	741	$	139		$	794		$	10,144
Charge-offs	—		(56		)	(2,038		)	—		(40		)	—			(2,134		)
Recoveries	3		2			—			—		20			—			25
Provision	60		(801		)	1,283			54		42			(153		)	485
Ending Balance	$	537	$	3,062		$	3,324		$	795	$	161		$	641		$	8,520



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages									Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential			Commercial			Construction			to Individuals			Unallocated		Totals
Beginning Balance	$	361	$	1,954		$	3,831		$	950		$	144		$	377	$	7,617
Charge-offs	—		(134		)	—			—			(25		)	—		(159		)
Recoveries	2		1			1			850			18			—		872
Provision	205		951			(73		)	(986		)	7			396		500
Ending Balance	$	568	$	2,772		$	3,759		$	814		$	144		$	773	$	8,830

The Company grants commercial, industrial, residential, and installment loans to customers throughout north-east and central Pennsylvania. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio at March 31, 2014, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the economic conditions within this region.

The Company has a concentration of loans at March 31, 2014 and 2013 as follows:



	March 31,
	2014		2013
Owners of residential rental properties	15.87	%	19.03	%
Owners of commercial rental properties	13.18	%	13.08	%

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	March 31, 2014
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Unallocated		Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	216	$	54	$	2,848	$	108	$	—	$	—	$	3,226
Collectively evaluated for impairment	321		3,008		476		687		161		641		5,294
Total ending allowance balance	$	537	$	3,062	$	3,324	$	795	$	161	$	641	$	8,520

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	522	$	797	$	10,422	$	1,029	$	—			$	12,770
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—		352		514		—		—				866
Collectively evaluated for impairment	107,792		402,145		264,870		14,975		18,102				807,884
Total ending loans balance	$	108,314	$	403,294	$	275,806	$	16,004	$	18,102			$	821,520

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2013
	Commercial and		Real Estate Mortgages						Installment Loans
(In Thousands)	Agricultural		Residential		Commercial		Construction		to Individuals		Unallocated		Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	224	$	65	$	2,153	$	113	$	—	$	—	$	2,555
Collectively evaluated for impairment	250		3,852		1,926		628		139		794		7,589
Total ending allowance balance	$	474	$	3,917	$	4,079	$	741	$	139	$	794	$	10,144

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	532	$	881	$	7,707	$	1,040	$	—			$	10,160
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—		354		514		—						868
Collectively evaluated for impairment	104,497		398,546		274,255		16,242		14,647				808,187
Total ending loans balance	$	105,029	$	399,781	$	282,476	$	17,282	$	14,647			$	819,215

Note 8. Net Periodic Benefit Cost-Defined Benefit Plans

For a detailed disclosure on the Company’s pension and employee benefits plans, please refer to Note 12 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The following sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit cost of the domestic non-contributory defined benefit plan for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2014			2013
Service cost	$	140		$	159
Interest cost	215			193
Expected return on plan assets	(288		)	(246		)
Amortization of prior service cost	—			7
Amortization of net loss	52			119
Net periodic cost	$	119		$	232

Employer Contributions

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, that it expected to contribute a minimum of $600,000 to its defined benefit plan in 2014. As of March 31, 2014, there were contributions of $205,000 made to the plan with additional contributions of $395,000 anticipated during the remainder of 2014.

Note 9. Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company maintains an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”). The Plan is intended to encourage employee participation in the ownership and economic progress of the Company. The Plan allows for up to 1,000,000 shares to be purchased by employees. The purchase price of the shares is 95% of market value with an employee eligible to purchase up to the lesser of 15% of base compensation or $12,000 in market value annually. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were 632 and 410 shares issued under the plan, respectively.

Note 10. Off Balance Sheet Risk

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are primarily comprised of commitments to extend credit and standby letters

Table of Contents

of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The Company may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk.

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



(In Thousands)	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Commitments to extend credit	$	140,251	$	185,415
Standby letters of credit	1,207		4,379
	$	141,458	$	189,794

Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, on an extension of credit is based on management’s credit assessment of the counterparty.

Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These instruments are issued primarily to support bid or performance related contracts. The coverage period for these instruments is typically a one year period with an annual renewal option subject to prior approval by management. Fees earned from the issuance of these letters are recognized upon expiration of the coverage period. For secured letters of credit, the collateral is typically Bank deposit instruments or customer business assets.

Note 11. Fair Value Measurements

The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value.



Level I:		Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level II:		Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level III:		Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.

The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2014
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	9,246	$	—	$	9,246
Mortgage-backed securities			13,622				13,622
Asset-backed securities			2,662				2,662
State and political securities	—		132,983		—		132,983
Other debt securities	—		103,823		—		103,823
Financial institution equity securities	9,838		—		—		9,838
Other equity securities	3,859		—		—		3,859
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	$	13,697	$	262,336	$	—	$	276,033



	December 31, 2013
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	—	$	9,923	$	—	$	9,923
Mortgage-backed securities	—		10,592				10,592
Asset-backed securities	—		6,564				6,564
State and political securities	—		141,795		—		141,795
Other debt securities	—		106,773		—		106,773
Financial institution equity securities	10,662		—		—		10,662
Other equity securities	2,303		—		—		2,303
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	$	12,965	$	275,647	$	—	$	288,612

The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.



	March 31, 2014
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	10,410	$	10,410
Other real estate owned	—		—		1,466		1,466
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	$	—	$	—	$	11,876	$	11,876



	December 31, 2013
(In Thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	8,473	$	8,473
Other real estate owned	—		—		1,898		1,898
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	$	—	$	—	$	10,371	$	10,371

The following tables present a listing of significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement process for items valued utilizing level III techniques as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Table of Contents

March 31, 2014

Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements

(In Thousands)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique(s)

Unobservable Inputs

Range

Weighted Average

Impaired loans

10,410

Discounted cash flow

Temporary reduction in payment amount

0 to -91%

-17%

Probability of default

—%

Appraisal of collateral

Appraisal adjustments (1)

0 to -44%

-21%

Other real estate owned

1,466

Appraisal of collateral (1)

(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.

December 31, 2013

Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements

(In Thousands)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique(s)

Unobservable Inputs

Range

Weighted Average

Impaired loans

8,473

Discounted cash flow

Temporary reduction in payment amount

0 to -91%

-18%

Probability of default

—%

Appraisal of collateral

Appraisal adjustments (1)

0 to -44%

-21%

Other real estate owned

1,898

Appraisal of collateral (1)

(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique include temporary changes in payment amounts and the probability of default. Significant increases (decreases) in payment amounts would result in significantly higher (lower) fair value measurements. The probability of default is 0% for impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique because all defaulted impaired loans are valued using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique include appraisal adjustments, which are adjustments to appraisals by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s other real estate owned are the same inputs used to value impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.

Table of Contents

Note 12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company is required to disclose fair values for its financial instruments. Fair values are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intention to hold most of its financial instruments to maturity and not to engage in trading or sales activities. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions can significantly affect the fair values.

Fair values have been determined by the Company using historical data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. The Company’s fair values, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s other financial instruments.

As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the Company, are not considered financial instruments but have value, this fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full market value of the Company.

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	Carrying		Fair		Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2014
(In Thousands)	Value		Value		Level I		Level II		Level III
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	39,663	$	39,663	$	39,663	$	—	$	—
Investment securities:
Available for sale	276,033		276,033		13,697		262,336		—
Loans held for sale	1,647		1,647		1,647		—		—
Loans, net	812,091		810,492		—		—		810,492
Bank-owned life insurance	25,430		25,430		25,430		—		—
Accrued interest receivable	4,514		4,514		4,514		—		—

Financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	764,286	$	734,347	$	505,865	$	—	$	228,482
Noninterest-bearing deposits	218,740		218,740		218,740		—		—
Short-term borrowings	14,127		14,127		14,127		—		—
Long-term borrowings	71,202		73,209		—		—		73,209
Accrued interest payable	388		388		388		—		—

Table of Contents



	Carrying		Fair		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
(In Thousands)	Value		Value		Level I		Level II		Level III
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,606	$	24,606	$	24,606	$	—	$	—
Investment securities:
Available for sale	288,612		288,612		12,965		275,647		—
Loans held for sale	1,626		1,626		1,626		—		—
Loans, net	808,200		808,895		—		—		808,895
Bank-owned life insurance	25,410		25,410		25,410		—		—
Accrued interest receivable	4,696		4,696		4,696		—		—

Financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	755,625	$	724,456	$	488,818	$	—	$	235,638
Noninterest-bearing deposits	217,377		217,377		217,377		—		—
Short-term borrowings	26,716		26,716		26,716		—		—
Long-term borrowings	71,202		73,248		—		—		73,248
Accrued interest payable	405		405		405		—		—

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Loans Held for Sale, Accrued Interest Receivable, Short-term Borrowings, and Accrued Interest Payable:

The fair value is equal to the carrying value.

Investment Securities:

The fair value of investment securities available for sale and held to maturity is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price is available, fair value is estimated using the quoted market price for similar securities. Regulatory stocks’ fair value is equal to the carrying value.

Loans:

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial and agricultural, commercial real estate, residential real estate, construction real estate, and installment loans to individuals. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories.

The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.

Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals. If appraisals are not available, estimated cashflows are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discounted rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance:

The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.

Deposits:

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

The fair value estimates above do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market, commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.

Long Term Borrowings:

The fair value of long term borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

Table of Contents

Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees Written:

There is no material difference between the notional amount and the estimated fair value of off-balance sheet items. The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments and letters of credit are presented in Note 10 (Off Balance Sheet Risk).

Note 13. Reclassification of Comparative Amounts

Certain comparative amounts for the prior period have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.

Note 14. Acquisition of Luzerne National Bank Corporation

On June 1, 2013, the Company closed on a merger transaction pursuant to which Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. acquired Luzerne National Bank Corporation in a stock and cash transaction. The acquisition extended the Company’s footprint into Luzerne and Lackawanna Counties, Pennsylvania.

Luzerne National Bank Corporation was the holding company for Luzerne Bank, a Pennsylvania bank that conducted its business from a main office in Luzerne, Pennsylvania with eight branch offices in Luzerne County and one loan production office in Lackawanna County, all in northeastern Pennsylvania. Since June 1, 2013, the loan production office in Lackawanna County has been closed.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Luzerne National Bank Corporation for a total purchase price of approximately $42,612,000. As a result of the acquisition, the Company issued 978,977 common shares, or 20.31% of the total shares outstanding as of March 31, 2014, to former shareholders of Luzerne National Bank Corporation. Luzerne Bank is operating as an independent bank under the Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. umbrella.

The acquired assets and assumed liabilities were measured at estimated fair values. Management made significant estimates and exercised significant judgment in accounting for the acquisition. Management measured loan fair values based on loan file reviews, appraised collateral values, expected cash flows, and historical loss factors of Luzerne Bank. Real estate acquired through foreclosure was primarily valued based on appraised collateral values. The Company also recorded an identifiable intangible asset representing the core deposit base of Luzerne Bank based on management’s evaluation of the cost of such deposits relative to alternative funding sources. The Company also recorded an identifiable intangible asset representing the trade name of Luzerne Bank based on management’s evaluation of the value of the name in the market. Management used significant estimates including the average lives of depository accounts, future interest rate levels, and the cost of servicing various depository products. Management used market quotations to determine the fair value of investment securities.

The business combination resulted in the acquisition of loans with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration. Luzerne Bank’s loans were deemed impaired at the acquisition date if the Company did not expect to receive all contractually required cash flows due to concerns about credit quality. Such loans were fair valued and the difference between contractually required payments at the acquisition date and cash flows expected to be collected was recorded as a non-accretable difference. At the acquisition date, the Company recorded $1,211,000 of purchased credit-impaired loans subject to a non-accretable difference of $842,000. The method of measuring carrying value of purchased loans differs from loans originated by the Company (originated loans), and as such, the Company identifies purchased loans and purchased loans with a credit quality discount and originated loans at amortized cost.

Luzerne Bank’s loans without evidence of credit deterioration were fair valued by discounting both expected principal and interest cash flows using an observable discount rate for similar instruments that a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Additionally, consideration was given to management’s best estimates of default rates and payment speeds. At acquisition, Luzerne Bank’s loan portfolio without evidence of deterioration totaled $249,789,000 and was recorded at a fair value of $249,500,000.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” including statements concerning plans, objectives, future events or performance and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact. The Company cautions readers that the following important factors, among others, may have affected and could in the future affect the Company’s actual results and could cause the Company’s actual results for subsequent periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company herein: (i) the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including

Table of Contents

federal and state banking laws and regulations, with which the Company must comply, and the associated costs of compliance with such laws and regulations either currently or in the future as applicable; (ii) the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or of changes in the Company’s organization, compensation and benefit plans; (iii) the effect on the Company’s competitive position within its market area of the increasing consolidation within the banking and financial services industries, including the increased competition from larger regional and out-of-state banking organizations as well as non-bank providers of various financial services; (iv) the effect of changes in interest rates; (v) the effect of changes in the business cycle and downturns in the local, regional or national economies; and (vi) our ability to successfully integrate the business of Luzerne Bank.

You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available by the Company on its website or otherwise. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

Summary Results

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $3,469,000 compared to $3,684,000 for the same period of 2013 as after-tax securities gains decreased $621,000 (from a gain of $986,000 to a gain of $393,000). In addition, a gain of $174,000 on death benefits related to bank owned life insurance was recorded during the first quarter of 2014. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were $0.72 and $0.96, respectively. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 1.15% and 10.58% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to 1.72% and 15.51% for the corresponding period of 2013. Net income from core operations (“operating earnings”) increased to $3,036,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $3,033,000 for the same period of 2013. Operating earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $0.63 basic and dilutive compared to $0.79 basic and dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Management uses the non-GAAP measure of net income from core operations, or operating earnings, in its analysis of the Company’s performance. This measure, as used by the Company, adjusts net income by excluding significant gains or losses that are unusual in nature. Because certain of these items and their impact on the Company’s performance are difficult to predict, management believes the presentation of financial measures excluding the impact of such items provides useful supplemental information in evaluating the operating results of the Company’s core businesses. For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, net income from core operations, or operating earnings, means net income adjusted to exclude after-tax net securities gains or losses and bank-owned life insurance gains on death benefit. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures



(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013
GAAP net income	$	3,469	$	3,684
Less: net securities and bank-owned life insurance gains, net of tax	433		651
Non-GAAP operating earnings	$	3,036	$	3,033



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013
Return on average assets (ROA)	1.15	%	1.72	%
Less: net securities and bank-owned life insurance gains, net of tax	0.14	%	0.31	%
Non-GAAP operating ROA	1.01	%	1.41	%



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013
Return on average equity (ROE)	10.58	%	15.51	%
Less: net securities and bank-owned life insurance gains, net of tax	1.32	%	2.74	%
Non-GAAP operating ROE	9.26	%	12.77	%



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013
Basic earnings per share (EPS)	$	0.72	$	0.96
Less: net securities and bank-owned life insurance gains, net of tax	0.09		0.17
Non-GAAP basic operating EPS	$	0.63	$	0.79

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013
Dilutive EPS	$	0.72	$	0.96
Less: net securities and bank-owned life insurance gains, net of tax	0.09		0.17
Non-GAAP dilutive operating EPS	$	0.63	$	0.79

Interest and Dividend Income

Interest and dividend income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased to $11,329,000 compared to $9,540,000 for the same period of 2013. The increase was due to loan portfolio income increasing as the impact of portfolio growth, due primarily due to the acquisition of Luzerne Bank, offset a reduction in yield of 81 basis points (“bp”) due to the competitive landscape and the continued low rate environment that is impacting new loan rates as well as the variable rate segment of the loan portfolio. The loan portfolio income increase was partially offset by a decrease in investment portfolio interest due to a decline in the average taxable equivalent yield of 38 bp as the duration in the investment portfolio continues to be shortened in order to reduce interest rate and market risk in the future. This is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long-term municipal bonds that have a maturity date of 2025 or later and securities with a call date within the next five years. To offset the revenue impact of the declining asset yields, a focus has been placed on increasing earning assets by adding quality short and intermediate term loans such as home equity loans, even though these new earning assets are a lower yields than legacy assets.

Interest and dividend income composition for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014				March 31, 2013				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Loans including fees	$	8,813	77.79	%	$	6,768	70.94	%	$	2,045		30.22		%
Investment securities:
Taxable	1,458		12.87		1,443		15.13		15			1.04
Tax-exempt	931		8.22		1,267		13.28		(336		)	(26.52	)
Dividend and other interest income	127		1.12		62		0.65		65			104.84
Total interest and dividend income	$	11,329	100.00	%	$	9,540	100.00	%	$	1,789		18.75		%

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $93,000 to $1,242,000 compared to $1,335,000 for the same period of 2013. The decrease associated with deposits is primarily the result of a reduction of 32 and 12 bps in the rate paid on time deposits and money markets, respectively, and a continued shift from higher cost time deposits to core deposits, with emphasis on money market and NOW accounts. Factors that led to the rate decreases include, but are not limited to, Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) actions to maintain low interest rates, campaigns conducted by the Company to focus on core deposit (non-time deposit) growth as the building block to solid customer relationships, and the acquisition of Luzerne Bank. In addition, during the past two years the time deposit portfolio has been shortened in order to increase repricing frequency. The time deposit portfolio is now slowly being lengthened to build protection when interest rates begin to increase. In addition, the Marcellus Shale natural gas exploration in north central Pennsylvania is creating opportunities to gather new and build upon existing deposit relationships. Borrowing interest expense decreased as FHLB long-term borrowings have matured and have been replaced at rates less than 1% with maturities ranging from four to five years.

Interest expense composition for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014				March 31, 2013				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Deposits	$	758	61.03	%	$	791	59.25	%	$	(33	)	(4.17	)	%
Short-term borrowings	15		1.21		25		1.87		(10		)	(40.00	)
Long-term borrowings	469		37.76		519		38.88		(50		)	(9.63	)
Total interest expense	$	1,242	100.00	%	$	1,335	100.00	%	$	(93	)	(6.97	)	%

Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin (“NIM”) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was 3.96% compared to 4.46% for the corresponding period of 2013. The NIM declined as a 26 bp decline in the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities was countered by a 70 bp decline in the yield on interest earning assets. The decrease in earning asset yield is due to the impact of the current low rate environment on the loan and investment portfolios. In addition, the duration of the investment portfolio has been shortened by utilizing variable rate and intermediate term corporate bonds to offset the relatively longer duration of the municipal bonds within the portfolio. This shortening of the investment portfolio limits current earnings due to the low rates on the short end of the interest rate curve, but it also limits interest rate risk and will provide cash flow over the next few years as we anticipate a period of increasing rates. The decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities from 0.85% to 0.59% was driven by a reduction in the rate paid on time deposits of 32 bp. The reduction in the rate paid on time deposits was the result of shortening the time deposit portfolio, which has resulted in an increasing repricing frequency during this period of low rates. In addition, a focus on increasing core deposits has resulted in significant growth in lower cost core deposits. The duration of the time deposit portfolio has slowly started to be lengthened due to the apparent bottoming or near bottoming of deposit rates. The average rate on long-term borrowings declined due to the maturity of FHLB borrowings during 2013.

The following is a schedule of average balances and associated yields for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:

Table of Contents



	AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014						Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
(In Thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate		Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate
Assets:
Tax-exempt loans	$	27,190	$	306	4.57	%	$	21,757	$	249	4.64	%
All other loans	770,656		8,611		4.53	%	495,789		6,604		5.40	%
Total loans	797,846		8,917		4.53	%	517,546		6,853		5.34	%

Fed funds sold	562		—		—	%	—		—		—	%

Taxable securities	176,725		1,577		3.57	%	161,529		1,504		3.72	%
Tax-exempt securities	97,131		1,411		5.81	%	127,474		1,920		6.02	%
Total securities	273,856		2,988		4.36	%	289,003		3,424		4.74	%

Interest-bearing deposits	16,043		8		0.20	%	3,683		1		0.11	%

Total interest-earning assets	1,088,307		11,913		4.42	%	810,232		10,278		5.12	%

Other assets	116,465						48,485

Total assets	$	1,204,772					$	858,717

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Savings	$	139,756	32		0.09	%	$	84,545	24		0.12	%
Super Now deposits	176,806		157		0.36	%	137,315		174		0.51	%
Money market deposits	206,812		133		0.26	%	144,366		135		0.38	%
Time deposits	232,182		436		0.76	%	171,733		458		1.08	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	755,556		758		0.41	%	537,959		791		0.60	%

Short-term borrowings	20,101		15		0.30	%	21,370		25		0.47	%
Long-term borrowings	71,202		469		2.63	%	75,889		519		2.74	%
Total borrowings	91,303		484		2.12	%	97,259		544		2.24	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities	846,859		1,242		0.59	%	635,218		1,335		0.85	%

Demand deposits	212,152						116,021
Other liabilities	14,608						12,457
Shareholders’ equity	131,153						95,021

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,204,772					$	858,717
Interest rate spread					3.83	%					4.27	%
Net interest income/margin			$	10,671	3.96	%			$	8,943	4.46	%

1. Information on this table has been calculated using average daily balance sheets to obtain average balances.

2. Non-accrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings.

3. Income and rates on a fully taxable equivalent basis include an adjustment for the difference between annual income from tax-exempt obligations and the taxable equivalent of such income at the standard 34% tax rate.

The following table presents the adjustment to convert net interest income to net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2014		2013
Total interest income	$	11,329	$	9,540
Total interest expense	1,242		1,335
Net interest income	10,087		8,205
Tax equivalent adjustment	584		738
Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)	$	10,671	$	8,943

The following table sets forth the respective impact that both volume and rate changes have had on net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014 vs. 2013
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Tax-exempt loans	$	61		$	(4	)	$	57
All other loans	3,204			(1,197		)	2,007
Fed funds sold	—			—			—
Taxable investment securities	138			(65		)	73
Tax-exempt investment securities	(443		)	(66		)	(509		)
Interest bearing deposits	7			—			7
Total interest-earning assets	2,967			(1,332		)	1,635

Interest expense:
Savings deposits	14			(6		)	8
Super Now deposits	43			(60		)	(17		)
Money market deposits	96			(98		)	(2		)
Time deposits	136			(158		)	(22		)
Short-term borrowings	(1		)	(9		)	(10		)
Long-term borrowings	(31		)	(19		)	(50		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	257			(350		)	(93		)
Change in net interest income	$	2,710		$	(982	)	$	1,728

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served. An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Bank. Management remains committed to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.

The allowance for loan losses is determined by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance has been determined. Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in mix and volume of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience. In addition, management considers industry standards and trends with respect to non-performing loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.

Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at March 31, 2014, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy, increased unemployment, and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased levels of nonperforming assets, charge-offs, loan loss provisions, and reductions in income. Additionally, as an integral part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Bank’s loan loss allowance. The banking agencies could require the recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Table of Contents

When determining the appropriate allowance level, management has attributed the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments; however, the allowance is available for the entire portfolio as needed.

The allowance for loan losses decreased from $10,144,000 at December 31, 2013 to $8,520,000 at March 31, 2014. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses was driven by net charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2014 of $2,134,000. The majority of the loans charged-off had a specific allowance within the allowance for losses. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.04% and 1.24%, respectively. The ratio was impacted by the growth in the loan portfolio due to the acquisition of Luzerne Bank and the related purchase accounting adjustments.

The provision for loan losses totaled $485,000 and $500,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The amount of the provision for loan losses was the result of several factors, including but not limited to, a ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans of 1.29% at March 31, 2014 and a ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans of 80.27% at March 31, 2014.

Nonperforming loans increased to $10,614,000 at March 31, 2014 from $9,059,000 at March 31, 2013 due primarily to one commercial real estate backed loan becoming non-performing. Internal loan review and analysis coupled with the ratios noted previously dictated that the provision for loan losses was at a level of $485,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The amount of the provision for loan losses for the period ended March 31, 2014 did not equate to the change in nonperforming loans as of March 31, 2014 because the majority of the non-performing loans are centered on several loans that are either in a secured position and have sureties with a strong underlying financial position or have a specific allocation for any impairment recorded within the allowance for loan losses.

The following is a table showing total nonperforming loans as of:



	Total Nonperforming Loans
(In Thousands)	90 Days Past Due		Non-accrual		Total
March 31, 2014	$	153	$	10,461	$	10,614
December 31, 2013	604		9,074		9,678
September 30, 2013	231		5,833		6,064
June 30, 2013	8		6,507		6,515
March 31, 2013	37		9,022		9,059

Non-interest Income

Total non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 increased $478,000 to $3,211,000. Excluding net securities gains/losses, non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $1,071,000 compared to the 2013 period due in part to the acquisition of Luzerne Bank. The increase in service charges was driven by the acquisition of Luzerne Bank. Bank owned life insurance income increased primarily due to a gain on death benefits. Insurance commissions and brokerage commissions increased due in part to the acquisition of Luzerne Bank and a shift in product mix. Other income was impacted by the acquisition of Luzerne Bank as it increased as debit and credit card related income continues to build as debit cards continue to gain in popularity, while an increasing number of merchants utilize our merchant card services.

Non-interest income composition for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014				March 31, 2013				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Service charges	$	595	18.53	%	$	442	16.17	%	$	153		34.62	%
Securities gains, net	393		12.24		986		36.08		(593		)	(60.14	)
Bank-owned life insurance	370		11.52		138		5.05		232			168.12
Gain on sale of loans	290		9.03		351		12.84		(61		)	(17.38	)
Insurance commissions	420		13.08		264		9.66		156			59.09
Brokerage commissions	271		8.44		248		9.07		23			9.27
Other	872		27.16		304		11.11		568			186.84
Total non-interest income	$	3,211	100.00	%	$	2,733	100.00	%	$	478		17.49	%

Non-interest Expense

Total non-interest expense increased $2,792,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same period of 2013 due primarily to the acquisition of Luzerne Bank. The increase in salaries and employee benefits was attributable to increases in salaries and health insurance coupled with the acquisition of Luzerne Bank. Occupancy and furniture and equipment expenses increased due to the additional branches of Luzerne Bank and significant upgrades to the core operating system, a new teller system, and various enhancements to other ancillary systems. Other expenses increased primarily due to increased fees related to providing debit card services and other expenses related to the acquisition of Luzerne Bank.

Non-interest expense composition for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014				March 31, 2013				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount		%
Salaries and employee benefits	$	4,503	52.10	%	$	3,068	52.44	%	$	1,435	46.77	%
Occupancy	630		7.29		351		6.00		279		79.49
Furniture and equipment	671		7.76		408		6.97		263		64.46
Pennsylvania shares tax	244		2.82		184		3.14		60		32.61
Amortization of investment in limited partnerships	165		1.91		165		2.82		—		—
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance	178		2.06		129		2.20		49		37.98
Marketing	110		1.27		95		1.62		15		15.79
Intangible amortization	92		1.06		—		—		92		N/A
Other	2,050		23.73		1,451		24.81		599		41.28
Total non-interest expense	$	8,643	100.00	%	$	5,851	100.00	%	$	2,792	47.72	%

Provision for Income Taxes

Income taxes decreased $202,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same period of 2013. The primary cause of the change in tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to 2013 is the impact of security gains. Excluding the impact of the net securities gains, the effective tax rate for the three ended March 31, 2014 was 15.01% compared to 15.77% for the same period of 2013. The Company currently is in a deferred tax asset position due to the low income housing tax credits earned both currently and previously. Management has reviewed the deferred tax asset and has determined that the asset will be utilized within the appropriate carry forward period and therefore does not require a valuation allowance.

ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents increased $15,057,000 from $24,606,000 at December 31, 2013 to $39,663,000 at March 31, 2014 primarily as a result of the following activities during the three months ended March 31, 2014:

Table of Contents

Loans Held for Sale

Activity regarding loans held for sale resulted in loan originations leading sale proceeds, less $290,000 in realized gains, by $21,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Loans

Gross loans increased $2,267,000 since December 31, 2013 due to an increase in commercial and agricultural loans coupled with an increase in installment loans due to an auto loan campaign. The increase in residential real estate was due primarily to an emphasis on home equity products.

The allocation of the loan portfolio, by category, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is presented below:



	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013					Change
(In Thousands)	Amount			% Total		Amount			% Total		Amount			%
Commercial and agricultural	$	108,314		13.20	%	$	105,029		12.83	%	$	3,285		3.13	%
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	403,294			49.14		399,781			48.86		3,513			0.88	%
Commercial	275,806			33.61		282,476			34.52		(6,670		)	(2.36	)%
Construction	16,004			1.95		17,282			2.11		(1,278		)	(7.39	)%
Installment loans to individuals	18,102			2.21		14,647			1.79		3,455			23.59	%
Net deferred loan fees and discounts	(909		)	(0.11	)	(871		)	(0.11	)	(38		)	4.36	%
Gross loans	$	820,611		100.00	%	$	818,344		100.00	%	$	2,267		0.28	%

The following table shows the amount of accrual and non-accrual TDRs at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
(In Thousands)	Accrual		Non-accrual		Total		Accrual		Non-accrual		Total
Commercial and agricultural	$	426	$	—	$	426	$	437	$	—	$	437
Real estate mortgage:
Residential	598		116		714		603		118		721
Commercial	4,107		5,097		9,204		4,145		5,123		9,268
Construction	11		1,018		1,029		11		1,028		1,039
Installment loans to individuals	5		—		5		7		—		7
	$	5,147	$	6,231	$	11,378	$	5,203	$	6,269	$	11,472

Investments

The fair value of the investment securities portfolio at March 31, 2014 decreased $12,579,000 since December 31, 2013 while the amortized cost of the portfolio decreased $17,515,000. The decrease in value is the result of the investment portfolio being actively managed in order to reduce interest rate and market risk. This is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long-term municipal bonds that have a maturity date of 2025 or later and securities with a call date within the next five years. The proceeds of the bond sales are being deployed into loans and variable rate intermediate term corporate bonds and short and intermediate term municipal bonds. The strategy to sell a portion of the long-term bond portfolio does negatively impact current earnings, but this action plays a key role in our long-term asset liability management strategy as the balance sheet is shortened to better prepare for a rising rate environment. The unrealized losses within the debt securities portfolio are the result of market activity, not credit issues/ratings, as approximately 92% of the debt securities portfolio on an amortized cost basis is currently rated A or higher by either S&P or Moody’s.

The Company considers various factors, which include examples from applicable accounting guidance, when analyzing the available for sale portfolio for possible other than temporary impairment. The Company primarily considers the following factors in its analysis: length of time and severity of the market value being less than carrying value; reduction of dividend paid (equities);

Table of Contents

continued payment of dividend/interest, credit rating, and financial condition of an issuer; intent and ability to hold until anticipated recovery (which may be maturity); and general outlook for the economy, specific industry, and entity in question.

The bond portion of the portfolio review is conducted with emphases on several factors. Continued payment of principal and interest is given primary importance with credit rating and financial condition of the issuer following as the next most important. Credit ratings were reviewed with the ratings of the bonds being satisfactory. Bonds that were not currently rated were discussed with a third party and/or underwent an internal financial review. The Company also monitors whether each of the investments incurred a decline in market value from carrying value of at least 20% for twelve consecutive months or a similar decline of at least 50% for three consecutive months. Each bond is reviewed to determine whether it is a general obligation bond, which is backed by the credit and taxing power of the issuing jurisdiction, or revenue bond, which is only payable from specified revenues. Based on the review undertaken by the Company, the Company determined that the decline in value of the various bond holdings were temporary and were the result of the general market downturns and interest rate/yield curve changes, not credit issues. The fact that almost all of such bonds are general obligation bonds further solidified the Company’s determination that the decline in the value of these bond holdings is temporary.

The fair value of the equity portfolio continues to fluctuate as the economic turbulence continues to impact stock pricing. The amortized cost of the equity securities portfolio has increased $744,000 to $11,928,000 at March 31, 2014 from $11,184,000 at December 31, 2013 while the fair value increased $732,000 over the same time period.

The equity portion of the portfolio is reviewed for possible other than temporary impairment in a similar manner to the bond portfolio with greater emphasis placed on the length of time the market value has been less than the carrying value and financial sector outlook. The Company also reviews dividend payment activities. The starting point for the equity analysis is the length and severity of a market price decline. The Company monitors two primary measures: 20% decline in market value from carrying value for twelve consecutive months and 50% decline for three consecutive months.

The distribution of credit ratings by amortized cost and fair values for the debt security portfolio at March 31, 2014 follows:



	A- to AAA				B- to BBB+				Not Rated				Total
(In Thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Available for sale (AFS)
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	5,406	$	5,409	$	—	$	—	$	3,997	$	3,837	$	9,403	$	9,246
Mortgage-backed securities	13,037		13,622		—		—		—		—		13,037		13,622
Asset-backed securities	2,629		2,662		—		—		—		—		2,629		2,662
State and political securities	125,924		126,329		900		914		5,761		5,740		132,585		132,983
Other debt securities	93,985		93,312		10,817		10,511		—		—		104,802		103,823
Total debt securities AFS	$	240,981	$	241,334	$	11,717	$	11,425	$	9,758	$	9,577	$	262,456	$	262,336

Financing Activities

Deposits

Total deposits increased $10,024,000 from December 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014. The growth was led by an increase in NOW accounts from December 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014 of 7.41%. The increase in core deposits (deposits less time deposits) has provided relationship driven funding for the loan and investment portfolios. The increase in deposits is the result of our focus on building relationships, not by offering market leading rates. Over the first three months of 2014, time deposits have decreased as we have taken a position of using these accounts as complementary accounts to core deposits.

Deposit balances and their changes for the periods being discussed follow:

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Demand deposits	$	218,740	22.25	%	$	217,377	22.34	%	$	1,363		0.63	%
NOW accounts	191,191		19.45		177,996		18.29		13,195			7.41
Money market deposits	202,893		20.64		203,786		20.94		(893		)	(0.44	)
Savings deposits	142,030		14.45		138,621		14.25		3,409			2.46
Time deposits	228,172		23.21		235,222		24.18		(7,050		)	(3.00	)
	$	983,026	100.00	%	$	973,002	100.00	%	$	10,024		1.03	%

Borrowed Funds

Total borrowed funds decreased 12.86% or $12,589,000 to $85,329,000 at March 31, 2014 compared to $97,918,000 at December 31, 2013. Short-term borrowings primarily decreased due to lower cost core deposit growth.



	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013				Change
(In Thousands)	Amount		% Total		Amount		% Total		Amount			%
Short-term borrowings:
FHLB repurchase agreements	$	—	—	%	$	14,325	14.63	%	$	(14,325	)	(100.00	)%
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	14,127		16.56		12,391		12.65		1,736			14.01	%
Total short-term borrowings	14,127		16.56		26,716		27.28		(12,589		)	(47.12	)
Long-term FHLB borrowings	70,750		82.91		70,750		72.25		—			—
Long-term capital lease	452		52.97		452		0.46		—			—
Total long-term borrowings	71,202		83.44		71,202		72.72		—			—	%
Total borrowed funds	$	85,329	100.00	%	$	97,918	100.00	%	$	(12,589	)	(12.86	)%

Capital

The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and regulatory guidelines. Management seeks to maintain a level of capital sufficient to support existing assets and anticipated asset growth, maintain favorable access to capital markets, and preserve high quality credit ratings.

Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines. The risk-based capital rules are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Specifically, each is required to maintain certain minimum dollar amounts and ratios of total risk-based, tier I risk-based, and tier I leverage capital. In addition to the capital requirements, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvements Act (FDICIA) established five capital categories ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized.” To be classified as “well capitalized”, total risk-based, tier I risked-based, and tier I leverage capital ratios must be at least 10%, 6%, and 5%, respectively.

Capital ratios as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(In Thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual	$	116,687	13.15	%	$	117,123	13.16	%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes	71,014		8.00		71,200		8.00
To Be Well Capitalized	88,768		10.00		89,000		10.00
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual	$	107,563	12.12	%	$	106,178	11.93	%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes	35,507		4.00		35,600		4.00
To Be Well Capitalized	53,261		6.00		53,400		6.00
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual	$	107,563	9.13	%	$	106,178	9.02	%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes	47,148		4.00		47,111		4.00
To Be Well Capitalized	58,935		5.00		58,889		5.00

In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted revisions to the agencies’ capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules, which were designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III. The July 2013 final rules generally implement higher minimum capital requirements, add a new common equity tier 1 capital requirement, and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity tier 1 capital, additional tier 1 capital or tier 2 capital. The new minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets requirements are a common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”) and a tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, increased from 4.0% (and increased from 6.0% to 8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”); the total capital ratio remains at 8.0% under the new rules (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”). Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The new minimum capital requirements are effective on January 1, 2015. The capital contribution buffer requirements phase in over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2016. The Company and the Bank will continue to analyze these new rules and their effects on the business, operations and capital levels of the Company and the Bank.

Liquidity; Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk

The asset/liability committee addresses the liquidity needs of the Company to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet credit demands and deposit withdrawals as well as to the placement of available funds in the investment portfolio. In assessing liquidity requirements, equal consideration is given to the current position as well as the future outlook.

The following liquidity measures are monitored for compliance and were within the limits cited at March 31, 2014:

1. Net Loans to Total Assets, 85% maximum

2. Net Loans to Total Deposits, 100% maximum

3. Cumulative 90 day Maturity GAP %, +/- 20% maximum

4. Cumulative 1 Year Maturity GAP %, +/- 25% maximum

Fundamental objectives of the Company’s asset/liability management process are to maintain adequate liquidity while minimizing interest rate risk. The maintenance of adequate liquidity provides the Company with the ability to meet its financial obligations to depositors, loan customers, and shareholders. Additionally, it provides funds for normal operating expenditures and business opportunities as they arise. The objective of interest rate sensitivity management is to increase net interest income by managing interest sensitive assets and liabilities in such a way that they can be repriced in response to changes in market interest rates.

The Bank, like other financial institutions, must have sufficient funds available to meet its liquidity needs for deposit withdrawals, loan commitments and originations, and expenses. In order to control cash flow, the Bank estimates future cash flows from deposits, loan payments, and investment security payments. The primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, FHLB borrowings, and brokered deposits. Management believes the Bank has adequate resources to meet its normal funding requirements.

Table of Contents

Management monitors the Company’s liquidity on both a long and short-term basis, thereby providing management necessary information to react to current balance sheet trends. Cash flow needs are assessed and sources of funds are determined. Funding strategies consider both customer needs and economical cost. Both short and long-term funding needs are addressed by maturities and sales of available for sale investment securities, loan repayments and maturities, and liquidating money market investments such as federal funds sold. The use of these resources, in conjunction with access to credit provides core funding to satisfy depositor, borrower, and creditor needs.

Management monitors and determines the desirable level of liquidity. Consideration is given to loan demand, investment opportunities, deposit pricing and growth potential, as well as the current cost of borrowing funds. The Company has a total current maximum borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $448,768,000. In addition to this credit arrangement, the Company has additional lines of credit with correspondent banks of $38,280,000. Management believes it has sufficient liquidity to satisfy estimated short-term and long-term funding needs. FHLB borrowings totaled $70,750,000 as of March 31, 2014.

Interest rate sensitivity, which is closely related to liquidity management, is a function of the repricing characteristics of the Company’s portfolio of assets and liabilities. Asset/liability management strives to match maturities and rates between loan and investment security assets with the deposit liabilities and borrowings that fund them. Successful asset/liability management results in a balance sheet structure which can cope effectively with market rate fluctuations. The matching process by segments both assets and liabilities into future time periods (usually 12 months, or less) based upon when repricing can be effected. Repriceable assets are subtracted from repriceable liabilities, for a specific time period to determine the “gap”, or difference. Once known, the gap is managed based on predictions about future market interest rates. Intentional mismatching, or gapping, can enhance net interest income if market rates move as predicted. However, if market rates behave in a manner contrary to predictions, net interest income will suffer. Gaps, therefore, contain an element of risk and must be prudently managed. In addition to gap management, the Company has an asset/liability management policy which incorporates a market value at risk calculation which is used to determine the effects of interest rate movements on shareholders’ equity and a simulation analysis to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet.

The Company currently maintains a GAP position of being liability sensitive. The Company has strategically taken this position as it has decreased the duration of the time deposit portfolio, while continuing to maintain a primarily fixed rate earning asset portfolio with a duration greater than the liabilities utilized to fund earning assets. Lengthening of the liability portfolio coupled with the addition of limited short-term assets is being undertaken. These actions are expected to reduce, but not eliminate, the liability sensitive structure of the balance sheet.

A market value at risk calculation is utilized to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet and more specifically shareholders’ equity. The Company does not manage the balance sheet structure in order to maintain compliance with this calculation. The calculation serves as a guideline with greater emphases placed on interest rate sensitivity. Changes to calculation results from period to period are reviewed as changes in results could be a signal of future events. As of the most recent analysis, the results of the market value at risk calculation were within established guidelines due to the strategic direction being taken.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

In this analysis the Company examines the result of a 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis point change in market interest rates and the effect on net interest income. It is assumed that the change is instantaneous and that all rates move in a parallel manner. Assumptions are also made concerning prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage securities.

The following is a rate shock forecast for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2015 assuming a static balance sheet as of March 31, 2014.



	Parallel Rate Shock in Basis Points
(In Thousands)	-200			-100			Static		+100			+200			+300			+400
Net interest income	$	36,990		$	38,788		$	40,353	$	41,356		$	42,505		$	43,480		$	44,244
Change from static	(3,363		)	(1,565		)	—		1,003			2,152			3,127			3,891
Percent change from static	-8.33		%	-3.88		%	—		2.49		%	5.33		%	7.75		%	9.64		%

The model utilized to create the report presented above makes various estimates at each level of interest rate change regarding cash flow from principal repayment on loans and mortgage-backed securities and/or call activity on investment securities. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the calculated projected

Table of Contents

change. In addition, the limits stated above do not necessarily represent the level of change under which management would undertake specific measures to realign its portfolio in order to reduce the projected level of change. Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond expeditiously when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Inflation

The asset and liability structure of a financial institution is primarily monetary in nature. Therefore, interest rates rather than inflation have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance. Interest rates are not always affected in the same direction or magnitude as prices of other goods and services, but are reflective of fiscal policy initiatives or economic factors which are not measured by a price index.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk for the Company is comprised primarily of interest rate risk exposure and liquidity risk. Interest rate risk and liquidity risk management is performed at the Bank level as well as the Company level. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored by management through selected interest rate risk measures produced by an independent third party. There have been no substantial changes in the Company’s gap analysis or simulation analysis compared to the information provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013. Additional information and details are provided in the “Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity” section of “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond in a timely manner when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An analysis was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2014.

Table of Contents

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s business.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds



Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (or Units) Purchased		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1 (January 1 - January 31, 2014)	—	$	—	—	76,776
Month #2 (February 1 - February 28, 2014)	—	—		—	76,776
Month #3 (March 1 - March 31, 2014)	—	—		—	76,776

On April 15, 2014, the Board of Directors approved authorization to repurchase up to 482,000 shares, or approximately 10%, of the outstanding shares of the Company for one year to April 15, 2015. To date, there have been no shares repurchased under this plan.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits



3(i)		Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 filed May 9, 2012).
3(ii)		Bylaws of the Registrant as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 17, 2005).
31(i)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31(ii)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32(i)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32(ii)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101		Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; (iv) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date:	May 12, 2014	/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
		Richard A. Grafmyre, President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	May 12, 2014	/s/ Brian L. Knepp
		Brian L. Knepp, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
		Officer)

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit 31(i)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(ii)		Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(i)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32(ii)		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 101		Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; (iv) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.