legacy_def14a.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
SCHEDULE 14A
 
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment No.      )
 
Filed by the Registrant       þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant       o
Check the appropriate box:
 
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
     
Legacy Reserves LP
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ      No fee required.
o   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
     
    (1)      Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
    (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
    (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
    (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
    (5) Total fee paid:
         
 
o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     
    (1) Amount Previously Paid:
         
    (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
    (3) Filing Party:
         
    (4) Date Filed:
         


 

 
Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas 79701
 
April 12, 2010
 
To Our Limited Partners:
 
     You are cordially invited to attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of Unitholders of Legacy Reserves LP to be held on May 12, 2010 commencing at 10:30 a.m. local time at the Midland Petroleum Club located at 501 W. Wall, Midland, Texas 79701. Proxy materials, which include a Notice of the Meeting, Proxy Statement and proxy card, are enclosed with this letter. The attached proxy statement is first being mailed to unitholders of Legacy Reserves LP on or about April 12, 2010. We have also enclosed our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
     The board of directors of our general partner has called this Annual Meeting for you to consider and act upon the election of directors of our general partner’s board of directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Unitholders. The current board of directors of our general partner unanimously recommends that you approve this proposal.
 
     Even if you plan to attend the meeting, you are requested to sign, date and return the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you attend the meeting after having returned the enclosed proxy card, you may revoke your proxy, if you wish, and vote in person. A proxy may also be revoked at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice to, or filing a duly exercised proxy bearing a later date with, our Secretary. If you would like to attend and your units are not registered in your own name, please ask the broker, trust, bank or other nominee that holds the units to provide you with evidence of your unit ownership.
 
     We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
 
Sincerely,
Cary D. Brown
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board,
Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, general partner of
Legacy Reserves LP
 

 

 
Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas 79701
_______________

NOTICE OF THE 2010
ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS
_______________
 
     The Annual Meeting of the Unitholders of Legacy Reserves LP, or the Partnership, will be held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. local time at the Midland Petroleum Club located at 501 W. Wall, Midland, Texas 79701 for the following purposes:
 
1.   To elect seven (7) directors to the board of directors of our general partner, each to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Unitholders; and
     
2.   To transact any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, including, without limitation, the adjournment of the annual meeting in order to solicit additional votes from unitholders in favor of adopting the foregoing proposal.
 
     Only unitholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2010, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. A list of such unitholders will be open to examination, during regular business hours, by any unitholder for at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting, at our offices at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701. Unitholders holding at least a majority of the outstanding units representing limited partner interests are required to be present or represented by proxy at the meeting to constitute a quorum.
 
     Please note that space limitations make it necessary to limit attendance at the meeting to unitholders, though each unitholder may be accompanied by one guest. Admission to the meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration will begin at 9:30 a.m. Each unitholder may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Unitholders holding units in brokerage accounts must bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting unit ownership as of the record date. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.
 
 
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Midland, Texas
April 12, 2010
 
Cary D. Brown
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board,
Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, general partner of
Legacy Reserves LP
 
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
 
To ensure your representation at the meeting, please sign, date and return your proxy as promptly as possible. An envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States, is enclosed for this purpose.
Mailing your completed proxy will ensure your representation at the meeting, whether you attend or not.
If you do attend the meeting and prefer to vote in person, you may do so.
 


Proxy Statement for the
Annual Meeting of Unitholders of
LEGACY RESERVES LP
To Be Held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING 1
       The Annual Meeting 1
       Voting and Proxy Procedures 1
       Quorum and Required Votes 3
       Additional Questions and Information 3
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 4
       Board of Directors 4
       Voting 4
       Recommendation and Proxies 4
       Nominees for Election 5
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 9
       Management of Legacy Reserves LP 9
       Board of Directors 9
       Director Independence 9
       Code of Ethics 14
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 14
       Introduction 14
       Corporate Governance 15
       Executive Officer Compensation Strategy and Philosophy 16
       Components of Compensation 16
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT 26
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 26
       Summary Compensation Table 26
       Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2009 28
       Employment Agreements 29
       Benefits Payable Upon Termination or Change in Control 30
       Option Exercises and Units Vested in 2009 33
       Equity Compensation Plan Information 34
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 34
       Director Compensation for the 2009 Fiscal Year 35
MANAGEMENT 35
       Executive Officers 35
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT 37
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS 38
       Distribution Upon Liquidation 39
       Transactions with Related Persons 39
       Review, Approval and Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons 40
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION 40
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 41
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 42
OTHER MATTERS 43
       Required Vote 43
       Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance 43
       Unitholder Proposals 43
       Communications with Directors or the Board of Directors 43
       Availability of Annual Report 44



 
Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas 79701
_______________

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 12, 2010
_______________
 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
 
The Annual Meeting
 
     Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Partnership,” “Legacy,” “we,” “our,” and “us” are used in this proxy statement to refer to Legacy Reserves LP together with our subsidiaries. The terms “board” and “board of directors” refer to our general partner’s board of directors.
 
What is a proxy statement and why is it important?
 
     We hold a meeting of unitholders annually. This year’s meeting will be held on May 12, 2010. Our board of directors is seeking your proxy to vote at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Unitholders. This proxy statement contains important information about the Partnership and the election of directors to be voted on at the meeting. Please read these materials carefully so that you have the information you need to make informed decisions.
 
     You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote. Instead, you may simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card.
 
When and where is the Annual Meeting?
 
     The 2010 Annual Meeting of Unitholders of Legacy Reserves LP will be held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010, at 10:30 a.m., local time, at the Midland Petroleum Club located at 501 W. Wall, Midland, Texas 79701.
 
What am I being asked to vote upon?
 
     You are being asked to approve the election of the directors nominated to our general partner’s board of directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Unitholders, and to consider and vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
 
Voting and Proxy Procedures
 
Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?
 
     Only unitholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2010, the record date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and to participate in the Annual Meeting. If you were a unitholder of record on that date, you will be entitled to vote all of the units representing limited partner interests of Legacy Reserves LP, each referred to as a Unit, that you held on that date at the Annual Meeting, or any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. We are mailing this proxy statement to unitholders on or about April 12, 2010.
 
     IMPORTANT CHANGE: If your units are held in the name of your broker, it is critical that you instruct your broker how you wish to vote your units in the election of directors. In the past, brokers had discretion to vote their customers’ units in an election of directors, even when the customers had not provided the broker with voting instructions. However, as of January 1, 2010, brokers are no longer permitted to vote in the election of directors if the broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner of the units. As a result, it is
 


particularly important that you instruct your broker how you wish to vote your units. If you do not complete and return voting instructions to your broker, no votes will be cast on your behalf when directors are elected. For more information on this topic, see the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Alert issued in February 2010 entitled “New Shareholder Voting Rules for the 2010 Proxy Season” at http://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/votingrules2010.htm.
 
What are the voting rights of the holders of Units?
 
     Each Unit is entitled to one vote on all matters. Your proxy card indicates the number of units that you owned as of the record date.
 
Who is soliciting my proxy?
 
     Our general partner’s board of directors on behalf of the Partnership is soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting.
 
What different methods can I use to vote?
 
     By Written Proxy. Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we urge you to complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. Returning the proxy card will not affect your right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.
 
     If you properly fill in your proxy card and send it to us in time to vote, your “proxy” (Steven H. Pruett or William M. Morris are the individuals named as proxies on your proxy card) will vote your units as you have directed. Unless otherwise directed in the proxy card, your proxy will vote your units for the election of the seven director nominees proposed by our general partner’s board of directors.
 
     If any other matter is presented, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card to vote proxies held by them in accordance with their best judgment. At the time this proxy statement was first mailed to unitholders, we knew of no matters that needed to be acted on at the Annual Meeting other than those discussed in this proxy statement.
 
     In Person. All unitholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, we will give you a ballot when you arrive. However, if your units are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the units on the record date.
 
How may I revoke my signed proxy card?
 
     You may revoke your proxy card or change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting. You can do this in one of three ways:
     If you have instructed a broker to vote your units, you must follow directions received from your broker to change those instructions.
 
What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?
 
     It indicates that your units are held in more than one account, such as two brokerage accounts registered in different names. You should complete each of the proxy cards to ensure that all of your units are voted. We encourage you to register all of your brokerage accounts in the same name and address for better service. You should contact your broker, bank or nominee for more information. Additionally, our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., can assist you if you want to consolidate multiple accounts registered in your name by contacting our transfer agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078, Telephone: (781) 575-4238.
 
2
 


Quorum and Required Votes
 
How many votes are needed to hold the meeting?
 
     A majority of the outstanding units as of the record date must be represented at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. As of the record date, April 1, 2010, there were 40,070,201 units outstanding held by approximately 51 holders. Unitholders are entitled to one vote, exercisable in person or by proxy, for each unit, held by such unitholder on the record date. Our partnership agreement does not provide for cumulative voting.
 
     Units are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if:
Who will count the vote?
 
     Representatives of Computershare Trust Company, N.A., our transfer agent, will tabulate the votes.
 
How many votes must the director nominees have to be elected?
 
     The affirmative vote of holders of a plurality of the units present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the election of each director nominee. Therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of the election of directors.
 
How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted?
 
     Abstentions and broker non-votes are included in determining whether a quorum is present, but will not be included in vote totals and will not affect the outcome of the vote.
 
How are proxies solicited?
 
     Proxies may be solicited by mail, telephone, or other means by our general partner’s officers, directors and our employees. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals in connection with proxy solicitations. We will pay for distributing and soliciting proxies and will reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians their reasonable fees and expenses for forwarding proxy materials to unitholders.
 
Additional Questions and Information
 
     If you would like additional copies of this proxy statement (which copies will be provided to you without charge) or if you have questions, including the procedures for voting your units, you should contact:
 
Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas 79701
Attention: Steven H. Pruett
President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
 
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 12, 2010.
 
     The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 are available at http://ir.legacylp.com/annual-proxy.cfm.
 
3
 


PROPOSAL 1
 
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
Board of Directors
 
     The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of our general partner provides that our general partner’s board of directors will consist of a number of directors as determined from time to time by resolution adopted by a majority of directors then in office, but shall not be less than seven, nor more than nine. Currently, our general partner’s board of directors has seven directors. Each of the nominees for election to the board of directors is currently a director of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC. If elected at the annual meeting, each of the nominees will be elected to hold office for a one year term and thereafter until his successor has been elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.
 
Voting
 
     Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Units represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the nominees named below. In the event that any nominee should be unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, such units will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee as may be nominated by our general partner’s board of directors. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected, and we have no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.
 
Recommendation and Proxies
 
   The board of directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees named below.
 
     The persons named in the enclosed proxy card will vote all units over which they have discretionary authority FOR the election of the nominees named below. Although our general partner’s board of directors does not anticipate that any of the nominees will be unable to serve, if such a situation should arise prior to the meeting, the appointed persons will use their discretionary authority pursuant to the proxy and vote for the election of such substitute nominee as may be nominated by our general partner’s board of directors.
 
4
 


     Set forth below is biographical information for each person nominated for a one-year term expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting. Each of the director nominees is an existing director standing for re-election.
 
Nominees for Election
 
Name         Principal Occupation       Age       Director Since
Cary D. Brown
 
Mr. Brown is Chairman of the board of directors of our general partner and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner and has served in such capacities since our founding in October 2005. Prior to October 2005, Mr. Brown co-founded two businesses, Moriah Resources, Inc. and Petroleum Strategies, Inc. Moriah Resources, Inc. was formed in 1992 to acquire oil and natural gas reserves. Petroleum Strategies, Inc. was formed in 1991 to serve as a qualified intermediary in connection with the execution of Section 1031 transactions for major oil companies, public independents and private oil and natural gas companies. Mr. Brown has served as Executive Vice President of Petroleum Strategies, Inc. since its inception in 1991. Mr. Brown served as an auditor for Grant Thornton in Midland, Texas from January 1991 to June 1991 and for Deloitte & Touche in Houston, Texas from June 1989 to December 1990. In 1995, Mr. Brown also co-founded and organized with Mr. Dale Brown The Executive Oil Conference held in Midland, Texas, which draws over 300 oil and natural gas industry professionals each year. Mr. Brown has a Bachelor of Business Administration degree, with honors, from Abilene Christian University. The board determined that Mr. Brown should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: the knowledge and experience attained through 20 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry and 18 years of experience in the Permian Basin.
43
 
October 2005
 
Kyle A. McGraw
 
Mr. McGraw is a member of the board of directors of our general partner and also serves as the Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land of our general partner and has served in such capacities since our founding in October 2005. Mr. McGraw joined Brothers Production Company in 1983, and has served as its General Manager since 1991 and became President in 2003. Mr. McGraw is a registered professional engineer (inactive status) in the state of Texas. Mr. McGraw has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University. The board determined that Mr. McGraw should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: the knowledge and experience attained through 27 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry in the Permian Basin, experience as a petroleum engineer and managerial and executive experience attained through his service with Brothers Production Company where he has served in numerous capacities including reservoir and production engineering, acquisition evaluation and land management.
50
 
October 2005
 

5
 


Name         Principal Occupation       Age       Director Since
Dale A. Brown
 
Mr. Brown is a member of the board of directors of our general partner and has served in such capacity since our founding in October 2005. Mr. Brown has been President of Moriah Resources, Inc. since its inception in 1992 and President of Petroleum Strategies, Inc. since he co-founded it in 1991 with his son, Cary D. Brown. Additionally, Mr. Brown co-founded and organized with Mr. Cary Brown The Executive Oil Conference, which has been held annually in Midland, TX since 1995. Mr. Brown is a retired certified public accountant. Mr. Brown has a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Pepperdine University. The board determined that Mr. Brown should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: financial literacy and experience as a Certified Public Accountant (retired at age 65) since 1967; the knowledge and experience attained through his service in the petroleum industry since 1972 and managerial experience attained through his service with Moriah Resources prior to contribution of its assets as part of the formation of Legacy in 2006.
67
 
October 2005
 
G. Larry Lawrence
 
Mr. Lawrence has been a member of the board of directors of our general partner since May 1, 2006. Since June 2006, Mr. Lawrence has been self-employed as a management consultant doing business as Crescent Consulting. From September 2006 to August 2009, he has served as Chief Financial Officer on a contract basis for Lynx Operating Company, a private company engaged in oil and gas operations with a primary business focus on gas processing. From May 2004 through April 2006, Mr. Lawrence served as Controller of Pure Resources, an exploration and production company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Unocal Corporation which was acquired by Chevron Corporation. From June 2000 through May 2004, Mr. Lawrence was a practice manager of the Parson Group, LLC, a financial management consulting firm whose services included Sarbanes Oxley engagements with oil and natural gas industry clients. From 1973 through May 2000, Mr. Lawrence was employed by Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) where he most recently (from 1993 through 2000) served as Controller of ARCO Permian. Mr. Lawrence has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting, with honors, from Dillard University. The board determined that Mr. Lawrence should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: financial expertise and experience as a chief financial officer and controller, Sarbanes Oxley consulting expertise, and financial reporting expertise and the knowledge and experience attained through his years of service in the preparation of publicly audited financial statements.
58
 
May 2006
 

6
 


Name         Principal Occupation       Age       Director Since
William D. (Bill)          
Sullivan
  Mr. Sullivan was appointed to the board of directors of our general partner upon completion of our private equity offering on March 15, 2006. Since May 2004, Mr. Sullivan has served as a director and since May 2009, as non-executive Chairman of the board of directors of St. Mary Land & Exploration Company, a publicly traded exploration and production company. Mr. Sullivan has served as director of Targa Resources GP, LLC (the general partner of Targa Resource Partners LP) since February 14, 2007. Targa is principally in the gas and gas liquids gathering, processing and logistics services business. Mr. Sullivan has served as a Director of Tetra Technologies, Inc. since August 2007. Tetra is principally in the oilfield services business. From May 2004 through its sale in August 2005, Mr. Sullivan served as a director of Gryphon Exploration Company, a privately held exploration and production company. Prior to joining the board of directors of St. Mary Land & Exploration Company and Gryphon Exploration Company, Mr. Sullivan was employed in various capacities by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation from 1981 to August 2003, most recently as Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production (from August 2001 through August 2003). From June 15, 2005 to August 5, 2005, Mr. Sullivan was president and CEO of Leor Energy L.P., a privately held exploration and production company. Mr. Sullivan has a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering, with high honors, from Texas A&M University. The board determined that Mr. Sullivan should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: the knowledge and experience attained through 25 years as an engineer, manager, and senior executive in the exploration and production business; his six years as a board member of several energy sector public companies and one private-equity owned company; executive experience with project, risk, economic analysis; capital allocation, strategic planning, organizational development, compensation program administration, corporate and asset acquisitions, mergers and integration, international and domestic oil and gas exploration, development, production, and business development; relationship management with equipment and service providers, government agencies and officials.   53   March 2006

7
 


Name         Principal Occupation       Age       Director Since
William R. Granberry   Mr. Granberry was appointed to the board of directors of our general partner on January 23, 2008. Mr. Granberry has been a member of the Board of Directors of The Williams Companies, Inc. (an integrated gas company with exploration and production, midstream, and gas pipeline operations) since November 2005 and a member of Compass Operating Company, LLC, a small, private oil and gas exploration, development and producing company with properties in West Texas and Southeast New Mexico since October 2004. From 1999 through September 2004, he managed investments and consulted with oil and gas companies. He invested in and became a board member of Just4Biz.com (a start-up internet company engaged in online office supply) in 1999 and served as Interim CEO for brief periods in 2000 and 2001. Just4Biz. com filed for bankruptcy in May 2001. Mr. Granberry was President and Chief Operating Officer of Tom Brown, Inc. from January 1996 to May 1999. Tom Brown, Inc. was a public oil and gas company with exploration, development, acquisition and production activities throughout the central United States. Mr. Granberry earned Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Texas and upon graduation, worked for Amoco Production Company for 16 years. The board determined that Mr. Granberry should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: expertise in the oil and gas industry which was attained through his 44 years of service in engineering and service in executive positions with companies ranging from a large global energy company to small independents.   67   January 2008
Kyle D. Vann Mr. Vann was appointed to the board of directors of our general partner upon completion of our private equity offering on March 15, 2006. From 1979 through January 2001, Mr. Vann was employed by Koch Industries. From February 2001 through December 2004, Mr. Vann served as Chief Executive Officer of Entergy — Koch, LP, an energy trading and transportation company. Mr. Vann continues to serve Entergy as a consultant and serves on the board and consults with Texon, LP, a private petroleum transportation company. On May 8, 2006, Mr. Vann was appointed to the board of directors of Crosstex Energy, L.P., a publicly traded midstream master limited partnership. In November 2009, Mr. Vann joined the Advisory Board of Haddington Ventures, LLC - a private equity firm. In January 2009, Mr. Vann Served as an advisory board member for Enexus, LLC, which is a subsidiary of Entergy Corporation. Mr. Vann has a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering, with honors, from the University of Kansas. The board determined that Mr. Vann should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: the knowledge and experience attained through 29 years of service in the commodity trading business and his background and expertise in risk assessment and leadership in the energy sector. 62 March 2006

8
 


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
Management of Legacy Reserves LP
 
    The directors and officers of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, as our general partner, manage our operations and activities. Our general partner is not elected by our unitholders and will not be subject to re-election on a regular basis in the future. Other than through their ability to elect directors of our general partner as described below, unitholders will not be entitled to directly or indirectly participate in our management or operation.
 
    Our general partner owes a fiduciary duty to our unitholders. Our general partner will be liable, as general partner, for all of our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except for indebtedness or other obligations that are made specifically nonrecourse to it. Our general partner therefore may cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to it.
 
    The limited liability company agreement of our general partner provides for a board of directors of not less than seven and not more than nine members.
 
    Our unitholders, including affiliates of our general partner, are entitled to annually elect all of the directors of our general partner. Directors of our general partner hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation, removal or disqualification or until their successors have been elected and qualified.
 
Board of Directors
 
    During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our general partner’s board of directors held fifteen meetings. It is the policy of our general partner’s board of directors to encourage directors to attend each meeting of unitholders. Six of our seven directors attended the Annual Meeting held in 2009.
 
Director Independence
 
    Four members of the board of directors of our general partner serve on a conflicts committee to review specific matters that the board believes may involve conflicts of interest. The conflicts committee will determine if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the conflicts committee may not be officers or employees of our general partner or directors, officers, or employees of its affiliates, and must meet the independence and experience standards established by any national securities exchange on which our securities may be listed and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, and other federal securities laws. Under NASDAQ Global Select Market, or NASDAQ, listing standards the board of directors must affirmatively determine that a director is independent. Any matters approved by the conflicts committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners and not a breach by our general partner of any duties it may owe us or our unitholders.
 
    In addition, the board of directors of our general partner has an audit committee of three directors who meet the independence and experience standards established by NASDAQ and the Exchange Act. The audit committee reviews our external financial reporting, recommends engagement of our independent auditors and reviews procedures for internal auditing and the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The board of directors of our general partner also has a compensation committee, consisting of three independent members, that administers the Legacy Reserves LP Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP. Additionally, the board of directors of our general partner has a nominating and governance committee, consisting of three independent members, that will nominate candidates to serve on the board of directors of our general partner.
 
    The board annually reviews all relevant business relationships any director may have with Legacy and the independence standards established by the NASDAQ. As a result of its annual review and nomination process, the board has determined that none of the Messrs. Sullivan, Lawrence, Vann and Granberry has a material relationship with the Partnership and, as a result, such directors are determined to be independent. Although not required, we currently have a majority of independent directors on the board of directors of our general partner.
 
9
 


    Independent members of the board of directors of our general partner serve as the members of the conflicts (Messrs. Sullivan (chairman), Granberry, Lawrence and Vann), audit (Messrs. Lawrence (chairman), Granberry and Sullivan ), compensation (Messrs. Vann (chairman), Granberry and Lawrence) and nominating and governance (Messrs. Granberry (chairman), Lawrence, Sullivan and Vann) committees.
 
    The audit committee met six times, the compensation committee met six times, the nominating and governance committee met one time, and the conflicts committee met twenty-five times during 2009.
 
Leadership Structure of the Board
 
    As prescribed by the amended and restated limited liability company agreement of our general partner, the Chairman of the board of directors has the power to preside at all meetings of the Board. Mr. C. Brown serves as our Chairman of our Board and as our Chief Executive Officer. The board believes that the combination of the Chairman and CEO roles is appropriate in the current circumstances, however, such approach is not established as a policy and the nominating and governance committee will re-evaluate this approach periodically.
 
    The nominating and governance committee believes that Mr. C. Brown’s history as one of the Partnership’s founders and his strategic experience make him the appropriate leader of the Board. In 2009, the nominating and governance committee considered the appointment of an independent lead director and determined not to appoint one. It is the nominating and governance committee’s view that Mr. C. Brown in his dual capacity as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer will serve as an effective communication link between the Board and management and there is no need for an independent lead director at this time. The nominating and governance committee will re-evaluate its view on the Board’s leadership structure periodically.
 
Risk Oversight
 
    While it is the job of management to assess and manage our risk, the board and its audit committee (each where applicable) discuss the guidelines and policies that govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken and evaluate reports from various functions with the management team on risk assessment and management. The board interfaces regularly with management and receives periodic reports that include updates on operational, financial, legal and risk management matters. The audit committee assists the board in oversight of the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including those related to the health, safety and environmental performance of Legacy. The audit committee also reviews and assesses the performance of our internal audit function and our independent auditors. The board receives regular reports from the audit committee. We do not believe that the board’s role in risk oversight has an effect on the board’s leadership structure.
 
   Evaluation of Compensation Risk
 
    Following a review of all of the compensation programs available to all employees of the company, we believe that there is not a reasonable likelihood that our current compensation practices and programs could have a material adverse effect on Legacy.
 
   Audit Committee
 
   Membership
 
    The audit committee has been established in accordance with Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The board of directors of our general partner has appointed Messrs. Lawrence, Sullivan and Granberry as members of the audit committee. Mr. Lawrence serves as the chair of the committee. Each of the members of the audit committee has been determined by the board of directors to be independent under NASDAQ’s standards for audit committee members to serve on its audit committee. In addition, the board of directors has determined that at least one member of the audit committee (Mr. Lawrence) has such accounting or related financial management expertise sufficient to qualify such person as the audit committee financial expert in accordance with Item 407 of Regulation S-K and NASDAQ requirements.
 
10
 


   Responsibilities
 
    The audit committee assists the general partner’s board of directors in overseeing:
    The audit committee is also charged with making regular reports to the board of directors of the general partner and preparing any reports that may be required under NASDAQ listing standards or SEC rules.
 
   Charter
 
    The board of directors of our general partner has adopted a charter for the audit committee, a copy of which is available on our website at www.legacylp.com. Please note that the preceding Internet address is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information found or provided at that Internet address or at our website in general is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein.
 
   Compensation Committee
 
   Membership
 
    The compensation committee consists of three members of the board of directors, Messrs. Lawrence, Granberry (who replaced Mr. Sullivan as a member of the compensation committee in May 2009) and Vann, all of whom have been determined by the board of directors of our general partner to be independent under NASDAQ listing standards. In addition, each member of the compensation committee qualifies as a “non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and as an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Mr. Vann is the chair of the compensation committee.
 
   Responsibilities
 
    The committee’s responsibilities under its charter are to:
11
 


   Charter
 
    The board of directors has adopted a charter for the compensation committee, a copy of which is available on our website at www.legacylp.com. Please note that the preceding Internet address is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information found or provided at that Internet address or at our website in general is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein.
 
   Nominating and Governance Committee
 
   Membership
 
    The nominating and governance committee consists of Messrs. Lawrence, Granberry (who joined the nominating and governance committee in May 2009), Sullivan and Vann. Mr. Granberry serves as the chair of the committee. The board of directors has determined that all members of the nominating and governance committee are independent under NASDAQ listing standards. The purpose of the nominating and governance committee is to:
   Responsibilities
 
    In addition to the purposes of the committee listed above, the duties of the nominating and governance committee include:
12
 


   Director Nominations
 
    Under our amended and restated agreement of limited partnership, unitholders desiring to suggest a board nominee must give prior written notice to our Secretary regarding the persons to be nominated. The notice must be received at our principal executive offices at the address shown on the cover page within the specified period and must be accompanied by the information and documents specified in the amended and restated agreement of limited partnership. A copy of the amended and restated agreement of limited partnership may be obtained by writing to our Secretary at the address shown on the cover page of this proxy statement.
 
    Recommendations by unitholders for directors to be nominated at the 2011 annual meeting of unitholders must be in writing and include sufficient biographical and other relevant information such that an informed judgment as to the proposed nominee’s qualifications can be made and the name, address and the class and number of units owned by such unitholder. Recommendations must be accompanied by a notarized statement executed by the proposed nominee consenting to be named in the proxy statement, if nominated, and to serve as a director, if elected. Notice and the accompanying information must be received at our principal executive office at the address shown on the cover page of this proxy statement no later than January 14, 2011 and no earlier than December 30, 2010.
 
    The amended and restated agreement of limited partnership does not affect any unitholder’s right to request inclusion of proposals in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Rule 14a-8 specifies what constitutes timely submission for a unitholder proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Under the SEC’s proxy solicitation rules, to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for the 2011 annual meeting of unitholders, unitholder proposals must be received by our Secretary at our principal offices in Midland, Texas by December 13, 2010. Unitholders are urged to review all applicable rules and consult legal counsel before submitting a nomination or proposal to us.
 
   Nomination Criteria
 
    The nominating and governance committee is responsible for assessing the skills and characteristics that candidates for election to our general partner’s board of directors should possess, as well as the composition of our general partner’s board of directors as a whole. The assessments include qualifications under applicable independence standards and other standards applicable to our general partner’s board of directors and its committees, as well as consideration of skills and experience in the context of the needs of our general partner’s board of directors. Each candidate must meet certain minimum qualifications, including:
    The nominating and governance committee may also consider the ability of a prospective candidate to work with the then-existing interpersonal dynamics of our general partner’s board of directors and the candidate’s ability to contribute to the collaborative culture among the members of the board of directors of our general partner.
 
    The nominating and governance committee will also evaluate each nominee based upon a consideration of diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the general partner’s board of directors. The nominating and governance committee does not have a policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. Diversity, including diversity of experience, professional expertise, gender, race and age, is one factor considered in evaluating a nominee.
 
    Based on this initial evaluation, the committee will determine whether to interview the candidate, and if warranted, will recommend that one or more of its members, other members of our general partner’s board of directors or senior management, as appropriate, interview the candidate in person or by telephone. After completing this evaluation and interview process, the committee ultimately determines its list of nominees and submits it to the full board of directors of our general partner for consideration and approval.
 
13
 


   Charter
 
    Our general partner’s board of directors has adopted a charter for the nominating and governance committee, a copy of which is available on our website at www.legacylp.com. Please note that the preceding Internet address is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information found or provided at that Internet address or at our website in general is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein.
 
   Conflicts Committee
 
   Membership
 
    The conflicts committee consists of Messrs. Granberry, Lawrence, Sullivan and Vann. The board of directors has determined that all members of the conflicts committee are independent under NASDAQ listing standards. Mr. Sullivan serves as the chair of the conflicts committee.
 
   Responsibilities
 
    The conflicts committee, at the request of the board of directors of our general partner, will review specific matters that the board of directors of our general partner believes may involve a conflict of interest. The conflicts committee will determine if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us. Any matters approved by the conflicts committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners and not a breach by our general partner of any duties it may owe us or our unitholders.
 
Code of Ethics
 
    The board of directors of our general partner has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to officers, directors of our general partner and our employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or those persons performing similar functions, of our general partner. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at www.legacylp.com and in print to any unitholder who requests it. Amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct will also be available on our website and reported as may be required under SEC rules; however, any technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments to the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct may not be posted. Please note that the preceding Internet address is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information found or provided at that Internet addresses or at our website in general is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein.
 
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
 
    The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of the named executive officers of our general partner, Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below.
 
Introduction
 
    Our general partner manages our operations and activities through its board of directors. Under our amended and restated agreement of limited partnership, we reimburse our general partner for direct and indirect general and administrative expenses incurred on our behalf, including the compensation of our general partner’s executive officers. Our general partner has not incurred any reimbursable expenses related to the compensation of our general partner’s executive officers for their management of us. Currently, our general partner’s executive officers are employed by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy Reserves Services, Inc., and are directly compensated for their management of us pursuant to their employment agreements. The compensation amounts disclosed in this section and under “Executive Compensation” reflect the total compensation paid to the executive officers of our general partner. Please read “Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements.”
 
14
 


    The five named executive officers of our general partner are Cary D. Brown, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Steven H. Pruett, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary; Kyle A. McGraw, Director and Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land; Paul T. Horne, Executive Vice President of Operations; and William M. Morris, Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller.
 
Corporate Governance
 
   Compensation Committee Authority
 
    Executive officer compensation is administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors of our general partner, which is composed of three members, Messrs. Vann, Lawrence and Granberry (who replaced Mr. Sullivan as a member of the committee in May 2009). The board of directors appoints the compensation committee members and delegates to the compensation committee the direct responsibility for, among other things, determining and approving the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, recommending compensation for the general partner’s other named executive officers, establishing equity and non-equity incentive plans, and administering our LTIP.
 
    The board of directors has determined that each committee member is independent under NASDAQ listing standards, SEC rules and the relevant securities laws, and that each member qualifies as a “non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and as an “outside director” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The compensation committee met six times in 2009.
 
   Role of Compensation Experts in Determining 2009 Executive Officer Compensation
 
    The compensation committee is authorized to obtain, at the Partnership’s expense, compensation surveys, reports on the design and implementation of compensation programs for directors, officers and employees, and other data and documentation as the compensation committee considers appropriate. In addition, the compensation committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any outside counsel or other experts or consultants engaged to assist it in the evaluation of compensation of our directors and executive officers, including the sole authority to approve such consultants’ fees and other retention terms.
 
    The compensation committee retained BDO Seidman, LLP (“BDO”) as a compensation consultant for 2009. BDO was engaged to provide a study of compensation programs related to named executive officers and outside directors offered by a broad peer group of exploration and production companies and publicly traded limited partnerships. The compensation committee charged BDO with undertaking this study to ascertain how the members of this peer group structure their compensation and to assist the compensation committee in establishing and maintaining a competitive compensation program to better enable the Partnership to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers and to further align the interests of our executive officers with those of our unitholders. In addition to peer group studies, BDO also consulted with the compensation committee regarding the design of long-term incentive awards and the compensation of outside directors.
 
   Selection of Compensation Comparative Data
 
    As discussed in greater detail below, central to our compensation philosophy is the alignment of the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our unitholders. It is the goal of our compensation philosophy to provide financial incentives to our executive officers to focus on business strategies designed to increase the distributions we pay to our unitholders. Except for comparing compensation packages of our named executive officers and outside directors with the compensation of their counterparts within our peer group of exploration and production companies and master limited partnerships, other specific performance levels or “benchmarks” were not used in 2009 to establish the compensation packages of our named executive officers and outside directors.
 
15
 


     In 2009, our peer group included Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Concho Resources, Inc., Parallel Petroleum, Inc., St. Mary’s Land and Exploration, Inc., Whiting Petroleum Corp., Atlas Energy Resources, LLC, Breitburn Energy Partners L.P., Copano Energy, L.L.C., Encore Energy Partners LP, EV Energy Partners, LP, Linn Energy, LLC, Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners, and Vanguard Natural Resources.
 
   Decision-Making Process and Role of Executive Officers
 
     Compensation decisions for executive officers involve both objective and subjective criteria. In 2009, the first step was the compensation committee consultant providing information to the compensation committee regarding competitive market data. The second component of the decision making process was our Chief Executive Officer providing a written overview of performance by the Partnership, including an overview of the performance by each named executive officer other than himself, in light of established operational and financial goals and objectives. After reviewing this written overview, the compensation committee met with the Chief Executive Officer in order to ask questions regarding the information set forth in the written overview and to gather any additional information needed in order to make recommendations to the board of directors regarding the compensation of the named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer.
 
     In determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, the compensation committee took into account the information provided by the compensation committee consultant. The compensation committee then evaluated the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of established operational and financial goals and objectives and determined as a committee, together with any other independent directors participating in the process, the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation.
 
Executive Officer Compensation Strategy and Philosophy
 
     In September 2009, we adopted a new executive officer compensation policy (the “Compensation Policy”) to make our executive officers’ total compensation more competitive with that of comparably-sized exploration and production companies that operate in the Permian Basin and U.S. Mid-Continent Region and publicly traded limited partnerships. In February 2010, the Compensation Policy was amended to revise the methodology of calculating the objective portion of equity based incentive compensation.
 
     Our executive officer compensation strategy is designed to align the compensation of the executive officers with unitholder return, be competitive with peer companies and have the flexibility to be both competitive and aligned with unitholder return in a volatile economic climate. We provide financial incentives to our executive officers for performance, achievement of goals and enhancement of unitholder value. Our compensation philosophy is to drive and support the long-term goal of sustainable growth in unit distributions and total unitholder return by paying for performance. In meeting the goal of sustainable growth, we intend to invest in our long-term opportunities while meeting our short-term commitments.
 
     As many of our executive officers hold units in the Partnership, we have attempted to maintain competitive levels of compensation while focusing on the growth of our business and distributions. Through this approach, our executives receive salaries for the market value of their services and their performance is further rewarded through the distributions they receive on their holdings of our units, which creates alignment of interests with our unitholders.
 
     At our named executive officers’ 2009 compensation levels and due to our organizational structure, we did not believe that Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) would be applicable and accordingly, did not consider it in setting 2009 compensation levels.
 
Components of Compensation
 
   Named Executive Officer Compensation
 
     Total compensation to our executive officers is comprised of base salary, non-equity incentive based compensation (cash bonus) and equity-based incentive compensation.
 
16
 


   2009 Performance Goals and Objectives
 
     For the 2009 performance year, the operational and financial goals and objectives were as follows:
     These goals and objectives, as supplemented by more detailed supporting goals and objectives put forth by our named executive officers, provided a framework for the compensation committee to assess our 2009 performance and to determine named executive officers’ compensation. Relative weight is not assigned to any or all of these goals and objectives. Additionally, the various financial goals were based on various assumptions, with the understanding that our actual financial performance would be assessed based on factors considered relevant by the compensation committee at the time named executive officer compensation was reviewed and determined.
 
   2009 Performance Assessment
 
     The compensation committee assessed the 2009 performance of executive officers for purposes of the determination of the subjective cash bonus (as set forth in the Compensation Policy) based on the attainment of the foregoing goals and objectives and the performance-related factors that it considered to be relevant. Among other things, the compensation committee considered the following achievements by the Partnership and the executive officers:
     Based on achieving a distribution coverage ratio of 1.3 (in excess of a goal of a distribution coverage ratio of 1.2), $120 million of EBITDA against a goal of $115 without the impact of acquisitions, lowering productions costs to $14.02 below a goal of $14.30 and only one lost time accident during 2009, the compensation committee awarded to Mr. Brown the subjective component of the cash bonus and recommended to the board that the executive officers other than Mr. Brown be awarded the subjective component of the cash bonus at the individual levels set forth under “Subjective Cash Award” below.
 
   Base Salaries
 
   Overview
 
     We pay base salary to attract talented executives and provide a fixed base of cash compensation. The compensation committee determines and approves the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, including salary, based on a review of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of established corporate goals and objectives. The compensation committee, with the assistance of the compensation committee consultant and input of the Chief Executive Officer, also makes recommendations to the board of directors as a whole with respect to the compensation, including base salary, to be paid to the other executive officers of our general partner.
 
17
 


     It is the intent of the compensation committee to have the base salaries of our named executive officers reviewed on an annual basis as well as at the time of a promotion or other material change in responsibilities.
 
   2009 Base Salary Determinations
 
     On September 21, 2009, the board, upon recommendation of the compensation committee, determined that the following salaries to each of our named executive officers for 2009 remain unchanged from 2008 levels: Cary D. Brown, $325,000; Steven H. Pruett, $275,000; Paul T. Horne, $250,000; Kyle A. McGraw, $235,000; and William M. Morris, $220,000.
 
   Non-Equity Incentive Compensation (Cash Bonus)
 
   Overview
 
     As a component of total compensation, the compensation committee chooses to pay annual incentives to drive the achievement of key results and to recognize individuals based on their contributions to those results. The compensation committee recognizes that short-term results contribute to achieving long-term goals. The amount of annual incentives is based upon our results and the achievement of operational and financial goals and objectives. The range and target amounts are recommended to the compensation committee by our Chief Executive Officer.
 
     In determining non-equity incentive awards, a subjective evaluation of prior fiscal year individual officer and Partnership performance (subjective criteria) and our results and the achievement of operational and financial goals and objectives during the prior fiscal (objective criteria) are considered. The objective and subjective components of the non-equity incentive compensation each comprise 50% of the maximum bonus available expressed as a percentage of annual salary for each executive officer, as set forth in the following table.
 
Maximum Cash Bonus Opportunity as
a Percentage of Annual Salary
Named Executive Officer          Title        Subjective        Objective        Total
Cary D. Brown Chairman of the Board and Chief 55 %   55 %   110
Executive Officer
Steven H. Pruett President, Chief Financial Officer and 50 % 50 %   100 %
Secretary
Paul T. Horne Executive Vice President of Operations 40 % 40 % 80 %
Kyle A. McGraw Director, Executive Vice President of 35 % 35 % 70 %
Business Development and Land
William M. Morris Vice President, Chief Accounting 30 % 30 % 60 %
Officer and Controller

   Objective Component of Cash Bonus
 
     The objective component (up to 50% of the annual cash bonus) is based on two measures of equal weight:
18
 


     The percentage levels that may be earned each year are based on the ranges of performance levels with respect to each target as set forth in the following table, as determined by straight-line interpolation.
 
Performance Measure          Weight        Performance Level/Percent Earned
EBITDA 50% 85% of Target        100% of Target        115% of Target
  30% 75% 100%
Growth in Cash Distributions Per Unit 50% 0% of Growth 7.5% of Growth 15% of Growth
50% 75% 100%

     These objective measures are intended to align the incentive compensation of each executive officer with unitholder return by rewarding performance that maintains or grows distributions and increases EBITDA. EBITDA and growth in cash distributions per unit are used to determine the objective component of the cash bonus. The respective target levels, for purposes of the annual cash bonus determination only, will be set by the compensation committee at the beginning of each year after considering management’s recommendation.
 
     During 2009, the Partnership achieved EBITDA of $120.0 million, or 96.8% of the $124 million target EBITDA, resulting in a Percentage Earned (pursuant to the table above) of 65.3% (weighted at 50% or 32.6%) and distribution growth in 2009 was 0%, resulting in a Percentage Earned of 50% (weighted at 50% or 25%), resulting in bonus amounts at 57.6% of the Objective Factor (as set forth in the table below).
 
   Subjective Cash Award
 
     Each executive officer was awarded the cash bonuses in the amounts determined by the percentage of maximum levels available, as set forth under “% of Subjective Factor” in the table below, and the potential maximum level of the subjective component of short-term (cash) incentive compensation for 2009 (the “Subjective Factor” as set forth below).
 
     Based on Legacy’s and the individual executive officers’ accomplishments and performances as set forth above, under the caption - “2009 Performance Assessment,” on February 18, 2010, the compensation committee recommended to the board, and the board set the subjective portion of the cash bonus as shown in the following table.
 
     The chart below illustrates the 2009 cash incentive award for each named executive officer in accordance with the performance level/percentage earned calculation set forth in the Compensation Policy:
 
              Subjective        Objective      
       % of                       
2009 Subjective Subjective Bonus Objective Bonus
Named Executive Officer Salary Factor Factor Amount Factor Amount (a) Total Bonus
Cary D. Brown $ 325,000 55% 80% $ 143,000 55%   $ 103,049 $ 246,049
Steven H. Pruett $ 275,000 50% 80% $ 110,000 50% $ 79,269 $ 189,269
Paul T. Horne   $ 250,000 40% 90% $ 90,000 40% $ 57,650   $ 147,650
Kyle A. McGraw $ 235,000 35% 70% $ 57,575 35% $ 47,417 $ 104,992
William M. Morris $ 220,000 30% 70% $ 46,200 30% $ 38,049 $ 84,249

____________________
 
(a)      The amounts are determined by using a weighted earned percentage of 57.6% of the Objective Factor as determined in accordance with the formula set forth in the Compensation Policy. See “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation” above.
 
19
 


   Determination and Approval of Executive Officer One-time Bonus for 2009
 
     On September 25, 2009, the board, upon recommendation of the compensation committee, awarded onetime cash bonuses to each of the executive officers in the amounts set forth below. The bonuses were awarded as recognition of management’s focus during the first half of 2009 while the conflicts committee evaluated the offer of Apollo Management VII, LP to acquire for cash all of the outstanding units of Legacy as well as management’s performance during the challenging commodity price and capital markets environment while achieving the following:
One-time
Named Executive Officer   Bonus
Cary D. Brown $ 162,500
Steven H. Pruett $ 110,000
Paul T. Horne $ 75,000
Kyle A. McGraw $ 58,750
William M. Morris $ 44,000

   Equity-Based Incentive Compensation
 
   Overview
 
     We provide performance-based equity-based incentive compensation opportunities to our executive officers as part of the compensation program because we believe that this element of compensation ties the interests of our executive officers directly to the interests of our unitholders. We also believe that equity-based incentive compensation serves as an important retention tool.
 
     More specifically, the equity-based incentive compensation program adopted by the board of directors and compensation committee of our general partner is designed to reward our named executive officers for their long-term performance by aligning grants of phantom units with associated distribution equivalent rights, or DERs, with the growth of distributions to unitholders. The DERs entitle the recipient of the award with a payment equivalent to the amount of per unit distribution payable to unitholders.
 
     We consider equity-based incentive compensation to be an important element of our compensation program for named executive officers. We believe meaningful equity participation by each named executive officer to be a strong motivating factor that will result in significant increases in value and in growth. This belief is reflected in the aggregate awards of unit options and phantom units that have been made to named executive officers that did not already have a significant interest in our units.
 
     In September 2009, the compensation committee established a new award structure for long-term equity-based incentives that employs a mix of subjective and objective measures, weighted at 50% each.
 
     Subjective or Service-Based Component. The subjective or service-based component is determined by a subjective evaluation of prior fiscal year performance and, with respect to each executive officer, may be awarded up to the maximum percentage of annual salary as set forth in the table below. Once granted, the only condition to vesting will be that the executive officer remain in the service of the Partnership until the end of the respective vesting period. The vesting of service-based equity-based awards, once granted, is not subject to the attainment of any performance criteria.
 
20
 


     Objective or Performance-Based Component. The objective or performance-based component is granted each year at the maximum percentage listed in the table below, but the amount vested each year for the three-year vesting period is determined on each vesting date in accordance with a formula (as set forth under “Calculation of Vesting of Objective Component of Equity-Based Compensation” below) based on the objective total unitholder return and relative performance measures (described below) achieved during the fiscal year prior to the applicable vesting date. If none or only a portion of phantom units of a particular tranche vest as a result of target levels not being met, the unvested portion of phantom units will be forfeited.
 
     All equity-based incentive compensation awards will be phantom units, with associated DERs, up to the maximum amounts reflected as percentages of annual salary as set forth in the following table.
 
              Maximum Grant Value of Phantom
Units as a Percentage of Annual Salary
Named Executive Officer     Title Subjective        Objective        Total
Cary D. Brown Chairman of the Board and Chief   100 % 150 % 250 %
Executive Officer      
Steven H. Pruett President, Chief Financial Officer and 80 % 120 % 200 %
Secretary    
Paul T. Horne Executive Vice President of Operations 60 % 90 % 150 %
Kyle A. McGraw Director, Executive Vice President of 50 % 75 % 125 %
Business Development and Land
William M. Morris Vice President, Chief Accounting 40 % 60 % 100 %
Officer and Controller  

     A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles the holder upon vesting to receive cash valued at the closing price of units on the vesting date, or, at the discretion of the compensation committee, the same number of Partnership units. The number of phantom units granted will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the intended grant value by the average closing price of Partnership units over the 20 trading days preceding the date of grant. All phantom unit grants vest over a three-year period, with each tranche to vest on the first, second and third anniversary of the initial grant date, as applicable. With respect to the objective component only, the actual number vested will be determined based on the three-step formula set forth below.
 
     With respect to all phantom unit grants, DERs accumulate and accrue based on the assumed 100% vesting of each tranche. With respect to the objective component only, the actual amounts payable are based solely on the number of vested underlying phantom units.
 
   Calculation of Vesting of Objective Component of Equity-Based Compensation
 
     At the vesting date of each one-third tranche of the objective or performance-based component of equity-based compensation, the number of phantom units to vest each year is determined based on the following three-step process, with the total vested amount for each year to be determined by adding the values arrived at in Step 1 and Step 2.
 
     Step 1: 50% of the performance-based award will be a function of the Total Unitholder Return for the Partnership (“Legacy TUR”) and the ordinal rank of the Legacy TUR among such upstream master limited partnership (“MLP”) peer companies as determined by the compensation committee at the beginning of each fiscal year (“Peer Group”). The percentage of the 50% of the performance-based award to vest under this Step 1 is determined within a matrix which ranges from 0% to 100% and will increase from 0% to 100% as each of the Legacy TUR and the ordinal rank of the Legacy TUR among the Peer Group increase. The applicable Legacy TUR range is from less than 8% (where no vesting will occur) to more than 20% (where 100% of the amount available under this Step 1 is subject to vesting, dependent upon the Legacy TUR rank among the Peer Group).
 
     Step 2: 50% of the performance-based award will be a function of the Legacy TUR and the percentile rank of the Partnership among a group of MLPs included in the Alerian MLP Index (such group of MLPs as determined by the compensation committee, excluding publicly traded general partners of MLPs and shipping companies) (the “Adjusted Alerian Index”). The percentage of the 50% of the performance-based award to vest
 
21
 


under this Step 2 is determined within a matrix which ranges from 0% to 100% and will increase from 0% to 100% as the Legacy TUR and the percentile rank of the Legacy TUR among the Adjusted Alerian Index increases. The applicable Legacy TUR range is from less than 8% (where no vesting occurs) to more than 20% (where 100% vesting will be available, dependent upon the percentile rank of the Legacy TUR within the Adjusted Alerian Index).
 
     Step 3: The respective award values arrived at by performing the calculations set forth in Step 1 and Step 2 above will be added to determine the total vested portion of the performance-based equity award with respect to a particular fiscal year.
 
     On February 18, 2010, the compensation committee approved the following phantom unit awards for Mr. Cary Brown, and, with respect to the remaining executive officers, recommended the following phantom unit awards to the board and the board approved such awards:
 
       Phantom Unit Grants
       Subjective Grant Objective Grant
                            Maximum
  Subjective Subjective Phantom Objective Phantom
Named Executive Officer   2009 Salary Factor (a)   Award Units (b)   Factor (a) Units (c)
Cary D. Brown $ 325,000    100 %      100 %     16,193      150 %   25,848
Steven H. Pruett $ 275,000 80 % 100 % 10,962 120 %   17,497
Paul T. Horne $ 250,000 60 % 100 % 7,474 90 % 11,930
Kyle A. McGraw $ 235,000 50 % 100 % 5,855 75 % 9,345
William M. Morris $ 220,000 40 % 100 % 4,385 60 % 6,999

____________________
 
(a)      Represents percentage of 2009 salary.
 
(b) Phantom units vest 1/3 each anniversary.
 
(c) Subject to performance criteria. Represents maximum number of phantom units available to vest in one-third tranches over the next three years starting February 18, 2011, pending attainment of specified performance criteria. Unvested phantom units will be forfeited.
 
     Subjective or Service-Based Component. Based upon the rationale set forth in “2009 Performance Assessment” set forth above, each executive officer was awarded the maximum level available of the potential subjective component of equity-based incentive compensation for 2009 (such maximum available level as set forth in the table above), with the number of phantom units granted determined by using the 20-day average closing price of Partnership units prior to February 18, 2010, or $20.07. The only condition to vesting will be that the award recipient remains in the service of the Partnership until the end of the respective vesting period. The vesting of service-based equity-based awards, once granted, is not subject to the attainment of any performance criteria.
 
     Objective Equity Compensation. The number of phantom units for the objective component of equity-based compensation was granted as prescribed by the Compensation Policy at the maximum level, in an amount based on the average closing price of Partnership units for the 20 trading day period ended the last trading day prior to January 1, 2010, or $18.86. As set forth in the Compensation Policy, the objective or performance-based component is granted each year at the maximum percentage listed in the table above but the amount vested each year for the three-year vesting period will be determined on each vesting date in accordance with a formula based on the objective total unitholder return measures achieved during the fiscal year prior to the applicable vesting date. If none or only a portion of phantom units of a particular one-third tranche vest as a result of target levels not being met, such number of phantom units will be forfeited.
 
22
 


Amended and Restated Legacy Reserves LP Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
 
     Long-term incentive compensation awards are administered through our LTIP adopted in March 2006 and amended and restated on August 17, 2007. The plan is administered by the compensation committee and permits the grant of awards resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 2,000,000 units. The purpose of the plan is to promote the interests of our unitholders by encouraging our employees, directors and other service providers to acquire or increase their equity interest in us, thereby giving them the added incentive to work toward our continued growth and success. The plan permits awards of unit grants, restricted units, phantom units, unit options, unit appreciation rights, performance based units and other forms of equity compensation.
 
     As of December 31, 2009, grants of awards, net of forfeitures, covering 945,198 units have been made including 65,116 restricted units, 729,864 unit options and unit appreciation rights and 105,250 phantom units and 44,968 units issued to directors. We have awarded unit options (until 2007) and phantom units as the primary forms of equity-based compensation. We selected these forms because of the favorable accounting and tax treatment and the expectation by key employees that part of their compensation would be derived from options to purchase units in the Partnership.
 
     Unit option awards have been tied to the performance of our named executive officers in expanding the business and increasing the cash flow available for distribution. All unit-based awards we have made have been time-based. Time-based awards vest in accordance with vesting schedules determined by our general partner’s board of directors and its compensation committee. The phantom units we have awarded to our named executive officers in 2009 vest in one-third increments each year over a three-year period. Our belief is that time-based awards more closely align our executives’ interests with those of our unitholders by providing a greater incentive for long-term performance.
 
     Our general partner’s board of directors, or its compensation committee, in its discretion may terminate, suspend or discontinue the LTIP at any time with respect to any award that has not yet been granted. Our general partner’s board of directors, or its compensation committee, also has the right to alter or amend the LTIP or any part of the plan from time to time, including increasing the number of units that may be granted, subject to unitholder approval as required by the exchange upon which the units are listed at that time. However, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that would materially impair the rights of the participant without the consent of the participant.
 
   Unit grants
 
     The LTIP permits the grant of units. A unit grant is a grant of units that vests immediately upon issuance.
 
   Restricted Units and Phantom Units
 
     A restricted unit is a unit that is subject to forfeiture prior to the vesting of the award. A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles the grantee to receive a unit upon the vesting of the phantom unit or, in the discretion of the compensation committee, cash equivalent to the value of a unit. The compensation committee may make grants under the plan of restricted units and phantom units to employees, consultants and directors containing such terms, consistent with the plan, as the compensation committee shall determine. The compensation committee will determine the period over which the restricted units and phantom units granted to employees, consultants and directors will vest. The compensation committee may base vesting upon the achievement of specified financial objectives or on the grantee’s completion of a period of service. In addition, the restricted units and phantom units will vest upon a change of control of the Partnership or our general partner, unless provided otherwise by the compensation committee in the award agreement.
 
     If the grantee’s employment, service relationship or membership on the board of directors terminates for any reason, the grantee’s restricted units and phantom units will be automatically forfeited unless, and to the extent, the compensation committee provides otherwise in the award agreement or waives (in whole or in part) any such forfeiture. Units to be delivered in connection with the grant of restricted units or upon the vesting of phantom units may be units acquired by us on the open market, or from any other person, or we may issue new units, or any combination of the foregoing. Our general partner is entitled to reimbursement by us for the cost
 
23
 


incurred in acquiring units. Thus, the cost of the restricted units and the delivery of units upon the vesting of phantom units will be borne by us. If we issue new units in connection with the grant of restricted units or upon vesting of the phantom units, the total number of units outstanding will increase. The compensation committee, in its discretion, may provide for tandem distribution rights with respect to restricted units and grant tandem distribution equivalent rights with respect to phantom units that entitle the holder to receive cash equal to any cash distributions made on units prior to the vesting of a restricted or phantom unit.
 
   Unit Options and Unit Appreciation Rights
 
     The LTIP permits the grant of options covering units and the grant of unit appreciation rights. A unit appreciation right is an award that, upon exercise, entitles the participant to receive the excess of the fair market value of a unit on the exercise date over the exercise price established for the unit appreciation right. Such excess may be paid in units, cash, or a combination thereof, as determined by the compensation committee in its discretion. The compensation committee will be able to make grants of unit options and unit appreciation rights under the plan to employees, consultants and directors containing such terms as the committee shall determine consistent with the plan. Unit options and unit appreciation rights may not have an exercise price that is less than the fair market value of the units on the date of grant. In general, unit options and unit appreciation rights granted will become exercisable over a period determined by the compensation committee. In addition, the unit options and unit appreciation rights will become exercisable upon a change in control of the Partnership or our general partner, unless provided otherwise by the committee in the award agreement. The compensation committee, in its discretion may grant tandem distribution equivalent rights with respect to unit options and unit appreciation rights.
 
     Upon exercise of a unit option (or a unit appreciation right settled in units), we will acquire units on the open market or from any other person or we may issue new units, or any combination of the foregoing. If we issue new units upon exercise of the unit options (or a unit appreciation right settled in units), the total number of units outstanding will increase, and our general partner will pay us the proceeds it receives from an optionee upon exercise of a unit option. The availability of unit options and unit appreciation rights is intended to furnish additional compensation to employees, consultants and directors and to align their economic interests with those of unitholders.
 
   Unit Option Practices
 
     Although our LTIP permits us to award options under a variety of circumstances, we have not granted unit options since early 2007 and do not anticipate granting any further unit options. We have not back-dated any option awards. The option grants we have made to date had an exercise price that corresponded with the offering price to purchasers of our units in a private offering we conducted in March 2006, the price at which our units traded on the Portal Market, the price to the public of our units in our January 2007 initial public offering, or the market value of our units at the close of trading on the date of the grant. Any option grants we may make in the future will have an exercise price equal to the market value of our units at the close of trading on the date of the grant. We have chosen to replace the use of unit options in the future with unit appreciation rights to reduce the administrative costs associated with unit options.
 
   Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
 
     We maintain a 401(k) plan. The plan permits eligible full-time employees, including named executive officers, to make voluntary, pre-tax contributions to the plan up to a specified percentage of compensation, subject to applicable tax limitations. We may make a discretionary matching contribution to the plan for each eligible employee equal to 4.0% of an employee’s annual compensation not in excess of $230,000 for 2008, and equal to 6.0% of an employee’s annual compensation not in excess of $245,000 for 2009 and 2010, subject to applicable tax limitations. Eligible employees who elect to participate in the plan are generally vested in any matching contribution after commencement of employment with the company. The plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code so that contributions to the plan, and income earned on plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the plan, and so that contributions, if any, will be deductible when made.
 
24
 


     We maintain an employee benefit plan that provides our employees with the opportunity to enroll in our health, dental and life insurance plans. We pay all of our employees’ health and life insurance premiums. Our dental plan requires the employee to pay a portion of the premium, with the company picking up the remainder. We provide these benefits so that we will remain competitive in the employment market and offer the benefits to all employees on the same basis.
 
     The compensation committee approved the following grants of phantom units with associated DERs, which were granted, in accordance with the compensation policy in effect for 2008, to our named executive officers on January 29, 2009, with respect to the declared distribution of $0.52 per unit ($2.08 on an annualized basis) with respect to the fourth quarter of 2008:
 
Phantom Units
with associated
Named Executive Officer         DERs
Cary D. Brown 11,760
Steven H. Pruett   11,760
Kyle A. McGraw 9,800
Paul T. Horne 9,800
William M. Morris 5,880

     The phantom units vest annually in one-third increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, over a three-year period.
 
     These grants of phantom units with associated DERs were in addition to the following grants of phantom units with associated DERs that were granted on February 4, 2008 with respect to the declared distribution of $0.45 per unit ($1.80 on an annualized basis) with respect to the fourth quarter of 2007:
 
Phantom Units
with associated
Named Executive Officer         DERs
Cary D. Brown 6,720
Steven H. Pruett 6,720
Kyle A. McGraw 5,600
Paul T. Horne 5,600
William M. Morris 3,360

     These phantom units also vest annually in one-third increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, over a three-year period. One third of each of these phantom unit grants vested on February 4, 2009.
 
Unit Ownership Guidelines
 
     We do not currently have any policy or guideline that requires a specified ownership of our units by our directors or executive officers or unit retention guidelines applicable to equity-based awards granted to directors and executive officers. Although we do not have a policy requiring ownership, each of our named executive officers directly or indirectly owns units.
 
     As of December 31, 2009, our named executive officers as a group beneficially owned 6,189,216 units and options to acquire 93,320 units. If all options were exercised, our named executive officers would have beneficially owned approximately 15.7% of our 40,070,201 issued and outstanding units. See “Executive Compensation — Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End” for outstanding options held by our named executive officers.
 
25
 


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
 
     The compensation committee of the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC held six meetings during fiscal year 2009. The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon such review, the related discussions and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the compensation committee, the compensation committee has recommended to the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
 
     Members of the compensation committee of the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC:
 
Kyle D. Vann (Chairman)
G. Larry Lawrence
William R. Granberry

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Summary Compensation Table
 
     The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers serving at December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and reflects the total compensation paid to the executive officers of our general partner.
 
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Equity Nonqualified
Unit Option Incentive Plan Deferred All Other
Salary Bonus Awards Awards Compensation Compensation Compensation Total
Name and Principal Position          Year       ($)(a)       ($)       ($)(b)       ($)(c)       ($)       Earnings       ($)       ($)
Cary D. Brown 2007 $ 216,667 $ 161,000 $ $ $ 22,671 (c) $ 400,338
       Chairman of the Board 2008 $ 275,000 $ 184,889 $ 106,771 $ $ 36,901 (c) $ 603,561
       and Chief Executive 2009 $ 325,000 $ 408,549 $ 107,140 $ $ 63,342 (c) $ 904,031
       Officer
Steven H. Pruett 2007 $ 191,667 $ 122,000 $ $ $ 46,775 (d) $ 360,442
       President, Chief 2008 $ 241,667 $ 167,444 $ 106,771 $ $ 36,901 (d) $ 552,783
       Financial Officer and 2009 $ 275,000 $ 299,269 $ 107,140 $ $ 63,342 (d) $ 744,751
       Secretary
Kyle A. McGraw 2007 $ 165,000 $ 98,000 $ $ $ 21,196 (e) $ 284,196
       Director, Executive 2008 $ 208,333 $ 133,689 $ 88,976 $ $ 34,012 (e) $ 465,010
       Vice President of 2009 $ 235,000 $ 163,742 $ 89,283 $ $ 57,417 (e) $ 565,442
       Business Development  
       and Land        
Paul T. Horne 2007 $ 165,000 $ 112,000   $ $ $ 21,196 (f) $ 298,196
       Executive Vice 2008 $ 213,333 $ 147,222 $ 88,976 $     $ 34,212 (f) $ 483,743
       President of Operations 2009 $ 250,000 $ 222,650 $ 89,283 $     $ 57,417 (f) $ 619,350
William M. Morris 2007 $ 165,000 $ 102,000 $   $ $ 51,788 (g) $ 318,788
       Vice President, Chief 2008 $ 203,333 $ 129,556 $ 53,386 $   $ 46,440 (g) $ 432,715
       Accounting Officer and   2009 $ 220,000 $ 128,249 $ 53,570 $ $ 41,421 (g) $ 443,240
       Controller
____________________

(a)       Annual salary adjustments for 2007 became effective on September 1, 2007. Annual salary adjustments for 2008 became effective on September 1, 2008. For 2009, executive salaries were kept at the level effective since September 1, 2008.
 
(b) Phantom units were granted to officers on February 4, 2008 and January 29, 2009. The amount shown reflects the grant date fair value of these awards based upon the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s authoritative guidance relating to stock compensation. The assumptions used in calculating these amounts are incorporated by reference to Note 13 – “Unit Based Compensation” to the financial statements in
 
26
 


  our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2010. In the prior years’ Summary Compensation Table, based on then prevailing rules, the value of these awards reflected the grant date fair value of the amounts expensed each year, for financial reporting purposes. On December 16, 2009, the SEC adopted a final rule that requires reporting all stock and option awards granted during the fiscal year at the full grant date value. The value for each of the three years in this Summary Compensation Table reflects the full grant date fair value.
 
(c)       Reflects for 2007 $8,056 of 401(k) employer matching contributions and $14,615 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for 2008 $9,200 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,395 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $13,306 of unit distributions received by Mr. Brown on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009 $14,700 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $34,944 of unit distributions received by Mr. Brown on his unvested phantom units.
 
(d) Reflects for 2007 the $9,220 value of perquisites we paid for Mr. Pruett’s travel to and from our offices in Midland from his former residence in Houston, $15,273 of packing and moving expenses to move from Houston to Midland, $7,667 of 401(k) employer matching contributions and $14,615 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for 2008 $9,200 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,395 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $13,306 of unit distributions received by Mr. Pruett on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009 $14,700 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $34,944 of unit distributions received by Mr. Pruett on his unvested phantom units.
 
(e) Reflects for 2007 $6,600 of 401(k) employer matching contributions and $14,596 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for 2008 $8,560 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,364 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $11,088 of unit distributions received by Mr. McGraw on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009 $14,600 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $29,119 of unit distributions received by Mr. McGraw on his unvested phantom units.
 
(f) Reflects for 2007 $6,600 of 401(k) employer matching contributions and $14,596 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for 2008 $8,760 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,364 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $11,088 of unit distributions received by Mr. Horne on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009 $14,700 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $29,119 of unit distributions received by Mr. Horne on his unvested phantom units.
 
(g) Reflects for 2007 $43,847 of unit distributions received by Mr. Morris on his unvested restricted units, $5,300 of 401(k) employer matching contributions and $2,641 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for 2008 $28,414 of unit distributions received by Mr. Morris on his unvested restricted units, $8,269 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $3,104 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $6,653 of unit distributions received by Mr. Morris on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009 $6,080 of unit distributions received by Mr. Morris on his unvested restricted units, $14,693 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $3,176 of health, life and disability insurance premiums and $17,472 of unit distributions received by Mr. Morris on his unvested phantom units.
 
27
 


Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2009
 
     The following table sets forth the payments that may be made under our LTIP.
 
All Other
Option Exercise
All Other Awards: or Base
Unit Number of Price of Grant Date
Date Estimated Future Payouts Under Awards: Securities Option Fair Value
Grant Action Equity Incentive Plan Awards Number   Underlying Award of Unit and
Name        Date(a)      Taken(b)      Threshold      Target      Maximum      of Units(c)      Options      ($/Unit)      Option Awards
Cary D. Brown 1/29/2009 1/29/2009   11,760 $ $ 107,140
Steven H. Pruett 1/29/2009 1/29/2009     11,760 $ $ 107,140
Kyle A. McGraw   1/29/2009 1/29/2009 9,800   $   $ 89,283
Paul T. Horne 1/29/2009 1/29/2009   9,800   $ $ 89,283
William M. Morris 1/29/2009   1/29/2009 5,880 $ $ 53,570
____________________

(a)      Reflects grants made in fiscal year 2009.
 
(b) Reflects the date on which the compensation committee was deemed to take action in making a grant of unit options.
 
(c) Phantom units vest annually in one-third increments beginning on the first anniversary of their respective grant dates and are payable in cash or, at the discretion of the compensation committee, in units. For 2009, the numbers granted reflects the subjective portion of the Compensation Policy.
 
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End
 
     The following table reflects all of the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2009. All named executive officers exercised all of their outstanding options on March 11, 2010.
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of Number of Number of
Securities Securities Securities
Underlying Underlying Underlying Number of Market Value
Unexercised Unexercised Unexercised Option Option Units That of Units That
Options (#) Options (#) Unearned Exercise Expiration Have Not Have Not
Name         Exercisable       Unexercisable       Options (#)       Price ($)       Date (a)       Vested (#)(b)       Vested ($)(c)
Cary D. Brown 20,000 $ 17.00 July 16, 2011 16,240 $ 319,441
Steven H. Pruett   20,000 $ 17.00 July 16, 2011 16,240 $ 319,441
Kyle A. McGraw 20,000 $ 17.00   July 16, 2011   13,533 $ 266,194
Paul T. Horne 20,000       $ 17.00 July 16, 2011 13,533 $ 266,194
William M. Morris 13,320 $ 17.00 July 16, 2011 8,120 $ 159,720
____________________
 
(a)       Options vest one-third annually commencing March 15, 2007 and expire five years from the grant date of July 17, 2006.
 
(b) Includes the phantom units that were granted on February 4, 2008, which vest annually in one-third increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, over a three-year period and the phantom units that were granted on January 29, 2009, which vest annually in one-third increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, over a three-year period.
 
(c) Reflects the value of phantom units based on the closing price of our units on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 31, 2009 of $19.67.
 
28
 


Employment Agreements
 
     Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Legacy Reserves Services, Inc. we have employment agreements with each of our executive officers. These agreements establish that each of our named executive officers is employed by Legacy Reserves Services, Inc., and provide for the employment of Mr. Brown as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Pruett as President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. McGraw as Executive Vice President — Business Development and Land, Mr. Horne as Vice President — Operations and Mr. Morris as Controller of our general partner. Mr. Horne is now Executive Vice President of Operations and Mr. Morris is now Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. Each of these agreements became effective upon the completion of our private placement on March 15, 2006, and is terminable either by the executive or by us at any time.
 
   Base Salaries
 
     The employment agreements provide that Messrs. Brown, Pruett, McGraw, Horne and Morris will receive an annual base salary of $200,000, $175,000, $150,000, $150,000 and $125,000, respectively. On August 20, 2007, the board of directors of our general partner approved increased salaries for each of the named executive officers effective September 1, 2007, as follows: Mr. Brown, $250,000; Mr. Pruett, $225,000; Mr. McGraw, $195,000; Mr. Horne, $195,000; and Mr. Morris, $195,000. On August 26, 2008, the board of directors of our general partner approved increased salaries for each of the named executive officers effective September 1, 2008, as follows: Mr. Brown, $325,000; Mr. Pruett, $275,000; Mr. McGraw, $235,000; Mr. Horne, $250,000; and Mr. Morris, $220,000. On September 21, 2009, at the recommendation of the compensation committee the board of directors of our general partner determined that the 2009 salary levels for the named executive officers would remain at the 2008 levels until the compensation committee and the board had the opportunity to redesign the executive compensation policy and fully determine 2009 performance. As a result, the board determined that a decision as to salary levels would be deferred until the first quarter of 2010. On January 11, 2010, the compensation committee of our general partner approved an increased salary for Mr. Brown of $364,000 effective March 1, 2010. On February 18, 2010, at the recommendation of the compensation committee, the board of directors of our general partner approved increased salaries for each of the other named executive officers effective March 1, 2010, as follows: Mr. Pruett, $292,000; Mr. McGraw, $242,000; Mr. Horne, $258,000; and Mr. Morris, $227,000. The employment agreements provide that each executive officer is entitled to participate in equity and non-equity incentive programs that we may establish from time to time and incentive compensation will be paid at the discretion of the board of directors of our general partner. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Components of Compensation — Named Executive Officer Compensation.”
 
   Intellectual Property and Non-Compete Clauses
 
     The employment agreements with each of our named executive officers require that the executive officer must promptly disclose and assign any individual rights that he may have in any intellectual property and business opportunities to us. For purposes of the employment agreements, intellectual property includes inventions, discoveries, processes, designs, methods, substances, articles, computer programs, or improvements and business opportunities include business ideas, prospects, proposals or other opportunities pertaining to the lease, acquisition, exploration, production, gathering or marketing of hydrocarbons and related products and the exploration potential of geographical areas on which hydrocarbon exploration prospects are located. Under the non-compete provisions of these agreements, the executive officers are prohibited from engaging or participating, with any person or entity, in any activity pertaining to the leasing, acquiring, exploring, producing, gathering or marketing of hydrocarbons during the term of the executive officer’s employment and the executive officer may not invest in any other such business unless prior approval is granted in writing by our general partner’s board of directors. The non-compete provisions limit the executives’ right to engage in these activities for a period of 90 days after termination of employment in counties where we do business, 90 days in adjacent counties, and limit investment to $500,000 in publicly traded companies engaged in similar businesses for a period of one year after termination unless such competitive activity is approved in writing by a majority of the independent directors of our general partner’s board of directors. The employment agreements also prohibit the executive officer from soliciting any of our employees or customers for two years following termination.
 
29
 


     The employment agreements prohibit the executive officers from engaging in or participating in any publicly traded partnership or limited liability company or privately held company contemplating an initial public offering as a limited partnership or a limited liability company that is in direct competition with us for one year following the termination of employment.
 
     The non-compete provisions contained in the employment agreements will not apply to investments by the executive officers made prior to the effective date of their respective employment agreements, provided that the investments were identified in the employment agreement. In addition, the non-compete provisions will not apply if we terminate the executive officer’s employment within one year following a change of control.
 
   Severance and Change in Control Payments
 
     Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements, we may be obligated to make severance payments to our named executive officers following the termination of their employment. These benefits are described below under “— Benefits Payable Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
 
     In the event that any payments to which any named executive officer is entitled become subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then the board shall provide for the payment of, or otherwise reimburse the executive for the amount of the excise tax. These gross-up payments will be in an amount such that, after payment by the named executive officer of all taxes, including any income tax or excise tax imposed on the gross-up payments, the named executive officer retains an amount equal to the payment before any excise tax is imposed. The gross-up payments, if applicable, will be in addition to any payments made below under “— Severance Benefits” or “— Change in Control Benefits.” Additionally, to the extent any payments to which any named executive officer is entitled is deemed to constitute non-qualified deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, then we will have the discretion to adjust the terms of such payment or benefit as we deem necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 409A to avoid the imposition of any additional tax or other penalty or interest with respect to such payment or benefit under Section 409A.
 
Benefits Payable Upon Termination or Change in Control
 
     The following table presents, for each named executive officer, the potential post-employment payments and payments upon a change in control as of December 31, 2009. Set forth below the table is a description of certain post-employment arrangements with our named executive officers, including the severance benefits and change in control benefits to which they are entitled under their employment agreements.
 
  Before Change in After Change in
Control w/o Control w/o
Cause or for Cause or for
Named Executive Officer   Benefit         Good Reason       Good Reason
Cary D. Brown Severance(a) $ 650,000 $ 975,000
Bonus(b) $ 593,438 $ 890,157
Benefits(c) $ 25,512 $ 38,268
Unit Options(d) $ 53,400 $ 53,400
Phantom Units(e) $ 319,441 $ 319,441
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) $ 386,689 $ 586,366
Steven H. Pruett Severance(a) $ 550,000 $ 825,000
Bonus(b) $ 466,713 $ 700,070
Benefits(c) $ 25,512 $ 38,268
Unit Options(d) $ 53,400   $ 53,400
Phantom Units(e) $ 319,441 $ 319,441
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) $ 333,460 $ 497,461

30
 


Before Change in After Change in
  Control w/o Control w/o
Cause or for Cause or for
Named Executive Officer        Benefit        Good Reason      Good Reason
Kyle A. McGraw   Severance(a) $ 470,000 $ 705,000
Bonus(b) $ 297,431 $ 446,147
Benefits(c) $ 25,512 $ 38,268
Unit Options(d) $ 53,400 $ 53,400
Phantom Units(e) $ 266,194 $ 266,194
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) $ 259,985 $ 384,760
Paul T. Horne Severance(a) $ 500,000 $ 750,000
Bonus(b) $ 369,872 $ 554,808
Benefits(c) $ 25,512 $ 38,268
Unit Options(d) $ 53,400 $ 53,400
Phantom Units(e) $ 266,194 $ 266,194
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) $ 285,865 $ 426,759
William M. Morris Severance(a) $ 440,000 $ 660,000
Bonus(b)   $ 257,805   $ 386,708
Benefits(c) $ 17,904 $ 26,856
Unit Options(d) $ 35,564 $ 35,564
Phantom Units(e) $ 159,720 $ 159,720
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g)
____________________

(a)      If terminated without cause, or executive terminates with good reason, executive is entitled to an amount equal to two years’ annual salary payable in 24 monthly payments, or three years’ annual salary if termination occurs within one year of a change of control.
 
(b) Executives are entitled to an average of bonus paid over past two years plus the pro-rata bonus earned in the year of termination but unpaid at the time of termination.
 
(c) Executives are entitled to COBRA benefits for the shorter of the severance period or the time at which executive receives substantially similar benefits from a subsequent employer.
 
(d) Reflects the market value on December 31, 2009 of the 20,000 unit options granted on July 17, 2006, all of which are still outstanding at December 31, 2009 except in the case of Mr. Morris who had 13,320 unit options outstanding. On March 11, 2010, all executive officers exercised their outstanding unit options in full.
 
(e) Reflects the market value on December 31, 2009 of the unvested phantom units granted on February 4, 2008 and January 29, 2009.
 
(f) Assumes a federal income tax rate of 35%, an excise tax rate under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 20% and a Medicare tax rate of 1.45% and that no payments will constitute “reasonable compensation” under Section 280G(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
(g) Assumes that the executive is entitled to a full reimbursement by the Partnership of (i) any excise taxes that are imposed upon the executive as a result of a change in control, (ii) any income and excise taxes that are imposed upon the executive as a result of reimbursement of the excise tax amount and (iii) any additional income and excise taxes that are imposed upon executive as a result of the reimbursement to the executive of any excise or income taxes.
 
31
 


   Severance Benefits
 
     Under the employment agreements, we may be obligated to make severance payments following the termination of each executive officer’s employment if we terminate him without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, subject to certain cure periods. “Cause” is defined under each employment agreement as:
     Each named executive officer will have a 15 day cure period prior to termination for cause under these agreements.
 
     “Good reason” is defined under each employment agreement as:
     If the employment of any named executive officer is terminated by us for cause or by the executive officer without good reason, we are not obligated to make any severance payments to the executive officer. The amount that an executive officer is entitled to receive upon a termination of his employment by us without cause or by the executive officer with good reason is based on the executive officer’s salary and his incentive compensation. Under the severance provisions of each executive officer’s employment agreement, they are each entitled to severance pay in the amount of two years’ of annual base salary payable monthly at the highest rate in effect at any time during the 36 month period prior to termination, a lump sum payment equal to the average annual bonus of the two years preceding the termination and an amount equal to the executive’s pro-rata bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, such pro-rata bonus amount to be paid in a lump sum within 30 days following the date of termination. In addition, the executive officers are entitled to the full costs of the executive’s COBRA continuation coverage for the shorter of the severance period or the time when the executive receives substantially similar benefits from a subsequent employer. In addition, Messrs. Brown and McGraw would have the right to exercise one demand registration right each.
 
   Change in Control Benefits
 
     Pursuant to the employment agreements, we may be required to make payments to named executive officers upon a change in control, which occurs upon any of the following:
32
 


that the following will not constitute a change of control: any acquisitions from or by the Partnership; any acquisition by a Partnership employee benefit plan; any business combination (x) where persons owning more than 50% of the outstanding equity interests in the Partnership own substantially the same percentages of the entity resulting from such business combination, (y) where no person owns more than 35% of the combined entity, except to the extent such ownership existed prior to the combination, or (z) any combination where at least a majority of the members of the board of the combined entity were also members of board of directors of the Partnership’s general partner at the time of initial execution of any acquisition agreement;
     If a termination without cause or by the executive officer with good reason occurs within one year following a change in control, the executive officer will be entitled to a payment of 36 months of his annual base salary determined at the highest rate in effect at any time during the 36 month period prior to termination, payable in a lump sum within 30 days. In addition, the executive will be entitled to receive the average annual bonus of the two years preceding the termination, an amount equal to the executive’s pro-rata bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs (such pro-rata bonus amount to be paid in a lump sum within 30 days following the date of termination) and the full costs of the executive’s COBRA continuation coverage for the shorter of the severance period or the time when the executive receives substantially similar benefits from a subsequent employer.
 
Option Exercises and Units Vested in 2009
 
     None of our named executive officers exercised unit options during 2009. On February 4, 2009, one-third of the Phantom units granted to the named executive officers on February 4, 2008 vested.
 
Option Awards Unit Awards
Number of Units Number of Units
Acquired On Value Realized Acquired On Value Realized
Exercise On Exercise Vesting On Vesting
Name         (#)       ($)       (#)       ($)(a)
Cary D. Brown 2,240 $ 27,121
Steven H. Pruett     2,240 $ 27,121
Kyle A. McGraw   1,867   $ 22,647
Paul T. Horne 1,867 $ 22,647
William M. Morris 12,813 $ 120,334

____________________
 
(a)       Represents the cash payments made to each of the named executive officers upon vesting of the limited 1/3 tranche of the February 4, 2008 phantom unit grant, except that in the case of Mr. Morris, it also includes the $106,748 of value, not cash, he realized on March 14, 2009 when 11,693 restricted units granted on March 15, 2006 vested.
 
33
 


 
Equity Compensation Plan Information
 
     The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009 with respect to the units that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
 
Number of Securities Weighted Average
to be Issued Upon Exercise Price of Number of Securities
Exercise of Outstanding Remaining Available For
Outstanding Options, Options, Warrants Future Issuance Under
Plan Category         Warrants and Rights(b)       and Rights       Equity Compensation Plan
Equity compensation plans approved by
       security holders
Equity compensation plans not approved by        
       security holders(a) 784,962 $ 19.23 1,006,649
Total 784,962 $ 19.23 1,006,649
____________________
 
(a)       Please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Components of Compensation — Equity-Based Incentive Compensation” for a description of the material features of the plan, including the awards that may be granted under the plan. This plan did not require approval by our limited partners since it was adopted prior to our initial public offering.
 
(b) Includes phantom units, unit options and Unit Appreciation Rights. These phantom units will be settled in cash unless the compensation committee determines that they should be settled in units. These UARs will be settled in cash or, at the discretion of the compensation committee, in units.
 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
 
     Officers or employees of our general partner and its affiliates who also serve as directors of our general partner did not receive additional compensation for their board service in 2009. In accordance with this policy, neither Cary D. Brown nor Kyle A. McGraw received any compensation for their service as a director in 2009. Each non-employee director and independent director was entitled to receive an annual retainer of $40,000 and up to $1,000 for each board of directors and committee meeting less than one hour and $1,500 for each board of directors and committee meeting in excess of one hour for each meeting in excess of the four quarterly meetings scheduled each year.
 
     Each non-employee director receives an annual grant of units valued at $50,000, generally corresponding to the service period between each annual election of the board members. In accordance with this policy, Messrs. Dale A. Brown, Granberry, Lawrence, Sullivan, and Vann received grants of 3,227 units on August 20, 2009 for their service on our general partner’s board of directors during the period of May 2009 to May 2010.
 
     In addition to the annual retainer and units paid to board members, the chairmen of our audit, conflicts, compensation, and nominating and governance committees each received an annual retainer for their additional service. For 2009, Mr. Lawrence received $25,000 as chairman of the audit committee, Mr. Sullivan received $5,000 as chairman of the conflicts committee, Mr. Granberry received $10,000 as chairman of the nominating and governance committee, and Mr. Vann received $15,000 as chairman of the compensation committee. In connection with the review of the proposal of Apollo Management VII, LP to acquire all of the Partnership’s outstanding units, each member of the conflicts committee that received a monthly retainer fee in addition to a fee for each meeting attended. For each of the months of March, April, May and June 2009, Messrs. Granberry, Lawrence and Vann received a $12,500 retainer fee and Mr. Sullivan received a $17,500 retainer fee. Additionally, each director received $38,000 for his attendance at the conflicts committee meetings held during the months of March, April, May and June 2009.
 
34
 


     Our general partner’s directors are eligible to receive awards under the LTIP but do not participate in any non-equity incentive plan, pension plan, or deferred compensation plan. Each non-employee director and independent director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the board of directors or committees. Each director will be indemnified by us for actions associated with being a director to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law.
 
     The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our general partner’s directors during 2009.
 
Director Compensation for the 2009 Fiscal Year
 
Change in
Pension
Value and
Fees Non-Equity Nonqualified
Earned Unit Option Incentive Plan Deferred All Other
or Paid Awards Awards Compensation Compensation Compensation Total
      Year       in Cash ($)(a)       ($)(b)       ($)       ($)       Earnings       ($)       ($)
Dale A. Brown 2009 $ 56,500 $ 50,000   $ 106,500
William R. Granberry   2009   $ 166,500   $ 50,000     $ 216,500
G. Larry Lawrence 2009 $ 180,000 $ 50,000     $ 230,000
William D. Sullivan 2009 $ 172,500 $ 50,000 $ 222,500
Kyle D. Vann 2009 $ 162,500 $ 50,000 $ 212,500
____________________
 
(a)        For 2009, Mr. Lawrence received $25,000 as chairman of the audit committee, Mr. Sullivan received $5,000 as chairman of the conflicts committee, Mr. Granberry received $10,000 as chairman of the nominating and governance committee, and Mr. Vann received $15,000 as chairman of the compensation committee. Each member of the conflicts committee received a monthly retainer fee in addition to a fee for each meeting attended. For each of the months of March, April, May and June 2009, Messrs. Granberry, Lawrence and Vann received a $12,500 retainer fee and Mr. Sullivan received a $17,500 retainer fee. Additionally, each member of the special conflicts committee received a total of $38,000 for his attendance at the conflicts committee meetings held during the months of March, April, May and June 2009.
 
(b) On August 20, 2009, each non-employee director was awarded an annual unit grant valued at $50,000, or 3,227 units.
 
MANAGEMENT
 
Executive Officers
 
     The following table shows information for the executive officers of our general partner.
 
Name         Age       Position with Legacy Reserves GP, LLC
Cary D. Brown 43 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Steven H. Pruett   48   President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Kyle A. McGraw 50 Director, Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land
Paul T. Horne 48 Executive Vice President of Operations
William M. Morris 57 Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller

     Officers of our general partner serve at the discretion of the board of directors. None of our executive officers and directors are related except for Dale A. Brown and Cary D. Brown, who are father and son.
 
     Cary D. Brown is Chairman of the board of directors of our general partner and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner and has served in such capacities since our founding in October 2005. Prior to October 2005, Mr. Brown co-founded two businesses, Moriah Resources, Inc. and Petroleum Strategies, Inc. Moriah Resources, Inc. was formed in 1992 to acquire oil and natural gas reserves. Petroleum Strategies, Inc. was formed in 1991 to serve as a qualified intermediary in connection with the execution of Section 1031 transactions for major oil companies, public independents and private oil and natural gas companies.
 
35
 


     Mr. Brown has served as Executive Vice President of Petroleum Strategies, Inc. since its inception in 1991. Mr. Brown served as an auditor for Grant Thornton in Midland, Texas from January 1990 to June 1991 and for Touche Ross in Houston, Texas from June 1989 to December 1990. In 1995, Mr. Brown also co-founded and organized with Mr. Dale Brown, The Executive Oil Conference, which is held in Midland, Texas and draws over 300 oil and natural gas industry professionals each year. Mr. Brown has a Bachelor of Business Administration degree, with honors, from Abilene Christian University. Mr. Brown has 20 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry with 18 years of experience in the Permian Basin.
 
     Steven H. Pruett is President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of our general partner and has served as President and Chief Financial Officer since our founding in October 2005. From January 2005 until he joined our general partner, Mr. Pruett served as a Managing Director at Quantum Energy Partners, a private equity group focused in the energy industry. From August 2004 to December 2004, Mr. Pruett was the President of PSI Management LLC, where his focus was investing in oil and natural gas projects in the United States. From June 2002 to July 2004, Mr. Pruett was the President of Petroleum Place and its subsidiary, P2 Energy Solutions, an acquisition and divestment advisor and accounting and land software systems developer serving over 100 public oil and natural gas companies. From June 2001 to June 2002, Mr. Pruett was employed by First Permian as its President and Chief Executive Officer until its sale to Energen Corporation. From April 2000 to May 2001, Mr. Pruett served as a Vice President of Enron North America Corp., where he managed 12 active oil and natural gas joint ventures and served as chairman of CGAS, an Appalachian oil and natural gas company. From April 1995 to March 2000, Mr. Pruett was President and Chief Executive Officer of First Reserve Oil & Gas Co., a Permian Basin and Oklahoma oil and natural gas property acquisition and development company. Mr. Pruett has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering, with high honors, from the University of Texas and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School where he was a Baker Scholar. Mr. Pruett has 26 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry with 21 years of experience in the Permian Basin.
 
     Kyle A. McGraw is a member of the board of directors of our general partner and also serves as the Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land of our general partner and has served in such capacities since our founding in October 2005. Mr. McGraw joined Brothers Production Company in 1983, and has served as its General Manager since 1991 and became President in 2003. During his 23-year tenure at Brothers Production Company, Mr. McGraw has served in numerous capacities including reservoir and production engineering, acquisition evaluation and land management. Mr. McGraw has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University. Mr. McGraw has 27 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry in the Permian Basin.
 
     Paul T. Horne is Executive Vice President of Operations of our general partner and has served in such capacity since our founding in October 2005. From January 2000 to the present, Mr. Horne has served as Operations Manager of Moriah Resources, Inc. From January 1985 to January 2000, Mr. Horne worked for Mobil E&P U.S. Inc. in a variety of petroleum engineering and operations management roles primarily in the Permian Basin. Mr. Horne has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University. Mr. Horne has 26 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry with 24 years of experience in the Permian Basin.
 
     William M. Morris is Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of our general partner and has served in such capacity since our founding in October 2005. From January 2000 until he joined our general partner in October 2005, Mr. Morris served as Financial Reporting Manager of Titan Exploration Inc. (from January 2000 through May 2000) and continued in that position upon Titan Exploration Inc.’s merger with the Permian Basin Business Unit of Unocal to form Pure Resources, Inc. (from May 2000 to January 2003) and most recently as a Financial Manager for Pure Resources, Inc. (from February 2003 to September 2005). Mr. Morris is a certified public accountant. Mr. Morris has a Bachelor of Science degree in Applied Mathematics, with honors, from the School of Engineering and Applied Science of the University of Virginia and a Master of Business Administration degree from Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business Administration of the University of Virginia. Mr. Morris has 29 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry with 28 years of experience in the Permian Basin.
 
36
 


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
     The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our units as of April 1, 2010 for:
     The amounts and percentage of units beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of April 1, 2010. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no economic interest.
 
     Except as indicated by footnote, to our knowledge the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all units shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.
 
     Percentage of total units beneficially owned is based on 40,070,201 units outstanding as of April 1, 2010. The business address for the beneficial owners listed below is 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701.
 
Units Beneficially Owned
Number       Percentage
Name of Beneficial Owner
       Moriah Properties, Ltd.(a) 4,391,408 10.6 %
       Brothers Production Properties, Ltd. 2,356,199 5.9
       Brothers Production Company, Inc.(b) 2,546,720 6.4
Directors and Officers
       Dale A. Brown(c) 5,527,713 13.8
       Cary D. Brown(d)(e) 5,379,345 13.4
       William R. Granberry 14,810   *
       Kyle A. McGraw(d)(f) 374,386 *
       Kyle D. Vann 53,227 *
       William D. Sullivan 17,227 *
       G. Larry Lawrence 9,227 *
       Steven H. Pruett(d)(g) 301,666 *
       Paul T. Horne(d)(h) 128,742 *
       William M. Morris(d) 5,077 *
       All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons) 7,386,340 18.4 %
____________________
 
*
Percentage of units beneficially owned does not exceed 1%.
 
(a)        1,500,000 units are pledged as collateral pursuant to a customary brokerage arrangement.
 
(b) Brothers Production Company, Inc., in its capacity as general partner of Brothers Production Properties, Ltd., is deemed to beneficially own the units held by Brothers Production Properties, Ltd. as well as 190,521 units it holds directly.
 
37
 


(c)        Mr. Dale A. Brown is deemed to beneficially own 33,672 units owned by Moriah Resources, Inc. and the 4,391,408 units held by Moriah Properties, Ltd., as well as 542,281 units held by DAB Resources, Ltd. Mr. Dale A. Brown and Mr. Cary D. Brown share voting and investment power with respect to the units held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. and Moriah Resources, Inc. Mr. Dale A. Brown directly owns 560,3352 units.
 
(d) Does not include grants of 52,121 phantom units to Cary D. Brown, grants of 38,539 phantom units to Steven H. Pruett, grants of 23,601 phantom units to Kyle A. McGraw, grants of 27,805 phantom units to Paul T. Horne and grants of 16,424 phantom units to William M. Morris.
 
(e) Mr. Cary D. Brown is deemed to beneficially own 33,672 units owned by Moriah Resources, Inc. and the 4,391,408 units held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. Mr. Dale A. Brown and Mr. Cary D. Brown share voting and investment power with respect to the units held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. and Moriah Resources, Inc. Mr. Cary D. Brown directly owns 954,265 units.
 
(f) Mr. McGraw is deemed to beneficially own the 374,386 units held by Kyle A. McGraw Family Holdings, Ltd.
 
(g) Mr. Pruett is deemed to beneficially own the 296,935 units held by SHP Capital LP.
 
(h) Mr. Horne is deemed to beneficially own the 121,684 units held by H2K Holdings, Ltd.
 
     The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of equity interests of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC:
 
Name of Beneficial Owner   Equity Interest
Dale A. Brown(a) 61.7 %
Cary D. Brown(a)(b) 61.7
Kyle A. McGraw
William R. Granberry
Steven H. Pruett 2.2
Kyle D. Vann
William D. Sullivan
G. Larry Lawrence
Paul T. Horne 0.5
William M. Morris
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons) 64.4 %
____________________
 
(a)        Includes a 56.6% equity interest held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. and a 5.1% equity interest held by DAB Resources, Ltd.
 
(b) Includes a 56.6% equity interest held by Moriah Properties, Ltd.
 
(c) Owned by SHP Capital LP, an entity controlled by Mr. Pruett.
 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
 
     Our founding investors, including members of our general partner’s management team and directors, own an aggregate of 10,560,923 units, which represents a 26.4% limited partner interest in us. In addition, our general partner owns less than a 0.1% general partner interest in us.
 
Distributions and Payments to Our General Partner and Its Affiliates
 
     The following table summarizes the distributions and payments made or to be made by us to our general partner and our founding investors in connection with our formation, ongoing operation and any liquidation of the Partnership. These distributions and payments were determined by and among affiliated entities and, consequently, are not the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
 
38
 


Distributions of available cash to our general
       partner and our founding investors
 
     

We will generally make cash distributions of approximately 99.9% to the unitholders pro rata, including our founding investors and members of our general partner’s management team and directors, as the holders of an aggregate of 10,560,923 units, and approximately 0.1% to our general partner.
 
Assuming we have sufficient available cash to pay the full amount of our current quarterly distribution on all of our outstanding units for four quarters, our general partner would receive an annual distribution of approximately $38,087 on its approximate 0.1% general partner interest, and our founding investors, including members of our general partner’s management team and directors, would receive approximately $22.0 million on their units.
   
Payments to our general partner
 
Our general partner is entitled to reimbursement for all expenses it incurs on our behalf. Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will determine the expenses that are allocable to us in good faith.
 
Withdrawal or removal of our general
       partner
 

If our general partner withdraws or is removed, its general partner interest will either be sold to the new general partner for cash or converted into units, for an amount equal to the fair market value of that interest.
 
Distribution Upon Liquidation
 
Liquidation
Upon our liquidation, the partners, including our general partner, will be entitled to receive liquidating distributions according to their respective capital account balances.
 
Transactions with Related Persons
 
Office Leases
 
     TCTB Partners, a limited partnership of which Dale A. Brown, Cary D. Brown and Kyle A. McGraw are limited partners, owns the office building in which the principal offices of the Moriah Group, Brothers Group and Petroleum Strategies, Inc. are located. We assumed the existing leases in 2006 for 15,000 square feet of office space. The annual rental payable to TCTB Partners is $102,528, without respect to property taxes and insurance. We also sublease 3,117 square feet of our space to Petroleum Strategies, Inc. at the same rate per square foot that we are charged by TCTB Partners.
 
     In August 2006 we entered in to an additional lease of 20,000 square feet, having an initial five year term with a five year renewal option, with TCTB Partners. Under this additional lease, we occupied 10,000 square feet in 2006, and another 10,000 square feet in June 2007. From September 2006 through May 2007, the monthly rent exclusive of property taxes and insurance was $2,333. From June 2007 through August 2009, the monthly rent exclusive of property taxes and insurance was $5,833. From September 2009 through December 2009 the monthly rent exclusive of property taxes and insurance was $11,667.
 
Other
 
     Travis McGraw, the brother of Kyle A. McGraw, Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land and a member of the board of directors of our general partner, is an employee of the Partnership serving as our Marketing, Revenue, and Regulatory Reporting Coordinator. We paid Travis McGraw $124,393 as compensation for his services during the year ended December 31, 2009. Travis McGraw’s current annual salary is $110,931 plus a discretionary, non-guaranteed bonus. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2009,
 
39
 


we retained Scott McGraw, also the brother of Kyle McGraw, as an independent contractor to perform engineering services. We paid Scott McGraw $56,000 during this time as compensation for his services and expect to pay him approximately $15,000 per quarter in 2010 for his contract engineering services.
 
Review, Approval and Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
 
     Our partnership agreement contains specific provisions that address potential conflicts of interest between our general partner and its affiliates, on one hand, and us and our subsidiaries, on the other hand. Whenever such a conflict of interest arises, our general partner will resolve the conflict. Our general partner may, but is not required to, seek the approval of such resolution from the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner, which is comprised of independent directors. Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under the partnership agreement or its duties to us or to our unitholders if the resolution of the conflict is:
     If our general partner does not seek approval from the conflicts committee and the board of directors of our general partner determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the Partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. Unless the resolution of a conflict is specifically provided for in our partnership agreement, our general partner or the conflicts committee may consider any factors it determines in good faith to consider when resolving a conflict. When our partnership agreement requires someone to act in good faith, it requires that person to reasonably believe that he is acting in the best interests of the Partnership, unless the context otherwise requires.
 
     In addition, our code of ethics requires that all employees, including employees, officers and members of the board of directors of our general partner, avoid or disclose any activity that may interfere, or have the appearance of interfering, with their responsibilities to us and our unitholders.
 
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
 
     No current executive officer served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity (other than our subsidiaries) that has or has had one or more executive officers serving as a member of the board of directors of our general partner or the compensation committee of our general partner.
 
40
 


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
     BDO Seidman, LLP was our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2009 audit. In connection with this audit, we entered into an engagement agreement with BDO Seidman, LLP, which sets forth the terms by which BDO Seidman, LLP will perform audit services for us. That agreement is subject to alternative dispute resolution procedures. A representative of BDO Seidman, LLP will attend our annual meeting. The representative will have the opportunity to make a statement if he desires to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.
 
     The audit committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, and other services. Pre-approval is detailed as to the specific service or category of service and is subject to a specific approval.
 
     The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants, BDO Seidman, LLP, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were:
 
Year Ended December 31,
2009       2008
Audit Fees $ 659,325 $ 996,385
Audit Related Fees $ 12,150   $ 42,885
Tax Fees $ $
All Other Fees (Executive compensation studies) $ 40,853 $ 24,900
       Total $ 712,328 $ 1,064,170
 
     In the above table, “Audit Fees” are fees we paid for professional services for the audit of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K or for services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and fees for Sarbanes-Oxley 404 audit work. “Audit-Related Fees” are fees billed for assurance and related services in connection with acquisition transactions and related regulatory filings.
 
     In regard to executive compensation services, as required by the PCAOB, all services are approved in advance by the audit committee. All compensation consulting services are provided under the terms of a separate engagement letter that describes the approved services and the company’s acceptance of its responsibilities. Under the terms of the engagement, BDO does not perform management functions or make any management decisions. The company must designate an individual with suitable skill, knowledge and experience to oversee the consulting engagement, evaluate the adequacy and results of the services performed, accept responsibility for the results of the services and establish and maintain internal controls and monitor ongoing activities.
 
41
 


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009
 
     The audit committee is responsible for overseeing the Partnership’s financial reporting process, reviewing the financial information that will be provided to unitholders and others, monitoring internal accounting controls, selecting our independent auditors and providing to the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, such additional information and materials as we may deem necessary to make the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, aware of significant financial matters. We operate under a written audit committee charter adopted by the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC.
 
     We have reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Partnership for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 with management and BDO Seidman, LLP, our independent auditor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. In addition, we have discussed with BDO Seidman, LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. We also have received the written disclosures and the letter from BDO Seidman, LLP, as required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and we have discussed the independence of BDO Seidman, LLP with that firm.
 
     We, the members of the audit committee, are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting nor are we experts in the fields of accounting or auditing, including determination of auditor independence. We rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management and the independent auditors. Accordingly, our oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audit of our financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or that the financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
     Based upon the discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
Members of the audit committee of the Board of
Directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC


G. Larry Lawrence (Chairman)
William D. Sullivan
William R. Granberry
 
42
 


OTHER MATTERS
 
Required Vote
 
     Only holders of units as of the Record Date will be entitled to vote in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A majority of issued and outstanding units as of the Record Date represented at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
 
     Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum, but will not be included in vote totals and will not affect the outcome of the vote. Provided that a quorum is present at the meeting, the director nominees who receive the greatest number of votes cast for election by unitholders entitled to vote therefor will be elected directors by plurality vote.
 
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
     Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, directors, certain officers, and beneficial owners of 10% or more of any class of the Partnership’s units, or Reporting Persons, are required from time to time to file with the SEC and NASDAQ reports of ownership and changes of ownership. Reporting Persons are required to furnish the Partnership with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on its review of forms and written representations received from Reporting Persons by it with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, with the exception of a late Form 4 for Mr. Vann as a result of the erroneous identification of Mr. Vann’s Legacy units in an automatic dividend reinvestment plan administered by Mr. Vann’s IRA account administrator which is described in further detail below, the Partnership believes that all filing requirements applicable to the general partner’s officers and directors and the Partnership’s greater than 10% unitholders have been met.
 
     On February 16, 2010, Mr. Vann filed a Form 5 to report two transactions on September 4, 2009 that resulted in the subtraction of 974 units representing limited partner interests of Legacy Reserves LP from the units held in Mr. Vann’s IRA account. The Form 4 dated August 20, 2009 reported two transactions that occurred on November 13, 2008 and February 17, 2009 in which the reporting person acquired 535 units and 439 units, respectively, pursuant to an automatic reinvestment of distributions received on units held in the reporting person’s IRA account. On September 4, 2009, the IRA account administrator unwound the automatic distribution reinvestments that occurred on November 13, 2008 and February 17, 2009, crediting the original cash purchase prices of $9.73 per unit and $12.47 per unit, respectively, to the reporting person’s money market fund. Mr. Vann did not authorize his IRA account administrator to take such action at such time and was therefore unable to report such transaction in a timely manner.
 
Unitholder Proposals
 
     Any unitholder who wishes to submit a proposal for action to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2011 annual meeting of unitholders must submit the proposal to us on or before December 13, 2010. Any such proposals should be timely sent to our Secretary at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701. Such proposal must meet all of the requirements of the SEC to be eligible for inclusion in our 2011 proxy materials. Furthermore, proposals by unitholders may be considered untimely if we have not received notice of the proposal within the deadline set under the SEC rules. In no event are limited partners allowed to vote on matters that would cause the limited partners to be deemed to be taking part in the management and control of our business and affairs so as to jeopardize the limited partners’ limited liability under the Delaware limited partnership act or the law of any other state in which we are qualified to do business.
 
Communications with Directors or the Board of Directors
 
     Unitholders wishing to communicate with the general partner’s board of directors should send any communication to our Secretary at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701. Any such communication should state the number of units beneficially owned by the unitholder making the communication. Communications received are distributed to the board or to any individual director or directors as appropriate, depending upon the directions and the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. The board of directors has directed the Secretary to forward such communication to the full board of directors or to any
 
43
 


individual director or directors to whom the communication is directed, excluding only any communication that does not relate to the business or affairs of the Company or the function or duties of the board of directors or any of its committees, or is a job inquiry or an advertisement or other commercial solicitation or communication.
 
Availability of Annual Report
 
     The Annual Report to Unitholders of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2009, including audited financial statements, is enclosed with this proxy statement but does not constitute a part of the proxy soliciting material. The Partnership will furnish a copy of its Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009, without exhibits, free of charge to each person who forwards a written request to our Secretary at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701.
 
44
 


 
Using a black ink pen mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
      x

Annual Meeting Proxy Card
 
¨ PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. ¨
A   
Election of Directors – The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed.
+
 
1.      Nominees to serve a one-year term: 01 – Cary D. Brown
04 – G. Larry Lawrence
07 – Kyle D. Vann
02 – Kyle A. McGraw
05 – William D. Sullivan
03 – Dale A. Brown
06 – William R. Granberry
 
o Mark here to vote FOR all nominees              
          
o Mark here to WITHHOLD vote from all nominees              
     
o For all EXCEPT – To withhold a vote for one or more nominees, mark the box to the left and the corresponding numbered box(es) to the right. 01
o
02
o
03
o
04
o
05
o
06
o
07
o
 
 
 
 
 
 
B   
Non-Voting Items
Change of Address  Please print new address below
 
 
  
 
 
 
C   
Authorized Signatures – This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. – Date and Sign Below
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.
 
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) – Please print date below.   Signature 1 – Please keep signature within the box.   Signature 2 – Please keep signature within the box.
/ /                
 

 

¨ PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. ¨

Proxy – Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas 79701
 
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEGACY RESERVES GP, LLC FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS OF LEGACY RESERVES LP TO BE HELD ON MAY 12, 2010
 
The undersigned hereby appoints Steven H. Pruett and William M. Morris, and each of them, any one of whom may act without joinder of the other, with full power of substitution, resubstitution and ratification, attorneys and proxies of the undersigned to vote all units representing limited partnership interests of Legacy Reserves LP which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the annual meeting of unitholders to be held at the Midland Petroleum Club located at 501 W. Wall on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 10:30 a.m., Midland, Texas time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in the manner stated herein as to the matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, and in their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.
 
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE HEREON. IF NO CONTRARY SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED IN ITEM 1 AND, IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.
 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEGACY RESERVES GP, LLC RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
 
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS AND THE PROXY STATEMENT FURNISHED HEREWITH. PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED, PRE-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE.
 
(To be Voted and Signed on Reverse Side)