Edgar Filing: PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORP

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 814-00736

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT

CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


MARYLAND		20-8250744
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

590 Madison Avenue, 15^th Floor New York, N.Y.		10022
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(212)-905-1000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.

The number of shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of May 5, 2010 was 31,558,772.

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements		2

Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009		2

Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		3

Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		4

Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		5

Schedules of Investments as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009		6

Notes to Financial Statements		12

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		22

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		23

Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		30

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		30

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		31

Item 1A. Risk Factors		31

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		31

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		31

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		31

Item 5. Other Information		31

Item 6. Exhibits		32

SIGNATURES		33

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

We are filing this Report in compliance with Rule 13a-13 promulgated by the SEC. In this Report, “PennantPark Investment”, “we”, “our” and “us” refer to PennantPark Investment Corporation unless the context otherwise requires.

Item 1.

Financial Statements

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


	March 31, 2010 (unaudited)			September 30, 2009
Assets
Investments at fair value
Non-controlled, non-affiliated investments, at fair value (cost—$563,678,210 and $479,909,805, respectively)	$	571,402,076		$	453,644,335
Non-controlled, affiliated investments, at fair value (cost—$17,761,718 and $17,378,081, respectively)		16,295,276			16,115,738

Total of Investments, at fair value (cost—$581,439,928 and $497,287,886, respectively)		587,697,352			469,760,073
Cash equivalents		934,570			33,247,666
Interest receivable		8,103,243			5,539,056
Receivables for investments sold		4,862,500			2,726,007
Prepaid expenses and other assets		788,246			1,108,567

Total assets		602,385,911			512,381,369


Liabilities
Distributions payable		8,205,281			5,056,505
Payable for investments purchased		24,500,000			19,489,525
Unfunded investments		13,342,129			6,331,385
Credit facility payable, at fair value (cost—$225,500,000 and $225,100,000, respectively) (See Notes 5 and 10)		201,567,008			175,475,380
Interest payable on credit facility		51,451			72,788
Management fee payable (See Note 3)		2,772,206			2,220,110
Performance-based incentive fee payable (See Note 3)		1,764,592			1,508,164
Accrued other expenses		971,346			1,647,244

Total liabilities		253,174,013			211,801,101


Net Assets
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 31,558,772 and 25,368,772 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		31,559			25,369
Paid-in capital in excess of par		384,602,224			327,062,304
Undistributed net investment income		1,626,997			1,890,235
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and cash equivalents		(67,239,298	)		(50,494,447	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		6,257,424			(27,527,813	)
Net unrealized depreciation on credit facility (See Note 5)		23,932,992			49,624,620

Total net assets	$	349,211,898		$	300,580,268

Total liabilities and net assets	$	602,385,911		$	512,381,369

Net asset value per share	$	11.07		$	11.85

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended March 31,						Six months ended March 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Investment income:
From non-controlled, non-affiliated investments:
Interest	$	12,783,931		$	10,084,577		$	25,735,164		$	21,796,587
Other		412,482			14,317			732,085			14,317
From non-controlled, affiliated investments:
Interest		328,580			325,820			656,229			690,319

Total investment income		13,524,993			10,424,714			27,123,478			22,501,223

Expenses:
Base management fee (See Note 3)		2,772,132			1,747,235			5,296,785			3,567,423
Performance-based incentive fee (See Note 3)		1,764,607			1,320,317			3,573,987			2,762,299
Interest and other credit facility expenses		838,275			1,188,326			1,656,958			3,025,546
Administrative services expenses (See Note 3)		539,619			356,093			1,097,123			976,495
Other general and administrative expenses		560,974			546,210			1,104,389			1,134,998

Expenses before taxes		6,475,607			5,158,181			12,729,242			11,466,761

Excise tax (See Note 2)		(9,072	)		—			97,890			—

Total expenses		6,466,535			5,158,181			12,827,132			11,466,761

Net investment income		7,058,458			5,266,533			14,296,346			11,034,462

Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and credit facility:
Net realized loss on non-controlled, non-affiliated investments		(140,986	)		(5,258,194	)		(16,744,851	)		(6,145,264	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Non-controlled, non-affiliated investments		9,895,674			27,887,439			33,989,336			(12,775,652	)
Non-controlled, affiliated investments		8,425			(627,183	)		(204,099	)		(2,320,369	)
Credit facility unrealized (appreciation) depreciation (See Note 5)		(19,852,714	)		14,930,395			(25,691,628	)		20,649,089

Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation		(9,948,615	)		42,190,651			8,093,609			5,553,068

Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain from investments and credit facility		(10,089,601	)		36,932,457			(8,651,242	)		(592,196	)

Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	(3,031,143	)	$	42,198,990		$	5,645,104		$	10,442,266

Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share (See Note 8)	$	(0.11	)	$	2.00		$	0.21		$	0.49
Net investment income per common share		0.26			0.25			0.54			0.52

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

(Unaudited)


	Six months ended March 31,
	2010			2009
Increase in net assets from operations:
Net investment income	$	14,296,346		$	11,034,462
Net realized loss on investments		(16,744,851	)		(6,145,264	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		33,785,237			(15,096,021	)
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on credit facility		(25,691,628	)		20,649,089

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations		5,645,104			10,442,266
Distributions to Stockholders:
Distributions from net investment income		(14,657,474	)		(10,113,011	)
Capital Share Transactions:
Issuance of shares of common stock, net of offering costs		57,644,000			—

Total increase in net assets		48,631,630			329,255


Net Assets:

Beginning of period		300,580,268			210,728,260
Cumulative effect of adoption of fair value option (See Note 5)		—			41,796,000

Adjusted beginning of period balance		300,580,268			252,524,260
End of period	$	349,211,898		$	252,853,515

Undistributed net investment income, at period end		1,626,997			318,791
Capital Share Activity:
Shares issued in connection with public offerings		6,190,000			—

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	5,645,104		$	10,442,266
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities:
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments		(33,785,237	)		15,096,021
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on credit facility		25,691,628			(20,649,089	)
Net realized loss on investments		16,744,851			6,145,264
Net accretion of discount and amortization of premium		(2,000,365	)		(1,037,219	)
Purchase of investments		(119,033,410	)		(15,297,151	)
Payments-in-kind		(3,354,193	)		(1,792,875	)
Proceeds from dispositions of investments		23,491,075			5,536,574
(Increase) in interest receivable		(2,564,187	)		(688,236	)
(Increase) in receivables for investments sold		(2,136,493	)		—
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets		320,321			256,981
Increase in payables for investments purchased		5,010,475			9,257,269
Increase in unfunded investments		7,010,744			4,665,231
(Decrease) in interest payable on credit facility		(21,337	)		(651,189	)
Increase in management fee payable		552,096			1,661,339
Increase in performance-based incentive fee payable		256,428			1,197,284
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses		(675,898	)		(72,392	)

Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities		(78,848,398	)		14,070,078


Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of shares of common stock, net of offering costs		57,644,000			—
Distributions paid to stockholders		(11,508,698	)		(10,113,011	)
Borrowings under credit facility (See Note 10)		116,000,000			41,300,000
Repayments under credit facility (See Note 10)		(115,600,000	)		(55,600,000	)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		46,535,302			(24,413,011	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(32,313,096	)		(10,342,933	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		33,247,666			40,249,201

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	934,570		$	29,906,268


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information and non-cash financing activity (See Note 5):
Interest paid	$	1,545,142		$	3,543,582
Income taxes paid	$	97,890		$	—
Cumulative effect of adoption of fair value option on credit facility	$	—		$	41,796,000

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)


Issuer Name	Maturity	Industry	Current Coupon		Basis Point Spread Above Index ⁽⁴⁾		Par / Shares		Cost		Fair Value⁽³⁾

Investments in Non-Controlled, Non-Affiliated Portfolio Companies – 163.6%^(1),(2)
Subordinated Debt/Corporate Notes – 56.7%
Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.	03/01/2012	Consumer Products	8.39	%⁽⁶⁾	L+750		$	24,541,792	$	24,017,449	$	23,069,285
Aquilex Holdings, LLC⁽⁵⁾	12/15/2016	Diversified / Conglomerate Services	11.13	%	—			10,000,000		9,605,598		10,750,000
Consolidated Foundries, Inc.	04/17/2015	Aerospace and Defense	14.25	%⁽⁶⁾	—			8,109,468		7,961,162		8,190,563
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc.	03/22/2014	Business Services	14.00	%⁽⁶⁾	—			20,515,227		20,115,539		21,130,684
Da-Lite Screen Company, Inc.⁽⁵⁾	04/01/2015	Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	12.50	%	—			25,000,000		24,328,495		24,312,500
Digicel Limited ^{(5), (10)}	04/01/2014	Telecommunications	12.00	%	—			1,000,000		995,991		1,132,500
i2 Holdings Ltd.⁽¹⁰⁾	06/06/2014	Aerospace and Defense	14.75	%⁽⁶⁾	—			22,968,996		22,633,316		23,026,417
IDQ Holdings, Inc.	05/20/2012	Auto Sector	13.75	%	—			15,000,000		14,769,363		15,000,000
Learning Care Group, Inc.	12/28/2015	Education	13.50	%⁽⁶⁾	—			10,455,885		10,334,438		10,455,885
Realogy Corp.	04/15/2015	Buildings and Real Estate	12.38	%	—			10,000,000		8,986,805		7,275,000
TRAK Acquisition Corp.	12/29/2015	Business Services	15.00	%⁽⁶⁾	—			11,573,472		11,205,768		11,573,472
Trizetto Group, Inc.	10/01/2016	Insurance	13.50	%⁽⁶⁾	—			20,349,340		20,170,101		20,959,820
UP Acquisitions Sub Inc.	02/08/2015	Oil and Gas	13.50	%	—			21,000,000		20,507,457		21,000,000

Total Subordinated Debt/Corporate Notes										195,631,482		197,876,126

Second Lien Secured Debt – 41.1%
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc.	02/07/2015	Energy/Utilities	6.28	%	L+600			13,600,000		13,181,898		12,158,400
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc.	02/07/2015	Energy/Utilities	7.29	%	L+700			12,000,000		11,755,043		11,100,000
Generics International (U.S.), Inc.	04/30/2015	Healthcare, Education and Childcare	7.79	%	L+750			12,000,000		11,957,086		11,640,000
Greatwide Logistics Services, L.L.C.	03/01/2014	Cargo Transport	11.00	%⁽⁶⁾	L+700	⁽⁸⁾		2,436,357		2,436,357		2,448,539
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority⁽⁵⁾	11/01/2017	Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	11.50	%	—			5,000,000		4,818,140		5,325,000
Questex Media Group LLC, Term Loan A	12/15/2014	Other Media	9.50	%	L+650	⁽⁸⁾		3,235,537		3,235,537		3,235,537
Questex Media Group LLC, Term Loan B	12/15/2015	Other Media	11.50	%⁽⁶⁾	L+850	⁽⁸⁾		1,675,694		1,675,694		1,675,694
Realogy Corp.	10/15/2017	Buildings and Real Estate	13.50	%	—			10,000,000		10,000,000		10,955,000
Saint Acquisition Corp.⁽⁵⁾	05/15/2015	Transportation	8.00	%	L+775			10,000,000		9,946,635		9,062,500
Saint Acquisition Corp.⁽⁵⁾	05/15/2017	Transportation	12.50	%	—			19,000,000		16,964,985		17,860,000
Sheridan Holdings, Inc.	06/15/2015	Healthcare, Education and Childcare	6.00	%⁽⁶⁾	L+575			21,500,000		19,036,433		19,672,500
Specialized Technology Resources, Inc.	12/15/2014	Chemical, Plastics and Rubber	7.25	%⁽⁶⁾	L+700			22,500,000		22,489,125		22,500,000
TransFirst Holdings, Inc.	06/15/2015	Financial Services	7.04	%⁽⁶⁾	L+675			17,393,790		16,887,722		15,915,318

Total Second Lien Secured Debt										144,384,655		143,548,488

Preferred Equity/Partnership Interests ⁽⁷⁾– 2.8%
AHC Mezzanine, LLC (Advanstar Inc.)	—	Other Media	—		—			319		318,896		—
CFHC Holdings, Inc., Class A (Consolidated Foundries, Inc.)	—	Aerospace and Defense	12.00	%	—			797		797,288		1,007,863
CT Technologies Holdings, LLC (CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc.)	—	Business Services	9.00	%	—			144,377		144,376		144,376
i2 Holdings Ltd.⁽¹⁰⁾	—	Aerospace and Defense	12.00	%	—			4,137,240		4,137,239		4,694,215
TZ Holdings, L.P., Series A (Trizetto Group, Inc.)	—	Insurance	—		—			686		685,820		685,820
TZ Holdings, L.P., Series B (Trizetto Group, Inc.)	—	Insurance	6.50	%	—			1,312		1,312,006		1,453,128
UP Holdings Inc., Class A-1 (UP Acquisitions Sub Inc.)	—	Oil and Gas	8.00	%	—			91,608		2,499,066		1,889,134

Total Preferred Equity/Partnership Interests										9,894,691		9,874,536

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS – (Continued)

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)


Issuer Name	Maturity	Industry	Current Coupon		Basis Point Spread Above Index⁽⁴⁾		Par /Shares		Cost		Fair Value⁽³⁾
Common Equity/Warrants/Partnership Interests ⁽⁷⁾ – 5.1%
CFHC Holdings, Inc. (Consolidated Foundries, Inc.)	—	Aerospace and Defense	—		—		$	1,627	$	16,271	$	452,381
CT Technologies Holdings, LLC (CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc.)	—	Business Services	—		—			5,556		3,200,000		6,975,042
i2 Holdings Ltd.⁽¹⁰⁾	—	Aerospace and Defense	—		—			457,322		454,030		—
Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation	—	Oil and Gas	—		—			1,055,932		2,464,999		3,157,237
QMG HoldCo, LLC, Class A (Questex Media Group, Inc.)	—	Other Media	—		—			4,325		1,306,167		1,076,765
QMG HoldCo, LLC, Class B (Questex Media Group, Inc.)	—	Other Media	—		—			531		—		132,199
TRAK Acquisition Corp. (warrants)	12/29/2019	Business Services	—		—			3,500		29,400		733,447
Transportation 100 Holdco, L.L.C. (Greatwide Logistics Services, L.L.C)	—	Cargo Transport	—		—			137,923		2,433,112		4,002,413
TZ Holdings, L.P. (Trizetto Group, Inc.)	—	Insurance	—		—			2		6,467		1,247,171
UP Holdings Inc. (UP Acquisitions Sub Inc.)	—	Oil and Gas	—		—			91,608		916		—

Total Common Equity/Warrants/Partnership Interests										9,911,362		17,776,655


First Lien Secured Debt – 57.9%
1-800 Contacts, Inc.	03/04/2015	Distribution	7.70	%	P+295	⁽⁸⁾		13,859,649		11,950,695		13,721,052
Ceva Group PLC^{(5), (10)}	10/01/2016	Logistics	11.63	%	—			7,500,000		7,294,823		8,006,250
Ceva Group PLC^{(5), (10)}	04/01/2018	Logistics	11.50	%	—			1,000,000		987,205		1,037,500
Chester Downs and Marina, LLC	07/31/2016	Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	12.38	%	L+988	⁽⁸⁾		9,625,000		9,096,997		9,997,969
Columbus International, Inc.^{(5), (10)}	11/20/2014	Communication	11.50	%	—			10,000,000		10,000,000		10,950,000
EnviroSolutions, Inc.	07/07/2012	Environmental Services	12.00	%^(6),(7)	P+775	⁽⁸⁾		14,228,928		13,445,577		10,771,298
EnviroSolutions, Inc.⁽⁹⁾	11/10/2010	Environmental Services	—		—			6,666,666		6,666,666		6,666,666
Fairway Group Acquisition Company	10/01/2014	Grocery	12.00	%	L+950	⁽⁸⁾		9,975,000		9,690,958		9,900,187
Hanley-Wood, L.L.C.	03/08/2014	Other Media	2.53	%	L+225			8,797,500		8,797,500		5,252,107
Headwaters Incorporated ⁽⁵⁾	11/01/2014	Diversified /Conglomerate Manufacturing	11.38	%	—			3,000,000		2,973,923		3,131,250
Hughes Network Systems, L.L.C.	04/15/2014	Telecommunications	2.81	%	L+250			5,000,000		5,000,000		4,725,000
Instant Web, Inc.	08/07/2014	Printing and Publishing	14.50	%	L+950	⁽⁸⁾		25,000,000		24,500,000		25,000,000
Jacuzzi Brands Corp.	02/07/2014	Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	2.50	%	L+225			9,781,081		9,781,081		7,922,676
Lyondell Chemical Co.	06/03/2010	Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber	13.00	%	L+1,000	⁽⁸⁾		12,668,615		13,025,033		13,101,945
Lyondell Chemical Co. ⁽⁹⁾	06/03/2010	Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber	—		—			6,331,385		6,504,901		6,547,950
Mattress Holding Corp.	01/18/2014	Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	2.69	%	L+225			3,890,250		3,890,250		3,209,456
National Bedding Co., L.L.C.	02/28/2013	Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	2.33	%	L+200			1,790,000		1,790,365		1,737,464
Penton Media, Inc.	08/01/2014	Other Media	5.00	%⁽⁶⁾	L+400	⁽⁸⁾		4,850,786		4,850,786		3,601,708
Philosophy, Inc.	03/16/2014	Consumer Products	2.25	%	L+200			1,426,506		1,426,506		1,323,084
Questex Media Group LLC	12/16/2012	Other Media	10.50	%	L+650	⁽⁸⁾		56,730		56,730		56,730
Questex Media Group LLC⁽⁹⁾	12/16/2012	Other Media	—		—			344,078		344,078		344,078
Rexnord, L.L.C.	07/19/2013	Manufacturing/Basic Industry	2.50	%	L+225			2,873,033		2,873,033		2,736,564
Sitel, L.L.C.	01/30/2014	Business Services	5.75	%	L+550			1,623,261		1,623,261		1,594,854
Sugarhouse HSP Gaming Prop.	09/23/2014	Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	11.25	%	L+825	⁽⁸⁾		29,500,000		28,683,880		29,131,250
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.	10/12/2014	Cargo Transportation	6.50	%	L+450	⁽⁸⁾		14,873,451		10,522,139		12,939,903
World Color Press Inc.⁽¹⁰⁾	07/21/2012	Printing and Publishing	9.00	%	P+500	⁽⁸⁾		3,487,361		3,215,489		3,519,330
Yonkers Racing Corp.⁽⁵⁾	07/15/2016	Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	11.38	%	—			5,000,000		4,864,144		5,400,000

Total First Lien Secured Debt										203,856,020		202,326,271

Investments in Non-Controlled, Non-Affiliated Portfolio Companies										563,678,210		571,402,076

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS – (Continued)

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)


Issuer Name	Maturity	Industry	Current Coupon		Basis Point Spread Above Index⁽⁴⁾	Par / Shares		Cost		Fair Value⁽³⁾

Investments in Non-Controlled, Affiliated Portfolio Companies – 4.7%^(1),(2)
Subordinated Debt/Corporate Notes – 1.5%
Performance Holdings, Inc.	07/02/2014	Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment	14.25	%⁽⁶⁾	—	$	5,446,061	$	5,261,718	$	5,364,370

Second Lien Secured Debt – 2.4%
Performance, Inc.	07/02/2013	Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment	6.00	%	L+575		8,750,000		8,750,000		8,264,375

Common Equity/Partnership Interest⁽⁷⁾ – 0.8 %
NCP-Performance (Performance Holdings, Inc.)	—	Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment	—		—		37,500		3,750,000		2,666,531

Investments in Non-Controlled, Affiliated Portfolio Companies									17,761,718		16,295,276

Total Investments – 168.3%									581,439,928		587,697,352

Cash Equivalents – 0.3%							934,570		934,570		934,570

Total Investments and Cash Equivalents – 168.6%								$	582,374,498	$	588,631,922

Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – (68.6)%											(239,420,024	)
Net Assets – 100.0%										$	349,211,898

(1)	As used in this Schedule of Investments and in accordance with the 1940 Act, “non-controlled” means we own less than 25% of a portfolio company’s voting securities.

(2)	As used in this Schedule of Investments and in accordance with the 1940 Act, “non-affiliated” means we own less than 5% of a portfolio company’s voting securities and “affiliated” means that we own 5% or more, but less than 25%, of a portfolio company’s voting securities.

(3)	Valued based on our accounting policy (see Note 2 to our financial statements).

(4)	Represents floating rate instruments that accrue interest at a predetermined spread relative to an index, typically the applicable London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR or “L”) or Prime Rate (Prime or “P”).

(5)	Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. The security may be resold in transactions that are exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.

(6)	Coupon is payable in cash and/or in-kind (“PIK”).

(7)	Non-income producing securities.

(8)	Coupon is subject to a LIBOR or Prime rate floor.

(9)	Represents the purchase of a security with delayed settlement. This security does not have a basis point spread above an index.

(10)	Non-U.S. company or principal place of business outside the U.S.

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


Issuer Name	Maturity	Industry	Current Coupon		Basis Point Spread Above Index⁽⁴⁾		Par / Shares		Cost		Fair Value⁽³⁾
Investments in Non-Controlled, Non-Affiliated Portfolio Companies – 150.9%^(1),(2)
Subordinated Debt/Corporate Notes – 50.6%
Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.	03/01/2012	Consumer Products	8.27	%⁽⁶⁾	L+750		$	23,572,133	$	22,930,475	$	21,497,875
Consolidated Foundries, Inc.	04/17/2015	Aerospace and Defense	14.25	%⁽⁶⁾	—			8,109,468		7,952,769		8,190,563
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc.	03/22/2014	Business Services	14.00	%⁽⁶⁾	—			20,311,603		19,875,880		20,463,940
Digicel Limited ⁽⁵⁾	04/01/2014	Telecommunications	12.00	%	—			1,000,000		995,610		1,115,000
i2 Holdings Ltd.	06/06/2014	Aerospace and Defense	14.75	%⁽⁶⁾	—			22,653,857		22,279,800		22,880,395
IDQ Holdings, Inc.	05/20/2012	Auto Sector	13.75	%	—			20,000,000		19,632,400		20,060,000
Learning Care Group, Inc.	12/28/2015	Education	13.50	%⁽⁶⁾	—			10,324,976		10,190,682		10,324,976
Realogy Corp.	04/15/2015	Buildings and Real Estate	12.38	%	—			10,000,000		8,921,187		5,525,000
Trizetto Group, Inc.	10/01/2016	Insurance	13.50	%⁽⁶⁾	—			20,197,856		20,010,210		20,652,308
UP Acquisitions Sub Inc.	02/08/2015	Oil and Gas	13.50	%	—			21,000,000		20,472,809		21,420,000

Total Subordinated Debt/Corporate Notes										153,261,822		152,130,057

Second Lien Secured Debt – 42.1%
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc.	02/07/2015	Energy/Utilities	6.36	%	L+600			13,600,000		13,153,077		12,416,800
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc.	02/07/2015	Energy/Utilities	7.44	%	L+700			12,000,000		11,735,965		11,364,000
Generics International (U.S.), Inc.	04/30/2015	Healthcare, Education and Childcare	7.78	%	L+750			12,000,000		11,949,634		11,376,000
Greatwide Logistics Services, L.L.C.	03/01/2014	Cargo Transport	11.00	%⁽⁶⁾	L+700	⁽⁸⁾		2,309,343		2,309,344		2,309,344
Questex Media Group, Inc.	11/04/2014	Other Media	6.91	%⁽⁷⁾	L+650			10,000,000		10,000,000		—
Realogy Corp.	10/15/2017	Buildings and Real Estate	13.50	%	—			10,000,000		10,000,000		10,387,500
Saint Acquisition Corp.⁽⁵⁾	05/15/2015	Transportation	8.19	%	L+775			10,000,000		9,941,121		7,100,000
Saint Acquisition Corp.⁽⁵⁾	05/15/2017	Transportation	12.50	%	—			19,000,000		16,890,972		14,250,000
Sheridan Holdings, Inc.	06/15/2015	Healthcare, Education and Childcare	6.00	%⁽⁶⁾	L+575			21,500,000		18,855,728		19,414,500
Specialized Technology Resources, Inc.	12/15/2014	Chemical, Plastics and Rubber	7.25	%⁽⁶⁾	L+700			22,500,000		22,488,166		22,500,000
TransFirst Holdings, Inc.	06/15/2015	Financial Services	7.04	%⁽⁶⁾	L+675			16,792,105		16,247,489		15,264,023

Total Second Lien Secured Debt										143,571,496		126,382,167

Preferred Equity/Partnership Interests⁽⁷⁾ – 3.6%
CFHC Holdings, Inc., Class A (Consolidated Foundries, Inc.)	—	Aerospace and Defense	12.00	%	—			797		797,288		949,648
i2 Holdings Ltd.	—	Aerospace and Defense	12.00	%	—			4,137,240		4,137,240		4,793,729
TZ Holdings, L.P., Series A (Trizetto Group, Inc.)	—	Insurance	—		—			686		685,820		685,820
TZ Holdings, L.P., Series B (Trizetto Group, Inc.)	—	Insurance	6.50	%	—			1,312		1,312,006		1,410,604
UP Holdings Inc., Class A-1 (UP Acquisitions Sub Inc.)	—	Oil and Gas	8.00	%	—			91,608		2,499,067		3,094,252
VSS-AHC Holdings, LLC (Advanstar Inc.)	—	Other Media	—		—			319		318,896		—

Total Preferred Equity/Partnership Interests										9,750,317		10,934,053

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENT– (Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


Issuer Name	Maturity	Industry	Current Coupon		Basis Point Spread Above Index⁽⁴⁾		Par / Shares	Cost		Fair Value⁽³⁾
Common Equity/Warrants/Partnership Interests ⁽⁷⁾ – 4.5%
AHC Mezzanine (Advanstar Inc.)	—	Other Media	—		—		3,000	$	3,005,163	$	—
CFHC Holdings, Inc. (Consolidated Foundries, Inc.)	—	Aerospace and Defense	—		—		1,627		16,271		215,547
CT Technologies Holdings, LLC (CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc.)	—	Business Services	—		—		5,556		3,200,000		6,696,281
i2 Holdings Ltd.	—	Aerospace and Defense	—		—		457,322		454,030		1,293,476
Transportation 100 Holdco, L.L.C. (Greatwide Logistics Services, L.L.C)	—	Cargo Transport	—		—		106,299		1,779,455		2,391,463
TZ Holdings, L.P. (Trizetto Group, Inc.)	—	Insurance	—		—		2		6,467		1,337,451
UP Holdings Inc. (UP Acquisitions Sub Inc.)	—	Oil and Gas	—		—		91,608		916		1,656,350
VSS-AHC Holdings, Inc. (Advanstar Inc.) (Warrant)	11/06/2018	Other Media	—		—		85		—		—

Total Common Equity/Warrants/Partnership Interests									8,462,302		13,590,568

First Lien Secured Debt – 50.1%
1-800 Contacts, Inc.	03/04/2015	Distribution	7.70	%	P+295	⁽⁸⁾	13,929,825		11,941,660		13,720,877
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp.	05/28/2013	Retail Store	2.57	%	L+225		2,837,374		2,835,299		2,578,464
Ceva Group PLC⁽⁵⁾	10/01/2016	Logistics	11.63	%	—		7,500,000		7,284,525		7,284,525
Chester Downs and Marina, LLC	07/31/2016	Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	12.38	%	L+988	⁽⁸⁾	10,000,000		9,421,220		10,050,000
EnviroSolutions, Inc.	07/07/2012	Environmental Services	11.00	%⁽⁶⁾	P+775	⁽⁸⁾	14,175,260		13,391,908		12,715,207
Hanley-Wood, L.L.C.	03/08/2014	Other Media	2.49	%	L+225		8,842,500		8,842,500		6,225,120
Hughes Network Systems, L.L.C.	04/15/2014	Telecommunications	2.88	%	L+250		5,000,000		5,000,000		4,562,500
Jacuzzi Brands Corp.	02/07/2014	Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	2.53	%	L+225		9,817,568		9,817,568		4,810,608
Levlad, L.L.C.	03/08/2014	Consumer Products	7.75	%	L+475		4,434,548		4,434,548		1,064,292
Lyondell Chemical Co.	12/15/2009	Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber	13.00	%	L+1,000	⁽⁸⁾	12,668,615		12,965,067		13,169,026
Lyondell Chemical Co. ⁽⁹⁾	12/15/2009	Chemicals, Plastics and Rubber	—		—		6,331,385		6,458,897		6,581,474
Mattress Holding Corp.	01/18/2014	Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	2.55	%	L+225		3,910,200		3,910,200		3,022,585
Mitchell International, Inc.	03/28/2014	Business Services	2.31	%	L+200		1,910,204		1,910,204		1,687,346
National Bedding Co., L.L.C.	02/28/2013	Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	2.26	%	L+200		6,825,000		6,829,243		6,142,500
Penton Media, Inc.	02/01/2013	Other Media	2.73	%	L+225		4,875,000		4,875,000		3,568,500
Philosophy, Inc.	03/16/2014	Consumer Products	2.25	%	L+200		1,426,506		1,426,506		1,148,337
Questex Media Group, Inc.	05/04/2014	Other Media	5.25	%⁽⁷⁾	L+200		4,886,667		4,886,667		2,912,600
Rexair, L.L.C.	06/30/2010	Retail	4.50	%	L+425		6,695,795		5,507,847		5,189,241
Rexnord , L.L.C.	07/19/2013	Manufacturing/Basic Industry	2.50	%	L+200		2,887,881		2,887,881		2,768,756
Sitel, L.L.C.	01/30/2014	Business Services	5.95	%	L+550		2,682,328		2,682,328		2,226,332
Sugarhouse HSP Gaming Prop.	09/23/2014	Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	11.25	%	L+825	⁽⁸⁾	20,000,000		19,203,528		19,600,000
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.	10/12/2014	Cargo Transportation	4.26	%	L+400		14,966,254		10,315,732		10,887,950
World Color Press Inc.	07/21/2012	Printing	9.00	%	P+500	⁽⁸⁾	3,500,000		3,177,842		3,491,250
Yonkers Racing Corp.⁽⁵⁾	07/15/2016	Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	11.38	%	—		5,000,000		4,857,698		5,200,000

Total First Lien Secured Debt									164,863,868		150,607,490

Investments in Non-Controlled, Non-Affiliated Portfolio Companies									479,909,805		453,644,335

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENT– (Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


Issuer Name	Maturity	Industry	Current Coupon		Basis Point Spread Above Index⁽⁴⁾	Par / Shares		Cost		Fair Value⁽³⁾

Investments in Non-Controlled, Affiliated Portfolio Companies – 5.4%^(1),(2)

Subordinated Debt/Corporate Notes – 1.7%

Performance Holdings, Inc.	07/02/2014	Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment	14.25	%⁽⁶⁾	—	$	5,077,822	$	4,878,081	$	4,988,960

Second Lien Secured Debt – 2.7%

Performance, Inc.	07/02/2013	Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment	6.24	%	L+575		8,750,000		8,750,000		8,019,375

Common Equity/Partnership Interest⁽⁷⁾ – 1.0%

NCP-Performance (Performance Holdings, Inc.)	—	Leisure, Amusement, Motion Pictures and Entertainment	—		—		37,500		3,750,000		3,107,403

Investments in Non-Controlled, Affiliated Portfolio Companies									17,378,081		16,115,738

Total Investments – 156.3%									497,287,886		469,760,073

Cash Equivalents – 11.1%							33,247,666		33,247,666		33,247,666

Total Investments and Cash Equivalents – 167.4%								$	530,535,552	$	503,007,739

Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – (67.4%)											(202,427,471	)
Net Assets – 100.0%										$	300,580,268

(1)	As used in this Schedule of Investments and in accordance with the 1940 Act, “non-controlled” means we own less than 25% of a portfolio company’s voting securities.

(2)	As used in this Schedule of Investments and in accordance with the 1940 Act, “non-affiliated” means we own less than 5% of a portfolio company’s voting securities and “affiliated” means that we own 5% or more, but less than 25%, of a portfolio company’s voting securities.

(3)	Valued based on our accounting policy (See Note 2 to our financial statements).

(4)	Represents floating rate instruments that accrue interest at a predetermined spread relative to an index, typically the applicable London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR or “L”) or Prime Rate (Prime or “P”).

(5)	Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. The security may be resold in transactions that are exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.

(6)	Coupon is payable in cash and/or in-kind (“PIK”).

(7)	Non-income producing securities.

(8)	Coupon is subject to a LIBOR or Prime rate floor.

(9)	Represents the purchase of a security with delayed settlement. This security does not have a basis point spread above an index.

SEE NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

Except where the context suggests otherwise, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “PennantPark Investment” refer to PennantPark Investment Corporation.

1. ORGANIZATION

PennantPark Investment Corporation was organized as a Maryland corporation on January 11, 2007. PennantPark Investment’s objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. PennantPark Investment invests primarily in U.S. middle-market companies in the form of mezzanine debt, senior secured loans and equity investments. Before the completion of its initial public offering on April 24, 2007, PennantPark Investment had limited operations other than the sale and issuance of 80,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per share to PennantPark Investment Advisers, LLC (the “Investment Adviser” or “PennantPark Investment Advisers”), resulting in net proceeds of $1.2 million.

On April 24, 2007 PennantPark Investment closed its initial public offering and sold 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $279.6 million. Also, on April 24, 2007 PennantPark Investment closed a private placement to officers, directors, the Investment Adviser and managers of the Investment Adviser, pursuant to Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, and issued an additional 320,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $4.8 million. On May 21, 2007, the underwriters of the initial public offering exercised their over-allotment option under the Underwriting Agreement and elected to purchase 625,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $8.8 million.

On September 29, 2009, PennantPark Investment closed a follow-on public offering and sold 4,300,000 shares of common stock at a price of $8.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $32.5 million. On October 13, 2009, the underwriters of the follow-on offering exercised their over-allotment option under the underwriting agreement and elected to purchase an additional 440,000 shares of common stock at a price of $8.00 per share resulting in net proceeds of $3.3 million. On March 8, 2010, PennantPark Investment closed a follow-on public offering and sold 5,750,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $54.3 million, inclusive of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. References to the Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, serve as a single source of accounting literature and are not intended to change accounting literature.

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-K and Article 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X, as appropriate. In accordance with Article 6-09 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act, we are providing a Statement of Changes in Net Assets in lieu of a Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity.

The significant accounting policies consistently followed by PennantPark Investment are:

(a)

Investment Valuations

Our board of directors generally uses market quotations to assess the value of our investments for which market quotations are readily available. We obtain these market values from independent pricing services or at the bid prices obtained from at least two broker/dealers if available, otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary market dealer. If the board of directors has a bona fide reason to believe any such market quote does not reflect the fair value of an investment, it may independently value such investments by using the valuation procedure that it uses with respect to assets for which market quotations are not readily available. Subordinated debt, first lien secured debt and other debt investments with maturities greater than 60 days generally are valued by an independent pricing service or at the bid prices from at least two broker/dealers (if available, otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary market dealer). Investments, of sufficient credit quality, purchased within 60 days of maturity are valued at cost plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, which approximates value. We expect that there will not be readily available market values for most, if not all, of the investments which are or will be in our portfolio, and we value such investments at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our board of directors using a documented valuation policy, described herein, and a consistently applied valuation process. With respect to investments for which there is no readily available market value, valuation methods include, but are not limited to, comparisons of financial ratios of the portfolio companies that issued such private securities to peer companies that are public. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we consider the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate or revise our valuation. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a readily available market value existed for such investments, and the differences could be material. See Note 5 to the financial statements.

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available, or for which market quotations are deemed not reflective of the fair value, our board of directors undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

(i)

Our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the investment professionals of the Investment Adviser responsible for the portfolio investment;

(ii)

Preliminary valuation conclusions are then documented and discussed with the management of our Investment Adviser;

(iii)

Our board of directors also engages independent valuation firms to conduct independent appraisals of our investments for which market quotations are not readily available or are readily available but deemed not reflective of the fair value of the investment. The independent valuation firms review management’s preliminary valuations in light of their own independent assessment and also in light of any market quotations obtained from an independent pricing service, broker, dealer or market maker.

(iv)

The audit committee of our board of directors reviews the preliminary valuations of the Investment Adviser and that of the independent valuation firms and responds and supplements the valuation recommendations of the independent valuation firms to reflect any comments; and

(v)

The board of directors discusses these valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith based on the input of our Investment Adviser, the respective independent valuation firms and the audit committee.

The factors that the board of directors may take into account in pricing our investments at fair value include, as relevant, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded securities and other relevant factors.

(b)

Security Transactions, Revenue Recognition, and Realized/Unrealized Gains or Losses

Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis. We measure realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment, using the specific identification method, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, but considering unamortized upfront fees and prepayment penalties. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the change in portfolio investment and credit facility values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.

We record interest income on an accrual basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts. For loans and debt investments with contractual payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, which represents interest accrued and added to the loan balance that generally becomes due at maturity, we will generally not accrue PIK interest when the portfolio company valuation indicates that such PIK interest is not collectable. We do not accrue as a receivable interest on loans and debt investments if we have reason to doubt our ability to collect such interest. Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium are capitalized, and we then accrete or amortize such amounts using the effective interest method as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans and debt investments as interest income. Dividend income, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis on the ex-dividend date to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts.

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past due 30 days or more and/or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current.

(c)

Income Taxes

Since May 1, 2007, PennantPark Investment has complied with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”) and expects to be subject to tax as a regulated investment company, or “RIC”. As a RIC, PennantPark Investment accounts for income taxes using the asset liability method prescribed by ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, income taxes were provided for amounts currently payable and for amounts deferred as tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Based upon PennantPark Investment’s qualification and election to be subject to tax as a RIC, we do not anticipate paying any material level of taxes in the future. Although we are subject to tax as a RIC, we have elected to retain a portion of our calendar year income and pay an excise tax of $0.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2010. PennantPark Investment recognizes in its financial statements the effect of a tax position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. We did not have any uncertain tax positions that met the recognition or measurement criteria of ASC 740-10-25 nor did we have any unrecognized tax benefits as of the periods presented herein. Although we file federal and state tax returns, our major tax jurisdiction is federal. Our inception-to-date federal tax years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

Book and tax basis differences relating to permanent book and tax differences are reclassified among PennantPark Investment’s capital accounts, as appropriate. Additionally, the character of income and gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

(d)

Dividends, Distributions, and Capital Transactions

Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a dividend is determined by the board of directors each quarter and is generally based upon the earnings estimated by management. Net realized capital gains, if any, are distributed at least annually.

Capital transactions, in connection with our dividend reinvestment plan or through offerings of our common stock, are recorded when issued and offering costs are charged as a reduction of capital upon issuance of our common stock.

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

(e)

New Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Standards Updates

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, or ASC 820-10-35-51A. ASC 820-10-35-51A amends ASC 820 to provide additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. It emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation technique used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same that the fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The guidance in ASC 820-10-35-51A is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. PennantPark Investment adopted ASC 820-10-35-51A on June 30, 2009, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In May 2009, FASB issued guidance on, Subsequent Events, or ASC 855, which establishes general accounting standards for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. In February 2010, the FASB issued clarification guidance under Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-09, or ASU 2010-09, which clarifies that a Securities and Exchange Commission’s filer need not to disclose the date when the financial statements are evaluated through in a note to the financial statements. The adoption of ASC 855 or ASU 2010-09 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2009, FASB issued guidance on, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB 162, or ASC 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC 105-10 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. On the effective date of ASC 105-10, the Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, has superseded all then-existing GAAP for non-governmental entities and reporting standards, subject to certain grandfathered literature. The purpose of ASC is not to change accounting literature but rather to serve as a single source of authoritative accounting literature. The adoption of ASC 105-10 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In August 2009, the FASB released ASU No. 2009-05 as an update to ASC 820, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. ASU 2009-05 provides additional clarity in circumstances where a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. ASU 2009-05 clarifies that a liability is required to measure fair value by using one or more of the following techniques: (a) The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset; (b) Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as an asset; or (c) Another valuation technique that is consistent with principles of ASC 820. This update also clarifies that when estimating fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate adjustment to an input relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The update also states that both a quoted price in an active market for a liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the same liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments are made to the quoted price are Level 1 fair value measurements. We adopted ASU 2009-05 on September 30, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements. See Note 5 to the financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to clarify and amend ASC 820-10. In particular, it requires additional disclosures with regards to transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2. It also requires that entities disclose on a gross basis purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within the Level 3 fair value roll-forward. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation as well as inputs and valuation techniques for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall into Level 2 or 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales and settlements in the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the additional disclosure requirements of ASU 2010-06 did not materially impact our financial statements. The disclosures regarding the disaggregation of purchases, sales and settlements in the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

3. AGREEMENTS

PennantPark Investment has entered into an investment management agreement (the “Investment Management Agreement”) with the Investment Adviser, which was re-approved by our board of directors, including a majority of our directors who are not interested persons of PennantPark Investment in February 2010. Under this agreement the Investment Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of PennantPark Investment’s board of directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, PennantPark Investment. For providing these services, the Investment Adviser receives a fee from PennantPark Investment, consisting of two components—a base management fee and an incentive fee (collectively, “Management Fees”).

The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00% on PennantPark Investment’s gross assets (net of U.S. Treasury Bills and/or temporary draws on the credit facility or “average adjusted gross assets”, if any, see Note 10). Although the base management fee is 2.00% our of average adjusted gross assets, the Investment Adviser agreed to waive a portion of the base management fee such that the base management fee equaled 1.50% from the consummation of the initial public offering through September 30, 2007 and 1.75% from October 1, 2007 through March 31, 2008. The base management fee has been 2.00% since March 31, 2008 and is payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is calculated based on the average value of our average adjusted gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, the Investment Adviser earned a base management fee of $2.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively, from us. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, the Investment Adviser earned a base management fee of $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively, from us.

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

The incentive fee has two parts, as follows:

One part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on PennantPark Investment’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose, Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means interest income, distribution income and any other income, including any other fees other than fees for providing managerial assistance, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees received from portfolio companies accrued during the calendar quarter, minus PennantPark Investment’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, any expenses payable under the Administration Agreement, and any interest expense and distribution paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of PennantPark Investment’s net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to the hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized). PennantPark Investment pays the Investment Adviser an incentive fee with respect to PennantPark Investment’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income in each calendar quarter as follows: (1) no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which PennantPark Investment’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 1.75%,(2) 100% of PennantPark Investment’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized), and (3) 20% of the amount of PennantPark Investment’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar quarter. These calculations are pro rated for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter.

The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Management Agreement, as of the termination date), commencing on December 31, 2007, and equals 20.0% of PennantPark Investment’s realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees. However, the incentive fee determined as of December 31, 2007 was calculated for a period of shorter than twelve calendar months to take into account any realized capital gains computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation from inception. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, the Investment Adviser earned an incentive fee of $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively from us. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, the Investment Adviser earned an incentive fee of $1.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively from us.

PennantPark Investment has also entered into an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with PennantPark Investment Administration, LLC (the “Administrator” or “PennantPark Investment Administration”), which was re-approved by our board of directors including a majority of our directors who are not interested persons of PennantPark Investment in February 2010. Under our Administration Agreement, the Administrator performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records which we are required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, the Administrator assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, oversees the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. Payments under our Administration Agreement are equal to an amount based upon our allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead in performing its obligations under our Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the cost of compensation and related expenses of our Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer and their respective staffs. Under our Administration Agreement, the Administrator provides on our behalf managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide such assistance. To the extent that our Administrator outsources any of its functions, we pay the fees associated with such functions on a direct basis without profit to the Administrator. Reimbursement for certain of these costs is included in administrative services expenses in the statement of operations. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, the Investment Adviser was reimbursed $1.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, from us, including expenses it incurred on behalf of the Administrator, for services described above. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, the Investment Adviser was reimbursed $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, from us, including expenses it incurred on behalf of the Administrator.

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

4. INVESTMENTS

Purchases of long-term investments including PIK for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 totaled $70.8 million and $122.4 million, respectively. For the same period in the prior year, purchases of long-term investments including PIK totaled $15.4 million and $17.1 million, respectively. Sales and repayments of long-term investments for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 totaled $6.7 million and $23.5 million, respectively. For the same period in the prior year, sales and repayments of long-term investments totaled $3.3 million and $5.5 million, respectively

Investments and cash equivalents consisted of the following:


	March 31, 2010				September 30, 2009
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
First lien	$	203,856,020	$	202,326,271	$	164,863,868	$	150,607,490
Second lien		153,134,655		151,812,863		152,321,496		134,401,542
Subordinated debt / corporate notes		200,893,200		203,240,496		158,139,903		157,119,017
Preferred equity		9,894,691		9,874,536		9,750,317		10,934,053
Common equity		13,661,362		20,443,186		12,212,302		16,697,971

Total Investments		581,439,928		587,697,352		497,287,886		469,760,073
Cash equivalents		934,570		934,570		33,247,666		33,247,666

Total Investments and cash equivalents	$	582,374,498	$	588,631,922	$	530,535,552	$	503,007,739

The table below describes investments by industry classification and enumerates the percentage, by market value, of the total portfolio assets (excluding cash equivalents) in such industries as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009.


Industry Classification	March 31, 2010		September 30, 2009
Hotels, Motels, Inns and Gaming	8	%	7	%
Business Services	7		7
Chemicals, Plastic and Rubber	7		9
Aerospace and Defense	6		8
Home and Office Furnishings, Housewares and Durable Consumer Products	6		3
Healthcare, Education and Childcare	5		7
Printing and Publishing	5		—
Transportation	5		5
Consumer Products	4		5
Energy / Utilities	4		5
Insurance	4		5
Oil and Gas	4		6
Auto Sector	3		4
Buildings and Real Estate	3		3
Cargo Transport	3		3
Environmental Services	3		3
Financial Services	3		3
Leisure, Amusement, Motion Picture and Entertainment	3		3
Other Media	3		3
Communication	2		—
Distribution	2		3
Diversified / Conglomerate Services	2		—
Education	2		2
Grocery	2		—
Logistics	2		2
Other	2		4

Total	100	%	100	%

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Effective October 1, 2008, we adopted ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, for cash and cash equivalents, investments and long-term credit facility. We realized no gain or loss as a result of the adoption of ASC 820. Fair value, as defined under ASC 820, is the price that we would receive upon selling an investment or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction to a market participant in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment or liability. ASC 820 emphasizes that valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. Inputs may be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of PennantPark Investment. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following hierarchies:

Level 1: Inputs that are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by us at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs that are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or that are quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term, if applicable, of the financial instrument.

Level 3: Inputs that are unobservable for an asset or liability because they are based on our own assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Substantially, all of our investments and long-term credit facility are classified as Level 3.

The inputs into the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation. Even if observable market data is available, such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimer would result in classification as Level 3 information, assuming no additional corroborating evidence was available.

In addition to using the above inputs in cash and cash equivalents, investments and long-term credit facility valuations, PennantPark Investment employs the valuation policy approved by its board of directors that is consistent with ASC 820 (See Note 2). Consistent with our valuation policy, PennantPark Investment evaluates the source of inputs, including any markets in which its investments are trading, in determining fair value.

Our investments are generally structured as debt and equity investments in the form of mezzanine debt, senior secured loans and equity co-investments. The transaction price, excluding transaction costs, is typically the best estimate of fair value at inception. When evidence supports a subsequent change to the carrying value from the original transaction price, adjustments are made to reflect the expected exit values. Ongoing reviews by our Investment Adviser and independent valuation firms are based on an assessment of each underlying investment, incorporating valuations that consider the evaluation of financing and sale transactions with third parties, expected cash flows and market-based information, including comparable transactions and performance multiples, among other factors. These nonpublic investments are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents, investments and our long-term credit facility were categorized as follows in the fair value hierarchy for ASC 820 purposes:


At March 31, 2010				Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Fair Value			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Loan and debt investments	$	557,379,630		$	—		$	—		$	557,379,630
Equity investments		30,317,722			3,157,237			—			27,160,485

Total Investments		587,697,352			3,157,237			—			584,540,115
Cash Equivalents		934,570			934,570			—			—

Total Investments and cash equivalents		588,631,922			4,091,807			—			584,540,115

Long-Term Credit Facility	$	(201,567,008	)	$	—		$	—		$	(201,567,008	)


At September 30, 2009				Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Fair Value			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Loan and debt investments	$	442,128,049		$	—		$	—		$	442,128,049
Equity investments		27,632,024			—			—			27,632,024

Total Investments		469,760,073			—			—			469,760,073
Cash Equivalents		33,247,666			33,247,666			—			—

Total Investments and cash equivalents		503,007,739			33,247,666			—			469,760,073

Long-Term Credit Facility	$	(168,475,380	)	$	—		$	—		$	(168,475,380	)


The following tables show a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair valued investments measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Period Ended March 31, 2010

Description				Loan and debt investments			Equity investments			Totals
Beginning Balance, September 30, 2009				$	442,128,049		$	27,632,024		$	469,760,073
Realized (losses)					(13,739,688	)		(3,005,163	)		(16,744,851	)
Unrealized appreciation					32,692,977			400,023			33,093,000
Purchases, PIK and net discount accretion					121,095,534			827,434			121,922,968
Sales / repayments					(23,491,075	)		—			(23,491,075	)
Non-cash exchanges					(1,306,167	)		1,306,167			—
Transfers in and /or out of Level 3					—			—			—

Ending Balance, March 31, 2010				$	557,379,630			27,160,485			584,540,115


Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the six months ended March 31, 2010 within the net change in unrealized appreciation on investments in our Statement of Operations attributable to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date:				$	16,550,354		$	(2,605,139	)	$	13,945,215


Period Ended March 31, 2009
Description				Loan and debt investments			Equity investments			Totals
Beginning Balance, September 30, 2008				$	349,260,104		$	22,887,716		$	372,147,820
Realized (losses)					(6,145,264	)		—			(6,145,264	)
Unrealized (depreciation)					(14,515,304	)		(580,717	)		(15,096,021	)
Purchases, PIK and net discount accretion					17,282,988			844,257			18,127,245
Sales / repayments					(5,536,574	)		—			(5,536,574	)
Non-cash exchanges					(1,209,455	)		1,209,455			—
Transfers in and /or out of Level 3					—			—			—

Ending Balance, March 31, 2009				$	339,136,495		$	24,360,711		$	363,497,206


Net change in unrealized depreciation for the six months ended March 31, 2009 reported within the net change in unrealized depreciation on investments in our Statement of Operations attributable to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date:				$	(17,523,679	)	$	(580,717	)	$	(18,104,396	)

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

The following tables show a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair valued liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no temporary draws outstanding.


Period Ended March 31, 2010

Long-Term Credit Facility	Carrying / Fair Value
Beginning balance, September 30, 2009 (Cost – $218,100,000)	$	168,475,380
Total unrealized appreciation included in earnings		25,691,628
Borrowings		86,700,000
Repayments		(79,300,000	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—

Ending Balance, March 31, 2010 (Cost – $225,500,000)	$	201,567,008


Period Ended March 31, 2009

Long-Term Credit Facility	Carrying / Fair Value
Beginning balance, September 30, 2008 (Cost – $162,000,000)	$	162,000,000
Cumulative effect of adoption of fair value option		(41,796,000	)
Total unrealized (depreciation) included in earnings		(20,649,089	)
Borrowings		35,700,000
Repayments		(10,000,000	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—

Ending Balance, March 31, 2009 (Cost – $187,700,000)	$	125,254,911

The carrying value of our financial instruments approximates fair value. Effective October 1, 2008, we adopted ASC 825-10, which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value, and made an irrevocable election to apply ASC 825-10 to our long-term credit facility. PennantPark Investment elected to use the fair value option for the credit facility to align the measurement attributes of both our assets and liabilities while mitigating volatility in earnings from using different measurement attributes. ASC 825-10 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and to more easily understand the effect of a company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. ASC 825-10 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on the face of the balance sheet and changes in fair value of the credit facility are recorded in the statement of operations. We elected not to apply ASC 825-10 to any other financial assets or liabilities. For the six month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our credit facility had a net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of $(25.7) million and $20.6 million, respectively. On March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, net unrealized depreciation on our long-term credit facility totaled $23.9 million and $49.6 million, respectively, which included the cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 825-10 on our credit facility of $41.8 million. PennantPark Investment uses a nationally recognized independent valuation service to measure the fair value of its credit facility in a manner consistent with the valuation process that the board of directors uses to value investments.

6. CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash equivalents represents cash pending investment in longer-term portfolio holdings, PennantPark Investment may invest temporarily in U.S. Treasury Bills (of varying maturities), repurchase agreements, money markets or repo-like treasury securities. These temporary investments with maturities of 90 days or less are deemed cash equivalents and are included in the Schedule of Investments. At the end of each fiscal quarter, PennantPark Investment has taken and in the future may take proactive steps to preserve investment flexibility for the next quarter, which is dependent upon the composition of its total assets at quarter end. PennantPark Investment may accomplish this in several ways, including purchasing U.S. Treasury Bills and closing out its positions on a net cash basis after quarter-end, temporarily drawing down on its credit facility, or utilizing repurchase agreements or other balance sheet transactions as are deemed appropriate for this purpose. These amounts are excluded from adjusted gross assets for purposes of computing management fees. U.S. Treasury Bills with maturities greater than 60 days from the time of purchase are marked-to-market consistent with PennantPark Investment’s valuation policy.

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

7. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

PennantPark Investment may enter into repurchase agreements as part of its investment program. In these transactions, PennantPark Investment’s custodian takes possession of collateral pledged by the counterparty. The collateral is marked-to-market daily to ensure that the value, plus accrued interest, is at least equal to the repurchase price. In the event of default of the obligor to repurchase, PennantPark Investment will have the right to liquidate the collateral and apply the proceeds in satisfaction of the obligation. Under certain circumstances, in the event of default or bankruptcy by the counterparty to the agreement, realization and/or retention of the collateral or proceeds may be subject to legal proceedings. There were no repurchase agreements outstanding on March 31, 2010 or September 30, 2009.

8. CHANGE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS PER COMMON SHARE

The following information sets forth the computation of basic and diluted per share net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations.


	Three months ended March 31,					Six months ended March 31,
Class and Year	2010			2009		2010		2009
Numerator for net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	(3,031,143	)	$	42,198,990	$	5,645,104	$	10,442,266
Denominator for basic and diluted weighted average shares		27,342,105			21,068,772		26,538,003		21,068,772
Basic and diluted net (decrease) increase in net assets per share resulting from operations	$	(0.11	)	$	2.00	$	0.21	$	0.49

9. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

PennantPark Investment’s net assets and net asset value per share on March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $349.2 million and $252.9 million, respectively, and $11.07 and $12.00, respectively. Below are the financial highlights for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.


	Six months ended March 31,
	2010			2009
Per Share Data:
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	11.85		$	10.00
Cumulative effect of adoption of fair value option⁽¹⁾		—			1.99

Adjusted net asset value, beginning of period		11.85			11.99
Net investment income⁽²⁾		0.54			0.52
Net change in realized and unrealized (loss)⁽²⁾		(0.33	)		(0.03	)

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations⁽²⁾		0.21			0.49
Dividends to stockholders^(2),(3)		(0.55	)		(0.48	)
Dilutive effect of common stock issuance below net asset value		(0.44	)		—

Net asset value, end of period	$	11.07		$	12.00

Per share market value, end of period	$	10.37		$	3.75
Total return*⁽⁴⁾		34.54	%		(43.40	)%
Shares outstanding at end of period		31,558,772			21,068,772

PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010

(Unaudited)


	Six months ended March 31,
	2010			2009
Ratios / Supplemental Data:**
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets		7.11	%		7.82	%
Ratio of credit facility related expenses to average net assets		1.05	%		2.80	%
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets		8.16	%		10.62	%
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets		9.10	%		10.22	%
Net assets at end of period	$	349,211,898		$	252,853,515
Average debt outstanding	$	231,791,209		$	167,012,637
Average debt per share	$	8.73		$	7.93
Portfolio turnover ratio		9.23	%		2.73	%

*	Not annualized for periods less than one year.

**	Annualized for periods less than one year.

(1)

On October 1, 2008, PennantPark Investment adopted ASC 825 and made an irrevocable election to apply the fair value option to our long-term credit facility. Upon our adoption Net Asset Value increased $41.8 million, or $1.99 per share, due to the fair value adjustment related to our credit facility.

(2)	Net investment income, net change in realized and unrealized loss, net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations and distributions per share data are calculated based on the weighted average shares outstanding for the respective periods.

(3)	Dividends and distributions are determined based on taxable income calculated in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from amounts determined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

(4)	Total return is based on the change in market price per share during the period and takes into account dividends and distributions, if any, reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan.

10. CREDIT FACILITY

On June 25, 2007, we entered into a senior secured revolving credit agreement, or our credit facility, among us, various lenders and SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent for the lenders. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Capital Markets acted as the joint lead arranger and book-runner, and JPMorgan Chase (Chase Lincoln First Commercial successor in interest of Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc.) acted as joint lead arranger and syndication agent. As of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, there were $225.5 million and $225.1 million (including a $7.0 million temporary draw) in outstanding borrowings under the credit facility, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate at the time of 1.27% and 1.31%, respectively, exclusive of the fee on undrawn commitment of 0.20%.

Under the credit facility, the lenders agreed to extend credit to PennantPark Investment in an initial aggregate principal or face amount not exceeding $300.0 million at any one time outstanding. The credit facility is a five-year revolving facility (with a stated maturity date of June 25, 2012) and is secured by substantially all of the assets in PennantPark Investment’s portfolio. Pricing is set at 100 basis points over LIBOR.

The credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including the maintenance of a minimum stockholders’ equity, the maintenance of a ratio not less than 200% of total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness) to total indebtedness and restrictions on certain payments and issuance of debt. For a complete list of such covenants, see our report on Form 8-K, filed June 28, 2007.

Our net asset value may decline as a result of economic conditions in the United States. Our continued compliance with the covenants under our credit facility depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Material net asset devaluation could have a material adverse effect on our operations and could require us to reduce our borrowings under our credit facility in order to comply with certain of the covenants we made when we entered into the credit facility, including the ratio of total assets to total indebtedness.

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, PennantPark Investment, the Investment Adviser or the Administrator may be a party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations. Unfunded debt investments described in the statement of assets and liabilities and schedule of investments at fair value represent unfunded delayed draws on investments in first lien secured debt.

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 29, 2010, PennantPark Investment amended its senior secured revolving credit facility. The amendment allows PennantPark Investment to form a Small Business Investment Company subsidiary (the “SBIC”) and to operate the SBIC under regulations applicable to the Small Business Administration program. There were no changes to existing lenders’ commitment amounts, pricing or maturity date.

The description above is only a summary of the material amendment provisions of the credit facility, does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions in the credit facility, as amended, which is attached as an Exhibit to this Report on Form 10-Q.

PennantPark Investment has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the financial statements and has no further required disclosure to report.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

PennantPark Investment Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Company”), including the schedules of investments, as of March 31, 2010, the statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the statements of changes in net assets and cash flows for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquires of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statement of assets and liabilities of PennantPark Investment Corporation, including the schedule of investments, as of September 30, 2009; and in our report dated November 18, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on that financial statement and schedule.

LOGO

New York, New York

May 5, 2010

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report, including the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs and our assumptions. The forward-looking statements contained in this report involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

•

our future operating results;

•

our business prospects and the prospects of our prospective portfolio companies and their ability to achieve their objectives;

•

the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest;

•

the impact of a protracted decline in the liquidity of credit markets on our business;

•

the impact of investments that we expect to make;

•

the impact of fluctuations in interest rates and borrowing costs on our business;

•

our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

•

the valuation of our investments in portfolio companies, particularly those having no liquid trading market;

•

our expected financings and investments;

•

the adequacy of our financing arrangements and working capital;

•

the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our prospective portfolio companies; and

•

the ability of the Investment Adviser to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments.

We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “seeks” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Undue influence should not be placed on the forward looking statements as our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

We have based the forward-looking statements included in this report on information available to us on the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report.

Overview

PennantPark Investment was organized under the Maryland General Corporation Law in January 2007. We are an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. As such, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities of U.S. private companies or thinly traded public companies, public companies with a market capitalization of less than $250 million, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less.

Our investment activities are managed by PennantPark Investment Advisers. Under our Investment Management Agreement, we have agreed to pay our Investment Adviser an annual base management fee based on our average adjusted gross total assets as well as an incentive fee based on our investment performance. We have also entered into an Administration Agreement with PennantPark Investment Administration. Under our Administration Agreement, we have agreed to reimburse the Administrator for our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under our Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of our chief compliance officer, chief financial officer and their respective staffs. Our board of directors, a majority of whom are independent of us and PennantPark Investment Advisers, supervise our activities.

Our investment objectives are to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments primarily in U.S. middle-market private companies in the form of mezzanine debt, senior secured loans and equity investments. We consider our core assets, by value and investment focus, to consist of subordinated debt, second lien secured debt, certain senior secured investments and, to a lesser extent, equity investments. The companies in which we invest are typically highly leveraged, often as a result of leveraged buy-outs or other recapitalization transactions, and, in most cases, are not rated by national rating agencies. If such companies were rated, we believe that they would typically receive ratings below investment grade (between BB and CCC under the Standard & Poor’s system) from the national rating agencies.

We expect that our investments in mezzanine debt, senior secured loans and other investments will range between $10 million and $50 million each. We expect this investment size to vary proportionately with the size of our capital base.

Our investment activity depends on many factors, including the amount of debt and equity capital available to middle-market companies, the level of merger and acquisition activity for such companies, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the types of investments we make. We have used, and will continue to use, the proceeds of our public offerings of securities and of our credit facility in accordance with our investment objectives. Market conditions may present us with attractive investment opportunities, as we believe that there are many middle-market companies that need senior secured and mezzanine debt financing. However, market conditions have, and in the future may continue to, adversely affect our portfolio valuations and increase the risk of default among our portfolio companies, which could negatively impact our performance.

Revenues

We generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt securities we hold and capital gains and distributions, if any, on investment securities that we may acquire in portfolio companies. Our debt investments, whether in the form of mezzanine debt or senior secured loans, typically have a term of three to ten years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. Interest on debt securities is generally payable quarterly or semiannually. In some cases, some of our investments provide for deferred interest payments or PIK. The principal amount of the debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest generally becomes due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, structuring or diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance and possibly consulting fees. Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium are capitalized, and we accrete or amortize such amounts as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans and debt securities as interest income. Dividend income, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis on the ex-dividend date to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts.

Expenses

Our primary operating expenses include the payment of management fees to our Investment Adviser, our allocable portion of overhead under our Administration Agreement and other operating costs as detailed below. Our management fee compensates our Investment Adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, consummating and monitoring our investments. Additionally, we pay interest expense on the outstanding debt we accrue under our credit facility. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including:

•

the cost of calculating our net asset value, including the cost of any third-party valuation services;

•

the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of our common stock and other securities;

•

fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, making investments, including fees and expenses associated with performing due diligence and reviews of prospective investments;

•

expenses incurred by the Investment Adviser in performing due diligence and reviews of investments;

•

transfer agent and custodial fees;

•

fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts;

•

federal and state registration fees and any stock exchange listing fees;

•

federal, state and local taxes;

•

independent directors’ fees and expenses;

•

brokerage commissions;

•

fidelity bond, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums;

•

direct costs such as printing, mailing, long distance telephone and staff;

•

fees and expenses associated with independent audits and outside legal costs;

•

costs associated with our reporting and compliance obligations under the 1940 Act and applicable federal and state securities laws; and

•

all other expenses incurred by either the Administrator or us in connection with administering our business, including payments under our Administration Agreement that will be based upon our allocable portion of overhead, and other expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under our Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of our chief compliance officer, chief financial officer and their respective staffs.

PORTFOLIO AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

As of March 31, 2010, our portfolio totaled $587.7 million and consisted of $203.3 million of subordinated debt, $151.8 million of second lien secured debt, $202.3 million of senior secured loans and $30.3 million of preferred and common equity investments. Our core assets totaled $555.6 million and consisted of investments in thirty-eight different companies with an average investment size of $14.6 million per company and a weighted average yield of 12.4% on debt investments. Our non-core senior secured loan portfolio totaled $32.1 million and consisted of nine different companies with an average investment size of $3.6 million, and a weighted average yield of 3.0% on debt investments. Our debt portfolio consisted of 66% fixed-rate (including 23% with a LIBOR floor) and 34% in variable-rate investments. Overall, the portfolio had an unrealized appreciation of $6.3 million as of March 31, 2010. Our overall portfolio consisted of forty-seven companies with an average investment size of $12.5 million and a weighted average yield on debt investments of 11.7%, and was invested 35% in subordinated debt, 26% in second lien secured debt, 34% in senior secured loans and 5% in preferred and common equity investments.

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we invested $68.5 million in three new and four existing portfolio companies with a weighted average yield on debt investments of 13.7%. During the same period we had one debt investment, representing 2.4% of our debt portfolio on a cost basis at March 31, 2010, which moved to non-accrual status. Sales and repayments of long-term investments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 totaled $6.7 million. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, we invested $119.0 million, in nine new and six existing portfolio companies with a weighted average yield of 13.3% on debt investments. Sales and repayments of long-term investments totaled $23.5 million for the same period.

As of September 30, 2009, our portfolio totaled $469.8 million and consisted of $157.1 million of subordinated debt, $134.4 million of second lien secured debt, $150.6 million of senior secured loans and $27.7 million of preferred and common equity investments. Our core assets totaled $427.1 million and consisted of investments in thirty different companies with an average investment size of $14.2 million per company and a weighted average yield of 12.5% on debt investments. Our non-core senior secured loan portfolio totaled $42.7 million and consisted of thirteen different companies (including one company also in our core portfolio) with an average investment size of $3.3 million and a weighted average yield of 3.1%. Our debt portfolio consisted of 53% fixed-rate (including 15% with a LIBOR floor) and 47% variable-rate investments. Overall, the portfolio had an unrealized depreciation of $27.5 million. Our overall portfolio consisted of forty-two companies with an average investment size of $11.2 million and a weighted average yield on debt investments of 11.4%, and was invested 33% in subordinated debt, 29% in second lien secured debt, 32% in senior secured loans and 6% in preferred and common equity investments.

For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we invested approximately $14.5 million in one new and one existing portfolio companies, with an average yield of 21.5% on debt investments. Sales and repayments of long-term investments totaled $3.3 million for the same period. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, we invested approximately $15.3 million in one new and three existing portfolio companies with a weighted average yield of 21.4% on debt investments. Sales and repayments of long-term investments totaled $5.5 million for the same period.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining such estimates could cause actual results to differ. In addition to the discussion below, we describe our critical accounting policies in the notes to our financial statements.

Valuation of Portfolio Investments

As a business development company, we generally invest in illiquid securities including debt and equity investments of middle-market companies. All of our investments are recorded using broker/dealers quotes or at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. Our board of directors generally uses market quotations to assess the value of our investments for which market quotations are readily available. We obtain these market values from independent pricing services or at the bid prices obtained from at least two broker/dealers, if available, or by a principal market maker or a primary market dealer. If the board of directors has a bona fide reason to believe any such market quote does not reflect the fair value of an investment, it may independently value such investments by using the valuation procedure that it uses with respect to assets for which market quotations are not readily available. Debt and equity investments that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our board of directors. Such determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and estimates. Investments, of sufficient credit quality, purchased within 60 days of maturity are valued at cost plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, which approximates value. With respect to unquoted securities, our board of directors, in consultation with our independent third party valuation firms, values each investment considering, among other measures, discounted cash flow models, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public and other factors.

When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs in connection with one of our portfolio companies, our board of directors uses the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate and/or assist us in our valuation of our investment in such portfolio company. Because there are not always readily available markets for most of the investments in our portfolio, we value certain of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors using a documented valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a readily available market value existed for such investments, and the differences could be material.

(i)

(ii)

Preliminary valuation conclusions are then documented and discussed with the management of our Investment Adviser;

(iii)

(iv)

(v)

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued guidance related to Fair Value Measurements, or ASC 820, which clarifies the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. Adoption of ASC 820 requires the use of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this statement on October 1, 2008. This adoption did not affect the PennantPark Investment’s financial position or its results of operations.

ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure these fair values into the following hierarchy:

Level 1: Inputs that are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, accessible by PennantPark Investment at the measurement date.

Level 3: Inputs that are unobservable for an asset or liability because they are based on PennantPark Investment’s own assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability.

The inputs into the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation. Even if observable market data are available, such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimer would result in classification as Level 3 information, assuming no additional corroborating evidence.

In February 2007, the FASB issued guidance on, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB 115, or ASC 825-10. This statement permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement applies to all reporting entities, and contains financial statement presentation and disclosure requirements for assets and liabilities reported at fair value as a consequence of the election. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted ASC 825-10 on October 1, 2008 and have made an irrevocable election to apply the fair value option to our credit facility liability. The fair value option was elected for our credit facility to align the measurement attributes of both the assets and liabilities while mitigating volatility in earnings from using different measurement attributes. Upon adoption, our Net Asset Value increased by $41.8 million, or $1.99 per share, due to the fair value adjustment related to our credit facility. For the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our long-term credit facility had a net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of $(25.7) million and $20.6 million, respectively. On March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, net unrealized appreciation on our long-term credit facility totaled $23.9 million and $49.6 million, respectively, which included the cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 825-10 on our credit facility of $41.8 million. We have used a nationally recognized independent valuation service to measure the fair value of our credit facility in a manner consistent with the valuation process that our board of directors uses to value our investments. After adoption, subsequent changes in the fair value of our credit facility will be recorded in the Statement of Operations. We have not elected to apply ASC 825-10 to any other financial assets or liabilities.

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, or ASC 820-10-35-51A. ASC 820-10-35-51A amends ASC 820 to provide additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. It emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation technique used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same that the fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The guidance in ASC 820-10-35-51A is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted ASC 820-10-35-51A on June 30, 2009, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements

In August 2009, the FASB released Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 (ASU 2009-05) as an update to ASC 820, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. ASU 2009-05 provides additional clarity in circumstances where a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. ASU 2009-05 clarifies that a liability is required to measure fair value by using one or more of the following techniques: (a) The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset; (b) Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as an asset; or (c) Another valuation technique that is consistent with principles of ASC 820. This update clarifies that when estimating fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate adjustment to an input relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The update also states that both a quoted price in an active market for a liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the same liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments are made to the quoted price are Level 1 fair value measurements. We adopted ASU 2009-05 on September 30, 2009, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements. See Note 5 to the financial statements.

Our investments are generally structured as debt and equity investments in the form of mezzanine debt, senior secured loans and equity co-investments. The transaction price, excluding transaction costs, is typically the best estimate of fair value at inception. When evidence supports a subsequent change to the carrying value from the original transaction price, adjustments are made to reflect the expected exit values. Ongoing reviews by our Investment Adviser and independent valuation firms are based on an assessment of each underlying investment, incorporating valuations that consider the evaluation of financing and sale transactions with third parties, expected cash flows and market-based information, including comparable transactions, and performance multiples, among other factors. These nonpublic investments are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Revenue Recognition

We record interest income on an accrual basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts. For loans and debt investments with contractual PIK interest which represents contractual interest accrued and added to the loan balance that generally becomes due at maturity, we will generally not accrue PIK interest if the portfolio company valuation indicates that such PIK interest is not collectible. We do not accrue as a receivable interest on loans and debt investments if we determine that it is probable that we will not be able to collect such interest. Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium are capitalized, and we then amortize such amounts as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans and debt investments as interest income. Dividend income, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts.

Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation

We measure realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment, using the specific identification method, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, but considering unamortized upfront fees and prepayment penalties. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.

Payment-in-Kind Interest or PIK

We have investments in our portfolio which contain a PIK interest provision. PIK interest is added to the principal balance of the investment and is recorded as income. For us to maintain our status as a RIC, this income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though we have not collected any cash with respect to PIK securities.

Federal Income Taxes

We operate so as to qualify to maintain our election to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and intend to continue to do so. Accordingly, we are not subject to federal income tax on the portion of our taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income as defined by the Code. If we do not distribute at least 98% of our annual taxable income (excluding net long-term capital gains retained or deemed to be distributed) in the year earned, we generally will be required to pay an excise tax on amounts carried over and distributed to shareholders in the next year equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of our annual taxable income available for distribution exceeds the distributions from such income for the current year.

Because federal income tax regulations differ from GAAP, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Set forth below are the results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

Investment Income

Investment income for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, was $13.5 million and $27.1 million, respectively, and was primarily attributable to $5.9 million and $11.3 million from subordinated debt investments, $3.3 million and $6.5 million from second lien secured debt investments and $3.2 million and $6.7 million from senior secured loan investments, respectively. The remaining investment income was primarily attributed to net accretion of discount and amortization of premium and other income. The increase in investment income compared with the same periods in the prior year is due to the growth of our portfolio and the transition of the portfolio from temporary to long-term core investments offset by lower interest rates on our variable rate portfolio of investments.

Investment income for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, was $10.4 million and $22.5 million, respectively, of which $2.5 million and $5.0 million was attributable to subordinated debt investments, $3.4 million and $7.3 million was attributable to second lien secured debt investments, and $4.3 million and $9.3 million was attributable to senior secured loan investments, respectively. The remaining investment income was primarily attributed to interest income from short-term investments and to net accretion of discount and amortization of premium. The change in investment income compared with the same periods in the prior year is due to the growth of our portfolio, the transition of the portfolio from temporary to long-term core investments offset by lower interest rates.

Expenses

Expenses for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, totaled $6.5 million and $12.8 million, respectively. For the same respective periods, base management fees totaled $2.8 million and $5.3 million, performance-based incentive fees totaled $1.8 million and $3.6 million, credit facility related expenses totaled $0.8 million and $1.6 million, general and administrative expenses totaled $1.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, an excise tax of $0.1 million was incurred.

Expenses for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, totaled $5.2 million and $11.5 million, respectively. For the same respective periods, base management fees totaled $1.8 million and $3.6 million, performance-based incentive fees totaled $1.3 million and $2.8 million, credit facility related expenses totaled $1.2 million and $3.0 million, general and administrative expenses totaled $0.9 million and $2.1 million.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income totaled $7.1 million and $14.3 million, or $0.26 and $0.54 per share, for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. For the same respective periods in the prior year, net investment income totaled $5.3 million and $11.0 million, or $0.25 and $0.52 per share.

Net Realized Loss

Sales and repayments of long-term investments for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 totaled $6.7 million and $23.5 million, respectively, and realized losses totaled approximately $0.1 million and $16.7 million, respectively, due to sales of non-core senior secured loans and restructurings on investments offset by repayments on other investments.

Sales and repayments of long-term investments for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009 totaled $3.3 million and $5.5 million, respectively, and realized losses totaled approximately $5.3 million and $6.1 million, respectively, due to sales of non-core senior secured loans and restructurings on investments.

Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments and (Appreciation) Depreciation on Credit Facility

For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, our investments had a net change in unrealized appreciation of $9.9 million and $33.8 million, respectively. On March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments totaled $6.3 million and $(27.5) million, respectively. The increase in unrealized appreciation on investments is due to the improvements in the leveraged finance credit markets.

For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, our long-term credit facility had a net change in unrealized appreciation of $19.9 million and $25.7 million, respectively. On March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, net unrealized depreciation on our long-term credit facility totaled $23.9 million and $49.6 million, respectively, which included the cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 825-10 on our credit facility of $41.8 million. The increase in unrealized appreciation on our credit facility is due to the improvements in the leveraged finance credit markets.

For the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, our investments had a net unrealized appreciation of $27.3 million and a net unrealized depreciation of $15.1 million, respectively. On March 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008, net unrealized depreciation on investments and cash equivalents totaled $87.1 million and $72.0 million, respectively, primarily due to the downturn in the leveraged finance credit markets.

For the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, our credit facility experienced a net unrealized depreciation of $14.9 million and $20.6 million, respectively. On March 31, 2009, net unrealized appreciation on our long-term credit facility totaled $62.4 million, respectively, which included the cumulative effect of adoption of ASC 825-10 on our credit facility of $41.8 million.

Net (Decrease) Increase in Net Assets from Operations

Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations totaled $(3.0) million and $5.6, respectively, or $(0.11) per share and $0.21 per share, respectively, for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in net assets from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is due to appreciation on our credit facility offset by appreciation on investments and net investment income. The increase in net assets from operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 is due to increase in the fair values of our investments held in our portfolio offset by the increase in fair value of our credit facility and realized losses on investments.

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations totaled $42.2 million and $10.4 million, respectively, or $2.00 and $0.49 per share, respectively, for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in investment values and a decline in market value of our credit facility.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

On June 25, 2007, PennantPark Investment entered into a senior secured revolving credit agreement, or our credit facility, among us, various lenders and SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent for the lenders. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Capital Markets acted as the joint lead arranger and JPMorgan Chase (Chase Lincoln First Commercial, as successor in interest to Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc.) acted as joint lead arranger and syndication agent. As of March 31, 2010, PennantPark Investment had outstanding borrowings of $225.5 million with a fair value of $201.6 million, with a weighted average interest rate at the time of 1.27% exclusive of the fee on undrawn commitments of 0.20%.

Under the credit facility, the lenders agreed to extend us credit in an initial aggregate principal or face amount not exceeding $300.0 million at any one time outstanding. The credit facility is a five-year revolving facility (with a stated maturity date of June 25, 2012) and is secured by substantially all of our investment portfolio assets. Pricing of borrowings under our credit facility is set at 100 basis points over LIBOR.

The credit facility contains affirmative and restrictive covenants, including: (a) periodic financial reporting requirements, (b) maintenance of a minimum shareholders’ equity of the greater of (i) 40% of the total assets of PennantPark Investment and its subsidiaries as of the last day of any fiscal quarter and (ii) the sum of (A) $120,000,000 plus (B) 25% of the net proceeds from the sale of equity interests in PennantPark Investment and its subsidiaries after the closing date of the credit facility, (c) maintenance of a ratio of total assets (less total liabilities other than indebtedness) to total indebtedness, in each case of PennantPark Investment, of not less than 2.0:1.0, (d) maintenance of minimum liquidity standards, (e) limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, (f) limitations on liens, (g) limitations on fundamental corporate changes, (h) limitations on investments (other than PennantPark Investment’s portfolio investments and certain other ordinary course investments), (i) limitations on payments and distributions (other than distributions to PennantPark Investment’s shareholders as contemplated to maintain RIC status), (j) limitations on transactions with affiliates, (k) limitations on engaging in business not contemplated by PennantPark Investment’s investment objectives, and (l) limitations on the creation or existence of agreements that prohibit liens on properties of PennantPark Investment and its subsidiaries. In addition to the asset coverage ratio described in clause (c) of the preceding sentence, borrowings under our credit facility (and the incurrence of certain other permitted debt) will be subject to compliance with a borrowing base that will apply different advance rates to different types of assets in PennantPark Investment’s portfolio.

We have and may continue to raise additional equity or debt capital through a registered offering off a shelf registration, or we may securitize a portion of our investments, among other considerations. In addition, any future additional debt capital we incur, to the extent it is available under stressed credit market conditions, may be issued at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than our current credit facility. We continuously monitor conditions in the credit markets and seek opportunities to enhance our debt structure considering our credit facility matures in June 2012. Furthermore, our credit facility availability depends on various covenants and restrictions as discussed in the preceding paragraph. The primary use of existing funds and any funds raised in the future is expected to be for repayment of indebtedness, investments in portfolio companies, cash distributions to our shareholders or for other general corporate purposes.

Our liquidity and capital resources are also generated and available from cash flows from operations, including investment sales and repayments, and income earned while our primary use of funds from operations includes investments in portfolio companies, payments of fees and other operating expenses we incur. On February 2, 2010, our stockholders approved a proposal that authorizes us to sell shares of our common stock below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock in one or more offerings for a period of 12 months. On March 8, 2010, we sold 5.75 million shares of our common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, below the then current net asset value per share of common stock, resulting in net proceeds of $54.3 million, inclusive of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. Any decision to sell shares below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock in one or more offerings is subject to the determination by our board of directors that such issuance and sale is in our and our stockholders’ best interests. Any sale or other issuance of shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value per share has resulted and will continue to result in an immediate dilution to our stockholder’s interest in our common stock and a reduction of our net asset value per share.

For the six months ended March 31, 2010, our operating activities used cash of $78.8 million and our financing activities provided cash of $46.5 million, primarily from proceeds of our common stock offerings.

For the six months ended March 31, 2009, our operating activities provided cash of $14.1 million and our financing activities used net cash proceeds of $24.4 million, primarily from net borrowings on our credit facility.

Contractual Obligations

A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations for the repayment of outstanding borrowings under the multi-currency $300.0 million, five-year, revolving credit facility maturing in June 2012 is as follows:


	Payments due by period (millions)
	Total		Less than 1 year	1-3 years		3-5 years	More than 5 years
Senior secured revolving credit facility⁽¹⁾	$	225.5	—	$	225.5	—	—

(1)

On March 31, 2010, $74.5 million remained unused under our senior secured revolving credit facility, subject to maintenance of at least 200% of our total assets less liabilities other than indebtedness to our total outstanding indebtedness, maintenance of a blended percentage of the values of our portfolio companies, and restrictions on certain payments and issuance of debt.

We have entered into certain contracts under which we have material future commitments. Under our Investment Management Agreement, which was renewed in February 2010, PennantPark Investment Advisers serves as our investment adviser in accordance with the terms of that Investment Management Agreement. Payments under our Investment Management Agreement in each reporting period is equal to (1) a management fee equal to a percentage of the value of our gross assets and (2) an incentive fee based on our performance. See Note 3 to the financial statements.

Under our Administration Agreement, which was renewed in February 2010, PennantPark Investment Administration furnishes us with office facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations. If requested to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies, PennantPark Investment Administration will be paid an additional amount based on the services provided, which amount will not in any case exceed the amount we receive from the portfolio companies for such services. Payment under our Administration Agreement is based upon our allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead in performing its obligations under our Administration Agreement, including rent, technology systems, insurance and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer, chief financial officer and their respective staffs. See Note 3 to the financial statements.

If any of our contractual obligations discussed above is terminated, our costs under new agreements that we enter into may increase. In addition, we will likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we expect to receive under our Investment Management Agreement and our Administration Agreement. Any new investment management agreement would also be subject to approval by our stockholders.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently engage in no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices.

Distributions

In order to qualify as a RIC and to not be subject to corporate-level tax on income, we are required, under Subchapter M of the Code, to distribute at least 90% of the sum of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains, if any to our stockholders on an annual basis. Although not required for us to maintain our RIC tax status, we also must distribute at least 98% of our income (both ordinary income and net capital gains) in order to preclude the imposition of an entity level excise tax. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, we have elected to retain a portion of our calendar year income and record an excise tax of $0.1 million.

During the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, we declared distributions of $0.26 and $0.51 per share, respectively, for total distributions of $8.2 million and $14.7 million, respectively. For the same periods in the prior year, we declared distributions of $0.24 and $0.48 per share, respectively, for total distributions of $5.1 million and $10.1 million, respectively. We monitor available net investment income to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the fiscal year. To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for any given fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed to be a tax return of capital to our common stockholders. Tax characteristics of all distributions will be reported to stockholders on Form 1099-DIV after the end of the calendar year.

We intend to continue to distribute quarterly dividends to our stockholders. Our quarterly dividends, if any, are determined by our board of directors.

We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.

We maintain an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a dividend, then stockholders’ cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically “opt out” of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends.

In January 2010, the Internal Revenue Service issued a revenue procedure that temporarily allows a RIC to distribute its own stock as a dividend for the purpose of fulfilling its distribution requirements. Pursuant to this revenue procedure, a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as a dividend if (1) the stock is publicly traded on an established securities market, (2) the distribution is declared with respect to a taxable year ending on or before December 31, 2011 and (3) each shareholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all shareholders, which must be at least 10% of the aggregate declared distribution. If too many shareholders elect to receive cash, each shareholder electing to receive cash will receive a pro rata amount of cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event will any shareholder electing to receive cash receive less than 10% of his or her entire distribution in cash.

We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make dividends and distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these dividends and distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make dividends and distributions due to the asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a business development company under the 1940 Act and/or due to provisions in future credit facilities. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of RIC status. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any dividends and distributions at a particular level.

Recent Developments

On March 17, 2010, the PennantPark Investment received a letter from the Investment Division of the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) that invited us to move forward with the licensing of a SBIC We remain cautiously optimistic that we will complete the licensing process although the process is still subject to the SBA approval. The SBIC, which will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the PennantPark Investment, will have investment objectives similar to ours and will make similar types of investments in accordance with SBA regulations. The SBIC will be subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA.

To the extent that we receive an SBIC license, our SBIC will be allowed to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures subject to required capitalization thresholds. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse to us, have a 10-year maturity, and may be prepaid at any time without penalty. SBA current regulations limit the amount that a single SBIC may borrow to a maximum of $150 million, which is up to twice its regulatory capital. This means that our SBIC may access the maximum borrowing if it has $75 million in regulatory capital, which generally equates to the amount of its equity capital. However, we may determine to capitalize the SBIC subsidiary with a lesser amount.

In connection with the filing of its SBA license application, we will be applying for exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary from our consolidated asset coverage ratio.

There can be no assurance that (i) we will be granted an SBIC license in a timely manner, (ii) that if we are granted an SBIC license we will be able to capitalize the subsidiary and access the maximum borrowing amount available, or (iii) that we will receive exemptive relief from the SEC with respect to the SBA-guaranteed debentures.

On April 29, 2010, PennantPark Investment amended its senior secured revolving credit facility. The amendment allows PennantPark Investment to form and to operate the SBIC under regulations applicable to the SBA program. There were no changes to existing lenders’ commitment amounts, pricing or maturity date.

Item 3.

Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. During the period covered by this report, many of the loans in our portfolio had floating interest rates. These loans are usually based on a floating LIBOR and typically have durations of three months after which they reset to current market interest rates.

Assuming that the balance sheet as of the period covered by this report was to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate sensitivity, a hypothetical immediate 1% change in interest rates may affect net income by more than 1% over a one-year horizon. Although management believes that this measure is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in the credit market, credit quality, size and composition of the assets on the balance sheet and other business developments that could affect net increase in net assets resulting from operations, or net income. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the statement above.

Because we borrow money to make investments, our net investment income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these funds. In periods of declining interest rates, our cost of funds would decrease, which may reduce our net investment income. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.

We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments with fixed interest rates. During the period covered by this report, we did not engage in interest rate hedging activities.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

As of the period covered by this report, we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of material information about us required to be included in periodic SEC filings. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Neither our Investment Adviser, our Administrator or us is currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us, or against the Investment Adviser or Administrator. From time to time, we, the Investment Adviser or the Administrator may be a party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our PennantPark Investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On February 2, 2010, PennantPark Investment Corporation held its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in New York, N.Y. for the purpose of considering and voting upon the election of a director, ratification of the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm and another business matter. Votes were cast as follows:


Director Nominee	For	Withheld
Election of Arthur H. Penn	15,721,719	1,829,860

Proposal	For	Against	Abstain
To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP to serve as PennantPark Investment Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.	23,022,212	570,059	76,678

The table below shows the votes casted as a percentage of shares outstanding and in terms of votes cast as follows:


Proposal:
To consider and vote upon a proposal to authorize flexibility for us, with the approval of our Board of Directors, to sell shares of our Common Stock (during the next 12 months) at a price below our then current net asset value per share, subject to certain limitations described in the proxy statement.

	With Affiliates			Without Affiliates
	Total Voted	% of Outstanding Shares		Total Voted	% of Outstanding Shares
For	16,452,440	63.75	%	14,595,204	56.55	%
Against	1,069,446	4.14	%	1,069,446	4.14	%
Abstain	29,692	0.12	%	29,692	0.12	%
Not voted	8,257,194	31.99	%	10,114,430	39.19	%

Item 5.

Other Information

Item 6.

Exhibits

Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the following exhibits are incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:


2.(k)(5) *		Amendment to Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement between Registrant and various lenders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00736), filed on June 28, 2007).

3.1		Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(a) to the Registrant’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form N-2/A (File No. 333-140092), filed on April 5, 2007).

3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 814-00736), filed on December 13, 2007).

4.1		Form of Share Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(d)(1) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-150033), filed on April 2, 2008).

11		Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the unaudited financial statements contained in this Report).

31.1 *		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2 *		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1 *		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 *		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

99.1		Privacy Policy of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 814-00736), filed on November 18, 2009).

*	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	PENNANTPARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION

Date: May 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Arthur H. Penn
		Arthur H. Penn
		Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Aviv Efrat
		Aviv Efrat
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company