UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
|
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 14(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended August 26, 2007 |
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period from ________ to__________ |
Commission file number 1-4415
PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP. |
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) |
New York |
|
11-1734643 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
48 South Service Road, Melville, N.Y. |
|
11747 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(631) 465-3600 |
|
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
|
Not Applicable |
|
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o |
|
Accelerated Filer x |
|
Non-Accelerated File o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 20,335,832 as of October 1, 2007.
2
PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
August 26, |
|
February 25, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
98,797 |
|
$ |
119,051 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
96,975 |
|
|
89,724 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
39,171 |
|
|
39,418 |
|
Inventories (Note 2) |
|
|
15,728 |
|
|
15,090 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
254,261 |
|
|
266,332 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
49,479 |
|
|
49,895 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,029 |
|
|
5,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
309,769 |
|
$ |
321,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
14,455 |
|
$ |
13,589 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
13,907 |
|
|
13,058 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
2,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
30,118 |
|
|
29,001 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
4,294 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
7,062 |
|
|
7,279 |
|
Liabilities from discontinued operations (Note 4) |
|
|
17,181 |
|
|
17,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
58,966 |
|
|
57,755 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
2,037 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
142,362 |
|
|
140,030 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
101,792 |
|
|
118,961 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
(1,625 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
250,803 |
|
|
264,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
309,769 |
|
$ |
321,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The balance sheet at February 25, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, except for certain reclassifications to conform to the August 26, 2007 balance sheet. |
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
13 weeks ended |
|
26 weeks ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
60,541 |
|
$ |
66,518 |
|
$ |
117,618 |
|
$ |
129,356 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
44,106 |
|
|
50,474 |
|
|
87,074 |
|
|
96,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
16,435 |
|
|
16,044 |
|
|
30,544 |
|
|
32,407 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
6,651 |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
13,223 |
|
|
13,597 |
|
Insurance arrangement termination charge (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
9,784 |
|
|
7,892 |
|
|
17,321 |
|
|
17,494 |
|
Interest income and other income |
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations before income taxes |
|
|
12,247 |
|
|
9,684 |
|
|
22,095 |
|
|
21,235 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) (Note 8) |
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
(2,860 |
) |
|
5,524 |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
9,160 |
|
$ |
12,544 |
|
$ |
16,571 |
|
$ |
21,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares |
|
|
20,325 |
|
|
20,183 |
|
|
20,265 |
|
|
20,159 |
|
Diluted shares |
|
|
20,405 |
|
|
20,295 |
|
|
20,320 |
|
|
20,311 |
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
13 weeks ended |
|
26 weeks ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
143,774 |
|
$ |
140,353 |
|
$ |
142,067 |
|
$ |
139,550 |
|
SFAS 123R compensation cost |
|
|
330 |
|
|
288 |
|
|
680 |
|
|
583 |
|
Stock option activity |
|
|
255 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
509 |
|
Tax benefit on exercise of options |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
144,399 |
|
|
140,642 |
|
|
144,399 |
|
|
140,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
124,756 |
|
|
113,093 |
|
|
118,961 |
|
|
105,808 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
9,160 |
|
|
12,544 |
|
|
16,571 |
|
|
21,438 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
(32,124 |
) |
|
(21,798 |
) |
|
(33,740 |
) |
|
(23,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
101,792 |
|
|
103,839 |
|
|
101,792 |
|
|
103,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
(1,625 |
) |
|
(2,370 |
) |
Stock option activity |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
(322 |
) |
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
4,681 |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
2,435 |
|
Net unrealized investment gains |
|
|
31 |
|
|
219 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
241 |
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
222 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
108 |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
3,626 |
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
3,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
250,803 |
|
$ |
246,700 |
|
$ |
250,803 |
|
$ |
246,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
26 Weeks Ended |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
August 26, 2007 |
|
August 27, 2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
16,571 |
|
$ |
21,439 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,079 |
|
|
4,516 |
|
SFAS 123R compensation |
|
|
680 |
|
|
583 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
(11,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
20,980 |
|
|
15,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
(3,558 |
) |
|
(1,169 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(60,976 |
) |
|
(70,784 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
54,169 |
|
|
46,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(10,365 |
) |
|
(25,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(33,740 |
) |
|
(23,407 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
1,143 |
|
Tax benefits from stock based compensation |
|
|
603 |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(30,785 |
) |
|
(21,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents before exchange rate changes |
|
|
(20,170 |
) |
|
(32,139 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(20,254 |
) |
|
(32,161 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
119,051 |
|
|
108,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
98,797 |
|
$ |
75,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
5,365 |
|
$ |
5,810 |
|
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of August 26, 2007 and the consolidated statements of operations and stockholders equity for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the 26 weeks then ended have been prepared by the Company, without audit. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position at August 26, 2007 and the results of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for all periods presented. |
|
|
|
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2007. |
|
|
2. |
INVENTORIES |
|
|
|
Inventories consisted of the following: |
|
|
August 26, |
|
February 25, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
6,609 |
|
$ |
6,867 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
3,372 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
5,085 |
|
|
4,535 |
|
Manufacturing supplies |
|
|
375 |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,728 |
|
$ |
15,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
As of August 26, 2007, the Company had a 1992 Stock Option Plan and a 2002 Stock Option Plan, and no other stock-based compensation plan. Both Stock Option Plans have been approved by the Companys stockholders and provide for the grant of stock options to directors and key employees of the Company. All options granted under such Plans have exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock of the Company at the time of grant, which pursuant to the terms of the Plans, is the reported closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date preceding the date the option is granted. Options granted under the Plans become exercisable 25% one year from the date of |
8
|
grant, with an additional 25% exercisable each succeeding anniversary of the date of grant and expire 10 years from the date of grant. The authority to grant additional options under the 1992 Stock Option Plan expired on March 24, 2002, and options to purchase a total of 900,000 shares of common stock were authorized for grant under the 2002 Stock Option Plan. At August 26, 2007, 1,275,569 shares of common stock of the Company were reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock options under the 1992 Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Stock Option Plan and 213,493 options were available for future grant under the 2002 Stock Option Plan. Options to purchase 164,150 shares of Common Stock were granted during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007. Options to purchase 174,700 shares of common stock were granted during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 27, 2006. |
|
|
|
Effective February 27, 2006, the beginning of the Companys 2007 fiscal year, the Company began recording compensation expense associated with stock options, the only form of stock-based compensation issued by the Company, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. Prior to February 27, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation according to the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(APB 25), and, therefore, no related compensation expense was recorded in the statements of earnings for awards granted with no intrinsic value. The Company adopted the modified prospective transition method pursuant to SFAS 123R, and, consequently, has not retroactively adjusted results from prior periods. Under this transition method, compensation cost associated with stock-based compensation recognized during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007 included (1) quarterly amortization related to the remaining unvested portion of all stock options granted prior to February 27, 2006 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), and (2) quarterly amortization related to all stock options granted subsequent to February 27, 2006 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. |
|
|
|
The Company determines the fair value of stock options on the dates of grants using an option pricing model with assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the risk-free interest rate of the options, the expected life of the options, the expected volatility of the market price of the Companys common stock, the expected dividends to be paid on the Companys common stock, and an estimate of the amount of options that are expected to be forfeited. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of options under SFAS 123R and the original SFAS 123. The compensation expense for stock options includes an estimate for forfeitures and is recognized over the vesting term using the ratable method. |
|
|
|
The future compensation expense affecting earnings from operations before income taxes for options outstanding at August 26, 2007 will be $3,487 as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R. |
9
|
The weighted average fair value for options was estimated at the dates of grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to be $10.30 for the first 26 weeks of fiscal year 2008, $10.84 for fiscal year 2007, $7.77 for fiscal year 2006 and $8.41 for fiscal year 2005, with the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 4.75% for the first 26 weeks of fiscal year 2008, 4.0%-5.0% for fiscal year 2007 and 5.0% for fiscal years 2006 and 2005; expected volatility factors of 32.1%-32.4%, 34.4%-58.8%, 34%-36% and 38%-46% for the first 26 weeks of fiscal year 2008 and fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively; expected dividend yield of 1.06% for the first 26 weeks of fiscal year 2008, 1.0%-1.6% for fiscal year 2007, 1.3% for fiscal year 2006 and 1.6% for fiscal year 2005; and estimated option terms of 5.2-5.4 years for the first 26 weeks of fiscal year 2008, 4.0-5.6 years for fiscal year 2007, and 4.0 years for fiscal years 2006 and 2005. |
|
|
|
The estimated term of the options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise behavior. The risk free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the estimated term of the options at the date of the grant. Volatility is based on historical volatility of the Companys stock. |
|
|
|
The following is a summary of options for the six-month period ended August 26, 2007: |
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregated |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at February 25, 2007 |
|
|
1,066,627 |
|
$ |
21.61 |
|
|
63.96 |
|
$ |
7,446 |
|
Granted |
|
|
164,150 |
|
|
30.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
140,449 |
|
|
16.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated or expired |
|
|
28,252 |
|
|
24.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 26, 2007 |
|
|
1,062,076 |
|
$ |
23.51 |
|
|
73.20 |
|
$ |
6,638 |
|
Exercisable at August 26, 2007 |
|
|
685,376 |
|
$ |
21.49 |
|
|
53.61 |
|
$ |
5,668 |
|
4. |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND PENSION LIABILITY |
|
|
|
On February 4, 2004, the Company announced that it was discontinuing its financial support of its Dielektra GmbH (Dielektra) subsidiary located in Cologne, Germany, due to the continued erosion of the European market for the Companys high technology products. Without Parks financial support, Dielektra filed an insolvency petition, which the Company believes will result in the liquidation of Dielektra. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Dielektra is treated as a discontinued operation. As a result of the discontinuation of financial support for Dielektra, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $22,023 for the write-off of Dielektra assets and other costs during the |
10
|
fourth quarter of the 2004 fiscal year. The liabilities from discontinued operations are reported separately on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. These liabilities from discontinued operations included $12,094 for Dielektras deferred pension liability. |
|
|
|
The Company expects to recognize a gain of approximately $17,000 related to the reversal of these liabilities when the Dielektra insolvency process is completed, although it is unclear when the process will be completed. |
|
|
|
Liabilities for discontinued operations as of August 26, 2007 and February 25, 2007 consisted of the following: |
|
|
August 26, |
|
February 25, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental and other liabilities |
|
$ |
5,087 |
|
$ |
5,087 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
17,181 |
|
$ |
17,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
REALIGNMENT AND SEVERANCE CHARGES |
|
|
|
The Company recorded charges during the 2004 fiscal year related to the realignment of its North America volume printed circuit materials operations in Newburgh, New York and Fullerton, California, including employment termination benefits and lease charges. The termination benefits were for the termination of hourly and salaried, administrative, manufacturing and support employees. Such employees were terminated during the 2004 fiscal year, and the termination benefits were paid in installments during such year. The lease charges covered one lease obligation payable through December 2004 and a portion of another lease obligation payable through September 2013. |
|
|
|
The liability for lease payments was $3,932 and $4,149 at August 26, 2007 and February 25, 2007, respectively. For the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007, the Company applied $109 and $217, respectively, of lease payments against the liability. |
|
|
6. |
INSURANCE ARRANGEMENT TERMINATION CHARGE |
|
|
|
During the 2007 fiscal year second quarter ended August 27, 2006, the Company terminated a split-dollar life insurance arrangement with Jerry Shore, the Companys founder and former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The insurance arrangement, which involved two life insurance policies payable on the death of the survivor of Jerry Shore and his spouse with an aggregate face value of $5 million and annual premium payments by the Company of approximately $129, was implemented in 1997 but discontinued in 2004 in light of certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and due to changes in the income taxation of split-dollar life insurance arrangements. The arrangement is more fully |
11
|
described in the Companys annual proxy statements for each of the years 1998 through 2007. Pursuant to an agreement entered into between Jerry Shore and the Company, the termination of the insurance arrangement involved a payment of $1,335 by the Company to Mr. Shore in January 2007. Such termination and payment resulted in a net cash cost to the Company of $685, after the Companys receipt of a portion of the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies. The Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $1,316 in the 2007 fiscal year second quarter ended August 27, 2006 in connection with this termination and recognized a $499 tax benefit relating to this insurance termination charge. |
|
|
7. |
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the sum of (a) the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and (b) the potential common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Stock options are the only common stock equivalents, and the number of dilutive options is computed using the treasury stock method. |
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007 and August 27, 2006. |
|
|
13 weeks ended |
|
26 weeks ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
9,160 |
|
$ |
12,544 |
|
$ |
16,571 |
|
$ |
21,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic EPS |
|
|
20,325 |
|
|
20,183 |
|
|
20,265 |
|
|
20,159 |
|
Net effect of dilutive options |
|
|
80 |
|
|
112 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted EPS |
|
|
20,405 |
|
|
20,295 |
|
|
20,320 |
|
|
20,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
12
|
Common stock equivalents, which were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive as the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock, were 2 and 8 for the 13 weeks ended August 26, 2007 and August 27, 2006, respectively, and 4 and 5 for the 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007 and August 27, 2006, respectively. |
|
|
8. |
INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48) effective as of February 26, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements, except for the reclassification of unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $3,600, including approximately $400 for interest and penalties, to non-current other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
|
|
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including adding or reducing amounts for current year tax positions, expiration of statutes of limitation on open income tax returns, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of tax examinations, and legislative activity. |
|
|
|
During the fiscal year 2008 second quarter, the Company recognized tax benefits of $537 relating to reserves previously established in a foreign jurisdiction where the Company no longer operates. The reserves, which related to intercompany transactions between two foreign jurisdictions, were deemed to be no longer required due to the passage of time subsequent to the filing of applicable income tax returns. The tax year in which the transactions were recorded is now closed. |
|
|
|
The Companys effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 were 29.6% and 27.4%, respectively, before recognition of tax benefits of $537 relating to reserves previously established in a foreign jurisdiction where the Company no longer operates compared to effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006 of 23.0% before adjusting for the tax benefits of $499 relating to the $1,316 pre-tax charge recorded by the Company in connection with the termination of an insurance arrangement with Jerry Shore, the Companys founder and former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the elimination of certain valuation allowances of $3,500 previously established relating to deferred tax assets in the United States and the elimination of tax reserves of $1,391 no longer required as a result of the completion of a tax audit. The higher tax provisions for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 were primarily the result of higher taxable income in jurisdictions with higher income tax rates. |
13
|
The Companys effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 after adjusting for the recognition of tax benefits in a foreign jurisdiction where the Company no longer operates were 25.2% and 25.0%, respectively. The Companys effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006 after adjusting for the tax benefits relating to the insurance arrangement termination charge, the elimination of certain valuation allowances in the United States and the elimination of tax reserves no longer required, all described above, were (29.5%) and (1.0%), respectively. |
|
|
|
A list of open tax years by major jurisdiction follows: |
United States |
|
2004 2007 |
Arizona |
|
2003 - 2007 |
California |
|
2004 2007 |
New York |
|
2004 2007 |
France |
|
2004 2007 |
Singapore |
|
2004 2007 |
|
The Companys policy is to include applicable interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. |
|
|
|
As part of its quarterly evaluation of deferred tax assets, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $3,500 during the 2007 fiscal year second quarter relating to the elimination of certain valuation allowances previously established related to deferred tax assets in the United States. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax benefits associated with these deferred tax assets will be realized during the next five fiscal years. In addition, during the 2007 fiscal year second quarter, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $1,391 relating to the elimination of reserves no longer required as the result of the completion of a tax audit and a $499 tax benefit relating to the life insurance arrangement termination charge. |
|
|
9. |
BUSINESS SEGMENTS |
|
|
|
The Company considers itself to operate in one business segment because the Companys advanced composite materials product line comprises less than 10% of the Companys assets, revenues, and earnings from operations on an absolute basis. The Companys printed circuit materials (the Nelco® product line) are marketed primarily to leading independent printed circuit board fabricators, electronic manufacturing service companies, electronic contract manufacturers and major electronic original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) located throughout North America, Europe and Asia. The Companys advanced composite materials (the Nelcote product line) customers, the majority of which are located in the United States, include OEMs, independent firms and distributors in the electronics, aerospace, and industrial industries. |
|
|
|
Sales are attributed to geographic region based upon the region from which the materials were invoiced to the customer. Sales between geographic regions were not significant. |
14
|
Financial information concerning the Companys operations by geographic region follows: |
|
|
13 weeks ended |
|
26 weeks ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
August 26, |
|
August 27, |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
31,035 |
|
$ |
33,447 |
|
$ |
60,321 |
|
$ |
68,872 |
|
Europe |
|
|
6,349 |
|
|
9,831 |
|
|
12,874 |
|
|
18,202 |
|
Asia |
|
|
23,157 |
|
|
23,240 |
|
|
44,423 |
|
|
42,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
60,541 |
|
$ |
66,518 |
|
$ |
117,618 |
|
$ |
129,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 26, |
|
February 25, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
24,905 |
|
$ |
25,600 |
|
Europe |
|
|
4,426 |
|
|
4,659 |
|
Asia |
|
|
26,177 |
|
|
25,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets |
|
$ |
55,508 |
|
$ |
55,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the 13 weeks ended August 26, 2007 and August 27, 2006 was $9,413 and $12,821 respectively. Total comprehensive income for the 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007 and August 27, 2006 was $16,741 and $22,629, respectively. Comprehensive income consisted primarily of net earnings and foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities. |
|
|
|
11. |
CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Litigation The Company is subject to a small number of proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, employment, product and other matters. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. |
|
|
|
|
b. |
Environmental Contingencies - The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named by the Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) or a comparable state agency under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (the Superfund Act) or similar state law as potentially responsible parties in connection with alleged releases of hazardous substances at nine sites. |
15
|
|
In addition, a subsidiary of the Company has received cost recovery claims under the Superfund Act from other private parties involving one other site and has received requests from the EPA under the Superfund Act for information with respect to its involvement at three other sites. |
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Superfund Act and similar state laws, all parties who may have contributed any waste to a hazardous waste disposal site or contaminated area identified by the EPA or comparable state agency may be jointly and severally liable for the cost of cleanup. Generally, these sites are locations at which numerous persons disposed of hazardous waste. In the case of the Companys subsidiaries, generally the waste was removed from their manufacturing facilities and disposed at waste sites by various companies which contracted with the subsidiaries to provide waste disposal services. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries have been accused of or charged with any wrongdoing or illegal acts in connection with any such sites. The Company believes it maintains an effective and comprehensive environmental compliance program. |
|
|
|
|
|
The insurance carriers who provided general liability insurance coverage to the Company and its subsidiaries for the years during which the Companys subsidiaries waste was disposed at these sites have agreed to pay, or reimburse the Company and its subsidiaries for, 100% of their legal defense and remediation costs associated with three of these sites and 25% of such costs associated with another one of these sites. |
|
|
|
|
|
The total costs incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries in connection with these sites, including legal fees incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries and their assessed share of remediation costs and excluding amounts paid or reimbursed by insurance carriers, were approximately $1 and $1 in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 26, 2007 and August 27, 2006, respectively. The recorded liabilities included in accrued liabilities for environmental matters were $1,757 at August 26, 2007 and at February 25, 2007. As discussed in Note 4, liabilities from discontinued operations have been segregated on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and include $2,121 for environmental matters related to Dielektra. |
|
|
|
|
|
Such recorded liabilities do not include environmental liabilities and related legal expenses for which the Company has concluded indemnification agreements with the insurance carriers who provided general liability insurance coverage to the Company and its subsidiaries for the years during which the Companys subsidiaries waste was disposed at three sites for which certain subsidiaries of the Company have been named as potentially responsible parties, pursuant to which agreements such insurance carriers have been paying 100% of the legal defense and remediation costs associated with such three sites since 1985. |
16
|
|
Included in cost of sales are charges for actual expenditures and accruals, based on estimates, for certain environmental matters described above. The Company accrues estimated costs associated with known environmental matters, when such costs can be reasonably estimated and when the outcome appears probable. The Company believes that the ultimate disposition of known environmental matters will not have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, capital resources, business or consolidated results of operations or financial position of the Company. However, one or more of such environmental matters could have a significant negative impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations or financial position for a particular reporting period. |
|
|
|
12. |
PROPOSED RESTRUCTURING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the 2008 fiscal year third quarter, the Company announced that its electronic materials business unit located in Mirebeau, France, Neltec Europe SAS, was proposing to restructure its operations and to reduce its workforce in response to the continuing erosion of the markets for electronic materials in Europe and the continuing migration of such markets to Asia, that Neltec Europe SAS had commenced an information and consultation process with its employees regarding the proposed restructuring and workforce reduction in accordance with French law and that, if the proposed restructuring and workforce reduction are implemented, the Company would expect to record a one-time charge of approximately $1.5 million in the fourth quarter of the Companys current fiscal year ending March 2, 2008. |
|
|
|
13. |
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies whenever other standards require, or permit, assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect SFAS 157 to have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect SFAS 159 to have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. |
17
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
General:
Park is a global advanced materials company which develops, manufactures and markets high technology digital and RF/microwave printed circuit materials (the Nelco® product line) and advanced composite materials (the Nelcote product line) principally for the telecommunications and internet infrastructure, high-end computing and aerospace markets. Park focuses on the general aviation aircraft segment of the aerospace market. Parks core capabilities are in the areas of polymer chemistry formulation and coating technology. The Companys manufacturing facilities are located in Singapore, China, France, Connecticut, New York, Arizona and California. In addition, the Company plans to construct a new facility in Newton, Kansas.
The Companys net sales decreased in both the three-month period and six-month period ended August 26, 2007 compared with last years comparable periods as a result of decreases in sales of the Companys printed circuit materials products in North America and Europe, which were only partially offset by increases in sales of printed circuit materials products in Asia and advanced composite materials products. The decreases in sales resulted in lower operating profits and lower net earnings in the six-months ended August 26, 2007 compared to the six-months ended August 27, 2006, although operating profits in the 2008 fiscal year second quarter were higher than they were in the 2007 fiscal year second quarter.
The weakness that occurred in the markets for the Companys printed circuit materials products in the 2007 fiscal year fourth quarter continued in the 2008 fiscal year first and second quarters. Consequently, sales of the Companys printed circuit materials products decreased in the 2008 fiscal year second quarter and first half compared to the 2007 fiscal year second quarter and first half. The markets for the Companys advanced composite materials products continued to be relatively strong during the 2008 fiscal year first half, and sales of the Companys advanced composite materials products increased in the second quarter and first half of the 2008 fiscal year compared to the comparable periods in the prior fiscal year.
The Companys operating profit in the 2008 fiscal year second quarter was higher than its operating profit in the 2007 fiscal year second quarter principally as a result of higher gross profit, while the Companys operating profit in the six months ended August 26, 2007 was lower than its operating profit in the six months ended August 27, 2006 principally as a result of lower sales and production unit volumes.
The global markets for the Companys printed circuit materials products continue to be very difficult to forecast, and it is not clear to the Company what the condition of the global markets for the Companys printed circuit materials products will be in the 2008 fiscal year third quarter. The Company believes that the markets for its advanced composite materials products will continue to be relatively strong during the 2008 fiscal year third quarter.
18
In the third quarter of the 2007 fiscal year, the Company acquired a facility in Singapore which the Company is modifying and expanding for use as a new advanced composites manufacturing plant. The Company is also in the final stages of planning the construction of a new development and manufacturing facility in Newton, Kansas to produce advanced composite materials principally for the general aviation aircraft segment of the aerospace industry. As recently announced, the Company plans to spend approximately $15 million on the facility and equipment.
While the Company continues to expand and invest in its business, it also continues to make additional adjustments to certain of its operations, which may result in workforce reductions. In the 2008 fiscal year third quarter, the Company announced that its electronic materials business unit located in Mirebeau, France, Neltec Europe SAS, was proposing to restructure its operations and to reduce its workforce in response to the continuing erosion of the markets for electronic materials in Europe and the continuing migration of such markets to Asia, that Neltec Europe SAS had commenced an information and consultation process with its employees regarding the proposed restructuring and workforce reduction in accordance with French law and that, if the proposed restructuring and workforce reduction are implemented, the Company would expect to record a one-time charge of approximately $1.5 million in the fourth quarter of the Companys current fiscal year ending March 2, 2008.
During the 2007 fiscal years second quarter, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $1.3 million in connection with the termination of an insurance arrangement with Jerry Shore, the Companys founder and former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and recognized a $0.5 million tax benefit relating to this insurance termination charge. The termination of the insurance arrangement involved a payment of $1.3 million by the Company to Mr. Shore in January 2007, which resulted in a net cash cost to the Company of $0.7 million, after the Companys receipt of a portion of the cash surrender value of the insurance policies. During the second quarter, the Company also recognized a tax benefit of $3.5 million relating to the elimination of certain valuation allowances previously established relating to deferred tax assets in the United States and a tax benefit of $1.4 million relating to the elimination of reserves no longer required as the result of the completion of a tax audit.
Three and Six Months Ended August 26, 2007 Compared with Three and Six Months Ended August 27, 2006:
The Companys total net sales and its net sales of printed circuit materials products decreased during the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 compared to the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006 principally as a result of declines in such sales in North America and Europe. Net sales of the Companys advanced composite materials products increased during the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 compared to the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006. Sales of advanced composite materials were 9% of the Companys total net sales worldwide in the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 compared to 7% of the Companys total net sales worldwide in the 2007 fiscal year comparable periods.
19
The Companys gross profit in the three-months ended August 26, 2007 was higher than the gross profit in the prior years comparable period primarily as a result of higher percentages of sales of higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products, higher selling prices, reduced costs as a percentage of sales and significant increases in the cost of copper foil in the prior years second quarter, while the gross profit in the six months ended August 26, 2007 was lower than the gross profit in the prior years comparable period primarily as a result of lower sales volumes.
Although the Companys earnings from operations, earnings before income taxes and net earnings before special items were higher in the three months ended August 26, 2007 than in the three months ended August 27, 2006 and such earnings were only slightly lower in the six months ended August 26, 2007 than in the six months ended August 27, 2006, net earnings were lower in both the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 than in the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007. However, the Companys net earnings for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006 were enhanced by the tax benefits relating to the insurance arrangement termination charge, the elimination of certain valuation allowances previously established relating to deferred tax assets in the United States and the elimination of reserves no longer required as a result of the completion of a tax audit which were only partially offset by the charge resulting from the termination of an insurance arrangement.
Results of Operations
The Companys total net sales for the three-month period ended August 26, 2007 decreased 9% to $60.5 million from $66.5 million for last fiscal years comparable period. Sales volumes decreased less than 1% in Asia, 7% in North America and 35% in Europe during the 2008 fiscal year second quarter compared to the sales for the comparable period in the prior year. The Companys total net sales for the six-month period ended August 26, 2007 decreased 9% to $117.6 million from $129.4 million for last fiscal years comparable period. Sales volumes declined 12% in North America and 29% in Europe and increased 5% in Asia during the six-months ended August 26, 2007 compared to the sales for the six-months ended August 27, 2006. The decreases in net sales were the result of lower unit volumes of printed circuit materials products shipped by the Companys operations in North America and Europe.
The Companys foreign operations accounted for $29.5 million and $57.3 million, respectively, of net sales, or 49% of the Companys total net sales worldwide, during the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007, compared with $33.1 million and $60.5 million, respectively, of net sales, or 50% and 47%, respectively, of total net sales worldwide, during last years comparable periods. Net sales by the Companys foreign operations during the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 decreased 11% and 5%, respectively, from the 2007 fiscal year comparable periods, primarily as a result of decreases in sales in Europe during both periods.
20
For the three-month period ended August 26, 2007, the Companys sales in North America, Asia and Europe were 51%, 38% and 11%, respectively, of the Companys total net sales worldwide compared with 50%, 35% and 15%, respectively, for the three-month period ended August 27, 2006; and for the six-month period ended August 26, 2007, the Companys sales in North America, Asia and Europe were 51%, 38% and 11% of the Companys total net sales worldwide compared with 53%, 33% and 14%, respectively, for the six-month period ended August 27, 2006. The Companys sales in North America decreased 7%, its sales in Asia decreased less than 1% and its sales in Europe decreased 35% in the three-month period ended August 26, 2007 compared with the three-month period ended August 27, 2006, and its sales in North America decreased 12%, its sales in Asia increased 5% and its sales in Europe decreased 29% in the six-month period ended August 26, 2007 compared with the six-month period ended August 27, 2006.
The overall gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the Companys worldwide operations improved to 27.1% and 26.0%, respectively, for the three months and six months ended August 26, 2007 compared with 24.1% and 25.1% for last fiscal years comparable periods. The improvements in the gross profit margins were attributable to higher percentages of sales of higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products, reductions of the Companys operating costs and significant increases in the cost of copper foil in three months ended August 27, 2006.
During the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007, the Companys total net sales worldwide of high temperature printed circuit materials, which include high performance materials (non-FR4 printed circuit materials), were 99% of the Companys total net sales worldwide of printed circuit materials, compared with 97% for last fiscal years comparable periods.
The Companys high temperature printed circuit materials include its high performance materials (non FR4 printed circuit materials), which consist of high-speed, low-loss materials for digital and RF/microwave applications requiring lead-free compatibility and high bandwidth signal integrity, bismalimide triazine (BT) materials, polyimides for applications that demand extremely high thermal performance, cyanate esters, and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) materials for RF/Microwave systems that operate at frequencies up to 77GHz.
During the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007, the Companys total net sales worldwide of high performance printed circuit materials (non FR4 printed circuit materials) were 52% and 51%, respectively, of the Companys total net sales worldwide of printed circuit materials, compared with 41% for last fiscal years comparable periods.
The Companys cost of sales as a percentage of net sales declined to 72.9% in the three-month period ended August 26, 2007 from 75.9% in the three-month period ended August 27, 2006 and to 74.0% in the six-month period ended August 26, 2007 from 74.9% in the six-month period ended August 27, 2006 resulting in gross profit margin improvements, which were attributable to higher percentages of sales of higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products and cost reduction measures implemented by the Company.
21
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, or by 3%, during the three-month period and six-month period, respectively, ended August 26, 2007 compared with last fiscal years comparable periods, but these expenses, measured as percentages of sales, were 10.9% and 11.3%, respectively, during the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 compared with 10.3% and 10.6%, respectively, during the last fiscal years comparable periods. The higher percentages in the 2008 fiscal year periods were the result of lower sales in such periods. Stock option expenses were $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 compared with $0.3 million and $0.6 million for last fiscal years comparable periods.
During the three-month period ended August 27, 2006, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $1.3 million in connection with the termination of a life insurance arrangement with Mr. Jerry Shore, the Companys founder and former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and recognized a tax benefit of $0.5 million relating to this insurance termination charge. During the 2007 fiscal year second quarter, the Company also recognized a tax benefit of $3.5 million relating to the elimination of certain valuation allowances previously established relating to deferred tax assets in the United States and a tax benefit of $1.4 million relating to the elimination of reserves no longer required as the result of the completion of a tax audit.
For the reasons set forth above, the Companys earnings from operations were $9.8 million for the three months ended August 26, 2007 compared to $7.9 million for the three months ended August 27, 2006, including the $1.3 million insurance arrangement termination charge described above, and its earnings from operations were $17.3 million for the six month ended August 26, 2007 compared to $17.5 million for the six months ended August 27, 2006, including the $1.3 million insurance arrangement termination charge described above. The net impacts of the charge described above were to reduce the Companys earnings from operations by $1.3 million in the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006.
Interest and other income, net, principally investment income, was $2.5 million and $4.8 million, respectively, for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 compared with $1.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for last fiscal years comparable periods. The increases in investment income were attributable principally to higher prevailing interest rates and higher levels of cash available for investment during the 2008 fiscal year first and second quarters than during the 2007 fiscal year first and second quarters. The Companys investments were primarily short-term taxable instruments and money market funds.
The Companys effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 were 29.6% and 27.4%, respectively, before recognition of tax benefits of $0.5 million relating to reserves previously established in a foreign jurisdiction where the Company no longer operates compared to effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006 of 23.0% before adjusting for the tax benefits relating to the insurance arrangement termination charge, the elimination of certain valuation allowances in the United States and the elimination of tax reserves no longer required, all described above. The higher tax provisions for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 were primarily the results of higher taxable income in jurisdictions with higher income tax rates.
22
The Companys effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 after adjusting for the recognition of tax benefits in a foreign jurisdiction where the Company no longer operates were 25.2% and 25.0%, respectively. The Companys effective income tax rates for the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006 after adjusting for the tax benefits relating to the insurance arrangement termination charge, the elimination of certain valuation allowances in the United States and the elimination of tax reserves no longer required, all described above, were (29.5%) and (1.0%), respectively.
The Companys net earnings for the three months ended August 26, 2007 were $9.2 million compared to net earnings of $12.5 million for the three months ended August 27, 2006, including the $1.3 million insurance arrangement termination charge described above and the related $0.5 million tax benefit and the tax benefits of $4.9 million relating to the elimination on certain valuation allowances and reserves described above, and the Companys net earnings for the six months ended August 26, 2007 were $16.6 million compared to net earnings of $21.4 million for the six-months ended August 27, 2006, including the charge and tax benefits described above.
Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.45 and $0.82 for the three months and six months, respectively, ended August 26, 2007 compared with basic and diluted earnings per share, including the insurance termination charge and tax benefits described above, of $0.62 and $1.06 for the three-months and six-months, respectively, ended August 27, 2006. The net impacts of the charge and tax benefits described above were to increase basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.20 in the three-month and six-month periods ended August 27, 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
At August 26, 2007, the Companys cash and temporary investments (consisting of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities) were $195.8 million compared with $208.8 million at February 25, 2007, the end of the Companys 2007 fiscal year. The decrease in the Companys cash and investment position at August 26, 2007 was attributable to the payment of dividends (including a special dividend of $1.50 per share totaling $30.5 million), the payment of income taxes and purchases of property, plant and equipment partially offset by cash generated by operating activities. The Companys working capital (which includes cash and temporary investments) was $224.1 million at August 26, 2007 compared with $237.3 million at February 25, 2007. The decrease in working capital at August 26, 2007 compared with February 25, 2007 was due principally to the decrease in cash and temporary investments and the increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities only partially offset by increases in inventories and other current assets and a decrease in income taxes payable. The 6% increase in accounts payable at August 26, 2007 compared to February 25, 2007 was principally due to the timing of payments, and the 7% increase in accrued liabilities at August 26, 2007 compared to February 25, 2007 was primarily the result of increased accruals for incentive compensation programs and professional fees. Other current assets increased 18% at August 26, 2007 compared to February 25, 2007 primarily as a result of an increase in prepaid assets, consisting of prepaid insurance. Income taxes payable declined 25% at August 26, 2007 compared to February 25, 2007 primarily as a result of tax payments made during the six-month period. The Companys current ratio (the ratio of current assets to current liabilities) was 8.4 to 1 at August 26, 2007 compared to 9.2 to 1 at February 25, 2007.
23
During the six months ended August 26, 2007, net earnings from the Companys operations, before depreciation and amortization, of $20.6 million increased by a net decrease in working capital items, resulted in $21.0 million of cash provided by operating activities. During the same six-month period, the Company expended $3.6 million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment compared with $2.0 million for the six-month period ended August 27, 2006. In addition, the Company paid $33.7 million in dividends on its common stock in the six-month period ended August 26, 2007 compared to $23.4 million in the six-month period ended August 27, 2006 as a result of the Companys declaration of a special cash dividend of $1.50 per share payable August 22, 2007 and totaling $30.5 million and a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share payable August 22, 2006 and totaling $20.2 million. Net expenditures for property, plant and equipment were $3.9 million in the 2007 fiscal year and $4.2 million in the 2006 fiscal year.
At August 26, 2007 and at February 25, 2007, the Company had no long-term debt.
The Company believes its financial resources will be sufficient, for the foreseeable future, to provide for continued investment in working capital and property, plant and equipment and for general corporate purposes. Such resources would also be available for purchases of the Companys common stock, appropriate acquisitions and other expansions of the Companys business.
The Company is not aware of any circumstances or events that are reasonably likely to occur that could materially affect its liquidity.
The Companys contractual obligations and other commercial commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as lease agreements, consist only of operating lease commitments. The Company has no long-term debt, capital lease obligations, unconditional purchase obligations or other long-term obligations, standby letters of credit, guarantees, standby repurchase obligations or other commercial commitments or contingent commitments, other than two standby letters of credit in the total amount of $1.7 million to secure the Companys obligations under its workers compensation insurance program and certain limited energy purchase contracts intended to protect the Company from increased utilities costs.
As of August 26, 2007, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of the Companys business in the Companys contractual obligations disclosed in Item 7 of Part II of its Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2007.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:
The Companys liquidity is not dependent on the use of, and the Company is not engaged in, any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, such as securitization of receivables or obtaining access to assets through special purpose entities.
24
Environmental Matters:
In the six-month periods ended August 26, 2007 and August 27, 2006, the Company charged less than $0.01 million against pretax income for environmental remedial response and voluntary cleanup costs (including legal fees). While annual expenditures have generally been constant from year to year and may increase over time, the Company expects it will be able to fund such expenditures from cash flow from operations. The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors, including regulatory approval of cleanup projects, remedial techniques to be utilized and agreements with other parties. At August 26, 2007 and February 25, 2007, the amount recorded in liabilities from discontinued operations for environmental matters related to Dielektra was $2.1 million and the amount recorded in accrued liabilities for other environmental matters was $1.8 million. Management does not expect that environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, capital resources, business, consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial position of the Company.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:
In response to financial reporting release, FR-60, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies, issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2001, the following information is provided regarding critical accounting policies that are important to the Consolidated Financial Statements and that entail, to a significant extent, the use of estimates, assumptions and the application of managements judgment.
General
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to sales allowances, accounts receivable, allowances for bad debts, inventories, valuation of long-lived assets, income taxes, restructurings, contingencies and litigation, and pensions and other employee benefit programs. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
25
Revenue Recognition
Sales revenue is recognized at the time title to product is transferred to a customer. All material sales transactions are for the shipment of manufactured prepreg and laminate products and advanced composite materials. The Company ships its products to customers based upon firm orders, with fixed selling prices, when collection is reasonably assured.
Sales Allowances
The Company provides for the estimated costs of sales allowances at the time such costs can be reasonably estimated. The Companys products are made to customer specifications and tested for adherence to such specifications before shipment to customers. There are no future performance requirements other than the products meeting the agreed specifications. The Companys bases for providing sales allowances for returns are known situations in which products may have failed due to manufacturing defects in the products supplied by the Company. The Company is focused on manufacturing the highest quality printed circuit materials and advanced composite materials possible and employs stringent manufacturing process controls and works with raw material suppliers who have dedicated themselves to complying with the Companys specifications and technical requirements. The amounts of returns and allowances resulting from defective or damaged products have been approximately 1.0% of sales for each of the Companys last three fiscal years.
Accounts Receivable
The majority of the Companys accounts receivable are due from purchasers of the Companys printed circuit materials. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a customers financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are due within established payment terms and are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts outstanding longer than established payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time accounts receivable are past due, the Companys previous loss history, the customers current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Allowances for Bad Debts
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
26
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketability based upon the age of the inventory and assumptions about future demand for the Companys products and market conditions.
Valuation of Long-lived Assets
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Important factors that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant negative industry or economic trends and significant changes in the use of the Companys assets or strategy of the overall business.
Income Taxes
Carrying value of the Companys net deferred tax assets assumes that the Company will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions, based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record additional valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in the Companys consolidated statement of operations, or conversely to further reduce the existing valuation allowance resulting in less income tax expense. Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets quarterly and assesses the need for additional valuation allowances quarterly.
Restructurings
In the 2008 fiscal year third quarter, the Company announced that it would expect to record a one-time charge of approximately $1.5 million in the fourth quarter of the Companys current fiscal year ending March 2, 2008 if the proposed restructuring and workforce reduction at its Neltec Europe SAS business unit in France are implemented. Such proposed restructuring and workforce reduction are described in Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Report and in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 2 of Part I of this Report.
The Company recorded charges in connection with the realignment of its Neltec Europe SAS business in France during the three months ended May 29, 2005 and the realignment of its North American volume printed circuit materials operations during the fiscal years ended February 29, 2004 and March 2, 2003. The Company also recorded realignment charges in its North American operations during the fiscal year ended February 27, 2005. In addition, during the 2003 fiscal year, the Company recorded charges in connection with the closure of the Companys manufacturing facility in England. Prior to the Companys treating Dielektra GmbH as a discontinued operation, the Company recorded charges in connection with the closure of the mass lamination operation of Dielektra and the realignment of Dielektra during the fiscal years ended February 29, 2004, March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002.
27
Contingencies
The Company is subject to a small number of proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, employment, product and other matters. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters.
Pension and Other Employee Benefit Programs
Dielektra GmbH has significant pension liabilities that were developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions including discount rates and wage inflation rates. The pension liability of Dielektra has been included in liabilities from discontinued operations on the Companys balance sheet.
The Companys obligations for workers compensation claims are effectively self-insured, although the Company maintains individual and aggregate stop-loss insurance coverage for such claims. The Company uses an insurance company administrator to process all such claims and benefits. The Company accrues its workers compensation liability based upon the claim reserves established by the third-party administrator and historical experience.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have a non-contributory profit sharing retirement plan covering their regular full-time employees. In addition, the Companys subsidiaries have various bonus and incentive compensation programs, most of which are determined at managements discretion.
The Companys reserves associated with these self-insured liabilities and benefit programs are reviewed by management for adequacy at the end of each reporting period.
Factors That May Affect Future Results.
Certain portions of this Report which do not relate to historical financial information may be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from Parks expectations or from results which might be projected, forecast, estimated or budgeted by the Company in forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, general conditions in the electronics and aerospace industries, the Companys competitive position, the status of the Companys relationships with its customers, economic conditions in international markets, the cost and availability of raw materials and utilities, and the various factors set forth in Item 1A Risk Factors and under the caption Factors That May Affect Future Results after Item 7 of Parks Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2007.
28
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk. |
The Companys market risk exposure at August 26, 2007 is consistent with, and not greater than, the types of market risk and amount of exposures presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2007.
Controls and Procedures. |
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of August 26, 2007, the end of the quarterly fiscal period covered by this quarterly report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There has not been any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
29
Legal Proceedings. |
None.
Risk Factors. |
There have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2007.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
The following table provides information with respect to shares of the Companys Common Stock acquired by the Company during each month included in the Companys 2008 fiscal year second quarter ended August 26, 2007.
Period |
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 28 - June 26 |
|
|
3(a) |
|
|
$27.85 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
June 27 -July 26 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
July 27 -August 26 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3(a) |
|
|
$27.85 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
2,000,000(b) |
|
|
|
(a) Acquired by the Company pursuant to privately negotiated transactions with two individual shareholders of the Company at the then current market price of the Companys Common Stock. |
|
|
|
(b) Aggregate number of shares available to be purchased by the Company pursuant to a previous share purchase authorization announced on October 20, 2004. Pursuant to such authorization, the Company is authorized to purchase its shares from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. |
30
Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
None.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on July 18, 2007:
|
(a) the persons elected as directors of the Company and the voting for such persons were as follows: |
Name |
|
Votes For |
|
Authority |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale Blanchfield |
|
|
17,491,662 |
|
|
174,397 |
|
Anthony Chiesa |
|
|
16,132,173 |
|
|
1,533,886 |
|
Lloyd Frank |
|
|
16,668,699 |
|
|
997,360 |
|
Brian E. Shore |
|
|
17,402,999 |
|
|
263,060 |
|
Steven T. Warshaw |
|
|
17,336,438 |
|
|
329,621 |
|
Other Information. |
None.
Exhibits. |
|
31.1 |
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Park Electrochemical Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brian E. Shore |
Date: October 2, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Brian E. Shore |
|
|
President and |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James L. Zerby |
Date: October 2, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
James L. Zerby |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(principal financial officer) |
32
Exhibit No. |
|
Name |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) |
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) |
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
38 |