Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 20-F
(MarkOne) o Registration Statement
pursuant to Section 12(b)
or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
ý Annual Report pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
o Transition report pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from to
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004
Commission file number 0-18262
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Victoria, Australia
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
100 Queen Street, Melbourne, VICTORIA, 3000, AUSTRALIA
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
American Depositary Shares each representing five ordinary shares |
|
The New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
|
|
|
American Depositary Receipts each representing four Preference shares |
|
The New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act. |
None |
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. |
None |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers
classes of capital or common stock as
of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report.
USD1,000 Preference Shares |
|
1,100,000 |
|
fully paid |
Ordinary Shares |
|
1,818,401,807 |
|
fully paid |
$100 Preference Shares |
|
10,000,000 |
|
fully paid |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o Item 18 ý
2004
US Form 20-F
Annual Report
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ABN 11 005 357 522.
Form 20-F Cross Reference Index |
|
|
|
Form 20-F Registration Statement |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Part I |
|
|
|
Item 1: Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency of Presentation, Exchange Rates and Certain Definitions |
|
|
|
|
|
NBNZ Contribution (net of acquisition, funding and incremental integration costs) |
|
|
|
Item 6: Directors, Senior Management/Executives and Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
4
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking statements, including statements regarding (i) economic and financial forecasts, (ii) anticipated implementation of certain control systems and programs, (iii) the expected outcomes of legal proceedings, and (iv) strategic priorities. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, anticipate, estimate, continue, plan, intend, believe or other similar words. These statements discuss future expectations concerning results of operations or of financial condition or provide other forward-looking information. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (the Company), together with its subsidiaries (ANZ, us, we, our, or the Group), which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. Given these risks, uncertainties and other factors, you should not place an undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speaks only as of the date made.
For example, the economic and financial forecasts contained in this Annual Report will be affected by movements in exchange rates and interest rates, which may vary significantly from current levels, as well as by general economic conditions in each of ANZs major markets. Such variations may materially impact ANZs financial condition and results of operations. The implementation of control systems and programs will be dependent on such factors as ANZs ability to acquire or develop necessary technology and its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. The plans, strategies and objectives of management will be subject to, among other things, government regulation, which may change at any time and over which ANZ has no control. In addition, ANZ will continue to be affected by general economic conditions in capital markets, the competitive environment in each of its markets and political and regulatory policies. There can be no assurance that actual outcomes will not differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. See Summary of Material Risk Factors on page 9.
Item 1 - Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
Not applicable.
Item 2 - Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
5
The summary consolidated balance sheet date as of September 30, 2004 and 2003 and income statement data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from the Groups 2004 audited financial statements (the Financial Report). The Financial Report has been audited by our independent auditors. The balance sheet data as of September 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and income statement data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000, which are not included in this document.
The financial statements referred to above have been prepared in accordance with Australian GAAP, which varies in certain significant respects from US GAAP. See Note 55 to the Financial Report for a discussion of the significant differences between Australian GAAP and US GAAP as they apply to us.
Prior to 2001, abnormal items were reported separately. Abnormal items were defined as items of revenue or expense which, although attributable to the ordinary operations of the business entity, were considered to be abnormal by reason of their size and/or effect on the results of the business entity for the period. Since 2000, however, under Australian GAAP, abnormal items are not allowed to be disclosed separately and we have presented prior periods accordingly. In 2000, the following abnormals were presented separately: abnormal income of $1,207 million, abnormal expenses of ($986 million) and abnormal tax expense of ($177 million). We have re-presented prior periods in the table below accordingly.
Amounts reported in US dollars have been translated at the September 30, 2004 Noon Buying Rate, which was USD0.7244 = $1.00.
6
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Years ended September 30 (1) |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
||||||
|
|
USD M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
||||||
Summary of Consolidated Statement of Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Australian GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
10,226 |
|
14,117 |
|
10,215 |
|
9,037 |
|
10,251 |
|
10,241 |
|
||||||
Interest expense |
|
(6,420 |
) |
(8,863 |
) |
(5,904 |
) |
(5,019 |
) |
(6,418 |
) |
(6,440 |
) |
||||||
Net interest income |
|
3,806 |
|
5,254 |
|
4,311 |
|
4,018 |
|
3,833 |
|
3,801 |
|
||||||
Profit from disposal of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Other operating income |
|
2,456 |
|
3,391 |
|
2,808 |
|
2,796 |
|
2,573 |
|
3,790 |
|
||||||
Operating income |
|
6,262 |
|
8,645 |
|
7,119 |
|
6,988 |
|
6,406 |
|
7,591 |
|
||||||
Operating expenses |
|
(2,916 |
) |
(4,026 |
) |
(3,228 |
) |
(2,905 |
) |
(3,092 |
) |
(4,300 |
) |
||||||
Profit before allowance for loan losses and income tax |
|
3,346 |
|
4,619 |
|
3,891 |
|
4,083 |
|
3,314 |
|
3,291 |
|
||||||
Allowance for loan loss charge (2) |
|
(458 |
) |
(632 |
) |
(614 |
) |
(860 |
) |
(531 |
) |
(502 |
) |
||||||
Profit before income tax |
|
2,888 |
|
3,987 |
|
3,277 |
|
3,223 |
|
2,783 |
|
2,789 |
|
||||||
Income tax expense |
|
(846 |
) |
(1,168 |
) |
(926 |
) |
(898 |
) |
(911 |
) |
(1,040 |
) |
||||||
Profit after income tax |
|
2,042 |
|
2,819 |
|
2,351 |
|
2,325 |
|
1,872 |
|
1,749 |
|
||||||
Net profit attributable to outside equity interests |
|
(3 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
||||||
Net profit attributable to shareholders of the Company (1) |
|
2,039 |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
1,870 |
|
1,747 |
|
||||||
Total adjustments attributable to shareholders of the company recognized directly into equity |
|
169 |
|
233 |
|
(356 |
) |
(98 |
) |
197 |
|
201 |
|
||||||
Total changes in equity other than those resulting from transactions with shareholders as owners |
|
2,208 |
|
3,048 |
|
1,992 |
|
2,224 |
|
2,067 |
|
1,948 |
|
||||||
Non-interest income as a % of operating income(3) |
|
39.2 |
% |
39.2 |
% |
39.4 |
% |
42.5 |
% |
40.2 |
% |
49.9 |
% |
||||||
Dividends paid / provided (4) |
|
1,158 |
|
1,598 |
|
641 |
|
1,252 |
|
1,062 |
|
941 |
|
||||||
Per fully paid ordinary share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating profit after income tax (cents) (5) |
|
111 |
|
153 |
|
142 |
|
141 |
|
113 |
|
103 |
|
||||||
Diluted net income per share (cents) |
|
109 |
|
150 |
|
142 |
|
140 |
|
112 |
|
102 |
|
||||||
Dividends |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
USD0.73 |
|
USD0.65 |
|
USD0.46 |
|
USD0.36 |
|
USD0.35 |
|
||||||
Dividends per ADR |
|
|
|
USD3.66 |
|
USD3.23 |
|
USD2.31 |
|
USD1.81 |
|
USD1.73 |
|
||||||
Adjusted in accordance with US GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net interest income |
|
3,695 |
|
5,101 |
|
4,263 |
|
4,001 |
|
4,128 |
|
3,801 |
|
||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(458 |
) |
(632 |
) |
(614 |
) |
(860 |
) |
(531 |
) |
(502 |
) |
||||||
Operating profit before taxes |
|
2,837 |
|
3,916 |
|
3,294 |
|
2,993 |
|
2,700 |
|
3,092 |
|
||||||
Operating profit after income tax |
|
2,020 |
|
2,788 |
|
2,380 |
|
2,097 |
|
1,796 |
|
1,940 |
|
||||||
Operating profit after income tax (cents) (5) |
|
112 |
|
155 |
|
144 |
|
127 |
|
108 |
|
115 |
|
||||||
Continuing Operations (Australian GAAP): (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total income from operations |
|
12,682 |
|
17,508 |
|
13,023 |
|
12,007 |
|
12,824 |
|
14,031 |
|
||||||
Less: Impact of discontinuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
(2,148 |
) |
||||||
Total income from continuing operations |
|
12,682 |
|
17,508 |
|
13,023 |
|
12,007 |
|
12,855 |
|
11,883 |
|
||||||
Total operating profit after income tax |
|
2,039 |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
1,870 |
|
1,747 |
|
||||||
Less: Impact of discontinuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
(153 |
) |
||||||
Operating profit after income tax from continuing operations |
|
2,039 |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
1,882 |
|
1,594 |
|
||||||
Operating profit after income tax (cents) (5) |
|
111 |
|
153 |
|
142 |
|
141 |
|
113 |
|
93 |
|
||||||
(1) In millions, except per share amount per ADR amount and ratios.
(2) The allowance for loan loss charge represents the economic loss provision charge (refer page 49).
(3) Operating income is the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
(4) Excludes preference share dividends and dividends taken under the bonus option plan. The final dividend for 2004 of $983 million (2003: $777 million) has not been provided for at September 30, due to a change in Australian Accounting Standards on recognition of dividends effective from 2003.
(5) Amounts are based on weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, 2004: 1,774.1 million, 2003: 1,577.8 million, 2002: 1,559.8 million, 2001: 1,554.8 million, and 2000: 1,604.9 million. Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding has been adjusted for rights issue. Operating profit after income tax excludes preference share dividends of 2004: $98 million, 2003: $102 million, 2002: $117 million, 2001: $119 million, 2000: $102 million.
(6) Operations that will continue to contribute to the results of the ANZ group in future periods. Operations exclude, 2004, 2003, 2002: Nil, 2001: sale of residual assets from Grindlays, 2000: Sale of Grindlays.
7
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
USD M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Summary of Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (1) |
|
12,972 |
|
17,907 |
|
13,770 |
|
11,448 |
|
10,538 |
|
9,795 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
6,139 |
|
8,475 |
|
5,630 |
|
3,445 |
|
3,831 |
|
3,687 |
|
Bonds and notes |
|
19,995 |
|
27,602 |
|
16,572 |
|
14,708 |
|
15,340 |
|
9,519 |
|
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
122,103 |
|
168,557 |
|
124,494 |
|
113,297 |
|
104,874 |
|
100,602 |
|
Gross loans, advances and acceptances (net of unearned income) (2) |
|
159,226 |
|
219,804 |
|
164,661 |
|
147,937 |
|
139,867 |
|
133,879 |
|
Specific allowance for loan losses |
|
(278 |
) |
(384 |
) |
(484 |
) |
(585 |
) |
(500 |
) |
(709 |
) |
General allowance for loan losses |
|
(1,443 |
) |
(1,992 |
) |
(1,534 |
) |
(1,496 |
) |
(1,386 |
) |
(1,373 |
) |
Net loans, advances and acceptances |
|
157,505 |
|
217,428 |
|
162,643 |
|
145,856 |
|
137,981 |
|
131,797 |
|
Total assets |
|
187,870 |
|
259,345 |
|
195,591 |
|
183,105 |
|
185,493 |
|
172,467 |
|
Net assets |
|
12,985 |
|
17,925 |
|
13,787 |
|
11,465 |
|
10,551 |
|
9,807 |
|
Risk weighted assets |
|
142,463 |
|
196,664 |
|
152,164 |
|
141,390 |
|
139,129 |
|
129,688 |
|
Adjusted in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (1) |
|
12,255 |
|
16,917 |
|
12,820 |
|
12,139 |
|
11,207 |
|
10,517 |
|
Total assets |
|
189,810 |
|
262,024 |
|
195,230 |
|
183,035 |
|
185,573 |
|
171,858 |
|
Summary of Consolidated Ratios Australian GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit after income tax (3) as a percentage of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
1.3 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
Average shareholders equity (1) |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
20.6 |
% |
23.2 |
% |
20.2 |
% |
19.3 |
% |
Dividends (4) to ordinary shareholders as a percentage of operating profit after income tax |
|
|
|
67.5 |
% |
64.2 |
% |
57.8 |
% |
62.0 |
% |
59.1 |
% |
Average shareholders equity as a percentage of average total assets (5) |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
5.7 |
% |
5.3 |
% |
5.0 |
% |
5.3 |
% |
Capital Adequacy ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
7.9 |
% |
7.5 |
% |
7.4 |
% |
Tier 2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
2.8 |
% |
3.2 |
% |
3.4 |
% |
Deductions (6) |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
(0.6 |
)% |
(1.2 |
)% |
(0.4 |
)% |
(0.6 |
)% |
Total |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
11.1 |
% |
9.5 |
% |
10.3 |
% |
10.2 |
% |
Number of shares on issue (million) |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
1,522 |
|
1,504 |
|
1,488 |
|
1,506 |
|
Adjusted in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit after income tax as a percentage of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
1.0 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
Operating profit (1) after income tax as a percentage of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shareholders equity (1) |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
20.8 |
% |
20.9 |
% |
18.2 |
% |
20.6 |
% |
Dividends (7) to ordinary shareholders as a percentage of operating profit after income tax (6) |
|
|
|
65.5 |
% |
62.2 |
% |
63.2 |
% |
63.3 |
% |
51.2 |
% |
Average shareholders equity (1, 6) as a percentage of average total assets |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
5.6 |
% |
5.3 |
% |
6.0 |
% |
5.4 |
% |
(1) Excludes outside equity interest and preference shares.
(2) Our balance sheet shows loans and advances net of the specific and general allowances. For ease of presentation the gross amount is shown here.
(3) Includes significant items.
(4) Includes proposed final dividend of $983 million in 2004 not provided at September 30, 2004 following a change in Accounting Standards on recognition of dividends.
(5) Excludes preference shares.
(6) Deductions represent our investment in life insurance, funds management, securitization activities and other banks of $1,019 million (2003: $920 million, 2002: $1,703 million, 2001: $604 million, 2000: $787 million). In 2003 the intangible components of investments is deducted from Tier 1 capital rather than from total capital.
(7) Excludes dividends taken under the bonus option plan. Includes proposed final dividend of $983 million in 2004 not provided at September 30, 2004 following a change in Accounting Standards on recognition of dividends.
8
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
USD M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of credit quality data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross non-accrual loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to specific allowance for loan losses |
|
517 |
|
714 |
|
913 |
|
1,072 |
|
940 |
|
1,046 |
|
Without specific allowance for loan losses |
|
83 |
|
115 |
|
94 |
|
131 |
|
320 |
|
345 |
|
Total non-accrual loans |
|
600 |
|
829 |
|
1,007 |
|
1,203 |
|
1,260 |
|
1,391 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific allowance (loans) |
|
274 |
|
378 |
|
482 |
|
575 |
|
490 |
|
692 |
|
Specific allowance (off-balance sheet commitments) |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
2 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
17 |
|
General allowance |
|
1,443 |
|
1,992 |
|
1,534 |
|
1,496 |
|
1,386 |
|
1,373 |
|
Total allowance |
|
1,721 |
|
2,376 |
|
2,018 |
|
2,081 |
|
1,886 |
|
2,082 |
|
Gross loans, advances and acceptances (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances (2)(3) |
|
150,196 |
|
207,338 |
|
151,483 |
|
134,141 |
|
125,543 |
|
118,397 |
|
Acceptances |
|
9,030 |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
13,796 |
|
14,324 |
|
15,482 |
|
Total gross loans, advances and acceptances |
|
159,226 |
|
219,804 |
|
164,661 |
|
147,937 |
|
139,867 |
|
133,879 |
|
Gross non-accrual loans as a percentage of gross loans and advances |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
0.7 |
% |
0.9 |
% |
1.0 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
Gross non-accrual loans as a percentage of gross loans, advances and acceptances |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
0.6 |
% |
0.8 |
% |
0.9 |
% |
1.0 |
% |
Specific allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross non-accrual loans (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to allowance |
|
|
|
52.9 |
% |
52.8 |
% |
53.6 |
% |
52.1 |
% |
66.2 |
% |
Total non-accrual loans |
|
|
|
45.6 |
% |
47.9 |
% |
47.8 |
% |
38.9 |
% |
49.7 |
% |
Total allowance for loan losses as a percentage of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and advances (2) |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
1.3 |
% |
1.6 |
% |
1.5 |
% |
1.8 |
% |
Gross loans, advances and acceptances (2) |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
1.4 |
% |
1.3 |
% |
1.6 |
% |
Risk weighted assets |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
1.3 |
% |
1.5 |
% |
1.4 |
% |
1.6 |
% |
(1) Excludes off-balance sheet commitments that have been classified as unproductive of $23 million (2003: $37 million, 2002: $44 million, 2001: $31 million, 2000: $56 million) net of an allowance of $6 million (2003: $2 million, 2002: $10 million, 2001: $10 million, 2000: $17 million) and restructured loans $32 million (2003: $nil, 2002: $1 million, 2001: $1 million, 2000: $1 million).
(2) Net of unearned income.
(3) The consolidated balance sheet shows loans and advances net of the specific and general allowances. For ease of presentation the gross amount is shown here.
Summary of Material Risk Factors
Changes in general business and economic conditions may adversely impact our results
As we conduct the majority of our business in Australia and New Zealand, our performance is influenced by the level and cyclical nature of business activity in Australia and New Zealand, which, in turn is affected by both domestic and international economic and political events.
These events and conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, relative changes in foreign exchange rates and the strength of the Australian and New Zealand economies. For example, a general economic downturn, a downturn in the housing market, a decrease in immigration, an increase in unemployment, or other events that negatively impact household and/or corporate incomes could decrease the demand for our loan and non-loan products and services and increase the number of customers who fail to pay interest or repay principal on their loans. Australian and New Zealand economic conditions may also be affected by geo-political instability, including, among other factors, actual or potential conflict and terrorism. Our future performance may also be affected by the economic conditions of other regions where we conduct operations.
9
Changes in fiscal and monetary policies may adversely impact our results
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) regulate the supply of money and credit in Australia and New Zealand (respectively). Their policies determine the cost of funds to us for lending and investing and the return we will earn on those loans and investments. Both of these impact our net interest margin, and can materially affect the value of financial instruments we hold, such as debt securities. The policies of the RBA and the RBNZ also can affect our borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans. Changes in RBA and RBNZ policies are hard to predict or anticipate.
Regulatory changes may adversely impact our results
As we consist of regulated entities which are deposit-taking institutions, we are regulated in Australia, New Zealand and in the other countries in which we have operations. This regulation varies from country to country but generally is designed to protect depositors and the banking system as a whole, not holders of our securities.
The Australian Government and its agencies, including the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the RBA, have supervisory oversight of us and our failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by these regulatory agencies and cause damage to our reputation. The New Zealand Government and its agencies, including the RBNZ, have supervisory oversight of our New Zealand business. Our failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by these regulatory agencies and cause damage to our reputation. The RBNZ approved the acquisition of The National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ) subject to various ongoing regulatory and consent requirements. To the extent that these regulatory and consent requirements limit our operations or flexibility, they could adversely affect our profitability and prospects.
In addition, these regulatory agencies frequently review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to laws, regulations or policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of laws, regulations or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. These may include changing required levels of bank liquidity and capital adequacy, limiting the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increasing the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, as well as changes to accounting standards, taxation laws and prudential regulatory requirements.
Competition may adversely impact our results, especially in Australia and New Zealand
The financial services sector in which we operate is highly competitive and could become even more competitive, particularly in those segments that are considered to provide higher growth prospects. Factors contributing to this include industry deregulation, mergers, changes in customers needs and preferences, entry of new participants, development of new distribution and service methods and increased diversification of products by competitors. For example, mergers between banks and other types of financial services companies create entities which can offer virtually any type of banking or financial service. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic payment systems, mortgages and credit cards. In addition, banks in different jurisdictions are subject to different levels of regulation and some may have lower cost structures.
The effect of the competitive market conditions in which we operate may have a material adverse effect on our financial performance and position, especially in Australia and New Zealand, where we operate in highly competitive markets.
Application of and changes to accounting policies may adversely impact our results
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial position and results of operations. Our management must exercise judgement in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods so that not only do they comply with generally accepted accounting principles but they also reflect the most appropriate manner in which to record and report our financial position and results of operations.
In some cases, management must select an accounting policy or method from two or more alternatives, any of which might comply with generally accepted accounting principles and be reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in us reporting materially different outcomes than would have been reported under a different alternative.
The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) is adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for application to reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005. As a result, from January 1, 2005, the accounting standards that apply to Australian reporting companies under the Corporations Act, such as us, will be based upon IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). We will adopt IFRS from October 1, 2005. Comparatives will be required to be restated on initial adoption of IFRS for most standards (other than for IAS39/AASB 139 (Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement), IAS32/AASB 132 (Financial Instruments - Disclosure and Presentation) and IAS4/AASB 4 (Insurance Contracts).
10
APRA has also announced that it intends to revise its capital adequacy requirements to take account of the impact of IFRS, in particular the treatment of innovative capital instruments for capital adequacy purposes and the treatment of superannuation fund surpluses/deficits.
Based on IFRS and related exposure drafts issued to date, adoption of IFRS may result in material changes to accounting for hedges, doubtful debt provisioning, securitization, recognition of fee income, accounting for goodwill, post employment benefits and share based payments and classification of hybrid equity instruments.
The final version of IFRS that will be applicable to us may still change. In particular, the AASB has yet to finalise the Australian equivalent of IAS 39, the standard on recognition and measurement of financial instruments.
All our financial information disclosed in this Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with current Australian GAAP. As explained above, the differences between current Australian GAAP and IFRS, will potentially have a significant effect on our financial position and performance. The differences identified above should not be taken as an exhaustive list of all the differences between Australian GAAP and IFRS. No attempt has been made to identify all disclosure, presentation or classification differences that would affect the manner in which transactions or events are presented.
We have not quantified the effects of the differences expected under IFRS. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our consolidated financial performance or financial position (or both) would not be significantly different if determined in accordance with IFRS.
The potential impacts on our financial performance and financial position of the adoption of IFRS, including system upgrades and other implementation costs which may be incurred, have not been quantified, as the actual impact will depend on the final standards and the particular circumstances prevailing at the time of adoption.
We are subject to credit risk, which may adversely impact our results
As a financial institution, we are exposed to the risks associated with extending credit to other parties. Less favorable business or economic conditions, whether generally or in a specific industry sector or geography, could cause customers or counterparties to experience adverse financial consequences, thereby exposing us to the increased risk that those customers or counterparties will fail to honor the terms of their loans or agreements. In addition, in assessing whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, we rely on information furnished to us by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. We also may rely on representations of customers and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted to the extent we rely on information or financial statements that are inaccurate or materially misleading.
As a result of the potential for loss arising from the failure of customers or counterparties to meet their contractual obligations, we hold provisions to cover loan losses. The amount of these provisions is determined by assessing, based on current information, the extent of credit risk within the current lending portfolio. However, if the information upon which the assessment of risk proves to be inaccurate, the provisions made for loan loss may be insufficient, which could have a material adverse effect on our results and operations.
We are subject to operational risk, which may adversely impact our results
Operational risk relates to the risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events, which impact our operating business. Operational risk includes the risks arising from process error, fraud, systems failure, failure of security and physical protection systems, customer services, staff skills and performance and product development and maintenance. We are highly dependent on information systems and technology and there is a risk that these might fail. From time to time, we will undertake major projects and there are operating risks in the design and implementation of these projects. Further, our exposure to potential systemic events or failings in the international financial services sector may also be a source of operational risk.
We are subject to market risk (including foreign exchange risk) and liquidity risk, which may adversely impact our results
Market risk relates to the risk of loss arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, prices of commodities, debt securities and other financial contracts including derivatives. Losses arising from these risks may have a material adverse effect on us. We are also exposed to liquidity risk, which is the risk that we have insufficient funds and are unable to meet our payment obligations as they fall due, including obligations to repay deposits and maturing wholesale debt.
11
Litigation and contingent liabilities may adversely impact our results
ANZ may from time to time be subject to material litigation and other contingent liabilities, which, if they crystallize, may adversely impact our results. Details regarding ANZs contingent liabilities are contained in note 48 of the 2004 Financial Report. For example (these are illustrative examples, please refer to the 2004 Financial Report for the full disclosures):
We face potential exposure in respect of litigation relating to a breach of the Indian Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973 (Indian FERA). This exposure arises from our past ownership of ANZ Grindlays Bank Limited (Grindlays). In 1991, certain amounts were transferred from non-convertible Indian Rupee accounts maintained with Grindlays in India. These transactions may not have complied with Indian FERA. Grindlays, on its own initiative, brought these transactions to the attention of the Reserve Bank of India. The Indian authorities have served notices on Grindlays and certain of its officers in India that could lead to possible penalties. Grindlays has commenced proceedings in the courts contesting the validity of these notices. Based on advice from the Banks Indian lawyers, we believe we maintain adequate provisions to cover such exposure.
ANZ in New Zealand is being audited by local revenue authorities as part of normal revenue authority procedures, with a particular focus on certain kinds of structured finance transactions. On September 30, 2004, ANZ in New Zealand received Notices of Proposed Adjustment (the Notice) in respect of one of these structured finance transactions undertaken in the 2000 financial year. The Notice is formal advice that the New Zealand Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is proposing to amend tax assessments. The Notice is not a tax assessment and does not establish a tax liability, but it is the first step in a formal dispute process. Should the same position be adopted by the IRD on the remaining transactions of that kind, the maximum potential tax liability would be approximately NZD348 million (including interest tax effected) for the period to September 30, 2004. Of that maximum potential liability, approximately NZD116 million is subject to tax indemnities provided by Lloyds TSB Bank PLC under the agreement by which ANZ acquired NBNZ and which relate to transactions undertaken by NBNZ before December 2003. Based on external advice, the ANZ group has assessed the likely progress of this issue, and believes that it holds appropriate provisions.
Other than disclosed in the 2004 Financial Report, there are no legal or arbitration proceedings (including any such proceedings which are pending or threatened of which we are aware) against ANZ that may have or have had in the previous 12 months a significant effect on ANZs financial position.
Acquisition risk may adversely impact our results
We regularly examine a range of corporate opportunities with a view to determining whether those opportunities will enhance our financial performance and position. Any corporate opportunity that we pursue could, for a variety of reasons, turn out to have a material adverse effect on us. The successful implementation of our corporate strategy will depend on a range of factors including potential funding strategies and challenges associated with integrating and adding value to a business which is acquired.
Our operating performance or capital structure may also be affected by these corporate opportunities and there is a risk that our credit rating may be placed on credit watch or downgraded if these opportunities are pursued.
Integration risk resulting from the ongoing integration of NBNZ may adversely affect our results
We acquired NBNZ in December 2003. The integration of businesses that have previously operated independently has been progressed significantly, involving, among other things, the completion of legal amalgamation and non-systems business integration and continuing work on integration of technology platforms and processes. Key risks associated with the integration include loss of revenue and customers, loss of key personnel, additional costs and losses arising from systems or technology failure. The scope of the integration process has recently been changed, primarily to exclude integration of the retail banking systems. This is expected to reduce the programs risk and complexity, and to enable management to focus on customer retention, growth and financial performance.
The success of integration has a number of dependencies including the approval of regulators, agreement on integration plans, the ability of management to execute the approved integration plans and the response of customers to the acquisition and integration.
12
Currency of Presentation, Exchange Rates and Certain Definitions
Currency of Presentation
The Company, together with its subsidiaries, publishes consolidated financial statements in Australian dollars. In this Annual Report, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, references to US$, USD and US dollars are to United States dollars and references to $, AUD and A$ are to Australian dollars. For the convenience of the reader, this Annual Report contains translations of certain Australian dollar amounts into US dollars at specified rates. These translations should not be construed as representations that the Australian dollar amounts actually represent such US dollar amounts or could be converted into US dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise stated, the translations of Australian dollars into US dollars have been made at the rate of USD0.7244 = $1.00, the Noon Buying Rate in New York City for cable transfers in Australian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York(the Noon Buying Rate) on September 30, 2004.
Exchange Rates
For each of the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end Noon Buying Rates for Australian dollars were:
|
|
USD per $1.00 |
|
|||||||
Year ended |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
|
Close |
|
|
2000 |
September |
|
0.6687 |
|
0.5372 |
|
0.6032 |
|
0.5415 |
|
2001 |
September |
|
0.5712 |
|
0.4828 |
|
0.5182 |
|
0.4946 |
|
2002 |
September |
|
0.5748 |
|
0.4923 |
|
0.5329 |
|
0.5429 |
|
2003 |
September |
|
0.6823 |
|
0.5422 |
|
0.6131 |
|
0.6797 |
|
2004 |
September |
|
0.7979 |
|
0.6814 |
|
0.7287 |
|
0.7244 |
|
Month ended |
June |
|
0.7067 |
|
0.6840 |
|
0.6937 |
|
0.6952 |
|
|
July |
|
0.7334 |
|
0.6980 |
|
0.7161 |
|
0.7035 |
|
|
August |
|
0.7245 |
|
0.7001 |
|
0.7111 |
|
0.7071 |
|
|
September |
|
0.7244 |
|
0.6880 |
|
0.7028 |
|
0.7244 |
|
|
October |
|
0.7478 |
|
0.7207 |
|
0.7337 |
|
0.7468 |
|
|
November |
|
0.7903 |
|
0.7447 |
|
0.7704 |
|
0.7723 |
|
The average is calculated from the Noon Buying Rate on the last day of each month during the period.
On December 2, 2004, the Noon Buying Rate was USD0.7769 per $1.00.
In 2004, 33% (2003: 27%) of our operating income was derived from overseas operations and was denominated principally in New Zealand dollars (NZ$ or NZD), US dollars (US$ or USD) and British pounds sterling (£ or GBP). Movements in foreign currencies against the Australian dollar can therefore affect ANZs earnings through the re-translation of overseas profits to Australian dollars. Based on exchange rates applied to convert overseas profits and losses from September 2000 to September 2004, the Australian dollar moved against these currencies as follows (refer also Note 56 to the Financial Report):
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
NZD |
|
+1 |
% |
7 |
% |
4 |
% |
1 |
% |
+5 |
% |
USD |
|
+19 |
% |
+15 |
% |
+2 |
% |
14 |
% |
5 |
% |
£ |
|
+6 |
% |
+6 |
% |
0 |
% |
7 |
% |
0 |
% |
We monitor our exposure to revenues, expenses and invested capital denominated in currencies other than Australian dollars. These currency exposures are hedged as considered necessary.
Certain Definitions
Our fiscal year ends on September 30. As used throughout this Annual Report, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 is referred to as 2004, and other fiscal years are referred to in a corresponding manner. References to calendar years are identified as such.
13
Item 4: Information on the Company
Overview
ANZ is one of the four major banking groups headquartered in Australia. Our Australian operations began in 1835 and our New Zealand operations began in 1840. We are a public limited company incorporated in the State of Victoria, Australia, which is our main domicile, and have our principal executive office located at 100 Queen Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia. Our telephone number is (61) (3) 9273 5555.
Based on publicly available information as at September 30, 2004, we ranked third among Australian banking groups in terms of total assets ($259 billion) and third in terms of shareholders equity ($18 billion) and ranked third in terms of market capitalization, with a market capitalization of $35 billion, which ranked us as the fourth largest company listed on the Australian Stock Exchange Limited.
We provide a broad range of banking and financial products and services to retail, small business, corporate and institutional clients. We conduct our operations primarily in Australia and New Zealand (approximately 93% of our total assets at September 30, 2004 are related to these operations). The remainder of our operations are conducted in the United Kingdom, the United States and a number of other countries, most of which are located in the Asia Pacific region. At September 30, 2004, we had 1,190 branches and other points of representation worldwide.
ANZs strategy is executed through a management structure focused on specialization:
Principal activities of divisions
Personal
Personal is comprised of the Australian operations of Personal Distribution (including Rural Banking), Banking Products, Mortgages and Cards and Merchant Services.
Personal Distribution - Provides a full range of banking and financial planning services to personal customers across Australia, and to small business and agriculture customers in rural Australia.
Banking Products - Provides deposit accounts, transaction accounts and margin lending products. In addition, the business manages ANZs direct channels covering Phone Banking and Internet Banking.
Mortgages - Provides housing finance to consumers in Australia for both owner occupied and investment purposes.
Cards and Merchant Services - Provides consumer and commercial credit cards, ePayment products, personal loans, and merchant payment facilities in Australia.
Institutional
Institutional is a segment encompassing businesses that provide a full range of financial services to ANZs largest corporate and institutional customers.
Institutional Banking - Manages customer relationships and develops financial services solutions and strategies for large businesses with a turnover greater than $100 million in Australia and New Zealand and, for corporate clients with whom ANZ has an existing customer relationship, in the United Kingdom, United States and Asia.
Transaction Services - Provides cash management, trade finance, international payments, clearing and custodian services principally to institutional and corporate customers.
Markets - Provides foreign exchange and commodity trading, sales-related services to corporate and institutional clients globally. In addition, the business provides origination, underwriting, structuring, risk management, advice and sale of credit and derivative products globally.
Corporate & Structured Financing - Provides complex financing and advisory services, structured financial products, leasing, private equity finance, project finance, export finance and leveraged finance and infrastructure investment products to ANZs customers.
New Zealand Business
New Zealand Business includes
National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ), which was acquired from Lloyds Bank on the December 1, 2003 (refer to page 36 for acquisition details); and
ANZ (NZ) businesses provide banking services, including wealth management, for personal, small business and corporate customers in New Zealand through branches, call centers, relationship managers and online banking.
14
ANZ (NZ) and NBNZ engage in the following businesses.
Personal and Business Banking - provides consumer banking deposits, loans, overdrafts, credit card and merchant services and mortgage products. A two-brand strategy has been adopted whereby both the ANZ and NBNZ brands and branch networks are to be maintained and run in competition. Management and systems of the businesses are separate.
Rural Banking provides a full range of banking services to the rural community and is offered under the NBNZ brand only.
Corporate Banking is responsible for managing customer relationships and developing financial solutions for medium-sized businesses and is offered under the ANZ brand.
The business model is focused upon preserving revenue by reducing customer disruption and attrition and leveraging the strong market positions in both Rural and Corporate Banking of NBNZ and ANZ respectively.
Corporate
Corporate includes
Small Business Banking Australia which provides a full range of banking services for metropolitan-based small businesses in Australia with funds under management up to $50,000;
Business Banking Australia which provides a full range of banking services for metropolitan based small to medium business in Australia with turnover up to $10 million; and
Corporate Banking Australia which manages customer relationships and develops financial solutions for medium-sized businesses (turnover $10 million to $150 million) in Australia.
Esanda and UDC
Esanda and UDC provides motor vehicle and equipment finance; equipment operating leases and management services, fleet management services, and investment products through its businesses - Esanda (Australia), Esanda FleetPartners (Australia & New Zealand), UDC (New Zealand) and Specialized Asset Finance (Australia).
Asia Pacific
Asia Pacific provides retail banking services in the Pacific Region and Asia. This business unit excludes Institutional and Corporate transactions that are included in the geographic results for Asia. The Asia Pacific business also manages ANZs consumer banking business in Asia with Singapore and Japan being the major contributors.
Asia Pacific also manages ANZs strategic retail partnerships in Asia. ANZ currently has partnerships in Indonesia with PT Panin Bank, in the Philippines with Metrobank and in Cambodia with the Royal Group. The relationships are focused on leveraging ANZs capabilities across the established client bases of the local partners.
ING Australia
On April 10, 2002, the Group entered into a contract to sell certain life and general insurance and funds management businesses to a joint venture with ING Group, and acquire a 49% interest in the joint venture.
Key details of the transaction are:
ING Australia Limited is owned 51% by ING Group and 49% by ANZ.
Both shareholders have an equal say in strategic decisions with a number of matters requiring the approval of both Shareholders. These include major items of capital expenditure, acquisitions or disposals in excess of $20 million and changes to the Board structure.
Equal board representation with four ANZ nominees and four ING Group nominees. All key issues (including business plans, major capital expenditure, acquisitions etc) require unanimous Board approval.
The Joint Venture was valued in April 2002, at $3,750 million with ING contributing businesses valued at $2,874 million; ANZ contributing businesses valued at $879 million. ANZs contribution to the Joint Venture was by way of selling a controlling interest in ANZ Life Assurance Company Limited, ANZ Managed Investments Limited, ANZ General Insurance Limited and Investment and Administration Services Limited, as well as making a capital contribution of $960 million.
The Joint Venture includes the majority of ANZs and INGs funds management and insurance activities in Australia and New Zealand.
15
COMPANY PROFILE
As a result of the transfer of ANZs life insurance, general insurance and funds management subsidiaries into the new joint venture company, ANZ Life Assurance Company Limited, ANZ Managed Investments Limited, ANZ General Insurance Limited and Investment and Administration Services Limited are no longer consolidated within the results of the ANZ Group as subsidiaries. ANZ Groups investment in ING Australia is accounted for under the equity accounting method with 49% of both the net profit before tax and net assets from the joint venture recognized. The equity accounting method has been applied on the basis of ING Australia being under the joint control of ANZ and ING.
The profit on sale was $170 million under Australian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (A GAAP) as a 49% interest in the businesses was retained. Under US GAAP all profit on sale was eliminated as it occurred as a result of a non-monetary transaction, which involved transferring ownership of controlled entities in exchange for a non-controlling ownership interest in the joint venture.
ING Australia, the wealth management joint venture between ANZ and ING Group, provides and distributes integrated wealth creation products, management and protection products and services aligned to ANZ distribution and the open market.
Group Treasury
Group Treasury is the banker for all ANZ businesses. It is charged with providing cash flow support, ensuring liquidity, managing interest rate risk and providing capital to all of the ANZ businesses. Group Treasury is included in the Group Center in 2004.
Group Center
Group Center includes Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Group Treasury, Group People Capital, Group Strategic Development, Group Financial Management, Group Risk Management, Capital, Funding and Group Items.
Organization Structure Changes
The Group from time to time modifies the organization of its businesses to enhance the focus on delivery of specialized products or services to customers. Prior period numbers are adjusted for such organizational changes to allow comparability where practical. During the year ended September 30, 2004 the significant changes were:
Personal clusters all ANZs businesses serving personal customers in Australia. It now includes Cards and Merchant Services (formerly called Consumer Finance) and Mortgages Australia.
A new business unit New Zealand Business was created which consists of the ANZ (NZ) businesses, the National Bank of New Zealand, and Integration costs. The ANZ (NZ) businesses now include New Zealand Mortgages, which was previously reported in Mortgages, and New Zealand Consumer Finance, which was previously reported in Cards and Merchant Services.
Within Institutional, the operations of Structured Finance International and Corporate Finance and Advisory have been brought together and are being managed as one global business, called Corporate and Structured Financing. In addition, the operations of Foreign Exchange and Capital Markets have been brought together and are reported as one unit called Markets. Pacific Foreign Exchange, which was previously reported in Asia Pacific is now reported in Institutional.
Corporate comprises Corporate Banking Australia, Business Banking Australia, and now includes Small Business Banking Australia which was previously part of Personal.
Asset Finance has been renamed Esanda and UDC.
ANZ has moved the goodwill amortisation on investments to Group Center. This is an extension of equity standardisation and facilitates better comparisons across different business units.
In addition, there have been a number of function transfers including some minor segmentation between Institutional Banking, Corporate, and Asia Pacific together with a number of relatively minor methodology changes to revenue and cost allocations.
16
ANZs aspiration is to be:
Australasias leading, most respected and fastest growing major bank.
The strategic priorities for achieving our aspiration are:
superior revenue growth
market leadership in our core businesses
increased market share
superior cost and risk management
superior shareholder returns
Underpinning the way ANZ operates are our core values:
Put our customers first
Create value for our shareholders
Lead and inspire each other
Earn the trust of our community
Breakout, be bold and have the courage to be different.
A Foundation for Growth
ANZ has built a powerful platform for growth in four key areas:
ANZ has shifted the focus of its portfolio of businesses from institutional and corporate banking towards retail and business banking. Today, approximately 50% of ANZs net profit after tax is derived from our retail segment, a rise from 31% of net profit after tax in 1997.
ANZ has reduced its cost-to-income ratio from 65% to 45% over the last seven years. This has positioned us well for growth, as for every dollar we earn, more flows through to the bottom line.
ANZ has improved its risk profile. We have reduced the amount of lending assets outside Australia and New Zealand from 15% in 1996 to just 5% today. Single customer exposures have also been significantly reduced.
ANZ has developed a strong performance culture based on a set of shared values. We have a record of setting targets and achieving them.
These four keys areas have set the foundation for achieving our aspiration. They also ensure that ANZ can deliver sustainable performance and value over the long term.
17
Our Strategic Priorities
Our aspiration translates into a clear set of priorities for the Group:
We aim to combine superior revenue growth with superior efficiency. Our approach in recent years has involved moderate revenue growth and significant efficiency gains. ANZ is now very efficient and so our priority has to be to generate superior revenue growth.
We aim for market leadership in our core businesses. We are the leading bank in New Zealand and have a number of other leading positions in Australia and the Pacific. We are now focusing on increasing our market share in each of our core businesses, particularly those of lower risk, more sustainable businesses where we are underweight such as Australian personal banking and small business banking.
We aim to have distinctive relationships and service to increase market share and produce the highest sustainable revenue growth. Specialisation has helped us make progress in this area. It has provided our businesses with focus and vitality and we have great products for our customers. This year we re-organized to harness synergies between the specialist businesses and to broaden and deepen their offering to customers. There has been good progress but we are currently focusing on developing more reasons for customers to choose ANZ over our competitors.
We aim to manage costs effectively in order to improve earnings, offer lower prices and free up resources for investment in future revenue growth. We are going to support growth with increased investment funded by reallocating resources to growth businesses, re-investing funds generated by growth and continuing to run our businesses in a lean, agile way.
We aim to avoid non-core or risky activities that might produce sub-standard and volatile shareholder returns and divert management attention from what is important. We have had a consistent strategy of ceasing high-risk activities and narrowing our focus to core businesses where we have realistic leadership prospects.
We aim to share the benefits of our success with customers, staff and the community. We recognize that delivering sustainable value to shareholders in the long-term requires companies to serve others as well as shareholders.
Generating Sustainable Momentum
To realize our aspiration, we need to create an organization that is both different and sustainable. This is not something that can be achieved overnight or with a simple statement of intent. It requires sustained commitment, persistence and investment over a number of years.
Our first major step was to create a portfolio of specialist businesses. Specialization has not only brought a sharper financial focus through greater accountability, it has also contributed to a greater sense of ownership and commitment from our people. This has already contributed to improved customer satisfaction across many business units, and in turn, improved results.
In April of this year we announced the formation of a new division, Personal, which is a cluster of all of ANZs specialized businesses primarily serving personal customers in Australia. The move completes a program of clustering specialist businesses around customer segments. ANZs Institutional, Corporate and New Zealand businesses have already adopted this approach. The divisional clusters are designed to accelerate organic growth and build market share. They aim to harness synergies between the specialist businesses to broaden and deepen the offering to customers, while maintaining the integrity and vitality of ANZs specialization model.
We established a program of cultural change, Breakout, in 1999 and it continues today. This program is designed to transform ANZs culture from the traditional, bureaucratic banking culture into a modern vibrant organisation. Over 18,000 people within ANZ have been through our Breakout program in its various phases, with each phase tackling a different priority or issue. Initially, much of the program was aimed at increasing accountability, freedom and openness and developing a common set of values. We are currently working at getting the whole organization aligned to the customer and to superior revenue growth. The Breakout program reflects our people are an investment rather than a resource. As a result we have seen a radical rise in staff satisfaction, which now stands at 85%.
At ANZ we are committed to helping our people continuously to improve their skills and capabilities, and support them in obtaining tertiary and post-graduate qualifications. We continue to be one of the largest private sector recruiters of graduates with a new intake of more than 250 in Australia and New Zealand in 2004.
18
ANZs aim to deliver sustainable value recognizes that companies do not serve shareholders exclusively, but others as well. Part of delivering on our aspiration involves engaging and contributing to the community. We continue to invest in financial literacy with the launch of Australias first comprehensive adult financial education program MoneyMinded. This program is designed to assist people make better judgments and decisions about the use and management of their money. The development of MoneyMinded follows the findings of Australias first national survey of adult financial literacy in May 2003, which identified a strong relationship between socio-economic status and financial literacy. We see this study as a next step towards empowering people with the appropriate financial skills to make informed basic financial decisions.
During 2004, ANZ conducted a pilot matched savings program, Australias first called Saver Plus. In conjunction with the Brotherhood of St Lawrence and other not-for-profit organizations, Saver Plus is aimed to help 270 families on low incomes to save for costs associated with their secondary education. For those on the Saver Plus program ANZ matches every dollar saved with two additional dollars and account holders have also been provided with financial skills training and personal coaching. In September, in partnership with The Smith Family, we expanded the program to Queensland furthering our commitment to making a difference to the community.
Building a future
Specialization creates a demonstrably more agile operation, able to respond rapidly to the opportunities presented within each business segment. We continue to position our businesses for growth and continue the focus on the specialized business model following the re-organisation of the Personal Banking business.
In our retail banking businesses, trained and committed staff acting as advocates for ANZ, are essential to the health of our relationships with customers and the broader community. We have also maintained high levels of investment to improve customer service, quality and efficiency. In Australia the MyTell system, a new branch telling platform, has been rolled out to the entire branch network with positive results for both staff and customers. We have also made substantial investment in the ANZ brand with the launch of the ANZ NOW national advertising campaign. In addition we have rebranded and redesigned 566 of our branches and refurbished 192 branches since 2002. In addition, we have begun a process of identifying attractive new sites to open 50 80 new ANZ branches in the next 3 years. This will strengthen our geographic footprint especially in areas of higher growth.
We continue to grow our rural franchise and are currently implementing our Take a fresh look program, which has been designed to fundamentally change the way Rural Banking does business by shifting the focus of staff to all of the customers activities.
Our institutional businesses across Australasia, Asia, Europe and North America, are focused on Institutional banking, Trade and Project finance, and financial markets. We continued our focus on risk reduction in the Institutional bank. In December 2004 we finalized the transfer of the majority of ANZs London-headquartered Project Finance business to Standard Chartered Bank.
Our regional international strategy is focused on consumer banking in Asia. Our preference is to work with local partners with domestic customer franchises where we can add our own distinct capabilities to theirs. Over time we would like to pursue further initiatives, while continuing to reflect the need to maintain a lower risk profile.
We will consider enhancing our capabilities, growth opportunities, scale benefits and other synergies through selective acquisitions. Any acquisition must be aligned with our vision for ANZ and must be value-creating. Our acquisition discipline was highlighted by the NBNZ transaction, which was completed in December 2003 and was EPS accretive in the first year of ownership. We will also enter commercial arrangements and partnerships where these provide a strategic fit with our existing businesses.
Subsidiaries, Associates and Joint Venture
We have many subsidiaries and associates. More detailed information regarding material subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures is contained in Exhibit 8 and Notes 43, 44 and 45 to the Financial Report.
19
ANZ Trustees merger with Equity Trustees Limited
On October 12, 2004, the Company announced it had signed an agreement with Equity Trustees Limited, to merge the Groups trustee business with Equity Trustees Limited. The merged business will create Australias third largest trustee company and the leading manager of charitable foundations.
In consideration, the Company will become the major shareholder in Equity Trustees Limited with a 37.5% share of the expanded issued capital, and receive $3 million in cash.
Completion of the merger is expected early in 2005 subject to the outcomes of due diligence, regulatory and government approvals and approval by Equity Trustees shareholders. The Company will equity account for its investment in Equity Trustees Limited and recognize a small profit from the transfer of the Groups trustee business.
The financial effect of this merger has not been recognized in these financial statements.
Share buyback
On October 26, 2004, the Company announced the intention to undertake an on-market share buyback of at least $350 million.
The financial effect of this buyback has not been reflected in these financial statements.
Sale of London-headquartered project finance activities
On October 26, 2004, the Company announced entry into a Memorandum of Understanding for the sale, subject to due diligence and other standard conditions, of the majority of its London-headquartered project finance activities to Standard Chartered Bank. The amount of the loans and commitments is approximately $2 billion. The premium from the sale above book value is not significant. Details of this transaction were finalized in December 2004.
The financial effect of this sale has not been reflected in these financial statements.
Joint Venture with Cambodias Royal Group
On November 2, 2004, the Company announced it had signed a shareholders agreement with the Royal Group, a mobile telecommunications company, to establish a joint venture bank in Cambodia.
Key points covered by the Agreement are:
Creation of a joint venture bank to be known as ANZ Royal Bank Cambodia Limited, owned 55% by ANZ and 45% by Royal Group.
ANZ will make a contribution of USD9.9 million to the joint venture banks capital.
Establishment of clear governance principles, including proportional Board representation.
ANZ Royal Bank Cambodia will focus on providing retail banking services including services to support the 700,000 foreign tourists who visit Cambodia annually and ANZs multinational clients who operate in Cambodia. Initially services will be provided in Cambodias capital, Phnom Penh and Siem Riep.
ANZ Euro Hybrid Capital
On December 13, 2004, the Company issued 0.5 million 1,000 fully paid preference shares with a liquidation preference of 1,000. The preference shares were issued as part of a structured hybrid Tier 1 capital raising. Refer page 137 for further information.
20
Assets and Gross Revenue by Line of Business
Years ended September 30 (1) |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Business (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
93,738 |
|
36 |
% |
79,829 |
|
41 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Institutional |
|
55,736 |
|
21 |
% |
56,977 |
|
29 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Corporate Australia |
|
18,992 |
|
7 |
% |
15,993 |
|
8 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
New Zealand Business |
|
55,870 |
|
22 |
% |
14,379 |
|
7 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
14,524 |
|
6 |
% |
13,460 |
|
7 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
ING Australia |
|
1,777 |
|
1 |
% |
1,736 |
|
1 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
2,379 |
|
1 |
% |
2,027 |
|
1 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Other (3) |
|
16,329 |
|
6 |
% |
11,190 |
|
6 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Total Assets |
|
259,345 |
|
100 |
% |
195,591 |
|
100 |
% |
183,105 |
|
100 |
% |
Line of Business (2)
As published in the September 2003 Company Profile:
External Assets |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
Personal |
|
6,696 |
|
3 |
% |
5,832 |
|
3 |
% |
Institutional |
|
56,529 |
|
29 |
% |
59,155 |
|
33 |
% |
Corporate |
|
16,085 |
|
8 |
% |
13,538 |
|
7 |
% |
New Zealand Banking |
|
4,225 |
|
2 |
% |
3,797 |
|
2 |
% |
Mortgages |
|
77,586 |
|
40 |
% |
64,826 |
|
35 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
6,135 |
|
3 |
% |
5,551 |
|
3 |
% |
Asset Finance |
|
13,460 |
|
7 |
% |
12,410 |
|
7 |
% |
ING Australia |
|
1,736 |
|
1 |
% |
1,638 |
|
1 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
1,949 |
|
1 |
% |
1,932 |
|
1 |
% |
Group Treasury |
|
9,085 |
|
5 |
% |
11,692 |
|
6 |
% |
Group Center (4) |
|
2,105 |
|
1 |
% |
2,734 |
|
2 |
% |
|
|
195,591 |
|
100 |
% |
183,105 |
|
100 |
% |
(1) Refer table above for line of business in 2003 under previous business structure. Refer 2003 20-F for discussion of these businesses.
(2) For discussion of operating results by Line of Business see Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Results by Line of Business.
(3) Includes Group Treasury, Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Corporate Center, Risk Management and Group Financial Management.
(4) Includes Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Corporate Center, Risk Management and Group Financial Management.
21
Years ended September 30 (1) |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
Gross Revenue (2) (equity standardized) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
6,782 |
|
39 |
% |
5,447 |
|
42 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Institutional |
|
3,616 |
|
21 |
% |
3,389 |
|
26 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Corporate Australia |
|
1,075 |
|
6 |
% |
893 |
|
7 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
New Zealand Business |
|
3,835 |
|
22 |
% |
1,319 |
|
10 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
1,154 |
|
6 |
% |
1,083 |
|
8 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
ING Australia |
|
116 |
|
1 |
% |
90 |
|
1 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
310 |
|
2 |
% |
316 |
|
2 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Other (4) |
|
620 |
|
3 |
% |
486 |
|
4 |
% |
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Total Gross Revenue |
|
17,508 |
|
100 |
% |
13,023 |
|
100 |
% |
12,007 |
|
100 |
% |
As published in the September 2003 Company Profile:
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
Gross Revenue (2) (equity standardized) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
737 |
|
6 |
% |
728 |
|
6 |
% |
Institutional |
|
3,342 |
|
26 |
% |
3,147 |
|
26 |
% |
Corporate |
|
932 |
|
7 |
% |
827 |
|
7 |
% |
New Zealand Banking |
|
480 |
|
4 |
% |
417 |
|
4 |
% |
Mortgages |
|
4,487 |
|
34 |
% |
3,760 |
|
31 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
1,052 |
|
8 |
% |
992 |
|
8 |
% |
Asset Finance |
|
1,091 |
|
8 |
% |
1,036 |
|
9 |
% |
ING Australia |
|
46 |
|
0 |
% |
142 |
|
1 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
326 |
|
3 |
% |
281 |
|
2 |
% |
Group Treasury |
|
455 |
|
3 |
% |
473 |
|
4 |
% |
Group Center (5) |
|
75 |
|
1 |
% |
204 |
|
2 |
% |
Total Gross Revenue |
|
13,023 |
|
100 |
% |
12,007 |
|
100 |
% |
(1) Refer table above for line of business for 2003 under previous business structure.
(2) Gross revenue comprises interest income, non-interest income and share of equity accounted investments (refer Note 2 of the Financial Report).
(3) Economic Value Added EVA(TM) principles are in use throughout the Group, whereby risk adjusted capital is allocated and charged against business units. Equity standardized profit is determined by eliminating the impact of earnings on each business units book capital and attributing earnings on the business units risk adjusted capital. This enhances comparability of business unit performance. Geographic results are not equity standardized.
(4) Includes Group Treasury, Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Corporate Center, Risk Management and Group Financial Management.
(5) Includes Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Corporate Center, Risk Management and Group Financial Management.
22
Assets and Gross Revenue by Region
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
$M |
|
|
|
Region (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
170,455 |
|
66 |
% |
151,538 |
|
77 |
% |
135,050 |
|
74 |
% |
New Zealand |
|
69,801 |
|
27 |
% |
25,696 |
|
13 |
% |
23,799 |
|
13 |
% |
Overseas Markets |
|
19,089 |
|
7 |
% |
18,357 |
|
10 |
% |
24,256 |
|
13 |
% |
|
|
259,345 |
|
100 |
% |
195,591 |
|
100 |
% |
183,105 |
|
100 |
% |
Gross Revenue (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
11,767 |
|
67 |
% |
9,508 |
|
73 |
% |
8,697 |
|
72 |
% |
New Zealand |
|
4,632 |
|
27 |
% |
2,149 |
|
17 |
% |
1,917 |
|
16 |
% |
Overseas Markets |
|
1,109 |
|
6 |
% |
1,366 |
|
10 |
% |
1,393 |
|
12 |
% |
|
|
17,508 |
|
100 |
% |
13,023 |
|
100 |
% |
12,007 |
|
100 |
% |
Net profit before tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
2,785 |
|
70 |
% |
2,371 |
|
72 |
% |
2,391 |
|
74 |
% |
New Zealand |
|
763 |
|
19 |
% |
495 |
|
15 |
% |
456 |
|
14 |
% |
Overseas Markets |
|
439 |
|
11 |
% |
411 |
|
13 |
% |
376 |
|
12 |
% |
|
|
3,987 |
|
100 |
% |
3,277 |
|
100 |
% |
3,223 |
|
100 |
% |
(1) For discussion of operating results by region see Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Results by Region.
(2) Gross revenue comprises interest income and non-interest income.
Australia
Effective from July 1, 1998, APRA assumed responsibility for the prudential and regulatory supervision of Australian banks, credit unions, building societies, other Authorised Deposit Institutions (ADIs), insurance companies and superannuation funds. Prior to July 1, 1998, the Australian banking industry was regulated by the RBA. The RBA has retained overall responsibility for monetary policy, financial system stability and payments system regulation. APRA draws authority from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Act 1998.
APRA requires Banks to meet certain prudential standards that are covered in a range of APRA Prudential Standards (APS). These include standards in relation to:
Capital adequacy and asset risk weighting
Credit risk including portfolio and large exposure reporting
Market risk
Liquidity management
Funds management and securitization
General insurance
Risk management of associations with related entities
Management of credit card risk
Management of outsourced business arrangements
23
APRA discharges its responsibilities in part by requiring banks subject to its supervision to regularly provide it with reports which set forth a broad range of information, including financial and statistical data relating to their financial position and information in respect of prudential and other matters. APRA gives special attention to capital adequacy, liquidity, earnings, loan loss experience, concentration of risks, the maturity profile of assets and liabilities, exposures to related entities, funds management and securitization activities and international banking operations. APRA may also exercise certain investigative powers if a bank fails to provide information about its financial condition or becomes unable to meet its obligations or suspends payment.
In carrying out its supervisory role, APRA supplements its analysis of statistical data collected from banks with selective on site visits and formal meetings with banks senior management and external auditors. APRA has also formalised a consultative relationship with each banks external auditors with the agreement of the banks. The external auditors provide additional assurance to APRA that the ADI has observed all prudential standards, and that statutory and other banking requirements are being met. External auditors also undertake targeted reviews of specific risk management areas as selected at the annual meeting between the bank, its external auditors and APRA. In addition, each banks Chief Executive Officer attests to, and the Board confirms by resolution, the adequacy and operating effectiveness of the banks risk management systems to control exposures and limit risks to prudent levels.
To ensure that Approved Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs) are adequately capitalized on both a stand-alone and group basis, APRA adopts a tiered approach to the measurement of an ADIs capital adequacy by assessing the ADIs financial strength at three levels:
(a) Level 1 - the ADI on a stand-alone basis;
(b) Level 2 - the consolidated banking group; and
(c) Level 3 - the conglomerate group at the widest level.
ANZ is a Level 1 & 2 reporter and measures capital adequacy monthly on a stand-alone and consolidated basis. ANZ is not required to report on a Level 3 basis.
An ADI should consult with APRA before establishing or acquiring a subsidiary (other than an entity which is to be used purely as a special purpose financing vehicle for the ADI) and committing to any proposal to acquire (whether directly or indirectly) more than 10% of equity interest in an entity which operates in the field of finance. In addition, an ADI should consult with APRA before taking up equity interest in an entity arising from the work-out of a problem exposure where this exceeds 0.25% of the ADIs Level 2 Tier 1 capital, will result in the ADI acquiring (whether directly or indirectly) more than 10% of equity interest in the entity, or will result in the ADIs aggregate investment in non-subsidiary entities which are not operating in the field of finance exceeding 5% of the ADIs Level 2 Tier 1 capital.
In calculating an ADIs Level 1 (stand alone) capital base the equity investments in non-subsidiary entities that are not operating in the field of finance in excess of 0.25% of the ADIs Level 2 Tier 1 capital for an individual investment or 5% of the ADIs Level 2 Tier 1 capital in aggregate are deductions from Tier 1 capital.
A bank may not enter into any agreement or arrangement for the sale or disposal of its business or carryon business in partnership with another bank without the consent of the Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia (the Treasurer). Although the RBA has the authority, with the approval of the Treasurer, to set interest rates paid or charged by banks, this authority is not currently exercized.
Liquidity is controlled by individual agreements with each bank, which take into consideration the specific operations of each organization. APRA requires that banks have a comprehensive liquidity policy statement which defines the guidelines and systems for managing domestic and foreign currency liquidity. This statement must be approved by the Board of Directors. A banks liquidity management policy should cater for a range of potential conditions and APRA requires each banks liquidity risk to be assessed under two specific scenarios. The first scenario is known as the going-concern and refers to the normal behavior of cash flows in the ordinary course of business and forms the day-to-day focus of a banks liquidity management. The second scenario, known as the short term crisis, covers the behavior of cash flows where there is a problem (real or perceived) which may include operational problems, doubts about the solvency of a bank or adverse rating changes. APRA expects a bank to have sufficient liquidity to continue operating for at least 5 business days in a short term crisis.
APRA imposes guidelines for the capital adequacy of banks as an essential part of its prudential supervision of ADIs and has adopted capital adequacy guidelines closely following the risk-weighted approach proposed by the Committee on Banking Regulation and Supervision of the Bank for International Settlements (the Basel Committee). Under the existing APRA guidelines, balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposures are assessed according to broad categories of relative credit risk, based largely on the nature of the asset or counterparty. Off-balance sheet exposures are taken into account by applying different categories of credit conversion factors to arrive at credit equivalent amounts, which are then weighted in the same manner as balance sheet assets according to the counterparty.
24
Capital, for APRA supervisory purposes, is classified into two tiers, referred to as Tier 1 and Tier 2. APRA requires all ADIs to maintain a minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets, at least half of which must be maintained in the form of Tier 1 capital, with the remainder being in Tier 2 capital. APRA has not indicated that it has any plans to allow Australian ADIs to employ a third tier of capital, which would consist of short term subordinated notes, to meet a proportion of the market risk capital requirements. APRA will consider other risk factors that have not been incorporated or accounted for quantitatively in the framework when assessing the overall capital adequacy of an ADI. Where it is judged appropriate, APRA may require individual ADIs to maintain a minimum capital ratio above 8 per cent.
Tier 1 capital consists of paid up ordinary shares, general reserves, retained earnings, non-cumulative preference shares and other innovative capital instruments not redeemable at the holders option (as approved by APRA) together with minority interests but excludes retained earnings and reserves of subsidiaries and associates that are not consolidated for capital adequacy purposes. Tier 1 must constitute at least 50% of the capital base requirements. Innovative equity instruments include capital instruments which are of a permanent and unrestricted commitment of funds, are available to absorb losses, have no fixed servicing obligations and are subordinated to the interests of depositors and other creditors. Provision has also been made so that capital instruments issued via special purpose vehicles may be eligible for inclusion in Tier 1 capital.
An ADI must gain APRAs approval for calling any dated capital instrument before its contract maturity date, or repurchasing any undated capital instrument. An ADI must also gain APRAs approval for paying out a periodic coupon on a Tier 1 instrument where the accumulated Tier 1 coupon payments exceed profits in the last two half years.
From July1, 2004, APRA required the deduction of capitalized costs from Tier 1 capital. Capitalized costs include loan origination, fees, commissions paid to originators and brokers, securitization establishment costs and costs associated with debt and capital raisings.
APRA also requires banks to measure and apply capital charges in respect of their market risks arising from their trading and commodity positions in a manner which is broadly consistent with the January 1996 Basel Committee amendment to its Capital Accord. In measuring their market risks, banks have a choice of two methods. The first alternative is to measure risks in a standardised manner defined by APRA. The second alternative allows banks to utilise their internal risk measurement systems subject to APRA approval. ANZ applies the second approach.
APRA requires there to be deducted from an ADIs regulatory capital investments in non-consolidated financial entities and investments in entities involved in funds management and securitization activities, strategic cross-ADI shareholdings, any non-repayable loan advanced by an ADI under APRAs certified industry support arrangements, any undertaking by an ADI to absorb designated first level of losses on claims supported by it, and certain intangibles.
APRA requires banks to report large credit exposures to an individual counterparty or a group of related counterparties at the company and consolidated banking group level (i.e. the bank and its subsidiaries). Banks must consult with APRA before committing to any exposure (includes claims and commitments recorded on and off balance sheet) to any individual counterparty or group of related counterparties which will exceed 10% (subject to exceptions) of the capital base of the company and consolidated banking group level. Banks are required to report quarterly to APRA the largest 10 exposures and all those exceeding or equal to 10% of the company and consolidated banking group capital base. At September 30, 2004, at the consolidated level ANZ reported the following 10 large exposures;
Two Government bodies - S&P rating Aaa, Moodys rating AAA
One Bank- S&P rating BBB+, Moodys rating A2
One Corporate - S&P rating AAA, Moodys rating Aaa
One Corporate - S&P rating A-, Moodys rating not rated
One Corporate - S&P rating A+, Moodys rating Aa3
One Corporate - S&P rating A, Moodys rating A2
One Corporate - S&P rating A+, Moodys rating A2
One Corporate - S&P rating AAA, Moodys rating not rated
One Corporate - S&P rating AA+, Moodys rating Aa1
As at September 30, 2004 ANZ reported one customer at the consolidated level and two customers at the company level with lending greater than 10% of the capital base.
25
At September 30, 2004 at the company level ANZ reported the following 10 large exposures;
One Government body - S&P rating Aaa, Moodys rating AAA
One Bank- S&P rating BBB+, Moodys rating A2
One Bank- S&P rating AA-, Moodys rating Aa2
One Corporate - S&P rating AAA, Moodys rating Aaa
One Corporate - S&P rating A-, Moodys rating not rated
One Corporate - S&P rating A+, Moodys rating Aa3
One Corporate - S&P rating A+, Moodys rating A2
One Corporate - S&P rating A, Moodys rating A2
One Corporate - S&P rating A-, Moodys rating A2
One Corporate - Not externally rated
Basel II
The common frame work for determining the appropriate quantum of bank regulatory capital is set by the Basel Committee, a sub-committee of the Bank for International Settlements, and a new frame work has been developed over the past five years that is commonly known as Basel II. A key objective of Basel II is to improve stability of the global financial system by encouraging improved risk management practices and requiring banks to hold levels of regulatory capital commensurate with their risk profile. In particular, Basel II will introduce a more risk-sensitive and detailed regulatory capital regime for credit risk and will introduce for the first time an explicit regulatory capital charge for operational risk. The final version of the new Accord was released in June 2004.
A major innovation of the new Accord is that Basel II allows banks of varying sophistication in their risk management practices to enter the new regulatory capital frame work at one of three levels, with incentives embedded (by way of reduced regulatory capital requirements) to attract banks with more sophisticated risk measurement and management approaches to reach the more advanced levels. Banks will need to choose their approach and be accredited at a level of compliance in each of credit and operational risk. Market risk will remain largely unchanged from the current Accord, following its revision in 1996. ANZ is already accredited for the most sophisticated approach to market risk.
At this time, ANZ is pursuing accreditation under the most advanced approaches for both credit and operational risk, in line with the Groups vision of risk management as a strategic asset and source of competitive advantage. It has projects underway to address all of the necessary requirements for accreditation at the most advanced levels for both areas under Basel II. Most of these projects are currently in the design and implementation phase of the project lifecycle. Key structural elements of our framework, such as a credit risk rating system that measures default probabilities and likely losses in the event of default, and a framework for operational risk measurement and capital allocation, are already in place, and was largely unchanged from the previous version. The results of an earlier calibration exercise indicated that ANZ would need less regulatory capital under the most advanced Basel II approaches than must be held under the current rules. However, APRA have stated that there will be some differences in the way Basel II is implemented in Australia, which will lessen this reduction.
New Zealand
For the purposes of these conditions of registration, the term banking group means ANZ National Bank Limiteds financial reporting group (as defined in section 2(1) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993).
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 (the Act) requires the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) to exercise its powers of registration of banks and prudential supervision of registered banks for the purposes of:
promoting the maintenance of a sound and efficient financial system; or
avoiding significant damage to the financial system that could result from the failure of a registered bank.
26
The RBNZs supervisory functions are aimed at encouraging the soundness and efficiency of the financial system as a whole, and not preventing individual bank failures or at protecting creditors. As a consequence the RBNZ places considerable emphasis on a requirement that the banks disclose, on a quarterly basis, information on financial performance and risk positions, and on a requirement that directors regularly attest to certain key matters. These measures are intended to strengthen market disciplines and to ensure that responsibility for the prudent management of banks lies with those who the RBNZ considers are best placed to exercise that responsibility - the directors and management.
The main elements of the RBNZs supervisory role are:
to require all banks to comply with certain minimum prudential requirements, which are applied through conditions of registration. These include constraints on connected exposure and minimum capital adequacy requirements;
to monitor each registered banks financial condition and compliance with conditions of registration, principally on the basis of published quarterly disclosure statements;
to consult with the senior management of registered banks; and
to use crisis management powers available to it under the Act to intervene where a bank distress or failure situation threatens the soundness of the financial system.
The disclosure statements that are required to be issued quarterly by registered banks contain comprehensive corporate details and full financial statements. They are subject to full external audit at the end of each financial year and a limited scope audit review at the end of each financial half year. Each bank director is required to sign his or her banks disclosure statements and to make certain attestations. A bank and its directors may incur criminal and civil penalties if the banks disclosure statement contains information that is held to be false or misleading.
The RBNZ currently also requires all registered banks to obtain and maintain a credit rating from an approved organization and publish that rating in the quarterly disclosure statements.
In addition, the RBNZ has wide reaching powers to obtain further information, data and forecasts in connection with its supervisory functions, and to require that information data, and forecasts to be audited.
It also possesses a number of crisis management powers. Those powers include recommending that a banks registration be cancelled, investigating the affairs of a registered bank, requiring that a registered bank consult with the RBNZ, giving directions to a registered bank, removing, replacing or appointing a director of a registered bank or recommending that a registered bank be subject to statutory management.
The registration of ANZ National Bank Limited (ANZ National) as a registered bank is subject to the following conditions:
1. That the banking group complies with the following requirements at all times:
Capital of the banking group is not less than 8% of risk weighted exposures.
Tier one capital of the banking group is not less than 4% of risk weighted exposures.
Capital of the banking group is not less than NZD15 million.
ANZ National complies with the following requirements at all times:
Capital of ANZ National is not less than 8% of risk weighted exposures.
Tier one capital of ANZ National is not less than 4% of risk weighted exposures.
Capital of ANZ National is not less than NZD15 million.
For the purposes of this condition of registration, capital, tier one capital and risk weighted exposures shall be calculated in accordance with the RBNZ document entitled Capital Adequacy Framework (BS2) dated July 2004.
In its disclosure statements under the Registered Bank Disclosure Statement (Off-Quarter - New Zealand Incorporated Registered Banks) Order 1998, ANZ National must include all of the information relating to the capital position of both ANZ National and the banking group which would be required if the second schedule of that Order was replaced by the second schedule of the Registered Bank Disclosure Statement (Full and Half-Year - New Zealand Incorporated Registered Banks) Order 1998 in respect of the relevant quarter.
2. That the banking group does not conduct any non-financial activities that in aggregate are material relative to its total activities, where the term material is based on generally accepted accounting practice, as defined in the Financial Reporting Act 1993.
27
3. That the banking groups insurance business is not greater than 1% of its total consolidated assets. For the purposes of this condition:
(i) Insurance business means any business of the nature referred to in section 4 of the Insurance Companies (Ratings and Inspections) Act 1994 (including those to which the Act is disapplied by sections 4(1)(a) and (b) and 9 of that Act), or any business of the nature referred to in section 3(1) of the Life Insurance Act 1908;
(ii) In measuring the size of the banking groups insurance business:
(a) where insurance business is conducted by any entity whose business predominantly consists of insurance business, the size of that insurance business shall be:
the total consolidated assets of the group headed by that entity;
or if the entity is a subsidiary of another entity whose business predominantly consists of insurance business, the total consolidated assets of the group headed by the latter entity;
(b) otherwise, the size of each insurance business conducted by any entity within the banking group shall equal the total liabilities relating to that insurance business, plus the equity retained by the entity to meet the solvency or financial soundness needs of the insurance business;
(c) the amounts measured in relation to parts (a) and (b) shall be summed and compared to the total consolidated assets of the banking group. All amounts in parts (a) and (b) shall relate to on balance sheet items only, and shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, as defined in the Financial Reporting Act 1993;
(d) where products or assets of which an insurance business is comprised also contain a non-insurance component, the whole of such products or assets shall be considered part of the insurance business.
4. That aggregate credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of specific allowance for loan losses) of the banking group to all connected persons do not exceed the rating-contingent limit outlined in the following matrix:
Credit rating |
|
|
Connected exposure limit |
|
|
|
(% of the banking groups Tier 1 capital) |
|
|
AA/Aa2 and above |
|
75 |
|
|
AA-/Aa3 |
|
70 |
|
|
A+/A1 |
|
60 |
|
|
A/A2 |
|
40 |
|
|
A-/A3 |
|
30 |
|
|
BBB+/Baa1 and below |
|
15 |
|
Within the rating-contingent limit, credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of specific allowance for loan losses) to non-bank connected persons shall not exceed 15 per cent of the banking groups tier 1 capital.
For the purposes of this condition of registration, compliance with the rating contingent connected exposure limit is determined in accordance with the RBNZ document entitled Connected Exposure Policy (BS8) dated July 2003.
5. That exposures to connected persons are not on more favourable terms(e.g., as relates to such matters as credit assessment, tenor, interest rates, amortisation schedules and requirement for collateral) than corresponding exposures to non-connected persons.
6. That the board of ANZ National contains at least two independent directors and that alternates for those directors, if any, are also independent. In this context an independent director (or alternate) is a director (or alternate) who is not an employee of ANZ National, and who is not a director, trustee, or employee of any holding company (as that term is defined in section 5 of the Companies Act 1993) of ANZ National, or any other entity capable of controlling or significantly influencing ANZ National.
7. That the chairperson of ANZ Nationals board is not an employee of ANZ National.
8. That ANZ Nationals constitution does not include any provision permitting a director, when exercising powers or performing duties as a director, to act other than in what he or she believes is the best interests of the company (i.e. ANZ National).
9. That a substantial proportion of ANZ Nationals business is conducted in and from New Zealand.
28
10. That none of the following actions may be taken except with the consent of the RBNZ:
(i) any transfer to another person or entity (other than ANZ National or any member of the banking group which is incorporated in, and operating in, New Zealand) of all or a material part of any business (which term shall include the customers of the business) carried on by ANZ National (or any member of the banking group); and
(ii) any transfer or change by which all or a material part of the management, operational capacity or systems of ANZ National (or any member of the banking group) is transferred to, or is to be performed by, another person or entity other than ANZ National (or any member of the banking group which is incorporated in, and operating in, New Zealand); and
(iii) any action affecting, or other change in, the arrangements by which any function relating to any business carried on by ANZ National (or any member of the banking group) is performed, which has or may have the effect that all or a material part of any such function will be performed by another person or entity other than ANZ National (or any member of the banking group which is incorporated in, and operating in, New Zealand); and
(iv) any action that prohibits, prevents or restricts the authority or ability of the board of ANZ National or any statutory manager of ANZ National (or the board of any member of the banking group or any statutory manager of any member of the banking group) to have unambiguous legal authority and practical ability to control and operate any business or activity of ANZ National (or any member of the banking group).
11. That no appointment of any director, chief executive officer, or executive who reports or is accountable directly to the chief executive officer, shall be made in respect of ANZ National unless:
(i) the RBNZ has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee, and
(ii) the RBNZ has advised that it has no objection to that appointment.
12. (i) That the management of ANZ National by its chief executive officer shall be carried out solely under the direction and supervision of the board of directors of ANZ National.
(ii) That the employment contract of the chief executive officer of ANZ National shall be with ANZ National. The chief executive officers responsibilities shall be owed solely to ANZ National and the terms and conditions of the chief executive officers employment agreement shall be determined by, and any decision relating to the employment or termination of employment of the chief executive officer shall be made by, the board of directors of ANZ National.
(iii) That all staff employed by ANZ National shall have their remuneration determined by (or under the delegated authority of) the chief executive officer of ANZ National and be accountable (directly or indirectly) solely to the chief executive officer of ANZ National.
13. (i) That no later than December 31, 2005 ANZ National shall locate and continue to operate in New Zealand the whole of ANZ Nationals domestic system and the board of directors of ANZ National will have unambiguous legal and practical ability to control the management and operation of the domestic system on a stand alone basis in, and resourced wholly within, New Zealand.
(ii) That in respect of the international system the board of directors of ANZ National will, no later than December 31, 2005, have unambiguous legal and practical ability to control the management and operation of the international system on a stand alone basis.
For the purposes of these conditions of registration the term domestic system means all property, assets and systems (including in particular (but without limitation) all management, administrative and information technology systems) owned, operated, or used, by ANZ National supporting, relating to, or connected with:
(a) the New Zealand dollar accounts and channels servicing the consumer banking market (but potentially also other customer segments); and
(b) the general ledger covering subsidiary ledgers for (a) above, together with a daily updated summary of the subsidiary ledgers running on the international system; and
(c) any other functions, operations or business of, or carried on by, ANZ National (now or at any time in the future) that are not included in, or form part of, the international system.
29
For the purposes of these conditions of registration the term international system means those systems of ANZ National generally having one or more of the following characteristics:
(a) supports foreign currency accounts/transactions;
(b) supports cross-border trade, payments and other transactions;
(c) supports businesses that operate in global markets;
(d) supports accounts and transactions undertaken by institutions, corporates and banks;
(e) used to manage large, volatile risk businesses which operate on a global basis;
(f) used to service customers who conduct accounts and transactions with the bank in multiple countries;
(g) used by the non-bank subsidiary companies.
United States
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sox) includes provisions addressing audits, financial reporting and disclosure, conflicts of interest, and corporate governance at public companies. The Act also establishes new supervisory mechanisms, including the new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for accountants and accounting firms that conduct external audits of public companies. Principal features of Sox include: higher standards for auditor independence; greater oversight requirements for corporate CEOs and CFOs, including certification of annual reports to the SEC; enhanced financial disclosures, particularly on the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and, tougher criminal penalties for white-collar crime and corporate fraud.
The USA PATRIOT Act (the Patriot Act) was passed in 2001 and contains strong measures to prevent, detect, and prosecute terrorism and international money laundering. Title III of the Patriot Act is the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001. It includes numerous provisions for fighting international money laundering and blocking terrorist access to the US financial system. The Patriot Act is far-reaching in scope, covering a broad range of financial activities and institutions.
The provisions affecting banking organizations are generally set forth as amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). These provisions relate principally to US banking organizations relationships with foreign banks and with persons who are resident outside the United States. The BSA, which generally applies to insured depository institutions as well as to the US branches and agencies of foreign banks, does not immediately impose any new filing or reporting obligations for banking organizations, but requires certain additional due diligence and recordkeeping practices. Some requirements take effect without the issuance of regulations. Other provisions have been implemented through regulations promulgated by the US Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the Federal Reserve Board and the other federal financial institutions regulators.
Following the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLB, also known as the Financial Modernization Act), ANZ successfully applied to the Federal Reserve Bank and became a Financial Holding Company (FHC). As a FHC, ANZ is allowed to engage in financial activities that are financial in nature or incidental, or complementary to financial activities, as determined by the Federal Reserve Bank and the Secretary of the Treasury Department. This legislation provides a clearer method for future integration of banks with other financial businesses and allows the Bank to enter into other new business lines for the first time.
Under this legislation, an FHC is subject to restrictions if it were determined that the FHC is not well managed or well capitalized. In addition, under the GLB, the Federal Reserve Bank is the umbrella supervisor with jurisdiction over the FHCs.
Under the GLBs new requirements, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (Comptroller) will continue to oversee, as primary regulator, foreign banks having a federal branch in the United States. Therefore, the ANZ New York Branch will continue to be subject to supervision, examination and extensive regulation by the Comptroller and the International Banking Act of 1978 (the IBA), along with the regulations adopted pursuant to the IBA. The IBA provides, among other things, that a federal branch of a foreign bank can exercise the same rights and privileges that are available to national banks. In addition, the exercise of any such right or privilege must be subject to the same duties, restrictions, penalties, liabilities, conditions and limitations that apply to national banks at the same location. The Comptroller also imposes a required capital equivalency deposit to a federal branch, which must be maintained on deposit with a Federal Reserve member bank (or invest in qualifying securities as authorized by the Comptroller). The amount of this deposit should be not less than 5% of the total liabilities (excluding, among other things, liabilities to affiliates) of the federal branch. In addition, a federal branch is subject to the record-keeping and reporting requirements that apply to national banks. The branch must maintain its accounts and records separate from those of the foreign bank and must comply with such additional requirements as may be prescribed by the Comptroller. In addition to the above deposit requirement, Regulation D of the Federal Reserve Bank imposes uniform reserve requirements to all institutions (including a federal branch) with transaction accounts or non-personal time deposits. The Regulation defines such deposits and requires reports of deposits to the Federal Reserve.
30
Under the IBA, a federal branch of a foreign bank is subject to the receivership provisions to the same extent as a national bank. The Comptroller may take possession of the business and property of a federal branch. Accordingly, the Comptroller has at its disposal a wide range of supervisory and enforcement tools addressing violations of laws and regulations and breaches of safety and soundness, which can be used against federal branches. The Comptroller may remove federal branch management and assess civil money penalties. In certain circumstances, the Comptroller may also terminate a federal branch license at its own initiative or at the recommendation of the Federal Reserve Board.
Also under the IBA, the branch is subject to certain restrictions with respect to opening new domestic deposit-taking branches and establishing or acquiring subsidiary banks in states outside of our home-state of New York.
Other countries
Local banking operations in all of the Issuers offshore branches and banking subsidiaries are subject to host country supervision by their respective regulators.
The Australian banking system is highly competitive. In September 2004, the four major banking groups in Australia (being ANZ, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, National Australia Bank Limited and Westpac Banking Corporation, together with their respective banking subsidiaries), held approximately 70% of the total Australian assets of banks that carry on business in Australia. Each of these four banking groups operates a nationwide branch network and, at September 30, 2004, they collectively operated approximately 70% of the total number of bank branches in Australia. The operations of the smaller regional banks are typically limited to servicing customers in a particular State or region with particular emphasis on residential mortgage lending.
The deregulation of the Australian financial system during the early 1980s led to a proliferation of financial institutions that compete in selected markets with the four major banks. Non-bank financial intermediaries such as building societies and credit unions compete principally in the areas of accepting deposits and residential mortgage lending, mainly for owner-occupied housing. Some large building societies were granted banking authorizations under the Banking Act 1959. Specialist non-bank residential mortgage lenders and direct (non-branch) banking operations have become more prominent in recent years.
Competition is particularly intense in the housing lending market, which has been largely driven in recent times by the rise of mortgage originators, and more recently, growth of the mortgage broker industry. Broker originated loans now account for approximately 30% of all transactions in the Australian marketplace. Most banks have embraced broker-originated business whilst continuing efforts to grow market share in the traditional network channel.
The retail deposit market in Australia is currently the focus of increased competition. The recent introduction into the market of a number of high rate cash management accounts by large offshore institutions including Citibank and HBOS, combined with INGs long standing online product has created a higher degree of competitive intensity.
Our Cards and Merchant Services business offers credit card products and personal loans in Australia. In a highly competitive market ANZ holds a strong position, accounting for around 20% of all credit card spending in Australia. Reforms recently introduced by the RBA, which allow merchants to recover the costs of accepting credit cards, determine objective cost-based benchmarks for setting interchange fees and liberalize access to the schemes, are designed to increase competition further in this market.
ANZs Esanda and UDC businesses offer a range of personal finance products in Australia and New Zealand. The businesses hold leading market positions in motor vehicle and equipment finance. The highly competitive nature of this business in both countries has seen a period of rationalization in recent years that has resulted in a number of our peers divesting their personal finance operations to non-banking institutions.
Institutional offers a wide range of financial market services to our large corporate and institutional customer base including: foreign exchange, derivative and fixed interest activities, project and structured finance, corporate finance (mergers and acquisitions, and other advisory), primary markets origination and syndication and leasing finance. Competitors gain recognition through the quality of their client base, perceived skill sets, reputation and brands. In domestic markets, Institutionals competitors are generally either international investment banks operating in niche markets, the boutique operations of large multinational banking conglomerates or domestic investment banks with a focus on niche areas. Institutionals key competitive strength is its focused geographic and sector experience, league table rankings and its established client base.
31
FINANCIAL REVIEW
ANZs Corporate Australia segment offers traditional relationship management to both its Corporate ($10 million to $150 million turnover), Business Banking ($50,000 Funds Under Management to $10 million turnover) and Small Business Banking (Funds Under Management to $50,000) businesses as well as financial solutions to its larger clients. ANZ has strong market share in the Corporate market that is dominated by the major Australian banks. The profile of the Business Banking market has seen competition intensify amongst the major and regional Australian banks and ANZs share of this market has increased in recent periods. ANZ is investing in a specialist strategy for the Small Business market and expects solid asset and liability growth from this segment in future periods.
The funds management industry is an area of strong competition amongst the four major Australian banks and Australias insurance companies. Competition has increased as the Australian Government has encouraged long-term saving through superannuation by means of taxation concessions and the imposition of a mandatory superannuation guarantee levy on employers. In May 2002, ANZ commenced operations of the joint venture with the ING Australia Group to create a larger and more competitive organization in wealth management.
On October 24, 2003, ANZ announced that it had purchased NBNZ from Lloyds TSB Group plc. Combined with ANZs existing New Zealand operations the amalgamated entity holds an approximate 40% market share, and is the leading player in all market segments of the New Zealand banking market. We compete in New Zealand with the Bank of New Zealand (a wholly-owned subsidiary of National Australia Bank Limited), Westpac Trust Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Westpac Banking Corporation), ASB Bank Limited (a subsidiary of Commonwealth Bank of Australia) and others.
Competition in the New Zealand banking market continues to increase. Kiwibank, the government owned entity run through the NZ Post Office network, continues to gain market share. In February 2003, Superbank, a joint venture between St George Bank NZ Ltd and Foodstuffs, was launched. The joint venture offers a basic suite of banking products through Foodstuffs supermarket network.
Competitive intensity is particularly prevalent in the New Zealand Mortgage market, where there has been significant competition in fixed rate mortgages. Margins on the two year fixed rate product were significantly reduced following reduced priced offerings by all New Zealand banks in late 2004.
Aggressive pricing has also adversely impacted New Zealand Institutional markets during 2004, as a number of the major New Zealand banks seek to increase their presence in this market.
32
Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Results for 2004, 2003 and 2002
The following discussion is based on the Financial Statements and accompanying notes as prepared under Australian GAAP and set out in the Financial Report. Note 55 to the Financial Report discusses the principal differences between Australian GAAP and US GAAP, as they relate to us and provides a reconciliation of shareholders equity and total assets to US GAAP.
The analysis that follows discusses results after income tax unless otherwise stated. Prior to 2000, abnormal items were reported separately. Since 2000, under Australian GAAP, abnormal items are not allowed to be disclosed separately. In past years, abnormal items were defined as items of revenue or expense which, although attributable to the ordinary operations of the business entity, were considered to be abnormal by reason of their size and/or effect on the results of the business entity for the period.
Overview
ANZ is a leading Australian commercial bank serving approximately 5 million customers in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific. It also has a presence in Asia, and the major financial markets in the United Kingdom and the United States.
ANZ operates a series of specialist businesses in key segments including Personal, Institutional, Corporate Australia, Esanda and UDC, ING Australia, and its major geographic businesses in Asia Pacific and New Zealand.
ANZs strategy is to develop a diverse portfolio of specialized businesses, which allows businesses to get closer to customers, to understand their real needs and deliver more valuable products and services. More recently, ANZ has re-organized its specialist businesses with the goal of harnessing the synergies between specialist businesses and broadening the offering to customers, while maintaining ANZs specialisation model.
To support its specialisation strategy, ANZ has had a consistent focus on key areas: the quality of its people, its culture and creating low risk sustainable businesses. Over the last several years this has involved:
Shifting away from the dependence on higher risk businesses including those in international emerging markets, towards lower risk, more sustainable consumer businesses in our domestic markets (Australia and New Zealand). In 2000, personal businesses accounted for 55% of ANZs gross lending assets. In 2004, these businesses account for approximately 63% of ANZs gross lending assets.
Transforming ANZs cost structure through developing the right technology and enabling our processes to become leaner and more competitive. Today, ANZ has a cost-to-income ratio of 45.3%.
Recognising ANZs long term competitive strength rests with its people. This has involved investing in revitalising ANZs culture enabling them to deliver more consistently and productively for shareholders and customers.
ANZ is focussed on creating sustainable value for its shareholders - now and in the longer term. Much of this involves building on the competitive advantages that exist in our specialist businesses and continually evaluating opportunities to expand in Australia, New Zealand, and elsewhere in Asia and the Pacific.
In 2003, ANZ acquired NBNZ from Lloyds TSB for $4.9 billion. The acquisition has made ANZ the leading bank in New Zealand and is consistent with ANZs strategic goal to have sustainable top three positions in each of our core businesses and markets.
As a result of this New Zealand acquisition and growth in our personal businesses in recent years, ANZ has strengthened its franchise across Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific. Going forward we will have a greater emphasis on identifying, and investing in organic growth opportunities, mostly in Australia but also through modest investments in Asia.
In 2004, 33% of our operating income was derived from countries outside Australia compared to 27% and 26% in 2003 and 2002 respectively. Movements in foreign currencies against the Australian dollar will therefore affect our earnings through the translation of overseas profits to Australian dollars.
We face substantial competition in all our markets, particularly Australia and New Zealand. Competition affects ANZs profitability in terms of reduced interest rate spreads and the volume of new lending. See Item 4: Information on the Company - Competition.
33
Our operations are impacted by government actions such as exchange controls and changes to taxation and government regulations in the countries in which we operate. Our operations in most countries depend on the continuing availability of banking licenses issued by applicable governments. In Australia, in addition to the competition rules overseen by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), the Commonwealth Government of Australia prohibits any merger between any of the four largest Australian banks. There is no change anticipated to this prohibition in the near term.
Finally, our operations are also constrained by community pressures, most notably in Australia, in keeping fee income, interest rate increases and branch rationalization to acceptable levels.
AASB 1044, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets became effective for the Group from October 1, 2002. Under the new Standard, provision for dividends cannot be booked unless dividends are declared, determined or publicly recommended on or before balance date. The final 2004 dividend was declared on November 17, 2004 and the final 2003 dividend was declared on November 13, 2003. Accordingly the dividend applicable to the current reporting period has not been booked in this report. However, dividends declared after balance date still need to be disclosed in the notes. The adoption of AASB 1044 results in an increase in Shareholders Equity of $983 million at September 30, 2004 and of $777 million at September 30, 2003. The Group will continue its current practice of making a public announcement of the dividend after balance date. Dividend information for the current period is provided in Note 7, Dividends.
AASB 1012, Foreign Currency Translation became effective for the Group from October 1, 2002. Under this revised Standard, foreign denominated equity must be reported using the spot rate applicable at the date of issue and not be retranslated using the spot rate at the end of each reporting period. The Group has retranslated its USD preference share capital to the historical spot rates. As the translation adjustment is reported in the foreign currency translation reserve the impact of these changes are neutral on equity.
ANZs results for the past three years are summarized below and are discussed under the headings of Analysis of Major Income and Expense Items, Results by Line of Business, and Results by Region, which follow.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
5,254 |
|
4,311 |
|
4,018 |
|
Allowance for loan losses charge |
|
(632 |
) |
(614 |
) |
(860 |
) |
Net interest income after allowance for loan losses charge |
|
4,622 |
|
3,697 |
|
3,158 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
3,391 |
|
2,808 |
|
2,970 |
|
Net operating income tax |
|
8,013 |
|
6,505 |
|
6,128 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
(4,026 |
) |
(3,228 |
) |
(2,905 |
) |
Operating profit before income tax |
|
3,987 |
|
3,277 |
|
3,223 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
(1,168 |
) |
(926 |
) |
(898 |
) |
Operating profit after income tax |
|
2,819 |
|
2,351 |
|
2,325 |
|
Outside equity interest |
|
(4 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Net profit attributable to shareholders of the company |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit attributable to ANZ shareholders |
|
2,788 |
|
2,380 |
|
2,097 |
|
ANZ recorded a profit after tax of $2,815 million for the year ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 20% over the September 2003 year. Basic earnings per ordinary share increased 8% (11 cents) to 153 cents at September 30, 2004, and return on shareholders equity was down from 20.6% to 18.1% primarily associated with the impact of the New Zealand acquisition.
34
Our management believes that the exclusion of significant items provides investors with a measure to compare the underlying performance of the operating business without the distortion of one-off gains and losses. Each significant item is non-recurring and therefore is not expected to affect the future financial performance of the Company.
The table below shows the impact of the significant items on our Operating Results for the past three years.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Profit before significant items (1) |
|
2,717 |
|
2,348 |
|
1,993 |
|
Recognition of deferred profit from closeout of interest rate swaps upon buy back of TrUEPrS hybrid Tier 1 instrument |
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit from sale of businesses to ING Australia joint venture after tax |
|
14 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Recovery from NHB litigation after tax |
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit attributable to shareholders of the company |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
(1) For Australian GAAP purposes, the incremental integration costs (($14) million after tax) in 2004 associated with the acquisition of NBNZ are considered to be a significant item, as is the additional allowance for loan losses (($175) million after tax) taken in 2002. This is not the case under US GAAP.
2004
TrUEPrS
During the March half, the Group bought back TrUEPrS, a hybrid Tier 1 instrument. Previously deferred income that was earned on close out of interest rate swaps that had been hedging the TrUEPrS distributions was recognized in profit. The $84 million after tax impact of TrUEPrS on the current year, being the release of deferred swap income of $108 million before tax, $2 million other swap income, the periodic and final cash dividends paid to holders of TrUEPrS ($36 million), the funding benefit from holding TrUEPrS for part of the year, and $28 million income tax expense have been classified as significant items. This item has not occurred in the past and is unlikely to occur again.
ING Australia completion account profit
In the September half, ANZ finalised the completion accounts on the sale of ANZ funds management and insurance businesses to ING Australia. This sale occurred in 2002. The final settlement of this transaction resulted in a $14 million after tax profit. It is not considered that this is recurring due to final settlement. This final adjustment to profit on sale has been treated as a significant item for Australian GAAP, consistent with the treatment of profit on sale in 2002. This profit is not recognized for US GAAP.
2003
There were no material significant items in 2003.
2002
Net profit after tax in 2002 was impacted by two significant items. ANZ believes the two items shown as significant in 2002 were non-recurring, infrequent or unusual and unlikely to recur within two years for the following reasons:
In January 2002, the Group settled its long standing litigation with National Housing Bank in India (NHB). This resulted in the recovery of $248 million ($159 million after tax), from the net amount of $575 million, which had been provided when the Group sold Grindlays to Standard Chartered Bank. The sale of Grindlays, which represented a significant part of the business was a one off event which has not recurred within the past two years.
In April 2002, certain life and general insurance and funds management businesses were sold to a joint venture with ING Group, and a 49% interest in the joint venture was acquired. A profit after tax of $170 million arose on sale of the businesses (of which $32 million resulted from the sale of New Zealand businesses). In accordance with US GAAP requirements, this profit was reversed in the US GAAP reconciliation (Note 55 of the Financial Statements). This is a one off event which cannot and has not recurred within the past two years as the majority of this business has now been sold.
35
NBNZ Contribution (net of acquisition, funding and incremental integration costs)
Acquisition, funding costs and contribution
NBNZ was purchased by ANZ Banking Group (New Zealand) Limited on December 1, 2003. The acquisition was internally funded by three main sources: $1.0 billion of ordinary shares, $1.3 billion of redeemable preference shares and $2.6 billion of intra-group interest bearing debt. The pre-tax cost of this funding was $140 million for the ten months.
The actual purchase price of $5,112 million differed from the $4,940 million published in the Renounceable Rights Issue prospectus due to adverse exchange rate movements and the impact of hedging, offset by reduced acquisition costs. The resulting goodwill of $3,266 million is being amortised in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards over 20 years with a charge of $129 million in the ten months to September 30, 2004.
For discussion of the $375 million contribution by NBNZ refer to page 63.
Integration
Integration of the two New Zealand registered banks has successfully progressed through a number of key milestones. The most important of these was completion of legal amalgamation on June 26, 2004. This involved an extensive logistical exercise and a widespread internal and external communication program. On June 28, 2004, the amalgamated registered bank in New Zealand changed its name from ANZ Banking Group (New Zealand) Limited to ANZ National Bank Limited (ANZ National).
Amalgamation provided the essential platform to initiate the achievement of the overall integration objectives. To date, the integration program has delivered the following major successes:
The completion of merged organization structures for all the business segments
Alignment of People Capital policy and processes
Implementation of the Rural Integration Plan
Integration programs completed for most central support areas
The merging of Institutional Markets operations, including the restructuring of dealing rooms
Expenditure on the integration of NBNZ includes both the reallocation of existing resources and incurring incremental costs. Incremental costs are those costs that will not recur once integration is complete, and thus do not form part of the core ongoing cost base. During 2004, $14 million after tax of incremental integration costs were incurred. For Australian GAAP purposes, incremental integration costs will be treated as a significant item in 2005 and, to the extent integration is not complete, in 2006.
Integration costs incurred to September 30, 2004 totalled NZD49 million before tax. Of this, $14 million after tax is incremental to the Group, with the remainder being non-incremental as they relate to existing resources that will continue after completion of the integration. There have also been initial cost synergies and revenue benefits from the amalgamation and integration activities completed to date. As expected, there has been minimal loss of revenue and customer growth, with these losses primarily caused by lending and transaction concentration in the merged Institutional and Markets businesses.
Over the last six months, there has been a continuation of effort to finalise plans for an integrated technology systems solution for the combined entity. As a result of this work, a revised retail systems strategy has been defined which will support the separate New Zealand Retail businesses over the longer term. The two-brand retail strategy will be supported by the two existing technology systems and by retaining separate Retail Banking head offices for ANZ (Auckland) and National Bank (Wellington). The establishment of the two retail banking teams emphasises our commitment to each brand particularly in respect of customer retention and the development of each franchise. The retention of the two existing technology systems for each respective brand whilst reducing potential cost synergies, removes technology risk from the success of the retail strategy, lowers integration cost as well as reducing risk for the overall process of integration.
As part of the RBNZ approval for amalgamation, additional requirements for the location and ownership of key technology systems were imposed. These additional requirements increase integration costs (NZD31 million) and result in additional operating costs (NZD12 million) which have not been included in previously reported integration financials.
The combined impact of the above is a reduction in the overall cost of integration by NZD45 million to NZD220 million compared to original estimates. These costs relate primarily to property co-location, restructuring and non-retail systems integration, with the majority of integration cost investment expected to occur in 2005. By 2007, the annual integration cost synergies are forecast to be NZD75 million and revenue synergies are forecast to be NZD47 million, excluding the RBNZ impact described above. Customer attrition of NZD34 million per annum has been estimated, mainly in the Institutional and Capital Markets businesses.
36
The Group recorded a profit after tax of $2,815 million for the year ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 20% over the year ended September 30, 2003. Profit excluding significant items and the 10 months contribution from NBNZ increased by 9% to $2,550 million.
ANZs revenue comprises net interest income and other operating income.
Net interest income at $5,254 million was 22% ($943 million) higher than the 2003 year, due largely to the $708 million contribution from NBNZ. Excluding NBNZ, net interest increased 5% driven by growth in average net loans and advances of $18.4 billion, particularly in Mortgages, and growth in average deposits and other borrowings of $11.9 billion. This growth was suppressed by reduced margins.
Other operating income at $3,391 million increased $583 million (21%). Excluding significant items, other operating income increased $459 million (16%) due largely to the $259 million contribution from NBNZ. The following explanations exclude NBNZ and significant items.
Lending fees increased by $18 million, driven by lending growth in Corporate, Personal and Esanda offset by a $16 million reduction in Institutional reflecting ANZs offshore risk reduction strategy.
Non-lending fee income increased by $165 million, driven mainly by growth in Personal ($112 million), Institutional ($39 million) and Esanda and UDC ($9 million).
Foreign exchange earnings increased $16 million with increased commodity and structured product sales in Institutional.
Profit on trading instruments increased $31 million, with a lower proportion of revenue booked as interest due to funding of cash flows.
Other operating income reduced $30 million with a reduction in income received on the TrUEPrS swap partly offset by increased equity accounted income from ING Australia.
During the year ended September 30, 2004 the cost to income ratio remained broadly stable at 45.3%, staying within ANZs target range. ANZ continued to increase investment in organic growth opportunities in the Australian franchise aimed at improving our market share. Operating expenses increased by $798 million, of which $593 million occurred because of the acquisition of NBNZ (including NBNZ incremental integration costs). Excluding these factors operating costs increased by $205 million (6%) driven by:
Personnel expenses increased $110 million as a result of annual salary increases together with an increase in staff numbers of 775, mainly in:
- customer facing positions (600 staff) in New Zealand, Foreign Exchange, Capital Markets, Trade Finance and Personal; and
- central functions (155 staff) driven mainly by an escalating compliance focus and project related activity.
Technology costs increased by $44 million largely due to costs associated with the rollout of the new telling platform and increased depreciation associated with investments in technology.
Premises costs increased $17 million, with increased investment in the branch network and changes in accounting methodology for rental costs.
The appreciation of the Australian dollar suppressed cost growth by $39 million.
37
Asset quality is continuing to improve with the economic loss provision rate down 6 basis points. This reflected a reduction in the additional charge taken in the Corporate Center for offshore losses and the increased proportion of lower risk domestic assets. Net specific allowance for loan losses reduced 19% to $429 million with the reduction assisted by the de-risking of the offshore book.
The following trends are expected to have an impact on income from continuing operations:
Income increased in 2004 as a result of the consolidation of 10 months results of the National Bank of New Zealand following its acquisition on December 1, 2003. Income in 2005 is expected to increase with the consolidation of a full 12 months results.
Treasury mismatch earnings declined in 2004 following an extended period of low and flat yield curve. This trend is expected to continue into the short to medium term.
ANZ has continued a process of de-risking its Institutional portfolio. De-risking commenced in 1998 and by December 2004 has approached its final stages. The result of the De-risking has been a reduction in income from the offshore Institutional loan portfolio. De-risking will continue to impact 2005 earnings growth following the sale of ANZs London headquartered project finance activities to Standard Chartered Bank and the run-off of structured finance transactions in NBNZ.
Margins continued to decline through 2004. As a result of:
- Changes in the composition of the portfolio with a higher proportion of mortgages,
- Changes in the funding mix with an increased proportion of wholesale funding and customers switching to lower margin (higher rate) deposit products; and
- Competitive pricing on mortgages and customer deposit products.
These trends are expected to continue into the foreseeable future.
Underlying asset volume growth has been strong especially in domestic retail markets although there has been a slow down in the Australian housing market in 2004 which has seen a softening in demand for mortgage products. This trend is expected to continue into the 2005 financial year.
38
Analysis of Major Income and Expense Items
Net interest income
The following table analyzes net interest income, interest spread and net interest average margin for Australia, New Zealand and overseas markets. Interest income figures included as part of spread and margin calculations are presented on a tax-equivalent basis.
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Interest income |
|
14,117 |
|
10,215 |
|
9,037 |
|
Interest expense |
|
(8,863 |
) |
(5,904 |
) |
(5,019 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
5,254 |
|
4,311 |
|
4,018 |
|
Average interest earning assets |
|
212,153 |
|
162,154 |
|
145,920 |
|
Interest spreads and net interest average margin |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread adjusted to include interest forgone |
|
2.11 |
|
2.31 |
|
2.44 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets (1) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
(0.02 |
) |
(0.04 |
) |
Net interest spread (2) |
|
2.09 |
|
2.29 |
|
2.40 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.39 |
|
0.41 |
|
0.51 |
|
Net interest average margin (3)- Australia |
|
2.48 |
|
2.70 |
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread adjusted to include interest forgone |
|
2.08 |
|
2.30 |
|
2.34 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets (1) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread (2) |
|
2.07 |
|
2.30 |
|
2.34 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.43 |
|
0.62 |
|
0.48 |
|
Net interest average margin (3)- New Zealand |
|
2.50 |
|
2.92 |
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread adjusted to include interest forgone |
|
1.34 |
|
1.37 |
|
1.20 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets (1) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
(0.07 |
) |
(0.05 |
) |
Net interest spread (2) |
|
1.30 |
|
1.30 |
|
1.15 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.25 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.25 |
|
Net interest average margin (3)- Overseas markets |
|
1.55 |
|
1.45 |
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread adjusted to include interest forgone |
|
2.08 |
|
2.28 |
|
2.31 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets (1) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
(0.03 |
) |
(0.04 |
) |
Net interest spread (2) |
|
2.06 |
|
2.25 |
|
2.27 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.43 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.50 |
|
Net interest average margin (3)- Group |
|
2.49 |
|
2.67 |
|
2.77 |
|
(1) Refer Note 14 to the Financial Report
(2) Average interest rate received on interest earning assets less the average interest rate paid on interest bearing liabilities
(3) Net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets
39
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Average rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Australian reference lending rate charged by ANZ |
|
9.0 |
% |
8.6 |
% |
8.3 |
% |
Average Australian variable housing loan rate charged by ANZ |
|
6.0 |
% |
6.2 |
% |
6.6 |
% |
Average Australian 90 day fixed term deposit rate (1) |
|
3.7 |
% |
3.2 |
% |
3.1 |
% |
US average prime rate (2) |
|
4.1 |
% |
4.2 |
% |
4.9 |
% |
(1) Source: Reserve Bank of Australia
(2) Source: Datastream
2004
Net interest income at $5,254 million was 22% ($943 million) higher than 2003. Excluding significant items and NBNZ, net interest increased 5% ($233 million) to $4,544 million.
Volume
Average net loans and advances grew by $44.8 billion (32%) overall with growth attributable to the acquisition of NBNZ ($26.4 billion), Personal ($14.4 billion or 22% with $13.0 billion in Mortgages), Corporate Australia ($2.3 billion or 22%) and Institutional ($1.8 billion or 10%). Average net loans and advances reduced by $2.4 billion (20%) in overseas markets as a result of the strategy to reduce higher risk exposures ($1.1 billion) and the exchange rate impact of a stronger Australian dollar ($1.3 billion).
Average deposits and other borrowings grew $37.2 billion (31%), with growth from the NBNZ acquisition ($25.3 billion), Treasury ($3.4 billion) to fund asset growth, Personal ($3.4 billion or 10%), and Corporate Australia ($1.7 billion or 13%). Average deposits and other borrowings were flat in overseas markets, with increases resulting from greater commercial paper issuance in the US offset by a $2.6 billion reduction resulting from exchange rate movements.
Margin
Net interest average margin contracted by 18 basis points for the full year:
Changes in the composition of the portfolio negatively impacted the net interest margin by 6 basis points, with a higher proportion of mortgages (1 basis point), and changes in the funding mix, from substitution of wholesale funding for customer deposits, together with transfer from higher margin retail deposits to lower margin retail deposits such as cash management, term deposits and V2 plus (3.5 basis points) and a reduction in net non-bearing interest items (1.5 basis points).
Competitive pressures reduced margins by 3 basis points with this impact arising mainly in Mortgages and Institutional.
Wholesale rate movements had a significant impact, reducing the net interest margin by 6 basis points. Variable rate mortgages, funded by short term liabilities, cost 3 basis points as the yield curve steepened following the RBAs move to a tightening bias, plus the relatively low level of term interest rates during 2004, as interest rates reached the bottom of the cycle, reduced mismatch earnings (3 basis points).
Other items include increases in retail broker payments (-2 basis points), offset by increased earnings from foreign exchange revenue hedging (+2 basis points), higher levels of credit card balances becoming interest earning in the 2004 year (+1 basis point), falling levels of interest foregone (+1 basis point), together with impacts from the replacement of TrUEPrs (+2 basis points).
Funding costs associated with unrealized trading gains increased as a result of the appreciation in the AUD. Whilst this 4 basis point decline is reflected in the net interest margin, it is directly offset by an equivalent gain in trading income.
The acquisition of NBNZ resulted in a 3 basis point decline in the Groups interest margin as a result of the partial funding of the transaction with term wholesale issuances.
40
2003
Net interest income at $4,311 million was 7% ($293 million) higher than 2002.
Average net lending assets grew by $13.6 billion (10%) overall, with growth of $10.8 billion (18%) in Mortgages, $1.6 billion in Corporate and $0.8 billion in Asset Finance. Net lending asset volumes reduced 15% in overseas markets as a result of the strategy to reduce higher risk exposures in the UK and US and the exchange rate impact of a strengthening Australian dollar.
Average deposits and other borrowings grew $13.5 billion, in Treasury ($3.2 billion), Personal ($4.2 billion), Institutional Financial Services ($2.7 billion), New Zealand Banking (NZD0.8 billion), Asset Finance ($0.8 billion) and Corporate ($1.6 billion). The deposit growth was encouraged by uncertainty in global equity markets.
Net interest margin contracted by 10 basis points:
The funding cost associated with unrealized trading gains increased as a result of the appreciation of the AUD. Whilst resulting in a 3 basis point decline in net interest margin, it was offset by an equivalent gain in trading income.
Net interest income in Treasury fell by $44 million with maturing high yielding assets not able to be replaced due to the sustained period of low and stable interest rates (3 basis points).
The interest benefit from low interest savings accounts and non-interest bearing balances reduced as the rate at which they were invested reduced (3 basis points).
The proportion of the balance sheet funded by low interest savings accounts and non-interest balances reduced during the year, offset by an increase in term deposits and wholesale funding. This change in funding mix reduced the net interest margin by 5 basis points.
Partially offsetting these declines was an increase in foreign currency hedge revenue as a result of the strengthening AUD (3 basis points) and a reduction in the funding cost on impaired assets (1 basis point).
Non Interest Income
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Fee income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending |
|
1,002 |
|
933 |
|
876 |
|
Other |
|
1,419 |
|
1,115 |
|
1,196 |
|
Total fee income |
|
2,421 |
|
2,048 |
|
2,072 |
|
Foreign exchange earnings |
|
411 |
|
348 |
|
365 |
|
Profit on trading instruments |
|
151 |
|
110 |
|
59 |
|
Other income |
|
284 |
|
302 |
|
300 |
|
Non interest income excluding significant items |
|
3,267 |
|
2,808 |
|
2,796 |
|
Significant items (1) |
|
124 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Total other income |
|
3,391 |
|
2,808 |
|
2,970 |
|
(1) Comprises $110 million TrUEPrS swap income and $14 million gain on finalizing INGA completion accounts after tax.
2004
Non-interest income in 2004, at $3,391 million, was $583 million (21%) higher than the September 2003 year. Excluding $124 million significant items, other operating income increased $459 million (16%) due largely to a $259 million contribution from NBNZ.
Non-interest income excluding significant items and NBNZ increased 7% ($200 million).
41
2003
Non interest income in 2003, at $2,808 million, was 5% lower than the 2002 year. Excluding profit on sale of business to ING Australia, other operating income was flat. Total fee income was $24 million lower than 2002 largely due to a one-off charge of $38 million as a result of an under-accrual of loyalty points on co-branded cards covering the period back to 1999 together with the ongoing impact of higher loyalty program costs. Profit on trading instruments increased $51 million largely due to Capital Markets activities where a lower proportion of trading revenue was booked as interest.
The following explanations exclude NBNZ and significant items:
Fee Income
2004
Total fee income increased $183 million (9%).
Lending fee income increased $18 million (2%):
Corporate Australia increased $15 million (8%) with $4 million higher loan approval fees with increased lending volumes arising from an increased investment in front line staff and $7 million additional commercial bill fees.
Personal increased $9 million (5%) with Banking Products up $5 million (9%) driven by growth in Break free package fees (banking products package for home buyers and residential property investors) with stronger marketing of this offer in 2004. There was also an increase in Cards and Merchant Services ($3 million) due to the popularity of the Premier Select product (packaged fee for mortgage and card products).
Esanda and UDC increased $8 million (23%) due primarily to changes in the fee structure for business lending and higher new business writings.
Institutional reduced $16 million (3%) due to a $17 million (25%) reduction in Corporate and Structured Financing reflecting our offshore risk reduction strategy but offset with increased non-lending fees ($21 million).
Non-lending fee income increased $165 million (15%):
Personal increased $112 million (23%) due largely to the $38 million under-accrual of loyalty points on co-branded cards which reduced income in 2003, higher merchant revenue and improved business conditions generally. In addition there was a $13 million increase in Banking Products, with growth in fees from core deposit transaction products, higher volume related non-ANZ ATM fees and Executor and Trustee management fees, $3 million increase in insurance commissions and $6 million increase from financial planners driven by an improving Funds Management industry outlook and changes to the pension rules.
Institutional increased $39 million (14%) largely due to Corporate and Structured Financing increasing $21 million (39%) reflecting strong performance in the leasing business and a shift in revenue mix away from net interest and lending fee income with a reduction in balance sheet risk. Trade and Transaction Services increased $16 million (9%) due to strong performance in structured commodity trade transactions and improved revenue from international payments.
Esanda and UDC grew $9 million (27%) with an emphasis on generating revenue through the provision of value-added fleet management services.
The appreciation of the AUD over 2003 suppressed fee income growth by 2%.
2003
Total 2003 fee income of $2,048 million was $24 million, or 1% lower than 2002 total fee income.
Lending fee income increased 7% ($57 million) largely in:
Institutional Banking ($30 million) with increased loan approval fees resulting from higher lending volumes and higher guarantee and line fees associated with increased volumes of off-balance sheet credit substitutes. In a review of the Groups credit card business following the Reserve Bank of Australias announced reforms, shortcomings were identified in the methodology used to accrue loyalty points for some co-branded cards. Since 1999, points for the Qantas ANZ Business One Card and bonus points for International expenditure on the Qantas ANZ Card have been under-accrued. The associated one-off charge reduced Consumer Finances after tax profit by $27 million in 2003. As a result, ANZ has made management changes in the cards issuing area and increased financial controls within the business.
Corporate ($12 million) with higher loan approval fees, largely in the SME sector with increased lending volumes arising from an increased investment in front line staff.
Asset Finance ($8 million) with increased fees received on motor vehicle leases due to an increase in the volume of new car sales in the Australian market.
Non-lending fee income reduced 7% ($81 million) as a result of three main factors:
A one-off charge of $38 million as a result of an under-accrual of loyalty points on co-branded cards covering the period back to 1999 together with the ongoing impact of higher loyalty program costs.
42
Lower structured finance fee income ($32 million) reflecting difficult market conditions and a decision to reduce credit exposures to the power and telecommunications sectors.
The sale of ANZs funds management businesses to ING Australia in 2002. Following the sale, funds management fees are booked in ING Australia, with ANZs share being reported in equity accounted income.
Foreign Exchange Earnings
2004
Foreign exchange earnings increased $16 million (4%)
Earnings in Markets increased $12 million (5%) with increased commodity and structured product sales and a book structured to take advantage of the strengthening USD.
Trade and Transaction Services increased $6 million (14%) reflecting improved foreign exchange spreads and volumes.
A strengthening of the AUD against the NZD and USD since 2003 suppressed foreign exchange earnings growth by $12 million (3%).
2003
Foreign exchange earnings in 2003 were $17 million, or 5%, lower than in 2002, largely due to:
Foreign exchange earnings in the Foreign Exchange business unit reduced by $23 million due to increasing competition, credit constraints limiting single name counterparty exposures and customer activity being constrained by currencies being range-bound for long periods reflecting the general uncertainty associated with the Iraq war and the SARS outbreak. This reduction was partly offset by increased profit on trading instruments, with total revenue in the Foreign Exchange business unit reducing $4 million.
Offsetting this reduction was a $14 million increase in the Asia Pacific business segment arising from increased volatility in Asian and Pacific currencies where ANZ has a strong market position.
Profit on Trading Instruments
2004
Profit on trading instruments increased $31 million (28%)
Markets increased $46 million (38%) where a lower proportion of revenue was booked as interest due to funding of cash flows. Total income in Markets was up $11 million (5%) despite difficult market conditions with reduced corporate hedging activity and tightening credit spreads.
Treasury increased $5 million with 2003 impacted by the downward revaluation of the liquidity portfolio (trading securities and allocated hedges).
Income on the hedge of capital investment earnings in ING Australia reduced $10 million, reflecting stronger equity markets in 2004.
Corporate and Structured Financing decreased $5 million as profit on sale of available for sale securities in 2003 was not repeated.
43
2003
Profit on trading instruments in 2003 was $51 million or 86% higher than in 2002 largely due to:
An increase of $47 million in Capital Markets 2003 profits principally due to a lower proportion of trading revenue being booked as net interest with an increase in the funding cost of unrealized trading gains as a result of the appreciation of the AUD.
Reduced earnings on hedges of certain capital earnings in ING Australia ($8 million). ANZ hedges against volatility in capital investment earnings in ING Australia arising from the performance of equity markets.
Foreign Exchange increased $24 million (offset in foreign exchange earnings discussed above) with increased commodities and structured derivative sales revenue.
Other Income
2004
Other operating income decreased $30 million (10%)
A reduction in swap income on the TrUEPrS transaction that contributed $71 million in 2003. This reduction has suppressed growth in profit after tax by 2% with the offset being lower preference share coupons.
Equity accounted income increased $39 million. ANZs share of the joint venture profit from ING Australia increased by $42 million (76%) driven by stronger investment markets with the first half of 2003 impacted by global uncertainty.
Mortgages contributed an additional $12 million (37%) with an increase in Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI) sales driven by strong lending volume growth and the favourable impact of a change in recognition of LMI insurance revenues in March 2004.
In the Group Center the release of ING warranty provisions was largely offset by a provision for loss on sale of the Martin Place property.
Institutional Banking reduced with a $27 million profit before tax on the sale of development properties in 2003.
2003
A reduction of $172 million in 2003 Other Income to $302 million, 36% lower than in 2002 due to the $174 million net profit before tax from the sale of the funds management business to ING Australia. Excluding this, other income increased 1%, impacted by three main factors:
A $99 million reduction in life insurance margin on services income following the sale of the funds management business to ING Australia in April 2003. This was partly offset by a $53 million increase in equity accounted profit from ING Australia
Higher equity accounted profit from other associated entities principally relating to increased share of profit by PT Panin of $55 million after tax
The $27 million profit before tax on the sale of development properties in Institutional Banking in 2003.
Non-Interest Expenses
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Personnel expenses |
|
2,131 |
|
1,750 |
|
1,714 |
|
Premises expenses |
|
353 |
|
295 |
|
299 |
|
Computer expenses |
|
553 |
|
465 |
|
424 |
|
Other expenses |
|
929 |
|
658 |
|
653 |
|
Restructuring |
|
60 |
|
60 |
|
63 |
|
Recovery from NHB litigation (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
Non-interest expenses |
|
4,026 |
|
3,228 |
|
2,905 |
|
(1) Part of the Provisions raised on sale of Grindlays and associated businesses.
44
2004
Operating expenses increased $798 million (25%) with a $572 million increase (including $128 million goodwill amortisation) largely as a result of the NBNZ acquisition and $21 million NBNZ incremental integration costs.
2003
Operating expenses in 2003 increased by $323 million, or 11%, compared to 2002. Excluding the 2002 NHB recovery ($248 million) operating expenses increased by $75 million, 2% higher than in 2002. Adjusting for expenses of the Funds Management businesses from the transfer to ING Australia in April 2003 until the end of the fiscal 2003, operating expenses would have increased 4%.
The following explanations exclude NBNZ acquisition and NBNZ incremental integration costs:
Personnel Expenses
2004
Personnel expenses increased $110 million (6%) as a result of annual salary increases together with an increase in staff of 775 (3%) mainly in the following business units:
New Zealand Businesses staff increased by 205 (7%) largely in New Zealand Banking with increased front line staff to cope with increased business volumes and improving service standards.
Institutional staff increased by 131 (5%) with further investment in Foreign Exchange capability in London and Asia, together with an increased Capital Markets and Trade Finance presence in Asia.
Personal Banking Australia increased by 138 (2%) with an increased number of financial planners in Personal Distribution, front line staff in Rural Banking, and operations staff in Mortgages to service continued high levels of customer activity offset by a reduction in Cards and Merchant Services following the wind down of temporary staff in the customer service team to handle a temporary higher level of calls associated with the RBA interchange reform project.
Group Center up 155 (4%) with Central Functions staff numbers increasing by 96 driven principally by the escalating focus on compliance and an additional 54 staff in Operations, Technology and Shared Services largely due to technology resources and project related activity.
2003
Personnel expenses in 2003 increased by $36 million, or 2%, compared to 2002. Adjusting for expenses of the Funds Management businesses from the transfer to ING Australia in April 2003 until the end of the fiscal 2003, operating expenses would have increased by $72 million or 4%.
Salaries and wages increased as a result of the 4% Enterprise Bargaining Agreement, performance related salary increases, and due to increased staff numbers in these main areas: Continuing investment in sales staff in Personal Banking Australia, Corporate and New Zealand Banking, as well as higher back office staffing required in Mortgages to service the higher volumes. Consumer Finance staff numbers increased (mainly temporary staff) to implement the Reserve Bank credit card reforms. These credit card reform changes were introduced in January 2003.
Premises Expenses
2004
Premises costs increased $17 million (6%):
Personal Banking Australia increased $10 million (6%) with an increased investment in the branch network including 3 new branches, 9 branch relocations and associated refurbishments, and 37 completed branch refurbishments.
Operations, Technology and Shared Services increased $6 million (17%) reflecting the impact of a change in the method of accounting for rental costs in 2003.
2003
Premises cost in 2003 decreased by $4 million, or 1%, compared to 2002 due to a change in the method of accounting for rental expense in Australia and reduced repairs and maintenance costs. Offsetting these reductions were several minor increases including building administration charges, asset write-offs and lease surrender costs.
45
Computer Expenses
2004
Computer costs increased $44 million (9%):
Personal Banking Australia increased $37 million (23%) largely due to costs associated with the rollout of the new telling platform and increased depreciation associated with investments in technology.
Operations, Technology and Shared Services increased $5 million (3%) as a result of lower capitalisation of project work.
2003
Computer costs in 2003 increased by $41 million, or 10%, compared to 2002 due to higher software amortization charges ($43 million) as new systems (e.g. Sales and service platform, Vision Plus and Nexus) became operational, and increased rentals and repairs ($11 million), partially offset by a decrease in use of computer contractors in 2003 ($16 million).
Other Expenses
2004
Other expenses increased by $36 million (6%):
Marketing expenses increased $14 million (15%) mainly in Personal due to expenditure on campaigns including the ANZ Now, ANZ Bank of the Year and the low rate MasterCard campaigns.
Travel costs increased $10 million across business units.
Insurance costs increased $10 million as a result of a market wide increase in insurance premiums and the renewal of ANZs long term insurance contract.
2003
Other expenses in 2003 increased by $5 million, or 1%, compared to 2002. Adjusting for the expenses of the Funds Management business from the transfer to ING Australia in April 2003 until the end of fiscal 2003, other expenses would have increased by $21 million, or 3%. These increases were due largely to:
Higher consultant costs ($5 million) with an increased use of consultants on Group strategic initiatives.
An increased loss on disposal of premises and equipment ($5 million) largely in New Zealand on the sale of assets at vacant sites.
Offsetting these increases were a number of relatively small cost reductions reflecting an ongoing focus on cost control.
Restructuring Expenses
2004
Restructuring expenses of $60 million were recognized in 2004 (2003: $60 million). The main components were the write-off of capitalized software on the Next Generation Switching project following the decision to consolidate the ATM and EFTPOS networks for ANZ and NBNZ on the Tandem platform and the write-down of hardware and software developed to significantly increase the functionality of ATMs.
During 2004 approximately 37% of the total restructuring and surplus leased space expense for the year related to one time termination and other staff benefits, and for excess premises space (2003: 92%) and the remainder for other associated costs including technology costs. The personnel costs related to ongoing business initiatives in response to changing market conditions that demanded streamlining of our front offices across the business units. These restructuring initiatives are expected to be substantially implemented over the next year.
46
The total restructuring provision as at September 30 was distributed as follows:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Termination and staff benefits |
|
73 |
|
58 |
|
100 |
|
Excess premises |
|
10 |
|
22 |
|
9 |
|
Other contract termination and associated costs |
|
23 |
|
12 |
|
34 |
|
Total |
|
106 |
|
92 |
|
143 |
|
Restructuring Provision (excluding NBNZ)
|
|
Termination and |
|
Excess |
|
Other Contract |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Carrying amount at beginning of the year - October 1, 2002 |
|
100 |
|
9 |
|
34 |
|
143 |
|
Provision made during the year |
|
11 |
|
3 |
|
31 |
|
45 |
|
Payments made during the year |
|
(25 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(51 |
) |
(80 |
) |
Release of provisions (2, 3) |
|
(28 |
) |
14 |
|
(2 |
) |
(16 |
) |
Carrying amount at end of the year - September 30, 2003 |
|
58 |
|
22 |
|
12 |
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of the year - October 1, 2003 |
|
58 |
|
22 |
|
12 |
|
92 |
|
Provision made during the year |
|
24 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
64 |
|
Payments made during the year |
|
(11 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(64 |
) |
Release of provisions (3) |
|
(6 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(15 |
) |
Carrying amount at end of the year - September 30, 2004 |
|
65 |
|
5 |
|
7 |
|
77 |
|
(1) Includes software write downs.
(2) $14 million credit relates to a transfer.
(3) Includes foreign currency movement.
NBNZ
|
|
Termination and |
|
Excess |
|
Other Contract |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Carrying amount at beginning of the year - October 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition provision (NBNZ) |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
13 |
|
27 |
|
Provision made during the year |
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
Payments made during the year |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Release of provisions (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Carrying amount at end of the year - September 30, 2004 |
|
8 |
|
5 |
|
16 |
|
29 |
|
(1) Includes software write downs.
(2) Includes foreign currency movement.
47
All restructuring costs are expensed and recorded as operating expenses.
Note 27 to the Financial Report provides additional details on the movements in the provision for restructuring costs.
Details of major projects including expected total spend and spend to date
|
|
Expected Total Spend |
|
Spend to date |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
ANZ National integration: Integration of ANZ Bank and NBNZ |
|
26 |
|
2 |
|
Next Generation Switching project: Tandem System replacement product |
|
32 |
|
32 |
|
Institutional Financial Services business unit restructure |
|
23 |
|
|
|
Replacement Transaction Banking System |
|
21 |
|
21 |
|
2003
The Group recognized $60 million in restructuring expenses in 2003, a $3 million (5%) decrease from 2002. Of this expense, $10 million is related to the termination of a technology project to update our EFTPOS / Credit card system. A further $8 million has been incurred for the write-down of the investment in an e-commerce security company.
Other restructuring costs incurred in 2003 are largely personnel costs related to ongoing business initiatives in response to changing market conditions and restructuring of front offices across business units. In addition continual streamlining of back office processes and systems has led to restructuring across several businesses resulting in staff redundancy costs which were taken to profit and loss.
During 2003 approximately 92% of the total restructuring and excess leased space expense for the year related to one time termination and other staff benefits, 4% was for excess premises space and the remainder for other associated costs. The personnel costs relate to ongoing business initiatives in response to changing market conditions that demand streamlining of our front offices across the business units. These restructuring initiatives are expected to be substantially implemented over the next year.
Pension Payments
Pension payments are the principal post-retirement benefit. Other post-retirement benefits (which chiefly comprise reduced fees on bank accounts) are not material. Health care is provided to Australian citizens by the government. Accordingly, ANZ does not provide post-retirement health insurance in Australia. Some post-retirement health care is provided in Japan and the United Kingdom, however this amount is not material.
48
Allowance for Loan Losses Charge
For discussion of ANZs Allowance for Loan Losses Methodology, refer page 79.
2004
The Group allowance for loan loss charge was $632 million, an increase of $18 million (3%). The allowance for loan loss charge excluding NBNZ reduced $44 million (7%) to $570 million due largely to a lower Group Center charge. The allowance for loan loss charge to operating segments (excluding NBNZ) increased $16 million (3%) with volume growth partly offset by lower risk.
The allowance for loan loss charge rate decreased 8 basis points over the year in line with the Groups improving risk profile. This is a result of sound growth in low risk domestic assets (principally mortgages), the acquisition of the NBNZ franchise, the continued de-risking of offshore and high-risk assets, and a lower Group Center charge reflecting lower offshore losses.
|
|
Allowance for |
|
Net Specific |
|
Allowance for |
|
Net Specific |
|
Allowance for |
|
Net Specific |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Personal |
|
183 |
|
138 |
|
169 |
|
131 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Institutional |
|
159 |
|
171 |
|
165 |
|
217 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Corporate Australia |
|
59 |
|
43 |
|
55 |
|
63 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
New Zealand Business |
|
99 |
|
30 |
|
37 |
|
20 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
67 |
|
47 |
|
63 |
|
72 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
23 |
|
14 |
|
19 |
|
1 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Group Center |
|
42 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
23 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
632 |
|
443 |
|
614 |
|
527 |
|
860 |
|
728 |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
Net Specific |
|
Allowance for |
|
Net Specific |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Personal |
|
27 |
|
19 |
|
24 |
|
17 |
|
Institutional |
|
164 |
|
216 |
|
173 |
|
454 |
|
Corporate |
|
48 |
|
57 |
|
46 |
|
49 |
|
New Zealand Banking |
|
13 |
|
(1 |
) |
13 |
|
5 |
|
Mortgages |
|
31 |
|
12 |
|
28 |
|
10 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
152 |
|
137 |
|
161 |
|
132 |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
63 |
|
72 |
|
69 |
|
58 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
10 |
|
(8 |
) |
10 |
|
5 |
|
Group Center |
|
106 |
|
23 |
|
336 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
614 |
|
527 |
|
860 |
|
728 |
|
(1) Line of business breakdown for 2002 cannot be provided on a comparable basis to 2003 and 2004 without unreasonable effort or expense.
49
In September 2003 an additional charge of $100 million (7 basis points) was taken to recognize continued uncertainty and expected levels of default in the offshore lending portfolios primarily in the UK, US and Europe. In 2004 the additional charge reduced to $40 million (2 basis points) as a result of lower risk, especially in the offshore portfolios. ANZ has continued to de-risk its offshore portfolio by removing high risk assets and developing asset writing strategies that discourages business in non core markets, unless supporting a core business relationship. As a result overall offshore lending has reduced from 9% of total lending assets in the year ended 2002 to 5% in the year ended 2004. In line with this strategy ANZ announced on October 26, 2004 the sale of most of its London head-quartered Project and Structure Finance operation to Standard Chartered. ANZ is continuing to grow its market dominance in the Pacific, through its long standing low risk operations in Fiji, PNG, Vanuatu and several other smaller Pacific nations.
The net specific allowance for loan losses was $443 million, down $84 million from the year to September 2003. The reduction in losses is principally in the international operations of Institutional, which fell $121 million over the year. Net specific allowance for loan losses in the Australian and New Zealand portfolios increased over the year by 11% and 56% respectively. The increase in Australia is primarily due to a provision raised for Reach ($87 million), whilst in New Zealand the acquisition of NBNZ added an additional $14 million over the year. As a percentage of average net lending assets, net specific allowance for loan losses reduced to 22 basis points, down from 34 basis points in September 2003.
The Group has a general allowance for loan loss balance at September 30, 2004 of $1,992 million (1.01% of risk weighted assets) an increase of $458 million from $1,534 million (1.01% of risk weighted assets) at September 30, 2003. This represents a surplus of $532 million over the APRA minimum guideline. NBNZ contributed $282 million of the increase and has a ratio of general allowance for loan loss to risk weighted assets of 0.98%. Excluding NBNZ the general allowance for loan loss balance increased $176 million.
2003
The Group had a total allowance for loan losses of $2,018 million, down $63 million from 2002. In September 2003 an additional charge of $100 million (7 basis points) was taken to recognize continued uncertainty and expected levels of default in the offshore lending portfolios primarily in the UK, US and Europe. A continued shift in the asset portfolio from offshore institutional assets, to domestic market based assets, predominately mortgages, has seen the overall risk of the portfolio reduce. The allowance for loan loss charge was $614 million for the September 2003 year as compared to $610 million (excluding the $250 million special provision) for the September 2002 year. The charge to profit and loss of $614 million represented a loss provisioning rate of 39 basis points, down from 43 basis points in 2002 excluding the additional charge. The general allowance for loan losses increased by $38 million, to $1,534 million with the moderate increase explained by the Groups larger yet less risky portfolio.
The $250 million special charge in 2002 to the allowance for loan losses expense was necessary to adjust the balance sheet provision to reflect changes to expected loss assumptions as a result of an increased incidence of downgrades of previously investment grade exposures in ANZs United Kingdom and Americas portfolios in particular.
On July 24, 2002, ANZ advised the market that it had credit exposures to Marconi PLC of approximately USD131 million. Marconi PLC, formerly GEC, is a global provider of telecommunications equipment and solutions. Marconi is headquartered in London and has been an ANZ customer since 1947. At the time, we commented: Marconi was investment grade just over 12 months ago but it has been severely impacted by the downturn in the telecommunications sector. In recent years, however, ANZ has substantially reduced its exposure to Marconi.
During the year ended September 30, 2002, ANZ advised the market that it had direct unsecured credit exposures to Enron Corporation Group of approximately USD69 million. In addition, ANZ had indirect or contingent exposures of approximately USD51 million primarily associated with stand-alone power projects. At the time, we highlighted that we were cautious about the credit outlook at this point in the credit cycle.
It was considered appropriate to discuss the provision excluding the special charge as the special charge represented an adjustment to the balance sheet provision and was taken to cover the unusual circumstances of Enron and Marconi. The 2002 allowance for loan losses charge (the charge to allowance for loan losses excluding the special charge) was based on expected loss assumptions consistent with those used in previous years. Accordingly, comparisons between 2003 and 2002 allowance for loan losses charge excluding the special charge is considered to be more meaningful than comparisons including the special charge.
The September 2003 year charge as a percentage of average net lending assets was 39 basis points, representing a 4 basis point decrease on the level reported for the September 2002 year with a modest improvement in average credit quality and the continuing increase in the proportion of mortgages as a percentage of the lending portfolio.
50
The specific allowance for loan losses fell from $585 million to $484 million in 2003. In Australia the specific allowance for loan losses increased by $56 million in 2003 year, with the majority of this being increased provisioning by the Groups corporate businesses. In overseas markets, the specific allowance for loan losses fell by $146 million, with $117 million being in the Groups UK operations, predominately relating to our restructure and partial write-off of the exposure to telecommunications company, Marconi. In the absence of the large single name exposures in the power and telecommunications industries seen in the UK and American markets in 2002, both new and increased allowances for loan losses and net specific allowance for loans losses were significantly lower than the amounts reported in 2002. New and increased allowance for loan losses were $675 million, down $223 million, while net specific allowance for loan losses were $527 million down $201 million from 2002.
Actual loss experience or net specific allowance for loan losses for the year to September 30 totalled $527 million, a decrease of $201 million over the September 30, 2002 year. The reduction was mainly due to the absence of large single name losses in the September 2003 year, compared to the September 2002 full year where 43% of losses were due to two large amounts in the offshore portfolios. While the Australian and New Zealand portfolio losses remained relatively stable over the year, the international portfolio losses reduced by 52%. Settlement of the Grindlays credit warranties ($27 million) was included in net specific allowances for the year.
Income Tax Expense
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Total income tax expense including significant items |
|
1,168 |
|
926 |
|
898 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
29.3 |
% |
28.3 |
% |
27.9 |
% |
Australian corporate tax rate |
|
30 |
% |
30 |
% |
30 |
% |
2004
The Groups income tax expense increased by $242 million to $1,168 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 29.3%, an increase of 1.0% from September 30, 2003. The increase in the effective tax rate was largely due to an increase in goodwill amortisation expense, which is non-deductible, and a higher overseas tax rate differential due to higher earnings in New Zealand, where the statutory tax rate is 33%, partly offset by an increase in non-assessable equity accounted income.
2003
The Groups effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 2003 increased 0.4% from September 30, 2002, largely due to the 2002 year benefiting from roll-over relief which shields from tax the capital gain arising on the sale of businesses to the joint venture with ING Australia. This was partly offset by the NHB settlement tax rate differential and the life insurance accounting in the 2002 year together with higher equity accounted earnings in 2003.
51
Results by Line of Business(1)
Years ended September 30 (3) |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 (2) |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Personal |
|
802 |
|
693 |
|
n/a |
|
Institutional |
|
788 |
|
802 |
|
n/a |
|
Corporate Australia |
|
344 |
|
311 |
|
n/a |
|
New Zealand |
|
584 |
|
211 |
|
n/a |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
143 |
|
129 |
|
n/a |
|
ING Australia |
|
108 |
|
82 |
|
n/a |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
111 |
|
100 |
|
n/a |
|
Operating Segments Total |
|
2,880 |
|
2,328 |
|
n/a |
|
Group Center (5) |
|
(163 |
) |
20 |
|
n/a |
|
Profit excluding significant items(4) |
|
2,717 |
|
2,348 |
|
1,993 |
|
As published in the September 2003 Financial Report
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Personal |
|
384 |
|
360 |
|
Institutional |
|
772 |
|
715 |
|
Corporate |
|
270 |
|
242 |
|
New Zealand Banking |
|
141 |
|
131 |
|
Mortgages |
|
270 |
|
247 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
144 |
|
150 |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
127 |
|
103 |
|
ING Australia |
|
38 |
|
43 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
131 |
|
98 |
|
Treasury |
|
95 |
|
125 |
|
Operating Segments Total |
|
2,372 |
|
2,214 |
|
Group Center (5) |
|
(24 |
) |
(221 |
) |
Profit excluding significant transactions (4) |
|
2,348 |
|
1,993 |
|
(1) Results are equity standardized. Refer definition on page 141 of the Financial Report.
(2) Results for 2002 have been restated to reflect changes to line of business in 2003.
(3) Line of Business results for 2002 cannot be provided on a comparable basis to 2003 and 2004 without unreasonable effort and expense. Management and reporting structures, revenue sharing arrangements and cost allocations have changed between 2003 and 2004. 2003 financial data has been restated to be comparable to 2004, however, restating 2002 data is unduly burdensome. In addition ANZ believes that a comparison of 2003 line of business results with 2002 results in a format that reflects the management and reporting structures that applied in 2003, which gives a better indication and comparison of business performance in that time period than artificially restating numbers to reflect 2004 management and reporting structures. Refer to the table above for line of business results under these 2003 management and reporting structures as published in the September 2003 Financial Report.
(4) Significant transactions are detailed on page 35.
(5) Includes Treasury, Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Corporate Center, Risk Management and Group Financial Management and goodwill amortization.
During the year ended September 30, 2004, ANZ managed its business activities along the following lines of business: Personal, Institutional, Corporate, New Zealand Banking, Esanda and UDC, ING Australia (joint venture), Asia Pacific and Other.
The following commentary compares the 2004 result with the results for 2003. Commentary comparing the 2003 result with the result for 2002 has also been included. This has not been restated to reflect changes to lines of business in 2004 for reasons noted in footnote 3 of the table above.
52
2004
Personal comprises Personal Banking Distribution, Banking Products, Mortgages and Cards and Merchant Services.
Profit after tax increased by 16% with strong momentum in each of the core businesses. Mortgage lending increased 18% and deposits grew 12% delivering increases in market share. After adjusting for the $27 million after tax effect of the under-accrual of card loyalty points in the March 2003 half year, which is not indicative of the core business performance, profit after tax increased 11% in Personal Banking and by 30% in Cards and Merchant Services.
Significant factors affecting the result were:
Net interest income increased 8%.
Mortgage lending grew 18% over the year (or 19% excluding the impact of securitization). Rural Banking volumes increased 18% reflecting ANZs focus on this market and increased investment by rural businesses. Cards and Merchant Services lending grew 6%.
Deposit volumes increased 12% as a result of successful campaigns throughout the year targeted at growing V2 Plus and term deposits. Mortgage offset deposit volumes increased 16%.
Net interest average margin reduced by 26 basis points. Mortgages margin was down 14 basis points mainly due to higher funding costs following increases in the cash rate, and market rates rising in anticipation of further cash rate rises which did not eventuate. The average net interest margin was also adversely impacted by the mix effect of relatively higher growth in the Mortgage business than in higher margin Cards and Merchant Services and Banking Products businesses. Margin in Cards and Merchant Services increased 16 basis points due to a reduction in the proportion of transactor volumes following product changes consequent to the Reserve Bank of Australias (RBA) interchange reforms. Banking Products margin was 2 basis points higher with the benefit of increases in the cash rate on deposit margins largely offset by higher growth in lower margin cash management and term deposits.
Other external operating income increased $131 million (19%). Of this, $38 million related to the under-accrual of card loyalty points in 2003. Excluding this amount other income increased 13%.
Mortgages contributed $14 million of the increase driven by a strong performance from the mortgage insurance business and lending volume growth.
Banking Products fees were up 12%, mainly due to growth in account numbers, while sales and retention payments from ING Australia were up 7%, reflecting a strong sales performance and improvement in the equity markets.
Operating costs increased $112 million (8%). Personnel costs were up $44 million due to annual salary increases together with a 3% increase in staff in Mortgages to service continued high levels of customer activity, a temporary increase in Cards and Merchant Services staff in the first quarter to handle the higher level of calls associated with the RBA interchange reform project, increased financial planners and increased staffing in Rural Banking. Computer expenses increased $37 million following the rollout of the new telling platform in Personal Banking Distribution and increased depreciation associated with investments in technology. Premises and other cost increases reflect investment in the branch network, growth in the business and an increased marketing spend.
Allowance for loan loss charge increased 8%, driven by lending volume growth. Non-accrual loans and net specific allowance for loan losses remained low reflecting sound credit quality.
Institutional comprises Institutional Banking, Markets (formerly Foreign Exchange and Capital Markets), Trade and Transaction Services and Corporate and Structured Financing.
Profit after tax reduced by 2%. After adjusting for the impact of the appreciating Australian dollar on translation of offshore earnings, profit after tax was flat.
This result was also affected by the progress made in refocusing the business to lower risk sectors. This strategy has contributed to reduced earnings in Institutional Banking ((2)%), Corporate and Structured Financing ((14)%) and Markets ((2)%) through the exit of higher risk offshore assets and non-core complex structured transactions, and through the flow on impact to the Markets business of lower levels of structured finance activity. Profit increased 10% in Trade and Transaction Services where focus has been given to investing in growth initiatives.
53
Key factors affecting the result were:
Net interest income decreased 7% due to a $52 million reduction in Markets, where a lower proportion of revenue was booked as interest due to funding costs associated with unrealized trading gains, largely as a consequence of the appreciation of the AUD during the period. This is offset by an equivalent gain in other operating income. Adjusted for this, net interest income was flat. Trade and Transaction Services increased 12%, driven by increased custody and cash management deposit volumes. Institutional Banking decreased 1% due to asset reductions offshore, partly offset by loan volumes being 3% higher in Australia. Corporate and Structured Financing reduced 13%, where offshore lending assets have been substantially reduced as part of the strategy to lower risk.
Overall loan volumes were flat, deposit volumes increased 7% and net interest margin was 8 basis points lower largely reflecting mix changes in deposits and competitive pressures.
Other operating income increased 4%. Excluding a $27 million profit before tax on the final sale of development properties in 2003, and the $52 million increase described above, other operating income increased 2%.
Non-interest income increased 8% in Trade and Transaction Services, reflecting improved trade volumes, higher revenue from international payments, and strong growth in Custody and Cash management revenue. Corporate and Structured Financing increased 2%, reflecting continued progress in shifting the revenue mix away from net interest income. Fee revenue in Institutional Banking was flat. Total revenue in Markets increased 1%, reflecting difficult market conditions, with lower levels of corporate hedging activity and tightening credit spreads.
Operating expenses were 4% higher due to increased pension funding costs in the United Kingdom ($8 million), the impact of a full years cost related to the consolidation of the TradeCentrix processing hub in the September 2003 half, increased technology investments in Markets and Transaction Services, and higher staff costs, with further investment in Markets capability in London and Asia, growth in Custody, Commodity Trade Finance in Asia, and International Payments.
Allowance for loan loss charge was 4% lower reflecting lower offshore exposures and modest asset growth in Australia. Net specific allowance for loan loss was 21% lower, with new specific allowance for loan loss of $171 million relating largely to further allowances against the power, telecommunications and mining sectors in Australia and offshore.
Corporate comprises Small Business Banking, Business Banking Australia and Corporate Banking Australia.
Profit after tax increased by 11%. Key influences on the result were:
Net interest income increased 11% driven largely by growth in both average lending (21%) and average deposits (13%).
The growth in average lending (Corporate Banking +17%, Business Banking +27%) and average deposit (Corporate Banking +13%, Business Banking +13%) volumes resulted from increased activity with existing customers and new customer acquisition. Key factors in achieving growth were our customer service proposition, expansion of our geographic footprint and success in specialized business segments.
Net interest average margins reduced by 5 basis points. Margins in both Corporate and Business Banking declined primarily due to changes in product mix reflecting a combination of faster growth in lending than deposits in Business Banking and also higher growth rates in lower margin products in both businesses. Product margins remained relatively stable, albeit slightly down.
Other external operating income increased 8%, driven by higher lending and bill fees from growth in business volumes.
Net inter-business unit fees, which represents net payments made to the branch network, were 7% higher with increased commissions paid on Small Business Banking deposits, increased investment in the branch network and increased transaction volumes associated with customer growth.
Operating expenses increased 11% as a result of business growth. Personnel costs accounted for the largest part of this increase with annual salary increases and the investment in around 70 new frontline staff. Non-lending losses increased from a low base in 2003. Cost to income ratio remained low at 32.0%.
Allowance for loan loss charge has increased $4 million (7%). Credit quality in both the Business Banking and Corporate segments remains sound with the portfolio quality reviewed regularly to detect any early adverse trends.
Net specific allowance for loan losses, at $43 million, are down 32%. Allowance for loan loss levels in 2003 were inflated by charges against two large corporate customer exposures. The reduction in net non-accrual loans has predominantly been driven by the successful management of the non-accrual loan portfolio.
54
New Zealand Business comprises ANZ New Zealand Banking, Mortgages, Consumer Finance and NBNZ.
Profit after tax increased $373 million to $584 million, with NBNZ contributing $375 million (excluding incremental integration costs) since acquisition on December 1, 2003. Profit after tax in ANZ New Zealand businesses increased $9 million (4%), despite a $3 million reduction resulting from the depreciation in the average NZD exchange rate. Integration and other costs for the year were $11 million. Of this result, the Consumer Finance business increased $9 million, ANZ New Zealand Banking increased $3 million, whilst Mortgages reduced $4 million.
Key influences on the result include the following:
Net interest income increased $797 million. Excluding the contribution of NBNZ of $789 million and the effect of the depreciation in the New Zealand dollar, net interest income increased $17 million. Lending volumes increased 9% in the ANZ businesses driven by growth in Mortgages (8%), Consumer Finance (8%), Corporate (12%) and Business and Rural (11%). Lending in NBNZ has increased 8% since acquisition, including an 8% increase in both home loans and rural lending. These were partly offset by repayments in Corporate and Institutional lending which were expected at the time of acquisition.
Both ANZ New Zealand Banking and NBNZ retail deposits increased 3%.
Net interest average margins have reduced in asset based businesses, particularly in Mortgages as a result of the rises in wholesale market rates, partly offsetting the growth in lending, deposit volumes and deposit margins.
The NBNZ contribution to other operating income was $259 million in the 10 months to September 2004. Other operating income in the ANZ New Zealand businesses increased 4% with a 10% increase in Consumer Finance and flat fees in Mortgages with competitor driven fee discounting offsetting volume growth. Fee growth in ANZ New Zealand Banking was flat. The ANZ result also benefited from NBNZ capital markets customers transacting through ANZ systems.
Operating expenses increased $464 million, of which $443 million related to the inclusion of NBNZ. Non-incremental integration costs of $9 million have been incurred to date. Cost growth in ANZ New Zealand businesses has been contained to $4 million (1%) despite increases in staff numbers in ANZ New Zealand Banking (frontline) and Mortgages (support) to cope with increased business volumes, and increased brand spend and sales training.
Credit quality remains sound with the increase in the allowance for loan loss charge in ANZ New Zealand being driven by lending volumes. Allowance for loan loss provisioning methodologies have been implemented in NBNZ and a $62 million charge recognized in the ten months to September 2004. The NBNZ businesses added $81 million to non-accrual loan volumes which were partly offset by $8 million in reduced non-accruals in the ANZ New Zealand businesses.
Esanda and UDC
Profit after tax increased by 11%. Key influences on the result were:
Net interest income grew by 3% with an 8% increase in lending volumes reflecting continued new business writings. This was partly offset by a 12 basis point decline in net interest average margins brought about by the run off of higher yielding loans during the year and increasing new business from better credit quality, high growth segments that are lower margin.
Other operating income increased by 21% due primarily to changes in the fee structure for business lending, fees on higher new business writings and increased fees from value-added fleet management services.
External operating expenses increased by 2% as a result of annual salary increases and increased indirect taxes, partly offset by back office efficiency gains. Internal charges increased 17% reflecting growth in the business and increasing compliance costs. The continued control of expenses and growth in income has resulted in the cost to income ratio falling to 40.9% from 41.8% in 2003.
Allowance for loan loss charge increased by 6% driven by an 8% increase in lending volumes. Net specific allowance for loan loss was $25 million lower than last year, reflecting the $20 million write-down associated with residual value losses on aircraft in the 2003 year and continued improvement in the underlying credit quality of the loan book.
ING Australia
Profit after tax increased by 32%. Key influences on the result were:
Funds management income increased 13%, driven by strong investment markets.
Risk income increased by 15% with increased sales of life insurance products through the ANZ network and continued favourable claims experience being the major contributors.
55
Capital investment earnings increased by 93% due to strong investment markets, with the first half of 2003 impacted by the global uncertainty at that time. ANZ continues to partially hedge against volatility in this income stream; as a result, gains in capital investment earnings were partially offset by hedge losses.
Costs increased 11% due to in sourcing of investment management services, the costs of which were previously classified in net income. In addition, increased investment was made in product systems and process improvements - the majority of these costs are non-recurring.
Tax expense increased due to the increased capital investment earnings and operating profit.
Asia Pacific
Profit after tax increased by 11%. Excluding the impact of exchange rate movements, profit increased 15%. Key influences on the result, excluding exchange rate movements, were:
Net interest income increased 16% as external assets increased 18%. Lending volumes in Fiji increased 13% due to continued economic growth, particularly in the tourism industry. Net interest income increased 76% in the Indonesian Cards business reflecting strong volume growth.
Other operating income increased 3% with fee income increasing 20% driven by a 16% increase in loan volumes and higher transaction volumes in the Indonesian Cards business. Foreign exchange earnings increased 4%, however these were offset by lower profits from PT Panin Bank predominantly as a result of a $16 million reduction in bond sales, partly offset by an $11 million withholding tax credit in 2004.
Operating expenses increased 5% as capability building in Quest continued to increase the level of support to the Pacific operations.
Credit quality remains sound with the allowance for loan loss charge increasing due to growth in credit card volumes in Indonesia. The increase in net specific allowance for loan loss results from a number of recoveries and allowance for loan loss reassessments in 2003.
Income tax expense decreased $5 million largely due to a tax credit, arising from the repayment of foreign currency loans upon the exercise of options in PT Panin.
Group Center includes Treasury, Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Group People Capital, Group Strategic Development, Group Risk Management and Group Financial Management.
The result for the Group Center was a loss of $149 million compared with a profit of $20 million in 2003. Key influences on the result were:
The level of the Groups surplus capital reduced as a result of the acquisition of NBNZ partly offset by growth in retained earnings and further de-risking of offshore credit portfolios.
Income in 2003 benefited from $71 million earnings on an interest rate swap that hedged the distributions to TrUEPrS investors. The combined effect of the replacement of TrUEPrS with StEPS is a reduction in net profit after tax of $35 million or 1% of reported profit.
The strengthening of the AUD over the year resulted in gains on contracts put in place to hedge NZD and USD denominated offshore earnings.
Group Treasury mismatch profit reduced $31 million following an extended period of low and flat interest rates as higher yielding investments matured.
Settlement of the ING Australia warranties enabled the release of provisions held against potential claims; this was largely offset by a provision for loss on the proposed sale of ANZs Sydney headquarters in Martin Place.
Goodwill amortisation increased $128 million principally due to the NBNZ goodwill amortisation of $129 million. Goodwill amortisation is booked in the Group Center. Other external operating expenses increased as a result of a higher technology spend, and additional spend on compliance requirements including: Basel II, GST, International Accounting Standards and the US Sarbanes Oxley legislation.
Allowance for loan loss charge reduced $64 million. De-risking of the offshore lending portfolio and reduced defaults have allowed a reduction in the charge that was taken in the last two years. This charge is based on uncertainty in offshore portfolios.
56
2003
The following is commentary of the 2003 result as compared to the 2002 result as published in the 2003 20-F. This has not been re-stated for changes to the Groups lines of business in 2004 for the reasons previously noted.
Personal comprises Personal Distribution and Banking Products.
Profit after tax increased by 7% to $384 million with profit growth in Banking Products of 27% offsetting a 4% reduction in Personal Distribution. Within Personal Distribution, Rural Banking delivered a 10% profit improvement offsetting investments in Personal Banking and revenue pressure in ANZ Financial Planning. Significant factors affecting the result were:
Net interest income increased 8% driven by volume growth in Rural Banking (business lending 22%, business deposits 44%), and in Banking Products with growth in consumer deposits (11%) and margin lending (19%). Net interest margin, however, was lower by 25 basis points due to the lower interest rate environment and higher growth in lower margin cash and term deposits.
Other external operating income increased 3%. Revenue from the distribution of investment management products is recorded as external income, whereas prior to the sale of businesses to ING Australia, this revenue was internal. After adjusting for this:
- Sales and retention commissions received from the sale of ANZ products through the branch network increased 5% reflecting strong demand for mortgages and the effects of our investment in training of sales staff in the second half.
- Fees from core transaction products were marginally up.
- Other external operating income reduced 6% driven by an 18% reduction in sales and retention payments from ING Australia, reflecting the negative impact of the downturn in the equity markets. This was particularly evident in the first half of the year.
Operating costs increased 3% due to an $8 million investment in training our sales force, and increased depreciation associated with investments in technology and the branch network. Banking Products benefited from cost savings arising from the creation of ING Australia.
Allowance for loan losses remained low reflecting credit quality, and the deposit driven nature of the business.
Personal Distribution profit after tax fell 4% to $224 million. In 2003, significant investments were made to improve the sales and service performance of the business. On the service side, 155 branches were refurbished, with new merchandising rolled out across the network. On the sales side, emphasis is on the skills of our sales force and in the second half of 2003, more than 4,200 staff received sales training. The second half showed stronger sales performance in Personal Banking on the back of continued demand for mortgages and higher sales productivity. Growth in the rural sector has continued, with ANZ improving its market share. The downturn in the equity markets continued to have a negative impact on the distribution of investment management products, however this improved during the second half as equity markets stabilized.
Demand for deposits in Banking Products led to deposit balances increasing by 9% over the year. In August, ANZ was named Savings Institution of the Year and ANZs transaction accounts were again voted best in the market. Transaction volumes via direct channels have increased 14% reflecting the expansion of our ATM fleet and continued growth in internet banking. Margin lending volumes increased 19%.
Institutional comprises Institutional Banking, Transaction Services, Foreign Exchange, Capital Markets, Structured Finance International, and Corporate Financing and Advisory.
Profit after tax increased 8% driven by revenue growth in Institutional Banking and Capital Markets of 10% and 9%, respectively, and a 7% increase in profit after tax in Transaction Services. This was offset by a 19% reduction in profit after tax in Structured Finance International reflecting the continuing rebalancing of the portfolio towards lower risk sectors. Significant influences on the result were:
Net interest income reduced 2%. A 6% increase in Institutional Banking due to growth in domestic lending volumes and higher margins, and a 17% increase in Structured Finance International driven by several high margin structured deals was offset by increased funding costs on derivative trading in Capital Markets and Foreign Exchange that was basically exchange rate driven.
Lending volumes were 3% lower as a result of a reduction in offshore exposures and the impact of the appreciation in the AUD.
57
Non interest income increased 7% due to volume related fee growth of 9% in Australia/New Zealand Institutional Banking, higher profit on trading instruments in Capital Markets and Foreign Exchange (the split of net interest income and non interest income can vary considerably in markets trading depending on economic conditions), and a $19 million profit after tax on the final sale of development property businesses.
Fee revenue in Transaction Services increased 4% despite being suppressed by the impact of the appreciation of AUD and NZD, SARS, terrorism alerts, and the drought in Australia.
Non-interest income reduced 29% in Structured Finance International reflecting difficult conditions in the Power and Telecommunications sectors, combined with reduced Leasing and Tax based activity, and by 6% in Corporate Financing and Advisory, reflecting the profit on sale of a legacy asset in 2002.
Operating expenses reduced by 2%, due to the appreciation of the AUD against the USD and GBP reducing the 2003 cost base in offshore sites, and continuing cost discipline across all businesses. Increased personnel costs and the cost consequence of consolidating the TradeCentrix (previously known as Proponix) processing hub were absorbed by back office efficiency initiatives, and control on discretionary expenditure.
Allowance for loan losses charge reduced 5% with a continuing reduction in offshore institutional exposures, including reduced exposure to the US and UK Power and Telecommunication sectors. Offsetting these improvements was a further deterioration in credit quality of the remaining power and telecommunication exposures. Net non-accrual loans decreased by 21%, largely reflecting the continuing rebalancing of the portfolio towards lower risk sectors.
Net specific allowance for loan losses reduced significantly from the 2002 year which included provisioning on Enron and Marconi. New specific allowance for loan losses relate mainly to further provisioning against the offshore Power sector.
Institutional Banking profit after tax grew 20% over the year. The strategy to reduce exposures in the UK and US markets and place an increased emphasis on the domestic operations resulted in ANZ maintaining its leading market position in Australia and improved overall credit quality. The improvement in credit quality is reflected in the decline in new non-accrual loans and net specific allowance for loan losses as offshore exposures are managed down. Allowance for loan losses charge increased in 2004 due to growth in lending assets in Australia, a number of domestic downgrades, and further deterioration in the remaining offshore power exposures. The September 2003 results also benefited from a $19 million profit after tax sale of development properties.
Transaction Services profit after tax grew by 7% to $164 million. Cash management businesses experienced deposit growth with customers increasing their cash holdings. This was coupled with improved income from Custodian Services with increased assets under custody and transaction volumes. Trade Finance and International payments suffered from the effects of SARS and terrorism alerts and the related downturn in tourism, the appreciation of AUD and NZD against the USD, and reduced trade flows resulting from the drought in Australia. Operating efficiency improved while completing the acquisition of the TradeCentrix processing hub, which added 105 staff in September half, and commencing the amortization charge for the new global trade platform software. Cost savings in cash, trade and payments processing more than offset these costs and the investment in a replacement custody system.
Foreign Exchange experienced a 1% growth in after tax profit, recording $85 million for 2003. Sales and trading activity was maintained at prior year levels despite slow market conditions prevailing for much of the year, particularly in the Australasian time zone. Consumer activity was constrained by currencies being range bound for long periods reflecting the general uncertainty associated with events such as the Iraq war, the SARS outbreak and the revision of treasury hedging policies by corporates. The development of collateralization capabilities and commissioning of CLS (continuous linked settlements) during the year reduced credit and settlement risk, respectively. Net specific allowance for loan losses and non accrual loans related to one large Australian Corporate that defaulted in 2002.
Capital Markets profit grew over 2003 - up 17% to $75 million. The 2003 year was characterized by a lack of volatility in interest markets, and reduced client hedging activity with expectations that historically low levels of interest rates would continue in the medium term. Increased revenues reflect increased penetration into existing markets by the derivative desk, a continued push into new fixed interest products and improved conversion of opportunities into mandates in the Primary Market Group.
Structured Finance International suffered a downturn in profit after tax of 19% in 2003, to $68 million. The 2003 result reflects the Groups strategy to rebalance the portfolio towards lower risk sectors, and reduce exposure to the UK and US power and telecommunications sectors. The leasing and transportation sector has performed strongly, however, most other industry segments have been impacted by subdued market conditions resulting in an increased time to bring mandated deals to financial close. Credit remains a critical issue with some further deterioration in credit quality, notably in the UK and US power sectors.
58
Corporate Financing and Advisory saw a slight decline in profit in 2003 - down 1% to $80 million. The portfolio strategy of developing and exploiting niche products for the core customer base showed promising results in 2003 as a result of the increased emphasis on growing the private equity, infrastructure fund management and leveraged finance businesses. Revenue from core activities grew notwithstanding a challenging environment. The profit on sale of a legacy asset inflated income in 2002. Other niche products directed at the Small Business segment will be launched in 2004 to further advance the portfolio strategy.
Corporate comprises Small to Medium Enterprises Australia (SME) and Corporate Banking Australia.
Profit after tax increased by 12%. Significant influences on the result were:
Operating income increased 8% with growth in both lending and deposit volumes. SME achieved 15% revenue growth resulting from an increased geographic footprint, a focus on industry specialization and an increasing volume of new business being generated through third party broker channels. Corporate Banking revenue increased by 1% over the year, but rose 5% in the second half of the year reflecting stronger business momentum.
The growth in non interest income was driven by the increase in volume of lending in both Corporate and SME.
Operating expenses increased 3%. Higher costs in SME are due to ongoing investment in frontline and support staff to enable the continued expansion of the overall business. Overheads in Corporate Banking have reduced due to on-going cost management and synergies in combining the business.
Allowance for loan losses have increased 4%, slower than the 19% growth in lending volumes. Credit quality in the SME sector remains sound with the portfolio quality reviewed every quarter to detect any early adverse trends. One internally used indicator of portfolio quality is the percentage of quarterly Business Activity Statement (BAS) payments met by drawing down existing deposits versus increasing debt (overdrafts). This has remained at around 80% of the tax payments being met from deposits suggesting steady cash performance in the SME sector.
Net specific allowance for loan losses were up largely due to provisioning against two large corporate customer exposures: problems with one emerged in the second half of the financial year while the other reflected an increase in allowance for loan losses in an account that has been closely monitored for two years.
Small to Medium Enterprises Australia experienced 16% growth in profit for 2003 - up to $159 million for the year. The strategy has been to develop a strong customer proposition and achieve rapid growth in the business. New investment has centered on expanding the geographic footprint and industry specialization. Growth has been achieved through an increased investment in relationship and business support staff and leveraging third party broker distribution channels. Monitoring the credit portfolio has received increased focus during this period of expansion and is reflected in the reduction in specific allowance for loan loss charge.
Corporate Banking Australias after tax profit grew 6% in 2003 - up to $111 million. The business has continued its focus on acquiring new business customers and cross-selling the products of other ANZ business units. Total customer profitability increased by 26% in the year with 46% of total profitability being reported in the profits of other product businesses. Growth was achieved despite subdued market conditions with overall credit quality of the portfolio improving slightly. Allowance for loan losses raised for two large customers impacted net specific allowance for loan losses. Operating efficiency has improved following the centralization of the Relationship Banking support functions early in the year.
New Zealand Banking profit after tax for the year increased 8%, driven by the appreciation of the New Zealand dollar. The flat result was due to the lack of fee growth as we improved the competitiveness of our product ranges, and higher costs as we increased our front line branch staff numbers to improve customer service. Net interest income increased 12%, driven by strong growth in Business and Rural lending and, to a lesser extent, Corporate lending. Overall margins contracted 5 basis points, with reduced deposit margins from competitive pressures, and reduced Corporate lending margins consistent with a focus on lower risk lending. Operating expenses increased 12%, reflecting increased frontline staff as part of the roll out of the Restoring Customer Faith program in Personal, and increasing capacity in Business and Rural. Technology costs were also higher with increased project related expenditure.
Mortgages profit after tax grew 9% over 2003. Significant impacts on this result included an increase of 13% in net interest income, driven by a 22% growth in the Australian mortgage portfolio - a record sales volume being written through all key channels. The New Zealand mortgage business has had a turn around in 2003, experiencing strong growth in the September 2003 quarter following a period of flat or reducing volumes in 2002. Expenses increased 12% due to increased staffing required to maintain service levels due to higher volumes.
59
Consumer Finance saw a decline in profit by 4% over 2003 - to $144 million. Impacting this result included growth in net interest income (up 15% on 2002) driven by volume increases in the average credit card outstandings (15%) and personal loans (4%) and a higher proportion of credit card balances paying interest. Other operating income was impacted by a $38 million charge taken in the first half as a result of an under accrual of loyalty points on co-branded cards going back to 1999, $20 million of which related to 2002. After adjusting for the impact of this under-accrual, other operating income increased by $21 million, reflecting strong growth in merchant turnover (15%) and cardholder spend (10%). Operating expenses increased by 12%, resulting from volume growth and increased amortization costs of new technology and the MultiPOS network.
Esanda and UDC experienced strong profit after tax growth in 2003 - up 23% to $127 million. This result was driven by a 25% increase in other income - the result of fees on higher new business volumes, profits on end-of-lease vehicle sales, and commissions on increased insurance writings. Strong growth rates in new business writings saw motor vehicle finance increase 18%, equipment finance 26%, fleet management services up 26% and equipment operating leases up 24%.
ING Australia profit after tax declined 12% in 2003 to $38 million. The 2002 result included $40 million from ANZ businesses in the seven months prior to their sale on May 1, 2002. The 2003 result for ING Australia improved over the five months to September 30, 2002 as a result of strong revenue growth from the life risk business and cost reductions. After a difficult start to the year due to major global uncertainties, funds under management increased in the second half and ING Australia consolidated its number 4 position in Retail Funds Under Management as measured by ASSIRT. Risk business income continued to improve with positive claims experience the major contributor. Costs fell in the second half as a result of the delivery of integration savings and strong cost management.
Asia Pacific profit after tax increased 34% despite an appreciation in the AUD. Significant influences include a 30% increase in other operating income, driven by the sale of bonds by PT Panin has increased equity accounting income bringing the total equity accounted PT Panin contribution to $55 million. Volatility in the Pacific and Asian currencies, particularly in the March 2003 half year, combined with ANZ strong market position in the region has resulted in a significant increase in foreign exchange earnings. Expenses are up 6% following the integration of the Bank of Hawaii operations and increased technology support to the Pacific region.
Treasury net profit for the year was $30 million (or 24%) lower than 2002, a direct consequence of the low and flat interest rate environment globally. The USD market was characterized by a rapid and significant decline in interest rates, between August 2001 and December 2001 when short-term interest rates fell by 2%. This led to an extended period where the interest rate yield curve flattened thus resulting in a contraction in mismatch interest margin. Likewise, the AUD market took a lead from US markets with the yield curve also flattening, without the added benefit of falling short term rates (as in the US). This exacerbated the large contraction in earnings margins.
Group Center includes Operations, Technology and Shared Services, Group People Capital, Group Strategic Development, CFO Units, Group Risk Management, Capital Funding & Group Items and Call Center.
The result for the Group Center was a loss of $24 million compared with a loss of $46 million in 2002. The level of the Groups surplus capital increased over the year with retained earnings growth and a reduction in the higher risk offshore credit portfolios. The strengthening of the Australian dollar over the year resulted in gains on contracts put in place to hedge United States dollar denominated offshore earnings. The weakening New Zealand dollar in the latter part of the year increased interest revenue from New Zealand dollar hedge contracts entered during the course of the year.
In February 2003, ANZs dispute with the Australian Tax Office relating to equity products was settled for $262 million from existing provisions. ANZ wrote down the value of its investments in E*Trade ($6 million) and Identrus ($8 million) during the year. External operating expenses increased with a higher technology spend, and the transfer of certain functions to the Corporate Center. Total costs were flat with increased external costs charged back to business units.
Allowance for loan losses charge relates to a $100 million provision equivalent to the allowance for loan losses on a downgrade of one level across the entire offshore Structured Finance and Institutional Banking portfolio. This provision has remained relatively constant because of uncertainty in the offshore portfolios. However, as these portfolios are stabilizing, the level of this provision is expected to decrease.
During the year, the new payroll and HR information systems were implemented in Australia. Group payroll systems were replaced. Corporate Banking technology initiatives were completed. Improvements leading to better customer response and processing efficiency for Consumer Finance and Mortgages have also been completed.
Advanced web-based systems were implemented across all Australian and New Zealand operations. On-line procurement was further progressed this year with the on-line purchasing of information technology services and office hardware, stationery and travel now in place.
60
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Operating profit before income tax and including significant transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
2,785 |
|
2,371 |
|
2,391 |
|
New Zealand |
|
763 |
|
495 |
|
456 |
|
|
|
3,548 |
|
2,866 |
|
2,847 |
|
Overseas |
|
439 |
|
411 |
|
376 |
|
|
|
3,987 |
|
3,277 |
|
3,223 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
(802 |
) |
(672 |
) |
(683 |
) |
New Zealand |
|
(266 |
) |
(147 |
) |
(126 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
(819 |
) |
(809 |
) |
Overseas |
|
(100 |
) |
(107 |
) |
(89 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
(1,168 |
) |
(926 |
) |
(898 |
) |
Outside equity interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
(4 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Operating profit after income tax including significant transactions by region |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
Domestic Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
1,984 |
|
1,699 |
|
1,708 |
|
New Zealand |
|
495 |
|
348 |
|
330 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
2,047 |
|
2,038 |
|
Overseas |
|
336 |
|
301 |
|
284 |
|
Operating profit after income tax including significant transactions (1) |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
(1) Includes significant transactions in the year ended September 30, 2004: recognition of deferred profit from close out of interest rate swaps upon buy back of TrUEPrS hybrid Tier 1 instruments (profit after tax $84 million) and profit from sale of businesses to ING Australia Joint venture (profit after tax $14 million). (September 30, 2003: Nil; September 30, 2002: the sale of businesses to ING Australia joint venture (profit after tax of $170 million) and National Housing Bank recovery ($159 million profit after tax) refer page 35).
Australia
Selected Australian economic indicators are shown below:
Years ended June 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
Nominal rates of growth (1) in Gross Domestic Product |
|
7.2% |
|
5.9% |
|
6.4% |
|
7.2% |
|
Inflation rates |
|
2.4% |
|
3.1% |
|
2.9% |
|
6.0% (3) |
|
Real rates of growth in Gross Domestic Product (2) |
|
3.6% |
|
3.1% |
|
3.9% |
|
2.0% (3) |
|
Source: Australian National Accounts: National Income and Expenditure, ABS Cat. no. 52060.0 and 6401.0
(1) Not restated for the effects of changes to price levels.
(2) Nominal rates of Gross Domestic Product restated for the effect of changes to price levels.
(3) Introduction of Goods and Services Tax made a one-off contribution to inflation in 2001.
The Commonwealth Government of Australia has forecast the real rate of growth in Gross Domestic Product for the year ending June 30, 2005 to be 3.66% (Australian National Accounts: Income and Expenditure).
61
2004
Profit after tax in Australia increased by 17%. Significant influences on the result were:
Net interest income increased by 7% as higher lending volumes offset a decline in net interest margin of 23 basis points including a $72 million reduction from Capital Markets where a lower proportion of revenue was booked as interest. The growth in net interest income was mainly due to Corporate Banking ($60 million), Mortgages ($32 million) and Consumer Finance ($26 million).
Fee income increased by 12%. Lending fee income increased 4% driven by Corporate Banking ($14 million) and Personal Banking ($11 million) on higher lending volumes. Non-lending fees increased 13% driven by Cards and Merchant Services with the $38 million under accrual of loyalty points that reduced income in 2003, reduced loyalty costs and increased merchant revenues, and by Trade and Transaction Services from increased international payments revenue.
Other operating income increased largely as a result of the TrUEPrS swap income, and in Capital Markets where a $72 million increase was offset by an increased cost of funding cash flows booked in net interest. This was partly offset by a reduction in Institutional Banking where $27 million profit on the final sale of development properties was booked in 2003.
Operating expenses increased by 8% mainly due to higher personnel expenses ($112 million) from annual salary increases and increased staff numbers, an increase in computer expenses ($56 million) with the rollout of the new telling platform and increased premises costs ($20 million) from investment in the branch network.
Allowance for loan loss charge decreased by 6% reflecting the stable credit quality of the portfolio and the de-risking of the offshore portfolios allowing a reduction in the charge taken in prior periods. Net specific allowance for loan losses increased $37 million as a result of an $87 million provision on Reach exposure.
Excluding the Australian component of significant items ($98 million profit in 2004) profit increased by 12%.
2003
Profit after tax in Australia decreased 1%. Excluding the Australian component of significant transactions (refer page 35) that increased profit by $122 million in 2002, profit grew 7% reflecting:
Net interest income increasing 7% with higher lending volumes in Mortgages, Consumer Finance, Institutional Banking and Corporate partly offset by a 20 basis point reduction in margin resulting from reduced earnings on the investment of capital, non-interest bearing and low interest savings accounts, and lower mismatch earnings in Treasury.
Fee income declined by 2% due to the $38 million cost of the under accrual of loyalty points on credit cards in prior years that was booked in the March 2003 half. Excluding this impact, fee income increased by 2% largely in Institutional Banking, Corporate and Consumer Finance.
Non interest income was flat with higher profit on trading instruments (offset in net interest), increased equity accounted income from ING Australia and profit on the sale of development properties, offset by reduced foreign exchange earnings and the impact of the sale of the Funds Management businesses to ING Australia.
Operating expense growth was contained to 2% with an increased number of sales staff in Personal Banking and Corporate and volume driven staffing increases in Mortgages. Higher software amortization charges occurred as new systems became operational.
Allowance for loan losses charge increased 2% with the majority of asset growth occurring in the relatively low risk mortgage portfolio.
62
New Zealand
2004
Profit after tax from New Zealand operations was $495 million.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||
|
|
New Zealand |
|
NBNZ |
|
Acquisition |
|
ANZ New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
1,371 |
|
786 |
|
(78 |
) |
663 |
|
675 |
|
Other operating income |
|
638 |
|
259 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
394 |
|
Operating income |
|
2,009 |
|
1,045 |
|
(78 |
) |
1,042 |
|
1,069 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
(1,128 |
) |
(443 |
) |
(129 |
) |
(556 |
) |
(519 |
) |
Profit before allowance for loan losses |
|
881 |
|
602 |
|
(207 |
) |
486 |
|
550 |
|
Allowance for loan loss charge |
|
(118 |
) |
(62 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
(55 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
763 |
|
540 |
|
(207 |
) |
430 |
|
495 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
(266 |
) |
(164 |
) |
27 |
|
(129 |
) |
(147 |
) |
Outside equity interest |
|
(2 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
Net profit |
|
495 |
|
375 |
|
(180 |
) |
300 |
|
348 |
|
NBNZ contributed $375 million profit (excluding goodwill amortisation, acquisition funding costs, incremental integration costs and employee share plan costs) in the ten months since acquisition on December 1, 2003:
The National Bank experienced 8% annualized growth in lending volumes since December 1, 2003 with strong growth in the residential housing market and in rural lending partly offset by institutional repayments.
Retail deposits have grown 3% since our acquisition of NBNZ.
Other operating income for the 10 months since December 1, 2003 reflects a slightly lower trend than prior to acquisition, with lower fee income from the corporate and capital markets businesses and certain structured finance transactions.
Operating expenses were well contained with continued focus on integration activities.
Allowance for loan loss methodologies have been implemented in NBNZ with a $62 million charge in the 10 months to September 30, 2004 representing an annualized charge of 0.23% of net lending assets.
Profit after tax increased 7% in ANZ New Zealand, or 9% after allowing for the negative impact of a weaker New Zealand Dollar. Profit growth was driven mainly by the retail businesses with deposit margins widening as interest rates rose. There was a lower contribution from Institutional with lower lending volumes and higher repayments. This result also includes $12 million (post tax) of non-incremental integration costs. Following completion of integration, these resources will be dedicated to other Group projects. Key influences on the result include:
Net interest income increased 7% with lending volumes increasing 3% driven by growth in Mortgages (5%) and Business and Rural (5%). Deposit volumes increased 5%, assisted by strong growth in Trade and Transaction Services. The result was also assisted by a reduction in the cost of term funding. Reduced asset margins, including a 5 basis point reduction in mortgage margins as a result of a reduction in spread between the cash rate and 90 day funding rates, were offset by increased deposit margins.
Other operating income decreased 4% with volume related lending fee growth in Consumer Finance (10%) and Corporate (12%) offset by reduced revenue in Institutional with lower trading revenue in Financial Markets, reduced activity in the private equity business and run off of certain structured finance activities.
Operating expenses were flat with annual salary increases, an increased number of frontline staff, and a increased spend on brand image and sales training being offset by cost savings in support areas.
Credit quality remains sound with total allowance for loan loss charge well in excess of net specific allowance for loan losses.
63
Integration costs
Incremental integration costs of $22 million after tax have been incurred by New Zealand. Of this, $14 million was incremental to the Group. Non-incremental integration costs are $14 million after tax, of which $2 million after tax is in NBNZ. Following integration these resources will be allocated to other projects.
2003
Profit after tax in New Zealand increased 5%. Excluding the gain of $32 million from the sale of the funds management businesses to ING Australia in 2002 and the impact (a $26 million increase) of exchange rate movements (principally the appreciation in the NZD against the AUD), which are not indicative of core business performance, profit increased by 8%. The main features of the result excluding these items were:
Net interest income increased 8% with lending growth achieved in Corporate, Esanda and UDC, and Business and Rural, and mortgage lending recovering in the second half. Margins improved with the Official Cash Rate, on average, remaining higher during 2003. This was partly offset by reduced mismatch earnings in Treasury.
Fee income increased 1%, mainly reflecting growth in corporate and institutional financing activities. Transactional fee income in Personal reduced following the launch of a simplified product range in July 2002.
Non interest income declined, with a number of large capital markets transactions recorded in 2002 not being repeated in the current year.
Operating expenses were flat due to higher employee numbers from an increased investment in front line staff, being offset by savings in the support areas.
Loan quality remained sound with the allowance for loan loss charge declining 6% due to a reduction in the risk profile of the Corporate loan portfolio. Allowance for loan losses remained well in excess of net specific allowance for loan losses.
Overseas Markets
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
United Kingdom |
|
88 |
|
58 |
|
60 |
|
United States |
|
49 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
191 |
|
184 |
|
160 |
|
Other |
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Profit after tax |
|
336 |
|
301 |
|
284 |
|
2004
Profit after tax from overseas markets increase 12% to $336 million.
Profit after tax from the Asia Pacific area increased 4% despite the impact of an appreciation in the AUD. Excluding the impact of exchange rate movements, profit increased by 11% as a result of:
Net interest income increased 14% driven by continued growth in the Indonesian Cards business, increased mortgage lending by Personal Banking in Singapore and a 13% increase in Fiji lending volumes as economic conditions, particularly in the tourism industry, continued to improve.
Fee income increased 16%, driven by the growth in Indonesian Cards business, and growth in lending fees in Fiji with the drawdown of several large corporate deals. The Trade Finance focus on trade flows between Australia and Asia also contributed to this improvement.
Other operating income reduced 18% as a result of a $12 million reduction in equity-accounted profit from PT Panin. This was partially offset by a withholding tax credit in PT Panin in the current year, a $2 million contribution from the newly-acquired stake in Metrobank Card Corporation in Philippines, increased foreign exchange earnings and a $2 million gain on surplus property sales in Fiji, Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea.
64
Operating expenses increased by 6% as the Institutional business invested in frontline staff in Asia, capacity was built in Quest to support the centralization of regional operations in Fiji and promotional spend was increased in the Indonesian Cards business. These cost increases were partially offset by lower technology expenditure due to the rationalisation of non-core projects.
Allowance for loan loss charge increased by 15%, largely due to the growth in the volume of Cards business. The overall quality of the Asian corporate loan book continues to improve, reflecting a much more focused approach to the regional Asian strategy.
Profit after tax in overseas markets other than Asia Pacific increased by 24%. Excluding the impact of exchange rates profit increased by 42%. Significant influences on the result excluding the impact of exchange rates were:
Net interest income increased 18% driven by an additional $49 million of interest earnings in the UK on increased capital levels associated with funding of the acquisition of NBNZ. This increase was partly offset by a reduction in Corporate and Structured Financing in the UK and US, reflecting the strategy to de-risk offshore portfolios and a reduction in Treasury mismatch earnings with the run-off of higher yielding assets following an extended period of low and flat USD and GBP interest rates.
Fee income increased 9% with increases in non-lending fees in Corporate and Structured Finance and Institutional Banking in the UK partly offset by a reduction in lending fee income reflecting the impact of the de-risking strategy on lending volumes and the push for non-lending income.
Other operating income increased by 15% mainly due to a $12 million increase in foreign exchange earnings in the UK driven by higher customer demand.
Operating expenses increased 8% driven by a 14% increase in personnel expenses (which constitute approximately 75% of expenses) with an additional 67 technology staff and an additional $8 million funding for the UK defined benefit pension plan.
Allowance for loan loss charge decreased 17% reflecting the reduction in lending volumes, particularly the US and UK Power and Telecommunications sectors. Net specific allowance for loan loss decreased 86% due to a reduction in large allowance for loan loss required against the remaining US and UK Power and Telecommunications exposures.
2003
Overseas markets contributed profit after tax of $301 million to the Group result in 2003, comprising $117 million from operations in the UK, Europe and United States (39%), $116 million from Asia, and $68 million from the Pacific. Overall this represents an increase of 6% from last year. Excluding the impact of exchange rates (a $20 million decrease), significant regional factors in the result were:
Net interest income increased 10% in UK/USA reflecting the impact of high margin assets written during the second half. An increase of 3% was recorded in Asia due mainly to increased lending volumes in China and ANZs successful application for the renminbi trading license and the expansion of the Cards business in Indonesia. In the Pacific, lending growth particularly in Fiji and Vanuatu drove net interest income up 13%, despite tightening regulatory pressure and increased competition following a rationalization of the number of banks in Papua New Guinea forced a reduction in interest margins. Overall, net interest income was relatively stable, showing a marginal decrease of 1% for the year.
Fee income decreased overall by 2% in 2003. Difficult market conditions drove UK/USA down 11%, offset by volume-driven increases in Asia and the Pacific, increasing 11% and 17% respectively.
Higher equity accounted earnings from PT Panin (up $25 million) drove other operating income up 30% in overseas markets. The PT Panin earnings benefited from a $16 million profit on the sale of bonds in the first half of 2003.
Regionally, Asia experienced an increase of 11% in operating expenses, driven by a 4% increase in staff numbers, and additional marketing costs associated with the trade finance operations in China and Cards operations in Indonesia. Expenses grew 16% in the Pacific following increased technology support required for the region, and the integration of the Bank of Hawaii operations during 2002.
UK and USA saw a reduction to the allowance for loan losses charge of 15% reflecting the reduction in the exposures to UK and US Power and Telecommunications sectors. This was offset by a 24% increase in Asia, reflecting lending growth in the higher risk Cards business in Indonesia. Allowance for loan losses charge was unchanged in the Pacific.
65
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets & due from other financial institutions |
|
11,144 |
|
9,019 |
|
11,225 |
|
Trading securities and investment securities |
|
13,224 |
|
8,980 |
|
9,482 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
204,962 |
|
149,465 |
|
132,060 |
|
Customers liability for acceptances |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
13,796 |
|
All other assets |
|
17,549 |
|
14,949 |
|
16,542 |
|
Total Assets |
|
259,345 |
|
195,591 |
|
183,105 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
7,349 |
|
6,467 |
|
10,860 |
|
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
168,557 |
|
124,494 |
|
113,259 |
|
Liability for acceptances |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
13,796 |
|
Creditors and other liabilities |
|
14,212 |
|
13,611 |
|
12,630 |
|
Bonds, notes and loan capital |
|
36,077 |
|
22,202 |
|
18,153 |
|
All other liabilities |
|
2,759 |
|
1,852 |
|
2,942 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
241,420 |
|
181,804 |
|
171,640 |
|
Net Assets |
|
17,925 |
|
13,787 |
|
11,465 |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
17,925 |
|
13,787 |
|
11,465 |
|
Total assets at September 30, 2004 were $259.3 billion, a $63.8 billion increase from September 30, 2003, with NBNZ contributing $47.1 billion. Total group liabilities increased by $59.6 million from September 30, 2003 with NBNZ contributing $34.0 billion of this growth.
Liquid Assets & Due From Other Financial Institutions
2004
Liquid assets reduced by $0.2 billion (3%) to $6.4 billion at September 30, 2004. Excluding NBNZ ($0.6 billion) and the impact of exchange rate movements ($0.1 billion) liquid assets decreased by $0.9 billion (14%), due largely to a reduction in liquidity levels in New Zealand where the 2003 balance had been built up in expectation of the purchase of NBNZ and also included holdings of NBNZ certificates of deposit, which have been eliminated on consolidation following the acquisition.
Due from other financial institutions increased by $2.4 billion to $4.8 billion at September 2004. The increase was driven by an additional $1.8 billion resulting from the acquisition of NBNZ and the investment of surplus liquidity in the interbank market in New Zealand and Asia. This was partly offset by customer driven reductions in vostro balances in Australia. The appreciation of the AUD resulted in a 2% reduction in Due from Other Financial Institutions.
2003
Liquid assets decreased by $0.8 billion in 2003, largely arising from a decrease in bills receivable and remittances in Institutional Financial Services in Australia, whilst a $1.4 billion reduction due from other financial institutions occurred largely in overseas markets, as Treasury increased its holding over long dated paper.
66
Trading and Investment Securities
2004
Trading security volumes increased $1.3 billion (30%) to $5.5 billion at September 2004.
Excluding NBNZ ($0.4 billion) and exchange rate movements trading securities increased by $0.8 billion due to:
Treasury increasing the minimum level of assets held in the liquidity portfolio following the acquisition of NBNZ ($0.3 billion)
An increase in the volume of securities held for trading purposes in Institutional ($0.7 billion)
Investment security volumes increased $3.0 billion to $7.7 billion at September 2004. Excluding NBNZ ($0.3 billion) and exchange rate movements investment securities increased by $2.7 billion (56%) due largely to Treasury increasing liquidity levels following the acquisition of NBNZ leading to higher volumes in Australia ($2.0 billion), New Zealand ($0.2 billion) and Overseas ($0.5 billion).
2003
Trading and Investment Securities decreased by $0.5 billion in 2003. A $1.7 billion reduction in trading securities was driven by a decrease in government securities ($1.0 billion) and ANZ accepted bills ($0.6 billion). This was partly offset by a $1.2 billion increase in Investment Securities, due largely to an increase in government securities ($0.7 billion) and other securities ($0.5 billion), as Treasury increased its holding of longer dated securities.
Net Loans, Advances and Acceptances
2004
Net loans and advances increased 37% ($55.5 billion) since September 2003. Excluding NBNZ, growth was 14% ($21.3 billion).
Growth in Australia of 16% ($19.0 billion) was largely the result of increases in the following businesses:
Personal ($13.6 billion or 18%), predominantly in Mortgages ($12.0 billion) as a result of growth in housing and equity loans, Rural Banking ($0.9 billion) and Banking Products ($0.3 billion) with growth in margin lending.
During the second half of 2004, the Group issued $1.5 billion of notes backed by mortgage loans. Including the value of the securitized loans as at September 30, 2004, growth in Personal Banking was $14.9 billion.
Corporate ($2.5 billion or 23%) mainly in Business Banking ($1.8 billion) from increased activity with existing customers and new customer acquisition through a very competitive customer service proposition and footprint growth.
Institutional ($2.1 billion) largely in Institutional Banking.
Esanda ($0.9 billion) with strong growth in equipment financing.
Excluding NBNZ, New Zealand increased by $2.7 billion largely in Mortgages ($0.8 billion), ANZ New Zealand Banking ($0.5 billion) and the impact of a stronger New Zealand dollar ($1.4 billion).
Overseas Markets declined by $0.4 billion largely due to reduction in exposures of the US and UK markets ($(0.3) billion) and exchange rate movements ($(0.2) billion).
Customer liability for acceptances reduced $0.7 billion to $12.5 billion at September 30, 2004 with growth in Corporate ($0.5 billion) being offset by a $1.1 billion increase in bills held in the trading portfolio, which are reported as trading securities.
67
2003
Net loans and advances increased by $17.4 billion in 2003. Exchange rate movements accounted for a net reduction of $1.9 billion, consisting of a $2.2 billion net reduction in overseas markets and an increase of $0.3 billion in New Zealand.
Australia - Growth of $18.8 billion was achieved.
Housing Loans ($10.1 billion) driven by customer demand and sustained low interest rates.
Non-housing term loans ($6.9 billion). Increases in Institutional Financial Services ($2.2 billion partly offset by decline in commercial bills) and Corporate ($1.8 billion) from growth in the small to medium business sector. Non-housing loans in Mortgages increased $1.9 billion reflecting customer demand for equity loans.
Lease finance ($0.8 billion) driven by growth in most channels particularly dealer and broker channels.
Overdrafts ($0.8 billion) driven by growth in invoice financing.
Credit Cards ($0.4 billion) reflecting growth in Consumer Finance.
Other ($(0.2) billion).
New Zealand - Growth of $1.8 billion was achieved. Excluding the impact of exchange rates, growth of $1.5 billion was achieved.
Increased non-housing terms loans ($0.9 billion) due to growth in Institutional Financial Services ($0.3 billion) and New Zealand Banking ($0.4 billion)
Growth in Mortgage portfolio ($0.6 billion)
Overseas Markets - Net loans and advances reduced $3.2 billion. Excluding the impact of exchange rates, Overseas Markets reduced by $0.9 billion reflecting the deliberate reduction in exposures in the US and UK markets.
Customer Financings
Customer financing through redeemable preference shares is undertaken as part of an in-house debt/equity hybrid capability making investments in small medium enterprise (SMEs) customers. Redeemable preference shares take the form of convertible redeemable preference notes, with an equity conversion right in the event of an IPO, trade sale or other specified trigger event.
Although legally described as preference shares, advances to customers using this product meet the definition of financial assets under both Australian and US GAAP, and therefore would be recorded as part of net loans and advances or investments as appropriate. Income received on these products, consistent with their recognition as assets, would be recorded as part of interest income. Our policies for management of lending in the form of redeemable preference shares are consistent with our policies for general lending of similar amounts to similar clients.
Other Assets
2004
All other assets increased by $2.6 billion as at September 2004 principally due to a $3.1 billion increase in goodwill arising from the acquisition of the National Bank of New Zealand partially offset by a reduction in the gross revaluation gains on derivative instruments assisted by increased use of collateral arrangements.
The recognition tests for deferred tax assets applied under A GAAP are more stringent than those applied in the recoverability assessment under US GAAP and therefore tax assets recognized under A GAAP also qualify for recognition under US GAAP. There are no additional deferred tax assets to be recognized under US GAAP. The only potential source of additional deferred tax assets that are currently not booked relate to tax losses. As disclosed in note 19 to the Financial Report, the only potential future benefit arising from unbooked tax losses is an amount of $67m relating to capital losses. Since capital losses can only be recovered against capital gains, and not against revenue generally, and the prospect of generating the necessary future capital gain is not probable, the potential future benefit cannot be booked.
We have a holding of freehold and leasehold land and buildings (largely within Australia) for our business purposes. These premises, which include branches, administration centers and residential accommodation for employees and had a carrying value at September 30, 2004 of $448 million (market value of $464 million as at June 30, 2002). 2003 carrying value: $426 million.
68
The Group last valued this class of assets, based on independent valuations, as at June 30, 2002. Whilst an independent valuation is conducted only every 3 years, an annual impairment review, which may involve independent valuation if required, is conducted in order to satisfy Australian Accounting Standards.
There were no material movements in property values in the period to September 30, 2004. At September 30, 2004, a recoverable amount review of this class of assets was conducted. Properties were reviewed for existence of impairment indicators that might provide evidence that the propertys recoverable amount exceeded carrying value. One property was identified and a loss of $2 million was booked.
The Group has assessed the implication of SFAS No. 147 Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions in relation to two acquisitions, NBNZ and Bank of Hawaii. The Group adopted SFAS No. 147 on October 1, 2002 but did not make any material purchases that fall within its scope in the year ended September 30, 2003. In fiscal year 2004, the acquisition of NBNZ has been treated in accordance with the new Standard and the required disclosures have been set out in Note 55 (xxiv) to the Financial Report. An asset is required to be booked at fair value on acquisition for long term customer relationship intangible assets which meet the criteria identified in SFAS 141. The recent acquisition of NBNZ by ANZ has resulted in consideration being given to booking an asset in respect of these relationships. Appendix A to SFAS 141 provides guidance on how to apply the recognition criteria to such assets. NBNZ is based in New Zealand and its customers are predominantly domiciled in New Zealand. Legislation and common law applying to banks in New Zealand prohibit an entity from selling, leasing, or otherwise exchanging information about some or all of its customers.
Long term customer relationship intangible assets such as customer lists and data do not arise from contractual relationships, and due to the Privacy Laws governing customer information in New Zealand, such assets are not separable, ie they cannot be sold, transferred, licenced, rented or exchanged, and thus have not been recognized. In light of this, the Group is considering whether a core deposit intangible should be recognized separately from goodwill.
The Group believes that any intangible asset related to long term customer relationships in respect of its acquisition of certain business of the Bank of Hawaii are immaterial. US Federal law requires financial companies to tell customers about their policies regarding the privacy of their personal information, and must give them the opportunity to opt out of some information sharing with companies which are not part of the same corporate group (unaffiliated). They may also be given the right to opt out of certain information sharing with affiliated companies. The value and ability of customer information to be sold, transferred, licenced, rented or exchanged was not considered in assessing the value of the transaction to the Group and at the time of acquisition was considered negligible. Hence the Group has not recognized an asset for such relationships in the financial statements.
2003
Other Assets reduced by $1.6 billion since September 30, 2002 due to a decrease in the revaluation of off balance sheet derivative instruments. This was partly offset by increases in accrued interest on higher asset volumes.
Due to Other Financial Institutions
2004
Due to other financial institutions increased $0.9 billion (14%) to $7.3 billion at September 2004. An increase of $1.2 billion resulting from the acquisition of NBNZ and increased interbank funding in Asia, largely due to changes to thin capitalisation rules in Korea, were offset by reduced call funding in ANZ New Zealand.
The exchange rate impact was negligible.
2003
Amounts due to other financial institutions were $4.4 billion lower than September 2002. Excluding the impact of exchange rates the decrease was $2.9 billion resulting from lower demand for short term funds following an increase in term funding.
69
Deposits and Other Borrowings
2004
Deposits and other borrowings increased $44.1 billion (35%) to $168.6 billion, at September 2004 including $28 billion resulting from the acquisition of the NBNZ. Exchange rate movements contributed $0.5 billion to the increase with an increase of $1.2 billion due the strengthening of the NZD partly offset by appreciation of the AUD against other currencies.
Excluding NBNZ and exchange rate movements, deposits and other borrowings increased by $15.2 billion (12%) due to:
Treasury funding increasing $5.4 billion with higher certificates of deposit ($6.7 billion) offset by lower commercial paper issuance ($1.3 billion) to meet the Groups increased short term funding requirements.
Institutional volumes increasing $2.0 billion with an increase in trade related deposits and higher cash management account volumes with the acquisition of a number of new large customer accounts during 2004.
Personal increasing $4.0 billion. Term deposit volumes increased $1.4 billion with increased marketing and competitive pricing. Other interest bearing deposit volumes increased $1.7 billion reflecting strong growth in the V2 Plus, Access, Mortgage offset, E*Trade and business transaction products account products.
Corporate increasing $1.4 billion with increased interest rates and competitive pricing on term deposits.
Esanda and UDC volumes increasing $1.4 billion with increased commercial paper ($0.9 billion) and debentures ($0.5 billion) to fund asset growth and reduce the reliance on internal funding.
2003
Deposits and borrowings increased $11.2 billion. Excluding the impact of exchange rates, the increase was $14 billion, reflecting:
A $5.5 billion increase in Treasury (principally commercial paper) driven by balance sheet growth.
Higher deposit volumes in Personal Banking ($2.8 billion), Corporate ($1.7 billion) and Institutional Financial Services ($1.2 billion).
Creditors and Other Liabilities
2004
Creditors and other liabilities increased $0.6 billion (4%) to $14.2 billion as at September 2004. Excluding $1.9 billion in NBNZ and a 1% increase from exchange rate movement, payables and other liabilities decreased by $1.4 billion (10%) with a reduction in the revaluation of derivative instruments ($3.0 billion) partly offset by growth in securities lending cash collateral ($1.5 billion). The increase in all other liabilities of $0.9 billion is due to an increase in tax liabilities. The Group has many products, transactions and operating expenditures where the timing of assessability or deductibility for taxation purposes, dictated by statutory directives, differs from the timing of recognition under GAAP. This difference in timing is accounted for and generates deferred tax balances. The balances relating to lease finance and treasury instruments reflect the ever-changing profile of the underlying product books driven by the ebbs and flows of customer demand and external factors such as exchange rates. The changes in the remainder of the deferred tax liability are caused by changes in provisions for taxation matters and by a variety of timing differences relating to operating expenditure including capitalized expenditure and capital allowances.
2003
Creditors and Other Liabilities increased by $1.0 billion since September 30, 2002 principally as a result of an increase in securities lending activity within Trade and Transaction Services Australia and increased accrued interest on higher deposit volumes.
A reduction in the revaluation of off balance sheet derivative instruments in Institutional Financial Services was offset by increases on hedges of USD bonds and notes in Treasury.
During 2003 a dispute with the Australian Tax Office was settled resulting in a tax payment of $262 million. As this amount had been provided for in previous periods and was a component of the Groups tax provision, the settlement did not materially impact the results of the Group. However, the payment did result in an increase in cash tax payments as disclosed in the statement of cash flows and a reduction in the overall level of Group income tax liabilities.
Additionally, the composition of the overall provision for tax balance between current tax and deferred tax changed significantly during the year as a result of movements in unrealized gains and losses on currency swaps that occurred as the AUD appreciated against the USD. The changes in the remainder of the deferred tax liability related to lease finance and sundry other items.
70
Bonds, Notes and Loan Capital
2004
Bonds and notes increased $11 billion (67%) to $27.6 billion, at September 2004. Excluding the $2.1 billion in NBNZ, bonds and notes increased by $9.1 billion (55%) in response to increased funding requirements.
Loan capital increased $2.8 billion (51%) to $8.5 billion, at September 2004 including $0.3 billion in NBNZ. The main drivers for the increase were:
The USD1.1 billion stapled securities issued in November 2003 to support the capital and funding base of the Group following the decision to acquire NBNZ. The issue was made in two tranches:
- USD750 million tranche with a coupon of 5.36%
- USD350 million tranche with a coupon of 4.484%
If the Trust Securities are not redeemed or bought back prior to December 15, 2053 they will convert into preference shares, which in turn will mandatorily convert into a number of ordinary shares, based on the formula in the offering memorandum. The US Stapled Trust Securities qualify as Tier 1 capital as defined by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, however, the securities are reported as debt under Australian International and US Accounting Standards, with the coupon payments classified as interest expense.
New issues of $1.2 billion to meet funding and capital adequacy requirements.
2003
Bonds and notes and loan capital increased by $4.1 billion in 2003, to meet additional funding requirements.
Capital, qualifying capital, on balance sheet assets and off balance sheet exposures
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Shareholders equity (including outside equity interests) |
|
17,925 |
|
13,787 |
|
11,465 |
|
Loan capital (subordinated debt) |
|
8,475 |
|
5,630 |
|
3,445 |
|
Total |
|
26,400 |
|
19,417 |
|
14,910 |
|
Liabilities excluding loan capital |
|
232,945 |
|
176,174 |
|
168,195 |
|
Total assets |
|
259,345 |
|
195,591 |
|
183,105 |
|
Risk weighted assets |
|
196,664 |
|
152,164 |
|
141,390 |
|
Tier 1 capital |
|
13,566 |
|
11,740 |
|
11,201 |
|
Tier 2 capital |
|
7,844 |
|
6,065 |
|
3,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Tier 1 capital ratio |
|
6.9 |
|
7.7 |
|
7.9 |
|
Tier 2 capital ratio |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
2.8 |
|
Deductions (1) |
|
(0.5 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(1.2 |
) |
Total capital adequacy ratio |
|
10.4 |
|
11.1 |
|
9.5 |
|
Adjusted common equity (2) |
|
5.1 |
|
5.7 |
|
5.7 |
|
(1) Total deductions of $1,019 million (2003: $920 million; 2002: $1,703 million).
(2) Tier 1 capital, less preference share capital (converted at September 30, 2004 rates), less deductions.
71
2004
The Groups central capital management target is formulated around Adjusted Common Equity (ACE) with a benchmark of ACE/RWA in the range of 4.5% to 5.0% as at September 30, 2004. This benchmark range was revised from the previous range of 5.25% to 5.75% to reflect progress made in rebalancing our portfolios and a change in the way APRA requires us to calculate Tier 1.
The Groups capital ratios declined during the year principally due to the acquisition of NBNZ and the buy back of the TrUEPrS hybrid. Adjusted Common Equity (ACE) reduced from 5.7% to 5.1%, Tier 1 from 7.7% to 6.9% and Total Capital from 11.1% to 10.4%.
During the year the following significant events affected the ACE ratio:
NBNZ acquisition resulted in a reduction of 58 basis points due to the net of:
- Rights Issue of ordinary equity in November 2003, which raised $3,562 million (net of issue costs).
- Goodwill deductions increasing by $3.1 billion.
- Risk weighted assets increasing by $28 billion.
Capitalized Expenses - From July 1, 2004 APRA required the deduction of capitalized costs from Tier 1, and consequently from ACE. Capitalized costs include loan origination fees, commissions paid to originators and brokers, securitization establishment costs, and costs associated with debt and capital raisings. At September 30, 2004 the Groups deduction was $0.5 billion.
At 5.1%, the ratio is above the Groups target range and provides capacity to pursue capital management initiatives in the six months, including a share buyback of at least $350 million, whilst providing a buffer against potential adverse impacts on the Groups capital base arising out of the implementation of International Accounting Standards on October 1, 2005.
The Group generated 68 basis points of capital from earnings (net of dividend payments) and share issues to employees and shareholders through established share issue plans (19 basis points). This capital growth supported risk weighted asset growth of 11% excluding the initial risk weighted assets of NBNZ and increases in capital deployed in the Groups funds management, securitization and Insurance businesses.
The Group raises hybrid capital to supplement the Groups ACE capital base to ensure that the Group complies with APRAs prudential capital requirements.
In addition to the items noted above, the Groups Tier 1 capital ratio was affected by the following hybrid capital issues during the year:
On November 27, 2003 ANZ raised USD1.1 billion via the issue of 1.1 million stapled securities comprising an interest paying note issued by a wholly owned subsidiary of ANZ and a preference share on which dividends will not be paid whilst it is stapled to a note. The notes are due on December 15, 2053 at which date the issue will mandatorily convert to ordinary shares unless redeemed or bought back prior to that date. The hybrid loan capital is classified as debt on ANZs balance sheet under Australian and US GAAP with distributions on the stapled securities classified as interest expense.
On December 12, 2003, the Group bought back its TrUEPrS preference shares that were issued for USD775 million in 1998. Income, expenses and dividends relating to the TrUEPrS transaction including $77 million profit after tax from the close out of interest rate swaps have been recorded as significant items.
2003
The Groups total capital adequacy ratio increased from 9.5% to 11.1% over the year to September 30, 2003 due largely to:
The $1 billion issuance of 10 million stapled securities (StEPS) on September 23, 2003 increased Tier 1 capital. The stapled securities comprise of an interest paying note issued by ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of ANZ, and a preference share on which dividend will not be paid while it is stapled to a note.
A net increase of $1.2 billion of Tier 2 capital in the March 2003 half year, and a further $1.1 billion in the second half.
Tier 1 ratio at 7.7% was unchanged from March 2003 but down from 7.9% at September 30, 2002. The stapled security issue was offset by a new APRA requirement to deduct purchased goodwill directly from Tier 1 capital.
The Groups ACE ratio remained unchanged at 5.7%.
A summary of qualifying capital, on-balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposures can be seen at Note 32 to the Financial Report.
72
Capital Resources
ANZ pursues an active approach to capital management, which involves a continual review of the level and composition of the Groups capital base, assessed against a range of objectives that include:
Maintaining sufficient capital so that ANZ retains its AA category credit rating;
Capital levels are maintained commensurate with the risk in the business;
Capital is in accordance with APRAs prudential requirements;
Maximizing shareholder returns; and
Capital base should be stable and prudently managed.
As part of this process, the Group has identified the ACE (Adjusted Common Equity) capital ratio target as its primary measure of capital. ACE is supplemented with Tier 1 hybrid, and Tier 2 subordinated debt issuances to meet the APRA prudential requirements. The ACE capital ratio is defined as ACE capital (Tier 1 capital less Tier 1 hybrid capital (at current rates) and Total Capital deductions) as a percentage of RWA (Risk Weighted Assets).
The Group generates ACE capital internally through the retention of current year earnings, net of dividend payments on ordinary equity, and Tier 1 hybrid and the issuance of ordinary shares to existing employees and shareholders through established share issuance plans. Based upon current profitability, dividend payout ratio and participation rates in the respective share issuance plans, the Group generates upwards of $1.2 billion of ACE a year which funds organic growth of the Groups balance sheet, minor strategic acquisitions and new prudential requirements. ACE required to fund major strategic transactions would be via issuances of ordinary shares, either through a private placement or a public issue depending upon the size of the funding required. The Group has a presence, and access to global markets, through existing Australian, New Zealand, US and European programs which enables it to issue Tier 1 capital, Tier 2 capital and senior debt into these markets.
As a result of the acquisition of the NBNZ on December 1, 2003, the Group undertook the following capital initiatives:
Issued $3,562 million (net of $37 million of issuance costs) in ordinary shares through a two for eleven rights issue at $13 per ordinary share;
On November 27, 2003, ANZ raised USD1.1 billion via the issue of 1.1 million stapled securities which are classified as liabilities on the balance sheet, but qualify as Tier 1 capital; and
Reduced its target ACE capital ratio range to 4.50% to 5.00%, down from 4.75% to 5.25%. The reduction in the capital ratio target range was a result of the Groups focus on removing risk from the Groups operations over prior periods, which was further enhanced by the NBNZ acquisition.
On the December 12, 2003, the Group bought back its USD775.2 million TrUEPrS Tier 1 hybrid issue. The buy back was pre-funded by the issue of $1.0 billion of ANZ StEPS Tier 1 hybrid issue on September 23, 2003.
From July 1, 2004, APRA required the deduction of capitalized costs from Tier 1, and consequently from ACE. Capitalized costs include loan origination fees, commission paid to originators and brokers, securitization establishment costs and costs associated with debt and capital raisings. As the new deduction did not represent a change in the substance of ANZs financial positions, the ACE target range was reduced by a commensurate amount to 4.50% to 5.00% following discussions with credit rating agencies.
73
Commitments
The Group leases land and buildings under operating leases expiring from one to five years. Leases generally provide the Group with a right of renewal at which time all terms are renegotiated. Lease payments comprise a base amount plus an incremental contingent rental. Contingent rentals are based on either movements in the Consumer Price Index or operating criteria. Contingent rentals are not included in lease rental commitments, are not provided for due to their immateriality, therefore are expensed as incurred.
The table below shows total commitments for the three year period ended September 30, 2004.
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Capital expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts for outstanding capital expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not later than 1 year |
|
60 |
|
55 |
|
75 |
|
Later than 1 year but not later than 5 years |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Total capital expenditure commitments |
|
60 |
|
56 |
|
75 |
|
Lease rentals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future rentals in respect of leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not later than 1 year |
|
201 |
|
164 |
|
163 |
|
Later than 1 year but not later than 5 years |
|
495 |
|
391 |
|
426 |
|
Later than 5 years |
|
442 |
|
441 |
|
450 |
|
Total land and building lease rental commitments |
|
1,138 |
|
996 |
|
1,039 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not later than 1 year |
|
13 |
|
17 |
|
16 |
|
Later than 1 year but not later than 5 years |
|
19 |
|
23 |
|
7 |
|
Total furniture and equipment lease rental commitments |
|
32 |
|
40 |
|
23 |
|
Total lease rental commitments |
|
1,170 |
|
1,036 |
|
1,062 |
|
Total commitments |
|
1,230 |
|
1,092 |
|
1,137 |
|
Credit related commitments
The credit risk of the following facilities may be less than the contract amount, but as it cannot be accurately determined, the credit risk has been taken to be the contract amount.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Undrawn facilities |
|
78,851 |
|
65,381 |
|
60,373 |
|
Underwriting facilities |
|
63 |
|
15 |
|
36 |
|
|
|
78,914 |
|
65,396 |
|
60,409 |
|
Contingent liabilities
The Group guarantees the performance of customers by issuing standby letters of credit and guarantees to third parties. The risk involved is essentially the same as the credit risk involved in extending loan facilities to customers, therefore these transactions are subjected to the same credit origination, portfolio management and collateral requirements for customers applying for loans. As the facilities may expire without being drawn upon, the notional amounts do not necessarily reflect future cash requirements.
The credit risk of these facilities may be less than the contract amount, but as it cannot be accurately determined, the credit risk has been taken to be the contract amount.
74
Table of Contingent Liabilities
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Guarantees |
|
5,065 |
|
4,954 |
|
3,580 |
|
Credit derivatives sold |
|
2,636 |
|
2,409 |
|
3,088 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
1,057 |
|
1,406 |
|
1,952 |
|
Bill endorsements |
|
168 |
|
148 |
|
298 |
|
Documentary letter of credit |
|
2,262 |
|
1,755 |
|
1,620 |
|
Performance related contingents |
|
9,625 |
|
9,027 |
|
11,161 |
|
Other |
|
1,336 |
|
854 |
|
935 |
|
Total contingent liabilities |
|
22,149 |
|
20,553 |
|
22,634 |
|
The details and estimated maximum amount of contingent liabilities that may become payable are set out below.
Contractual Obligations (1) |
|
Total |
|
Less than |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
More than |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Long Term Debt |
|
41,135 |
|
5,492 |
|
16,534 |
|
14,728 |
|
4,381 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
1,170 |
|
214 |
|
216 |
|
298 |
|
442 |
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-term Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
42,305 |
|
5,706 |
|
16,750 |
|
15,026 |
|
4,823 |
|
(1) Excludes capital expenditure set out on page 74.
Clearing and Settlement Obligations
In accordance with the clearing and settlement arrangements set out:
in the Australian Payments Clearing Association Limited (APCA) Regulations for the Australian Paper Clearing System, the Bulk Electronic Clearing System, the Consumer Electronic Clearing System and the High Value Clearing System (HVCS), the Company has a commitment to rules which could result in a bilateral exposure and loss in the event of a failure to settle by a member institution; and
in the Austraclear System Regulations, the Company has a commitment to participate in loss-sharing arrangements in the event of a failure to settle by a member institution.
For both the APCA HVCS and Austraclear, the obligation arises only in limited circumstances.
Nominee Activities
The Group will indemnify each customer of ANZ controlled entities engaged in nominee activities against loss suffered by reason of such entities failing to perform any obligation undertaken by them to a customer.
Interbank Deposit Agreement
ANZ has entered into an Interbank Deposit Agreement with the major banks in the payments system. This agreement is a payment system support facility certified by APRA, where the terms are such that if any bank is experiencing liquidity problems, the other participants are required to deposit equal amounts of up to $2 billion for a period of 30 days. At the end of 30 days the deposit holder has the option to repay the deposit in cash or by way of assignment of mortgages to the value of the deposit.
Tax Audit
The Group in Australia is being audited by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) as part of normal ATO procedures. The Group has received various assessments that are being disputed and may receive further assessments.
At the Companys request the ATO is reviewing the taxation treatment of the sale of Grindlays in 2000.
75
During the year, the Company and the ATO settled the dispute over the taxation treatment of lease assignments undertaken in 1991 and 1992. The settlement was within existing provisions. The Group in New Zealand is being audited by local revenue authorities as part of normal revenue authority procedures, with a particular focus on certain kinds of structured finance transactions. On September 30, 2004, the Group in New Zealand received Notices of Proposed Adjustment (the Notice) in respect of one of these structured finance transactions undertaken in the 2000 financial year. The Notice is formal advice that the New Zealand Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is proposing to amend tax assessments. The Notice is not a tax assessment and does not establish a tax liability, but it is the first step in a formal dispute process. Should the same position be adopted by the IRD on the remaining transactions of that kind, the maximum potential tax liability would be approximately NZD348 million (including interest tax effected) for the period to September 30, 2004. Of that maximum potential liability, approximately NZD116 million is subject to tax indemnities provided by Lloyds TSB Bank PLC under the agreement by which ANZ acquired the NBNZ and which relate to transactions undertaken by National Bank of New Zealand before December 2003.
Based on external advice, the Group has assessed the likely progress of these and other issues, and believes that it holds appropriate provisions.
Sale of Grindlays businesses
On July 31, 2000, ANZ completed the sale to Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) of ANZ Grindlays Bank Limited and the private banking business of ANZ in the United Kingdom and Jersey, together with ANZ Grindlays (Jersey) Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries, for USD1.3 billion in cash. ANZ provided warranties and certain indemnities relating to those businesses and, where it anticipated that payments would be likely under the warranties or indemnities, made provisions to cover the anticipated liability. The issues below have not impacted our reported results. All settlements and costs have been covered within the provisions established at the time. Of these warranties, ANZ remains liable in relation to the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and differential cheque matters described below.
National Housing Bank
In 1992, Grindlays received a claim aggregating approximately Indian Rupees 5.06 billion from the National Housing Bank (NHB) in India. The claim arose out of cheques drawn by NHB in favour of Grindlays, the proceeds of which were credited to the account of a Grindlays customer.
Grindlays won an arbitration award in March 1997, under which NHB paid Grindlays an award of Indian Rupees 9.12 billion. NHB subsequently won an appeal to the special court of Mumbai, after which Grindlays filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of India. While that appeal was pending, the parties settled the matter, with Grindlays receiving Indian Rupees 6.20 billion of disputed monies that Grindlays had lodged with the Court, and NHB receiving the balance. ANZ in turn received a payment of USD124 million from Standard Chartered Bank under the terms of the Indian Indemnity, and is separately pursuing a $130 million claim against its insurers in respect of the loss Grindlays suffered in the dispute. ANZs claim against its insurers is being litigated in the Victorian Supreme Court, with a trial unlikely to be held until early 2006. No amounts receivable under this action have been recognized in these accounts.
FERA
In 1991, amounts of INR 689m ($21 million) were transferred from non-convertible Indian Rupee accounts maintained with Grindlays in India, mainly to the convertible vostro account at Girobank, maintained at Bombay. These transactions may not have complied with the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. Grindlays, on its own initiative, brought these transactions to the attention of the Reserve Bank of India. The Indian authorities have served notices on Grindlays and certain of its officers in India that could lead to possible penalties. Grindlays has commenced proceedings in the courts contesting the validity of these notices. In November 1998 the Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions. In March 1999 the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and ordered that, pending the disposal of the appeals, the prosecutions and adjudications against the officers shall not be proceeded with further. Final hearing of the appeals before the Supreme Court of India is expected in late 2004/early 2005.
Differential Cheques
In June 2003, Grindlays was successful in its appeal against orders to repay, with interest, two payments it received from a stockbroker in 1991 in connection with securities transactions Grindlays had entered into with counter party banks. These orders, requiring Grindlays to show cause why the payments made by the stockbroker should not be set aside on the grounds that they were not made in the ordinary course of business and were not genuine, had directed repayment of Indian Rupees 24 million ($0.9 million), plus interest accruing at 24% since 1991. The Custodian has yet to file an appeal against this judgment. Grindlays is awaiting the outcome of proceedings in relation to a further twelve proceedings received by it in 1991 in similar circumstances totalling Indian Rupees 277 million ($10.4 million). Including interest at 24%, this is approximately $29.9 million.
76
In addition, ANZ provided an indemnity relating to tax liabilities of Grindlays (and its subsidiaries) and the Jersey Sub-Group to the extent to which such liabilities were not provided for in the Grindlays accounts as at July 31, 2000. A claim has been made under this indemnity also, with no material impact on the Group expected.
vi) Pursuant to class order 98/1418 (as amended) dated August 13, 1998, relief was granted to a number of wholly owned controlled entities from the Corporations Act 2001 requirements for preparation, audit, and publication of individual financial statements. The results of these companies are included in the consolidated Group results. The entities to which relief was granted are:
ANZ Properties (Australia) Pty Ltd(1)
Alliance Holdings Pty Ltd(1)
ANZ Capital Hedging Pty Ltd(1)
ANZ Funds Pty Ltd(1)
ANZ Infrastructure Investments Ltd(3)
ANZ Nominees Ltd(1)
ANZ Securities (Holdings) Ltd(3)
Binnstone Traders Pty Ltd(4)
Deori Pty Ltd(4)
E S & A Holdings Pty Ltd(1)
Jikk Pty Ltd(1)
LFD Ltd(4)
NMRSB Pty Ltd(4)
ANZ Orchard Investments Pty Ltd(2)
Votraint No. 1103 Pty Ltd(2)
(1) Relief granted on August 21, 2001
(2) Relief granted on August 13, 2002
(3) Relief granted on September 9, 2003
(4) Revocation Deed on June 24, 2004
General
There are outstanding court proceedings, claims and possible claims against the Group the aggregate amount of which cannot be readily quantified. Appropriate legal advice has been obtained and, in the light of such advice, provisions as deemed necessary have been made.
The gross amounts of accruals made for material litigation contingencies is $258 million.
Liquidity Resources
The core objective of the Groups liquidity management frame work and processes is to ensure that ANZ has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations as they fall due under all but systemic crisis conditions including during an ANZ specific name crisis. The key principles of ANZs liquidity management framework are:
A diverse retail and wholesale funding base, avoiding undue concentrations of funding maturity, source and currency. The Group targets
a minimum level of customer (non-wholesale) funding to External Assets less Regulatory Capital of 60%; and
a minimum of 15% of all term assets be financed with term wholesale debt with a maturity greater than 12 months.
Strong standing in financial markets to ensure timely access to wholesale funding by minimising the possibility of adverse market sentiment. The Group has established issuance programs: domestic debt, US and Euro commercial paper and US and Euro medium term note.
Holding an appropriate level of readily liquefiable assets to buffer the Group against short-term adverse conditions, in addition to the level of liquid assets required to support normal daily operations.
Accurate and timely identification of all material sources and uses of funds, together with a strong understanding of the businesss underlying cashflows.
Monitoring and appropriate management of cashflow concentrations, particularly wholesale funding maturities and large-value net payments.
77
Growth in lending has required an increase in the level of wholesale debt outstandings from $66 billion as of September 2003 to $94 billion as of September 2004. The issuance of term wholesale debt greater than 12 months to maturity increased to $18.4 billion from $12.9 billion in 2003. The proportion of liabilities sourced from customer deposits has decreased to 63% as at September 30, 2004 from 65% at September 30, 2003 as asset growth outstripped customer funded deposits. The total level of readily liquefiable assets held to minimise the impact of any liquidity disruption was $9.1 billion at September 2004.
The earnings of the Group are not its primary source of liquidity, which is customer deposits and wholesale primary markets. Accordingly, restrictions on the repatriation of earnings from offshore subsidiaries, back to the parent, would not materially affect the Groups liquidity. A number of our subsidiaries are domiciled in foreign jurisdictions and are controlled by local regulators. As such, repatriation of earnings from such entities is subject to local regulatory approval. Approval can be expected to be granted during normal business conditions subject to compliance with local capital and liquidity regulations. We are not currently aware of any restrictions on our ability to repatriate earnings. Note 41 to the Financial Report sets out the geographical analysis of the Groups earnings, noting that post the NBNZ acquisition, the Australian contribution is expected to decline to approximately 67% and New Zealands contribution is expected to increase to approximately 25%.
Details of the sources and unused sources of liquidity are included in Note 42 to the Financial Report.
Wholesale Funding
ANZ is funded from both the retail and wholesale markets. ANZs $40 billion of term wholesale funding as at September 30, 2004 increased from $26 billion as at September 30, 2003. In 2004, $17 billion of debt was issued via 150 transactions. The portfolio is diversified by both type and currency with a weighted average term to maturity of 3.5 years. In 2004/05 new term debt issuance is planned at $14 billion with an average term of 3.5 years - including NBNZ funding.
Maturity Profile of Funding
AUD |
|
Senior |
|
Subordinated |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
1 year |
|
5,405 |
|
87 |
|
5,492 |
|
2 years |
|
9,373 |
|
713 |
|
10,086 |
|
3 years |
|
5,472 |
|
976 |
|
6,448 |
|
4 years |
|
5,969 |
|
1,597 |
|
7,566 |
|
5 years |
|
6,311 |
|
851 |
|
7,162 |
|
> 5 years |
|
47 |
|
4,334 |
|
4,381 |
|
|
|
32,577 |
|
8,558 |
|
41,135 |
|
78
Liquidity Portfolio
ANZ holds a minimum $9.1 billion ($10.4 billion as at September 30, 2004) portfolio of high quality (A- rated and higher), diversified, highly liquid securities to support payment obligations and contingent funding in the event of a market disruption. The portfolio is managed on a global basis through the Groups major funding centers ie: Melbourne, New York, London, Wellington and Singapore.
AUD |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$M |
|
AUD |
|
4,969 |
|
NZD |
|
2,138 |
|
USD |
|
2,287 |
|
EUR |
|
256 |
|
GBP |
|
764 |
|
SGD |
|
37 |
|
|
|
10,451 |
|
For further details of financial instruments, refer to Note 38 to the Financial Report.
Supplementary Financial Information
Group Risk Profile
ANZ uses a two-dimensional risk grading system, which measures both the customers ability to repay (probability of default) and the loss in the event of default (a factor of the security taken to support the facilities). The bank uses financial and statistical tools to assist in the risk rating of much of the Banks business and consumer borrowers. Customers risk ratings and loan facilities are reviewed periodically (typically at least annually) to ensure the risk ratings reflect the credit risk of the customer and the prevailing economic conditions. Similarly, the performance of the risk rating tools used in the credit rating process are reviewed periodically to ensure they remain statistically valid and reflect current loss experiences.
To measure the probability of default the Group applies a risk rating scale of 0 to 10 to its lending - with ratings 0 through 8 representing productive ratings, and 9 and 10 representing non-accrual loans. Institutional, Corporate and Commercial customers risk grades 1 to 8 have + and - modifiers, making a total of 27 separate risk grades. In the Personal portfolio, some lending is portfolio graded.
To measure security coverage, a seven grade scale is applied, ranging from A through G. Security Indicator A represents more than 130% security coverage, while G is applied to unsecured customer borrowings.
The table below shows the mix of assets by rating in ANZs portfolio as at September 30. Outstandings (as opposed to limits) are documented, as they more closely relate to information disclosed on the balance sheet. Over the year the quality of the portfolio has improved, with the percentage of lending assets graded 7 - 10 decreasing as a percentage of the total portfolio. The percentage of accounts graded 0-3 has also decreased as a result of strong growth in Australian Mortgages of $12.1 billion (18% in a portfolio graded 4B) and the acquisition of NBNZ, which had only 11.9% lending assets rated 1-3 as opposed to 12.8% in the pre NBNZ ANZ portfolio. Overall, the portfolio remains well diversified. The general allowance for loan losses is considered sufficient to insulate against losses inherent in the portfolio.
79
Years ended September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
ANZ |
|
S&P |
|
Moodys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCR 0-3 |
|
AAA to BBB+ |
|
Aaa to Baa2 |
|
11.3 |
% |
12.8 |
% |
14.5 |
% |
CCR 4 |
|
BBB- |
|
Baa3 |
|
57.2 |
% |
55.3 |
% |
54.0 |
% |
CCR 5 |
|
BB+ to BB |
|
Ba1 to Ba2 |
|
15.8 |
% |
15.3 |
% |
14.3 |
% |
CCR 6 |
|
BB- |
|
Ba3 |
|
13.5 |
% |
13.7 |
% |
13.9 |
% |
CCR 7-8 |
|
B+ to CCC |
|
B1 to Caa |
|
1.8 |
% |
2.3 |
% |
2.5 |
% |
CCR 9-10 |
|
D/Non Accrual |
|
Non Accrual |
|
0.4 |
% |
0.6 |
% |
0.8 |
% |
Loan Quality
Our policy relating to the recognition and measurement of impaired assets conforms with APRA guidelines.
Loans are classified as either accrual or non-accrual. Accrual loans are credit risk assets where interest is accrued to income. Non-accrual loans are credit risk assets where, generally, there is reasonable doubt about the ultimate collectability of any of the interest and/or principal under contractual terms; accordingly, the crediting to profit of interest and fees on such loans ceases unless the amounts are actually received.
2004
Gross non-accrual loans decreased to $829 million from $1,007 million at September 2003 (notwithstanding the inclusion of $81 million of NBNZ non accruals). The overall reduction was primarily the result of realizations, upgrades and write-offs of a number of large outstanding balances in the Institutional portfolios. New non-accruals of $1,075 million in the September 2004 year represents an increase of $87 million compared to the September 2003 year. Notwithstanding this increase the default rate (new non-accruals/average gross lending assets) has decreased since September 2003 by 10 basis points, from 63 basis points to 53 basis points in the year to September 2004. The principal sources of new non-accrual loans in 2004 were four legacy customers in the power and telecommunication sectors, and two resource customers.
The Group has a specific allowance for loan loss coverage ratio of 46%. Net non-accruals are $451 million (September 2003: $525 million) and represents 2.5% of shareholders equity at September 2004.
2003
Gross non-accrual loans decreased to $1,007 million from $1,203 million at September 2002 mainly due to a reduction in the International portfolio as a result of a stable level of non-accruals and write-offs. New non-accruals of $988 million in the September 2003 year represent a reduction of $297 million compared to the September 2002 year where large single names boosted the level of non-accruals.
The Group has a specific allowance for loan loss coverage ratio of 48%. Net non-accruals are $525 million (September 2002: $628 million) and represents 3.8% of shareholders equity at September 2003.
See Note 1, (vii) and (viii), of the Financial Report, for more details.
80
Non-Accrual Loans
Set out below are our non-accrual loans classified as loans carrying specific allowances and loans not carrying specific allowances. Non-accrual loans are credit risk assets where, generally, there is reasonable doubt about the ultimate collectability of any of the interest and/or principal under contractual terms.
September 30, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Gross non-accrual loans |
|
829 |
|
1,007 |
|
1,203 |
|
Subject to specific allowance for loan losses |
|
714 |
|
913 |
|
1,072 |
|
Without specific allowance for loan losses |
|
115 |
|
94 |
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Non Accrual Loans by
Region |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Australia/New Zealand |
|
537 |
|
544 |
|
561 |
|
US/UK Europe |
|
233 |
|
376 |
|
541 |
|
Asia |
|
20 |
|
50 |
|
62 |
|
Other international |
|
39 |
|
37 |
|
39 |
|
Total |
|
829 |
|
1,007 |
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Non Accrual Loans by Region |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Australia/New Zealand |
|
826 |
|
636 |
|
674 |
|
US/UK Europe |
|
216 |
|
320 |
|
587 |
|
Asia |
|
25 |
|
11 |
|
10 |
|
Other international |
|
8 |
|
21 |
|
14 |
|
Total |
|
1,075 |
|
988 |
|
1,285 |
|
81
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Gross non-accrual loans subject to specific allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
339 |
|
502 |
|
445 |
|
597 |
|
370 |
|
New Zealand |
|
109 |
|
17 |
|
30 |
|
74 |
|
46 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
266 |
|
394 |
|
597 |
|
269 |
|
630 |
|
Total |
|
714 |
|
913 |
|
1,072 |
|
940 |
|
1,046 |
|
Specific allowance for loan losses |
|
(378 |
) |
(482 |
) |
(575 |
) |
(490 |
) |
(692 |
) |
Net exposure |
|
336 |
|
431 |
|
497 |
|
450 |
|
354 |
|
Gross non-accrual loans not subject to specific allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
82 |
|
20 |
|
78 |
|
195 |
|
281 |
|
New Zealand |
|
6 |
|
5 |
|
7 |
|
6 |
|
13 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
27 |
|
69 |
|
46 |
|
119 |
|
51 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
94 |
|
131 |
|
320 |
|
345 |
|
Net non-accrual loans (1) |
|
451 |
|
525 |
|
628 |
|
770 |
|
699 |
|
Gross non-accrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
421 |
|
522 |
|
523 |
|
792 |
|
651 |
|
New Zealand |
|
115 |
|
22 |
|
37 |
|
80 |
|
59 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
293 |
|
463 |
|
643 |
|
388 |
|
681 |
|
Total |
|
829 |
|
1,007 |
|
1,203 |
|
1,260 |
|
1,391 |
|
Specific allowances for loan losses |
|
(378 |
) |
(482 |
) |
(575 |
) |
(490 |
) |
(692 |
) |
Net non-accrual loans (1) |
|
451 |
|
525 |
|
628 |
|
770 |
|
699 |
|
Ratio of specific allowances for loan losses to gross non-accrual loans |
|
45.6 |
% |
47.9 |
% |
47.8 |
% |
38.9 |
% |
49.7 |
% |
(1) Excluding off-balance sheet commitments that have been classified as unproductive of $23 million (2003: $37 million, 2002: $44 million, 2001: $31 million and 2000: $56 million) net of an allowance of $6 million (2003: $2 million, 2002: $10 million, 2001: $10 million and 2000: $17 million).
Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More
Set out below are aggregate amounts of loans, which are past due by over 90 days. A facility is past due when a contracted payment (principal or interest) has not been met when due or it is otherwise outside contracted arrangements (e.g. an overdraft is over limit). This category comprises accrual loans in arrears 90 days and over which we believe are well secured, and accrual portfolio managed facilities past due from 90 to 180 days.
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Australia |
|
188 |
|
175 |
|
176 |
|
277 |
|
335 |
|
New Zealand |
|
77 |
|
18 |
|
25 |
|
63 |
|
51 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
28 |
|
20 |
|
15 |
|
11 |
|
20 |
|
Total past due loans |
|
293 |
|
213 |
|
216 |
|
351 |
|
406 |
|
82
Restructured Loans
Set out below are aggregate amounts of loans where the original contract terms have been modified to provide concessions of interest and/or principal due to the financial difficulties of the customer. For these loans, interest and fees earned are recognized as income on an accrual basis.
Under APRA guidelines, restructured loans include loans with an effective yield above our cost of funds and below our prevailing reference rate for that form of lending. Restructured loans with an effective yield below our average cost of funds at the date of restructuring are classified as non-accrual loans.
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Australia |
|
32 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructured loans |
|
32 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Other potential problem loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Potential Problem Loans
We do not use the category potential problem loans for loans that continue to accrue interest. If a loan is identified as a potential problem, it is classified as non-accrual and if necessary an allowance is raised.
Interest Forgone
The following table shows the estimated amount of interest income that would have been recorded during the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 had interest on the above non-accrual loans and restructured loans been accrued to income for those years (or, in the case of restructured loans, had interest been accrued at the original contract rate), and the amount of interest income received with respect to such loans.
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Gross interest receivable on non-accrual loans and restructured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
29 |
|
36 |
|
50 |
|
New Zealand |
|
8 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
25 |
|
31 |
|
30 |
|
Total gross interest receivable on non-accruals and restructured loans |
|
62 |
|
69 |
|
83 |
|
Interest income received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
(6 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(10 |
) |
New Zealand |
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Overseas markets |
|
(12 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(16 |
) |
Total interest received |
|
(19 |
) |
(23 |
) |
(29 |
) |
Net interest forgone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
23 |
|
26 |
|
40 |
|
New Zealand |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
13 |
|
19 |
|
14 |
|
Total net interest forgone |
|
43 |
|
46 |
|
54 |
|
83
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses reflects managements estimate of the losses inherent in the lending portfolio.
Per Australian GAAP non current assets must not be carried at amounts greater than their recoverable amount. When we recognize a write down in an individual asset or portfolio of assets, we are recognizing that future economic benefits which had previously been assessed as being available to the entity no longer exist. Thus, at the date of our assessment, the asset is impaired with the level of impairment across the portfolio represented by the allowance for loan losses.
ANZs methodology for determining the total allowance for loan losses establishes both a specific (allocated) and general (unallocated) component. The specific allowance represents the results of analysis of individual loans within ANZs portfolio. ANZ regularly reviews all its loan portfolios and monitors adherence to terms, conditions and lending covenants. The reviews undertaken employ a variety of statistical and intuitive measures to determine the continuing collectability of credit facilities. When doubt arises as to the collectability of a credit facility, the exposure is classified and reported as a Non Accrual. When a credit facility is classified as Non Accrual, a Specific Allowance, calculated on the principal exposure less a conservative estimation of asset realization, is transferred from the General Allowance and allocated against the Non Accrual Loan.
The unallocated allowance (general allowance for loan losses) is established for losses inherent in the portfolio, but yet to be specifically identified. The unallocated allowance is regularly reviewed to ensure it is adequate, having regard to the loss rate and term of the portfolio. The allowance for loan loss charge represents the average one year loss expected for the particular loan portfolio. Expected loss is determined from analysis of both individual loan and portfolio risk gradings and associated default and loss expectancy rates. The Banks risk rating framework separately identifies the probability of default from the loss given default.
Australian and US GAAP principles for the identification of impaired loans are similar. Differences arise in the measurement of the loan impairment. US GAAP requires the use of a discounted cash flow methodology for measuring impairment of individual loans where recovery is based on estimated cash flows; this is not required under Australian GAAP. As discussed above, ANZ splits the calculation of allowance for loan losses into two components. ANZ does not discount the associated cash flows when computing the specific component of the allowance for loan losses.
APRA guidance note AGN 220.2 - Security Valuation and Provisioning, suggests a licensed bank should maintain its allowance for loan losses net of tax above 0.5% of total risk weighted assets as a benchmark.
84
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Specific allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
209 |
|
267 |
|
211 |
|
New Zealand |
|
69 |
|
9 |
|
20 |
|
Principal domestic markets |
|
278 |
|
276 |
|
231 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
106 |
|
208 |
|
354 |
|
Total specific allowance for loan losses |
|
384 |
|
484 |
|
585 |
|
General allowance for loan losses |
|
1,992 |
|
1,534 |
|
1,496 |
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
2,376 |
|
2,018 |
|
2,081 |
|
General allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of period |
|
1,534 |
|
1,496 |
|
1,386 |
|
Acquisition of provisions |
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for exchange rate fluctuations |
|
53 |
|
(49 |
) |
(22 |
) |
Charge to profit and loss |
|
632 |
|
614 |
|
860 |
|
Transfer to specific allowance for loan losses |
|
(525 |
) |
(588 |
) |
(788 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
82 |
|
61 |
|
60 |
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
1,534 |
|
1,496 |
|
Specific allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of period |
|
484 |
|
585 |
|
500 |
|
Acquisition of provisions |
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for exchange rate fluctuations |
|
(2 |
) |
(49 |
) |
(6 |
) |
Bad debts written off |
|
(680 |
) |
(640 |
) |
(697 |
) |
Transfer from general allowance for loan losses |
|
525 |
|
588 |
|
788 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
484 |
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
2,376 |
|
2,018 |
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance movement analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New and increased allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
459 |
|
418 |
|
423 |
|
New Zealand |
|
80 |
|
45 |
|
54 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
32 |
|
78 |
|
214 |
|
United States |
|
28 |
|
64 |
|
185 |
|
Other overseas markets |
|
26 |
|
70 |
|
22 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
675 |
|
898 |
|
Allowance for loan loss releases |
|
(100 |
) |
(87 |
) |
(110 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
588 |
|
788 |
|
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
|
(82 |
) |
(61 |
) |
(60 |
) |
Net specific allowance for loan losses |
|
443 |
|
527 |
|
728 |
|
Net credit to general allowance for loan losses |
|
189 |
|
87 |
|
132 |
|
Charge to profit and loss |
|
632 |
|
614 |
|
860 |
|
85
The following table shows our specific allowance for loan losses against loans by geographic region in addition to specific allowances against off balance sheet commitments and our general allowance for loan losses for each of the past five years ended September 30.
Years ended September 30 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
$M |
|
Specific allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
209 |
|
266 |
|
208 |
|
300 |
|
258 |
|
New Zealand |
|
69 |
|
9 |
|
20 |
|
32 |
|
26 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
100 |
|
207 |
|
347 |
|
158 |
|
408 |
|
Allowances against loans |
|
378 |
|
482 |
|
575 |
|
490 |
|
692 |
|
Allowances against off-balance sheet commitments |
|
6 |
|
2 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
17 |
|
Total specific allowances |
|
384 |
|
484 |
|
585 |
|
500 |
|
709 |
|
General allowance for loan losses |
|
1,992 |
|
1,534 |
|
1,496 |
|
1,386 |
|
1,373 |
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
2,376 |
|
2,018 |
|
2,081 |
|
1,886 |
|
2,082 |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses Industry Analysis
See Notes 4 and 5 of the Financial Information section of the Financial Report for details.
Concentrations of Credit Risk / Loans and Advances by Industry Category
See Note 4 of the Financial Information section of the Financial Report for details.
Although our loan portfolio is spread across many countries, 67% of loans and advances are booked in Australia (September 2003: 79%) and 28% are booked in New Zealand (September 2003: 14%). The percentage of loans and advances booked in New Zealand increased after the acquisition of NBNZ in December 2003. The inherent risk characteristics of our loan portfolio are therefore very much linked to general economic conditions in Australia and NZ where the portfolio is diversified across different regions, industries, customer types and products.
As at September 30, 2004, our largest credit exposure in Australia was in the category Real estate - mortgage (58%) which principally comprises owner occupied residential property loans with the remainder comprising loans made for residential investment (non-owner occupied) and commercial property purchases. Over the year strong growth was recorded in our Mortgages Australia portfolio (18%, or 19% excluding the impact of securitization) with growth in the portfolio continuing to benefit from the strong Australian housing market coupled with our products and distribution networks.
As at September 30, 2004, 14% of our Australian loans and advances were in the category Personal, which covers non-business loans to individuals through overdrafts, personal loans, credit cards and fully drawn advances.
Our largest overseas credit exposure is to Real estate - mortgage, where most of the exposure and associated growth is in New Zealand. This categorys percentage share of our overseas loan portfolio was 52% in 2004.
Our prudent credit practices coupled with Australias and NZs strong economic conditions have seen our consumer delinquency and loss rates remain at very low levels. Our risk policies remain firmly based on sound principles of loan-to-value ratios, conservative debt servicing capacity and the avoidance of speculative lending. ANZs prudent approach to Inner City residential Mortgages Lending, which are potentially higher risk, has meant that our exposure to this market has remained low.
Issues identified in 2002 in the power and telecommunications sectors are now considered to be largely resolved.
86
Power Industry Exposure
Approximately 83% of ANZs exposure to the global power industry is investment grade. The US power sector remains under stress following market deregulation, and ANZs portfolio has been affected by a small number of single name exposures.
ANZs exposure to offshore power companies has reduced by 23% since 2002 through repayments, sell-downs and restructuring. The portfolio has also become increasingly Australian-centric (exposure 67% Australia; 33% Offshore). During the September 2004 year, non accrual loans increased in the US portfolio due to lagged credit effects from previously identified high risk exposures, however, any future losses are expected to be lower and readily absorbed within existing allowance for loan loss levels.
The growth in the portfolio was primarily driven by the inclusion of $1.3 billion of NBNZ exposures, coupled with growth in the Corporate Australia/New Zealand market.
ANZs Energy Portfolio Limits 2004 (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30 |
|
A$B |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
AAA to BBB |
|
7,105 |
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
BBB- |
|
855 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
BB+ to BB |
|
262 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
BB- |
|
902 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
B+ to CCC |
|
296 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non Accrual |
|
230 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
ANZs Exposure by Geography 2004
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia and New Zealand |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Based on mapping ANZs internal rating system to external credit grades.
Telecommunication Industry Exposure
Industry issues now appear to be abating, although oversupply remains evident in some sectors (including the global bandwidth market). ANZ has continued to reduce non-core higher risk offshore telecommunications exposures. Approximately 68% of total limits are now in Australia and New Zealand and 90% of total limits are considered investment grade.
ANZs Telecommunication Portfolio Limits 2004 (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
AAA to BBB |
|
2,647 |
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
BBB- |
|
343 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
BB+ to BB |
|
78 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
BB- |
|
159 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
B+ to CCC |
|
27 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non Accrual |
|
62 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
ANZs Exposure by Geography 2004
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia and New Zealand |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Based on mapping ANZs internal rating system to external credit grades.
2003
Lending quality was strong in our Corporate Businesses. Moderate reduction in the proportion of loans rated AAA to BBB (based on mapping ANZs internal rating system to external credit grades) was largely due to normal fluctuating debt maturities amongst a small number of Institutional customers. Slippage in our high risk exposures was largely the result of continued pressure on global power companies and the lagged effect of the global economic slowdown on our International portfolio. Stress in the power industry will continue for some time. Reducing high risk exposures remains a key focus.
The two industry sectors that emerged as problems during the 2002 year were power and telecommunications. These continue to be closely monitored.
The US power industry continues to experience sectoral stress in the aftermath of market deregulation, which triggered excessive construction and acquisition of generating assets. As expected, we have experienced some further deterioration in the US power portfolio over the last year, but to a lesser magnitude than in 2002. Oversupply in many sectors of the US power market will take some years to stabilize. In the meantime, we are continuing to manage down our higher risk power exposures.
As a result of active portfolio management of this sector, credit limits for offshore telecommunications operators fell by 46%. This fall in offshore exposure and increased Australia and New Zealand investment grade business combined to reduce offshore limits from 57% to 42% of the global portfolio.
87
In the retail portfolios the arrears profile (60 days) approached historical lows reflecting strength of Australias retail sector. The consumer sector is robust with continuing low levels of unemployment and a low interest rate environment. Quarterly behavioural review scoring in the SME portfolio is also contributing to a lower arrears profile.
In the retail portfolios the arrears profile (60 days) remained at low levels, reflecting the strength of the underlying credit quality and of Australias strong economy in general. The consumer sector remained robust with continuing low levels of unemployment and a low interest rate environment.
Average Deposits
Details of our average deposits and balances due from other banks for each of the past three fiscal years is provided in the Average Balance Sheet analysis in Note 33 to the Financial Report.
Certificates of Deposit and Other Time Deposit Maturities
See Note 2 of the Financial Information section to the Financial Report for details.
Short Term Borrowings
See Note 6 of the Financial Information section to the Financial Report for details.
Volume and Rate Analysis
See Note 3 of the Financial Information section to the Financial Report for details.
88
Australian GAAP
International Financial Reporting Standards
For reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005, the Group will be required to prepare financial statements using Australian Standards that have been revised to satisfy the requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The Group will report for the first time in compliance with Australian equivalents to IFRS when the results for the half-year ended March 31, 2006 and the year ended September 30, 2006 are released.
The Group is required to prepare an opening balance sheet in accordance with Australian equivalents to IFRS as at October 1, 2004. Most accounting policy adjustments to retrospectively apply Australian equivalents to IFRS will be made against retained earnings in this opening balance sheet. However, transitional adjustments relating to those standards for which comparatives are not required will only be made on October 1, 2005. Comparatives are not required for AASB 132: Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation, AASB 139: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and AASB 4: Insurance Contracts.
A Steering Committee is monitoring the adoption of IFRS as per the Groups implementation plan. This Committee has been following developments in IFRS and the likely impact that these standards will have on our products and our customers, and on our own financial reports and accounting policies. Dedicated workstreams are responsible for evaluating the impact of a specific group of accounting changes. Each workstream is progressing through multiple phases of work: technical evaluation, design, development and implementation. The Group has largely completed the technical evaluation phases of each workstream, and is moving into design, development and implementation. The program is achieving scheduled milestones.
The following areas have been identified as significant for the Group:
Credit Loss Provisioning
IFRS adopts an approach known as incurred losses for credit loss provisioning and provides guidance on measurement of incurred losses. Provisions are raised for losses that have already been incurred for exposures that are known to be impaired. The estimated losses on these impaired exposures are then discounted to their present value. As this discount unwinds, there is a resulting recognition of interest in the statement of financial performance during the period between recognition of impairment and recovery of the written down amount.
Exposures found not to be impaired are placed into pools of similar assets with similar risk characteristics to be collectively assessed for losses that have been incurred, but not identified yet. The required provision is estimated on the basis of historical loss experience for assets with credit risk characteristics similar to those in the collective pool. The historical loss experience is adjusted based on current observable data.
The current allowance for loan loss charge to profit will be replaced, on adoption of IFRS, by a charge for specific allowance for loan losses on impaired exposures, plus a charge for movements in the provision that is held for exposures that are being collectively assessed for impairment.
It is anticipated that the proposed changes will result in a reduction in the level of allowance for loan losses which the bank holds against its credit exposures.
Debt v Equity classification
The Group has issued a number of hybrid tier one instruments. The ANZ StEPS issue, which is currently treated as equity, will be reclassified as debt. Distributions on ANZ StEPS will be treated as interest rather than dividends.
Fee Revenue
Revised rules governing the accounting for fee income will result in more fees being deferred on initial payment, and recognized either as an adjustment to yield or over the period of service. Fees required to be treated as an adjustment to yield will be recognized in interest income rather than fee income. On initial application, certain fees that have previously been recognized in the statement of financial performance will be recognized in the statement of financial position, with a corresponding reduction to retained earnings. The annual impact on net profit from this change is not expected to be material.
89
Goodwill
The current Group policy of amortising goodwill over the expected period of benefit will cease. Instead, goodwill will be subject to impairment testing annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. This change in policy may result in increased volatility of future earnings where impairment losses may occur.
Hedging
All derivatives contracts, whether used as hedging instruments or otherwise, will be carried at fair value on the Groups statement of financial position. IFRS recognize fair value hedge accounting, cash flow hedge accounting, and hedges of investments in foreign operations. Fair value and cash flow hedge accounting can only be considered where effectiveness tests are met.
Ineffectiveness outside the prescribed range precludes the use of hedge accounting and can result in significant volatility in the statement of financial performance. The Group expects to predominantly use cash flow hedging in respect of its interest rate risk hedges, which will create volatility in equity reserve balances.
The hedging rules will impact the way the Group accounts for hedges of its funding and for hedges of its statement of financial position. Customer trading, where all derivatives are currently marked to market, will not be impacted.
Post Employment
The Group does not currently recognize an asset or liability for the net position of defined benefit superannuation schemes including those which operate in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. On adoption of AASB 119: Employee Benefits (revised), the Group will recognize the net position of each scheme on the statement of financial position, with a corresponding entry to equity. The initial adjustment will be made, retrospectively, against opening retained earnings as at October 1, 2004, and will be based on actuarially determined valuations of each scheme made at that date in accordance with AASB 119. After the transitional adjustment, further movements in the net position of each scheme will be recognized in equity.
Securitization
IFRS introduces new requirements for the recognition of financial assets, including those transferred to a special purpose vehicle for securitization. Existing securitizations, both of our own assets and of our customers assets, require an assessment of the accounting treatment that will be required under IFRS. Further, a different interpretation of the consolidation rules applicable to special purpose vehicles may result in some vehicles, which were previously not consolidated, being consolidated by the Group. Securitizations commenced on or after January 1, 2004 have been assessed in accordance with IFRS and current Australian GAAP.
Share-Based Payments
The Group currently recognizes immediately an expense equal to the full fair value of all deferred shares issued as part of the short and long term incentive arrangements. The deferred shares vest over one to three years, and may be forfeited under certain conditions. The Group does not currently recognize an expense for options issued to staff, shares issued under the $1,000 employee share plan, nor for the 5% discount applicable to the ANZ Share Save Scheme. On adoption of AASB 2: Share-based Payment, the Group will recognize an expense for all share-based remuneration, including deferred shares and options, and will amortise those expenses over the relevant vesting periods. The Group will also recognize an expense for shares issued under the $1,000 employee share plan, and for the 5% discount on shares granted under the ANZ Share Save Scheme. On transition, this change in accounting policy will result in a reduction in retained earnings at October 1, 2004.
Taxation
Under AASB 112: Income Taxes, a balance sheet approach will be adopted, replacing the statement of financial performance approach currently used. This method recognizes deferred tax balances when there is a difference between the carrying value of an asset or liability, and its tax base. It is expected that the standard may require the Group to carry a slightly higher level of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
90
United States GAAP
There are no current United States GAAP developments which are likely to materially impact ANZ in the 2005 fiscal year.
The Group prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative accounting pronouncements. However, notwithstanding the existence of relevant accounting standards, there are a number of critical accounting treatments, which include complex or subjective decisions or assessments. The Group requires all such applications of judgement to be reviewed and agreed by Group Finance, and where the impact is material, the accounting treatment is reviewed during the audit process by the Groups external auditors. All material changes to accounting policy are approved by the Audit Committee of the Board.
Historical changes
There have been no material changes to the Groups critical accounting policies or their related methodologies over the last 3 years.
A brief discussion of critical accounting policies, and their impact on the Group, follows:
a) Allowance for Loan Loss Charge
Description and Significance
Each month the Group recognizes an expense for credit losses in the form of allowance for loan loss charge reflecting historical loss experience for each part of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan loss charge is booked to the General allowance for loss which is maintained to cover the losses inherent in the Groups existing loan portfolio. The method used by the Group for determining the expense is referred to as an allowance for loan loss charge. The Group uses allowance for loan loss models to calculate the expected loss by considering:
the size, composition and risk profile of the current loan portfolio; and
the history of credit losses for each type and risk of lending.
Ongoing reviews
The Group regularly reviews the assumptions used in the allowance for loan loss models. These reviews are conducted in recognition of the subjective nature of the allowance for loan loss methodology. Methodologies are updated as improved analysis becomes available. In addition, the robustness of outcomes is reviewed considering the Groups actual loss experience, and losses sustained by other banks operating in similar markets.
To the extent that credit losses are not consistent with previous loss patterns used to develop the assumptions within the allowance for loan loss methodology, the existing General allowance for loan loss may be determined to be either in excess of or insufficient to cover credit losses not yet specifically identified.
As a result of the reassessments, allowance for loan loss levels may be periodically increased or decreased with a direct impact on profitability.
As part of its review of the allowance for loan loss model outputs, the Group also regularly evaluates the overall level of the General allowance for loan loss. The Group is required, by APRA prudential standards, to have policies which cover the level of General allowance for loan loss required to absorb estimated losses inherent in the credit portfolio. In some limited circumstances, the assessment of the inherent losses in the portfolio may require an additional charge to profits to ensure the adequacy of the General allowance for loan loss. The Group considers it appropriate to maintain its General allowance for loan loss in excess of the APRA guidelines.
Quantification of Sensitivity
The average charge to profit for the allowance for loan loss charge was 0.31% of average net lending assets or $632 million (Sep 2003: 0.39% or $614 million; Sep 2002: 0.43% or $610 million excluding the special general allowance for loan losses of $250 million).
As at September 2004, the balance of the General allowance for loan loss of $1,992 million (Sep 2003: $1,534 million) represents 1.01% (Sep 2003: 1.01%) of risk weighted assets.
91
b) Specific Allowance for Loan Loss Charge
Description and Significance
The specific allowance for loan loss is maintained to cover identified Non Accrual Loans. When a specific debt loss is identified as being probable, its value is transferred from the General allowance for loan loss to the specific allowance for loan loss. Specific allowance for loan losses is applied when the full recovery of one of the Groups exposures is identified as being doubtful resulting in the creation of a specific allowance for loan loss charge equal to the full amount of the expected loss plus any enforcement/recovery expenses.
Recoveries resulting from proceeds received from accounts which were written off in prior years are transferred back to the General allowance for loan loss.
Quantification of Sensitivity
The recognition of losses has an impact on the size of the General allowance for loan loss rather than directly impacting profit. However, to the extent that the General allowance for loan loss is drawn down beyond a prudent amount it will be restored through a transfer from the current years earnings. The amount of net transfer from the General allowance for loan loss to the Specific allowance for loan loss, net of recoveries, during the year was $443 million (Sep 2003: $527 million; Sep 2002: $728 million).
c) Deferred acquisition costs, software assets and deferred income
Description and Significance
The Group recognizes assets and liabilities that represent:
Deferred acquisition costs direct costs from the acquisition of interest earning assets;
Software assets direct costs incurred in developing software systems; and
Deferred income liabilities representing income received in advance of services performed.
Deferred acquisition costs Initially, expenses related to the acquisition of interest earning assets are recognized as part of the cost of acquiring the asset and written-off as an adjustment to its yield over its expected life. For assets subject to prepayment, expected life is determined on the basis of the historical behaviour of the asset portfolio, taking into account prepayments. Commissions paid to third party mortgage brokers are an example of expenditure that is deferred and amortised over the expected average life of a mortgage of 4 years.
Software assets Costs incurred in acquiring and building software and computer systems are capitalized as fixed assets and expensed as depreciation over periods of between 3 and 5 years except for the branch front end applications where 7 years is used. The carrying value of these assets is subject to a recoverable amount test to determine their value to the Group. If it is determined that the value of the asset is less than its book value, the asset is written down to the recoverable amount. Costs incurred in planning or evaluating software proposals, or in maintaining systems after implementation, are not capitalized.
Deferred income Income received in advance of the Groups performance of services or in advance of having been earned, is initially recorded as a liability. Once the recognition criteria are met, it is then recognized as income.
Quantification of Sensitivity
Deferred acquisition costs At September 30, 2004, the Groups assets included $465 million (Sep 2003: $360 million) in relation to costs incurred in acquiring interest earning assets. During the year, amortisation of $218 million (Sep 2003: $178 million) was recognized as an adjustment to the yield earned on interest earning assets.
Software assets At September 30, 2004, the Groups fixed assets included $430 million (Sep 2003: $465 million) in relation to costs incurred in acquiring and developing software. During the year, depreciation expense of $129 million (Sep 2003: $83 million) was recognized. Following prior periods of above average project activity which replaced significant parts of the Groups core infrastructure, the software depreciation expense is expected to stabilize going forward. Consistent with US accounting rules on software capitalization, only costs incurred during configuration, coding and installation stages are capitalized. Administrative, preliminary project and post implementation costs including determining performance requirements, vendor selection and training costs are expensed as incurred.
92
Deferred income At September 30, 2004, the Groups liabilities included $149 million (Sep 2003: $280 million) in relation to income received in advance. This income is largely comprised of two components: (1) fees received for services not yet completed; and (2) profit made on interest rate swaps from a shortening investment term of capital. Under Australian Accounting Standards, this profit is deferred and recognized when the hedged transaction occurs, or immediately if the hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur.
The balances of deferred assets and liabilities at September 30, were:
|
|
Deferred Acquisition Costs |
|
Software Assets |
|
Deferred Income |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Personal |
|
145 |
|
109 |
|
296 |
|
322 |
|
31 |
|
17 |
|
Institutional |
|
10 |
|
9 |
|
43 |
|
50 |
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
New Zealand Business |
|
36 |
|
15 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
Corporate Australia |
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
14 |
|
12 |
|
7 |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
250 |
|
227 |
|
8 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Group Center |
|
22 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
56 |
|
90 |
|
249 |
|
Total |
|
465 |
|
360 |
|
430 |
|
465 |
|
149 |
|
280 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs analysis
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Brokerage |
|
Brokerage |
|
Balance (2) |
|
Brokerage |
|
Brokerage |
|
Balance (2) |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Personal |
|
64 |
|
89 |
|
145 |
|
41 |
|
70 |
|
109 |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
147 |
|
177 |
|
250 |
|
133 |
|
175 |
|
227 |
|
New Zealand Business |
|
7 |
|
11 |
|
36 |
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
15 |
|
Institutional |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
10 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
9 |
|
Other (3) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
24 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Total |
|
218 |
|
277 |
|
465 |
|
178 |
|
253 |
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Brokerage paid includes brokerage trailer commissions that are not capitalized relating to the acquisition of mortgages assets.
(2) Includes capitalized debt raising expenses.
(3) Includes Group Center and Corporate Australia.
d) Derivatives and Hedging
Description and Significance
The Group buys and sells derivatives as part of its trading operations and to hedge its interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and equity risks (in ING Australia). The derivative instruments used to hedge the Groups exposures include:
swaps;
forward rate agreements;
futures;
options; and
combinations of the above instruments.
The Group classifies derivatives into two types according to the purpose they are entered into: trading or hedging.
Income and loss relating to trading derivatives is reported in the statement of financial performance as trading income. The fair value of trading derivatives is recorded on a gross basis as other assets or other liabilities as appropriate unless there is a legal right of set off. The fair value of a derivative financial instrument is the net present value of future expected cash flows arising from that instrument.
93
In order to be classified as a hedging derivative the hedging relationship must be expected to be effective. Hedging derivatives are accounted for in the same manner as the underlying asset or liability they are hedging. For example, if the hedged instrument is accounted for using the accrual method, the hedging instrument will also be accounted for using the accrual method.
Accounting treatment Derivative instruments entered into for the purpose of hedging are accounted for on the same basis as the underlying exposures or risks.
Derivative instruments entered into to hedge exposures that are not recorded at fair value, do not have their fair values recorded in the Groups Statement of Financial Position.
Exposures hedged by derivatives not recorded at their fair value include risks related to:
revenues from and capital invested into foreign operations;
structured lending transactions;
lending assets; and
funding liabilities.
Hedge accounting is only applied when the hedging relationship is identified at the time the Group enters into the hedging derivative transaction. If a hedge ceases to be effective, the hedging derivative transaction will be recognized at fair value. Gains and losses on derivative instruments not carried at their fair value amounts are recognized at the same time as the gain or loss on the hedged exposure is booked.
Movements in the value of foreign exchange contracts that are hedging overseas operations are not recognized as income or expenses. Instead these movements are recognized in the Foreign Currency Translation Reserve together with the net difference arising from the translation of the overseas operation.
Fair value determination Derivatives entered into as part of the Groups trading operations are carried at their fair values with any change in fair value being immediately recognized as part of trading income. Where liquid markets exist, fair value is based on quoted market prices. For certain complex or illiquid derivative instruments, it may be necessary to use projections, estimates and models to determine fair value.
e) Special purpose and off balance sheet vehicles
The Group may invest in or establish special purpose companies or vehicles (SPVs), to enable it to undertake specific types of transactions.
Where the Group controls such vehicles, they are consolidated into the Group financial results.
Certain SPVs may be set up by the Group to facilitate Group strategic aims, or to assist with structured transactions for clients. The accounting treatment of each SPV is assessed using existing Australian guidance, with reference also to International and US accounting standards where specific issues are yet to be addressed in Australia. The Group has established certain special purpose companies or vehicles controlled by the Group, which are consolidated into the Groups financial statements in order to facilitate transactions undertaken for Group purposes. These special purpose companies or vehicles have been established as part of the Groups funding activities, for example, the StEPS structure, and as part of lending activities undertaken in the normal course of business, where assets of the vehicles are recorded as part of the Groups Net Loans and Advances.
94
The table below summarizes the main types of SPVs that are not consolidated into the Group, the reason for their establishment, and the key risks associated with them.
Type of Special |
|
|
|
|
|
SPV Assets |
|
||||
Purpose Vehicle (SPV) |
|
Reason for establishment |
|
Key Risks |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Securitization vehicles |
|
Assets are transferred to an SPV which funds the purchase by issuing securities. |
|
ANZ may manage securitization vehicles, service assets in a vehicle or provide liquidity or other support and retains the risks associated with the provision of these services. Credit and market risks associated with the underlying assets are not retained or assumed by ANZ except to the limited extent that ANZ provides arms length services and facilities. |
|
13,013 |
|
9,954 |
|
6,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enables ANZ or customers to increase diversity of funding sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount disclosed here is the total assets of SPVs managed or arranged by ANZ. It includes SPVs that purchase assets from sellers other than ANZ. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured finance entities |
|
These entities are set up to assist with the structuring of client financing. |
|
ANZ may retain liquidity risk, if it provides liquidity support to the vehicle. ANZ may also manage these vehicles. |
|
1,993 |
|
2,124 |
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed funds |
|
These funds invest in specified investments on behalf of clients. |
|
The ANZ/ING Australia joint venture and ANZ National Bank Limited, as managers of the funds, expose ANZ to operational and reputational risk. |
|
32,174 |
|
28,655 |
|
26,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Securitization vehicle assets that were
managed or arranged by ANZ that related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sold by ANZ |
|
2,316 |
|
1,311 |
|
1,874 |
|
||||
Sellers other than ANZ |
|
10,697 |
|
8,643 |
|
5,118 |
|
||||
|
|
13,013 |
|
9,954 |
|
6,992 |
|
||||
Securitization vehicle assets that were
managed or arranged by ANZ that related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sold by ANZ during the year |
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sold by ANZ in previous years |
|
933 |
|
1,311 |
|
1,874 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Balances represent total assets as at year end.
For details of amounts of cash flows arising from assets securitized by ANZ, refer to Note 39 of the Financial Report.
The following interests are retained by ANZ in relation to the SPVs
Securitization vehicles: credit and market risks associated with the underlying assets within securitization vehicles are not retained or assumed by ANZ, except to the limited extent that ANZ provides arms length services, for example, credit enhancement or hedging facility.
Structured finance entities: liquidity risk is retained
Managed funds: As a manager of funds, ANZ is exposed to operational and reputational risk.
95
Details of facilities provided by ANZ to the securitization vehicles are provided in the table below. These facilities are consolidated into the Groups financial results. ANZ earns fees at a commercial rate for providing these facilities.
Type of facility |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Liquidity facility |
|
4,070 |
|
3,760 |
|
3,161 |
|
Settlement limits |
|
1,527 |
|
90 |
|
90 |
|
Hedging facilities |
|
996 |
|
451 |
|
994 |
|
Loans and securities (1) |
|
654 |
|
436 |
|
262 |
|
Credit enhancement facilities |
|
197 |
|
196 |
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Facilities provided by ANZ to the SPV which are not classified as credit enhancement facilities.
ANZ is also entitled to receive residual income in SPVs that relate to assets that ANZ has sold.
The transfer of financial assets to SPVs has been, and will continue to be treated as a sale where the following conditions are met:
a) the transferred assets have been isolated from ANZ and are beyond its reach in receivership. In other words, the assets are transferred to a bankruptcy remote SPV;
b) the holder of the financial assets has the right to pledge or exchange the assets; and
c) ANZ does not maintain effective control through redemption rights prior to maturity or the unilateral right to require the SPV to return specific assets.
When these conditions are met, the assets are removed from ANZs balance sheet, as they no longer meet the definition of assets under Australian GAAP.
In accordance with current Australian accounting standards and the interpretation thereof, ANZ did not control these vehicles and consolidation was not required for the following reasons:
the activities of the SPVs are not being conducted on behalf of ANZ according to its specific business needs so that ANZ obtains benefits from the SPVs operations;
ANZ does not have decision making powers to obtain the majority of the benefits of the activities of the SPV or by setting up an autopilot mechanism, the entity has delegated these decision making powers;
ANZ does not have rights to obtain the majority of the benefits of the SPV, nor is it exposed to risks incident to the activities of the SPV; or
ANZ does not retain the majority of the residual or ownership risks related to the SPV or its assets in order to obtain benefits from its activities.
f) Valuation of investment in ING Australia
Description and significance
The Group adopts the equity method of accounting for its 49% interest in ING Australia. As of September 30, 2004 the Groups carrying value is $1,697 million (Sep 2003: $1,648 million).
The carrying value is subject to a recoverable amount test, to ensure that this does not exceed its recoverable amount at the reporting date. This involved the Group obtaining an independent valuation for March 31, 2004 reporting purposes to determine current recoverable amount, with a review of whether there are any indicators that the carrying value may be greater than recoverable amount for September 30, 2004 reporting purposes. Where there is the existence of impairment indicators, a further independent valuation is sourced to determine current recoverable amount.
Any excess of carrying value above recoverable amount is written off to the Statement of Financial Performance.
Quantification of sensitivity
During the year the Group engaged Ernst and Young ABC Limited (EY ABC) to provide an independent valuation of ING Australia for March 31, 2004, assessment purposes. The valuation was a stand alone market based assessment of economic value, and excluded the Groups specific synergies and hedging arrangements. The independent valuation was based on a discounted cashflow approach, with allowance for the cost of capital. EY ABC presented an independent valuation range of $3,507 million to $3,793 million, reflecting a range of sales and cost base assumptions. Based on this review, ANZ believed that no change was required to the carrying value of the investment as at March 31, 2004.
96
A review for September 30, 2004 reporting purposes revealed there were no indicators of impairment and a further independent review was not required. As at September 30, 2004, ANZ believed no change was required to the carrying value of ANZs investment in ING Australia.
g) Valuation of goodwill in ANZ National Bank Ltd
Description and significance
Goodwill arising from the NBNZ acquisition is systematically amortized by way of a charge to the statement of financial performance over the period of time during which the benefits of the acquisition are expected to arise, such period of benefit not exceeding 20 years.
The unamortized balance of goodwill is reviewed at each balance date and is written down to the extent that it is no longer supported by probable future benefits.
The Group engaged Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Australia Limited to provide an independent valuation prior to the amalgamation of NBNZ and ANZ Banking Group New Zealand Ltd (ANZ New Zealand) in June 2004. The valuation ascribed separate values to NBNZ Life Insurance Limited, the structured finance business and the core banking operations of NBNZ. The valuation excluded the value of synergies ANZ expects to extract from the integration of the banking operations of ANZ New Zealand and NBNZ.
The core banking operations were valued using a capitalization of earnings methodology. Based on the results of this valuation, it is considered that there is no indication of impairment as at September 30, 2004.
Vision and Strategy
ANZ recognizes the importance of effective risk management to its business success. Management is committed to achieving strong risk control, resulting in no surprises and a distinctive risk management capability that enables ANZ business units to meet their performance, growth and breakout objectives.
ANZ approaches risk management on a holistic basis, managing the various elements of the system as a whole rather than viewing them as independent and unrelated parts. The risk function is independent of the business with clear delegations from the Board and operates within a comprehensive framework comprising:
The Board, providing leadership, setting risk appetite/strategy and monitoring progress.
A strong framework for development and maintenance of Group-wide risk management policies, procedures and systems, overseen by an independent team of risk professionals.
The use of sophisticated risk tools, applications and processes to execute our global risk management strategy across the Group.
Business Unit level accountability, as the first line of defence, and for the management of risks in alignment with the Groups strategy.
Independent oversight at Group-level to ensure Business Unit compliance with policies, regulations and laws, and to provide regular risk evaluation and reporting.
ANZ recognizes that effective risk management is based upon having an appropriate risk culture embedded in the organization. In recent years, significant effort has been invested in actively promoting a prudent and responsible culture of risk management.
The various risks inherent in the operations of the Group may be broadly grouped together under the following major categories:
Credit Risk (48% of Economic Capital excluding goodwill)
Group Risk Managements responsibilities for credit risk policy and management are principally executed through dedicated departments, which support the Groups wholesale and consumer business units.
All major credit decisions (and automated decision processes) for the Groups wholesale and consumer businesses require dual approval by both Group Risk Management and Business Unit-based personnel.
97
Market Risk (14% of Economic Capital excluding goodwill)
Market risk is the risk to earnings arising from changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or from fluctuations in bond, commodity or equity prices. It also includes the risk that the Group will incur increased interest expense arising from funding requirements during periods of poor market liquidity (balance sheet or non-traded market risk).
The market risk framework is discussed in more details at Item 11: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Operational Risk (20% of Economic Capital excluding goodwill)
Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.
Group Risk Management is responsible for establishing Group policy; for the measurement, monitoring and reporting of operational risk across the Group; for providing leadership in the overall development of ANZs operational risk capability and specialists in key risk areas.
Each business unit has its own operational risk function responsible for the management of operational risk in the business.
Other (18% of Economic Capital excluding goodwill)
There are a number of other risks, which are not classified as Market, Credit or Operational Risk that ANZ holds economic capital for. These include, but are not limited to, items such as investment risk and fixed asset risk.
Key Risk Enhancements
Credit Derivatives
Credit derivatives are used for Portfolio Management and for trading purposes. Credit derivative activity over the year has been modest, with close ongoing monitoring by the Market Risk team.
Credit derivatives for Portfolio Management purposes are used as an efficient mechanism for reducing large exposures and diversifying the risk in lending portfolios. A comprehensive policy framework of strong controls exists around this activity, including restricting the sale of credit derivatives (undertaken to reshape the portfolio mix) to Australian and New Zealand names that meet investment grade and other specific criteria.
Credit Default Swap (CDS) positions in the year ended September 30, 2004
AUD millions |
|
Bought |
|
Sold |
|
Net |
|
Portfolio Management |
|
332 |
|
(542 |
) |
(210 |
) |
Matched Trades |
|
3,068 |
|
(3,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outright Positions |
|
1,561 |
|
(1,078 |
) |
483 |
|
Trading Book |
|
4,629 |
|
(4,146 |
) |
483 |
|
Total CDS |
|
4,961 |
|
(4,688 |
) |
273 |
|
Credit derivatives in the trading book are used to support customer activity with trades typically matched off into the market place within a period of 90 days. This trading is subject to the usual market risk controls such as VaR limits, term limitations, asset quality requirements, and daily revaluation of all positions independently overseen by Group Market Risk.
In addition to direct use of credit derivatives for Portfolio Management and Trading Book purposes, as reflected in the above table, ANZ holds investments in three structured transactions. Each of these investments are excluded from the table above and is in the amount of USD250 million, where ANZ has indirect exposure to a sold First-to-Default basket of credit derivatives in the amount of USD500 million, with a first-loss limit of USD250 million. The underlying exposures are to a highly diversified group of 67 names, with no individual aggregate exposure in excess of USD60 million. As with credit derivative activity associated with Portfolio Management and the Trading Book, these exposures are independently monitored by Group Market Risk, with key trigger points established to proactively manage the risk. To date, credit protection totalling USD93 million has been purchased as a hedge against 5 of the underlying names and is included in the table above.
98
Operational Risk Management Framework
ANZs operational risk framework continues to be strengthened in line with new and emerging risks, including ongoing development of the Groups methodology for operational risk measurement and capital allocation. ANZ uses operational risk scorecards to increase risk awareness, measure operational risk and directly link capital to the operational risk of each Business Unit, thereby providing Business Unit Managers with strong and clear incentives to better manage operational risk. The scorecard process is undertaken half-yearly.
Operational risk scorecards are the mechanism adopted for ANZ operational risk measurement within this framework specifically to:
Link capital directly to the operational risk of each ANZ Business Unit, and
Provide Business Unit Managers strong and clear incentives to reduce operational risk.
The scorecard process is undertaken half-yearly. The results of the scorecard process play an important role in assisting ANZ Business Units in the management of operational risk.
Business Continuity and Crisis Management
ANZs business continuity and crisis management capabilities continue to be reviewed, tested and, where necessary, strengthened in response to new and emerging threats. The continuous monitoring of country security risks has been improved by implementing a country security risk rating framework, which assists ANZs response to changing risks in the international business environment and ongoing protection of the Groups staff and operations.
Technology and Projects
A specialist technology risk function has been established to enhance the approach to technology risk management and to provide additional focus on large and high-risk technology projects. Governance and reporting has also been strengthened with executive oversight and monitoring performed by the Project Initiative Review Committee.
99
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Item 6: Directors, Senior Management/Executives and Employees
Our business is managed by the directors, who may exercise all powers not required to be exercised at a general meeting of shareholders. On the date hereof the directors of ANZ are:
Directors Name |
|
Position held |
|
Year appointed |
|
Age |
|
C B Goode, AC |
|
Director/Chairman of Directors (1) |
|
1991 |
|
66 |
|
J C Dahlsen |
|
Director |
|
1985 |
|
69 |
|
R S Deane |
|
Director |
|
1994 |
|
63 |
|
J K Ellis |
|
Director |
|
1995 |
|
67 |
|
M A Jackson, AC |
|
Director |
|
1994 |
|
51 |
|
J McFarlane, OBE |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
1997 |
|
57 |
|
B W Scott, AO |
|
Director |
|
1985 |
|
69 |
|
D M Gonski, AO |
|
Director |
|
2002 |
|
51 |
|
G J Clark |
|
Director |
|
2004 |
|
61 |
|
D E Meiklejohn |
|
Director |
|
2004 |
|
62 |
|
J P Morschel |
|
Director |
|
2004 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The Chairman is an ex officio member of all Board committees.
Directors profiles
Mr C B Goode, AC
B Com (Hons) (Melb), MBA (Columbia University, New York), Hon LLD (Melb), Hon LLD (Monash)
Chairman
Independent Non-Executive Director
Non-executive director since July 1991. Mr Goode was appointed Chairman in August 1995 and is ex-Officio member of all Board Committees.
Experience and expertise: Mr Goode has 29 years of experience in the finance industry and has been a professional non-executive director since 1989.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Woodside Petroleum Ltd (Director from 1988), Australian United Investment Company Ltd (Director from 1990), Diversified United Investment Ltd (Director from 1991) and The Ian Potter Foundation (Director from 1997). Director: Singapore Airlines Limited (from 1999) and the Howard Florey Institute of Experimental Physiology and Medicine (from 1987).
Mr J C Dahlsen
LLB, MBA
Independent Non-Executive Director
Chairman of the Audit Committee
Non-executive director since May 1985. Mr Dahlsen is a member of the Nominations & Corporate Governance Committee.
Experience and expertise: Mr Dahlsen has had an extensive legal career and experience in the media, not-for-profit, business education, banking, retail and small business sectors.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Southern Cross Broadcasting (Australia) Ltd (Director from 1985). Director: The Smith Family (from 1995), J C Dahlsen Pty Ltd Group (from 1973) and the Warehouse Group Ltd of New Zealand (from 2001).
Former Directorships: Chairman: Woolworths Ltd (1992 - 2001). Partner: Corrs Chambers Westgarth (1963 - 1987 and 1989 - 1993). Consultant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth (1987 - 1989 and 1993 - 2002). Director: Melbourne Business School Ltd (1989 -2000) and MPI Mines Ltd (1992 - 2002).
100
Dr R S Deane
PhD, B Com (Hons), FCA, FCIS, FNZIM
Independent Non-Executive Director
Chairman of ANZ National Bank Limited
Non-executive director since September 1994. Dr Deane is a member of the Risk Management and Compensation Committees.
Experience and expertise: Dr Deane has skills and experience in a variety of sectors including the government, banking and finance, economics, telecommunications, and with charitable and cultural organisations.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Limited (Director from 1992, CEO 1992 to 1999), Fletcher Building Limited (from 2001), Te Papa Tongarewa (Museum of New Zealand) (from 2000), and New Zealand Seed Fund (from 2000). Director: Woolworths Limited (from 2000).
Former Directorships: Director: TransAlta Corporation (Canada) (2000 - 2003) and Fletcher Challenge Limited (1994 -2001). Deputy Governor: Reserve Bank of New Zealand (1982 - 1986). Alternate Executive Director: International Monetary Fund (1974 - 1976).
Mr J K Ellis
MA (Oxon), FAICD, Hon FIE Aust, FAusIMM, FTSE, Hon Dr Eng (CQU)
Independent Non-Executive Director
Chairman of the Risk Management Committee
Non-executive director since October 1995. Mr Ellis is a member of the Audit Committee.
Experience and expertise: A trained engineer, Mr Ellis business experience includes working across a range of operational issues, investments and acquisitions in natural resources, manufacturing, biotechnology and education.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Pacifica Group Ltd (Director from 1999), National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (Director from 2003) and Australia- Japan Foundation (from 1999). Chancellor: Monash University (from 1999). Director: GroPep Ltd (from 1999).
Former Directorships: Chairman: BHP Ltd (1997 - 1999), Black Range Minerals Ltd (Director 2000 - January 2004) and Sandvik Australia Pty Ltd (1994 - 2002). Director: Aurora Gold Ltd (1999 - 2001).
Ms M A Jackson, AC
B Ec, MBA, Hon LLD, FAICD, FCA
Independent Non-Executive Director
Chairman of the Compensation Committee
Non-executive director since March 1994. Ms Jackson is a member of the Audit Committee.
Experience and expertise: A Chartered Accountant, with financial expertise, Ms Jacksons experience includes her involvement in transportation, mining, the media, manufacturing and insurance as well as in health and education.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Qantas Airways Limited (Director from 1992). Deputy Chairman: Southcorp Limited (August 2004). Director: Billabong International Limited (from 2000).
Former Directorships: Partner: Consulting Division of KPMG Peat Marwick (March 5, 1991 - June 30, 1992). Director: BHP Ltd (1994 - 2000), Pacific Dunlop (1992 - 2000) and John Fairfax Holdings Limited (2003 - August 2004).
101
Mr J McFarlane, OBE
MA, MBA
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer since October 1997. Mr McFarlane is also a Director of ANZ National Bank Limited.
Experience and expertise: Mr McFarlane has over 30 years of banking experience. Mr McFarlane is a former Group Executive Director, Standard Chartered Plc, Head of Citibank, United Kingdom and Managing Director, Citicorp Investment Bank Ltd.
Current Directorships: Chairman: The Australian Bankers Association (from October 1997). Director: The Financial Markets Foundation for Children (from 1999). President: The International Monetary Conference (June 2004). Member: The Australian Business Arts Foundation (from 2000) and Asia Business Council (from 2004).
Former Directorships: Director: Business Council of Australia (1999 - October 2003) and Australian Graduate School of Management Ltd (1999 - December 2003). Non-Executive Director of the London Stock Exchange (1989 - 1991), The Auditing Practices Board (1991-1997), The Securities Association (1989 - 1990), Capital Radio Plc (1995 - 1998) and the Cranfield School of Management (1992 - 1996).
Dr B W Scott, AO
B Ec, MBA, DBA
Independent Non-Executive Director
Chairman of the Nominations & Corporate Governance Committee
Non-executive director since August 1985. Dr Scott is also a member of the Compensation Committee and represents the Group as a Director of Metrobank Card Corporation Inc.
Experience and expertise: A management consultant and company director, Dr Scott has skills and experience across a range of business sectors and community organizations.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Management Frontiers Pty Ltd (Director from 1985), The Foundation for Development Cooperation Ltd (Director from 1990) and The James N. Kirby Foundation Ltd (Director from 1981). Director: Air Liquide Australia Ltd (from 1985). Australian member: The Board of Governors of the Asian Institute of Management (from 1990).
Mr D M Gonski, AO
B Com, LLB, SIA (Aff), FAICD, FCPA
Independent Non-Executive Director
Non-executive director since February 2002. Mr Gonski is a member of the Nominations & Corporate Governance Committee and the Risk Management Committee. He represents the Group as a Director of ING Australia Limited.
Experience and expertise: Mr Gonski, a lawyer, has experience in business, the law and investment banking as well as in the community through his work in the arts and the not-for profit sector.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Coca Cola Amatil Limited (Director from 1999), and the Investec Group in Australia (including Investec Wentworth Pty Limited) (Director from 2001). Director: The Westfield Group Ltd (Director of Westfield Holdings Limited from 1985) and John Fairfax Holdings Limited (from 1993).
Former Directorships: Chairman: Morgan Stanley Australia Limited (1999 - 2002) and Hoyts Cinemas Limited (1995 - 1999). Partner: Freehill Hollingdale & Page (1979 - 1986).
102
Dr G J Clark
PhD, BSc (Hons)
Independent Non-Executive Director
Non-executive director since February 2004. Dr Clark is a member of the Nominations & Corporate Governance Committee.
Experience and expertise: Dr Clark is Principal of Clark Capital Partners, a US based firm that advises internationally on technology and the technology market place. Previously he held senior executive positions in IBM, News Corporation and Loral Space and Communications. His experience includes international business experience and a career in microelectronics, computing and communications.
Current Directorships: Director: James Hardie Industries NV (from 2002).
Former Directorships: Director: Digex (2000 -2002).
Mr D E Meiklejohn
B Com, Dip Ed, FCPA, FAICD, FAIM
Independent Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director since October 2004. Mr Meiklejohn is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominations & Corporate Governance Committee.
Experience and expertise: A Fellow of CPA Australia, Mr Meiklejohns background is in finance and accounting. He also has experience as a director of major Australian companies spanning a range of industries. He was Chief Financial Officer for Amcor Limited from 1981 to 2000.
Current Directorships: Chairman: PaperlinX Limited and SPC Ardmona Limited. Director: OneSteel Limited and WMC Resources Limited.
Former Directorships: Chairman: Kimberly-Clark Australia Limited. Deputy Chairman: GasNet Australia Limited. Director: Amcor Limited, Colonial Limited, Spicers Paper Limited and Treasury Corporation of Victoria.
Mr J P Morschel
Dip QS, FAIM
Independent Non-Executive Company Director
Non-Executive Director since October 2004. Mr Morschel is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Risk Management Committee.
Experience and expertise: Mr Morschels background includes banking and financial services as well as experience as a director of major Australian and international companies. From 1988 to 1995, he was Managing Director for Lend Lease Corporation. Between 1993 and 2001, Mr Morshel was a Director of Westpac Banking Corporation, including two years as Executive Director where his responsibilities included retail banking and wealth management.
Current Directorships: Chairman: Rinker Group Limited. Director: Rio Tinto plc, Rio Tinto Limited, Singapore Telecommunications Limited and Tenix Pty Limited. Former Chairman: Leighton Holdings Limited, CSR Limited and Comalco Limited.
Former Directorships: Director: Cable & Wireless Optus Limited and Westpac Banking Corporation.
103
Senior Management and Executives
At the date of the 20-F executive officers and senior management of ANZ were:
Executive Officers |
|
Position held |
|
Year
appointed |
|
Year joined |
|
J McFarlane |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
1997 |
|
1997 |
|
|
|
31 years in the Banking and Financial Services Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
J Anderson |
|
Chief Executive and Director ANZ National Bank Limited, New Zealand |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Over 30 years experience in the Finance Services Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
R J Edgar |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
2003 |
|
1984 |
|
|
|
27 years experience in Finance Services Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
S A Freeman |
|
Group General Manager, People Capital |
|
2001 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
26 years experience in Human Resources, including Industrial Relations |
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper |
|
Group Managing Director, Asia Pacific |
|
2004 |
|
1995 |
|
|
|
9 years experience in Financial Services, covering Risk Management, International and Retail Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
M A Grime |
|
Managing Director, Operations, Technology and Shared Services |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
23 years experience in senior Operations and Technology roles |
|
|
|
|
|
B C Hartzer |
|
Group Managing Director, Personal Division |
|
2004 |
|
1999 |
|
|
|
11 years experience in Strategic Consulting to the Financial Services industry and 4 years managing a global credit card business |
|
|
|
|
|
P J O Hawkins |
|
Group Managing Director, Group Strategic Development |
|
2002 |
|
1971 |
|
|
|
Over 30 years experience in International and Commercial Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
G K Hodges |
|
Group Managing Director, Corporate |
|
2002 |
|
1991 |
|
|
|
27 years experience across Corporate Banking and Government |
|
|
|
|
|
P Hodgson |
|
Chief Risk Officer (from December 1, 2004) |
|
2004 |
|
1997 |
|
|
|
Over 20 years experience in the Corporate and Investment Banking Sectors |
|
|
|
|
|
K M Lawrence |
|
Chief Risk Officer (until November 30, 2004) |
|
2002 |
|
1999 |
|
|
|
17 years Senior Management experience in Risk Management in the Financial Services and Banking Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
T LEstrange |
|
Group General Counsel |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
Over 20 years legal and management experience spanning a range of industry sectors |
|
|
|
|
|
P R Marriott |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
1997 |
|
1993 |
|
|
|
25 years experience in International Banking, Finance and Auditing |
|
|
|
|
|
R G Moore |
|
Group General Manager, Internal Audit |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
30 years experience in Audit and Risk Management consulting to the Investment Services Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
J W Priestley |
|
Company Secretary |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Over 20 years legal, company secretarial and management experience |
|
|
|
|
|
E M Proust |
|
Managing Director, Esanda |
|
2002 |
|
1998 |
|
|
|
Over 15 years Senior Management experience in major public and private sector organizations, and Finance Services Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
S C Targett |
|
Group Managing Director, Institutional Financial Services |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
15 years experience in the Financial Markets world-wide |
|
|
|
|
|
There are no family relationships between or among any of the directors or executive officers.
104
Section A Remuneration Tables
Refer to pages 6 to 9 of the Financial Report
Section B Non-Executive Directors Remuneration
Refer to page 10 of the Financial Report
Section C Remuneration Structure
Refer to pages 11 to 14 of the Financial Report
Section D Chief Executive Officers Remuneration
Refer to pages 15 and 16 of the Financial Report
Section E Specified Executives Contract Terms
Refer to pages 17 to 19 of the Financial Report
Section F Equity Instrument Relating to Directors and Specified Executives
Refer to pages 20 to 23 of the Financial Report
105
ANZs shareholders depend on the Companys Board for strategic guidance and oversight of the Company. The Board recognizes its overriding responsibility to act honestly, fairly, diligently and progressively, in accordance with the law, in serving the interests of ANZs shareholders, as well as its employees, customers, and the community at large.
Corporate governance is an important focus for the Board. Good corporate governance meets ethical and stewardship responsibilities, and gives ANZ a strong commercial advantage. It is receiving close scrutiny, and for the past two years, the Board has had a Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee to ensure such issues are fully addressed.
ANZ shares and related securities are listed on the Australian (ASX), the New Zealand (NZX) and the New York (NYSE) Stock Exchanges. ANZ must comply with a range of requirements including listing requirements in Australia and New Zealand as well as overseas requirements such as the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and the New York Stock Exchange listed company requirements. In addition, ANZ strives to achieve best practice by taking into account the principles and guidelines set out by the ASX Corporate Governance Council, the New Zealand Securities Commission and the Combined Code of the United Kingdom.
In general, the Board resolves:
To embrace principles considered to be best practice across the jurisdictions; and
To be an early adopter where possible by complying before a published law or recommendation takes effect.
Consequently, the Board continually monitors governance developments to align ANZs practices with best practice standards.
During the year, the Board worked closely with management to review and update ANZ policies and procedures in light of recent changes to regulations, legislation and guidelines across relevant jurisdictions (see below).
Key corporate governance issues addressed by the Board include:
International
International Financial Reporting Standards - (IFRS) - ANZ has a formal program to ensure that the Company is prepared to report, in compliance with Australian equivalents to IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, when its results for the half-year ended March 31, 2006 are announced. The program is on track to achieve this schedule.
Basel II - For ANZ, the new Basel Accord is scheduled to commence in 2006 for two years of parallel running with the current capital Accord, prior to full implementation in January 2008. ANZ has established a program to ensure the Company achieves accreditation at the advanced levels for both credit and operational risk under Basel II. The program is on schedule with a number of Basel II requirements already in place.
Australia
ASX Corporate Governance Council -Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations - ANZ considers these principles important and complies with the recommendations.
The Corporations Law Economic Reform Program (Audit Reform and Corporate Disclosure) Act 2004 - CLERP 9 Act - The legislation was passed by Parliament on June 25, 2004. While compliance with the majority of the changes made by the Act is not required until ANZ reports for the 2005 financial year, the Company has chosen to be an early adopter of most of the new requirements.
New Zealand
NZX Corporate Governance Rules and Principles - The NZX has introduced a Corporate Governance Best Practice Code. As an overseas listed issuer on the NZX, ANZ is deemed to comply with the NZX Listing Rules provided that it remains listed on the ASX.
106
Other Jurisdictions
United States of America - As a foreign private issuer registered with the SEC with securities listed on the NYSE, ANZ is required to comply with certain corporate governance requirements contained in US securities laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable NYSE Listing Standards. Under the NYSE Listing Standards, ANZ is required to provide a brief description of the significant differences between its corporate governance practices and corporate governance requirements for US listed companies under the NYSE listing rules in this Form 20-F. For further information on the significant differences between ANZs corporate governance practices and the NYSE listing rules for US listed companies, please see page 118 of this Form 20-F.
United Kingdom - ANZ monitors developments in the UK Combined Code through changes made by the Higgs Report and the Smith Report. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee has considered the changes made to the Combined Code, and the extent to which they represent developing trends in international corporate governance.
Corporate Governance Recognition
Governance Metrics International (GMI) Global Rating Report
In August 2004, ANZ participated in a review by GMI of corporate governance and disclosure practices of the top 2,600 companies worldwide. ANZ received an overall global rating of 9 out of 10 and was in the top 7% of companies surveyed. In addition, ANZ received recognition for its:
Board accountability
Shareholder rights
Remuneration
Market for control and ownership base
Corporate behavior
Horwath Corporate Governance Report The Horwath Report ranked ANZ equal second for its corporate governance practices among the top 250 Australian companies in September 2004. ANZ received an overall 5 out of 5 star rating, meaning that the Companys corporate governance structures met all Australian best practice standards.
Fostering Ethical Decision Making
The Board encourages management to promote and maintain a culture within ANZ which draws upon a set of unifying values to guide the actions and decisions of the Board and all employees.
More than 18,000 ANZ employees have participated in the Breakout culture development program. The program includes workshops to help staff to apply values-based decision making, balancing the competing needs of staff, shareholders, customers and the community in their roles and activities.
ANZ has three main codes of conduct which also guide everyday business practice and decision making throughout the Group.
ANZ Directors Code of Conduct sets ethical standards for the directors. They are expected to pursue the highest standards of ethical conduct in the interests of shareholders and all other stakeholders.
ANZ (Employee) Code of Conduct sets ethical standards for ANZ staff to embrace and advocate. It establishes an environment in which ANZ staff can excel, regardless of race, religion, age, ability or gender.
ANZ Code of Conduct for Financial Officers (adopted from G100 Code of Conduct for Chief Financial Officers) provides a practical guide for the CFO and financial staff in their everyday dealings as to the standards of ethical behavior expected in the performance of their duties in addition to the ANZ Employee Code of Conduct.
Creating a Sustainable Contribution to Society
Through ANZs values, the Company places a high emphasis on creating long-term business success, while at the same time, making a sustainable contribution to the community.
107
Demonstrating ANZs Commitment to Shareholder Communication
Shareholders are the owners of ANZ, and the Companys stated aim is to perform and grow to create value for our shareholders.
In order to vote on decisions about ANZ, and to communicate views to the Company, shareholders need an understanding of the Companys business operations and performance.
ANZ encourages shareholders to take an active interest in the Company. It seeks to provide shareholders with quality information in a timely fashion generally through ANZs reporting of results, the Companys Annual Report, briefings, newsletters and via its dedicated shareholder site on anz.com.
ANZ strives for transparency in all its business practices. The Company recognizes the impact of quality disclosure on the trust and confidence of the shareholder, the wider market and the community.
Continuous Disclosure
It has long been ANZs practice to release all price sensitive information as required under the ASX listing rules in a timely manner:
to all relevant stock exchanges on which ANZs securities are listed; and
to the market and community generally through ANZs media releases, website and other appropriate channels.
ANZ-related releases are posted on relevant stock exchange websites and on ANZs website.
Through ANZs Market (Continuous) Disclosure Policy (see page 117), the Company demonstrates its commitment to continuous disclosure. The policy reflects relevant obligations under applicable stock exchange listing rules and legislation.
For reporting purposes, price sensitive information is information that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price or value of ANZs securities.
Designated Disclosure Officers have responsibility for reviewing proposed disclosures and making decisions in relation to what information can be or should be disclosed to the market. All ANZ staff are required to inform a Disclosure Officer regarding any potentially price-sensitive information concerning ANZ as soon as they become aware of it.
Upholding Shareholder Rights
ANZ upholds shareholder rights and provides shareholders with the opportunity to be involved in shareholder meetings.
To allow as many shareholders as possible to have an opportunity to attend a meeting, ANZ rotates shareholder meetings around regional capital cities. Webcast technology has been introduced which makes it possible to attend presentations - to listen to the speakers and simultaneously view presentations over the internet.
Prior to the annual general meeting, shareholders are encouraged to submit any questions they have for the Chairman or Chief Executive Officer to enable key common themes to be considered.
The external auditor is present at ANZ Annual General Meetings and available to answer shareholder questions. The auditor can respond on any business item that concerns them in their capacity as auditor.
Shareholders have the right to vote on various resolutions related to company matters. If shareholders are unable to attend a meeting they can submit their proxies via post or electronically through anz.com. Where votes are taken on a poll, ANZ appoints an independent party to verify the results, which are reported to the ASX and posted on anz.com.
During the year, ANZ presentations included:
Annual Results and Acquisition of NBNZ Announcement - October 24, 2003 - Melbourne, Australia and Auckland, New Zealand
Annual General Meeting - December 19, 2003 - Brisbane, Australia
New Zealand Briefing - March 11, 2004 - Auckland, New Zealand
Interim Results Announcement - April 27, 2004 - Sydney, Australia
Australian Personal Customer Division Market Briefing - September 8, 2004 - Melbourne, Australia
Annual Results Announcement - October 26, 2004 - Melbourne, Australia and Auckland, New Zealand
Annual General Meeting - December 17, 2004 - Melbourne, Australia
108
Board Responsibility and Delegation of Authority
The Board is responsible to shareholders for the governance of the Group, and oversees its operations and financial performance. To this end, it sets the strategic direction and financial objectives, and monitors operational performance. It also monitors compliance in terms of ethical and efficiency standards and regulatory requirements. The Board also appoints the Chief Executive Officer and regularly reviews his performance.
The ANZ Board is chaired by a non-executive independent director. Its structure provides for a division of responsibility between the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer. This is supported by the ANZ Board Charter available at (anz.com>about ANZ>corporate information> Board Charter) which states that the Chairman must be an independent non-executive director and that the majority of the Board must comprise independent non-executive directors.
The Board Charter clearly sets out the Boards purpose, powers, and specific responsibilities. The business of the Bank is managed under the direction of the Board. The Board delegates to the Chief Executive Officer and through him, to other senior management, the authority and responsibility for managing the everyday affairs of the company. The Board monitors management and performance on behalf of shareholders.
Role of Chairman
The Chairman plays an important leadership role with ANZ and is involved in:
chairing meetings of shareholders and Board meetings;
monitoring the performance of the Board and the mix of skills and effectiveness of individual contributions;
maintaining on-going dialogue with the Chief Executive Officer and appropriate mentoring and guidance;
overseeing Board review processes; and
on-going mentoring of individual directors.
Access to Directors
Management is able to consult with directors as required on a regular basis. Employees and shareholders have access to the directors either directly or through the Company Secretary.
Board Composition, Selection and Appointment
The Board strives to achieve a balance of skills, knowledge, experience and perspective among its directors. To ensure such a balance, the Board undertook a review of its nomination and selection process during the year.
Once a director is selected, there are several key elements relating to formalization of appointment including:
Adherence to Directors Code of Conduct - As presented earlier, this code sets out that directors will pursue the highest standards of ethical conduct.
Meeting shares qualification - ANZs Constitution provides that each director is required to hold, within 3 months of appointment, at least 2,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the directors own right and must continue to hold at least 2,000 shares until the director ceases to hold office.
Signing Directors Deed - The Deed covers a number of issues including indemnity, directors and officers liability insurance, the right to obtain independent advice and the requirements concerning confidential information.
Receipt of Director Handbook - Each director receives a hand book which outlines the directors principal obligations, Company policies, charters and processes as well as Board-specific procedures. It also sets out details of scheduled Board and Committee meetings.
Undertaking induction training - New directors take part in a formal induction program which ensures that directors meet with ANZ executives and other key staff members regarding ANZs governance framework, financial management and business operations.
109
Election at next annual general meeting The ANZ Constitution and the Corporations Act 2001 both permit the Board to appoint a person to be a director of ANZ at any time, but that person must seek election by shareholders at the next Annual General Meeting.
Tenure and Retirement
ANZs Constitution provides that at least one third (or the nearest whole number) of directors must retire at each annual general meeting, but are eligible for re-election at that meeting.
Where a director is due for retirement by rotation at the next Annual General Meeting, the following process is undertaken at the July meeting of the Board (or earlier) for determining whether the Board endorses the directors re-election -
Step 1 The director is required to submit a written or oral statement to the Board setting out reasons why he/she seeks re-election
Step 2 With the director absent from the room, the Board:-
Evaluates the directors re-election having regard for the statement provided and the performance criteria
Passes a resolution stating whether or not the Board supports the directors re-election having regard to the performance criteria
Step 3 Shareholders receive the Notice of Meeting for the upcoming Annual General Meeting which will:-
Provide the directors experience and related details
State the Boards resolution on whether or not the Board supports the directors re-election (an outcome of Step 2)
An appointee who is filling a casual vacancy has to stand for election at the first Annual General Meeting after their appointment. This requirement does not apply to the Chief Executive Officer, or any director retiring at that meeting in any event.
ANZs Constitution establishes a director shall retire at 70 years of age, unless the Board determines otherwise. Also, directors appointed since 1993 have agreed to retire after 15 years service.
Performance Evaluations
Performance evaluations are conducted internally and cover the Board, each non-executive director and Board Committees.
The framework used to assess the directors is based on the expectation they are performing their duties in a manner which should create and continue to build sustainable value for shareholders, and in accordance with the duties and obligations imposed upon them by the ANZ Constitution and the law.
The performance criteria takes into account each directors contribution to:-
the charting of direction, strategy and financial objectives for ANZ;
the monitoring of compliance with regulatory requirements and ethical standards;
the monitoring and assessing of management performance in achieving strategies and budgets approved by the Board;
the setting of criteria for, and evaluation of, the Chief Executive Officers performance; and
the regular and continuing review of executive succession planning and executive development activities.
Board and non-executive performance evaluations are conducted in two ways:
Annual review - On an annual basis, or more frequently if appropriate, the Chairman has a one-on-one meeting with each director specifically addressing the performance criteria. In addition, they discuss the effectiveness of the Board and related issues including the Boards oversight and contribution to the Company, Board discussion (including the performance of the non-executive directors and the Chairman), Board memberships, Committees, and other relevant issues. They also discuss the performance of the Board against its Charter. The Chairman provides a report to the Board on the outcome of these meetings.
Re-election statement - Directors when nominating for re-election are required to submit a written or oral statement to the Board setting out the reasons why they seek re-election. In the directors absence, the Board evaluates this statement (having regard to the performance criteria) when it considers whether to endorse the relevant directors re-election.
Each Board committee conducts a self-evaluation at least annually.
110
Independence and Materiality
Under its Charter, a majority of non-executive directors on the ANZ Board must satisfy ANZs criteria for independence. The Board Charter sets out independence parameters in order to establish whether a non-executive director may have a relationship with ANZ which could (or could be perceived to) impede their decision-making.
Directors are required to seek Board approval before accepting other Board appointments or appointments to charitable or other committees. In addition, directors are required to inform the Company of appointments or retirement from external organizations.
In the 2004 financial year, the Board reviewed its criteria for independence in respect of the requirements in the ASX Corporate Governance Councils Best Practice Recommendations, NZX and NYSE Corporate Governance Standards, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Board adopted standards for determining non-executive director independence both for members of the Board and the Audit Committee (some jurisdictions apply different tests for the assessment of Audit Committee independence). The criteria are more rigid than those set in most jurisdictions including criteria stipulated specifically for audit committees.
As set out in the Board Charter, a relationship with ANZ is material if a reasonable person in the position of a non-executive director of ANZ would expect there to be a real and sensible possibility that it would influence a directors mind in -
Making decisions on matters likely to come regularly before the Board or its committees;
Objectively assessing information and advice given by management;
Setting policy for general application across ANZ; and
Generally, carrying out the performance of his or her role as director.
At its September and December 2004 meetings, the Board considered each directors independence and in each case concluded that the independence criteria were met by all non-executive directors.
The independence criteria used by the Board in its determination of director independence included a review of relationships that directors and their immediate family members may have such as:
A relationship as an acquirer of services / and or products from ANZ and/ or its subsidiaries of the following kind:
Personal banking services or products
Business banking services or products
Sponsorship or donor funds
A relationship as a supplier of services and /or products to ANZ and / or its subsidiaries of the following kind:
Strategic services / products provider
Professional services provided as a partner or executive
Professional services provided as an employee
Direct compensation from ANZ (and / or its subsidiaries) of more than $100,000 (other than as directors fees)
A relationship as a previous employee or partner of ANZ and/or its subsidiaries
A relationship as a previous employee or partner of the external auditor
A relationship as an executive officer of another company where any of ANZs present executives serve on that companys compensation committee
A relationship with a substantial shareholder or officer of an organization that has a holding with 5% or more of the voting shares in ANZ
All other material relationships or circumstances by which a director could be perceived not to be independent of management and free from any business or other relationship that could interfere with their independence.
111
The Board examined acquirer relationships associated with each director in respect of the level of lending and whether ANZ is the sole lender, the credit rating and whether the account is in order. Due to privacy regulations, ANZ is unable to disclose details of acquirer relationships associated with each director. The Board concluded that there was no such situation which would impact on a directors independence.
The Board also examined supplier relationships associated with each director in respect of the value of the relationship to the supplier, the service or product provided and its value as well as other relevant information. It particularly noted several director associations as follows:
Roderick Deane is Chairman of Telecom New Zealand Ltd. ANZ acquires communication services from Telecom New Zealand for the Companys New Zealand operations.
David Gonski is a director of Westfield Holdings Ltd. ANZ leases properties from Westfield for its branch network in Australia.
Margaret Jackson is Chairman of Qantas Airways Limited. ANZ has commercial relationships with Qantas as a partner in the co-branded ANZ Frequent Flyer Visa Cards, as a lessor of airport terminal properties in Australia and New Zealand for ANZ automatic teller machines (ATMs), and as an acquirer of travel services for ANZ people.
In each case, the Board concluded that having regard to the nature and value of the commercial relationship and the materiality criteria described above, each of Roderick Deane, David Gonski and Margaret Jackson is independent.
It is Board policy that directors do not participate in any decisions regarding transactions with organisations which they are associated as acquirer or supplier. Directors biographies on pages 100 to 103 highlight their associations outside of ANZ.
In terms of length of service, the Board noted that there are three Board members with service over ten years. Notwithstanding Charles Goodes length of service, the Board members considered that his tenure does not interfere with his independence as a non-executive director or as Chairman. The Board concluded that the independence of John Dahlsen and Brian Scott is not compromised by their service of greater than ten years.
Conflict of Interest
Over and above the issue of independence, each director has a continuing responsibility to determine whether he or she has a potential or actual conflict of interest in relation to any material matter which comes before the Board. Such a situation may arise from external associations, interests or personal relationships which might affect, or be seen potentially to affect, the directors position to act in the best interest of ANZ.
Under the Directors Disclosure of Interest Policy and Policy for Handling Conflicts of Interest (see page 117), the director may not exercise any influence over the Board if a potential conflict of interest exists. The process set out is such that the director may not receive relevant Board papers, may not be present for Board deliberations on the subject, and may not vote on any related Board resolutions. These matters are recorded in the Board minutes when they occur.
Independent Advice
In order to assist directors to fulfil their responsibilities, each director has the right (with the prior approval of the Chairman) to seek independent professional advice regarding their responsibilities at the expense of the Group. In addition the Board and each Committee, at the expense of the Group, may obtain whatever professional advice it requires to assist in its work.
Continuing Education
ANZ directors take part in a range of training and continuing education programs. In addition to a formal induction program, directors receive regular business unit briefings at each Board meeting. These briefings provide directors with an insight into each area of the Company, in particular, performance, key issues and risks, and strategy for growth. Directors also participate in business unit site visits which provide them with the opportunity to meet with staff and customers.
Continuing education sessions are held throughout the year focusing on a range of topics including emerging economic issues, technical developments, pending legislation, accounting standards, taxation, risk management and corporate governance.
112
Board Committees
Each of the four main Committees is comprised solely of independent directors, has its own Charter and has the power to initiate any special investigations it deems necessary. Committee membership is reviewed annually. Membership criteria are based on a directors skills and experience, as well as his/her ability to add value to the Committee.
The Chairman is an ex-officio member of all Committees. The Chief Executive Officer, John McFarlane, is invited to attend Committee meetings, as appropriate. His presence is not automatic, however, and he does not attend any meeting where his remuneration is considered or discussed. Non-executive directors may attend any meeting of a Committee on a subject where they have a special interest.
Committee performance self-evaluations are conducted annually to review performance against its Charter and goals set for the year. The suitability of the Charter and any areas for improvement are also assessed. The review and stated objectives for the new financial year are submitted to the full Board for discussion and approval.
A copy of each Committee Charter can be found on our website at anz.com > about anz > corporate governance.
The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight and monitoring of:
the Companys financial reporting policies and controls;
the work of Group (Internal) Audit which reports directly and solely to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Refer to Group (Internal) Audit on page 116 for more information;
the Audit Committees of subsidiary companies such as ANZ National Bank;
the integrity of the Companys financial statements and prudential returns; and
compliance with regulatory requirements and independent audit thereof.
The Audit Committee is also responsible for:
the appointment, evaluation and oversight of the external auditor
compensation of the external auditors; and
replacement of the external auditor.
Audit Committee members are: John Dahlsen (Chairman), Jerry Ellis, Margaret Jackson (financial expert), David Meiklejohn (financial expert) and Charles Goode (ex-Officio).
It is Board policy that all members of the Audit Committee be financially literate and that at least one member of the Committee be a financial expert as defined in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As noted above, Ms Jackson and Mr Meiklejohn are designated as the Audit Committees financial experts. Refer to pages 101 and 103 for their qualifications.
The Audit Committee meets with the external auditor without management being present. The Chairman of the Audit Committee meets separately and regularly with the Group General Manager (Internal) Audit and the external auditor.
Some 2004 financial year activities:
Monitoring the work of Group (Internal) Audit - During the year, the Committee appointed a new Group General Manager, (Internal) Audit. A revised reporting system, based on a balanced scorecard, was put in place on the activities of Internal Audit including audit activities, governance, staff, customers, quality and management.
Revising external auditor policy - The Policy on Relationship of the External Auditor Policy was revised during the year to ensure ANZ continues to meet best practice in this area.
Refining external auditor evaluation - This year the Committee revised its process for evaluating the external auditor. The outcome of the evaluation was reported to the Board.
Oversighting The National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ) acquisition financial reporting - The Committee monitored all the financial reporting including consolidation accounting related to the NBNZ acquisition.
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee is responsible for recommendations to the Board in respect of the Groups compensation program including any equity-based programs. It also evaluates the performance of and approves the compensation for the senior executive officers and Board appointees (including the Chief Executive Officer) and approves compensation levels and policy guidelines.
113
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee members are Margaret Jackson (Chairman), Roderick Deane, John Morshel, Brian Scott and Charles Goode (ex-Officio).
Some 2004 financial year activities included:
Revising remuneration principles and processes - A review of ANZs compensation program was conducted to ensure alignment with best practice principles. Related changes were introduced during the year.
Reviewing performance of senior executives - The Committee reviewed the performance of the CEO and the CEOs direct reports against agreed performance measures. Succession planning was also undertaken.
Considering non-executive director compensation and retirement benefits - In accordance with regulatory and corporate governance principles, the Committee reviewed and recommended changes to the compensation structure for non-executive directors.
The Nominations & Corporate Governance Committees responsibility is to identify and recommend prospective Board members, to recommend processes for Board performance review and to recommend corporate governance principles, practices and procedures for ANZ.
The Nominations & Corporate Governance Committee members are Brian Scott (Chairman), Greg Clark, John Dahlsen, David Gonski, David Meiklejohn and Charles Goode (ex-Officio).
Some 2004 financial year activities included:
Refining director independence criteria - Procedures for confirmation of independent director status of non-executive directors were further refined (see page 111).
Reviewing nominations procedures - Procedures for consideration of Board director nominations were refined and used during the year
Developing principles and procedures - Additional principles and procedures were developed during the year for nominations and corporate governance to ensure ANZ would continue to meet best practice in these areas.
The Risk Management Committee is responsible for the review of risk in all aspects of the business. It is responsible for overseeing, monitoring and reviewing the Groups risk management principles and policies, strategies, processes and controls including credit, market, balance sheet, operational risk and compliance. It may approve credit transactions and other matters beyond the approval discretion of executive management.
The Risk Management Committee members are Jerry Ellis (Chairman), Roderick Deane, David Gonski, John Morshel and Charles Goode (ex-Officio).
Some 2004 financial year activities included:
Monitoring risks associated with integration of NBNZ - The Committee reviewed regular status reports highlighting key risks and progress by integration streams for operational risk, market risk and credit risk (see page 11).
Reviewing the Groups risk culture - To ensure the correct balance between risk and reward. A specific compliance measure was introduced to each business units balanced scorecard.
Ensuring timely and necessary mitigating actions are taken in response to emerging risk issues - Continued to review regular reports on key emerging risks, and appropriate responses to be taken.
Additional Committees
In addition to the four main Board Committees, the Board has constituted a Shares Committee and an Executive Committee to assist in carrying out its functions.
The Executive Committee has the full power of the Board and is convened as necessary between regularly scheduled Board meetings. The Board also forms and delegates authority to ad hoc Committees of the Board as and when needed to carry out its functions.
The Shares Committee has the power to administer ANZs Employee Share Plan and Employee Share Option Plan.
114
Directors Meetings
The number of Board meetings and Committee meetings held during the year ended September 30, 2004 and attended by each director are set out in the following table:
|
|
Board |
|
Audit |
|
Compensation |
|
Nominations |
|
Risk |
|
Executive |
|
Shares |
|
Committee |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
A |
|
B |
|
A |
|
B |
|
A |
|
B |
|
A |
|
B |
|
A |
|
B |
|
A |
|
B |
|
A |
|
B |
|
A |
|
B |
|
G J Clark |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J C Dahlsen |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
R S Deane(1) |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J K Ellis |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
D M Gonski |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
C B Goode |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
M A Jackson |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J McFarlane |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
B W Scott |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Column A Indicates the number of meetings the Director was eligible to attend
Column B The number of meetings attended. The Chairman is an ex-officio member of all Board Committees
(1) New Zealand resident
Risk Management and Compliance
ANZs business controls are governed by an ongoing focus on risk and compliance issues within the framework of the Companys overall strategy. ANZ has established a comprehensive risk and compliance management framework to ensure best practice alignment.
In terms of risk management and compliance, the Board provides leadership, oversees risk appetite and strategy, and ensures that a robust risk and compliance culture pervades.
The Risk Management Committee of the Board oversees the Groups risk management policies and controls, may approve credit transactions and other matters beyond the approval discretion of executive management.
On a day-to-day basis, the various risks inherent in ANZs operations are managed by both Group Risk Management and each business unit.
For further information on risk management, please see pages 97 to 99 and Item 11.
Financial Controls
As previously noted, the Audit Committee of the Board oversees the Companys financial reporting policies and controls, integrity of the Companys financial statements, the work of Group (internal) Audit, the Audit Committees of the subsidiary companies, prudential returns and compliance with related regulatory requirements.
To further strengthen controls and procedures, the Audit Committee agreed that the Company would undertake a Group-wide program focusing on Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sox). ANZ is in the process of assessing its readiness to meet Section 404 requirements of Sox. In doing so, ANZ assesses the appropriateness of internal controls of financial reporting and the financial control activity level relative to key accounts and locations of operations. The program is being instituted at both Company and business unit level and is overseen by a program steering committee. ANZ is well progressed in its assessment program and expects to be in full compliance with this section of the Act during the financial year to September 30, 2005, ANZs first reporting date after the compliance date of the Act.
115
Audit
Group (Internal) Audit
Group (Internal) Audit provides independent assurance that the design and operation of the risk and control framework across the Group is effective. The internal audit function operates under a Charter from the Audit Committee that gives it unrestricted access to review all activities of the Group. The Group General Manager, (Internal) Audit reports to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee monitors the performance of Group (Internal) Audit and the Group General Manager, (Internal) Audit.
A risk-based audit approach is used to ensure that the higher risk activities in each business are audited each year. All audits are conducted in a manner that conforms to international auditing standards. Audit results also influence incentive compensation of business heads.
Group (Internal) Audit plays an active role in ensuring compliance with the requirements of supervisory regulatory authorities. Group (Internal) Audit also works collaboratively with the external auditor to ensure a comprehensive audit scope.
The Audit Committee plays an active role in reviewing significant issues arising from internal audits conducted by Group (Internal) Audit. There is a robust process for ensuring prompt resolution of audit issues, which includes monthly reviews of progress by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee also receives formal reports on significant issues until satisfactory action has been taken.
External Audit
The external auditors role is to provide reasonable assurance that ANZs financial reports are accurate and free from material misstatement. The external auditor is to perform independent audits in accordance with Australian and United States Auditing Standards. The external auditor provides reports directly to the Audit Committee.
During the year, the Audit Committee further strengthened ANZs Relationship with External Auditor policy. Under the policy, the Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment (subject to ratification by shareholders), compensation, retention and oversight of the external auditor.
The policy also stipulates that the Audit Committee:
Pre-approves all audit and non-audit services;
Regularly reviews the independence of the external auditor;
Evaluates the effectiveness of the external auditor.
In addition, ANZ requires a two-year period before any former partner or employee of the external auditor is appointed as a director or senior executive of ANZ.
The lead partner position of the external audit should rotate off the ANZ audit after five years and cannot return for a further five years. Other senior audit staff are required to rotate off after a maximum of seven years.
Any potential appointments of ex-partners or ex-employees of the external auditor to the ANZ finance staff, at senior management level or higher, must be pre-approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
ANZs Codes of Conduct and Policies
Below is an overview of ANZs key codes and policies which apply to directors and employees within the Group. Summaries of these policies can be found on anz.com > about anz > corporate governance.
Codes of Conduct for Directors and for Employees - These policies set out the ethical standards to which directors and employees are expected to adhere. The Codes require that directors and employees adhere to the law, and that they disclose any relevant interests, that they act in the best interests of the Group and that they act honestly and ethically in all their dealings. The codes also cover the confidentiality of information, limits on acceptance of gifts or entertainment and on use of ANZ goods, services and facilities. Key contact - Group General Counsel and Company Secretary. A copy of this Code of Conduct can be obtained without charge by writing to The Company Secretary, Level 6, 100 Queen Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
116
Code of Conduct for Financial Officers - (adopted from the Group of 100 Code of Conduct for CFOs and Senior Financial Officers). The Code requires that Chief Financial Officers and other finance staff influencing financial performance adhere to principles of honesty and integrity, respect confidentiality of information, declare conflicts of interest, maintain transparency in reporting, exercise diligence and good faith, ensure sound internal controls and set a standard for other financial professionals. Key contact - Chairman of the Audit Committee. A copy of this Code of Conduct can be obtained without charge by writing to The Company Secretary, Level 6, 100 Queen Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Critical Accounting Policies - Details of the critical accounting policies and any changes in accounting policies made since the date of the 2003 Annual Report are set out on page 91 and in the Financial Report on pages 129 to 133.
Directors Disclosure of Interests Policy and Policy for Handling Conflicts of Interests - The Board has adopted a policy on disclosure of interests requiring that directors disclose certain interests, and actual or potential conflicts of interest are addressed. Details of directors dealings with ANZ are set out in Note 52 of the Financial Report. Key contact - Group General Counsel and Company Secretary.
Employee Indemnity Policy - This policy provides that the Group will indemnify employees against any liability that they incur in carrying out their role subject to meeting certain requirements. Further details on this policy and on indemnities given to certain employees can be found on page 77 of the Annual Report. Key contact - General Manager Operational and Technology Risk.
Market (Continuous) Disclosure Policy - ANZ is committed to achieving best practice in the area of continuous disclosure. The policy is designed to ensure that there is full and timely disclosure of ANZs activities to shareholders and the market. The policy requires that information disclosed to the relevant stock exchanges is placed on ANZs website. Key contacts -Head of Investor Relations, Head of Media Relations, Company Secretary.
Policy on the Prevention of Money Laundering, Criminal and Terrorist Financing - This policy covers Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism laws and regulations. It sets out principles related to identification and record keeping procedures, the need for staff awareness and related training, and annual requirements for independent testing and compliance reporting. The policy is aimed at ensuring that ANZ is able to protect its reputation, integrity, assets, liabilities and shareholder funds. Key contacts - General Manager Operational and Technology Risk and General Manager Group Compliance.
Policy on Relationship with External Auditor - The Board and the Audit Committees policy on audit and non-audit services regulates the audit-related and non-audit services that may be conducted by ANZs external auditor. It sets in place a formal approval process regarding the provision of audit and non-audit services. This approval process is the responsibility of the Audit Committee. In addition it sets out the rotation requirements for the lead partner and other members of the audit team, and processes related to the potential appointment of ex-partners or ex-employees of the external auditor. Key contact -Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Share Trading Policy - This policy covers trading in ANZ securities by all employees, contractors and consultants engaged by ANZ. The policy prohibits trading in ANZ securities or the securities of other entities for all persons aware of unpublished ANZ price sensitive information. In addition, it specifically prohibits trading by certain employees, contractors and consultants working in specific areas of ANZ during blackout periods. A blackout period is the six-week period leading up to the day after the announcement of the half yearly and full year results. The Board has also resolved to apply the principles of this policy to directors own trading in ANZ shares. Key contact - Head of Investor Relations.
Whistleblower Policy (formerly known as Serious Complaints Policy) - The Whistleblower Process is an additional mechanism by which ANZ staff, contractors and consultants may voice any concerns they may have regarding any malpractice or impropriety that they find within ANZ. It requires that protection be given to employees against dismissal or penalty as a result of disclosing concerns in good faith. Key contacts - Group General Manager, (Internal) Audit and Group General Counsel and Company Secretary.
New Zealand Policies - Recognizing the importance of ANZs presence in New Zealand and the requirements of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, the ANZ National Bank Limited Board reviews and approves all ANZ Group governance and risk management polices before they are adopted by ANZ National Bank to ensure that they meet all New Zealand regulatory requirements.
Other Company Policies - Can be found on anz.com. Operational policies may not be publicly available.
117
Comparison to NYSE Corporate Governance Standards
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listing Rules, Section 303A, recently instituted a broad regime of new corporate governance requirements for NYSE-listed companies. Under the NYSE Listing Rules, foreign private issuers, such as ANZ, are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of the requirements of Section 303A, except for the Listing Rule relating to compliance with Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and certain notification provisions contained in Section 303A of the Listing Rules. The relevant home country practice for ANZ is the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Corporate Governance Council- Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations.
Section 303A.11 of the Listing Rules, however, requires ANZ to disclose any significant ways in which ANZ corporate governance practices differ from those followed by US domestic listed companies under these NYSE Listing Rules. ANZ has compared the Companys corporate governance practices to the requirements of the Section 303A of the NYSE Listing Rules that would otherwise currently apply to foreign private issuers and notes the following significant difference:
Equity Compensation Plans
Shareholders are not provided under Australian law with the opportunity to vote on certain new equity compensation plans or material revisions to existing equity compensation plans. Under the NYSEs rules, shareholder approval is required for such plans or for material revisions to such plans.
This disclosure is also available on our website at http://www.anz.com/australia/aboutanz/corporateinformation/corpgovpolicy under the heading Other Corporate Governance Matters-Comparison with NYSE Corporate Governance Standards.
United States Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
Sox was signed into law on July 30, 2002. As ANZ has securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and files disclosure documents with the SEC (the SEC), ANZ is subject to the provisions of this Act and applicable NYSE Listing Standards.
The SEC has been delegated authority to adopt rules to implement many of Sox provisions. At present, some of these rules do not yet apply to ANZ as a foreign private issuer. In addition, under the NYSE Listing Standards, ANZ is required to provide a brief description of the significant differences between ANZs corporate governance practices and those applicable to US listed companies under the NYSE listing rules in lieu of complying with those US domestic listed company standards. For a description of these significant differences, please see Comparison to NYSE Corporate Governance Standards above.
Audit Committee determination of independence and financial experts
Sox requires that each member of the ANZ Audit Committee is a member of the ANZ Board of Directors, and meets certain criteria for independence. In addition, Sox requires there to be at least one financial expert on the Committee.
The Audit Committee is composed solely of non-executive directors. The ANZ Board has reviewed the independence criteria in Sox, and determined that each non-executive director on the Committee is independent.
The current Committee membership is Mr John Dahlsen (Chairman), Ms Margaret Jackson, Mr Jerry Ellis and Mr David Meiklejohn (from October 1, 2004), each of whom is a non-executive, independent Director. Mr Charles Goode (Board Chairman) is an ex-officio member of the Audit Committee. The Committee includes members who have appropriate financial expertise and an understanding of the industry in which ANZ operates. All members of the Committee satisfy the independence requirements under Section 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the rules of the NYSE.
The Board has determined that Ms Margaret Jackson and Mr David Meiklejohn are audit committee financial experts. Although the Board also has determined that these individuals have the requisite attributes defined under the rules of the SEC, their responsibilities are the same as those of the other audit committee members. They are not auditors, do not perform field work and are not full-time employees.
The SEC has determined that an audit committee member who is designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed to be an expert for any purpose as a result of being identified as an audit committee financial expert. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of management in the preparation of ANZs financial statements and financial disclosures. The Audit Committee relies on the information provided by management and the external auditor. The Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits to determine that ANZs financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate. ANZs Audit Committee charter provides that these are the responsibility of management and the external auditor.
118
Services outside the scope of practice of auditors
Sox prohibits the external auditor of ANZ from providing certain non-audit services to the Company. The Audit Committee of the ANZ Board announced in April 2002 a revised policy on the provision of audit-related and non-audit services. Since that date, the policy has been reviewed at least annually and updated to ensure it meets current best practice standards as well as relevant domestic and overseas regulatory requirements. The policy lists services which may be perceived to be in conflict with the role of the auditor, and precludes the external auditor from providing such services. ANZs policy, which is consistent with Sox, requires the Audit Committee to approve all services provided by the external auditor.
Work of External Auditor
Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, remuneration and oversight of the external auditor. The former KPMG lead auditor concluded his term at the conclusion of the 2003 audit activities and a new lead auditor took responsibility for the Groups audit in the 2004 financial year.
Section 404
Please see commentary on page 115 under Financial Controls.
Responsibility for Financial Reports
As required by Sox, our CEO and CFO have provided 302 certification for this 20-F filing. This certification follows an audit of the disclosure controls and procedures. See Item 15 for a further description of this evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The audit was conducted by the Groups internal audit function during September and October 2004. A report on the findings of this audit was presented to the Audit Committee and to the external auditor.
Code of Ethics
ANZ has written a Code of Conduct that applies to ANZs principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and other financial officers. See page 117 for further description. ANZ has also written a Code of Conduct for directors and employees that applies to ANZs chief executive officer, all directors and all ANZ employees. See page 116 for a further description.
Share Trading Policy
The share trading policy adopted by the Group specifically prohibits trading in ANZ shares by directors, certain employees, contractors and consultants working in specific areas of the Group during black out periods. The Groups policy is consistent with Sox.
Complaints
As required by Sox, the Audit Committee has established a whistleblower policy and procedures which provide a mechanism by which ANZ staff, consultants and contractors may voice concerns anonymously regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
Employment Contracts
Arrangements or undertakings between executive officers and ANZ are covered by an employment agreement under which remuneration is at such rates and terms as ANZ shall determine from time to time.
119
Fees paid to Auditors and Pre-approved Policies and Procedures
Summary of Fees
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$000 |
|
$000 |
|
KPMG Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
Audit or review of financial reports of the Company or any entity in the Group |
|
2,981 |
|
2,640 |
|
Other audit-related services(1,2) |
|
567 |
|
2,083 |
|
Other assurance services(3) |
|
2,934 |
|
3,891 |
|
|
|
6,482 |
|
8,614 |
|
Taxation |
|
563 |
|
775 |
|
Total |
|
7,045 |
|
9,389 |
|
Overseas Related practices of KPMG Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
Audit or review of financial reports of Group entities |
|
1,834 |
|
1,293 |
|
Other audit-related services(1,2) |
|
1,494 |
|
1,503 |
|
Other assurance services(3) |
|
77 |
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
4,269 |
|
Taxation |
|
65 |
|
83 |
|
Total |
|
3,470 |
|
4,352 |
|
Total remuneration of auditors |
|
10,515 |
|
13,741 |
|
(1) Includes completion accounts review.
(2) Includes services for the audit or review of financial information other than financial reports including prudential supervision reviews for central banks, prospectus reviews, trust audits and other audits required for local statutory purposes.
(3) 2004 includes an NBNZ due diligence oversight review and markets co-sourcing internal audit work which ceased in April 2004. 2003 includes assessing the Groups compliance with the requirements of the Patriot Act.
It is Group policy that KPMG Australia or any of its related practices may provide assurance and other audit-related services that, while outside the scope of the statutory audit, are consistent with the role of auditor. These include regulatory and prudential reviews requested by the Companys regulators such as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. KPMG Australia or any of its related practices may not provide services that are perceived to be in conflict with the role of auditor. These include consulting advice and subcontracting of operational activities normally undertaken by management, and engagements where the auditor may ultimately be required to express an opinion on its own work. However, non-audit services that are not perceived to be in conflict with the role of auditor may be provided by KPMG Australia or any of its related practices subject to the approval of the ANZ Audit Committee.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed in 2004 and 2003 for professional services rendered by KPMG, our external auditor and an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, for the audit of the annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory filing engagements for those fiscal years are $4,815,000 and $3,933,000, respectively.
120
Audit Related Fees
The aggregate fees billed in 2004 and 2003 for assurance and related services by KPMG that are reasonably related to performance of the audit or review of ANZs financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees are $2,061,000 and $3,586,000, respectively. The nature of services comprising the fees disclosed under the category are audit of completion accounts, the audit or review of financial information other than financial reports, including prudential supervision reviews for central banks and other audits required for local statutory purposes.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed in 2004 and 2003 for professional services rendered by KPMG for tax compliance and related services are $628,000 and $858,000, respectively. The nature of services comprising the fees disclosed under the category are assistance in relation to compliance obligations including the Australian tax consolidations regime, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, review of tax returns and review of correspondence with taxation authorities.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by KPMG, other than services reported under Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees are $3,011,000 and $5,364,000, respectively. The nature of services comprising the fees disclosed under the category are the oversight of the NBNZ due diligence process, markets co-sourcing internal audit work (ceased in April 2004), advice on International Financial Reporting Standards, and other sundry agreed upon procedures engagements, including securitization reviews, Sarbanes Oxley oversight and assessment of ANZs compliance with the requirements of the Patriot Act (2003 only).
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Information Request
In the context of an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) into certain Australian companies registered with the SEC and accounting firms relating to the U.S. auditor independence rules, the SEC has requested that we produce documents and information relating to non-audit services provided by our external auditors, KPMG Australia, since October 1, 2000.
During the period covered by the SECs information request a number of KPMG Australia employees provided non-audit services, including regulatory, tax, accounting, financial modeling and project management services, for varying periods of time to entities in the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group while on secondment to entities in the Group. While KPMG Australia has reported that some of the secondment engagements in the 2001 and 2002 financial years were potential violations of U.S. auditor independence rules, KPMG Australia has affirmed to our Audit Committee and to the SEC that, in its opinion, the provision of these non-audit services did not compromise the independence of the firm.
We are continuing to provide the documents and information requested by the SEC, and to examine the matters covered by the SEC's information request.
While we cannot predict what action the SEC may take as a result of its ongoing investigation and the other matters referred to above, the SEC has authority to impose or negotiate any one of a number of possible sanctions for any breaches of its rules resulting from secondments or any other non-audit services provided by KPMG Australia. These sanctions could include fines, the entry of cease-and-desist orders or injunctions, or a requirement to engage a different accounting firm to perform procedures and report on aspects of the relevant accounts or financial statements relevant to areas raising auditor independence concerns.
121
At September 30, 2004 ANZ employed 28,755 (2003: 23,137) people worldwide on a full-time equivalent basis (FTEs), of which 27,383 were permanent employees and 1,372 were temporary. There were 16,815 FTEs in Australia at September 30, 2004 compared with 16,400 FTEs at September 30, 2003 (refer to table below).
Approximately 33% of employees in Australia are members of the Finance Sector Union of Australia. ANZ has a specific industrial award that contains terms and conditions of employment that apply in differing degrees to all ANZ staff. The award is supplemented by a collective enterprise bargaining agreement and in addition the majority of senior management and executive staff are covered by individual common law contracts of employment.
Under enterprise bargaining in Australia, terms and conditions of employment, including salaries, are dependent on agreements negotiated between unions and management. The Australian Industrial Relations Commission has the power to ratify these agreements and ensure legally enforceable minimum conditions of employment are retained.
ANZs current Australian collective enterprise bargaining agreement was entered into in August 1998 and continues to legally operate despite passing its nominal expiry date of February 2001. ANZ paid a 4% salary increase to most non-management staff in July 2004.
ANZ has nine superannuation/pension plans worldwide. Notes 49 and 55 to the Financial Statements give further detail on ANZs superannuation commitments. ANZ also provides loans at concessional rates to eligible employees and senior management but excluding executives and directors.
Staff Numbers, at September 30, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Movement |
|
Personal |
|
8,934 |
|
8,795 |
|
2 |
% |
Institutional |
|
2,926 |
|
2,795 |
|
5 |
% |
New Zealand Businesses |
|
7,988 |
|
2,939 |
|
172 |
% |
Corporate Australia |
|
1,671 |
|
1,596 |
|
5 |
% |
Esanda and UDC |
|
1,292 |
|
1,311 |
|
-1 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
1,711 |
|
1,624 |
|
5 |
% |
ING Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Treasury and Group Center |
|
4,233 |
|
4,077 |
|
4 |
% |
|
|
28,755 |
|
23,137 |
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
16,815 |
|
16,400 |
|
3 |
% |
New Zealand |
|
8,816 |
|
3,822 |
|
131 |
% |
Overseas Markets |
|
3,124 |
|
2,915 |
|
7 |
% |
|
|
28,755 |
|
23,137 |
|
24 |
% |
The ANZ Employee Share Acquisition Plan was approved by shareholders at ANZs Annual General Meeting on January 21, 1998. At the invitation of ANZ, the Plan allows for permanent employees who have had continuous service for one year with ANZ and its subsidiaries, to each be issued with up to $1,000 worth of ANZ shares each year at no cost to the employee. The first offer to employees under the Plan was made on November 30, 1998. Subsequent offers have been made in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and a seventh issue will be made in December 2004. The Plan also includes a section that allows for the issue of deferred shares to selected employees in lieu of cash bonuses.
The ANZ Share Option Plan provides benefits, in the form of share options, to selected employees. More detailed information regarding ANZs employee share and option plans, remuneration of directors and remuneration of executives is contained in the Financial Report.
122
Item 7: Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
We are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or any foreign government. At December 2, 2004 we know of no person who is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our ordinary shares.
The following table identifies the shareholders which, at December 2004, 2003 and 2002 were registered as holding 3% or more of our issued ordinary shares:
Shareholder (1) |
|
Number of Shares Held |
|
% of Total |
|
December 2, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
National Nominees Ltd |
|
248,667,130 |
|
13.66 |
|
Chase Manhattan Nominees Ltd |
|
240,389,349 |
|
13.20 |
|
Westpac Custodian Nominees Ltd |
|
230,503,315 |
|
12.66 |
|
Citicorp Nominees Pty Ltd |
|
88,027,953 |
|
4.83 |
|
RBC Global Services Australia Nominees Pty Ltd |
|
59,849,448 |
|
3.29 |
|
December 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
J P Morgan Nominees Australia Ltd |
|
250,872,670 |
|
14.05 |
|
National Nominees Ltd |
|
220,520,868 |
|
12.35 |
|
Westpac Custodian Nominees Ltd |
|
211,004,977 |
|
11.82 |
|
December 2, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chase Manhattan Nominees Ltd |
|
211,127,137 |
|
14.01 |
|
National Nominees Ltd |
|
193,410,333 |
|
12.83 |
|
Westpac Custodian Nominees Ltd |
|
141,693,653 |
|
9.40 |
|
(1) The nominee companies indicated hold shares on behalf of other beneficial owners none of which are to our knowledge beneficially entitled to more than 5% of our ordinary shares.
At December 2, 2004, there were no entries in the Register of Substantial Shareholdings (5% or more of the votes attached to voting shares).
At December 2, 2004, 1,758,332,235 ordinary shares representing 96.57% of our total ordinary share capital were held by 234,276 record holders with registered addresses in Australia.
The following table outlines the total number of ordinary shares and share options in ANZ owned by our directors and executive officers as at December 2, 2004:
Title of Class |
|
Identity of Group |
|
Amount of |
|
% of Class |
|
Ordinary shares fully paid |
|
Directors and Executive Officers (26 persons) |
|
5,442,770 |
|
0.2989 |
% |
Share options over ordinary shares |
|
Directors and Executive Officers (15 persons) |
|
7,813,205 |
|
19.9405 |
% |
As at December 2, 2004, no individual director or executive officer beneficially owned more than 1% of the outstanding share capital of the Company.
The acquisition of shares in Australian companies by foreign interests is regulated by the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (the Foreign Takeovers Act). The Foreign Takeovers Act applies to any acquisition or issue of shares which results in either:
(a) a foreign person and its associates being in a position to control 15% or more of the voting power or hold any legal or equitable interest in 15% or more of the issued shares; or
(b) two or more foreign persons and their associates being in a position to control 40% or more of the voting power or hold any legal or equitable interest in 40% or more of the issued shares.
In either of these cases, the Federal Treasurer may prohibit the acquisition if it would be contrary to the Australian national interest.
123
The Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 prohibits a person, or two or more persons under an arrangement, from acquiring shares in a financial sector company if the acquisition would result in a person holding a stake in the company of more than 15%. However, the Federal Treasurer may grant approval to a person to hold a stake of greater than 15% but only if satisfied that it is in the Australian national interest. No such approvals have been granted in respect of our shares.
Any person acquiring voting shares in a company is subject to the control of the acquisition of shares provisions contained in Chapter 6 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act). Subject to certain limited exceptions, Section 606 of the Corporations Act prohibits a person from acquiring a relevant interest in voting shares in a company if, because of a transaction, the persons or someone elses voting power in the company increases:
(a) from 20% or below to more than 20%; or
(b) from a starting point above 20% and below 90%
One of the exceptions to Section 606 is that the law will allow a person who has been entitled to voting power in the company of at least 19% for at least six months to acquire an additional 3% of the companys voting power in any six month period.
For the purposes of the Corporations Act, a persons voting power in a company is the total number of votes attached to voting shares in respect of which the person and its associates (which are broadly defined) have a relevant interest (which is also broadly defined) as a proportion of the total number of votes attached to all voting shares in the company.
There are no arrangements known to ANZ, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of ANZ.
All related party loans were made in the ordinary course of business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and entities, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
More detailed information regarding related party disclosures is contained in Note 52, 53 and 54 to the Financial Report.
124
For financial information refer to Attachment 1.
There are outstanding court proceedings, claims and possible claims against the Group, the aggregate amount of which cannot readily be quantified. Appropriate legal advice has been obtained and, in the light of such advice, provisions as deemed necessary have been made.
The Board of Directors of the Company will determine and declare the amount and timing of dividend distributions to shareholders based on the financial performance and financial position of the Group.
125
Our principal ordinary share listing and quotation is on the Australian Stock Exchange Limited (the Australian Stock Exchange, ASX). Our ordinary shares are also quoted on the New Zealand Stock Exchange. Our ANZ stapled exchangeable preferred securities (ANZ StEPS) are listed on the ASX and the ANZ Euro Hybrid Capital, on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
Our ordinary shares are traded in the United States by means of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). We entered into a Deposit Agreement dated December 9, 1988 with The Bank of New York. The Bank of New York, acting as depositary, issues ADRs. Each ADR represents an American Depositary Share (ADS), which in turn represents five ANZ ordinary shares. This agreement was amended to permit listing of the ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (NYSE), and on December 6, 1994 trading of the ADRs commenced on the NYSE. At December 2, 2004, 571,059 ADRs representing 2,855,295 or 0.16% of our ordinary shares were outstanding and there were 42 record holders of ADRs.
The following table sets out, for the calendar periods indicated, the high and low market quotations for both our ordinary shares as reported by the Australian Stock Exchange and our ADRs as quoted on the NYSE.
|
|
|
|
Per Ordinary Share ($) |
|
Per ADR (USD) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
September |
|
12.87 |
|
9.18 |
|
38.56 |
|
30.06 |
|
2001 |
|
September |
|
16.71 |
|
12.63 |
|
45.40 |
|
33.25 |
|
2002 |
|
September |
|
19.70 |
|
15.23 |
|
57.90 |
|
39.80 |
|
2003 |
|
September |
|
18.45 |
|
15.01 |
|
64.29 |
|
46.83 |
|
2004 |
|
September |
|
19.44 |
|
15.94 |
|
73.50 |
|
60.50 |
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
March |
|
17.80 |
|
16.28 |
|
47.83 |
|
44.10 |
|
2003 |
|
March |
|
17.24 |
|
15.01 |
|
54.00 |
|
47.10 |
|
|
|
June |
|
18.45 |
|
16.82 |
|
64.29 |
|
53.30 |
|
|
|
September |
|
17.90 |
|
16.66 |
|
63.72 |
|
56.55 |
|
|
|
December |
|
18.03 |
|
15.94 |
|
67.03 |
|
60.75 |
|
2004 |
|
March |
|
19.40 |
|
17.35 |
|
72.82 |
|
66.65 |
|
|
|
June |
|
19.44 |
|
17.45 |
|
73.50 |
|
60.50 |
|
|
|
September |
|
19.14 |
|
17.65 |
|
69.24 |
|
62.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month ended |
|
June |
|
18.72 |
|
17.91 |
|
65.50 |
|
62.82 |
|
|
|
July |
|
18.35 |
|
17.65 |
|
66.69 |
|
62.41 |
|
|
|
August |
|
18.47 |
|
17.68 |
|
65.55 |
|
63.34 |
|
|
|
September |
|
19.14 |
|
18.33 |
|
69.24 |
|
63.98 |
|
|
|
October |
|
20.40 |
|
19.02 |
|
76.71 |
|
69.40 |
|
|
|
November |
|
20.95 |
|
19.47 |
|
80.45 |
|
75.71 |
|
126
On March 4, 1993, we completed an underwritten public offering in the United States of USD258.8 million (aggregate principal amount) of 9 1/8% Capital Securities (Capital Securities). These Capital Securities were listed on the NYSE, which is the principal market in the United States for the trading of the Capital Securities.
The securities were redeemed at par on March 4, 2003 in accordance with an option held by us as part of the issue items.
The following table sets out the high and low market quotations per USD25 principal amount of Capital Securities as quoted on the NYSE.
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
September |
|
|
28.030 |
|
26.130 |
|
2000 |
September |
|
|
26.440 |
|
22.000 |
|
2001 |
September |
|
|
27.290 |
|
24.800 |
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
December |
|
|
27.150 |
|
25.930 |
|
2002 |
March |
|
|
27.150 |
|
25.650 |
|
|
June |
|
|
27.220 |
|
25.750 |
|
|
September |
|
|
27.290 |
|
25.930 |
|
|
December |
|
|
26.100 |
|
25.250 |
|
2003 |
March |
|
|
25.810 |
|
25.350 |
|
In 1998, we issued 124,032,000 fully paid non-converting non-cumulative preference shares for USD6.25 per share in 1998 raising capital of USD775 million via two (1) Trust Securities Issues.
Date of issue |
|
Number of shares |
|
Price (USD) |
|
Capital (USD) |
|
Trust distribution |
|
Maturity |
|
September 23, 1998 |
|
64,016,000 |
|
6.25 |
|
400 million |
|
8.00 |
% |
2047 |
|
November 19, 1998 |
|
56,016,000 |
|
6.25 |
|
350 million |
|
8.08 |
% |
2048 |
|
November 24, 1998 (1) |
|
4,000,000 |
|
6.25 |
|
25 million |
|
8.08 |
% |
2048 |
|
(1) On November 24, 1998 the underwriters exercised an option on the November 19, 1998 issue resulting in a further 4,000,000 shares being issued, giving a total of 60,016,000 shares issued for USD375 million.
The Trust Securities were mandatorily exchangeable for the preference shares issued by us and carried an entitlement to a non-cumulative trust distribution per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The Trust Securities were issued by a non diversified closed end management investment company registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940. The preference shares themselves carried no present entitlement to dividends. Distributions to investors in the Trust Securities were funded by income distributions made by the Group.
Upon maturity of the Trust Securities, investors would have mandatorily exchanged the Trust Securities for the preference shares and thereupon the preference shares carried an entitlement to non-cumulative dividends at the Trust distribution rate payable quarterly in arrears. The mandatory exchange of Trust Securities for preference shares may have occurred earlier at our option or in certain specified circumstances including default, breach of APRA capital adequacy limits and appointment of a liquidator.
With the prior consent of APRA, the preference shares were redeemable at our option after 5 years, or within 5 years in limited circumstances. The entitlement of investors to distributions on the Trust Securities ceased on redemption of the preference shares.
The transaction costs arising on the issue of these instruments were recognized directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds of the equity instruments to which the costs relate.
On December 12, 2003 we exercised our option to buy-back for cash both tranches of preference shares.
127
Item 10: Additional Information
Any public documents referred to in this Annual Report on Form 20-F may be inspected by contacting the Company Secretary on (613) 9273 5555 or in writing to the Company Secretary, 100 Queen Street Melbourne, Victoria, 3000 Australia.
Exchange Controls and Limitations Affecting Security Holders
There are currently no Australian Exchange Control regulations in force which restrict the payment of dividends, interest or other remittances to holders of our securities, other than in relation to holders who are among or are connected with the following countries or groups, which categories are referred to below as Proscribed Entities:
(a) the previous Government of Iraq (as defined in the Iraq (Reconstruction and Repeal of Sanctions) Regulations 2003 of the Commonwealth of Australia), the former President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, and senior officials of the previous Government of Iraq;
(b) (in relation to transactions exceeding AUD100,000 in value), the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the Consulate-General of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the National Bank of Yugoslavia;
(c) certain persons listed by the Reserve Bank of Australia as known supporters of the former Milosevic regime of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
(d) certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe listed by the Reserve Bank of Australia
(e) the Taliban (which also calls itself the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan), Osama bin Laden and any member of the Al-Qaida organization and any person or entity mentioned in the list maintained under paragraph 2 of Resolution 1390 (2002) of the Security Council of the United Nations;
(f) any person or entity mentioned in paragraph 1(c) of Resolution 1373 (2001) of the Security Council of the United Nations; and
(g) certain other persons and entities listed by the Australian Government under the Charter of the United Nations (Terrorism and Dealings with Assets) Regulations 2002 of the Commonwealth of Australia
Payments in or from Australia to, by the order of, on behalf of, for credit of, or relating to the property, security of funds belonging to or controlled by or payments to Proscribed Entities cannot be made without the specific approval of:
(i) In cases (b), (c) or (d), the Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia; or
(ii) In cases (a), (e), (f) or (g), the relevant Government Minister.
Australian law and our Constitution do not limit the right of a holder of an ANZ issued debt security who is not an Australian resident to hold such securities nor do they limit the exercise of any voting rights save in the case of Proscribed Entities.
Australian Taxation
The following discussion is a summary of the Australian taxes generally applicable to United States (US) holders of ADRs or Capital Securities. The summary does not purport to be a complete technical analysis, and does not address the Australian taxes applicable to special classes of US holders. Except as otherwise noted, the statements of Australian tax laws are as of the date of this Annual Report, including the Australia, United States income tax convention in force, and are subject to any changes in law occurring after that date.
ADSs - Australian taxation
Distributions
In accordance with Article 10(2) of the Australia/United States income tax convention (the treaty), dividends derived by a nonresident of Australia who is a resident of the US may be taxed in Australia. The tax is limited to 15% of the gross amount of the dividends (unless the dividend is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base in Australia, in which case, a 30% rate may apply).
Pursuant to a recent treaty protocol that took effect July 1, 2003, further limitations on the dividend withholding rate can apply for 10% or greater shareholdings. In all other cases, the 15% rate limit will continue to apply.
128
The Australian Government introduced a dividend imputation system, effective from July 1, 1987. The basis of the system is that Australian tax paid by an Australian resident company on its income is allocated to stockholders by means of imputation credits attached to the dividends they receive. Such dividends are known as franked dividends. For Australian resident individual and institutional stockholders, the imputed tax credits are available to apply against the tax liability which arises on their assessable income (or in the case of a resident corporate shareholder, to be allocated to its own shareholders).
To the extent that a dividend paid by an Australian resident company and derived by US residents is franked, the dividend will not be subject to Australian dividend withholding tax. In this case, no separate credit or refund for the attached imputation credit is available.
The Australian tax rules require taxpayers to hold shares at risk for certain periods before obtaining the benefit of the dividend imputation system. The minimum period for holding ordinary shares at risk is currently 45 days, but the Government is considering a proposal to reduce the minimum period. Failure to satisfy these requirements may result in the deduction of Australian withholding tax from dividends paid to non-residents of Australia. There is an exemption from these rules for defined small transactions.
There is a similar system by which unfranked dividends paid to non-resident shareholders may be exempt from dividend withholding tax if it is specified that the dividends are paid by Australian resident companies out of its Foreign Dividend Account (FDA). The FDA is used to capture certain types of foreign source dividend income derived on or after July 1, 1994 from offshore subsidiaries. Dividends paid out of the FDA qualify for the dividend withholding tax exemption. It is not mandatory for Australian resident companies receiving eligible foreign source dividends to maintain a FDA. The Australian Government has previously announced an intention to consider replacing the FDA by a Foreign Income Account (FIA) which will allow all types of foreign source income to be FDA eligible (not just foreign source dividend income). The proposal has been confirmed by the Australian Government as part of the Review of International Taxation Arrangements.
ANZ dividends have recently been fully franked or paid from the FDA and, therefore, there has not been any withholding tax withheld on dividends paid to non-resident shareholders. However, ANZ does not guarantee the level to which future dividend payments will be franked or whether they will be sourced from its FDA.
Consequently, the portion of the dividend paid to US residents which is not franked nor sourced from a FDA by an Australian resident company will be subject to Australian dividend withholding tax as above. The payment of unfranked dividends (other than those paid out of a FDA) to a US resident is made net of the withholding tax. The Australian income tax legislation does not allow shareholders to elect to be paid dividends on a franked or an unfranked basis.
With effect from July 1, 2001, new legislation classifies certain holdings as either equity or debt. A holding that is classified as equity will be frankable, whereas a holding that is classified as debt will not be frankable. ADRs would be classified as equity on the basis that the return is contingent on ANZs performance or is at the discretion of ANZ.
Dispositions
A US resident enterprise which is a non-resident of Australia would not generally be liable to income tax on sale of shares by virtue of Article 7 of the Australia/United States income tax convention, as long as the sale was not attributable to a permanent establishment in Australia.
US resident holders who are non-residents of Australia would not generally be subject to Australian capital gains tax except in the circumstances described below.
Generally speaking, shares or rights to acquire shares in Australian resident public companies sold by US residents are exempt from capital gains tax in Australia. However, in accordance with Section 136-25 of the Australian Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, the disposal of such shares or rights shall be held to have the necessary connection with Australia and subject to capital gains tax if they have at any time been used by the taxpayer in carrying on a trade or business wholly or partly at or through a permanent establishment in Australia. Capital gains tax will also apply where the sale of shares or rights in an Australian resident public company has occurred where the vendor and the vendors associates held 10% or more of the issued capital of the Company any time within 5 years prior to the time of sale. The Australian Taxation Office takes the view that profits taxed under the capital gains tax regime are not entitled to the protection of Article 7 of the Australia/United States income tax convention.
In those applicable circumstances as referred to in the preceding paragraph, Australian capital gains realized on the disposal of assets acquired after September 19, 1985 are taxed at ordinary tax rates. The basis of calculating any taxable capital gains has been amended effective September 21, 1999. The taxable capital gain is still based on the excess of the disposal proceeds (or value, in certain non arms-length transactions) over cost of the asset, however the basis of establishing cost has been amended. Capital losses continue to be available for offset only against capital gains.
129
Prior to September 21, 1999 if the asset was held for a period in excess of 12 months the original cost (plus certain costs of acquisition) was indexed by the Australian inflation rate. Effective September 21, 1999, indexation of the cost base has been frozen at September 30, 1999. The calculation of the cost of the asset depends on whether the assets are acquired before or after September 21, 1999 and whether the taxpayer is an individual or a company.
For assets acquired on or before September 21, 1999 and held for at least one year, companies are taxed on the whole difference between the disposal price and the frozen indexed cost base. Individual tax payers, trusts and certain superannuation funds have the choice of calculating the taxable capital gain on either:
half the realized nominal gain (or two-thirds for certain superannuation funds); or
the whole difference between the disposal price and the frozen indexed cost base.
For assets acquired after September 21, 1999, companies are taxed on nominal gains but individuals, trusts and certain superannuation funds will be taxed on half (two-thirds for some superannuation funds) the difference between the disposal price and the original cost if the assets are held for at least one year.
If the individual is taxed or chooses to be taxed on half the nominal gain, any available capital losses will be applied against the full nominal capital gains. If the individual chooses the indexation option, capital losses will be applied against the real gains with indexation frozen up to September 30, 1999. Individuals who have both types of capital gains can chose the order in which available capital losses are offset against the different capital gains.
Some holders, such as share traders or certain institutions carrying on a business of investment, may be subject to tax on the profit on disposal of shares, on an historical cost basis, as ordinary income. Any capital gains tax liability otherwise arising on such a profit would be reduced to the extent that it was taxed as ordinary income.
Capital Securities
Distributions
A US holder of Capital Securities will not incur or become liable for any Australian income tax (including Australian withholding tax on income produced by holding such Capital Securities). No Australian taxes or duties will be liable to be deducted in respect of payments (including additional amounts, if any) to that US holder provided that the conditions of Section 128F of the Australian Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 are, and continue to be, satisfied. If we were at any time compelled by law to withhold or deduct an amount in respect of any present or future tax or duty imposed, or levied by any Australian taxing authority on a payment (including on any premium payable on redemption of any Capital Securities) we would be required to pay to a US holder additional amounts in respect of the tax or duty (subject, in certain circumstances, to our right to redeem for tax reasons).
If however, a US holder were an Australian resident or that US holder derived payments on the Capital Securities through a permanent establishment or fixed base in Australia, the holder could be subject to Australian income tax on interest or premium comprised by such payments, at normally applicable Australian tax rates.
Dispositions
A US holder would not be liable to Australian capital gains tax on a profit on any sale or other disposition (including redemption) of Capital Securities unless the Capital Securities were held through an Australian permanent establishment or fixed base. Australian income tax would not apply to such a profit unless the profit was income under Australian law (e.g. the profit was derived in the course of a securities trading business), and had an Australian source (determined as a question of fact by reference to factors such as location of the Securities, the business or transaction of which the disposition was part, and of payment) and the US holder could not claim exemption under the Australia/United States income tax convention.
Inheritance Tax
No Australian federal or state inheritance or similar taxes are payable in respect of Capital Securities transmitted by death held by a person who is a US holder at the date of death.
Stamp Taxes
No Australian stamp tax or duty is payable by a US holder on the issue or transfer by delivery of Capital Securities. No such stamp duty or tax is payable by a US holder on the transfer outside Australia by instrument of any Capital Securities so long as the Capital Securities are registered on a register maintained outside Australia, as is required under the Indenture relating to the Capital Securities.
130
Goods and Services Tax
Australia introduced a Goods and Services Tax (GST) with effect from July 1, 2000.
Our primary financial products qualify as input taxed and therefore GST is not generally added directly to the consumers price for financial services and products. Consequently, ANZ is not able to claim the input credit for GST paid. Leasing, general insurance and a range of other products are subject to GST like most goods and services. We operate in a number of other countries which have a similar tax to the GST.
Tax Consolidation
Legislation has been enacted to allow Australian resident entities to elect to consolidate and be treated as a single entity for Australian tax purposes. The implementation date for the ANZ tax consolidated group is October 1, 2003.
Calculations at September 30, 2004 have been based on legislation enacted to date. These calculations have resulted in no material adjustment to the consolidated tax expense or consolidated deferred tax balances for the year ended September 30, 2004.
United States Federal Income Taxation
This section describes the material United States federal income tax consequences to a US holder (as defined below) of owning ordinary shares or ADSs. It applies only to persons who hold ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes.
This section does not apply to any member of a special class of holders subject to special rules, including a dealer in securities, a trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for securities holdings, a tax-exempt organization, a life insurance company, a person liable for alternative minimum tax, a person that actually or constructively owns 10% or more of our voting stock, a person that holds ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction, or a US holder (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the US dollar.
This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions all as currently in effect, as well as on the Treaty. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of the Depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.
A US holder is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares or ADSs that is a citizen or resident of the United States, a domestic corporation, an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source, a domestic partnership, or a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts administration and one or more United States persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
Holders of ordinary shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors regarding the United States federal, state and local and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of ordinary shares and ADSs in their particular circumstances.
This discussion addresses only United States federal income taxation.
In general, and taking into account the earlier assumptions, for United States federal income tax purposes, a holder of ADRs evidencing ADSs will be treated as the owner of the shares represented by those ADRs. Exchanges of shares for ADRs, and ADRs for shares, generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax.
131
Distributions
A US holder of ordinary shares or ADSs is subject to United States federal income tax on the gross amount of any dividend we pay out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under United States federal income tax principles). Dividends paid to a non-corporate US holder in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002 and before January 1, 2009 that constitute qualified dividend income will be subject to a maximum tax rate of 15% provided that such holder holds the ordinary shares or ADSs for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meets other holding period requirements. Dividends we pay with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs generally will be qualified dividend income.
US holders must include any Australian tax withheld from the dividend payment in their gross income even though they do not in fact receive it. The dividend is taxable when the holder, in the case of ordinary shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, receives the dividend, actually or constructively. The dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to United States corporations in respect of dividends received from other United States corporations. The amount of the dividend distribution that a US holder must include in its income will be the US dollar value of the Australian dollar payments made, determined at the spot Australian dollar/US dollar rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in the holders income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into US dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the US holder includes the dividend payment in income to the date the US holder converts the payment into US dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. The exchange gain or loss generally will be from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for United States federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the US holders basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain.
Subject to certain limitations, the Australian tax withheld in accordance with the Treaty and paid over to Australia will be creditable against a US holders United States federal income tax liability. Special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the maximum 15% tax rate. To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is available under Australian law or under the Treaty, the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for credit against a US holders United States federal income tax liability.
Dividends will be income from sources outside the United States, but generally dividends paid in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2007 will be passive or financial services which in either case is treated separately from other types of income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to US holders.
Dispositions
A US holder who sells or otherwise disposes of ordinary shares or ADSs will recognize capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount realized and its tax basis, determined in US dollars, in those ordinary shares or ADSs. Capital gain of a non-corporate US holder that is recognized on or after May 6, 2003 and before January 1, 2009 is generally taxed at a maximum rate of 15% where the holder has a holding period greater than one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
The following is a summary of the key aspects of the Constitution.
Objects and purposes
The Company was registered in the state of Victoria, Australia on July 14, 1977 as a public company limited by shares. The Company is registered with the Australian and Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and its Australian Business Number is 11 005 357 522. The objects and purposes of the Company are not set out in its Constitution. Under the Corporations Act 2001, the Company has the legal capacity and powers of an individual as well as all powers of a body corporate.
132
Directors
Our Constitution and the Corporations Act 2001 regulate various matters concerning the directors of the Company:
(a) Matters in which the director has a material personal interest
A director who has a material personal interest in a matter that is being considered at a directors meeting cannot be present while the matter is being considered at the meeting and may not vote on the matter, except in the following four circumstances permitted by the Constitution and the Corporations Act 2001:
directors who do not have a material personal interest in the matter have passed a resolution identifying the relevant director, the nature and extent of the directors personal interest and its relation to the affairs of the Company and stating that the remaining directors are satisfied that the relevant directors material personal interest should not disqualify the director from being present or voting;
ASIC has made a declaration or order under the Corporations Act 2001 which permits the director to be present and vote notwithstanding the directors material personal interest;
there are not enough directors to form a quorum for a directors meeting because of the disqualification of the interested directors, in which event the directors (including directors with a material personal interest in the matter) may call a general meeting to deal with the matter; and
the matter is of a type which the Corporations Act 2001 specifically permits the director to vote upon and to be present at a directors meeting during consideration of the matter notwithstanding the directors material personal interest.
(b) Compensation of directors
The aggregate remuneration of directors is determined by the Company in general meeting. Subject to that maximum aggregate amount, remuneration is to be divided among the directors as they agree on or, in the absence of agreement, equally. The division of remuneration among directors does not require an independent quorum.
(c) Borrowing power exercisable by directors
Under the Constitution, the directors have exclusive power to manage the business of the Company to the exclusion of the members in general meetings, and may exercise all of the powers of the Company that are not required by the Corporations Act 2001, or the Constitution, to be exercised by the Company in general meeting. The general power granted to the directors includes the power to borrow. These powers can only be altered by an amendment to the Companys Constitution, which would need to be approved by a special resolution of the Companys members at a general meeting.
(d) Retirement of directors under an age limit requirement
A director who attains the age of 70 is deemed to have retired from the Company on that day, unless the remaining directors have previously resolved that the directors retirement will occur at a later date. Directors appointed since 1993 have reached an understanding that he/she will not, in normal circumstances, serve as a director beyond 15 years.
(e) Share qualification
Within 2 months after a director is appointed, the director must hold at least 2,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the Company in the directors own right.
Share rights ordinary shares
(a) Dividend rights
Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the directors from time to time. Dividends that are not claimed are required to be dealt with in accordance with laws relating to unclaimed monies.
Dividends are only payable out of profits of the Company, and a declaration by the directors as to the amount of profits available for payment of a dividend is final and binding on all members. Before paying any dividend, directors must ensure that they are in compliance with Australian prudential standards as to the payments of periodic tier 1 instrument coupon payments out of current year profits - refer Supervision and Regulation section. In addition they may set aside, out of profits of the Company, such reserves as they think proper to be applied at their discretion for any proper purposes, and may carry forward so much of the profits remaining as they consider ought not to be distributed as dividends without transferring those profits to a reserve.
133
(b) Voting rights
Each ordinary shareholder present at a general meeting (whether in person or by proxy or representative) is entitled to one vote on a show of hands or, on a poll, one vote for each fully paid ordinary share held.
(c) Right to share in profit
In the event of a winding-up of the Company, ordinary shareholders rank after creditors and preference shareholders and are fully entitled to any surplus proceeds on liquidation.
(d) Rights to redemption
Ordinary shareholders have no right to redeem their shares.
(e) Further calls
Holders of fully paid ordinary shares have no liability for further capital calls by the Company. There are no partly paid ordinary shares.
There is no provision of the Constitution that discriminates against any existing or prospective holder of ordinary shares as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares.
Share rights American depositary shares (ADSs)
Each ADS confers an interest in 5 fully paid ordinary shares in the Company which have been deposited with a depositary or custodian. The rights attaching to each fully paid ordinary share represented by an ADS are the same as the rights attaching to fully paid ordinary shares as described above. These rights are vested in the custodian or depositary as the holder of the fully paid ordinary shares, although holders of American depositary receipts (ADRs), which evidence ADSs, have certain rights against the depositary or custodian under the terms governing the issue of the ADRs.
Share rights TrUEPrS (SM) preference shares
ANZ TrUEPrS were 124,032,000 fully paid non-converting non-cumulative preference shares issued for USD6.25 per share via Trust Securities Issues in 1998.
The Trust Securities were mandatorily exchangeable for the preference shares issued by the Company, and carried an entitlement to a non-cumulative trust distribution of 8.00% or 8.08% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The Trust Securities were issued by a non-diversified closed end management investment company registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940. The preference shares themselves carried no present entitlement to dividends. Distributions to investors in the Trust Securities were funded by income distributions made by the Group.
Upon maturity of the Trust Securities in 2048, investors would have mandatorily exchanged the Trust Securities for the preference shares and thereupon the preference shares would have carried an entitlement to non-cumulative dividends of 8.00% or 8.08% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The mandatory exchange of the Trust Securities for the preference shares could have occurred earlier at the Companys option or in specified circumstances.
With the prior consent of APRA the preference shares were redeemable at the Companys option after 5 years, or within 5 years in limited circumstances. The entitlement of investors to distributions on the Trust Securities would have ceased on redemption of the preference shares.
The transaction costs arising on the issue of these instruments were recognized directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds of the equity instruments to which the costs related.
On December 12, 2003, the Group bought back its 124,032,000 preference shares issued via Trust Securities Issues for $1,045 million.
134
ANZ stapled exchangeable preferred securities (ANZ StEPS)
On September 23, 2003, the Company issued 10 million ANZ StEPS at $100 each pursuant to a prospectus dated August 14, 2003 raising $1 billion (excluding issue costs of $13 million: net raising $987 million). ANZ StEPS comprise two fully paid securities - an interest paying unsecured note (issued by ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) stapled to a fully paid preference share (issued by the Company).
Distributions on ANZ StEPS are non-cumulative and are payable quarterly in arrears based upon a floating distribution rate equal to the 90 day bank bill rate plus a margin of 100 basis points. At each payment date the 90 day bank bill rate is reset for the next quarter. Distributions are subject to certain payment tests (ie APRA requirements and distributable profits being available) and the basis for their calculation may change on any reset date. Distributions are expected to be payable on 15 March, June, September and December of each year. Dividends are not payable on the preference share while it is stapled to the note. If distributions are not paid on ANZ StEPS, the Company may not pay dividends or return capital on its ordinary shares or any other share capital ranking equal or below the preference share component.
On any reset date, ANZ may change certain terms (subject to certain restrictions) including the next reset date, market reset (from floating rate to a fixed rate, or vice versa), margin and the frequency and timing of the distribution payment dates. The first reset date is September 15, 2008. Holders of ANZ StEPS can require exchange on any reset date or earlier if certain specified events occur. On exchange, a holder will receive (at the Companys discretion) either $100 cash for each ANZ StEPS exchanged or a number of ordinary shares calculated in accordance with a conversion ratio based on $100 divided by the market price of ordinary shares at the date of conversion less 2.5%. In certain circumstances, the Company may also require exchange other than on a reset date.
Upon the occurrence of an Assignment Event, ANZ StEPS become unstapled. In this case, the note will be assigned from the holder, however, the holder will retain the preference share and the rights to exchange the preference share.
The preference shares forming part of ANZ StEPS rank equally with the preference shares issued in connection with other hybrid capital issues by the Group in all respects. Except in certain limited circumstances, holders of ANZ StEPS do not have any right to vote in general meetings of the Company.
On a winding up of the Company, the rights of ANZ StEPS holders will be determined by the preference share component of ANZ StEPS. Those preference shares rank behind all depositors and creditors, but ahead of ordinary shareholders.
The transactions costs arising on the issue of these instruments were recognized directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds of the equity instruments to which the costs relate.
An Assignment Event means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(a) a Liquidation Event in relation to ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited or ANZ;
(b) a Distribution not being paid in full within 20 Business Days after the relevant Distribution Payment Date;
(c) the Total Capital Adequacy Ratio or Tier 1 Capital Ratio of ANZ (on a Level 1 basis) or the relevant entities within the Group (on a Level 2 or Level 3 basis) falling below APRAs then current requirements for 90 continuous days (or any other period specified by APRA);
(d) ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited no longer being a subsidiary of ANZ;
(e) APRA requiring that an Assignment Event occur;
(f) ANZ choosing to have an Assignment Event occur;
(g) ANZ choosing to Convert or Repurchase ANZ StEPS after the security-holder requires Exchange;
(h) ANZ requiring Exchange; or
(i) September 14, 2053.
Exchange is a process through which the investor receives, at ANZs choice, a number of Ordinary Shares or $100.00 for each ANZ StEPS. Rights to Exchange are determined by the Preference Share component of the stapled security.
135
ANZ Hybrid Capital
On November 26, 2003, we issued 1.1 million fully paid preference shares each with a liquidation preference of USD1,000. The preference shares were issued as part of a two tranche structured hybrid capital raising consisting of:
Tranche I: USD350 million 4.484% trust securities with an initial call date of January 15, 2010; and
Tranche II: USD750 million 5.36% trust securities with an initial call date of December 15, 2013.
We used the proceeds of the capital raising for capital management purposes, including to fund a buy-back of all of the preference shares that were components of the TrUEPrS and as part of the acquisition financing with respect to the acquisition of NBNZ.
Each trust security represents a unit, which consists of:
One of our preference shares, which we refer to as the November 2003 Series I preference shares in the case of Tranche I and the November 2003 Series II preference shares in the case of Tranche II; and
USD1,000 principal amount of notes issued by a New Zealand subsidiary wholly owned by the Group, which we have fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis.
The trust securities pay semi-annual distributions on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning June 15, 2004. Initially, the notes will make interest payments that fund the distributions payable on the corresponding trust securities, while the preference shares will not pay dividends. At any time in our discretion or upon the occurrence of certain other conversion events, such as the failure of the trusts to pay distributions within seven business days of the relevant distribution payment date or a holder gives us an exchange notice, as described below, the preference shares that are represented by the relevant trust securities will be distributed to holders in redemption of such trust securities and the notes that are represented by the relevant trust securities will be automatically assigned to another wholly owned subsidiary of the Group. The distributed preference shares will become dividend paying and holders will receive non-cumulative dividends equivalent to the scheduled payments in respect of the trust securities for which the preference shares were distributed.
Dividend payments on the preference shares and interest payments on the notes, including payments under our guarantee of the notes, are subject to our having sufficient distributable profits and our complying with APRA requirements. If we do not make a payment when due, subject to certain exceptions, we will not be allowed to make payments on or repurchase any of our securities that rank equal or below the preference shares until we have made two semi-annual dividend payments on the preference shares or have paid an optional dividend, with the approval of APRA. Our obligations in respect of the preference shares and the guarantee of the notes rank senior to our obligations in respect of our ordinary shares, equal to our obligations in respect of ANZ StEPS and any other equally ranking preference shares and junior to all of our other obligations, including our obligations to our creditors and depositors.
Any redemption of the trust securities will require the approval of APRA. With such approval, the trust securities will be redeemed upon the redemption by us of the preference shares, which may occur in whole only prior to the initial call date upon the occurrence of certain tax or regulatory events and in whole or in part at any time on and after the initial call date.
If we do not give a notice of redemption, holders of trust securities may exchange their trust securities for an equivalent amount of our ordinary shares on January 15, 2010, in the case of Tranche I, and December 15, 2013, in the case of Tranche II, and on any subsequent dividend payment date, or earlier in the event that we are acquired by another entity, subject to certain exceptions, or we are subject to certain restrictions because we failed to make a payment when due. To the extent they remain outstanding, both classes of trust securities will automatically be exchanged for our ordinary shares on December 15, 2053. The number of ordinary shares we will issue in exchange for each trust security will be equal to the liquidation preference of the trust security divided by 95% of the simple average of the US equivalent of the volume weighted average sale price of our ordinary shares on each of the 20 trading days immediately prior to the date of exchange.
Holders of the preference shares are typically not entitled to vote at our general meetings. However, holders of the preference shares are entitled to vote together with the holders of our ordinary shares, to the extent that the ordinary shareholders are entitled to vote, on the basis of one vote per preference share on a limited number of matters, including any proposal to wind us up or any proposal to affect the rights attaching to the preference shares. Holders of the trust securities will be required to instruct the trustee how to vote the preference shares.
Since the preference shares will be automatically exchanged into our ordinary shares on December 15, 2053, unless they have been exchanged or redeemed prior to that date, under Australian GAAP they are considered to be debt and have therefore been reported under Loan Capital, and not Shareholders Equity, in our statement of financial position.
The transaction costs arising from the issue of the trust securities have been capitalized and will be amortized as an expense over the period ending on the initial call date of the respective tranche.
136
ANZ Euro Hybrid Capital
On December 13, 2004, we issued 0.5 million fully paid preference shares each with a liquidation preference of 1,000. The preference shares were issued as part of a structured hybrid Tier 1 capital raising where each trust security represents a unit, which consists of:
One of the 1,000 fully paid preference shares; and,
1,000 principal amount of notes issued by a United Kingdom subsidiary wholly owned by the Group, which we have fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis.
The trust securities pay quarterly non-cumulative distributions in arrears equal to the 3 month EURIBOR rate plus a margin of 66bpts. Distributions will be made on 15 March, June, September and December of each year, beginning March 15, 2005. Initially the notes will make interest payments that fund the distributions payable on the corresponding trust securities, while the preference shares will not pay dividends. After December 15, 2014, the trust securities will pay quarterly non-cumulative distributions in arrears equal to the 3 month EURIBOR rate plus a margin of 166bpts, with the additional 100bpts being funded by the preference shares paying a 1% dividend. At any time in our discretion or upon the occurrence of certain other conversion events, such as the failure of the trust to fully pay a distribution within 7 business days of the relevant distribution payment date or the business day prior to December 15, 2053, the preference shares that are represented by the relevant trust securities will be distributed to holders in redemption of such trust securities and the notes that are represented by the relevant trust securities will be automatically assigned to a branch of the company. The distributed preference shares will immediately become dividend paying and holders will receive non-cumulative dividends equivalent to the scheduled payments in respect of the trust securities for which the preference shares were distributed.
Dividend payments on the preference shares and interest payments on the notes, including payments under the guarantee of the notes, are subject to our having sufficient distributable profits and complying with APRA requirements. If we do not make a payment on the trust securities when due, then a conversion event will occur. If we do not make a payment on the preference shares when due, subject to certain exceptions, we will not be allowed to make payments on or repurchase any of our securities that rank equal or junior to the preference shares, other than proportional payments on the preference shares and other instruments that rank equally with the preference shares, until we have made four consecutive quarterly dividend payments on the preference shares and or the trust securities or have made an optional dividend payment, with the approval of APRA. Our obligations in respect of the preference shares and the guarantee of the notes will rank senior in our winding up to our obligations in respect of our ordinary shares, equal to our obligations in respect of ANZ StEPS and the USD Hybrid Capital, and junior to all other of our obligations, including our obligations to our creditors and depositors.
Any redemption of the trust securities will require the approval of APRA. With such approval, the trust securities will be redeemed upon the redemption by us of the preference shares, which may occur in whole only prior to the initial call date, December 15, 2014, upon the occurrence of certain tax or regulatory events and in whole or in part at any time on or after the initial call date.
Holders of the preference shares are typically not entitled to vote at our general meetings. However, holders of the preference shares are entitled to vote together with holders of other preference shares and our ordinary shares, to the extent that ordinary shareholders are entitled to vote, on the basis of one vote per preference share on a limited number of matters, including any proposal to wind us up or any proposal to affect the rights attaching to the preference shares. In these circumstances holders of the trust securities will be required to instruct the trustee how to vote the preference shares.
Convening of and admission to general meetings
The Board may call a meeting of the Companys shareholders. The directors must call and arrange to hold a general meeting of the Company if requested to do so by shareholders who hold at least 5% of the votes that may be cast at the general meeting or 100 shareholders entitled to vote at a general meeting. Shareholders who hold at least 5% of the votes that may be cast at the general meeting may also call and arrange to hold a general meeting of the Company at their own expense.
At least 28 days notice must be given of a meeting of the Companys shareholders. Written notice must be given to all shareholders entitled to attend and vote at a meeting. All ordinary shareholders are entitled to attend to vote at general meetings of the Company. Voting rights attaching to other classes of shares in the Company are set out above.
The directors may, in accordance with the constitution and the Corporations Act 2001, determine a time before a meeting at which membership in the Company (for the purposes of the meeting) is to be ascertained in respect of holding of shares that are quoted on the stock market of the Australian Stock Exchange.
137
Limitations on ownership and changes in control
The Constitution does not contain any limitations on the rights to own securities in the Company. However, there are detailed Australian laws and regulations which govern the acquisition of interests in the Company, and a summary of those is set out in item 7 above, Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.
The Constitution requires any sale or disposal of the Companys main undertaking to be subject to ratification by the Company in general meeting. Except for that provision, there are no provisions in the constitution which would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company which would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company or its controlled entities.
Constitution provisions governing disclosure of shareholdings
There are no provisions of the Constitution which provide an ownership threshold above which share ownership must be disclosed. However, the Corporations Act 2001 requires a person to disclose certain prescribed information to the Company and the ASX if the person has or ceases to have a substantial holding in the Company. The term substantial holding is defined in the Corporations Act 2001 as 5% or more of the total number of voting shares and is not limited to direct shareholdings.
The Corporations Act 2001 also permits the Company or ASIC to direct any member of the Company to make certain disclosures in respect of their interest in the Companys shares and the interest held by any other person in those shares.
Changes in capital
The Constitution does not make any provision governing changes in the capital of the Company, which is more stringent than is required by Australian law.
Material Contracts
There have been no material contracts entered into during the year by the Group other than the previously reported acquisition of NBNZ Holdings.
Any public documents referred to in this Annual Report on Form 20-F may be inspected by contacting the Company Secretary on (613) 9273 5555 or in writing to the Company Secretary, 100 Queen Street Melbourne, Victoria, 3000 Australia.
It is possible to read and copy documents referred to in this Annual Report on Form 20-F that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at the SECs public reference room located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington DC 20549 or for documents filed after November 4, 2002 on their website at www.sec.gov. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information.
138
Item 11: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk to earnings arising from changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or from fluctuations in bond, commodity or equity prices. It also includes the risk that the Group will incur increased interest expense arising from funding requirements during periods of poor market liquidity.
The Board of Directors, through the Risk Management Committee (a Committee of the Board), has responsibility for oversight of market risk within the Group. Routine management of market risk is delegated to two senior management committees chaired by the Chief Financial Officer. The Credit and Trading Risk Committee (CTC) is responsible for traded market risk, while the Group Asset and Liability Committee (GALCO) is responsible for non-traded market risk (or balance sheet risk).
The CTC monitors traded market risk exposures (including Value at Risk and Stress Testing) and is responsible for authorising the trading risk limit framework. The GALCO oversees, reviews and approves hedging strategies for Balance sheet and revenue hedging; reviews and approves capital management activities, and its responsible for authorising the balance sheet risk limit framework.
Derivatives Activities are conducted within the Capital Markets and Foreign Exchange trading businesses for trading purposes; and by Group Treasury for hedging/balance sheet management purposes.
The Value at Risk (VaR) Measure
A key measure of market risk is Value at Risk (VaR). VaR is a statistical estimate of the likely daily loss and is based on historical market movements.
The confidence levels used are such that there is 97.5% or 99% probability that a potential loss will not exceed the VaR estimate on any given day. The 99% confidence level encompasses a wider range of potential outcomes.
The Groups standard VaR approach for both traded and non-traded risk is historical simulation. The Group calculates VaR using historical changes in market rates and prices over the previous 500 business days.
It should be noted that because VaR is driven by actual historical observations, it is therefore not an estimate of the maximum loss that the Group could experience from an extreme market event. As a result of this limitation, the Group utilises a number of other risk measures (eg. stress testing) and associated supplementary Detailed Control Limits to measure and manage traded and non-traded market risk.
Traded and non-traded market risks have been considered separately below.
Traded Market Risk
Trading activities are focused on customer trading, distribution and underwriting of a range of securities and derivative instruments. The principal activities include foreign exchange, interest rate and debt markets. These activities are managed on a global product basis.
Derivatives Activities
The Capital Markets and Foreign Exchange businesses trade in off-balance sheet instruments within the constraints of the Market Risk Trading Policy. ANZ does not actively engage in proprietary trading; however, routine risk taking arising on the back of customer transactions is permitted within specific trading book limit structures.
The Capital Markets business trades in interest rate derivatives (forward rate agreements, swaps, futures, vanilla and exotic options) and credit instruments. The Foreign Exchange businesses trade in spot and forward FX, vanilla and exotic FX options, precious and base metals, soft commodity forwards, futures and options.
The Banks Traded Market Risk policy establishes guidelines and parameters for off-balance sheet derivative activities.
Credit Derivatives in the Trading Book
Capital Markets trade in credit default swaps (CDS) as part of its credit trading business. Counterparties are limited to banks with internal equivalent of S&P rating A- or above and ANZ-created special purpose vehicles as conduits to managed funds or fund managers where collateral is held.
139
Reference securities underlying CDS are limited to those issued by Australian and New Zealand registered entities, or those denominated in AUD or NZD where the issuer is registered in other jurisdictions and is rated no worse than S&P BBB/A3. The Trading Book is limited to holding unhedged sold credit derivative positions for 90 days, after which reference entity credit exposures are recorded for the full face value of the CDS (in line with Banking Book credit treatment).
Limit monitoring
Trading limits are independently established and monitored daily by Group Market Risk, within parameters delegated by the Boards Risk Management Committee. In addition to VaR limits, Cumulative Loss Limits and Detailed Control Limits are in place. Detailed Control Limits address risks such as, foreign exchange open positions, Vega and interest rate sensitivities. All limit excesses are reported to management in accordance with delegations contained in the Traded Risk Policy.
Group Market Risk also performs daily stress testing on all trading portfolios. These scenarios measure the potential impact on profit and loss from a series of extreme market moves.
Trading management receives daily reports and commentary of risk exposures for all portfolios - these reports are produced by Group Market Risk. On a monthly basis, Group Market Risk produces a summary report to the CTC that presents risk and financial performance data for all trading areas, along with any other significant issues that warrant discussion. The Boards Risk Management Committee also receives regular reporting and commentary on the risk in the Trading Book.
Below are aggregate VaR exposures covering both derivative and non-derivative trading positions for the Groups principal trading centers.
|
|
|
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average for |
|
|
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average |
|
|
|
As at |
|
period |
|
period |
|
period |
|
As at |
|
period |
|
period |
|
period |
|
|
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Value at risk at 97.5% confidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange |
|
0.5 |
|
2.0 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.7 |
|
1.4 |
|
2.0 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.8 |
|
Interest rate |
|
1.5 |
|
2.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.1 |
|
1.1 |
|
2.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.0 |
|
Diversification benefit |
|
(0.7 |
) |
(1.6 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
(1.5 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
Total |
|
1.3 |
|
2.5 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.4 |
|
1.7 |
|
2.6 |
|
0.7 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average for |
|
|
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average |
|
|
|
As at |
|
period |
|
period |
|
period |
|
As at |
|
period |
|
period |
|
period |
|
|
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Value at risk at 99% confidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange |
|
0.9 |
|
2.8 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.6 |
|
3.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.3 |
|
Interest rate |
|
1.8 |
|
2.8 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
3.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.7 |
|
Diversification benefit |
|
(0.9 |
) |
(2.2 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
(2.6 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
Total |
|
1.8 |
|
3.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.9 |
|
2.2 |
|
3.6 |
|
1.0 |
|
2.1 |
|
VaR is calculated separately for Foreign Exchange/Commodities and for Interest Rate/Debt Markets businesses, as well as for the Total Group. The diversification benefit reflects the correlation implied by historical rates between Foreign Exchange/Commodities and Interest Rate/Debt Markets.
As can be seen from the above table, levels of risk in ANZs Trading Books continue to be low, a continuation of the risk profile in 2003 and in line with managements focus on de-risking the organization. VaR over the last two years is approximately a third of levels in 2000. Stress testing levels reflect a similar trend, and indicate that the Trading Book does not contain any material levels of sold deep-out-of-the-money options that create market risk not reflected in VaR results.
Despite heightened demand for qualified market risk professionals, given events in the industry over the last 12 months, ANZ has retained all key staff in the independent Group Market Risk team, who continue to have a strong presence with the trading units of the Group.
140
Non-Traded Risk Management (Balance Sheet Risk)
The principal objectives of balance sheet management are to manage interest income sensitivity while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk, to hedge the market value of the Groups capital and to protect future earnings from exchange rate movements.
Balance Sheet Risk Management
The balance sheet risk management process embraces the management of non-traded interest rate risk, liquidity and risk to capital and earnings as a result of exchange rate movements. Group Treasury, a specialist balance sheet management unit, manages these risks and is overseen by the GALCO and specialists within Group Market Risk.
A key objective of balance sheet management is to produce strong and stable net interest income over time. ANZ uses simulation models to quantify the potential impact of interest rate changes on earnings.
Hedging is implemented under strictly monitored limit delegations. Additionally, GALCO is regularly updated on material hedging strategies and all net risk positions. All instruments used are approved for use, under specific dealer mandates, by Group Market Risk.
For hedging purposes ANZ principally uses forward rate agreements, futures contracts, options, interest rate swaps, currency swaps and cross currency interest rate swaps. ANZ uses a variety of foreign exchange derivatives to hedge against adverse movements in the value of foreign denominated assets and liabilities and future revenue streams.
A derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge where it has been entered into for the purpose of mitigating the impact of a change in interest rates on net interest income, or the effect of a change in rates of exchange for foreign currency amounts when translated to AUD. The derivative instrument must reduce an identified exposure and must continue to be effective in reducing that exposure until the hedging instrument is closed out, terminated, exercised or expires. To be designated as a hedge, the fair value of the hedge must move inversely with changes in the fair value of the underlying exposure.
All derivative instruments used for hedging purposes must be designated as a hedge in our accounting records at the time of entering the transaction.
Interest Rate Exposures
Interest rate risk in the balance sheet relates to the potential for changes in market interest rates to have an adverse impact on the Groups future net interest income. This risk arises from two principal sources: mismatching the repricing dates of interest bearing assets and liabilities; and the investment of capital and other non-interest bearing liabilities (NBIs) in interest bearing assets.
Generally, internal mismatch risk can be minimised (but not completely eliminated) by matching the repricing terms of assets and liabilities. The investment of capital and other NBIs in assets - key components of the Banks external risk position - generate an open interest rate exposure which is managed to optimise net interest income and, ultimately, shareholder value. If the risk profile cannot be appropriately managed by matching the repricing terms of assets and liabilities, the Bank uses derivatives to hedge residual interest rate risk.
Management of exposure to interest rates across the group is coordinated centrally by Group Treasury and executed on an individual country basis. GALCO, via Group Market Risk reporting, monitors individual interest rate risk exposures to ensure that the Banks aggregate exposure is contained within policy guidelines and approved limits set by the Risk Management Committee.
The objective of balance sheet interest rate risk management is to secure stable and optimal net interest income over both the short (next 12 months) and long term. Interest rate risk is monitored and reported using three principal measures: VaR, scenario analysis (to a 1% shock) and interest rate sensitivity gap analysis.
In Australia and New Zealand, a combination of pricing initiatives and off-balance sheet instruments are used in the management of interest rate risk. For example, where a strong medium to long term rate view is held, hedging and pricing strategies are used to modify the profiles rate sensitivity so that it is positioned to take advantage of the expected movement in interest rates. However, such positions are taken within the overall risk limits specified by policy.
Offshore operations, which are generally wholesale in nature, are able to minimise interest rate sensitivity though closely matching the maturing of the loans and deposits. Given both the size and nature of their business, the interest rate sensitivities of these balance sheets contribute little to the aggregate risk exposure, which is primarily a reflection of the positions in Australia and New Zealand.
141
The bulk of the Groups loan/deposit mix is priced on a floating rate basis, with the mix of repricing maturities influenced by the underlying needs of customers. Risk levels reflect a declining trend over the last twelve months, in general a reflection of flat yield curves in AUD and USD that existed over the period.
a) VaR Interest Rate Risk
|
|
|
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average for |
|
|
|
High for |
|
|
|
As at |
|
period |
|
period |
|
period |
|
As at |
|
period |
|
|
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 04 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
Sep 03 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Value at risk at 97.5% confidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ANZ |
|
21.0 |
|
37.2 |
|
21.0 |
|
29.5 |
|
24.4 |
|
59.3 |
|
b) Scenario Analysis - 1% Shock on the Next 12 Months Net Interest Income
A 1% overnight parallel positive shift in the yield curve is modelled to determine the potential impact on net interest income over the immediate forward period of 12 months. This is a standard risk quantification tool.
The figures in the table below indicate the outcome of this risk measure for the current and previous financial years - expressed as a percentage of reported net interest income. The sign indicates the nature of the rate sensitivity with a positive number signifying that a rate increase is positive for net interest income over the next 12 months. Conversely, a negative number signifies that a rate increase is negative for the next 12 months net interest income.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Impact of 1% Rate Shock |
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30 |
|
1.48 |
% |
1.67 |
% |
Maximum exposure |
|
1.53 |
% |
1.67 |
% |
Minimum exposure |
|
(0.09 |
)% |
(0.86 |
)% |
Average exposure |
|
0.69 |
% |
0.54 |
% |
c) Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The extent of mismatching between the repricing characteristics and timing of interest bearing assets and liabilities at any point has implications for future net interest income. On a global basis, the Group quantifies the potential variation in future net interest income as a result of these repricing mismatches each month using a static gap model.
The repricing gaps themselves are constructed based on contractual repricing information. However, for those assets and liabilities where the contractual term to repricing is not considered to be reflective of the actual interest rate sensitivity (for example, products priced at the Groups discretion), a profile based on historically observed and/or anticipated rate sensitivity is used. This treatment excludes the effect of basis risk between customer pricing and wholesale market pricing. For example, when wholesale market rates are anticipating an official rate increase the Group does not reprice certain customer business until the first repricing date after the official rate rise.
The majority of the Groups non-traded interest exposure exists in Australia and New Zealand. In these centers, a balance sheet simulation process supplements this static gap information. This allows the net interest income outcomes of a number of different scenarios - with different market interest rate environments and future balance sheet structures - to be identified. This enables the Group to more accurately quantify the interest rate risks associated with the balance sheet, and to formulate strategies to manage current and future risk profiles.
The following table represents the interest rate sensitivity as at September 30, 2004 of the Groups assets, liabilities and off balance sheet instruments repricing in the periods shown.
142
|
|
|
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
|
|
Not |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Less than |
|
3 months and |
|
6 months and |
|
1 year and |
|
After |
|
bearing |
|
|
|
|||||||
At September 30, 2004 |
|
3 months |
|
6 months |
|
12 months |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
interest |
|
Total |
|
|||||||
|
|
$ |
m |
|
$ |
m |
|
$ |
m |
|
$ |
m |
|
$ |
m |
|
$ |
m |
|
$ |
m |
|
Liquid assets and due from other financial institutions |
|
8,030 |
|
788 |
|
508 |
|
823 |
|
6 |
|
989 |
|
11,144 |
|
|||||||
Trading and investment securities |
|
8,326 |
|
1,261 |
|
1,538 |
|
1,667 |
|
293 |
|
139 |
|
13,224 |
|
|||||||
Net loans and advances |
|
147,883 |
|
8,415 |
|
12,914 |
|
36,740 |
|
673 |
|
(1,663 |
) |
204,962 |
|
|||||||
Other assets |
|
383 |
|
134 |
|
127 |
|
607 |
|
5 |
|
28,759 |
|
30,015 |
|
|||||||
Total assets |
|
164,622 |
|
10,598 |
|
15,087 |
|
39,837 |
|
977 |
|
28,224 |
|
259,345 |
|
|||||||
Certificates of deposit and term deposits |
|
54,245 |
|
7,596 |
|
4,574 |
|
4,199 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
70,621 |
|
|||||||
Other deposits |
|
53,843 |
|
843 |
|
1,648 |
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
7,927 |
|
69,258 |
|
|||||||
Other borrowings and due to other financial institutions |
|
27,733 |
|
2,784 |
|
2,844 |
|
1,805 |
|
7 |
|
854 |
|
36,027 |
|
|||||||
Other liabilities |
|
127 |
|
151 |
|
186 |
|
749 |
|
166 |
|
28,058 |
|
29,437 |
|
|||||||
Bonds, notes and loan capital |
|
18,738 |
|
2,474 |
|
962 |
|
9,955 |
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
36,077 |
|
|||||||
Total liabilities |
|
154,686 |
|
13,848 |
|
10,214 |
|
21,705 |
|
4,128 |
|
36,839 |
|
241,420 |
|
|||||||
Shareholders equity and outside equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,925 |
|
17,925 |
|
|||||||
Off balance sheet items affecting interest rate sensitivity |
|
6,655 |
|
3,114 |
|
(8,887 |
) |
(4,777 |
) |
3,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Interest sensitivity gap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
net |
|
16,591 |
|
(136 |
) |
(4,014 |
) |
13,355 |
|
744 |
|
(26,540 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
cumulative |
|
16,591 |
|
16,455 |
|
12,441 |
|
25,796 |
|
26,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
For more detail on interest rate sensitivity refer to Note 36 to the Financial Report.
Foreign Currency Exposures
ANZ manages its structural foreign exchange exposures within the context of an overall capital and earnings strategy. Foreign currency capital and earnings are not automatically hedged as they form part of a diversified portfolio of assets. However, certain exposures may be hedged to protect the capital ratio or where the GALCO has a strong medium term view that the foreign currency is overvalued.
The table below shows the aggregate amounts of our balance sheet financial instruments denominated in currencies other than Australian dollars. (These have been translated at the September 30, 2004 exchange rates used for our financial reporting).
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-AUD |
|
Year ended September 30, 2004 |
|
NZD |
|
USD |
|
GBP |
|
Other |
|
exposure |
|
|
|
AUD$M |
|
AUD$M |
|
AUD$M |
|
AUD$M |
|
AUD$M |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
2,051 |
|
2,134 |
|
279 |
|
460 |
|
4,924 |
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
1,965 |
|
1,890 |
|
51 |
|
344 |
|
4,250 |
|
Trading securities |
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
715 |
|
Investment securities |
|
966 |
|
1,695 |
|
645 |
|
818 |
|
4,124 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
56,680 |
|
9,471 |
|
914 |
|
3,129 |
|
70,194 |
|
Customers liability for acceptances |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
61 |
|
Other financial assets |
|
2,646 |
|
7,744 |
|
298 |
|
1,280 |
|
11,968 |
|
Total |
|
64,930 |
|
22,992 |
|
2,187 |
|
6,127 |
|
96,236 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
961 |
|
2,874 |
|
296 |
|
1,308 |
|
5,439 |
|
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
41,634 |
|
24,523 |
|
1,699 |
|
3,901 |
|
71,757 |
|
Liability for acceptances |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
60 |
|
Bonds and notes |
|
667 |
|
4,718 |
|
3,896 |
|
17,343 |
|
26,624 |
|
Loan capital |
|
794 |
|
3,555 |
|
1,506 |
|
1,389 |
|
7,244 |
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
10,660 |
|
2,937 |
|
140 |
|
300 |
|
14,037 |
|
Total |
|
54,716 |
|
38,664 |
|
7,537 |
|
24,244 |
|
125,161 |
|
Information on fair values is contained in Note 37 to the Financial Report and information on contract terms is contained in Notes 9, 10, 12, 13, 22, 23, 24, 28 and 29 to the Financial Report.
Further details on our foreign exchange derivative financial instruments are contained in Note 35 and 38 to the Financial Report.
Foreign Currency Related Risks
A proportion of the Banks Capital is invested in its offshore operations and is denominated in a variety of foreign currencies. Movements in foreign exchange rates impact the AUD value of this capital. The resultant gains or losses directly affect the level of the Groups shareholders equity; net assets per share and the Groups Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio. Variations in the value of these foreign currency investments are reflected in the Foreign Currency Translation Reserve.
Subject to Policy guidelines, GALCO has the authority to hedge foreign currency capital exposures when the capital ratio is at risk and to achieve equilibrium between foreign currency capital and risk weighted assets.
Capital related hedge contracts outstanding at September 30, 2004 were USD27 million, GBP157 million and NZD nil.
The Group incurs some non-traded foreign currency risk related to the potential repatriation of profits from non-Australian business units. Movements in foreign exchange rates may impact reported Group results. As a result, under terms dictated by the Banks Foreign Exchange Policy, foreign currency earnings for approved future periods may be hedged.
Hedging decisions are made within the context of the Banks capital and earnings management strategy prevailing at the time and over a medium term time horizon (ie, 3 to 5 years).
The main instruments utilised to hedge the Groups foreign exchange exposures are unhedged foreign currency denominated borrowings; and forward foreign exchange transactions involving a sale of foreign currency.
All hedging strategies relating to future foreign exchange earnings are specifically approved by GALCO. Hedge positions and outcomes are also routinely reported to GALCO.
The most material stream of non-AUD earnings relate to the Groups New Zealand subsidiaries. This is reflected in the hedging undertaken to protect future earning from currency exposure. The scale of the hedging that has been undertaken reflects, on a descending volume basis, forecast future earnings over a number of years.
This risk is routinely monitored and hedging is conducted where it is likely to add shareholder value.
144
Revenue related hedge contracts outstanding at September 30, 2004 were USD26 million and NZD3,691 million. During the year NZD2.4 billion hedges of NZD revenue were put in place to lock in historically high NZD exchange rates. The NZD3,691 million is hedging approximately $1.1 billion of NZD revenue in each of the 2005, 2006 and 2007 years.
The risk relating to the timing mismatch non-traded foreign currency assets and liabilities has not been presented, as this type of risk is minimal for the Group.
Foreign Currency Investments in Subsidiaries and Associates
If required, the foreign currency exposures arising from non-AUD investments in overseas branches and subsidiaries are managed by Group Treasury using foreign exchange forward contracts and cross currency back-to-back lending. Foreign currency exposures may be matched on a currency by currency basis to hedge the impact of foreign exchange rate changes, provided the hedging can be implemented in a cost effective manner.
Movements arising on these foreign exchange exposures impact reserves (see foreign currency translation reserves on page 27 of the Financial Report). Exposures are reviewed on a regular basis by GALCO.
Further key market risk information is contained in Notes 35, 36, 37 and 38 to the Financial Report and in Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
Liquidity Risk
The liquidity management process ensures that funds are available at all times to meet maturing obligations as they fall due. Our policy establishes daily liquidity management practices as well as scenario-based guidelines to monitor future liquidity flows under both normal operating conditions and in the event of an ANZ-specific liquidity crisis.
To assist with routine and crisis liquidity management and to support payment system activities, the Bank holds a portfolio of high quality, readily saleable assets. The interest rate risk on this portfolio is hedged to minimise any potential impact to the Banks net interest income.
Further liquidity information is contained throughout the Financial Report, and within the Financial Review section of this document.
Credit Derivatives in the Banking Book
ANZs banking book purchases credit protection in order to hedge names for which ANZ has large exposures. Selling credit protection occurs to a limited extent, in order to further diversify ANZs exposure and manage the portfolio profile. All credit derivative activity in the Banking Book is managed through a specialized Portfolio Management team, under clearly defined policies and procedures established by Group Risk Management via Board-delegated authorities. Oversight is maintained via the Portfolio Management Committee, which is made up of various executives from both business units and from Group Risk Management.
In addition to direct use of credit derivatives for Portfolio Management, ANZ holds investments in three structured transactions. Each of these investments is in the amount of USD250 million, where ANZ has indirect exposure to a sold First-to-Default basket of credit derivatives in the amount of USD500 million, with a first-loss limit of USD250 million. The underlying exposures are to a highly diversified group of 67 names, with no individual aggregate exposure in excess of USD60 million. As with credit derivative activity associated with Portfolio Management, these exposures are independently monitored by Group Market Risk, with key trigger points established to proactively manage the risk. To date, credit protection totalling USD93 million has been purchased as a hedge against 5 of the underlying names.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments
The Group complies with SFAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended by SFAS 138 Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities in its US GAAP reconciliation. SFAS 133 requires all derivatives to be recognized on balance sheet at fair value. Movements in the fair value of derivatives are taken to the statement of profit and loss, unless the derivatives meet the criteria prescribed in SFAS 133 for fair value, cash flow, or foreign currency hedges. If certain criteria are met derivatives can be designated as hedges. Under SFAS 133 normal banking hedging practices may not qualify for hedge accounting, notwithstanding their ability to hedge existing balance sheet positions from an economic perspective.
As a result future fair value movements recognized in the US GAAP reconciliation may not be indicative of the Groups risk profile.
Further information on the results of the Groups hedging activities, and the effectiveness of the risk management policies, can be assessed better by considering the information provided on interest rate risk in note 36 to the Financial Report, and the information on hedging derivatives provided in note 38: Derivative Financial Instruments to the Financial Report. The accounting for derivatives under Australian GAAP is outlined in note 38 to the Financial Report.
145
Under SFAS 133, movements in the value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges are taken to the statement of profit and loss, along with the movement in the fair value of the underlying exposure that is being hedged to the extent the hedge is effective. These amounts largely offset each other with any in effectiveness in the hedge recognized in the US GAAP statement of financial performance.
Movements in the effective portion of the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are taken to other comprehensive income. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in the US GAAP statement of financial performance immediately. Amounts are subsequently reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings as the hedged transaction impacts earnings.
The net gain/(loss) after tax in the net income according to US GAAP recognized during the September 2004 year due to fair value and cashflow hedge ineffectiveness (in respect of qualifying hedges) or non compliance is $(28) million (2003: ($57) million; 2002: $10 million) and ($35) million (2003: $24 million; 2002: ($22) million) respectively.
146
Item 12: Description of Securities other than Equity Securities
None
Item 13: Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None
Item 14: Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and use of Proceeds
None
Item 15: Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
For 2004, the Group performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the material financial and non-financial information required to be disclosed in the annual report on Form 20-F and filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner. The evaluation was performed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedure, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Groups management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Groups disclosures controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2004.
Internal Controls
There have been no changes in the Groups internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this annual report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Groups internal control over financial reporting.
Item 16A: Audit Committee Financial Expert
Refer to Item 7 pages 113 and 118.
Refer to Item 7 pages 116 to 117.
Item 16C: Fees Paid to Accountants and Pre-approved Policies and Procedures
Refer to Item 7 pages 118 to 121.
Not applicable as Item 18 complied with.
See attached for Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Financial Report and Consent of KPMG.
147
Exhibit 4.1 Employment contracts
4.1.1 Mr R Moore
4.1.2 Mr S Targett
4.1.3 Sir J Anderson
4.1.4 Mr J McFarlane
4.1.5 Mr G Miller
4.1.6 Mr P Hodgson
Exhibit 8 Subsidiaries
Exhibit 12.1 302 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 12.2 302 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1 906 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2 906 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
148
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
(Registrant)
By: |
/s/ P R Marriott |
|
||||
|
|
|||||
P R MARRIOTT |
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Date: December 17, 2004 |
|
|||||
149
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 4.1 Employment contracts
4.1.1 Mr R Moore
4.1.2 Mr S Targett
4.1.3 Sir J Anderson
4.1.4 Mr J McFarlane
4.1.5 Mr G Miller
4.1.6 M P Hodgson
Exhibit 8 Subsidiaries
Exhibit 12
Exhibit 12.1 302 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 12.2 302 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13
Exhibit 13.1 906 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2 906 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
150
FINANCIAL REPORT
CONTENTS
There have been some additional immaterial disclosures made from the Financial Report published on 4 November 2004 to comply with US requirements. These additional disclosures have impacted notes 1, 12, 38, 48 and 55.
1
The directors present their report together with the Financial Report of the consolidated entity (the Group), being Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (the Company) and its controlled entities, for the year ended 30 September 2004 and the Auditors Report thereon. The information is provided in conformity with the Corporations Act 2001.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activities of the Group during the year were general banking, mortgage lending, leasing, hire purchase and general finance, international and investment banking, nominee and custodian services, executor and trustee services and through its joint venture ING Australia Limited (INGA) and ANZ National Bank Limited, life insurance and wealth management.
There has been no significant change in the nature of the principal activities of the Group during the financial year.
At 30 September 2004, the Group had 1,190 points of representation.
RESULT
Profit - Consolidated net profit after income tax attributable to shareholders of the Company was $2,815 million, an increase of 20% over the prior year.
Net loans and advances increased by 37% from $149,465 million to $204,962 million, primarily due to the acquisition of National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ) and growth in mortgage lending and commercial lending in Australia.
Deposits and other borrowings increased by 35% from $124,494 million to $168,557 million primarily due to the acquisition of NBNZ and to fund asset growth.
The provision for doubtful debts has been determined using economic loss provisioning (ELP) and is based on the Groups risk management models. The ELP charge increased 3% from $614 million to $632 million, including $62 million relating to NBNZ. The current charge reflects a decrease in the ELP rate over the year in line with the Groups improving risk profile. This is as a result of growth in low risk domestic assets (principally mortgages), the acquisition of NBNZ, the continued risk reduction strategy covering the overseas portfolio and high risk assets, and a lower Corporate Centre charge reflecting lower unexpected offshore losses. ANZs ELP models recognise that the general provision balance must be regularly reviewed, and in rare situations, increased to cover unusual events. The balance is at an appropriate level.
Net specific provisions were $443 million, down $84 million from the prior year. Gross non-accrual loans decreased to $829 million, down from $1,007 million, or 0.4%, down from 0.7%, of net loans and advances. The reductions reflect the strategy to reduce risk in overseas portfolios (not including New Zealand).
Further details are contained in the Chief Financial Officers review on pages 12 to 19 of the 2004 Annual Report.
STATE OF AFFAIRS
In the directors opinion, there have been no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group during the financial year, other than:
Acquisition of the National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ) - On 24 October 2003, the Company announced it had entered into an agreement to acquire NBNZ and the acquisition was completed on 1 December 2003. On 26 June 2004, NBNZ was amalgamated with ANZ Banking Group (New Zealand) Limited to create ANZ National Bank Limited.
Funding of NBNZ acquisition
Renounceable Rights Issue - In November/ December 2003, the Company issued 276,847,766 ordinary shares by way of a 2 for 11 Renounceable Rights Issue at $13 per share in the Company, raising $3,562 million (net of issue costs).
US Stapled Trust Security Issue - On 27 November 2003, the Company raised USD1.1 billion via the issue of non-cumulative stapled trust securities, to support the capital and funding base of the Group.
Trust Securities Issues (TrUEPrS) - On 12 December 2003, the Company bought back its 124,032,000 TrUEPrS that were issued at USD6.25 per share in 1998. Further details are included on page 63 of this 2004 Financial Report.
Reduction of Risk - The Company has been actively reducing the overall risk profile of the Group. Net specific provisions of $443 million were down 16% compared to the prior year. This was below the amount accrued for doubtful debts in the Statement of Financial Performance of $632 million.
Further review of matters affecting the Groups state of affairs is also contained in the 2004 Annual Report under the Chairmans Report on pages 8 to 9, the Chief Executive Officers Report on pages 10 to 11 and the Chief Financial Officers Review on pages 12 to 19.
DIVIDENDS
The directors propose that a final fully franked dividend of 54 cents per fully paid ordinary share be declared on 15 November 2004 and be paid on 17 December 2004. The proposed payment amounts to approximately $983 million.
During the financial year, the following fully franked dividends were paid on fully paid ordinary shares:
Type |
|
Cents per |
|
Amount before |
|
Date of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final |
|
51 |
|
777 |
|
19 December 2003 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim |
|
47 |
|
850 |
|
1 July 2004 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
A review of the operations of the Group during the financial year and the results of those operations are contained in the Chairmans Report, the Chief Executive Officers Report, and the Chief Financial Officers Review and Business Performance on pages 8 to 9, 10 to 11, 12 to 19 and 34 to 37 respectively of the 2004 Annual Report.
2
EVENTS SINCE THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR
Merger of ANZs trustee business announced with Equity Trustees Limited (announced 12 October 2004);
On-market share buyback of at least $350 million pending regulatory approval for a new offshore hybrid equity transaction (announced 26 October 2004); and
Sale of London-headquartered project finance activities (announced 26 October 2004).
Other than the items above (these are further described in note 9 of the Concise Report to the 2004 Annual Report on page 86 and note 58 of this Financial Report), no matter or circumstance has arisen between 30 September 2004 and the date of this report that has significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the Group in future financial years, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the Group in future years.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Details of likely developments in the operations of the Group in future financial years are contained in the Chairmans Report and the Chief Executive Officers Report contained in the 2004 Annual Report. In the opinion of the directors, disclosure of any further information would be likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to the Group.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
The operations of the Group are not subject to any particular or significant environmental regulation under a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory. However, the operations of the Group may become subject to environmental regulation when enforcing securities over land. ANZ has developed policies to appropriately manage such environmental risks. ANZ has not incurred any environmental liabilities during the year. Further information on ANZs environmental framework and practices can be found in the 2004 Annual Report on pages 38 to 39 and on anz.com.
DIRECTORS QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
From 1 October 2003 to 31 January 2004, the Board was comprised of seven non-executive directors. Three new non-executive director appointments were made in 2004: Dr Greg Clark on 1 February 2004; and Mr David Meiklejohn and Mr John Morschel on 1 October 2004. These new appointees will be retiring and seeking election at the 2004 Annual General Meeting. Information about these directors is included in the Notice of Annual General Meeting.
At the date of this report, the Board comprises ten non-executive directors who have a diversity of business and community experience and one executive director, the Chief Executive Officer, who has extensive banking experience. The names of directors and details of their qualifications and experience are contained on pages 42, 43 and 47 of the 2004 Annual Report and on anz.com.
Special responsibilities and attendance at meetings by directors, are shown on page 51 of the 2004 Annual Report.
For those directors in office at 30 September 2004, details of the directorships of other listed companies held by each director in the 3 years prior to the end of the 2004 financial year are listed in the 2004 Annual Report on pages 42 and 43.
COMPANY SECRETARIES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Currently there are three people appointed as Company Secretary of the Company.
Details of their roles are contained on page 51 of the 2004 Annual Report. Their qualifications are as follows:
Tim LEstrange, LLB, BCom, ANZ Group General Counsel and Company Secretary
Mr LEstrange has a long-standing legal career spanning 25 years. He has significant experience in corporate law. Mr LEstrange joined ANZ in 2003. Prior to ANZ, he worked closely with Boards and senior management of major corporations, banks and financial institutions. Mr LEstrange was the National Executive Partner, Litigation and Dispute Resolution of Allens Arthur Robinson and a member of the Board of Management of that firm. He was also Managing Partner of Allen Allen & Hemsley.
Peter Marriott, BEc (Hons), ANZ Chief Financial Officer.
Mr Marriott has been involved in the finance industry for more than 20 years. Mr Marriott joined ANZ in 1993. Prior to his career at ANZ, Mr Marriott was a Partner in the Melbourne office of the then KPMG Peat Marwick. He is a Fellow of a number of professional organisations including the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and the Australian Institute of Banking and Finance. He is also a Member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
John Priestley, BEc, LLB, ANZ Deputy General Counsel and Company Secretary.
Mr Priestley, a qualified lawyer, joined ANZ in 2004. Prior to ANZ, he had a long career with the Mayne Group as Company Secretary and Group General Manager, Corporate Services responsible for the legal, company secretarial, compliance and insurance functions.
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The Companys Relationship with External Auditor Policy states that the external auditor may not provide services that are perceived to be in conflict with the role of the auditor. These include consulting advice and sub-contracting of operational activities normally undertaken by management, and engagements where the auditor may ultimately be required to express an opinion on its own work.
Specifically the policy:
Limits the non-audit services that may be provided;
Requires that audit and permitted non-audit services must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, or pre-approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee and notified to the Audit Committee; and
Requires the external auditor to not commence an audit engagement for the Group, until the Group has confirmed that the engagement has been pre-approved.
The Audit Committee has reviewed a summary of non-audit services provided by the external auditor for 2004, and has confirmed that the provision of non-audit services for 2004 is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. This has been formally advised to the Board of Directors.
The external auditor has confirmed to the Audit Committee that they have complied with the Companys Relationship with External Auditor Policy on the provision of non-audit services by the external auditor for 2004.
3
The non-audit services supplied by the Groups external auditor, KPMG, and the amount paid or payable by type of non-audit service during the year to 30 September 2004 are as follows:
Non-audit service |
|
Amount paid/payable |
|
Co-sourced internal audit services(1) |
|
1,260 |
|
Tax compliance and related services |
|
628 |
|
Controls and process reviews |
|
249 |
|
Review of the non-cumulative US Stapled Trust Securities issue |
|
219 |
|
NBNZ due diligence oversight |
|
420 |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley and International Financial Reporting Standard matters |
|
335 |
|
Accounting advice |
|
170 |
|
Securitisation review |
|
128 |
|
Review of capital raising circulars |
|
73 |
|
Other |
|
157 |
|
Total |
|
3,639 |
|
(1) The work performed by KPMG was independent of the external audit team and management
The directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services by the external auditor during the year to 30 September 2004 is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001.
AUDITORS INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
The Companys lead auditor has provided a written declaration under Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 that to the best of his knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of:
the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
the applicable Australian code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
A copy of this declaration is detailed on page 88 of the 2004 Annual Report. This declaration is incorporated in and forms part of the Directors Report.
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS WHO WERE PREVIOUSLY PARTNERS OF THE AUDITOR
The following persons are currently officers of the Group and were partners of KPMG at a time when KPMG was the auditor of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited:
Ms Margaret Jackson, Non-executive Director (left KPMG in June 1992);
Mr Peter Marriott, Chief Financial Officer (left KPMG in January 1993).
CEO/CFO DECLARATION
The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have given a declaration to the Board concerning the Groups financial statements under section 295A(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 and recommendations 4.1 and 7.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations.
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS INDEMNITY
The Companys Constitution (Rule 11.1) permits the Company to indemnify each officer or employee of the Company against liabilities (so far as may be permitted under the Corporations Act 2001) incurred in the execution and discharge of the officers or employees duties.
It is the Companys policy that its employees should not incur any liability for acting in the course of their employment legally, within the policies of the Company and provided they act in good faith.
Under the policy, the Company will indemnify employees against any liability they incur in carrying out their role. The indemnity protects employees and former employees who incur a liability when acting as an employee, trustee or officer of the Company, or a subsidiary of the Company at the request of the Company.
The indemnity is subject to the Corporations Act 2001 and will not apply in respect of any liability arising from:
a claim by the Company;
a claim by a related body corporate;
a lack of good faith;
illegal or dishonest conduct; or
non compliance with the Companys policies or discretions.
The Company has entered into Deeds of Access, Insurance and Indemnity with each of its directors and secretaries and with certain employees and certain other individuals who act as directors of related body corporates or of another company. To the extent permitted by law, the Company indemnifies the individual for all liabilities, including costs, damages and expenses incurred in their capacity as an officer of the company to which they have been appointed.
The Company has indemnified the trustees and former trustees of certain of the Companys superannuation funds and directors, former directors, officers and former officers of trustees of various Company sponsored superannuation schemes in Australia. Under the relevant Deeds of Indemnity, the Company must indemnify each indemnified person if the assets of the relevant fund are insufficient to cover any loss, damage, liability or cost incurred by the indemnified person in connection with the fund, being loss, damage, liability or costs for which the indemnified person would have been entitled to be indemnified out of the assets of the fund in accordance with the trust deed and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. This indemnity survives the termination of the fund. Some of the indemnified persons are or were directors or executive officers of the Company.
The Company has also indemnified certain employees of the Company, being trustees and administrators of a trust which is a subsidiary entity, from and against any loss, damage, liability, tax, penalty, expense or claim of any kind or nature arising out of or in connection with the creation, operation or dissolution of the trust, where they are acting in good faith and in a manner that they reasonably believed to be within the scope of the authority conferred by the trust.
4
Except for the above, neither the Company nor any related body corporate of the Company has indemnified or made an agreement to indemnify any person who is or has been an officer or auditor of the Company or of a related body corporate.
During the financial year, and again since the end of the financial year, the Company has paid a premium for an insurance policy for the benefit of the directors, secretaries, and senior managers of the Company, and directors, secretaries and senior managers of related bodies corporate of the Company. In accordance with common commercial practice, the insurance policy prohibits disclosure of the nature of the liability insured against and the amount of the premium.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS REMUNERATION POLICY
Details of ANZs remuneration policy in respect of the directors and executive officers is detailed in the Remuneration Report on pages 54 to 71 of the 2004 Annual Report and pages 6 to 23 of this Financial Report. Details of the remuneration paid to each non-executive director, the Chief Executive Officer and other specified executives are detailed in the Remuneration Report. The Remuneration Report is incorporated in and forms part of this Directors Report.
DIRECTORS SHAREHOLDINGS
The directors shareholdings, both beneficial and non-beneficial, as at the date of this report in the shares of the Company are detailed in the Remuneration Report.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SHARE OPTIONS
Details of share options issued over un-issued shares granted to the Chief Executive Officer, senior executives and officers, and on issue as at the date of this report are detailed in the Remuneration Report and note 50 to this 2004 Financial Report.
No person entitled to exercise any option has or had, by virtue of an option, a right to participate in any share issue of any other body corporate. The names of all persons who currently hold options are entered in the register kept by the Company pursuant to section 170 of the Corporations Act 2001. This register may be inspected free of charge.
ROUNDING OF AMOUNTS
The Company is a company of the kind referred to in Australian Securities and Investments Commission class order 98/100 dated 10 July 1998 (as amended) pursuant to section 341(1) of the Corporations Act 2001. As a result, amounts in this Financial Report have been rounded to the nearest million dollars except where otherwise indicated.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
/s/ Charles Goode |
|
Charles Goode |
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John McFarlane |
|
John McFarlane |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
4 November 2004 |
|
5
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section F. Equity Instruments relating to Directors and Specified Executives |
|
SECTION A. REMUNERATION TABLES
For the year ended 30 September 2004 details of the emoluments of the directors are set out below (table is continued on page 7):
|
|
|
|
PRIMARY(3) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
Long
service |
|
Value of
shares |
|
Associated
entity |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-executive Directors(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CB Goode (Appointed director July1991; appointed Chairman August 1995) |
|
2004 |
|
91,000 |
|
n/a |
|
338,000 |
|
|
|
Independent Non Executive Director, Chairman |
|
2003 |
|
76,000 |
|
n/a |
|
274,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G Clark (Appointed February 2004) |
|
2004 |
|
86,667 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JC Dahlsen (Appointed May 1985)(7) |
|
2004 |
|
130,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
110,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RS Deane (Appointed September 1994) |
|
2004 |
|
130,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
117,958 |
(9) |
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
110,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
100,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JK Ellis (Appointed October 1995) |
|
2004 |
|
103,000 |
|
n/a |
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
110,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM Gonski (Appointed February 2002) |
|
2004 |
|
130,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
50,150 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
110,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
42,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA Jackson (Appointed March 1994) |
|
2004 |
|
130,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
88,000 |
|
n/a |
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BW Scott (Appointed August 1985) (7) |
|
2004 |
|
130,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
24,389 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
110,000 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OF NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS |
|
2004 |
|
930,667 |
|
n/a |
|
365,000 |
|
192,497 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
714,000 |
|
n/a |
|
296,000 |
|
143,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J McFarlane (Appointed October 1997) |
|
2004 |
|
43 |
(8) |
78,211 |
|
1,882,831 |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
2003 |
|
702,565 |
|
23,431 |
|
709,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OF ALL DIRECTORS |
|
2004 |
|
930,710 |
|
78,211 |
|
2,247,831 |
|
192,497 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
1,416,565 |
|
23,431 |
|
1,005,685 |
|
143,496 |
|
(1) DE Meiklejohn and JP Morschel commenced as directors on 1 October 2004
(2) Shares acquired through participation in Directors Share Plan (relates to CEO only in relation to cash bonus, as Non-Executive Directors do not participate in short-term incentive arrangements). Value reflects the price at which the shares were purchased on market (amortisation not applicable)
(3) Non-monetary benefits for all directors are nil
(4) Accrual relates to Directors Retirement Scheme. If each non-executive director had ceased to be a director as at 30 September 2004, the following benefits would have been payable under the Directors Retirement Scheme: CB Goode - $1,069,255; G Clark- $33,008; JC Dahlsen - $402,365; RS Deane - $644,116; JK Ellis- $412,058; DM Gonski - $146,725; MA Jackson - $366,690; BW Scott- $389,125. The Directors Retirement Scheme is being reviewed and it is currently planned to be discontinued after 30 September 2005
(5) Details of options and deferred shares granted appear in the Annual Report of the year in which they are granted. In accordance with the requirements of AASB1046A, the amortisation value includes a proportion of the fair value (taking into account market-related vesting conditions) of all equity that had not yet fully vested as at the commencement of the financial year. It is assumed that 100% of the options will vest at the commencement of their exercise period (ie the shortest possible vesting period is assumed). The fair value is determined at grant date and is allocated on a straight-line basis over the shortest possible vesting period. The fair value is determined using a binomial option pricing model that is explained in section F8. The amount included as remuneration is not related to nor indicative of the benefit (if any) that may ultimately be realised should the options become exercisable
6
|
|
|
|
PRIMARY(3) |
|
POST EMPLOYMENT |
|
EQUITY(5) |
|
OTHER(6) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Committee |
|
Value of
shares |
|
Primary |
|
Super |
|
Retirement |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
Non-executive Directors(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CB Goode (Appointed director July1991; appointed Chairman August 1995) |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
429,000 |
|
11,297 |
|
99,586 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
539,883 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director, Chairman |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
350,000 |
|
10,520 |
|
16,996 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
377,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G Clark (Appointed February 2004) |
|
2004 |
|
10,834 |
|
n/a |
|
97,501 |
|
7,597 |
|
33,008 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
138,106 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JC Dahlsen (Appointed May 1985)(7) |
|
2004 |
|
65,050 |
|
n/a |
|
195,050 |
|
11,296 |
|
74,356 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
280,702 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
25,000 |
|
n/a |
|
135,000 |
|
10,520 |
|
22,430 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
167,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RS Deane (Appointed September 1994) |
|
2004 |
|
19,500 |
|
n/a |
|
267,458 |
|
10,321 |
|
70,998 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
348,777 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
210,996 |
|
9,900 |
|
17,151 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
238,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JK Ellis (Appointed October 1995) |
|
2004 |
|
52,250 |
|
n/a |
|
182,250 |
|
11,297 |
|
65,780 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
259,327 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
25,000 |
|
n/a |
|
135,000 |
|
10,520 |
|
23,384 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
168,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM Gonski (Appointed February 2002) |
|
2004 |
|
16,050 |
|
n/a |
|
196,200 |
|
11,297 |
|
67,227 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
274,724 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
152,500 |
|
10,520 |
|
49,078 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
212,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA Jackson (Appointed March 1994) |
|
2004 |
|
42,250 |
|
n/a |
|
172,250 |
|
10,899 |
|
56,352 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
239,501 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
110,000 |
|
9,900 |
|
(5,562 |
)(11) |
n/a |
|
|
|
114,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BW Scott (Appointed August 1985)(7) |
|
2004 |
|
30,750 |
|
n/a |
|
185,139 |
|
11,297 |
|
64,839 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
261,275 |
|
Independent Non Executive Director |
|
2003 |
|
25,000 |
|
n/a |
|
135,000 |
|
10,520 |
|
15,950 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
161,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OF NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS |
|
2004 |
|
236,684 |
|
n/a |
|
1,724,848 |
|
85,301 |
|
532,146 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,342,295 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
75,000 |
|
n/a |
|
1,228,496 |
|
72,400 |
|
139,427 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
1,440,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J McFarlane (Appointed October 1997) |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
1,850,006 |
|
3,811,091 |
|
417,000 |
(10) |
|
|
2,584,880 |
(12) |
90,619 |
(13) |
6,903,590 |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
982,121 |
|
2,417,802 |
|
87,750 |
|
|
|
2,538,759 |
|
|
|
5,044,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OF ALL DIRECTORS |
|
2004 |
|
236,684 |
|
1,850,006 |
|
5,535,939 |
|
502,301 |
|
532,146 |
|
2,584,880 |
|
90,619 |
|
9,245,885 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
75,000 |
|
982,121 |
|
3,646,298 |
|
160,150 |
|
139,427 |
|
2,538,759 |
|
|
|
6,484,634 |
|
(6) Amounts disclosed for remuneration of directors exclude insurance premiums paid by the consolidated entity in respect of directors and officers liability insurance contracts which cover current and former directors and officers, including executive officers of the entity and directors, executive officers and secretaries of the controlled entities. The total premium, which cannot be disclosed because of confidentiality agreements, has not been allocated to the individuals covered by the insurance policy as, based on all available information, the directors believe that no reasonable basis for such allocation exists
(7) JC Dahlsen and BW Scott will be retiring as directors on 3 February 2005 and 23 April 2005 respectively
(8) J McFarlane elected to use almost all his cash salary and bonus to purchase on market deferred shares under the Directors Share Plan.
(9) Amounts paid in NZD are converted to AUD at an average rate for the year of 1.1254 (1.1139 in 2003)
(10) Includes $300,000 additional employer contribution, agreed as part of contract extension announced 26 October 2004 (refer to section D2)
(11) In accordance with the ANZ Directors Retirement Scheme (explained in section B2), MA Jacksons Retirement Benefit accrued during the year is shown as negative because the increase in the balance held in the ANZ Staff Superannuation Scheme (for the year ended 30 September 2003) exceeded the increase in other remuneration for the 3 preceeding years (ie from the 3-year period ended 30 September 2002 to the 3-year period ended September 2003)
(12) Amortisation value of options as a percentage of total remuneration (as shown in the Total column above) was 37% in 2004 (50% in 2003)
(13) Relates to reimbursement to J McFarlane for the additional tax liability on his UK Pension Plan holdings, arising as a result of Australian Foreign Investment Fund rules, and J Mc Far lanes continuing Australian residency (in accordance with the contractual agreement detailed in section D2)
7
For the year ended 30 September 2004 details of the emoluments of the top seven executives (Specified Executives), other than the Chief Executive Officer, are set out below and include the five most highly remunerated executives in the Company and the Group (as required under the Corporations Act 2001) and the top executives in the Group by authority (as required by AASB1046) (table is continued on page 9):
|
|
|
|
PRIMARY |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
Long
service |
|
Non
monetary |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
Specified Executives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sir J Anderson (appointed 1 December 2003)(7) |
|
2004 |
|
672,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive & Director, ANZ National Bank Limited |
|
2003 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr RJ Edgar |
|
2004 |
|
723,651 |
|
56,212 |
|
31,552 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
2003 |
|
583,500 |
|
2,399 |
|
31,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper(8) |
|
2004 |
|
654,550 |
|
10,846 |
|
7,277 |
|
Group Managing Director Asia-Pacific |
|
2003 |
|
654,850 |
|
10,865 |
|
6,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BC Hartzer(9) |
|
2004 |
|
543,062 |
|
15,694 |
|
57,091 |
|
Group Managing Director Personal Banking |
|
2003 |
|
454,072 |
|
11,812 |
|
65,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PJO Hawkins |
|
2004 |
|
551,625 |
|
11,678 |
|
7,277 |
|
Group Managing Director Group Strategic Development |
|
2003 |
|
593,432 |
|
11,646 |
|
6,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Marriott |
|
2004 |
|
728,451 |
|
29,098 |
|
7,277 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
2003 |
|
654,850 |
|
10,865 |
|
6,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Targett (appointed 5 May 2004) |
|
2004 |
|
305,407 |
|
5,101 |
|
2,934 |
|
Group Managing Director Institutional Financial Services |
|
2003 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
2004 |
|
4,179,538 |
|
128,629 |
|
113,408 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
2,940,704 |
|
47,587 |
|
117,176 |
|
(1) Non monetary benefits provided to Specified Executives consist of salary packaged items such as car parking and novated lease motor vehicles
(2) Total cash bonus relates to the cash component provided as part of ANZs short-term incentive program in May 2004 (50% cash) and the full bonus amount from October 2004 (which was 100% cash, except in those instances where the Specified Executive elected to receive shares in lieu, in which case the value of these elective shares are shown above as though they were cash). Refer to section C5.1 for further details
(3) Details of options and deferred shares granted appear in the Annual Report of the year in which they are granted. In accordance with the requirements of AASB1046 A, the amortisation value includes a proportion of the fair value (taking into account market-related vesting conditions) of all equity that had not yet fully vested as at the commencement of the financial year. It is assumed that 100% of the options will vest at the commencement of their exercise period (ie the shortest possible vesting period is assumed) and that deferred shares will vest after 3 years. The fair value is determined at grant date and is allocated on a straight-line basis over the 3-year vesting period. For options, the fair value is determined using a Binomial Option Pricing model that is explained in section F8. For deferred shares, the fair value is the weighted average price of the Companys shares on the allocation date. The amount included as remuneration is not related to nor indicative of the benefit (if any) that may ultimately be realised should the options become exercisable
(4) Accrual relates to Retirement Allowance (refer to section E for further details)
8
|
|
|
|
PRIMARY |
|
EQUITY(3) |
|
POST EMPLOYMENT |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Total
cash |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Super |
|
Retirement |
|
Total(5),(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
Specified Executives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sir J Anderson (appointed 1 December 2003)(7) |
|
2004 |
|
335,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,168 |
|
67,279 |
|
32,160 |
|
1,327,280 |
|
Chief Executive & Director, ANZ National Bank Limited |
|
2003 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr RJ Edgar |
|
2004 |
|
393,000 |
|
197,681 |
|
342,662 |
|
256,110 |
|
|
|
46,752 |
|
7,163 |
|
2,054,783 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
2003 |
|
222,004 |
|
236,895 |
|
141,264 |
|
201,924 |
|
|
|
38,025 |
|
10,276 |
|
1,467,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper(8) |
|
2004 |
|
385,500 |
|
232,208 |
|
232,024 |
|
333,500 |
|
|
|
40,950 |
|
|
|
1,896,855 |
|
Group Managing Director Asia-Pacific |
|
2003 |
|
210,008 |
|
315,650 |
|
233,812 |
|
452,430 |
|
|
|
40,950 |
|
|
|
1,925,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BC Hartzer(9) |
|
2004 |
|
424,000 |
|
201,364 |
|
192,239 |
|
298,814 |
|
|
|
37,224 |
|
|
|
1,769,488 |
|
Group Managing Director Personal Banking |
|
2003 |
|
165,005 |
|
272,484 |
|
141,682 |
|
265,593 |
|
|
|
32,175 |
|
|
|
1,408,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PJO Hawkins |
|
2004 |
|
325,000 |
|
214,906 |
|
206,975 |
|
293,966 |
|
|
|
43,875 |
|
2,947 |
|
1,658,249 |
|
Group Managing Director Group Strategic Development |
|
2003 |
|
200,016 |
|
280,451 |
|
219,660 |
|
347,032 |
|
|
|
43,875 |
|
2,979 |
|
1,705,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Marriott |
|
2004 |
|
482,000 |
|
243,435 |
|
276,714 |
|
369,376 |
|
|
|
45,542 |
|
|
|
2,181,893 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
2003 |
|
239,017 |
|
295,927 |
|
255,135 |
|
394,675 |
|
|
|
40,950 |
|
|
|
1,898,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Targett (appointed 5 May 2004) |
|
2004 |
|
267,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,081 |
(10) |
18,976 |
|
|
|
787,499 |
|
Group Managing Director Institutional Financial Services |
|
2003 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
2004 |
|
2,612,381 |
|
1,089,594 |
|
1,250,614 |
|
1,551,766 |
|
407,249 |
|
300,598 |
|
42,270 |
|
11,676,047 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
1,036,050 |
|
1,401,407 |
|
991,553 |
|
1,661,654 |
|
|
|
195,975 |
|
13,255 |
|
8,405,361 |
|
(5) Amounts disclosed for remuneration of Specified Executives exclude insurance premiums paid by the consolidated entity in respect of directors and officers liability insurance contracts which cover current and former directors and officers, including executive officers of the entity and directors, executive officers and secretaries of the controlled entities. The total premium, which cannot be disclosed because of confidentiality agreements, has not been allocated to the individuals covered by the insurance policy as, based on all available information, the directors believe that no reasonable basis for such allocation exists.
(6) Amortisation value of options as a percentage of total remuneration (as shown in the Total column above) was as follows: Sir J Anderson - 16% (n/a in 2003); RJ Edgar - 12% (14% in 2003); E Funke Kupper - 18% (23% in 2003); BC Hartzer - 17% (19% in 2003); PJO Hawkins - 18% (20% in 2003); PR Marriott - 17% (21% in 2003); S Targett - 12% (n/a in 2003)
(7) Amounts paid in NZD are converted to AUD at an average rate for the year of 1.1254. Amortisation of other equity allocations for Sir J Anderson relates to the granting of zero priced options (ZPO) and shares issued under ANZs $1,000 Employee Share Acquisition Plan (ESAP). ZPOs are granted under the ANZ Share Option Plan and have a nil exercise price and no time-based vesting criteria. They were designed to deliver equity to the CEO of National Bank of New Zealand and were issued to meet the particular needs and circumstances at the time of the acquisition of NBNZ.
Refer to section C7 for further details pertaining to the $1,000 ESAP
(8) E Funke Kupper was the Managing Director of Personal Banking & Wealth Management Australia prior to 1 May 2004
(9) BC Hartzer was the Managing Director of Consumer Finance prior to 1 May 2004
(10) Amortisation of other equity allocations for S Targett relates to the grant of deferred shares (four tranches of $700,000 to be issued at 6 month intervals in approximately April and October each year, subject to Board approval and continued employment) and hurdled options (refer to section C5.2.1 for performance hurdle details) to compensate S Targett for the loss of access to equity as a result of his resignation from his previous employer
9
SECTION B. NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REMUNERATION
B1. NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REMUNERATION POLICY
Non-executive directors fees are reviewed annually and are determined by the Board of Directors based on advice from external advisors and with reference to fees paid to other non-executive directors of comparable companies.
Non-executive directors fees are within the maximum aggregate limit agreed to by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on 13 December 2002 ($2.5 million, excluding retirement allowances), and are set at levels that fairly represent the responsibilities of, and the time spent by, the non-executive directors on Group matters.
Directors receive a fee for being a director of the Board, and also additional fees for either chairing or being a member of a committee. Special work on committees may attract additional fees, of an amount considered appropriate in the circumstances. An additional fee is also paid if a non-executive director serves as a director of ANZ National Bank Limited, ING Australia Ltd or Metrobank Card Corporation.
The fee structure is illustrated in the table below:
Role |
|
Current Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman |
|
$ |
429,000 |
|
Non-executive director |
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
Committee Chair(1) |
|
$ |
32,500 |
|
Committee Member(1) |
|
$ |
9,750 |
|
(1) Except Nominations & Corporate Governance Committee, where the current Chair and Member Fees are $21,000 and $6,300 respectively.
Directors may elect to take all or part of their fees in shares under the Directors Share Plan (refer to section B3 for more details).
For details of emoluments paid to directors for the year ended 30 September 2004, refer to the Remuneration tables in section A of this Remuneration Report.
B2. NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS RETIREMENT POLICY
All non-executive directors participate in the ANZ Directors Retirement Scheme. Under this scheme, a lump-sum retirement benefit is payable to non-executive directors upon their ceasing to be a director.
The lump-sum retirement benefit payable where the non-executive director has held office for 8 years or more is equal to the total remuneration (excluding retirement benefit accrual) of the non-executive director in respect of the 3 years immediately preceding the non-executive director ceasing to be a non-executive director. This benefit is funded in part by the balance held, if any, on the non-executive directors behalf in the ANZ Staff Superannuation Scheme. For periods of less than 8 years, a proportionate part of such emoluments is payable. The non-executive directors are not entitled to the statutory entitlements of long service leave and annual leave.
Consistent with Principle 9.3 of the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Corporate Governance Rules, which states that non-executive directors should not be provided with retirement benefits other than statutory superannuation, the ANZ Directors Retirement Scheme is being reviewed and it is currently planned to be discontinued after 30 September 2005.
B3. DIRECTORS SHARE PLAN
The Directors Share Plan is available to both non-executive and executive directors. Directors may elect to forgo remuneration to which they may have otherwise become entitled and receive shares to the value of the remuneration forgone. Participation in the plan is voluntary and therefore the shares acquired are not subject to performance conditions.
Shares acquired under the plan are purchased on market and are held in trust for up to 10 years. The director selects a restriction period of between 1 and 10 years during which the shares cannot be traded. The shares are subject to forfeiture for serious misconduct.
All costs associated with the plan are met by the Company.
10
SECTION C. REMUNERATION STRUCTURE
C1. EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
ANZs reward policy guides the Compensation Committee and Management in shaping remuneration
Strategies and initiatives.
The following philosophies underpin ANZs reward policy:
1. Focus on creating and enhancing value for ANZs shareholders;
2. Differentiation of individual rewards commensurate with contribution to overall results and according to individual
accountability, performance and potential;
3. Significant emphasis on at risk Components of total rewards linked to the enhancement of shareholder value through improvements in Economic Value Added (EVA); and
4. The provision of a competitive reward proposition to successfully attract, motivate and retain the high quality workforce required to deliver ANZs business and growth strategies.
During 2004 a comprehensive review of reward structures has been conducted against the backdrop of these philosophies and against the Companys growth strategy and corporate governance principles. As a result, a number of changes to reward structures are planned for the first half of the 2005 financial year. These changes are detailed in section C5 of this Remuneration Report.
C2. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee has a charter which details the terms of reference under which the Committee operates. The Charter can be found on anz.com > about ANZ (listing at top of screen) > Corporate Information > ANZ Policies> Corporate Governance and Policies.
The role of the Compensation Committee is detailed on page 50 of the Corporate Governance Report.
On a number of occasions throughout the year, both the Compensation Committee and management received external advice on matters relating to remuneration. The following advisors were used: Hay Group; Blake Dawson Waldron; Free hills; Mercer Human Resource Consulting; and PricewaterhouseCoopers.
C3. REMUNERATION STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
ANZs reward structures are designed to meet the needs of the specialised business units as well as the markets in which they operate. As a result, the mix of remuneration components can vary across the organisation although, where practicable, ANZ applies structures and opportunities on a consistent basis for similar roles and levels. There is a strong emphasis on variable pay opportunities with total employee remuneration differentiated significantly on the basis of performance.
The executive remuneration program is designed to support the reward philosophies detailed in section C1, and to underpin the Companys growth strategy. This program aims to differentiate remuneration on the basis of achievement against both individual, business unit and group performance targets which are aligned to sustained growth in shareholder value.
The program comprises the following components:
Fixed remuneration component: salary, non-monetary benefits and superannuation contributions.
Variable or at risk component:
Short-Term Incentive (STI); and
Long-Term Incentive (LTI), which consists of options and deferred shares
The relative weighting of fixed and variable components, for target performance, is set according to the size or market of the executives role, with the proportion of remuneration at risk increasing for the most senior or complex roles, or for those roles where there is strong market pressure to provide greater levels of remuneration. Compared to the market, fixed remuneration levels are designed to be around median, as are the variable components - STI and LTI - except in cases of superior performance where total remuneration is designed to reflect the upper range of competitive market levels. In this way the remuneration structure is heavily weighted towards reward for performance.
C4. FIXED REMUNERATION
For most executives, fixed remuneration consists of what is referred to as Total Employment Cost (TEC). TEC comprises a notional cash salary, a superannuation contribution (calculated as 9% of the notional salary except for Sir J Anderson who receives a superannuation contribution equal to one eleventh of TEC) and the remainder as cash or nominated benefits. The types of benefits that can be packaged by executives include novated car leases, additional superannuation contributions, car parking, child care and contributions towards the Employee Share Save Scheme (see note 50 of the 2004 Financial Report for details of the Employee Share Save Scheme).
To ensure fixed remuneration for the Companys most senior executives remains competitive, the TEC component of executive compensation is reviewed annually based on performance and market data, with the level targeted to around the market median being paid in the finance industry in the relevant global markets in which ANZ operates.
International remuneration levels are considered in assessing market competitiveness where an executives primary place of residence is (or has been) outside of Australia or New Zealand, in which case the local market is considered.
11
C5. VARIABLE REMUNERATION
Variable remuneration forms a significant part of executives potential remuneration, providing an at-risk component that is designed to drive performance in both the short-term (semi annually or annually) and in the long-term (over 3 years or more).
The opportunities available to executives under ANZs variable reward programs are calibrated to reflect executives potential impact on the business; to manage internal relativities; and to ensure competitiveness in the relevant markets in which they operate.
Most executives participate in the short-term incentive scheme detailed in section C5.1. All executives participate in the long-term incentive plan detailed in section C5.2, subject to individual performance thresholds. In some instances, customised short-term incentive plans will exist that executives may participate in to ensure more precise alignment with business objectives and market practice. No executives however, may participate in more than one short-term incentive plan.
C5.1 Short-term Incentives
Short-term incentive (STI) payments encourage executives to support ANZs strategic objectives by providing rewards that are significantly differentiated on the basis of achievement against performance targets. Most executives participate in the scheme explained below. All short-term incentive schemes are reviewed by the Compensation Committee.
The size of STI payments are based, firstly, on overall group and business unit performance results against a balanced scorecard and, secondly, on individual performance against financial and non-financial measures.
Group and business unit performance is assessed against a number of qualitative and quantitative measures consistent with the ANZ Balanced Scorecard Approach. Measures include but are not limited to:
Change in Economic Value Added (EVATM);
Customer Satisfaction;
Employee Engagement;
Risk Management; and
Compliance.
Performance against these measures influences the size of the incentive pool available to individuals within each business unit.
For individual performance, executives are ranked against their peers, with better relative performance attracting a greater proportion of the incentive pool. Individual Key Result Areas (KRAs) are set annually to support the Company objectives stated in the Balanced Scorecard noted above, and performance against these KRAs is used as an input to assessing relative ranking.
Up until May 2004, STI payments have been made each half year and a portion of them have been paid in shares deferred for 3 years (STI deferred shares).
STI deferred shares have the following conditions attached:
Shares are subject to a time-based vesting hurdle of 3 years, during which time they are held in trust;
During the deferral period, shares attract dividends that are paid directly to the employee; and
Shares issued under this plan may be held in trust for up to 10 years.
The value used to determine the number of STI shares to be allocated has been based on the volume weighted average price of the Companys shares traded on the ASX in the week leading up to and including the date of issue.
From October 2004, performance will continue to be measured every 6 months, but payments will be made annually. Furthermore, bonuses are to be paid 100% in cash (except where specific business schemes require otherwise, or executives elect to receive shares in lieu). This change, together with the changes being made to our long-term incentive program, is designed to increase the competitiveness and clarity of purpose of the Companys reward structures.
C5.2 Long-term Incentives
Long-term incentives (LTIs) are used as a mechanism to link a significant portion of executives compensation to the attainment of sustained growth in shareholder value. The size of LTI grants is determined by the Companys performance and an individuals level of responsibility, performance and the assessed potential of the executive. Allocations have typically been made in or around April and October each year, although after 2004 the grants will be made annually in or around November.
There are two components to LTI, each making up approximately half of the annual LTI grant value:
Options; and
Deferred Shares.
Upon exercise, each option entitles the option holder to one ordinary share.
The conditions under which shares and options are granted are approved by the Board in accordance with the rules of both the ANZ Employee Share Acquisition Plan and the ANZ Share Option Plan. Performance conditions are explained in more detail below, including changes planned for the coming year.
C5.2.1 Options
Options are designed to reward executives for share price growth dependent upon the Companys Total Shareholder Return outperforming peers. Each option has the following features:
An exercise price (or for index-linked options, the original exercise price) that is set equal to the weighted average sale price of all fully paid ordinary shares in the Company sold on the Australian Stock Exchange during the 1 week prior to and including the date of grant (1);
A maximum life of 7 years and an exercise period that commences after 3 years(2), subject to performance hurdles being cleared. Options are re-tested monthly (if required) after the commencement of the exercise period;
Upon exercise, each option entitles the option-holder to one ordinary share;
In case of resignation or termination on notice or dismissal for misconduct: options are forfeited;
In case of redundancy: options are pro rated and a grace period of 3 months is provided in which to exercise the remaining options (with hurdles waived, if applicable);
In case of retirement, death or total & permanent disablement: A grace period of 3 months is provided in which to exercise all options (with hurdles waived, if applicable); and
Performance hurdles, which are explained below for each type of option.
(1) For options granted to the CEO, the exercise price is equal to the weighted average share price during the 5 trading days immediately before or after the Companys Annual General Meeting that immediately precedes the allocation.
(2) For options granted to the CEO, the life and exercise period may differ, as disclosed in the tables of the year in which they are granted.
12
Hurdled options (granted from February 2000 until July 2002, and from November 2003 until May 2004)
Until May 2004, hurdled options were granted with the following performance hurdles attached:
1. Half the options may only be exercised once the ANZ Total Shareholder Return (ANZ TSR) exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index, measured over the same period (since issue) and calculated as at the last trading day of any month (once the exercise period has commenced); and
2. The other half of hurdled options may only be exercised once the ANZ TSR exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 100 Accumulation Index, measured over the same period (since issue) and calculated as at the last trading day of any month (once the exercise period has commenced).
These hurdles were originally selected to ensure rewards were aligned with share price growth in a manner that was easy to understand and which took into account performance relative to the market. At the time of implementation these hurdles were in line with market practice.
Index-linked options (granted from October 2002 to May 2003)
Index-linked options have a dynamic exercise price that acts as a built-in performance hurdle, ie the exercise price is adjusted in line with the movement in the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index (excluding ANZ). As an additional constraint, the adjusted exercise price can only be set at or above the original exercise price. Index-linked options ensure that executives are only rewarded for the true out-performance of ANZs share price over and above the movement in the related index. They are exercisable between the 3rd and 7th year after grant date, subject to the adjusted exercise price being above the prevailing share price.
Hurdled options (to be granted from November 2004)
From November 2004, the hurdles attached to options will change. The proportion of options that become exercisable will depend upon the TSR achieved by ANZ relative to the companies in the comparator group shown below. Performance equal to the median TSR of the comparator group will result in half the options becoming exercisable. Performance above median will result in further options becoming exercisable, increasing on a straight-line basis until all of the options become exercisable where ANZ TSR is at or above the 75th percentile in the comparator group. These new performance hurdles are more consistent with current market practice in the financial services industry and are aligned with the Companys strategic focus on growth.
Comparator Group
National Australia Bank |
St George Bank |
Commonwealth Bank |
Westpac |
QBE |
AMP |
AXA Asia Pacific |
IAG |
Suncorp Metway |
Macquarie |
C5.2.2 Deferred Shares (LTI)
Deferred Shares granted under the long-term incentive arrangements are designed to reward executives for superior growth whilst also encouraging retention and an increase in the Companys share price.
Shares are subject to a time-based vesting hurdle of 3 years, during which time they are held in trust;
During the deferral period, the employee is entitled to any dividends paid on the shares;
Shares issued under this plan may be held in trust for up to 10 years;
The value used to determine the number of LTI deferred shares to be allocated has been based on the volume weighted average price of the shares traded on the ASX in the week leading up to and including the date of issue;
In case of resignation or termination on notice or dismissal for misconduct: LTI shares are forfeited;
In case of redundancy: the number of LTI shares that are released is pro rated according to the time held as a proportion of the vesting period; and
In case of retirement, death or total & permanent disablement: LTI shares are released to executives.
13
C6. PERFORMANCE OF ANZ
The following table shows how ANZs Total Shareholder Return (TSR, which includes share price growth, dividends and other capital adjustments) has performed against two comparator groups, measured from various dates (which approximately coincide with previous major option allocations) to 30 September 2004. The measure shown (ANZ out-performance against the index) is intended to demonstrate the link between company performance and the value delivered to executives as part of the long-term incentive arrangements (ie the measure reflects the hurdle attached to previously granted hurdled options, as explained under section C5.2.1).
|
|
|
|
ANZ out-performance against |
|
ANZ out-performance against |
|
Measurement Period |
|
Number of months |
|
Measured point-to-point |
|
Measured point-to-point |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Apr 04- 30 Sep 04 |
|
6 |
|
-7 |
% |
6 |
% |
1 Oct03 - 30 Sep 04 |
|
12 |
|
-3 |
% |
10 |
% |
1 Apr 03- 30 Sep 04 |
|
18 |
|
-16 |
% |
6 |
% |
1 Oct02 - 30 Sep 04 |
|
24 |
|
-11 |
% |
10 |
% |
1 Apr 02- 30 Sep 04 |
|
30 |
|
9 |
% |
15 |
% |
1 Oct01 - 30 Sep 04 |
|
36 |
|
8 |
% |
6 |
% |
1 Apr 01- 30 Sep 04 |
|
42 |
|
39 |
% |
32 |
% |
1 Oct00 - 30 Sep 04 |
|
48 |
|
52 |
% |
31 |
% |
1 Apr 00- 30 Sep 04 |
|
54 |
|
98 |
% |
51 |
% |
1 Oct99 - 30 Sep 04 |
|
60 |
|
91 |
% |
63 |
% |
(1) Out-performance is measured in absolute percentage points by which the Companys TSR has exceeded or lagged the relevant accumulation index, over the measurement period, eg the Companys TSR from 01 Oct99 to 30 Sep 04 was146.3%, whilst the S&P/ASX100 Accumulation Index grew by55.8% in the same period. This represents a 91% out-performance by the Company
(2) The Banking and Finance Accumulation Index is used instead of the S&P/ASX200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index for any portion of a performance period extending before April 2000
C7. OTHER EMPLOYEE SHARE SCHEME
$1,000 Employee Share Acquisition Plan
All permanent employees (other than the most senior executives) who have had continuous service for one year with the Company or any of its controlled entities may be eligible to participate in a scheme enabling the issue of up to $1,000 of shares to an employee in each financial year, subject to the approval of the Board. The shares are retained in trust for a three-year vesting period. On expiration of that period, an employee may generally sell the shares, transfer them into their name, or have them retained in the trust. On termination, the shares are generally transferred into the employees name. Forfeiture provisions may apply outside of Australia, depending on the jurisdiction.
The Company has made six offers under the $1,000 Employee Share Acquisition Plan, with a seventh scheduled for December 2004. A total of 8,258,575 shares have been granted under the plan as at 30 September 2004.
14
SECTION D. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS REMUNERATION
D1. CEO REMUNERATION OVERVIEW
The structure of J McFarlanes compensation, which is in accordance with his agreement, is as follows:
Fixed Compensation: Consists of salary, benefits and superannuation contributions. Since October 2003, J McFarlane has elected to receive almost all of his Fixed Compensation in the form of shares purchased under the Directors Share Plan.
Short-Term Incentive: J McFarlanes Short-Term Incentive is based on the Groups EPS Growth and EVATM performance against target and an annual assessment of J McFarlanes achievement of specific objectives agreed with the Board. J McFarlanes Short-Term Incentive may be paid in cash or in shares purchased under the Directors Share Plan. J McFarlane has typically elected to receive shares.
Long-Term Incentive: J McFarlanes Long-Term Incentive was approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting in December 2001. Four tranches of options were approved for granting by the Board: 500,000 in 2001; 1,000,000 in 2002; 1,000,000 in 2003 and 500,000 in 2004. The exercise of these options is subject to performance hurdles being satisfied. J McFarlanes specific performance hurdles, for options granted during the year, are indicated in section F3. Subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting in December 2004, it is proposed that J McFarlane be offered 175,000 Performance Shares as part of his contract extension. The conditions attached to these Performance Shares are explained in section D4 below.
The compensation of J McFarlane for the year ended 30 September 2004 is set out in Section A of this Remuneration Report.
D2. CEOS CONTRACT TERMS
On 26 October 2004, the Company announced an extension to J McFarlanes contract:
The term of the contract will be extended by one year to 30 September 2007;
In addition to mandatory superannuation contributions, the Company will make additional employer contributions of $300,000 per annum (effective from 1 October 2003), paid quarterly to J McFarlanes chosen superannuation fund; and
Subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting in December 2004, it is proposed that J McFarlane be offered 175,000 Performance Shares, described in section D4.
A separate agreement, made on 23 October 2001, provides for reimbursements to J McFarlane for any additional tax liabilities that may arise on his UK Pension Plan holdings as a result of his continuing Australian residency. Under this agreement, ANZ reimburses J McFarlane for any additional tax liability incurred on his UK Pension Plan during his employment with ANZ, arising as a consequence of Australian Foreign Investment Fund rules. In the event of decreased Australian tax liabilities due to a decreased value in J McFarlanes UK Pension Plan, the reduced liability will be used to offset potential subsequent reimbursements.
D3. CEOS RETIREMENT AND TERMINATION BENEFITS
In accordance with J McFarlanes contract variation (refer section D2), J McFarlanes nominated superannuation fund receives $300,000 per annum (effective from 1 October 2003, paid quarterly) in addition to mandatory superannuation contributions.
J McFarlane can terminate his employment agreement by providing 12 months notice. ANZ may terminate the employment agreement by providing notice equal to the unexpired term of the employment agreement (which ends on 1 October 2007). If ANZ terminates the employment agreement without notice and thus breaches its obligation to provide the required notice, ANZ has agreed with J McFarlane that the damages payable by ANZ for breach of contract would be equal to the Total Employment Cost (TEC) that would otherwise be received over the remainder of the contract (TEC comprises salary or fees, non-monetary benefits and mandatory superannuation contributions). In circumstances of serious misconduct, J McFarlane is only entitled to payment of TEC up to the date of termination. Payment of accumulated superannuation benefits plus statutory entitlements of long service leave and annual leave (calculated on the basis of salary or fees) applies in all events of separation.
In the event of resignation not approved by the Board or dismissal for serious misconduct, all unexercised options will be forfeited. In the event of termination on notice, all option grants may be exercised. Upon separation, option entitlements must be exercised within 6 months of termination. In the event of serious misconduct, shares held in the Directors Share Plan will be forfeited.
On resignation or termination on notice, shares will be released.
15
D4. ALLOCATION OF PERFORMANCE SHARES (DECEMBER 2004)
Subject to shareholder approval, 175,000 Performance Shares will be issued to J McFarlane on 31 December 2004. No dividends will be payable on the shares until they vest. Vesting will be subject to the following time and performance hurdles being satisfied:
The performance hurdle will be measured during the performance period by comparing ANZs Total Shareholder Return (ANZ TSR) with that of a comparator group of selected major financial services companies in the S&P/ASX 100 Index, excluding ANZ. The companies to be used in the comparator group will be as approved by the Board.
The percentage of Performance Shares that will vest will depend upon the TSR achieved by ANZ relative to the companies in the comparator group. Performance equal to the median TSR of the comparator group will result in half the Performance Shares vesting. For each percentile above the median an additional 2% of Performance Shares will vest, increasing on a straight-line basis until all of the Performance Shares vest where ANZ TSR is at or above the 75th percentile of TSRs in the comparator group.
TSR will be measured for ANZ and the comparator group over the same period (since grant) and calculated as at the last trading day of any month, once the performance period has commenced. The first opportunity for Performance Shares to vest will be after the second anniversary of grant, after which the Performance Shares will continue to be tested monthly until they are forfeited 5 years after the grant date, or 100% vest, whichever is the earlier.
Performance Shares will be forfeited if they have not vested five years after grant or if J McFarlane ceases to be an employee of the Company by reason of serious misconduct. If J McFarlane resigns without the prior approval of the Board, unvested Performance Shares will be forfeited.
D5. CEOS PARTICIPATION IN EQUITY PROGRAMS
J McFarlane participates in the Directors Share Plan, which is explained in section B3. Refer to section F for details of grants and holdings.
J McFarlane also participates in the ANZ Share Option Plan, which is described in section C5.
16
SECTION E. SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES CONTRACT TERMS
Contractual terms for most executives are similar, but do, on occasions, vary to suit different needs.
Section E1 details the contractual terms for those Specified Executives who are on open-ended contracts. Section E2 details the contractual terms for Sir J Anderson, who is on a fixed term contract.
E1. OPEN-ENDED CONTRACTS (RJ EDGAR, E FUNKE KUPPER, BC HARTZER, PJO HAWKINS, PR MARRIOTT, S TARGETT)
Length of Contract |
|
Open-ended. |
|
|
|
Fixed Compensation |
|
The Total Employment Cost (TEC) package consists of salary, mandatory employer superannuation contributions and benefits. |
|
|
|
STI |
|
Eligible to participate. Target opportunity of 66.67% of Total Employment Cost (refer to section C5.1 for details of short-term incentive arrangements). |
|
|
|
LTI |
|
Eligible to participate at the Boards discretion - refer to section C5.2 for long-term incentive arrangements. |
|
|
|
Resignation |
|
Employment may be terminated by giving 6 months written notice. On resignation any options and unvested deferred shares will be forfeited. As a result of being employed by ANZ prior to November 1992, RJ Edgar and PJO Hawkins are eligible to receive a Retirement Allowance on resignation for illness, incapacity, or domestic reasons; refer to Other Aspects (below) for more details. |
|
|
|
Retirement |
|
On retirement, shares and options are generally released in full, although this is only stated in the contracts of E Funke Kupper (for shares) and PR Marriott (both shares and options). Furthermore, PR Marriott is entitled to a bonus on retirement, pro-rated for the proportion of the final performance period that is worked prior to cessation of employment, and subject to adjustment for performance in accordance with the short-term incentive arrangements in place at the time. As a result of being employed by ANZ prior to November 1992, RJ Edgar and PJO Hawkins are eligible to receive a Retirement Allowance on retirement; refer to Other Aspects (below) for more details. |
|
|
|
Termination on Notice by ANZ |
|
ANZ may terminate the employment agreement by providing 12 months written notice or payment in lieu of the notice period based on TEC. |
|
|
|
|
|
On termination on notice by ANZ, any options or LTI deferred shares that have vested, or will vest during the notice period will be released, in accordance with the ANZ Share Option Plan Rules. LTI shares that have not yet vested will generally be forfeited, although for some executives (E Funke Kupper, BC Hartzer and PR Marriott) these shares will be released in full. Deferred shares granted under STI arrangements will vest in full for all executives. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discretion to pay bonuses on a pro-rata basis (depending on termination date, and subject to business performance) applies in most cases, but is contracted for BC Hartzer and PR Marriott. |
|
|
|
Redundancy |
|
If ANZ terminates employment for reasons of bona fide redundancy, a severance payment will be made that is equal to 12 months TEC. |
|
|
|
|
|
All STI deferred shares are released. All options granted since 24 April 2002 are released on a pro-rata basis - all prior grants may be exercised. All LTI deferred shares granted since 23 October 2002 are released on a pro-rata basis - all prior grants will vest. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discretion to pay bonuses on a pro-rata basis (depending on termination date, and subject to business performance) applies in most cases, but is contracted for BC Hartzer and PR Marriott. |
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of being employed by ANZ prior to November 1992, RJ Edgar and PJO Hawkins are eligible to receive a Retirement Allowance on retrenchment; refer to Other Aspects (below) for more details. |
|
|
|
Death or Total and Permanent Disablement |
|
All options and shares released; pro-rata bonus. |
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of being employed by ANZ prior to November 1992, RJ Edgar and PJO Hawkins are eligible to receive a Retirement Allowance on death; refer to Other Aspects (below) for more details. |
|
|
|
Termination for serious misconduct |
|
ANZ may terminate the employment agreement at any time without notice, and the employee will only be entitled to payment of TEC up to the date of termination. On termination for serious misconduct, any options, unvested deferred shares or vested deferred shares still held in trust will be forfeited. |
17
Other Aspects |
|
S Targett: subject to continuing employment and the approval of the Board, four tranches of deferred shares (sign-on deferred shares), each worth $700,000, are to be granted at six month intervals in or around April and October each year, and Hurdled Options (sign-on options) worth $750,000 are to be granted within 3 months of commencement of employment, to compensate for the loss of equity from S Targetts previous employer. On termination on notice, a pro-rata proportion of the sign-on options can be exercised, based on the period of employment, and sign-on deferred shares will vest in full, including any scheduled to be granted during the notice period. |
|
|
|
|
|
PJO Hawkins: for the period ending 31 December 2005, any payments on cessation of employment (including payout of accrued but untaken Long Service Leave) will be based on a TEC of $750,000. |
|
|
|
|
|
In instances where a retirement allowance is payable under ANZ policy (ie for RJ Edgar and PJO Hawkins in instances of retirement, death, retrenchment or resignation for illness, incapacity, or domestic reasons), the retirement allowance is calculated as follows: 3 months of notional salary (which is 65% of TEC) plus an additional 3% of notional salary for each year of full time service above 10 years, less the total accrual value of long service leave (including taken and untaken).
|
18
E2. FIXED TERM CONTRACT (SIR J ANDERSON)
Length of Contract |
Ends 30 September 2005. |
|
|
Fixed Compensation |
The Total Employment Cost (TEC) package is inclusive of employer contributions to the superannuation fund. |
|
|
STI |
Short term incentive payments are subject to both business and individual performance. The target payment is 50% of TEC. |
|
|
LTI |
Fixed at NZD500,000 worth of zero-priced options annually, granted in two tranches per annum. The share options can be exercised at any time during employment and within 6 months of the termination of employment. |
|
|
Resignation |
Sir J Anderson may terminate his employment by giving 12 months written notice. On resignation, any share options which have not been exercised as at the termination date are forfeited. |
|
|
Retirement |
A policy for payment of retirement gratuities was in place with NBNZ employees prior to the acquisition by the Company of NBNZ. This policy has been continued for eligible staff who were ANZ National Bank Limited employees as at 1 December 2003, including Sir J Anderson. Under this policy, a payment will be made to Sir J Anderson on his retirement that is equal to the number of full years service divided by 35 and multiplied by 85% of finishing salary (where finishing salary is fixed remuneration less any superannuation contribution). This value is then grossed up for tax (ie divided by 0.61) and from this value the total accrual value of long service leave taken is deducted. |
|
|
Termination on Notice by ANZ |
ANZ National Bank Limited may terminate the employment agreement by providing notice or payment in lieu of notice equal to the unexpired term of the employment agreement (which ends on 30 September 2005). On termination on notice by ANZ any options may be exercised in accordance with the ANZ Share Option Plan Rules. |
|
|
Death or Total and Permanent Disablement |
All shares released; pro-rata bonus. |
|
|
Terminated for serious misconduct |
ANZ National Bank Limited may terminate the employment agreement at any time without notice, and Sir J Anderson will only be entitled to payment up to the date of termination. On termination for serious misconduct any share options which have not been exercised as at the termination date may not be exercised. |
E3. PARTICIPATION IN EQUITY PROGRAMS
A number of shares and options are granted to executives under the remuneration programs detailed in Section C. For specified executives, details of all grants made during the year are listed in Section F. Aggregate holdings of shares and options are also shown.
The deferred shares component of the STI is administered under the ANZ Employee Share Acquisition Plan. For executives, the shares are deferred for three years, although some employees may receive shares deferred for one year, depending upon the role or jurisdiction.
The deferred shares component of the LTI is also administered under the ANZ Employee Share Acquisition Plan. The shares are deferred for three years.
19
SECTION F. EQUITY INSTRUMENTS RELATING TO DIRECTORS AND SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES
F1. SHAREHOLDINGS OF NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
Name |
|
Balance of |
|
Shares |
|
Shares acquired |
|
Other shares |
|
Balance of |
|
Balance of |
|
CB Goode |
|
403,334 |
|
14,215 |
|
75,922 |
|
8,993 |
|
502,464 |
|
523,933 |
|
G Clark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
JC Dahlsen |
|
105,243 |
|
|
|
16,609 |
|
63 |
|
121,915 |
|
121,915 |
|
RS Deane |
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
75,364 |
|
75,364 |
|
JK Ellis |
|
65,367 |
|
1,097 |
|
12,996 |
|
5,016 |
|
84,476 |
|
86,179 |
|
DM Gonski |
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
50,131 |
|
52,612 |
|
54,667 |
|
MA Jackson |
|
78,245 |
|
|
|
13,861 |
|
1,191 |
|
93,297 |
|
93,297 |
|
DE Meiklejohn |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
5,502 |
|
JP Morschel |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
4,185 |
|
BW Scott |
|
72,207 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
69 |
|
72,475 |
|
72,475 |
|
(1) Balance of shares held at 1 October 2003, 30 September 2004 and 4 November 2004, includes directly held shares, nominally held shares and shares held by personally related entities
(2) All shares acquired in lieu of salary were done so under the Directors Share Plan (refer to section B3 of this Remuneration Report for an overview of the Directors Share Plan)
(3) Refers to rights arising from the Renounceable Rights Issue that partly funded the acquisition of NBNZ. All ANZ shareholders were eligible to purchase 2 new ordinary shares for every11 existing ordinary shares registered in their name as at 31 October 2003. Amounts shown include directly held rights, nominally held rights and rights held by personally related entities. CB Goode, RS Deane, JK Ellis and DM Gonski exercised their full allocation of rights (nominally held, directly held and rights held by personally related entities) on 28 November 2003. The following rights were sold: JC Dahlsen - 2,528; MA Jackson - 364; and BW Scott - 12,933
(4) Other shares acquired may include those acquired under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan
(5) The following shares were nominally held as at 30 September 2004: CB Goode - 114,349; JC Dahlsen - 39,473; RS Deane - 73,000; JK Ellis - 17,197; DM Gonski - 50,000; MA Jackson - 10,632; BW Scott - 6,563
(6) The directors relevant interest in shares as required by the Corporations Act 2001 is as follows: CB Goode 521,096; G Clark 2,000; JC Dahlsen 107,064; RS Deane 75,364; JK Ellis 83,484; DM Gonski 54,667; MA Jackson 91,297; DE Meiklejohn 5,502; JP Morschel 4,185; and BW Scott 71,117. Any differences between the balances in this footnote and the table is due to the application of AASB 1046
F2. SHAREHOLDINGS OF CEO (INCLUDING MOVEMENTS DURING THE YEAR)
Balance of |
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Shares
acquired |
|
Shares
acquired |
|
Other
shares |
|
Total
number |
|
Balance |
|
Balance |
|
1,264,559 |
|
42,928 |
|
103,633 |
|
750,000 |
|
225,807 |
|
56,580 |
|
753,000 |
|
1,690,507 |
|
1,568,891 |
|
(1) Balance of shares held at 1 October 2003, 30 September 2004 and 4 November 2004 includes directly held shares, nominally held shares and shares held by personally related entities
(2) All shares acquired in lieu of salary or bonus were done so under the Directors Share Plan (refer to section B3 of this Remuneration Report for an overview of the Directors Share Plan)
(3) All options held/exercised by the CEO have been approved by shareholders (December 1999 and December 2001)
(4) Refers to rights arising from the Renounceable Rights Issue that partly funded the acquisition of NBNZ. All ANZ shareholders were eligible to purchase 2 new ordinary shares for every 11 existing ordinary shares registered in their name as at 31 October 2003. Amounts shown include directly held rights, nominally held rights and rights held by personally related entities
(5) 945,145 shares were held nominally as at 30 September 2004
(6) This also represents the Chief Executive Officers relevant interest in shares as required by the Corporations Act 2001
F3. OPTIONS GRANTED TO CEO DURING THE YEAR(1)
|
|
Type of |
|
Grant date |
|
Number granted |
|
Value per option |
|
Exercise price(4) |
|
Date |
|
Expiry date |
|
|
|
Hurdled (CEO) |
|
31 Dec 03 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
2.11 |
|
17.48 |
|
31 Dec 05 |
|
31 Dec 08 |
(5) |
(1) All options held/exercised by the CEO have been approved by shareholders (December 1999 and December 2001)
(2) One half of the options may be exercised only if the ANZ TSR calculated over the period commencing on the grant date and ending on the last day of any month after the second anniversary of their grant date exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index over that same period; and the other half of the options may be exercised only if the ANZ TSR calculated over the relevant period exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 100 Accumulation Index over that same period
(3) Refer to section F8 for details of the valuation methodology and inputs
(4) The exercise price is equal to the weighted average share price during the 5 trading days immediately after the Companys 2003 Annual General Meeting
(5) Treatment of options on termination of employment is explained in section D3
F4. OPTION HOLDINGS OF CEO (INCLUDING MOVEMENTS DURING THE YEAR)(1),(2)
Balance as |
|
Granted
during |
|
Exercised |
|
Date of |
|
Number
of |
|
Share
price on |
|
Amount
paid |
|
Balance |
|
Number |
|
Vested
and |
|
2,750,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
750,000 |
|
1 Jul 04 |
|
100,000 |
|
18.17 |
|
14.06 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
1,250,000 |
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Jul 04 |
|
650,000 |
|
18.14 |
|
14.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) All options held/exercised by the CEO have been approved by shareholders (December 1999 and December 2001)
(2) This table does not include the 225,807 rights arising from the Renounceable Rights Issue that partly funded the acquisition of NBNZ. All ANZ shareholders were eligible to purchase 2 new ordinary shares for every11 existing shares registered in their name as at 31 October 2003. The CEO chose to exercise all of his rights on 28 November 2003
20
F5. DEFERRED SHARES GRANTED TO SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES DURING THE YEAR
Name |
|
Type of |
|
Number of |
|
Value of |
|
Number of |
|
Value of |
|
Number of other |
|
Value of other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Sir J Anderson (app 1 Dec 2003)(5) |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr RJ Edgar |
|
STI |
|
6,781 |
|
118,982 |
|
7,683 |
|
140,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTI |
|
33,889 |
|
594,627 |
|
8,452 |
|
154,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper |
|
STI |
|
7,636 |
|
133,984 |
|
7,052 |
|
128,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTI |
|
6,838 |
|
119,982 |
|
6,256 |
|
114,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BC Hartzer |
|
STI |
|
7,322 |
|
128,474 |
|
7,244 |
|
132,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTI |
|
7,408 |
|
129,983 |
|
7,135 |
|
130,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PJO Hawkins |
|
STI |
|
7,123 |
|
124,982 |
|
6,860 |
|
125,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTI |
|
7,522 |
|
131,983 |
|
6,586 |
|
120,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Marriott |
|
STI |
|
7,978 |
|
139,985 |
|
9,604 |
|
175,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTI |
|
9,573 |
|
167,971 |
|
9,275 |
|
169,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Targett (app 5 May 2004)(6) |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,419 |
|
700,437 |
|
(1) Deferred shares issued as STI shares are granted under the ANZ Short-Term Incentive program. Deferred shares issued as LTI shares are granted under the ANZ Long-Term Incentive program. The shares are restricted for 3 years and may be held in trust for up to ten years. Refer to section C5 for more details
(2) Shares granted in November 2003 were in relation to incentives earned for the half year ended 30 September 2003
(3) The value per share used in this calculation is the volume weighted average price of the Companys shares traded on the ASX on the day the shares were granted
(4) Shares granted in May 2004 were in relation to incentives earned for the half year ended 31 March 2004
(5) Other shares issued (3 March 2004) to Sir J Anderson during the year relates to the $1,000 Employee Share Acquisition Plan. Refer to section C7 for further details
(6) Other shares issued to S Targett relates to the issue of deferred shares (four tranches of $700,000 to be issued at 6 month intervals in approximately April and October each year, subject to Board approval and continuing employment) to compensate S Targett for the loss of access to equity as a result of his resignation from his previous employer
F6. AGGREGATE SHAREHOLDINGS OF SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES
Name |
|
Balance |
|
Shares |
|
Number
of shares |
|
Shares
acquired |
|
Other
shares |
|
Total
number |
|
Balance |
|
Number |
|
Sir J Anderson |
|
|
|
55 |
|
11,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
Dr RJ Edgar |
|
255,114 |
|
50,024 |
|
95,000 |
|
37,295 |
|
6,781 |
|
60,000 |
|
384,214 |
|
25,482 |
|
E Funke Kupper(6) |
|
157,051 |
|
20,146 |
|
365,000 |
|
175 |
|
7,636 |
|
365,000 |
|
185,008 |
|
44,979 |
|
BC Hartzer |
|
75,148 |
|
21,787 |
|
60,000 |
|
13,665 |
|
7,781 |
|
99,335 |
|
79,046 |
|
27,072 |
|
PJO Hawkins |
|
1,149,754 |
|
20,968 |
|
170,000 |
|
209,048 |
|
7,123 |
|
170,000 |
|
1,386,893 |
|
41,462 |
|
PR Marriott |
|
539,989 |
|
28,452 |
|
250,000 |
|
460 |
|
8,966 |
|
150,000 |
|
677,867 |
|
40,381 |
|
S Targett (app 5 May 2004) |
|
|
|
38,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,419 |
|
|
|
(1) Balance of shares held at 1 October 2003 and 30 September 2004, include directly held shares, nominally held shares and shares held by personally related entities
(2) STI shares granted on 5 November 2003 have not been included in these figures as they related to the half year ended 30 September 2003. Instead, these shares have been reflected in the Other shares acquired during the year column
(3) Refers to rights arising from the Renounceable Rights Issue that partly funded the acquisition of NBNZ. All ANZ shareholders were eligible to purchase 2 new ordinary shares for every11 existing ordinary shares registered in their name as at 31 October 2003. Amounts pertaining to the rights issue include directly held rights, nominally held rights, and rights held by personally related entities
(4) Other shares acquired include those acquired through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan and STI shares granted on 5 November 2003 in relation to the half year ended 30 September 2003
(5) The following shares were held nominally as at 30 September 2004: Sir J Anderson - 55; RJ Edgar - 180,991; E Funke Kupper - 183,224; BC Hartzer - 69,480; PJO Hawkins - 233,821; PR Marriott - 230,817; S Targett - 38,419
(6) Amounts shown do not include ANZ Stapled Exchangeable Preferred Securities (ANZ StEPS). E Funke Kupper held 500 ANZ StEPS as at 1 October 2003; this holding remained unchanged up to and including 30 September 2004
21
F7. OPTIONS GRANTED TO SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES DURING THE YEAR
Name |
|
Type of |
|
Number
granted |
|
Grant date |
|
Value
per option |
|
Exercise price |
|
Date |
|
Expiry date(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Sir J Anderson (app 1 Dec 2003) |
|
Zero priced(5) |
|
11,967 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
18.23 |
|
|
|
11 May 04 |
|
10 May 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr RJ Edgar |
|
Hurdled |
|
66,666 |
|
5 Nov 03 |
|
2.34 |
|
17.55 |
|
5 Nov 06 |
|
4 Nov 10 |
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
63,115 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
2.44 |
|
18.22 |
|
11 May 07 |
|
10 May 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper |
|
Hurdled |
|
51,282 |
|
5 Nov 03 |
|
2.34 |
|
17.55 |
|
5 Nov 06 |
|
4 Nov 10 |
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
46,722 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
2.44 |
|
18.22 |
|
11 May 07 |
|
10 May 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BC Hartzer |
|
Hurdled |
|
55,555 |
|
5 Nov 03 |
|
2.34 |
|
17.55 |
|
5 Nov 06 |
|
4 Nov 10 |
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
53,279 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
2.44 |
|
18.22 |
|
11 May 07 |
|
10 May 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PJO Hawkins |
|
Hurdled |
|
56,410 |
|
5 Nov 03 |
|
2.34 |
|
17.55 |
|
5 Nov 06 |
|
4 Nov 10 |
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
49,181 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
2.44 |
|
18.22 |
|
11 May 07 |
|
10 May 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Marriott |
|
Hurdled |
|
71,794 |
|
5 Nov 03 |
|
2.34 |
|
17.55 |
|
5 Nov 06 |
|
4 Nov 10 |
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
69,263 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
2.44 |
|
18.22 |
|
11 May 07 |
|
10 May 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Targett (app 5 May 2004) |
|
Hurdled |
|
307,337 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
2.44 |
|
18.22 |
|
11 May 07 |
|
10 May 11 |
|
(1) For Hurdled options, the following performance hurdles apply: one half of the options may be exercised only if the ANZ TSR calculated over the period commencing on the date of grant and ending on the last day of any month after the Date exercisable exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index over that same period; and the other half of the options may be exercised only if the ANZTSR calculated over the relevant period exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 100 Accumulation Index over that same period. Refer to section C5.2.1 for further information
(2) No additional options were granted in the period up to and including 4 November 2004
(3) Refer to section F8 for details of the valuation methodology and inputs
(4) Treatment of options on termination of employment is explained in section E
(5) Zero priced options are granted under the ANZ Share Option Plan and have a nil exercise price and no time-based vesting criteria. They are specifically designed to deliver equity to Sir J Anderson, and were issued to meet the particular needs and circumstances at the time of the acquisition of NBNZ
F9. AGGREGATE OPTION HOLDINGS OF SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES (INCLUDING MOVEMENTS DURING THE YEAR)
Name |
|
Type |
|
Balance
as |
|
Granted
during |
|
Allocation
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sir J Anderson |
|
Zero-priced(1) |
|
|
|
11,967 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr RJ Edgar |
|
Index-Linked |
|
272,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
170,000 |
|
129,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
46,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper |
|
Index-Linked |
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
499,000 |
|
98,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
28,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BC Hartzer |
|
Index-Linked |
|
222,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
247,000 |
|
108,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
13,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PJO Hawkins |
|
Index-Linked |
|
183,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
381,000 |
|
105,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
209,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Marriott |
|
Index-Linked |
|
311,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
668,000 |
|
141,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
98,185 |
|
|
|
Other(3) |
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Targett |
|
Hurdled |
|
n/a |
|
307,337 |
|
n/a |
|
Name |
|
Type |
|
Exercised |
|
Date of |
|
Sale of
rights |
|
Share
price on |
|
Amount
paid |
|
Balance |
|
Total |
|
Vested
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sir J Anderson |
|
Zero-priced(1) |
|
11,967 |
|
11 May 04 |
|
|
|
18.10 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
11,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr RJ Edgar |
|
Index-Linked |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
272,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
60,000 |
|
7 Jan 04 |
|
|
|
17.86 |
|
13.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
14 May 04 |
|
|
|
17.62 |
|
12.98 |
|
204,781 |
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
37,295 |
|
28 Nov 03 |
|
9,091 |
|
16.82 |
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
46,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper |
|
Index-Linked |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
270,000 |
|
12 May 04 |
|
|
|
18.29 |
|
13.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
12 May 04 |
|
|
|
18.29 |
|
12.98 |
|
232,004 |
|
365,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
175 |
|
28 Nov 03 |
|
28,382 |
|
16.82 |
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
28,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BC Hartzer |
|
Index-Linked |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
222,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
60,000 |
|
2 Feb 04 |
|
|
|
17.56 |
|
13.62 |
|
295,834 |
|
102,000 |
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
13,665 |
|
28 Nov 03 |
|
|
|
16.82 |
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
13,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PJO Hawkins |
|
Index-Linked |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
183,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
170,000 |
|
11 Mar 04 |
|
|
|
19.20 |
|
13.62 |
|
316,591 |
|
250,000 |
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
209,048 |
|
28 Nov 03 |
|
|
|
16.82 |
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
209,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Marriott |
|
Index-Linked |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
250,000 |
|
12 Feb 04 |
|
|
|
17.95 |
|
10.48 |
|
559,057 |
|
250,000 |
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
Rights(2) |
|
460 |
|
28 Nov 03 |
|
97,725 |
|
16.82 |
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
98,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other(3) |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
11,000 |
|
6,000 |
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Targett |
|
Hurdled |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
307,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Zero priced options first granted in May 2004, and specifically designed to deliver equity to Sir J Anderson. These options are granted under the ANZ Share Option Plan and have a nil exercise price and no time-based vesting criteria. They were issued to meet the particular needs and circumstances at the time of the acquisition of NBNZ
(2) Refers to rights arising from the Renounceable Rights Issue that partly funded the acquisition of NBNZ. All ANZ Shareholders were eligible to purchase 2 new ordinary shares for every 11 existing ordinary shares registered in their name as at 31 October 2003. Amounts shown include directly held rights, nominally held rights and rights held by personally related entities
(3) Other refers to share options granted to a personally related entity
22
F8. OPTIONS VALUATIONS
For options granted in the current year, valuations have been determined in accordance with the fair value measurement provisions of Accounting Standards AASB 1046 and 1046A. The following table outlines the general assumptions used in the option pricing model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price |
|
Share price |
|
ANZ expected |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected |
|
Expected |
|
Risk free |
|
Option type |
|
Grant date |
|
Option value(1) |
|
(5 day VWAP) |
|
at grant |
|
volatility(2) |
|
Option term |
|
Vesting period |
|
life |
|
dividends(3) |
|
interest rate(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurdled |
|
5 Nov03 |
|
2.34 |
|
17.55 |
|
17.13 |
|
20.50 |
% |
7 years |
|
3 years |
|
5 years |
|
5.00 |
% |
5.80 |
% |
Hurdled |
|
11 May04 |
|
2.44 |
|
18.22 |
|
18.10 |
|
19.00 |
% |
7 years |
|
3 years |
|
5 years |
|
5.40 |
% |
5.97 |
% |
Hurdled (CEO) |
|
31 Dec03 |
|
2.11 |
|
17.48 |
|
17.68 |
|
20.00 |
% |
5 years |
|
2 years |
|
3.5 years |
|
5.50 |
% |
5.56 |
% |
Zero-priced |
|
11 May04 |
|
18.23 |
|
0 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
2 years |
|
0 years |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
(1) The Binomial Option Pricing Model (the model) is used to assess the value of ANZs options (other than zero-priced options, for which the value is the volume weighted average price of the Companys shares traded on the ASX on the day of the options were granted). The model utilises probability theory to determine the value of an ANZ option based on likely share prices at the expiry date of the option. In accordance with AASB 1046 and 1046A, the model reflects both the performance hurdles that currently apply to the Hurdled Options and the non-transferability of the options. Under the terms of the Options, the hurdle conditions (outlined in section C5.2.1) must be met before the options may be exercised during the exercise period
(2) Expected volatility represents a measure of the amount by which ANZs share price is expected to fluctuate over the life of the options. The measure of volatility used in the model is the annualised standard deviation of the continuously compounded rates of return on the historical share price over a defined period of time preceding the date of grant. This historical average annualised volatility is then used to estimate a reasonable expected volatility over the expected life of the options
(3) In estimating the fair value of the ANZ option grant, expected dividends were included in the application of the model. The expected dividend yield applied to the model was based on an analysis of ANZs historical dividend payments and yields
(4) The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield currently available on zero-coupon bonds issued by the Australian government, with a remaining term equal to the expected life of ANZs options
23
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
24
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2004
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
Note |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Total Income |
|
2 |
|
17,508 |
|
13,023 |
|
12,007 |
|
12,081 |
|
11,368 |
|
Interest income |
|
2 |
|
14,117 |
|
10,215 |
|
9,037 |
|
9,054 |
|
7,378 |
|
Interest expense |
|
3 |
|
(8,863 |
) |
(5,904 |
) |
(5,019 |
) |
(6,088 |
) |
(4,556 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
|
5,254 |
|
4,311 |
|
4,018 |
|
2,966 |
|
2,822 |
|
Proceeds, net of costs, on disposal of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount of assets given up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Profit from disposal of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
2 |
|
3,246 |
|
2,702 |
|
2,765 |
|
3,027 |
|
3,990 |
|
Share of joint venture profit from ING Australia |
|
2 |
|
97 |
|
55 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share of associates profit (net of write-offs) |
|
2 |
|
48 |
|
51 |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
8,645 |
|
7,119 |
|
6,988 |
|
5,993 |
|
6,812 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
3 |
|
(4,026 |
) |
(3,228 |
) |
(2,905 |
) |
(2,878 |
) |
(2,663 |
) |
Profit before doubtful debt provision and income tax |
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
3,891 |
|
4,083 |
|
3,115 |
|
4,149 |
|
Provision for doubtful debts |
|
15 |
|
(632 |
) |
(614 |
) |
(860 |
) |
(433 |
) |
(465 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
3,987 |
|
3,277 |
|
3,223 |
|
2,682 |
|
3,684 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
6 |
|
(1,168 |
) |
(926 |
) |
(898 |
) |
(710 |
) |
(616 |
) |
Profit after income tax |
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
2,351 |
|
2,325 |
|
1,972 |
|
3,068 |
|
Net profit attributable to outside equity interests |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
(3) |
|
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit attributable to shareholders of the Company(1) |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
1,972 |
|
3,068 |
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of hedges after tax |
|
|
|
233 |
|
(356 |
) |
(98 |
) |
5 |
|
(191 |
) |
Total adjustments attributable to shareholders of the company recognised directly into equity |
|
|
|
233 |
|
(356 |
) |
(98 |
) |
5 |
|
(191 |
) |
Total changes in equity other than those resulting from transactions with shareholders as owners |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
1,992 |
|
2,224 |
|
1,977 |
|
2,877 |
|
Earnings per ordinary share (cents) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
142.4 |
|
141.4 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
149.7 |
|
141.7 |
|
140.4 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
The notes appearing on pages 29 to 126 form an integral part of these financial statements
(1) The results of 2004 include the impact of these significant items:
Close out of the TrUEPrS swap ($84 million profit after tax);
ING Australia completion accounts ($14 million profit after tax); and
Incremental NBNZ integration costs ($14 million charge after tax)
The results of 2002 include the impact of these significant items:
The sale of businesses to INGA joint venture (profit after tax of $170 million);
National Housing Bank recovery ($159 million profit after tax); and
Special general provision for doubtful debts ($175 million charge after tax)
Further details on these transactions are shown in notes 2, 3 and 15
25
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2004
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
Note |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
9 |
|
6,363 |
|
6,592 |
|
3,744 |
|
3,916 |
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
10 |
|
4,781 |
|
2,427 |
|
2,537 |
|
2,143 |
|
Trading securities |
|
11 |
|
5,478 |
|
4,213 |
|
4,783 |
|
3,636 |
|
Investment securities |
|
12 |
|
7,746 |
|
4,767 |
|
6,117 |
|
3,838 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
13 |
|
204,962 |
|
149,465 |
|
133,767 |
|
115,530 |
|
Customers liabilities for acceptances |
|
16 |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
Due from controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,338 |
|
5,738 |
|
Regulatory deposits |
|
17 |
|
176 |
|
101 |
|
144 |
|
68 |
|
Shares in controlled entities, associates and joint venture entities |
|
18 |
|
1,960 |
|
1,814 |
|
11,517 |
|
8,095 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
19 |
|
1,454 |
|
1,165 |
|
737 |
|
746 |
|
Goodwill(1) |
|
20 |
|
3,269 |
|
160 |
|
74 |
|
87 |
|
Other assets(2) |
|
21 |
|
9,158 |
|
10,224 |
|
5,751 |
|
8,042 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
22 |
|
1,532 |
|
1,485 |
|
826 |
|
897 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
259,345 |
|
195,591 |
|
189,801 |
|
165,914 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
23 |
|
7,349 |
|
6,467 |
|
5,860 |
|
5,490 |
|
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
24 |
|
168,557 |
|
124,494 |
|
99,811 |
|
90,186 |
|
Liability for acceptances |
|
|
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
Due to controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,544 |
|
9,262 |
|
Income tax liabilities |
|
25 |
|
1,914 |
|
1,083 |
|
1,251 |
|
546 |
|
Payables and other liabilities(3) |
|
26 |
|
14,212 |
|
13,611 |
|
10,890 |
|
11,671 |
|
Provisions |
|
27 |
|
845 |
|
769 |
|
618 |
|
614 |
|
Bonds and notes |
|
28 |
|
27,602 |
|
16,572 |
|
25,034 |
|
16,131 |
|
Loan capital |
|
29 |
|
8,475 |
|
5,630 |
|
7,680 |
|
5,367 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
241,420 |
|
181,804 |
|
173,154 |
|
152,445 |
|
Net assets |
|
|
|
17,925 |
|
13,787 |
|
16,647 |
|
13,469 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary share capital |
|
30 |
|
8,005 |
|
4,175 |
|
8,005 |
|
4,175 |
|
Preference share capital |
|
30 |
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
Reserves |
|
|
|
579 |
|
180 |
|
659 |
|
684 |
|
Retained profits |
|
|
|
8,336 |
|
7,203 |
|
6,996 |
|
6,398 |
|
Share capital and reserves attributable to share holders of the Company |
|
|
|
17,907 |
|
13,770 |
|
16,647 |
|
13,469 |
|
Outside equity interests |
|
31 |
|
18 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
|
17,925 |
|
13,787 |
|
16,647 |
|
13,469 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments |
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent liabilities, contingent assets and credit related commitments |
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes appearing on pages 29 to 126 form an integral part of these financial statements
(1) Excludes notional goodwill of $754 million (September 2003: $821 million) included in the net carrying value of ING Australia Limited
(2) Includes life insurance investment assets held by NBNZ Life Insurance Limited $65 million (September 2003: $nil).
(3) Includes life insurance policy liabilities held by NBNZ Life Insurance Limited $30 million (September 2003: $nil)
26
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2004
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
Note |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
|
|
4,175 |
|
3,939 |
|
3,733 |
|
4,175 |
|
3,939 |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
|
|
135 |
|
115 |
|
94 |
|
135 |
|
115 |
|
Group employee share acquisition scheme |
|
|
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
55 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
Group share option scheme |
|
|
|
86 |
|
73 |
|
57 |
|
86 |
|
73 |
|
Rights issues |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
|
8,005 |
|
4,175 |
|
3,939 |
|
8,005 |
|
4,175 |
|
Preference shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
1,375 |
|
1,526 |
|
2,212 |
|
1,375 |
|
New issues(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
|
|
987 |
|
Buy back of preference shares |
|
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
Retranslation of preference shares |
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
(151 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
Balance at end of year |
|
|
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
1,375 |
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
Total share capital |
|
|
|
8,992 |
|
6,387 |
|
5,314 |
|
8,992 |
|
6,387 |
|
Asset revaluation reserve(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
|
|
31 |
|
31 |
|
31 |
|
401 |
|
401 |
|
Revaluation of investment in controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
Total asset revaluation reserve |
|
|
|
31 |
|
31 |
|
31 |
|
415 |
|
401 |
|
Foreign currency translation reserve(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
117 |
|
215 |
|
228 |
|
419 |
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of hedges after tax |
|
|
|
233 |
|
(356 |
) |
(98 |
) |
5 |
|
(191 |
) |
Transfer from general reserve |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign currency translation reserve |
|
|
|
218 |
|
(239 |
) |
117 |
|
233 |
|
228 |
|
General reserve(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
|
|
239 |
|
237 |
|
322 |
|
55 |
|
55 |
|
TrUEPrS preference share gain on buy back |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
Transfers (to) from retained profits/FCTR |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
2 |
|
(85 |
) |
(224 |
) |
|
|
Total general reserve |
|
|
|
181 |
|
239 |
|
237 |
|
11 |
|
55 |
|
Capital reserve(4) |
|
|
|
149 |
|
149 |
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserves |
|
|
|
579 |
|
180 |
|
534 |
|
659 |
|
684 |
|
Retained profits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
|
|
7,203 |
|
5,600 |
|
4,562 |
|
6,398 |
|
3,971 |
|
Net profit attributable to share holders of the Company |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
1,972 |
|
3,068 |
|
Total available for appropriation |
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
7,948 |
|
6,884 |
|
8,370 |
|
7,039 |
|
Transfers from (to) reserves |
|
|
|
14 |
|
(2 |
) |
85 |
|
224 |
|
|
|
Ordinary share dividends provided for or paid |
|
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
(641 |
) |
(1,252 |
) |
(1,598 |
) |
(641 |
) |
Preference share dividends paid |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
(102 |
) |
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Retained profits at end of year |
|
|
|
8,336 |
|
7,203 |
|
5,600 |
|
6,996 |
|
6,398 |
|
Total shareholders equity attributable to share holders of the Company |
|
|
|
17,907 |
|
13,770 |
|
11,448 |
|
16,647 |
|
13,469 |
|
The notes appearing on pages 29 to 126 form an integral part of these financial statements
(1) Relates to the issue of 10 million ANZ Stapled Exchangeable Preferred Securities, raising $1 billion net of issue costs of $13 million. Refer note 30
Nature and purpose of reserves
(2) Asset revaluation reserve
Prior to 1 October 2000, the asset revaluation reserve was used to record certain increments and decrements on the revaluation of non-current assets. As the Group has elected to adopt deemed cost in accordance with AASB 1041, the balance of the reserve is not available for future non-current asset write downs while the Group remains on the deemed cost basis
(3) Foreign currency translation reserve
Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign self-sustaining operations are taken to the foreign currency translation reserve, as described in accounting policy note 1
(4) General reserve and Capital reserve
The balance of these reserve shave resulted from prior period allocations of retained profits and may be released to retained profits.
27
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2004
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
Note |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
|
|
14,515 |
|
10,887 |
|
10,148 |
|
8,744 |
|
7,243 |
|
Dividends received |
|
|
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
650 |
|
1,803 |
|
Fees and other income received |
|
|
|
3,257 |
|
3,170 |
|
2,637 |
|
2,008 |
|
2,397 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
|
(8,258 |
) |
(5,724 |
) |
(5,367 |
) |
(5,711 |
) |
(4,372 |
) |
Personnel expenses paid |
|
|
|
(2,110 |
) |
(1,848 |
) |
(1,900 |
) |
(1,542 |
) |
(1,463 |
) |
Premises expenses paid |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
(279 |
) |
(268 |
) |
(275 |
) |
(257 |
) |
Other operating expenses paid |
|
|
|
(2,093 |
) |
(1,952 |
) |
(1,893 |
) |
(1,087 |
) |
(855 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
(1,312 |
) |
(853 |
) |
107 |
|
(1,063 |
) |
Net goods and services tax (paid) received |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
1 |
|
(28 |
) |
(2 |
) |
17 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in trading securities |
|
|
|
514 |
|
1,669 |
|
(1,030 |
) |
(1,147 |
) |
1,583 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
42 |
|
5,250 |
|
4,619 |
|
1,449 |
|
1,745 |
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets - greater than three months |
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
1,113 |
|
(442 |
) |
(298 |
) |
1,091 |
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
|
|
522 |
|
(44 |
) |
554 |
|
(153 |
) |
(59 |
) |
Regulatory deposits |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
52 |
|
37 |
|
(78 |
) |
48 |
|
Loans and advances |
|
|
|
(22,757 |
) |
(19,944 |
) |
(9,441 |
) |
(18,869 |
) |
(17,928 |
) |
Shares in controlled entities and associates |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(5,361 |
) |
(701 |
) |
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
(7,560 |
) |
(3,871 |
) |
(2,851 |
) |
(5,023 |
) |
(2,838 |
) |
Proceeds from sale or maturity |
|
|
|
4,850 |
|
2,445 |
|
2,436 |
|
2,693 |
|
1,294 |
|
Controlled entities and associates Purchased (net of cash acquired) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NBNZ |
|
|
|
(3,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
(368 |
) |
(385 |
) |
(237 |
) |
(292 |
) |
Proceeds from sale |
|
|
|
53 |
|
51 |
|
101 |
|
4 |
|
38 |
|
Recovery from NHB litigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
1,401 |
|
483 |
|
999 |
|
1,501 |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
(27,117 |
) |
(19,167 |
) |
(10,311 |
) |
(26,323 |
) |
(17,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
(2,946 |
) |
(1,211 |
) |
427 |
|
(3,434 |
) |
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
|
|
11,216 |
|
13,995 |
|
9,152 |
|
10,003 |
|
7,500 |
|
Due from/to controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
4,993 |
|
Payables and other liabilities |
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
1,000 |
|
362 |
|
1,075 |
|
1,140 |
|
Bonds and notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue proceeds |
|
|
|
14,181 |
|
8,255 |
|
4,537 |
|
13,233 |
|
7,788 |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
|
(4,100 |
) |
(4,095 |
) |
(3,519 |
) |
(4,100 |
) |
(4,095 |
) |
Loan capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue proceeds |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
3,380 |
|
759 |
|
2,694 |
|
3,380 |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
|
(368 |
) |
(437 |
) |
(589 |
) |
(368 |
) |
(437 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in outside equity interests |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
(1,322 |
) |
(1,178 |
) |
(1,463 |
) |
(1,220 |
) |
Share capital issues (ordinary capital) |
|
|
|
3,695 |
|
120 |
|
112 |
|
3,695 |
|
120 |
|
ANZ StEPS preference share issue |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
ANZ StEPS issues costs |
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Preference share buyback |
|
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
23,378 |
|
18,936 |
|
8,426 |
|
24,781 |
|
16,722 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
4,619 |
|
1,449 |
|
1,745 |
|
5,033 |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
(27,117 |
) |
(19,167 |
) |
(10,311 |
) |
(26,323 |
) |
(17,846 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
23,378 |
|
18,936 |
|
8,426 |
|
24,781 |
|
16,722 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
4,388 |
|
(436 |
) |
203 |
|
3,909 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
7,925 |
|
9,071 |
|
4,411 |
|
5,453 |
|
Foreign currency translation on opening balances |
|
|
|
(972 |
) |
(4,998 |
) |
(710 |
) |
(372 |
) |
(4,951 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
42 |
|
7,854 |
|
7,315 |
|
7,925 |
|
4,242 |
|
4,411 |
|
The notes appearing on pages 29 to 126 form an integral part of these financial statements
28
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our critical accounting policies are described on pages 129 to 133.
i) Basis of preparation
This general purpose financial report complies with the accounts provisions of the Banking Act 1959, applicable Australian Accounting Standards, the accounts provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, Urgent Issues Group Consensus Views and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. Except as disclosed below, these accounting policies are consistent with those of the previous year.
Certain disclosures required by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in respect of foreign registrants have also been included in this report.
The financial report has been prepared in accordance with the historical cost convention as modified by the revaluation of trading instruments which are recorded at market value with gains and losses on revaluation taken to the statement of financial performance, and the deemed cost of properties (deemed cost being the carrying amount of revalued non current assets as at the date of reverting to the cost basis per AASB 1041 - Revaluation of Non Current Assets) less any accumulated depreciation.
The preparation of the financial report requires the use of management estimates. Such estimates may require review in future periods.
The Company is a company of the kind referred to in Australian Securities and Investments Commission class order 98/100, dated 10 July 1998. Consequently, amounts in the financial report have been rounded to the nearest million dollars except where otherwise indicated.
All amounts are expressed in Australian dollars, unless otherwise stated. Where necessary, amounts shown for the previous year have been reclassified to facilitate comparison.
ii) Changes in Accounting Policies
There have been no changes in accounting policies for the year ended 30 September 2004.
iii) Consolidation
The financial statements consolidate the financial statements of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (the Company) and its controlled entities.
Shares in controlled entities are stated at deemed cost in the statement of financial position.
Where controlled entities and associates have been sold or acquired during the year, their operating results have been included to the date of disposal or from the date of acquisition.
Control means the capacity of an entity to dominate decision making, directly or indirectly, in relation to the financial and operating policies of another entity so as to enable that other entity to pursue the objectives of the controlling entity.
The capacity of an entity to dominate decision making is usually present when that entity has power over more than one-half of the voting rights of the other entity; power to govern the financial and operating policies of the other entity; power to appoint or remove the majority of the members of the board of directors; or power to cast the majority of votes at meetings of the board of directors or equivalent governing body of the entity. However, all the facts of a particular situation will be considered when assessing control.
The Group adopts the equity method of accounting for associates and the Groups interest in joint venture entities.
The Groups share of results of associates and joint venture entities is included in the consolidated statement of financial performance. Shares in associates and joint venture entities are stated in the consolidated statement of financial position at cost plus the Groups share of post acquisition net assets. Interests in associates and joint ventures are reviewed annually for impairment primarily using a discounted cash flow methodology. In the course of completing this valuation other methodologies are considered to determine the reasonableness of the valuation including the multiples of earnings methodology.
All significant activities of the Group, with the exception of ING Australia Joint Venture and PT Panin Indonesia Bank, are operated through wholly owned controlled entities.
The Group may invest in or establish special purpose companies, or vehicles, to enable it to undertake specific types of transactions. Where the Group controls such vehicles, they are consolidated into the Group financial results.
iv) Goodwill
Goodwill, representing the excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of a controlled entity at the date of gaining control, is recognised as an asset and amortised on a straight line basis over the period during which the benefits are expected to arise, not exceeding 20 years.
The unamortised balance of goodwill and notional goodwill and the period of amortisation are reviewed annually for impairment using a discounted cash flow methodology. The reasonableness of this valuation is assessed by comparing, and ensuring it is similar to, the value calculated using the capitalization of earnings methodology. Where the balance exceeds the value of expected future benefits, the difference is charged to the statement of financial performance.
v) Foreign currency
Financial assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Australian dollars at the rates of exchange ruling at balance date.
Revenues and expenses of overseas branches and controlled entities are translated at average exchange rates for the year.
Net translation differences arising from the translation of overseas branches and controlled entities considered to be self-sustaining operations are included in the foreign currency translation reserve, after allowing for those positions hedged by foreign exchange contracts and related currency borrowings (net of tax).
vi) Fee income
Fee and commission income are brought to account on an accruals basis. Yield-related front-end application fees received are deferred and accrued to income as an adjustment to yield over the period of the loan. Non yield-related application and activation lending fees received are recognised as income no later than when the loan is disbursed or the commitment to lend expires.
29
Fees and commissions that relate to the execution of a significant act (for example, advisory services, placement fees and underwriting fees) are taken to income when the fees are receivable.
Fees charged for providing ongoing services that represent the recoupment of the costs of providing service (for example, maintaining and administering existing facilities) are recognised as revenue in the period in which the service is provided.
vii) Net loans and advances
Net loans and advances include direct finance provided to customers such as bank overdrafts, credit cards, term loans, lease finance, hire purchase finance and commercial bills.
Overdrafts, credit cards and term loans are carried at principal balances outstanding. Interest on amounts outstanding is accounted for on an accruals basis.
Finance leases, including hire purchase contracts are accounted for using the finance method whereby income is taken to account progressively over the life of the lease or the contract in proportion to the outstanding investment balance. The finance receivable component of operating leases is accounted for using the finance method and residual interest retained are recorded as other assets. At finalisation, goods are disposed of and proceeds received are applied against the residual value. Any resulting gains or losses are recognised through income.
Other assets include the residual interest in operating leases which is reflected at estimated future realisable value. The residual value is reviewed semi-annually and compared to estimated future market values. Any impairment on these residual value assets is recognised in the statement of financial performance for the period.
A hire purchase is a contract where Esanda or UDC (the owner) allows the customer (the hirer) the right to possess and use goods in return for regular payments. When all payments are made the title to the goods will pass to the customer.
The gross amount of contractual payments for finance leases to business customers that have a fixed rate and a fixed term are recorded as gross lease receivables and the unearned interest component is recognised as income yet to mature.
Customer financing through redeemable preference shares is included within net loans and advances. Dividends received on redeemable preference shares are taken to the statement of financial performance as part of interest income.
All loans are subject to regular scrutiny and graded according to the level of credit risk. Loans are classified as either productive or non-accrual. The Group has adopted the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Impaired Assets Guidelines in assessing non-accrual loans. Non-accrual loans include loans where the accrual of interest and fees has ceased due to doubt as to full recovery, and loans that have been restructured with an effective yield below the Groups average cost of funds at the date of restructuring. A specific provision is raised to cover the expected loss, where full recovery of principal is doubtful.
Restructured loans are loans with an effective yield above the Groups cost of funds and below the yield applicable to a customer of equal credit standing.
Cash receipts on non-accrual loans are, in the absence of a contrary agreement with the customer, applied as income or fees in priority to being applied as a reduction in principal, except where the cash receipt relates to proceeds from the sale of security.
viii) Bad and doubtful debts and other loss contingencies
Bad and doubtful debts:
Each month the Group recognises an expense for credit losses based on the expected long term loss ratio for each part of the loan portfolio. The monthly charge is booked to the General Provision which is maintained to cover losses inherent within the Groups existing loan portfolio.
The method used by the Group for determining this monthly expense charge is referred to as economic loss provisioning (ELP). The Group uses ELP models to calculate the expected loss by considering:
the history of credit loss for each type and risk grade of lending; and
the size, composition and risk profile of the current loan portfolio.
The Group regularly reviews the assumptions used in the ELP models. These reviews are conducted in recognition of the subjective nature of ELP methodology. Methodologies are updated as improved analysis becomes available. In addition, the robustness of outcomes is reviewed considering the Groups actual loss experience, and losses sustained by other banks operating in similar markets.
To the extent that credit losses are not consistent with previous loss patterns used to develop the assumptions within the ELP methodology, the existing General Provision may be determined to be either in excess of or insufficient to cover credit losses not yet specifically identified. As a result of the reassessments, ELP charge levels may be periodically increased or decreased.
Specific provisions are maintained to cover identified doubtful debts. All known bad debts are written off in the year in which they are identified. The specific provision requirement (representing new and increased specific provisions less specific provision releases) is transferred from the general provision to the specific provision. Recoveries, representing excess transfers to the specific provision, are credited to the general provision.
Provisions for doubtful debts are deducted from loans and advances in the statement of financial position.
Other loss contingencies:
These items are recorded as liabilities on the balance sheet when the following requirements are met:
the transaction is probable in that the contingency is likely to occur; and
can be reasonably estimated.
Further disclosure is made within note 48, where the above requirements are not met but the contingency falls within the category of reasonably possible. Specific details are provided together with an estimate of the range or a statement that such as estimate is not possible.
30
ix) Acceptances
Commercial bills accepted but not held in portfolio are accounted for and disclosed as a liability with a corresponding contra asset.
The Groups own acceptances discounted are held as part of either the trading securities portfolio or the loan portfolio, depending on whether, at the time of such discount, the intention was to hold the acceptances for resale or until maturity.
x) Trading securities
Securities held for trading purposes are recorded at market value. Unrealised gains and losses on revaluation are taken to the statement of financial performance.
Market value for listed and unlisted securities is determined by the price displayed by a willing buyer in a liquid market at the reporting date, adjusted for liquidity issues around the size of the parcel of securities held by the Group as compared to the normal daily trading volumes in the securities. Where a market price in a liquid market is not readily available, the market value is determined by reference to the market price available for a security with similar credit, maturity and yield characteristics or by using industry standard pricing models.
xi) Investment securities
Investment securities are those which the Group intends and has the ability to hold until maturity. Such securities are recorded at cost or at cost adjusted for amortisation of premiums or discounts.
Premiums and discounts are capitalised and amortised from the date of purchase to maturity. Interest and dividend income is accrued. Changes in market values of securities are not taken into account unless there is considered to be an other than temporary diminution in value. The market value of listed and unlisted investment securities used for considering other than temporary impairment and fair market value disclosures is determined using quoted market prices for securities with the same or similar credit, maturity and yield characteristics.
Market value, used for impairment issues, is determined in accordance with the methodology discussed under Trading Securities.
xii) Repurchase agreements
Securities sold under repurchase agreements are retained in the financial statements and a counterparty liability is disclosed under the classifications of Due to other financial institutions or Deposits and other borrowings. The difference between the sale price and the repurchase price is amortised over the life of the repurchase agreement and charged to interest expense in the statement of financial performance.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell are recorded as Liquid assets, Net loans and advances, or Due from other financial institutions, depending on the term of the agreement and the counterparty.
xiii) Derivative financial instruments
Derivative financial instruments (derivatives) are contracts whose value is derived from one or more underlying financial instruments or indices. They include swaps, forward rate agreements, futures, options and combinations of these instruments.
Trading derivatives, comprising derivatives entered into for customer-related or proprietary reasons or for hedging the trading portfolio, are measured at fair value and all gains and losses are taken to other operating income in the statement of financial performance.
Fair value losses arising from trading derivatives are not offset against fair value gains on the statement of financial position unless a legal right of set-off exists.
For contracts subject to master netting agreements that create a legal right of set off for which only the net revaluation amount is recognised on the statement of financial performance, unrealised gains on derivatives are recognised as part of other assets and unrealised losses are recognised as part of other liabilities in a category described as treasury instrument revaluations.
Derivatives designated as hedges of underlying non-trading exposures are accounted for on the same basis as the underlying exposures. To be designated as a hedge, the fair value of the hedge must move inversely with changes in the fair value of the underlying exposure.
Gains and losses resulting from the termination of a derivative that was designated as a hedge of non-trading exposures are deferred and amortised over the remaining period of the original term covered by the terminated instrument where the underlying exposure still exists. The gains or losses are recorded in the income or expense line in which the underlying exposure movements are recorded. Where the underlying exposure no longer exists, the gains and losses are recognised in the statement of financial performance in the other operating income line.
Gains and losses on derivatives related to hedging exposures arising from anticipated transactions are deferred and recognised in the financial statements when the anticipated transaction occurs.
These gains and losses are deferred only to the extent that there is an offsetting unrecognised (unrealised) gain or loss on the exposures being hedged. Deferred gains and losses are amortised over the expected term of the hedged exposure and are recorded in the results of operations in the same line as the underlying exposure. For hedging instruments designed as hedging interest rate risk the amortised deferred gain or loss is posted to the net interest line; for items designated as hedging foreign currency exposures the amortised deferred gain or loss is recorded in the other operating income line. The impact of hedges of foreign currency revenue is recorded in interest income. The deferred gain or loss is recorded in other liability or other assets in the statement of financial position.
Gains and losses that arise prior to and upon the maturity of transactions entered into under hedge rollover strategies are deferred and included in the measurement of the hedged anticipated transaction if the transaction is still expected to occur. If the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, the gains and losses are recognised immediately in the statement of financial performance in the other income disclosure.
31
Movements in the derivative financial position are recorded in the cashflow statement when they are settled on the other financing and investing lines.
xiv) Premises and equipment
Premises and equipment are carried at cost less depreciation or amortisation.
Profit or loss on the disposal of premises and equipment is determined as the difference between the carrying amount of the assets at the time of disposal and the proceeds of disposal, and is included in the results of the Group in the year of disposal.
Assets other than freehold land are depreciated at rates based upon their expected useful lives to the Group, using the straight line method. The depreciation rates used for each class of asset are:
Buildings |
|
1% |
|
Building integrals |
|
10% |
|
Furniture & equipment |
|
10% |
|
Computer & office equipment |
|
12.5% to 33% |
|
Software |
|
14% to 33% |
|
Leasehold improvements are amortised on a straight line basis over the shorter of the useful lives or remaining terms of the lease.
Costs incurred in acquiring and building software and computer systems are capitalised as fixed assets and expensed as amortisation over periods of between 3 and 5 years except for the branch front end applications where 7 years is used. Costs incurred in planning or evaluating software proposals, or in maintaining systems after implementation, are not capitalised.
The carrying value of all non current assets, including premises and equipment, have been assessed annually, and have not been found to be in excess of their recoverable amounts. Recoverable amounts are determined through a combination of comparisons with market values and cash flows. If the carrying value of non current assets exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is written down to the lower value. Where assets working together as a group support the generation of cash flows, the recoverable amount is assessed in relation to the group of assets.
xv) Income tax
The Group adopts the liability method of tax effect accounting whereby income tax expense is calculated based on accounting profit adjusted for permanent differences. Permanent differences are items of revenue and expense which are recognised in the statement of financial performance but are not part of taxable income or vice versa.
Future tax benefits and deferred tax liabilities relating to timing differences and tax losses are carried forward at tax rates applicable to future periods. These future tax benefits are not brought to account unless realisation of the asset is assured beyond reasonable doubt. Future tax benefits relating to tax losses are only carried forward where realisation of the benefit is considered virtually certain.
Provision for Australian income tax is made where the earnings of overseas controlled entities are subjected to Australian tax under the attribution rules for the taxation of foreign sourced income.
Otherwise, no provision is made for overseas withholding tax or Australian income tax which may arise on repatriation of earnings from overseas controlled entities, where it is expected these earnings will be retained by those entities to finance their ongoing business.
For details of the impact of Tax Consolidation, refer notes 6, 19 and 25.
xvi) Employee entitlements
The amounts expected to be paid in respect of employees entitlements to annual leave are accrued at expected salary rates including on-costs. Liability for long service leave is accrued in respect of all applicable employees at the present value of future amounts expected to be paid.
xvii) Provisions
Refer to note 27 for the accounting policies covering various provisions excluding ELP which is detailed in note 1(viii) above.
xviii) Superannuation commitments
Contributions, which are determined on an actuarial basis, to superannuation schemes are charged to personnel expenses in the statement of financial performance.
Any aggregate deficiencies arising from the actuarial valuations of the Groups defined benefit schemes have been provided for in the financial statements, where a legal or constructive obligation exists.
The assets and liabilities of the schemes have not been consolidated as the Company does not have direct or indirect control of the schemes.
xix) Leasing
Leases entered into by the Group as lessee are predominantly operating leases, and the operating lease payments are included in the statement of financial performance in equal installments over the lease term.
xx) Goods and services tax
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST), except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Tax Office (ATO). In these circumstances the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense.
Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO is included as an other asset or liability in the statement of financial position.
Cash flows are included in the statement of cash flows on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to, the ATO are classified as operating cash flows.
32
xxi) Life insurance
The Groups life insurance business was conducted through ANZ Life Assurance Company Limited until 30 April 2002 and its results consolidated until that date. On 1 May 2002 the Groups life insurance business was transferred to a joint venture entity, (see note 45) which is accounted for in accordance with the equity method of accounting. The joint venture adopts similar accounting policies to those described here.
Components of life insurance margin on services operating income disclosed are premium revenue and related revenue, investment revenue, claims expense and insurance policy liabilities expense (refer note 40).
Premiums with a regular due date are recognised as revenue on an accruals basis. Unpaid premiums are only recognised as revenue during the days of grace or where secured by the surrender value of the policy and are included as Other Assets in the Statement of Financial Position. The fee component of premiums with no due date are recognised as revenue on a cash received basis. This category relates to investment products which offer policy holders the facility to make additional payments but where there is no contractual requirement to do so.
There are no risks arising from policyholder mortality associated with these investment products. These are savings products which are reported as deposits, and accordingly the fee is recognised when received.
Business is classified as investment-linked where the benefit amount is directly linked to the market value of the investments. The policy owner bears the risk and rewards of the funds investment performance. Non investment linked business covers a wide range of contracts where the benefit amount is not directly linked to the market value of the investments. Dependent upon the type of contract involved, benefits could be paid upon termination of the contract from any cause or specifically on death, or on the occurrence of a contingency dependent on the termination or continuation of human life or on the occurrence of injury or disability caused by accident or illness. The financial risk of the occurrence of the event which crystallises the payment of the benefit is borne by the company.
Claims under investment-linked business are recognised when the policy ceases to participate in the earnings of the fund. Claims on non investment-linked business are recognised when the liability to the policy owner under the policy contract has been established or upon notification of the insured event depending on the type of claim.
Policy liabilities and other liabilities are measured at net present value of estimated future cash flows. Changes in net present values are recognised in the statement of financial performance as revenue or expenses in the financial year in which they occur.
All assets are measured at net market values as at the reporting date. Changes in the net market values are recognised in the statement of financial performance as revenue or expenses in the financial year in which they occur.
xxii) Capitalised expenses
Direct external expenses related to the acquisition of interest earning assets, including structured institutional lending, mortgages and finance leases, are initially recognised as part of the cost of acquiring the asset and written-off as an adjustment to its expected yield over its expected life. For assets subject to prepayment, expected life is determined on the basis of the historical behaviour of the particular asset portfolio, taking into account contractual obligations and prepayment experience assessed on a regular basis. Impairment of capitalised expenses is assessed through comparing the actual behaviour of the portfolio against initial expected life assumptions.
33
2: INCOME
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From other financial institutions |
|
209 |
|
92 |
|
121 |
|
68 |
|
65 |
|
On regulatory deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
On trading securities |
|
359 |
|
272 |
|
261 |
|
245 |
|
230 |
|
On investment securities |
|
275 |
|
180 |
|
136 |
|
210 |
|
125 |
|
On loans and advances |
|
12,984 |
|
9,380 |
|
8,245 |
|
8,194 |
|
6,667 |
|
Other |
|
290 |
|
291 |
|
273 |
|
200 |
|
213 |
|
|
|
14,117 |
|
10,215 |
|
9,037 |
|
8,917 |
|
7,300 |
|
From controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
78 |
|
Total interest income |
|
14,117 |
|
10,215 |
|
9,037 |
|
9,054 |
|
7,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Fee income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending |
|
1,002 |
|
933 |
|
876 |
|
822 |
|
813 |
|
Other, commissions(1) |
|
1,419 |
|
1,115 |
|
1,196 |
|
947 |
|
795 |
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
2,048 |
|
2,072 |
|
1,769 |
|
1,608 |
|
From controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 |
|
219 |
|
Total fee income |
|
2,421 |
|
2,048 |
|
2,072 |
|
2,029 |
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii) Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange earnings |
|
411 |
|
348 |
|
365 |
|
232 |
|
238 |
|
Profit on trading instruments |
|
151 |
|
110 |
|
59 |
|
158 |
|
122 |
|
Significant item: Net profit before tax from sale of business to INGA joint venture |
|
14 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
Significant item: Net profit before tax from the close out of the TrUEPrS swap |
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
Hedge of TrUEPrS cash flows(2) |
|
2 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
2 |
|
71 |
|
Life insurance margin on services operating income (refer note 40) |
|
15 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) on sale of premises(3) |
|
(7 |
) |
6 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
Other |
|
129 |
|
116 |
|
89 |
|
482 |
|
1,729 |
|
Total other income(4) |
|
825 |
|
654 |
|
867 |
|
998 |
|
2,163 |
|
Total other operating income |
|
3,246 |
|
2,702 |
|
2,939 |
|
3,027 |
|
3,990 |
|
Share of joint venture profit from ING Australia(5) (refer note 45) |
|
97 |
|
55 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share of associates profit (net of write offs) |
|
48 |
|
51 |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total share of joint venture and associates profit |
|
145 |
|
106 |
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total income(6) |
|
17,508 |
|
13,023 |
|
12,007 |
|
12,081 |
|
11,368 |
|
(1) Includes commissions from funds management business (up to 30 April 2002)
(2) Preference shares are issued via the TrUEPrS structure. This income is earned on a fixed receive/floating pay swap of the fixed dividend commitments. $2 million in 2004 treated as significant item
(3) Gross proceeds on sale of premises is $34 million (2003: $33 million, 2002: $42 million)
(4) The Companys other income include dividends received from controlled entities of $648 million (2003: $1,803 million)
(5) Net of notional goodwill amortisation
(6) Includes external dividend income of $3 million (2003: $10 million, 2002: $3 million) for the Group and $2 million (2003: $1 million) for the Company
34
3: EXPENSES
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To other financial institutions |
|
238 |
|
183 |
|
246 |
|
161 |
|
164 |
|
On deposits |
|
5,037 |
|
3,502 |
|
3,019 |
|
3,403 |
|
2,722 |
|
On borrowing corporations debt |
|
481 |
|
445 |
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
|
On commercial paper |
|
765 |
|
310 |
|
251 |
|
196 |
|
184 |
|
On loan capital, bonds and notes |
|
1,699 |
|
1,052 |
|
801 |
|
1,515 |
|
1,014 |
|
Other |
|
643 |
|
412 |
|
298 |
|
534 |
|
295 |
|
|
|
8,863 |
|
5,904 |
|
5,019 |
|
5,809 |
|
4,379 |
|
To controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
177 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
8,863 |
|
5,904 |
|
5,019 |
|
6,088 |
|
4,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension fund |
|
145 |
|
109 |
|
103 |
|
108 |
|
94 |
|
Employee entitlements and taxes |
|
144 |
|
122 |
|
129 |
|
108 |
|
106 |
|
Salaries and wages |
|
1,431 |
|
1,177 |
|
1,134 |
|
975 |
|
912 |
|
Other |
|
411 |
|
342 |
|
348 |
|
303 |
|
283 |
|
Total personnel expenses |
|
2,131 |
|
1,750 |
|
1,714 |
|
1,494 |
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii) Premises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortisation of leasehold improvements |
|
13 |
|
15 |
|
14 |
|
7 |
|
9 |
|
Depreciation of buildings and integrals |
|
12 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
Rent |
|
197 |
|
154 |
|
161 |
|
139 |
|
120 |
|
Utilities and other outgoings |
|
109 |
|
88 |
|
92 |
|
81 |
|
74 |
|
Other |
|
22 |
|
22 |
|
15 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
295 |
|
299 |
|
246 |
|
222 |
|
To controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
43 |
|
Total premises expenses |
|
353 |
|
295 |
|
299 |
|
292 |
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii) Computer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer contractors |
|
25 |
|
18 |
|
34 |
|
23 |
|
16 |
|
Data communication |
|
83 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
|
48 |
|
41 |
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
240 |
|
183 |
|
140 |
|
176 |
|
148 |
|
Rentals and repairs |
|
59 |
|
70 |
|
59 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
|
Software purchased |
|
101 |
|
103 |
|
105 |
|
90 |
|
90 |
|
Other |
|
45 |
|
30 |
|
24 |
|
19 |
|
12 |
|
Total computer expenses |
|
553 |
|
465 |
|
424 |
|
418 |
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv) Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising and public relations |
|
130 |
|
91 |
|
98 |
|
72 |
|
66 |
|
Amortisation of goodwill(1) |
|
146 |
|
18 |
|
20 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
Audit fees (refer note 5) |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
Depreciation of furniture and equipment(2) |
|
44 |
|
33 |
|
35 |
|
27 |
|
26 |
|
Freight and cartage |
|
41 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
32 |
|
29 |
|
Loss on sale of equipment |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
Non-lending losses, frauds and forgeries |
|
49 |
|
48 |
|
51 |
|
30 |
|
36 |
|
Postage and stationery |
|
111 |
|
92 |
|
97 |
|
66 |
|
67 |
|
Professional fees |
|
112 |
|
101 |
|
97 |
|
83 |
|
86 |
|
Telephone |
|
57 |
|
49 |
|
53 |
|
30 |
|
35 |
|
Travel |
|
100 |
|
78 |
|
77 |
|
65 |
|
55 |
|
Other |
|
128 |
|
102 |
|
84 |
|
189 |
|
165 |
|
Total other expenses |
|
929 |
|
658 |
|
653 |
|
610 |
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v) Restructuring |
|
60 |
|
60 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
|
55 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
4,026 |
|
3,228 |
|
3,153 |
|
2,878 |
|
2,663 |
|
Significant item: recovery from NHB litigation |
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses including recovery from NHB litigation |
|
4,026 |
|
3,228 |
|
2,905 |
|
2,878 |
|
2,663 |
|
Total expenses |
|
12,889 |
|
9,132 |
|
7,924 |
|
8,966 |
|
7,219 |
|
(1) In addition, there is a notional goodwill amortisation charge of $41 million (2003: $44 million; 2002: $18 million) included in the calculation of the share of income from the ING Australia joint venture
(2) Excludes integrals $8 million (2003: $12 million), included in Premises disclosure
35
4: EQUITY INSTRUMENTS ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES
Under existing Australian Accounting Standards, equity instruments issued to employees are not required to be expensed. The impact of expensing options(1), and shares issued under the $1,000 employee share plan, has been calculated and is disclosed below.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Net profit attributable to shareholders of the Company |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
Expenses attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options issued to Group Heads(1) |
|
(8 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(7 |
) |
Options issued to general management(1) |
|
(23 |
) |
(24 |
) |
(19 |
) |
Shares issued under $1,000 employee share plan |
|
(22 |
) |
(18 |
) |
(18 |
) |
Total |
|
2,762 |
|
2,298 |
|
2,278 |
|
(1) Based on fair values estimated at grant date determined in accordance with the fair value measurement provisions of AASB 1046. Value of options are amortised on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$000 |
|
$000 |
|
$000 |
|
$000 |
|
$000 |
|
KPMG Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit or review of financial reports of the Company or any entity in the Group |
|
2,981 |
|
2,640 |
|
2,065 |
|
2,357 |
|
2,115 |
|
Other audit-related services(1),(2) |
|
567 |
|
2,083 |
|
2,793 |
|
492 |
|
1,690 |
|
Other assurance services(3) |
|
2,934 |
|
3,891 |
|
8,188 |
|
2,899 |
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
6,482 |
|
8,614 |
|
13,046 |
|
5,748 |
|
7,669 |
|
Taxation |
|
563 |
|
775 |
|
1,278 |
|
443 |
|
775 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
775 |
|
1,278 |
|
443 |
|
775 |
|
Total |
|
7,045 |
|
9,389 |
|
14,324 |
|
6,191 |
|
8,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas Related practices of KPMG Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit or review of financial reports of Group entities |
|
1,834 |
|
1,293 |
|
1,305 |
|
346 |
|
315 |
|
Other audit-related services(1),(2) |
|
1,494 |
|
1,503 |
|
1,611 |
|
556 |
|
639 |
|
Other assurance services(3) |
|
77 |
|
1,473 |
|
316 |
|
32 |
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
4,269 |
|
3,232 |
|
934 |
|
2,148 |
|
Taxation |
|
65 |
|
83 |
|
200 |
|
31 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
83 |
|
200 |
|
31 |
|
10 |
|
Total |
|
3,470 |
|
4,352 |
|
3,432 |
|
965 |
|
2,158 |
|
Total remuneration of auditors |
|
10,515 |
|
13,741 |
|
17,756 |
|
7,156 |
|
10,602 |
|
By virtue of an Australian Securities and Investments Commission class order dated 30 September 1998, the auditors of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and its related bodies corporate, KPMG, have been exempted from compliance with certain requirements of Section 324 of the Corporations Act 2001. The class order exemption applies in that partners and associates of KPMG, not engaged on the audit of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and its related bodies corporate, may be indebted to the Company, provided that such indebtedness was i) less than $5,000; or ii) was for a mortgage loan on principal place of residence; or iii) arose prior to the date of Class Order, or prior to joining KPMG, and arose upon ordinary commercial terms and conditions.
It is Group policy that KPMG Australia or any of its related practices may provide assurance and other audit-related services that, while outside the scope of the statutory audit, are consistent with the role of auditor. These include regulatory and prudential reviews requested by the Companys regulators such as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. KPMG Australia or any of its related practices may not provide services that are perceived to be materially in conflict with the role of auditor. These include consulting advice and subcontracting of operational activities normally undertaken by management, and engagements where the auditor may ultimately be required to express an opinion on its own work. However, non-audit services that are not perceived to be materially in conflict with the role of auditor maybe provided by KPMG Australia or any of its related practices subject to the approval of the ANZ Audit Committee.
KPMG has confirmed to ANZ that it has policies in place on loans from audit clients that are in accordance with Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X and that neither KPMG nor any covered person or immediate family member have any loans outstanding from Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and its related parties that are part of the audit client that are not in compliance with that rule.
(1) Includes completion accounts review
(2) Includes services for the audit or review of financial information other than financial reports including prudential supervision reviews for central banks, prospectus reviews, trust audits and other audits required for local statutory purposes
(3) 2004 includes an NBNZ due diligence oversight review and markets co-sourcing internal audit work which ceased in April 2004. 2003 includes assessing the Groups compliance with the requirements of the US Patriot Act. 2002 includes due diligence services principally related to ING Australia joint venture. Under the policy adopted by ANZ in April 2002, due diligence services are no longer provided by the external auditor, unless specifically approved by the Board
36
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Reconciliation of the prima facie income tax payable on profit with the income tax expense charged in the statement of financial performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
3,987 |
|
3,277 |
|
3,223 |
|
2,681 |
|
3,684 |
|
Prima facie income tax at 30% |
|
1,196 |
|
983 |
|
967 |
|
804 |
|
1,105 |
|
Tax effect of permanent differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas tax rate differential |
|
20 |
|
15 |
|
14 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
Other non-assessable income |
|
(32 |
) |
(31 |
) |
(39 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
Rebateable and non-assessable dividends |
|
(20 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(194 |
) |
(541 |
) |
Life insurance accounting |
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill amortisation |
|
46 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Profit from associated and joint venture entities |
|
(43 |
) |
(32 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
NHB settlement tax rate differential |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of business to INGA joint venture |
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|
|
Other |
|
11 |
|
5 |
|
(4 |
) |
105 |
|
52 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
929 |
|
896 |
|
712 |
|
619 |
|
Income tax under/(over) provided in prior years |
|
(2 |
) |
(3 |
) |
2 |
|
(2 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Total income tax expense |
|
1,168 |
|
926 |
|
898 |
|
710 |
|
616 |
|
Australia |
|
802 |
|
672 |
|
683 |
|
641 |
|
543 |
|
Overseas |
|
366 |
|
254 |
|
215 |
|
69 |
|
73 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
926 |
|
898 |
|
710 |
|
616 |
|
Tax Consolidation
The Company, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, is the head entity in the tax-consolidated group, comprising all the Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries, trusts and partnerships. The implementation date for the tax-consolidated group is 1 October 2003. Under tax consolidations the head entity recognises all of the current and deferred tax assets and liabilities of the tax-consolidated group adjusted for the impact of arrangements made with other members of the tax - consolidated group.
Members of the tax-consolidated group have entered into a tax sharing agreement which provides for the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the head entity default on its income tax payment obligations.
The tax-consolidated group has also entered into a tax funding agreement that requires wholly-owned subsidiaries to make/receive contributions to the head entity for:
deferred tax balances recognised by the head entity on implementation date, including the impact of any relevant reset tax cost bases; and
current tax assets and liabilities and deferred tax balances which have been calculated as if the wholly-owned subsidiaries were taxed on a stand-alone basis.
The contributions are payable as set out in the tax funding agreement and reflect the timing of the head entitys obligations to make payments for tax liabilities to the relevant tax authorities. The assets and liabilities arising under the tax funding agreement are recognised as intercompany assets and liabilities which are equivalent to deferred tax balances.
Calculations at 30 September 2004 have been based on legislation enacted to that date. These calculations have resulted in no material adjustment to the consolidated tax expense or consolidated deferred tax balances for the year ended 30 September 2004.
37
7: DIVIDENDS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Ordinary dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interim dividend |
|
850 |
|
666 |
|
583 |
|
850 |
|
666 |
|
Proposed final dividend |
|
777 |
(1) |
|
(1) |
692 |
|
777 |
(1) |
|
(1) |
Bonus option plan adjustment |
|
(29 |
) |
(25 |
) |
(23 |
) |
(29 |
) |
(25 |
) |
Dividends on ordinary shares |
|
1,598 |
|
641 |
|
1,252 |
|
1,598 |
|
641 |
|
(1) Change in accounting standard in 2003. Dividends no longer accrued and are recorded when declared. Final dividend of $983 million not included in above table
A final dividend of 54 cents, fully franked, is proposed to be paid on each fully paid ordinary share on 17 December 2004 (2003 final dividend of 51 cents, paid 19 December 2003, fully franked, 2002: final dividend of 46 cents, paid 13 December 2002, fully franked). The 2004 interim dividend of 47 cents, paid 1 July 2004, was fully franked (2003: interim dividend of 44 cents, paid 1 July 2003, was fully franked, 2002: interim dividend of 39 cents, paid 1 July 2002, fully franked).
The tax rate applicable to the franking credits attached to the interim dividend and to be attached to the proposed final dividend is 30% (2003: 30%, 2002: 30%).
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Preference dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Securities Issues |
|
36 |
|
102 |
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
ANZ Stapled Exchangeable Preferred Securities(ANZ StEPS) |
|
62 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on preference shares |
|
98 |
|
102 |
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Securities Issues (ANZ TrUEPrS)
In 1998 ANZ TrUEPrS issued 124,032,000 preference shares, raising USD 775 million via Trust Securities issues. The Trust Securities carried an entitlement to a distribution of 8% (USD 400 million) or 8.08% (USD 375 million). The amounts were payable quarterly in arrears. Payment dates were the fifteenth day of January, April, July and October in each year. The preference shares were bought back on 12 December 2003.
ANZ Stapled Exchangeable Preferred Securities (ANZ StEPS)
On 23 September 2003, the Group issued 10 million ANZ StEPS at $100 each raising $1 billion ($987 million net of issue costs of $13 million). ANZ StEPS comprise 2 fully paid securities - an interest paying unsecured note stapled to a fully paid preference share.
Distributions on ANZ StEPS are non-cumulative and are payable quarterly in arrears (on 15 March, 15 June, 15 September, 15 December of each year) based upon a floating distribution rate equal to the 90 day bank bill rate plus a margin. At each payment date the 90 day bank bill rate is reset for the next quarter. Dividends are not payable on the preference share while it is stapled to the note. If distributions are not paid on ANZ StEPS, the Company may not pay dividends or return capital on its ordinary shares or any other share capital ranking below the preference share component.
Dividend Franking Account
The amount of franking credits available to the Company for the subsequent financial year is $111 million (2003 and 2002: nil), after adjusting for franking credits that will arise from the payment of tax on Australian profits for the 2004 financial year, $421 million of franking credits which will be utilised in franking the proposed final dividend and franking credits that may not be accessible by the Company at present.
The 2004 amount includes franking credits that were transferred from Australian wholly-owned entities to the parent entity at 1 October 2003 when these entities entered the Australian tax consolidated group.
38
Restrictions which Limit the Payment of Dividends
There are presently no significant restrictions on the payment of dividends from controlled entities to the Company. Various capital adequacy, liquidity, statutory reserve and other prudential requirements must be observed by certain controlled entities and the impact on these requirements caused by the payment of cash dividends is monitored.
Payments of dividends from overseas controlled entities may attract withholding taxes which have not been provided for in these financial statements.
There are presently no restrictions on payment of dividends by the Company. Reductions of shareholders equity through payment of cash dividends is monitored having regard to the regulatory requirements to maintain a specified capital adequacy ratio. In particular, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has advised Australian banks that a bank under its supervision must consult with it before declaring a dividend if the bank has incurred a loss, or proposes to pay dividends which exceed the level of profits earned.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
During the year, 3,909,659 ordinary shares were issued at $16.61 per share, and 3,906,171 ordinary shares at $17.84 per share, under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (2003: 3,142,629 ordinary shares at $18.32 per share, and 3,081,237 ordinary shares at $18.48 per share)
Bonus Option Plan
Dividends paid during the year have been reduced by way of certain shareholders participating in the Bonus Option Plan and forgoing all or part of their right to dividends in return for the receipt of bonus shares.
During the year, 927,439 ordinary shares were issued at $16.61 per share, and 844,425 ordinary shares at $17.84 per share, under the Bonus Option Plan (2003: 787,335 ordinary shares at $18.32 per share, and 747,652 ordinary shares at $18.48 per share).
|
|
Declared |
|
Bonus options |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Final dividend 2003 |
|
777 |
|
(15 |
) |
762 |
|
Interim dividend 2004 |
|
850 |
|
(14 |
) |
836 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
(29 |
) |
1,598 |
|
39
8: EARNINGS PER ORDINARY SHARE
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Basic earnings per share (cents)(1) |
|
153.1 |
|
142.4 |
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings reconciliation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit |
|
2,819 |
|
2,351 |
|
2,325 |
|
Less: net profit attributable to outside equity interests |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
Less: preference share dividend paid |
|
98 |
|
102 |
|
117 |
|
Earnings used in calculating basic earnings per share |
|
2,717 |
|
2,246 |
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in calculating basic earnings per share |
|
1,774.1 |
|
1,577.8 |
|
1,559.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (cents)(1) |
|
149.7 |
|
141.7 |
|
140.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings reconciliation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit |
|
2,819 |
|
2,351 |
|
2,325 |
|
Less: net profit attributable to outside equity interests |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
Less: preference share dividend paid |
|
98 |
|
102 |
|
117 |
|
Add: Hybrid interest expense |
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings used in calculating diluted earnings per share |
|
2,761 |
|
2,246 |
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (millions)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in calculating basic earnings per share |
|
1,774.1 |
|
1,577.8 |
|
1,559.8 |
|
Add: potential conversion of options to ordinary shares(1) |
|
70.7 |
|
7.2 |
|
10.2 |
|
Used in calculating diluted earnings per share |
|
1,844.8 |
|
1,585.0 |
|
1,570.0 |
|
(1) Discounted for rights issue
The weighted average number of converted and lapsed options, weighted with reference to the date of conversion or lapse, and included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share is 1.0 million.
StEPS has not been included in the calculation of diluted EPS as they are not dilutive. Refer to note 30.
40
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coins, notes and cash at bankers |
|
696 |
|
601 |
|
678 |
|
522 |
|
Money at call, bills receivable and remittances in transit |
|
157 |
|
753 |
|
121 |
|
747 |
|
Securities purchased under agreement to resell less than 90 days |
|
568 |
|
496 |
|
552 |
|
496 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
1,850 |
|
1,351 |
|
1,765 |
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coins, notes and cash at bankers |
|
418 |
|
284 |
|
103 |
|
96 |
|
Money at call, bills receivable and remittances in transit |
|
2,289 |
|
1,647 |
|
1,087 |
|
882 |
|
Other banks certificates of deposit |
|
2,080 |
|
2,437 |
|
1,203 |
|
1,173 |
|
Securities purchases under agreement to resell less than 90 days |
|
155 |
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,942 |
|
4,742 |
|
2,393 |
|
2,151 |
|
Total liquid assets |
|
6,363 |
|
6,592 |
|
3,744 |
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity analysis based on original term to maturity at 30 September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 90 days |
|
4,999 |
|
5,509 |
|
2,408 |
|
2,834 |
|
More than 90 days |
|
1,364 |
|
1,083 |
|
1,336 |
|
1,082 |
|
Total liquid assets |
|
6,363 |
|
6,592 |
|
3,744 |
|
3,916 |
|
10: DUE FROM OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
498 |
|
646 |
|
488 |
|
638 |
|
Overseas |
|
4,283 |
|
1,781 |
|
2,049 |
|
1,505 |
|
Total due from other financial institutions |
|
4,781 |
|
2,427 |
|
2,537 |
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity analysis based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdraft |
|
370 |
|
638 |
|
299 |
|
636 |
|
Less than 3 months |
|
2,692 |
|
1,283 |
|
1,729 |
|
1,051 |
|
Between 3 months and 12 months |
|
824 |
|
351 |
|
349 |
|
309 |
|
Between 1 year and 5 years |
|
790 |
|
84 |
|
58 |
|
83 |
|
After 5 years |
|
105 |
|
71 |
|
102 |
|
64 |
|
|
|
4,781 |
|
2,427 |
|
2,537 |
|
2,143 |
|
41
Trading securities are allocated between Australia and Overseas based on the domicile of the issuer
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Unlisted Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth securities |
|
164 |
|
475 |
|
164 |
|
475 |
|
Local, semi-government and other government securities |
|
1,693 |
|
1,230 |
|
1,693 |
|
1,230 |
|
ANZ accepted bills |
|
1,875 |
|
820 |
|
1,875 |
|
820 |
|
Other securities and equity securities |
|
627 |
|
1,142 |
|
568 |
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
3,667 |
|
4,300 |
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlisted Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
631 |
|
395 |
|
241 |
|
2 |
|
Other securities and equity securities |
|
488 |
|
151 |
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
546 |
|
483 |
|
2 |
|
Total unlisted |
|
5,478 |
|
4,213 |
|
4,783 |
|
3,636 |
|
Total trading securities |
|
5,478 |
|
4,213 |
|
4,783 |
|
3,636 |
|
42
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Investment securities are allocated between
Australia and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
1,070 |
|
546 |
|
1,070 |
|
546 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
1,354 |
|
1,540 |
|
1,354 |
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
2,086 |
|
2,424 |
|
2,086 |
|
Total listed |
|
2,428 |
|
2,090 |
|
2,424 |
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlisted Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local and semi-government securities |
|
895 |
|
1,362 |
|
895 |
|
1,362 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
2,786 |
|
250 |
|
2,660 |
|
157 |
|
|
|
3,681 |
|
1,612 |
|
3,555 |
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlisted Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand government securities |
|
914 |
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
357 |
|
237 |
|
133 |
|
131 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
366 |
|
429 |
|
5 |
|
102 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
1,065 |
|
138 |
|
233 |
|
Total unlisted |
|
5,318 |
|
2,677 |
|
3,693 |
|
1,752 |
|
Total investment securities |
|
7,746 |
|
4,767 |
|
6,117 |
|
3,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
12 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
1,072 |
|
548 |
|
1,072 |
|
548 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
1,358 |
|
1,537 |
|
1,358 |
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
2,085 |
|
2,430 |
|
2,085 |
|
Total market value of listed investment securities |
|
2,442 |
|
2,087 |
|
2,430 |
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlisted Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local and semi-government securities |
|
895 |
|
1,362 |
|
895 |
|
1,362 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
2,785 |
|
251 |
|
2,659 |
|
157 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
1,613 |
|
3,554 |
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlisted Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand government securities |
|
913 |
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
361 |
|
238 |
|
137 |
|
132 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
366 |
|
429 |
|
5 |
|
102 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
1,066 |
|
142 |
|
234 |
|
Total market value of unlisted investment securities |
|
5,320 |
|
2,679 |
|
3,696 |
|
1,753 |
|
Total market value of investment securities |
|
7,762 |
|
4,766 |
|
6,126 |
|
3,838 |
|
43
Investment Securities by Maturities and Yields
Based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September 2004
At book value |
|
Less than |
|
Between 3 |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
No |
|
Total |
|
Market |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local and semi-government securities |
|
695 |
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895 |
|
895 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
2,480 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
162 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
2,790 |
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
3,175 |
|
250 |
|
51 |
|
162 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
3,685 |
|
3,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand government securities |
|
589 |
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
913 |
|
Other government securities |
|
861 |
|
491 |
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
1,433 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
194 |
|
442 |
|
1,077 |
|
1 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
1,258 |
|
1,152 |
|
1 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
4,070 |
|
Total book value |
|
4,819 |
|
1,508 |
|
1,203 |
|
163 |
|
6 |
|
47 |
|
7,746 |
|
n/a |
|
Total market value |
|
4,784 |
|
1,508 |
|
1,251 |
|
165 |
|
6 |
|
48 |
|
n/a |
|
7,762 |
|
Weighted average yields(1)
|
|
Less than |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local and semi-government securities |
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
5.33 |
|
6.49 |
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand government securities |
|
6.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
4.37 |
|
7.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
3.00 |
|
2.71 |
|
2.84 |
|
2.18 |
|
(1) Based on effective yields for fixed interest and discounted securities and dividend yield for equity investments at 30 September 2004
44
Investment Securities by Maturities and Yields
Based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September 2003
At book value |
|
Less than |
|
Between 3 |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
No |
|
Total |
|
Market |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local and semi-government securities |
|
1,002 |
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
1,362 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
95 |
|
60 |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
254 |
|
253 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
420 |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
1,616 |
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand government securities |
|
291 |
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
399 |
|
Other government securities |
|
220 |
|
363 |
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783 |
|
786 |
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
831 |
|
503 |
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,969 |
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
974 |
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,151 |
|
3,151 |
|
Total book value |
|
2,439 |
|
1,394 |
|
903 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
4,767 |
|
n/a |
|
Total market value |
|
2,439 |
|
1,393 |
|
903 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
n/a |
|
4,766 |
|
Weighted average yields(1)
|
|
Less than |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local and semi-government securities |
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
4.94 |
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand government securities |
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
7.74 |
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
3.11 |
|
1.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Based on effective yields for fixed interest and discounted securities and dividend yield for equity investments at 30 September 2003
The following investment securities, that have unrealized losses at 30 September 2004, are not considered other-than-temporary impaired under US GAAP:
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Listed Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other government securities |
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
657 |
|
(2 |
) |
196 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlisted Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand government securities |
|
703 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
(1 |
) |
Other government securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities and equity investments |
|
52 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
1,472 |
|
(3 |
) |
335 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
(3 |
) |
Under US GAAP, 65 debt security investments had unrealised losses at 30 September 2004.
ANZ reviews its investment security portfolio on a regular basis for evidence of other-than-temporary impairment. Under US GAAP, ANZ recognizes an other-than-temporary impairment in the Statement of Financial Performance for any investment security whose market value has been significantly below its carrying value for a period exceeding six months. The only exception to this policy is in respect of debt securities where their decline in market value is due solely to an increase in underlying rates of interest and where ANZ has the ability to hold these securities until maturity. None of the securities disclosed in the table above are considered other-than temporarily impaired at 30 September 2004.
45
Loans and advances are classified between Australia, New Zealand and Overseas markets based on the domicile of the lending point.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdrafts |
|
4,390 |
|
3,915 |
|
4,390 |
|
3,915 |
|
Credit card outstandings |
|
4,523 |
|
4,265 |
|
4,523 |
|
4,265 |
|
Term loans housing |
|
71,499 |
|
62,482 |
|
71,499 |
|
62,482 |
|
Term loans non-housing |
|
49,217 |
|
41,133 |
|
44,098 |
|
35,804 |
|
Lease finance (refer below) |
|
2,667 |
|
2,613 |
|
1,061 |
|
1,020 |
|
Hire purchase |
|
7,093 |
|
6,127 |
|
497 |
|
398 |
|
Other |
|
1,091 |
|
785 |
|
1,066 |
|
760 |
|
|
|
140,480 |
|
121,320 |
|
127,134 |
|
108,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdrafts |
|
1,604 |
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card outstandings |
|
1,032 |
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans housing |
|
31,519 |
|
10,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans non-housing |
|
22,472 |
|
7,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease finance (refer below) |
|
493 |
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hire purchase |
|
517 |
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
584 |
|
985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,221 |
|
20,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdrafts |
|
558 |
|
740 |
|
408 |
|
579 |
|
Credit card outstandings |
|
128 |
|
134 |
|
7 |
|
21 |
|
Term loans housing |
|
464 |
|
361 |
|
363 |
|
266 |
|
Term loans non-housing |
|
8,730 |
|
8,984 |
|
7,314 |
|
7,437 |
|
Lease finance (refer below) |
|
111 |
|
239 |
|
79 |
|
216 |
|
Commercial bills |
|
78 |
|
78 |
|
78 |
|
78 |
|
Other |
|
44 |
|
2 |
|
40 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
10,113 |
|
10,538 |
|
8,289 |
|
8,599 |
|
Total gross loans and advances |
|
208,814 |
|
152,787 |
|
135,423 |
|
117,243 |
|
Provisions for doubtful debts (refer note 15) |
|
(2,376 |
) |
(2,018 |
) |
(1,655 |
) |
(1,712 |
) |
Income yet to mature |
|
(1,476 |
) |
(1,304 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3,852 |
) |
(3,322 |
) |
(1,656 |
) |
(1,713 |
) |
Total net loans and advances |
|
204,962 |
|
149,465 |
|
133,767 |
|
115,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease finance consists of gross lease receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
555 |
|
615 |
|
102 |
|
124 |
|
Non-current |
|
2,716 |
|
2,607 |
|
1,038 |
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
3,271 |
|
3,222 |
|
1,140 |
|
1,236 |
|
46
Maturity Distribution and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September 2004
|
|
Overdraft(1) |
|
Less than |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
544 |
|
791 |
|
583 |
|
1,156 |
|
1,518 |
|
4,592 |
|
Business service |
|
216 |
|
559 |
|
358 |
|
1,025 |
|
1,188 |
|
3,346 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
76 |
|
814 |
|
850 |
|
820 |
|
1,100 |
|
3,660 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
366 |
|
854 |
|
1,297 |
|
625 |
|
406 |
|
3,548 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
1 |
|
87 |
|
2 |
|
15 |
|
21 |
|
126 |
|
Lease finance |
|
|
|
90 |
|
238 |
|
1,820 |
|
519 |
|
2,667 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
310 |
|
1,432 |
|
613 |
|
1,507 |
|
872 |
|
4,734 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
6,260 |
|
7,073 |
|
143 |
|
5,521 |
|
495 |
|
19,492 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
207 |
|
185 |
|
192 |
|
1,100 |
|
684 |
|
2,368 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
137 |
|
2,886 |
|
2,406 |
|
10,206 |
|
66,136 |
|
81,771 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
597 |
|
1,960 |
|
510 |
|
1,822 |
|
2,737 |
|
7,626 |
|
Other |
|
199 |
|
2,441 |
|
925 |
|
1,662 |
|
1,323 |
|
6,550 |
|
New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
113 |
|
792 |
|
512 |
|
5,388 |
|
2,613 |
|
9,418 |
|
Business service |
|
242 |
|
52 |
|
100 |
|
285 |
|
167 |
|
846 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
75 |
|
25 |
|
198 |
|
415 |
|
178 |
|
891 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
75 |
|
316 |
|
98 |
|
2,175 |
|
69 |
|
2,733 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
7 |
|
106 |
|
24 |
|
129 |
|
71 |
|
337 |
|
Lease finance |
|
15 |
|
2 |
|
137 |
|
333 |
|
6 |
|
493 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
186 |
|
342 |
|
143 |
|
972 |
|
326 |
|
1,969 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
867 |
|
82 |
|
234 |
|
792 |
|
180 |
|
2,155 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
98 |
|
130 |
|
91 |
|
216 |
|
89 |
|
624 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
620 |
|
2,776 |
|
2,147 |
|
4,554 |
|
24,628 |
|
34,725 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
189 |
|
249 |
|
158 |
|
634 |
|
314 |
|
1,544 |
|
Other |
|
149 |
|
349 |
|
336 |
|
1,168 |
|
484 |
|
2,486 |
|
Overseas Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
13 |
|
120 |
|
230 |
|
446 |
|
324 |
|
1,133 |
|
Business service |
|
10 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
54 |
|
9 |
|
85 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
4 |
|
14 |
|
7 |
|
32 |
|
20 |
|
77 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
14 |
|
88 |
|
47 |
|
294 |
|
112 |
|
555 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
26 |
|
4 |
|
11 |
|
69 |
|
14 |
|
124 |
|
Lease finance |
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
23 |
|
111 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
59 |
|
878 |
|
312 |
|
1,110 |
|
354 |
|
2,713 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
6 |
|
46 |
|
53 |
|
170 |
|
164 |
|
439 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
12 |
|
6 |
|
34 |
|
39 |
|
6 |
|
97 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
10 |
|
40 |
|
18 |
|
277 |
|
233 |
|
578 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
216 |
|
243 |
|
95 |
|
93 |
|
42 |
|
689 |
|
Other |
|
243 |
|
380 |
|
268 |
|
1,105 |
|
1,516 |
|
3,512 |
|
Gross loans and advances |
|
12,235 |
|
26,219 |
|
13,375 |
|
48,044 |
|
108,941 |
|
208,814 |
|
Specific provision for doubtful debts |
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
Income yet to mature |
|
(12 |
) |
(355 |
) |
(287 |
) |
(816 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(1,476 |
) |
|
|
(396 |
) |
(355 |
) |
(287 |
) |
(816 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(1,860 |
) |
Loans and advances net of specific provision and income yet to mature |
|
11,839 |
|
25,864 |
|
13,088 |
|
47,228 |
|
108,935 |
|
206,954 |
|
General provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,992 |
) |
(1,992 |
) |
Net loans and advances |
|
11,839 |
|
25,864 |
|
13,088 |
|
47,228 |
|
106,943 |
|
204,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate sensitivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rates(4) |
|
278 |
|
11,029 |
|
8,060 |
|
22,057 |
|
43,720 |
|
84,694 |
|
Variable interest rates |
|
11,957 |
|
15,190 |
|
5,315 |
|
25,987 |
|
65,671 |
|
124,120 |
|
|
|
12,235 |
|
26,219 |
|
13,375 |
|
48,044 |
|
108,941 |
|
208,814 |
|
(1) Overdraft includes credit cards and unsecured lending
(2) Personal includes non-business loans to individuals through overdrafts, personal loans, credit cards and fully drawn advances
(3) Real estate-mortgage includes residential and commercial property exposure. Loans within this category are for the purchase of such properties and must be secured by property
(4) Housing loans and other loans that are capped for an initial period are fixed interest rate loans and their maturities based on the principal repayments due over the term of the loan
47
Maturity Distribution and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September 2003
|
|
Overdraft(1) |
|
Less than |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
505 |
|
417 |
|
655 |
|
1,001 |
|
1,251 |
|
3,829 |
|
Business service |
|
243 |
|
261 |
|
313 |
|
869 |
|
946 |
|
2,632 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
100 |
|
588 |
|
199 |
|
805 |
|
940 |
|
2,632 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
1,355 |
|
705 |
|
897 |
|
1,733 |
|
276 |
|
4,966 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
20 |
|
27 |
|
51 |
|
Lease finance |
|
|
|
113 |
|
289 |
|
1,701 |
|
510 |
|
2,613 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
345 |
|
2,068 |
|
479 |
|
1,125 |
|
1,349 |
|
5,366 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
4,491 |
|
5,322 |
|
210 |
|
5,046 |
|
579 |
|
15,648 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
223 |
|
66 |
|
114 |
|
821 |
|
543 |
|
1,767 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
125 |
|
1,990 |
|
1,811 |
|
9,871 |
|
55,863 |
|
69,660 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
621 |
|
2,086 |
|
620 |
|
1,241 |
|
2,253 |
|
6,821 |
|
Other |
|
170 |
|
2,284 |
|
647 |
|
1,065 |
|
1,169 |
|
5,335 |
|
New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
85 |
|
30 |
|
229 |
|
588 |
|
679 |
|
1,611 |
|
Business service |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
96 |
|
139 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
23 |
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
71 |
|
332 |
|
436 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
61 |
|
5 |
|
462 |
|
564 |
|
75 |
|
1,167 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
7 |
|
2 |
|
6 |
|
62 |
|
70 |
|
147 |
|
Lease finance |
|
25 |
|
28 |
|
79 |
|
236 |
|
2 |
|
370 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
58 |
|
27 |
|
185 |
|
493 |
|
440 |
|
1,203 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
43 |
|
171 |
|
202 |
|
375 |
|
39 |
|
830 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
16 |
|
27 |
|
56 |
|
153 |
|
56 |
|
308 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
629 |
|
38 |
|
623 |
|
464 |
|
10,198 |
|
11,952 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
51 |
|
10 |
|
100 |
|
385 |
|
428 |
|
974 |
|
Other |
|
97 |
|
61 |
|
137 |
|
712 |
|
785 |
|
1,792 |
|
Overseas Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
17 |
|
111 |
|
252 |
|
534 |
|
231 |
|
1,145 |
|
Business service |
|
14 |
|
6 |
|
15 |
|
146 |
|
3 |
|
184 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
6 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
32 |
|
27 |
|
98 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
5 |
|
78 |
|
23 |
|
137 |
|
106 |
|
349 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
11 |
|
9 |
|
16 |
|
81 |
|
10 |
|
127 |
|
Lease finance |
|
73 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
10 |
|
148 |
|
239 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
171 |
|
418 |
|
394 |
|
1,089 |
|
379 |
|
2,451 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
10 |
|
177 |
|
119 |
|
202 |
|
433 |
|
941 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
8 |
|
125 |
|
4 |
|
164 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
49 |
|
16 |
|
61 |
|
403 |
|
278 |
|
807 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
263 |
|
259 |
|
19 |
|
186 |
|
40 |
|
767 |
|
Other |
|
242 |
|
191 |
|
195 |
|
1,269 |
|
1,369 |
|
3,266 |
|
Gross loans and advances |
|
10,156 |
|
17,602 |
|
9,445 |
|
33,650 |
|
81,934 |
|
152,787 |
|
Specific provision for doubtful debts |
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
Income yet to mature |
|
(96 |
) |
(287 |
) |
(256 |
) |
(661 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
(287 |
) |
(256 |
) |
(661 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(1,788 |
) |
Loans and advances net of specific provision and income yet to mature |
|
9,576 |
|
17,315 |
|
9,189 |
|
32,989 |
|
81,930 |
|
150,999 |
|
General provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
(1,534 |
) |
Net loans and advances |
|
9,576 |
|
17,315 |
|
9,189 |
|
32,989 |
|
80,396 |
|
149,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate sensitivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rates(4) |
|
372 |
|
8,585 |
|
4,724 |
|
22,739 |
|
19,826 |
|
56,246 |
|
Variable interest rates |
|
9,784 |
|
9,017 |
|
4,721 |
|
10,911 |
|
62,108 |
|
96,541 |
|
|
|
10,156 |
|
17,602 |
|
9,445 |
|
33,650 |
|
81,934 |
|
152,787 |
|
(1) Overdraft includes credit cards and unsecured lending
(2) Personal includes non-business loans to individuals through overdrafts, personal loans, credit cards and fully drawn advances
(3) Real estate-mortgage includes residential and commercial property exposure. Loans within this category are for the purchase of such properties and must be secured by property
(4) Housing loans and other loans that are capped for an initial period are fixed interest rate loans and their maturities based on the principal repayments due over the term of the loan
48
14: IMPAIRED ASSETS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Summary of impaired assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
829 |
|
1,007 |
|
644 |
|
865 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
Unproductive facilities |
|
29 |
|
39 |
|
29 |
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impaired assets |
|
890 |
|
1,046 |
|
705 |
|
903 |
|
Specific provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
(378 |
) |
(482 |
) |
(268 |
) |
(427 |
) |
Unproductive facilities |
|
(6 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Net impaired assets |
|
506 |
|
562 |
|
431 |
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
829 |
|
1,007 |
|
644 |
|
865 |
|
Specific provisions |
|
(378 |
) |
(482 |
) |
(268 |
) |
(427 |
) |
Total net non-accrual loans |
|
451 |
|
525 |
|
376 |
|
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For these loans interest and fees are recognised as income on an accrual basis |
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the event of customer default, any loan security is held as mortgagee in possession and therefore the Group does not hold any other real estate owned assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproductive facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproductive facilities |
|
29 |
|
39 |
|
29 |
|
38 |
|
Specific provisions |
|
(6 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Net unproductive facilities |
|
23 |
|
37 |
|
23 |
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These amounts, comprising loans less than $100,000 or fully secured, are not classified as impaired assets and therefore are not included within the above summary |
|
293 |
|
213 |
|
175 |
|
163 |
|
Consolidated average non-accrual loans: September 2004 $912 million; September 2003 $1,103 million; September 2002 $1,254 million
Further analysis of impaired assets at 30 September 2004 and interest and/or other income received during the year under Australian Prudential Regulation Authority guidelines is as follows:
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
Specific |
|
Interest and/or |
|
Gross |
|
Specific |
|
Interest and/or |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
82 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
79 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
New Zealand |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
27 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
27 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
106 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
With provisions and no, or partial, performance(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
338 |
|
208 |
|
3 |
|
296 |
|
184 |
|
2 |
|
New Zealand |
|
109 |
|
69 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
265 |
|
100 |
|
5 |
|
241 |
|
83 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
377 |
|
9 |
|
537 |
|
267 |
|
7 |
|
With provisions and full performance(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans |
|
829 |
|
378 |
|
19 |
|
644 |
|
268 |
|
15 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unproductive facilities |
|
29 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
Total impaired assets |
|
890 |
|
384 |
|
19 |
|
705 |
|
274 |
|
15 |
|
(1) A loans performance is assessed against its contractual repayment schedule
49
Interest and other income forgone on impaired assets
The following table shows the estimated amount of interest and other income that would have been recorded had interest and other income on non-accrual loans and unproductive facilities been accrued to income (or, in the case of restructured loans, had interest and other income been accrued at the original contract rate), and the amount of interest and other income received with respect to such loans.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Gross interest and other income receivable
on non-accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
29 |
|
36 |
|
24 |
|
28 |
|
New Zealand |
|
8 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
25 |
|
31 |
|
15 |
|
23 |
|
Total gross interest and other income
receivable on non-accrual |
|
62 |
|
69 |
|
39 |
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
(6 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(9 |
) |
New Zealand |
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
(12 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(11 |
) |
Total interest and other income received |
|
(19 |
) |
(23 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and other income forgone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
23 |
|
26 |
|
20 |
|
19 |
|
New Zealand |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
13 |
|
19 |
|
4 |
|
12 |
|
Total net interest and other income forgone |
|
43 |
|
46 |
|
24 |
|
31 |
|
50
15: PROVISIONS FOR DOUBTFUL DEBTS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
General provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
1,534 |
|
1,496 |
|
1,386 |
|
1,283 |
|
1,310 |
|
Acquisition of provisions |
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for exchange rate fluctuations |
|
53 |
|
(49 |
) |
(22 |
) |
16 |
|
(70 |
) |
Charge to statement of financial performance |
|
632 |
|
614 |
|
610 |
|
433 |
|
465 |
|
Significant transactions: special charge to statement of financial performance(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to specific provision |
|
(525 |
) |
(588 |
) |
(788 |
) |
(399 |
) |
(460 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
82 |
|
61 |
|
60 |
|
48 |
|
38 |
|
Total general provision |
|
1,992 |
|
1,534 |
|
1,496 |
|
1,381 |
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
484 |
|
585 |
|
500 |
|
429 |
|
509 |
|
Acquisition of provisions |
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for exchange rate fluctuations |
|
(2 |
) |
(49 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(43 |
) |
Bad debts written off |
|
(680 |
) |
(640 |
) |
(697 |
) |
(547 |
) |
(497 |
) |
Transfer from general provision |
|
525 |
|
588 |
|
788 |
|
399 |
|
460 |
|
Total specific provision |
|
384 |
|
484 |
|
585 |
|
274 |
|
429 |
|
Total provisions for doubtful debts |
|
2,376 |
|
2,018 |
|
2,081 |
|
1,655 |
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision movement analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New and increased provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
459 |
|
418 |
|
423 |
|
404 |
|
360 |
|
New Zealand |
|
80 |
|
45 |
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other overseas markets |
|
86 |
|
212 |
|
421 |
|
60 |
|
163 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
675 |
|
898 |
|
464 |
|
523 |
|
Provision releases |
|
(100 |
) |
(87 |
) |
(110 |
) |
(65 |
) |
(63 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
588 |
|
788 |
|
399 |
|
460 |
|
Recoveries of amounts previously written off |
|
(82 |
) |
(61 |
) |
(60 |
) |
(48 |
) |
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net specific provision |
|
443 |
|
527 |
|
728 |
|
351 |
|
422 |
|
Net credit to general provision |
|
189 |
|
87 |
|
132 |
|
82 |
|
43 |
|
Charge to statement of financial performance |
|
632 |
|
614 |
|
860 |
|
433 |
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Provisions(2) as a % of total advances(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
General |
|
1.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.0 |
|
Provisions(2) as a % of risk weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
General |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.1 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.1 |
|
Bad debts written off as a % of total advances(3) |
|
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
Net specific provision as a % of total advances(3) |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
(1) Following an assessment of the general provision balance in March 2002, a special provision for doubtful debts of $250 million ($175 million after tax) was charged to restore the provision balance to an appropriate level in the environment relevant at that time of unexpected investment grade defaults
(2) Excludes provisions for unproductive facilities
(3) See Glossary on page 141
51
16: CUSTOMERS LIABILITIES FOR ACCEPTANCES
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
813 |
|
797 |
|
813 |
|
797 |
|
Business service |
|
572 |
|
550 |
|
572 |
|
550 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
502 |
|
473 |
|
502 |
|
473 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
1,081 |
|
977 |
|
1,081 |
|
977 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
1,710 |
|
2,251 |
|
1,710 |
|
2,251 |
|
Personal(1) |
|
5 |
|
80 |
|
5 |
|
80 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
132 |
|
112 |
|
132 |
|
112 |
|
Real estate mortgage(2) |
|
5,073 |
|
5,463 |
|
5,073 |
|
5,463 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
1,524 |
|
1,810 |
|
1,524 |
|
1,810 |
|
Other |
|
994 |
|
629 |
|
994 |
|
629 |
|
|
|
12,406 |
|
13,142 |
|
12,406 |
|
13,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
6 |
|
11 |
|
6 |
|
11 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
44 |
|
20 |
|
44 |
|
20 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
10 |
|
4 |
|
10 |
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
36 |
|
60 |
|
36 |
|
Total customers liabilities for acceptances |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
(1) Personal includes non-business acceptances to individuals
(2) Real estate mortgage includes residential and commercial property exposure. Acceptances within this category are for the purchase of such properties and must be secured by property
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Overseas central banks |
|
176 |
|
101 |
|
144 |
|
68 |
|
52
18: SHARES IN CONTROLLED ENTITIES, ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURE ENTITIES
Refer notes 43 to 45 for details.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Total shares in controlled entities |
|
|
|
|
|
11,472 |
|
8,054 |
|
Total shares in associates |
|
263 |
|
166 |
|
45 |
|
41 |
|
Total shares in joint venture entity |
|
1,697 |
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares in controlled entities, associates and joint venture entities |
|
1,960 |
|
1,814 |
|
11,517 |
|
8,095 |
|
ACQUISITIONS OF CONTROLLED ENTITIES
During the year ended 30 September 2004 the following material controlled entities were acquired:
On 1 December 2003, the Company acquired NBNZ Holdings Ltd and its controlled entities (NBNZ). Details of the acquisition are disclosed in note 42. The operating results of these acquired entities have been included in consolidated operating profit since acquisition.
A restructuring provision of $25 million was established for restructuring the operations of the acquired entities. A balance of $24 million remains in the provision at 30 September 2004. On 26 June 2004, NBNZ was amalgamated into ANZ Banking Group (New Zealand) Limited. ANZ Banking Group (New Zealand) Limited changed its name to ANZ National Bank Limited on 28 June 2004.
There were no material controlled entities acquired during the year ended 30 September 2003.
DISPOSALS OF CONTROLLED ENTITIES
There were no material controlled entities disposed of during the years ended 30 September 2004 and 2003.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Future income tax assets comprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General provision for doubtful debts |
|
650 |
|
505 |
|
442 |
|
414 |
|
Other |
|
804 |
|
660 |
|
295 |
|
332 |
|
Total income tax assets |
|
1,454 |
|
1,165 |
|
737 |
(1) |
746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
959 |
|
874 |
|
636 |
|
605 |
|
Overseas |
|
495 |
|
291 |
|
101 |
|
141 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
1,165 |
|
737 |
|
746 |
|
(1) Gross deferred tax assets for the Company $1,060 million (2004) less intercompany liability to tax consolidated controlled entities $323 million (2004)
Certain potential future income tax assets within the Group have not been recognised as assets because recovery cannot be regarded as virtually certain. These potential benefits arise from tax losses and timing differences (benefits could amount to $nil, 2003: nil), and from realised capital losses (benefits could amount to $67 million, 2003: nil).
These benefits will only be obtained if:
i) the relevant entities derive future assessable income of a nature and amount sufficient to enable the benefit of the taxation deductions to be realised;
ii) the relevant entities continue to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by law; and
iii) there are no changes in taxation legislation adversely affecting the benefit of the taxation deductions.
53
20: GOODWILL
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Goodwill at cost |
|
3,509 |
|
248 |
|
123 |
|
128 |
|
Accumulated amortisation |
|
(240 |
) |
(88 |
) |
(49 |
) |
(41 |
) |
Total goodwill(1) |
|
3,269 |
|
160 |
|
74 |
|
87 |
|
(1) Excludes notional goodwill related to the ING Australia joint venture of $754 million (September 2003: $821 million)
21: OTHER ASSETS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Property held for resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of acquisition |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for diminution in value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest/prepaid discounts |
|
1,568 |
|
1,085 |
|
1,181 |
|
859 |
|
Accrued commission |
|
82 |
|
81 |
|
55 |
|
55 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
71 |
|
70 |
|
10 |
|
13 |
|
Treasury instruments revaluations |
|
4,456 |
|
5,963 |
|
3,738 |
|
5,379 |
|
Security settlements |
|
952 |
|
373 |
|
10 |
|
360 |
|
Operating leases residual value |
|
535 |
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance business investments |
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
1,429 |
|
2,189 |
|
757 |
|
1,376 |
|
Total other assets |
|
9,158 |
|
10,224 |
|
5,751 |
|
8,042 |
|
54
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Freehold and leasehold land and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost(1) |
|
472 |
|
442 |
|
31 |
|
22 |
|
Provision for depreciation |
|
(24 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
448 |
|
426 |
|
30 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost |
|
209 |
|
168 |
|
117 |
|
108 |
|
Provision for amortisation |
|
(148 |
) |
(116 |
) |
(78 |
) |
(71 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
52 |
|
39 |
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost |
|
920 |
|
725 |
|
519 |
|
507 |
|
Provision for depreciation |
|
(614 |
) |
(488 |
) |
(342 |
) |
(324 |
) |
|
|
306 |
|
237 |
|
177 |
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer and office equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost |
|
964 |
|
853 |
|
646 |
|
636 |
|
Provision for depreciation |
|
(712 |
) |
(572 |
) |
(462 |
) |
(419 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
281 |
|
184 |
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost |
|
728 |
|
624 |
|
614 |
|
560 |
|
Provision for amortisation |
|
(298 |
) |
(159 |
) |
(239 |
) |
(139 |
) |
|
|
430 |
|
465 |
|
375 |
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital works in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost |
|
35 |
|
24 |
|
21 |
|
18 |
|
Total premises and equipment |
|
1,532 |
|
1,485 |
|
826 |
|
897 |
|
(1) In accordance with AASB 1041 this represents deemed cost
From 1 October 2000 as allowed by AASB 1041 Revaluation of Non-Current Assets the Group elected to revert to the cost basis for measuring the class of assets land and buildings.
As all properties are carried at deemed cost subject to individually meeting a recoverable amount test, valuations are carried out on all properties with a carrying value in excess of $1 million every three years. Properties carrying values are not increased to market values if valuations exceed carrying amounts. However, if the valuation of an individual property is determined to be less than its carrying amount, it will be written down to the lower amount.
The properties are subject to external valuation by independent valuers. Valuations are based on the estimated open market value and assume that the properties concerned continue to be used in their existing manner by the Group.
The independent valuation of the Groups freehold land and buildings was carried out as at 30 June 2002 by Jones Lang La Salle Advisory and resulted in a valuation of $464 million (The Company: $32 million). As land and buildings are recorded at deemed cost, the valuation was not brought to account.
At 30 September 2004, the recoverable amount review of properties, with net carrying values equal to or greater than $2 million was completed. Properties were reviewed for the existence of impairment indicators that might provide evidence that the propertys recoverable amount exceeded its carrying value. One property was identified as impaired and a loss of $2 million was booked.
Group accounting policy covering the amortisation of software costs capitalised are detailed in note 1(xiv). As at 30 September 2004 the weighted average amortisation period is 5 years.
55
Reconciliations of the carrying amounts for each class of premises and equipment are set out below:
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Freehold and leasehold land and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of year |
|
426 |
|
455 |
|
21 |
|
27 |
|
Additions |
|
15 |
|
13 |
|
10 |
|
4 |
|
Acquisitions(1) |
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals(2) |
|
(43 |
) |
(35 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(7 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
(4 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net foreign currency exchange difference |
|
1 |
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Carrying amount at end of year |
|
448 |
|
426 |
|
30 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of year |
|
52 |
|
44 |
|
37 |
|
30 |
|
Additions |
|
17 |
|
25 |
|
9 |
|
16 |
|
Acquisitions(1) |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals |
|
(6 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortisation |
|
(13 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(9 |
) |
Net foreign currency exchange difference |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at end of year |
|
61 |
|
52 |
|
39 |
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of year |
|
237 |
|
231 |
|
183 |
|
161 |
|
Additions |
|
111 |
|
56 |
|
58 |
|
50 |
|
Acquisitions(1) |
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals |
|
(66 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(33 |
) |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
(52 |
) |
(45 |
) |
(29 |
) |
(26 |
) |
Net foreign currency exchange difference |
|
(3 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Carrying amount at end of year |
|
306 |
|
237 |
|
177 |
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer and office equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of year |
|
281 |
|
283 |
|
217 |
|
235 |
|
Additions |
|
80 |
|
110 |
|
65 |
|
94 |
|
Acquisitions(1) |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals |
|
(14 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(26 |
) |
(36 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
(111 |
) |
(100 |
) |
(72 |
) |
(75 |
) |
Net foreign currency exchange difference |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Carrying amount at end of year |
|
252 |
|
281 |
|
184 |
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of year |
|
465 |
|
419 |
|
421 |
|
389 |
|
Additions |
|
114 |
|
141 |
|
92 |
|
115 |
|
Acquisitions(1) |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writeoffs(4) |
|
(37 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(34 |
) |
(10 |
) |
Amortisation |
|
(129 |
) |
(83 |
) |
(104 |
) |
(73 |
) |
Carrying amount at end of year |
|
430 |
|
465 |
|
375 |
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital works in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of year |
|
24 |
|
32 |
|
18 |
|
24 |
|
Net additions (transfers) |
|
8 |
|
(8 |
) |
3 |
|
(6 |
) |
Acquisitions(1) |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at end of year |
|
35 |
|
24 |
|
21 |
|
18 |
|
Total premises and equipment |
|
1,532 |
|
1,485 |
|
826 |
|
897 |
|
(1) Relates to NBNZ acquisition at 1 December 2003. Additions after this date are included in the Additions lines
(2) Includes $2 million writedown in carrying value of one property
(3) Includes integrals
(4) Software writeoffs arose where projects were terminated and the software no longer utilised
56
23: DUE TO OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
1,346 |
|
1,652 |
|
1,345 |
|
1,652 |
|
Overseas |
|
6,003 |
|
4,815 |
|
4,515 |
|
3,838 |
|
Total due to other financial institutions |
|
7,349 |
|
6,467 |
|
5,860 |
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity analysis based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At call |
|
2,255 |
|
2,887 |
|
1,853 |
|
1,948 |
|
Less than 3 months |
|
4,152 |
|
2,893 |
|
3,346 |
|
2,859 |
|
Between 3 months and 12 months |
|
662 |
|
686 |
|
661 |
|
682 |
|
Between 1 year and 5 years |
|
280 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total due to other financial institutions |
|
7,349 |
|
6,467 |
|
5,860 |
|
5,490 |
|
24: DEPOSITS AND OTHER BORROWINGS
Deposits and other borrowings are classified between Australia and Overseas based on the location of the deposit taking point.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
12,221 |
|
7,029 |
|
12,221 |
|
7,029 |
|
Term deposits |
|
22,615 |
|
19,263 |
|
23,273 |
|
19,814 |
|
Other deposits bearing interest |
|
45,155 |
|
40,864 |
|
45,155 |
|
40,852 |
|
Deposits not bearing interest |
|
4,005 |
|
3,881 |
|
4,005 |
|
3,881 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
4,708 |
|
5,458 |
|
2,099 |
|
3,722 |
|
Borrowing corporations debt(1) |
|
7,214 |
|
6,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
|
78 |
|
299 |
|
78 |
|
299 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
509 |
|
713 |
|
509 |
|
713 |
|
|
|
96,505 |
|
84,329 |
|
87,340 |
|
76,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
4,844 |
|
3,119 |
|
1,365 |
|
1,786 |
|
Term deposits |
|
30,941 |
|
19,683 |
|
9,629 |
|
10,768 |
|
Other deposits bearing interest |
|
15,891 |
|
6,536 |
|
782 |
|
771 |
|
Deposits not bearing interest |
|
4,207 |
|
1,950 |
|
632 |
|
452 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
14,072 |
|
6,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing corporations debt(2) |
|
2,034 |
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings |
|
63 |
|
99 |
|
63 |
|
99 |
|
|
|
72,052 |
|
40,165 |
|
12,471 |
|
13,876 |
|
Total deposits and other borrowings |
|
168,557 |
|
124,494 |
|
99,811 |
|
90,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity analysis based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At call |
|
68,421 |
|
52,726 |
|
50,013 |
|
45,225 |
|
Less than 3 months |
|
74,186 |
|
56,587 |
|
37,783 |
|
37,323 |
|
Between 3 months and 12 months |
|
17,923 |
|
10,300 |
|
7,337 |
|
5,291 |
|
Between 1 year and 5 years |
|
7,923 |
|
4,860 |
|
4,662 |
|
2,335 |
|
After 5 years |
|
104 |
|
21 |
|
16 |
|
12 |
|
Total deposits and other borrowings |
|
168,557 |
|
124,494 |
|
99,811 |
|
90,186 |
|
(1) Included in this balance is debenture stock of controlled entities. $7.2 billion of debenture stock of the consolidated subsidiary company Esanda together with accrued interest thereon, is secured by a trust deed and collateral debentures, giving floating charges upon the undertaking and all the assets of the entity other than land and buildings ($12,100 million). All controlled entities of Esanda (except for some controlled entities which have been placed or are expected to be placed in voluntary deregistration and have minimal book value) have guaranteed the payment of principal, interest and other monies in relation to all debenture stock and unsecured notes issued by the Company. The only loans pledged as collateral are those in Esanda and its subsidiaries
(2) This balance represents NZ$2.2 billion of secured debenture stock of the consolidated subsidiary UDC Finance Limited and the interest accruals thereon are secured by a floating charge over all assets of the UDC Finance Limited and its subsidiaries (NZ$2,527 million)
57
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax |
|
242 |
|
(303 |
) |
203 |
|
(381 |
) |
Provision for deferred income tax |
|
1,354 |
|
1,168 |
|
921 |
|
801 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
865 |
|
1,124 |
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax |
|
93 |
|
52 |
|
18 |
|
26 |
|
Provision for deferred income tax |
|
225 |
|
166 |
|
109 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
218 |
|
127 |
|
126 |
|
Total income tax liabilities |
|
1,914 |
|
1,083 |
|
1,251 |
(1) |
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income tax comprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease finance |
|
166 |
|
95 |
|
79 |
|
46 |
|
Treasury instruments |
|
497 |
|
511 |
|
497 |
|
511 |
|
Other |
|
916 |
|
728 |
|
454 |
|
344 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
1,334 |
|
1,030 |
|
901 |
|
(1) Gross income tax liabilities for the company $1,724 million (2004) less intercompany asset to tax consolidated controlled entities $473 million (2004)
26: PAYABLES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables |
|
4,746 |
|
3,102 |
|
4,700 |
|
3,145 |
|
Accrued interest and unearned discounts |
|
1,169 |
|
864 |
|
1,051 |
|
758 |
|
Treasury instruments revaluations |
|
3,274 |
|
5,997 |
|
3,781 |
|
5,995 |
|
Accrued charges |
|
297 |
|
312 |
|
255 |
|
299 |
|
Security settlements |
|
1 |
|
165 |
|
1 |
|
165 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
438 |
|
693 |
|
291 |
|
642 |
|
|
|
9,925 |
|
11,133 |
|
10,079 |
|
11,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables |
|
145 |
|
197 |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
Accrued interest and unearned discounts |
|
647 |
|
341 |
|
259 |
|
178 |
|
Treasury instruments revaluations |
|
2,382 |
|
1,335 |
|
143 |
|
104 |
|
Accrued charges |
|
237 |
|
143 |
|
43 |
|
49 |
|
Security settlements |
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance policy liabilities |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
468 |
|
462 |
|
365 |
|
331 |
|
|
|
4,287 |
|
2,478 |
|
811 |
|
667 |
|
Total payables and other liabilities |
|
14,212 |
|
13,611 |
|
10,890 |
|
11,671 |
|
58
27: PROVISIONS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Employee entitlements(1) |
|
333 |
|
269 |
|
248 |
|
237 |
|
Dividends (refer note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-lending losses, frauds and forgeries |
|
171 |
|
164 |
|
125 |
|
128 |
|
Restructuring costs and surplus leased space |
|
106 |
|
92 |
|
66 |
|
68 |
|
Other |
|
235 |
|
244 |
|
179 |
|
181 |
|
Total provisions |
|
845 |
|
769 |
|
618 |
|
614 |
|
(1) The aggregate liability for employee benefits largely comprise employee entitlements provisions plus liability for payroll tax and fringe benefits tax. The aggregate liability as at 30 September 2004 was $456 million consolidated and $284 million for the company (30 September 2003: was $362 million consolidated and $263 million for the company)
Reconciliations of the carrying amounts of each class of provisions, except for employee entitlements are set out below:
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Dividends(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of the year |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
Final ordinary dividend |
|
777 |
|
n/a |
|
777 |
|
n/a |
|
Interim ordinary dividend |
|
850 |
|
666 |
|
850 |
|
666 |
|
Preference share dividend |
|
98 |
|
102 |
|
98 |
|
102 |
|
Payments made during the year(2) |
|
(1,725 |
) |
(1,460 |
) |
(1,725 |
) |
(1,460 |
) |
Carrying amount at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs and surplus leased space(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of the year |
|
92 |
|
143 |
|
68 |
|
103 |
|
Acquisition provision (NBNZ) |
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision made during the year |
|
69 |
|
45 |
|
63 |
|
43 |
|
Payments made during the year |
|
(68 |
) |
(80 |
) |
(50 |
) |
(62 |
) |
Release of Provisions |
|
(15 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(16 |
) |
Adjustment for exchange rate fluctuations |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at the end of the year |
|
106 |
|
92 |
|
66 |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-lending losses frauds and forgeries(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of the year |
|
164 |
|
216 |
|
128 |
|
184 |
|
Provision made during the year |
|
18 |
|
17 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
Payments made during the year |
|
(7 |
) |
(59 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(57 |
) |
Release of Provisions |
|
(4 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(5 |
) |
Carrying amount at the end of the year |
|
171 |
|
164 |
|
125 |
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at beginning of the year |
|
244 |
|
298 |
|
181 |
|
268 |
|
Provision made during the year |
|
209 |
|
153 |
|
165 |
|
111 |
|
Payments made during the year |
|
(173 |
) |
(130 |
) |
(127 |
) |
(129 |
) |
Release of Provisions |
|
(46 |
) |
(76 |
) |
(40 |
) |
(68 |
) |
Adjustment for exchange rate fluctuations |
|
1 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Carrying amount at the end of the year |
|
235 |
|
244 |
|
179 |
|
181 |
|
(1) A provision for dividends payable will be recognised in the reporting period in which the dividends are declared, determined, or publicly recommended. Current practice is to publicly announce dividends after the reporting period to which the dividend relates
(2) Includes issue of ordinary shares under the Bonus Option Plan (2004: $29 million; 2003: $25 million)
(3) Restructuring costs and surplus leased space provisions arise from exit activities related to material changes in the scope of business undertaken by the Group or the manner in which that business is undertaken, and includes termination benefits. Costs related to on-going activities are not provided for. Provision is made when the Group is demonstrably committed, it is probable that the costs will be incurred, though its timing is uncertain, and the costs can be reliably estimated
(4) Non-lending losses, frauds and forgeries provisions arise from inadequate or failed internal processes and systems, or from external events
(5) Other provisions comprise various other provisions including fringe benefits tax, fleet maintenance, workers compensation and other non-employee entitlement provisions
59
28: BONDS AND NOTES
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
|
Bonds and notes by currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
USD |
United States dollars |
|
4,718 |
|
5,772 |
|
4,262 |
|
5,331 |
|
||
GBP |
Great British pounds |
|
3,896 |
|
1,758 |
|
3,896 |
|
1,758 |
|
||
AUD |
Australian dollars |
|
979 |
|
688 |
|
979 |
|
688 |
|
||
NZD |
New Zealand dollars |
|
667 |
|
31 |
|
33 |
|
31 |
|
||
JPY |
Japanese yen |
|
1,433 |
|
304 |
|
1,433 |
|
304 |
|
||
EUR |
Euro |
|
10,863 |
|
4,903 |
|
9,571 |
|
4,903 |
|
||
HKD |
Hong Kong dollars |
|
2,805 |
|
2,259 |
|
2,619 |
|
2,259 |
|
||
CHF |
Swiss francs |
|
831 |
|
389 |
|
831 |
|
389 |
|
||
CAD |
Canadian dollars |
|
1,258 |
|
184 |
|
1,258 |
|
184 |
|
||
NOK |
Norwegian krone |
|
82 |
|
84 |
|
82 |
|
84 |
|
||
SGD |
Singapore dollars |
|
70 |
|
200 |
|
70 |
|
200 |
|
||
Total bonds and notes |
|
27,602 |
|
16,572 |
|
25,034 |
|
16,131 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Bonds and notes by maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Maturity analysis based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Less than 3 months |
|
419 |
|
269 |
|
419 |
|
269 |
|
|||
Between 3 months and 12 months |
|
4,238 |
|
3,652 |
|
4,145 |
|
3,652 |
|
|||
Between 1 year and 5 years |
|
22,870 |
|
12,651 |
|
20,395 |
|
12,210 |
|
|||
After 5 years |
|
75 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|||
Total bonds and notes |
|
27,602 |
|
16,572 |
|
25,034 |
|
16,131 |
|
|||
60
29: LOAN CAPITAL
|
|
Interest |
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
% |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
|||
Hybrid loan capital (subordinated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
US Stapled trust security issue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
USD 350m cumulative trust securities due 2053 |
|
4.484 |
|
488 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|||
USD 750m cumulative trust securities due 2053 |
|
5.36 |
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Perpetual subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
USD 300m |
floating rate notes |
|
LIBOR(1) + 0.15 |
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
USD 250m |
fixed notes due 2004 |
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
||
USD 500m |
fixed notes due 2006 |
|
7.55 |
|
698 |
|
735 |
|
698 |
|
735 |
|
||
JPY 482m |
floating rate notes due 2007 |
|
LIBOR + 0.50 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
||
USD 7.9m |
floating rate notes due 2007 |
|
LIBOR + 0.50 |
|
11 |
|
17 |
|
11 |
|
17 |
|
||
JPY 568.8m |
floating rate notes due 2008 |
|
LIBOR + 0.55 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
||
USD 10m |
floating rate notes due 2008 |
|
LIBOR + 0.50 |
|
14 |
|
20 |
|
14 |
|
20 |
|
||
USD 79m |
floating rate notes due 2008(2) |
|
LIBOR + 0.53 |
|
110 |
|
115 |
|
110 |
|
115 |
|
||
NZD 100m |
fixed notes due 2010 |
|
8.36 |
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NZD 100m |
fixed notes due 2011 |
|
6.87 |
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AUD 400m |
floating rate notes due 2012 |
|
BBSW + 0.57 |
|
400 |
|
400 |
|
400 |
|
400 |
|
||
AUD 100m |
floating rate notes due 2012 |
|
BBSW + 0.57 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
||
NZD 125m |
fixed notes due 2012 |
|
7.40 |
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NZD 125m |
fixed notes due 2012 |
|
7.61 |
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NZD 300m |
floating rate notes due 2012 |
|
BKBM(3) + 0.50 |
|
280 |
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
NZD 100m |
fixed notes due 2013 |
|
6.46 |
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
USD 550m |
floating rate notes due 2013(3) |
|
LIBOR(3) + 0.55 |
|
768 |
|
808 |
|
768 |
|
808 |
|
||
EUR 500m |
fixed/floating rate notes due 2013(4) |
|
4.45 |
|
860 |
|
854 |
|
860 |
|
854 |
|
||
EUR 300m |
floating rate notes due 2013(5) |
|
EURIBOR(3) + 0.375 |
|
516 |
|
512 |
|
516 |
|
512 |
|
||
AUD 350m |
fixed notes due 2014 |
|
6.50 |
|
350 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
||
AUD 380m |
floating rate notes due 2014 |
|
BBSW(3) + 0.41 |
|
380 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
||
GBP 200m |
fixed notes due 2015 |
|
5.625 |
|
502 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
||
GBP 400m |
fixed notes due 2018 |
|
4.75 |
|
1,004 |
|
983 |
|
1,004 |
|
983 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,521 |
|
5,188 |
|
5,726 |
|
4,925 |
|
|
Total loan capital |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
5,630 |
|
7,680 |
|
5,367 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan capital by currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
AUD Australian dollars |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
500 |
|
1,230 |
|
500 |
|
|||
NZD New Zealand dollars |
|
|
|
795 |
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
USD United States dollars |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
2,504 |
|
3,555 |
|
2,504 |
|
|||
GBP Great British pounds |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
983 |
|
1,506 |
|
983 |
|
|||
EUR Euro |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
1,366 |
|
1,376 |
|
1,366 |
|
|||
JPY Japanese yen |
|
|
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
5,630 |
|
7,680 |
|
5,367 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Loan capital by maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Maturity analysis based on remaining term to maturity at 30 September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Between 3 months and 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|||
Between 1 year and 5 years |
|
|
|
846 |
|
736 |
|
846 |
|
736 |
|
|||
After 5 years |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
4,084 |
|
6,415 |
|
3,821 |
|
|||
Perpetual |
|
|
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
5,630 |
|
7,680 |
|
5,367 |
|
|||
(1) LIBOR is an average of rates offered on loans to leading banks in the London inter-bank market
(2) Prior to January 2002, the interest rate was LIBOR+ 1.03
(3) After February 2008 rate changes to LIBOR (3) + 1.05
(4) After February 2010 rate changes to EURIBOR (3) + 0.50
(5) After August 2008 rate changes to EURIBOR (3) + 0.875
Loan capital is subordinated in right of payment to the claims of depositors and all other creditors of the Company and its controlled entities which have issued the notes. The loan capital, except for the US Stapled Trust Security Issue constitutes tier 2 capital as defined by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) for capital adequacy purposes. The US Stapled Trust Security Issue constitutes Tier 1 capital as defined by APRA for capital adequacy purposes.
61
US STAPLED TRUST SECURITY ISSUE
On 27 November 2003, ANZ raised USD1.1 billion via the issue of non-cumulative trust securities, to support the capital and funding base of the Group following the decision to acquire NBNZ. The issue was structured as a stapled security along similar lines as ANZ StEPS, with investors purchasing a fully paid, non-coupon paying preference share issued by the parent and a fully paid, coupon paying, note issued by a special purpose NZ subsidiary (Samson Funding Limited). The Trust Security can be de-stapled and the investor left with a coupon paying preference share at ANZs discretion at any time, or at the investors discretion under certain circumstances. The issue was made in two tranches:
USD750 million tranche with a coupon of 5.36%. After 15 December 2013 and at any coupon date thereafter, ANZ has the discretion to redeem the Trust Securities for cash. If it does not exercise this discretion, the investor is entitled to require ANZ to exchange the Trust Security into a number of ordinary shares based on the formula in the offering memorandum.
USD350 million tranche with a coupon of 4.484% which has the same conversion features as the USD750 million but from 15 January 2010.
If the Trust Securities are not redeemed or bought back prior to 15 December 2053 they will convert into preference shares, which in turn will mandatorily convert into a number of ordinary shares, based on the formula in the offering memorandum.
The US Stapled Trust Securities qualify as Tier 1 capital as defined by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, however, the Securities are reported as debt under Australian, International and US Accounting Standards with the coupon payment classified as interest expense.
30: SHARE CAPITAL
|
|
The Company |
|
||||
Number of issued shares |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Ordinary shares each fully paid |
|
1,818,401,807 |
|
1,521,686,560 |
|
1,503,886,082 |
|
Preference shares each fully paid |
|
10,000,000 |
|
134,032,000 |
|
124,032,000 |
|
Total number of issued shares |
|
1,828,401,807 |
|
1,655,718,560 |
|
1,627,918,082 |
|
ORDINARY SHARES
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
|
|
The Company |
|
||||
Number of issued shares |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Balance at start of year |
|
1,521,686,560 |
|
1,503,886,082 |
|
1,488,267,146 |
|
Bonus option plan |
|
1,771,864 |
|
1,534,987 |
|
1,351,845 |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
7,815,830 |
|
6,223,866 |
|
5,018,513 |
|
ANZ employee share acquisition plan |
|
3,891,978 |
|
3,615,714 |
|
4,144,988 |
|
ANZ share option plan |
|
6,387,809 |
|
6,425,911 |
|
5,103,590 |
|
ANZ share purchase scheme ANZ rights issue |
|
276,847,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
1,818,401,807 |
|
1,521,686,560 |
|
1,503,886,082 |
|
For a reconciliation of the movement in ordinary share capital refer to Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity on page 27
62
PREFERENCE SHARES
a) Trust Securities Issues (ANZ TrUEPrS)
ANZ TrUEPrS were 124,032,000 fully paid non-converting non-cumulative preference shares issued for USD6.25 per share via Trust Securities Issues in 1998.
The Trust Securities were mandatorily exchangeable for the preference shares issued by the Company, and carried an entitlement to a non-cumulative trust distribution of 8.00% or 8.08% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The Trust Securities were issued by a non diversified closed end management investment company registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940. The preference shares themselves carried no present entitlement to dividends. Distributions to investors in the Trust Securities were funded by income distributions made by the Group.
Upon maturity of the Trust Securities in 2048, investors would have mandatorily exchanged the Trust Securities for the preference shares and thereupon the preference shares would have carried an entitlement to non-cumulative dividends of 8.00% or 8.08% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The mandatory exchange of the Trust Securities for the preference shares could have occurred earlier at the Companys option or in specified circumstances.
With the prior consent of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, the preference shares were redeemable at the Companys option after 5 years, or within 5 years in limited circumstances. The entitlement of investors to distributions on the Trust Securities would have ceased on redemption of the preference shares.
The transaction costs arising on the issue of these instruments were recognised directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds of the equity instruments to which the costs related.
On 12 December 2003, the Group bought back its 124,032,000 preference shares issued via Trust Securities Issues for $1,045 million.
b) ANZ Stapled Exchangeable Preferred Securities (ANZ StEPS)
On 23 September 2003, the Company issued 10 million ANZ StEPS at $100 each pursuant to a prospectus dated 14 August 2003 raising $1 billion (excluding issue costs of $13 million: net raising $987 million). ANZ StEPS comprise two fully paid securities - an interest paying unsecured note (issued by ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) stapled to a fully paid preference share (issued by the Company).
Distributions on ANZ StEPS are noncumulative and are payable quarterly in arrears based upon a floating distribution rate equal to the 90 day bank bill rate plus a margin. At each payment date the 90 day bank bill rate is reset for the next quarter. Distributions are subject to certain payment tests (ie APRA requirements and distributable profits being available) and the basis for their calculation may change on any reset date. Distributions are expected to be payable on 15 March, 15 June, 15 September and 15 December of each year. Dividends are not payable on the preference share while it is stapled to the note. If distributions are not paid on ANZ StEPS, the Company may not pay dividends or return capital on its ordinary shares or any other share capital ranking below the preference share component.
On any reset date, ANZ may change certain terms (subject to certain restrictions) including the next reset date, market reset (from floating rate to a fixed rate, or vice versa), margin and the frequency and timing of the distribution payment dates. The first reset date is 15 September 2008. Holders of ANZ StEPS can require exchange on any reset date or earlier if certain specified events occur. On exchange, a holder will receive (at the Companys discretion) either $100 cash for each ANZ StEPS exchanged or a number of ordinary shares calculated in accordance with a conversion ratio based on $100 divided by the market price of ordinary shares at the date of conversion less 2.5%. In certain circumstances, the Company may also require exchange other than on a reset date.
Upon the occurrence of an assignment event, ANZ StEPS become unstapled. In this case, the note will be assigned from the holder, however, the holder will retain the preference share and the rights to exchange the preference share.
The preference shares forming part of ANZ StEPS rank equally with the preference shares issued in connection with Trust Securities Issues in all respects. Except in certain limited circumstances, holders of ANZ StEPS do not have any right to vote in general meetings of the Company.
On a winding up of the Company, the rights of ANZ StEPS holders will be determined by the preference share component of ANZ StEPS. Those preference shares rank behind all depositors and creditors, but ahead of ordinary shareholders.
The transactions costs arising on the issue of these instruments were recognised directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds of the equity instruments to which the costs relate.
63
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Preference share balance at start of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ANZ TrUEPrS (USD748 million)(1) |
|
1,225 |
|
1,375 |
|
1,225 |
|
1,375 |
|
- ANZ StEPS(1) |
|
987 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
1,375 |
|
2,212 |
|
1,375 |
|
Retranslation of ANZ TrUEPrS(2) |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
Buyback of ANZ TrUEPrS(3) |
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
987 |
|
1,225 |
|
987 |
|
1,225 |
|
Preference share net proceeds from new issues during the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ANZ StEPS(1) |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
Preference share balance at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ANZ TrUEPrS (USD748 million)(1) |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
- ANZ StEPS(1) |
|
987 |
|
987 |
|
987 |
|
987 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
987 |
|
2,212 |
|
(1) Net of issue costs
(2) From 1 October 2002, the net proceeds are translated at the spot rate applicable at date of issue. Before 1 October 2002, the net proceeds were translated at the current spot rate at each reporting period and recorded in FCTR. Refer note 1
(3) ANZ TrUEPrS bought back on 12 December 2003 for $1,045 million
Share Buybacks
The Company conducted no on-market buybacks during the years ended 30 September 2004 and 2003. The Company announced the intention to undertake an on-market share buyback of at least $350 million post year end. (Refer note 58).
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Share capital |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Retained Profits |
|
17 |
|
15 |
|
Total outside equity interests |
|
18 |
|
17 |
|
64
32: CAPITAL ADEQUACY
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) adopts a risk-based capital assessment framework for Australian banks based on internationally accepted capital measurement standards. This risk-based approach requires eligible capital to be divided by total risk weighted assets, with the resultant ratio being used as a measure of a banks capital adequacy.
Capital is divided into tier 1, or core capital, and tier 2, or supplementary capital. For capital adequacy purposes, eligible tier 2 capital cannot exceed the level of tier 1 capital. Banks are required to deduct from total capital any strategic holdings of other banks capital instruments and investments in entities engaged in life insurance, funds management and securitisation activities. Under APRA guidelines, banks must maintain a ratio of qualifying capital to risk weighted assets of at least 8 per cent.
The measurement of risk weighted assets is based on: a) A credit risk-based approach wherein risk weightings are applied to statement of financial position assets and to credit converted off balance sheet exposures. Categories of risk weights are assigned based upon the nature of the counterparty and the relative liquidity of the assets concerned and: b) The recognition of risk weighted assets attributable to market risk arising from trading and commodity positions. Trading and commodity balance sheet positions do not attract a risk weighting under the credit risk-based approach.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Qualifying capital |
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity and outside equity interests |
|
17,925 |
|
13,787 |
|
Hybrid loan capital(1) |
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
Asset revaluation reserve |
|
(31 |
) |
(31 |
) |
Dividend(2) |
|
(983 |
) |
(777 |
) |
Accumulated retained profits and reserves of insurance, funds management and securitisation entities |
|
(218 |
) |
(168 |
) |
Unamortised goodwill and other intangibles(3) |
|
(4,170 |
) |
(1,044 |
) |
Capitalised expenses(4) |
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
Investment in ANZ Lenders Mortgage Insurance |
|
(27 |
) |
(27 |
) |
Tier 1 capital |
|
13,566 |
|
11,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset revaluation reserve |
|
31 |
|
31 |
|
Perpetual subordinated notes |
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
General provision for doubtful debts(5) |
|
1,342 |
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
1,502 |
|
Subordinated notes(6) |
|
6,052 |
|
4,563 |
|
Tier 2 capital |
|
7,844 |
|
6,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Funds Management and securitisation entities |
|
(107 |
) |
(56 |
) |
Investment in joint venture with INGA |
|
(708 |
) |
(708 |
) |
Other |
|
(204 |
) |
(156 |
) |
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
(920 |
) |
Total qualifying capital |
|
20,391 |
|
16,885 |
|
Adjusted common equity(7) |
|
10,012 |
|
8,679 |
|
Total risk weighted assets |
|
196,664 |
|
152,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
Capital adequacy ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 |
|
6.9 |
|
7.7 |
|
Tier 2 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
Deductions |
|
(0.5 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
Total |
|
10.4 |
|
11.1 |
|
Adjusted common equity(7) |
|
5.1 |
|
5.7 |
|
(1) Represents the US Stapled Trust Security Issue approved by APRA as qualifying for Tier 1 status. Refer note 29
(2) Relates to final dividend not provided for
(3) From 1 July 2003 the intangible component of investments is deducted from Tier 1 Capital. Prior to this, the deduction was from total capital
(4) From 1 July 2004, APRA requires certain capitalised expenses to be deducted from Tier 1 Capital
(5) Net of attributable future income tax benefit
(6) For capital adequacy calculation purposes, subordinated note issues are reduced by 20% of the original amount during each of the last five years to maturity
(7) Tier 1 capital, less preference share capital (converted at 30 September 2004 rates), less deductions
65
|
|
Assets |
|
Risk weighted assets |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Statement of financial position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, claims on Australian Commonwealth, State Governments, Territory Governments, claims on OECD Central Governments, local currency claims on non-OECD Governments and other zero weighted assets |
|
24,467 |
|
19,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
Claims on approved banks and local Governments |
|
12,593 |
|
8,350 |
|
2,519 |
|
1,670 |
|
Advances secured by residential mortgages |
|
106,013 |
|
76,711 |
|
53,007 |
|
38,355 |
|
Other assets credit risk |
|
113,218 |
|
88,042 |
|
113,218 |
|
88,042 |
|
Total statement of financial position assets credit risk |
|
256,291 |
|
192,920 |
|
168,744 |
|
128,067 |
|
Trading assets market risk |
|
3,054 |
|
2,671 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Total statement of financial position assets |
|
259,345 |
|
195,591 |
|
168,744 |
|
128,067 |
|
|
|
Contract/ |
|
Credit |
|
Risk |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Off balance sheet exposures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct credit substitutes |
|
10,262 |
|
9,771 |
|
10,262 |
|
9,771 |
|
8,173 |
|
8,115 |
|
Trade and performance related items |
|
11,887 |
|
10,782 |
|
5,265 |
|
4,864 |
|
4,728 |
|
4,502 |
|
Commitments |
|
78,914 |
|
65,396 |
|
12,385 |
|
7,632 |
|
10,239 |
|
7,422 |
|
Foreign exchange, interest rate and other market related transactions |
|
672,500 |
|
516,773 |
|
11,692 |
|
11,469 |
|
3,790 |
|
3,387 |
|
Total off balance sheet exposures credit risk |
|
773,563 |
|
602,722 |
|
39,604 |
|
33,736 |
|
26,930 |
|
23,426 |
|
Total risk weighted assets credit risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,674 |
|
151,493 |
|
Risk weighted assets market risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990 |
|
671 |
|
Total risk weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,664 |
|
152,164 |
|
66
33: AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED INTEREST
Averages used in the following table are predominantly daily averages. Interest income figures are presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Non-accrual loans are included under the interest earning asset category Loans, advances and bills discounted. Intragroup interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities are treated as external assets and liabilities for the geographic segments.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
Interest earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
578 |
|
29 |
|
5.0 |
|
432 |
|
21 |
|
4.9 |
|
653 |
|
26 |
|
4.0 |
|
New Zealand |
|
2,728 |
|
137 |
|
5.0 |
|
582 |
|
23 |
|
4.0 |
|
570 |
|
26 |
|
4.6 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
2,322 |
|
43 |
|
1.9 |
|
2,046 |
|
48 |
|
2.3 |
|
2,404 |
|
69 |
|
2.9 |
|
Investments in public securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
7,231 |
|
389 |
|
5.4 |
|
6,390 |
|
301 |
|
4.7 |
|
5,384 |
|
259 |
|
4.8 |
|
New Zealand |
|
3,038 |
|
150 |
|
4.9 |
|
1,642 |
|
73 |
|
4.4 |
|
1,253 |
|
55 |
|
4.4 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
3,175 |
|
95 |
|
3.0 |
|
1,870 |
|
78 |
|
4.2 |
|
1,550 |
|
82 |
|
5.3 |
|
Loans, advances and bills discounted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
129,658 |
|
8,893 |
|
6.9 |
|
110,260 |
|
7,263 |
|
6.6 |
|
95,846 |
|
6,273 |
|
6.5 |
|
New Zealand |
|
48,346 |
|
3,701 |
|
7.7 |
|
20,365 |
|
1,637 |
|
8.0 |
|
18,129 |
|
1,363 |
|
7.5 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
9,810 |
|
421 |
|
4.3 |
|
12,213 |
|
503 |
|
4.1 |
|
14,195 |
|
627 |
|
4.4 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
1,524 |
|
127 |
|
8.3 |
|
1,606 |
|
105 |
|
6.5 |
|
1,463 |
|
17 |
|
1.2 |
|
New Zealand |
|
1,808 |
|
36 |
|
2.0 |
|
1,353 |
|
46 |
|
3.4 |
|
1,349 |
|
83 |
|
6.2 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
1,935 |
|
127 |
|
6.6 |
|
3,395 |
|
140 |
|
4.1 |
|
3,124 |
|
179 |
|
5.7 |
|
Intragroup assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
10,670 |
|
225 |
|
2.1 |
|
9,858 |
|
200 |
|
2.0 |
|
9,525 |
|
211 |
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
222,823 |
|
14,373 |
|
|
|
172,012 |
|
10,438 |
|
|
|
155,445 |
|
9,270 |
|
|
|
Intragroup elimination |
|
(10,670 |
) |
(225 |
) |
|
|
(9,858 |
) |
(200 |
) |
|
|
(9,525 |
) |
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
212,153 |
|
14,148 |
|
6.7 |
|
162,154 |
|
10,238 |
|
6.3 |
|
145,920 |
|
9,059 |
|
6.2 |
|
Non-interest earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceptances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
13,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
18,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for doubtful debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
(1,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
28,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
242,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
190,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
178,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
162,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
142,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
130,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
61,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
25,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
22,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
29,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
34,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
200,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
187,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intragroup elimination |
|
(10,670 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(9,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(9,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
190,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
178,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total average assets attributable to overseas activities |
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
Interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
30,839 |
|
1,589 |
|
5.2 |
|
25,171 |
|
1,165 |
|
4.6 |
|
20,741 |
|
937 |
|
4.5 |
|
New Zealand |
|
20,910 |
|
1,138 |
|
5.4 |
|
10,666 |
|
570 |
|
5.3 |
|
8,894 |
|
456 |
|
5.1 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
12,772 |
|
296 |
|
2.3 |
|
14,738 |
|
336 |
|
2.3 |
|
15,113 |
|
417 |
|
2.8 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
13,017 |
|
352 |
|
2.7 |
|
11,959 |
|
279 |
|
2.3 |
|
10,964 |
|
245 |
|
2.2 |
|
New Zealand |
|
6,463 |
|
212 |
|
3.3 |
|
3,285 |
|
79 |
|
2.4 |
|
3,113 |
|
76 |
|
2.4 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
386 |
|
3 |
|
0.8 |
|
405 |
|
3 |
|
0.7 |
|
449 |
|
7 |
|
1.6 |
|
Other demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
29,737 |
|
1,182 |
|
4.0 |
|
26,718 |
|
963 |
|
3.6 |
|
23,397 |
|
792 |
|
3.4 |
|
New Zealand |
|
6,428 |
|
256 |
|
4.0 |
|
2,108 |
|
98 |
|
4.6 |
|
1,903 |
|
78 |
|
4.1 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
662 |
|
9 |
|
1.4 |
|
642 |
|
9 |
|
1.4 |
|
704 |
|
11 |
|
1.6 |
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
1,452 |
|
85 |
|
5.9 |
|
957 |
|
49 |
|
5.1 |
|
942 |
|
49 |
|
5.2 |
|
New Zealand |
|
1,608 |
|
76 |
|
4.7 |
|
631 |
|
23 |
|
3.6 |
|
514 |
|
17 |
|
3.3 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
3,736 |
|
77 |
|
2.1 |
|
6,446 |
|
111 |
|
1.7 |
|
7,399 |
|
180 |
|
2.4 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
5,824 |
|
308 |
|
5.3 |
|
5,216 |
|
252 |
|
4.8 |
|
3,888 |
|
178 |
|
4.6 |
|
New Zealand |
|
6,764 |
|
383 |
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
6,485 |
|
74 |
|
1.1 |
|
4,740 |
|
58 |
|
1.2 |
|
3,641 |
|
73 |
|
2.0 |
|
Borrowing corporations debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
7,092 |
|
371 |
|
5.2 |
|
6,626 |
|
337 |
|
5.1 |
|
6,097 |
|
316 |
|
5.2 |
|
New Zealand |
|
1,925 |
|
110 |
|
5.7 |
|
1,824 |
|
108 |
|
5.9 |
|
1,472 |
|
88 |
|
6.0 |
|
Loan capital, bonds and notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
29,631 |
|
1,575 |
|
5.3 |
|
19,783 |
|
1,011 |
|
5.1 |
|
15,639 |
|
756 |
|
4.8 |
|
New Zealand |
|
2,009 |
|
121 |
|
6.0 |
|
521 |
|
37 |
|
7.1 |
|
441 |
|
30 |
|
6.8 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
150 |
|
3 |
|
2.0 |
|
184 |
|
4 |
|
2.2 |
|
540 |
|
15 |
|
2.8 |
|
Other liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
4,232 |
|
543 |
|
n/a |
|
2,714 |
|
292 |
|
n/a |
|
1,463 |
|
167 |
|
n/a |
|
New Zealand |
|
40 |
|
83 |
|
n/a |
|
96 |
|
97 |
|
n/a |
|
117 |
|
98 |
|
n/a |
|
Overseas markets |
|
82 |
|
17 |
|
n/a |
|
33 |
|
23 |
|
n/a |
|
37 |
|
33 |
|
n/a |
|
Intragroup Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
5,644 |
|
(19 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
7,926 |
|
134 |
|
1.7 |
|
6,778 |
|
128 |
|
1.9 |
|
New Zealand |
|
5,026 |
|
244 |
|
4.9 |
|
1,932 |
|
66 |
|
3.4 |
|
2,747 |
|
83 |
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
202,914 |
|
9,088 |
|
|
|
155,321 |
|
6,104 |
|
|
|
136,993 |
|
5,230 |
|
|
|
Intragroup elimination |
|
(10,670 |
) |
(225 |
) |
|
|
(9,858 |
) |
(200 |
) |
|
|
(9,525 |
) |
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
192,244 |
|
8,863 |
|
4.6 |
|
145,463 |
|
5,904 |
|
4.1 |
|
127,468 |
|
5,019 |
|
3.9 |
|
(1) Includes foreign exchange swap costs
68
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
3,958 |
|
3,656 |
|
3,925 |
|
New Zealand |
|
2,619 |
|
1,159 |
|
873 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
867 |
|
683 |
|
597 |
|
Acceptances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
13,398 |
|
13,492 |
|
14,556 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
54 |
|
88 |
|
152 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
13,611 |
|
14,113 |
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
34,507 |
|
33,191 |
|
39,737 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
226,751 |
|
178,654 |
|
167,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
153,927 |
|
134,462 |
|
123,341 |
|
New Zealand |
|
57,550 |
|
24,071 |
|
21,507 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
25,944 |
|
29,979 |
|
31,882 |
|
|
|
237,421 |
|
188,512 |
|
176,730 |
|
Intragroup elimination |
|
(10,670 |
) |
(9,858 |
) |
(9,525 |
) |
|
|
226,751 |
|
178,654 |
|
167,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary share capital(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
10,929 |
|
9,507 |
|
Preference share capital |
|
1,229 |
|
1,244 |
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
16,229 |
|
12,173 |
|
10,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
242,980 |
|
190,827 |
|
178,127 |
|
% of total average liabilities attributable to overseas activities |
|
34.6 |
% |
29.2 |
% |
30.3 |
% |
(1) Includes reserves and retained profits
69
34: INTEREST SPREADS AND NET INTEREST AVERAGE MARGINS
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Net interest income(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
3,450 |
|
3,210 |
|
3,009 |
|
New Zealand |
|
1,400 |
|
699 |
|
601 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
433 |
|
425 |
|
432 |
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
4,334 |
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
138,991 |
|
118,688 |
|
103,346 |
|
New Zealand |
|
55,920 |
|
23,942 |
|
21,301 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
27,912 |
|
29,382 |
|
30,798 |
|
Intragroup elimination |
|
(10,670 |
) |
(9,858 |
) |
(9,525 |
) |
|
|
212,153 |
|
162,154 |
|
145,920 |
|
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Gross earnings rate(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
6.79 |
|
6.48 |
|
6.36 |
|
New Zealand |
|
7.20 |
|
7.43 |
|
7.17 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
3.27 |
|
3.30 |
|
3.79 |
|
Group |
|
6.67 |
|
6.31 |
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest spreads and net interest average margins may be analysed as follows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread |
|
2.11 |
|
2.31 |
|
2.44 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets(3) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
(0.02 |
) |
(0.04 |
) |
Net interest spread |
|
2.09 |
|
2.29 |
|
2.40 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.39 |
|
0.41 |
|
0.51 |
|
Net interest average margin Australia |
|
2.48 |
|
2.70 |
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread |
|
2.08 |
|
2.30 |
|
2.34 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets(3) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
2.07 |
|
2.30 |
|
2.34 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.43 |
|
0.62 |
|
0.48 |
|
Net interest average margin New Zealand |
|
2.50 |
|
2.92 |
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread |
|
1.34 |
|
1.37 |
|
1.20 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets(3) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
(0.07 |
) |
(0.05 |
) |
Net interest spread |
|
1.30 |
|
1.30 |
|
1.15 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.25 |
|
0.15 |
|
0.25 |
|
Net interest average margin Overseas markets |
|
1.55 |
|
1.45 |
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest spread |
|
2.08 |
|
2.28 |
|
2.31 |
|
Interest forgone on impaired assets(3) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
(0.03 |
) |
(0.04 |
) |
Net interest spread |
|
2.06 |
|
2.25 |
|
2.27 |
|
Interest attributable to net non-interest bearing items |
|
0.43 |
|
0.42 |
|
0.50 |
|
Net interest average margin Group |
|
2.49 |
|
2.67 |
|
2.77 |
|
(1) On a tax equivalent basis
(2) Average interest rate received on interest earning assets. Overseas markets includes intragroup assets
(3) Refer note 14 to the financial report
70
35: MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk to earnings arising from changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or from fluctuations in bond, commodity or equity prices.
The Board of Directors through the Risk Management Committee, a Committee of the Board, has responsibility for oversight of market risk within the Group. Routine management of market risk is delegated to two senior management committees chaired by the Chief Financial Officer. The Credit and Trading Risk Committee is responsible for traded market risk, while the Group Asset and Liability Committee is responsible for non-traded market risk (or balance sheet risk).
The Credit and Trading Risk Committee monitors traded market risk exposures (including Value at Risk and Stress Testing) and is responsible for authorising the trading risk limit framework. The Group Asset and Liability Committee reviews balance sheet based risk measures and strategies on a monthly basis.
The Value at Risk (VaR) Measure
A key measure of market risk is Value at Risk (VaR). VaR is a statistical estimate of the likely daily loss and is based on historical market movements.
The confidence level is such that there is 97.5% or 99% probability that the loss will not exceed the VaR estimate on any given day. The 99% confidence level encompasses a wider range of potential outcomes.
The Groups standard VaR approach for both traded and non-traded risk is historical simulation. The Group calculates VaR using historical changes in market rates and prices over the previous 500 business days.
It should be noted that because VaR is driven by actual historical observations, it is therefore not an estimate of the maximum loss that the Group could experience from an extreme market event. As a result of this limitation, the Group utilises a number of other risk measures (eg. stress testing) and associated supplementary limits to measure and manage traded market risk.
Traded and non-traded market risks have been considered separately below.
Traded Market Risks
Trading activities are focused on customer trading, distribution and underwriting of a range of securities and derivative instruments. The principal activities include foreign exchange, interest rate and debt markets. These activities are managed on a global product basis.
Below are aggregate VaR exposures covering both derivative and non-derivative trading positions for the Groups principal trading centres.
|
|
As at |
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average for |
|
As at |
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Value at risk at 97.5% confidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange |
|
0.5 |
|
2.0 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.7 |
|
1.4 |
|
2.0 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.8 |
|
Interest rate |
|
1.5 |
|
2.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.1 |
|
1.1 |
|
2.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.0 |
|
Diversification benefit |
|
(0.7 |
) |
(1.6 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
(1.5 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
Total VaR |
|
1.3 |
|
2.5 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.4 |
|
1.7 |
|
2.6 |
|
0.7 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at risk at 99% confidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange |
|
0.9 |
|
2.8 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.6 |
|
3.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.3 |
|
Interest rate |
|
1.8 |
|
2.8 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
3.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.7 |
|
Diversification benefit |
|
(0.9 |
) |
(2.2 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
(2.6 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
Total VaR |
|
1.8 |
|
3.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.9 |
|
2.2 |
|
3.6 |
|
1.0 |
|
2.1 |
|
VaR is calculated separately for Foreign Exchange/Commodities and for Interest Rate/Debt Markets businesses as well as Total Group. The diversification benefit reflects the correlation implied by historical rates between Foreign Exchange/Commodities and Interest Rate/Debt Markets.
71
Non-Traded Market Risks (Balance Sheet Risk)
The principal objectives of balance sheet management are to manage interest income sensitivity while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk and to hedge the market value of the Groups capital.
Interest Rate Risk
The objective of balance sheet interest rate risk management is to secure stable and optimal net interest income over both the short (next 12 months) and long term. Non-traded interest rate risk relates to the potential adverse impact of changes in market interest rates on the Groups future net interest income. This risk arises from two principal sources: mismatches between the repricing dates of interest bearing assets and liabilities; and the investment of capital and other non-interest bearing liabilities in interest bearing assets. Interest rate risk is reported as follows using three measures: VaR, scenario analysis (to a 1% shock) and disclosure of the interest rate sensitivity gap (refer note 36).
a) VaR Interest Rate Risk
Below are aggregate VaR figures covering non-traded interest rate risk.
|
|
As at |
|
High for |
|
Low for |
|
Average for |
|
As at |
|
High for |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Value at risk at 97.5% confidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ANZ Group |
|
21.0 |
|
37.2 |
|
21.0 |
|
29.5 |
|
24.4 |
|
59.3 |
|
b) Scenario Analysis - A 1% Shock on the Next 12 Months Net Interest Income
A 1% overnight parallel positive shift in the yield curve is modelled to determine the potential impact on net interest income over the immediate forward period of 12 months. This is a standard risk quantification tool.
The figures in the table below indicate the outcome of this risk measure for the current and previous financial years - expressed as a percentage of reported net interest income. The sign indicates the nature of the rate sensitivity with a positive number signifying that a rate increase is positive for net interest income over the next 12 months. Conversely, a negative number signifies that a rate increase is negative for the next 12 months net interest income.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Impact of 1% Rate Shock |
|
|
|
|
|
As at 30 September |
|
1.48 |
% |
1.67 |
% |
Maximum exposure |
|
1.53 |
% |
1.67 |
% |
Minimum exposure |
|
(0.09 |
)% |
(0.86 |
)% |
Average exposure |
|
0.69 |
% |
0.54 |
% |
The extent of mismatching between the repricing characteristics and timing of interest bearing assets and liabilities at any point has implications for future net interest income. On a global basis, the Group quantifies the potential variation in future net interest income as a result of these repricing mismatches each month using a static gap model.
The repricing gaps themselves are constructed based on contractual repricing information. However, for those assets and liabilities where the contractual term to repricing is not considered to be reflective of the actual interest rate sensitivity (for example, products priced at the Groups discretion), a profile based on historically observed and/or anticipated rate sensitivity is used. This treatment excludes the effect of basis risk between customer pricing and wholesale market pricing. For example, when wholesale market rates are anticipating an official rate increase the Group does not reprice certain customer business until the first repricing date after the official rate rise.
The majority of the Groups non-traded interest exposure exists in Australia and New Zealand. In these centres, a separate balance sheet simulation process supplements this static gap information. This allows the net interest income outcomes of a number of different scenarios - with different market interest rate environments and future balance sheet structures - to be identified. This better enables the Group to accurately quantify the interest rate risks associated with the balance sheet, and to formulate strategies to manage current and future risk profiles.
72
Foreign Currency Related Risks
The Groups investment of capital in non-Australian operations generates an exposure to changes in the relative value of individual currencies against the Australian Dollar. Variations in the value of these foreign currency investments are reflected in the Foreign Currency Translation Reserve.
The Group incurs some non-traded foreign currency risk related to the potential repatriation of profits from non-Australian business units. This risk is routinely monitored and hedging is conducted where it is likely to add shareholder value. Revenue related hedge contracts outstanding at 30 September 2004 were USD 36 million and NED 3,450 million.
The risk relating to mismatching of non-traded foreign currency assets and liabilities has not been presented, as this type of risk is minimal for the Group.
The following table represents the interest rate sensitivity as at 30 September 2004 of the Groups assets, liabilities and off balance sheet instruments repricing (that is, when interest rates applicable to each asset or liability can be changed) in the periods shown.
Repricing gaps are based upon contractual repricing information except where the contractual terms are not considered to be reflective of actual interest rate sensitivity, for example, those assets and liabilities priced at the Groups discretion. In such cases, the rate sensitivity is based upon historically observed and/or anticipated rate sensitivity.
Sensitivity to interest rates arises from mismatches in the period to repricing of assets and that of the corresponding liability funding. These mismatches are managed within policy guidelines for mismatch positions.
At 30 September 2004 |
|
Less than |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
Not |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Liquid assets and due from other financial institutions |
|
8,030 |
|
788 |
|
508 |
|
823 |
|
6 |
|
989 |
|
11,144 |
|
Trading and investment securities |
|
8,326 |
|
1,261 |
|
1,538 |
|
1,667 |
|
293 |
|
139 |
|
13,224 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
147,883 |
|
8,415 |
|
12,914 |
|
36,740 |
|
673 |
|
(1,663 |
) |
204,962 |
|
Other assets |
|
383 |
|
134 |
|
127 |
|
607 |
|
5 |
|
28,759 |
|
30,015 |
|
Total assets |
|
164,622 |
|
10,598 |
|
15,087 |
|
39,837 |
|
977 |
|
28,224 |
|
259,345 |
|
Certificates of deposit and term deposits |
|
54,245 |
|
7,596 |
|
4,574 |
|
4,199 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
70,621 |
|
Other deposits |
|
53,843 |
|
843 |
|
1,648 |
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
7,927 |
|
69,258 |
|
Other borrowings and due to other financial institutions |
|
27,733 |
|
2,784 |
|
2,844 |
|
1,805 |
|
7 |
|
854 |
|
36,027 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
127 |
|
151 |
|
186 |
|
749 |
|
166 |
|
28,058 |
|
29,437 |
|
Bonds, notes and loan capital |
|
18,738 |
|
2,474 |
|
962 |
|
9,955 |
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
36,077 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
154,686 |
|
13,848 |
|
10,214 |
|
21,705 |
|
4,128 |
|
36,839 |
|
241,420 |
|
Shareholders equity and outside equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,925 |
|
17,925 |
|
Off balance sheet items affecting interest rate sensitivity |
|
6,655 |
|
3,114 |
|
(8,887 |
) |
(4,777 |
) |
3,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitivity gap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net |
|
16,591 |
|
(136 |
) |
(4,014 |
) |
13,355 |
|
744 |
|
(26,540 |
) |
|
|
cumulative |
|
16,591 |
|
16,455 |
|
12,441 |
|
25,796 |
|
26,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
The bulk of the Groups loan/deposit business is conducted in the domestic balance sheets of Australia and New Zealand and is priced on a floating rate basis. The mix of repricing maturities in these books is influenced by the underlying financial needs of customers.
Offshore operations, which are generally wholesale in nature, are able to minimise interest rate sensitivity through closely matching the maturity of loans and deposits. Given both the size and nature of their business, the interest rate sensitivities of these balance sheets contribute little to the aggregate risk exposure, which is primarily a reflection of the positions in Australia and New Zealand.
In Australia and New Zealand, a combination of pricing initiatives and off-balance sheet instruments are used in the management of interest rate risk. For example, where a strong medium to long term rate view is held, hedging and pricing strategies are used to modify the profiles rate sensitivity so that it is positioned to take advantage of the expected movement in interest rates. However, such positions are taken within the overall risk limits specified by policy.
73
The following table represents the interest rate sensitivity as at 30 September 2003 of the Groups assets, liabilities and off balance sheet instruments repricing (that is, when interest rates applicable to each asset or liability can be changed) in the periods shown.
At 30 September 2003 |
|
Less than |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
Not |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Liquid assets and due from other financial institutions |
|
6,857 |
|
388 |
|
103 |
|
47 |
|
36 |
|
1,588 |
|
9,019 |
|
Trading and investment securities |
|
4,452 |
|
890 |
|
1,231 |
|
2,059 |
|
291 |
|
57 |
|
8,980 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
117,209 |
|
6,796 |
|
7,201 |
|
18,804 |
|
466 |
|
(1,011 |
) |
149,465 |
|
Other assets |
|
640 |
|
61 |
|
92 |
|
828 |
|
58 |
|
26,448 |
|
28,127 |
|
Total assets |
|
129,158 |
|
8,135 |
|
8,627 |
|
21,738 |
|
851 |
|
27,082 |
|
195,591 |
|
Certificates of deposit and term deposits |
|
39,945 |
|
4,313 |
|
2,634 |
|
2,158 |
|
44 |
|
|
|
49,094 |
|
Other deposits |
|
43,002 |
|
471 |
|
956 |
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
5,831 |
|
53,231 |
|
Other borrowings and due to other financial institutions |
|
20,408 |
|
2,591 |
|
2,352 |
|
2,024 |
|
35 |
|
1,226 |
|
28,636 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
480 |
|
19 |
|
65 |
|
441 |
|
117 |
|
27,519 |
|
28,641 |
|
Bonds, notes and loan capital |
|
10,384 |
|
1,273 |
|
241 |
|
8,466 |
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
22,202 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
114,219 |
|
8,667 |
|
6,248 |
|
16,060 |
|
2,034 |
|
34,576 |
|
181,804 |
|
Shareholders equity and outside equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,787 |
|
13,787 |
|
Off balance sheet items affecting interest rate sensitivity |
|
(4,818 |
) |
(111 |
) |
(1,214 |
) |
5,227 |
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitivity gap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net |
|
10,121 |
|
(643 |
) |
1,165 |
|
10,905 |
|
(267 |
) |
(21,281 |
) |
|
|
cumulative |
|
10,121 |
|
9,478 |
|
10,643 |
|
21,548 |
|
21,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
74
37: NET FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Australian Accounting Standard AASB 1033: Presentation and Disclosure of Financial Instruments (AASB 1033) requires disclosure of the net fair value of on and off balance sheet financial instruments. The disclosures exclude all non-financial instruments, such as income taxes and regulatory deposits, and specified financial instruments, such as interests in controlled entities. The aggregate net fair value amounts do not represent the underlying value of the Group.
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arms length transaction. Net fair value is the fair value adjusted for transaction costs.
Quoted market prices, where available, are adjusted for material transaction costs and used as the measure of net fair value. In cases where quoted market values are not available, net fair values are based on present value estimates or other valuation techniques. For the majority of short-term financial instruments, defined as those which reprice or mature in 90 days or less, with no significant change in credit risk, the net fair value was assumed to equate to the carrying amount in the Groups statement of financial position.
The fair values are based on relevant information available as at 30 September 2004. While judgement is used in obtaining the net fair value of financial instruments, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Many of the estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgement, and changes in underlying assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. Furthermore, market prices or rates of discount are not available for many of the financial instruments valued and surrogates have been used which may not reflect the price that would apply in an actual sale.
The net fair value amounts have not been updated for the purposes of these financial statements since 30 September 2004, and therefore the net fair value of the financial instruments subsequent to 30 September 2004 may be different from the amounts reported.
|
|
Net fair value |
|
Carrying value |
|
||||
Financial Assets |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Liquid assets |
|
6,363 |
|
6,592 |
|
6,363 |
|
6,592 |
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
4,781 |
|
2,427 |
|
4,781 |
|
2,427 |
|
Trading securities |
|
5,478 |
|
4,213 |
|
5,478 |
|
4,213 |
|
Investment securities, shares in associates and joint venture entities |
|
9,786 |
|
6,706 |
|
9,706 |
|
6,581 |
|
Loans and advances |
|
206,788 |
|
151,058 |
|
204,962 |
|
149,465 |
|
Customers liabilities for acceptances |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
Other financial assets |
|
9,458 |
|
10,618 |
|
9,088 |
|
9,824 |
|
LIQUID ASSETS AND DUE FROM OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
The carrying values of these financial instruments are considered to approximate their net fair values as they are short-term in nature or are receivable on demand.
TRADING SECURITIES
Trading securities are carried at market value. Market value is generally based on quoted market prices, broker or dealer price quotations, or prices for securities with similar credit risk, maturity and yield characteristics.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Net fair value is based on quoted market prices or broker or dealer price quotations. If this information is not available, net fair value has been estimated using quoted market prices for securities with similar credit, maturity and yield characteristics.
SHARES IN ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURE ENTITIES
Net fair value is based on quoted market prices or broker or dealer price quotations. If this information is not available net fair value has been estimated using quoted market prices for securities with similar credit, maturity and yield characteristics, or by reference to the net tangible asset backing of the investee.
75
LOANS, ADVANCES AND CUSTOMERS LIABILITIES FOR ACCEPTANCES
The carrying value of loans, advances and acceptances is net of specific and general provisions for doubtful debts and income yet to mature. The estimated net fair value of loans, advances and acceptances is based on the discounted amount of estimated future cash flows and accordingly has not been adjusted for either specific or general provisions for doubtful debts.
Estimated contractual cash flows for performing loans are discounted at estimated current bank credit spreads to determine fair value. For loans with doubt as to collection, expected cash flows (inclusive of the value of security) are discounted using a rate which includes a premium for the uncertainty of the flows.
The difference between estimated net fair values of loans, advances and acceptances and carrying value reflects changes in interest rates and the credit worthiness of borrowers since loan origination.
Net lease receivables, with a carrying value of $3,079 million (2003: $2,996 million) and a net fair value of $3,080 million (2003: $3,003 million), are included in loans and advances.
OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS
Included in this category are accrued interest, fees receivable and derivative financial instruments. The carrying values of accrued interest and fees receivable are considered to approximate their net fair values as they are short term in nature or are receivable on demand.
The fair values of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and currency swaps were calculated using discounted cash flow models based on current market yields for similar types of instruments and the maturity of each instrument. Foreign exchange contracts and interest rate option contracts were valued using market prices and option valuation models as appropriate.
Properties held for resale, deferred tax assets and prepaid expenses are not considered financial assets.
|
|
Net fair value |
|
Carrying value |
|
||||
Financial Liabilities |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
7,349 |
|
6,467 |
|
7,349 |
|
6,467 |
|
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
168,542 |
|
124,519 |
|
168,557 |
|
124,494 |
|
Liability for acceptances |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
12,466 |
|
13,178 |
|
Bonds and notes |
|
27,747 |
|
16,837 |
|
27,602 |
|
16,572 |
|
Loan capital |
|
8,540 |
|
5,640 |
|
8,475 |
|
5,630 |
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
13,665 |
|
13,285 |
|
13,525 |
|
13,062 |
|
DUE TO OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
The carrying value of amounts due to other financial institutions is considered to approximate the net fair value.
DEPOSITS AND OTHER BORROWINGS
The net fair value of a deposit liability without a specified maturity or at call is deemed by AASB 1033 to be the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value is not adjusted for any value expected to be derived from retaining the deposit for a future period of time.
For interest bearing fixed maturity deposits and other borrowings and acceptances without quoted market prices, market borrowing rates of interest for debt with a similar maturity are used to discount contractual cash flows.
BONDS AND NOTES AND LOAN CAPITAL
The aggregate net fair value of bonds and notes and loan capital at 30 September 2004 was calculated based on quoted market prices. For those debt issues where quoted market prices were not available, a discounted cash flow model using a yield curve appropriate for the remaining term to maturity of the instrument was used.
OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
This category includes accrued interest and fees payable for which the carrying amount is considered to approximate the fair value. Also included are derivative financial instruments, where fair value is determined on the basis described under Other financial assets.
Income tax liabilities, other provisions and accrued charges are not considered financial liabilities.
76
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As outlined in note 48, the Group has various credit related commitments. Based upon the level of fees currently charged for granting such commitments, taking into account maturity and interest rates, together with any changes in the creditworthiness of counterparties since origination of the commitments, their estimated replacement or net fair value is not material.
TRANSACTION COSTS
The fair value of financial instruments required to be disclosed under US accounting standard, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS 107) is calculated without regard to estimated transaction costs. Such transaction costs are not material, and accordingly the fair values shown above would not differ materially from fair values calculated in accordance with SFAS 107.
38: DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
DERIVATIVES
Derivative instruments are contracts whose value is derived from one or more underlying financial instruments or indices. They include swaps, forward rate agreements, futures, options and combinations of these instruments. The use of derivatives and their sale to customers as risk management products is an integral part of the Groups trading activities. Derivatives are also used to manage the Groups own exposure to fluctuations in exchange and interest rates as part of its asset and liability management activities and are classified as other than trading. Derivatives are subject to the same types of credit and market risk as other financial instruments, and the Group manages these risks in a consistent manner.
The principal exchange rate contracts used by the Group are forward foreign exchange contracts, currency swaps and currency options. Forward foreign exchange contracts are agreements to buy or sell a specified quantity of foreign currency on a specified future date at an agreed rate. A currency swap generally involves the exchange, or notional exchange, of equivalent amounts of two currencies and a commitment to exchange interest periodically until the principal amounts are re-exchanged on a future date. Currency options provide the buyer with the right, but not the obligation, either to purchase or sell a fixed amount of a currency at a specified rate on or before a future date. As compensation for assuming the option risk, the option writer generally receives a premium at the start of the option period.
The principal interest rate contracts used by the Group are forward rate agreements, interest rate futures, interest rate swaps and options. Forward rate agreements are contracts for the payment of the difference between a specified interest rate and a reference rate on a notional deposit at a future settlement date. There is no exchange of principal. An interest rate future is an exchange traded contract for the delivery of a standardised amount of a fixed income security or time deposit at a future date. Interest rate swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts.
Derivative transactions generate income for the Group from buy/sell spreads and from trading positions taken by the Group. Income from these transactions is taken to net interest income, foreign exchange earnings or profit on trading instruments. Income or expense on derivatives entered into for balance sheet and revenue hedging purposes is accrued and recorded as an adjustment to the interest income or expense of the related hedged item.
CREDIT RISK
The credit risk of derivative financial instruments arises from the potential for a counterparty to default on its contractual obligation. Credit risk arises when market movements are such that the derivative has a positive value to the Group. It is the cost of replacing the contract in the event of counterparty default. The Group limits its credit risk within a conservative framework by dealing with creditworthy counterparties, setting credit limits on exposures to counterparties, and obtaining collateral where appropriate.
The following table provides an overview of the Groups exchange rate, credit, commodity and interest rate derivatives. It includes all trading and other than trading contracts. Notional principal amounts measure the amount of the underlying physical or financial commodity and represent the volume of outstanding transactions. They are not a measure of the risk associated with a derivative.
The credit equivalent amount is calculated in accordance with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authoritys Capital Adequacy guidelines. It combines the aggregate gross replacement cost with an allowance for the potential increase in value over the remaining term of the transaction should market conditions change.
The fair value of a derivative represents the aggregate net present value of the cash inflows and outflows required to extinguish the rights and obligations arising from the derivative in an orderly market as at the reporting date. Fair value does not indicate future gains or losses, but rather the unrealised gains and losses from marking to market all derivatives at a particular point in time.
77
|
|
Notional |
|
Credit |
|
Fair value |
|
Notional |
|
Credit |
|
Fair value |
|
Consolidated |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot and forward contracts |
|
183,825 |
|
3,216 |
|
(1,411 |
) |
144,687 |
|
3,717 |
|
(683 |
) |
Swap agreements |
|
51,437 |
|
3,095 |
|
(25 |
) |
42,528 |
|
3,124 |
|
(121 |
) |
Futures contracts(1) |
|
251 |
|
n/a |
|
2 |
|
353 |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Options purchased |
|
13,288 |
|
398 |
|
224 |
|
10,971 |
|
433 |
|
395 |
|
Options sold(2) |
|
18,852 |
|
n/a |
|
(226 |
) |
15,889 |
|
n/a |
|
(451 |
) |
Other contracts |
|
2,686 |
|
436 |
|
115 |
|
3,818 |
|
408 |
|
112 |
|
|
|
270,339 |
|
7,145 |
|
(1,321 |
) |
218,246 |
|
7,682 |
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward rate agreements |
|
39,572 |
|
9 |
|
5 |
|
47,617 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
Swap agreements |
|
321,585 |
|
3,682 |
|
424 |
|
236,083 |
|
3,232 |
|
487 |
|
Futures contracts(1) |
|
38,270 |
|
n/a |
|
4 |
|
13,458 |
|
n/a |
|
3 |
|
Options purchased |
|
12,810 |
|
111 |
|
64 |
|
11,961 |
|
117 |
|
61 |
|
Options sold(2) |
|
15,214 |
|
n/a |
|
(35 |
) |
13,987 |
|
n/a |
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
427,451 |
|
3,802 |
|
462 |
|
323,106 |
|
3,359 |
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps(3) |
|
11,743 |
|
3,381 |
|
31 |
|
8,520 |
|
2,836 |
|
73 |
|
|
|
709,533 |
|
14,328 |
|
(828 |
) |
549,872 |
|
13,877 |
|
(136 |
) |
(1) Credit equivalent amounts have not been included as there is minimal credit risk associated with exchange traded futures where the clearing house is the counterparty
(2) Options sold have no credit exposure, as they represent obligations rather than assets
(3) Credit default swaps include structured financing transactions that expose the Group to the performance of certain assets. The total investment of the Group in these transactions is USD 750 million (2003: USD 750 million)
78
The maturity structure of derivative activity is a primary component of potential credit exposure. The table below shows the remaining maturity profile by class of derivatives, based on notional principal amounts. The table also shows the notional principal amounts of the derivatives held for trading and other than trading purposes.
|
|
Remaining life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Consolidated |
|
Less than |
|
1 to 5 years |
|
Greater than |
|
Total |
|
Trading |
|
Other than |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot and forward contracts |
|
178,501 |
|
5,033 |
|
291 |
|
183,825 |
|
162,072 |
|
21,753 |
|
Swap agreements |
|
9,945 |
|
33,631 |
|
7,861 |
|
51,437 |
|
13,670 |
|
37,767 |
|
Futures contracts |
|
243 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
251 |
|
|
|
Options purchased |
|
12,361 |
|
863 |
|
64 |
|
13,288 |
|
13,288 |
|
|
|
Options sold |
|
18,001 |
|
789 |
|
62 |
|
18,852 |
|
18,852 |
|
|
|
Other contracts |
|
1,015 |
|
1,436 |
|
235 |
|
2,686 |
|
2,681 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
220,066 |
|
41,760 |
|
8,513 |
|
270,339 |
|
210,814 |
|
59,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward rate agreements |
|
39,514 |
|
58 |
|
|
|
39,572 |
|
31,437 |
|
8,135 |
|
Swap agreements |
|
121,594 |
|
153,556 |
|
46,435 |
|
321,585 |
|
248,186 |
|
73,399 |
|
Futures contracts |
|
35,759 |
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
38,270 |
|
32,498 |
|
5,772 |
|
Options purchased |
|
4,546 |
|
7,680 |
|
584 |
|
12,810 |
|
12,773 |
|
37 |
|
Options sold |
|
7,506 |
|
7,267 |
|
441 |
|
15,214 |
|
15,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
208,919 |
|
171,072 |
|
47,460 |
|
427,451 |
|
340,108 |
|
87,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps |
|
1,310 |
|
9,472 |
|
961 |
|
11,743 |
|
8,775 |
|
2,968 |
|
Total |
|
430,295 |
|
222,304 |
|
56,934 |
|
709,533 |
|
559,697 |
|
149,836 |
|
|
|
Remaining life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Consolidated |
|
Less than |
|
1 to 5 years |
|
Greater than |
|
Total |
|
Trading |
|
Other than |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot and forward contracts |
|
138,559 |
|
5,677 |
|
451 |
|
144,687 |
|
130,825 |
|
13,862 |
|
Swap agreements |
|
9,632 |
|
24,616 |
|
8,280 |
|
42,528 |
|
17,763 |
|
24,765 |
|
Futures contracts |
|
348 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
353 |
|
|
|
Options purchased |
|
10,002 |
|
792 |
|
177 |
|
10,971 |
|
10,971 |
|
|
|
Options sold |
|
14,475 |
|
1,228 |
|
186 |
|
15,889 |
|
15,889 |
|
|
|
Other contracts |
|
1,379 |
|
2,258 |
|
181 |
|
3,818 |
|
3,808 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
174,395 |
|
34,576 |
|
9,275 |
|
218,246 |
|
179,609 |
|
38,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward rate agreements |
|
47,090 |
|
527 |
|
|
|
47,617 |
|
42,764 |
|
4,853 |
|
Swap agreements |
|
94,922 |
|
106,612 |
|
34,549 |
|
236,083 |
|
186,760 |
|
49,323 |
|
Futures contracts |
|
13,114 |
|
344 |
|
|
|
13,458 |
|
13,458 |
|
|
|
Options purchased |
|
5,407 |
|
5,790 |
|
764 |
|
11,961 |
|
11,961 |
|
|
|
Options sold |
|
13,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,987 |
|
13,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
174,520 |
|
113,273 |
|
35,313 |
|
323,106 |
|
268,930 |
|
54,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps |
|
2,157 |
|
6,287 |
|
76 |
|
8,520 |
|
5,298 |
|
3,222 |
|
Total |
|
351,072 |
|
154,136 |
|
44,664 |
|
549,872 |
|
453,837 |
|
96,035 |
|
79
Concentrations of credit risk exist for groups of counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics. Major concentrations of credit risk arise by location and type of customer.
The following table shows the concentrations of credit risk, by class of counterparty and by geographic location, measured by credit equivalent amount.
Approximately 47% (2003: 54%) of the Groups exposures are with counterparties which are either Australian banks or banks based in other OECD countries.
Consolidated |
|
OECD |
|
Australian |
|
Corporations, |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
147 |
|
5,258 |
|
6,534 |
|
11,939 |
|
New Zealand |
|
12 |
|
1,228 |
|
839 |
|
2,079 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
2 |
|
212 |
|
96 |
|
310 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
6,698 |
|
7,469 |
|
14,328 |
|
Consolidated |
|
OECD |
|
Australian |
|
Corporations, |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
227 |
|
6,559 |
|
5,531 |
|
12,317 |
|
New Zealand |
|
21 |
|
531 |
|
506 |
|
1,058 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
3 |
|
386 |
|
113 |
|
502 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
7,476 |
|
6,150 |
|
13,877 |
|
80
The next table shows the fair values of the Groups derivatives by product type, disaggregated into gross unrealised gains and gross unrealised losses.
The fair value of a derivative represents the aggregate net present value of the cash inflows and outflows required to extinguish the rights and obligations arising from the derivative in an orderly market as at the reporting date. Fair value does not indicate future gains or losses, but rather the unrealised gains and losses from marking to market all derivatives at a particular point in time.
|
|
Other than Trading |
|
Trading |
|
Trading |
|
||||||
Consolidated |
|
Fair value |
|
Fair value |
|
Fair value |
|
Fair value |
|
Fair value |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot and forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
875 |
|
628 |
|
687 |
|
1,923 |
|
1,719 |
|
1,284 |
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
(2,392 |
) |
(2,509 |
) |
(581 |
) |
(725 |
) |
(927 |
) |
(794 |
) |
Swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
532 |
|
397 |
|
110 |
|
776 |
|
498 |
|
554 |
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
(430 |
) |
(283 |
) |
(237 |
) |
(1,011 |
) |
(254 |
) |
(672 |
) |
Futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
395 |
|
352 |
|
270 |
|
Options sold |
|
|
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
(451 |
) |
(337 |
) |
(326 |
) |
Other contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
245 |
|
247 |
|
315 |
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
|
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
(133 |
) |
(111 |
) |
(136 |
) |
|
|
(1,415 |
) |
(1,767 |
) |
94 |
|
1,019 |
|
1,187 |
|
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward rate agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
13 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(1 |
) |
Swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
467 |
|
402 |
|
1,825 |
|
1,843 |
|
2,127 |
|
1,885 |
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
(181 |
) |
(228 |
) |
(1,687 |
) |
(1,530 |
) |
(1,790 |
) |
(1,561 |
) |
Futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
6 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
|
41 |
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
(48 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(37 |
) |
Options purchased |
|
8 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
61 |
|
65 |
|
79 |
|
Options sold |
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
(23 |
) |
(36 |
) |
(58 |
) |
Other contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
174 |
|
166 |
|
365 |
|
377 |
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealised gains |
|
42 |
|
74 |
|
44 |
|
34 |
|
37 |
|
44 |
|
Gross unrealised losses |
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
(35 |
) |
(42 |
) |
(69 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
74 |
|
(5 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(25 |
) |
Total |
|
(1,083 |
) |
(1,519 |
) |
255 |
|
1,383 |
|
1,559 |
|
825 |
|
The fair values of derivatives vary over time depending on movements in interest and exchange rates and the trading or hedging strategies used
81
The Group classifies derivatives into two types according to the purpose they are entered into: trading or hedging.
In addition to customer and trading activities, the Group uses, inter alia, derivatives to manage the risk associated with its balance sheet and future revenue streams. The principal objectives of asset and liability management are to hedge the market value of the Groups capital and to manage and control the sensitivity of the Groups income while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk. The Group also uses a variety of foreign exchange derivatives to hedge against adverse movements in the value of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities and future revenue streams.
Income and loss relating to trading derivatives is reported in the statement of financial performance as other operating income. The fair value of trading derivatives is recorded on a gross basis as other assets or other liabilities as appropriate unless there is a legal right of set off. The fair value of a derivative financial instrument is the net present value of future expected cash flows arising from that instrument.
In order to be classified as a hedging derivative the hedging relationship must be expected to be effective.
An effective hedging relationship is one where there is expected to be a high degree of negative correlation between changes in the fair value of the financial asset being hedged and the derivative nominated as the hedging instrument. This effectiveness is assessed on initial classification of the hedging relationship. A hedging relationship is either effective or non effective in its entirety, no accounting adjustment is made for an assessed percentage of ineffectiveness. Where a hedging relationship is deemed effective it is accounted for in the same manner as the underlying asset or liability it is hedging. Australian GAAP does not require adjustment to be made for ineffectiveness. For the purposes of US GAAP, adjustment is made for hedges which are considered ineffective in note 55, page 108 in the item described as Mark to market and non compliant derivative hedges (under SFAS133).
The Group utilizes the following derivatives to hedge the following types of risk:
Interest Rate Risk - interest rate futures, interest rate swaps (both vanilla and cross currency), forward rate agreements and options.
Foreign Currency Risk - forward foreign exchange contracts, currency swaps, currency options.
Credit Risk - credit default swaps.
Hedging derivatives are accounted for in the same manner as the underlying asset or liability they are hedging. For example, if the hedged instrument is accounted for using the accrual method, the hedging instrument will also be accounted for using the accrual method.
During the year NZD2.4 billion hedge of NZD revenue were put in place to lock in historically high NZD exchange rates. Hedge contracts outstanding at 30 September 2004 totalled NZD3.7 billion.
The table below shows the notional principal amount, credit equivalent amount and fair value of derivatives held by the Group, split between those entered into for customer-related and trading purposes, and those entered into for balance sheet hedging and revenue related hedging.
Consolidated |
|
Notional |
|
Credit |
|
Fair |
|
Notional |
|
Credit |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Foreign exchange and commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related and trading purposes |
|
210,814 |
|
4,511 |
|
94 |
|
179,609 |
|
5,795 |
|
1,019 |
|
Balance sheet hedging purposes |
|
56,039 |
|
2,585 |
|
(1,371 |
) |
37,360 |
|
1,874 |
|
(1,857 |
) |
Revenue related hedging |
|
3,486 |
|
49 |
|
(44 |
) |
1,277 |
|
13 |
|
90 |
|
|
|
270,339 |
|
7,145 |
|
(1,321 |
) |
218,246 |
|
7,682 |
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related and trading purposes |
|
340,108 |
|
3,163 |
|
166 |
|
268,930 |
|
2,931 |
|
365 |
|
Balance sheet hedging purposes |
|
87,343 |
|
639 |
|
296 |
|
54,176 |
|
428 |
|
174 |
|
|
|
427,451 |
|
3,802 |
|
462 |
|
323,106 |
|
3,359 |
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related and trading purposes |
|
8,775 |
|
745 |
|
(5 |
) |
5,298 |
|
427 |
|
(1 |
) |
Balance sheet hedging purposes |
|
2,968 |
|
2,636 |
|
36 |
|
3,222 |
|
2,409 |
|
74 |
|
|
|
11,743 |
|
3,381 |
|
31 |
|
8,520 |
|
2,836 |
|
73 |
|
Total |
|
709,533 |
|
14,328 |
|
(828 |
) |
549,872 |
|
13,877 |
|
(136 |
) |
Detailed below are the net deferred realised and unrealised gains and losses arising from other than trading contracts used to hedge interest rate exposure or to hedge anticipated transactions. These gains and losses are deferred only to the extent that there is an offsetting unrecognised gain or loss on the exposure being hedged. Deferred gains or losses are generally amortised over the expected term of the hedged exposure.
|
|
Foreign Exchange |
|
Interest Rate and Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Consolidated |
|
2004 |
|
Contracts |
|
2004 |
|
Contracts |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Expected recognition in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
(37 |
) |
47 |
|
71 |
|
214 |
|
34 |
|
261 |
|
One to two years |
|
(14 |
) |
26 |
|
127 |
|
86 |
|
113 |
|
112 |
|
Two to five years |
|
|
|
14 |
|
40 |
|
117 |
|
40 |
|
131 |
|
Greater than five years |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(5 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
87 |
|
235 |
|
412 |
|
184 |
|
499 |
|
82
39: SECURITISATION
During the year ended 30 September 2004, the Group securitised residential mortgage loans amounting to $1,481 million (2003: $nil).
All securitised loans have been removed from the Groups balance sheet and transferred to third party special purpose entities (SPEs).
The Group retains servicing and (for some loans) custodian responsibilities for the loans sold. Following a securitisation, the Group receives fees for servicing the loans, custodian fees, fees for facilities provided and any excess income derived by the SPE after interest has been paid to investors and net credit losses and expenses absorbed.
The Group does not hold any material retained interest in the loans that have been sold. There is no recourse against the Group if cash flows from the securitised loans are inadequate to service the obligations of the SPE except to the limited extent provided in the transaction documents through the provision of arms length services and facilities.
The securities issued by the SPEs do not represent deposits or other liabilities of the Company or the Group. Neither the Company nor the Group in any way stands behind the capital value or performance of the securities or the assets of the SPEs except to the limited extent provided in the transaction documents through the provision of arms length services and facilities.
The Group may also provide liquidity facilities and other forms of credit enhancement to ensure adequate funds are available to the SPEs. The facilities are undrawn. The Group also provides hedging facilities to the SPEs to mitigate interest rate and currency risks. All these transactions are completed on an arms length basis.
The following table summarises the cash flows from the SPEs to the Group in respect of assets securitised by the Group.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Proceeds from securitising loans |
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
Servicing fees received |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
Other cash inflows |
|
7 |
|
13 |
|
40: LIFE INSURANCE
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
|
|
2004(1) |
|
2003 |
|
2002(1) |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Reconciliation of Life Insurance margin on services operating income to profit after income tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium and related revenue |
|
25 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
Investment revenue |
|
2 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Claims expense |
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
Insurance policy liabilities expense |
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
Life insurance margin on services operating income |
|
15 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
12 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Profit after income tax |
|
12 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after income tax arose from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movements in policy liabilities separated between: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned margin of revenues over expenses released |
|
12 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Difference between actual and assumed experience |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Investment earnings on assets in excess of policy liabilities |
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Profit after income tax |
|
12 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
(1) Results for 2002 include the profits of ANZ Life Assurance Company Limited, which was sold into a joint venture with ING in April 2002. Results for 2004 include the profits of NBNZ Life Insurance Limited, which was acquired as part of the purchase of NBNZ in December 2003
83
41: SEGMENT ANALYSIS
For management purposes the Group is organised into seven major business segments including Personal Banking Australia, Institutional, New Zealand Business, Corporate Australia, Esanda and UDC, Asia Pacific and ING Australia. An expanded description of the principal activities for each of the business segments is contained in the Glossary on pages 141 to 142.
A summarised description of each business segment is shown below:
Personal Banking Australia |
Comprises the activities of Personal Distribution (including Rural Banking), Banking Products, Cards and Merchant Services and Mortgages. Personal Distribution and Banking Products encompasses branches, call centres, on-line banking, as well as financial advisory products and services. Mortgages provides mortgage finance serviced by residential real estate in Australia and New Zealand. Cards and Merchant Services provides consumer and commercial credit cards, ePayment products, personal loans, merchant payment facilities and automatic teller machines |
|
|
Institutional |
Comprises businesses that provide a full range of financial services to the Groups largest corporate and institutional customers |
|
|
New Zealand Business |
Provides a full range of banking services including wealth management and card services, for personal, small business and corporate customers in New Zealand |
|
|
Corporate Australia |
Comprises corporate banking, business banking and small business banking in Australia |
|
|
Esanda and UDC |
Provides vehicle and equipment finance and rental services. Operates in Australia as Esanda and Esanda FleetPartners and in New Zealand as UDC and Esanda FleetPartners |
|
|
Asia Pacific |
Provides retail banking services in the Asia and Pacific regions, including ANZs share of PT Panin Bank in Indonesia |
|
|
ING Australia |
A joint venture between ANZ and ING Group provides integrated manufacture and distribution of wealth creation, management and protection products and services aligned to ANZ distribution channels and the open market |
As the composition of segments has changed over time, September 2003 comparatives have been adjusted to be consistent with the 2004 segment definitions. Comparatives for the year ended 30 September 2002 have not been provided because the data could not reasonably be disaggregated into the changed segments.
BUSINESS SEGMENT ANALYSIS(1),(2)
Consolidated |
|
Personal |
|
Institutional |
|
New |
|
Corporate |
|
Esanda |
|
Asia |
|
ING |
|
Other(3) |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
External interest income |
|
5,818 |
|
2,341 |
|
3,312 |
|
903 |
|
1,060 |
|
165 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
14,117 |
|
External interest expense |
|
(1,313 |
) |
(2,347 |
) |
(1,842 |
) |
(513 |
) |
(592 |
) |
(115 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(2,120 |
) |
(8,863 |
) |
Net inter segment interest |
|
(2,590 |
) |
658 |
|
(176 |
) |
248 |
|
(107 |
) |
100 |
|
(2 |
) |
1,869 |
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
1,915 |
|
652 |
|
1,294 |
|
638 |
|
361 |
|
150 |
|
(23 |
) |
267 |
|
5,254 |
|
Other external operating income |
|
828 |
|
1,298 |
|
518 |
|
270 |
|
103 |
|
100 |
|
(22 |
) |
151 |
|
3,246 |
|
Share of net profit/loss of equity accounted investments |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
45 |
|
138 |
|
(44 |
) |
145 |
|
Net intersegment income |
|
132 |
|
(24 |
) |
5 |
|
(98 |
) |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
Operating income |
|
2,879 |
|
1,927 |
|
1,817 |
|
810 |
|
455 |
|
295 |
|
93 |
|
369 |
|
8,645 |
|
Other external expenses |
|
(1,263 |
) |
(578 |
) |
(736 |
) |
(201 |
) |
(158 |
) |
(109 |
) |
2 |
|
(983 |
) |
(4,026 |
) |
Net intersegment expenses |
|
(288 |
) |
(123 |
) |
(130 |
) |
(58 |
) |
(28 |
) |
(29 |
) |
(2 |
) |
658 |
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
(1,551 |
) |
(701 |
) |
(866 |
) |
(259 |
) |
(186 |
) |
(138 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
(4,026 |
) |
Charge for doubtful debts |
|
(183 |
) |
(159 |
) |
(99 |
) |
(59 |
) |
(67 |
) |
(23 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
(632 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
(343 |
) |
(278 |
) |
(267 |
) |
(148 |
) |
(59 |
) |
(21 |
) |
15 |
|
(67 |
) |
(1,168 |
) |
Outside equity interests |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Profit after income tax |
|
802 |
|
788 |
|
584 |
|
344 |
|
143 |
|
111 |
|
108 |
|
(65 |
) |
2,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
(112 |
) |
(20 |
) |
(49 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(25 |
) |
(8 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
(309 |
) |
Amortisation of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
(146 |
) |
Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external assets |
|
93,738 |
|
55,736 |
|
55,870 |
|
18,992 |
|
14,524 |
|
2,379 |
|
1,777 |
|
16,329 |
|
259,345 |
|
Associate investments |
|
14 |
|
69 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
176 |
|
1,697 |
|
1 |
|
1,960 |
|
Acquisition of NBNZ assets including goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
43,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,011 |
|
Total external liabilities |
|
40,036 |
|
49,060 |
|
47,275 |
|
21,397 |
|
12,261 |
|
4,924 |
|
416 |
|
66,051 |
|
241,420 |
|
(1) Results are equity standardised
(2) Intersegment transfers are accounted for and determined on an arms length or cost recovery basis
(3) Includes Treasury, Operations, Technology & Shared Services, Corporate Centre, Risk Management, Group Financial Management and significant items
84
The following analysis details financial information by business segment.
Consolidated |
|
Personal |
|
Institutional |
|
New |
|
Corporate |
|
Esanda |
|
Asia |
|
ING |
|
Other(3) |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
External interest income |
|
4,625 |
|
2,170 |
|
1,060 |
|
734 |
|
1,005 |
|
167 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
10,215 |
|
External interest expense |
|
(1,044 |
) |
(2,087 |
) |
(475 |
) |
(403 |
) |
(512 |
) |
(123 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(1,244 |
) |
(5,904 |
) |
Net intersegment interest |
|
(1,810 |
) |
620 |
|
(88 |
) |
243 |
|
(143 |
) |
96 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
1,771 |
|
703 |
|
497 |
|
574 |
|
350 |
|
140 |
|
(16 |
) |
292 |
|
4,311 |
|
Other external operating income |
|
701 |
|
1,242 |
|
254 |
|
251 |
|
86 |
|
94 |
|
(9 |
) |
83 |
|
2,702 |
|
Share of net profit/loss of equity accounted investments |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
99 |
|
(51 |
) |
106 |
|
Net intersegment income |
|
121 |
|
(26 |
) |
5 |
|
(92 |
) |
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
2,593 |
|
1,922 |
|
756 |
|
733 |
|
428 |
|
289 |
|
74 |
|
324 |
|
7,119 |
|
Other external expenses |
|
(1,144 |
) |
(551 |
) |
(280 |
) |
(180 |
) |
(155 |
) |
(111 |
) |
2 |
|
(809 |
) |
(3,228 |
) |
Net intersegment expenses |
|
(295 |
) |
(124 |
) |
(122 |
) |
(54 |
) |
(24 |
) |
(31 |
) |
(2 |
) |
652 |
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
(1,439 |
) |
(675 |
) |
(402 |
) |
(234 |
) |
(179 |
) |
(142 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
(3,228 |
) |
Charge for doubtful debts |
|
(169 |
) |
(165 |
) |
(37 |
) |
(55 |
) |
(63 |
) |
(19 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
(614 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
(292 |
) |
(278 |
) |
(106 |
) |
(133 |
) |
(57 |
) |
(27 |
) |
8 |
|
(41 |
) |
(926 |
) |
Outside equity interests |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Profit after income tax |
|
693 |
|
802 |
|
211 |
|
311 |
|
129 |
|
100 |
|
82 |
|
20 |
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
(85 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(8 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
(247 |
) |
Amortisation of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
(18 |
) |
Financial Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external assets |
|
79,829 |
|
56,977 |
|
14,379 |
|
15,993 |
|
13,460 |
|
2,027 |
|
1,736 |
|
11,190 |
|
195,591 |
|
Associate investments |
|
12 |
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
117 |
|
1,648 |
|
4 |
|
1,814 |
|
Total external liabilities |
|
35,660 |
|
48,005 |
|
12,016 |
|
19,508 |
|
10,795 |
|
4,524 |
|
403 |
|
50,893 |
|
181,804 |
|
(1) Results are equity standardised
(2) Intersegment transfers are accounted for and determined on an arms length or cost recovery basis
(3) Includes Treasury, Operations, Technology & Shared Services, Corporate Centre, Risk Management and Group Financial Management
The following analysis details financial information by geographic location.
GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENT ANALYSIS(4),(5)
Consolidated |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
% |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
$m |
|
% |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
11,767 |
|
67 |
|
9,508 |
|
73 |
|
8,697 |
|
72 |
|
New Zealand |
|
4,632 |
|
27 |
|
2,149 |
|
17 |
|
1,917 |
|
16 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
1,109 |
|
6 |
|
1,366 |
|
10 |
|
1,393 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
17,508 |
|
100 |
|
13,023 |
|
100 |
|
12,007 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
170,455 |
|
66 |
|
151,538 |
|
77 |
|
135,050 |
|
74 |
|
New Zealand(6) |
|
69,801 |
|
27 |
|
25,696 |
|
13 |
|
23,799 |
|
13 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
19,089 |
|
7 |
|
18,357 |
|
10 |
|
24,256 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
259,345 |
|
100 |
|
195,591 |
|
100 |
|
183,105 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit before tax(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
2,785 |
|
70 |
|
2,371 |
|
72 |
|
2,391 |
|
74 |
|
New Zealand |
|
763 |
|
19 |
|
495 |
|
15 |
|
456 |
|
14 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
439 |
|
11 |
|
411 |
|
13 |
|
376 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
3,987 |
|
100 |
|
3,277 |
|
100 |
|
3,223 |
|
100 |
|
(4) Intersegment transfers are accounted for and determined on an arms length or cost recovery basis
(5) The geographic segments represent the locations in which the transaction was booked
(6) 2004 amount includes NBNZ assets, including goodwill acquired of $3.1 billion
(7) Includes outside equity interests
85
42: NOTES TO THE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
a) Reconciliation of net profit after income tax to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflows |
|
|
|
|
|
Inflows |
|
Net profit after income tax |
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
1,972 |
|
3,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net profit after income tax to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful debts |
|
632 |
|
614 |
|
860 |
|
433 |
|
464 |
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
455 |
|
265 |
|
226 |
|
220 |
|
193 |
|
Provision for employee entitlements, restructuring and other provisions |
|
429 |
|
219 |
|
248 |
|
352 |
|
87 |
|
Payments from provisions |
|
(395 |
) |
(349 |
) |
(436 |
) |
(390 |
) |
(248 |
) |
(Profit) loss on sale of premises and equipment |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
(5 |
) |
5 |
|
6 |
|
Provision for surplus lease space |
|
7 |
|
(11 |
) |
1 |
|
7 |
|
(1 |
) |
(Profit) on sale of controlled entities and associates |
|
|
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recovery from NHB litigation |
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Profit on sale of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealised (gain) loss on revaluation of treasury instruments |
|
(169 |
) |
262 |
|
(282 |
) |
(535 |
) |
216 |
|
Net decrease (increase) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
514 |
|
1,669 |
|
(1,030 |
) |
(1,147 |
) |
1,583 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
(478 |
) |
(189 |
) |
328 |
|
(326 |
) |
(144 |
) |
Accrued income |
|
|
|
51 |
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
Tax balances |
|
921 |
|
(386 |
) |
46 |
|
817 |
|
(447 |
) |
Amortisation of discounts/premiums included in interest income |
|
(27 |
) |
(19 |
) |
(30 |
) |
16 |
|
9 |
|
Net increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable |
|
605 |
|
180 |
|
(348 |
) |
377 |
|
184 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
75 |
|
69 |
|
(1 |
) |
(49 |
) |
228 |
|
Other |
|
(139 |
) |
(109 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(7 |
) |
14 |
|
Total adjustments |
|
2,435 |
|
2,271 |
|
(873 |
) |
(227 |
) |
2,181 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
5,250 |
|
4,619 |
|
1,449 |
|
1,745 |
|
5,249 |
|
b) Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents(1)
Cash and cash equivalents include liquid assets and amounts due from other financial institutions with an original term to maturity of less than 90 days. Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year as shown in the statements of cash flows are reconciled to the related items in the statements of financial position as follows
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Liquid assets less than 90 days |
|
4,998 |
|
5,509 |
|
4,821 |
|
2,408 |
|
2,834 |
|
Due from other financial institutions less than 90 days |
|
2,856 |
|
1,806 |
|
3,104 |
|
1,834 |
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
7,854 |
|
7,315 |
|
7,925 |
|
4,242 |
|
4,411 |
|
(1) At 30 September 2004, cash and cash equivalents totalling nil (2003: nil; 2002: nil) were not available for use outside the local operations due to exchange control regulations
86
c) Acquisitions and disposals(1)
Values retranslated at 30 September 2004 exchange rates
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Details of aggregate assets and liabilities of controlled entities and branches acquired, and disposed of, by the Group are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
2,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and advances |
|
32,215 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Trading securities |
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
169 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payables and other liabilities |
|
(2,588 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
(32,352 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
Provisions |
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unsubordinated debt |
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loan capital |
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired |
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Goodwill on acquisition |
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Consideration paid |
|
5,112 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Cash consideration paid |
|
4,842 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets disposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance investment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
5,090 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Life insurance policy liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,798 |
) |
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Fair value of net assets disposed |
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
Profit on disposal net of transaction costs |
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
Net consideration received/receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
Cash consideration received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) For details on acquisitions and disposals refer to note 18
d) Non-cash financing and investing activities
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Share capital issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
135 |
|
115 |
|
94 |
|
135 |
|
115 |
|
e) Financing arrangements
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
Available |
|
Unused |
|
Available |
|
Unused |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Financing arrangements which are available under normal financial arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit stand by arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby lines |
|
889 |
|
884 |
|
978 |
|
549 |
|
Other financing arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overdrafts and other financing arrangements |
|
4,115 |
|
433 |
|
3,376 |
|
352 |
|
Total finance available |
|
5,004 |
|
1,317 |
|
4,354 |
|
901 |
|
87
|
|
Incorporated in |
|
Nature of Business |
|
All controlled entities are 100% owned unless otherwise noted. |
|
|
|
|
|
The material controlled entities of the Group are: |
|
|
|
|
|
Amerika Samoa Bank Inc* |
|
Amerika Samoa |
|
Banking |
|
ANZ Capel Court Limited |
|
Australia |
|
Investment Banking |
|
ANZ Capital Funding Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Funding |
|
ANZ Capital Hedging Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Hedging |
|
ANZCOVER Insurance Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Self-Insurance |
|
ANZ (Delware) Inc* |
|
USA |
|
Finance |
|
ANZ Executors & Trustee Company Limited |
|
Australia |
|
Trustee/Nominee |
|
ANZ Financial Products Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Investment |
|
ANZ Funds Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Holding Company |
|
ANZ Bank (Europe) Limited* |
|
England |
|
Banking |
|
ANZ Bank (Samoa) Limited* |
|
Samoa |
|
Banking |
|
ANZ Holdings (New Zealand) Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Holding Company |
|
ANZ National Bank Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Banking |
|
ANZ National (Intl) Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Finance |
|
Arawata Finance Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Finance |
|
Burnley Investments Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Investment |
|
Whitelaw Investments* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Investment |
|
Gold Liquid Investments Limited* |
|
Cayman Islands |
|
Investment |
|
Arawata Holdings Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Holding Company |
|
Harcourt Corporation Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Investment |
|
Airlie Investments Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Investment |
|
Nerine Finance No. 2*(1) |
|
New Zealand |
|
Finance |
|
Endeavour Finance Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Finance |
|
Tui Endeavour Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Finance |
|
NBNZ Holdings Ltd* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Holding Company |
|
NBNZ Life Insurance Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Insurance |
|
Tui Securities Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Investment |
|
CNZ Investment Trust* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Investment |
|
UDC Finance Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Finance |
|
Truck Leasing Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Leasing |
|
ANZ International (Hong Kong) Limited* |
|
Hong Kong |
|
Holding Company |
|
ANZ Asia Limited* |
|
Hong Kong |
|
Banking |
|
ANZ Bank (Vanuatu) Limited* |
|
Vanuatu |
|
Banking |
|
ANZ International Private Limited* |
|
Singapore |
|
Finance |
|
ANZ Singapore Limited* |
|
Singapore |
|
Merchant Banking |
|
Bank of Kiribati Ltd*(1) |
|
Kiribati |
|
Banking |
|
LFD Limited |
|
Australia |
|
Holding Company |
|
Minerva Holdings Limited* |
|
England |
|
Holding Company |
|
ANZEF Limited* |
|
England |
|
Export Finance |
|
Norway Funds Limited* |
|
New Zealand |
|
Funding |
|
ANZ Investment Holdings Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Investment |
|
530 Collins Street Property Trust |
|
Australia |
|
Investment Activities |
|
ANZ Lenders Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited |
|
Australia |
|
Mortgage Insurance |
|
ANZ Orchard Investments Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Investment |
|
ANZ Rural Products Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Investment |
|
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (PNG) Limited* |
|
Papua New Guinea |
|
Banking |
|
Esanda Finance Corporation Limited |
|
Australia |
|
General Finance |
|
Fleet Partners Pty Limited |
|
Australia |
|
Finance |
|
NMRSB Pty Ltd |
|
Australia |
|
Investment |
|
PT ANZ Panin Bank*(1) |
|
Indonesia |
|
Banking |
|
Upspring Limited* |
|
England |
|
Investment |
|
* Audited by overseas KPMG firms
(1) Outside equity interests hold ordinary shares or units in the controlled entities listed above as follows: Bank of Kiribati - 150,000 $1 ordinary sharess (25%) (2003 : 150,000 $1 ordinary shares 25%); PT ANZ Panin Bank 7,500 IDR 1M shares (15%) (2003: 7,500 IDR 1M shares (15%); Nerine Finance No. 2 - 340,000,000 $1 redeemable preference shares (40%)
88
44: ASSOCIATES
Significant associates of the Group are as follows:
|
|
Ownership |
|
Voting |
|
Incorporated |
|
Carrying Value(6) |
|
Reporting |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
|
|
|
|
PT Panin Indonesia Bank(1) |
|
29 |
% |
29 |
% |
Indonesia |
|
160 |
|
31 December |
|
Banking |
|
Metro bank Card Corporation Inc(2) |
|
40 |
% |
40 |
% |
Indonesia |
|
16 |
|
31 December |
|
Cards Issuing |
|
ETrade(3) |
|
35 |
% |
35 |
% |
Australia |
|
14 |
|
30 June |
|
Online |
|
Autobake Pty Ltd(4) |
|
43 |
% |
20 |
% |
Australia |
|
7 |
|
30 June |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Australian Convenience Foods Pty Ltd(5) |
|
46 |
% |
20 |
% |
Australia |
|
9 |
|
30 June |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Other associates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares in associates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) An associate from 1 April 2001. In 2004 the Group exercised options over a further 18% of PT Panin Indonesia Bank
(2) An associate from 9 October 2003
(3) An associate from 1 October 2002
(4) An associate from 21 August 2002
(5) An associate from 1 July 2002
(6) 2003 carrying values as follows: PT Panin Indonesia Bank $117 million, ETrade $12 million, Australian Convenience Foods Pty Ltd $7 million, Autobake Pty Ltd $8 million and Other associates $22 million. Total $166 million
45: INTERESTS IN JOINT VENTURE ENTITIES
The Group has an interest in a joint venture entity as follows:
|
|
Interest(2) |
|
Voting(2) |
|
Incorporated |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Reporting |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
|
|
|
|
ING Australia Limited(1) |
|
49 |
% |
49 |
% |
Australia |
|
1,697 |
|
31 December |
|
Funds Management and Insurance |
|
(1) A joint venture entity from 1 May 2002
(2) This represents the Groups 49% share of the assets and liabilities of ING Australia Limited. The Group has joint control of the joint venture, therefore we do not consolidate this entity. Key details of the joint venture are:
ING Australia Limited is owned 51% by ING Group and 49% by the Group.
Both shareholders have an equal say in strategic decisions with a number of matters requiring the approval of both Shareholders (ie require unanimous approval). These include major items of capital expenditure, acquisitions or disposals in excess of $20 million and changes to the Board structure.
Equal board representation with four Group nominees and four ING Group nominees. All key issues (including business plans, major capital expenditure, acquisitions etc) require unanimous Board approval.
Refer to Critical Accounting Policies item f) for details regarding valuation of investment in ING Australia Limited.
The Joint Venture includes the majority of the Groups and INGs funds management and insurance activities in Australia and New Zealand.
89
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Retained profits attributable to the joint venture entity |
|
|
|
|
|
At the beginning of the financial year |
|
57 |
|
2 |
|
At the end of the financial year |
|
116 |
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in the carrying amount of the joint venture entity |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount at the commencement of the period |
|
1,648 |
|
1,593 |
|
Share of net profit |
|
97 |
|
55 |
|
Completion accounts adjustment |
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
Dividend received |
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
Carrying amount at the end of the financial year |
|
1,697 |
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of assets and liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
10,301 |
|
9,659 |
|
Other assets |
|
768 |
|
663 |
|
Total assets |
|
11,069 |
|
10,322 |
|
Policy holder liabilities |
|
9,565 |
|
8,928 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
375 |
|
324 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
9,940 |
|
9,252 |
|
Net assets |
|
1,129 |
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of revenues, expenses and results |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
386 |
|
310 |
|
Expenses |
|
(220 |
) |
(197 |
) |
Profit from ordinary activities before income tax |
|
166 |
|
113 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
(28 |
) |
(14 |
) |
Profit from ordinary activities after income tax |
|
138 |
|
99 |
|
Amortisation of notional goodwill |
|
(41 |
) |
(44 |
) |
Net equity accounted profit |
|
97 |
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease commitments |
|
173 |
|
169 |
|
Other commitments |
|
16 |
|
23 |
|
Total expenditure commitments |
|
189 |
|
192 |
|
Share of contingent liabilities(2) |
|
73 |
|
77 |
|
(1) This represents the Groups share of the assets and liabilities of ING Australia, less outside equity interests and including goodwill on acquisition of ANZ Funds Management entities
(2) This represents Deeds of Subordination with ASIC and buyer of last resort
90
The Group conducts investment fiduciary activities for trusts, including deceased estates. These trusts have not been consolidated as the Company does not have direct or indirect control.
Where the Company or its controlled entities incur liabilities in respect of these operations as trustee, where the primary obligation is incurred in an agency capacity as trustee of the trust rather than on the Groups own account, a right of indemnity exists against the assets of the applicable funds or trusts. As these assets are sufficient to cover the liabilities and it is therefore not probable that the Company or its controlled entities will be required to settle the liabilities, the liabilities are not included in the financial statements.
The aggregate amounts of funds concerned are as follows:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Trusteeships |
|
1,632 |
|
1,432 |
|
Funds management activities are conducted through the ANZ/INGA joint venture and ANZ National Bank Limited. As at 30 September 2004, the ANZ/INGA joint venture had funds under management of $30,679 million (2003: $28,655 million) whilst ANZ National Bank Limited had funds under management of $1,495 million.
47: COMMITMENTS
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Capital expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts for outstanding capital expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not later than 1 year |
|
60 |
|
55 |
|
20 |
|
11 |
|
Later than 1 year but not later than 5 years |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total capital expenditure commitments |
|
60 |
|
56 |
|
20 |
|
12 |
|
Lease rentals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future rentals in respect of leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not later than 1 year |
|
201 |
|
164 |
|
135 |
|
134 |
|
Later than 1 year but not later than 5 years |
|
495 |
|
391 |
|
336 |
|
320 |
|
Later than 5 years |
|
442 |
|
441 |
|
405 |
|
425 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
996 |
|
876 |
|
879 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not later than 1 year |
|
13 |
|
17 |
|
7 |
|
12 |
|
Later than 1 year but not later than 5 years |
|
19 |
|
23 |
|
12 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
40 |
|
19 |
|
32 |
|
Total lease rental commitments |
|
1,170 |
|
1,036 |
|
895 |
|
911 |
|
Total commitments |
|
1,230 |
|
1,092 |
|
915 |
|
923 |
|
The Group leases land and buildings under operating leases expiring from one to five years. Leases generally provide the Group with a right of renewal at which time all terms are renegotiated. Lease payments comprise a base amount plus an incremental contingent rental. Contingent rentals are based on either movements in the Consumer Price Index or operating criteria. Contingent rentals are not included in lease rental commitments, are not provisioned for due to their immateriality, and therefore are expensed as incurred.
91
48: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES, CONTINGENT ASSET AND CREDIT RELATED COMMITMENTS
CREDIT RELATED COMMITMENTS
The credit risk of the following facilities may be less than the contract amount, but as it cannot be accurately determined, the credit risk has been taken to be the contract amount.
The majority of undrawn facilities are subject to customers maintaining specific credit standards. The amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements as many of these facilities are expected to be only partially used or expire unused.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
Controlled Entities |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Undrawn facilities |
|
78,851 |
|
65,381 |
|
62,118 |
|
57,914 |
|
16,733 |
|
7,467 |
|
Underwriting facilities |
|
63 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
78,914 |
|
65,396 |
|
62,118 |
|
57,929 |
|
16,796 |
|
7,467 |
|
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The qualitative details of the estimated maximum amount of contingent liabilities that may become payable relate to non-customer contingent liabilities. These contingent liabilities relate to transactions that the Group has entered into as principal. By contrast, the quantitative tabular presentation relates to customer contingent liabilities, ie direct credit substitutes and trade and performance related items. Hence, as the contingent liabilities refer to different aspects of Group operations, there are no reconciling items.
Guarantees, Credit derivatives sold, Standby letters of credit, Bill endorsements and Other are classified by APRA as direct credit substitutes and exhibit the same credit risk characteristics as a direct extension of credit. The maximum potential amount of future payments represents the contract amount that could be lost under the contingent liability if the counterparty fails to meet its financial obligations.
Documentary letters of credit involve the issue of letters of credit guaranteeing payment in favour of an exporter secured against an underlying shipment of goods or backed by a confirmatory letter of credit from another bank.
Performance related contingents are liabilities that obligate the Group to make payments to a third party should the customer fail to fulfil the non-monetary terms of the contract.
The Group guarantees the performance of customers by issuing standby letters of credit and guarantees to third parties. The risk involved is essentially the same as the credit risk involved in extending loan facilities to customers, therefore these transactions are subjected to the same credit origination, portfolio management and collateral requirements for customers applying for loans. As the facilities may expire without being drawn upon, the notional amounts do not necessarily reflect future cash requirements.
The credit risk of these facilities may be less than the contract amount, but as it cannot be accurately determined, the credit risk has been taken to be the contract amount.
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
Controlled Entities |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Guarantees |
|
5,065 |
|
4,954 |
|
4,923 |
|
4,888 |
|
142 |
|
66 |
|
Credit derivatives - sold |
|
2,636 |
|
2,409 |
|
2,636 |
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stand by letters of credit |
|
1,057 |
|
1,406 |
|
1,036 |
|
1,387 |
|
21 |
|
19 |
|
Bill endorsements |
|
168 |
|
148 |
|
168 |
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Documentary letters of credit |
|
2,262 |
|
1,755 |
|
2,045 |
|
1,637 |
|
217 |
|
118 |
|
Performance related contingents |
|
9,625 |
|
9,027 |
|
9,352 |
|
8,815 |
|
273 |
|
212 |
|
Other |
|
1,336 |
|
854 |
|
931 |
|
601 |
|
405 |
|
253 |
|
Total contingent liabilities |
|
22,149 |
|
20,553 |
|
21,091 |
|
19,885 |
|
1,058 |
|
668 |
|
The details and estimated maximum amount of contingent liabilities that may become payable are set out below.
i) Clearing and Settlement Obligations
In accordance with the clearing and settlement arrangements set out:
in the Australian Payments Clearing Association Limited (APCA) Regulations for the Australian Paper Clearing System, the Bulk Electronic Clearing System, the Consumer Electronic Clearing System and the High Value Clearing System (HVCS), the Company has a commitment to rules which could result in a bilateral exposure and loss in the event of a failure to settle by a member institution; and
in the Austraclear System Regulations, the Company has a commitment to participate in loss-sharing arrangements in the event of a failure to settle by a member institution.
92
For both the APCA HVCS and Austraclear, the obligation arises only in limited circumstances.
ii) Nominee Activities
The Group will indemnify each customer of controlled entities engaged in nominee activities against loss suffered by reason of such entities failing to perform any obligation undertaken by them to a customer.
iii) Interbank Deposit Agreement
ANZ has entered into an Interbank Deposit Agreement with the major banks in the payments system. This agreement is a payment system support facility certified by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, where the terms are such that if any bank is experiencing liquidity problems, the other participants are required to deposit equal amounts of up to $2 billion for a period of 30 days. At the end of 30 days the deposit holder has the option to repay the deposit in cash or by way of assignment of mortgages to the value of the deposit.
iv) Tax Audit
The Group in Australia is being audited by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) as part of normal ATO procedures. The Group has received various assessments that are being disputed and may receive further assessments.
At the Companys request the ATO is reviewing the taxation treatment of the sale of Grindlays in 2000.
During the year, the Company and the ATO settled the dispute over the taxation treatment of lease assignments undertaken in 1991 and 1992. The settlement was within existing provisions.
The Group in New Zealand is being audited by local revenue authorities as part of normal revenue authority procedures, with a particular focus on certain kinds of structured finance transactions. On 30 September 2004, the Group in New Zealand received Notices of Proposed Adjustment (the Notice) in respect of one of these structured finance transactions undertaken in the 2000 financial year. The Notice is formal advice that the New Zealand Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is proposing to amend tax assessments. The Notice is not a tax assessment and does not establish a tax liability, but it is the first step in a formal dispute process. Should the same position be adopted by the IRD on the remaining transactions of that kind, the maximum potential tax liability would be approximately NZD348 million (including interest tax effected) for the period to 30 September 2004. Of that maximum potential liability, approximately NZD116 million is subject to tax indemnities provided by Lloyds TSB Bank PLC under the agreement by which ANZ acquired the National Bank of New Zealand and which relate to transactions undertaken by National Bank of New Zealand before December 2003.
Based on external advice, the Group has assessed the likely progress of these and other issues, and believes that it holds appropriate provisions.
v) Sale of Grindlays businesses
On July 31, 2000, ANZ completed the sale to Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) of ANZ Grindlays Bank Limited and the private banking business of ANZ in the United Kingdom and Jersey, together with ANZ Grindlays (Jersey) Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries, for USD1.3 billion in cash. ANZ provided warranties and certain indemnities relating to those businesses and, where it anticipated that payments would be likely under the warranties or indemnities, made provisions to cover the anticipated liability. The issues below have not impacted our reported results. All settlements and costs have been covered within the provisions established at the time. ANZ remains liable in relation to the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and differential cheques matters described below.
National Housing Bank
In 1992, Grindlays received a claim aggregating approximately Indian Rupees 5.06 billion from the National Housing Bank (NHB) in India. The claim arose out of cheques drawn by NHB in favour of Grindlays, the proceeds of which were credited to the account of a Grindlays customer.
Grindlays won an arbitration award in March 1997, under which NHB paid Grindlays an award of Indian Rupees 9.12 billion. NHB subsequently won an appeal to the special court of Mumbai, after which Grindlays filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of India. While that appeal was pending, the parties settled the matter, with Grindlays receiving Indian Rupees 6.20 billion of disputed monies that Grindlays had lodged with the Court, and NHB receiving the balance. ANZ in turn received a payment of USD124 million from Standard Chartered Bank under the terms of the Indian Indemnity, and is separately pursuing a $130 million claim against its insurers in respect of the loss Grindlays suffered in the dispute. ANZs claim against its insurers is being litigated in the Victorian Supreme Court, with a trial unlikely to be held until early 2006. No amounts receivable under this action have been recognised in these accounts.
93
FERA
In 1991, amounts of INR 689m (AUD 21m) were transferred from non-convertible Indian Rupee accounts maintained with Grindlays in India, mainly to the convertible vostro account at Girobank, maintained at Bombay. These transactions may not have complied with the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. Grindlays, on its own initiative, brought these transactions to the attention of the Reserve Bank of India. The Indian authorities have served notices on Grindlays and certain of its officers in India that could lead to possible penalties. Grindlays has commenced proceedings in the courts contesting the validity of these notices. In November 1998 the Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions. In March 1999 the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and ordered that, pending the disposal of the appeals, the prosecutions and adjudications against the officers shall not be proceeded with further. Final hearing of the appeals before the Supreme Court of India is expected in late 2004/early 2005.
Differential Cheques
In June 2003, Grindlays was successful in its appeal against orders to repay, with interest, two payments it received from a stockbroker in 1991 in connection with securities transactions Grindlays had entered into with counterparty banks. These orders, requiring Grindlays to show cause why the payments made by the stockbroker should not be set aside on the grounds that they were not made in the ordinary course of business and were not genuine, had directed repayment of Indian Rupees 24 million (AUD 0.9m), plus interest accruing at 24% since 1991. The Custodian has yet to file an appeal against this judgment. Grindlays is awaiting the outcome of proceedings in relation to a further twelve proceedings received by it in 1991 in similar circumstances totalling Indian Rupees 277 million (AUD 10.4m), including interest at 24% this is approximately AUD 29.9m.
In addition, ANZ provided an indemnity relating to tax liabilities of Grindlays (and its subsidiaries) and the Jersey Sub-Group to the extent to which such liabilities were not provided for in the Grindlays accounts as at 31 July 2000. A claim has been made under this indemnity also, with no material impact on the Group expected.
vi) Pursuant to class order 98/1418 (as amended) dated 13 August 1998, relief was granted to a number of wholly owned controlled entities from the Corporations Act 2001 requirements for preparation, audit, and publication of individual financial statements. The results of these companies are included in the consolidated Group results. The entities to which relief was granted are:
ANZ Properties (Australia) Pty Ltd(1)
Alliance Holdings Pty Ltd(1)
ANZ Capital Hedging Pty Ltd(1)
ANZ Funds Pty Ltd(1)
ANZ Infrastructure Investments Ltd(3)
ANZ Nominees Ltd(1)
ANZ Securities (Holdings) Ltd(3)
Deori Pty Ltd(4)
E S & A Holdings Pty Ltd(1)
Jikk Pty Ltd(1)
LFD Ltd(4)
NMRSB Pty Ltd(4)
ANZ Orchard Investments Pty Ltd(2)
Votraint No. 1103 Pty Ltd(2)
Binnstone Traders Pty Ltd(4)
(1) Relief granted on 21 August 2001
(2) Relief granted on 13 August 2002
(3) Relief granted on 9 September 2003
(4) Revocation Deed on 24 June 2004
94
It is the condition of the class order that the Company and each of the above controlled entities enter into a Deed of Cross Guarantee. A Deed of Cross Guarantee under the class order was lodged and approved by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. The effect of the Deed is that the Company guarantees to each creditor payment in full of any debt in the event of winding up any of the controlled entities under certain provisions of the Corporations Act 2001. The Company will only be liable in the event that after six months any creditor has not been paid in full. The controlled entities have also given similar guarantees in the event that the Company is wound up. The consolidated statement of financial performance and consolidated statement of financial position of the Company and its wholly owned controlled entities which have entered into the Deed of Cross Guarantee are:
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Profit before tax |
|
3,017 |
|
2,595 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
(771 |
) |
(643 |
) |
Profit after income tax |
|
2,246 |
|
1,952 |
|
Retained profits at start of year (1) |
|
6,100 |
|
4,788 |
|
Total available for appropriation |
|
8,346 |
|
6,740 |
|
Ordinary share dividends provided for or paid |
|
(1,598 |
) |
(640 |
) |
Transfer from reserves |
|
224 |
|
|
|
Retained profits at end of year |
|
6,972 |
|
6,100 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
3,747 |
|
3,919 |
|
Investment securities |
|
6,107 |
|
3,818 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
134,566 |
|
116,557 |
|
Other assets |
|
35,806 |
|
38,916 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
1,114 |
|
1,178 |
|
Total assets |
|
181,340 |
|
164,388 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and other borrowings |
|
99,811 |
|
90,186 |
|
Income tax liability |
|
1,551 |
|
766 |
|
Payables and other liabilities |
|
62,713 |
|
59,353 |
|
Provisions |
|
618 |
|
614 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
164,693 |
|
150,919 |
|
Net assets |
|
16,647 |
|
13,469 |
|
Shareholders equity (2) |
|
16,647 |
|
13,469 |
|
(1) The Companies included in the class order changed in 2003, accordingly retained profits did not carry forward in 2003
(2) Shareholders equity excludes retained profits and reserves of controlled entities within the class order
vii) The Company has guaranteed payment on maturity of the principal and accrued interest of commercial paper notes issued by ANZ (Delaware) Inc. of $7,068 million as at 30 September 2004 (2003: $6,988 million).
viii) The Company is party to an underpinning agreement with ANZ National Bank Limited whereby the Company undertakes to assume risk in relation to credit facilities extended by ANZ National Bank Limited to individual customers which exceed 35% of ANZ National Bank Limiteds capital base.
ix) The Company is party to an underpinning agreement with Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (PNG) Limited whereby the Company undertakes to assume risk in relation to credit facilities extended by Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (PNG) Limited to individual customers which exceed 50% of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (PNG) Limiteds capital base.
GENERAL
There are outstanding court proceedings, claims and possible claims against the Group, the aggregate amount of which cannot readily be quantified. Appropriate legal advice has been obtained and, in the light of such advice, provisions as deemed necessary have been made. The gross amounts of accruals made for material litigation contingencies is $258 million.
95
CONTINGENT ASSET
On 14 October 2003 ANZ issued proceedings in the Victorian Supreme Court against its captive insurance company ANZcover Insurance Pty Ltd (ANZcover) regarding its insurance claim consequent upon settlement of its former subsidiary ANZ Grindlays Bank Limiteds 1992 dispute with Indias National Housing Bank (NHB). ANZcover is an authorised general insurer restricted to insuring the interests of ANZ and its subsidiaries. ANZcover in turn purchases reinsurance from global reinsurers, primarily in the London reinsurance market. ANZcover has no retained exposure to the NHB claim which is fully re-insured save for a small exposure arising from the insolvency of some re-insurers in the London market.
The January 2002 settlement of the NHB litigation saw Grindlays recover Rupees 6.20 billion ($248 million at 19 January 2002 rates) of the disputed monies that Grindlays Bank had lodged with the Court, which by that time totalled Rupees 16.45 billion ($661 million at 19 January 2002 rates), including interest, with NHB receiving the balance. ANZ in turn received a payment of USD124 million from Standard Chartered Bank under the terms of the Indian Indemnity. The claim of $130 million (plus compound interest) is for the balance of the limit of indemnity under ANZcovers reinsurance arrangements for the 199192 policy year. The proceedings remain on foot.
49: SUPERANNUATION COMMITMENTS
A number of pension and superannuation schemes have been established by the Group worldwide. The Group may be obliged to contribute to the schemes as a consequence of legislation and provisions of trust deeds. Legal enforceability is dependent on the terms of the legislation and trust deeds. The major schemes with assets in excess of $25 million are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution levels |
|
||
Country |
|
Scheme |
|
Scheme type |
|
Employee |
|
Employer |
|
Australia |
|
ANZ Australian Staff Superannuation Scheme(1),(2) |
|
Defined Contribution Scheme Section C(3) |
|
optional(7) |
|
Balance of cost(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
Or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Contribution Scheme Section A |
|
optional |
|
9% of salary(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
Or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Scheme Pension Section(4) |
|
nil |
|
Balance of cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
ANZ GROUP (New Zealand) Staff Superannuation Scheme(1),(2) |
|
Defined Benefit Scheme(5) |
|
nil |
|
Balance of cost(11) |
|
|
|
|
|
Or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Contribution Scheme |
|
2.5% min |
|
7.5% of salary (12) |
|
|
|
National Bank Staff |
|
Defined Benefit Scheme(6) |
|
5.0% of salary |
|
Balance of cost(13) |
|
|
|
Superannuation Fund(1),(2) |
|
Or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Contribution Scheme |
|
2.0% min |
|
11.2% of salary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
England |
|
ANZ UK Staff Pension Scheme(1) |
|
Defined Benefit Scheme |
|
5.0%(8) |
|
Balance of cost(14) |
|
Balance of cost: the Groups contribution is assessed by the actuary after taking account of members contributions and the value of the schemes assets
(1) These schemes provide for pension benefits
(2) These schemes provide for lump sum benefits
(3) Closed to new members in 1997
(4) Closed to new members. Operates to make pension payments to retirees who were members or to dependants of the members
(5) Closed to new members on 31 March 1990. Operates to make pension payments to retirees who were members of that section of the scheme or to dependants of the members
(6) Closed to new members on 1 October 1991
(7) Optional but with minimum of 1%
(8) From 1 October 2003, members of the Senior Management section, commenced contributions at the rate of 5% of salary, and all new members at the rate of 5% of salary
(9) As determined by the Scheme Trustee on the recommendation of the actuary, currently 9% (2003: 9%) of members salaries
(10) 2003: 9% of salary
(11) As recommended by the actuary, currently nil (2003: nil)
(12) 2003: 7.5% of salary
(13) As recommended by the actuary, currently 20.7% of members salaries
(14) The Group recommenced contributions to the Scheme, effective from 1 October 2003. Contributions are currently 25% of pensionable salaries. Additional half yearly contributions of GBP 500,000 for 15 years will commence, with the first payment to be made in November 2004
96
The details of defined benefit schemes are as follows:
2004 |
|
Employers |
|
Accrued |
|
Net market |
|
Excess of |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
ANZ Australian Staff Superannuation Scheme Pension Section(1) |
|
|
|
41 |
|
35 |
|
(6 |
) |
41 |
|
ANZ UK Staff Pension Scheme(1) |
|
8 |
(4) |
869 |
|
844 |
|
(25 |
) |
844 |
|
ANZ Group (New Zealand) Staff Superannuation Scheme(2) |
|
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
National Bank Staff Superannuation Fund(3),(6) |
|
3 |
|
175 |
|
164 |
|
(11 |
) |
179 |
|
Other |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
Totals |
|
12 |
|
1,094 |
|
1,053 |
|
(41 |
) |
1,077 |
|
2003 |
|
Employers |
|
Accrued |
|
Net market |
|
Excess of |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
ANZ Australian Staff Superannuation Scheme Pension Section(5) |
|
|
|
43 |
|
37 |
|
(6 |
) |
43 |
|
ANZ UK Staff Pension Scheme(5) |
|
|
(4) |
872 |
|
771 |
|
(101 |
) |
845 |
|
ANZ Group (New Zealand) Staff Superannuation Scheme(5) |
|
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
National Bank Staff Superannuation Fund(6) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
Other |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
Totals |
|
1 |
|
924 |
|
818 |
|
(106 |
) |
901 |
|
(1) Amounts were measured at 31 December 2003
(2) Amounts were measured at 30 June 2004
(3) Amounts were measured at 30 September 2004
(4) Represents employer contributions from the period 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2004 (nil in the prior year)
(5) Amounts were measured at 31 December 2002
(6) This scheme arises from the acquisition of the National Bank of New Zealand effective on 1 December 2003
ANZ Australian Staff Superannuation Scheme Pension Section
The pension section of the ANZ Australian Staff Superannuation Scheme is closed to new members. The last full actuarial valuation, conducted by the actuary Towers Perrin (now Russell Employee Benefits), as at 31 December 2001 showed a small surplus. An interim valuation conducted as at 31 December 2003 showed a deficit of $6 million and the expectation is that this has remained materially unchanged since that date. The Group has no present liability under the Schemes trust deed to commence contributions or fund the deficit. A full actuarial valuation is due to be conducted as at 31 December 2004 at which time the funding position will be re-assessed.
97
National Bank Staff Superannuation Fund
The last full actuarial valuation of the pension section of the National Bank Staff Superannuation Fund was conducted by Aon Consulting NZ as at 31 March 2004, and showed a deficit of NZD6 million ($6 million). An interim valuation conducted as at 30 September 2004 shows a deficit of NZD12 million ($11 million). The Group has no present liability under the Schemes trust deed to fund the deficit, however it does have a contingent liability if the Scheme was wound up. Under the Schemes trust deed the Group is required to pay the Trustees of the Scheme an amount sufficient to ensure members do not suffer a reduction in benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled, as a result of a wind up of the Scheme.
The Group took actuarial advice at 31 March 2004 and has taken action to fund the deficit by contributing 20.7% of salary.
ANZ UK Staff Pension Scheme
The deficit disclosed above has been determined for the purpose of AASB1028 Employee Benefits.
Consulting actuaries Watson Wyatt LLP have advised that as at 31 December 2003, the Scheme would have met the minimum funding requirement test (MFR) as defined in the UK legislation, being 115% funded on that basis.
The Group has no present liability under the Schemes trust deed to fund the deficit, however it does have a contingent liability if the Scheme was wound up. If this were to happen, the Trustee would be able to pursue the Bank for additional contributions under the UK Employer Debt regulations. This is calculated based on an insurance buy-out of the Scheme. This is considered unlikely, given the Group intends to continue the Scheme on an on-going basis and the financial strength of the Group.
From 1 October 2003, the Group recommenced contributions at the rate of 25% of pensionable salaries. These contributions are sufficient to cover the cost of accruing benefits. In order to address the deficit, the Group has agreed to pay half yearly additional contributions of GBP 500,000 for a period of 15 years, commencing for the year beginning 1 October 2004, with the first payment being made in November 2004.
50: EMPLOYEE SHARE AND OPTION PLANS
The Company has four share purchase and option incentive plans available for employees and directors of the Group: the ANZ Employee Share Acquisition Plan(1); the ANZ Employee Share Save Scheme; the ANZ Share Option Plan; and the ANZ Directors Share Plan.
Shareholders of the Company have approved the implementation of each of the current plans. Fully paid ordinary shares issued under these plans rank equally with other existing fully paid ordinary shares, other than in respect of voting rights.
Each option granted under the ANZ Share Option Plan entitles a holder to purchase one ordinary share subject to any terms and conditions imposed on issue.
The exercise price of the options, determined in accordance with the rules of the plan, is based on the weighted average price of the Companys shares traded during the five business days preceding the date of granting the options.
An offer to employees and directors cannot be made under any of the plans if an issue pursuant to that offer will result in the aggregate of shares issued and options granted over unissued shares held for employees under various employee share and option incentive schemes exceeding 7% of the issued capital (and unexercised options) of the Company.
The closing market price of one ordinary share at 30 September 2004 was $19.02.
(1) The ANZ Employee Share Acquisition Plan includes the $1,000 Share Plan and the Deferred Share Plan
98
ANZ EMPLOYEE SHARE ACQUISITION PLAN
$1,000 Share Plan
Subject to Board approval this plan allows for the issue of up to $1,000 of shares to all eligible employees each financial year. Refer to section C7 of the Remuneration Report for more details.
The shares are issued for no consideration. During the financial year, 1,244,654 shares with an average issue price of $18.04 were issued under the $1,000 Share Plan (2003: 1,028,623 shares with an average issue price of $17.70 were issued). These shares are issued from the Share Capital account, hence only an increase in the number of shares on issue results.
Details of the movement in employee shares under the $1,000 Share Plan are as follows:
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares at beginning of the year |
|
4,537,676 |
|
4,217,660 |
|
Number of shares issued to the trust |
|
1,512,886 |
|
1,242,614 |
|
Number of shares distributed to employees |
|
(787,873 |
) |
(915,612 |
) |
Number of shares forfeited |
|
(33,437 |
) |
(6,986 |
) |
Number of shares at end of the year |
|
5,229,252 |
|
4,537,676 |
|
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares acquired since commencement of the $1,000 Share Plan(1) |
|
8,258,575 |
|
7,013,921 |
|
(1) Excludes shares issued under the bonus option plan and the dividend reinvestment plan
Deferred Share Plan
Selected employees may also be issued deferred shares, which vest in the employee up to three years from the date of issue. Ordinary shares issued under this plan may be held in trust for up to 10 years, and may be required to meet performance hurdles before being able to be traded after the restriction period has expired. The issue price is based on the volume weighted average price of the shares traded on the ASX in the weeks leading up to and including the date of issue. Unvested shares are forfeited on resignation or dismissal, or if a performance condition has not been met. Refer to sections C5.1 and C5.2 of the Remuneration Report for more details.
During the financial year, 2,750,277 (2003: 2,587,091) deferred shares were issued under this Plan.
Details of the movement in employee shares under the Deferred Share Plan are as follows:
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares at beginning of the year |
|
8,020,848 |
|
7,500,351 |
|
Number of shares issued to the trust |
|
2,851,886 |
|
2,666,291 |
|
Number of shares distributed to employees |
|
(2,034,234 |
) |
(2,024,878 |
) |
Number of shares forfeited |
|
(122,604 |
) |
(120,916 |
) |
Number of shares at end of the year |
|
8,715,896 |
|
8,020,848 |
|
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares acquired since commencement of the Deferred Share Plan(1) |
|
16,628,462 |
|
13,878,185 |
|
(1) Excludes shares issued under the bonus option plan and the dividend reinvestment plan
99
ANZ EMPLOYEE SHARE SAVE SCHEME
Eligible employees have the opportunity to request that a proportion of their income be directed to the purchase of ANZ shares. The amount they elect to contribute is deducted fortnightly and shares are purchased on market quarterly in arrears by the trust. The Company contributes 5% of the purchase price and pays for brokers fees and stamp duty. Senior executives may participate but are not eligible to receive the 5% discount. Employees are eligible to participate in the Scheme if they are permanent full-time or part-time employees of the Company and have been employed since 1 October immediately prior to the invitation being made by the Company. Employees nominate a restriction period between 1 to 10 years during which period the shares are held in trust. Dividends are paid to the employees.
Details of the movement in employee shares under the ANZ Employee Share Save Scheme are as follows:
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares at beginning of the year |
|
394,405 |
|
302,410 |
|
Number of shares purchased |
|
279,723 |
|
291,210 |
|
Number of shares issued to the trust |
|
24,243 |
|
16,408 |
|
Number of shares distributed to employees |
|
(246,241 |
) |
(215,623 |
) |
Number of shares at end of the year |
|
452,130 |
|
394,405 |
|
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares acquired since commencement of the ANZ Employee Share Save Scheme |
|
1,043,375 |
|
763,652 |
|
Costs associated with the ANZ Employee Share Save Scheme were recognised in Personnel Expenses and Liquid Assets
(amounts were less than $500,000).
ANZ SHARE PURCHASE SCHEME
The ANZ Share Purchase Scheme is a closed scheme. Shares have been progressively paid up by eligible officers, with the last remaining shares held under the scheme fully paid up and redeemed during the year. No fully paid ordinary shares have been issued under this Scheme since 1996.
Details of the movement in employee shares under the ANZ Share Purchase Scheme are as follows:
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares at beginning of the year |
|
229,500 |
|
1,272,500 |
|
Number of shares redeemed by employees(1) |
|
(229,500 |
) |
(1,043,000 |
) |
Number of shares at end of the year |
|
|
|
229,500 |
|
(1) Redeemed once paid out by employee
100
ANZ SHARE OPTION PLAN
Selected employees may be granted options, which entitle them to purchase ordinary fully paid shares in the Company at or greater than a price fixed at the time when the options are issued (depending on whether the exercise price is indexed or not). Voting and dividend rights will be attached to the unissued ordinary shares when the options have been exercised.
Details of the options over unissued ordinary shares as at the beginning and end of the financial year and movements during the year are set out below.
Grant date |
|
Exercise |
|
Earliest |
|
Expiry |
|
No. options |
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. options outstanding |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
at 30 September 2004 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
On issue |
|
Vested |
|
Hurdle |
|
||||||||||||||||
11/12/1998 |
|
9.62 |
|
11/12/2001 |
|
10/12/2003 |
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
A |
|
25/03/1999 |
|
10.72 |
|
25/03/2002 |
|
24/03/2004 |
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
A |
|
02/06/1999 |
|
10.48 |
|
02/06/2002 |
|
01/06/2004 |
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
A |
|
02/06/1999 |
|
10.48 |
|
02/06/2002 |
|
01/06/2004 |
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
23/02/2000 |
|
9.39 |
|
23/02/2003 |
|
22/02/2007 |
|
442,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
147,000 |
|
Yes |
|
B |
|
08/03/2000 |
|
9.48 |
|
08/03/2003 |
|
07/03/2007 |
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
|
B |
|
23/05/2000 |
|
11.09 |
|
23/05/2003 |
|
23/05/2007 |
|
271,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
107,500 |
|
163,750 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
26/09/2000 |
|
12.03 |
|
26/09/2003 |
|
25/09/2007 |
|
57,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,500 |
|
30,000 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
21/11/2000 |
|
13.62 |
|
22/11/2003 |
|
21/11/2007 |
|
2,043,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,338,039 |
|
705,219 |
|
Yes |
|
B |
|
27/12/2000 |
|
13.91 |
|
25/10/2003 |
|
07/02/2008 |
|
1,472,500 |
|
|
|
36,750 |
|
441,028 |
|
994,722 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
31/12/2000 |
|
14.06 |
|
31/12/2003 |
|
31/12/2004 |
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
E |
|
27/01/2001 |
|
13.91 |
|
07/02/2004 |
|
07/02/2008 |
|
921,000 |
|
|
|
34,500 |
|
214,700 |
|
671,800 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
21/02/2001 |
|
14.20 |
|
21/02/2004 |
|
20/02/2008 |
|
4,063,825 |
|
|
|
72,050 |
|
1,020,207 |
|
2,971,568 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
27/02/2001 |
|
14.75 |
|
27/02/2004 |
|
26/02/2008 |
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
25,000 |
|
Yes |
|
B |
|
24/04/2001 |
|
12.98 |
|
25/04/2004 |
|
24/04/2008 |
|
934,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
403,600 |
|
531,300 |
|
Yes |
|
B |
|
24/04/2001 |
|
12.98 |
|
25/04/2004 |
|
24/04/2008 |
|
2,271,415 |
|
|
|
62,325 |
|
540,563 |
|
1,668,527 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
07/05/2001 |
|
12.98 |
|
07/05/2004 |
|
06/05/2008 |
|
176,900 |
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
73,450 |
|
104,100 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
01/06/2001 |
|
14.61 |
|
01/06/2004 |
|
31/05/2008 |
|
414,250 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
86,750 |
|
310,000 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
23/08/2001 |
|
15.77 |
|
21/08/2004 |
|
20/08/2008 |
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
Yes |
|
B |
|
27/08/2001 |
|
16.09 |
|
27/08/2004 |
|
26/08/2008 |
|
75,750 |
|
|
|
8,250 |
|
4,500 |
|
63,000 |
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
24/10/2001 |
|
16.33 |
|
25/10/2004 |
|
24/10/2008 |
|
870,200 |
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
111,800 |
|
753,300 |
|
No |
|
B |
|
24/10/2001 |
|
16.33 |
|
25/10/2004 |
|
24/10/2008 |
|
3,101,925 |
|
|
|
156,200 |
|
134,125 |
|
2,811,600 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
24/10/2001 |
|
0.00 |
|
24/10/2002 |
|
24/10/2003 |
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
24/10/2001 |
|
16.33 |
|
24/10/2004 |
|
23/10/2008 |
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
No |
|
B |
|
31/12/2001 |
|
16.48 |
|
31/12/2004 |
|
31/12/2005 |
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
No |
|
E |
|
31/12/2001 |
|
16.80 |
|
31/12/2003 |
|
31/12/2007 |
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Yes |
|
F |
|
28/02/2002 |
|
17.49 |
|
26/02/2005 |
|
25/02/2009 |
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
No |
|
B |
|
24/04/2002 |
|
18.03 |
|
24/04/2005 |
|
24/04/2009 |
|
3,183,849 |
|
|
|
226,063 |
|
77,145 |
|
2,880,641 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
24/04/2002 |
|
0.00 |
|
24/04/2003 |
|
24/04/2004 |
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
(5,243 |
) |
9,948 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
24/04/2002 |
|
18.03 |
|
24/04/2005 |
|
24/04/2009 |
|
885,193 |
|
|
|
19,393 |
|
105,299 |
|
760,501 |
|
No |
|
C |
|
24/04/2002 |
|
18.03 |
|
24/04/2005 |
|
24/04/2009 |
|
415,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
25,000 |
|
380,000 |
|
No |
|
C |
|
31/05/2002 |
|
18.55 |
|
14/05/2005 |
|
13/05/2009 |
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,000 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
27/06/2002 |
|
18.55 |
|
28/06/2005 |
|
27/06/2009 |
|
286,470 |
|
|
|
20,035 |
|
4,625 |
|
261,810 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
21/07/2002 |
|
17.18 |
|
22/07/2005 |
|
21/07/2009 |
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
No |
|
C |
|
23/10/2002 |
|
17.34 |
|
23/10/2005 |
|
22/10/2009 |
|
2,584,352 |
|
|
|
295,825 |
|
|
|
2,288,527 |
|
No |
|
D |
|
23/10/2002 |
|
17.34 |
|
23/10/2005 |
|
22/10/2009 |
|
2,265,111 |
|
|
|
131,293 |
|
13,053 |
|
2,120,765 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
20/11/2002 |
|
17.56 |
|
20/11/2005 |
|
19/11/2009 |
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
No |
|
D |
|
31/12/2002 |
|
16.69 |
|
31/12/2004 |
|
31/12/2007 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
No |
|
F |
|
20/05/2003 |
|
17.60 |
|
20/05/2006 |
|
19/05/2010 |
|
2,890,631 |
|
|
|
291,150 |
|
2,241 |
|
2,597,240 |
|
No |
|
D |
|
20/05/2003 |
|
17.60 |
|
20/05/2006 |
|
19/05/2010 |
|
2,139,491 |
|
|
|
107,372 |
|
4,423 |
|
2,027,696 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
09/06/2003 |
|
18.12 |
|
09/06/2006 |
|
08/06/2010 |
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
05/11/2003 |
|
17.55 |
|
05/11/2006 |
|
04/11/2010 |
|
|
|
2,796,256 |
|
136,938 |
|
1,076 |
|
2,658,242 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
05/11/2003 |
|
17.55 |
|
05/11/2006 |
|
04/11/2010 |
|
|
|
1,322,863 |
|
60,922 |
|
66,276 |
|
1,195,665 |
|
No |
|
C |
|
31/12/2003 |
|
17.48 |
|
31/12/2005 |
|
31/12/2008 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
No |
|
F |
|
11/05/2004 |
|
0.00 |
|
11/05/2004 |
|
10/05/2006 |
|
|
|
11,967 |
|
|
|
11,967 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
N |
|
11/05/2004 |
|
18.22 |
|
11/05/2007 |
|
10/05/2011 |
|
|
|
2,751,348 |
|
60,928 |
|
|
|
2,690,420 |
|
No |
|
N |
|
11/05/2004 |
|
18.22 |
|
11/05/2007 |
|
10/05/2011 |
|
|
|
1,664,836 |
|
34,016 |
|
585 |
|
1,630,235 |
|
No |
|
C |
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,781,884 |
|
9,547,270 |
|
2,140,717 |
|
6,387,809 |
|
36,800,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate fair value of shares issued as a result of the exercise of options during the 2004 financial year was $116 million.
101
On 24 October 2003 the Company issued a prospectus to invite shareholders to participate in a pro-rata renounceable rights issue. In accordance with the rules set out in the ANZ Share Option Plan in the event of a rights issue, the exercise price of options granted under the plan is to be reduced in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 6.22. As a result the exercise price of each option issued under the ANZ Share Option Plan is reduced by 72 cents from the amount previously disclosed.
Details of performance hurdles applicable to options are as follows:
N No performance hurdles apply. Once the exercise period has been reached, the options may be exercised. These options are only granted to high-potential employees below executive level. As their purpose is predominately retention and to share in any growth in the share price, additional hurdles are not applied. These types of options will not be granted after November 2004.
A During the two year period commencing three years and ending five years after the date of issue of the options, the percentage change of the ANZ Total Shareholder Return (ANZ TSR) to exceed the percentage change of the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index from date of issue to any time from the third anniversary date up to and including the proposed exercise date.
B & C During the four-year period commencing three years, and ending seven years, after the issue date of the options:
50% of the options allocated may be exercised by the option holder subject to the ANZ TSR exceeding the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index measured over the same period and calculated as at the last trading day of any month; and
50% of the options allocated may be exercised by the option holder subject to the ANZ TSR exceeding the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 100 Accumulation Index measured over the same period and calculated as at the last trading day of any month.
D Options may be exercised during the four-year period commencing three years, and ending seven years, after the issue date of the options. The exercise price will be set according to the movement in the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index (excluding ANZ) since issue date, and can be no lower than the base issue price.
E The options may be exercised only if the ANZ Accumulation Index over the period from the date on which the options are granted to the last trading day of any month occurring during the relevant exercise period, equals or exceeds the, S&P/ASX 100 Accumulation Index calculated over the same period (applicable to the CEO only).
F One half of the options may be exercised only if the ANZ TSR calculated over the period commencing on the date of grant and ending on the last day of any month after the second anniversary of their date of grant exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 200 Banks (Industry Group) Accumulation Index over that same period; and the other half of the options may be exercised only if the ANZ TSR calculated over the relevant period exceeds the percentage change in the S&P/ASX 100 Accumulation Index over that same period (applicable to the CEO only).
These options will expire immediately on termination of employment, except in the event of retirement, retrenchment, death or disablement or where agreed by the directors of the Company, in which case the exercise of the options may be allowed.
In the event of a takeover offer or takeover announcement, the directors of the Company may allow the options to be exercised.
If there is a bonus issue prior to the expiry or exercise of the options, then upon exercise of the options, option holders are entitled to those shares as if the options had been exercised prior to that issue. Those shares will be allotted to the option holder when the options are exercised.
102
The following options were exercised by employees and former employees during the financial year:
Exercise price |
|
No. of shares issued |
|
Proceeds received |
|
Exercise price |
|
No. of shares issued |
|
Proceeds received |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
0.00 |
|
409 |
|
0.00 |
|
14.34 |
|
8,000 |
|
114,720 |
|
0.00 |
|
9,948 |
|
0.00 |
|
14.61 |
|
83,750 |
|
1,223,587 |
|
0.00 |
|
11,967 |
|
0.00 |
|
14.63 |
|
4,500 |
|
65,835 |
|
9.39 |
|
100,000 |
|
939,000 |
|
14.63 |
|
82,750 |
|
1,210,632 |
|
9.62 |
|
15,000 |
|
144,300 |
|
14.75 |
|
50,000 |
|
737,500 |
|
10.11 |
|
195,000 |
|
1,971,450 |
|
14.92 |
|
21,000 |
|
313,320 |
|
10.48 |
|
90,000 |
|
943,200 |
|
15.33 |
|
3,000 |
|
45,990 |
|
10.48 |
|
325,000 |
|
3,406,000 |
|
16.09 |
|
4,500 |
|
72,405 |
|
10.72 |
|
22,000 |
|
235,840 |
|
16.33 |
|
108,600 |
|
1,773,438 |
|
11.09 |
|
85,000 |
|
942,650 |
|
16.33 |
|
121,725 |
|
1,987,769 |
|
11.20 |
|
15,000 |
|
168,000 |
|
17.05 |
|
3,200 |
|
54,560 |
|
11.81 |
|
22,500 |
|
265,725 |
|
17.05 |
|
12,400 |
|
211,420 |
|
12.03 |
|
25,000 |
|
300,750 |
|
17.34 |
|
12,768 |
|
221,397 |
|
12.75 |
|
2,500 |
|
31,875 |
|
17.55 |
|
1,076 |
|
18,883 |
|
12.98 |
|
73,450 |
|
953,381 |
|
17.55 |
|
66,276 |
|
1,163,143 |
|
12.98 |
|
400,400 |
|
5,197,192 |
|
17.60 |
|
4,423 |
|
77,844 |
|
12.98 |
|
530,313 |
|
6,883,462 |
|
18.03 |
|
25,000 |
|
450,750 |
|
13.62 |
|
1,330,039 |
|
18,115,131 |
|
18.03 |
|
77,145 |
|
1,390,924 |
|
13.70 |
|
3,200 |
|
43,840 |
|
18.03 |
|
105,299 |
|
1,898,540 |
|
13.70 |
|
10,250 |
|
140,425 |
|
18.06 |
|
285 |
|
5,147 |
|
13.91 |
|
210,200 |
|
2,923,882 |
|
18.22 |
|
585 |
|
10,658 |
|
13.91 |
|
358,278 |
|
4,983,646 |
|
18.55 |
|
4,625 |
|
85,793 |
|
14.06 |
|
750,000 |
|
10,545,000 |
|
18.59 |
|
2,241 |
|
41,660 |
|
14.20 |
|
999,207 |
|
14,188,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For those options exercised by employees and former employees during the financial year, the market price of the Companys shares during the year were as follows:
High |
|
$ |
19.44 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
15.94 |
|
As at 30 September 2004 |
|
$ |
19.02 |
|
103
As at the date of the Directors Report, unexercised options over ordinary shares are as per the table on the previous page, adjusted for the exercise of the following options which were exercised by employees and former employees since the end of the financial year.
Exercise price |
|
No. of shares issued |
|
Proceeds received |
|
Exercise price |
|
No. of shares issued |
|
Proceeds received |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
9.39 |
|
10,000 |
|
93,900 |
|
16.09 |
|
2,250 |
|
36,203 |
|
11.09 |
|
15,000 |
|
166,350 |
|
16.33 |
|
174,800 |
|
2,854,484 |
|
12.03 |
|
884 |
|
10,635 |
|
16.33 |
|
234,600 |
|
3,831,018 |
|
12.98 |
|
158,700 |
|
2,059,926 |
|
17.34 |
|
2,031 |
|
35,218 |
|
12.98 |
|
96,125 |
|
1,247,703 |
|
17.55 |
|
1,214 |
|
21,306 |
|
12.98 |
|
8,250 |
|
107,085 |
|
17.60 |
|
1,547 |
|
27,227 |
|
13.62 |
|
9,000 |
|
122,580 |
|
18.03 |
|
2,536 |
|
45,724 |
|
13.91 |
|
47,242 |
|
657,136 |
|
18.22 |
|
230 |
|
4,191 |
|
13.91 |
|
31,500 |
|
438,165 |
|
18.22 |
|
323 |
|
5,885 |
|
14.20 |
|
153,750 |
|
2,183,250 |
|
18.94 |
|
6,183 |
|
117,106 |
|
14.61 |
|
9,250 |
|
135,143 |
|
19.30 |
|
8,458 |
|
163,239 |
|
Amounts received from exercising options under the ANZ Share Option Plan during the financial year were recognised as follows:
|
|
The Company |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Share capital |
|
86 |
|
73 |
|
Liquid assets |
|
86 |
|
73 |
|
ANZ DIRECTORS SHARE PLAN
Directors may elect to forgo remuneration to which they may have otherwise become entitled and receive shares to the value of the remuneration forgone. Participation in the Plan is voluntary.
Refer to section B3 of the Remuneration Report for more details.
Details of the movement in shares under this Scheme are as follows:
|
|
The Company(1) |
|
||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Number of shares at beginning of the year |
|
464,467 |
|
349,767 |
|
Number of shares purchased |
|
197,655 |
|
114,700 |
|
Number of shares sold |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares at end of the year |
|
662,122 |
|
464,467 |
|
(1) Includes deferred shares
51: DIRECTORS AND SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES REMUNERATION AND SHARE AND OPTION DISCLOSURES
The remuneration and share and options details concerning the Directors of the Company and AASB 1046 Director and Executive Disclosures by Disclosing Entities specified executives of the Group are detailed on pages 6 to 23.
104
52: DIRECTORS AND SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
This note covers the related party transactions (excluding share and options transactions) of the directors of the Company and AASB1046 Director and Executive Disclosures by Disclosing Entities specified executives, as identified on pages 6 and 8.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Class Order 98/110 dated 10 July 1998 (as amended)
The directors and specified executives have been exempted, subject to certain conditions, by an ASIC class order, 98/110 dated 10 July 1998 (as amended), from making disclosures of loans regularly made, guaranteed or secured directly or indirectly by the Group to related parties or in respect of a financial instrument transaction regularly made by the Group to related parties (other than shares and share options), other than to the director or specified executive, or to an entity controlled or significantly influenced by the director or specified executive, where the loan or financial instrument transaction is lawfully made and occurs in the course of ordinary banking business either at arms length or with the approval of a general meeting of the relevant entity and its ultimate chief entity (if any).
The class order does not apply to a loan or financial instrument transaction of which any director or specified executive should reasonably be aware that, if not disclosed, would have the potential to adversely affect the decisions made by users of the financial statements about the allocation of scarce resources.
A condition of the class order is that for each financial year to which it applies, the Company must provide evidence to ASIC that the Company has systems of internal controls and procedures which:
i) in the case of any material financial instrument transaction, ensure that; and
ii) in any other case, are designed to provide a reasonable degree of assurance that, any financial instrument transaction of a bank which may be required to be disclosed in the Companys financial statements on and which is not entered into regularly, is drawn to the attention of the directors.
SHARES AND SHARE OPTIONS TRANSACTIONS
The aggregate of and movement during the financial year of shares and share options relating to the directors and specified executives and their personally related parties are detailed on pages 20 to 23.
Directors and specified executives receive normal dividends on these shares.
LOAN TRANSACTIONS
Details regarding loans outstanding at the reporting date to directors and specified executives including personally related parties (subject to the ASIC Class Order 98/110 (as amended) disclosure limitation as described above), where the individuals aggregate loan balance exceeded $100,000 at any time in the reporting period, are as follows:
|
|
Balance |
|
Balance |
|
Interest paid and |
|
Highest balance |
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-executive Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CB Goode |
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
170,734 |
|
3,500,000 |
|
J C Dahlsen |
|
13,154,657 |
|
17,695,111 |
|
632,052 |
|
21,062,375 |
|
D M Gonski |
|
18,342,500 |
|
18,342,000 |
|
1,369,075 |
|
18,342,500 |
|
Executive Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J McFarlane(1) |
|
24,981 |
|
10,349,429 |
|
245,507 |
|
14,033,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specified executives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Funke Kupper |
|
688,542 |
|
680,000 |
|
832 |
(2) |
722,500 |
|
B C Hartzer |
|
1,709,927 |
|
2,645,581 |
|
149,632 |
(2) |
4,222,927 |
|
P Hawkins |
|
9,495,000 |
|
14,303,423 |
|
618,611 |
|
14,303,423 |
|
(1) The loan balances as at 30 September 2004 principally relate to loans for the purchase of ANZ shares, including the exercise of options
(2) Interest payments were reduced as a result of a linked offset account
105
Details regarding the aggregate of loans made, guaranteed or secured by any entity in the Group to each group of directors and specified executives including related parties (subject to the ASIC Class Order 98/110 (as amended) disclosure limitation as described above) are as follows:
|
|
Balance |
|
Balance |
|
Interest paid and |
|
Number in group at |
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
35,022,138 |
|
46,386,540 |
|
2,417,368 |
|
4 |
|
Specified executives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
11,897,647 |
|
17,725,828 |
|
771,443 |
|
4 |
|
Loans made to the non-executive directors are made in the course of ordinary business on normal commercial terms and conditions. Loans to the executive director are made pursuant to the Executive Directors Loan Scheme authorised by shareholders on 18 January 1982, on the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees within the Group in accordance with established policy.
No amounts have been written down or recorded as allowances, as the balances are considered fully collectible.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS OF DIRECTORS AND SPECIFIED EXECUTIVES
Other transactions (other than shares and share options)
Under the ASIC class order referred to above, disclosure of other transactions regularly made by the Group is limited to disclosure of such transactions with a director of the Company, specified executives of the Group and to an entity controlled or significantly influenced by the directors and specified executives, on the basis the transactions are:
on arms length terms and conditions no more favourable than those entered into by other employees or unrelated customers;
information about them does not have the potential to affect adversely decisions about the allocations of scarce resources made by users of the financial report, or the discharge of accountability by the director or specified executive; and
are deemed trivial or domestic in nature.
Transactions between the directors, specified executives and related entities and the Group during the financial year were in the nature of normal personal banking, debentures, investment and deposit transactions. These transactions occurred on an arms length basis and on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favourable than those given to other employees or customers and were trivial and domestic in nature.
106
53: DIRECTORS OF CONTROLLED ENTITIES OF THE COMPANY - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS(1)
LOAN TRANSACTIONS
Loans to executive directors of controlled entities are made pursuant to the Executive Directors Loan Scheme authorised by shareholders on 18 January 1982. These loans were in the nature of normal personal loans and were made on the same terms and conditions applicable to other eligible employees within the Group in accordance with established policy.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS OF DIRECTORS AND PERSONALLY RELATED ENTITIES
i) Financial instrument transactions
ASIC class order 98/110 dated 10 July 1998 (as amended)
Disclosure of financial instrument transactions regularly made by a bank is limited to disclosure of such transactions with a director of the controlled entity concerned or an entity controlled or significantly influenced by the director of the controlled entity.
Financial instrument transactions between the directors of the controlled entities or their personally related entities and the Bank during the financial year were in the nature of normal personal banking, investment and deposit transactions. These transactions occurred on an arms length basis and on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favourable than those given to other employees or customers.
ii) Transactions other than financial instrument transactions of banks
All other transactions with directors of the controlled entities of the Company and their personally related entities are conducted on arms length terms and conditions, and are deemed trivial or domestic in nature. These transactions are in the nature of deposits, debentures, or investment transactions conducted with non-bank controlled entities.
All other transactions with directors personally related entities occur within a normal customer or supplier relationship and are on arms length terms and conditions.
(1) Relates to all other related party disclosures not concerning directors of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited as disclosed in note 52
54: TRANSACTIONS WITH ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURE ENTITIES - RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
During the course of the financial year the Company and the Group conducted transactions with associates and joint venture entities on normal commercial terms and conditions as shown below:
|
|
Consolidated |
|
The Company |
|
||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts receivable from associates and joint venture entities |
|
101,835 |
|
30,691 |
|
27,553 |
|
1,139 |
|
Interest revenue |
|
4,078 |
|
1,126 |
|
2,422 |
|
507 |
|
Dividend revenue |
|
38,353 |
|
5,606 |
|
365 |
|
326 |
|
Commissions received from ING Australia joint venture |
|
87,026 |
|
79,146 |
|
80,127 |
|
70,504 |
|
Costs recovered from ING Australia joint venture |
|
9,776 |
|
15,802 |
|
9,761 |
|
15,544 |
|
107
55: US GAAP RECONCILIATION
The consolidated financial statements of the Group are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in Australia (Australian GAAP) which differ in some respects from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (US GAAP).
The following are reconciliations of the net profit, shareholders equity and total assets, applying US GAAP insted of Australian GAAP.
|
|
Note |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Net profit reported under Australian GAAP |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
2,348 |
|
2,322 |
|
Items having the effect of increasing (decreasing) net income according to US GAAP (total tax impact of adjustments shown separately): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee share issue and options |
|
(xix |
) |
(43 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(40 |
) |
Depreciation charged on the difference between revaluation amount and historical cost of buildings |
|
(i |
) |
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
Difference in gain or loss on disposal of properties revalued under historical cost |
|
(i |
) |
12 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
Deferred profit on sale and leaseback transactions over the lease term |
|
(iii |
) |
(10 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(9 |
) |
Amortisation of goodwill |
|
(ii |
) |
189 |
|
62 |
|
(6 |
) |
Amortisation of sale and leaseback gain over the lease term |
|
(iii |
) |
26 |
|
25 |
|
25 |
|
Pension expense adjustment |
|
(vi |
) |
(5 |
) |
2 |
|
18 |
|
Mark to market and non compliant derivative hedges (under SFAS 133) |
|
(xv |
) |
(89 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(17 |
) |
Adjustment on entering joint venture |
|
(xvii |
) |
(14 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
Interest on reclassified preference shares and amortisation of costs |
|
(xx |
) |
(64 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
Pension plan deficit amortisation |
|
(vi |
) |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Guarantee fee obligation |
|
(xviii |
) |
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition cost of NBNZ adjustment |
|
(xxiv |
) |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total tax impact of the above adjustments (refer below) |
|
|
|
40 |
|
12 |
|
2 |
|
Net income according to US GAAP |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
2,380 |
|
2,097 |
|
Earnings per share (cents) according to US GAAP* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
155 |
|
144 |
|
127 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
149 |
|
144 |
|
126 |
|
Adjustments to determine other comprehensive income for US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income according to US GAAP |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
2,380 |
|
2,097 |
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of hedges after tax: Tax is (Sep 2004: $9m; Sep 2003: $54m; Sep 2002: $43m) |
|
(xiii |
) |
233 |
|
(356 |
) |
(98 |
) |
Unrealised profit (loss) on available for sale securities net of tax: Tax is (Sep 2004: $3m; Sep 2003: -$1m; Sep 2002: $1m) |
|
(ix |
) |
7 |
|
(2 |
) |
3 |
|
Mark to market of cash flow hedges net of tax: Tax is: (Sep 2004: $-40m; Sep 2003: $33m; Sep 2002: $26m) |
|
(xv |
) |
(94 |
) |
76 |
|
60 |
|
Pension plan deficit net of tax: Tax is: (Sep 2004: $-6m; Sep 2003: $-42m) |
|
(vi |
) |
(14 |
) |
(99 |
) |
|
|
Total comprehensive income according to US GAAP |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
1,999 |
|
2,062 |
|
Total tax impact of the above adjustments comprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/ loss on assets sold and leased back |
|
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Amortisation of deferred profit |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(1 |
) |
Pension expense adjustment |
|
|
|
2 |
|
(1 |
) |
6 |
|
Marked to market of non-compliant derivative hedges |
|
|
|
27 |
|
14 |
|
(5 |
) |
Guarantee revenue |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan deficit amortisation |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
12 |
|
2 |
|
* Rounded to the nearest whole cent and restated for rights issue
108
|
|
Note |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Shareholders equity reported under Australian GAAP (1) |
|
|
|
17,907 |
|
13,770 |
|
11,448 |
|
Elimination of gross asset revaluation reserves |
|
(i |
) |
(224 |
) |
(247 |
) |
(266 |
) |
Unrealised profit (loss) on available for sale securities |
|
(ix |
) |
8 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
Adjustment to accumulated depreciation on buildings revalued |
|
(i |
) |
52 |
|
50 |
|
48 |
|
Restoration of previously deducted goodwill |
|
(ii |
) |
695 |
|
695 |
|
695 |
|
Accumulated amortisation of goodwill |
|
(ii |
) |
(263 |
) |
(452 |
) |
(514 |
) |
Deferred profit on sale and leaseback transactions |
|
(iii |
) |
(20 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(20 |
) |
Provision for final cash dividend |
|
(iv |
) |
|
|
|
|
681 |
|
Pension expense adjustment |
|
(vi |
) |
(48 |
) |
(14 |
) |
126 |
|
Derivatives and hedging activities |
|
(xv |
) |
69 |
|
309 |
|
247 |
|
Adjustment on entering joint venture |
|
(xvii |
) |
(217 |
) |
(203 |
) |
(203 |
) |
Reclassification of preference shares |
|
(xx |
) |
(990 |
) |
(988 |
) |
|
|
Guarantee fee obligation |
|
(xviii |
) |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition cost of NBNZ purchase adjustment |
|
(xxiv |
) |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total tax impact of the above adjustments (refer below) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
(84 |
) |
(106 |
) |
Shareholders equity according to US GAAP |
|
|
|
16,917 |
|
12,820 |
|
12,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets reported under Australian GAAP |
|
|
|
259,345 |
|
195,591 |
|
183,105 |
|
Elimination of gross incremental revaluations |
|
(i |
) |
(191 |
) |
(203 |
) |
(205 |
) |
Unrealised profit (loss) on available for sale securities |
|
(ix |
) |
12 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
Adjustment to accumulated depreciation on buildings revalued |
|
(i |
) |
52 |
|
50 |
|
48 |
|
Restoration of previously deducted goodwill |
|
(ii |
) |
695 |
|
695 |
|
695 |
|
Accumulated amortisation of goodwill |
|
(ii |
) |
(263 |
) |
(452 |
) |
(514 |
) |
Prepaid pension adjustment |
|
(vi |
) |
58 |
|
66 |
|
67 |
|
Reclassification of deferred tax assets against deferred tax liabilities |
|
(v |
) |
(672 |
) |
(726 |
) |
(462 |
) |
Revaluation of hedges |
|
(xv |
) |
192 |
|
397 |
|
501 |
|
Issue Costs |
|
(xx |
) |
10 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
Adjustment to carrying value of the ING Australia joint venture |
|
(xvii |
) |
(217 |
) |
(203 |
) |
(203 |
) |
Consolidation of variable interest entities |
|
(xii |
) |
3,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantee receivable |
|
(xviii |
) |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
NBNZ goodwill due to acquisition cost adjustment |
|
(xxiv |
) |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total assets according to US GAAP |
|
|
|
262,024 |
|
195,230 |
|
183,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Excluding outside equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax impact of the above adjustments comprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred profit on sale and lease back transactions |
|
|
|
6 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
Pension expense adjustment |
|
|
|
14 |
|
4 |
|
(38 |
) |
Derivative and hedging activities |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
(93 |
) |
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
(84 |
) |
(106 |
) |
109
We have outlined in the following notes the significant differences between Australian GAAP and US GAAP by category. A more detailed discussion of the Australian GAAP policies is contained in Note 1.
We prepare a list of identified differences between Australian and US GAAP, and assess annually whether those differences which are unadjusted in our US GAAP reconciliation do, in aggregate result in a material difference to our US GAAP financial statements. We are satisfied that the aggregate result is not materially different from the US GAAP financial statements presented in this note.
i) Premises and equipment
In accordance with Australian GAAP, the Group holds its properties at a deemed cost value (refer note 1xiv). However in the past the Group at various times, has revalued properties, increasing the book value of these assets. Any increments on revaluation were credited directly to the Asset Revaluation Reserve (ARR), and decrements were debited to the ARR to the extent of any previous revaluation increments.
Decrements in excess of any previous revaluation increments were charged to the statement of financial performance. The ARR forms part of Shareholders equity and is not available for future property writedowns while properties are measured at deemed cost.
Under US GAAP, revaluation of properties is not permitted except for decrements which are regarded as other than temporary. Any such decrements are recorded in the statement of financial performance. Subsequent recoveries to the statement of financial performance are not allowed.
The impact of previous revaluations under Australian GAAP is that depreciation charges are generally higher and profits on disposal are lower than those recorded under US GAAP. The depreciation charges, together with the profits and losses on revalued assets sold have been adjusted to historical cost in the US GAAPreconciliation.
ii) Goodwill
Under Australian GAAP the Group changed its accounting policy in respect of goodwill in the financial year ended 30 September 1993 so that goodwill is amortised over a period not exceeding 20 years. Previously, goodwill on acquisition was charged in full to the Groups statement of financial performance in the year of acquisition.
Historically, under US GAAP, goodwill has been capitalised and amortised over the period of time during which the benefits are expected to arise, such period not exceeding 20 years. Until 1 October 2002, adjustments were made in the US GAAP reconciliation statement to restore goodwill written-off in full under Australian GAAP and to amortise such goodwill over the period of the expected benefits. As at 1 October 2002, ANZ adopted SFAS 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under US GAAP for goodwill acquired during the year ended 30 September 2002 and for all goodwill balances after 30 September 2002 a review for impairment test will apply rather than systematic goodwill amortisation. This review is undertaken in accordance with SFAS 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill acquired is allocated to reporting segments that are expected to benefit from the acquisition. These units have been evaluated using a combination of discounted cash flows and multiples of earnings methodologies. Any impairment is recognised in earnings in the year in which it is identified. The 2004 review did not indicate any impairment.
For comparability the table below reconciles the Groups US GAAP reported income to adjusted income excluding the effect of goodwill amortisation.
|
|
2002 |
|
|
US GAAP reported net income |
|
$ |
2,097m |
|
Goodwill amortisation |
|
$ |
26m |
|
Reported net income excluding effect of amortisation |
|
$ |
2,123m |
|
Basic EPS using adjusted net income |
|
129 |
* |
|
Diluted EPS using adjusted net income |
|
128 |
* |
* Rounded to nearest whole cent and restated for rights issue
iii) Sale-leaseback transactions
All sale and leaseback transactions relate to property and premises.
Under Australian GAAP for operating leases, gains on disposal under sale-leaseback transactions can be recognised in the period of sale.
Under US GAAP, the gain is amortised over the remaining lease term (typically this is between 5 and 10 years) . This difference in treatment has been adjusted in the US GAAP reconciliation.
iv) Dividends in 2002
Historically Australian GAAP dividends were shown in the statement of financial performance in the period to which they relate rather than in the period when theyare declared as required by US GAAP. This difference in treatment has been adjusted in the US GAAP shareholders equity reconciliation. Changes in Australian GAAP for 2003 disallowed accrual of dividends, thus there is no adjustment for the 2004 or 2003 years.
v) Income taxes
Under Australian GAAP, tax benefits relating to carry forward tax losses must be virtually certain of being realised before being booked. Realisations of benefits relating to other timing differences must be beyond reasonable doubt before they may be booked. These tests are more stringent than those applied under US GAAP. However no material adjustment to future tax benefits for US GAAP is required.
Australian GAAP allows offsetting of future income tax benefits and liabilities to the extent they will reverse in the same period.
Under US GAAP, deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets are offset and presented for each tax paying component of an enterprise and within each particular tax jurisdiction. The impact of the difference in this approach to Australian GAAP has been adjusted for in the US GAAP reconciliation for total assets.
As detailed in note 6, the Group implemented tax consolidation during the year. The amounts due to and receivable from the Holding Company are as follows:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Amounts due from |
|
|
|
|
|
group entities |
|
323 |
|
|
|
Amounts due to |
|
|
|
|
|
group entities |
|
474 |
|
|
|
vi) Pension commitments
Under Australian GAAP, contributions in respect of defined benefit schemes are recorded in the income statement and are made at levels necessary to ensure that these schemes are maintained with sufficient assets to meet their actuarially assessed liabilities. Any net deficiency arising from the aggregation of assets and liabilities of the Groups defined benefit schemes, where there is a legal or constructive obligation, is provided for in the Groups financial statements (refer note 49).
110
Under US GAAP SFAS 87 Employers Accounting for Pensions and the disclosure requirements of SFAS 132 Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Post Retirement Benefits, pension expense is a function of an employees service period, interest costs, expected actuarial return on the schemes assets, amortisation of net transition asset and recognised prior service cost. In addition, reconciliation between the accrued pension liability/prepaid asset and the funded status (difference between projected benefit obligation and fair value of pension plan assets) of the pension schemes is required.
In the year ended 30 September 2003, as required under US GAAP an additional liability was recognised for the Groups UK Pension plan of $142 million ($99 million after tax). As at 30 September 2004, based on 30 June 2004 actuarial information, due to an improvement in the position of the plan, this liability has been reduced to $136 million ($95 million after tax). In 2004, a liability was recognised for the Groups NBNZ pension plan of $35 million ($25 million after tax). These liabilities are required to be recognised where the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets and an asset has been recognised as prepaid pension cost, or the liability already recognised as unfunded accrued pension cost, is less than the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation.
vii) Post retirement and post employment benefits
Post retirement and post employment benefits other than pension payments are not material and no adjustment is required in the US GAAP reconciliation.
viii) Trading securities
US GAAP requires that in instances where trading securities are not bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term, they should be classified as available for sale and recorded at market value with unrealised profits and losses in respect of market value adjustments recognised as other comprehensive income in Shareholders equity.
The residual emerging markets portfolio had been classified as available with the market value write down taken through the statement of financial performance for both Australian and US GAAP purposes.
Except for the above, no adjustment is required to be made in the US GAAP reconciliation as the effect of reclassifying certain trading securities as available for sale is not material.
ix) Investment securities
US GAAP requires that investments not classified as trading securities or as held to maturity securities shall be classified as available for sale securities and be recorded at market value in accordance with SFAS 115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. An adjustment is made in the US GAAP reconciliation to reclassify certain investment securities under Australian GAAP to reflect available for sale securities which are carried at market value with unrealised profits and losses in respect of market value adjustments being reported as other comprehensive income in shareholders equity.
x) Accounting for the impairment of loans
SFAS 114 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by SFAS 118 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan Income Recognition and Disclosures, requires the value of an impaired loan to be measured as the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loans initial effective interest rate, the loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent.
There is no requirement under Australian GAAP to discount the expected future cash flows attributable to impaired loans in assessing the level of specific provision for doubtful debts.
No adjustment is required in the US GAAP reconciliation as the estimated fair value of impaired loans is not materially different from the carrying value (net of the allowance for loan losses).
xi) Accounting for the impairment of long lived assets and for long lived assets to be disposed of
SFAS 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires that where an event or a change in circumstance indicates that the carrying value of an asset that is expected to be held and used may not be recoverable, an impairment loss should be recognised. The standard also requires that where there is a committed plan to dispose of an asset, the asset should be reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair valueless selling costs.
The Group has assessed the carrying values of all non-current assets and where required, have written down the assets to their recoverable amounts.
xii) Accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities and variable interest entities
SFAS 140 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities prescribes the accounting and disclosure requirements for transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. Under certain circumstances, the statement also requires a transferor of financial assets that are pledged as collateral to reclassify those assets, and the transferee to recognise those assets and their obligation to return them.
No adjustment is required in the US GAAP reconciliation as the effect of applying the provisions of SFAS 140 on total assets is not material. Refer to note 39 for the required disclosures.
In the year ended 30 September 2004, the Group first applied the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R). FIN 46R addresses the consolidation of entities in which a reporting enterprise has an economic interest, but for which a voting interestapproach to consolidation is not effective in identifying where control of the entity really lies, or in which the equity investors do not bear the economic risks and rewards of the entity. Overall, the objective of FIN46R is to improve the consistency and comparability of financial statements of enterprises engaged in similar activities.
111
An entity is a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) if the entitys equity at risk is not sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. An entity is also a VIE if, as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack any one of the following characteristics:
Direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entitys activities through voting rights
Obligation to absorb the expected losses of the special purpose entity if they occur
The right to receive the residual returns of the entity if there are any.
The Group is required to consolidate those VIEs for which the Group is the primary beneficiary.
Those entities that have been identified as requiring consolidation as a result of the application of FIN46R have been detailed in note 55 xxii. These entities are not consolidated or equity accounted under Australian GAAP.
Details of the treatment of securitisations under Australian GAAP are detailed in note 39.
The Group retains servicing and (for some loans) custodian responsibilities for sold loans. The fair value of these servicing rights is estimated to be approximately $13 million as at 30 September 2004. These interests are not considered to be material and as such have not been adjusted for in the US GAAP reconciliation.
Following a securitisation the Group may also receive any excess income derived by the SPV after interest has been paid to investors and net credit losses and expenses absorbed. Due to the significant uncertainties inherent in estimating the underlying loan repayment rates and interest margins with respect to the these loan securitisation programs, future cash flows cannot be reliably measured and no asset in relation to any entitlement to residual income is recognised.
xiii) Comprehensive income
SFAS 130 Reporting Comprehensive Income establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components.
Comprehensive income is defined as all changes in shareholders equity during a period excluding those resulting from investments by shareholders and distributions to shareholders.
Accordingly, the Group has shown currency translation adjustments, unrealised profit on available for sale securities, additional pension liability and certain SFAS 133 adjustments as components of other comprehensive income with net income according to US GAAP forming the remaining component of comprehensive income. Amounts transferred in and out of comprehensive income relating to unrealised profits on available for sale securities are specific to individual assets. The fair value of equity investments recorded as available for sale subject to adjustment in the US GAAP reconciliation was $14 million as at 30 September 2004 (2003: $4 million), with a book value of $2 million (2003: $2 million).
The movement in the unrealised gain relating to these securities during the year is equal to $10 million, realised gains before tax on these securities during the year is equal to $5 million (2003: $4 million).
The currency translation adjustment through comprehensive income includes a net gain on hedges after tax of $21 million (before tax $30 million) (2003: net gain after tax $126 million; before tax $180 million).
xiv) Earnings per share (EPS)
Under US GAAP, EPS is computed in accordance with SFAS 128 Earnings Per Share. This Standard is similar to Australian GAAP. In calculating EPS in accordance with SFAS 128, instruments that have the characteristics of both debt and equity have been considered. Such instruments have been treated as follows in the calculation of dilutive EPS for US GAAP purposes:
Trust Securities Issues (ANZ TrUEPrS): Have been excluded from the dilutive EPS calculation, as whilst they are classified as equity for US GAAP purposes, they do not convert into ordinary shares. The Trust Securities were mandatorily exchangeable for the preference shares issued by the Company, and carried an entitlement to a non-cumulative trust distribution of 8.00% or 8.08% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The securities were bought back in December 2003 for $1,045 million.
ANZ Stapled Exchangeable Preferred Securities (ANZ StEPS): Have been excluded from the dilutive EPS calculation as it is classified as debt for US GAAP purposes. On exchange, a holder will receive (at the Companys discretion) either $100 cash for each ANZ StEPS exchanged or a number of ordinary shares calculated in accordance with a conversion ratio based on $100 divided by the market price of ordinary shares at the date of conversion less 2.5%. Based on the experience of similar issues in Australia it is considered more likely that the securities will be repaid in cash rather than in ordinary shares.
US Stapled Trust Security: Has been included in the dilutive EPS as if the security is not redeemed or bought back prior to
15 December 2053 they will convert into preference shares, which in turn manditorily convert into a number of ordinary shares.
xv) Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities
The Group has adopted SFAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended by SFAS 138 Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities in its US GAAP reconciliationfrom 1 October 2000. SFAS 133 requires all derivatives to be recognised on balance sheet at fair value. Movements in the fair value of derivatives are taken tothe statement of financial performance,unless the derivatives meet the criteria prescribed in SFAS 133 for fair value, cashflow, or foreign currency hedges. If certain criteria are met derivatives can be designated as hedges. Under SFAS 133 normal banking hedging practices may not qualify for hedge accounting, notwithstanding their ability to hedge existing balance sheet positions from an economic perspective.
As a result future fair value movements recognised in the US GAAP reconciliation may not be indicative of the Groups risk profile. The Group uses instruments and hedging techniques that are effective in managing interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.
Further information on the results of the Groups hedging activities, and the effectiveness of the risk management policies, can be assessed better by considering the information provided on interest rate risk in note 35, and the information on hedging derivatives provided in note 38: Derivative Financial Instruments. The accounting for derivatives under Australian GAAP is outlined in note 1 (xiii).
Under SFAS 133, movements in the value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges are taken to the statement of financial performance, along with the movement in the fair value of the underlying exposure that is being hedged to the extent the hedge is effective. These amounts largely offset each other with any ineffectiveness recognised in the US GAAP statement of financial performance.
112
Movements in the effective portion of the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are taken to other comprehensive income.
Any ineffectiveness is recognised in the US GAAP statement of financial performance immediately. Amounts are subsequently reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings as the hedged transaction impacts earnings.
The impact on adoption of SFAS 133 and SFAS 138 at 1 October 2000 was a transitional adjustment to increase US GAAP profit by $11 million, and a transitional adjustment to decrease other comprehensive income by $52 million. Changes in market conditions and the Groups hedging policies may result in volatility in these US GAAP adjustments going forward. The net gain/(loss) after tax in the net income according to US GAAP recognised during the September 2004 year, due to fair value and cashflow hedge ineffectiveness (in respect of qualifying hedges) or non compliance is ($28) million (2003: ($57) million; 2002: $10 million) and ($35) million (2003: $24 million; 2002: ($22 million), respectively.
xvi) Provisions
Since 2001 significant amendments have been made to Australian GAAP in relation to recognition and measurement of restructuring provisions that bring them into line with those required for US GAAP reporting.
The recognition requirements for restructuring provisions under Australian GAAP and US GAAP are similar and as such no adjustment has been made in the reconciliation.
Whilst the wording of AASB 1044 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities & Assets and SFAS 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities may differ, the intention of both standards with regards to the recording of restructuring provisions is the same. Both standards require there to be a detailed plan, that there be a present obligation and that the entity has no realistic alternative but to proceed with the plan. As such, the liability/provision is deemed incurred. SFAS146 has additional disclosure requirements, which are addressed in the following.
During 2004 approximately 37% of the total restructuring and surplus leased space expense for the year related to one time termination and other staff benefits, and for surplus premises space(2003: 92%) and the remainder for other associated costs including technology costs. The personnel costs relate to ongoing business initiatives in response to changing market conditions that demanding streamlining of our front offices across the business units. These restructuring initiatives are expected to be substantially implemented over the next year.
The total restructuring provision as at 30 September is distributed as follows:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
One time termination and staff benefits |
|
73 |
|
58 |
|
Excess premises |
|
10 |
|
22 |
|
Other contract termination and associated costs |
|
23 |
|
12 |
|
Total |
|
106 |
|
92 |
|
All restructuring costs are expensed and recorded as operating expenses in the most appropriate category; for example, termination benefits are recorded in personnel and, surplus premises are recorded in premises, with the remainder recorded in other.
Note 27 to the financial statements provides additional details on the movements in the provision for restructuring costs.
xvii) Gain and non-capitalisable costs recognised on entering joint venture
In accordance with Australian GAAP the Group recognised a profit (net of transaction costs) based on the difference between fair value and carrying value of the share of businesses transferred to an external party on entering into a joint venture.
Under US GAAP the gain may not be recognised as it occurred as a result of a non-monetary transaction, which involved transferring ownership of controlled entities in exchange for a non-controlling ownership interest in the joint venture.
xviii) Guarantees
As of 1 January 2003 FIN 45 Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantors, including indirect Guarantees of indebtedness of Others requires a guarantor (for non derivative contracts) to recognise at inception a liability equal to the fair value of the obligations undertaken in issuing that guarantee. The fair value of the obligation in issuing the guarantee at inception is typically equal to the net present value of the future amount of the premium receivable under the contract.
ANZ provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to our customers to enhance their credit standing or allow them to complete various business transactions. The Group considers the following off balance sheet non derivative arrangements to be guarantees under FIN 45: Standby letters of credit, Guarantees, Bill endorsements, Documentary letters of credit, Performance related contingencies. The fair value of the estimated liability related to guarantees for the forementioned instruments at 30 September 2004 has been adjusted in the US GAAP reconciliation.
Standby letters of credit generally include guarantees of payments for loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade acceptances and are generally issued in connection with agreements made by customers with counterparties. Documentary letters of credit are an undertaking by the bank to guarantee payment to a beneficiary provided documents are presented in strict compliance with the terms and conditions of the documentary credit. Performance guarantees are issued to guarantee completion of projects in accordance with contract terms. They can be issued to support a customers obligation to supply specified products, commodities or maintenance or warranty services to a third party. ANZ as guarantor becomes obligated to perform under the guarantee when a counterparty does not fulfill its obligations under an associated contract. The majority of these contracts are short term.
Sold credit derivatives also meet the definition of guarantees under this statement but are recorded in the statementof financial position at their fair value.
Details of the maximum potential amount of future payments can be found at note 48. The amounts detailed in note 48 represent the notional amounts that could be lost under the guarantees and indemnifications if there was a total default by the guaranteed parties, without consideration of possible recoveries.
113
xix) Accounting for stock compensation plans
Under Australian GAAP an expense is not required to be recognised for share options issued to employees or for shares issued at a discount. However, ANZ expenses the deferred share plan under Australian GAAP.
SFAS 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation requires shares and options issued as part of a compensation plan to employees to be recognised using either the fair value method or the intrinsic value method as prescribed by APB No. 25 and its related interpretations.
For US GAAP, APB No.25 share-based employee compensation cost for variable share option plans (those with performance hurdles) is measured using the intrinsic value method. US GAAP compensation cost is determined at date of issue and is expensed if the strike price is less than the market price at the time and it is probable that performance hurdles are met.
To the extent that the intrinsic value increases in subsequent periods an additional expense is recorded.
Variable share option plans include all plans with performance conditions. The Groups policy is to generally grant share options at the average market price of the underlying shares at the date of grant.
Share issues to employees under the $1000 Share Plan are expensed in the year issued under US GAAP. Under Australian GAAP they are issued from Share Capital Account and are not expensed. An adjustment is made in the US GAAP reconciliation for $22 million (2003: $18 million).
The following amounts were booked as a compensation expense during the year in relation to stock based compensation:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Gross(1) |
|
90 |
|
68 |
|
After tax(2) |
|
63 |
|
48 |
|
(1) This includes the Deferred Share Plan which is also expensed under Australian GAAP.
(2) The tax deduction for the deferred share and the $1,000 share plan occurs at the time that shares are issued. The tax effect is recognised under Australian GAAP and therefore, no adjustment is made in the US GAAP reconciliation.
114
If the fair value basis of accounting had been applied to account for compensation costs as stipulated in SFAS 123, the following profit after income tax and earnings per share would have appeared.
The fair value of the options has been calculated using a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value is calculated as at the grant date and the value amortised on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Note 4 details the assumptions taken into account in the fair value calculation. An adjustment is made in the US GAAP reconciliation for $21 million (2003: $3 million).
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Net income according to US GAAP |
|
2,788 |
|
2,380 |
|
2,097 |
|
Intrinsic method adjustment (APB 25) |
|
43 |
|
21 |
|
40 |
|
Fair value adjustment (SFAS123) |
|
(53 |
) |
(50 |
) |
(44 |
) |
Adjusted Pro Forma net income according to US GAAP |
|
2,778 |
|
2,351 |
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
Basic earnings per share (cents)* |
|
155 |
|
155 |
|
144 |
|
143 |
|
127 |
|
127 |
|
Diluted earnings per share (cents)* |
|
149 |
|
149 |
|
144 |
|
142 |
|
126 |
|
126 |
|
* Rounded to nearest whole cent and restated for rights issue
Details of the share-based compensation plans are included in note 50.
xx) Classification of financial instruments with characteristics of both liability and equity all new issues post May 2003
Under Australian GAAP, preference shares issued on 23 September 2003 (known as ANZ StEPS) are classified as equity instruments as they are not considered to be mandatorily converting to ordinary shares and do not meet the classification requirements of a financial liability upon issue. SFAS 150 Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity requires that the StEPS be classified as a liability because the monetary value of the obligation to the holders of the securities is known at inception and the holders are not exposed to changes in the fair value of equity. Any associated dividends have been reclassified as interest expense in the US GAAP reconciliation.
SFAS 150 does not apply to issues of preference shares made prior to 31 May 2003.
115
xxi) Details of Pension Schemes and Pension Expense
Reconciliations of the funded status of major defined benefit schemes as at 30 June 2004 are summarised below.
Details of the funding of the schemes are set out in note 49.
Australian Scheme
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
54 |
|
Interest costs |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
(5 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(6 |
) |
Actuarial gains (losses) |
|
(3 |
) |
2 |
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, 30 June |
|
44 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at start of year |
|
35 |
|
43 |
|
49 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
4 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
Employer contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
(5 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(6 |
) |
Total fair value of plan assets, 30 June |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
43 |
|
Funded status |
|
(10 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(8 |
) |
Unrecognised net transition loss |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Unrecognised net loss |
|
10 |
|
16 |
|
10 |
|
Adjustment required to recognise minimum unfunded projected benefit obligation |
|
(10 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(12 |
) |
Net amount recognised |
|
(10 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(8 |
) |
Amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefits costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liabilities |
|
(10 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(8 |
) |
The assumptions used in the actuarial calculations are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate used in determining present values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pensioners |
|
6.0 |
% |
5.0 |
% |
6.0 |
% |
Annual increase in future compensation levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pensions |
|
2.5 |
% |
2.5 |
% |
2.5 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
7.5 |
% |
7.5 |
% |
7.5 |
% |
Weighted average assets allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
61 |
% |
n/a |
* |
n/a |
* |
Debt securities |
|
23 |
% |
n/a |
* |
n/a |
* |
Real estate |
|
9 |
% |
n/a |
* |
n/a |
* |
Other |
|
7 |
% |
n/a |
* |
n/a |
* |
|
|
100 |
% |
n/a |
* |
n/a |
* |
* Information is not available
The Plans investment objectives are to maximise returns over the long term whilst accepting a moderate degree of performance variability; and to exceed inflation (CPI increases), on average, by at least 3% over rolling five and seven year periods. The Plans investment strategy is to combine 70% growth assets (shares and property) and 30% defensive assets (diversified fixed income and cash). This combination reduces the expected variability compared to a portfolio invested only in shares.
116
xxi) Details of Pension Schemes and Pension Expense
Cash Flows
Contributions
It is anticipated that nil will be contributed to this scheme in 2005.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Year |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
2010-14 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
UK Pension Scheme
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
952 |
|
1,034 |
|
1,038 |
|
Service cost |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
15 |
|
Interest cost |
|
49 |
|
53 |
|
62 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
(46 |
) |
(49 |
) |
(62 |
) |
Actuarial gains (losses) |
|
(11 |
) |
56 |
|
27 |
|
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations |
|
19 |
|
(155 |
) |
(46 |
) |
Benefit obligation, 30 June |
|
975 |
|
952 |
|
1,034 |
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at start of year |
|
790 |
|
982 |
|
1,152 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
71 |
|
(4 |
) |
(69 |
) |
Employer contribution |
|
8 |
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
(46 |
) |
(49 |
) |
(62 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations |
|
16 |
|
(138 |
) |
(37 |
) |
Total fair value of plan assets, 30 June |
|
839 |
|
790 |
|
982 |
|
Funded status |
|
(136 |
) |
(162 |
) |
(52 |
) |
Unrecognised net transition gain |
|
(3 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(19 |
) |
Unrecognised loss |
|
165 |
|
194 |
|
92 |
|
Unrecognised prior service cost |
|
32 |
|
44 |
|
46 |
|
Adjustment required to recognise minimum benefit obligation |
|
(136 |
) |
(142 |
) |
|
|
Net amount recognised |
|
(78 |
) |
(76 |
) |
67 |
|
Amounts recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefits costs |
|
58 |
|
66 |
|
67 |
|
Accrued benefit liabilities |
|
(136 |
) |
(142 |
) |
|
|
The assumptions used in the actuarial calculations are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate used in determining present values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active members |
|
5.75 |
% |
5.25 |
% |
5.75 |
% |
pensioners |
|
5.75 |
% |
5.25 |
% |
5.75 |
% |
Annual increase in future compensation levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
salary |
|
4.50 |
% |
4.25 |
% |
4.5 |
% |
pensions |
|
2.75 |
% |
2.25 |
% |
2.5 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
7.00 |
% |
6.25 |
% |
6.75 |
% |
117
The Trustee of the ANZ UK Staff Pension Scheme determines their investment strategy after consulting with the Bank with regard to the liability profile of the plan and in accordance with the Statement of Investment Principles. Following an asset liability modeling exercise, the Trustee has determined the following benchmarks which they believe provide an adequate balance between maximising the return on the assets and minimising the risk of failing to meet the liabilities over the long term:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Weighted average assets allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
50 |
% |
45 |
% |
n/a* |
|
Debt securities |
|
34 |
% |
36 |
% |
n/a* |
|
Real estate |
|
15 |
% |
15 |
% |
n/a* |
|
Other |
|
1 |
% |
4 |
% |
n/a* |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
n/a* |
|
* Information is not available
Cash Flows
Contributions
It is anticipated that $12 million will be contributed to this scheme in 2005.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Year |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
48 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
53 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
55 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
55 |
|
|
|
2010-14 |
|
314 |
|
|
|
118
NZ Scheme
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at start of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase due to NBNZ acquisition |
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, 30 June |
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at start of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase due to NBNZ acquisition |
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contribution |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of plan assets, 30 June |
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrecognised net transition gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognised loss (gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognised prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment required to recognise minimum benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognised |
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefits costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liabilities |
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The assumptions used in the actuarial calculations are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate used in determining present values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active members |
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
pensioners |
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Annual increase in future compensation levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
salary |
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
pensions |
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average assets allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Assets in the Fund are held in pooled funds and are managed by specialist investment managers. Investment returns are measured against the relevant market index for each assets class and are targeted to outperform the index by a prescribed amount over a three-year period. The strategic range around the asset allocation benchmarks is 10 percentage points.
119
Cash Flows
Contributions
It is anticipated that approximately 20.7% of salaries (gross of tax) will be contributed to this scheme in 2005. This will be subject to a full actuarial valuation in March 2005.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
Year |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
2010-14 |
|
38 |
|
|
|
The elements of the net periodic pension cost of the above schemes are as follows:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Service cost |
|
16 |
|
14 |
|
13 |
|
Interest cost |
|
58 |
|
57 |
|
59 |
|
Expected return on schemes assets |
|
(60 |
) |
(70 |
) |
(77 |
) |
Amortisation net transition asset |
|
(6 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(7 |
) |
Recognised gains/losses |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognised prior service cost |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
16 |
|
(1 |
) |
(8 |
) |
Amortisation of prepaid pension expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Employer contributions |
|
(11 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Net pension expense |
|
5 |
|
(2 |
) |
(18 |
) |
The Group also sponsors defined contribution schemes. The Groups contributions to major defined contribution schemes amounted to $127 million for the year (2003: $102 million; 2002: $80 million).
120
xxii) Variable Interest Entities
The following entities have been identified as requiring consolidation as a result of the application of FIN46R on the basis that the Group is the Primary Beneficiary. These entities are not consolidated or equity accounted under Australian GAAP:
Entity |
|
Nature |
|
Purpose & Activities |
|
Total Assets* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
Arc Funding Pty Ltd |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV issues commercial paper to finance the acquisition or holding of financial assets. |
|
174 |
Aurora Securitisation Pty Ltd |
|
Conduit |
|
SPV issues commercial paper and on-lends the funds to special purpose trusts that acquire or hold financial assets. |
|
2,147 |
Coast Asset Corporation |
|
Conduit |
|
SPV issues commercial paper in the United States and on-lends the funds to special purpose companies that acquire or hold financial assets. |
|
370 |
Coral(3) |
|
ANZ Client deal Capital Markets funded |
|
SPV issues commercial paper to finance the acquisition or holding of financial assets. |
|
221 |
Eos(2) |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV issues commercial paper to finance the acquisition or holdings of financial assets. |
|
178 |
Echo Funding Pty Ltd |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV issues medium term notes on a segregated series basis and uses the funds to acquire bonds or exposures through credit derivatives. |
|
77 |
Kingfisher Securitisation Pty Ltd |
|
Conduit |
|
SPV raises funds by issuing debt instruments and uses the funds so raised to acquire assets / investments. |
|
291 |
Omeros Trust(1) |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV raises funds by issuing notes to Aurora Securitisation. The proceeds of notes are used to finance the acquisition or holding of financial assets. |
|
279 |
Omeros II Trust(1) |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV raises funds by issuing notes to Aurora Securitisation. The proceeds of notes are used to finance the acquisition or holding of financial assets |
|
68 |
Orion |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV issues commercial paper to finance the acquisition or holding of financial assets. |
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solera Trust |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV issues commercial paper and on-lends the funds to special purpose trusts that acquire or hold financial assets. |
|
178 |
Stellar Funding Pty Ltd |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV issues commercial paper to finance the acquisition or holding of financial assets. |
|
152 |
Surf Capital |
|
Repackaging Vehicle |
|
SPV raises funds by issuing notes to Coast Asset Corporation. The proceeds of notes are used to finance the acquisition or holding of financial assets. |
|
157 |
(1) Consolidates into Aurora Securitisation Pty Ltd
(2) Consolidates into Solera Trust
(3) Consolidates into Coast Asset Corporation
* Total assets are shown gross of any consolidation eliminations
Those SPVs identified as VIEs are represented as VIEs rather than Qualifying SPEs on the basis that these SPVs are not likely to satisfy all of the requirements of clause 35 of the definition of Qualifying SPE set out in SFAS 140.
ANZ is not expected to absorb the majority of the entitys losses as these losses are either (i) insured by suitably rated counterparties; or (ii) held by external investors.
121
The Group also holds a significant variable interest in the following Variable Interest Entities; however, it is not the Primary Beneficiary:
Entity |
|
Nature |
|
Purpose & Activities |
|
Total Assets |
|
Maximum exposure to loss* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
Kingfisher Trust 2001-1G |
|
ANZ client deal. Capital markets funded |
|
Trust raises funds by issuing notes to the market. Proceeds of notes are used to fund the acquisition of Receivables and Related Securities. |
|
613 |
|
88 |
Kingfisher Trust 2004 - 1G |
|
ANZ client deal. Capital markets funded |
|
Trust raises funds by issuing notes to the market. Proceeds of notes are used to fund the acquisition of Receivables and Related Securities. |
|
1,383 |
|
80 |
* Maximum exposure to loss is considered to be the notional amounts of the liquidity and redraw facilities
xxiii) Maturity analysis of the Groups Bonds and Notes and Loan Capital
At 30 September |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
4,657 |
|
4,289 |
|
3,972 |
|
Between 1 year and 2 years |
|
9,568 |
|
3,360 |
|
5,068 |
|
Between 2 years and 3 years |
|
5,128 |
|
5,481 |
|
2,131 |
|
Between 3 years and 4 years |
|
3,537 |
|
1,994 |
|
3,024 |
|
Between 4 years and 5 years |
|
5,483 |
|
2,552 |
|
1,962 |
|
After 5 years |
|
7,285 |
|
4,084 |
|
969 |
|
Perpetual |
|
419 |
|
442 |
|
1,027 |
|
Total |
|
36,077 |
|
22,202 |
|
18,153 |
|
xxiv) Material business combination in the year of acquisition
On 1 December 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the issued share capital of NBNZ Holdings Ltd and its controlled entities. The number of shares acquired was 159 million. The results of NBNZs operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. NBNZ is a leading bank in New Zealand.
The aggregate purchase price under US GAAP was $4,805 billion (converted as at the date of acquisition). The following table summarises the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, at the exchange rate which prevailed at the date of acquisition
|
|
Fair Value of NBNZs |
|
|
|
$M |
|
Liquid assets |
|
799 |
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
2,597 |
|
Trading securities |
|
1,653 |
|
Investment securities |
|
213 |
|
Net loans and advances |
|
30,564 |
|
Other assets |
|
1,722 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
160 |
|
Total assets acquired |
|
37,708 |
|
Due to other financial institutions |
|
1,092 |
|
Deposits and borrowings |
|
30,694 |
|
Provisions |
|
109 |
|
Creditors and other liabilities |
|
2,455 |
|
Unsubordinated debt |
|
1,119 |
|
Loan capital |
|
488 |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
35,957 |
|
Net assets acquired |
|
1,751 |
|
Goodwill |
|
3,054 |
|
The amount of goodwill under US GAAP is not the same as that recognised under Australian GAAP, as the cost of the hedges of the acquisition price are not considered part of the acquisition price under US GAAP.
In its recent acquisitions ANZ has acquired what would be termed long term customer relationship intangible assets. An asset is required to be booked at fair value on acquisition for long term customer relationship intangible assets which meet the criteria in SFAS 141. The recent acquisition of NBNZ by ANZ has resulted in consideration being given to booking an asset in respect of these relationships. Appendix A to SFAS 141 provides guidance on how to apply the recognition criteria to such assets. NBNZ is based in New Zealand and its customers are predominatly domiciled in New Zealand. Legislation and common law applying to banks in New Zealand prohibit an entity from selling, leasing, or otherwise exchanging information about some or all of its customers.
Long term customer relationship intangible assets such as customer lists and data do not arise from contractual relationships, and due to the Privacy Laws governing customer information in New Zealand, such assets are not separable, i.e cannot be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, and hence have not been recognised. In light of this, the Group is assessing whether a core deposit intangible should be recognised separately from goodwill.
122
Operating result of ANZ had the acquisition of NBNZ occurred on 1 October 2002 for the 2004 and 2003 financial years
The following table illustrates the impact to the Group results, had NBNZ been acquired at the commencement of the 2003 financial year.
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Operating income |
|
17,622 |
|
14,274 |
|
Income before extraordinary items and the cumulative effect of accounting changes |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
2,719 |
|
2,687 |
|
EPS* |
|
153 |
|
145 |
|
* Rounded to nearest whole cent
The pro-forma net income reported above includes $550 million in 2004 and $409 million in relation to NBNZ in 2003.
The balances have been adjusted to reflect the difference in depreciation and amortisation expense caused by any variation between the fair value acquired, and the carrying value of these assets in the accounts of ANZ. No adjustment has been made for any change to accounting policies.
Net income in 2003 has not been adjusted for FAS133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as NBNZ did not prepare US GAAP accounts prior to acquisition.
Disposal of controlled entities
There were no material controlled entities disposed of during the year to 30 September 2004.
(xxv) Recently issued Australian accounting standards
A number of new accounting standards have been issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) that have not yet been adopted for Australian GAAP. A summary of the standards that currently apply appear in note 1.
We will also be required to adopt the Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the AASB, for the half-year ending 31 March 2006 and year ending 30 September 2006. A summary of the significant areas of impact of adopting IFRS appears in note 57.
Some of these standards, once adopted, will result in certain adjustments in the reconciliations of net income to US GAAP and shareholders equity to US GAAP no longer being required.
56: EXCHANGE RATES
The exchange rates used in the translation of the results and the assets and liabilities of major overseas branches and controlled entities are:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||||
|
|
Closing |
|
Average |
|
Closing |
|
Average |
|
Closing |
|
Average |
|
Great British pound |
|
0.3983 |
|
0.4054 |
|
0.4070 |
|
0.3822 |
|
0.3477 |
|
0.3621 |
|
United States dollar |
|
0.7165 |
|
0.7263 |
|
0.6795 |
|
0.6124 |
|
0.5441 |
|
0.5323 |
|
New Zealand dollar |
|
1.0700 |
|
1.1254 |
|
1.1431 |
|
1.1139 |
|
1.1585 |
|
1.2001 |
|
123
57: INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS
For reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005, the Group will be required to prepare financial statements using Australian Standards that have been revised to satisfy the requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The Group will report for the first time in compliance with Australian equivalents to IFRS when the results for the half-year ended 31 March 2006 and the year ended 30 September 2006 are released.
The Group is required to prepare an opening balance sheet in accordance with Australian equivalents to IFRS as at 1 October 2004. Most accounting policy adjustments to retrospectively apply Australian equivalents to IFRS will be made against retained earnings in this opening balance sheet. However, transitional adjustments relating to those standards for which comparatives are not required will only be made on 1 October 2005. Comparatives are not required for AASB 132: Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation, AASB 139: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and AASB 4: Insurance Contracts.
A Steering Committee is monitoring the adoption of IFRS as per the Groups implementation plan. This Committee has been following developments in IFRS and the likely impact that these standards will have on our products and our customers, and on our own financial reports and accounting policies. Dedicated workstreams are responsible for evaluating the impact of a specific group of accounting changes. Each workstream is progressing through multiple phases of work: technical evaluation, design, development and implementation. The Group has largely completed the technical evaluation phases of each workstream, and is moving into design, development and implementation. The program is achieving scheduled milestones.
The following areas have been identified as significant for the Group:
Credit Loss
Provisioning |
|
IFRS adopts an approach known as incurred losses for credit loss provisioning and provides guidance on measurement of incurred losses. Provisions are raised for losses that have already been incurred for exposures that are known to be impaired. The estimated losses on these impaired exposures are then discounted to their present value. As this discount unwinds, there is a resulting recognition of interest in the statement of financial performance during the period between recognition of impairment and recovery of the written down amount. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exposures found not to be impaired are placed into pools of similar assets with similar risk characteristics to be collectively assessed for losses that have been incurred, but not identified yet. The required provision is estimated on the basis of historical loss experience for assets with credit risk characteristics similar to those in the collective pool. The historical loss experience is adjusted based on current observable data. |
|
|
|
|
|
The current ELP charge to profit will be replaced, on adoption of IFRS, by a charge for specific provisions on impaired exposures, plus a charge for movements in the provision that is held for exposures that are being collectively assessed for impairment. |
|
|
|
|
|
It is anticipated that the proposed changes will result in a reduction in the level of provisioning which the bank holds against its credit exposures. |
|
|
|
Debt v Equity
classification |
|
The Group has issued a number of hybrid tier one instruments. The ANZ StEPS issue, which is currently treated as equity, will be reclassified as debt. Distributions on ANZ StEPS will be treated as interest rather than dividends. |
|
|
|
Fee Revenue |
|
Revised rules governing the accounting for fee income will result in more fees being deferred on initial payment, and recognised either as an adjustment to yield or over the period of service. Fees required to be treated as an adjustment to yield will be recognised in interest income rather than fee income. On initial application, certain fees that have previously been recognised in the statement of financial performance will be recognised in the statement of financial position, with a corresponding reduction to retained earnings. The annual impact on net profit from this change is not expected to be material. |
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
The current Group policy of amortising goodwill over the expected period of benefit will cease. Instead, goodwill will be subject to impairment testing annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. This change in policy may result in increased volatility of future earnings where impairment losses may occur. |
124
Hedging |
|
All derivatives contracts, whether used as hedging instruments or otherwise, will be carried at fair value on the Groups statement of financial position. IFRS recognise fair value hedge accounting, cash flow hedge accounting, and hedges of investments in foreign operations. Fair value and cash flow hedge accounting can only be considered where effectiveness tests are met. Ineffectiveness outside the prescribed range precludes the use of hedge accounting and can result in significant volatility in the statement of financial performance. The Group expects to predominantly use cash flow hedging in respect of its interest rate risk hedges, which will create volatility in equity reserve balances. |
|
|
|
|
|
The hedging rules will impact the way the Group accounts for hedges of its funding and for hedges of its statement of financial position. Customer trading, where all derivatives are currently marked to market, will not be impacted. |
|
|
|
Post
Employment Benefits |
|
The Group does not currently recognise an asset or liability for the net position of the defined benefit superannuation schemes, including those which operate in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. On adoption of AASB 119: Employee Benefits, the Group will recognise the net position of each scheme on the statement of financial position, with a corresponding entry to the statement of financial performance. The initial adjustment will be made, retrospectively, against opening retained earnings as at 1 October 2004, and will be based on actuarially determined valuations of each scheme made at that date in accordance with AASB 119. After the transitional adjustment, further movements in the net position of each scheme will be recognised in the statement of financial performance. |
|
|
|
Securitisation |
|
IFRS introduces new requirements for the recognition of financial assets, including those transferred to a special purpose vehicle for securitisation. Existing securitisations, both of our own assets and of our customers assets, require an assessment of the accounting treatment that will be required under IFRS. Further, a different interpretation of the consolidation rules applicable to special purpose vehicles may result in some vehicles, which were previously not consolidated, being consolidated by the Group. Securitisations commenced on or after 1 January 2004 have been assessed in accordance with IFRS and current Australian GAAP. |
|
|
|
Share-Based
Payments |
|
The Group currently recognises immediately an expense equal to the full fair value of all deferred shares issued as part of the short and long-term incentive arrangements. The deferred shares vest over one to three years, and may be forfeited under certain conditions. The Group does not currently recognise an expense for options issued to staff, shares issued under the $1,000 employee share plan, nor for the 5% discount applicable to the ANZ Share Save Scheme. On adoption of AASB 2: Share-based Payments, the Group will recognise an expense for all share-based remuneration, including deferred shares and options, and will amortise those expenses over the relevant vesting periods. The Group will also recognise an expense for shares issued under the $1,000 employee share plan, and for the 5% discount on shares granted under the ANZ Share Save Scheme. On transition, this change in accounting policy will result in a reduction in retained earnings at 1 October 2004. |
|
|
|
Taxation |
|
Under AASB 112: Income Taxes, a balance sheet approach will be adopted, replacing the statement of financial performance approach currently used. This method recognises deferred tax balances when there is a difference between the carrying value of an asset or liability and its tax base. It is expected that the standard may require the Group to carry a slightly higher level of deferred tax assets and liabilities. |
Capital measurement - The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has announced that it intends to revise its capital adequacy requirements to take account of the impact of IFRS. This will be achieved through the progressive release of a series of discussion papers. Priority areas for review by APRA include the treatment of innovative capital instruments for capital adequacy purposes and the treatment of superannuation fund surpluses and deficits. APRA has stated that it will not make any IFRS-related changes to the existing prudential framework until it has completed relevant consultations, and not before 1 July 2005 at the earliest. In the interim, existing prudential standards will continue to apply.
125
58: EVENTS SINCE THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR
ANZ Trustees merger with Equity Trustees Limited
On 12 October 2004, the Company announced it had signed an agreement with Equity Trustees Limited, to merge the Groups trustee business with Equity Trustees Limited. The merged business will create Australias third largest trustee company and the leading manager of charitable foundations.
In consideration, the Company will become the major shareholder in Equity Trustees Limited with a 37.5% share of the expanded issued capital, and receive $3 million in cash.
Completion of the merger is expected early in 2005 subject to the outcomes of due diligence, regulatory and government approvals and approval by Equity Trustees shareholders. The Company will equity account for its investment in Equity Trustees Limited and recognise a small profit from the transfer of the Groups trustee business.
The financial effect of this merger has not been recognised in these financial statements.
Share buyback
On 26 October 2004, the Company announced the intention to undertake an on-market share buyback of at least $350 million. The buyback is contingent on regulatory approval for a new offshore hybrid equity transaction.
The financial effect of this buyback has not been reflected in these financial statements.
Sale of London-headquartered project finance activities
On 26 October 2004, the Company announced entry into a Memorandum of Understanding for the sale, subject to due diligence and other standard conditions, of the majority of its London-headquartered project finance activities to Standard Chartered Bank. The amount of the loans and commitments is approximately $2 billion. The premium from the sale above book value is not expected to be significant.
The financial effect of this sale has not been reflected in these financial statements.
126
The directors of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited declare that the financial statements and notes of the Company and the consolidated entity:
a) are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
i) complying with applicable Australian Accounting Standards, and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and
ii) giving a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company and of the consolidated entity as at 30 September 2004 and of their performance as represented by the results of their operations and their cash flows, for the year ended on that date; and
iii) that the directors have been given the declaration under section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001; and
b) in the directors opinion at the date of this declaration there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
The Company and some of its wholly owned controlled entities (listed in note 48) executed a Deed of Cross Guarantee enabling them to take advantage of the accounting and audit relief offered by class order 98/1418 (as amended), dated 13 August 1998 issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
The nature of the Deed of Cross Guarantee is to guarantee each creditor payment in full of any debt in accordance with the terms of the Deed of Cross Guarantee.
At the date of this declaration, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and its controlled entities which executed the Deed of Cross Guarantee are able, as an economic entity, to meet any obligations or liabilities to which they are, or may become, subject by virtue of the Deed of Cross Guarantee.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
/s/ Charles Goode |
|
/s/ John McFarlane |
|
Charles Goode |
|
John McFarlane |
|
Director |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
4 November 2004 |
|
|
|
127
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF AUSTRALIA AND
NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
SCOPE
We have audited the financial report of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited for the financial year ended 30 September 2004, consisting of the statements of financial position as of 30 September 2004 and 2003, statements of financial performance, statements of changes in shareholders equity and statements of cash flows for the three years ended 30 September 2004 and accompanying notes 1 to 58, and the directors declaration set out on pages 6 to 127. The financial report includes the consolidated financial statements of the consolidated entity, comprising the Company and the entities it controlled at the end of the year or from time to time during the financial year. The Companys directors are responsible for the financial report. We have conducted an independent audit of this financial report in order to express an opinion on it to the members of the Company.
Our audit has been conducted in accordance with Auditing Standards of Australia and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report is free of material misstatement. Our procedures included examination, on a test basis, of evidence supporting the amounts and other disclosures in the financial report, and the evaluation of accounting policies and significant accounting estimates. These procedures have been undertaken to form an opinion whether, in all material respects, the financial report is presented fairly in accordance with Accounting Standards and other mandatory professional reporting requirements in Australia and statutory requirements so as to present a view which is consistent with our understanding of the Companys and the consolidated entitys financial position, and performance as represented by the results of their operations and their cash flows.
The audit opinion expressed in this report has been formed on the above basis.
AUDIT OPINION
In our opinion, the financial report of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited is in accordance with:
a) the Corporations Act 2001, including:
i. giving a true and fair view of the Companys and the consolidated entitys financial position as at 30 September 2004 and 2003, of the Companys performance for the financial years ended 30 September 2004 and 2003, and of the consolidated entitys financial performance, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the financial years ended 30 September 2004, 2003 and 2002; and
ii. complying with Accounting Standards in Australia and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
b) other mandatory professional reporting requirements in Australia.
Accounting principles generally accepted in Australia vary in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in note 55 to the financial statements.
/s/ KPMG |
|
/s/ Chris Hall |
|
KPMG |
Chris Hall |
||
|
Partner |
||
|
|
||
Melbourne, Australia |
|
||
4 November 2004 |
|
128
The Group prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative accounting pronouncements. However, notwithstanding the existence of relevant accounting standards, there are a number of critical accounting treatments, which include complex or subjective decisions or assessments. The Group requires all such applications of judgement to be reviewed and agreed by Group Finance, and where the impact is material, the accounting treatment is reviewed during the audit process by the Groups external auditors. All material changes to accounting policy are approved by the Audit Committee of the Board.
HISTORICAL CHANGES
There have been no material changes to the Groups critical accounting policies or their related methodologies over the last 3 years.
A brief discussion of critical accounting policies, and their impact on the Group, follows:
a) Economic Loss Provisioning
Description and Significance
Each month the Group recognises an expense for credit losses provision for doubtful debts based on the average one year loss expected to be incurred if the same loan portfolio was held over an economic cycle. The provision for doubtful debts is booked to the General Provision which is maintained to cover the losses inherent in the Groups existing loan portfolio. The method used by the Group for determining the expense charge is referred to as Economic Loss Provisioning (ELP). The Group uses ELP models to calculate the expected loss by considering:
the size, composition and risk profile of the current loan portfolio; and
the history of credit losses for each loan portfolio.
Ongoing reviews
The Group regularly reviews the assumptions used in the ELP models. These reviews are conducted in recognition of the subjective nature of the ELP methodology. Methodologies are updated as improved analysis becomes available. In addition, the robustness of outcomes is reviewed considering the Groups actual loss experience, and losses sustained by other banks operating in similar markets.
To the extent that credit losses are not consistent with previous loss patterns used to develop the assumptions within the ELP methodology, the existing General Provision may be determined to be either in excess of or insufficient to cover credit losses not yet specifically identified.
As a result of the reassessments, ELP charge levels may be periodically increased or decreased with a direct impact on profitability.
As part of its review of the ELP model outputs, the Group also regularly evaluates the overall level of the General Provision. The Group is required, by APRA prudential standards, to have policies which cover the level of General Provisions that are needed to absorb estimated losses inherent in the credit portfolio. In some limited circumstances, the assessment of the inherent losses in the portfolio may require an additional charge to profits to ensure the adequacy of the General Provision. The Group considers it appropriate to maintain its General Provision in excess of the APRA guidelines.
Quantification of Sensitivity
The average charge to profit for ELP was 0.31% of average net lending assets or $632 million (Sep 2003: 0.39% or $614 million; Sep 2002: 0.43% or $610 million excluding the special general provision of $250 million).
As at September 2004, the balance of the General Provision of $1,992 million (Sep 2003: $1,534 million) represents 1.01% (Sep 2003: 1.01%) of risk weighted assets.
b) Specific Provisioning
Description and Significance
The Group maintains a specific provision for doubtful debts arising from its exposure to organisations and credit counterparties.
When a specific debt loss is identified as being probable, its value is transferred from the general provision to the specific provision. Specific provisioning is applied when the full recovery of one of the Groups exposures is identified as being doubtful resulting in the creation of a specific provision equal to the full amount of the expected loss plus any enforcement/recovery expenses.
Recoveries resulting from proceeds received from accounts which were written off in prior years are transferred back to the General Provision.
Quantification of Sensitivity
The recognition of losses has an impact on the size of the General Provision rather than directly impacting profit. However, to the extent that the General Provision is drawn down beyond a prudent amount it will be restored through a transfer from the current years earnings. The amount of net transfer from the General Provision to the Specific Provision, net of recoveries, during the year was $443 million (Sept 2003: $527 million; Sep 2002: $728 million).
129
c) Deferred acquisition costs, software assets and deferred income
Description and Significance
The Group recognises assets and liabilities that represent:
Deferred acquisition costs direct costs from the acquisition of interest earning assets;
Software assets direct costs incurred in developing software systems; and
Deferred income liabilities representing income received in advance of services performed.
Deferred acquisition costs Initially, expenses related to the acquisition of interest earning assets are recognised as part of the cost of acquiring the asset and written-off as an adjustment to its yield over its expected life. For assets subject to prepayment, expected life is determined on the basis of the historical behaviour of the asset portfolio, taking into account prepayments. Commissions paid to third party mortgage brokers are an example of expenditure that is deferred and amortised over the expected average life of a mortgage of 4 years.
Software assets Costs incurred in acquiring and building software and computer systems are capitalised as fixed assets and expensed as depreciation over periods of between 3 and 5 years except for the branch front end applications where 7 years is used. The carrying value of these assets is subject to a recoverable amount test to determine their value to the Group. If it is determined that the value of the asset is less than its book value, the asset is written down to the recoverable amount. Costs incurred in planning or evaluating software proposals, or in maintaining systems after implementation, are not capitalised.
Deferred income Income received in advance of the Groups performance of services or in advance of having been earned, is initially recorded as a liability. Once the recognition criteria are met, it is then recognised as income.
Quantification of Sensitivity
Deferred acquisition costs At 30 September, the Groups assets included $465 million (Sep 2003: $360 million) in relation to costs incurred in acquiring interest earning assets. During the year, amortisation of $218 million (Sep 2003: $178 million) was recognised as an adjustment to the yield earned on interest earning assets.
Software assets At 30 September, the Groups fixed assets included $430 million (Sep 2003: $465 million) in relation to costs incurred in acquiring and developing software. During the year, depreciation expense of $129 million (Sep 2003: $83 million) was recognised. Following prior periods of above average project activity which replaced significant parts of the Groups core infrastructure, the software depreciation expense is expected to stabilise going forward. Consistent with US accounting rules on software capitalisation, only costs incurred during configuration, coding and installation stages are capitalised. Administrative, preliminary project and post implementation costs including determining performance requirements, vendor selection and training costs are expensed as incurred.
Deferred income At 30 September, the Groups liabilities included $149 million (Sep 2003: $280 million) in relation to income received in advance. This income is largely comprised of two components: (1) fees received for services not yet completed; and (2) profit made on interest rate swaps from a shortening investment term of capital. Under Australian Accounting Standards, this profit is deferred and recognised when the hedged transaction occurs, or immediately if the hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur.
130
The balances of deferred assets and liabilities at 30 September were:
|
|
Deferred Acquisition Costs |
|
Software Assets |
|
Deferred Income |
|
||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Personal Banking Australia |
|
145 |
|
109 |
|
296 |
|
322 |
|
31 |
|
17 |
|
Institutional |
|
10 |
|
9 |
|
43 |
|
50 |
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
New Zealand Business |
|
36 |
|
15 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
Corporate Australia |
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
14 |
|
12 |
|
7 |
|
Esanda and UDC |
|
250 |
|
227 |
|
8 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Group Centre |
|
22 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
56 |
|
90 |
|
249 |
|
Total |
|
465 |
|
360 |
|
430 |
|
465 |
|
149 |
|
280 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs analysis
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Brokerage |
|
Brokerage |
|
Balance(2) |
|
Brokerage |
|
Brokerage |
|
Balance(2) |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Personal Banking Australia |
|
64 |
|
89 |
|
145 |
|
41 |
|
70 |
|
109 |
|
Esanda & UDC |
|
147 |
|
177 |
|
250 |
|
133 |
|
175 |
|
227 |
|
New Zealand Business |
|
7 |
|
11 |
|
36 |
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
15 |
|
Institutional |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
10 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
9 |
|
Other(3) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
24 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Total |
|
218 |
|
277 |
|
465 |
|
178 |
|
253 |
|
360 |
|
(1) Brokerage paid includes brokerage trailer commissions that are not capitalised relating to the acquisition of mortgages assets
(2) Includes capitalised debt raising expenses
(3) Includes Group Centre and Corporate Australia
d) Derivatives and Hedging
Description and Significance
The Group buys and sells derivatives as part of its trading operations and to hedge its interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and equity risks (in ING Australia). The derivative instruments used to hedge the Groups exposures include:
swaps;
forward rate agreements;
futures;
options; and
combinations of the above instruments.
The Group classifies derivatives into two types according to the purpose they are entered into: trading or hedging.
Income and loss relating to trading derivatives is reported in the statement of financial performance as trading income. The fair value of trading derivatives is recorded on a gross basis as other assets or other liabilities as appropriate unless there is a legal right of set off. The fair value of a derivative financial instrument is the net present value of future expected cash flows arising from that instrument.
In order to be classified as a hedging derivative the hedging relationship must be expected to be effective. Hedging derivatives are accounted for in the same manner as the underlying asset or liability they are hedging. For example, if the hedged instrument is accounted for using the accrual method, the hedging instrument will also be accounted for using the accrual method.
Accounting treatment Derivative instruments entered into for the purpose of hedging are accounted for on the same basis as the underlying exposures or risks.
131
Derivative instruments entered into to hedge exposures that are not recorded at fair value, do not have their fair values recorded in the Groups Statement of Financial Position.
Exposures hedged by derivatives not recorded at their fair value include risks related to:
revenues from and capital invested into foreign operations;
structured lending transactions;
lending assets; and
funding liabilities.
Hedge accounting is only applied when the hedging relationship is identified at the time the Group enters into the hedging derivative transaction. If a hedge ceases to be effective, the hedging derivative transaction will be recognised at fair value. Gains and losses on derivative instruments not carried at their fair value amounts are recognised at the same time as the gain or loss on the hedged exposure is booked.
Movements in the value of foreign exchange contracts that are hedging overseas operations are not recognised as income or expenses. Instead these movements are recognised in the Foreign Currency Translation Reserve together with the net difference arising from the translation of the overseas operation.
Fair value determination Derivatives entered into as part of the Groups trading operations are carried at their fair values with any change in fair value being immediately recognised as part of trading income. Where liquid markets exist, fair value is based on quoted market prices. For certain complex or illiquid derivative instruments, it may be necessary to use projections, estimates and models to determine fair value.
e) Special purpose and off balance sheet vehicles
The Group may invest in or establish special purpose companies or vehicles (SPVs), to enable it to undertake specific types of transactions.
Where the Group controls such vehicles, they are consolidated into the Group financial results.
Certain SPVs may be set up by the Group to facilitate Group strategic aims, or to assist with structured transactions for clients. The accounting treatment of each SPV is assessed using existing Australian guidance, with reference also to International and US accounting standards where specific issues are yet to be addressed in Australia. The Group has established certain special purpose companies or vehicles controlled by the Group, which are consolidated into the Groups financial statements in order to facilitate transactions undertaken for Group purposes. These special purpose companies or vehicles have been established as part of the Groups funding activities, for example, the StEPS structure, and as part of lending activities undertaken in the normal course of business, where assets of the vehicles are recorded as part of the Groups Net Loans and Advances.
The table below summarises the main types of SPVs that are not consolidated into the Group, the reason for their establishment, and the key risks associated with them.
Type of Special |
|
Reason for establishment |
|
Key Risks |
|
SPV Assets |
|
||
2004 |
|
2003 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Securitisation vehicles |
|
Assets are transferred to an SPV which funds the purchase by issuing securities.
Enables ANZ or customers to increase diversity of funding sources.
The amount disclosed here is the total assets of SPVs managed or arranged by ANZ. It includes SPVs that purchase assets from sellers other than ANZ. |
|
ANZ may manage securitisation vehicles, service assets in a vehicle or provide liquidity or other support and retains the risks associated with the provision of these services. Credit and market risks associated with the underlying assets are not retained or assumed by ANZ except to the limited extent that ANZ provides arms length services and facilities. |
|
13,013 |
|
9,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured finance entities |
|
These entities are set up to assist with the structuring of client financing. |
|
ANZ may retain liquidity risk, if it provides liquidity support to the vehicle. ANZ may also manage these vehicles. |
|
1,993 |
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed funds |
|
These funds invest in specified investments on behalf of clients. |
|
The ANZ/ING Australia joint venture and ANZ National Bank Limited, as managers of the funds, expose ANZ to operational and reputational risk. |
|
32,174 |
|
28,655 |
|
132
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
f) Valuation of investment in ING Australia Limited (INGA)
Description and significance
The Group adopts the equity method of accounting for its 49% interest in ING Australia. As of 30 September 2004, the Groups carrying value is $1,697 million (Sep 2003: $1,648 million).
The carrying value is subject to a recoverable amount test, to ensure that this does not exceed its recoverable amount at the reporting date. This involved the Group obtaining an independent valuation for 31 March 2004 reporting purposes to determine current recoverable amount, with a review of whether there are any indicators that the carrying value may be greater than recoverable amount for 30 September 2004 reporting purposes. Where there is the existence of impairment indicators, a further independent valuation is sourced to determine current recoverable amount.
Any excess of carrying value above recoverable amount is written off to the Statement of Financial Performance.
Quantification of sensitivity
During the year the Group engaged Ernst and Young ABC Limited (EY ABC) to provide an independent valuation of INGA for 31 March 2004 assessment purposes. The valuation was a stand alone market based assessment of economic value, and excluded the Groups specific synergies and hedging arrangements. The independent valuation was based on a discounted cashflow approach, with allowance for the cost of capital. EY ABC presented an independent valuation range of $3,507 million to $3,793 million, reflecting a range of sales and cost base assumptions. Based on this review, ANZ believed that no change was required to the carrying value of the investment as at 31 March 2004.
A review for 30 September 2004 reporting purposes revealed there were no indicators of impairment and a further independent review was not required. As at 30 September 2004, ANZ believed no change was required to the carrying value of ANZs investment in INGA.
g) Valuation of goodwill in ANZ National Bank Ltd
Description and significance
Goodwill arising from the NBNZ acquisition is systematically amortised by way of a charge to the statement of financial performance over the period of time during which the benefits of the acquisition are expected to arise, such period of benefit not exceeding 20 years.
The unamortised balance of goodwill is reviewed at each balance date and is written down to the extent that it is no longer supported by probable future benefits.
The Group engaged Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Australia Limited to provide an independent valuation prior to the amalgamation of NBNZ and ANZ Banking Group New Zealand Ltd (ANZ New Zealand) in June 2004. The valuation ascribed separate values to NBNZ Life Insurance Limited, the structured finance business and the core banking operations of NBNZ. The valuation excluded the value of synergies ANZ expects to extract from the integration of the banking operations of ANZ New Zealand and NBNZ.
The core banking operations were valued using a capitalisation of earnings methodology. Based on the results of this valuation, it is considered that there is no indication of impairment as at 30 September 2004.
133
ANZ recognises the importance of effective risk management to its business success. Management is committed to achieving strong risk control, resulting in no surprises and a distinctive risk management capability that enables ANZ business units to meet their performance, growth and breakout objectives.
ANZ approaches risk management on a holistic basis, managing the various elements of the system as a whole rather than viewing them as independent and unrelated parts. The risk function is independent of the business with clear delegations from the Board and operates within a comprehensive framework comprising:
The Board, providing leadership, setting risk appetite/strategy and monitoring progress.
A strong framework for development and maintenance of Group-wide risk management policies, procedures and systems, overseen by an independent team of risk professionals.
The use of sophisticated risk tools, applications and processes to execute our global risk management strategy across the Group.
Business Unit level accountability, as the first line of defence, and for the management of risks in alignment with the Groups strategy.
Independent oversight at Group-level to ensure Business Unit compliance with policies, regulations and laws, and to provide regular risk evaluation and reporting.
ANZ recognises that effective risk management is based upon having an appropriate risk culture embedded in the organisation. In recent years, significant effort has been invested in actively promoting a prudent and responsible culture of risk management.
The various risks inherent in the operations of the Group may be broadly grouped together under the following major categories:
Credit Risk
The Group has an overall lending objective of sound profitable growth. To support this objective, a credit risk management framework exists to provide a structured and disciplined process for managing credit risk.
This framework is top down, being defined firstly by the Groups Vision and Values and secondly, by Credit Principles and Policies. The effectiveness of the credit risk management framework is validated through compliance and monitoring processes. These, in conjunction with the overall Group portfolio strategy, define and guide the credit process, organisation and staff.
Group Risk Managements responsibilities for credit risk policy and management are executed through dedicated departments, which support the Groups wholesale and retail business units. All major Business Unit credit decisions (including those arising from automated decision processes) require dual approval by both business writers and independent risk personnel.
Market Risk
ANZ has a detailed market risk management and control framework, to support trading activities, which incorporates a risk measurement approach to quantify the magnitude of market risk within the trading books. This approach, along with related analysis, identifies the range of possible outcomes that can be expected over a given period of time, and establishes the relative likelihood of those outcomes.
Market risk also includes the risk that the Group will incur increased interest expense arising from funding requirements during periods of poor market liquidity (balance sheet or non-traded market risk). ANZ has a separate risk management and control framework for balance sheet risks, which is built around a Board-approved policy and limit framework. The framework quantifies the magnitude of risks and controls the potential impact that changes in market interest rates can have on the net interest income (NII) and market value of equity of the Group.
Within overall strategies and policies, control of market risk exposures at Group level is the responsibility of Group Market Risk, who work closely with the three business units: Foreign Exchange and Commodities, Capital Markets, and Group Treasury.
Operational Risk
Group Risk Management is responsible for establishing the Groups framework and associated Group-level operational risk policies. Business Units are responsible for the identification and day-to-day management of operational risks.
A Risk Drivers and Controls Approach to operational risk measurement is utilised to measure the operational risk profile of Business Units and allocate operational risk economic capital. This approach gives business managers strong and clear incentive to reduce operational risk.
Compliance
ANZs policy is to conduct its business in accordance with the laws of the countries in which it operates, relevant regulatory codes of conduct, and standards set by the Group. ANZ promotes a culture of compliance, where compliance is valued and embedded in everyday business. ANZ does not tolerate wilful or knowing breaches of the law, codes of conduct or of its standards and staff are required to observe these responsibilities.
In order to assist the Group identify, manage, monitor and measure its compliance obligations, the Group has a comprehensive regulatory compliance program in place, which is consistent with the Australian Standard on Compliance
Programs (AS 3806).
Group Compliance, a discrete function within Group Risk Management, is responsible for setting, reviewing and monitoring ANZs Regulatory Compliance Program. Business Units retain ultimate day-to-day responsibility for compliance management within their areas.
A comprehensive compliance framework has been established to ensure compliance with each of APRAs Prudential Standards. Each standard is assigned to a specific Senior Executive for accountability and control. For example, dealings between the Company and its subsidiaries and other related entities are specifically governed by Board-approved policies and procedures, which have been designed to ensure compliance with APRAs Prudential Standard APS222.
134
Cross border outstandings of the Group to countries which individually represented in excess of 0.75% of the Groups total assets
are shown below.
There were no cross border outstandings to any other country exceeding 0.75% of total assets.
Cross border foreign outstandings are based on the country of domicile of the borrower or guarantor of the ultimate risk and comprise loans (including accrued interest), placements with banks, acceptances and other monetary assets denominated in currencies other than the borrowers local currency.
For certain countries, local currency obligations are also included. Cross border foreign outstandings are before specific and general provisions.
|
|
Governments |
|
Banks and |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
% of |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
|
|
At 30 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
217 |
|
2,400 |
|
2,652 |
|
5,269 |
|
2.0 |
|
USA |
|
177 |
|
3,157 |
|
1,184 |
|
4,518 |
|
1.7 |
|
At 30 September 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
205 |
|
1,571 |
|
2,769 |
|
4,545 |
|
2.3 |
|
USA |
|
94 |
|
1,818 |
|
1,171 |
|
3,083 |
|
1.6 |
|
2: CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AND TERM DEPOSIT MATURITIES
The following table shows the maturity profile of the Groups certificates of deposit and term deposits in excess of $100,000 issued at 30 September 2004.
|
|
Less than |
|
Between |
|
Between |
|
After |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
7,702 |
|
2 |
|
380 |
|
4,147 |
|
12,231 |
|
Term deposits |
|
14,751 |
|
1,625 |
|
895 |
|
314 |
|
17,585 |
|
|
|
22,453 |
|
1,627 |
|
1,275 |
|
4,461 |
|
29,816 |
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
3,623 |
|
469 |
|
605 |
|
127 |
|
4,824 |
|
Term deposits |
|
19,367 |
|
2,684 |
|
1,480 |
|
792 |
|
24,323 |
|
|
|
22,990 |
|
3,153 |
|
2,085 |
|
919 |
|
29,147 |
|
Total |
|
45,443 |
|
4,780 |
|
3,360 |
|
5,380 |
|
58,963 |
|
135
The following table allocates changes in interest income and interest expense between changes in volume and changes in rate for the past two years. Volume and rate variances have been calculated on the movement in average balances and the change in the interest rates on average interest earning assets and average interest bearing liabilities. The variance caused by the change of both volume and rate has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of each change to the total.
|
|
2004 over 2003 |
|
2003 over 2002 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Volume |
|
Rate |
|
Total |
|
Volume |
|
Rate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Interest earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from other financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
8 |
|
(10 |
) |
5 |
|
(5 |
) |
New Zealand |
|
106 |
|
8 |
|
114 |
|
1 |
|
(4 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Overseas markets |
|
6 |
|
(11 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(21 |
) |
Investments in public securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
42 |
|
46 |
|
88 |
|
47 |
|
(5 |
) |
42 |
|
New Zealand |
|
68 |
|
9 |
|
77 |
|
17 |
|
1 |
|
18 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
43 |
|
(26 |
) |
17 |
|
15 |
|
(19 |
) |
(4 |
) |
Loans, advances and bills discounted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
1,320 |
|
310 |
|
1,630 |
|
949 |
|
41 |
|
990 |
|
New Zealand |
|
2,146 |
|
(82 |
) |
2,064 |
|
176 |
|
98 |
|
274 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
(102 |
) |
20 |
|
(82 |
) |
(84 |
) |
(40 |
) |
(124 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
(6 |
) |
28 |
|
22 |
|
2 |
|
86 |
|
88 |
|
New Zealand |
|
13 |
|
(23 |
) |
(10 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
(37 |
) |
Overseas markets |
|
(75 |
) |
62 |
|
(13 |
) |
14 |
|
(53 |
) |
(39 |
) |
Intragroup assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
17 |
|
8 |
|
25 |
|
7 |
|
(18 |
) |
(11 |
) |
Change in interest income |
|
3,585 |
|
350 |
|
3,935 |
|
1,125 |
|
43 |
|
1,168 |
|
Intragroup elimination |
|
(17 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(25 |
) |
(7 |
) |
18 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
342 |
|
3,910 |
|
1,118 |
|
61 |
|
1,179 |
|
Interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
282 |
|
142 |
|
424 |
|
205 |
|
23 |
|
228 |
|
New Zealand |
|
557 |
|
11 |
|
568 |
|
94 |
|
20 |
|
114 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
(45 |
) |
5 |
|
(40 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(71 |
) |
(81 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
26 |
|
47 |
|
73 |
|
23 |
|
11 |
|
34 |
|
New Zealand |
|
97 |
|
36 |
|
133 |
|
4 |
|
(1 |
) |
3 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(4 |
) |
Other demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
115 |
|
104 |
|
219 |
|
117 |
|
54 |
|
171 |
|
New Zealand |
|
174 |
|
(16 |
) |
158 |
|
9 |
|
11 |
|
20 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
Due to other financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
28 |
|
8 |
|
36 |
|
1 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
New Zealand |
|
44 |
|
9 |
|
53 |
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
6 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
(53 |
) |
19 |
|
(34 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(48 |
) |
(69 |
) |
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
31 |
|
25 |
|
56 |
|
64 |
|
10 |
|
74 |
|
New Zealand |
|
383 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overseas markets |
|
20 |
|
(4 |
) |
16 |
|
18 |
|
(33 |
) |
(15 |
) |
Borrowing corporations debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
24 |
|
10 |
|
34 |
|
27 |
|
(6 |
) |
21 |
|
New Zealand |
|
6 |
|
(4 |
) |
2 |
|
21 |
|
(1 |
) |
20 |
|
Loan capital, bonds and notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
522 |
|
42 |
|
564 |
|
210 |
|
45 |
|
255 |
|
New Zealand |
|
90 |
|
(6 |
) |
84 |
|
6 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
Overseas markets |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(11 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
187 |
|
64 |
|
251 |
|
135 |
|
(10 |
) |
125 |
|
New Zealand |
|
(78 |
) |
64 |
|
(14 |
) |
(19 |
) |
18 |
|
(1 |
) |
Overseas markets |
|
18 |
|
(24 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(10 |
) |
Intragroup liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
(30 |
) |
(123 |
) |
(153 |
) |
20 |
|
(14 |
) |
6 |
|
New Zealand |
|
141 |
|
37 |
|
178 |
|
(27 |
) |
10 |
|
(17 |
) |
Change in interest expense |
|
2,538 |
|
446 |
|
2,984 |
|
868 |
|
6 |
|
874 |
|
Intragroup elimination |
|
(17 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(25 |
) |
(7 |
) |
18 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
2,521 |
|
438 |
|
2,959 |
|
861 |
|
24 |
|
885 |
|
Change in net interest income |
|
1,047 |
|
(96 |
) |
951 |
|
257 |
|
37 |
|
294 |
|
136
4: CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Concentrations of credit risk exist if a number of counterparties are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Off balance sheet transactions of the Group are substantially with other banks.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||||
|
|
Loans and |
|
Specific |
|
Loans and |
|
Specific |
|
Loans and |
|
Specific |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
4,592 |
|
26 |
|
3,829 |
|
71 |
|
3,436 |
|
16 |
|
Business service |
|
3,346 |
|
4 |
|
2,632 |
|
4 |
|
2,120 |
|
5 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
3,660 |
|
7 |
|
2,632 |
|
23 |
|
2,465 |
|
28 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
3,548 |
|
5 |
|
4,966 |
|
5 |
|
4,603 |
|
13 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
126 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
Lease finance |
|
2,667 |
|
1 |
|
2,613 |
|
2 |
|
2,503 |
|
2 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
4,734 |
|
26 |
|
5,366 |
|
5 |
|
4,303 |
|
7 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
19,492 |
|
24 |
|
15,648 |
|
23 |
|
14,893 |
|
27 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
2,368 |
|
3 |
|
1,767 |
|
4 |
|
1,152 |
|
5 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
81,771 |
|
8 |
|
69,660 |
|
11 |
|
57,049 |
|
32 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
7,626 |
|
21 |
|
6,821 |
|
54 |
|
5,957 |
|
15 |
|
Other |
|
6,550 |
|
84 |
|
5,335 |
|
65 |
|
3,990 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
140,480 |
|
209 |
|
121,320 |
|
267 |
|
102,538 |
|
211 |
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
10,551 |
|
43 |
|
2,756 |
|
12 |
|
2,526 |
|
3 |
|
Business service |
|
931 |
|
4 |
|
323 |
|
1 |
|
435 |
|
1 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
968 |
|
3 |
|
534 |
|
5 |
|
586 |
|
4 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
3,288 |
|
9 |
|
1,516 |
|
5 |
|
1,561 |
|
21 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
461 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
Lease finance |
|
604 |
|
3 |
|
609 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
1 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
4,682 |
|
21 |
|
3,654 |
|
17 |
|
4,701 |
|
34 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
2,594 |
|
4 |
|
1,771 |
|
19 |
|
1,848 |
|
7 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
721 |
|
9 |
|
472 |
|
1 |
|
551 |
|
1 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
35,303 |
|
6 |
|
12,759 |
|
4 |
|
11,956 |
|
5 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
2,233 |
|
9 |
|
1,741 |
|
9 |
|
1,648 |
|
15 |
|
Other |
|
5,998 |
|
64 |
|
5,058 |
|
144 |
|
5,943 |
|
282 |
|
|
|
68,334 |
|
175 |
|
31,467 |
|
217 |
|
32,811 |
|
374 |
|
Total portfolio |
|
208,814 |
|
384 |
|
152,787 |
|
484 |
|
135,349 |
|
585 |
|
(1) Loans and advances exclude acceptances
(2) Personal includes non-business loans to individuals through overdrafts, personal loans, credit cards and fully drawn advances
(3) Real estate mortgages include residential and commercial property exposure. Loans within this category are for the purchase of such properties and must be secured by property
137
|
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
||||
|
|
Loans and |
|
Specific |
|
Loans and |
|
Specific |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
3,500 |
|
104 |
|
4,157 |
|
34 |
|
Business service |
|
2,044 |
|
7 |
|
2,206 |
|
6 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
2,293 |
|
27 |
|
2,062 |
|
4 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
4,311 |
|
3 |
|
5,532 |
|
1 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
122 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
Lease finance |
|
2,524 |
|
5 |
|
2,821 |
|
8 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
4,034 |
|
11 |
|
4,236 |
|
19 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
13,435 |
|
36 |
|
12,728 |
|
131 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
1,198 |
|
11 |
|
1,376 |
|
7 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
49,127 |
|
13 |
|
43,912 |
|
9 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
6,017 |
|
16 |
|
5,691 |
|
24 |
|
Other |
|
3,850 |
|
70 |
|
4,196 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
92,455 |
|
303 |
|
89,020 |
|
260 |
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
2,686 |
|
8 |
|
2,429 |
|
12 |
|
Business service |
|
214 |
|
1 |
|
274 |
|
1 |
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
361 |
|
1 |
|
505 |
|
6 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
2,276 |
|
26 |
|
1,952 |
|
128 |
|
Government and official institutions |
|
372 |
|
27 |
|
627 |
|
25 |
|
Lease finance |
|
936 |
|
4 |
|
504 |
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
5,153 |
|
30 |
|
4,781 |
|
118 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
1,804 |
|
18 |
|
1,876 |
|
16 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
921 |
|
9 |
|
820 |
|
36 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
11,638 |
|
12 |
|
10,628 |
|
16 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
2,021 |
|
18 |
|
1,950 |
|
35 |
|
Other |
|
5,853 |
|
43 |
|
4,266 |
|
56 |
|
|
|
34,235 |
|
197 |
|
30,612 |
|
449 |
|
Total portfolio |
|
126,690 |
|
500 |
|
119,632 |
|
709 |
|
(1) Loans and advances exclude acceptances
(2) Personal includes non-business loans to individuals through overdrafts, personal loans, credit cards and fully drawn advances
(3) Real estate mortgages include residential and commercial property exposure. Loans within this category are for the purchase of such properties and must be secured by property
138
5: DOUBTFUL DEBTS INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Balance at start of year |
|
2,018 |
|
2,081 |
|
1,886 |
|
2,082 |
|
2,302 |
|
Adjustment for exchange rate fluctuations |
|
51 |
|
(98 |
) |
(28 |
) |
32 |
|
37 |
|
Acquisition of provisions |
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debts written off (refer (i) below) |
|
(680 |
) |
(640 |
) |
(697 |
) |
(834 |
) |
(539 |
) |
Charge to statement of financial performance |
|
632 |
|
614 |
|
860 |
|
531 |
|
502 |
|
Recoveries (refer (ii) below) |
|
82 |
|
61 |
|
60 |
|
75 |
|
46 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Total provisions for doubtful debts |
|
2,376 |
|
2,018 |
|
2,081 |
|
1,886 |
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Total write-offs by industry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
(86 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(72 |
) |
(14 |
) |
(12 |
) |
Business service |
|
(4 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(5 |
) |
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
(5 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(10 |
) |
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(3 |
) |
Lease finance |
|
(2 |
) |
(22 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(9 |
) |
Manufacturing |
|
(15 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(22 |
) |
(11 |
) |
Personal(2) |
|
(203 |
) |
(177 |
) |
(237 |
) |
(292 |
) |
(133 |
) |
Real estate construction |
|
(2 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(13 |
) |
(5 |
) |
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
(8 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(19 |
) |
(13 |
) |
(51 |
) |
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
(38 |
) |
(42 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(97 |
) |
(28 |
) |
Other |
|
(105 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(37 |
) |
(28 |
) |
(8 |
) |
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
(212 |
) |
(326 |
) |
(229 |
) |
(326 |
) |
(264 |
) |
Total write-offs |
|
(680 |
) |
(640 |
) |
(697 |
) |
(834 |
) |
(539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii) Total recoveries by industry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining |
|
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
Business service |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
Entertainment, leisure and tourism |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Financial, investment and insurance |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
Lease finance |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
|
6 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
Personal(2) |
|
46 |
|
24 |
|
27 |
|
30 |
|
9 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
Real estate mortgage(3) |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
Retail and wholesale trade |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
Overseas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
24 |
|
17 |
|
12 |
|
26 |
|
12 |
|
Total recoveries |
|
82 |
|
61 |
|
60 |
|
75 |
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net write-offs |
|
(598 |
) |
(579 |
) |
(637 |
) |
(759 |
) |
(493 |
) |
Ratio of net write-offs to average loans and acceptances |
|
0.3 |
% |
0.4 |
% |
0.4 |
% |
0.5 |
% |
0.4 |
% |
(1) 2000 includes $266 million reduction from the sale of Grindlays
(2) Personal includes non-business loans to individuals through overdrafts, personal loans, credit cards and fully drawn advances
(3) Real estate mortgage includes residential and commercial property exposure. Loans within this category are for the purchase of such properties and must be secured by property
139
The Groups short-term borrowings comprise commercial paper, as well as unsecured notes issued by subsidiary borrowing corporations with an original term to maturity of less than one year. The Group has commercial paper programs in the United States, where it issues paper through ANZ (Delaware) Inc., and in Europe and Asia, where the Group issues paper direct.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
$m |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper ANZ (Delaware) Inc. |
|
7,068 |
|
6,981 |
|
1,654 |
|
Commercial paper other |
|
11,712 |
|
5,458 |
|
3,963 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper ANZ (Delaware) Inc. |
|
1.68 |
% |
1.07 |
% |
1.85 |
% |
Commercial paper other |
|
5.41 |
% |
4.76 |
% |
4.92 |
% |
Unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end during year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper ANZ (Delaware) Inc. |
|
7,068 |
|
6,988 |
|
5,541 |
|
Commercial paper other |
|
18,387 |
|
7,407 |
|
5,647 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
|
7 |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average amount outstanding during year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper ANZ (Delaware) Inc. |
|
6,485 |
|
4,740 |
|
3,641 |
|
Commercial paper other |
|
12,588 |
|
5,216 |
|
3,888 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
|
7 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper ANZ (Delaware) Inc. |
|
1.14 |
% |
1.22 |
% |
2.00 |
% |
Commercial paper other |
|
5.49 |
% |
4.83 |
% |
4.57 |
% |
Unsecured notes |
|
|
|
5.85 |
% |
5.54 |
% |
140
Asia Pacific provides primarily retail banking services in the Pacific Region and Asia, including ANZs share of PT Panin Bank in Indonesia; this business unit excludes Institutional and Corporate transactions included in the geographic results for Asia Pacific which are included in Institutional results.
Corporate Australia incorporates Corporate Banking Australia, Business Banking and Small Business Banking in Australia.
Small Business Banking in Australia provides business banking services to metropolitan-based small businesses, with business banking funds under management of up to $50,000.
Business Banking in Australia provides a full range of banking services to metropolitan-based small to medium businesses, with turnover up to $10 million and business banking funds under management of more than $50,000.
Corporate Banking Australia manages customer relationships and develops financial solutions for medium-sized businesses, with a turnover of $10 million to $150 million.
Economic loss provisioning (ELP) charge is determined based on the expected average annual loss of principal over the economic cycle for the current risk profile of the lending portfolio.
Equity standardisation Economic Value Added (EVATM) principles are in use throughout the Group, whereby risk adjusted capital is allocated and charged against business units. Equity standardised profit is determined by eliminating the impact of earnings on each business units book capital and attributing earnings on the business units risk adjusted capital. This enhances comparability of business unit performance. Geographic results are not equity standardised.
Esanda and UDC comprises Esanda Finance Corporation Limited and UDC Finance Corporation Limited. They provide vehicle and equipment finance and rentalservices, operating in Australia as Esanda and Esanda FleetPartners, and in New Zealand as UDC and Esanda FleetPartners.
Group Centre provides support to the other segments in the areas of People Capital, Risk Management, Finance, Operations, Technology, Strategy, Administration and Treasury.
Impaired assets are loans or other credit facilities where there is reasonable doubt about the collectability of interest, fee (past and future) or principal outstanding, or where concessional terms have been provided because of the financial difficulties of the customer.
ING Australia (INGA), the joint venture between the Group and ING Group, provides integrated manufacture and distribution of wealth creation, management and protection products and services aligned to the Groups distribution and the open market.
Institutional is a segment encompassing businesses that provide a full range of financial services to the Groups largest corporate and institutional customers.
Institutional Banking - Manages customer relationships and develops financial services solutions and strategies for large businesses with a turnover greater than $150 million in Australia and New Zealand and, through corporate clients where the Group has an existing customer relationship, in the United Kingdom, United States and Asia.
Trade and Transaction Services - Provides cash management, trade finance, international payments, clearing and custodian services principally to corporate and institutional customers.
Markets - Provides origination, underwriting, structuring, risk management, advice and sale of credit and derivative products, foreign exchange and commodity trading and sales-related services, globally.
Corporate and Structured Financing - Provides complex financing and advisory services, structured financial products, leasing, private equity, project and leveraged finance and infrastructure investment to ANZs corporate, institutional, and small business customers.
Net advances include gross loans and advances and acceptances less income yet to mature and provisions (for both as at and average volumes).
Net interest average margin is net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets. Non-assessable interest income is grossed up to the equivalent before tax amount for the purpose of these calculations.
Net interest spread is the average interest rate received on interest earning assets less the average interest rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. Non-assessable interest income is grossed up to the equivalent before tax amount for the purpose of these calculations.
Net non-interest bearing items, which are referred to in the analysis of interest spread and net interest average margin, includes shareholders equity, provisions for doubtful debts, and deposits not bearing interest and other liabilities not bearing interest, offset by premises and equipment and other non-interest earning assets. Non-accrual loans are included within interest bearing loans, advances and bills discounted.
Net specific provision is the transfer from the general provision to the specific provision (representing new and increased specific provisions less specific provision releases on impaired assets) less recoveries.
New Zealand Business comprises the ANZ businesses of NZ Banking, Mortgages and Consumer Finance, and all of the businesses of National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ) which was acquired on 1 December 2003.
The ANZ businesses of Institutional and UDC that operate in New Zealand through global lines are excluded from New Zealand Business, although these activities are included in the equivalent NBNZ businesses.
Accordingly, New Zealand Business provides full service banking operations in the personal, corporate, business and rural sectors in New Zealand. The wealth management sector is serviced by Private Banking, ING New Zealand, and the NBNZ funds management business. Life insurance and fire and general insurance services are also provided through NBNZ.
141
Operating expenses exclude the charge for doubtful debts.
Operations, Technology and Shared Services comprises the Groups core support units responsible for operating the Groups global technology platforms, development and maintenance of business applications, information security, the Groups payments back-office processing, and the provision of other essential shared services to the Group, including property, human resources operations, procurement and outsourcing.
Overseas includes the results of all operations outside Australia, except if New Zealand is separately shown.
Overseas markets includes the results of operations in the UK, Europe, Asia, Pacific and the Americas. The Groups geographic segments are Australia, New Zealand and Overseas markets.
Personal comprises Personal Banking Distribution (including Rural Banking and Private Banking), Banking Products, Mortgages and Cards and Merchant Services.
Personal Banking Distribution - provides a full range of banking and financial planning services to personal customers across Australia, and to small business and agricultural customers in rural Australia.
Banking Products - manufactures deposit, transaction accounts and margin lending products.
Mortgages - provides mortgage finance secured by residential real estate.
Cards and Merchant Services - provides consumer and commercial credit cards, ePayment products, personal loans, and merchant payment and ATM facilities.
Service transfer pricing is used to allocate services that are provided by central areas to each of its business units. The objective of service transfer pricing is to remove cross-subsidies between business units, and ensure each business accounts for the cost of the services it uses. Transfer pricing arrangements are reviewed periodically. The basis of pricing for internal services varies from cost recovery, to market equivalent. Changes in transfer pricing arrangements in current periods are, to the extent possible, reflected in prior period comparatives to assist comparability. NBNZ has not yet adopted full transfer pricing.
The Statement of Financial Performance of each business unit includes net inter business unit fees and net inter business unit expenses. This treatment is consistent with the Groups strategy of managing along specialist business lines. Net inter business unit fees includes intra-group receipts or payments for sales commissions. A product business (for example, Mortgages) will pay a distribution channel (for example, Personal Banking) for product sales. Both the payment and receipt are shown as net inter business unit fees. Net inter business unit expenses consist of the charges made to business units for the provision of support services. Examples of services provided include technology and payments, risk management, finance and human resources management. Both payments by business units and receipts by services providers are shown as net inter business unit expenses.
The results of the segments may include business units and a support unit. The services provided by the support unit are allocated to the business units. As a result of this allocation, the sum of individual profit and loss line items of the business units may not equal the corresponding line item in the Statement of Financial Performance of the segment.
Total advances include gross loans and advances and acceptances less income yet to mature (for both as at and average volumes).
Treasury is the banker to all ANZ businesses charged with providing cashflow support, ensuring liquidity, managing interest rate risk and providing capital to the businesses.
Unproductive facilities comprise certain facilities (such as standby letters of credit, bill endorsements, documentary letters of credit and guarantees to third parties, undrawn facilities to which the Group is irrevocably committed and market related exposures) where the customer status is defined as non-accrual.
142
143