UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Abbott Laboratories |
||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
Abbott Laboratories
100 Abbott Park Road
Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-6400 U.S.A.
On the Cover: | ||
Abbott Prism Arden Cantwell, San Antonio, Texas |
||
Swimming is a big part of 5-year-old Arden Cantwell's life. Unfortunately, so is cancer. As part of Arden's ongoing treatment, she needs regular blood transfusions. With its unique automated processing technology, Abbott Prism ensures the safety of her donated blood, allowing Arden to enjoy her swimming lessons. |
Your Vote
Is Important
Please sign and promptly return your proxy in the enclosed envelope or vote your shares by telephone or using the Internet.
Notice of Annual Meeting
of Shareholders
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on April 25, 2008
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Abbott Laboratories will be held at Abbott's headquarters, 100 Abbott Park Road, at the intersection of Route 137 and Waukegan Road, Lake County, Illinois, on Friday, April 25, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. for the following purposes:
The board of directors recommends that you vote FOR Items 1 and 2 on the proxy card.
The board of directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Items 3 and 4 on the proxy card.
The close of business February 26, 2008 has been fixed as the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Abbott's 2008 Proxy Statement and 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.abbott.com/proxy. If you are a registered shareholder, you may access your proxy card, by either:
Admission to the meeting will be by admission card only. If you plan to attend, please complete and return the reservation form on the back cover, and an admission card will be sent to you. Due to space limitations, reservation forms must be received before April 18, 2008. Each admission card, along with photo identification, admits one person. A shareholder may request two admission cards, but a guest must be accompanied by a shareholder. |
By order of the board of directors.
LAURA J. SCHUMACHER Secretary |
|
March 19, 2008 |
Table of Contents
|
Page |
||
---|---|---|---|
Solicitation of Proxies | 1 | ||
Information about the Annual Meeting | 1 | ||
Who Can Vote | 1 | ||
Cumulative Voting | 1 | ||
Voting by Proxy | 1 | ||
Revoking a Proxy | 1 | ||
Discretionary Voting Authority | 2 | ||
Quorum and Vote Required to Approve Each Item on the Proxy | 2 | ||
Effect of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions | 2 | ||
Inspectors of Election | 2 | ||
Cost of Soliciting Proxies | 2 | ||
Abbott Laboratories Stock Retirement Plan | 2 | ||
Confidential Voting | 2 | ||
Information Concerning Nominees for Directors (Item 1 on Proxy Card) | 3 | ||
Nominees for Election as Directors | 4 | ||
The Board of Directors and its Committees | 8 | ||
The Board of Directors | 8 | ||
Committees of the Board of Directors | 8 | ||
Communicating with the Board of Directors | 9 | ||
Corporate Governance Materials | 9 | ||
Director Compensation | 10 | ||
Security Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors | 12 | ||
Executive Compensation | 13 | ||
Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 13 | ||
Compensation Committee Report | 16 | ||
Summary Compensation Table | 17 | ||
Grants of Plan-Based Awards | 20 | ||
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End | 23 | ||
Option Exercises and Stock Vested | 32 | ||
Pension Benefits | 33 | ||
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control | 36 | ||
Approval Process for Related Person Transactions | 38 | ||
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Auditors (Item 2 on Proxy Card) | 39 | ||
Report of the Audit Committee | 40 | ||
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | 40 | ||
Shareholder Proposals | 40 | ||
Shareholder Proposal on Access to Medicines (Item 3 on Proxy Card) | 41 | ||
Proponent's Statement in Support of Shareholder Proposal | 41 | ||
Board of Directors' Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal | 41 | ||
Shareholder Proposal on Advisory Vote (Item 4 on Proxy Card) | 42 | ||
Proponent's Statement in Support of Shareholder Proposal | 42 | ||
Board of Directors' Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal | 42 | ||
Other Matters | 44 | ||
Date for Receipt of Shareholder Proposals for the 2009 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement | 44 | ||
Procedure for Recommendation and Nomination of Directors and Transaction of Business at Annual Meeting | 44 | ||
General | 44 | ||
EXHIBIT A DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARD | A-1 |
Reservation Form for Annual Meeting | Back Cover |
Abbott Laboratories
Proxy Statement
Solicitation of Proxies
The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The meeting will be held on April 25, 2008, at Abbott's headquarters, 100 Abbott Park Road, at the intersection of Route 137 and Waukegan Road, Lake County, Illinois. This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are being mailed to shareholders on or about March 19, 2008.
Information about the Annual Meeting
Who Can Vote
Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 26, 2008 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of January 31, 2008, Abbott had 1,545,737,903 outstanding common shares, which are Abbott's only outstanding voting securities. All shareholders have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors and one vote per share on all other matters.
Cumulative Voting
Cumulative voting allows a shareholder to multiply the number of shares owned by the number of directors to be elected and to cast the total for one nominee or distribute the votes among the nominees, as the shareholder desires. Nominees who receive the greatest number of votes will be elected. If you wish to cumulate your votes, you must sign and mail in your proxy card or attend the Annual Meeting.
Voting by Proxy
All of Abbott's shareholders may vote by mail or at the Annual Meeting. The bylaws provide that a shareholder may authorize no more than two persons as proxies to attend and vote at the meeting. Most of Abbott's shareholders may also vote their shares by telephone or the Internet. If you vote by telephone or the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card. The instructions for voting by telephone or the Internet can be found with your proxy card.
Revoking a Proxy
You may revoke your proxy by voting in person at the Annual Meeting or, at any time prior to the meeting:
1
Discretionary Voting Authority
Unless authority is withheld in accordance with the instructions on the proxy, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares covered by proxies they receive to elect the 13 nominees named in Item 1 on the proxy card. Should a nominee become unavailable to serve, the shares will be voted for a substitute designated by the board of directors, or for fewer than 13 nominees if, in the judgment of the proxy holders, such action is necessary or desirable. The persons named in the proxy may also decide to vote shares cumulatively so that one or more of the nominees may receive fewer votes than the other nominees (or no votes at all), although they have no present intention of doing so.
Where a shareholder has specified a choice for or against the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors, or the approval of a shareholder proposal, or where the shareholder has abstained on these matters, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted (or not voted) as specified. Where no choice has been specified, the proxy will be voted FOR ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors and AGAINST the shareholder proposals.
With the exception of matters omitted from this proxy statement pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the board of directors is not aware of any other issue which may properly be brought before the meeting. If other matters are properly brought before the meeting, the accompanying proxy will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders.
Quorum and Vote Required to Approve Each Item on the Proxy
A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on a matter, represented in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for consideration of that matter at the meeting. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on a matter shall be the act of the shareholders with respect to that matter.
Effect of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions
A proxy submitted by an institution such as a broker or bank that holds shares for the account of a beneficial owner may indicate that all or a portion of the shares represented by that proxy are not being voted with respect to a particular matter. This could occur, for example, when the broker or bank is not permitted to vote those shares in the absence of instructions from the beneficial owner of the stock. These "non-voted shares" will be considered shares not present and, therefore, not entitled to vote on that matter, although these shares may be considered present and entitled to vote for other purposes. Non-voted shares will not affect the determination of the outcome of the vote on any matter to be decided at the meeting. Shares represented by proxies which are present and entitled to vote on a matter but which have elected to abstain from voting on that matter will have the effect of votes against that matter.
Inspectors of Election
The inspectors of election and the tabulators of all proxies, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify shareholders are independent and are not Abbott employees.
Cost of Soliciting Proxies
Abbott will bear the cost of making solicitations from its shareholders and will reimburse banks and brokerage firms for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with this solicitation. Proxies may be solicited by mail or in person by directors, officers, or employees of Abbott and its subsidiaries.
Abbott has retained Georgeson Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies, at an estimated cost of $17,500 plus reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
Abbott Laboratories Stock Retirement Plan
Participants in the Abbott Laboratories Stock Retirement Plan will receive a voting instruction card for their shares held in the Abbott Laboratories Stock Retirement Trust. The Stock Retirement Trust is administered by both a trustee and an investment committee. The trustee of the Trust is Mercer Fiduciary Trust Company. The members of the investment committee are William J. Chase, Stephen R. Fussell, and William H. Preece, Jr., employees of Abbott. The voting power with respect to the shares is held by and shared between the investment committee and the participants. The investment committee must solicit voting instructions from the participants and follow the voting instructions it receives. The investment committee may use its own discretion with respect to those shares for which no voting instructions are received.
Confidential Voting
It is Abbott's policy that all proxies, ballots, and voting tabulations that reveal how a particular shareholder has voted be kept confidential and not be disclosed, except:
2
Information Concerning Nominees for Directors (Item 1 on Proxy Card)
Thirteen directors are to be elected to hold office until the next Annual Meeting or until their successors are elected. All of the nominees are currently serving as directors. Mr. William A. Osborn was recommended for election by the nominations and governance committee.
3
Nominees for Election as Directors
Roxanne S. Austin Age 47 Director since 2000 President, Austin Investment Advisors, Newport Coast, California (Private Investment and Consulting Firm) Mrs. Austin is the president of Austin Investment Advisors, a private investment and consulting firm. Prior to that, she served as president and chief operating officer of DIRECTV, Inc. from June 2001 to December 2003. She also served as executive vice president of Hughes Electronics Corporation and as a member of its executive committee until December 2003. From 1997 to June 2001, Mrs. Austin was the corporate senior vice president and chief financial officer of Hughes Electronics Corporation. Mrs. Austin served as Hughes Electronics' vice president, treasurer, chief accounting officer and controller from December 1996 to July 1997; as its vice president, treasurer, and controller from July 1996 to December 1996; and as its vice president and controller from July 1993 to July 1996. Prior to joining Hughes, Mrs. Austin was a partner at the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche. Mrs. Austin earned her B.B.A. degree in accounting from the University of Texas at San Antonio. She serves on the board of trustees of the California Science Center. Mrs. Austin serves on the board of directors of Target Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Inc. |
||
William M. Daley Age 59 Director since 2004 Head of the Office of Corporate Social Responsibility and Chairman of the Midwest, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chicago, Illinois (Banking and Financial Services Company) Mr. Daley has served as the senior executive of the Midwest region and serves on the JPMorgan Chase & Co. Executive Committee and on its International Council since May 2004. He served as President, SBC Communications, Inc. (diversified telecommunications) from December 2001 to May 2004. Mr. Daley was vice chairman of Evercore Capital Partners L.P. from January to November 2001. From June to December 2000, Mr. Daley served as chairman of Vice President Albert Gore's 2000 presidential election campaign. Mr. Daley served as the U.S. Secretary of Commerce from January 1997 to June 2000. Mr. Daley serves on the board of directors of The Boeing Company, The Art Institute of Chicago, Joffrey Ballet of Chicago, Loyola University of Chicago, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and Northwestern University. He also sits on the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Daley is a graduate of Loyola University in Chicago and of John Marshall Law School. |
||
W. James Farrell Age 65 Director since 2006 Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Illinois Tool Works Inc., Glenview, Illinois (Worldwide Manufacturer of Highly Engineered Products and Specialty Systems) Mr. Farrell served as the chairman of Illinois Tool Works Inc. from 1996 to 2006 and as its chief executive officer from 1995 to 2005. He serves on the board of directors of Allstate Insurance Company, UAL Corporation, and 3M. |
4
H. Laurance Fuller Age 69 Director since 1988 Retired Co-Chairman of the Board, BP Amoco, p.l.c., London, United Kingdom (Integrated Petroleum and Chemicals Company) Mr. Fuller was elected president of Amoco Corporation in 1983 and chairman and chief executive officer in 1991. As the result of the merger of British Petroleum, p.l.c. and Amoco effective December 31, 1998, he became co-chairman of BP Amoco, p.l.c. He retired from that position in April 2000. He is a director of Cabot MicroElectronics Corporation, Verde Group and The Nature Conservancy of South Carolina, and a life trustee of The Orchestral Association and presidential counselor of Cornell University. |
||
William A. Osborn Age 60 Director since 2008 Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer of Northern Trust Corporation (a multibank holding company) and The Northern Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois (Banking Services Company) Mr. Osborn has been chairman of Northern Trust Corporation since 1995 and served as its chief executive officer from 1995 through 2007. Mr. Osborn is a director of Caterpillar Inc. and Tribune Company. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Museum of Science and Industry, Northwestern University, and Northwestern Memorial HealthCare and serves as chairman of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra Association. He holds a B.A. degree and an M.B.A. degree from Northwestern University. |
||
The Rt. Hon. Lord Owen CH Age 69 Director since 1996 Chairman of Europe Steel, p.l.c., London, United Kingdom (International Trader in Steel Products) David Owen is a British subject. He was a neurologist and Research Fellow on the Medical Unit of St. Thomas' Hospital, London, from 1965 through 1968 and a member of Parliament for Plymouth in the House of Commons from 1966 until he retired in May of 1992. In 1992, he was created a Life Peer and a Member of the House of Lords. In August of 1992, the European Union appointed him Co-Chairman of the International Conference on Former Yugoslavia. He stepped down in June of 1995. He was chairman of Global Natural Energy p.l.c. (an owner and operator of gasoline retailing sites) from 1995 to 2006. Lord Owen was Secretary for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs from 1977 to 1979 and Minister of Health from 1974 to 1976. |
5
Boone Powell Jr. Age 71 Director since 1985 Retired Chairman, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, Texas Mr. Powell had been associated with Baylor University Medical Center since 1980 when he was named president and chief executive officer. In August 2001, Mr. Powell retired from his position as Chairman of Baylor Health Care System. Prior to joining Baylor, he was president of Hendrick Medical Center in Abilene, Texas. He is a director of Comerica Bank-Texas, U.S. Oncology, and United Surgical Partners International and a fellow of the American College of Health Care Executives. Mr. Powell is a graduate of Baylor University. He received a master's degree in hospital administration from the University of California. |
||
W. Ann Reynolds, Ph.D. Age 70 Director since 1980 Former President, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Dr. Reynolds served as the president of The University of Alabama at Birmingham from 1997 to 2002 and as director of its Center for Community Outreach and Development from 2002 through 2003. From 1990 to 1997, Dr. Reynolds served as chancellor of The City University of New York. Prior to that, she served as chancellor of The California State University system, provost of The Ohio State University and associate vice chancellor for research and dean of the graduate college of the University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago. She also held appointments as professor of anatomy, research professor of obstetrics and gynecology, and acting associate dean for academic affairs at the University of Illinois College of Medicine. Dr. Reynolds is a graduate of Emporia State University (Kansas) and holds M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in zoology from the University of Iowa. She is also a director of Humana Inc., Owens-Corning, Invitrogen, and the News-Gazette, Champaign, Illinois. |
||
Roy S. Roberts Age 68 Director since 1998 Managing Director, Reliant Equity Investors, Chicago, Illinois (Venture Capital Firm) Mr. Roberts has served as managing director of Reliant Equity Investors since September 2000. Mr. Roberts retired from General Motors in April 2000. At the time of his retirement, he was group vice president for North American Vehicle Sales, Service and Marketing of General Motors Corporation, having been elected to that position in October 1998. Prior to that time, he was vice president and general manager in charge of Field Sales, Service and Parts for the Vehicle Sales, Service and Marketing Group from August 1998 to October 1998, general manager of the Pontiac-GMC Division from February 1996 to October 1998, and general manager of the GMC Truck Division from October 1992 to February 1996. Mr. Roberts first joined General Motors Corporation in 1977 and became a corporate officer of General Motors Corporation in April 1987. Mr. Roberts earned a bachelor's degree from Western Michigan University. He serves as a director of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, as Trustee Emeritus at Western Michigan University, and as past president and on the National Board of Directors for the Boy Scouts of America. |
6
Samuel C. Scott III Age 63 Director since 2007 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Corn Products International, Inc., Westchester, Illinois (A Corn Refining Company) Mr. Scott has served as chairman, president and chief executive officer of Corn Products International since 1997. He was president of the Corn Refining Division of CPC International from 1995 through 1997, when CPC International spun off Corn Products International as a separate corporation. Mr. Scott serves on the board of directors of Bank of New York, Motorola, Inc., Accion International and the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. He also serves as a trustee of The Conference Board. Mr. Scott graduated from Fairleigh Dickinson University. |
||
William D. Smithburg Age 69 Director since 1982 Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Quaker Oats Company, Chicago, Illinois (Worldwide Food Manufacturer and Marketer of Beverages and Grain-Based Products) Mr. Smithburg retired from Quaker Oats in October 1997. Mr. Smithburg joined Quaker Oats in 1966 and became president and chief executive officer in 1981, and chairman and chief executive officer in 1983 and also served as president from November 1990 to January 1993 and again from November 1995. Mr. Smithburg was elected to the Quaker board in 1978 and served on its executive committee until he retired. He is a director of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, Northern Trust Corporation, and Corning Incorporated. He is a member of the board of trustees of Northwestern University. Mr. Smithburg earned a B.S. degree from DePaul University and an M.B.A. degree from Northwestern University. |
||
Glenn F. Tilton Age 59 Director since 2007 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of UAL Corporation, Elk Grove Township, Illinois (Holding Company) and United Air Lines, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UAL Corporation (Air Transportation) Mr. Tilton has been chairman, president and chief executive officer of UAL Corporation and United Air Lines, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UAL Corporation since September 2002. From October 2001 to August 2002, he served as vice chairman of ChevronTexaco Corporation (global energy). In addition, from May 2002 to September 2002 he served as non-executive chairman of Dynegy, Inc. (energy). From February to October 2001 he served as chairman and chief executive officer of Texaco Inc. (global energy). He previously served as president of Texaco's Global Business Unit. |
||
Miles D. White Age 53 Director since 1998 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Abbott Laboratories Mr. White has served as Abbott's chairman of the board and chief executive officer since 1999. He served as an executive vice president of Abbott from 1998 to 1999, as senior vice president, diagnostics operations from 1994 to 1998, and as vice president, diagnostics systems operations from 1993 to 1994. Mr. White joined Abbott in 1984. He received both his bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and M.B.A. degree from Stanford University. He serves on the board of trustees of The Culver Educational Foundation, The Field Museum in Chicago, and Northwestern University. He serves as a director of Motorola Inc. |
7
The Board of Directors and its Committees
The Board of Directors
The board of directors held seven meetings in 2007. The average attendance of all incumbent directors at board and committee meetings in 2007 was 96 percent. Abbott encourages its board members to attend the annual shareholders meeting. Last year, all of Abbott's directors attended the annual shareholders meeting.
The board has determined that each of the following directors and director nominees is independent in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards: R. S. Austin, W. M. Daley, W. J. Farrell, H. L. Fuller, W. A. Osborn, D. A. L. Owen, B. Powell Jr., W. A. Reynolds, R. S. Roberts, S. C. Scott III, W. D. Smithburg, and G. F. Tilton. In addition, the board also determined that J. M. Greenberg, who served on the board during the year, was independent under those standards. To determine independence, the board applied the categorical standards attached as Exhibit A to this proxy statement. The board also considered whether a director has any other material relationships with Abbott or its subsidiaries and concluded that none of these directors had a relationship that impaired the director's independence. This included consideration of the fact that some of the directors are officers or serve on boards of companies or entities to which Abbott sold products or made contributions or from which Abbott purchased products and services during the year. In making its determination, the board relied on both information provided by the directors and information developed internally by Abbott.
The chairman of the nominations and governance committee acts as lead director to facilitate communication with the board and presides over regularly conducted executive sessions of the independent directors or sessions where the chairman of the board is not present. It is the role of the lead director to review and approve matters, such as agenda items, schedule sufficiency, and, where appropriate, information provided to other board members. The lead director is chosen by and from the independent members of the board of directors, and serves as the liaison between the chairman and the independent directors; however, all directors are encouraged to, and in fact do, consult with the chairman on each of the above topics as well. The lead director, and each of the other directors, communicates regularly with the chairman and chief executive officer regarding appropriate agenda topics and other board related matters.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The board of directors has five committees established in Abbott's bylaws: the executive committee, audit committee, compensation committee, nominations and governance committee, and public policy committee. Each of the members of the audit committee, compensation committee, nominations and governance committee, and public policy committee is independent.
The executive committee, whose members are M. D. White, chairman, R. S. Austin, H. L. Fuller, W. A. Reynolds, and W. D. Smithburg, did not hold any meetings in 2007. This committee may exercise all the authority of the board in the management of Abbott, except for matters expressly reserved by law for board action.
The audit committee, whose members are R. S. Austin, chair, D. A. L. Owen, S. C. Scott III, W. D. Smithburg, and G. F. Tilton, held six meetings in 2007. The committee is governed by a written charter. This committee assists the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to Abbott's accounting and financial reporting practices and the audit process, the quality and integrity of Abbott's financial statements, the independent auditors' qualifications, independence and performance, the performance of Abbott's internal audit function and internal auditors, and certain areas of legal and regulatory compliance. Each of the members of the audit committee is financially literate, as required of audit committee members by the New York Stock Exchange. The board of directors has determined that R. S. Austin, the committee's chair, is an "audit committee financial expert." A copy of the report of the audit committee is on page 40.
The compensation committee, whose members are W. D. Smithburg, chairman, W. M. Daley, W. J. Farrell, H. L. Fuller, and B. Powell Jr., held three meetings in 2007. The committee is governed by a written charter. This committee assists the board of directors in carrying out the board's responsibilities relating to the compensation of Abbott's executive officers and directors. The compensation committee annually reviews the compensation paid to the members of the board and gives its recommendations to the full board regarding both the amount of director compensation that should be paid and the allocation of that compensation between equity-based awards and cash. In recommending director compensation, the compensation committee takes comparable director fees into account and reviews any arrangement that could be viewed as indirect director compensation. The processes and procedures used for the consideration and determination of executive compensation are described in the section of the proxy captioned, "Compensation Discussion and Analysis." This committee also reviews, approves, and administers the incentive compensation plans in which any executive officer of Abbott participates and all of Abbott's equity-based plans. It may delegate the responsibility to administer and make grants under these plans to management, except to the extent that such delegation would be inconsistent with
8
applicable law or regulation or with the listing rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The compensation committee has engaged Hewitt Associates LLC, as its independent compensation consultant to provide counsel and advice on executive and non-employee director compensation matters and has instructed Hewitt to provide information and advice regarding the peer groups against which performance and pay should be examined, the financial metrics to be used to assess Abbott's relative performance, the competitive long-term incentive practices in the market place, and compensation levels relative to market practice. A copy of the report of the compensation committee is on page 16.
The nominations and governance committee, whose members are H. L. Fuller, chairman, W. J. Farrell, D. A. L. Owen, W. A. Reynolds, and R. S. Roberts, held two meetings in 2007. The committee is governed by a written charter. This committee assists the board of directors in identifying individuals qualified to become board members and recommends to the board the nominees for election as directors at the next annual meeting of shareholders, recommends to the board the persons to be elected as executive officers of Abbott, develops and recommends to the board the corporate governance guidelines applicable to Abbott, and serves in an advisory capacity to the board and the chairman of the board on matters of organization, management succession plans, major changes in the organizational structure of Abbott, and the conduct of board activities. The process used by this committee to identify a nominee to serve as a member of the board of directors depends on the qualities being sought. Board members should have backgrounds that when combined provide a portfolio of experience and knowledge that will serve Abbott's governance and strategic needs. Board candidates will be considered on the basis of a range of criteria, including broad-based business knowledge and relationships, prominence and excellent reputations in their primary fields of endeavor, as well as a global business perspective and commitment to good corporate citizenship. Directors should have demonstrated experience and ability that is relevant to the board of directors' oversight role with respect to Abbott's business and affairs.
The public policy committee, whose members are W. A. Reynolds, chair, R. S. Austin, W. M. Daley, B. Powell Jr., and R. S. Roberts held two meetings in 2007. The committee is governed by a written charter. This committee assists the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to Abbott's public policy, certain areas of legal and regulatory compliance, and governmental affairs and healthcare compliance issues that affect Abbott by discharging the responsibilities set forth in its charter.
Communicating with the Board of Directors
You may communicate with the board of directors by writing a letter to the chairman of the board, to the chairman of the nominations and governance committee, who acts as the lead director at the meetings of the independent directors, or to the independent directors c/o Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Road, D-364, AP6D, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-6400 Attention: corporate secretary. The general counsel and corporate secretary regularly forwards to the addressee all letters other than mass mailings, advertisements, and other materials not relevant to Abbott's business. In addition, directors regularly receive a log of all correspondence received by the company that is addressed to a member of the board and may request any correspondence on that log.
Corporate Governance Materials
Abbott's corporate governance guidelines, outline of directorship qualifications, director independence standards, code of business conduct and the charters of Abbott's audit committee, compensation committee, nominations and governance committee, and public policy committee are all available in the corporate governance section of Abbott's investor relations Web site (www.abbottinvestor.com) or by sending a request for a paper copy to: Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Road, Dept. 362, AP6D2, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-6048, attn. Investor Relations.
9
Director Compensation
Abbott employees are not compensated for serving on the board or board committees. Abbott's non-employee directors are compensated for their service under the Abbott Laboratories Non-Employee Directors' Fee Plan and the Abbott Laboratories 1996 Incentive Stock Program.
The following table sets forth a summary of the non-employee directors' 2007 compensation.
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1) |
Stock Awards ($) (2) |
Option Awards ($) (3) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (5) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R. S. Austin | $ | 104,668 | $ | 97,979 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 6,225 | $ | 208,872 | ||||||
W. M. Daley | 90,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 0 | 11,419 | 200,066 | ||||||||||||
W. J. Farrell | 90,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 4,967 | 12,049 | 205,663 | ||||||||||||
H. L. Fuller | 102,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 0 | 41,571 | (6) | 242,218 | |||||||||||
J. M. Greenberg | 32,668 | 0 | 93,209 | (4) | 14,496 | 43,987 | (6) | 184,360 | ||||||||||
D. A. L. Owen | 96,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 0 | 31,225 | (6) | 225,872 | |||||||||||
B. Powell Jr. | 90,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 0 | 95,801 | (6) | 284,448 | |||||||||||
W. A. Reynolds | 102,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 6,075 | 91,530 | (6) | 298,252 | |||||||||||
R. S. Roberts | 90,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 5,297 | 42,702 | (6) | 236,646 | |||||||||||
S. C. Scott III | 68,000 | 97,979 | 0 | 0 | 1,125 | 167,104 | ||||||||||||
W. D. Smithburg | 108,668 | 97,979 | 0 | 0 | 122,606 | (6) | 329,253 | |||||||||||
G. F. Tilton | 68,000 | 97,979 | 0 | 0 | 1,333 | 167,312 | ||||||||||||
Fees earned under the Abbott Laboratories Non-Employee Directors' Fee Plan are paid in cash to the director, paid in the form of non-qualified stock options (based on an independent appraisal of their fair value), deferred (as a non-funded obligation of Abbott), or paid currently into an individual grantor trust established by the director. The distribution of deferred fees and amounts held in a director's grantor trust generally commences when the director reaches age 65, or upon retirement from the board of directors. The director may elect to have deferred fees and fees deposited in trust credited to either a guaranteed interest account at the prime rate plus 2.25 percentage points or to a stock equivalent account that earns the same return as if the fees were invested in Abbott stock. If necessary, Abbott contributes funds to a director's trust so that as of year end the stock equivalent account balance (net of taxes) is not less than seventy-five percent of the market value of the related Abbott common stock at year end. Abbott pays the director for any tax owed on the income earned by the trust or any supplemental contributions to the trust by Abbott.
10
In addition to the fees described in footnote 1, the Abbott Laboratories 1996 Incentive Stock Program provides that each non-employee director elected to the board of directors at the annual shareholder meeting receives stock equivalent units having a value of $98,000 (rounded down). In 2007, this was 1,730 units. The non-employee directors receive cash payments equal to the dividends paid on the Abbott shares covered by the units at the same rate as other shareholders. Upon termination, retirement from the board, death, or a change in control of Abbott, a non-employee director will receive one Abbott common share for each restricted share unit outstanding under the Incentive Stock Program. The amounts reported in this column also represent the grant date fair value of the award.
The following restricted share units were outstanding as of December 31, 2007: R. S. Austin, 5,746; W. M. Daley, 5,746; W. J. Farrell, 3,857; H. L. Fuller, 5,746; D. A. L. Owen, 5,746; B. Powell Jr., 5,746; W. A. Reynolds, 5,746; R. S. Roberts, 5,746; S. C. Scott III, 1,730; W. D. Smithburg, 5,746; and G. F. Tilton, 1,730.
11
Security Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors
The table below reflects the number of common shares beneficially owned as of January 31, 2008, by each person who is currently serving or who served as a director of Abbott during 2007, by the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, and the 5 other most highly paid executive officers (the "named officers"), and by all directors and executive officers of Abbott as a group. It also reflects the number of stock equivalent units and restricted stock units held by non-employee directors under the Abbott Laboratories Non-Employee Directors' Fee Plan.
Name |
Shares Beneficially Owned (1)(2)(3) |
Stock Options Exercisable within 60 days of January 31, 2008 |
Stock Equivalent Units |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R. S. Austin |
12,590 |
6,668 |
0 |
|||
W. M. Daley |
9,246 |
0 |
5,713 |
|||
W. G. Dempsey |
52,993 |
487,788 |
0 |
|||
W. J. Farrell |
4,857 |
0 |
0 |
|||
T. C. Freyman |
317,764 |
415,359 |
0 |
|||
H. L. Fuller |
10,946 |
52,710 |
49,823 |
|||
S. R. Fussell |
104,440 |
372,472 |
0 |
|||
R. A. Gonzalez |
208,332 |
527,592 |
0 |
|||
H. A. Liepmann |
159,136 |
367,049 |
0 |
|||
W. A. Osborn |
5,000 |
0 |
0 |
|||
D. A. L. Owen |
20,306 |
31,243 |
6,190 |
|||
B. Powell Jr. |
31,975 |
0 |
85,305 |
|||
W. A. Reynolds |
42,955 |
40,389 |
77,025 |
|||
R. S. Roberts |
17,238 |
35,660 |
1,465 |
|||
S. C. Scott III |
7,730 |
0 |
1,254 |
|||
W. D. Smithburg |
59,700 |
25,129 |
122,125 |
|||
G. F. Tilton |
7,080 |
0 |
1,254 |
|||
J. L. Tyree |
117,870 |
317,626 |
0 |
|||
M. D. White |
1,065,972 |
4,067,498 |
0 |
|||
All directors and executive officers as a group (4)(5) |
3,483,043 |
9,490,754 |
350,154 |
|||
12
Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
The Compensation Committee has established a compensation philosophy to attract, retain and motivate executives and to align their financial rewards with shareholder returns. The following guiding principles apply:
All components of both performance and pay should be examined relative to two peer groups:
To achieve the Compensation Committee's objectives, Abbott's pay plans must serve three primary purposes. First, they must be competitive. Presently, competitive means targeting total compensation, in the aggregate (i.e., including base pay, short-term incentives, long-term incentives and benefits) in a manner that references the median of our primary health care comparison group as an initial benchmark, but varies based on individual and company performance relative to those peer groups over periods of 1, 3 and 5-years. Individual targets are equitably set on the same basis, compared to both peer groups and internal benchmarks. Secondly, pay should vary based on company and individual performance. Thirdly, they should align participant's interests with shareholders.
Specifically, base salaries are typically reviewed annually. Overall, company targets are set based on the company's business plan. Individual increases are granted based on performance (merit), and influenced by internal and external equity. The Compensation Committee focuses on those elements of pay that are driven by performance, rather than on fixed elements such as base pay.
Short-term (annual) incentive targets are determined annually. Specific performance goals supporting both the company's overall goals for the year and the contributions of each executive in his or her own area of responsibility are established. In this way, each executive's bonus is directly tied to company results, yet varies based on the individual's actual performance. Short-term incentives primarily support the setting and tracking of individual and team goals, and rewarding performance that facilitates their achievement. In the aggregate, short-term incentives should trail our peers when performance trails, match our peers when performance is at peer levels and exceed peers when performance does.
Long-term incentives are typically in the form of equity-based awards and are designed to increase executives' ownership in the company, creating direct alignment with the interests of shareholders. As with other pay elements, reference is made to the median of competitive benchmarks, but the actual awards vary based on Abbott's overall results compared to peers, the company's business plan, and individual performance. Long-term incentives serve two primary purposes. The first objective is the retention of our senior leaders, a key asset of the company. Secondly, long term incentives help to continuously align shareholder and executive interests. Accordingly, while reference is made to the competitive medians, long-term incentive awards should trail competitors when performance trails, match competitors when performance matches, and exceed competitors when performance exceeds their performance. To achieve this outcome, Abbott currently grants both non-qualified stock options and full value shares subject to vesting restrictions. The full value shares are typically granted in two forms: performance based restricted stock with a return on equity vesting threshold and traditional time-vested shares, which provide for cliff vesting to provide retention incentives for the recipient.
Post-retirement and certain other benefits are also necessary to attract and retain key executives. In the aggregate, while the practices of individual companies vary widely, these plans also reference competitive medians which are adjusted to reflect the actual performance of the individual and the company.
HOW OUR PHILOSOPHY GUIDES SPECIFIC DECISIONS
Each named officer establishes specific written goals for each performance period, typically a calendar year. These goals establish targets which are tied with the financial, strategic and operational goals of the company and include, company and business specific targets relating to net sales, gross margin, investment results, earnings per share, and similar financial measures. The appropriate Executive Officer and the Chief Executive Officer review the goals of each executive for alignment and calibration with the overall objectives of the company. The Chief Executive Officer's goals are established with input from and are reviewed by the independent Board members. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates the performance and recommends the total compensation award for each named officer, other than himself. The Chief Executive Officer's performance, against these established goals, is reviewed by the Compensation Committee and, based upon that evaluation, the Committee determines the compensation of the Chief Executive
13
Officer, with the exception of the Chief Executive Officer's base compensation, which is approved by the independent directors of the full board, following the recommendation of the Committee. The Committee also reviews the performance of the company's other executive officers, taking into consideration the Chief Executive Officer's recommendation, and determines their compensation based on that review.
COMPENSATION COMPONENTS
Using compensation survey data from the peer groups, a range for total compensation and each of its elementsbase salary, annual incentive, long-term incentives and non-cash compensationis annually established by the Committee for each named officer. The Committee considered a number of alternative financial metrics to assess Abbott's relative performance. Based upon the advice of its independent compensation consultant, and its own review, the Committee determined that total shareholder return, earnings per share, return on equity, and return on net assets were appropriate performance measures. The Committee also evaluates the success of the management team as a whole and each officer's goals in the development and execution of strategic plans, the development of talent, successful progress of Abbott's diversity initiative, and the exercise of leadership within the industry and in the communities that Abbott serves.
Specific pay decisions for the named officers are described below and reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 17 of this proxy statement.
Base Pay
An overall merit budget of 4.0% was established for executive staff in 2007. This target equals the target for most of Abbott's U. S. employee population. Most executives received a 4.0% merit increase, but due to individual performance, peer comparisons both outside and inside the company, promotions, career growth and potential, individual increases varied.
Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentives
All named officers participate in the 1998 Abbott Laboratories Performance Incentive Plan. The Performance Incentive Plan is designed to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for performance-based compensation.
Each year, maximum award allocations for Performance Incentive Plan participants as a percentage of consolidated net earnings are set. For 2007, the maximum award for the Chief Executive Officer was ..0015 of adjusted consolidated net earnings for the fiscal year; for the Chief Operating Officer .0010 of adjusted consolidated net earnings; and for all other Performance Incentive Plan participants ..00075 of adjusted consolidated net earnings. Historically, and in 2007, the Committee exercised its discretion to deliver Performance Incentive Plan awards below the maximums.
Actual 2007 awards paid to Performance Incentive Plan participants were based on performance relative to pre-determined company and individual goals and measures. The company met or exceeded its predetermined 2007 financial goals, including consolidated net earnings, profitability, sales, returns and earnings per share. Since the company financial goals were met in 2007, that portion of each participant's award was paid accordingly.
For the individual component, each participant had a portion of his or her award determined based on goals specific to the officer's area of responsibility, which included sales, margin, returns, cash flow, and demonstrated management and leadership, as appropriate. Goal performance varied among participants in 2007 and as a result the final bonus awards differed.
Long-Term IncentivesEquity Awards
In addition to meeting the pre-determined financial goals described above, Abbott also delivered one-year total shareholder return in the top quartile of the health care peer group. The longer term measures of three-year and five-year total shareholder returns were near and at the top, respectively, of the companies in Abbott's health care peer group. Based on the Committee's assessment of this performance, the goals of the company's long-term incentive program, each individual's relative performance against his or her pre-determined goals, current outstanding awards held by named officers and the recommendation of its independent compensation consultant, the Committee delivered long-term incentive awards that were, in aggregate, near the top quartile of the health care peer group.
Applying these standards, the Committee determined the value for each named officer and made the awards reported in the Summary Compensation Table as shown on page 17 of this proxy statement. Further, the Committee determined in 2007, based on changing market practice, input from its independent compensation consultant and to align with recommendations of institutional shareholders, the long-term incentive award for named officers should be in the form of 50% stock options and 50% performance-vested shares. In light of the current competitive environment for executive talent and the potential for key executive retirements, Abbott also awarded retention-restricted stock that vests on the third anniversary of the award to named officers. This retention award excluded the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer.
Abbott's policy with respect to its annual equity award for all employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, executive officers and all other officers of the company, is to grant this award and set the grant price at the same time each year, at the Compensation Committee's regularly scheduled February meeting. These meeting dates are generally the third Friday of February and are scheduled two years in advance. In 2007, the annual grant was dated and the grant price set on February 16th. The historical practice for setting the grant price is the average of the highest and lowest trading price of a common share on the date of the grant (rounded up to the next even penny). The grant price for the 2007 annual grant was set at $52.54. The high, low and closing price of an Abbott common share on February 16th was $52.80, $52.28 and $52.49, respectively.
In establishing criteria for performance vesting shares, the Committee considered the recommendation of its independent
14
compensation consultant, and the fact that the secondary comparison of "High-Performance Companies" is currently defined by five-year average return on equity of 18% or greater. Accordingly, performance-based stock awards granted in 2007 will be earned (vested) over a period of up to five years, with not more than one-third of the award vesting in any one year, dependent upon the company achieving an annual return on equity threshold of 18% from continuing operations adjusted for specified items per the quarterly earnings releases (which is currently above the median of Abbott's Standard Industrial Classification peer group). If the thresholds are met in three of the five years, 100% of the performance shares will vest. If the thresholds are not met in any of the five years, 100% of the performance shares will be forfeited. Outstanding restricted shares receive dividends at the same rate as all other shareholders.
Post Termination and Other Benefits
Each of the benefits described below were chosen to support the company's objective of providing a total competitive pay program. Individual benefits do not directly affect decisions regarding other benefits or pay components, except to the extent that all benefits and pay components must, in aggregate, be competitive, as previously discussed.
Retirement Benefits
The named officers participate in two Abbott-sponsored defined benefit plans: the Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan and the Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan. These plans are described in greater detail in the section of the proxy statement captioned "Pension Benefits".
Since officers' Supplemental Pension Plan benefits cannot be secured in a manner similar to qualified plans, which are held in trust, officers receive an annual cash payment equal to the increase in present value of their Supplemental Pension Plan benefit. Officers have the option of depositing these annual payments to an individually established grantor trust, net of tax withholdings. Deposited amounts may be credited with the difference between the officer's actual annual trust earnings and the rate used to calculate trust funding (currently eight percent). Amounts deposited in the individual trusts are not tax deferred. Since amounts contributed to the trust have already been taxed, Abbott remits the tax owed on the income earned by the trust or any company adjustment paid to the trust, thus preserving the parity of the benefit to those payable under the Annuity Retirement Plan. The manner in which the grantor trust will be distributed to an officer upon retirement from the company generally follows the manner elected by the officer under the Annuity Retirement Plan. Should an officer (or his spouse depending upon the pension distribution method elected by the officer under the Annuity Retirement Plan) live beyond the actuarial life expectancy age used to determine the Supplemental Pension Plan benefit and therefore exhaust the trust balance, the Supplemental Pension Plan benefit will be paid to the officer by Abbott.
Deferred Compensation
Officers of the company, like all U.S. employees, are eligible to defer a portion of annual base salary, on a pre-tax basis, to the company's qualified 401(k) plan, up to the IRS contribution limits. Officers are also eligible to defer up to 18% of their base salary, less contributions to the 401(k) plan, to a non-qualified plan. 100% of annual incentive awards earned under the company's Performance Incentive Plan are also eligible for deferral to a non-qualified plan. Officers may defer these amounts to unfunded book accounts or choose to have the amounts paid in cash on a current basis and deposited into individually established grantor trusts, net of tax withholdings. These amounts are credited annually with earnings equivalent to the average prime rate over the previous thirteen months plus 2.25 percent. Amounts deposited in the individual trusts are not tax deferred. Since amounts contributed to the trusts have already been taxed, Abbott remits the tax owed on the income earned by the trusts or any company adjustment paid to the trusts. Officers elect the manner in which the assets held in their grantor trusts will be distributed to them upon retirement or other separation from the company.
Change in Control Arrangements
On February 16, 2007 Messrs. White, Gonzalez and Freyman informed the Compensation Committee that they would voluntarily terminate their individual change in control agreements with the Company, effective February 28, 2007.
Abbott's other executive officers have individual change in control agreements. The purpose of these agreements is to aid in retention and recruitment, encourage continued attention and dedication to assigned duties during periods involving a possible change in control of the company and to protect the earned benefits of the officer against adverse changes resulting from a change in control. The level of payments provided under the agreements is established to be consistent with market practice as confirmed by data provided the Committee by its independent compensation consultant. These arrangements are described in greater detail in the section of the proxy captioned "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control".
Financial Planning
Named officers are eligible for up to $10,000 of annual costs associated with estate planning advice, tax preparation and general financial planning fees. If an officer chooses to utilize this benefit, fees for services received up to the annual allocation are paid by the company and are treated as imputed income to the officer who then is responsible for payment of all taxes due on the fees paid by the company.
Company Automobile
Named officers are eligible for use of a company-leased vehicle, with a lease term of 50 months. Seventy-five (75%) percent of the cost of the vehicle is imputed to the officer as income.
15
Company Aircraft
Non-business related flights on corporate aircraft are covered by time-sharing lease agreements, pursuant to which certain costs associated with those flights are reimbursed in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations. Messrs. White, Gonzalez and Freyman had such agreements and reimbursed the Company. Mr. Gonzalez's agreement expired upon his retirement.
Disability Benefit
In addition to Abbott's standard disability benefits, the named officers are eligible for a monthly long-term disability benefit, which is described in greater detail in the section of the proxy captioned, "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."
SHARE OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
To further promote sustained shareholder return and to ensure the company's executives remain focused on both short and long-term objectives, the company has established share ownership guidelines. Each officer has five years from the date appointed/elected to his/her position to achieve the ownership level associated with the position. The share ownership requirements are 175,000 shares for the Chief Executive Officer; 100,000 shares for the Chief Operating Officer; 50,000 shares for Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents and 25,000 shares for all other officers. All named officers meet or substantially exceed the guidelines.
As provided in Abbott's Stock Incentive Program, no award may be assigned, alienated, sold or transferred otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order or as permitted by the Committee for estate planning purposes, and no award and no right under any award, may be pledged, alienated, attached or otherwise encumbered. All members of senior management, including the company's executive officers, and certain other employees are required to clear any transaction involving company stock with the General Counsel prior to entering into such transaction.
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S COMPENSATION
The company's performance for 2007 as described above and as reflected in the company's financial statements included strong growth in sales, earnings and shareholder returns that placed Abbott in the top quartile of the health care peer group. Accordingly, in evaluating Mr. White's overall performance, the Committee determined that Mr. White exceeded his strategic and financial goals for 2007. Therefore, in February 2008, the Committee awarded Mr. White a Performance Incentive Plan bonus of $4,050,000 for his performance in 2007, intended to recognize his leadership in guiding the Company to top-quartile performance.
Other 2007 compensation approved for Mr. White by the Committee and Independent Directors of the Board, as appropriate, in February 2007 (the Committee's Charter requires the CEO's base salary be approved by the Independent Directors of the Board) included a base salary increase of 4.0%, the average of the company's U.S. merit increase budget, to $1,738,000, a 550,000 share stock option grant and a 140,000 share performance vesting restricted stock award.
COMPLIANCE
The Performance Incentive Plan and Incentive Stock Program, which are described above, are intended to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) to ensure deductibility.
The Committee reserves the flexibility to take actions that may be based on considerations in addition to tax deductibility. The Committee believes that shareholder interests are best served by not restricting the Committee's discretion and flexibility in crafting compensation programs, even if such programs may result in certain non-deductible compensation expenses. Accordingly, the Committee may from time to time approve components of compensation for certain officers that are not deductible.
While the Committee does not anticipate there would ever be circumstances where a restatement of earnings upon which any incentive plan award decisions were based would occur, the Committee, in evaluating such circumstances, has discretion to take all actions necessary to protect the interests of shareholders up to and including actions to recover such incentive awards. Such circumstances have never occurred.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of the Board is primarily responsible for reviewing, approving and overseeing Abbott's compensation plans and practices, and works with management and the committee's independent consultant to establish Abbott's executive compensation philosophy and programs. The Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Compensation Committee
W. D. Smithburg, Chairman, W. M. Daley, W. J. Farrell, H. L. Fuller, and B. Powell Jr.
16
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named officers. The section of the proxy statement captioned "Compensation Discussion and Analysis Compensation Components" describes in greater detail the information reported in this table.
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) |
Stock Awards ($) (1) |
Option Awards ($) (2) (3) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (4) |
Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (5) |
All Other Compensation ($) (6) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Miles D. White, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
2007 2006 |
$ |
1,726,936 1,661,973 |
$ |
8,747,311 10,560,151 |
$ |
14,774,465 8,479,149 |
$ |
4,050,000 4,050,000 |
$ |
2,998,887 1,308,852 |
$ |
1,048,661 855,233 |
$ |
33,346,260 26,915,358 |
||||||||
Thomas C. Freyman, Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
2007 2006 |
852,542 812,884 |
1,967,615 1,829,920 |
3,527,170 1,269,012 |
1,200,000 1,091,000 |
837,712 745,382 |
355,329 273,281 |
8,740,368 6,021,479 |
|||||||||||||||
Holger A. Liepmann, Executive Vice President, Global Nutrition |
2007 2006 |
671,700 625,962 |
1,958,919 1,686,423 |
1,813,941 1,334,455 |
548,000 657,000 |
973,511 760,795 |
228,155 624,063 |
6,194,226 5,688,698 |
|||||||||||||||
James L. Tyree, Executive Vice President, Pharmaceutical Products Group |
2007 | 634,318 | 1,979,332 | 1,762,200 | 713,700 | 595,743 | 69,125 | 5,754,418 | |||||||||||||||
Stephen R. Fussell, Senior Vice President, Human Resources |
2007 | 454,689 | 2,120,508 | 2,230,564 | 480,000 | 338,903 | 125,799 | 5,750,463 | |||||||||||||||
Richard A. Gonzalez, Former Chief Operating Officer and Director(7) |
2007 2006 |
951,771 973,931 |
7,638,582 8,496,529 |
5,906,344 4,322,329 |
1,287,000 1,535,000 |
1,020,348 912,509 |
349,925 472,991 |
17,153,970 16,713,289 |
|||||||||||||||
William G. Dempsey, Former Executive Vice President, Pharmaceutical Products Group(8) |
2007 2006 |
594,779 630,583 |
2,288,646 1,773,391 |
2,904,516 1,281,960 |
852,300 756,000 |
828,974 710,542 |
288,993 319,151 |
7,758,208 5,471,627 |
|||||||||||||||
Historically, Abbott has granted performance-based restricted stock awards and retention-restricted stock awards, each of which has its own service period. The amount of expense reported with respect to an officer is a function of the composition of that officer's current and prior awards. The grant date fair value of awards made in 2007 to the officers is reported in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on pages 20 and 21.
17
These amounts were determined as of the option's grant date using a Black-Scholes stock option valuation model. These amounts are being reported solely for the purpose of comparative disclosure in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. There is no certainty that the amount determined using a Black-Scholes stock option valuation model would be the value at which employee stock options would be traded for cash. For options, other than replacement options, the assumptions are the same as those described in Note 8 entitled "Incentive Stock Program" of Abbott's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in Abbott's 2007 Annual Report on Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K. For replacement options, the model uses the following assumptions: expected volatility of 19% for 2007 and 28% for 2006, dividend yield ranging between 2.0% and 2.3% for 2007 and 2.4% and 2.8% for 2006, risk-free interest ranging between 3.3% and 4.7% for 2007 and 4.6% and 5.0% for 2006, and an option life equal to 61% of the option's remaining term for 2007 and 2006.
For Messrs. White, Freyman, Liepmann, Gonzalez, and Dempsey, the amounts shown alongside the officer's name are for 2007 and 2006, respectively. For Messrs. Tyree and Fussell, the amount shown alongside the officer's name is for 2007.
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan
M. D. White: $4,004 / $25,025; T. C. Freyman: $4,106 / $29,849; H. A. Liepmann: $30,684 / $31,824; J. L. Tyree: $41,778; S. R. Fussell: $28,679; R. A. Gonzalez: $0 / $30,651; and, W. G. Dempsey: $0 / $48,486.
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan
M. D. White: $2,521,122 / $972,873; T. C. Freyman: $809,653 / $702,566; H. A. Liepmann: $821,047 / $642,705; J. L. Tyree: $542,181; S. R. Fussell: $279,913; R. A. Gonzalez: $844,731 / $763,682; and, W. G. Dempsey: $597,141 / $492,654.
Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plan Earnings
The totals in this column include reportable interest credited under Abbott's non-qualified defined contribution plan.
M. D. White: $473,761 / $310,954; T. C. Freyman: $23,953 / $12,967; H. A. Liepmann: $121,780 / $86,266; J. L. Tyree: $11,784; S. R. Fussell: $30,311; R. A. Gonzalez: $175,617 / $118,176; and, W. G. Dempsey: $231,833 / $169,402.
For Messrs. White, Freyman, Liepmann, Gonzalez, and Dempsey, the amounts shown alongside the officer's name are for 2007 and 2006, respectively. For Messrs. Tyree and Fussell, the amount shown alongside the officer's name is for 2007.
Earnings, Fees and Tax Payments for Non-Qualified Defined Benefit and Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plans (net of reportable interest included in footnote 5).
M. D. White: $851,678 / $675,843; T. C. Freyman: $305,338 / $217,119; H. A. Liepmann: $164,163 / $485,077; J. L. Tyree: $14,072; S. R. Fussell: $73,920; R. A. Gonzalez: $228,272 / $349,822; and, W. G. Dempsey: $249,764 / $261,738.
Each of the named officers' awards under the 1998 Abbott Laboratories Performance Incentive Plan is paid in cash to the officer on a current basis and may be deposited into a grantor trust established by the officer, net of maximum tax withholdings. The officers have also established grantor trusts in connection with the Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan, the Abbott Laboratories 401(k) Supplemental Plan and the 1986 Abbott Laboratories Management Incentive Plan (although none of the named officers currently receives awards under this plan). These amounts include the earnings (net of the reportable interest included in footnote (5)), fees, and tax payments paid in connection with these grantor trusts.
Employer Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans
M. D. White: $86,347 / $83,099; T. C. Freyman: $42,627 / $40,644; H. A. Liepmann: $33,585 / $31,298; J. L. Tyree: $31,716; S. R. Fussell: $22,734; R. A. Gonzalez: $38,283 / $48,697; and, W. G. Dempsey: $25,135 / $31,529.
These amounts include employer contributions to both Abbott's tax-qualified defined contribution plan and the Abbott Laboratories 401(k) Supplemental Plan. The Abbott Laboratories 401(k) Supplemental Plan permits Abbott's officers to contribute amounts in excess of the limit set by the Internal Revenue Code for employee contributions to 401(k) plans up to the excess of (i) 18% of their base salary over (ii) the amount contributed to Abbott's tax-qualified 401(k) plan. Abbott matches participant contributions at the rate of 250% of the first
18
2% of compensation contributed to the Plan. The named officers have these amounts paid to them in cash on a current basis and deposited into a grantor trust established by the officer, net of maximum tax withholdings.
Other Compensation
Non-business related flights on corporate aircraft are covered by time-sharing lease agreements, pursuant to which certain costs associated with those flights are reimbursed in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations. Messrs. White and Freyman have such agreements and reimbursed Abbott for non-business flights in accordance with those agreements.
The following amounts are included in the totals in this column, which reflect Abbott's incremental cost less reimbursements for non-business related flights, M. D. White: $103,292 / $90,154; T. C. Freyman: $0 / $8,148; and R. A. Gonzalez: $54,766 / $43,546.
Abbott determines the incremental cost for these flights based on the direct cost to Abbott, including fuel costs, parking, handling and landing fees, catering, travel fees, and other miscellaneous direct costs.
Also included in the totals shown in the table is the cost of providing a corporate automobile less the amount reimbursed by the executive:
M. D. White: $7,344 / $6,137; T. C. Freyman: $7,364 / $7,370; H. A. Liepmann: $22,407 / $22,561; J. L. Tyree: 20,337; S. R. Fussell: $19,145; R. A. Gonzalez: $18,604 / $23,426; and, W. G. Dempsey: $4,094 / $15,884.
For Messrs. Liepmann, Tyree, Fussell, Gonzalez, and Dempsey costs associated with financial planning are included: H. A. Liepmann, $8,000 / $10,000; J. L. Tyree, $3,000; S. R. Fussell: $10,000; R. A. Gonzalez: $10,000 / $7,500; and, W. G. Dempsey: $10,000 / $10,000.
The named officers are also eligible to participate in an executive disability benefit described on page 36.
For Mr. Liepmann, incremental tax payments of $75,127 in 2006 resulting from his multi-year assignment outside the United States are included.
19
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards Target (#) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Numbers of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Exercise or Base Price of Options Awards ($/Sh.) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Closing Market Price on Grant Date |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
M. D. White | 2/16/07 | 140,000 | (2) | $ | 7,355,600 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 132,148 | (5) | $ | 52.55 | $ | 52.66 | 450,625 | (7) | ||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 44,046 | (5) | 52.55 | 52.66 | 198,207 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 262,464 | (5) | 52.55 | 52.66 | 2,335,930 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 550,000 | (4) | 52.54 | 52.49 | 7,084,000 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/19/07 | 316,660 | (5) | 53.60 | 53.95 | 1,260,307 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/19/07 | 346,704 | (5) | 53.60 | 53.95 | 3,113,401 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/19/07 | 92,521 | (5) | 53.60 | 53.95 | 316,422 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/19/07 | 1,890 | (5) | 53.60 | 53.95 | 15,573 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
T. C. Freyman | 2/16/07 | 27,600 | (2) | 1,450,104 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 21,000 | (3) | 1,103,340 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 20,882 | (5) | 52.55 | 52.66 | 129,050 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 26,572 | (5) | 52.55 | 52.66 | 236,491 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 33,180 | (5) | 52.55 | 52.66 | 319,192 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
1/31/07 | 27,848 | (5) | 53.19 | 53.00 | 139,797 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 112,000 | (4) | 52.54 | 52.49 | 1,442,560 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
3/01/07 | 2,012 | (5) | 54.62 | 53.78 | 7,143 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
3/27/07 | 36,250 | (5) | 57.24 | 56.60 | 280,938 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/08/07 | 16,384 | (5) | 54.30 | 56.30 | 151,061 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
11/13/07 | 2,036 | (5) | 54.67 | 55.11 | 16,675 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
11/13/07 | 23,665 | (5) | 54.67 | 55.11 | 178,671 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
11/30/07 | 56,835 | (5) | 57.00 | 57.51 | 356,355 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
12/11/07 | 25,602 | (5) | 58.90 | 58.09 | 213,521 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
12/11/07 | 10,318 | (5) | 58.90 | 58.09 | 55,716 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
H. A. Liepmann | 2/16/07 | 27,600 | (2) | 1,450,104 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 21,000 | (3) | 1,103,340 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 112,000 | (4) | 52.54 | 52.49 | 1,442,560 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
3/09/07 | 10,067 | (5) | 53.40 | 54.39 | 48,422 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
3/09/07 | 7,530 | (5) | 53.40 | 54.39 | 45,858 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
3/09/07 | 16,187 | (5) | 53.40 | 54.39 | 144,226 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
3/09/07 | 11,000 | (5) | 53.40 | 54.39 | 106,260 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
12/07/07 | 1,719 | (5) | 58.15 | 58.22 | 11,105 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
12/07/07 | 1,731 | (5) | 58.15 | 58.22 | 15,510 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
J. L. Tyree | 2/16/07 | 20,400 | (2) | 1,071,816 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||
8/27/07 | 5,400 | (2) | 281,556 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 17,000 | (3) | 893,180 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||
8/27/07 | 4,000 | (3) | 208,560 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 83,000 | (4) | 52.54 | 52.49 | 1,069,040 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/20/07 | 22,388 | (5) | 52.49 | 52.58 | 212,686 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/22/07 | 15,473 | (5) | 52.36 | 52.14 | 83,400 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/22/07 | 5,111 | (5) | 52.36 | 52.14 | 44,261 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/27/07 | 9,712 | (5) | 52.53 | 52.01 | 78,473 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/27/07 | 22,000 | (4) | 52.14 | 52.01 | 274,340 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
20
Grants of Plan-Based Awards (continued)
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards Target (#) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Numbers of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Exercise or Base Price of Options Awards ($/Sh.) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Closing Market Price on Grant Date |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
S. R. Fussell | 2/16/07 | 20,400 | (2) | $ | 1,071,816 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 17,000 | (3) | 893,180 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||
2/1/07 | 21,975 | (5) | $ | 53.00 | $ | 52.87 | 197,336 | (7) | ||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 83,000 | (4) | 52.54 | 52.49 | 1,069,040 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/02/07 | 11,156 | (5) | 50.95 | 51.21 | 25,102 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/02/07 | 4,549 | (5) | 50.95 | 51.21 | 35,755 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/07/07 | 5,816 | (5) | 53.12 | 54.30 | 52,460 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/21/07 | 15,116 | (5) | 52.39 | 52.36 | 130,905 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/19/07 | 1,762 | (5) | 53.60 | 53.95 | 7,013 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
12/03/07 | 1,196 | (5) | 57.51 | 57.01 | 4,557 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
R. A. Gonzalez(8) | 2/16/07 | 125,000 | (2) | 6,567,500 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 20,839 | (5) | 52.55 | 52.66 | 139,830 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
1/29/07 | 21,357 | (5) | 52.55 | 52.66 | 131,986 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 302,000 | (4) | 52.54 | 52.49 | 3,889,760 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/21/07 | 219,192 | (5) | 52.39 | 52.36 | 1,744,768 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
W. G. Dempsey(9) | 2/16/07 | 27,600 | (2) | 1,450,104 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 21,000 | (3) | 1,103,340 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||
2/02/07 | 44,824 | (5) | 52.87 | 52.67 | 278,805 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/02/07 | 10,591 | (5) | 52.87 | 52.67 | 94,789 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/02/07 | 33,282 | (5) | 52.87 | 52.67 | 322,170 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/16/07 | 112,000 | (4) | 52.54 | 52.49 | 1,442,560 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
2/20/07 | 6,744 | (5) | 52.49 | 52.58 | 59,077 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/7/07 | 9,566 | (5) | 53.12 | 54.30 | 79,398 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/7/07 | 14,703 | (5) | 53.12 | 54.30 | 132,621 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/8/07 | 62,637 | (5) | 54.30 | 56.30 | 269,339 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
8/8/07 | 21,146 | (5) | 54.30 | 56.30 | 179,318 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/12/07 | 1,937 | (5) | 51.96 | 52.25 | 16,639 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/19/07 | 1,865 | (5) | 53.60 | 53.95 | 7,423 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
9/20/07 | 2,696 | (5) | 53.95 | 53.69 | 22,377 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||
21
these options have an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low market prices (rounded-up to the next even penny) of an Abbott common share on the date of grant. These options do not contain a replacement option feature.
22
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards held by the named officers at year-end.
|
Option Awards (1) |
Stock Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
||||||||||||
M. D. White | 21,266 | (2) | $ | 1,194,086 | |||||||||||||||||
92,666 | (2) | $ | 5,203,196 | ||||||||||||||||||
140,000 | (2) | 7,861,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
2,875 | $ | 34.7727 | 2/12/08 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 40.5618 | 9/14/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
10,128 | 42.4978 | 2/11/09 | |||||||||||||||||||
558,628 | 45.4488 | 2/08/11 | |||||||||||||||||||
37,046 | 47.8829 | 2/12/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
131,125 | 47.8829 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
675,674 | 53.6250 | 2/14/12 | |||||||||||||||||||
293,867 | 146,933 | (2) | 46.3400 | 2/17/15 | |||||||||||||||||
224,097 | 44.6000 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
146,000 | 292,000 | (2) | 44.1600 | 2/16/16 | |||||||||||||||||
41,579 | 47.1000 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
273,778 | 47.1000 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
132,148 | 52.5500 | 2/12/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
44,046 | 52.5500 | 9/14/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
262,464 | 52.5500 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
550,000 | (2) | 52.5400 | 2/15/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
316,660 | (2) | 53.6000 | 2/11/09 | ||||||||||||||||||
346,704 | (2) | 53.6000 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
92,521 | (2) | 53.6000 | 9/14/08 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,890 | (2) | 53.6000 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
See footnotes on pages 30 and 31. |
23
T. C. Freyman | 3,100 | (2) | $ | 174,065 | |||||||||||||||||
21,000 | (2) | 1,179,150 | |||||||||||||||||||
19,066 | (2) | $ | 1,070,556 | ||||||||||||||||||
27,600 | (2) | 1,549,740 | |||||||||||||||||||
95,764 | $ | 53.6250 | 2/14/12 | ||||||||||||||||||
42,534 | 21,266 | (2) | 46.3400 | 2/17/15 | |||||||||||||||||
27,667 | 55,333 | (2) | 44.1600 | 2/16/16 | |||||||||||||||||
20,882 | 52.5500 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
26,572 | 52.5500 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
33,180 | 52.5500 | 2/19/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
27,848 | 53.1900 | 2/11/09 | |||||||||||||||||||
112,000 | (2) | 52.5400 | 2/15/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,012 | 54.6200 | 2/12/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
36,250 | 57.2400 | 2/08/11 | |||||||||||||||||||
16,384 | (2) | 54.3000 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,036 | (2) | 54.6700 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
23,665 | (2) | 54.6700 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
56,835 | (2) | 57.0000 | 2/08/11 | ||||||||||||||||||
25,602 | (2) | 58.9000 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
10,318 | (2) | 58.9000 | 2/10/10 | ||||||||||||||||||
See footnotes on pages 30 and 31. |
24
H. A. Liepmann | 3,100 | (2) | $ | 174,065 | |||||||||||||||||
21,000 | (2) | 1,179,150 | |||||||||||||||||||
17,666 | (2) | $ | 991,946 | ||||||||||||||||||
27,600 | (2) | 1,549,740 | |||||||||||||||||||
13,228 | $ | 45.4488 | 2/08/11 | ||||||||||||||||||
15,960 | 44.6124 | 7/08/11 | |||||||||||||||||||
3,965 | 52.2529 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
53,201 | 53.6250 | 2/14/12 | |||||||||||||||||||
822 | 33.2314 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
16,672 | 41.0317 | 2/19/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
26,601 | 38.6258 | 3/30/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
42,534 | 21,266 | (2) | 46.3400 | 2/17/15 | |||||||||||||||||
17,954 | 42.9400 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
27,667 | 55,333 | (2) | 44.1600 | 2/16/16 | |||||||||||||||||
17,395 | 42.9000 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
112,000 | (2) | 52.5400 | 2/15/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
10,067 | 53.4000 | 2/11/09 | |||||||||||||||||||
7,530 | 53.4000 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
16,187 | 53.4000 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
11,000 | 53.4000 | 2/19/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
1,719 | (2) | 58.1500 | 2/08/11 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,731 | (2) | 58.1500 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
See footnotes on pages 30 and 31. |
25
J. L. Tyree | 1,733 | (2) | $ 97,308 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,366 | (2) | 76,701 | |||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | (2) | 561,500 | |||||||||||||||||||
17,000 | (2) | 954,550 | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | (2) | 224,600 | |||||||||||||||||||
17,666 | (2) | $ | 991,946 | ||||||||||||||||||
20,400 | (2) | 1,145,460 | |||||||||||||||||||
5,400 | (2) | 303,210 | |||||||||||||||||||
12,768 | $ | 42.4978 | 2/11/09 | ||||||||||||||||||
22,876 | 45.4488 | 2/08/11 | |||||||||||||||||||
15,960 | 48.1225 | 5/31/11 | |||||||||||||||||||
42,561 | 53.6250 | 2/14/12 | |||||||||||||||||||
2,792 | 41.9500 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
1,562 | 46.4200 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
23,200 | 11,600 | (2) | 46.3400 | 2/17/15 | |||||||||||||||||
14,811 | 45.6600 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
19,333 | 9,667 | (2) | 48.6600 | 4/30/15 | |||||||||||||||||
10,697 | 42.8300 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
27,667 | 55,333 | (2) | 44.1600 | 2/16/16 | |||||||||||||||||
3,782 | 47.9600 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
83,000 | (2) | 52.5400 | 2/15/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
22,388 | 52.4900 | 2/19/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
15,473 | (2) | 52.3600 | 2/10/10 | ||||||||||||||||||
5,111 | (2) | 52.3600 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
9,712 | (2) | 52.5300 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
22,000 | (2) | 52.1400 | 8/26/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
See footnotes on pages 30 and 31. |
26
S. R. Fussell | 1,366 | (2) | $ 76,701 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,733 | (2) | 97,308 | |||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | (2) | 561,500 | |||||||||||||||||||
17,000 | (2) | 954,550 | |||||||||||||||||||
17,666 | (2) | $ | 991,946 | ||||||||||||||||||
20,400 | (2) | 1,145,460 | |||||||||||||||||||
28,485 | $ | 42.4978 | 2/11/09 | ||||||||||||||||||
3,065 | 32.6111 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
53,202 | 45.4488 | 2/08/11 | |||||||||||||||||||
42,561 | 53.6250 | 2/14/12 | |||||||||||||||||||
3,050 | 33.2314 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
2,454 | 41.0317 | 2/19/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
5,724 | 43.2500 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
19,334 | 9,666 | (2) | 46.3400 | 2/17/15 | |||||||||||||||||
23,200 | 11,600 | (2) | 48.3200 | 5/31/15 | |||||||||||||||||
10,642 | 48.3300 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
13,194 | 43.0000 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
27,667 | 55,333 | (2) | 44.1600 | 2/16/16 | |||||||||||||||||
2,885 | 47.8200 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
11,636 | 47.8200 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
21,975 | 53.0000 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
83,000 | (2) | 52.5400 | 2/15/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
11,156 | (2) | 50.9500 | 2/12/08 | ||||||||||||||||||
4,549 | (2) | 50.9500 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
5,816 | (2) | 53.1200 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
15,116 | (2) | 52.3900 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,762 | (2) | 53.6000 | 2/11/09 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,196 | (2) | 57.5100 | 2/11/09 | ||||||||||||||||||
See footnotes on pages 30 and 31. |
27
R. A. Gonzalez | 66,666 | (2) | $ | 3,743,296 | |||||||||||||||||
16,666 | (2) | 935,796 | |||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | (2) | 7,018,750 | |||||||||||||||||||
2,875 | $ | 34.7727 | 2/12/08 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,353 | 42.4978 | 2/11/09 | |||||||||||||||||||
57,200 | 45.4488 | 2/08/11 | |||||||||||||||||||
48,145 | 49.8095 | 2/12/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
3,761 | 49.8095 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
478,824 | 53.6250 | 2/14/12 | |||||||||||||||||||
19,814 | 51.0594 | 2/12/08 | |||||||||||||||||||
25,353 | 51.0594 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
2,454 | 41.0317 | 2/19/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
208,800 | 104,400 | (2) | 46.3400 | 2/17/15 | |||||||||||||||||
2,142 | 46.6500 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
37,256 | 46.6500 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
103,334 | 206,666 | (2) | 44.1600 | 2/16/16 | |||||||||||||||||
71,191 | 42.6400 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
20,839 | 52.5500 | 7/31/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
21,357 | 52.5500 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
302,000 | (2) | 52.5400 | 2/15/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
219,192 | (2) | 52.3900 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
See footnotes on pages 30 and 31. |
28
W. G. Dempsey | 17,666 | (2) | $ | 991,946 | |||||||||||||||||
27,600 | (2) | 1,549,740 | |||||||||||||||||||
25,566 | $ | 50.3827 | 2/10/10 | ||||||||||||||||||
95,764 | 53.6250 | 2/14/12 | |||||||||||||||||||
42,534 | 21,266 | (2) | 46.3400 | 2/17/15 | |||||||||||||||||
27,667 | 55,333 | (2) | 44.1600 | 2/16/16 | |||||||||||||||||
44,824 | 52.8700 | 2/10/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
10,591 | 52.8700 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
33,282 | 52.8700 | 2/19/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
112,000 | (2) | 52.5400 | 2/15/17 | ||||||||||||||||||
6,744 | 52.4900 | 2/13/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
9,566 | (2) | 53.1200 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
14,703 | (2) | 53.1200 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
62,637 | (2) | 54.3000 | 2/11/09 | ||||||||||||||||||
21,146 | (2) | 54.3000 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,937 | (2) | 51.9600 | 2/19/14 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,865 | (2) | 53.6000 | 2/11/09 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,696 | (2) | 53.9500 | 2/13/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
See footnotes on pages 30 and 31. |
29
Footnotes to Outstanding Equity Awards table:
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Number of Unexercised Shares Remaining from Original Grant |
Number of Option Shares Vesting Date Vested 2008 |
Number of Option Shares Vesting Date Vested 2009 |
Number of Option Shares Vesting Date Vested 2010 |
Number of Restricted Shares |
Number of Restricted Shares Vesting Date Vested 2008 |
Number of Restricted Shares Vesting Date Vested 2009 |
Number of Restricted Shares Vesting Date Vested 2010 |
||||||||
M. D. White | 146,933 | 146,933 2/18 | 21,266 | 21,266 2/18 | ||||||||||||
292,000 | 146,000 2/17 | 146,000 2/17 | 92,666 | (a | ) | |||||||||||
550,000 | 183,334 2/16 | 183,333 2/16 | 183,333 2/16 | 140,000 | (b | ) | ||||||||||
316,660 | 316,660 3/20 | |||||||||||||||
346,704 | 346,704 3/20 | |||||||||||||||
92,521 | 92,521 3/20 | |||||||||||||||
1,890 | 1,890 3/20 | |||||||||||||||
T. C. Freyman | 21,266 | 21,266 2/18 | 3,100 | 3,100 2/18 | ||||||||||||
55,333 | 27,666 2/17 | 27,667 2/17 | 21,000 | 21,000 2/16 | ||||||||||||
112,000 | 37,334 2/16 | 37,333 2/16 | 37,333 2/16 | 19,066 | (a | ) | ||||||||||
16,384 | 16,384 2/9 | 27,600 | (b | ) | ||||||||||||
2,036 | 2,036 5/14 | |||||||||||||||
23,665 | 23,665 5/14 | |||||||||||||||
56,835 | 56,835 6/1 | |||||||||||||||
25,602 | 25,602 6/12 | |||||||||||||||
10,318 | 10,318 6/12 | |||||||||||||||
H. A. Liepmann | 21,266 | 21,266 2/18 | 3,100 | 3,100 2/18 | ||||||||||||
55,333 | 27,666 2/17 | 27,667 2/17 | 21,000 | 21,000 2/16 | ||||||||||||
112,000 | 37,334 2/16 | 37,333 2/16 | 37,333 2/16 | 17,666 | (a | ) | ||||||||||
1,719 | 1,719 6/8 | 27,600 | (b | ) | ||||||||||||
1,731 | 1,731 6/8 | |||||||||||||||
J. L. Tyree | 11,600 | 11,600 2/18 | 1,733 | 1,733 2/18 | ||||||||||||
9,667 | 9,667 5/1 | 1,366 | 1,366 5/1 | |||||||||||||
55,333 | 27,666 2/17 | 27,667 2/17 | 10,000 | 10,000 5/1 | ||||||||||||
83,000 | 27,667 2/16 | 27,666 2/16 | 27,667 2/16 | 17,000 | 17,000 2/16 | |||||||||||
15,473 | 15,473 2/23 | 4,000 | 4,000 8/27 | |||||||||||||
5,111 | 5,111 2/23 | 17,666 | (a | ) | ||||||||||||
9,712 | 9,712 2/28 | 20,400 | (b | ) | ||||||||||||
22,000 | 7,334 8/27 | 7,333 8/27 | 7,333 8/27 | 5,400 | (c | ) | ||||||||||
30
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Number of Unexercised Shares Remaining from Original Grant |
Number of Option Shares Vesting Date Vested 2008 |
Number of Option Shares Vesting Date Vested 2009 |
Number of Option Shares Vesting Date Vested 2010 |
Number of Restricted Shares |
Number of Restricted Shares Vesting Date Vested 2008 |
Number of Restricted Shares Vesting Date Vested 2009 |
Number of Restricted Shares Vesting Date Vested 2010 |
||||||||
S. R. Fussell | 9,666 | 9,666 2/18 | 1,366 | 1,366 2/18 | ||||||||||||
11,600 | 11,600 6/1 | 1,733 | 1,733 6/1 | |||||||||||||
55,333 | 27,666 2/17 | 27,667 2/17 | 10,000 | 10,000 6/1 | ||||||||||||
83,000 | 27,667 2/16 | 27,666 2/16 | 27,667 2/16 | 17,000 | 17,000 2/16 | |||||||||||
11,156 | 11,156 2/3 | 17,666 | (a | ) | ||||||||||||
4,549 | 4,549 2/3 | 20,400 | (b | ) | ||||||||||||
5,816 | 5,816 2/8 | |||||||||||||||
15,116 | 15,116 2/22 | |||||||||||||||
1,762 | 1,762 3/20 | |||||||||||||||
1,196 | 1,196 6/4 | |||||||||||||||
R. A. Gonzalez | 104,400 | 104,400 2/18 | 66,666 | (a | ) | |||||||||||
206,666 | 103,333 2/17 | 103,333 2/17 | 16,666 | (d | ) | |||||||||||
302,000 | 100,667 2/16 | 100,666 2/16 | 100,667 2/16 | 125,000 | (b | ) | ||||||||||
219,192 | 219,192 2/22 | |||||||||||||||
W. G. Dempsey | 21,266 | 21,266 2/18 | 17,666 | (a | ) | |||||||||||
55,333 | 27,666 2/17 | 27,667 2/17 | 27,600 | (b | ) | |||||||||||
112,000 | 37,334 2/16 | 37,333 2/16 | 37,333 2/16 | |||||||||||||
9,566 | 9,566 2/8 | |||||||||||||||
14,703 | 14,703 2/8 | |||||||||||||||
62,637 | 62,637 2/9 | |||||||||||||||
21,146 | 21,146 2/9 | |||||||||||||||
1,937 | 1,937 3/13 | |||||||||||||||
1,865 | 1,865 3/20 | |||||||||||||||
2,696 | 2,696 3/21 | |||||||||||||||
31
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table summarizes for each named officer the number of shares the officer acquired on the exercise of stock options and the number of shares the officer acquired on the vesting of stock awards in 2007:
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired On Exercise (#) |
Value Realized On Exercise ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired On Vesting (#) |
Value Realized On Vesting ($) |
||||||
M. D. White | 1,498,712 | $ | 20,959,049 | 322,601 | $ | 16,975,326 | ||||
T. C. Freyman | 367,923 | 4,021,419 | 45,634 | 2,400,579 | ||||||
H. A. Liepmann | 73,853 | 784,722 | 37,934 | 2,006,381 | ||||||
J. L. Tyree | 95,547 | 1,009,076 | 41,434 | 2,194,266 | ||||||
S. R. Fussell | 86,072 | 1,313,885 | 30,434 | 1,607,320 | ||||||
R. A. Gonzalez | 1,021,086 | 13,447,301 | 257,601 | 13,608,990 | ||||||
W. G. Dempsey | 486,807 | 4,984,860 | 61,701 | 3,234,211 | ||||||
32
Pension Benefits
The named officers participate in two Abbott-sponsored defined benefit pension plans: the Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan, a tax-qualified pension plan; and the Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan, a non-qualified supplemental pension plan. Abbott has adopted the Supplemental Pension Plan to provide the portion of the Annuity Retirement Plan benefit that cannot be paid from the Annuity Retirement Plan due to the pay and benefit amount limitations set by the Internal Revenue Code. The Supplemental Pension Plan also includes a benefit feature Abbott uses to attract officers who are at the mid-point of their career. This feature provides an additional benefit that is most valuable to officers who are mid-career hires and is less valuable to officers who have spent most of their career at Abbott. Except as provided in Abbott's change in control agreements, Abbott does not have a policy granting extra years of credited service under the plans.
The compensation considered in determining the pensions payable to the named officers is the compensation shown in the "Salary" and "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 17.
Annuity Retirement Plan
The Annuity Retirement Plan covers most employees in the United States, age 21 or older and provides participants with a life annuity benefit at normal retirement equal to A plus the greater of B or C below.
1.50%
of 5-year final average earnings multiplied by years of benefit service prior to 2004 in excess of 20 (but no more than 15 additional years); less
0.50% of the lesser of 3-year final average earnings (but not more than the social security wage base in any year) or the social security covered compensation level multiplied by years of benefit service.
The benefit for service prior to 2004 (B or C above) is reduced for the cost of preretirement surviving spouse benefit protection. The reduction is calculated using formulas based on age and employment status during the period in which coverage was in effect.
Final average earnings are the average of the 60 highest-paid consecutive calendar months of compensation (salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation) out of the last 120 months worked. The Annuity Retirement Plan covers earnings up to the limit imposed by Internal Revenue Code section 401(a)(17) and provides for a maximum of 35 years of benefit service.
Participants become fully vested in their pension benefit upon the completion of five years of service. The benefit is payable on an unreduced basis at age 65. Employees hired after 2003 who terminate prior to age 55 with at least 10 years of service may choose to commence their benefits on an actuarially reduced basis as early as age 55. Employees hired prior to 2004 who terminate prior to age 50 with at least 10 years of service may choose to commence their benefits on an actuarially reduced basis as early as age 50. Employees hired prior to 2004 who terminate prior to age 50 with less than 10 years of service may choose to commence their benefits on an actuarially reduced basis as early as age 55.
The Annuity Retirement Plan offers several optional forms of payment, including certain and life annuities, joint and survivor annuities, and level income annuities. The benefit paid under any of these options is actuarially equivalent to the life annuity benefit produced by the formula described above.
Employees who retire from Abbott prior to their normal retirement age may receive subsidized early retirement benefits. Employees hired after 2003 are eligible for early retirement at age 55 with 10 years of service. Employees hired prior to 2004 are eligible for early retirement at age 50 with 10 years of service or age 55 if the employee's age plus years of benefit service total 70 or more. Each of the named officers is eligible for early retirement benefits under the plan.
The subsidized early retirement reductions applied to the benefit payable for service after 2003 (A above) depend upon the participant's age at retirement. If the participant retires after reaching age 55, the benefit is reduced 5 percent per year for each year that payments are made before age 62. If the participant retires after reaching age 50 but prior to reaching age 55, the benefit is actuarially reduced from age 65.
The early retirement reductions applied to the benefit payable for service prior to 2004 (B and C above) depend upon age and service at retirement:
33
Special Retirement applies, seniority service is used in place of benefit service in the formulas. The 5-year final average earnings portions of the benefit in B above are reduced 12/3 percent for each year between ages 59 and 62 plus 21/2 percent for each year between ages 55 and 59. The 3-year final average earnings portion of the benefit is reduced 5 percent per year for each year that payments are made before age 62. Benefit C is payable on an unreduced basis at Special Retirement and is reduced 3 percent per year for each year that payments are made before age 62, if Early Special Retirement applies.
Supplemental Pension Plan
With the following exceptions, the provisions of the Supplemental Pension Plan are the same as those of the Annuity Retirement Plan:
Benefits payable under the Supplemental Pension Plan are offset by the benefits payable from the Annuity Retirement Plan. Abbott pays the officer's Supplemental Pension Plan benefits to the extent assets held in the officer's trust are insufficient.
34
Pension Benefits
Name |
Plan Name |
Number Of Years Credited Service |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(1) |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. D. White |
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan |
23 | $ | 364,886 | $ | 0 | ||||
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan |
23 | 13,216,784 | 2,246,418(2) | |||||||
T. C. Freyman |
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan |
28 | 462,577 | 0 | ||||||
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan | 28 | 4,849,224 | 1,212,778(2) | |||||||
H. A. Liepmann |
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan |
21 | 440,705 | 0 | ||||||
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan |
21 | 3,124,330 | 876,754(2) | |||||||
J. L. Tyree |
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan |
10 | 177,209 | 0 | ||||||
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan |
10 | 1,127,828 | 107,711(2) | |||||||
S. R. Fussell |
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan |
11 | 136,197 | 0 | ||||||
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan |
11 | 666,742 | 109,598(2) | |||||||
R. A. Gonzalez |
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan |
27 | 446,870 | 15,097(3) | ||||||
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan |
27 | 6,799,155 | 2,624,095(2) | |||||||
W. G. Dempsey |
Abbott Laboratories Annuity Retirement Plan |
25 | 513,067 | 20,015(4) | ||||||
Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan |
25 | 4,626,163 | 1,609,870(2) | |||||||
35
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Potential Payments Upon Termination Generally
Abbott does not have employment agreements with the named officers.
The following summarizes the payments that the named officers would have received if their employment had terminated on December 31, 2007. If the officer's employment had terminated due to death or disability, the officer's unvested stock options and restricted shares would have vested on December 31, 2007 with values as set forth below in the section captioned, "Potential Payments Upon Change in Control." If the termination of employment was due to disability, then the following named officers also would have received, in addition to Abbott's standard disability benefits, a monthly long-term disability benefit in the amount of $168,750 for M. D. White, $50,000 for T. C. Freyman, $22,833 for H. A. Liepmann, $29,738 for J. L. Tyree, and $20,000 for S. R. Fussell. This long-term disability benefit would continue for up to 18 months following termination of employment. It ends if the officer retires, recovers, dies or ceases to meet eligibility criteria. Finally, the following one-time deposits would have been made under the Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Pension Plan for each of the following named officers, respectively, M. D. White, $5,344,364, T. C. Freyman, $2,505,860, H. A. Liepmann, $1,363,882; J. L. Tyree, $1,059,653, and S. R. Fussell, $774,959. As each of the named officers who was employed by Abbott on December 31, 2007 is eligible to retire, each of these officers would be eligible to begin to receive the pension benefits described on pages 33 to 34.
Potential Payments Upon Change in Control
Messrs. White and Freyman do not have change in control agreements with Abbott.
Abbott has change in control arrangements with the rest of its management team, in the form of change in control agreements for Abbott officers and a change in control plan for other key management personnel. The agreements with Messrs. Liepmann, Tyree, and Fussell are described below.
The agreements with Messrs. Liepmann, Tyree, and Fussell continue in effect until December 31, 2010, and at the end of each year will automatically be extended through the third year thereafter unless Abbott notifies the officer that the agreement will not be extended. The agreements also automatically extend for two years following any change in control (see below) that occurs while they are in effect. The agreements provide that if the officer is terminated other than for cause or permanent disability or if the officer elects to terminate employment for good reason (good reason includes, a significant adverse change in the executive's position, duties, or authority; the company's failure to pay the executive's compensation or a reduction in the executive's base pay or benefits; or the relocation of the company's principle executive offices to a location that is more than thirty-five miles from the location of the offices at the time of the change in control) during a potential change in control (see below) or within two years following a change in control of Abbott (including termination by the officer for any reason during the thirty-day window period which begins six months after the date of a change in control), the officer is entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to three times the officer's annual salary and bonus (assuming for this purpose that all target performance goals have been achieved or, if higher, based on the average bonus for the last three years), plus any unpaid bonus owing for any completed performance period and the pro rata bonus for any current bonus period (based on the highest of the bonus assuming achievement of target performance, the average bonus for the past three years, or in the case of the unpaid bonus for any completed performance period, the actual bonus earned). Bonus payments include payments made under the Performance Incentive Plan. The officer will also receive up to three years of additional employee benefits (including welfare benefits, outplacement services and tax and financial counseling for three years and the value of three more years of pension accruals), and payment of any excise taxes imposed under section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code and other related taxes for which the officer is responsible as a result of receiving payments and benefits in connection with a change in control. The agreements also limit the conduct for which awards under Abbott's incentive stock programs can be terminated and generally permit options to remain exercisable for the remainder of their term. Independent compensation consultants confirm that the level of payments provided under the agreements is consistent with current market practice. For purposes of the agreements, the term "change in control" includes the following events: any person becoming the beneficial owner of Abbott securities representing 20% or more of the outstanding voting power (not including an acquisition directly from Abbott and its affiliates); a change in the majority of the members of the Board of Directors whose appointment was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the incumbent directors; and the consummation of certain mergers or similar corporate transactions involving Abbott. A "potential change in control" under the agreements would include, among other things, Abbott's entry into an agreement that would result in a change in control.
If a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2007, immediately followed by one of the covered circumstances described above, Messrs. Liepmann, Tyree, and Fussell would have been entitled to receive the following payments and benefits under the change in control agreements:
36
To determine the amount of the officer's excise tax reimbursement, Abbott has assumed that the named officer pays taxes at the highest marginal tax rate and that the price of Abbott shares was equal to the closing price of an Abbott common share on December 31, 2007.
Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards
Under the Abbott Laboratories 1996 Incentive Stock Program, upon a change in control, all outstanding stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units vest, including performance-based restricted shares, which are deemed earned in full. If a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2007:
The value of stock options shown is based on the excess of the closing price of a share of Abbott common stock on December 31, 2007 over the exercise price of such options, multiplied by the number of unvested stock options held by the named officer. The value of restricted shares shown is determined by multiplying the number of restricted shares that would vest as of December 31, 2007 and the closing price of a share of Abbott common stock on December 31, 2007.
37
Approval Process for Related Person Transactions
It is Abbott's policy that the nominations and governance committee review, approve or ratify any transaction in which Abbott participates and in which any related person has a direct or indirect material interest if such transaction involves or is expected to involve payments of $120,000 or more in the aggregate per fiscal year. Related person transactions requiring review by the nominations and governance committee pursuant to this policy are identified in:
In determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the nominations and governance committee will consider the following items, among others:
This process is included in the nominations and governance committee's written charter, which is available on the corporate governance section of Abbott's investor relations Web site (www.abbottinvestor.com). Abbott did not have any related person transactions in 2007 requiring nominations and governance committee approval under this policy.
38
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Auditors (Item 2 on Proxy Card)
Abbott's bylaws provide that the audit committee shall appoint annually a firm of independent registered public accountants to serve as auditors. In October 2007, the audit committee appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as auditors for 2008. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as Abbott's auditors since 2002.
Although the audit committee has sole authority to appoint auditors, it would like to know the opinion of the shareholders regarding its appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors for 2008. For this reason, shareholders are being asked to ratify this appointment. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors for 2008, the audit committee will take that fact into consideration, but may, nevertheless, continue to retain Deloitte & Touche LLP.
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors for 2008.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit Fees and Non-Audit Fees
The following table presents fees for professional audit services by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (the "Deloitte Entities") for the audit of Abbott's annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and fees billed for other services rendered by the Deloitte Entities during these periods.
|
2007 |
2006 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit fees: (1) | $ | 15,409,000 | $ | 13,966,000 | ||
Audit related fees: (2) | 21,000 | 36,000 | ||||
Tax fees: (3) | 1,428,000 | 1,697,000 | ||||
All other fees: (4) | | | ||||
Total | $ | 16,858,000 | $ | 15,699,000 |
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Independent Auditor
The audit committee has established policies and procedures to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the Deloitte Entities.
Prior to engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for the next year's audit, management will submit a schedule of all proposed services expected to be rendered during that year for each of four categories of services to the audit committee for approval.
Prior to engagement, the audit committee pre-approves these services by category of service. The fees are budgeted and the audit committee requires the independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the audit committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting firm.
The audit committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.
39
Report of the Audit Committee
Management is responsible for Abbott's internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, as well as expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee reviews these processes on behalf of the board of directors. In this context, the committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements contained in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K with Abbott's management and its independent registered public accounting firm.
The committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended.
The committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), as amended, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence. The committee has also considered whether the provision of the services described on page 39 under the caption "Audit Fees and Non-Audit Fees" is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in Abbott's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee
R. S. Austin, Chair, D. A. L. Owen, S. C. Scott III, W. D. Smithburg and G. F. Tilton
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
One report for Olivier Bohuon reporting the vesting of performance-based restricted stock units was filed late and one report for Robert B. Hance reporting the exercise of stock options was filed late by Abbott.
Shareholder Proposals
Two shareholder proposals have been received. Abbott is advised that the proposals will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. The proposed resolutions and the statements made in support thereof are presented below.
The board of directors recommends that you vote AGAINST the proposals.
40
Shareholder Proposal on Access to Medicines (Item 3 on Proxy Card)
The Christian Brothers Investment Services, Inc., 90 Park Avenue, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and eighteen other proponents have informed Abbott that they intend to present the following proposal at the meeting. Abbott will provide the proponents' names and addresses to any shareholder who requests that information and, if provided by a proponent to Abbott, the number of Abbott common shares held by that proponent.
Resolved: Shareholders request that the board amend the company's human rights policy to address the right to access to medicines and report to shareholders on the plan for implementation of such a policy by December 31, 2008.
Proponent's Statement in Support of Shareholder Proposal
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, "The increased presence of business in most spheres of modern society has created new societal expectations regarding its appropriate role and responsibilities, including in the area of human rights. There is a growing acknowledgement, endorsed by many business leaders, that business enterprises in virtually all sectors can have a significant impact on human rights and a correspondingly crucial role to play in supporting and promoting human rights";
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights laid the foundations for the international legal framework for the right to health. The right to health has been codified in numerous legally binding international and regional human rights treaties.
The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights' General Comment No. 14 on the "Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health" recognizes that the private business sector has responsibilities regarding the realization of the right to health.
UN Special Rapporteur Paul Hunt drafted human rights guidelines for pharmaceutical companies in relation to access to medicines. Mr. Hunt states that: "access to medicines is a central feature of the right to the highest attainable standard of health." However, "almost 2 billion people lack access to essential medicines. Improving access to existing medicines could save 10 million lives each year, 4 million of them in Africa and South-East Asia. Access to medicines is characterized by profound global inequity. 15% of the world's population consumes over 90% of the world's pharmaceuticals."
Access to medicines is at the core of Abbott's business. Many investors are convinced that pharmaceutical companies should be pursuing and reporting on access to medicines strategy and performance, which could have material impact on long-term shareholder value. Commercial advantages, such as enhanced corporate reputation and market opportunities, may accrue to our company by adopting a human rights policy that addresses access to medicines.
Abbott's website states that "Abbott believes in the dignity of every human being and respects individual rights as set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights." However, while Article 25 of the Declaration states that "Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services," Abbott's human rights policy lacks reference to health and the principle of access to medicine.
As the UN Special Rapporteur Report (September 2006) noted, "Although a number of pharmaceutical companies report on their corporate citizenship, few appear to have carefully examined their human rights policies through the lens of the right to the highest attainable standard of health. This is a missed opportunity because all pharmaceutical companies...would find it beneficial to adopt a rights-sensitive approach to their businesses."
Board of Directors' Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal on Access to Medicines (Item 3 on Proxy Card)
The proponents' proposal requesting that the Board of Directors amend Abbott's human rights policy to address access to medicines is unnecessary and offers no incremental benefit to shareholders.
Abbott's position on access to medicines is well known. As Abbott has publicly stated in several forums, we believe that all people should have access to quality health care, and we participate in numerous programs to promote the underlying principle of getting medicines to those in need.
The Company's position on the need for affordable access to medicines is described in our annual Global Citizenship report and on our Web site, www.abbott.com. Abbott has been named to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index for the past three years, in part, in recognition of our efforts in the area of access to medicines.
The Board of Directors believes that the proponents' request to amend Abbott's human rights policy to address "access to medicines" is duplicative of information we currently provide to shareholders and therefore offers no incremental benefit to shareholders.
The board of directors recommends that you vote AGAINST the proposal.
41
Shareholder Proposal on Advisory Vote (Item 4 on Proxy Card)
The Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations, 25 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108, owner of 100 Abbott common shares has informed Abbott that it intends to present the following proposal at the meeting.
RESOLVED, that shareholders of Abbott Laboratories request the board of directors to adopt a policy that provides shareholders the opportunity at each annual shareholder meeting to vote on an advisory resolution, proposed by management, to ratify the compensation of the named executive officers ("NEOs") set forth in the proxy statement's Summary Compensation Table (the "SCT") and the accompanying narrative disclosure of material factors provided to understand the SCT (but not the Compensation Discussion and Analysis). The proposal submitted to shareholders should make clear that the vote is non-binding and would not affect any compensation paid or awarded to any NEO.
Proponent's Statement in Support of Shareholder Proposal
We believe that existing U.S. corporate governance arrangements, including SEC rules and stock exchange listing standards, do not provide shareholders with sufficient mechanisms for providing input to boards on senior executive compensation. In contrast to U.S. practice, in the United Kingdom, public companies allow shareholders to cast an advisory vote on the "directors' remuneration report," which discloses executive compensation. Such a vote isn't binding, but gives shareholders a clear voice that could help shape senior executive compensation. A recent study of executive compensation in the U.K. before and after the adoption of the shareholder advisory vote there found that CEO cash and total compensation became more sensitive to negative operating performance after the vote's adoption. (Sudhakar Balachandran et al., "Solving the Executive Compensation Problem through Shareholder Votes? Evidence from the U.K." (Oct. 2007).)
Currently U.S. stock exchange listing standards require shareholder approval of equity-based compensation plans; those plans, however, set general parameters and accord the compensation committee substantial discretion in making awards and establishing performance thresholds for a particular year. Shareholders do not have any mechanism for providing ongoing feedback on the application of those general standards to individual pay packages.
Similarly, performance criteria submitted for shareholder approval to allow a company to deduct compensation in excess of $1 million are broad and do not constrain compensation committees in setting performance targets for particular senior executives. Withholding votes from compensation committee members who are standing for reelection is a blunt and insufficient instrument for registering dissatisfaction with the way in which the committee has administered compensation plans and policies in the previous year.
Accordingly, we urge Abbott Laboratories's board to allow shareholders to express their opinion about senior executive compensation by establishing an annual referendum process. The results of such a vote could provide Abbott Laboratories with useful information about shareholders' views on the company's senior executive compensation, as reported each year, and would facilitate constructive dialogue between shareholders and the board.
We urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.
Board of Directors' Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal on Advisory Vote (Item 4 on Proxy Card)
The proponent's proposal to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on compensation offers no incremental benefit to shareholders and is not in the best interests of Abbott.
The fundamental principle of corporate governance is to provide shareholders with an independent oversight body to govern a company for the benefit of its shareholders. Abbott's independent Board of Directors is responsible for all aspects of governance, including compensation for executives as well as Abbott's equity-based plans for all of Abbott's employees. Abbott has extremely robust governance practices, which include executive compensation programs that are closely aligned with shareholder interests and annual grants of stock with performance vesting requirements.
An advisory vote would ask shareholders to endorse or reject compensation decisions without the benefit of all the relevant information available to the Board of Directors or to the Compensation Committee members, or the benefit of their expertise. The Compensation Committee, composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible for bringing its expertise to the process of reviewing, approving and overseeing Abbott's compensation plans and practices. The Committee determines executive compensation, only after considering a multitude of factors, including the strategic and financial objectives of Abbott and the performance of the individuals involved. In this process, the Committee uses comparative market data from dozens of other companies and retains consultants to provide expert advice on appropriate compensation variables and levels.
The Compensation Committee has determined that an executive compensation program designed around various elements of compensation, which includes base salaries, incentive bonuses, and various performance-based equity awards, best meets its dual objectives of retaining highly talented executives and aligning compensation with shareholder returns. This program promotes the best interests of shareholders.
The advisory vote called for by the proponent will not enhance the Company's governance practices, improve accountability or
42
communication with shareholders. The Company has established procedures to provide shareholders with a means to communicate directly with Board and Committee members on any issue, including executive compensation. Additionally, the Company also has in place various accountability mechanisms, such as its majority voting requirements to ensure that shareholder opinions are heard.
For the foregoing reasons, the Board of Directors believes that an advisory vote is not in the best interests of Abbott's shareholders and is unnecessary given Abbott's existing governance practices.
The board of directors recommends that you vote AGAINST the proposal.
43
Other Matters
In 2007, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Abbott and Abbott's then current directors alleging that these directors breached their fiduciary responsibilities in connection with oversight of regulatory compliance with Food and Drug Administration regulations which allegedly caused unspecified injury or damage to the Company. Plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of monetary damages for all losses Abbott suffered stemming from the alleged breach of fiduciary duty, reimbursement of his legal fees and costs, and various other forms of relief. As required by its articles of incorporation, Abbott has advanced defense costs on behalf of the directors named in this lawsuit.
Date for Receipt of Shareholder Proposals for the 2009 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement
Shareholder proposals for presentation at the 2009 Annual Meeting must be received by Abbott no later than November 19, 2008 and must otherwise comply with the applicable requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and proxy for the 2009 meeting.
Procedure for Recommendation and Nomination of Directors and Transaction of Business at Annual Meeting
A shareholder may recommend persons as potential nominees for director by submitting the names of such persons in writing to the chairman of the nominations and governance committee or the secretary of Abbott. Recommendations should be accompanied by a statement of qualifications and confirmation of the person's willingness to serve. A nominee who is recommended by a shareholder following these procedures will receive the same consideration as other comparably qualified nominees.
A shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at an Annual Meeting and who is a shareholder of record on:
may directly nominate persons for director by providing proper timely written notice to the secretary of Abbott.
That notice must include the name, age, business address, residence address and principal occupation or employment of the nominee, the class and number of shares of Abbott owned by the nominee and any other information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act. In addition, the notice must include the name and record address of the nominating shareholder and the class and number of shares of Abbott owned by the nominating shareholder.
A shareholder of record on the record date for an Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the date the shareholder provides timely notice to Abbott, and on the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders may properly bring business before the Annual Meeting by providing timely written notice to the secretary of Abbott. For each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the Annual Meeting, the notice must include a brief description of the business to be discussed, the reasons for conducting such business at the Annual Meeting, the name and record address of the shareholder proposing such business, the class and number of shares of Abbott owned by the shareholder and any material interest of the shareholder in such business.
To be timely, written notice either to directly nominate persons for director or to bring business properly before the Annual Meeting must be received at Abbott's principal executive offices not less than ninety days and not more than one hundred twenty days prior to the anniversary date of the preceding Annual Meeting. If the Annual Meeting is called for a date that is not within twenty-five days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or made public in a press release or in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, whichever occurs first.
General
It is important that proxies be returned promptly. Shareholders are urged, regardless of the number of shares owned, to vote their shares. Most of Abbott's shareholders may vote their shares by telephone or the Internet. Shareholders who wish to vote by mail should sign and return their proxy card in the enclosed business reply envelope. Shareholders who vote by telephone or the Internet do not need to return their proxy card.
The Annual Meeting will be held at Abbott's headquarters, 100 Abbott Park Road, located at the intersection of Route 137 and Waukegan Road, Lake County, Illinois. Admission to the meeting will be by admission card only. A shareholder planning to attend the meeting should promptly complete and return the reservation form. Reservation forms must be received before April 18, 2008. An admission card admits only one person. A shareholder may request two admission cards, but a guest must be accompanied by a shareholder.
By order of the board of directors. | ||
LAURA J. SCHUMACHER SECRETARY |
44
EXHIBIT A |
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARD
No director qualifies as "independent" unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Abbott or its subsidiaries (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Abbott or any of its subsidiaries). In making this determination, the Board shall consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including the following standards:
A-1
Abbott Laboratories
100 Abbott Park Road
Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-6400 U.S.A.
Notice of Annual Meeting
of Shareholders
and Proxy Statement
Meeting Date
April 25, 2008
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
Please sign and promptly return your proxy
in the enclosed envelope or vote your
shares by telephone or using the Internet.
Reservation Form for Annual Meeting
I am a shareholder of Abbott Laboratories and plan to attend the Annual
Meeting to be held at Abbott's headquarters, 100 Abbott Park Road,
located at the intersection of Route 137 and Waukegan Road, Lake
County, Illinois at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, April 25, 2008.
Please send me an admission card for each of the following persons.
Name | Name | |||||
Please print name of shareholder | Please print name of guest | |||||
Address |
Address |
|||||
City |
City |
|||||
State |
Zip Code |
State |
Zip Code |
|||
Phone Number( ) |
Phone Number ( ) |
|||||
If you plan to attend the meeting, please complete and return the Reservation Form directly to Abbott Laboratories, Annual Meeting Ticket Requests,
D-0383 AP6D, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-6048. Due to space limitations, Reservation Forms must be received before April 18, 2008. An admission
card, along with a form of photo identification, admits one person. A shareholder may request two admission cards, but a guest must be accompanied by a shareholder.
To avoid a delay in the receipt of your admission card, do not return this form with your proxy card or mail it in the enclosed business envelope.
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as
shown in ý
this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
Annual Meeting Proxy Card |
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,
DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Telephone and Internet Voting InstructionsYou can vote by telephone OR Internet! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
To vote using the Telephone (within U.S. and Canada)
To vote using the Internet
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Items 1 and 2.
Nominees:
(01) R.S. Austin, (02) W.M. Daley, (03) W.J. Farrell, (04) H.L. Fuller,
(05) W.A. Osborn, (06) D.A.L. Owen, (07) B. Powell Jr., (08) W.A. Reynolds,
(09) R.S. Roberts, (10) S.C. Scott III, (11) W.D. Smithburg, (12) G.F. Tilton and (13) M.D. White
o To Vote FOR All Nominees o To WITHHOLD Vote From All Nominees
o For, except vote withheld from the above nominee(s)
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Items 3 and 4.
Authorized SignaturesSign HereThis section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
Each joint tenant should sign; executors, administrators, trustees, etc. should give full
title and, where more than one is named, a majority should sign.
Please read other side before signing.
Date
(mm/dd/yyyy)Please print date below.
Signature
1Please keep signature within the box.
Signature
2Please keep signature within the box.
IF
YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,
DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
ProxyAbbott Laboratories |
SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned, revoking previous proxies, acknowledges receipt of the Notice and Proxy Statement dated March 19, 2008, in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Abbott Laboratories to be held at 9:00 a.m. on April 25, 2008, at the corporation's headquarters, and hereby appoints MILES D. WHITE and LAURA J. SCHUMACHER, or either of them, proxy for the undersigned, with power of substitution, to represent and vote all shares of the undersigned upon all matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.
If the undersigned is a participant in the Abbott Laboratories Stock Retirement Plan, then this card also instructs the plan's Investment Committee to vote as specified at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and any adjournments thereof, all shares of Abbott Laboratories held in the undersigned's plan account upon the matters indicated and in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.
INSTRUCTIONS: This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR Items 1 and 2 and AGAINST Items 3 and 4 and in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders on any other matters that are properly brought before the meeting.
(ImportantPlease sign and date on other side.)